text
stringlengths 308
15.4k
| answer
stringlengths 2
16
| query
stringlengths 990
17.6k
| id
stringlengths 6
14
|
|---|---|---|---|
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
beginning balance | $ 7632 | $ 10640 | $ -431 ( 431 )
foreign currency translation adjustments | 5156 | -4144 ( 4144 ) | 17343
income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings | -2208 ( 2208 ) | 1136 | -6272 ( 6272 )
ending balance | $ 10580 | $ 7632 | $ 10640 the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2010 to 2011?
| 2.62 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
beginning balance | $ 7632 | $ 10640 | $ -431 ( 431 )
foreign currency translation adjustments | 5156 | -4144 ( 4144 ) | 17343
income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings | -2208 ( 2208 ) | 1136 | -6272 ( 6272 )
ending balance | $ 10580 | $ 7632 | $ 10640 the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2010 to 2011?
| convfinqa2600 |
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
beginning balance | $ 7632 | $ 10640 | $ -431 ( 431 )
foreign currency translation adjustments | 5156 | -4144 ( 4144 ) | 17343
income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings | -2208 ( 2208 ) | 1136 | -6272 ( 6272 )
ending balance | $ 10580 | $ 7632 | $ 10640 the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2010 to 2011?
Steps: subtract(31.81, 29.19)
Answer: 2.62
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that average price in 2010?
| 0.08976 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
beginning balance | $ 7632 | $ 10640 | $ -431 ( 431 )
foreign currency translation adjustments | 5156 | -4144 ( 4144 ) | 17343
income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings | -2208 ( 2208 ) | 1136 | -6272 ( 6272 )
ending balance | $ 10580 | $ 7632 | $ 10640 the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2010 to 2011?
Steps: subtract(31.81, 29.19)
Answer: 2.62
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that average price in 2010?
| convfinqa2601 |
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
beginning balance | $ 7632 | $ 10640 | $ -431 ( 431 )
foreign currency translation adjustments | 5156 | -4144 ( 4144 ) | 17343
income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings | -2208 ( 2208 ) | 1136 | -6272 ( 6272 )
ending balance | $ 10580 | $ 7632 | $ 10640 the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2010 to 2011?
Steps: subtract(31.81, 29.19)
Answer: 2.62
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that average price in 2010?
Steps: divide(#0, 29.19)
Answer: 0.08976
Question: in the last year of that period, what was impact of foreign currency translation adjustments?
| 5156.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
beginning balance | $ 7632 | $ 10640 | $ -431 ( 431 )
foreign currency translation adjustments | 5156 | -4144 ( 4144 ) | 17343
income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings | -2208 ( 2208 ) | 1136 | -6272 ( 6272 )
ending balance | $ 10580 | $ 7632 | $ 10640 the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2010 to 2011?
Steps: subtract(31.81, 29.19)
Answer: 2.62
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that average price in 2010?
Steps: divide(#0, 29.19)
Answer: 0.08976
Question: in the last year of that period, what was impact of foreign currency translation adjustments?
| convfinqa2602 |
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
beginning balance | $ 7632 | $ 10640 | $ -431 ( 431 )
foreign currency translation adjustments | 5156 | -4144 ( 4144 ) | 17343
income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings | -2208 ( 2208 ) | 1136 | -6272 ( 6272 )
ending balance | $ 10580 | $ 7632 | $ 10640 the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2010 to 2011?
Steps: subtract(31.81, 29.19)
Answer: 2.62
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that average price in 2010?
Steps: divide(#0, 29.19)
Answer: 0.08976
Question: in the last year of that period, what was impact of foreign currency translation adjustments?
Steps: Ask for number 5156
Answer: 5156.0
Question: and what was the income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings?
| -2208.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
beginning balance | $ 7632 | $ 10640 | $ -431 ( 431 )
foreign currency translation adjustments | 5156 | -4144 ( 4144 ) | 17343
income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings | -2208 ( 2208 ) | 1136 | -6272 ( 6272 )
ending balance | $ 10580 | $ 7632 | $ 10640 the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2010 to 2011?
Steps: subtract(31.81, 29.19)
Answer: 2.62
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that average price in 2010?
Steps: divide(#0, 29.19)
Answer: 0.08976
Question: in the last year of that period, what was impact of foreign currency translation adjustments?
Steps: Ask for number 5156
Answer: 5156.0
Question: and what was the income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings?
| convfinqa2603 |
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
beginning balance | $ 7632 | $ 10640 | $ -431 ( 431 )
foreign currency translation adjustments | 5156 | -4144 ( 4144 ) | 17343
income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings | -2208 ( 2208 ) | 1136 | -6272 ( 6272 )
ending balance | $ 10580 | $ 7632 | $ 10640 the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2010 to 2011?
Steps: subtract(31.81, 29.19)
Answer: 2.62
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that average price in 2010?
Steps: divide(#0, 29.19)
Answer: 0.08976
Question: in the last year of that period, what was impact of foreign currency translation adjustments?
Steps: Ask for number 5156
Answer: 5156.0
Question: and what was the income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings?
Steps: Ask for number -2208
Answer: -2208.0
Question: which one, then, was greater in that year?
| yes | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
beginning balance | $ 7632 | $ 10640 | $ -431 ( 431 )
foreign currency translation adjustments | 5156 | -4144 ( 4144 ) | 17343
income tax effect relating to translation adjustments forundistributed foreign earnings | -2208 ( 2208 ) | 1136 | -6272 ( 6272 )
ending balance | $ 10580 | $ 7632 | $ 10640 the following table sets forth the components of foreign currency translation adjustments for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 ( in thousands ) : beginning balance foreign currency translation adjustments income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings ending balance $ 7632 ( 2208 ) $ 10580 $ 10640 ( 4144 ) $ 7632 $ ( 431 ) 17343 ( 6272 ) $ 10640 stock repurchase program to facilitate our stock repurchase program , designed to return value to our stockholders and minimize dilution from stock issuances , we repurchase shares in the open market and also enter into structured repurchase agreements with third-parties .authorization to repurchase shares to cover on-going dilution was not subject to expiration .however , this repurchase program was limited to covering net dilution from stock issuances and was subject to business conditions and cash flow requirements as determined by our board of directors from time to time .during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 , our board of directors approved an amendment to our stock repurchase program authorized in april 2007 from a non-expiring share-based authority to a time-constrained dollar-based authority .as part of this amendment , the board of directors granted authority to repurchase up to $ 1.6 billion in common stock through the end of fiscal 2012 .this amended program did not affect the $ 250.0 million structured stock repurchase agreement entered into during march 2010 .as of december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remain under that agreement .during fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , we entered into several structured repurchase agreements with large financial institutions , whereupon we provided the financial institutions with prepayments totaling $ 695.0 million , $ 850.0 million and $ 350.0 million , respectively .of the $ 850.0 million of prepayments during fiscal 2010 , $ 250.0 million was under the stock repurchase program prior to the program amendment and the remaining $ 600.0 million was under the amended $ 1.6 billion time-constrained dollar- based authority .we enter into these agreements in order to take advantage of repurchasing shares at a guaranteed discount to the volume weighted average price ( 201cvwap 201d ) of our common stock over a specified period of time .we only enter into such transactions when the discount that we receive is higher than the foregone return on our cash prepayments to the financial institutions .there were no explicit commissions or fees on these structured repurchases .under the terms of the agreements , there is no requirement for the financial institutions to return any portion of the prepayment to us .the financial institutions agree to deliver shares to us at monthly intervals during the contract term .the parameters used to calculate the number of shares deliverable are : the total notional amount of the contract , the number of trading days in the contract , the number of trading days in the interval and the average vwap of our stock during the interval less the agreed upon discount .during fiscal 2011 , we repurchased approximately 21.8 million shares at an average price of $ 31.81 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2011 .during fiscal 2010 , we repurchased approximately 31.2 million shares at an average price of $ 29.19 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 .during fiscal 2009 , we repurchased approximately 15.2 million shares at an average price per share of $ 27.89 through structured repurchase agreements entered into during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 .for fiscal 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , the prepayments were classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets at the payment date , though only shares physically delivered to us by december 2 , 2011 , december 3 , 2010 and november 27 , 2009 were excluded from the computation of earnings per share .as of december 2 , 2011 and december 3 , 2010 , no prepayments remained under these agreements .as of november 27 , 2009 , approximately $ 59.9 million of prepayments remained under these agreements .subsequent to december 2 , 2011 , as part of our $ 1.6 billion stock repurchase program , we entered into a structured stock repurchase agreement with a large financial institution whereupon we provided them with a prepayment of $ 80.0 million .this amount will be classified as treasury stock on our consolidated balance sheets .upon completion of the $ 80.0 million stock table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) jarcamo typewritten text .
Question: what was the change in the average price of repurchased shares from 2010 to 2011?
Steps: subtract(31.81, 29.19)
Answer: 2.62
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that average price in 2010?
Steps: divide(#0, 29.19)
Answer: 0.08976
Question: in the last year of that period, what was impact of foreign currency translation adjustments?
Steps: Ask for number 5156
Answer: 5156.0
Question: and what was the income tax effect relating to translation adjustments for undistributed foreign earnings?
Steps: Ask for number -2208
Answer: -2208.0
Question: which one, then, was greater in that year?
| convfinqa2604 |
affiliated company .the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc .the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company .during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india .cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment .in may 2000 , the company completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of tractebel power ltd ( 2018 2018tpl 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 67 million and assumed liabilities of approximately $ 200 million .tpl owned 46% ( 46 % ) of nigen .the company also acquired an additional 6% ( 6 % ) interest in nigen from minority stockholders during the year ended december 31 , 2000 through the issuance of approximately 99000 common shares of aes stock valued at approximately $ 4.9 million .with the completion of these transactions , the company owns approximately 98% ( 98 % ) of nigen 2019s common stock and began consolidating its financial results beginning may 12 , 2000 .approximately $ 100 million of the purchase price was allocated to excess of costs over net assets acquired and was amortized through january 1 , 2002 at which time the company adopted sfas no .142 and ceased amortization of goodwill .in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited ( 2018 2018songas 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 40 million .the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 .songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania .in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell songas .the sale is expected to close in early 2003 .see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction .the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. . as of and for the years ended december 31, | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
revenues | $ 2832 | $ 6147 | $ 6241
operating income | 695 | 1717 | 1989
net income | 229 | 650 | 859
current assets | 1097 | 3700 | 2423
noncurrent assets | 6751 | 14942 | 13080
current liabilities | 1418 | 3510 | 3370
noncurrent liabilities | 3349 | 8297 | 5927
stockholder's equity | 3081 | 6835 | 6206 in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 .the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) , 19% ( 19 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .
Question: what was the change in revenues for investments in 50% or less owned investments between 2001 and 2002?
| -3315.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
affiliated company .the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc .the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company .during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india .cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment .in may 2000 , the company completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of tractebel power ltd ( 2018 2018tpl 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 67 million and assumed liabilities of approximately $ 200 million .tpl owned 46% ( 46 % ) of nigen .the company also acquired an additional 6% ( 6 % ) interest in nigen from minority stockholders during the year ended december 31 , 2000 through the issuance of approximately 99000 common shares of aes stock valued at approximately $ 4.9 million .with the completion of these transactions , the company owns approximately 98% ( 98 % ) of nigen 2019s common stock and began consolidating its financial results beginning may 12 , 2000 .approximately $ 100 million of the purchase price was allocated to excess of costs over net assets acquired and was amortized through january 1 , 2002 at which time the company adopted sfas no .142 and ceased amortization of goodwill .in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited ( 2018 2018songas 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 40 million .the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 .songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania .in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell songas .the sale is expected to close in early 2003 .see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction .the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. . as of and for the years ended december 31, | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
revenues | $ 2832 | $ 6147 | $ 6241
operating income | 695 | 1717 | 1989
net income | 229 | 650 | 859
current assets | 1097 | 3700 | 2423
noncurrent assets | 6751 | 14942 | 13080
current liabilities | 1418 | 3510 | 3370
noncurrent liabilities | 3349 | 8297 | 5927
stockholder's equity | 3081 | 6835 | 6206 in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 .the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) , 19% ( 19 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .
Question: what was the change in revenues for investments in 50% or less owned investments between 2001 and 2002?
| convfinqa2605 |
affiliated company .the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc .the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company .during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india .cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment .in may 2000 , the company completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of tractebel power ltd ( 2018 2018tpl 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 67 million and assumed liabilities of approximately $ 200 million .tpl owned 46% ( 46 % ) of nigen .the company also acquired an additional 6% ( 6 % ) interest in nigen from minority stockholders during the year ended december 31 , 2000 through the issuance of approximately 99000 common shares of aes stock valued at approximately $ 4.9 million .with the completion of these transactions , the company owns approximately 98% ( 98 % ) of nigen 2019s common stock and began consolidating its financial results beginning may 12 , 2000 .approximately $ 100 million of the purchase price was allocated to excess of costs over net assets acquired and was amortized through january 1 , 2002 at which time the company adopted sfas no .142 and ceased amortization of goodwill .in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited ( 2018 2018songas 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 40 million .the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 .songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania .in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell songas .the sale is expected to close in early 2003 .see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction .the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. . as of and for the years ended december 31, | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
revenues | $ 2832 | $ 6147 | $ 6241
operating income | 695 | 1717 | 1989
net income | 229 | 650 | 859
current assets | 1097 | 3700 | 2423
noncurrent assets | 6751 | 14942 | 13080
current liabilities | 1418 | 3510 | 3370
noncurrent liabilities | 3349 | 8297 | 5927
stockholder's equity | 3081 | 6835 | 6206 in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 .the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) , 19% ( 19 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .
Question: what was the change in revenues for investments in 50% or less owned investments between 2001 and 2002?
Steps: Ask for number 2832
Answer: -3315.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
| -0.53929 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
affiliated company .the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc .the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company .during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india .cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment .in may 2000 , the company completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of tractebel power ltd ( 2018 2018tpl 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 67 million and assumed liabilities of approximately $ 200 million .tpl owned 46% ( 46 % ) of nigen .the company also acquired an additional 6% ( 6 % ) interest in nigen from minority stockholders during the year ended december 31 , 2000 through the issuance of approximately 99000 common shares of aes stock valued at approximately $ 4.9 million .with the completion of these transactions , the company owns approximately 98% ( 98 % ) of nigen 2019s common stock and began consolidating its financial results beginning may 12 , 2000 .approximately $ 100 million of the purchase price was allocated to excess of costs over net assets acquired and was amortized through january 1 , 2002 at which time the company adopted sfas no .142 and ceased amortization of goodwill .in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited ( 2018 2018songas 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 40 million .the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 .songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania .in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell songas .the sale is expected to close in early 2003 .see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction .the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. . as of and for the years ended december 31, | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
revenues | $ 2832 | $ 6147 | $ 6241
operating income | 695 | 1717 | 1989
net income | 229 | 650 | 859
current assets | 1097 | 3700 | 2423
noncurrent assets | 6751 | 14942 | 13080
current liabilities | 1418 | 3510 | 3370
noncurrent liabilities | 3349 | 8297 | 5927
stockholder's equity | 3081 | 6835 | 6206 in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 .the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) , 19% ( 19 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .
Question: what was the change in revenues for investments in 50% or less owned investments between 2001 and 2002?
Steps: Ask for number 2832
Answer: -3315.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
| convfinqa2606 |
affiliated company .the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc .the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company .during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india .cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment .in may 2000 , the company completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of tractebel power ltd ( 2018 2018tpl 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 67 million and assumed liabilities of approximately $ 200 million .tpl owned 46% ( 46 % ) of nigen .the company also acquired an additional 6% ( 6 % ) interest in nigen from minority stockholders during the year ended december 31 , 2000 through the issuance of approximately 99000 common shares of aes stock valued at approximately $ 4.9 million .with the completion of these transactions , the company owns approximately 98% ( 98 % ) of nigen 2019s common stock and began consolidating its financial results beginning may 12 , 2000 .approximately $ 100 million of the purchase price was allocated to excess of costs over net assets acquired and was amortized through january 1 , 2002 at which time the company adopted sfas no .142 and ceased amortization of goodwill .in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited ( 2018 2018songas 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 40 million .the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 .songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania .in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell songas .the sale is expected to close in early 2003 .see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction .the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. . as of and for the years ended december 31, | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
revenues | $ 2832 | $ 6147 | $ 6241
operating income | 695 | 1717 | 1989
net income | 229 | 650 | 859
current assets | 1097 | 3700 | 2423
noncurrent assets | 6751 | 14942 | 13080
current liabilities | 1418 | 3510 | 3370
noncurrent liabilities | 3349 | 8297 | 5927
stockholder's equity | 3081 | 6835 | 6206 in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 .the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) , 19% ( 19 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .
Question: what was the change in revenues for investments in 50% or less owned investments between 2001 and 2002?
Steps: Ask for number 2832
Answer: -3315.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
Steps: Ask for number 6147
Answer: -0.53929
Question: what was the difference in revenues for investments in 50% or less owned investments between 2000 and 2001?
| -94.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
affiliated company .the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc .the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company .during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india .cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment .in may 2000 , the company completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of tractebel power ltd ( 2018 2018tpl 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 67 million and assumed liabilities of approximately $ 200 million .tpl owned 46% ( 46 % ) of nigen .the company also acquired an additional 6% ( 6 % ) interest in nigen from minority stockholders during the year ended december 31 , 2000 through the issuance of approximately 99000 common shares of aes stock valued at approximately $ 4.9 million .with the completion of these transactions , the company owns approximately 98% ( 98 % ) of nigen 2019s common stock and began consolidating its financial results beginning may 12 , 2000 .approximately $ 100 million of the purchase price was allocated to excess of costs over net assets acquired and was amortized through january 1 , 2002 at which time the company adopted sfas no .142 and ceased amortization of goodwill .in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited ( 2018 2018songas 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 40 million .the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 .songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania .in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell songas .the sale is expected to close in early 2003 .see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction .the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. . as of and for the years ended december 31, | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
revenues | $ 2832 | $ 6147 | $ 6241
operating income | 695 | 1717 | 1989
net income | 229 | 650 | 859
current assets | 1097 | 3700 | 2423
noncurrent assets | 6751 | 14942 | 13080
current liabilities | 1418 | 3510 | 3370
noncurrent liabilities | 3349 | 8297 | 5927
stockholder's equity | 3081 | 6835 | 6206 in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 .the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) , 19% ( 19 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .
Question: what was the change in revenues for investments in 50% or less owned investments between 2001 and 2002?
Steps: Ask for number 2832
Answer: -3315.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
Steps: Ask for number 6147
Answer: -0.53929
Question: what was the difference in revenues for investments in 50% or less owned investments between 2000 and 2001?
| convfinqa2607 |
affiliated company .the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc .the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company .during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india .cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment .in may 2000 , the company completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of tractebel power ltd ( 2018 2018tpl 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 67 million and assumed liabilities of approximately $ 200 million .tpl owned 46% ( 46 % ) of nigen .the company also acquired an additional 6% ( 6 % ) interest in nigen from minority stockholders during the year ended december 31 , 2000 through the issuance of approximately 99000 common shares of aes stock valued at approximately $ 4.9 million .with the completion of these transactions , the company owns approximately 98% ( 98 % ) of nigen 2019s common stock and began consolidating its financial results beginning may 12 , 2000 .approximately $ 100 million of the purchase price was allocated to excess of costs over net assets acquired and was amortized through january 1 , 2002 at which time the company adopted sfas no .142 and ceased amortization of goodwill .in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited ( 2018 2018songas 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 40 million .the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 .songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania .in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell songas .the sale is expected to close in early 2003 .see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction .the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. . as of and for the years ended december 31, | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
revenues | $ 2832 | $ 6147 | $ 6241
operating income | 695 | 1717 | 1989
net income | 229 | 650 | 859
current assets | 1097 | 3700 | 2423
noncurrent assets | 6751 | 14942 | 13080
current liabilities | 1418 | 3510 | 3370
noncurrent liabilities | 3349 | 8297 | 5927
stockholder's equity | 3081 | 6835 | 6206 in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 .the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) , 19% ( 19 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .
Question: what was the change in revenues for investments in 50% or less owned investments between 2001 and 2002?
Steps: Ask for number 2832
Answer: -3315.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
Steps: Ask for number 6147
Answer: -0.53929
Question: what was the difference in revenues for investments in 50% or less owned investments between 2000 and 2001?
Steps: subtract(2832, 6147)
Answer: -94.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
| -0.01506 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
affiliated company .the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc .the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company .during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india .cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment .in may 2000 , the company completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of tractebel power ltd ( 2018 2018tpl 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 67 million and assumed liabilities of approximately $ 200 million .tpl owned 46% ( 46 % ) of nigen .the company also acquired an additional 6% ( 6 % ) interest in nigen from minority stockholders during the year ended december 31 , 2000 through the issuance of approximately 99000 common shares of aes stock valued at approximately $ 4.9 million .with the completion of these transactions , the company owns approximately 98% ( 98 % ) of nigen 2019s common stock and began consolidating its financial results beginning may 12 , 2000 .approximately $ 100 million of the purchase price was allocated to excess of costs over net assets acquired and was amortized through january 1 , 2002 at which time the company adopted sfas no .142 and ceased amortization of goodwill .in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas limited ( 2018 2018songas 2019 2019 ) for approximately $ 40 million .the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 .songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania .in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell songas .the sale is expected to close in early 2003 .see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction .the following table presents summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) for the company 2019s investments in 50% ( 50 % ) or less owned investments accounted for using the equity method. . as of and for the years ended december 31, | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
revenues | $ 2832 | $ 6147 | $ 6241
operating income | 695 | 1717 | 1989
net income | 229 | 650 | 859
current assets | 1097 | 3700 | 2423
noncurrent assets | 6751 | 14942 | 13080
current liabilities | 1418 | 3510 | 3370
noncurrent liabilities | 3349 | 8297 | 5927
stockholder's equity | 3081 | 6835 | 6206 in 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 .the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) , 19% ( 19 % ) and 8% ( 8 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .the company recorded $ 83 million , $ 210 million , and $ 64 million of pre-tax non-cash foreign currency transaction losses on its investments in brazilian equity method affiliates during 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively. .
Question: what was the change in revenues for investments in 50% or less owned investments between 2001 and 2002?
Steps: Ask for number 2832
Answer: -3315.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
Steps: Ask for number 6147
Answer: -0.53929
Question: what was the difference in revenues for investments in 50% or less owned investments between 2000 and 2001?
Steps: subtract(2832, 6147)
Answer: -94.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
| convfinqa2608 |
cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) . ( in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
united kingdom | $ 5951 | $ 5531 | $ 2696
canada | 4565 | 2014 | 1463
australia | 3567 | 1519 | 1441
netherlands | 2014 | 2014 | 992
germany | 2944 | 2696 | 4217
total cross-border outstandings | $ 17027 | $ 9746 | $ 10809 the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .there were no cross- border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 .aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) .capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to ensure that our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives .regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors .we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements .our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt .the capital committee , working in conjunction with the asset and liability committee , referred to as 2018 2018alco , 2019 2019 oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies .the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve board .both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve board and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act of 1991 .state street bank must meet the regulatory capital thresholds for 2018 2018well capitalized 2019 2019 in order for the parent company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. .
Question: what was the total of cross-border outstandings in the uk in 2007, in millions?
| 5951.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) . ( in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
united kingdom | $ 5951 | $ 5531 | $ 2696
canada | 4565 | 2014 | 1463
australia | 3567 | 1519 | 1441
netherlands | 2014 | 2014 | 992
germany | 2944 | 2696 | 4217
total cross-border outstandings | $ 17027 | $ 9746 | $ 10809 the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .there were no cross- border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 .aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) .capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to ensure that our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives .regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors .we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements .our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt .the capital committee , working in conjunction with the asset and liability committee , referred to as 2018 2018alco , 2019 2019 oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies .the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve board .both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve board and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act of 1991 .state street bank must meet the regulatory capital thresholds for 2018 2018well capitalized 2019 2019 in order for the parent company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. .
Question: what was the total of cross-border outstandings in the uk in 2007, in millions?
| convfinqa2609 |
cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) . ( in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
united kingdom | $ 5951 | $ 5531 | $ 2696
canada | 4565 | 2014 | 1463
australia | 3567 | 1519 | 1441
netherlands | 2014 | 2014 | 992
germany | 2944 | 2696 | 4217
total cross-border outstandings | $ 17027 | $ 9746 | $ 10809 the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .there were no cross- border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 .aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) .capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to ensure that our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives .regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors .we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements .our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt .the capital committee , working in conjunction with the asset and liability committee , referred to as 2018 2018alco , 2019 2019 oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies .the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve board .both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve board and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act of 1991 .state street bank must meet the regulatory capital thresholds for 2018 2018well capitalized 2019 2019 in order for the parent company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. .
Question: what was the total of cross-border outstandings in the uk in 2007, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5951
Answer: 5951.0
Question: and what was it in 2006, also in millions?
| 5531.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) . ( in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
united kingdom | $ 5951 | $ 5531 | $ 2696
canada | 4565 | 2014 | 1463
australia | 3567 | 1519 | 1441
netherlands | 2014 | 2014 | 992
germany | 2944 | 2696 | 4217
total cross-border outstandings | $ 17027 | $ 9746 | $ 10809 the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .there were no cross- border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 .aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) .capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to ensure that our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives .regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors .we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements .our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt .the capital committee , working in conjunction with the asset and liability committee , referred to as 2018 2018alco , 2019 2019 oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies .the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve board .both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve board and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act of 1991 .state street bank must meet the regulatory capital thresholds for 2018 2018well capitalized 2019 2019 in order for the parent company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. .
Question: what was the total of cross-border outstandings in the uk in 2007, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5951
Answer: 5951.0
Question: and what was it in 2006, also in millions?
| convfinqa2610 |
cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) . ( in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
united kingdom | $ 5951 | $ 5531 | $ 2696
canada | 4565 | 2014 | 1463
australia | 3567 | 1519 | 1441
netherlands | 2014 | 2014 | 992
germany | 2944 | 2696 | 4217
total cross-border outstandings | $ 17027 | $ 9746 | $ 10809 the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .there were no cross- border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 .aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) .capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to ensure that our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives .regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors .we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements .our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt .the capital committee , working in conjunction with the asset and liability committee , referred to as 2018 2018alco , 2019 2019 oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies .the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve board .both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve board and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act of 1991 .state street bank must meet the regulatory capital thresholds for 2018 2018well capitalized 2019 2019 in order for the parent company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. .
Question: what was the total of cross-border outstandings in the uk in 2007, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5951
Answer: 5951.0
Question: and what was it in 2006, also in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5531
Answer: 5531.0
Question: what was, then, in millions, the change in cross-border outstandings in the uk from 2006 to 2007?
| 420.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) . ( in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
united kingdom | $ 5951 | $ 5531 | $ 2696
canada | 4565 | 2014 | 1463
australia | 3567 | 1519 | 1441
netherlands | 2014 | 2014 | 992
germany | 2944 | 2696 | 4217
total cross-border outstandings | $ 17027 | $ 9746 | $ 10809 the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .there were no cross- border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 .aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) .capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to ensure that our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives .regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors .we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements .our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt .the capital committee , working in conjunction with the asset and liability committee , referred to as 2018 2018alco , 2019 2019 oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies .the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve board .both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve board and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act of 1991 .state street bank must meet the regulatory capital thresholds for 2018 2018well capitalized 2019 2019 in order for the parent company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. .
Question: what was the total of cross-border outstandings in the uk in 2007, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5951
Answer: 5951.0
Question: and what was it in 2006, also in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5531
Answer: 5531.0
Question: what was, then, in millions, the change in cross-border outstandings in the uk from 2006 to 2007?
| convfinqa2611 |
cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) . ( in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
united kingdom | $ 5951 | $ 5531 | $ 2696
canada | 4565 | 2014 | 1463
australia | 3567 | 1519 | 1441
netherlands | 2014 | 2014 | 992
germany | 2944 | 2696 | 4217
total cross-border outstandings | $ 17027 | $ 9746 | $ 10809 the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .there were no cross- border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 .aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) .capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to ensure that our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives .regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors .we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements .our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt .the capital committee , working in conjunction with the asset and liability committee , referred to as 2018 2018alco , 2019 2019 oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies .the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve board .both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve board and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act of 1991 .state street bank must meet the regulatory capital thresholds for 2018 2018well capitalized 2019 2019 in order for the parent company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. .
Question: what was the total of cross-border outstandings in the uk in 2007, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5951
Answer: 5951.0
Question: and what was it in 2006, also in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5531
Answer: 5531.0
Question: what was, then, in millions, the change in cross-border outstandings in the uk from 2006 to 2007?
Steps: subtract(5951, 5531)
Answer: 420.0
Question: how much does that change represent, in percentage, in relation to the 2006 amount?
| 0.07594 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business which amounted to at least 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets were as follows as of december 31 : 2007 2006 2005 ( in millions ) . ( in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
united kingdom | $ 5951 | $ 5531 | $ 2696
canada | 4565 | 2014 | 1463
australia | 3567 | 1519 | 1441
netherlands | 2014 | 2014 | 992
germany | 2944 | 2696 | 4217
total cross-border outstandings | $ 17027 | $ 9746 | $ 10809 the total cross-border outstandings presented in the table represented 12% ( 12 % ) , 9% ( 9 % ) and 11% ( 11 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .there were no cross- border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets as of december 31 , 2007 .aggregate cross-border outstandings to countries which totaled between .75% ( .75 % ) and 1% ( 1 % ) of our consolidated total assets at december 31 , 2006 , amounted to $ 1.05 billion ( canada ) and at december 31 , 2005 , amounted to $ 1.86 billion ( belgium and japan ) .capital regulatory and economic capital management both use key metrics evaluated by management to ensure that our actual level of capital is commensurate with our risk profile , is in compliance with all regulatory requirements , and is sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives .regulatory capital our objective with respect to regulatory capital management is to maintain a strong capital base in order to provide financial flexibility for our business needs , including funding corporate growth and supporting customers 2019 cash management needs , and to provide protection against loss to depositors and creditors .we strive to maintain an optimal level of capital , commensurate with our risk profile , on which an attractive return to shareholders will be realized over both the short and long term , while protecting our obligations to depositors and creditors and satisfying regulatory requirements .our capital management process focuses on our risk exposures , our capital position relative to our peers , regulatory capital requirements and the evaluations of the major independent credit rating agencies that assign ratings to our public debt .the capital committee , working in conjunction with the asset and liability committee , referred to as 2018 2018alco , 2019 2019 oversees the management of regulatory capital , and is responsible for ensuring capital adequacy with respect to regulatory requirements , internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies .the primary regulator of both state street and state street bank for regulatory capital purposes is the federal reserve board .both state street and state street bank are subject to the minimum capital requirements established by the federal reserve board and defined in the federal deposit insurance corporation improvement act of 1991 .state street bank must meet the regulatory capital thresholds for 2018 2018well capitalized 2019 2019 in order for the parent company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. .
Question: what was the total of cross-border outstandings in the uk in 2007, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5951
Answer: 5951.0
Question: and what was it in 2006, also in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5531
Answer: 5531.0
Question: what was, then, in millions, the change in cross-border outstandings in the uk from 2006 to 2007?
Steps: subtract(5951, 5531)
Answer: 420.0
Question: how much does that change represent, in percentage, in relation to the 2006 amount?
| convfinqa2612 |
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities .the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions .we establish credit limits for each counterparty .our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments .for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions .a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures .the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level .the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future .the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set .the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur .further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure .the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments .the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments .the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . in millions | fair value impact may 27 2018 | fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 | fair value impact may 282017
interest rate instruments | $ 33.2 | $ 27.5 | $ 25.1
foreign currency instruments | 21.3 | 23.1 | 24.6
commodity instruments | 1.9 | 2.1 | 3.2
equity instruments | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 .
Question: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?
| 33.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities .the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions .we establish credit limits for each counterparty .our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments .for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions .a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures .the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level .the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future .the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set .the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur .further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure .the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments .the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments .the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . in millions | fair value impact may 27 2018 | fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 | fair value impact may 282017
interest rate instruments | $ 33.2 | $ 27.5 | $ 25.1
foreign currency instruments | 21.3 | 23.1 | 24.6
commodity instruments | 1.9 | 2.1 | 3.2
equity instruments | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 .
Question: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?
| convfinqa2613 |
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities .the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions .we establish credit limits for each counterparty .our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments .for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions .a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures .the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level .the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future .the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set .the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur .further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure .the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments .the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments .the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . in millions | fair value impact may 27 2018 | fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 | fair value impact may 282017
interest rate instruments | $ 33.2 | $ 27.5 | $ 25.1
foreign currency instruments | 21.3 | 23.1 | 24.6
commodity instruments | 1.9 | 2.1 | 3.2
equity instruments | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 .
Question: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 33.2
Answer: 33.2
Question: and what was it in may of the previous year?
| 25.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities .the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions .we establish credit limits for each counterparty .our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments .for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions .a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures .the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level .the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future .the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set .the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur .further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure .the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments .the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments .the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . in millions | fair value impact may 27 2018 | fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 | fair value impact may 282017
interest rate instruments | $ 33.2 | $ 27.5 | $ 25.1
foreign currency instruments | 21.3 | 23.1 | 24.6
commodity instruments | 1.9 | 2.1 | 3.2
equity instruments | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 .
Question: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 33.2
Answer: 33.2
Question: and what was it in may of the previous year?
| convfinqa2614 |
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities .the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions .we establish credit limits for each counterparty .our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments .for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions .a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures .the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level .the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future .the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set .the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur .further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure .the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments .the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments .the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . in millions | fair value impact may 27 2018 | fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 | fair value impact may 282017
interest rate instruments | $ 33.2 | $ 27.5 | $ 25.1
foreign currency instruments | 21.3 | 23.1 | 24.6
commodity instruments | 1.9 | 2.1 | 3.2
equity instruments | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 .
Question: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 33.2
Answer: 33.2
Question: and what was it in may of the previous year?
Steps: Ask for number 25.1
Answer: 25.1
Question: by how much, then, did it increase?
| 8.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities .the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions .we establish credit limits for each counterparty .our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments .for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions .a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures .the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level .the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future .the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set .the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur .further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure .the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments .the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments .the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . in millions | fair value impact may 27 2018 | fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 | fair value impact may 282017
interest rate instruments | $ 33.2 | $ 27.5 | $ 25.1
foreign currency instruments | 21.3 | 23.1 | 24.6
commodity instruments | 1.9 | 2.1 | 3.2
equity instruments | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 .
Question: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 33.2
Answer: 33.2
Question: and what was it in may of the previous year?
Steps: Ask for number 25.1
Answer: 25.1
Question: by how much, then, did it increase?
| convfinqa2615 |
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities .the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions .we establish credit limits for each counterparty .our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments .for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions .a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures .the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level .the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future .the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set .the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur .further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure .the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments .the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments .the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . in millions | fair value impact may 27 2018 | fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 | fair value impact may 282017
interest rate instruments | $ 33.2 | $ 27.5 | $ 25.1
foreign currency instruments | 21.3 | 23.1 | 24.6
commodity instruments | 1.9 | 2.1 | 3.2
equity instruments | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 .
Question: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 33.2
Answer: 33.2
Question: and what was it in may of the previous year?
Steps: Ask for number 25.1
Answer: 25.1
Question: by how much, then, did it increase?
Steps: subtract(33.2, 25.1)
Answer: 8.1
Question: and in that same year of 2018, what was the total of those interest rate instruments and the foreign currency ones?
| 54.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities .the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions .we establish credit limits for each counterparty .our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments .for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions .a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures .the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level .the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future .the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set .the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur .further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure .the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments .the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments .the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . in millions | fair value impact may 27 2018 | fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 | fair value impact may 282017
interest rate instruments | $ 33.2 | $ 27.5 | $ 25.1
foreign currency instruments | 21.3 | 23.1 | 24.6
commodity instruments | 1.9 | 2.1 | 3.2
equity instruments | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 .
Question: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 33.2
Answer: 33.2
Question: and what was it in may of the previous year?
Steps: Ask for number 25.1
Answer: 25.1
Question: by how much, then, did it increase?
Steps: subtract(33.2, 25.1)
Answer: 8.1
Question: and in that same year of 2018, what was the total of those interest rate instruments and the foreign currency ones?
| convfinqa2616 |
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities .the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions .we establish credit limits for each counterparty .our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments .for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions .a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures .the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level .the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future .the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set .the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur .further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure .the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments .the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments .the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . in millions | fair value impact may 27 2018 | fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 | fair value impact may 282017
interest rate instruments | $ 33.2 | $ 27.5 | $ 25.1
foreign currency instruments | 21.3 | 23.1 | 24.6
commodity instruments | 1.9 | 2.1 | 3.2
equity instruments | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 .
Question: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 33.2
Answer: 33.2
Question: and what was it in may of the previous year?
Steps: Ask for number 25.1
Answer: 25.1
Question: by how much, then, did it increase?
Steps: subtract(33.2, 25.1)
Answer: 8.1
Question: and in that same year of 2018, what was the total of those interest rate instruments and the foreign currency ones?
Steps: add(33.2, 21.3)
Answer: 54.5
Question: including the commodity instruments, what becomes this total?
| 56.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities .the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions .we establish credit limits for each counterparty .our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments .for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions .a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures .the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level .the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future .the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set .the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur .further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure .the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments .the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments .the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . in millions | fair value impact may 27 2018 | fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 | fair value impact may 282017
interest rate instruments | $ 33.2 | $ 27.5 | $ 25.1
foreign currency instruments | 21.3 | 23.1 | 24.6
commodity instruments | 1.9 | 2.1 | 3.2
equity instruments | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 .
Question: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 33.2
Answer: 33.2
Question: and what was it in may of the previous year?
Steps: Ask for number 25.1
Answer: 25.1
Question: by how much, then, did it increase?
Steps: subtract(33.2, 25.1)
Answer: 8.1
Question: and in that same year of 2018, what was the total of those interest rate instruments and the foreign currency ones?
Steps: add(33.2, 21.3)
Answer: 54.5
Question: including the commodity instruments, what becomes this total?
| convfinqa2617 |
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities .the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions .we establish credit limits for each counterparty .our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments .for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions .a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures .the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level .the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future .the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set .the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur .further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure .the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments .the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments .the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . in millions | fair value impact may 27 2018 | fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 | fair value impact may 282017
interest rate instruments | $ 33.2 | $ 27.5 | $ 25.1
foreign currency instruments | 21.3 | 23.1 | 24.6
commodity instruments | 1.9 | 2.1 | 3.2
equity instruments | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 .
Question: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 33.2
Answer: 33.2
Question: and what was it in may of the previous year?
Steps: Ask for number 25.1
Answer: 25.1
Question: by how much, then, did it increase?
Steps: subtract(33.2, 25.1)
Answer: 8.1
Question: and in that same year of 2018, what was the total of those interest rate instruments and the foreign currency ones?
Steps: add(33.2, 21.3)
Answer: 54.5
Question: including the commodity instruments, what becomes this total?
Steps: add(#1, 1.9)
Answer: 56.4
Question: and including the equity ones, what becomes the total for all instruments?
| 58.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities .the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions .we establish credit limits for each counterparty .our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments .for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions .a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures .the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level .the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future .the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set .the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur .further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure .the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments .the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments .the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. . in millions | fair value impact may 27 2018 | fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 | fair value impact may 282017
interest rate instruments | $ 33.2 | $ 27.5 | $ 25.1
foreign currency instruments | 21.3 | 23.1 | 24.6
commodity instruments | 1.9 | 2.1 | 3.2
equity instruments | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 .
Question: what was the total of interest rate instruments as of may 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 33.2
Answer: 33.2
Question: and what was it in may of the previous year?
Steps: Ask for number 25.1
Answer: 25.1
Question: by how much, then, did it increase?
Steps: subtract(33.2, 25.1)
Answer: 8.1
Question: and in that same year of 2018, what was the total of those interest rate instruments and the foreign currency ones?
Steps: add(33.2, 21.3)
Answer: 54.5
Question: including the commodity instruments, what becomes this total?
Steps: add(#1, 1.9)
Answer: 56.4
Question: and including the equity ones, what becomes the total for all instruments?
| convfinqa2618 |
there are inherent limitations on the effectiveness of our controls .we do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud .a control system , no matter how well-designed and operated , can provide only reasonable , not absolute , assurance that the control system 2019s objectives will be met .the design of a control system must reflect the fact that resource constraints exist , and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs .further , because of the inherent limitations in all control systems , no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , have been detected .the design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events , and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions .projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls to future periods are subject to risks .over time , controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures .if our controls become inadequate , we could fail to meet our financial reporting obligations , our reputation may be adversely affected , our business and operating results could be harmed , and the market price of our stock could decline .item 1b .unresolved staff comments not applicable .item 2 .properties as of december 31 , 2016 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 ..........................................................31.5 19.2 50.7 leased facilities2 ..........................................................2.5 7.1 9.6 . ( square feet in millions ) | unitedstates | othercountries | total
owned facilities1 | 31.5 | 19.2 | 50.7
leased facilities2 | 2.5 | 7.1 | 9.6
total facilities | 34.0 | 26.3 | 60.3 1 leases and municipal grants on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2109 .2 leases expire on varying dates through 2058 and generally include renewals at our option .our principal executive offices are located in the u.s .and the majority of our wafer manufacturing activities in 2016 were also located in the u.s .one of our arizona wafer fabrication facilities is currently on hold and held in a safe state , and we are reserving the building for additional capacity and future technologies .incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facility for its intended use .for more information on our wafer fabrication and our assembly and test facilities , see 201cmanufacturing and assembly and test 201d in part i , item 1 of this form 10-k .we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it .we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment .for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 4 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .item 3 .legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 20 : commitments and contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .item 4 .mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: as of december 31, 2016, what percentage of the total area of major facilities is from owned ones?
| 0.8408 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
there are inherent limitations on the effectiveness of our controls .we do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud .a control system , no matter how well-designed and operated , can provide only reasonable , not absolute , assurance that the control system 2019s objectives will be met .the design of a control system must reflect the fact that resource constraints exist , and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs .further , because of the inherent limitations in all control systems , no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , have been detected .the design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events , and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions .projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls to future periods are subject to risks .over time , controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures .if our controls become inadequate , we could fail to meet our financial reporting obligations , our reputation may be adversely affected , our business and operating results could be harmed , and the market price of our stock could decline .item 1b .unresolved staff comments not applicable .item 2 .properties as of december 31 , 2016 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 ..........................................................31.5 19.2 50.7 leased facilities2 ..........................................................2.5 7.1 9.6 . ( square feet in millions ) | unitedstates | othercountries | total
owned facilities1 | 31.5 | 19.2 | 50.7
leased facilities2 | 2.5 | 7.1 | 9.6
total facilities | 34.0 | 26.3 | 60.3 1 leases and municipal grants on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2109 .2 leases expire on varying dates through 2058 and generally include renewals at our option .our principal executive offices are located in the u.s .and the majority of our wafer manufacturing activities in 2016 were also located in the u.s .one of our arizona wafer fabrication facilities is currently on hold and held in a safe state , and we are reserving the building for additional capacity and future technologies .incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facility for its intended use .for more information on our wafer fabrication and our assembly and test facilities , see 201cmanufacturing and assembly and test 201d in part i , item 1 of this form 10-k .we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it .we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment .for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 4 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .item 3 .legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 20 : commitments and contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .item 4 .mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: as of december 31, 2016, what percentage of the total area of major facilities is from owned ones?
| convfinqa2619 |
there are inherent limitations on the effectiveness of our controls .we do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud .a control system , no matter how well-designed and operated , can provide only reasonable , not absolute , assurance that the control system 2019s objectives will be met .the design of a control system must reflect the fact that resource constraints exist , and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs .further , because of the inherent limitations in all control systems , no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , have been detected .the design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events , and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions .projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls to future periods are subject to risks .over time , controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures .if our controls become inadequate , we could fail to meet our financial reporting obligations , our reputation may be adversely affected , our business and operating results could be harmed , and the market price of our stock could decline .item 1b .unresolved staff comments not applicable .item 2 .properties as of december 31 , 2016 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 ..........................................................31.5 19.2 50.7 leased facilities2 ..........................................................2.5 7.1 9.6 . ( square feet in millions ) | unitedstates | othercountries | total
owned facilities1 | 31.5 | 19.2 | 50.7
leased facilities2 | 2.5 | 7.1 | 9.6
total facilities | 34.0 | 26.3 | 60.3 1 leases and municipal grants on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2109 .2 leases expire on varying dates through 2058 and generally include renewals at our option .our principal executive offices are located in the u.s .and the majority of our wafer manufacturing activities in 2016 were also located in the u.s .one of our arizona wafer fabrication facilities is currently on hold and held in a safe state , and we are reserving the building for additional capacity and future technologies .incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facility for its intended use .for more information on our wafer fabrication and our assembly and test facilities , see 201cmanufacturing and assembly and test 201d in part i , item 1 of this form 10-k .we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it .we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment .for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 4 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .item 3 .legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 20 : commitments and contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .item 4 .mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: as of december 31, 2016, what percentage of the total area of major facilities is from owned ones?
Steps: divide(50.7, 60.3)
Answer: 0.8408
Question: and what becomes this percentage when only counting facilities in the us?
| 0.92647 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
there are inherent limitations on the effectiveness of our controls .we do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud .a control system , no matter how well-designed and operated , can provide only reasonable , not absolute , assurance that the control system 2019s objectives will be met .the design of a control system must reflect the fact that resource constraints exist , and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs .further , because of the inherent limitations in all control systems , no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , have been detected .the design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events , and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions .projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls to future periods are subject to risks .over time , controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures .if our controls become inadequate , we could fail to meet our financial reporting obligations , our reputation may be adversely affected , our business and operating results could be harmed , and the market price of our stock could decline .item 1b .unresolved staff comments not applicable .item 2 .properties as of december 31 , 2016 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 ..........................................................31.5 19.2 50.7 leased facilities2 ..........................................................2.5 7.1 9.6 . ( square feet in millions ) | unitedstates | othercountries | total
owned facilities1 | 31.5 | 19.2 | 50.7
leased facilities2 | 2.5 | 7.1 | 9.6
total facilities | 34.0 | 26.3 | 60.3 1 leases and municipal grants on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2109 .2 leases expire on varying dates through 2058 and generally include renewals at our option .our principal executive offices are located in the u.s .and the majority of our wafer manufacturing activities in 2016 were also located in the u.s .one of our arizona wafer fabrication facilities is currently on hold and held in a safe state , and we are reserving the building for additional capacity and future technologies .incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facility for its intended use .for more information on our wafer fabrication and our assembly and test facilities , see 201cmanufacturing and assembly and test 201d in part i , item 1 of this form 10-k .we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it .we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment .for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 4 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .item 3 .legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 20 : commitments and contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .item 4 .mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: as of december 31, 2016, what percentage of the total area of major facilities is from owned ones?
Steps: divide(50.7, 60.3)
Answer: 0.8408
Question: and what becomes this percentage when only counting facilities in the us?
| convfinqa2620 |
82 | 2017 form 10-k a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions , including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits , follows .reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:1 years a0ended a0december a031 . ( millions of dollars ) | years ended december 31 , 2017 | years ended december 31 , 2016
balance at january 1, | $ 1032 | $ 968
additions for tax positions related to current year | 270 | 73
additions for tax positions related to prior years | 20 | 55
reductions for tax positions related to prior years | -27 ( 27 ) | -36 ( 36 )
reductions for settlements2 | -9 ( 9 ) | -24 ( 24 )
reductions for expiration of statute of limitations | 2014 | -4 ( 4 )
balance at december 31, | $ 1286 | $ 1032
amount that if recognized would impact the effective tax rate | $ 1209 | $ 963 1 foreign currency impacts are included within each line as applicable .2 includes cash payment or other reduction of assets to settle liability .we classify interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of the provision for income taxes .we recognized a net provision for interest and penalties of $ 38 million , $ 34 million and $ 20 million during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .the total amount of interest and penalties accrued was $ 157 million and $ 120 million as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .on january 31 , 2018 , we received a revenue agent 2019s report from the irs indicating the end of the field examination of our u.s .income tax returns for 2010 to 2012 .in the audits of 2007 to 2012 including the impact of a loss carryback to 2005 , the irs has proposed to tax in the united states profits earned from certain parts transactions by csarl , based on the irs examination team 2019s application of the 201csubstance-over-form 201d or 201cassignment-of-income 201d judicial doctrines .we are vigorously contesting the proposed increases to tax and penalties for these years of approximately $ 2.3 billion .we believe that the relevant transactions complied with applicable tax laws and did not violate judicial doctrines .we have filed u.s .income tax returns on this same basis for years after 2012 .based on the information currently available , we do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease to our unrecognized tax benefits for this matter within the next 12 months .we currently believe the ultimate disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , liquidity or results of operations .with the exception of a loss carryback to 2005 , tax years prior to 2007 are generally no longer subject to u.s .tax assessment .in our major non-u.s .jurisdictions including australia , brazil , china , germany , japan , mexico , switzerland , singapore and the u.k. , tax years are typically subject to examination for three to ten years .due to the uncertainty related to the timing and potential outcome of audits , we cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible change in unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months. .
Question: what was the net difference in the provision for interest and penalties from 2015 to 2016?
| 14.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
82 | 2017 form 10-k a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions , including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits , follows .reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:1 years a0ended a0december a031 . ( millions of dollars ) | years ended december 31 , 2017 | years ended december 31 , 2016
balance at january 1, | $ 1032 | $ 968
additions for tax positions related to current year | 270 | 73
additions for tax positions related to prior years | 20 | 55
reductions for tax positions related to prior years | -27 ( 27 ) | -36 ( 36 )
reductions for settlements2 | -9 ( 9 ) | -24 ( 24 )
reductions for expiration of statute of limitations | 2014 | -4 ( 4 )
balance at december 31, | $ 1286 | $ 1032
amount that if recognized would impact the effective tax rate | $ 1209 | $ 963 1 foreign currency impacts are included within each line as applicable .2 includes cash payment or other reduction of assets to settle liability .we classify interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of the provision for income taxes .we recognized a net provision for interest and penalties of $ 38 million , $ 34 million and $ 20 million during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .the total amount of interest and penalties accrued was $ 157 million and $ 120 million as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .on january 31 , 2018 , we received a revenue agent 2019s report from the irs indicating the end of the field examination of our u.s .income tax returns for 2010 to 2012 .in the audits of 2007 to 2012 including the impact of a loss carryback to 2005 , the irs has proposed to tax in the united states profits earned from certain parts transactions by csarl , based on the irs examination team 2019s application of the 201csubstance-over-form 201d or 201cassignment-of-income 201d judicial doctrines .we are vigorously contesting the proposed increases to tax and penalties for these years of approximately $ 2.3 billion .we believe that the relevant transactions complied with applicable tax laws and did not violate judicial doctrines .we have filed u.s .income tax returns on this same basis for years after 2012 .based on the information currently available , we do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease to our unrecognized tax benefits for this matter within the next 12 months .we currently believe the ultimate disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , liquidity or results of operations .with the exception of a loss carryback to 2005 , tax years prior to 2007 are generally no longer subject to u.s .tax assessment .in our major non-u.s .jurisdictions including australia , brazil , china , germany , japan , mexico , switzerland , singapore and the u.k. , tax years are typically subject to examination for three to ten years .due to the uncertainty related to the timing and potential outcome of audits , we cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible change in unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months. .
Question: what was the net difference in the provision for interest and penalties from 2015 to 2016?
| convfinqa2621 |
82 | 2017 form 10-k a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions , including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits , follows .reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:1 years a0ended a0december a031 . ( millions of dollars ) | years ended december 31 , 2017 | years ended december 31 , 2016
balance at january 1, | $ 1032 | $ 968
additions for tax positions related to current year | 270 | 73
additions for tax positions related to prior years | 20 | 55
reductions for tax positions related to prior years | -27 ( 27 ) | -36 ( 36 )
reductions for settlements2 | -9 ( 9 ) | -24 ( 24 )
reductions for expiration of statute of limitations | 2014 | -4 ( 4 )
balance at december 31, | $ 1286 | $ 1032
amount that if recognized would impact the effective tax rate | $ 1209 | $ 963 1 foreign currency impacts are included within each line as applicable .2 includes cash payment or other reduction of assets to settle liability .we classify interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of the provision for income taxes .we recognized a net provision for interest and penalties of $ 38 million , $ 34 million and $ 20 million during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .the total amount of interest and penalties accrued was $ 157 million and $ 120 million as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .on january 31 , 2018 , we received a revenue agent 2019s report from the irs indicating the end of the field examination of our u.s .income tax returns for 2010 to 2012 .in the audits of 2007 to 2012 including the impact of a loss carryback to 2005 , the irs has proposed to tax in the united states profits earned from certain parts transactions by csarl , based on the irs examination team 2019s application of the 201csubstance-over-form 201d or 201cassignment-of-income 201d judicial doctrines .we are vigorously contesting the proposed increases to tax and penalties for these years of approximately $ 2.3 billion .we believe that the relevant transactions complied with applicable tax laws and did not violate judicial doctrines .we have filed u.s .income tax returns on this same basis for years after 2012 .based on the information currently available , we do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease to our unrecognized tax benefits for this matter within the next 12 months .we currently believe the ultimate disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , liquidity or results of operations .with the exception of a loss carryback to 2005 , tax years prior to 2007 are generally no longer subject to u.s .tax assessment .in our major non-u.s .jurisdictions including australia , brazil , china , germany , japan , mexico , switzerland , singapore and the u.k. , tax years are typically subject to examination for three to ten years .due to the uncertainty related to the timing and potential outcome of audits , we cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible change in unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months. .
Question: what was the net difference in the provision for interest and penalties from 2015 to 2016?
Steps: subtract(34, 20)
Answer: 14.0
Question: what was the value in 2015?
| 20.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
82 | 2017 form 10-k a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions , including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits , follows .reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:1 years a0ended a0december a031 . ( millions of dollars ) | years ended december 31 , 2017 | years ended december 31 , 2016
balance at january 1, | $ 1032 | $ 968
additions for tax positions related to current year | 270 | 73
additions for tax positions related to prior years | 20 | 55
reductions for tax positions related to prior years | -27 ( 27 ) | -36 ( 36 )
reductions for settlements2 | -9 ( 9 ) | -24 ( 24 )
reductions for expiration of statute of limitations | 2014 | -4 ( 4 )
balance at december 31, | $ 1286 | $ 1032
amount that if recognized would impact the effective tax rate | $ 1209 | $ 963 1 foreign currency impacts are included within each line as applicable .2 includes cash payment or other reduction of assets to settle liability .we classify interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of the provision for income taxes .we recognized a net provision for interest and penalties of $ 38 million , $ 34 million and $ 20 million during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .the total amount of interest and penalties accrued was $ 157 million and $ 120 million as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .on january 31 , 2018 , we received a revenue agent 2019s report from the irs indicating the end of the field examination of our u.s .income tax returns for 2010 to 2012 .in the audits of 2007 to 2012 including the impact of a loss carryback to 2005 , the irs has proposed to tax in the united states profits earned from certain parts transactions by csarl , based on the irs examination team 2019s application of the 201csubstance-over-form 201d or 201cassignment-of-income 201d judicial doctrines .we are vigorously contesting the proposed increases to tax and penalties for these years of approximately $ 2.3 billion .we believe that the relevant transactions complied with applicable tax laws and did not violate judicial doctrines .we have filed u.s .income tax returns on this same basis for years after 2012 .based on the information currently available , we do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease to our unrecognized tax benefits for this matter within the next 12 months .we currently believe the ultimate disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , liquidity or results of operations .with the exception of a loss carryback to 2005 , tax years prior to 2007 are generally no longer subject to u.s .tax assessment .in our major non-u.s .jurisdictions including australia , brazil , china , germany , japan , mexico , switzerland , singapore and the u.k. , tax years are typically subject to examination for three to ten years .due to the uncertainty related to the timing and potential outcome of audits , we cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible change in unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months. .
Question: what was the net difference in the provision for interest and penalties from 2015 to 2016?
Steps: subtract(34, 20)
Answer: 14.0
Question: what was the value in 2015?
| convfinqa2622 |
82 | 2017 form 10-k a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions , including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits , follows .reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:1 years a0ended a0december a031 . ( millions of dollars ) | years ended december 31 , 2017 | years ended december 31 , 2016
balance at january 1, | $ 1032 | $ 968
additions for tax positions related to current year | 270 | 73
additions for tax positions related to prior years | 20 | 55
reductions for tax positions related to prior years | -27 ( 27 ) | -36 ( 36 )
reductions for settlements2 | -9 ( 9 ) | -24 ( 24 )
reductions for expiration of statute of limitations | 2014 | -4 ( 4 )
balance at december 31, | $ 1286 | $ 1032
amount that if recognized would impact the effective tax rate | $ 1209 | $ 963 1 foreign currency impacts are included within each line as applicable .2 includes cash payment or other reduction of assets to settle liability .we classify interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of the provision for income taxes .we recognized a net provision for interest and penalties of $ 38 million , $ 34 million and $ 20 million during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .the total amount of interest and penalties accrued was $ 157 million and $ 120 million as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .on january 31 , 2018 , we received a revenue agent 2019s report from the irs indicating the end of the field examination of our u.s .income tax returns for 2010 to 2012 .in the audits of 2007 to 2012 including the impact of a loss carryback to 2005 , the irs has proposed to tax in the united states profits earned from certain parts transactions by csarl , based on the irs examination team 2019s application of the 201csubstance-over-form 201d or 201cassignment-of-income 201d judicial doctrines .we are vigorously contesting the proposed increases to tax and penalties for these years of approximately $ 2.3 billion .we believe that the relevant transactions complied with applicable tax laws and did not violate judicial doctrines .we have filed u.s .income tax returns on this same basis for years after 2012 .based on the information currently available , we do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease to our unrecognized tax benefits for this matter within the next 12 months .we currently believe the ultimate disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , liquidity or results of operations .with the exception of a loss carryback to 2005 , tax years prior to 2007 are generally no longer subject to u.s .tax assessment .in our major non-u.s .jurisdictions including australia , brazil , china , germany , japan , mexico , switzerland , singapore and the u.k. , tax years are typically subject to examination for three to ten years .due to the uncertainty related to the timing and potential outcome of audits , we cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible change in unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months. .
Question: what was the net difference in the provision for interest and penalties from 2015 to 2016?
Steps: subtract(34, 20)
Answer: 14.0
Question: what was the value in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 20
Answer: 20.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
82 | 2017 form 10-k a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions , including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits , follows .reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:1 years a0ended a0december a031 . ( millions of dollars ) | years ended december 31 , 2017 | years ended december 31 , 2016
balance at january 1, | $ 1032 | $ 968
additions for tax positions related to current year | 270 | 73
additions for tax positions related to prior years | 20 | 55
reductions for tax positions related to prior years | -27 ( 27 ) | -36 ( 36 )
reductions for settlements2 | -9 ( 9 ) | -24 ( 24 )
reductions for expiration of statute of limitations | 2014 | -4 ( 4 )
balance at december 31, | $ 1286 | $ 1032
amount that if recognized would impact the effective tax rate | $ 1209 | $ 963 1 foreign currency impacts are included within each line as applicable .2 includes cash payment or other reduction of assets to settle liability .we classify interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of the provision for income taxes .we recognized a net provision for interest and penalties of $ 38 million , $ 34 million and $ 20 million during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .the total amount of interest and penalties accrued was $ 157 million and $ 120 million as of december a031 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .on january 31 , 2018 , we received a revenue agent 2019s report from the irs indicating the end of the field examination of our u.s .income tax returns for 2010 to 2012 .in the audits of 2007 to 2012 including the impact of a loss carryback to 2005 , the irs has proposed to tax in the united states profits earned from certain parts transactions by csarl , based on the irs examination team 2019s application of the 201csubstance-over-form 201d or 201cassignment-of-income 201d judicial doctrines .we are vigorously contesting the proposed increases to tax and penalties for these years of approximately $ 2.3 billion .we believe that the relevant transactions complied with applicable tax laws and did not violate judicial doctrines .we have filed u.s .income tax returns on this same basis for years after 2012 .based on the information currently available , we do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease to our unrecognized tax benefits for this matter within the next 12 months .we currently believe the ultimate disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , liquidity or results of operations .with the exception of a loss carryback to 2005 , tax years prior to 2007 are generally no longer subject to u.s .tax assessment .in our major non-u.s .jurisdictions including australia , brazil , china , germany , japan , mexico , switzerland , singapore and the u.k. , tax years are typically subject to examination for three to ten years .due to the uncertainty related to the timing and potential outcome of audits , we cannot estimate the range of reasonably possible change in unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months. .
Question: what was the net difference in the provision for interest and penalties from 2015 to 2016?
Steps: subtract(34, 20)
Answer: 14.0
Question: what was the value in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 20
Answer: 20.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| convfinqa2623 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 130 the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib and consumer/cio positions for 2009 .the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 227 out of 261 days in this period , with 69 days exceeding $ 160 million .the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence level var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days .losses were sustained on 34 days during 2009 and exceeded the var measure on one day due to high market volatility in the first quarter of 2009 .under the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence interval , the firm would expect to incur daily losses greater than that pre- dicted by var estimates about twelve times a year .the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads .this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve .as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized .debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase credit spread . ( in millions ) | 1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread
december 31 2009 | $ 39
december 31 2008 | $ 37 loss advisories and drawdowns loss advisories and drawdowns are tools used to highlight to senior management trading losses above certain levels and initiate discus- sion of remedies .economic value stress testing while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in normal markets , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets .the firm conducts economic- value stress tests using multiple scenarios that assume credit spreads widen significantly , equity prices decline and significant changes in interest rates across the major currencies .other scenar- ios focus on the risks predominant in individual business segments and include scenarios that focus on the potential for adverse movements in complex portfolios .scenarios were updated more frequently in 2009 and , in some cases , redefined to reflect the signifi- cant market volatility which began in late 2008 .along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk .stress testing enhances the understanding of the firm 2019s risk profile and loss potential , and stress losses are monitored against limits .stress testing is also utilized in one-off approvals and cross-business risk measurement , as well as an input to economic capital allocation .stress-test results , trends and explanations based on current market risk positions are reported to the firm 2019s senior management and to the lines of business to help them better measure and manage risks and to understand event risk 2013sensitive positions. .
Question: what was the proportion of basis points increase from 12/31/09 to 12/31/08?
| 1.05405 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 130 the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib and consumer/cio positions for 2009 .the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 227 out of 261 days in this period , with 69 days exceeding $ 160 million .the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence level var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days .losses were sustained on 34 days during 2009 and exceeded the var measure on one day due to high market volatility in the first quarter of 2009 .under the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence interval , the firm would expect to incur daily losses greater than that pre- dicted by var estimates about twelve times a year .the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads .this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve .as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized .debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase credit spread . ( in millions ) | 1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread
december 31 2009 | $ 39
december 31 2008 | $ 37 loss advisories and drawdowns loss advisories and drawdowns are tools used to highlight to senior management trading losses above certain levels and initiate discus- sion of remedies .economic value stress testing while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in normal markets , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets .the firm conducts economic- value stress tests using multiple scenarios that assume credit spreads widen significantly , equity prices decline and significant changes in interest rates across the major currencies .other scenar- ios focus on the risks predominant in individual business segments and include scenarios that focus on the potential for adverse movements in complex portfolios .scenarios were updated more frequently in 2009 and , in some cases , redefined to reflect the signifi- cant market volatility which began in late 2008 .along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk .stress testing enhances the understanding of the firm 2019s risk profile and loss potential , and stress losses are monitored against limits .stress testing is also utilized in one-off approvals and cross-business risk measurement , as well as an input to economic capital allocation .stress-test results , trends and explanations based on current market risk positions are reported to the firm 2019s senior management and to the lines of business to help them better measure and manage risks and to understand event risk 2013sensitive positions. .
Question: what was the proportion of basis points increase from 12/31/09 to 12/31/08?
| convfinqa2624 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 130 the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib and consumer/cio positions for 2009 .the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 227 out of 261 days in this period , with 69 days exceeding $ 160 million .the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence level var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days .losses were sustained on 34 days during 2009 and exceeded the var measure on one day due to high market volatility in the first quarter of 2009 .under the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence interval , the firm would expect to incur daily losses greater than that pre- dicted by var estimates about twelve times a year .the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads .this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve .as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized .debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase credit spread . ( in millions ) | 1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread
december 31 2009 | $ 39
december 31 2008 | $ 37 loss advisories and drawdowns loss advisories and drawdowns are tools used to highlight to senior management trading losses above certain levels and initiate discus- sion of remedies .economic value stress testing while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in normal markets , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets .the firm conducts economic- value stress tests using multiple scenarios that assume credit spreads widen significantly , equity prices decline and significant changes in interest rates across the major currencies .other scenar- ios focus on the risks predominant in individual business segments and include scenarios that focus on the potential for adverse movements in complex portfolios .scenarios were updated more frequently in 2009 and , in some cases , redefined to reflect the signifi- cant market volatility which began in late 2008 .along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk .stress testing enhances the understanding of the firm 2019s risk profile and loss potential , and stress losses are monitored against limits .stress testing is also utilized in one-off approvals and cross-business risk measurement , as well as an input to economic capital allocation .stress-test results , trends and explanations based on current market risk positions are reported to the firm 2019s senior management and to the lines of business to help them better measure and manage risks and to understand event risk 2013sensitive positions. .
Question: what was the proportion of basis points increase from 12/31/09 to 12/31/08?
Steps: divide(39, 37)
Answer: 1.05405
Question: and subtracting 1?
| 0.05405 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 130 the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib and consumer/cio positions for 2009 .the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 227 out of 261 days in this period , with 69 days exceeding $ 160 million .the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence level var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days .losses were sustained on 34 days during 2009 and exceeded the var measure on one day due to high market volatility in the first quarter of 2009 .under the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence interval , the firm would expect to incur daily losses greater than that pre- dicted by var estimates about twelve times a year .the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads .this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve .as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized .debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase credit spread . ( in millions ) | 1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread
december 31 2009 | $ 39
december 31 2008 | $ 37 loss advisories and drawdowns loss advisories and drawdowns are tools used to highlight to senior management trading losses above certain levels and initiate discus- sion of remedies .economic value stress testing while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in normal markets , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets .the firm conducts economic- value stress tests using multiple scenarios that assume credit spreads widen significantly , equity prices decline and significant changes in interest rates across the major currencies .other scenar- ios focus on the risks predominant in individual business segments and include scenarios that focus on the potential for adverse movements in complex portfolios .scenarios were updated more frequently in 2009 and , in some cases , redefined to reflect the signifi- cant market volatility which began in late 2008 .along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk .stress testing enhances the understanding of the firm 2019s risk profile and loss potential , and stress losses are monitored against limits .stress testing is also utilized in one-off approvals and cross-business risk measurement , as well as an input to economic capital allocation .stress-test results , trends and explanations based on current market risk positions are reported to the firm 2019s senior management and to the lines of business to help them better measure and manage risks and to understand event risk 2013sensitive positions. .
Question: what was the proportion of basis points increase from 12/31/09 to 12/31/08?
Steps: divide(39, 37)
Answer: 1.05405
Question: and subtracting 1?
| convfinqa2625 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 130 the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib and consumer/cio positions for 2009 .the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 227 out of 261 days in this period , with 69 days exceeding $ 160 million .the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence level var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days .losses were sustained on 34 days during 2009 and exceeded the var measure on one day due to high market volatility in the first quarter of 2009 .under the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence interval , the firm would expect to incur daily losses greater than that pre- dicted by var estimates about twelve times a year .the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads .this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve .as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized .debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase credit spread . ( in millions ) | 1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread
december 31 2009 | $ 39
december 31 2008 | $ 37 loss advisories and drawdowns loss advisories and drawdowns are tools used to highlight to senior management trading losses above certain levels and initiate discus- sion of remedies .economic value stress testing while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in normal markets , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets .the firm conducts economic- value stress tests using multiple scenarios that assume credit spreads widen significantly , equity prices decline and significant changes in interest rates across the major currencies .other scenar- ios focus on the risks predominant in individual business segments and include scenarios that focus on the potential for adverse movements in complex portfolios .scenarios were updated more frequently in 2009 and , in some cases , redefined to reflect the signifi- cant market volatility which began in late 2008 .along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk .stress testing enhances the understanding of the firm 2019s risk profile and loss potential , and stress losses are monitored against limits .stress testing is also utilized in one-off approvals and cross-business risk measurement , as well as an input to economic capital allocation .stress-test results , trends and explanations based on current market risk positions are reported to the firm 2019s senior management and to the lines of business to help them better measure and manage risks and to understand event risk 2013sensitive positions. .
Question: what was the proportion of basis points increase from 12/31/09 to 12/31/08?
Steps: divide(39, 37)
Answer: 1.05405
Question: and subtracting 1?
Steps: subtract(A0, const_1)
Answer: 0.05405
Question: and now converted from a decimal to basis points?
| 5.40541 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 130 the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib and consumer/cio positions for 2009 .the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 227 out of 261 days in this period , with 69 days exceeding $ 160 million .the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence level var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days .losses were sustained on 34 days during 2009 and exceeded the var measure on one day due to high market volatility in the first quarter of 2009 .under the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence interval , the firm would expect to incur daily losses greater than that pre- dicted by var estimates about twelve times a year .the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads .this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve .as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized .debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase credit spread . ( in millions ) | 1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread
december 31 2009 | $ 39
december 31 2008 | $ 37 loss advisories and drawdowns loss advisories and drawdowns are tools used to highlight to senior management trading losses above certain levels and initiate discus- sion of remedies .economic value stress testing while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in normal markets , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets .the firm conducts economic- value stress tests using multiple scenarios that assume credit spreads widen significantly , equity prices decline and significant changes in interest rates across the major currencies .other scenar- ios focus on the risks predominant in individual business segments and include scenarios that focus on the potential for adverse movements in complex portfolios .scenarios were updated more frequently in 2009 and , in some cases , redefined to reflect the signifi- cant market volatility which began in late 2008 .along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk .stress testing enhances the understanding of the firm 2019s risk profile and loss potential , and stress losses are monitored against limits .stress testing is also utilized in one-off approvals and cross-business risk measurement , as well as an input to economic capital allocation .stress-test results , trends and explanations based on current market risk positions are reported to the firm 2019s senior management and to the lines of business to help them better measure and manage risks and to understand event risk 2013sensitive positions. .
Question: what was the proportion of basis points increase from 12/31/09 to 12/31/08?
Steps: divide(39, 37)
Answer: 1.05405
Question: and subtracting 1?
Steps: subtract(A0, const_1)
Answer: 0.05405
Question: and now converted from a decimal to basis points?
| convfinqa2626 |
note 9 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: . ( millions of dollars ) | pension plans 2019 | pension plans 2018 | pension plans 2017
service cost | $ 134 | $ 136 | $ 110
interest cost | 107 | 90 | 61
expected return on plan assets | ( 180 ) | ( 154 ) | ( 112 )
amortization of prior service credit | ( 13 ) | ( 13 ) | ( 14 )
amortization of loss | 78 | 78 | 92
settlements | 10 | 2 | 2014
net pension cost | $ 135 | $ 137 | $ 138
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans | $ 32 | $ 34 | $ 43 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 32 $ 34 $ 43 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .the settlement losses recorded in 2019 and 2018 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .supplemental pension plan .the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year .as further discussed in note 2 , upon adopting an accounting standard update on october 1 , 2018 , all components of the company 2019s net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs , aside from service cost , are recorded to other income ( expense ) , net on its consolidated statements of income , for all periods presented .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company .
Question: what is the net change in value of service costs from 2017 to 2018?
| 26.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 9 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: . ( millions of dollars ) | pension plans 2019 | pension plans 2018 | pension plans 2017
service cost | $ 134 | $ 136 | $ 110
interest cost | 107 | 90 | 61
expected return on plan assets | ( 180 ) | ( 154 ) | ( 112 )
amortization of prior service credit | ( 13 ) | ( 13 ) | ( 14 )
amortization of loss | 78 | 78 | 92
settlements | 10 | 2 | 2014
net pension cost | $ 135 | $ 137 | $ 138
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans | $ 32 | $ 34 | $ 43 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 32 $ 34 $ 43 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .the settlement losses recorded in 2019 and 2018 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .supplemental pension plan .the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year .as further discussed in note 2 , upon adopting an accounting standard update on october 1 , 2018 , all components of the company 2019s net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs , aside from service cost , are recorded to other income ( expense ) , net on its consolidated statements of income , for all periods presented .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company .
Question: what is the net change in value of service costs from 2017 to 2018?
| convfinqa2627 |
note 9 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: . ( millions of dollars ) | pension plans 2019 | pension plans 2018 | pension plans 2017
service cost | $ 134 | $ 136 | $ 110
interest cost | 107 | 90 | 61
expected return on plan assets | ( 180 ) | ( 154 ) | ( 112 )
amortization of prior service credit | ( 13 ) | ( 13 ) | ( 14 )
amortization of loss | 78 | 78 | 92
settlements | 10 | 2 | 2014
net pension cost | $ 135 | $ 137 | $ 138
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans | $ 32 | $ 34 | $ 43 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 32 $ 34 $ 43 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .the settlement losses recorded in 2019 and 2018 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .supplemental pension plan .the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year .as further discussed in note 2 , upon adopting an accounting standard update on october 1 , 2018 , all components of the company 2019s net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs , aside from service cost , are recorded to other income ( expense ) , net on its consolidated statements of income , for all periods presented .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company .
Question: what is the net change in value of service costs from 2017 to 2018?
Steps: subtract(136, 110)
Answer: 26.0
Question: what is that change over the 2017 value?
| 0.23636 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 9 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: . ( millions of dollars ) | pension plans 2019 | pension plans 2018 | pension plans 2017
service cost | $ 134 | $ 136 | $ 110
interest cost | 107 | 90 | 61
expected return on plan assets | ( 180 ) | ( 154 ) | ( 112 )
amortization of prior service credit | ( 13 ) | ( 13 ) | ( 14 )
amortization of loss | 78 | 78 | 92
settlements | 10 | 2 | 2014
net pension cost | $ 135 | $ 137 | $ 138
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans | $ 32 | $ 34 | $ 43 net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 32 $ 34 $ 43 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .the settlement losses recorded in 2019 and 2018 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .supplemental pension plan .the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year .as further discussed in note 2 , upon adopting an accounting standard update on october 1 , 2018 , all components of the company 2019s net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs , aside from service cost , are recorded to other income ( expense ) , net on its consolidated statements of income , for all periods presented .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company .
Question: what is the net change in value of service costs from 2017 to 2018?
Steps: subtract(136, 110)
Answer: 26.0
Question: what is that change over the 2017 value?
| convfinqa2628 |
impairment of long-lived assets based on the projection of undiscounted cash flows whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such assets may not be recoverable .in the event such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the recorded value of the assets , the assets are written down to their estimated fair values ( see note 5 ) .asset retirement obligations 2014effective january 1 , 2003 , the company adopted statement of financial accounting standards ( 2018 2018sfas 2019 2019 ) no .143 , 2018 2018accounting for asset retirement obligations . 2019 2019 sfas no .143 requires the company to record the fair value of a legal liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred .when a new liability is recorded the company will capitalize the costs of the liability by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset .the liability is accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset .upon settlement of the liability , the company settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement .the company 2019s retirement obligations covered by sfas no .143 include primarily active ash landfills , water treatment basins and the removal or dismantlement of certain plant and equipment .as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , the company had recorded liabilities of approximately $ 29 million and $ 15 million , respectively , related to asset retirement obligations .there are no assets that are legally restricted for purposes of settling asset retirement obligations .upon adoption of sfas no .143 , the company recorded an additional liability of approximately $ 13 million , a net asset of approximately $ 9 million , and a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of approximately $ 2 million , after income taxes .amounts recorded related to asset retirement obligations during the years ended december 31 , 2003 were as follows ( in millions ) : . balance at december 31 2002 | $ 15
additional liability recorded from cumulative effect of accounting change | 13
accretion expense | 2
change in the timing of estimated cash flows | -1 ( 1 )
balance at december 31 2003 | $ 29 proforma net ( loss ) income and ( loss ) earnings per share have not been presented for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 because the proforma application of sfas no .143 to prior periods would result in proforma net ( loss ) income and ( loss ) earnings per share not materially different from the actual amounts reported for those periods in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .had sfas 143 been applied during all periods presented the asset retirement obligation at january 1 , 2001 , december 31 , 2001 and december 31 , 2002 would have been approximately $ 21 million , $ 23 million and $ 28 million , respectively .included in other long-term liabilities is the accrual for the non-legal obligations for removal of assets in service at ipalco amounting to $ 361 million and $ 339 million at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively .deferred financing costs 2014financing costs are deferred and amortized over the related financing period using the effective interest method or the straight-line method when it does not differ materially from the effective interest method .deferred financing costs are shown net of accumulated amortization of $ 202 million and $ 173 million as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively .project development costs 2014the company capitalizes the costs of developing new construction projects after achieving certain project-related milestones that indicate the project 2019s completion is probable .these costs represent amounts incurred for professional services , permits , options , capitalized interest , and other costs directly related to construction .these costs are transferred to construction in progress when significant construction activity commences , or expensed at the time the company determines that development of a particular project is no longer probable ( see note 5 ) . .
Question: what was the change in the balance of liabilities related to asset retirement obligations throughout 2003?
| 14.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment of long-lived assets based on the projection of undiscounted cash flows whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such assets may not be recoverable .in the event such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the recorded value of the assets , the assets are written down to their estimated fair values ( see note 5 ) .asset retirement obligations 2014effective january 1 , 2003 , the company adopted statement of financial accounting standards ( 2018 2018sfas 2019 2019 ) no .143 , 2018 2018accounting for asset retirement obligations . 2019 2019 sfas no .143 requires the company to record the fair value of a legal liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred .when a new liability is recorded the company will capitalize the costs of the liability by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset .the liability is accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset .upon settlement of the liability , the company settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement .the company 2019s retirement obligations covered by sfas no .143 include primarily active ash landfills , water treatment basins and the removal or dismantlement of certain plant and equipment .as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , the company had recorded liabilities of approximately $ 29 million and $ 15 million , respectively , related to asset retirement obligations .there are no assets that are legally restricted for purposes of settling asset retirement obligations .upon adoption of sfas no .143 , the company recorded an additional liability of approximately $ 13 million , a net asset of approximately $ 9 million , and a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of approximately $ 2 million , after income taxes .amounts recorded related to asset retirement obligations during the years ended december 31 , 2003 were as follows ( in millions ) : . balance at december 31 2002 | $ 15
additional liability recorded from cumulative effect of accounting change | 13
accretion expense | 2
change in the timing of estimated cash flows | -1 ( 1 )
balance at december 31 2003 | $ 29 proforma net ( loss ) income and ( loss ) earnings per share have not been presented for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 because the proforma application of sfas no .143 to prior periods would result in proforma net ( loss ) income and ( loss ) earnings per share not materially different from the actual amounts reported for those periods in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .had sfas 143 been applied during all periods presented the asset retirement obligation at january 1 , 2001 , december 31 , 2001 and december 31 , 2002 would have been approximately $ 21 million , $ 23 million and $ 28 million , respectively .included in other long-term liabilities is the accrual for the non-legal obligations for removal of assets in service at ipalco amounting to $ 361 million and $ 339 million at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively .deferred financing costs 2014financing costs are deferred and amortized over the related financing period using the effective interest method or the straight-line method when it does not differ materially from the effective interest method .deferred financing costs are shown net of accumulated amortization of $ 202 million and $ 173 million as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively .project development costs 2014the company capitalizes the costs of developing new construction projects after achieving certain project-related milestones that indicate the project 2019s completion is probable .these costs represent amounts incurred for professional services , permits , options , capitalized interest , and other costs directly related to construction .these costs are transferred to construction in progress when significant construction activity commences , or expensed at the time the company determines that development of a particular project is no longer probable ( see note 5 ) . .
Question: what was the change in the balance of liabilities related to asset retirement obligations throughout 2003?
| convfinqa2629 |
impairment of long-lived assets based on the projection of undiscounted cash flows whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such assets may not be recoverable .in the event such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the recorded value of the assets , the assets are written down to their estimated fair values ( see note 5 ) .asset retirement obligations 2014effective january 1 , 2003 , the company adopted statement of financial accounting standards ( 2018 2018sfas 2019 2019 ) no .143 , 2018 2018accounting for asset retirement obligations . 2019 2019 sfas no .143 requires the company to record the fair value of a legal liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred .when a new liability is recorded the company will capitalize the costs of the liability by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset .the liability is accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset .upon settlement of the liability , the company settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement .the company 2019s retirement obligations covered by sfas no .143 include primarily active ash landfills , water treatment basins and the removal or dismantlement of certain plant and equipment .as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , the company had recorded liabilities of approximately $ 29 million and $ 15 million , respectively , related to asset retirement obligations .there are no assets that are legally restricted for purposes of settling asset retirement obligations .upon adoption of sfas no .143 , the company recorded an additional liability of approximately $ 13 million , a net asset of approximately $ 9 million , and a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of approximately $ 2 million , after income taxes .amounts recorded related to asset retirement obligations during the years ended december 31 , 2003 were as follows ( in millions ) : . balance at december 31 2002 | $ 15
additional liability recorded from cumulative effect of accounting change | 13
accretion expense | 2
change in the timing of estimated cash flows | -1 ( 1 )
balance at december 31 2003 | $ 29 proforma net ( loss ) income and ( loss ) earnings per share have not been presented for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 because the proforma application of sfas no .143 to prior periods would result in proforma net ( loss ) income and ( loss ) earnings per share not materially different from the actual amounts reported for those periods in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .had sfas 143 been applied during all periods presented the asset retirement obligation at january 1 , 2001 , december 31 , 2001 and december 31 , 2002 would have been approximately $ 21 million , $ 23 million and $ 28 million , respectively .included in other long-term liabilities is the accrual for the non-legal obligations for removal of assets in service at ipalco amounting to $ 361 million and $ 339 million at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively .deferred financing costs 2014financing costs are deferred and amortized over the related financing period using the effective interest method or the straight-line method when it does not differ materially from the effective interest method .deferred financing costs are shown net of accumulated amortization of $ 202 million and $ 173 million as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively .project development costs 2014the company capitalizes the costs of developing new construction projects after achieving certain project-related milestones that indicate the project 2019s completion is probable .these costs represent amounts incurred for professional services , permits , options , capitalized interest , and other costs directly related to construction .these costs are transferred to construction in progress when significant construction activity commences , or expensed at the time the company determines that development of a particular project is no longer probable ( see note 5 ) . .
Question: what was the change in the balance of liabilities related to asset retirement obligations throughout 2003?
Steps: subtract(29, 15)
Answer: 14.0
Question: and, by the end of the year, what would have been that balance without the accounting change?
| 16.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment of long-lived assets based on the projection of undiscounted cash flows whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such assets may not be recoverable .in the event such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the recorded value of the assets , the assets are written down to their estimated fair values ( see note 5 ) .asset retirement obligations 2014effective january 1 , 2003 , the company adopted statement of financial accounting standards ( 2018 2018sfas 2019 2019 ) no .143 , 2018 2018accounting for asset retirement obligations . 2019 2019 sfas no .143 requires the company to record the fair value of a legal liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred .when a new liability is recorded the company will capitalize the costs of the liability by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset .the liability is accreted to its present value each period and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset .upon settlement of the liability , the company settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement .the company 2019s retirement obligations covered by sfas no .143 include primarily active ash landfills , water treatment basins and the removal or dismantlement of certain plant and equipment .as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , the company had recorded liabilities of approximately $ 29 million and $ 15 million , respectively , related to asset retirement obligations .there are no assets that are legally restricted for purposes of settling asset retirement obligations .upon adoption of sfas no .143 , the company recorded an additional liability of approximately $ 13 million , a net asset of approximately $ 9 million , and a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of approximately $ 2 million , after income taxes .amounts recorded related to asset retirement obligations during the years ended december 31 , 2003 were as follows ( in millions ) : . balance at december 31 2002 | $ 15
additional liability recorded from cumulative effect of accounting change | 13
accretion expense | 2
change in the timing of estimated cash flows | -1 ( 1 )
balance at december 31 2003 | $ 29 proforma net ( loss ) income and ( loss ) earnings per share have not been presented for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 because the proforma application of sfas no .143 to prior periods would result in proforma net ( loss ) income and ( loss ) earnings per share not materially different from the actual amounts reported for those periods in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .had sfas 143 been applied during all periods presented the asset retirement obligation at january 1 , 2001 , december 31 , 2001 and december 31 , 2002 would have been approximately $ 21 million , $ 23 million and $ 28 million , respectively .included in other long-term liabilities is the accrual for the non-legal obligations for removal of assets in service at ipalco amounting to $ 361 million and $ 339 million at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively .deferred financing costs 2014financing costs are deferred and amortized over the related financing period using the effective interest method or the straight-line method when it does not differ materially from the effective interest method .deferred financing costs are shown net of accumulated amortization of $ 202 million and $ 173 million as of december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively .project development costs 2014the company capitalizes the costs of developing new construction projects after achieving certain project-related milestones that indicate the project 2019s completion is probable .these costs represent amounts incurred for professional services , permits , options , capitalized interest , and other costs directly related to construction .these costs are transferred to construction in progress when significant construction activity commences , or expensed at the time the company determines that development of a particular project is no longer probable ( see note 5 ) . .
Question: what was the change in the balance of liabilities related to asset retirement obligations throughout 2003?
Steps: subtract(29, 15)
Answer: 14.0
Question: and, by the end of the year, what would have been that balance without the accounting change?
| convfinqa2630 |
note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . | 2018 | 2017 | 2016
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations | 284.5 | 287.8 | 299.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards | 2.3 | 2.8 | 3.8
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations | 286.8 | 290.6 | 303.1 we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 .note 3 2013 acquisition and divestitures consolidation of awe management limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) .consequently , we began consolidating awe and our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment in awe using the equity method of accounting .under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales .accordingly , prior to august 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s .gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities of awe at fair value .accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243 million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million .the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows .in 2016 , we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104 million associated with obtaining a controlling interest in awe , which consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office .the gain represented the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest in awe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment in awe and deferred taxes .the gain was recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings .the fair value of awe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach .divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we divested our former is&gs business , which merged with leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) .the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer .under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock .at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange .the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) .following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos .as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock .we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction .based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares .in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses .the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 .the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction. .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2018?
| 286.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . | 2018 | 2017 | 2016
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations | 284.5 | 287.8 | 299.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards | 2.3 | 2.8 | 3.8
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations | 286.8 | 290.6 | 303.1 we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 .note 3 2013 acquisition and divestitures consolidation of awe management limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) .consequently , we began consolidating awe and our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment in awe using the equity method of accounting .under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales .accordingly , prior to august 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s .gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities of awe at fair value .accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243 million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million .the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows .in 2016 , we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104 million associated with obtaining a controlling interest in awe , which consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office .the gain represented the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest in awe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment in awe and deferred taxes .the gain was recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings .the fair value of awe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach .divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we divested our former is&gs business , which merged with leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) .the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer .under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock .at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange .the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) .following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos .as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock .we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction .based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares .in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses .the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 .the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction. .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2018?
| convfinqa2631 |
note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . | 2018 | 2017 | 2016
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations | 284.5 | 287.8 | 299.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards | 2.3 | 2.8 | 3.8
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations | 286.8 | 290.6 | 303.1 we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 .note 3 2013 acquisition and divestitures consolidation of awe management limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) .consequently , we began consolidating awe and our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment in awe using the equity method of accounting .under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales .accordingly , prior to august 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s .gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities of awe at fair value .accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243 million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million .the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows .in 2016 , we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104 million associated with obtaining a controlling interest in awe , which consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office .the gain represented the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest in awe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment in awe and deferred taxes .the gain was recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings .the fair value of awe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach .divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we divested our former is&gs business , which merged with leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) .the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer .under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock .at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange .the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) .following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos .as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock .we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction .based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares .in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses .the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 .the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction. .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 286.8
Answer: 286.8
Question: and in 2017?
| 290.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . | 2018 | 2017 | 2016
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations | 284.5 | 287.8 | 299.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards | 2.3 | 2.8 | 3.8
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations | 286.8 | 290.6 | 303.1 we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 .note 3 2013 acquisition and divestitures consolidation of awe management limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) .consequently , we began consolidating awe and our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment in awe using the equity method of accounting .under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales .accordingly , prior to august 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s .gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities of awe at fair value .accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243 million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million .the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows .in 2016 , we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104 million associated with obtaining a controlling interest in awe , which consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office .the gain represented the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest in awe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment in awe and deferred taxes .the gain was recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings .the fair value of awe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach .divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we divested our former is&gs business , which merged with leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) .the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer .under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock .at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange .the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) .following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos .as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock .we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction .based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares .in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses .the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 .the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction. .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 286.8
Answer: 286.8
Question: and in 2017?
| convfinqa2632 |
note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . | 2018 | 2017 | 2016
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations | 284.5 | 287.8 | 299.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards | 2.3 | 2.8 | 3.8
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations | 286.8 | 290.6 | 303.1 we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 .note 3 2013 acquisition and divestitures consolidation of awe management limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) .consequently , we began consolidating awe and our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment in awe using the equity method of accounting .under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales .accordingly , prior to august 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s .gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities of awe at fair value .accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243 million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million .the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows .in 2016 , we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104 million associated with obtaining a controlling interest in awe , which consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office .the gain represented the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest in awe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment in awe and deferred taxes .the gain was recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings .the fair value of awe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach .divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we divested our former is&gs business , which merged with leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) .the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer .under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock .at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange .the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) .following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos .as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock .we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction .based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares .in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses .the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 .the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction. .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 286.8
Answer: 286.8
Question: and in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 290.6
Answer: 290.6
Question: so what was the difference in value between the two years?
| -3.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . | 2018 | 2017 | 2016
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations | 284.5 | 287.8 | 299.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards | 2.3 | 2.8 | 3.8
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations | 286.8 | 290.6 | 303.1 we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 .note 3 2013 acquisition and divestitures consolidation of awe management limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) .consequently , we began consolidating awe and our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment in awe using the equity method of accounting .under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales .accordingly , prior to august 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s .gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities of awe at fair value .accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243 million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million .the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows .in 2016 , we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104 million associated with obtaining a controlling interest in awe , which consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office .the gain represented the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest in awe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment in awe and deferred taxes .the gain was recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings .the fair value of awe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach .divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we divested our former is&gs business , which merged with leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) .the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer .under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock .at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange .the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) .following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos .as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock .we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction .based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares .in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses .the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 .the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction. .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 286.8
Answer: 286.8
Question: and in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 290.6
Answer: 290.6
Question: so what was the difference in value between the two years?
| convfinqa2633 |
note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . | 2018 | 2017 | 2016
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations | 284.5 | 287.8 | 299.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards | 2.3 | 2.8 | 3.8
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations | 286.8 | 290.6 | 303.1 we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 .note 3 2013 acquisition and divestitures consolidation of awe management limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) .consequently , we began consolidating awe and our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment in awe using the equity method of accounting .under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales .accordingly , prior to august 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s .gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities of awe at fair value .accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243 million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million .the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows .in 2016 , we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104 million associated with obtaining a controlling interest in awe , which consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office .the gain represented the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest in awe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment in awe and deferred taxes .the gain was recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings .the fair value of awe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach .divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we divested our former is&gs business , which merged with leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) .the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer .under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock .at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange .the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) .following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos .as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock .we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction .based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares .in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses .the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 .the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction. .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 286.8
Answer: 286.8
Question: and in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 290.6
Answer: 290.6
Question: so what was the difference in value between the two years?
Steps: subtract(286.8, 290.6)
Answer: -3.8
Question: and the percentage change?
| -0.01308 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . | 2018 | 2017 | 2016
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations | 284.5 | 287.8 | 299.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards | 2.3 | 2.8 | 3.8
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations | 286.8 | 290.6 | 303.1 we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 .note 3 2013 acquisition and divestitures consolidation of awe management limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) .consequently , we began consolidating awe and our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment in awe using the equity method of accounting .under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales .accordingly , prior to august 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33% ( 33 % ) of awe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit .we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s .gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities of awe at fair value .accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243 million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million .the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows .in 2016 , we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104 million associated with obtaining a controlling interest in awe , which consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office .the gain represented the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest in awe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment in awe and deferred taxes .the gain was recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings .the fair value of awe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach .divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business on august 16 , 2016 , we divested our former is&gs business , which merged with leidos , in a reverse morris trust transaction ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) .the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock of abacus was distributed to participating lockheed martin stockholders through an exchange offer .under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheed martin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheed martin common stock for shares of abacus common stock .at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange .the shares of lockheed martin common stock that were exchanged and accepted were retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) .following the exchange offer , abacus merged with a subsidiary of leidos , with abacus continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of leidos .as part of the merger , each share of abacus common stock was automatically converted into one share of leidos common stock .we did not receive any shares of leidos common stock as part of the transaction and do not hold any shares of leidos or abacus common stock following the transaction .based on an opinion of outside tax counsel , subject to customary qualifications and based on factual representations , the exchange offer and merger will qualify as tax-free transactions to lockheed martin and its stockholders , except to the extent that cash was paid to lockheed martin stockholders in lieu of fractional shares .in connection with the transaction , abacus borrowed an aggregate principal amount of approximately $ 1.84 billion under term loan facilities with third party financial institutions , the proceeds of which were used to make a one-time special cash payment of $ 1.80 billion to lockheed martin and to pay associated borrowing fees and expenses .the entire special cash payment was used to repay debt , pay dividends and repurchase stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2016 .the obligations under the abacus term loan facilities were guaranteed by leidos as part of the transaction. .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 286.8
Answer: 286.8
Question: and in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 290.6
Answer: 290.6
Question: so what was the difference in value between the two years?
Steps: subtract(286.8, 290.6)
Answer: -3.8
Question: and the percentage change?
| convfinqa2634 |
cgmhi has committed long-term financing facilities with unaffiliated banks .at december 31 , 2010 , cgmhi had drawn down the full $ 900 million available under these facilities , of which $ 150 million is guaranteed by citigroup .generally , a bank can terminate these facilities by giving cgmhi one-year prior notice .the company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies .it uses derivative contracts , primarily interest rate swaps , to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt .the maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged .in addition , the company uses other derivative contracts to manage the foreign exchange impact of certain debt issuances .at december 31 , 2010 , the company 2019s overall weighted average interest rate for long-term debt was 3.53% ( 3.53 % ) on a contractual basis and 2.78% ( 2.78 % ) including the effects of derivative contracts .aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities are as follows : long-term debt at december 31 , 2010 and december 31 , 2009 includes $ 18131 million and $ 19345 million , respectively , of junior subordinated debt .the company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of delaware .the trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of ( i ) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust ; ( ii ) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures ( subordinated debentures ) of its parent ; and ( iii ) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto .upon approval from the federal reserve , citigroup has the right to redeem these securities .citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase ( i ) the 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xv before september 15 , 2056 , ( ii ) the 6.45% ( 6.45 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvi before december 31 , 2046 , ( iii ) the 6.35% ( 6.35 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvii before march 15 , 2057 , ( iv ) the 6.829% ( 6.829 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xviii before june 28 , 2047 , ( v ) the 7.250% ( 7.250 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xix before august 15 , 2047 , ( vi ) the 7.875% ( 7.875 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xx before december 15 , 2067 , and ( vii ) the 8.300% ( 8.300 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xxi before december 21 , 2067 , unless certain conditions , described in exhibit 4.03 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on september 18 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 28 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on march 8 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on july 2 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on august 17 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 27 , 2007 , and in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on december 21 , 2007 , respectively , are met .these agreements are for the benefit of the holders of citigroup 2019s 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due 2034 .citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts .these subsidiary trusts have no assets , operations , revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance , administration , and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts 2019 common securities .these subsidiary trusts 2019 obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by citigroup. . in millions of dollars | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | thereafter
bank | $ 35066 | $ 38280 | $ 8013 | $ 7620 | $ 6380 | $ 17875
non-bank | 15213 | 25950 | 7858 | 5187 | 3416 | 18381
parent company | 21194 | 30004 | 21348 | 19096 | 12131 | 88171
total | $ 71473 | $ 94234 | $ 37219 | $ 31903 | $ 21927 | $ 124427 .
Question: what proportion of total subsidiary trusts obligations is attributable to the bank in 2011?
| 0.49062 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
cgmhi has committed long-term financing facilities with unaffiliated banks .at december 31 , 2010 , cgmhi had drawn down the full $ 900 million available under these facilities , of which $ 150 million is guaranteed by citigroup .generally , a bank can terminate these facilities by giving cgmhi one-year prior notice .the company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies .it uses derivative contracts , primarily interest rate swaps , to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt .the maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged .in addition , the company uses other derivative contracts to manage the foreign exchange impact of certain debt issuances .at december 31 , 2010 , the company 2019s overall weighted average interest rate for long-term debt was 3.53% ( 3.53 % ) on a contractual basis and 2.78% ( 2.78 % ) including the effects of derivative contracts .aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities are as follows : long-term debt at december 31 , 2010 and december 31 , 2009 includes $ 18131 million and $ 19345 million , respectively , of junior subordinated debt .the company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of delaware .the trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of ( i ) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust ; ( ii ) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures ( subordinated debentures ) of its parent ; and ( iii ) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto .upon approval from the federal reserve , citigroup has the right to redeem these securities .citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase ( i ) the 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xv before september 15 , 2056 , ( ii ) the 6.45% ( 6.45 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvi before december 31 , 2046 , ( iii ) the 6.35% ( 6.35 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvii before march 15 , 2057 , ( iv ) the 6.829% ( 6.829 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xviii before june 28 , 2047 , ( v ) the 7.250% ( 7.250 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xix before august 15 , 2047 , ( vi ) the 7.875% ( 7.875 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xx before december 15 , 2067 , and ( vii ) the 8.300% ( 8.300 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xxi before december 21 , 2067 , unless certain conditions , described in exhibit 4.03 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on september 18 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 28 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on march 8 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on july 2 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on august 17 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 27 , 2007 , and in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on december 21 , 2007 , respectively , are met .these agreements are for the benefit of the holders of citigroup 2019s 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due 2034 .citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts .these subsidiary trusts have no assets , operations , revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance , administration , and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts 2019 common securities .these subsidiary trusts 2019 obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by citigroup. . in millions of dollars | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | thereafter
bank | $ 35066 | $ 38280 | $ 8013 | $ 7620 | $ 6380 | $ 17875
non-bank | 15213 | 25950 | 7858 | 5187 | 3416 | 18381
parent company | 21194 | 30004 | 21348 | 19096 | 12131 | 88171
total | $ 71473 | $ 94234 | $ 37219 | $ 31903 | $ 21927 | $ 124427 .
Question: what proportion of total subsidiary trusts obligations is attributable to the bank in 2011?
| convfinqa2635 |
17 .leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property .the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2016 , and 2015 included $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2273 million , net of $ 1189 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases .a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income .future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2016 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . millions | operatingleases | capitalleases
2017 | $ 461 | $ 221
2018 | 390 | 193
2019 | 348 | 179
2020 | 285 | 187
2021 | 245 | 158
later years | 1314 | 417
total minimum lease payments | $ 3043 | $ 1355
amount representing interest | n/a | -250 ( 250 )
present value of minimum lease payments | n/a | $ 1105 approximately 96% ( 96 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives .rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 535 million in 2016 , $ 590 million in 2015 , and $ 593 million in 2014 .when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term .contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant .18 .commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries .we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity .to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated .we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters .personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year .we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims .the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents .under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements .we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work .our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments .approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 6% ( 6 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2016 .because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 290 million to $ 317 million .we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other .estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases?
| 3043.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
17 .leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property .the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2016 , and 2015 included $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2273 million , net of $ 1189 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases .a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income .future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2016 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . millions | operatingleases | capitalleases
2017 | $ 461 | $ 221
2018 | 390 | 193
2019 | 348 | 179
2020 | 285 | 187
2021 | 245 | 158
later years | 1314 | 417
total minimum lease payments | $ 3043 | $ 1355
amount representing interest | n/a | -250 ( 250 )
present value of minimum lease payments | n/a | $ 1105 approximately 96% ( 96 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives .rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 535 million in 2016 , $ 590 million in 2015 , and $ 593 million in 2014 .when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term .contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant .18 .commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries .we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity .to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated .we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters .personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year .we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims .the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents .under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements .we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work .our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments .approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 6% ( 6 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2016 .because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 290 million to $ 317 million .we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other .estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases?
| convfinqa2636 |
17 .leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property .the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2016 , and 2015 included $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2273 million , net of $ 1189 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases .a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income .future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2016 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . millions | operatingleases | capitalleases
2017 | $ 461 | $ 221
2018 | 390 | 193
2019 | 348 | 179
2020 | 285 | 187
2021 | 245 | 158
later years | 1314 | 417
total minimum lease payments | $ 3043 | $ 1355
amount representing interest | n/a | -250 ( 250 )
present value of minimum lease payments | n/a | $ 1105 approximately 96% ( 96 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives .rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 535 million in 2016 , $ 590 million in 2015 , and $ 593 million in 2014 .when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term .contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant .18 .commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries .we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity .to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated .we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters .personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year .we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims .the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents .under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements .we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work .our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments .approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 6% ( 6 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2016 .because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 290 million to $ 317 million .we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other .estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases?
Steps: Ask for number 3043
Answer: 3043.0
Question: what is it for capital leases?
| 1355.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
17 .leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property .the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2016 , and 2015 included $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2273 million , net of $ 1189 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases .a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income .future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2016 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . millions | operatingleases | capitalleases
2017 | $ 461 | $ 221
2018 | 390 | 193
2019 | 348 | 179
2020 | 285 | 187
2021 | 245 | 158
later years | 1314 | 417
total minimum lease payments | $ 3043 | $ 1355
amount representing interest | n/a | -250 ( 250 )
present value of minimum lease payments | n/a | $ 1105 approximately 96% ( 96 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives .rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 535 million in 2016 , $ 590 million in 2015 , and $ 593 million in 2014 .when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term .contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant .18 .commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries .we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity .to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated .we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters .personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year .we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims .the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents .under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements .we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work .our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments .approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 6% ( 6 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2016 .because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 290 million to $ 317 million .we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other .estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases?
Steps: Ask for number 3043
Answer: 3043.0
Question: what is it for capital leases?
| convfinqa2637 |
17 .leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property .the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2016 , and 2015 included $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2273 million , net of $ 1189 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases .a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income .future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2016 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . millions | operatingleases | capitalleases
2017 | $ 461 | $ 221
2018 | 390 | 193
2019 | 348 | 179
2020 | 285 | 187
2021 | 245 | 158
later years | 1314 | 417
total minimum lease payments | $ 3043 | $ 1355
amount representing interest | n/a | -250 ( 250 )
present value of minimum lease payments | n/a | $ 1105 approximately 96% ( 96 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives .rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 535 million in 2016 , $ 590 million in 2015 , and $ 593 million in 2014 .when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term .contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant .18 .commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries .we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity .to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated .we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters .personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year .we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims .the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents .under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements .we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work .our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments .approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 6% ( 6 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2016 .because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 290 million to $ 317 million .we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other .estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases?
Steps: Ask for number 3043
Answer: 3043.0
Question: what is it for capital leases?
Steps: Ask for number 1355
Answer: 1355.0
Question: what is the ratio of operating to capital?
| 2.24576 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
17 .leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property .the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2016 , and 2015 included $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2273 million , net of $ 1189 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases .a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income .future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2016 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . millions | operatingleases | capitalleases
2017 | $ 461 | $ 221
2018 | 390 | 193
2019 | 348 | 179
2020 | 285 | 187
2021 | 245 | 158
later years | 1314 | 417
total minimum lease payments | $ 3043 | $ 1355
amount representing interest | n/a | -250 ( 250 )
present value of minimum lease payments | n/a | $ 1105 approximately 96% ( 96 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives .rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 535 million in 2016 , $ 590 million in 2015 , and $ 593 million in 2014 .when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term .contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant .18 .commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries .we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity .to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated .we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters .personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year .we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims .the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents .under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements .we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work .our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments .approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 6% ( 6 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2016 .because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 290 million to $ 317 million .we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other .estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases?
Steps: Ask for number 3043
Answer: 3043.0
Question: what is it for capital leases?
Steps: Ask for number 1355
Answer: 1355.0
Question: what is the ratio of operating to capital?
| convfinqa2638 |
17 .leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property .the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2016 , and 2015 included $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2273 million , net of $ 1189 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases .a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income .future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2016 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . millions | operatingleases | capitalleases
2017 | $ 461 | $ 221
2018 | 390 | 193
2019 | 348 | 179
2020 | 285 | 187
2021 | 245 | 158
later years | 1314 | 417
total minimum lease payments | $ 3043 | $ 1355
amount representing interest | n/a | -250 ( 250 )
present value of minimum lease payments | n/a | $ 1105 approximately 96% ( 96 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives .rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 535 million in 2016 , $ 590 million in 2015 , and $ 593 million in 2014 .when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term .contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant .18 .commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries .we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity .to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated .we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters .personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year .we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims .the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents .under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements .we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work .our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments .approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 6% ( 6 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2016 .because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 290 million to $ 317 million .we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other .estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases?
Steps: Ask for number 3043
Answer: 3043.0
Question: what is it for capital leases?
Steps: Ask for number 1355
Answer: 1355.0
Question: what is the ratio of operating to capital?
Steps: divide(3043, 1355)
Answer: 2.24576
Question: what is that times 100?
| 224.57565 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
17 .leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property .the consolidated statements of financial position as of december 31 , 2016 , and 2015 included $ 1997 million , net of $ 1121 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2273 million , net of $ 1189 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases .a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income .future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2016 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases . millions | operatingleases | capitalleases
2017 | $ 461 | $ 221
2018 | 390 | 193
2019 | 348 | 179
2020 | 285 | 187
2021 | 245 | 158
later years | 1314 | 417
total minimum lease payments | $ 3043 | $ 1355
amount representing interest | n/a | -250 ( 250 )
present value of minimum lease payments | n/a | $ 1105 approximately 96% ( 96 % ) of capital lease payments relate to locomotives .rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 535 million in 2016 , $ 590 million in 2015 , and $ 593 million in 2014 .when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term .contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant .18 .commitments and contingencies asserted and unasserted claims 2013 various claims and lawsuits are pending against us and certain of our subsidiaries .we cannot fully determine the effect of all asserted and unasserted claims on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity .to the extent possible , we have recorded a liability where asserted and unasserted claims are considered probable and where such claims can be reasonably estimated .we do not expect that any known lawsuits , claims , environmental costs , commitments , contingent liabilities , or guarantees will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity after taking into account liabilities and insurance recoveries previously recorded for these matters .personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year .we use an actuarial analysis to measure the expense and liability , including unasserted claims .the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents .under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements .we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work .our personal injury liability is not discounted to present value due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of future payments .approximately 94% ( 94 % ) of the recorded liability is related to asserted claims and approximately 6% ( 6 % ) is related to unasserted claims at december 31 , 2016 .because of the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate outcome of personal injury claims , it is reasonably possible that future costs to settle these claims may range from approximately $ 290 million to $ 317 million .we record an accrual at the low end of the range as no amount of loss within the range is more probable than any other .estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation. .
Question: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases?
Steps: Ask for number 3043
Answer: 3043.0
Question: what is it for capital leases?
Steps: Ask for number 1355
Answer: 1355.0
Question: what is the ratio of operating to capital?
Steps: divide(3043, 1355)
Answer: 2.24576
Question: what is that times 100?
| convfinqa2639 |
worldwide distribution channels the following table presents the number of doors by geographic location , in which ralph lauren-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold to consumers in our primary channels of distribution as of march 31 , 2012 : location number of . location | number of doors
the americas | 6587
europe | 4377
asia | 83
total | 11047 in addition , american living and chaps-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold domestically through approximately 1800 doors as of march 31 , 2012 .we have three key wholesale customers that generate significant sales volume .for fiscal 2012 , these customers in the aggregate accounted for approximately 40% ( 40 % ) of total wholesale revenues , with macy 2019s , inc .representing approximately 20% ( 20 % ) of total wholesale revenues .our product brands are sold primarily through our own sales forces .our wholesale segment maintains its primary showrooms in new york city .in addition , we maintain regional showrooms in chicago , dallas , milan , paris , london , munich , madrid , stockholm and tokyo .shop-within-shops .as a critical element of our distribution to department stores , we and our licensing partners utilize shop-within-shops to enhance brand recognition , to permit more complete merchandising of our lines by the department stores and to differentiate the presentation of products .shop-within- shop fixed assets primarily include items such as customized freestanding fixtures , wall cases and components , decorative items and flooring .as of march 31 , 2012 , we had approximately 18000 shop-within-shops dedicated to our ralph lauren-branded wholesale products worldwide .the size of our shop-within-shops ranges from approximately 300 to 7400 square feet .we normally share in the cost of building-out these shop-within-shops with our wholesale customers .basic stock replenishment program .basic products such as knit shirts , chino pants , oxford cloth shirts , and selected accessories ( including footwear ) and home products can be ordered at any time through our basic stock replenishment programs .we generally ship these products within two-to-five days of order receipt .our retail segment as of march 31 , 2012 , our retail segment consisted of 379 stores worldwide , totaling approximately 2.9 million gross square feet , 474 concessions- based shop-within-shops and six e-commerce websites .the extension of our direct-to-consumer reach is a primary long-term strategic goal .ralph lauren retail stores our ralph lauren retail stores reinforce the luxury image and distinct sensibility of our brands and feature exclusive lines that are not sold in domestic department stores .we opened 10 new ralph lauren stores , acquired 3 previously licensed stores , and closed 16 ralph lauren stores in fiscal 2012 .our retail stores are primarily situated in major upscale street locations and upscale regional malls , generally in large urban markets. .
Question: as of march 31, 2012, what percentage of the total of worldwide distribution channels doors was from the americas?
| 0.59627 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
worldwide distribution channels the following table presents the number of doors by geographic location , in which ralph lauren-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold to consumers in our primary channels of distribution as of march 31 , 2012 : location number of . location | number of doors
the americas | 6587
europe | 4377
asia | 83
total | 11047 in addition , american living and chaps-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold domestically through approximately 1800 doors as of march 31 , 2012 .we have three key wholesale customers that generate significant sales volume .for fiscal 2012 , these customers in the aggregate accounted for approximately 40% ( 40 % ) of total wholesale revenues , with macy 2019s , inc .representing approximately 20% ( 20 % ) of total wholesale revenues .our product brands are sold primarily through our own sales forces .our wholesale segment maintains its primary showrooms in new york city .in addition , we maintain regional showrooms in chicago , dallas , milan , paris , london , munich , madrid , stockholm and tokyo .shop-within-shops .as a critical element of our distribution to department stores , we and our licensing partners utilize shop-within-shops to enhance brand recognition , to permit more complete merchandising of our lines by the department stores and to differentiate the presentation of products .shop-within- shop fixed assets primarily include items such as customized freestanding fixtures , wall cases and components , decorative items and flooring .as of march 31 , 2012 , we had approximately 18000 shop-within-shops dedicated to our ralph lauren-branded wholesale products worldwide .the size of our shop-within-shops ranges from approximately 300 to 7400 square feet .we normally share in the cost of building-out these shop-within-shops with our wholesale customers .basic stock replenishment program .basic products such as knit shirts , chino pants , oxford cloth shirts , and selected accessories ( including footwear ) and home products can be ordered at any time through our basic stock replenishment programs .we generally ship these products within two-to-five days of order receipt .our retail segment as of march 31 , 2012 , our retail segment consisted of 379 stores worldwide , totaling approximately 2.9 million gross square feet , 474 concessions- based shop-within-shops and six e-commerce websites .the extension of our direct-to-consumer reach is a primary long-term strategic goal .ralph lauren retail stores our ralph lauren retail stores reinforce the luxury image and distinct sensibility of our brands and feature exclusive lines that are not sold in domestic department stores .we opened 10 new ralph lauren stores , acquired 3 previously licensed stores , and closed 16 ralph lauren stores in fiscal 2012 .our retail stores are primarily situated in major upscale street locations and upscale regional malls , generally in large urban markets. .
Question: as of march 31, 2012, what percentage of the total of worldwide distribution channels doors was from the americas?
| convfinqa2640 |
worldwide distribution channels the following table presents the number of doors by geographic location , in which ralph lauren-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold to consumers in our primary channels of distribution as of march 31 , 2012 : location number of . location | number of doors
the americas | 6587
europe | 4377
asia | 83
total | 11047 in addition , american living and chaps-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold domestically through approximately 1800 doors as of march 31 , 2012 .we have three key wholesale customers that generate significant sales volume .for fiscal 2012 , these customers in the aggregate accounted for approximately 40% ( 40 % ) of total wholesale revenues , with macy 2019s , inc .representing approximately 20% ( 20 % ) of total wholesale revenues .our product brands are sold primarily through our own sales forces .our wholesale segment maintains its primary showrooms in new york city .in addition , we maintain regional showrooms in chicago , dallas , milan , paris , london , munich , madrid , stockholm and tokyo .shop-within-shops .as a critical element of our distribution to department stores , we and our licensing partners utilize shop-within-shops to enhance brand recognition , to permit more complete merchandising of our lines by the department stores and to differentiate the presentation of products .shop-within- shop fixed assets primarily include items such as customized freestanding fixtures , wall cases and components , decorative items and flooring .as of march 31 , 2012 , we had approximately 18000 shop-within-shops dedicated to our ralph lauren-branded wholesale products worldwide .the size of our shop-within-shops ranges from approximately 300 to 7400 square feet .we normally share in the cost of building-out these shop-within-shops with our wholesale customers .basic stock replenishment program .basic products such as knit shirts , chino pants , oxford cloth shirts , and selected accessories ( including footwear ) and home products can be ordered at any time through our basic stock replenishment programs .we generally ship these products within two-to-five days of order receipt .our retail segment as of march 31 , 2012 , our retail segment consisted of 379 stores worldwide , totaling approximately 2.9 million gross square feet , 474 concessions- based shop-within-shops and six e-commerce websites .the extension of our direct-to-consumer reach is a primary long-term strategic goal .ralph lauren retail stores our ralph lauren retail stores reinforce the luxury image and distinct sensibility of our brands and feature exclusive lines that are not sold in domestic department stores .we opened 10 new ralph lauren stores , acquired 3 previously licensed stores , and closed 16 ralph lauren stores in fiscal 2012 .our retail stores are primarily situated in major upscale street locations and upscale regional malls , generally in large urban markets. .
Question: as of march 31, 2012, what percentage of the total of worldwide distribution channels doors was from the americas?
Steps: divide(6587, 11047)
Answer: 0.59627
Question: and what percentage of them was from europe?
| 0.39622 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
worldwide distribution channels the following table presents the number of doors by geographic location , in which ralph lauren-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold to consumers in our primary channels of distribution as of march 31 , 2012 : location number of . location | number of doors
the americas | 6587
europe | 4377
asia | 83
total | 11047 in addition , american living and chaps-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold domestically through approximately 1800 doors as of march 31 , 2012 .we have three key wholesale customers that generate significant sales volume .for fiscal 2012 , these customers in the aggregate accounted for approximately 40% ( 40 % ) of total wholesale revenues , with macy 2019s , inc .representing approximately 20% ( 20 % ) of total wholesale revenues .our product brands are sold primarily through our own sales forces .our wholesale segment maintains its primary showrooms in new york city .in addition , we maintain regional showrooms in chicago , dallas , milan , paris , london , munich , madrid , stockholm and tokyo .shop-within-shops .as a critical element of our distribution to department stores , we and our licensing partners utilize shop-within-shops to enhance brand recognition , to permit more complete merchandising of our lines by the department stores and to differentiate the presentation of products .shop-within- shop fixed assets primarily include items such as customized freestanding fixtures , wall cases and components , decorative items and flooring .as of march 31 , 2012 , we had approximately 18000 shop-within-shops dedicated to our ralph lauren-branded wholesale products worldwide .the size of our shop-within-shops ranges from approximately 300 to 7400 square feet .we normally share in the cost of building-out these shop-within-shops with our wholesale customers .basic stock replenishment program .basic products such as knit shirts , chino pants , oxford cloth shirts , and selected accessories ( including footwear ) and home products can be ordered at any time through our basic stock replenishment programs .we generally ship these products within two-to-five days of order receipt .our retail segment as of march 31 , 2012 , our retail segment consisted of 379 stores worldwide , totaling approximately 2.9 million gross square feet , 474 concessions- based shop-within-shops and six e-commerce websites .the extension of our direct-to-consumer reach is a primary long-term strategic goal .ralph lauren retail stores our ralph lauren retail stores reinforce the luxury image and distinct sensibility of our brands and feature exclusive lines that are not sold in domestic department stores .we opened 10 new ralph lauren stores , acquired 3 previously licensed stores , and closed 16 ralph lauren stores in fiscal 2012 .our retail stores are primarily situated in major upscale street locations and upscale regional malls , generally in large urban markets. .
Question: as of march 31, 2012, what percentage of the total of worldwide distribution channels doors was from the americas?
Steps: divide(6587, 11047)
Answer: 0.59627
Question: and what percentage of them was from europe?
| convfinqa2641 |
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 ( in mmboe ) . . | u.s . | canada | total
proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2013 | 258 | 443 | 701
extensions and discoveries | 153 | 8 | 161
revisions due to prices | -1 ( 1 ) | -34 ( 34 ) | -35 ( 35 )
revisions other than price | -61 ( 61 ) | 18 | -43 ( 43 )
sale of reserves | -4 ( 4 ) | -2 ( 2 ) | -6 ( 6 )
conversion to proved developed reserves | -40 ( 40 ) | -49 ( 49 ) | -89 ( 89 )
proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2014 | 305 | 384 | 689 at december 31 , 2014 , devon had 689 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves .this represents a 2 percent decrease as compared to 2013 and represents 25 percent of total proved reserves .drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 161 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 89 mmboe , or 13 percent , of the 2013 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves .costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were approximately $ 1.0 billion for 2014 .additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 43 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain u.s .onshore dry-gas areas , which devon does not expect to develop in the next five years .the largest revisions , which were approximately 69 mmboe , relate to the dry-gas areas in the barnett shale in north texas .a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2014 related to its jackfish operations .at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 384 mmboe and 441 mmboe , respectively .development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity .processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity and steam-oil ratios .furthermore , development of these projects involves the up-front construction of steam injection/distribution and bitumen processing facilities .due to the large up-front capital investments and large reserves required to provide economic returns , the project conditions meet the specific circumstances requiring a period greater than 5 years for conversion to developed reserves .as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years .currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 .price revisions 2014 2013 reserves increased 9 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices in the barnett shale and the anadarko basin , partially offset by higher bitumen prices , which result in lower after-royalty volumes , in canada .2013 2013 reserves increased 94 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices .of this increase , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 19 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area .2012 2013 reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices .of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area. .
Question: what was the change in the proved undeveloped reserves from 2013 to 2014?
| -12.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 ( in mmboe ) . . | u.s . | canada | total
proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2013 | 258 | 443 | 701
extensions and discoveries | 153 | 8 | 161
revisions due to prices | -1 ( 1 ) | -34 ( 34 ) | -35 ( 35 )
revisions other than price | -61 ( 61 ) | 18 | -43 ( 43 )
sale of reserves | -4 ( 4 ) | -2 ( 2 ) | -6 ( 6 )
conversion to proved developed reserves | -40 ( 40 ) | -49 ( 49 ) | -89 ( 89 )
proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2014 | 305 | 384 | 689 at december 31 , 2014 , devon had 689 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves .this represents a 2 percent decrease as compared to 2013 and represents 25 percent of total proved reserves .drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 161 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 89 mmboe , or 13 percent , of the 2013 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves .costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were approximately $ 1.0 billion for 2014 .additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 43 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain u.s .onshore dry-gas areas , which devon does not expect to develop in the next five years .the largest revisions , which were approximately 69 mmboe , relate to the dry-gas areas in the barnett shale in north texas .a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2014 related to its jackfish operations .at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 384 mmboe and 441 mmboe , respectively .development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity .processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity and steam-oil ratios .furthermore , development of these projects involves the up-front construction of steam injection/distribution and bitumen processing facilities .due to the large up-front capital investments and large reserves required to provide economic returns , the project conditions meet the specific circumstances requiring a period greater than 5 years for conversion to developed reserves .as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years .currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 .price revisions 2014 2013 reserves increased 9 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices in the barnett shale and the anadarko basin , partially offset by higher bitumen prices , which result in lower after-royalty volumes , in canada .2013 2013 reserves increased 94 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices .of this increase , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 19 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area .2012 2013 reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices .of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area. .
Question: what was the change in the proved undeveloped reserves from 2013 to 2014?
| convfinqa2642 |
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 ( in mmboe ) . . | u.s . | canada | total
proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2013 | 258 | 443 | 701
extensions and discoveries | 153 | 8 | 161
revisions due to prices | -1 ( 1 ) | -34 ( 34 ) | -35 ( 35 )
revisions other than price | -61 ( 61 ) | 18 | -43 ( 43 )
sale of reserves | -4 ( 4 ) | -2 ( 2 ) | -6 ( 6 )
conversion to proved developed reserves | -40 ( 40 ) | -49 ( 49 ) | -89 ( 89 )
proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2014 | 305 | 384 | 689 at december 31 , 2014 , devon had 689 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves .this represents a 2 percent decrease as compared to 2013 and represents 25 percent of total proved reserves .drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 161 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 89 mmboe , or 13 percent , of the 2013 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves .costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were approximately $ 1.0 billion for 2014 .additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 43 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain u.s .onshore dry-gas areas , which devon does not expect to develop in the next five years .the largest revisions , which were approximately 69 mmboe , relate to the dry-gas areas in the barnett shale in north texas .a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2014 related to its jackfish operations .at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 384 mmboe and 441 mmboe , respectively .development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity .processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity and steam-oil ratios .furthermore , development of these projects involves the up-front construction of steam injection/distribution and bitumen processing facilities .due to the large up-front capital investments and large reserves required to provide economic returns , the project conditions meet the specific circumstances requiring a period greater than 5 years for conversion to developed reserves .as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years .currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 .price revisions 2014 2013 reserves increased 9 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices in the barnett shale and the anadarko basin , partially offset by higher bitumen prices , which result in lower after-royalty volumes , in canada .2013 2013 reserves increased 94 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices .of this increase , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 19 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area .2012 2013 reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices .of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area. .
Question: what was the change in the proved undeveloped reserves from 2013 to 2014?
Steps: subtract(689, 701)
Answer: -12.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the proved undeveloped reserves in 2013, in percentage?
| -0.01712 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 ( in mmboe ) . . | u.s . | canada | total
proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2013 | 258 | 443 | 701
extensions and discoveries | 153 | 8 | 161
revisions due to prices | -1 ( 1 ) | -34 ( 34 ) | -35 ( 35 )
revisions other than price | -61 ( 61 ) | 18 | -43 ( 43 )
sale of reserves | -4 ( 4 ) | -2 ( 2 ) | -6 ( 6 )
conversion to proved developed reserves | -40 ( 40 ) | -49 ( 49 ) | -89 ( 89 )
proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2014 | 305 | 384 | 689 at december 31 , 2014 , devon had 689 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves .this represents a 2 percent decrease as compared to 2013 and represents 25 percent of total proved reserves .drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 161 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 89 mmboe , or 13 percent , of the 2013 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves .costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were approximately $ 1.0 billion for 2014 .additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 43 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain u.s .onshore dry-gas areas , which devon does not expect to develop in the next five years .the largest revisions , which were approximately 69 mmboe , relate to the dry-gas areas in the barnett shale in north texas .a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2014 related to its jackfish operations .at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 384 mmboe and 441 mmboe , respectively .development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity .processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity and steam-oil ratios .furthermore , development of these projects involves the up-front construction of steam injection/distribution and bitumen processing facilities .due to the large up-front capital investments and large reserves required to provide economic returns , the project conditions meet the specific circumstances requiring a period greater than 5 years for conversion to developed reserves .as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years .currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 .price revisions 2014 2013 reserves increased 9 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices in the barnett shale and the anadarko basin , partially offset by higher bitumen prices , which result in lower after-royalty volumes , in canada .2013 2013 reserves increased 94 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices .of this increase , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 19 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area .2012 2013 reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices .of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area. .
Question: what was the change in the proved undeveloped reserves from 2013 to 2014?
Steps: subtract(689, 701)
Answer: -12.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the proved undeveloped reserves in 2013, in percentage?
| convfinqa2643 |
for additional information on segment results see page 43 .income from equity method investments increased by $ 126 million in 2006 from 2005 and increased by $ 98 million in 2005 from 2004 .income from our lpg operations in equatorial guinea increased in both periods due to higher sales volumes as a result of the plant expansions completed in 2005 .the increase in 2005 also included higher ptc income as a result of higher distillate gross margins .cost of revenues increased $ 4.609 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 7.106 billion in 2005 from 2004 .in both periods the increases were primarily in the rm&t segment and resulted from increases in acquisition costs of crude oil , refinery charge and blend stocks and purchased refined products .the increase in both periods was also impacted by higher manufacturing expenses , primarily the result of higher contract services and labor costs in 2006 and higher purchased energy costs in 2005 .purchases related to matching buy/sell transactions decreased $ 6.968 billion in 2006 from 2005 and increased $ 3.314 billion in 2005 from 2004 , mostly in the rm&t segment .the decrease in 2006 was primarily related to the change in accounting for matching buy/sell transactions discussed above .the increase in 2005 was primarily due to increased crude oil prices .depreciation , depletion and amortization increased $ 215 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 125 million in 2005 from 2004 .rm&t segment depreciation expense increased in both years as a result of the increase in asset value recorded for our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 .in addition , the detroit refinery expansion completed in the fourth quarter of 2005 contributed to the rm&t depreciation expense increase in 2006 .e&p segment depreciation expense for 2006 included a $ 20 million impairment of capitalized costs related to the camden hills field in the gulf of mexico and the associated canyon express pipeline .natural gas production from the camden hills field ended in 2006 as a result of increased water production from the well .selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 73 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 134 million in 2005 from 2004 .the 2006 increase was primarily because personnel and staffing costs increased throughout the year primarily as a result of variable compensation arrangements and increased business activity .partially offsetting these increases were reductions in stock-based compensation expense .the increase in 2005 was primarily a result of increased stock-based compensation expense , due to the increase in our stock price during that year as well as an increase in equity-based awards , which was partially offset by a decrease in expense as a result of severance and pension plan curtailment charges and start-up costs related to egholdings in 2004 .exploration expenses increased $ 148 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 59 million in 2005 from 2004 .exploration expense related to dry wells and other write-offs totaled $ 166 million , $ 111 million and $ 47 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .exploration expense in 2006 also included $ 47 million for exiting the cortland and empire leases in nova scotia .net interest and other financing costs ( income ) reflected a net $ 37 million of income for 2006 , a favorable change of $ 183 million from the net $ 146 million expense in 2005 .net interest and other financing costs decreased $ 16 million in 2005 from 2004 .the favorable changes in 2006 included increased interest income due to higher interest rates and average cash balances , foreign currency exchange gains , adjustments to interest on tax issues and greater capitalized interest .the decrease in expense for 2005 was primarily a result of increased interest income on higher average cash balances and greater capitalized interest , partially offset by increased interest on potential tax deficiencies and higher foreign exchange losses .included in net interest and other financing costs ( income ) are foreign currency gains of $ 16 million , losses of $ 17 million and gains of $ 9 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .minority interest in income of mpc decreased $ 148 million in 2005 from 2004 due to our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 .provision for income taxes increased $ 2.308 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 979 million in 2005 from 2004 , primarily due to the $ 4.259 billion and $ 2.691 billion increases in income from continuing operations before income taxes .the increase in our effective income tax rate in 2006 was primarily a result of the income taxes related to our libyan operations , where the statutory income tax rate is in excess of 90 percent .the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for continuing operations for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .see note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. . | 2006 | 2005 | 2004
statutory u.s . income tax rate | 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) | 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) | 35.0% ( 35.0 % )
effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits | 9.9 | -0.8 ( 0.8 ) | 0.5
state and local income taxes net of federal income tax effects | 1.9 | 2.5 | 1.6
other tax effects | -2.0 ( 2.0 ) | -0.4 ( 0.4 ) | -0.9 ( 0.9 )
effective income tax rate for continuing operations | 44.8% ( 44.8 % ) | 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) | 36.2% ( 36.2 % ) .
Question: what was the net change in foreign operations including foreign tax credits from 2004 to 2006?
| 9.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
for additional information on segment results see page 43 .income from equity method investments increased by $ 126 million in 2006 from 2005 and increased by $ 98 million in 2005 from 2004 .income from our lpg operations in equatorial guinea increased in both periods due to higher sales volumes as a result of the plant expansions completed in 2005 .the increase in 2005 also included higher ptc income as a result of higher distillate gross margins .cost of revenues increased $ 4.609 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 7.106 billion in 2005 from 2004 .in both periods the increases were primarily in the rm&t segment and resulted from increases in acquisition costs of crude oil , refinery charge and blend stocks and purchased refined products .the increase in both periods was also impacted by higher manufacturing expenses , primarily the result of higher contract services and labor costs in 2006 and higher purchased energy costs in 2005 .purchases related to matching buy/sell transactions decreased $ 6.968 billion in 2006 from 2005 and increased $ 3.314 billion in 2005 from 2004 , mostly in the rm&t segment .the decrease in 2006 was primarily related to the change in accounting for matching buy/sell transactions discussed above .the increase in 2005 was primarily due to increased crude oil prices .depreciation , depletion and amortization increased $ 215 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 125 million in 2005 from 2004 .rm&t segment depreciation expense increased in both years as a result of the increase in asset value recorded for our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 .in addition , the detroit refinery expansion completed in the fourth quarter of 2005 contributed to the rm&t depreciation expense increase in 2006 .e&p segment depreciation expense for 2006 included a $ 20 million impairment of capitalized costs related to the camden hills field in the gulf of mexico and the associated canyon express pipeline .natural gas production from the camden hills field ended in 2006 as a result of increased water production from the well .selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 73 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 134 million in 2005 from 2004 .the 2006 increase was primarily because personnel and staffing costs increased throughout the year primarily as a result of variable compensation arrangements and increased business activity .partially offsetting these increases were reductions in stock-based compensation expense .the increase in 2005 was primarily a result of increased stock-based compensation expense , due to the increase in our stock price during that year as well as an increase in equity-based awards , which was partially offset by a decrease in expense as a result of severance and pension plan curtailment charges and start-up costs related to egholdings in 2004 .exploration expenses increased $ 148 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 59 million in 2005 from 2004 .exploration expense related to dry wells and other write-offs totaled $ 166 million , $ 111 million and $ 47 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .exploration expense in 2006 also included $ 47 million for exiting the cortland and empire leases in nova scotia .net interest and other financing costs ( income ) reflected a net $ 37 million of income for 2006 , a favorable change of $ 183 million from the net $ 146 million expense in 2005 .net interest and other financing costs decreased $ 16 million in 2005 from 2004 .the favorable changes in 2006 included increased interest income due to higher interest rates and average cash balances , foreign currency exchange gains , adjustments to interest on tax issues and greater capitalized interest .the decrease in expense for 2005 was primarily a result of increased interest income on higher average cash balances and greater capitalized interest , partially offset by increased interest on potential tax deficiencies and higher foreign exchange losses .included in net interest and other financing costs ( income ) are foreign currency gains of $ 16 million , losses of $ 17 million and gains of $ 9 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .minority interest in income of mpc decreased $ 148 million in 2005 from 2004 due to our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 .provision for income taxes increased $ 2.308 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 979 million in 2005 from 2004 , primarily due to the $ 4.259 billion and $ 2.691 billion increases in income from continuing operations before income taxes .the increase in our effective income tax rate in 2006 was primarily a result of the income taxes related to our libyan operations , where the statutory income tax rate is in excess of 90 percent .the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for continuing operations for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .see note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. . | 2006 | 2005 | 2004
statutory u.s . income tax rate | 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) | 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) | 35.0% ( 35.0 % )
effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits | 9.9 | -0.8 ( 0.8 ) | 0.5
state and local income taxes net of federal income tax effects | 1.9 | 2.5 | 1.6
other tax effects | -2.0 ( 2.0 ) | -0.4 ( 0.4 ) | -0.9 ( 0.9 )
effective income tax rate for continuing operations | 44.8% ( 44.8 % ) | 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) | 36.2% ( 36.2 % ) .
Question: what was the net change in foreign operations including foreign tax credits from 2004 to 2006?
| convfinqa2644 |
for additional information on segment results see page 43 .income from equity method investments increased by $ 126 million in 2006 from 2005 and increased by $ 98 million in 2005 from 2004 .income from our lpg operations in equatorial guinea increased in both periods due to higher sales volumes as a result of the plant expansions completed in 2005 .the increase in 2005 also included higher ptc income as a result of higher distillate gross margins .cost of revenues increased $ 4.609 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 7.106 billion in 2005 from 2004 .in both periods the increases were primarily in the rm&t segment and resulted from increases in acquisition costs of crude oil , refinery charge and blend stocks and purchased refined products .the increase in both periods was also impacted by higher manufacturing expenses , primarily the result of higher contract services and labor costs in 2006 and higher purchased energy costs in 2005 .purchases related to matching buy/sell transactions decreased $ 6.968 billion in 2006 from 2005 and increased $ 3.314 billion in 2005 from 2004 , mostly in the rm&t segment .the decrease in 2006 was primarily related to the change in accounting for matching buy/sell transactions discussed above .the increase in 2005 was primarily due to increased crude oil prices .depreciation , depletion and amortization increased $ 215 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 125 million in 2005 from 2004 .rm&t segment depreciation expense increased in both years as a result of the increase in asset value recorded for our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 .in addition , the detroit refinery expansion completed in the fourth quarter of 2005 contributed to the rm&t depreciation expense increase in 2006 .e&p segment depreciation expense for 2006 included a $ 20 million impairment of capitalized costs related to the camden hills field in the gulf of mexico and the associated canyon express pipeline .natural gas production from the camden hills field ended in 2006 as a result of increased water production from the well .selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 73 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 134 million in 2005 from 2004 .the 2006 increase was primarily because personnel and staffing costs increased throughout the year primarily as a result of variable compensation arrangements and increased business activity .partially offsetting these increases were reductions in stock-based compensation expense .the increase in 2005 was primarily a result of increased stock-based compensation expense , due to the increase in our stock price during that year as well as an increase in equity-based awards , which was partially offset by a decrease in expense as a result of severance and pension plan curtailment charges and start-up costs related to egholdings in 2004 .exploration expenses increased $ 148 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 59 million in 2005 from 2004 .exploration expense related to dry wells and other write-offs totaled $ 166 million , $ 111 million and $ 47 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .exploration expense in 2006 also included $ 47 million for exiting the cortland and empire leases in nova scotia .net interest and other financing costs ( income ) reflected a net $ 37 million of income for 2006 , a favorable change of $ 183 million from the net $ 146 million expense in 2005 .net interest and other financing costs decreased $ 16 million in 2005 from 2004 .the favorable changes in 2006 included increased interest income due to higher interest rates and average cash balances , foreign currency exchange gains , adjustments to interest on tax issues and greater capitalized interest .the decrease in expense for 2005 was primarily a result of increased interest income on higher average cash balances and greater capitalized interest , partially offset by increased interest on potential tax deficiencies and higher foreign exchange losses .included in net interest and other financing costs ( income ) are foreign currency gains of $ 16 million , losses of $ 17 million and gains of $ 9 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .minority interest in income of mpc decreased $ 148 million in 2005 from 2004 due to our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 .provision for income taxes increased $ 2.308 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 979 million in 2005 from 2004 , primarily due to the $ 4.259 billion and $ 2.691 billion increases in income from continuing operations before income taxes .the increase in our effective income tax rate in 2006 was primarily a result of the income taxes related to our libyan operations , where the statutory income tax rate is in excess of 90 percent .the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for continuing operations for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .see note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. . | 2006 | 2005 | 2004
statutory u.s . income tax rate | 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) | 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) | 35.0% ( 35.0 % )
effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits | 9.9 | -0.8 ( 0.8 ) | 0.5
state and local income taxes net of federal income tax effects | 1.9 | 2.5 | 1.6
other tax effects | -2.0 ( 2.0 ) | -0.4 ( 0.4 ) | -0.9 ( 0.9 )
effective income tax rate for continuing operations | 44.8% ( 44.8 % ) | 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) | 36.2% ( 36.2 % ) .
Question: what was the net change in foreign operations including foreign tax credits from 2004 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(9.9, 0.5)
Answer: 9.4
Question: what was the value of foreign operations including foreign tax credits in 2004?
| 0.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
for additional information on segment results see page 43 .income from equity method investments increased by $ 126 million in 2006 from 2005 and increased by $ 98 million in 2005 from 2004 .income from our lpg operations in equatorial guinea increased in both periods due to higher sales volumes as a result of the plant expansions completed in 2005 .the increase in 2005 also included higher ptc income as a result of higher distillate gross margins .cost of revenues increased $ 4.609 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 7.106 billion in 2005 from 2004 .in both periods the increases were primarily in the rm&t segment and resulted from increases in acquisition costs of crude oil , refinery charge and blend stocks and purchased refined products .the increase in both periods was also impacted by higher manufacturing expenses , primarily the result of higher contract services and labor costs in 2006 and higher purchased energy costs in 2005 .purchases related to matching buy/sell transactions decreased $ 6.968 billion in 2006 from 2005 and increased $ 3.314 billion in 2005 from 2004 , mostly in the rm&t segment .the decrease in 2006 was primarily related to the change in accounting for matching buy/sell transactions discussed above .the increase in 2005 was primarily due to increased crude oil prices .depreciation , depletion and amortization increased $ 215 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 125 million in 2005 from 2004 .rm&t segment depreciation expense increased in both years as a result of the increase in asset value recorded for our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 .in addition , the detroit refinery expansion completed in the fourth quarter of 2005 contributed to the rm&t depreciation expense increase in 2006 .e&p segment depreciation expense for 2006 included a $ 20 million impairment of capitalized costs related to the camden hills field in the gulf of mexico and the associated canyon express pipeline .natural gas production from the camden hills field ended in 2006 as a result of increased water production from the well .selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 73 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 134 million in 2005 from 2004 .the 2006 increase was primarily because personnel and staffing costs increased throughout the year primarily as a result of variable compensation arrangements and increased business activity .partially offsetting these increases were reductions in stock-based compensation expense .the increase in 2005 was primarily a result of increased stock-based compensation expense , due to the increase in our stock price during that year as well as an increase in equity-based awards , which was partially offset by a decrease in expense as a result of severance and pension plan curtailment charges and start-up costs related to egholdings in 2004 .exploration expenses increased $ 148 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 59 million in 2005 from 2004 .exploration expense related to dry wells and other write-offs totaled $ 166 million , $ 111 million and $ 47 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .exploration expense in 2006 also included $ 47 million for exiting the cortland and empire leases in nova scotia .net interest and other financing costs ( income ) reflected a net $ 37 million of income for 2006 , a favorable change of $ 183 million from the net $ 146 million expense in 2005 .net interest and other financing costs decreased $ 16 million in 2005 from 2004 .the favorable changes in 2006 included increased interest income due to higher interest rates and average cash balances , foreign currency exchange gains , adjustments to interest on tax issues and greater capitalized interest .the decrease in expense for 2005 was primarily a result of increased interest income on higher average cash balances and greater capitalized interest , partially offset by increased interest on potential tax deficiencies and higher foreign exchange losses .included in net interest and other financing costs ( income ) are foreign currency gains of $ 16 million , losses of $ 17 million and gains of $ 9 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .minority interest in income of mpc decreased $ 148 million in 2005 from 2004 due to our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 .provision for income taxes increased $ 2.308 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 979 million in 2005 from 2004 , primarily due to the $ 4.259 billion and $ 2.691 billion increases in income from continuing operations before income taxes .the increase in our effective income tax rate in 2006 was primarily a result of the income taxes related to our libyan operations , where the statutory income tax rate is in excess of 90 percent .the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for continuing operations for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .see note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. . | 2006 | 2005 | 2004
statutory u.s . income tax rate | 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) | 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) | 35.0% ( 35.0 % )
effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits | 9.9 | -0.8 ( 0.8 ) | 0.5
state and local income taxes net of federal income tax effects | 1.9 | 2.5 | 1.6
other tax effects | -2.0 ( 2.0 ) | -0.4 ( 0.4 ) | -0.9 ( 0.9 )
effective income tax rate for continuing operations | 44.8% ( 44.8 % ) | 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) | 36.2% ( 36.2 % ) .
Question: what was the net change in foreign operations including foreign tax credits from 2004 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(9.9, 0.5)
Answer: 9.4
Question: what was the value of foreign operations including foreign tax credits in 2004?
| convfinqa2645 |
for additional information on segment results see page 43 .income from equity method investments increased by $ 126 million in 2006 from 2005 and increased by $ 98 million in 2005 from 2004 .income from our lpg operations in equatorial guinea increased in both periods due to higher sales volumes as a result of the plant expansions completed in 2005 .the increase in 2005 also included higher ptc income as a result of higher distillate gross margins .cost of revenues increased $ 4.609 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 7.106 billion in 2005 from 2004 .in both periods the increases were primarily in the rm&t segment and resulted from increases in acquisition costs of crude oil , refinery charge and blend stocks and purchased refined products .the increase in both periods was also impacted by higher manufacturing expenses , primarily the result of higher contract services and labor costs in 2006 and higher purchased energy costs in 2005 .purchases related to matching buy/sell transactions decreased $ 6.968 billion in 2006 from 2005 and increased $ 3.314 billion in 2005 from 2004 , mostly in the rm&t segment .the decrease in 2006 was primarily related to the change in accounting for matching buy/sell transactions discussed above .the increase in 2005 was primarily due to increased crude oil prices .depreciation , depletion and amortization increased $ 215 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 125 million in 2005 from 2004 .rm&t segment depreciation expense increased in both years as a result of the increase in asset value recorded for our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 .in addition , the detroit refinery expansion completed in the fourth quarter of 2005 contributed to the rm&t depreciation expense increase in 2006 .e&p segment depreciation expense for 2006 included a $ 20 million impairment of capitalized costs related to the camden hills field in the gulf of mexico and the associated canyon express pipeline .natural gas production from the camden hills field ended in 2006 as a result of increased water production from the well .selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 73 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 134 million in 2005 from 2004 .the 2006 increase was primarily because personnel and staffing costs increased throughout the year primarily as a result of variable compensation arrangements and increased business activity .partially offsetting these increases were reductions in stock-based compensation expense .the increase in 2005 was primarily a result of increased stock-based compensation expense , due to the increase in our stock price during that year as well as an increase in equity-based awards , which was partially offset by a decrease in expense as a result of severance and pension plan curtailment charges and start-up costs related to egholdings in 2004 .exploration expenses increased $ 148 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 59 million in 2005 from 2004 .exploration expense related to dry wells and other write-offs totaled $ 166 million , $ 111 million and $ 47 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .exploration expense in 2006 also included $ 47 million for exiting the cortland and empire leases in nova scotia .net interest and other financing costs ( income ) reflected a net $ 37 million of income for 2006 , a favorable change of $ 183 million from the net $ 146 million expense in 2005 .net interest and other financing costs decreased $ 16 million in 2005 from 2004 .the favorable changes in 2006 included increased interest income due to higher interest rates and average cash balances , foreign currency exchange gains , adjustments to interest on tax issues and greater capitalized interest .the decrease in expense for 2005 was primarily a result of increased interest income on higher average cash balances and greater capitalized interest , partially offset by increased interest on potential tax deficiencies and higher foreign exchange losses .included in net interest and other financing costs ( income ) are foreign currency gains of $ 16 million , losses of $ 17 million and gains of $ 9 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .minority interest in income of mpc decreased $ 148 million in 2005 from 2004 due to our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 .provision for income taxes increased $ 2.308 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 979 million in 2005 from 2004 , primarily due to the $ 4.259 billion and $ 2.691 billion increases in income from continuing operations before income taxes .the increase in our effective income tax rate in 2006 was primarily a result of the income taxes related to our libyan operations , where the statutory income tax rate is in excess of 90 percent .the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for continuing operations for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .see note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. . | 2006 | 2005 | 2004
statutory u.s . income tax rate | 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) | 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) | 35.0% ( 35.0 % )
effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits | 9.9 | -0.8 ( 0.8 ) | 0.5
state and local income taxes net of federal income tax effects | 1.9 | 2.5 | 1.6
other tax effects | -2.0 ( 2.0 ) | -0.4 ( 0.4 ) | -0.9 ( 0.9 )
effective income tax rate for continuing operations | 44.8% ( 44.8 % ) | 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) | 36.2% ( 36.2 % ) .
Question: what was the net change in foreign operations including foreign tax credits from 2004 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(9.9, 0.5)
Answer: 9.4
Question: what was the value of foreign operations including foreign tax credits in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 0.5
Answer: 0.5
Question: what is the percent change?
| 18.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
for additional information on segment results see page 43 .income from equity method investments increased by $ 126 million in 2006 from 2005 and increased by $ 98 million in 2005 from 2004 .income from our lpg operations in equatorial guinea increased in both periods due to higher sales volumes as a result of the plant expansions completed in 2005 .the increase in 2005 also included higher ptc income as a result of higher distillate gross margins .cost of revenues increased $ 4.609 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 7.106 billion in 2005 from 2004 .in both periods the increases were primarily in the rm&t segment and resulted from increases in acquisition costs of crude oil , refinery charge and blend stocks and purchased refined products .the increase in both periods was also impacted by higher manufacturing expenses , primarily the result of higher contract services and labor costs in 2006 and higher purchased energy costs in 2005 .purchases related to matching buy/sell transactions decreased $ 6.968 billion in 2006 from 2005 and increased $ 3.314 billion in 2005 from 2004 , mostly in the rm&t segment .the decrease in 2006 was primarily related to the change in accounting for matching buy/sell transactions discussed above .the increase in 2005 was primarily due to increased crude oil prices .depreciation , depletion and amortization increased $ 215 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 125 million in 2005 from 2004 .rm&t segment depreciation expense increased in both years as a result of the increase in asset value recorded for our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 .in addition , the detroit refinery expansion completed in the fourth quarter of 2005 contributed to the rm&t depreciation expense increase in 2006 .e&p segment depreciation expense for 2006 included a $ 20 million impairment of capitalized costs related to the camden hills field in the gulf of mexico and the associated canyon express pipeline .natural gas production from the camden hills field ended in 2006 as a result of increased water production from the well .selling , general and administrative expenses increased $ 73 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 134 million in 2005 from 2004 .the 2006 increase was primarily because personnel and staffing costs increased throughout the year primarily as a result of variable compensation arrangements and increased business activity .partially offsetting these increases were reductions in stock-based compensation expense .the increase in 2005 was primarily a result of increased stock-based compensation expense , due to the increase in our stock price during that year as well as an increase in equity-based awards , which was partially offset by a decrease in expense as a result of severance and pension plan curtailment charges and start-up costs related to egholdings in 2004 .exploration expenses increased $ 148 million in 2006 from 2005 and $ 59 million in 2005 from 2004 .exploration expense related to dry wells and other write-offs totaled $ 166 million , $ 111 million and $ 47 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .exploration expense in 2006 also included $ 47 million for exiting the cortland and empire leases in nova scotia .net interest and other financing costs ( income ) reflected a net $ 37 million of income for 2006 , a favorable change of $ 183 million from the net $ 146 million expense in 2005 .net interest and other financing costs decreased $ 16 million in 2005 from 2004 .the favorable changes in 2006 included increased interest income due to higher interest rates and average cash balances , foreign currency exchange gains , adjustments to interest on tax issues and greater capitalized interest .the decrease in expense for 2005 was primarily a result of increased interest income on higher average cash balances and greater capitalized interest , partially offset by increased interest on potential tax deficiencies and higher foreign exchange losses .included in net interest and other financing costs ( income ) are foreign currency gains of $ 16 million , losses of $ 17 million and gains of $ 9 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .minority interest in income of mpc decreased $ 148 million in 2005 from 2004 due to our acquisition of the 38 percent interest in mpc on june 30 , 2005 .provision for income taxes increased $ 2.308 billion in 2006 from 2005 and $ 979 million in 2005 from 2004 , primarily due to the $ 4.259 billion and $ 2.691 billion increases in income from continuing operations before income taxes .the increase in our effective income tax rate in 2006 was primarily a result of the income taxes related to our libyan operations , where the statutory income tax rate is in excess of 90 percent .the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for continuing operations for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .see note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion. . | 2006 | 2005 | 2004
statutory u.s . income tax rate | 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) | 35.0% ( 35.0 % ) | 35.0% ( 35.0 % )
effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits | 9.9 | -0.8 ( 0.8 ) | 0.5
state and local income taxes net of federal income tax effects | 1.9 | 2.5 | 1.6
other tax effects | -2.0 ( 2.0 ) | -0.4 ( 0.4 ) | -0.9 ( 0.9 )
effective income tax rate for continuing operations | 44.8% ( 44.8 % ) | 36.3% ( 36.3 % ) | 36.2% ( 36.2 % ) .
Question: what was the net change in foreign operations including foreign tax credits from 2004 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(9.9, 0.5)
Answer: 9.4
Question: what was the value of foreign operations including foreign tax credits in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 0.5
Answer: 0.5
Question: what is the percent change?
| convfinqa2646 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions .this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization .on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date .on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 .on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .table 61 : share repurchases . for the years ended december 31 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
shares authorized for repurchase at january 1 | 63046682 | 19201518 | 19201518
additional authorizations ( a ) | 45541057 | 86269178 | -
share repurchases ( b ) | -65516126 ( 65516126 ) | -42424014 ( 42424014 ) | -
shares authorized for repurchase at december 31 | 43071613 | 63046682 | 19201518
average price paid per share | $ 18.80 | $ 14.82 | n/a ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction .the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date .this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp .( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans .these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization .stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions .the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios .the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy .the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements .the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan .additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon .the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa .large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules .the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions .in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar .for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions .the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders .if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2013?
| 18.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions .this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization .on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date .on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 .on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .table 61 : share repurchases . for the years ended december 31 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
shares authorized for repurchase at january 1 | 63046682 | 19201518 | 19201518
additional authorizations ( a ) | 45541057 | 86269178 | -
share repurchases ( b ) | -65516126 ( 65516126 ) | -42424014 ( 42424014 ) | -
shares authorized for repurchase at december 31 | 43071613 | 63046682 | 19201518
average price paid per share | $ 18.80 | $ 14.82 | n/a ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction .the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date .this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp .( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans .these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization .stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions .the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios .the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy .the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements .the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan .additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon .the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa .large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules .the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions .in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar .for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions .the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders .if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2013?
| convfinqa2647 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions .this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization .on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date .on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 .on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .table 61 : share repurchases . for the years ended december 31 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
shares authorized for repurchase at january 1 | 63046682 | 19201518 | 19201518
additional authorizations ( a ) | 45541057 | 86269178 | -
share repurchases ( b ) | -65516126 ( 65516126 ) | -42424014 ( 42424014 ) | -
shares authorized for repurchase at december 31 | 43071613 | 63046682 | 19201518
average price paid per share | $ 18.80 | $ 14.82 | n/a ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction .the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date .this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp .( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans .these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization .stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions .the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios .the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy .the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements .the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan .additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon .the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa .large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules .the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions .in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar .for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions .the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders .if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 18.80
Answer: 18.8
Question: what about in 2012?
| 14.82 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions .this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization .on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date .on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 .on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .table 61 : share repurchases . for the years ended december 31 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
shares authorized for repurchase at january 1 | 63046682 | 19201518 | 19201518
additional authorizations ( a ) | 45541057 | 86269178 | -
share repurchases ( b ) | -65516126 ( 65516126 ) | -42424014 ( 42424014 ) | -
shares authorized for repurchase at december 31 | 43071613 | 63046682 | 19201518
average price paid per share | $ 18.80 | $ 14.82 | n/a ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction .the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date .this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp .( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans .these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization .stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions .the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios .the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy .the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements .the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan .additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon .the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa .large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules .the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions .in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar .for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions .the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders .if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 18.80
Answer: 18.8
Question: what about in 2012?
| convfinqa2648 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions .this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization .on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date .on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 .on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .table 61 : share repurchases . for the years ended december 31 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
shares authorized for repurchase at january 1 | 63046682 | 19201518 | 19201518
additional authorizations ( a ) | 45541057 | 86269178 | -
share repurchases ( b ) | -65516126 ( 65516126 ) | -42424014 ( 42424014 ) | -
shares authorized for repurchase at december 31 | 43071613 | 63046682 | 19201518
average price paid per share | $ 18.80 | $ 14.82 | n/a ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction .the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date .this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp .( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans .these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization .stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions .the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios .the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy .the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements .the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan .additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon .the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa .large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules .the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions .in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar .for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions .the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders .if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 18.80
Answer: 18.8
Question: what about in 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 14.82
Answer: 14.82
Question: what is the net change in value of the price paid per share?
| 3.98 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions .this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization .on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date .on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 .on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .table 61 : share repurchases . for the years ended december 31 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
shares authorized for repurchase at january 1 | 63046682 | 19201518 | 19201518
additional authorizations ( a ) | 45541057 | 86269178 | -
share repurchases ( b ) | -65516126 ( 65516126 ) | -42424014 ( 42424014 ) | -
shares authorized for repurchase at december 31 | 43071613 | 63046682 | 19201518
average price paid per share | $ 18.80 | $ 14.82 | n/a ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction .the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date .this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp .( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans .these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization .stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions .the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios .the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy .the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements .the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan .additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon .the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa .large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules .the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions .in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar .for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions .the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders .if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 18.80
Answer: 18.8
Question: what about in 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 14.82
Answer: 14.82
Question: what is the net change in value of the price paid per share?
| convfinqa2649 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions .this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization .on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date .on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 .on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .table 61 : share repurchases . for the years ended december 31 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
shares authorized for repurchase at january 1 | 63046682 | 19201518 | 19201518
additional authorizations ( a ) | 45541057 | 86269178 | -
share repurchases ( b ) | -65516126 ( 65516126 ) | -42424014 ( 42424014 ) | -
shares authorized for repurchase at december 31 | 43071613 | 63046682 | 19201518
average price paid per share | $ 18.80 | $ 14.82 | n/a ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction .the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date .this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp .( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans .these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization .stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions .the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios .the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy .the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements .the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan .additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon .the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa .large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules .the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions .in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar .for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions .the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders .if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 18.80
Answer: 18.8
Question: what about in 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 14.82
Answer: 14.82
Question: what is the net change in value of the price paid per share?
Steps: subtract(18.80, 14.82)
Answer: 3.98
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2012?
| 14.82 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions .this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization .on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date .on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 .on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .table 61 : share repurchases . for the years ended december 31 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
shares authorized for repurchase at january 1 | 63046682 | 19201518 | 19201518
additional authorizations ( a ) | 45541057 | 86269178 | -
share repurchases ( b ) | -65516126 ( 65516126 ) | -42424014 ( 42424014 ) | -
shares authorized for repurchase at december 31 | 43071613 | 63046682 | 19201518
average price paid per share | $ 18.80 | $ 14.82 | n/a ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction .the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date .this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp .( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans .these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization .stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions .the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios .the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy .the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements .the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan .additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon .the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa .large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules .the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions .in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar .for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions .the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders .if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 18.80
Answer: 18.8
Question: what about in 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 14.82
Answer: 14.82
Question: what is the net change in value of the price paid per share?
Steps: subtract(18.80, 14.82)
Answer: 3.98
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2012?
| convfinqa2650 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions .this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization .on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date .on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 .on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .table 61 : share repurchases . for the years ended december 31 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
shares authorized for repurchase at january 1 | 63046682 | 19201518 | 19201518
additional authorizations ( a ) | 45541057 | 86269178 | -
share repurchases ( b ) | -65516126 ( 65516126 ) | -42424014 ( 42424014 ) | -
shares authorized for repurchase at december 31 | 43071613 | 63046682 | 19201518
average price paid per share | $ 18.80 | $ 14.82 | n/a ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction .the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date .this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp .( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans .these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization .stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions .the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios .the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy .the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements .the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan .additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon .the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa .large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules .the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions .in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar .for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions .the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders .if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 18.80
Answer: 18.8
Question: what about in 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 14.82
Answer: 14.82
Question: what is the net change in value of the price paid per share?
Steps: subtract(18.80, 14.82)
Answer: 3.98
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 14.82
Answer: 14.82
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.26856 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions .this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization .on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date .on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 .on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 .the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 .the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 .table 61 : share repurchases . for the years ended december 31 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
shares authorized for repurchase at january 1 | 63046682 | 19201518 | 19201518
additional authorizations ( a ) | 45541057 | 86269178 | -
share repurchases ( b ) | -65516126 ( 65516126 ) | -42424014 ( 42424014 ) | -
shares authorized for repurchase at december 31 | 43071613 | 63046682 | 19201518
average price paid per share | $ 18.80 | $ 14.82 | n/a ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction .the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date .this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp .( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans .these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization .stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions .the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios .the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy .the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements .the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan .additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon .the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa .large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules .the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions .in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar .for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions .the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders .if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 18.80
Answer: 18.8
Question: what about in 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 14.82
Answer: 14.82
Question: what is the net change in value of the price paid per share?
Steps: subtract(18.80, 14.82)
Answer: 3.98
Question: what is the price paid per share in 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 14.82
Answer: 14.82
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| convfinqa2651 |
amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions of dollars total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 . other commercial commitmentsmillions of dollars | total | amount of commitment expiration per period 2010 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2011 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2012 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2013 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2014 | amount of commitment expiration per period after 2014
credit facilities [a] | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ -
sale of receivables [b] | 600 | 600 | - | - | - | - | -
guarantees [c] | 416 | 29 | 76 | 24 | 8 | 214 | 65
standby letters of credit [d] | 22 | 22 | - | - | - | - | -
total commercial commitments | $ 2938 | $ 651 | $ 76 | $ 1924 | $ 8 | $ 214 | $ 65 [a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2009 .[b] $ 400 million of the sale of receivables program was utilized at december 31 , 2009 .[c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations .[d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2009 .off-balance sheet arrangements sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc .( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility .upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors .the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 600 million and $ 700 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 400 million and $ 584 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .during 2009 , upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables .the value of the undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements .the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively .this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements .the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution .if default or dilution ratios increase one percent , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would not change as of december 31 , 2009 .should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility .the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability , as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities .the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility .the costs of the sale of receivables program are included in other income and were $ 9 million , $ 23 million , and $ 35 million for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively .the costs include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability .the decrease in the 2009 costs was primarily attributable to lower commercial paper rates and a decrease in the outstanding interest held by investors. .
Question: what is the sum of the value of the interest retained by upri in 2008 and the value of the undivided interest held by investors?
| 1234.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions of dollars total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 . other commercial commitmentsmillions of dollars | total | amount of commitment expiration per period 2010 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2011 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2012 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2013 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2014 | amount of commitment expiration per period after 2014
credit facilities [a] | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ -
sale of receivables [b] | 600 | 600 | - | - | - | - | -
guarantees [c] | 416 | 29 | 76 | 24 | 8 | 214 | 65
standby letters of credit [d] | 22 | 22 | - | - | - | - | -
total commercial commitments | $ 2938 | $ 651 | $ 76 | $ 1924 | $ 8 | $ 214 | $ 65 [a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2009 .[b] $ 400 million of the sale of receivables program was utilized at december 31 , 2009 .[c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations .[d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2009 .off-balance sheet arrangements sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc .( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility .upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors .the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 600 million and $ 700 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 400 million and $ 584 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .during 2009 , upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables .the value of the undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements .the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively .this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements .the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution .if default or dilution ratios increase one percent , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would not change as of december 31 , 2009 .should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility .the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability , as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities .the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility .the costs of the sale of receivables program are included in other income and were $ 9 million , $ 23 million , and $ 35 million for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively .the costs include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability .the decrease in the 2009 costs was primarily attributable to lower commercial paper rates and a decrease in the outstanding interest held by investors. .
Question: what is the sum of the value of the interest retained by upri in 2008 and the value of the undivided interest held by investors?
| convfinqa2652 |
amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions of dollars total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 . other commercial commitmentsmillions of dollars | total | amount of commitment expiration per period 2010 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2011 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2012 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2013 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2014 | amount of commitment expiration per period after 2014
credit facilities [a] | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ -
sale of receivables [b] | 600 | 600 | - | - | - | - | -
guarantees [c] | 416 | 29 | 76 | 24 | 8 | 214 | 65
standby letters of credit [d] | 22 | 22 | - | - | - | - | -
total commercial commitments | $ 2938 | $ 651 | $ 76 | $ 1924 | $ 8 | $ 214 | $ 65 [a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2009 .[b] $ 400 million of the sale of receivables program was utilized at december 31 , 2009 .[c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations .[d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2009 .off-balance sheet arrangements sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc .( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility .upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors .the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 600 million and $ 700 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 400 million and $ 584 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .during 2009 , upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables .the value of the undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements .the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively .this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements .the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution .if default or dilution ratios increase one percent , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would not change as of december 31 , 2009 .should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility .the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability , as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities .the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility .the costs of the sale of receivables program are included in other income and were $ 9 million , $ 23 million , and $ 35 million for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively .the costs include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability .the decrease in the 2009 costs was primarily attributable to lower commercial paper rates and a decrease in the outstanding interest held by investors. .
Question: what is the sum of the value of the interest retained by upri in 2008 and the value of the undivided interest held by investors?
Steps: add(417, 817)
Answer: 1234.0
Question: how much did the railroad collect in servicing fees in 2009?
| 13.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions of dollars total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 . other commercial commitmentsmillions of dollars | total | amount of commitment expiration per period 2010 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2011 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2012 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2013 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2014 | amount of commitment expiration per period after 2014
credit facilities [a] | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ -
sale of receivables [b] | 600 | 600 | - | - | - | - | -
guarantees [c] | 416 | 29 | 76 | 24 | 8 | 214 | 65
standby letters of credit [d] | 22 | 22 | - | - | - | - | -
total commercial commitments | $ 2938 | $ 651 | $ 76 | $ 1924 | $ 8 | $ 214 | $ 65 [a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2009 .[b] $ 400 million of the sale of receivables program was utilized at december 31 , 2009 .[c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations .[d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2009 .off-balance sheet arrangements sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc .( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility .upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors .the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 600 million and $ 700 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 400 million and $ 584 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .during 2009 , upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables .the value of the undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements .the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively .this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements .the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution .if default or dilution ratios increase one percent , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would not change as of december 31 , 2009 .should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility .the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability , as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities .the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility .the costs of the sale of receivables program are included in other income and were $ 9 million , $ 23 million , and $ 35 million for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively .the costs include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability .the decrease in the 2009 costs was primarily attributable to lower commercial paper rates and a decrease in the outstanding interest held by investors. .
Question: what is the sum of the value of the interest retained by upri in 2008 and the value of the undivided interest held by investors?
Steps: add(417, 817)
Answer: 1234.0
Question: how much did the railroad collect in servicing fees in 2009?
| convfinqa2653 |
amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions of dollars total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 . other commercial commitmentsmillions of dollars | total | amount of commitment expiration per period 2010 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2011 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2012 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2013 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2014 | amount of commitment expiration per period after 2014
credit facilities [a] | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ -
sale of receivables [b] | 600 | 600 | - | - | - | - | -
guarantees [c] | 416 | 29 | 76 | 24 | 8 | 214 | 65
standby letters of credit [d] | 22 | 22 | - | - | - | - | -
total commercial commitments | $ 2938 | $ 651 | $ 76 | $ 1924 | $ 8 | $ 214 | $ 65 [a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2009 .[b] $ 400 million of the sale of receivables program was utilized at december 31 , 2009 .[c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations .[d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2009 .off-balance sheet arrangements sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc .( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility .upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors .the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 600 million and $ 700 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 400 million and $ 584 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .during 2009 , upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables .the value of the undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements .the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively .this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements .the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution .if default or dilution ratios increase one percent , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would not change as of december 31 , 2009 .should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility .the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability , as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities .the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility .the costs of the sale of receivables program are included in other income and were $ 9 million , $ 23 million , and $ 35 million for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively .the costs include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability .the decrease in the 2009 costs was primarily attributable to lower commercial paper rates and a decrease in the outstanding interest held by investors. .
Question: what is the sum of the value of the interest retained by upri in 2008 and the value of the undivided interest held by investors?
Steps: add(417, 817)
Answer: 1234.0
Question: how much did the railroad collect in servicing fees in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 13.8
Answer: 13.8
Question: what is that times 1000?
| 13800.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions of dollars total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 . other commercial commitmentsmillions of dollars | total | amount of commitment expiration per period 2010 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2011 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2012 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2013 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2014 | amount of commitment expiration per period after 2014
credit facilities [a] | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ -
sale of receivables [b] | 600 | 600 | - | - | - | - | -
guarantees [c] | 416 | 29 | 76 | 24 | 8 | 214 | 65
standby letters of credit [d] | 22 | 22 | - | - | - | - | -
total commercial commitments | $ 2938 | $ 651 | $ 76 | $ 1924 | $ 8 | $ 214 | $ 65 [a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2009 .[b] $ 400 million of the sale of receivables program was utilized at december 31 , 2009 .[c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations .[d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2009 .off-balance sheet arrangements sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc .( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility .upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors .the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 600 million and $ 700 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 400 million and $ 584 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .during 2009 , upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables .the value of the undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements .the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively .this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements .the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution .if default or dilution ratios increase one percent , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would not change as of december 31 , 2009 .should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility .the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability , as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities .the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility .the costs of the sale of receivables program are included in other income and were $ 9 million , $ 23 million , and $ 35 million for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively .the costs include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability .the decrease in the 2009 costs was primarily attributable to lower commercial paper rates and a decrease in the outstanding interest held by investors. .
Question: what is the sum of the value of the interest retained by upri in 2008 and the value of the undivided interest held by investors?
Steps: add(417, 817)
Answer: 1234.0
Question: how much did the railroad collect in servicing fees in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 13.8
Answer: 13.8
Question: what is that times 1000?
| convfinqa2654 |
amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions of dollars total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 . other commercial commitmentsmillions of dollars | total | amount of commitment expiration per period 2010 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2011 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2012 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2013 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2014 | amount of commitment expiration per period after 2014
credit facilities [a] | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ -
sale of receivables [b] | 600 | 600 | - | - | - | - | -
guarantees [c] | 416 | 29 | 76 | 24 | 8 | 214 | 65
standby letters of credit [d] | 22 | 22 | - | - | - | - | -
total commercial commitments | $ 2938 | $ 651 | $ 76 | $ 1924 | $ 8 | $ 214 | $ 65 [a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2009 .[b] $ 400 million of the sale of receivables program was utilized at december 31 , 2009 .[c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations .[d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2009 .off-balance sheet arrangements sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc .( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility .upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors .the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 600 million and $ 700 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 400 million and $ 584 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .during 2009 , upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables .the value of the undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements .the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively .this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements .the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution .if default or dilution ratios increase one percent , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would not change as of december 31 , 2009 .should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility .the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability , as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities .the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility .the costs of the sale of receivables program are included in other income and were $ 9 million , $ 23 million , and $ 35 million for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively .the costs include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability .the decrease in the 2009 costs was primarily attributable to lower commercial paper rates and a decrease in the outstanding interest held by investors. .
Question: what is the sum of the value of the interest retained by upri in 2008 and the value of the undivided interest held by investors?
Steps: add(417, 817)
Answer: 1234.0
Question: how much did the railroad collect in servicing fees in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 13.8
Answer: 13.8
Question: what is that times 1000?
Steps: multiply(13.8, const_1000)
Answer: 13800.0
Question: what is the ratio of the collected fees to the total sum?
| 11.18314 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
amount of commitment expiration per period other commercial commitments after millions of dollars total 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 . other commercial commitmentsmillions of dollars | total | amount of commitment expiration per period 2010 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2011 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2012 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2013 | amount of commitment expiration per period 2014 | amount of commitment expiration per period after 2014
credit facilities [a] | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ 1900 | $ - | $ - | $ -
sale of receivables [b] | 600 | 600 | - | - | - | - | -
guarantees [c] | 416 | 29 | 76 | 24 | 8 | 214 | 65
standby letters of credit [d] | 22 | 22 | - | - | - | - | -
total commercial commitments | $ 2938 | $ 651 | $ 76 | $ 1924 | $ 8 | $ 214 | $ 65 [a] none of the credit facility was used as of december 31 , 2009 .[b] $ 400 million of the sale of receivables program was utilized at december 31 , 2009 .[c] includes guaranteed obligations related to our headquarters building , equipment financings , and affiliated operations .[d] none of the letters of credit were drawn upon as of december 31 , 2009 .off-balance sheet arrangements sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc .( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility .upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors .the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 600 million and $ 700 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 400 million and $ 584 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .during 2009 , upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables .the value of the undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements .the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 817 million and $ 1015 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 417 million and $ 431 million , respectively .this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements .the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction .the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution .if default or dilution ratios increase one percent , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would not change as of december 31 , 2009 .should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility .the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability , as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities .the railroad collected approximately $ 13.8 billion and $ 17.8 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility .the costs of the sale of receivables program are included in other income and were $ 9 million , $ 23 million , and $ 35 million for 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively .the costs include interest , which will vary based on prevailing commercial paper rates , program fees paid to banks , commercial paper issuing costs , and fees for unused commitment availability .the decrease in the 2009 costs was primarily attributable to lower commercial paper rates and a decrease in the outstanding interest held by investors. .
Question: what is the sum of the value of the interest retained by upri in 2008 and the value of the undivided interest held by investors?
Steps: add(417, 817)
Answer: 1234.0
Question: how much did the railroad collect in servicing fees in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 13.8
Answer: 13.8
Question: what is that times 1000?
Steps: multiply(13.8, const_1000)
Answer: 13800.0
Question: what is the ratio of the collected fees to the total sum?
| convfinqa2655 |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
| 1540000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
| convfinqa2656 |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
Steps: Ask for number 1540000
Answer: 1540000.0
Question: and what was it in 2000?
| 1593000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
Steps: Ask for number 1540000
Answer: 1540000.0
Question: and what was it in 2000?
| convfinqa2657 |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
Steps: Ask for number 1540000
Answer: 1540000.0
Question: and what was it in 2000?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: 1593000.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| -53000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
Steps: Ask for number 1540000
Answer: 1540000.0
Question: and what was it in 2000?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: 1593000.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| convfinqa2658 |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
Steps: Ask for number 1540000
Answer: 1540000.0
Question: and what was it in 2000?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: 1593000.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(1540000, 1593000)
Answer: -53000.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2000 contributions?
| -0.03327 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
Steps: Ask for number 1540000
Answer: 1540000.0
Question: and what was it in 2000?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: 1593000.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(1540000, 1593000)
Answer: -53000.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2000 contributions?
| convfinqa2659 |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
Steps: Ask for number 1540000
Answer: 1540000.0
Question: and what was it in 2000?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: 1593000.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(1540000, 1593000)
Answer: -53000.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2000 contributions?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: -0.03327
Question: and for 2001 and the subsequent year, what was the total of 401 (k) contributions?
| 2519000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
Steps: Ask for number 1540000
Answer: 1540000.0
Question: and what was it in 2000?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: 1593000.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(1540000, 1593000)
Answer: -53000.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2000 contributions?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: -0.03327
Question: and for 2001 and the subsequent year, what was the total of 401 (k) contributions?
| convfinqa2660 |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
Steps: Ask for number 1540000
Answer: 1540000.0
Question: and what was it in 2000?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: 1593000.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(1540000, 1593000)
Answer: -53000.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2000 contributions?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: -0.03327
Question: and for 2001 and the subsequent year, what was the total of 401 (k) contributions?
Steps: divide(#0, 1593000)
Answer: 2519000.0
Question: including 2000, what becomes this total?
| 4112000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
Steps: Ask for number 1540000
Answer: 1540000.0
Question: and what was it in 2000?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: 1593000.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(1540000, 1593000)
Answer: -53000.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2000 contributions?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: -0.03327
Question: and for 2001 and the subsequent year, what was the total of 401 (k) contributions?
Steps: divide(#0, 1593000)
Answer: 2519000.0
Question: including 2000, what becomes this total?
| convfinqa2661 |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
Steps: Ask for number 1540000
Answer: 1540000.0
Question: and what was it in 2000?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: 1593000.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(1540000, 1593000)
Answer: -53000.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2000 contributions?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: -0.03327
Question: and for 2001 and the subsequent year, what was the total of 401 (k) contributions?
Steps: divide(#0, 1593000)
Answer: 2519000.0
Question: including 2000, what becomes this total?
Steps: add(979000, 1540000)
Answer: 4112000.0
Question: and what is the average between the three years?
| 1370666.66667 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of sfas no .123 to stock-based compensation .the estimated fair value of each option is calculated using the black-scholes option-pricing model ( in thousands , except per share amounts ) : . | 2002 | 2001 | 2000
net loss as reported | $ -1141879 ( 1141879 ) | $ -450094 ( 450094 ) | $ -194628 ( 194628 )
less : total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value basedmethod for all awards net of related tax effect | -38126 ( 38126 ) | -50540 ( 50540 ) | -51186 ( 51186 )
pro-forma net loss | $ -1180005 ( 1180005 ) | $ -500634 ( 500634 ) | $ -245814 ( 245814 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014as reported | $ -5.84 ( 5.84 ) | $ -2.35 ( 2.35 ) | $ -1.15 ( 1.15 )
basic and diluted net loss per share 2014pro-forma | $ -6.04 ( 6.04 ) | $ -2.61 ( 2.61 ) | $ -1.46 ( 1.46 ) fair value of financial instruments 2014as of december 31 , 2002 , the carrying amounts of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 210.9 million , $ 212.7 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 291.4 million , $ 187.2 million , $ 144.4 million and $ 780.0 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2001 , the carrying amount of the company 2019s 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) convertible notes , the 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) convertible notes , the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) convertible notes and the senior notes were approximately $ 450.0 million , $ 204.1 million , $ 212.8 million and $ 1.0 billion , respectively , and the fair values of such notes were $ 268.3 million , $ 173.1 million , $ 158.2 million and $ 805.0 million , respectively .fair values were determined based on quoted market prices .the carrying values of all other financial instruments reasonably approximate the related fair values as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 .retirement plan 2014the company has a 401 ( k ) plan covering substantially all employees who meet certain age and employment requirements .under the plan , the company matches 35% ( 35 % ) of participants 2019 contributions up to a maximum 5% ( 5 % ) of a participant 2019s compensation .the company contributed approximately $ 979000 , $ 1540000 and $ 1593000 to the plan for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 , respectively .recent accounting pronouncements 2014in june 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .143 , 201caccounting for asset retirement obligations . 201d this statement establishes accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of liabilities associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the related asset retirement costs .the requirements of sfas no .143 are effective for the company as of january 1 , 2003 .the company will adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2003 and does not expect the impact of adopting this statement to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations .in august 2001 , the fasb issued sfas no .144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets . 201d sfas no .144 supersedes sfas no .121 , 201caccounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of , 201d but retains many of its fundamental provisions .sfas no .144 also clarifies certain measurement and classification issues from sfas no .121 .in addition , sfas no .144 supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a business segment as found in apb no .30 , 201creporting the results of operations 2014reporting the effects of disposal of a segment of a business and extraordinary , unusual and infrequently occurring events and transactions 201d .however , sfas no .144 retains the requirement in apb no .30 to separately report discontinued operations , and broadens the scope of such requirement to include more types of disposal transactions .the scope of sfas no .144 excludes goodwill and other intangible assets that are not to be amortized , as the accounting for such items is prescribed by sfas no .142 .the company implemented sfas no .144 on january 1 , 2002 .accordingly , all relevant impairment assessments and decisions concerning discontinued operations have been made under this standard in 2002. .
Question: what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in 2001?
Steps: Ask for number 1540000
Answer: 1540000.0
Question: and what was it in 2000?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: 1593000.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(1540000, 1593000)
Answer: -53000.0
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2000 contributions?
Steps: Ask for number 1593000
Answer: -0.03327
Question: and for 2001 and the subsequent year, what was the total of 401 (k) contributions?
Steps: divide(#0, 1593000)
Answer: 2519000.0
Question: including 2000, what becomes this total?
Steps: add(979000, 1540000)
Answer: 4112000.0
Question: and what is the average between the three years?
| convfinqa2662 |
income tax expense . ( in millions ) | gaap 2017 | gaap 2016 | gaap 2015 | gaap 2017 | gaap 2016 | 2015
operating income ( 1 ) | $ 5272 | $ 4570 | $ 4664 | $ 5287 | $ 4674 | $ 4695
total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) | -32 ( 32 ) | -108 ( 108 ) | -69 ( 69 ) | -32 ( 32 ) | -108 ( 108 ) | -70 ( 70 )
income before income taxes ( 2 ) | $ 5240 | $ 4462 | $ 4595 | $ 5255 | $ 4566 | $ 4625
income tax expense ( 3 ) | $ 270 | $ 1290 | $ 1250 | $ 1539 | $ 1352 | $ 1312
effective tax rate ( 3 ) | 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) | 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) | 27.2% ( 27.2 % ) | 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) | 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) | 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) operating income ( 1 ) $ 5272 $ 4570 $ 4664 $ 5287 $ 4674 $ 4695 total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 69 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 70 ) income before income taxes ( 2 ) $ 5240 $ 4462 $ 4595 $ 5255 $ 4566 $ 4625 income tax expense ( 3 ) $ 270 $ 1290 $ 1250 $ 1539 $ 1352 $ 1312 effective tax rate ( 3 ) 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) 27.2% ( 27.2 % ) 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) ( 1 ) see non-gaap financial measures for further information on and reconciliation of as adjusted items .( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci .( 3 ) gaap income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2017 reflects $ 1.2 billion of a net tax benefit related to the 2017 tax act .the company 2019s tax rate is affected by tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income earned in those jurisdictions , which the company expects to be fairly consistent in the near term .the significant foreign jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates than the u.s .federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) include the united kingdom , channel islands , ireland and netherlands .2017 .income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 the following amounts related to the 2017 tax act : 2022 $ 106 million tax expense related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax assets ; 2022 $ 1758 million noncash tax benefit related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; 2022 $ 477 million tax expense related to the mandatory deemed repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings and profits .2022 a noncash expense of $ 16 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities as a result of domestic state and local tax changes ; and 2022 $ 173 million discrete tax benefits , primarily related to stock-based compensation awards , including $ 151 million related to the adoption of new accounting guidance related to stock-based compensation awards .see note 2 , significant accounting policies , for further information .the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) for 2017 excluded the noncash deferred tax revaluation benefit of $ 1758 million and noncash expense of $ 16 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented .in addition , the deemed repatriation tax expense of $ 477 million has been excluded from the as adjusted results due to the one-time nature and to ensure comparability among periods presented .2016 .income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 30 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 65 million of nonrecurring items , including the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters .the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) for 2016 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 30 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented .2015 .income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 54 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 75 million of nonrecurring items , primarily due to the realization of losses from changes in the company 2019s organizational tax structure and the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters .the as adjusted effective tax rate of 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) for 2015 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 54 million mentioned above , as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented .balance sheet overview as adjusted balance sheet the following table presents a reconciliation of the consolidated statement of financial condition presented on a gaap basis to the consolidated statement of financial condition , excluding the impact of separate account assets and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements ( directly related to lending separate account securities ) and separate account liabilities and separate account collateral liabilities under securities lending agreements and consolidated sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies .the company presents the as adjusted balance sheet as additional information to enable investors to exclude certain assets that have equal and offsetting liabilities or noncontrolling interests that ultimately do not have an impact on stockholders 2019 equity or cash flows .management views the as adjusted balance sheet , which contains non-gaap financial measures , as an economic presentation of the company 2019s total assets and liabilities ; however , it does not advocate that investors consider such non-gaap financial measures in isolation from , or as a substitute for , financial information prepared in accordance with gaap .separate account assets and liabilities and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements separate account assets are maintained by blackrock life limited , a wholly owned subsidiary of the company that is a registered life insurance company in the united kingdom , and represent segregated assets held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts .the .
Question: what is the net change in value of operating income from 2015 to 2016?
| -94.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
income tax expense . ( in millions ) | gaap 2017 | gaap 2016 | gaap 2015 | gaap 2017 | gaap 2016 | 2015
operating income ( 1 ) | $ 5272 | $ 4570 | $ 4664 | $ 5287 | $ 4674 | $ 4695
total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) | -32 ( 32 ) | -108 ( 108 ) | -69 ( 69 ) | -32 ( 32 ) | -108 ( 108 ) | -70 ( 70 )
income before income taxes ( 2 ) | $ 5240 | $ 4462 | $ 4595 | $ 5255 | $ 4566 | $ 4625
income tax expense ( 3 ) | $ 270 | $ 1290 | $ 1250 | $ 1539 | $ 1352 | $ 1312
effective tax rate ( 3 ) | 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) | 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) | 27.2% ( 27.2 % ) | 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) | 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) | 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) operating income ( 1 ) $ 5272 $ 4570 $ 4664 $ 5287 $ 4674 $ 4695 total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 69 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 70 ) income before income taxes ( 2 ) $ 5240 $ 4462 $ 4595 $ 5255 $ 4566 $ 4625 income tax expense ( 3 ) $ 270 $ 1290 $ 1250 $ 1539 $ 1352 $ 1312 effective tax rate ( 3 ) 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) 27.2% ( 27.2 % ) 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) ( 1 ) see non-gaap financial measures for further information on and reconciliation of as adjusted items .( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci .( 3 ) gaap income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2017 reflects $ 1.2 billion of a net tax benefit related to the 2017 tax act .the company 2019s tax rate is affected by tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income earned in those jurisdictions , which the company expects to be fairly consistent in the near term .the significant foreign jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates than the u.s .federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) include the united kingdom , channel islands , ireland and netherlands .2017 .income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 the following amounts related to the 2017 tax act : 2022 $ 106 million tax expense related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax assets ; 2022 $ 1758 million noncash tax benefit related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; 2022 $ 477 million tax expense related to the mandatory deemed repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings and profits .2022 a noncash expense of $ 16 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities as a result of domestic state and local tax changes ; and 2022 $ 173 million discrete tax benefits , primarily related to stock-based compensation awards , including $ 151 million related to the adoption of new accounting guidance related to stock-based compensation awards .see note 2 , significant accounting policies , for further information .the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) for 2017 excluded the noncash deferred tax revaluation benefit of $ 1758 million and noncash expense of $ 16 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented .in addition , the deemed repatriation tax expense of $ 477 million has been excluded from the as adjusted results due to the one-time nature and to ensure comparability among periods presented .2016 .income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 30 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 65 million of nonrecurring items , including the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters .the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) for 2016 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 30 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented .2015 .income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 54 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 75 million of nonrecurring items , primarily due to the realization of losses from changes in the company 2019s organizational tax structure and the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters .the as adjusted effective tax rate of 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) for 2015 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 54 million mentioned above , as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented .balance sheet overview as adjusted balance sheet the following table presents a reconciliation of the consolidated statement of financial condition presented on a gaap basis to the consolidated statement of financial condition , excluding the impact of separate account assets and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements ( directly related to lending separate account securities ) and separate account liabilities and separate account collateral liabilities under securities lending agreements and consolidated sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies .the company presents the as adjusted balance sheet as additional information to enable investors to exclude certain assets that have equal and offsetting liabilities or noncontrolling interests that ultimately do not have an impact on stockholders 2019 equity or cash flows .management views the as adjusted balance sheet , which contains non-gaap financial measures , as an economic presentation of the company 2019s total assets and liabilities ; however , it does not advocate that investors consider such non-gaap financial measures in isolation from , or as a substitute for , financial information prepared in accordance with gaap .separate account assets and liabilities and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements separate account assets are maintained by blackrock life limited , a wholly owned subsidiary of the company that is a registered life insurance company in the united kingdom , and represent segregated assets held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts .the .
Question: what is the net change in value of operating income from 2015 to 2016?
| convfinqa2663 |
income tax expense . ( in millions ) | gaap 2017 | gaap 2016 | gaap 2015 | gaap 2017 | gaap 2016 | 2015
operating income ( 1 ) | $ 5272 | $ 4570 | $ 4664 | $ 5287 | $ 4674 | $ 4695
total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) | -32 ( 32 ) | -108 ( 108 ) | -69 ( 69 ) | -32 ( 32 ) | -108 ( 108 ) | -70 ( 70 )
income before income taxes ( 2 ) | $ 5240 | $ 4462 | $ 4595 | $ 5255 | $ 4566 | $ 4625
income tax expense ( 3 ) | $ 270 | $ 1290 | $ 1250 | $ 1539 | $ 1352 | $ 1312
effective tax rate ( 3 ) | 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) | 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) | 27.2% ( 27.2 % ) | 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) | 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) | 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) operating income ( 1 ) $ 5272 $ 4570 $ 4664 $ 5287 $ 4674 $ 4695 total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 69 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 70 ) income before income taxes ( 2 ) $ 5240 $ 4462 $ 4595 $ 5255 $ 4566 $ 4625 income tax expense ( 3 ) $ 270 $ 1290 $ 1250 $ 1539 $ 1352 $ 1312 effective tax rate ( 3 ) 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) 27.2% ( 27.2 % ) 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) ( 1 ) see non-gaap financial measures for further information on and reconciliation of as adjusted items .( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci .( 3 ) gaap income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2017 reflects $ 1.2 billion of a net tax benefit related to the 2017 tax act .the company 2019s tax rate is affected by tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income earned in those jurisdictions , which the company expects to be fairly consistent in the near term .the significant foreign jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates than the u.s .federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) include the united kingdom , channel islands , ireland and netherlands .2017 .income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 the following amounts related to the 2017 tax act : 2022 $ 106 million tax expense related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax assets ; 2022 $ 1758 million noncash tax benefit related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; 2022 $ 477 million tax expense related to the mandatory deemed repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings and profits .2022 a noncash expense of $ 16 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities as a result of domestic state and local tax changes ; and 2022 $ 173 million discrete tax benefits , primarily related to stock-based compensation awards , including $ 151 million related to the adoption of new accounting guidance related to stock-based compensation awards .see note 2 , significant accounting policies , for further information .the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) for 2017 excluded the noncash deferred tax revaluation benefit of $ 1758 million and noncash expense of $ 16 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented .in addition , the deemed repatriation tax expense of $ 477 million has been excluded from the as adjusted results due to the one-time nature and to ensure comparability among periods presented .2016 .income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 30 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 65 million of nonrecurring items , including the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters .the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) for 2016 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 30 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented .2015 .income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 54 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 75 million of nonrecurring items , primarily due to the realization of losses from changes in the company 2019s organizational tax structure and the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters .the as adjusted effective tax rate of 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) for 2015 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 54 million mentioned above , as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented .balance sheet overview as adjusted balance sheet the following table presents a reconciliation of the consolidated statement of financial condition presented on a gaap basis to the consolidated statement of financial condition , excluding the impact of separate account assets and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements ( directly related to lending separate account securities ) and separate account liabilities and separate account collateral liabilities under securities lending agreements and consolidated sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies .the company presents the as adjusted balance sheet as additional information to enable investors to exclude certain assets that have equal and offsetting liabilities or noncontrolling interests that ultimately do not have an impact on stockholders 2019 equity or cash flows .management views the as adjusted balance sheet , which contains non-gaap financial measures , as an economic presentation of the company 2019s total assets and liabilities ; however , it does not advocate that investors consider such non-gaap financial measures in isolation from , or as a substitute for , financial information prepared in accordance with gaap .separate account assets and liabilities and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements separate account assets are maintained by blackrock life limited , a wholly owned subsidiary of the company that is a registered life insurance company in the united kingdom , and represent segregated assets held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts .the .
Question: what is the net change in value of operating income from 2015 to 2016?
Steps: subtract(4570, 4664)
Answer: -94.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.02015 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
income tax expense . ( in millions ) | gaap 2017 | gaap 2016 | gaap 2015 | gaap 2017 | gaap 2016 | 2015
operating income ( 1 ) | $ 5272 | $ 4570 | $ 4664 | $ 5287 | $ 4674 | $ 4695
total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) | -32 ( 32 ) | -108 ( 108 ) | -69 ( 69 ) | -32 ( 32 ) | -108 ( 108 ) | -70 ( 70 )
income before income taxes ( 2 ) | $ 5240 | $ 4462 | $ 4595 | $ 5255 | $ 4566 | $ 4625
income tax expense ( 3 ) | $ 270 | $ 1290 | $ 1250 | $ 1539 | $ 1352 | $ 1312
effective tax rate ( 3 ) | 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) | 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) | 27.2% ( 27.2 % ) | 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) | 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) | 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) operating income ( 1 ) $ 5272 $ 4570 $ 4664 $ 5287 $ 4674 $ 4695 total nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 69 ) ( 32 ) ( 108 ) ( 70 ) income before income taxes ( 2 ) $ 5240 $ 4462 $ 4595 $ 5255 $ 4566 $ 4625 income tax expense ( 3 ) $ 270 $ 1290 $ 1250 $ 1539 $ 1352 $ 1312 effective tax rate ( 3 ) 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) 27.2% ( 27.2 % ) 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) ( 1 ) see non-gaap financial measures for further information on and reconciliation of as adjusted items .( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci .( 3 ) gaap income tax expense and effective tax rate for 2017 reflects $ 1.2 billion of a net tax benefit related to the 2017 tax act .the company 2019s tax rate is affected by tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income earned in those jurisdictions , which the company expects to be fairly consistent in the near term .the significant foreign jurisdictions that have lower statutory tax rates than the u.s .federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) include the united kingdom , channel islands , ireland and netherlands .2017 .income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 the following amounts related to the 2017 tax act : 2022 $ 106 million tax expense related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax assets ; 2022 $ 1758 million noncash tax benefit related to the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; 2022 $ 477 million tax expense related to the mandatory deemed repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings and profits .2022 a noncash expense of $ 16 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities as a result of domestic state and local tax changes ; and 2022 $ 173 million discrete tax benefits , primarily related to stock-based compensation awards , including $ 151 million related to the adoption of new accounting guidance related to stock-based compensation awards .see note 2 , significant accounting policies , for further information .the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.3% ( 29.3 % ) for 2017 excluded the noncash deferred tax revaluation benefit of $ 1758 million and noncash expense of $ 16 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented .in addition , the deemed repatriation tax expense of $ 477 million has been excluded from the as adjusted results due to the one-time nature and to ensure comparability among periods presented .2016 .income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 30 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 65 million of nonrecurring items , including the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters .the as adjusted effective tax rate of 29.6% ( 29.6 % ) for 2016 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 30 million mentioned above as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented .2015 .income tax expense ( gaap ) reflected : 2022 a net noncash benefit of $ 54 million , primarily associated with the revaluation of certain deferred income tax liabilities ; and 2022 a benefit from $ 75 million of nonrecurring items , primarily due to the realization of losses from changes in the company 2019s organizational tax structure and the resolution of certain outstanding tax matters .the as adjusted effective tax rate of 28.4% ( 28.4 % ) for 2015 excluded the net noncash benefit of $ 54 million mentioned above , as it will not have a cash flow impact and to ensure comparability among periods presented .balance sheet overview as adjusted balance sheet the following table presents a reconciliation of the consolidated statement of financial condition presented on a gaap basis to the consolidated statement of financial condition , excluding the impact of separate account assets and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements ( directly related to lending separate account securities ) and separate account liabilities and separate account collateral liabilities under securities lending agreements and consolidated sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies .the company presents the as adjusted balance sheet as additional information to enable investors to exclude certain assets that have equal and offsetting liabilities or noncontrolling interests that ultimately do not have an impact on stockholders 2019 equity or cash flows .management views the as adjusted balance sheet , which contains non-gaap financial measures , as an economic presentation of the company 2019s total assets and liabilities ; however , it does not advocate that investors consider such non-gaap financial measures in isolation from , or as a substitute for , financial information prepared in accordance with gaap .separate account assets and liabilities and separate account collateral held under securities lending agreements separate account assets are maintained by blackrock life limited , a wholly owned subsidiary of the company that is a registered life insurance company in the united kingdom , and represent segregated assets held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts .the .
Question: what is the net change in value of operating income from 2015 to 2016?
Steps: subtract(4570, 4664)
Answer: -94.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| convfinqa2664 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses .liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . cash flow data | years ended december 31 , 2014 | years ended december 31 , 2013 | years ended december 31 , 2012
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1 | $ 831.2 | $ 598.4 | $ 697.2
net cash used in working capital b2 | -131.1 ( 131.1 ) | -9.6 ( 9.6 ) | -293.2 ( 293.2 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash | -30.6 ( 30.6 ) | 4.1 | -46.8 ( 46.8 )
net cash provided by operating activities | $ 669.5 | $ 592.9 | $ 357.2
net cash used in investing activities | -200.8 ( 200.8 ) | -224.5 ( 224.5 ) | -210.2 ( 210.2 )
net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities | -343.9 ( 343.9 ) | -1212.3 ( 1212.3 ) | 131.3 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes .2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income .the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies .the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .
Question: what was the net cash provided by operating activities in 2013?
| 592.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses .liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . cash flow data | years ended december 31 , 2014 | years ended december 31 , 2013 | years ended december 31 , 2012
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1 | $ 831.2 | $ 598.4 | $ 697.2
net cash used in working capital b2 | -131.1 ( 131.1 ) | -9.6 ( 9.6 ) | -293.2 ( 293.2 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash | -30.6 ( 30.6 ) | 4.1 | -46.8 ( 46.8 )
net cash provided by operating activities | $ 669.5 | $ 592.9 | $ 357.2
net cash used in investing activities | -200.8 ( 200.8 ) | -224.5 ( 224.5 ) | -210.2 ( 210.2 )
net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities | -343.9 ( 343.9 ) | -1212.3 ( 1212.3 ) | 131.3 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes .2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income .the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies .the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .
Question: what was the net cash provided by operating activities in 2013?
| convfinqa2665 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses .liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . cash flow data | years ended december 31 , 2014 | years ended december 31 , 2013 | years ended december 31 , 2012
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1 | $ 831.2 | $ 598.4 | $ 697.2
net cash used in working capital b2 | -131.1 ( 131.1 ) | -9.6 ( 9.6 ) | -293.2 ( 293.2 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash | -30.6 ( 30.6 ) | 4.1 | -46.8 ( 46.8 )
net cash provided by operating activities | $ 669.5 | $ 592.9 | $ 357.2
net cash used in investing activities | -200.8 ( 200.8 ) | -224.5 ( 224.5 ) | -210.2 ( 210.2 )
net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities | -343.9 ( 343.9 ) | -1212.3 ( 1212.3 ) | 131.3 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes .2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income .the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies .the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .
Question: what was the net cash provided by operating activities in 2013?
Steps: subtract(669.5, 76.6)
Answer: 592.9
Question: and what was the improvement in that from 2013 to 2014?
| 76.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses .liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . cash flow data | years ended december 31 , 2014 | years ended december 31 , 2013 | years ended december 31 , 2012
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1 | $ 831.2 | $ 598.4 | $ 697.2
net cash used in working capital b2 | -131.1 ( 131.1 ) | -9.6 ( 9.6 ) | -293.2 ( 293.2 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash | -30.6 ( 30.6 ) | 4.1 | -46.8 ( 46.8 )
net cash provided by operating activities | $ 669.5 | $ 592.9 | $ 357.2
net cash used in investing activities | -200.8 ( 200.8 ) | -224.5 ( 224.5 ) | -210.2 ( 210.2 )
net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities | -343.9 ( 343.9 ) | -1212.3 ( 1212.3 ) | 131.3 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes .2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income .the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies .the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .
Question: what was the net cash provided by operating activities in 2013?
Steps: subtract(669.5, 76.6)
Answer: 592.9
Question: and what was the improvement in that from 2013 to 2014?
| convfinqa2666 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses .liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . cash flow data | years ended december 31 , 2014 | years ended december 31 , 2013 | years ended december 31 , 2012
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1 | $ 831.2 | $ 598.4 | $ 697.2
net cash used in working capital b2 | -131.1 ( 131.1 ) | -9.6 ( 9.6 ) | -293.2 ( 293.2 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash | -30.6 ( 30.6 ) | 4.1 | -46.8 ( 46.8 )
net cash provided by operating activities | $ 669.5 | $ 592.9 | $ 357.2
net cash used in investing activities | -200.8 ( 200.8 ) | -224.5 ( 224.5 ) | -210.2 ( 210.2 )
net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities | -343.9 ( 343.9 ) | -1212.3 ( 1212.3 ) | 131.3 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes .2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income .the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies .the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .
Question: what was the net cash provided by operating activities in 2013?
Steps: subtract(669.5, 76.6)
Answer: 592.9
Question: and what was the improvement in that from 2013 to 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 76.6
Answer: 76.6
Question: how much does this improvement represent in relation to the 2013 net cash?
| 0.1292 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses .liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . cash flow data | years ended december 31 , 2014 | years ended december 31 , 2013 | years ended december 31 , 2012
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1 | $ 831.2 | $ 598.4 | $ 697.2
net cash used in working capital b2 | -131.1 ( 131.1 ) | -9.6 ( 9.6 ) | -293.2 ( 293.2 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash | -30.6 ( 30.6 ) | 4.1 | -46.8 ( 46.8 )
net cash provided by operating activities | $ 669.5 | $ 592.9 | $ 357.2
net cash used in investing activities | -200.8 ( 200.8 ) | -224.5 ( 224.5 ) | -210.2 ( 210.2 )
net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities | -343.9 ( 343.9 ) | -1212.3 ( 1212.3 ) | 131.3 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes .2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income .the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies .the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .
Question: what was the net cash provided by operating activities in 2013?
Steps: subtract(669.5, 76.6)
Answer: 592.9
Question: and what was the improvement in that from 2013 to 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 76.6
Answer: 76.6
Question: how much does this improvement represent in relation to the 2013 net cash?
| convfinqa2667 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses .liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . cash flow data | years ended december 31 , 2014 | years ended december 31 , 2013 | years ended december 31 , 2012
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1 | $ 831.2 | $ 598.4 | $ 697.2
net cash used in working capital b2 | -131.1 ( 131.1 ) | -9.6 ( 9.6 ) | -293.2 ( 293.2 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash | -30.6 ( 30.6 ) | 4.1 | -46.8 ( 46.8 )
net cash provided by operating activities | $ 669.5 | $ 592.9 | $ 357.2
net cash used in investing activities | -200.8 ( 200.8 ) | -224.5 ( 224.5 ) | -210.2 ( 210.2 )
net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities | -343.9 ( 343.9 ) | -1212.3 ( 1212.3 ) | 131.3 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes .2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income .the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies .the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .
Question: what was the net cash provided by operating activities in 2013?
Steps: subtract(669.5, 76.6)
Answer: 592.9
Question: and what was the improvement in that from 2013 to 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 76.6
Answer: 76.6
Question: how much does this improvement represent in relation to the 2013 net cash?
Steps: divide(76.6, A0)
Answer: 0.1292
Question: and how much is that in percentage?
| 12.91955 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses .liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . cash flow data | years ended december 31 , 2014 | years ended december 31 , 2013 | years ended december 31 , 2012
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1 | $ 831.2 | $ 598.4 | $ 697.2
net cash used in working capital b2 | -131.1 ( 131.1 ) | -9.6 ( 9.6 ) | -293.2 ( 293.2 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash | -30.6 ( 30.6 ) | 4.1 | -46.8 ( 46.8 )
net cash provided by operating activities | $ 669.5 | $ 592.9 | $ 357.2
net cash used in investing activities | -200.8 ( 200.8 ) | -224.5 ( 224.5 ) | -210.2 ( 210.2 )
net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities | -343.9 ( 343.9 ) | -1212.3 ( 1212.3 ) | 131.3 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes .2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income .the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies .the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .
Question: what was the net cash provided by operating activities in 2013?
Steps: subtract(669.5, 76.6)
Answer: 592.9
Question: and what was the improvement in that from 2013 to 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 76.6
Answer: 76.6
Question: how much does this improvement represent in relation to the 2013 net cash?
Steps: divide(76.6, A0)
Answer: 0.1292
Question: and how much is that in percentage?
| convfinqa2668 |
generate cash without additional external financings .free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2014 2013 2012 . millions | 2014 | 2013 | 2012
cash provided by operating activities | $ 7385 | $ 6823 | $ 6161
cash used in investing activities | -4249 ( 4249 ) | -3405 ( 3405 ) | -3633 ( 3633 )
dividends paid | -1632 ( 1632 ) | -1333 ( 1333 ) | -1146 ( 1146 )
free cash flow | $ 1504 | $ 2085 | $ 1382 2015 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve .we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments .we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety .we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network .f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2015 , we will continue to add resources to support growth , improve service , and replenish our surge capability .f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices at the end of 2014 , there is even more uncertainty around the projections of fuel prices .we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s .domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors .as prices fluctuate there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months .lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport .alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments .f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , including expenditures for ptc and 218 locomotives .the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments .( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we expect the overall u.s .economy to continue to improve at a moderate pace .one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities .on balance , we expect to see positive volume growth for 2015 versus the prior year .in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives and the ability to leverage our resources as we improve the fluidity of our network. .
Question: what was the value of expected capital plan in 2015, converted to the thousands?
| 4300.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
generate cash without additional external financings .free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2014 2013 2012 . millions | 2014 | 2013 | 2012
cash provided by operating activities | $ 7385 | $ 6823 | $ 6161
cash used in investing activities | -4249 ( 4249 ) | -3405 ( 3405 ) | -3633 ( 3633 )
dividends paid | -1632 ( 1632 ) | -1333 ( 1333 ) | -1146 ( 1146 )
free cash flow | $ 1504 | $ 2085 | $ 1382 2015 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve .we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments .we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety .we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network .f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2015 , we will continue to add resources to support growth , improve service , and replenish our surge capability .f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices at the end of 2014 , there is even more uncertainty around the projections of fuel prices .we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s .domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors .as prices fluctuate there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months .lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport .alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments .f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , including expenditures for ptc and 218 locomotives .the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments .( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we expect the overall u.s .economy to continue to improve at a moderate pace .one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities .on balance , we expect to see positive volume growth for 2015 versus the prior year .in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives and the ability to leverage our resources as we improve the fluidity of our network. .
Question: what was the value of expected capital plan in 2015, converted to the thousands?
| convfinqa2669 |
generate cash without additional external financings .free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2014 2013 2012 . millions | 2014 | 2013 | 2012
cash provided by operating activities | $ 7385 | $ 6823 | $ 6161
cash used in investing activities | -4249 ( 4249 ) | -3405 ( 3405 ) | -3633 ( 3633 )
dividends paid | -1632 ( 1632 ) | -1333 ( 1333 ) | -1146 ( 1146 )
free cash flow | $ 1504 | $ 2085 | $ 1382 2015 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve .we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments .we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety .we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network .f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2015 , we will continue to add resources to support growth , improve service , and replenish our surge capability .f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices at the end of 2014 , there is even more uncertainty around the projections of fuel prices .we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s .domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors .as prices fluctuate there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months .lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport .alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments .f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , including expenditures for ptc and 218 locomotives .the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments .( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we expect the overall u.s .economy to continue to improve at a moderate pace .one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities .on balance , we expect to see positive volume growth for 2015 versus the prior year .in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives and the ability to leverage our resources as we improve the fluidity of our network. .
Question: what was the value of expected capital plan in 2015, converted to the thousands?
Steps: multiply(4.3, const_1000)
Answer: 4300.0
Question: so is the 2014 operating cash flow enough for the budgeted capital expenditures in 2015?
| yes | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
generate cash without additional external financings .free cash flow should be considered in addition to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : millions 2014 2013 2012 . millions | 2014 | 2013 | 2012
cash provided by operating activities | $ 7385 | $ 6823 | $ 6161
cash used in investing activities | -4249 ( 4249 ) | -3405 ( 3405 ) | -3633 ( 3633 )
dividends paid | -1632 ( 1632 ) | -1333 ( 1333 ) | -1146 ( 1146 )
free cash flow | $ 1504 | $ 2085 | $ 1382 2015 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve .we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments .we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety .we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network .f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2015 , we will continue to add resources to support growth , improve service , and replenish our surge capability .f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices at the end of 2014 , there is even more uncertainty around the projections of fuel prices .we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s .domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors .as prices fluctuate there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months .lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport .alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments .f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2015 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 4.3 billion , including expenditures for ptc and 218 locomotives .the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments .( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 we expect the overall u.s .economy to continue to improve at a moderate pace .one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities .on balance , we expect to see positive volume growth for 2015 versus the prior year .in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives and the ability to leverage our resources as we improve the fluidity of our network. .
Question: what was the value of expected capital plan in 2015, converted to the thousands?
Steps: multiply(4.3, const_1000)
Answer: 4300.0
Question: so is the 2014 operating cash flow enough for the budgeted capital expenditures in 2015?
| convfinqa2670 |
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2016 .period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . period | total numberof sharespurchased | averageprice paidper share | total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a ) | total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms | approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )
october 2016 | 433272 | $ 52.69 | 50337 | 382935 | $ 2.7 billion
november 2016 | 667644 | $ 62.25 | 248349 | 419295 | $ 2.6 billion
december 2016 | 1559569 | $ 66.09 | 688 | 1558881 | $ 2.5 billion
total | 2660485 | $ 62.95 | 299374 | 2361111 | $ 2.5 billion ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2016 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans .( b ) on july 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock .this authorization has no expiration date .as of december 31 , 2016 , the approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the 2015 authorization is $ 40 million .on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date .as of december 31 , 2016 , no purchases have been made under the 2016 authorization. .
Question: what was the net change in shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans from nov 2016 to dec 2016?
| 1139586.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2016 .period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . period | total numberof sharespurchased | averageprice paidper share | total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a ) | total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms | approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )
october 2016 | 433272 | $ 52.69 | 50337 | 382935 | $ 2.7 billion
november 2016 | 667644 | $ 62.25 | 248349 | 419295 | $ 2.6 billion
december 2016 | 1559569 | $ 66.09 | 688 | 1558881 | $ 2.5 billion
total | 2660485 | $ 62.95 | 299374 | 2361111 | $ 2.5 billion ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2016 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans .( b ) on july 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock .this authorization has no expiration date .as of december 31 , 2016 , the approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the 2015 authorization is $ 40 million .on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date .as of december 31 , 2016 , no purchases have been made under the 2016 authorization. .
Question: what was the net change in shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans from nov 2016 to dec 2016?
| convfinqa2671 |
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2016 .period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . period | total numberof sharespurchased | averageprice paidper share | total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a ) | total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms | approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )
october 2016 | 433272 | $ 52.69 | 50337 | 382935 | $ 2.7 billion
november 2016 | 667644 | $ 62.25 | 248349 | 419295 | $ 2.6 billion
december 2016 | 1559569 | $ 66.09 | 688 | 1558881 | $ 2.5 billion
total | 2660485 | $ 62.95 | 299374 | 2361111 | $ 2.5 billion ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2016 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans .( b ) on july 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock .this authorization has no expiration date .as of december 31 , 2016 , the approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the 2015 authorization is $ 40 million .on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date .as of december 31 , 2016 , no purchases have been made under the 2016 authorization. .
Question: what was the net change in shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans from nov 2016 to dec 2016?
Steps: subtract(1558881, 419295)
Answer: 1139586.0
Question: what were the number of shares in november 2016?
| 419295.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2016 .period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . period | total numberof sharespurchased | averageprice paidper share | total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a ) | total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms | approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )
october 2016 | 433272 | $ 52.69 | 50337 | 382935 | $ 2.7 billion
november 2016 | 667644 | $ 62.25 | 248349 | 419295 | $ 2.6 billion
december 2016 | 1559569 | $ 66.09 | 688 | 1558881 | $ 2.5 billion
total | 2660485 | $ 62.95 | 299374 | 2361111 | $ 2.5 billion ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2016 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans .( b ) on july 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock .this authorization has no expiration date .as of december 31 , 2016 , the approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the 2015 authorization is $ 40 million .on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date .as of december 31 , 2016 , no purchases have been made under the 2016 authorization. .
Question: what was the net change in shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans from nov 2016 to dec 2016?
Steps: subtract(1558881, 419295)
Answer: 1139586.0
Question: what were the number of shares in november 2016?
| convfinqa2672 |
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2016 .period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . period | total numberof sharespurchased | averageprice paidper share | total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a ) | total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms | approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )
october 2016 | 433272 | $ 52.69 | 50337 | 382935 | $ 2.7 billion
november 2016 | 667644 | $ 62.25 | 248349 | 419295 | $ 2.6 billion
december 2016 | 1559569 | $ 66.09 | 688 | 1558881 | $ 2.5 billion
total | 2660485 | $ 62.95 | 299374 | 2361111 | $ 2.5 billion ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2016 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans .( b ) on july 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock .this authorization has no expiration date .as of december 31 , 2016 , the approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the 2015 authorization is $ 40 million .on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date .as of december 31 , 2016 , no purchases have been made under the 2016 authorization. .
Question: what was the net change in shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans from nov 2016 to dec 2016?
Steps: subtract(1558881, 419295)
Answer: 1139586.0
Question: what were the number of shares in november 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 419295
Answer: 419295.0
Question: what is the net change over the november number of shares?
| 2.71786 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2016 .period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) . period | total numberof sharespurchased | averageprice paidper share | total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a ) | total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms | approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )
october 2016 | 433272 | $ 52.69 | 50337 | 382935 | $ 2.7 billion
november 2016 | 667644 | $ 62.25 | 248349 | 419295 | $ 2.6 billion
december 2016 | 1559569 | $ 66.09 | 688 | 1558881 | $ 2.5 billion
total | 2660485 | $ 62.95 | 299374 | 2361111 | $ 2.5 billion ( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2016 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans .( b ) on july 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock .this authorization has no expiration date .as of december 31 , 2016 , the approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the 2015 authorization is $ 40 million .on september 21 , 2016 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date .as of december 31 , 2016 , no purchases have been made under the 2016 authorization. .
Question: what was the net change in shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans from nov 2016 to dec 2016?
Steps: subtract(1558881, 419295)
Answer: 1139586.0
Question: what were the number of shares in november 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 419295
Answer: 419295.0
Question: what is the net change over the november number of shares?
| convfinqa2673 |
during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years .stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives .the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria .annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached .a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
balance at beginning of year | 2804901 | 2912456 | 2728290
granted | 192563 | 92729 | 185333
cancelled | -3267 ( 3267 ) | -200284 ( 200284 ) | -1167 ( 1167 )
balance at end of year | 2994197 | 2804901 | 2912456
vested during the year | 21074 | 408800 | 66299
compensation expense recorded | $ 6713155 | $ 6930381 | $ 17365401
weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year | $ 17386949 | $ 7023942 | $ 21768084 weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years .for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options .we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 .a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price .the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years .during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively .2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp .2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan .the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year .in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) .the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively .substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .
Question: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?
| 27.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years .stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives .the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria .annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached .a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
balance at beginning of year | 2804901 | 2912456 | 2728290
granted | 192563 | 92729 | 185333
cancelled | -3267 ( 3267 ) | -200284 ( 200284 ) | -1167 ( 1167 )
balance at end of year | 2994197 | 2804901 | 2912456
vested during the year | 21074 | 408800 | 66299
compensation expense recorded | $ 6713155 | $ 6930381 | $ 17365401
weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year | $ 17386949 | $ 7023942 | $ 21768084 weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years .for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options .we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 .a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price .the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years .during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively .2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp .2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan .the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year .in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) .the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively .substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .
Question: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?
| convfinqa2674 |
during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years .stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives .the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria .annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached .a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
balance at beginning of year | 2804901 | 2912456 | 2728290
granted | 192563 | 92729 | 185333
cancelled | -3267 ( 3267 ) | -200284 ( 200284 ) | -1167 ( 1167 )
balance at end of year | 2994197 | 2804901 | 2912456
vested during the year | 21074 | 408800 | 66299
compensation expense recorded | $ 6713155 | $ 6930381 | $ 17365401
weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year | $ 17386949 | $ 7023942 | $ 21768084 weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years .for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options .we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 .a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price .the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years .during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively .2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp .2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan .the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year .in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) .the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively .substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .
Question: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 27.3
Answer: 27.3
Question: and for 2012?
| 12.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years .stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives .the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria .annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached .a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
balance at beginning of year | 2804901 | 2912456 | 2728290
granted | 192563 | 92729 | 185333
cancelled | -3267 ( 3267 ) | -200284 ( 200284 ) | -1167 ( 1167 )
balance at end of year | 2994197 | 2804901 | 2912456
vested during the year | 21074 | 408800 | 66299
compensation expense recorded | $ 6713155 | $ 6930381 | $ 17365401
weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year | $ 17386949 | $ 7023942 | $ 21768084 weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years .for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options .we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 .a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price .the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years .during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively .2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp .2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan .the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year .in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) .the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively .substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .
Question: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 27.3
Answer: 27.3
Question: and for 2012?
| convfinqa2675 |
during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years .stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives .the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria .annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached .a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
balance at beginning of year | 2804901 | 2912456 | 2728290
granted | 192563 | 92729 | 185333
cancelled | -3267 ( 3267 ) | -200284 ( 200284 ) | -1167 ( 1167 )
balance at end of year | 2994197 | 2804901 | 2912456
vested during the year | 21074 | 408800 | 66299
compensation expense recorded | $ 6713155 | $ 6930381 | $ 17365401
weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year | $ 17386949 | $ 7023942 | $ 21768084 weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years .for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options .we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 .a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price .the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years .during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively .2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp .2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan .the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year .in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) .the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively .substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .
Question: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 27.3
Answer: 27.3
Question: and for 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 12.6
Answer: 12.6
Question: combined, what was the total value in these years?
| 39.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years .stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives .the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria .annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached .a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
balance at beginning of year | 2804901 | 2912456 | 2728290
granted | 192563 | 92729 | 185333
cancelled | -3267 ( 3267 ) | -200284 ( 200284 ) | -1167 ( 1167 )
balance at end of year | 2994197 | 2804901 | 2912456
vested during the year | 21074 | 408800 | 66299
compensation expense recorded | $ 6713155 | $ 6930381 | $ 17365401
weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year | $ 17386949 | $ 7023942 | $ 21768084 weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years .for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options .we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 .a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price .the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years .during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively .2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp .2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan .the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year .in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) .the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively .substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .
Question: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 27.3
Answer: 27.3
Question: and for 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 12.6
Answer: 12.6
Question: combined, what was the total value in these years?
| convfinqa2676 |
during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years .stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives .the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria .annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached .a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
balance at beginning of year | 2804901 | 2912456 | 2728290
granted | 192563 | 92729 | 185333
cancelled | -3267 ( 3267 ) | -200284 ( 200284 ) | -1167 ( 1167 )
balance at end of year | 2994197 | 2804901 | 2912456
vested during the year | 21074 | 408800 | 66299
compensation expense recorded | $ 6713155 | $ 6930381 | $ 17365401
weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year | $ 17386949 | $ 7023942 | $ 21768084 weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years .for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options .we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 .a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price .the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years .during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively .2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp .2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan .the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year .in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) .the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively .substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .
Question: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 27.3
Answer: 27.3
Question: and for 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 12.6
Answer: 12.6
Question: combined, what was the total value in these years?
Steps: add(27.3, 12.6)
Answer: 39.9
Question: and the specific value for 2011?
| 8.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years .stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives .the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria .annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached .a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
balance at beginning of year | 2804901 | 2912456 | 2728290
granted | 192563 | 92729 | 185333
cancelled | -3267 ( 3267 ) | -200284 ( 200284 ) | -1167 ( 1167 )
balance at end of year | 2994197 | 2804901 | 2912456
vested during the year | 21074 | 408800 | 66299
compensation expense recorded | $ 6713155 | $ 6930381 | $ 17365401
weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year | $ 17386949 | $ 7023942 | $ 21768084 weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years .for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options .we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 .a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price .the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years .during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively .2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp .2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan .the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year .in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) .the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively .substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .
Question: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 27.3
Answer: 27.3
Question: and for 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 12.6
Answer: 12.6
Question: combined, what was the total value in these years?
Steps: add(27.3, 12.6)
Answer: 39.9
Question: and the specific value for 2011?
| convfinqa2677 |
during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years .stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives .the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria .annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached .a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
balance at beginning of year | 2804901 | 2912456 | 2728290
granted | 192563 | 92729 | 185333
cancelled | -3267 ( 3267 ) | -200284 ( 200284 ) | -1167 ( 1167 )
balance at end of year | 2994197 | 2804901 | 2912456
vested during the year | 21074 | 408800 | 66299
compensation expense recorded | $ 6713155 | $ 6930381 | $ 17365401
weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year | $ 17386949 | $ 7023942 | $ 21768084 weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years .for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options .we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 .a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price .the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years .during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively .2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp .2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan .the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year .in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) .the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively .substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .
Question: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 27.3
Answer: 27.3
Question: and for 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 12.6
Answer: 12.6
Question: combined, what was the total value in these years?
Steps: add(27.3, 12.6)
Answer: 39.9
Question: and the specific value for 2011?
Steps: Ask for number 8.5
Answer: 8.5
Question: so what was the total amount for all three years?
| 48.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years .stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives .the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria .annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached .a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
balance at beginning of year | 2804901 | 2912456 | 2728290
granted | 192563 | 92729 | 185333
cancelled | -3267 ( 3267 ) | -200284 ( 200284 ) | -1167 ( 1167 )
balance at end of year | 2994197 | 2804901 | 2912456
vested during the year | 21074 | 408800 | 66299
compensation expense recorded | $ 6713155 | $ 6930381 | $ 17365401
weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year | $ 17386949 | $ 7023942 | $ 21768084 weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years .for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options .we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 .a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price .the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years .during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively .2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp .2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan .the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year .in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) .the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively .substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .
Question: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 27.3
Answer: 27.3
Question: and for 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 12.6
Answer: 12.6
Question: combined, what was the total value in these years?
Steps: add(27.3, 12.6)
Answer: 39.9
Question: and the specific value for 2011?
Steps: Ask for number 8.5
Answer: 8.5
Question: so what was the total amount for all three years?
| convfinqa2678 |
during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years .stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives .the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria .annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached .a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
balance at beginning of year | 2804901 | 2912456 | 2728290
granted | 192563 | 92729 | 185333
cancelled | -3267 ( 3267 ) | -200284 ( 200284 ) | -1167 ( 1167 )
balance at end of year | 2994197 | 2804901 | 2912456
vested during the year | 21074 | 408800 | 66299
compensation expense recorded | $ 6713155 | $ 6930381 | $ 17365401
weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year | $ 17386949 | $ 7023942 | $ 21768084 weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years .for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options .we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 .a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price .the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years .during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively .2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp .2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan .the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year .in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) .the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively .substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .
Question: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 27.3
Answer: 27.3
Question: and for 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 12.6
Answer: 12.6
Question: combined, what was the total value in these years?
Steps: add(27.3, 12.6)
Answer: 39.9
Question: and the specific value for 2011?
Steps: Ask for number 8.5
Answer: 8.5
Question: so what was the total amount for all three years?
Steps: add(A0, 8.5)
Answer: 48.4
Question: and the average during this time?
| 16.13333 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , we recognized approximately $ 6.5 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 4.7 million of compensation expense , respectively , for these options .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was approximately $ 20.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years .stock-based compensation effective january 1 , 1999 , we implemented a deferred compensation plan , or the deferred plan , covering certain of our employees , including our executives .the shares issued under the deferred plan were granted to certain employees , including our executives and vesting will occur annually upon the completion of a service period or our meeting established financial performance criteria .annual vesting occurs at rates ranging from 15% ( 15 % ) to 35% ( 35 % ) once performance criteria are reached .a summary of our restricted stock as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 and charges during the years then ended are presented below: . | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
balance at beginning of year | 2804901 | 2912456 | 2728290
granted | 192563 | 92729 | 185333
cancelled | -3267 ( 3267 ) | -200284 ( 200284 ) | -1167 ( 1167 )
balance at end of year | 2994197 | 2804901 | 2912456
vested during the year | 21074 | 408800 | 66299
compensation expense recorded | $ 6713155 | $ 6930381 | $ 17365401
weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year | $ 17386949 | $ 7023942 | $ 21768084 weighted average fair value of restricted stock granted during the year $ 17386949 $ 7023942 $ 21768084 the fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 1.6 million , $ 22.4 million and $ 4.3 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 17.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.7 years .for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , approximately $ 4.5 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 3.4 million , respectively , was capitalized to assets associated with compensation expense related to our long-term compensation plans , restricted stock and stock options .we granted ltip units , which include bonus , time-based and performance based awards , with a fair value of $ 27.1 million , zero and $ 8.5 million as of 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .the grant date fair value of the ltip unit awards was calculated in accordance with asc 718 .a third party consultant determined the fair value of the ltip units to have a discount from sl green's common stock price .the discount was calculated by considering the inherent uncertainty that the ltip units will reach parity with other common partnership units and the illiquidity due to transfer restrictions .as of december 31 , 2013 , there was $ 5.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the time-based and performance based awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.5 years .during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , we recorded compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards of approximately $ 27.3 million , $ 12.6 million and $ 8.5 million , respectively .2010 notional unit long-term compensation plan in december 2009 , the compensation committee of the company's board of directors approved the general terms of the sl green realty corp .2010 notional unit long-term compensation program , or the 2010 long-term compensation plan .the 2010 long-term compensation plan is a long-term incentive compensation plan pursuant to which award recipients could earn , in the aggregate , from approximately $ 15.0 million up to approximately $ 75.0 million of ltip units in the operating partnership based on our stock price appreciation over three years beginning on december 1 , 2009 ; provided that , if maximum performance had been achieved , approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the second year and an additional approximately $ 25.0 million of awards could be earned at any time after the beginning of the third year .in order to achieve maximum performance under the 2010 long-term compensation plan , our aggregate stock price appreciation during the performance period had to equal or exceed 50% ( 50 % ) .the compensation committee determined that maximum performance had been achieved at or shortly after the beginning of each of the second and third years of the performance period and for the full performance period and , accordingly , 366815 ltip units , 385583 ltip units and 327416 ltip units were earned under the 2010 long-term compensation plan in december 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively .substantially in accordance with the original terms of the program , 50% ( 50 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 17 , 2012 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2013 vesting date ) , 25% ( 25 % ) of these ltip units vested on december 11 , 2013 ( accelerated from the original january 1 , 2014 vesting date ) and the remainder is scheduled to vest on january 1 , 2015 based on .
Question: what was the compensation expense related to bonus , time-based and performance based awards in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 27.3
Answer: 27.3
Question: and for 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 12.6
Answer: 12.6
Question: combined, what was the total value in these years?
Steps: add(27.3, 12.6)
Answer: 39.9
Question: and the specific value for 2011?
Steps: Ask for number 8.5
Answer: 8.5
Question: so what was the total amount for all three years?
Steps: add(A0, 8.5)
Answer: 48.4
Question: and the average during this time?
| convfinqa2679 |
on may 12 , 2017 , the company 2019s stockholders approved the american water works company , inc .2017 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2017 omnibus plan 201d ) .a total of 7.2 million shares of common stock may be issued under the 2017 omnibus plan .as of december 31 , 2017 , 7.2 million shares were available for grant under the 2017 omnibus plan .the 2017 omnibus plan provides that grants of awards may be in any of the following forms : incentive stock options , nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , stock units , stock awards , other stock-based awards and dividend equivalents , which may be granted only on stock units or other stock-based awards .following the approval of the 2017 omnibus plan , no additional awards are to be granted under the 2007 plan .however , shares will still be issued under the 2007 plan pursuant to the terms of awards previously issued under that plan prior to may 12 , 2017 .the cost of services received from employees in exchange for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards issued .the value of stock options and rsus awards at the date of the grant is amortized through expense over the three-year service period .all awards granted in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are classified as equity .the company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards over the vesting period of the award .the company stratified its grant populations and used historic employee turnover rates to estimate employee forfeitures .the estimated rate is compared to the actual forfeitures at the end of the reporting period and adjusted as necessary .the following table presents stock-based compensation expense recorded in operation and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
stock options | $ 1 | $ 2 | $ 2
rsus | 9 | 8 | 8
nonqualified employee stock purchase plan | 1 | 1 | 1
stock-based compensation | 11 | 11 | 11
income tax benefit | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 )
stock-based compensation expense net of tax | $ 7 | $ 7 | $ 7 there were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .the company receives a tax deduction based on the intrinsic value of the award at the exercise date for stock options and the distribution date for rsus .for each award , throughout the requisite service period , the company recognizes the tax benefits , which have been included in deferred income tax assets , related to compensation costs .the tax deductions in excess of the benefits recorded throughout the requisite service period are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations and are presented in the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows .stock options there were no grants of stock options to employees in 2017 .in 2016 and 2015 , the company granted non-qualified stock options to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the stock options vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning on january 1 of the year of the grant and have no performance vesting conditions .expense is recognized using the straight-line method and is amortized over the requisite service period. .
Question: what was the income tax benefit in the years of 2015 to 2017?
| -4.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on may 12 , 2017 , the company 2019s stockholders approved the american water works company , inc .2017 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2017 omnibus plan 201d ) .a total of 7.2 million shares of common stock may be issued under the 2017 omnibus plan .as of december 31 , 2017 , 7.2 million shares were available for grant under the 2017 omnibus plan .the 2017 omnibus plan provides that grants of awards may be in any of the following forms : incentive stock options , nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , stock units , stock awards , other stock-based awards and dividend equivalents , which may be granted only on stock units or other stock-based awards .following the approval of the 2017 omnibus plan , no additional awards are to be granted under the 2007 plan .however , shares will still be issued under the 2007 plan pursuant to the terms of awards previously issued under that plan prior to may 12 , 2017 .the cost of services received from employees in exchange for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards issued .the value of stock options and rsus awards at the date of the grant is amortized through expense over the three-year service period .all awards granted in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are classified as equity .the company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards over the vesting period of the award .the company stratified its grant populations and used historic employee turnover rates to estimate employee forfeitures .the estimated rate is compared to the actual forfeitures at the end of the reporting period and adjusted as necessary .the following table presents stock-based compensation expense recorded in operation and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
stock options | $ 1 | $ 2 | $ 2
rsus | 9 | 8 | 8
nonqualified employee stock purchase plan | 1 | 1 | 1
stock-based compensation | 11 | 11 | 11
income tax benefit | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 )
stock-based compensation expense net of tax | $ 7 | $ 7 | $ 7 there were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .the company receives a tax deduction based on the intrinsic value of the award at the exercise date for stock options and the distribution date for rsus .for each award , throughout the requisite service period , the company recognizes the tax benefits , which have been included in deferred income tax assets , related to compensation costs .the tax deductions in excess of the benefits recorded throughout the requisite service period are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations and are presented in the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows .stock options there were no grants of stock options to employees in 2017 .in 2016 and 2015 , the company granted non-qualified stock options to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the stock options vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning on january 1 of the year of the grant and have no performance vesting conditions .expense is recognized using the straight-line method and is amortized over the requisite service period. .
Question: what was the income tax benefit in the years of 2015 to 2017?
| convfinqa2680 |
on may 12 , 2017 , the company 2019s stockholders approved the american water works company , inc .2017 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2017 omnibus plan 201d ) .a total of 7.2 million shares of common stock may be issued under the 2017 omnibus plan .as of december 31 , 2017 , 7.2 million shares were available for grant under the 2017 omnibus plan .the 2017 omnibus plan provides that grants of awards may be in any of the following forms : incentive stock options , nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , stock units , stock awards , other stock-based awards and dividend equivalents , which may be granted only on stock units or other stock-based awards .following the approval of the 2017 omnibus plan , no additional awards are to be granted under the 2007 plan .however , shares will still be issued under the 2007 plan pursuant to the terms of awards previously issued under that plan prior to may 12 , 2017 .the cost of services received from employees in exchange for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards issued .the value of stock options and rsus awards at the date of the grant is amortized through expense over the three-year service period .all awards granted in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are classified as equity .the company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards over the vesting period of the award .the company stratified its grant populations and used historic employee turnover rates to estimate employee forfeitures .the estimated rate is compared to the actual forfeitures at the end of the reporting period and adjusted as necessary .the following table presents stock-based compensation expense recorded in operation and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
stock options | $ 1 | $ 2 | $ 2
rsus | 9 | 8 | 8
nonqualified employee stock purchase plan | 1 | 1 | 1
stock-based compensation | 11 | 11 | 11
income tax benefit | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 )
stock-based compensation expense net of tax | $ 7 | $ 7 | $ 7 there were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .the company receives a tax deduction based on the intrinsic value of the award at the exercise date for stock options and the distribution date for rsus .for each award , throughout the requisite service period , the company recognizes the tax benefits , which have been included in deferred income tax assets , related to compensation costs .the tax deductions in excess of the benefits recorded throughout the requisite service period are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations and are presented in the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows .stock options there were no grants of stock options to employees in 2017 .in 2016 and 2015 , the company granted non-qualified stock options to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the stock options vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning on january 1 of the year of the grant and have no performance vesting conditions .expense is recognized using the straight-line method and is amortized over the requisite service period. .
Question: what was the income tax benefit in the years of 2015 to 2017?
Steps: Ask for number -4
Answer: -4.0
Question: and what was the stock-based compensation in that period?
| 11.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on may 12 , 2017 , the company 2019s stockholders approved the american water works company , inc .2017 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2017 omnibus plan 201d ) .a total of 7.2 million shares of common stock may be issued under the 2017 omnibus plan .as of december 31 , 2017 , 7.2 million shares were available for grant under the 2017 omnibus plan .the 2017 omnibus plan provides that grants of awards may be in any of the following forms : incentive stock options , nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , stock units , stock awards , other stock-based awards and dividend equivalents , which may be granted only on stock units or other stock-based awards .following the approval of the 2017 omnibus plan , no additional awards are to be granted under the 2007 plan .however , shares will still be issued under the 2007 plan pursuant to the terms of awards previously issued under that plan prior to may 12 , 2017 .the cost of services received from employees in exchange for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards issued .the value of stock options and rsus awards at the date of the grant is amortized through expense over the three-year service period .all awards granted in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are classified as equity .the company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards over the vesting period of the award .the company stratified its grant populations and used historic employee turnover rates to estimate employee forfeitures .the estimated rate is compared to the actual forfeitures at the end of the reporting period and adjusted as necessary .the following table presents stock-based compensation expense recorded in operation and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
stock options | $ 1 | $ 2 | $ 2
rsus | 9 | 8 | 8
nonqualified employee stock purchase plan | 1 | 1 | 1
stock-based compensation | 11 | 11 | 11
income tax benefit | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 )
stock-based compensation expense net of tax | $ 7 | $ 7 | $ 7 there were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .the company receives a tax deduction based on the intrinsic value of the award at the exercise date for stock options and the distribution date for rsus .for each award , throughout the requisite service period , the company recognizes the tax benefits , which have been included in deferred income tax assets , related to compensation costs .the tax deductions in excess of the benefits recorded throughout the requisite service period are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations and are presented in the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows .stock options there were no grants of stock options to employees in 2017 .in 2016 and 2015 , the company granted non-qualified stock options to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the stock options vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning on january 1 of the year of the grant and have no performance vesting conditions .expense is recognized using the straight-line method and is amortized over the requisite service period. .
Question: what was the income tax benefit in the years of 2015 to 2017?
Steps: Ask for number -4
Answer: -4.0
Question: and what was the stock-based compensation in that period?
| convfinqa2681 |
on may 12 , 2017 , the company 2019s stockholders approved the american water works company , inc .2017 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2017 omnibus plan 201d ) .a total of 7.2 million shares of common stock may be issued under the 2017 omnibus plan .as of december 31 , 2017 , 7.2 million shares were available for grant under the 2017 omnibus plan .the 2017 omnibus plan provides that grants of awards may be in any of the following forms : incentive stock options , nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , stock units , stock awards , other stock-based awards and dividend equivalents , which may be granted only on stock units or other stock-based awards .following the approval of the 2017 omnibus plan , no additional awards are to be granted under the 2007 plan .however , shares will still be issued under the 2007 plan pursuant to the terms of awards previously issued under that plan prior to may 12 , 2017 .the cost of services received from employees in exchange for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards issued .the value of stock options and rsus awards at the date of the grant is amortized through expense over the three-year service period .all awards granted in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are classified as equity .the company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards over the vesting period of the award .the company stratified its grant populations and used historic employee turnover rates to estimate employee forfeitures .the estimated rate is compared to the actual forfeitures at the end of the reporting period and adjusted as necessary .the following table presents stock-based compensation expense recorded in operation and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
stock options | $ 1 | $ 2 | $ 2
rsus | 9 | 8 | 8
nonqualified employee stock purchase plan | 1 | 1 | 1
stock-based compensation | 11 | 11 | 11
income tax benefit | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 )
stock-based compensation expense net of tax | $ 7 | $ 7 | $ 7 there were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .the company receives a tax deduction based on the intrinsic value of the award at the exercise date for stock options and the distribution date for rsus .for each award , throughout the requisite service period , the company recognizes the tax benefits , which have been included in deferred income tax assets , related to compensation costs .the tax deductions in excess of the benefits recorded throughout the requisite service period are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations and are presented in the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows .stock options there were no grants of stock options to employees in 2017 .in 2016 and 2015 , the company granted non-qualified stock options to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the stock options vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning on january 1 of the year of the grant and have no performance vesting conditions .expense is recognized using the straight-line method and is amortized over the requisite service period. .
Question: what was the income tax benefit in the years of 2015 to 2017?
Steps: Ask for number -4
Answer: -4.0
Question: and what was the stock-based compensation in that period?
Steps: Ask for number 11
Answer: 11.0
Question: what portion, then, did that benefit represent in relation to this compensation?
| -0.36364 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on may 12 , 2017 , the company 2019s stockholders approved the american water works company , inc .2017 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2017 omnibus plan 201d ) .a total of 7.2 million shares of common stock may be issued under the 2017 omnibus plan .as of december 31 , 2017 , 7.2 million shares were available for grant under the 2017 omnibus plan .the 2017 omnibus plan provides that grants of awards may be in any of the following forms : incentive stock options , nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , stock units , stock awards , other stock-based awards and dividend equivalents , which may be granted only on stock units or other stock-based awards .following the approval of the 2017 omnibus plan , no additional awards are to be granted under the 2007 plan .however , shares will still be issued under the 2007 plan pursuant to the terms of awards previously issued under that plan prior to may 12 , 2017 .the cost of services received from employees in exchange for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards issued .the value of stock options and rsus awards at the date of the grant is amortized through expense over the three-year service period .all awards granted in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are classified as equity .the company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards over the vesting period of the award .the company stratified its grant populations and used historic employee turnover rates to estimate employee forfeitures .the estimated rate is compared to the actual forfeitures at the end of the reporting period and adjusted as necessary .the following table presents stock-based compensation expense recorded in operation and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
stock options | $ 1 | $ 2 | $ 2
rsus | 9 | 8 | 8
nonqualified employee stock purchase plan | 1 | 1 | 1
stock-based compensation | 11 | 11 | 11
income tax benefit | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 )
stock-based compensation expense net of tax | $ 7 | $ 7 | $ 7 there were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .the company receives a tax deduction based on the intrinsic value of the award at the exercise date for stock options and the distribution date for rsus .for each award , throughout the requisite service period , the company recognizes the tax benefits , which have been included in deferred income tax assets , related to compensation costs .the tax deductions in excess of the benefits recorded throughout the requisite service period are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations and are presented in the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows .stock options there were no grants of stock options to employees in 2017 .in 2016 and 2015 , the company granted non-qualified stock options to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the stock options vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning on january 1 of the year of the grant and have no performance vesting conditions .expense is recognized using the straight-line method and is amortized over the requisite service period. .
Question: what was the income tax benefit in the years of 2015 to 2017?
Steps: Ask for number -4
Answer: -4.0
Question: and what was the stock-based compensation in that period?
Steps: Ask for number 11
Answer: 11.0
Question: what portion, then, did that benefit represent in relation to this compensation?
| convfinqa2682 |
on may 12 , 2017 , the company 2019s stockholders approved the american water works company , inc .2017 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2017 omnibus plan 201d ) .a total of 7.2 million shares of common stock may be issued under the 2017 omnibus plan .as of december 31 , 2017 , 7.2 million shares were available for grant under the 2017 omnibus plan .the 2017 omnibus plan provides that grants of awards may be in any of the following forms : incentive stock options , nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , stock units , stock awards , other stock-based awards and dividend equivalents , which may be granted only on stock units or other stock-based awards .following the approval of the 2017 omnibus plan , no additional awards are to be granted under the 2007 plan .however , shares will still be issued under the 2007 plan pursuant to the terms of awards previously issued under that plan prior to may 12 , 2017 .the cost of services received from employees in exchange for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards issued .the value of stock options and rsus awards at the date of the grant is amortized through expense over the three-year service period .all awards granted in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are classified as equity .the company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards over the vesting period of the award .the company stratified its grant populations and used historic employee turnover rates to estimate employee forfeitures .the estimated rate is compared to the actual forfeitures at the end of the reporting period and adjusted as necessary .the following table presents stock-based compensation expense recorded in operation and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
stock options | $ 1 | $ 2 | $ 2
rsus | 9 | 8 | 8
nonqualified employee stock purchase plan | 1 | 1 | 1
stock-based compensation | 11 | 11 | 11
income tax benefit | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 )
stock-based compensation expense net of tax | $ 7 | $ 7 | $ 7 there were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .the company receives a tax deduction based on the intrinsic value of the award at the exercise date for stock options and the distribution date for rsus .for each award , throughout the requisite service period , the company recognizes the tax benefits , which have been included in deferred income tax assets , related to compensation costs .the tax deductions in excess of the benefits recorded throughout the requisite service period are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations and are presented in the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows .stock options there were no grants of stock options to employees in 2017 .in 2016 and 2015 , the company granted non-qualified stock options to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the stock options vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning on january 1 of the year of the grant and have no performance vesting conditions .expense is recognized using the straight-line method and is amortized over the requisite service period. .
Question: what was the income tax benefit in the years of 2015 to 2017?
Steps: Ask for number -4
Answer: -4.0
Question: and what was the stock-based compensation in that period?
Steps: Ask for number 11
Answer: 11.0
Question: what portion, then, did that benefit represent in relation to this compensation?
Steps: divide(-4, 11)
Answer: -0.36364
Question: and what was that in percentage?
| 0.36364 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
on may 12 , 2017 , the company 2019s stockholders approved the american water works company , inc .2017 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2017 omnibus plan 201d ) .a total of 7.2 million shares of common stock may be issued under the 2017 omnibus plan .as of december 31 , 2017 , 7.2 million shares were available for grant under the 2017 omnibus plan .the 2017 omnibus plan provides that grants of awards may be in any of the following forms : incentive stock options , nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , stock units , stock awards , other stock-based awards and dividend equivalents , which may be granted only on stock units or other stock-based awards .following the approval of the 2017 omnibus plan , no additional awards are to be granted under the 2007 plan .however , shares will still be issued under the 2007 plan pursuant to the terms of awards previously issued under that plan prior to may 12 , 2017 .the cost of services received from employees in exchange for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards issued .the value of stock options and rsus awards at the date of the grant is amortized through expense over the three-year service period .all awards granted in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are classified as equity .the company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards over the vesting period of the award .the company stratified its grant populations and used historic employee turnover rates to estimate employee forfeitures .the estimated rate is compared to the actual forfeitures at the end of the reporting period and adjusted as necessary .the following table presents stock-based compensation expense recorded in operation and maintenance expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: . | 2017 | 2016 | 2015
stock options | $ 1 | $ 2 | $ 2
rsus | 9 | 8 | 8
nonqualified employee stock purchase plan | 1 | 1 | 1
stock-based compensation | 11 | 11 | 11
income tax benefit | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 ) | -4 ( 4 )
stock-based compensation expense net of tax | $ 7 | $ 7 | $ 7 there were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .the company receives a tax deduction based on the intrinsic value of the award at the exercise date for stock options and the distribution date for rsus .for each award , throughout the requisite service period , the company recognizes the tax benefits , which have been included in deferred income tax assets , related to compensation costs .the tax deductions in excess of the benefits recorded throughout the requisite service period are recorded to the consolidated statements of operations and are presented in the financing section of the consolidated statements of cash flows .stock options there were no grants of stock options to employees in 2017 .in 2016 and 2015 , the company granted non-qualified stock options to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the stock options vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning on january 1 of the year of the grant and have no performance vesting conditions .expense is recognized using the straight-line method and is amortized over the requisite service period. .
Question: what was the income tax benefit in the years of 2015 to 2017?
Steps: Ask for number -4
Answer: -4.0
Question: and what was the stock-based compensation in that period?
Steps: Ask for number 11
Answer: 11.0
Question: what portion, then, did that benefit represent in relation to this compensation?
Steps: divide(-4, 11)
Answer: -0.36364
Question: and what was that in percentage?
| convfinqa2683 |
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the company and implex had been operating since 2000 , the following table summarizes the estimated fair values relating to the development and distribution of reconstructive of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of implant and trauma products incorporating trabecular metal the implex acquisition : ( in millions ) technology .as ofthe merger agreement contains provisions for additional april 23 , 2004annual cash earn-out payments that are based on year-over- current assets $ 23.1year sales growth through 2006 of certain products that . | as of april 23 2004
current assets | $ 23.1
property plant and equipment | 4.5
intangible assets subject to amortization: |
core technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 3.6
developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 103.9
other assets | 14.4
goodwill | 61.0
total assets acquired | 210.5
current liabilities | 14.1
deferred taxes | 43.3
total liabilities assumed | 57.4
net assets acquired | $ 153.1 estimates total earn-out payments , including payments core technology ( 30 year useful life ) 3.6 already made , to be in a range from $ 120 to $ 160 million .developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) 103.9 other assets 14.4these earn-out payments represent contingent consideration goodwill 61.0and , in accordance with sfas no .141 and eitf 95-8 2018 2018accounting for contingent consideration paid to the total assets acquired 210.5 shareholders of an acquired enterprise in a purchase current liabilities 14.1 deferred taxes 43.3business combination 2019 2019 , are recorded as an additional cost of the transaction upon resolution of the contingency and total liabilities assumed 57.4 therefore increase goodwill .net assets acquired $ 153.1the implex acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to sfas no .141 .4 .change in accounting principle accordingly , implex results of operations have been included in the company 2019s consolidated results of operations instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic subsequent to april 23 , 2004 , and its respective assets and surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical liabilities have been recorded at their estimated fair values in procedures .effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are the company 2019s consolidated statement of financial position as recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , of april 23 , 2004 , with the excess purchase price being plant and equipment .undeployed instruments are carried at allocated to goodwill .pro forma financial information has not cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .instruments in the been included as the acquisition did not have a material field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .impact upon the company 2019s financial position , results of depreciation is computed using the straight-line method operations or cash flows .based on average estimated useful lives , determined the company completed the preliminary purchase price principally in reference to associated product life cycles , allocation in accordance with u.s .generally accepted primarily five years .in accordance with sfas no .144 , the accounting principles .the process included interviews with company reviews instruments for impairment whenever management , review of the economic and competitive events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying environment and examination of assets including historical value of an asset may not be recoverable .an impairment loss performance and future prospects .the preliminary purchase would be recognized when estimated future cash flows price allocation was based on information currently available relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .to the company , and expectations and assumptions deemed depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general reasonable by the company 2019s management .no assurance can and administrative expense , consistent with the classification be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .estimate expected technology based product revenues , prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were development costs or profitability , or the events associated carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for with such technology , will occur as projected .the final obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and purchase price allocation may vary from the preliminary recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in purchase price allocation .the final valuation and associated the year in which the instruments were placed into service .purchase price allocation is expected to be completed as the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted soon as possible , but no later than one year from the date of to recognize the cost of these important assets of the acquisition .to the extent that the estimates need to be company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet adjusted , the company will do so .and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the periods benefited , typically five years .the effect of the change during the year ended december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted share .the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the .
Question: what was the amount of total assets acquired?
| 210.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the company and implex had been operating since 2000 , the following table summarizes the estimated fair values relating to the development and distribution of reconstructive of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of implant and trauma products incorporating trabecular metal the implex acquisition : ( in millions ) technology .as ofthe merger agreement contains provisions for additional april 23 , 2004annual cash earn-out payments that are based on year-over- current assets $ 23.1year sales growth through 2006 of certain products that . | as of april 23 2004
current assets | $ 23.1
property plant and equipment | 4.5
intangible assets subject to amortization: |
core technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 3.6
developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 103.9
other assets | 14.4
goodwill | 61.0
total assets acquired | 210.5
current liabilities | 14.1
deferred taxes | 43.3
total liabilities assumed | 57.4
net assets acquired | $ 153.1 estimates total earn-out payments , including payments core technology ( 30 year useful life ) 3.6 already made , to be in a range from $ 120 to $ 160 million .developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) 103.9 other assets 14.4these earn-out payments represent contingent consideration goodwill 61.0and , in accordance with sfas no .141 and eitf 95-8 2018 2018accounting for contingent consideration paid to the total assets acquired 210.5 shareholders of an acquired enterprise in a purchase current liabilities 14.1 deferred taxes 43.3business combination 2019 2019 , are recorded as an additional cost of the transaction upon resolution of the contingency and total liabilities assumed 57.4 therefore increase goodwill .net assets acquired $ 153.1the implex acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to sfas no .141 .4 .change in accounting principle accordingly , implex results of operations have been included in the company 2019s consolidated results of operations instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic subsequent to april 23 , 2004 , and its respective assets and surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical liabilities have been recorded at their estimated fair values in procedures .effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are the company 2019s consolidated statement of financial position as recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , of april 23 , 2004 , with the excess purchase price being plant and equipment .undeployed instruments are carried at allocated to goodwill .pro forma financial information has not cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .instruments in the been included as the acquisition did not have a material field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .impact upon the company 2019s financial position , results of depreciation is computed using the straight-line method operations or cash flows .based on average estimated useful lives , determined the company completed the preliminary purchase price principally in reference to associated product life cycles , allocation in accordance with u.s .generally accepted primarily five years .in accordance with sfas no .144 , the accounting principles .the process included interviews with company reviews instruments for impairment whenever management , review of the economic and competitive events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying environment and examination of assets including historical value of an asset may not be recoverable .an impairment loss performance and future prospects .the preliminary purchase would be recognized when estimated future cash flows price allocation was based on information currently available relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .to the company , and expectations and assumptions deemed depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general reasonable by the company 2019s management .no assurance can and administrative expense , consistent with the classification be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .estimate expected technology based product revenues , prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were development costs or profitability , or the events associated carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for with such technology , will occur as projected .the final obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and purchase price allocation may vary from the preliminary recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in purchase price allocation .the final valuation and associated the year in which the instruments were placed into service .purchase price allocation is expected to be completed as the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted soon as possible , but no later than one year from the date of to recognize the cost of these important assets of the acquisition .to the extent that the estimates need to be company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet adjusted , the company will do so .and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the periods benefited , typically five years .the effect of the change during the year ended december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted share .the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the .
Question: what was the amount of total assets acquired?
| convfinqa2684 |
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the company and implex had been operating since 2000 , the following table summarizes the estimated fair values relating to the development and distribution of reconstructive of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of implant and trauma products incorporating trabecular metal the implex acquisition : ( in millions ) technology .as ofthe merger agreement contains provisions for additional april 23 , 2004annual cash earn-out payments that are based on year-over- current assets $ 23.1year sales growth through 2006 of certain products that . | as of april 23 2004
current assets | $ 23.1
property plant and equipment | 4.5
intangible assets subject to amortization: |
core technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 3.6
developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 103.9
other assets | 14.4
goodwill | 61.0
total assets acquired | 210.5
current liabilities | 14.1
deferred taxes | 43.3
total liabilities assumed | 57.4
net assets acquired | $ 153.1 estimates total earn-out payments , including payments core technology ( 30 year useful life ) 3.6 already made , to be in a range from $ 120 to $ 160 million .developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) 103.9 other assets 14.4these earn-out payments represent contingent consideration goodwill 61.0and , in accordance with sfas no .141 and eitf 95-8 2018 2018accounting for contingent consideration paid to the total assets acquired 210.5 shareholders of an acquired enterprise in a purchase current liabilities 14.1 deferred taxes 43.3business combination 2019 2019 , are recorded as an additional cost of the transaction upon resolution of the contingency and total liabilities assumed 57.4 therefore increase goodwill .net assets acquired $ 153.1the implex acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to sfas no .141 .4 .change in accounting principle accordingly , implex results of operations have been included in the company 2019s consolidated results of operations instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic subsequent to april 23 , 2004 , and its respective assets and surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical liabilities have been recorded at their estimated fair values in procedures .effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are the company 2019s consolidated statement of financial position as recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , of april 23 , 2004 , with the excess purchase price being plant and equipment .undeployed instruments are carried at allocated to goodwill .pro forma financial information has not cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .instruments in the been included as the acquisition did not have a material field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .impact upon the company 2019s financial position , results of depreciation is computed using the straight-line method operations or cash flows .based on average estimated useful lives , determined the company completed the preliminary purchase price principally in reference to associated product life cycles , allocation in accordance with u.s .generally accepted primarily five years .in accordance with sfas no .144 , the accounting principles .the process included interviews with company reviews instruments for impairment whenever management , review of the economic and competitive events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying environment and examination of assets including historical value of an asset may not be recoverable .an impairment loss performance and future prospects .the preliminary purchase would be recognized when estimated future cash flows price allocation was based on information currently available relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .to the company , and expectations and assumptions deemed depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general reasonable by the company 2019s management .no assurance can and administrative expense , consistent with the classification be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .estimate expected technology based product revenues , prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were development costs or profitability , or the events associated carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for with such technology , will occur as projected .the final obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and purchase price allocation may vary from the preliminary recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in purchase price allocation .the final valuation and associated the year in which the instruments were placed into service .purchase price allocation is expected to be completed as the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted soon as possible , but no later than one year from the date of to recognize the cost of these important assets of the acquisition .to the extent that the estimates need to be company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet adjusted , the company will do so .and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the periods benefited , typically five years .the effect of the change during the year ended december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted share .the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the .
Question: what was the amount of total assets acquired?
Steps: Ask for number 210.5
Answer: 210.5
Question: and what was the total of net assets acquired?
| 153.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the company and implex had been operating since 2000 , the following table summarizes the estimated fair values relating to the development and distribution of reconstructive of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of implant and trauma products incorporating trabecular metal the implex acquisition : ( in millions ) technology .as ofthe merger agreement contains provisions for additional april 23 , 2004annual cash earn-out payments that are based on year-over- current assets $ 23.1year sales growth through 2006 of certain products that . | as of april 23 2004
current assets | $ 23.1
property plant and equipment | 4.5
intangible assets subject to amortization: |
core technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 3.6
developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 103.9
other assets | 14.4
goodwill | 61.0
total assets acquired | 210.5
current liabilities | 14.1
deferred taxes | 43.3
total liabilities assumed | 57.4
net assets acquired | $ 153.1 estimates total earn-out payments , including payments core technology ( 30 year useful life ) 3.6 already made , to be in a range from $ 120 to $ 160 million .developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) 103.9 other assets 14.4these earn-out payments represent contingent consideration goodwill 61.0and , in accordance with sfas no .141 and eitf 95-8 2018 2018accounting for contingent consideration paid to the total assets acquired 210.5 shareholders of an acquired enterprise in a purchase current liabilities 14.1 deferred taxes 43.3business combination 2019 2019 , are recorded as an additional cost of the transaction upon resolution of the contingency and total liabilities assumed 57.4 therefore increase goodwill .net assets acquired $ 153.1the implex acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to sfas no .141 .4 .change in accounting principle accordingly , implex results of operations have been included in the company 2019s consolidated results of operations instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic subsequent to april 23 , 2004 , and its respective assets and surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical liabilities have been recorded at their estimated fair values in procedures .effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are the company 2019s consolidated statement of financial position as recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , of april 23 , 2004 , with the excess purchase price being plant and equipment .undeployed instruments are carried at allocated to goodwill .pro forma financial information has not cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .instruments in the been included as the acquisition did not have a material field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .impact upon the company 2019s financial position , results of depreciation is computed using the straight-line method operations or cash flows .based on average estimated useful lives , determined the company completed the preliminary purchase price principally in reference to associated product life cycles , allocation in accordance with u.s .generally accepted primarily five years .in accordance with sfas no .144 , the accounting principles .the process included interviews with company reviews instruments for impairment whenever management , review of the economic and competitive events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying environment and examination of assets including historical value of an asset may not be recoverable .an impairment loss performance and future prospects .the preliminary purchase would be recognized when estimated future cash flows price allocation was based on information currently available relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .to the company , and expectations and assumptions deemed depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general reasonable by the company 2019s management .no assurance can and administrative expense , consistent with the classification be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .estimate expected technology based product revenues , prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were development costs or profitability , or the events associated carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for with such technology , will occur as projected .the final obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and purchase price allocation may vary from the preliminary recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in purchase price allocation .the final valuation and associated the year in which the instruments were placed into service .purchase price allocation is expected to be completed as the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted soon as possible , but no later than one year from the date of to recognize the cost of these important assets of the acquisition .to the extent that the estimates need to be company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet adjusted , the company will do so .and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the periods benefited , typically five years .the effect of the change during the year ended december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted share .the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the .
Question: what was the amount of total assets acquired?
Steps: Ask for number 210.5
Answer: 210.5
Question: and what was the total of net assets acquired?
| convfinqa2685 |
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the company and implex had been operating since 2000 , the following table summarizes the estimated fair values relating to the development and distribution of reconstructive of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of implant and trauma products incorporating trabecular metal the implex acquisition : ( in millions ) technology .as ofthe merger agreement contains provisions for additional april 23 , 2004annual cash earn-out payments that are based on year-over- current assets $ 23.1year sales growth through 2006 of certain products that . | as of april 23 2004
current assets | $ 23.1
property plant and equipment | 4.5
intangible assets subject to amortization: |
core technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 3.6
developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 103.9
other assets | 14.4
goodwill | 61.0
total assets acquired | 210.5
current liabilities | 14.1
deferred taxes | 43.3
total liabilities assumed | 57.4
net assets acquired | $ 153.1 estimates total earn-out payments , including payments core technology ( 30 year useful life ) 3.6 already made , to be in a range from $ 120 to $ 160 million .developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) 103.9 other assets 14.4these earn-out payments represent contingent consideration goodwill 61.0and , in accordance with sfas no .141 and eitf 95-8 2018 2018accounting for contingent consideration paid to the total assets acquired 210.5 shareholders of an acquired enterprise in a purchase current liabilities 14.1 deferred taxes 43.3business combination 2019 2019 , are recorded as an additional cost of the transaction upon resolution of the contingency and total liabilities assumed 57.4 therefore increase goodwill .net assets acquired $ 153.1the implex acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to sfas no .141 .4 .change in accounting principle accordingly , implex results of operations have been included in the company 2019s consolidated results of operations instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic subsequent to april 23 , 2004 , and its respective assets and surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical liabilities have been recorded at their estimated fair values in procedures .effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are the company 2019s consolidated statement of financial position as recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , of april 23 , 2004 , with the excess purchase price being plant and equipment .undeployed instruments are carried at allocated to goodwill .pro forma financial information has not cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .instruments in the been included as the acquisition did not have a material field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .impact upon the company 2019s financial position , results of depreciation is computed using the straight-line method operations or cash flows .based on average estimated useful lives , determined the company completed the preliminary purchase price principally in reference to associated product life cycles , allocation in accordance with u.s .generally accepted primarily five years .in accordance with sfas no .144 , the accounting principles .the process included interviews with company reviews instruments for impairment whenever management , review of the economic and competitive events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying environment and examination of assets including historical value of an asset may not be recoverable .an impairment loss performance and future prospects .the preliminary purchase would be recognized when estimated future cash flows price allocation was based on information currently available relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .to the company , and expectations and assumptions deemed depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general reasonable by the company 2019s management .no assurance can and administrative expense , consistent with the classification be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .estimate expected technology based product revenues , prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were development costs or profitability , or the events associated carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for with such technology , will occur as projected .the final obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and purchase price allocation may vary from the preliminary recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in purchase price allocation .the final valuation and associated the year in which the instruments were placed into service .purchase price allocation is expected to be completed as the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted soon as possible , but no later than one year from the date of to recognize the cost of these important assets of the acquisition .to the extent that the estimates need to be company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet adjusted , the company will do so .and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the periods benefited , typically five years .the effect of the change during the year ended december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted share .the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the .
Question: what was the amount of total assets acquired?
Steps: Ask for number 210.5
Answer: 210.5
Question: and what was the total of net assets acquired?
Steps: Ask for number 153.1
Answer: 153.1
Question: what is, then, the difference between the total assets and the net assets acquired?
| 57.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the company and implex had been operating since 2000 , the following table summarizes the estimated fair values relating to the development and distribution of reconstructive of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of implant and trauma products incorporating trabecular metal the implex acquisition : ( in millions ) technology .as ofthe merger agreement contains provisions for additional april 23 , 2004annual cash earn-out payments that are based on year-over- current assets $ 23.1year sales growth through 2006 of certain products that . | as of april 23 2004
current assets | $ 23.1
property plant and equipment | 4.5
intangible assets subject to amortization: |
core technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 3.6
developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 103.9
other assets | 14.4
goodwill | 61.0
total assets acquired | 210.5
current liabilities | 14.1
deferred taxes | 43.3
total liabilities assumed | 57.4
net assets acquired | $ 153.1 estimates total earn-out payments , including payments core technology ( 30 year useful life ) 3.6 already made , to be in a range from $ 120 to $ 160 million .developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) 103.9 other assets 14.4these earn-out payments represent contingent consideration goodwill 61.0and , in accordance with sfas no .141 and eitf 95-8 2018 2018accounting for contingent consideration paid to the total assets acquired 210.5 shareholders of an acquired enterprise in a purchase current liabilities 14.1 deferred taxes 43.3business combination 2019 2019 , are recorded as an additional cost of the transaction upon resolution of the contingency and total liabilities assumed 57.4 therefore increase goodwill .net assets acquired $ 153.1the implex acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to sfas no .141 .4 .change in accounting principle accordingly , implex results of operations have been included in the company 2019s consolidated results of operations instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic subsequent to april 23 , 2004 , and its respective assets and surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical liabilities have been recorded at their estimated fair values in procedures .effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are the company 2019s consolidated statement of financial position as recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , of april 23 , 2004 , with the excess purchase price being plant and equipment .undeployed instruments are carried at allocated to goodwill .pro forma financial information has not cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .instruments in the been included as the acquisition did not have a material field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .impact upon the company 2019s financial position , results of depreciation is computed using the straight-line method operations or cash flows .based on average estimated useful lives , determined the company completed the preliminary purchase price principally in reference to associated product life cycles , allocation in accordance with u.s .generally accepted primarily five years .in accordance with sfas no .144 , the accounting principles .the process included interviews with company reviews instruments for impairment whenever management , review of the economic and competitive events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying environment and examination of assets including historical value of an asset may not be recoverable .an impairment loss performance and future prospects .the preliminary purchase would be recognized when estimated future cash flows price allocation was based on information currently available relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .to the company , and expectations and assumptions deemed depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general reasonable by the company 2019s management .no assurance can and administrative expense , consistent with the classification be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .estimate expected technology based product revenues , prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were development costs or profitability , or the events associated carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for with such technology , will occur as projected .the final obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and purchase price allocation may vary from the preliminary recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in purchase price allocation .the final valuation and associated the year in which the instruments were placed into service .purchase price allocation is expected to be completed as the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted soon as possible , but no later than one year from the date of to recognize the cost of these important assets of the acquisition .to the extent that the estimates need to be company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet adjusted , the company will do so .and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the periods benefited , typically five years .the effect of the change during the year ended december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted share .the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the .
Question: what was the amount of total assets acquired?
Steps: Ask for number 210.5
Answer: 210.5
Question: and what was the total of net assets acquired?
Steps: Ask for number 153.1
Answer: 153.1
Question: what is, then, the difference between the total assets and the net assets acquired?
| convfinqa2686 |
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the company and implex had been operating since 2000 , the following table summarizes the estimated fair values relating to the development and distribution of reconstructive of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of implant and trauma products incorporating trabecular metal the implex acquisition : ( in millions ) technology .as ofthe merger agreement contains provisions for additional april 23 , 2004annual cash earn-out payments that are based on year-over- current assets $ 23.1year sales growth through 2006 of certain products that . | as of april 23 2004
current assets | $ 23.1
property plant and equipment | 4.5
intangible assets subject to amortization: |
core technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 3.6
developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 103.9
other assets | 14.4
goodwill | 61.0
total assets acquired | 210.5
current liabilities | 14.1
deferred taxes | 43.3
total liabilities assumed | 57.4
net assets acquired | $ 153.1 estimates total earn-out payments , including payments core technology ( 30 year useful life ) 3.6 already made , to be in a range from $ 120 to $ 160 million .developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) 103.9 other assets 14.4these earn-out payments represent contingent consideration goodwill 61.0and , in accordance with sfas no .141 and eitf 95-8 2018 2018accounting for contingent consideration paid to the total assets acquired 210.5 shareholders of an acquired enterprise in a purchase current liabilities 14.1 deferred taxes 43.3business combination 2019 2019 , are recorded as an additional cost of the transaction upon resolution of the contingency and total liabilities assumed 57.4 therefore increase goodwill .net assets acquired $ 153.1the implex acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to sfas no .141 .4 .change in accounting principle accordingly , implex results of operations have been included in the company 2019s consolidated results of operations instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic subsequent to april 23 , 2004 , and its respective assets and surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical liabilities have been recorded at their estimated fair values in procedures .effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are the company 2019s consolidated statement of financial position as recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , of april 23 , 2004 , with the excess purchase price being plant and equipment .undeployed instruments are carried at allocated to goodwill .pro forma financial information has not cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .instruments in the been included as the acquisition did not have a material field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .impact upon the company 2019s financial position , results of depreciation is computed using the straight-line method operations or cash flows .based on average estimated useful lives , determined the company completed the preliminary purchase price principally in reference to associated product life cycles , allocation in accordance with u.s .generally accepted primarily five years .in accordance with sfas no .144 , the accounting principles .the process included interviews with company reviews instruments for impairment whenever management , review of the economic and competitive events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying environment and examination of assets including historical value of an asset may not be recoverable .an impairment loss performance and future prospects .the preliminary purchase would be recognized when estimated future cash flows price allocation was based on information currently available relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .to the company , and expectations and assumptions deemed depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general reasonable by the company 2019s management .no assurance can and administrative expense , consistent with the classification be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .estimate expected technology based product revenues , prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were development costs or profitability , or the events associated carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for with such technology , will occur as projected .the final obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and purchase price allocation may vary from the preliminary recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in purchase price allocation .the final valuation and associated the year in which the instruments were placed into service .purchase price allocation is expected to be completed as the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted soon as possible , but no later than one year from the date of to recognize the cost of these important assets of the acquisition .to the extent that the estimates need to be company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet adjusted , the company will do so .and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the periods benefited , typically five years .the effect of the change during the year ended december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted share .the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the .
Question: what was the amount of total assets acquired?
Steps: Ask for number 210.5
Answer: 210.5
Question: and what was the total of net assets acquired?
Steps: Ask for number 153.1
Answer: 153.1
Question: what is, then, the difference between the total assets and the net assets acquired?
Steps: subtract(210.5, 153.1)
Answer: 57.4
Question: and how much does this difference represent in relation to the total of net assets acquired, in percentage?
| 0.37492 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 4 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the company and implex had been operating since 2000 , the following table summarizes the estimated fair values relating to the development and distribution of reconstructive of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of implant and trauma products incorporating trabecular metal the implex acquisition : ( in millions ) technology .as ofthe merger agreement contains provisions for additional april 23 , 2004annual cash earn-out payments that are based on year-over- current assets $ 23.1year sales growth through 2006 of certain products that . | as of april 23 2004
current assets | $ 23.1
property plant and equipment | 4.5
intangible assets subject to amortization: |
core technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 3.6
developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) | 103.9
other assets | 14.4
goodwill | 61.0
total assets acquired | 210.5
current liabilities | 14.1
deferred taxes | 43.3
total liabilities assumed | 57.4
net assets acquired | $ 153.1 estimates total earn-out payments , including payments core technology ( 30 year useful life ) 3.6 already made , to be in a range from $ 120 to $ 160 million .developed technology ( 30 year useful life ) 103.9 other assets 14.4these earn-out payments represent contingent consideration goodwill 61.0and , in accordance with sfas no .141 and eitf 95-8 2018 2018accounting for contingent consideration paid to the total assets acquired 210.5 shareholders of an acquired enterprise in a purchase current liabilities 14.1 deferred taxes 43.3business combination 2019 2019 , are recorded as an additional cost of the transaction upon resolution of the contingency and total liabilities assumed 57.4 therefore increase goodwill .net assets acquired $ 153.1the implex acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting pursuant to sfas no .141 .4 .change in accounting principle accordingly , implex results of operations have been included in the company 2019s consolidated results of operations instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic subsequent to april 23 , 2004 , and its respective assets and surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical liabilities have been recorded at their estimated fair values in procedures .effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are the company 2019s consolidated statement of financial position as recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , of april 23 , 2004 , with the excess purchase price being plant and equipment .undeployed instruments are carried at allocated to goodwill .pro forma financial information has not cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .instruments in the been included as the acquisition did not have a material field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .impact upon the company 2019s financial position , results of depreciation is computed using the straight-line method operations or cash flows .based on average estimated useful lives , determined the company completed the preliminary purchase price principally in reference to associated product life cycles , allocation in accordance with u.s .generally accepted primarily five years .in accordance with sfas no .144 , the accounting principles .the process included interviews with company reviews instruments for impairment whenever management , review of the economic and competitive events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying environment and examination of assets including historical value of an asset may not be recoverable .an impairment loss performance and future prospects .the preliminary purchase would be recognized when estimated future cash flows price allocation was based on information currently available relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .to the company , and expectations and assumptions deemed depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general reasonable by the company 2019s management .no assurance can and administrative expense , consistent with the classification be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .estimate expected technology based product revenues , prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were development costs or profitability , or the events associated carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for with such technology , will occur as projected .the final obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and purchase price allocation may vary from the preliminary recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in purchase price allocation .the final valuation and associated the year in which the instruments were placed into service .purchase price allocation is expected to be completed as the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted soon as possible , but no later than one year from the date of to recognize the cost of these important assets of the acquisition .to the extent that the estimates need to be company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet adjusted , the company will do so .and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the periods benefited , typically five years .the effect of the change during the year ended december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted share .the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the .
Question: what was the amount of total assets acquired?
Steps: Ask for number 210.5
Answer: 210.5
Question: and what was the total of net assets acquired?
Steps: Ask for number 153.1
Answer: 153.1
Question: what is, then, the difference between the total assets and the net assets acquired?
Steps: subtract(210.5, 153.1)
Answer: 57.4
Question: and how much does this difference represent in relation to the total of net assets acquired, in percentage?
| convfinqa2687 |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no .123 , as amended by sfas no .148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 .the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model .the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively .key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . | 2004 | 2003 | 2002
approximate risk-free interest rate | 4.23% ( 4.23 % ) | 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) | 4.53% ( 4.53 % )
expected life of option grants | 4 years | 4 years | 5 years
expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan ) | 80.6% ( 80.6 % ) | 86.6% ( 86.6 % ) | 92.3% ( 92.3 % )
expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans ) | n/a | n/a | n/a
expected dividends | n/a | n/a | n/a voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) .the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico .the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure .during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees .such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share .the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request .the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model .as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 .no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 .( see note 10. ) .
Question: what was the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2004?
| 7.05 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no .123 , as amended by sfas no .148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 .the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model .the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively .key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . | 2004 | 2003 | 2002
approximate risk-free interest rate | 4.23% ( 4.23 % ) | 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) | 4.53% ( 4.53 % )
expected life of option grants | 4 years | 4 years | 5 years
expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan ) | 80.6% ( 80.6 % ) | 86.6% ( 86.6 % ) | 92.3% ( 92.3 % )
expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans ) | n/a | n/a | n/a
expected dividends | n/a | n/a | n/a voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) .the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico .the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure .during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees .such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share .the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request .the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model .as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 .no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 .( see note 10. ) .
Question: what was the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2004?
| convfinqa2688 |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no .123 , as amended by sfas no .148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 .the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model .the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively .key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . | 2004 | 2003 | 2002
approximate risk-free interest rate | 4.23% ( 4.23 % ) | 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) | 4.53% ( 4.53 % )
expected life of option grants | 4 years | 4 years | 5 years
expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan ) | 80.6% ( 80.6 % ) | 86.6% ( 86.6 % ) | 92.3% ( 92.3 % )
expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans ) | n/a | n/a | n/a
expected dividends | n/a | n/a | n/a voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) .the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico .the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure .during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees .such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share .the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request .the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model .as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 .no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 .( see note 10. ) .
Question: what was the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 7.05
Answer: 7.05
Question: and in 2003?
| 6.32 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no .123 , as amended by sfas no .148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 .the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model .the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively .key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . | 2004 | 2003 | 2002
approximate risk-free interest rate | 4.23% ( 4.23 % ) | 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) | 4.53% ( 4.53 % )
expected life of option grants | 4 years | 4 years | 5 years
expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan ) | 80.6% ( 80.6 % ) | 86.6% ( 86.6 % ) | 92.3% ( 92.3 % )
expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans ) | n/a | n/a | n/a
expected dividends | n/a | n/a | n/a voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) .the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico .the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure .during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees .such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share .the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request .the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model .as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 .no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 .( see note 10. ) .
Question: what was the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 7.05
Answer: 7.05
Question: and in 2003?
| convfinqa2689 |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no .123 , as amended by sfas no .148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 .the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model .the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively .key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . | 2004 | 2003 | 2002
approximate risk-free interest rate | 4.23% ( 4.23 % ) | 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) | 4.53% ( 4.53 % )
expected life of option grants | 4 years | 4 years | 5 years
expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan ) | 80.6% ( 80.6 % ) | 86.6% ( 86.6 % ) | 92.3% ( 92.3 % )
expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans ) | n/a | n/a | n/a
expected dividends | n/a | n/a | n/a voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) .the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico .the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure .during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees .such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share .the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request .the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model .as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 .no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 .( see note 10. ) .
Question: what was the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 7.05
Answer: 7.05
Question: and in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 6.32
Answer: 6.32
Question: so what was the change in this value between these years?
| 0.73 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no .123 , as amended by sfas no .148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 .the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model .the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively .key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . | 2004 | 2003 | 2002
approximate risk-free interest rate | 4.23% ( 4.23 % ) | 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) | 4.53% ( 4.53 % )
expected life of option grants | 4 years | 4 years | 5 years
expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan ) | 80.6% ( 80.6 % ) | 86.6% ( 86.6 % ) | 92.3% ( 92.3 % )
expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans ) | n/a | n/a | n/a
expected dividends | n/a | n/a | n/a voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) .the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico .the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure .during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees .such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share .the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request .the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model .as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 .no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 .( see note 10. ) .
Question: what was the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 7.05
Answer: 7.05
Question: and in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 6.32
Answer: 6.32
Question: so what was the change in this value between these years?
| convfinqa2690 |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no .123 , as amended by sfas no .148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 .the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model .the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively .key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . | 2004 | 2003 | 2002
approximate risk-free interest rate | 4.23% ( 4.23 % ) | 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) | 4.53% ( 4.53 % )
expected life of option grants | 4 years | 4 years | 5 years
expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan ) | 80.6% ( 80.6 % ) | 86.6% ( 86.6 % ) | 92.3% ( 92.3 % )
expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans ) | n/a | n/a | n/a
expected dividends | n/a | n/a | n/a voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) .the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico .the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure .during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees .such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share .the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request .the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model .as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 .no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 .( see note 10. ) .
Question: what was the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 7.05
Answer: 7.05
Question: and in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 6.32
Answer: 6.32
Question: so what was the change in this value between these years?
Steps: subtract(7.05, 6.32)
Answer: 0.73
Question: and the value for 2003 again?
| 6.32 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no .123 , as amended by sfas no .148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 .the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model .the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively .key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . | 2004 | 2003 | 2002
approximate risk-free interest rate | 4.23% ( 4.23 % ) | 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) | 4.53% ( 4.53 % )
expected life of option grants | 4 years | 4 years | 5 years
expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan ) | 80.6% ( 80.6 % ) | 86.6% ( 86.6 % ) | 92.3% ( 92.3 % )
expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans ) | n/a | n/a | n/a
expected dividends | n/a | n/a | n/a voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) .the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico .the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure .during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees .such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share .the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request .the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model .as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 .no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 .( see note 10. ) .
Question: what was the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 7.05
Answer: 7.05
Question: and in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 6.32
Answer: 6.32
Question: so what was the change in this value between these years?
Steps: subtract(7.05, 6.32)
Answer: 0.73
Question: and the value for 2003 again?
| convfinqa2691 |
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no .123 , as amended by sfas no .148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 .the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model .the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively .key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . | 2004 | 2003 | 2002
approximate risk-free interest rate | 4.23% ( 4.23 % ) | 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) | 4.53% ( 4.53 % )
expected life of option grants | 4 years | 4 years | 5 years
expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan ) | 80.6% ( 80.6 % ) | 86.6% ( 86.6 % ) | 92.3% ( 92.3 % )
expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans ) | n/a | n/a | n/a
expected dividends | n/a | n/a | n/a voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) .the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico .the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure .during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees .such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share .the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request .the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model .as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 .no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 .( see note 10. ) .
Question: what was the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 7.05
Answer: 7.05
Question: and in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 6.32
Answer: 6.32
Question: so what was the change in this value between these years?
Steps: subtract(7.05, 6.32)
Answer: 0.73
Question: and the value for 2003 again?
Steps: Ask for number 6.32
Answer: 6.32
Question: and the growth rate during this time?
| 0.11551 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no .123 , as amended by sfas no .148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 .the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model .the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively .key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . | 2004 | 2003 | 2002
approximate risk-free interest rate | 4.23% ( 4.23 % ) | 4.00% ( 4.00 % ) | 4.53% ( 4.53 % )
expected life of option grants | 4 years | 4 years | 5 years
expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan ) | 80.6% ( 80.6 % ) | 86.6% ( 86.6 % ) | 92.3% ( 92.3 % )
expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans ) | n/a | n/a | n/a
expected dividends | n/a | n/a | n/a voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant .these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock .the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option .no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date .atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) .the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico .the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure .during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees .such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share .the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request .the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model .as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 .no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 .( see note 10. ) .
Question: what was the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 7.05
Answer: 7.05
Question: and in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 6.32
Answer: 6.32
Question: so what was the change in this value between these years?
Steps: subtract(7.05, 6.32)
Answer: 0.73
Question: and the value for 2003 again?
Steps: Ask for number 6.32
Answer: 6.32
Question: and the growth rate during this time?
| convfinqa2692 |
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and . year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ) | year ended december 31 , 2010 | year ended december 31 , 2009 | 2008
balance january 1 | $ 25544 | $ 32619 | $ 2014
washington mutual acquisition | 2014 | 2014 | 39454
accretion into interest income | -3232 ( 3232 ) | -4363 ( 4363 ) | -1292 ( 1292 )
changes in interest rates on variable rate loans | -819 ( 819 ) | -4849 ( 4849 ) | -5543 ( 5543 )
other changes in expected cash flows ( a ) | -2396 ( 2396 ) | 2137 | 2014
balance december 31 | $ 19097 | $ 25544 | $ 32619
accretable yield percentage | 4.35% ( 4.35 % ) | 5.14% ( 5.14 % ) | 5.81% ( 5.81 % ) ( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions .for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference .such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage .the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions .to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods .certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) .extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
Question: what was the accretable yield balance in 2010?
| 19097.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and . year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ) | year ended december 31 , 2010 | year ended december 31 , 2009 | 2008
balance january 1 | $ 25544 | $ 32619 | $ 2014
washington mutual acquisition | 2014 | 2014 | 39454
accretion into interest income | -3232 ( 3232 ) | -4363 ( 4363 ) | -1292 ( 1292 )
changes in interest rates on variable rate loans | -819 ( 819 ) | -4849 ( 4849 ) | -5543 ( 5543 )
other changes in expected cash flows ( a ) | -2396 ( 2396 ) | 2137 | 2014
balance december 31 | $ 19097 | $ 25544 | $ 32619
accretable yield percentage | 4.35% ( 4.35 % ) | 5.14% ( 5.14 % ) | 5.81% ( 5.81 % ) ( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions .for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference .such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage .the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions .to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods .certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) .extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
Question: what was the accretable yield balance in 2010?
| convfinqa2693 |
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and . year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ) | year ended december 31 , 2010 | year ended december 31 , 2009 | 2008
balance january 1 | $ 25544 | $ 32619 | $ 2014
washington mutual acquisition | 2014 | 2014 | 39454
accretion into interest income | -3232 ( 3232 ) | -4363 ( 4363 ) | -1292 ( 1292 )
changes in interest rates on variable rate loans | -819 ( 819 ) | -4849 ( 4849 ) | -5543 ( 5543 )
other changes in expected cash flows ( a ) | -2396 ( 2396 ) | 2137 | 2014
balance december 31 | $ 19097 | $ 25544 | $ 32619
accretable yield percentage | 4.35% ( 4.35 % ) | 5.14% ( 5.14 % ) | 5.81% ( 5.81 % ) ( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions .for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference .such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage .the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions .to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods .certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) .extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
Question: what was the accretable yield balance in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 19097
Answer: 19097.0
Question: what was in in 2009?
| 25544.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and . year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ) | year ended december 31 , 2010 | year ended december 31 , 2009 | 2008
balance january 1 | $ 25544 | $ 32619 | $ 2014
washington mutual acquisition | 2014 | 2014 | 39454
accretion into interest income | -3232 ( 3232 ) | -4363 ( 4363 ) | -1292 ( 1292 )
changes in interest rates on variable rate loans | -819 ( 819 ) | -4849 ( 4849 ) | -5543 ( 5543 )
other changes in expected cash flows ( a ) | -2396 ( 2396 ) | 2137 | 2014
balance december 31 | $ 19097 | $ 25544 | $ 32619
accretable yield percentage | 4.35% ( 4.35 % ) | 5.14% ( 5.14 % ) | 5.81% ( 5.81 % ) ( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions .for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference .such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage .the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions .to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods .certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) .extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
Question: what was the accretable yield balance in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 19097
Answer: 19097.0
Question: what was in in 2009?
| convfinqa2694 |
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and . year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ) | year ended december 31 , 2010 | year ended december 31 , 2009 | 2008
balance january 1 | $ 25544 | $ 32619 | $ 2014
washington mutual acquisition | 2014 | 2014 | 39454
accretion into interest income | -3232 ( 3232 ) | -4363 ( 4363 ) | -1292 ( 1292 )
changes in interest rates on variable rate loans | -819 ( 819 ) | -4849 ( 4849 ) | -5543 ( 5543 )
other changes in expected cash flows ( a ) | -2396 ( 2396 ) | 2137 | 2014
balance december 31 | $ 19097 | $ 25544 | $ 32619
accretable yield percentage | 4.35% ( 4.35 % ) | 5.14% ( 5.14 % ) | 5.81% ( 5.81 % ) ( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions .for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference .such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage .the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions .to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods .certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) .extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
Question: what was the accretable yield balance in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 19097
Answer: 19097.0
Question: what was in in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 25544
Answer: 25544.0
Question: what was the net change?
| -6447.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and . year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ) | year ended december 31 , 2010 | year ended december 31 , 2009 | 2008
balance january 1 | $ 25544 | $ 32619 | $ 2014
washington mutual acquisition | 2014 | 2014 | 39454
accretion into interest income | -3232 ( 3232 ) | -4363 ( 4363 ) | -1292 ( 1292 )
changes in interest rates on variable rate loans | -819 ( 819 ) | -4849 ( 4849 ) | -5543 ( 5543 )
other changes in expected cash flows ( a ) | -2396 ( 2396 ) | 2137 | 2014
balance december 31 | $ 19097 | $ 25544 | $ 32619
accretable yield percentage | 4.35% ( 4.35 % ) | 5.14% ( 5.14 % ) | 5.81% ( 5.81 % ) ( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions .for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference .such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage .the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions .to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods .certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) .extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
Question: what was the accretable yield balance in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 19097
Answer: 19097.0
Question: what was in in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 25544
Answer: 25544.0
Question: what was the net change?
| convfinqa2695 |
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and . year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ) | year ended december 31 , 2010 | year ended december 31 , 2009 | 2008
balance january 1 | $ 25544 | $ 32619 | $ 2014
washington mutual acquisition | 2014 | 2014 | 39454
accretion into interest income | -3232 ( 3232 ) | -4363 ( 4363 ) | -1292 ( 1292 )
changes in interest rates on variable rate loans | -819 ( 819 ) | -4849 ( 4849 ) | -5543 ( 5543 )
other changes in expected cash flows ( a ) | -2396 ( 2396 ) | 2137 | 2014
balance december 31 | $ 19097 | $ 25544 | $ 32619
accretable yield percentage | 4.35% ( 4.35 % ) | 5.14% ( 5.14 % ) | 5.81% ( 5.81 % ) ( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions .for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference .such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage .the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions .to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods .certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) .extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
Question: what was the accretable yield balance in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 19097
Answer: 19097.0
Question: what was in in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 25544
Answer: 25544.0
Question: what was the net change?
Steps: subtract(19097, 25544)
Answer: -6447.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.25239 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and . year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ) | year ended december 31 , 2010 | year ended december 31 , 2009 | 2008
balance january 1 | $ 25544 | $ 32619 | $ 2014
washington mutual acquisition | 2014 | 2014 | 39454
accretion into interest income | -3232 ( 3232 ) | -4363 ( 4363 ) | -1292 ( 1292 )
changes in interest rates on variable rate loans | -819 ( 819 ) | -4849 ( 4849 ) | -5543 ( 5543 )
other changes in expected cash flows ( a ) | -2396 ( 2396 ) | 2137 | 2014
balance december 31 | $ 19097 | $ 25544 | $ 32619
accretable yield percentage | 4.35% ( 4.35 % ) | 5.14% ( 5.14 % ) | 5.81% ( 5.81 % ) ( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions .for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference .such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage .the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions .to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods .certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) .extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .
Question: what was the accretable yield balance in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 19097
Answer: 19097.0
Question: what was in in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 25544
Answer: 25544.0
Question: what was the net change?
Steps: subtract(19097, 25544)
Answer: -6447.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| convfinqa2696 |
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : . | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
net income | $ 807 | $ 3804 | $ 3338
non-cash operating activities ( a ) | 7301 | 4505 | 4398
pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) | -917 ( 917 ) | -1436 ( 1436 ) | -3240 ( 3240 )
income tax receivables and payables | 280 | 236 | -319 ( 319 )
changes in working capital and other noncurrent assets and liabilities | -148 ( 148 ) | -12 ( 12 ) | -340 ( 340 )
other operating activities | -107 ( 107 ) | -24 ( 24 ) | -2 ( 2 )
net cash from operating activities | $ 7216 | $ 7073 | $ 3835 ( a ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative and foreign exchange transactions , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense , impairment charges and other non-cash items .cash from operating activities remained strong throughout the 2010 to 2012 time period .operating cash flow was favorably impacted in 2012 , compared with 2011 , by lower contributions into our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans ; however , this was partially offset by changes in our working capital position , which was impacted by overall growth in the business .the change in the cash flows for income tax receivables and payables in 2011 and 2010 was primarily related to the timing of discretionary pension contributions during 2010 , as discussed further in the following paragraph .except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company-sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans .2022 in 2012 , we made a $ 355 million required contribution to the ups ibt pension plan .2022 in 2011 , we made a $ 1.2 billion contribution to the ups ibt pension plan , which satisfied our 2011 contribution requirements and also approximately $ 440 million in contributions that would not have been required until after 2011 .2022 in 2010 , we made $ 2.0 billion in discretionary contributions to our ups retirement and ups pension plans , and $ 980 million in required contributions to our ups ibt pension plan .2022 the remaining contributions in the 2010 through 2012 period were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s .postretirement medical benefit plans .as discussed further in the 201ccontractual commitments 201d section , we have minimum funding requirements in the next several years , primarily related to the ups ibt pension , ups retirement and ups pension plans .as of december 31 , 2012 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash and cash equivalents was $ 7.327 billion .approximately $ 4.211 billion of this amount was held in european subsidiaries with the intended purpose of completing the acquisition of tnt express n.v .( see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements ) .excluding this portion of cash held outside the u.s .for acquisition-related purposes , approximately 50%-60% ( 50%-60 % ) of the remaining cash and cash equivalents are held by foreign subsidiaries throughout the year .the amount of cash held by our u.s .and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business .cash provided by operating activities in the united states continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners .to the extent that such amounts represent previously untaxed earnings , the cash held by foreign subsidiaries would be subject to tax if such amounts were repatriated in the form of dividends ; however , not all international cash balances would have to be repatriated in the form of a dividend if returned to the u.s .when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .
Question: what was the net change in value of cash from operating activities from 2010 to 2011?
| 3238.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : . | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
net income | $ 807 | $ 3804 | $ 3338
non-cash operating activities ( a ) | 7301 | 4505 | 4398
pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) | -917 ( 917 ) | -1436 ( 1436 ) | -3240 ( 3240 )
income tax receivables and payables | 280 | 236 | -319 ( 319 )
changes in working capital and other noncurrent assets and liabilities | -148 ( 148 ) | -12 ( 12 ) | -340 ( 340 )
other operating activities | -107 ( 107 ) | -24 ( 24 ) | -2 ( 2 )
net cash from operating activities | $ 7216 | $ 7073 | $ 3835 ( a ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative and foreign exchange transactions , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense , impairment charges and other non-cash items .cash from operating activities remained strong throughout the 2010 to 2012 time period .operating cash flow was favorably impacted in 2012 , compared with 2011 , by lower contributions into our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans ; however , this was partially offset by changes in our working capital position , which was impacted by overall growth in the business .the change in the cash flows for income tax receivables and payables in 2011 and 2010 was primarily related to the timing of discretionary pension contributions during 2010 , as discussed further in the following paragraph .except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company-sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans .2022 in 2012 , we made a $ 355 million required contribution to the ups ibt pension plan .2022 in 2011 , we made a $ 1.2 billion contribution to the ups ibt pension plan , which satisfied our 2011 contribution requirements and also approximately $ 440 million in contributions that would not have been required until after 2011 .2022 in 2010 , we made $ 2.0 billion in discretionary contributions to our ups retirement and ups pension plans , and $ 980 million in required contributions to our ups ibt pension plan .2022 the remaining contributions in the 2010 through 2012 period were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s .postretirement medical benefit plans .as discussed further in the 201ccontractual commitments 201d section , we have minimum funding requirements in the next several years , primarily related to the ups ibt pension , ups retirement and ups pension plans .as of december 31 , 2012 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash and cash equivalents was $ 7.327 billion .approximately $ 4.211 billion of this amount was held in european subsidiaries with the intended purpose of completing the acquisition of tnt express n.v .( see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements ) .excluding this portion of cash held outside the u.s .for acquisition-related purposes , approximately 50%-60% ( 50%-60 % ) of the remaining cash and cash equivalents are held by foreign subsidiaries throughout the year .the amount of cash held by our u.s .and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business .cash provided by operating activities in the united states continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners .to the extent that such amounts represent previously untaxed earnings , the cash held by foreign subsidiaries would be subject to tax if such amounts were repatriated in the form of dividends ; however , not all international cash balances would have to be repatriated in the form of a dividend if returned to the u.s .when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .
Question: what was the net change in value of cash from operating activities from 2010 to 2011?
| convfinqa2697 |
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : . | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
net income | $ 807 | $ 3804 | $ 3338
non-cash operating activities ( a ) | 7301 | 4505 | 4398
pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) | -917 ( 917 ) | -1436 ( 1436 ) | -3240 ( 3240 )
income tax receivables and payables | 280 | 236 | -319 ( 319 )
changes in working capital and other noncurrent assets and liabilities | -148 ( 148 ) | -12 ( 12 ) | -340 ( 340 )
other operating activities | -107 ( 107 ) | -24 ( 24 ) | -2 ( 2 )
net cash from operating activities | $ 7216 | $ 7073 | $ 3835 ( a ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative and foreign exchange transactions , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense , impairment charges and other non-cash items .cash from operating activities remained strong throughout the 2010 to 2012 time period .operating cash flow was favorably impacted in 2012 , compared with 2011 , by lower contributions into our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans ; however , this was partially offset by changes in our working capital position , which was impacted by overall growth in the business .the change in the cash flows for income tax receivables and payables in 2011 and 2010 was primarily related to the timing of discretionary pension contributions during 2010 , as discussed further in the following paragraph .except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company-sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans .2022 in 2012 , we made a $ 355 million required contribution to the ups ibt pension plan .2022 in 2011 , we made a $ 1.2 billion contribution to the ups ibt pension plan , which satisfied our 2011 contribution requirements and also approximately $ 440 million in contributions that would not have been required until after 2011 .2022 in 2010 , we made $ 2.0 billion in discretionary contributions to our ups retirement and ups pension plans , and $ 980 million in required contributions to our ups ibt pension plan .2022 the remaining contributions in the 2010 through 2012 period were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s .postretirement medical benefit plans .as discussed further in the 201ccontractual commitments 201d section , we have minimum funding requirements in the next several years , primarily related to the ups ibt pension , ups retirement and ups pension plans .as of december 31 , 2012 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash and cash equivalents was $ 7.327 billion .approximately $ 4.211 billion of this amount was held in european subsidiaries with the intended purpose of completing the acquisition of tnt express n.v .( see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements ) .excluding this portion of cash held outside the u.s .for acquisition-related purposes , approximately 50%-60% ( 50%-60 % ) of the remaining cash and cash equivalents are held by foreign subsidiaries throughout the year .the amount of cash held by our u.s .and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business .cash provided by operating activities in the united states continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners .to the extent that such amounts represent previously untaxed earnings , the cash held by foreign subsidiaries would be subject to tax if such amounts were repatriated in the form of dividends ; however , not all international cash balances would have to be repatriated in the form of a dividend if returned to the u.s .when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .
Question: what was the net change in value of cash from operating activities from 2010 to 2011?
Steps: subtract(7073, 3835)
Answer: 3238.0
Question: what was the value of cash in 2010?
| 3835.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : . | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
net income | $ 807 | $ 3804 | $ 3338
non-cash operating activities ( a ) | 7301 | 4505 | 4398
pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) | -917 ( 917 ) | -1436 ( 1436 ) | -3240 ( 3240 )
income tax receivables and payables | 280 | 236 | -319 ( 319 )
changes in working capital and other noncurrent assets and liabilities | -148 ( 148 ) | -12 ( 12 ) | -340 ( 340 )
other operating activities | -107 ( 107 ) | -24 ( 24 ) | -2 ( 2 )
net cash from operating activities | $ 7216 | $ 7073 | $ 3835 ( a ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative and foreign exchange transactions , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense , impairment charges and other non-cash items .cash from operating activities remained strong throughout the 2010 to 2012 time period .operating cash flow was favorably impacted in 2012 , compared with 2011 , by lower contributions into our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans ; however , this was partially offset by changes in our working capital position , which was impacted by overall growth in the business .the change in the cash flows for income tax receivables and payables in 2011 and 2010 was primarily related to the timing of discretionary pension contributions during 2010 , as discussed further in the following paragraph .except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company-sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans .2022 in 2012 , we made a $ 355 million required contribution to the ups ibt pension plan .2022 in 2011 , we made a $ 1.2 billion contribution to the ups ibt pension plan , which satisfied our 2011 contribution requirements and also approximately $ 440 million in contributions that would not have been required until after 2011 .2022 in 2010 , we made $ 2.0 billion in discretionary contributions to our ups retirement and ups pension plans , and $ 980 million in required contributions to our ups ibt pension plan .2022 the remaining contributions in the 2010 through 2012 period were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s .postretirement medical benefit plans .as discussed further in the 201ccontractual commitments 201d section , we have minimum funding requirements in the next several years , primarily related to the ups ibt pension , ups retirement and ups pension plans .as of december 31 , 2012 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash and cash equivalents was $ 7.327 billion .approximately $ 4.211 billion of this amount was held in european subsidiaries with the intended purpose of completing the acquisition of tnt express n.v .( see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements ) .excluding this portion of cash held outside the u.s .for acquisition-related purposes , approximately 50%-60% ( 50%-60 % ) of the remaining cash and cash equivalents are held by foreign subsidiaries throughout the year .the amount of cash held by our u.s .and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business .cash provided by operating activities in the united states continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners .to the extent that such amounts represent previously untaxed earnings , the cash held by foreign subsidiaries would be subject to tax if such amounts were repatriated in the form of dividends ; however , not all international cash balances would have to be repatriated in the form of a dividend if returned to the u.s .when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .
Question: what was the net change in value of cash from operating activities from 2010 to 2011?
Steps: subtract(7073, 3835)
Answer: 3238.0
Question: what was the value of cash in 2010?
| convfinqa2698 |
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : . | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
net income | $ 807 | $ 3804 | $ 3338
non-cash operating activities ( a ) | 7301 | 4505 | 4398
pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) | -917 ( 917 ) | -1436 ( 1436 ) | -3240 ( 3240 )
income tax receivables and payables | 280 | 236 | -319 ( 319 )
changes in working capital and other noncurrent assets and liabilities | -148 ( 148 ) | -12 ( 12 ) | -340 ( 340 )
other operating activities | -107 ( 107 ) | -24 ( 24 ) | -2 ( 2 )
net cash from operating activities | $ 7216 | $ 7073 | $ 3835 ( a ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative and foreign exchange transactions , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense , impairment charges and other non-cash items .cash from operating activities remained strong throughout the 2010 to 2012 time period .operating cash flow was favorably impacted in 2012 , compared with 2011 , by lower contributions into our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans ; however , this was partially offset by changes in our working capital position , which was impacted by overall growth in the business .the change in the cash flows for income tax receivables and payables in 2011 and 2010 was primarily related to the timing of discretionary pension contributions during 2010 , as discussed further in the following paragraph .except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company-sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans .2022 in 2012 , we made a $ 355 million required contribution to the ups ibt pension plan .2022 in 2011 , we made a $ 1.2 billion contribution to the ups ibt pension plan , which satisfied our 2011 contribution requirements and also approximately $ 440 million in contributions that would not have been required until after 2011 .2022 in 2010 , we made $ 2.0 billion in discretionary contributions to our ups retirement and ups pension plans , and $ 980 million in required contributions to our ups ibt pension plan .2022 the remaining contributions in the 2010 through 2012 period were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s .postretirement medical benefit plans .as discussed further in the 201ccontractual commitments 201d section , we have minimum funding requirements in the next several years , primarily related to the ups ibt pension , ups retirement and ups pension plans .as of december 31 , 2012 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash and cash equivalents was $ 7.327 billion .approximately $ 4.211 billion of this amount was held in european subsidiaries with the intended purpose of completing the acquisition of tnt express n.v .( see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements ) .excluding this portion of cash held outside the u.s .for acquisition-related purposes , approximately 50%-60% ( 50%-60 % ) of the remaining cash and cash equivalents are held by foreign subsidiaries throughout the year .the amount of cash held by our u.s .and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business .cash provided by operating activities in the united states continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners .to the extent that such amounts represent previously untaxed earnings , the cash held by foreign subsidiaries would be subject to tax if such amounts were repatriated in the form of dividends ; however , not all international cash balances would have to be repatriated in the form of a dividend if returned to the u.s .when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .
Question: what was the net change in value of cash from operating activities from 2010 to 2011?
Steps: subtract(7073, 3835)
Answer: 3238.0
Question: what was the value of cash in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 3835
Answer: 3835.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.84433 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : . | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
net income | $ 807 | $ 3804 | $ 3338
non-cash operating activities ( a ) | 7301 | 4505 | 4398
pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) | -917 ( 917 ) | -1436 ( 1436 ) | -3240 ( 3240 )
income tax receivables and payables | 280 | 236 | -319 ( 319 )
changes in working capital and other noncurrent assets and liabilities | -148 ( 148 ) | -12 ( 12 ) | -340 ( 340 )
other operating activities | -107 ( 107 ) | -24 ( 24 ) | -2 ( 2 )
net cash from operating activities | $ 7216 | $ 7073 | $ 3835 ( a ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative and foreign exchange transactions , deferred income taxes , provisions for uncollectible accounts , pension and postretirement benefit expense , stock compensation expense , impairment charges and other non-cash items .cash from operating activities remained strong throughout the 2010 to 2012 time period .operating cash flow was favorably impacted in 2012 , compared with 2011 , by lower contributions into our defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans ; however , this was partially offset by changes in our working capital position , which was impacted by overall growth in the business .the change in the cash flows for income tax receivables and payables in 2011 and 2010 was primarily related to the timing of discretionary pension contributions during 2010 , as discussed further in the following paragraph .except for discretionary or accelerated fundings of our plans , contributions to our company-sponsored pension plans have largely varied based on whether any minimum funding requirements are present for individual pension plans .2022 in 2012 , we made a $ 355 million required contribution to the ups ibt pension plan .2022 in 2011 , we made a $ 1.2 billion contribution to the ups ibt pension plan , which satisfied our 2011 contribution requirements and also approximately $ 440 million in contributions that would not have been required until after 2011 .2022 in 2010 , we made $ 2.0 billion in discretionary contributions to our ups retirement and ups pension plans , and $ 980 million in required contributions to our ups ibt pension plan .2022 the remaining contributions in the 2010 through 2012 period were largely due to contributions to our international pension plans and u.s .postretirement medical benefit plans .as discussed further in the 201ccontractual commitments 201d section , we have minimum funding requirements in the next several years , primarily related to the ups ibt pension , ups retirement and ups pension plans .as of december 31 , 2012 , the total of our worldwide holdings of cash and cash equivalents was $ 7.327 billion .approximately $ 4.211 billion of this amount was held in european subsidiaries with the intended purpose of completing the acquisition of tnt express n.v .( see note 16 to the consolidated financial statements ) .excluding this portion of cash held outside the u.s .for acquisition-related purposes , approximately 50%-60% ( 50%-60 % ) of the remaining cash and cash equivalents are held by foreign subsidiaries throughout the year .the amount of cash held by our u.s .and foreign subsidiaries fluctuates throughout the year due to a variety of factors , including the timing of cash receipts and disbursements in the normal course of business .cash provided by operating activities in the united states continues to be our primary source of funds to finance domestic operating needs , capital expenditures , share repurchases and dividend payments to shareowners .to the extent that such amounts represent previously untaxed earnings , the cash held by foreign subsidiaries would be subject to tax if such amounts were repatriated in the form of dividends ; however , not all international cash balances would have to be repatriated in the form of a dividend if returned to the u.s .when amounts earned by foreign subsidiaries are expected to be indefinitely reinvested , no accrual for taxes is provided. .
Question: what was the net change in value of cash from operating activities from 2010 to 2011?
Steps: subtract(7073, 3835)
Answer: 3238.0
Question: what was the value of cash in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 3835
Answer: 3835.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| convfinqa2699 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.