text
stringlengths 308
15.4k
| answer
stringlengths 2
16
| query
stringlengths 990
17.6k
| id
stringlengths 6
14
|
|---|---|---|---|
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 .equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3946111 $ 34.67 3608527 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . plan category | number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) | weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) | number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) | 2014 | 2014 | 2014
total | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527 ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .of these shares , 1166492 were subject to stock options , 2060138 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , 641556 were restricted stock rights , and 63033 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .in addition , this number includes 9129 stock rights and 5763 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 1166492 outstanding stock options only .( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .item 13 .certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .item 14 .principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights that is approved by security holders?
| 3946111.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 .equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3946111 $ 34.67 3608527 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . plan category | number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) | weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) | number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) | 2014 | 2014 | 2014
total | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527 ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .of these shares , 1166492 were subject to stock options , 2060138 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , 641556 were restricted stock rights , and 63033 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .in addition , this number includes 9129 stock rights and 5763 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 1166492 outstanding stock options only .( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .item 13 .certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .item 14 .principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights that is approved by security holders?
| convfinqa2400 |
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 .equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3946111 $ 34.67 3608527 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . plan category | number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) | weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) | number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) | 2014 | 2014 | 2014
total | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527 ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .of these shares , 1166492 were subject to stock options , 2060138 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , 641556 were restricted stock rights , and 63033 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .in addition , this number includes 9129 stock rights and 5763 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 1166492 outstanding stock options only .( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .item 13 .certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .item 14 .principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights that is approved by security holders?
Steps: Ask for number 3946111
Answer: 3946111.0
Question: what about the number of shares that remain available for future issuance?
| 3608527.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 .equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3946111 $ 34.67 3608527 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . plan category | number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) | weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) | number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) | 2014 | 2014 | 2014
total | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527 ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .of these shares , 1166492 were subject to stock options , 2060138 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , 641556 were restricted stock rights , and 63033 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .in addition , this number includes 9129 stock rights and 5763 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 1166492 outstanding stock options only .( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .item 13 .certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .item 14 .principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights that is approved by security holders?
Steps: Ask for number 3946111
Answer: 3946111.0
Question: what about the number of shares that remain available for future issuance?
| convfinqa2401 |
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 .equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3946111 $ 34.67 3608527 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . plan category | number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) | weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) | number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) | 2014 | 2014 | 2014
total | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527 ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .of these shares , 1166492 were subject to stock options , 2060138 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , 641556 were restricted stock rights , and 63033 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .in addition , this number includes 9129 stock rights and 5763 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 1166492 outstanding stock options only .( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .item 13 .certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .item 14 .principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights that is approved by security holders?
Steps: Ask for number 3946111
Answer: 3946111.0
Question: what about the number of shares that remain available for future issuance?
Steps: Ask for number 3608527
Answer: 3608527.0
Question: what is the total number approved by security holders?
| 7554638.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 .equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3946111 $ 34.67 3608527 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . plan category | number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) | weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) | number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) | 2014 | 2014 | 2014
total | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527 ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .of these shares , 1166492 were subject to stock options , 2060138 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , 641556 were restricted stock rights , and 63033 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .in addition , this number includes 9129 stock rights and 5763 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 1166492 outstanding stock options only .( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .item 13 .certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .item 14 .principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights that is approved by security holders?
Steps: Ask for number 3946111
Answer: 3946111.0
Question: what about the number of shares that remain available for future issuance?
Steps: Ask for number 3608527
Answer: 3608527.0
Question: what is the total number approved by security holders?
| convfinqa2402 |
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 .equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3946111 $ 34.67 3608527 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . plan category | number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) | weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) | number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) | 2014 | 2014 | 2014
total | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527 ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .of these shares , 1166492 were subject to stock options , 2060138 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , 641556 were restricted stock rights , and 63033 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .in addition , this number includes 9129 stock rights and 5763 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 1166492 outstanding stock options only .( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .item 13 .certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .item 14 .principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights that is approved by security holders?
Steps: Ask for number 3946111
Answer: 3946111.0
Question: what about the number of shares that remain available for future issuance?
Steps: Ask for number 3608527
Answer: 3608527.0
Question: what is the total number approved by security holders?
Steps: add(3946111, 3608527)
Answer: 7554638.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.52234 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 .equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 3946111 $ 34.67 3608527 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 . plan category | number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) | weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) | number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) | 2014 | 2014 | 2014
total | 3946111 | $ 34.67 | 3608527 ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .of these shares , 1166492 were subject to stock options , 2060138 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , 641556 were restricted stock rights , and 63033 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .in addition , this number includes 9129 stock rights and 5763 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 1166492 outstanding stock options only .( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .item 13 .certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .item 14 .principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights that is approved by security holders?
Steps: Ask for number 3946111
Answer: 3946111.0
Question: what about the number of shares that remain available for future issuance?
Steps: Ask for number 3608527
Answer: 3608527.0
Question: what is the total number approved by security holders?
Steps: add(3946111, 3608527)
Answer: 7554638.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| convfinqa2403 |
entergy gulf states , inc .management's financial discussion and analysis . | ( in millions )
2003 net revenue | $ 1110.1
volume/weather | 26.7
net wholesale revenue | 13.0
summer capacity charges | 5.5
price applied to unbilled sales | 4.8
fuel recovery revenues | -14.2 ( 14.2 )
other | 3.9
2004 net revenue | $ 1149.8 the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector .billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors .the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers .summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 .the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 .the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales .fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates .entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds .these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 .gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions .the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase .fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above .other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 .the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 .2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .
Question: what was the change in value of net revenues from 2003 to 2004?
| 39.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy gulf states , inc .management's financial discussion and analysis . | ( in millions )
2003 net revenue | $ 1110.1
volume/weather | 26.7
net wholesale revenue | 13.0
summer capacity charges | 5.5
price applied to unbilled sales | 4.8
fuel recovery revenues | -14.2 ( 14.2 )
other | 3.9
2004 net revenue | $ 1149.8 the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector .billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors .the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers .summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 .the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 .the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales .fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates .entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds .these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 .gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions .the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase .fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above .other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 .the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 .2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .
Question: what was the change in value of net revenues from 2003 to 2004?
| convfinqa2404 |
entergy gulf states , inc .management's financial discussion and analysis . | ( in millions )
2003 net revenue | $ 1110.1
volume/weather | 26.7
net wholesale revenue | 13.0
summer capacity charges | 5.5
price applied to unbilled sales | 4.8
fuel recovery revenues | -14.2 ( 14.2 )
other | 3.9
2004 net revenue | $ 1149.8 the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector .billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors .the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers .summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 .the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 .the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales .fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates .entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds .these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 .gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions .the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase .fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above .other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 .the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 .2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .
Question: what was the change in value of net revenues from 2003 to 2004?
Steps: subtract(1149.8, 1110.1)
Answer: 39.7
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.03576 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy gulf states , inc .management's financial discussion and analysis . | ( in millions )
2003 net revenue | $ 1110.1
volume/weather | 26.7
net wholesale revenue | 13.0
summer capacity charges | 5.5
price applied to unbilled sales | 4.8
fuel recovery revenues | -14.2 ( 14.2 )
other | 3.9
2004 net revenue | $ 1149.8 the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector .billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors .the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers .summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 .the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 .the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales .fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates .entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds .these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 .gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions .the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase .fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above .other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 .the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 .2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .
Question: what was the change in value of net revenues from 2003 to 2004?
Steps: subtract(1149.8, 1110.1)
Answer: 39.7
Question: what was the percent change?
| convfinqa2405 |
notes to consolidated financial statements the firm permanently reinvests eligible earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries and , accordingly , does not accrue any u.s .income taxes that would arise if such earnings were repatriated .as of december 2012 and december 2011 , this policy resulted in an unrecognized net deferred tax liability of $ 3.75 billion and $ 3.32 billion , respectively , attributable to reinvested earnings of $ 21.69 billion and $ 20.63 billion , respectively .unrecognized tax benefits the firm recognizes tax positions in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on examination by the relevant taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position .a position that meets this standard is measured at the largest amount of benefit that will more likely than not be realized on settlement .a liability is established for differences between positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements .as of december 2012 and december 2011 , the accrued liability for interest expense related to income tax matters and income tax penalties was $ 374 million and $ 233 million , respectively .the firm recognized $ 95 million , $ 21 million and $ 28 million of interest and income tax penalties for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits could change significantly during the twelve months subsequent to december 2012 due to potential audit settlements , however , at this time it is not possible to estimate any potential change .the table below presents the changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits .this liability is included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 17 for further information. . in millions | as of december 2012 | as of december 2011 | as of december 2010
balance beginning of year | $ 1887 | $ 2081 | $ 1925
increases based on tax positions related to the current year | 190 | 171 | 171
increases based on tax positions related to prior years | 336 | 278 | 162
decreases related to tax positions of prior years | -109 ( 109 ) | -41 ( 41 ) | -104 ( 104 )
decreases related to settlements | -35 ( 35 ) | -638 ( 638 ) | -128 ( 128 )
acquisitions/ ( dispositions ) | -47 ( 47 ) | 47 | 56
exchange rate fluctuations | 15 | -11 ( 11 ) | -1 ( 1 )
balance end of year | $ 2237 | $ 1887 | $ 2081
related deferred income tax asset1 | 685 | 569 | 972
net unrecognized tax benefit2 | $ 1552 | $ 1318 | $ 1109 related deferred income tax asset 1 685 569 972 net unrecognized tax benefit 2 $ 1552 $ 1318 $ 1109 1 .included in 201cother assets . 201d see note 12 .2 .if recognized , the net tax benefit would reduce the firm 2019s effective income tax rate .194 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the difference in net unrecognized tax benefit values from 2011 to 2012?
| 234.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements the firm permanently reinvests eligible earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries and , accordingly , does not accrue any u.s .income taxes that would arise if such earnings were repatriated .as of december 2012 and december 2011 , this policy resulted in an unrecognized net deferred tax liability of $ 3.75 billion and $ 3.32 billion , respectively , attributable to reinvested earnings of $ 21.69 billion and $ 20.63 billion , respectively .unrecognized tax benefits the firm recognizes tax positions in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on examination by the relevant taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position .a position that meets this standard is measured at the largest amount of benefit that will more likely than not be realized on settlement .a liability is established for differences between positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements .as of december 2012 and december 2011 , the accrued liability for interest expense related to income tax matters and income tax penalties was $ 374 million and $ 233 million , respectively .the firm recognized $ 95 million , $ 21 million and $ 28 million of interest and income tax penalties for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits could change significantly during the twelve months subsequent to december 2012 due to potential audit settlements , however , at this time it is not possible to estimate any potential change .the table below presents the changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits .this liability is included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 17 for further information. . in millions | as of december 2012 | as of december 2011 | as of december 2010
balance beginning of year | $ 1887 | $ 2081 | $ 1925
increases based on tax positions related to the current year | 190 | 171 | 171
increases based on tax positions related to prior years | 336 | 278 | 162
decreases related to tax positions of prior years | -109 ( 109 ) | -41 ( 41 ) | -104 ( 104 )
decreases related to settlements | -35 ( 35 ) | -638 ( 638 ) | -128 ( 128 )
acquisitions/ ( dispositions ) | -47 ( 47 ) | 47 | 56
exchange rate fluctuations | 15 | -11 ( 11 ) | -1 ( 1 )
balance end of year | $ 2237 | $ 1887 | $ 2081
related deferred income tax asset1 | 685 | 569 | 972
net unrecognized tax benefit2 | $ 1552 | $ 1318 | $ 1109 related deferred income tax asset 1 685 569 972 net unrecognized tax benefit 2 $ 1552 $ 1318 $ 1109 1 .included in 201cother assets . 201d see note 12 .2 .if recognized , the net tax benefit would reduce the firm 2019s effective income tax rate .194 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the difference in net unrecognized tax benefit values from 2011 to 2012?
| convfinqa2406 |
notes to consolidated financial statements the firm permanently reinvests eligible earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries and , accordingly , does not accrue any u.s .income taxes that would arise if such earnings were repatriated .as of december 2012 and december 2011 , this policy resulted in an unrecognized net deferred tax liability of $ 3.75 billion and $ 3.32 billion , respectively , attributable to reinvested earnings of $ 21.69 billion and $ 20.63 billion , respectively .unrecognized tax benefits the firm recognizes tax positions in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on examination by the relevant taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position .a position that meets this standard is measured at the largest amount of benefit that will more likely than not be realized on settlement .a liability is established for differences between positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements .as of december 2012 and december 2011 , the accrued liability for interest expense related to income tax matters and income tax penalties was $ 374 million and $ 233 million , respectively .the firm recognized $ 95 million , $ 21 million and $ 28 million of interest and income tax penalties for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits could change significantly during the twelve months subsequent to december 2012 due to potential audit settlements , however , at this time it is not possible to estimate any potential change .the table below presents the changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits .this liability is included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 17 for further information. . in millions | as of december 2012 | as of december 2011 | as of december 2010
balance beginning of year | $ 1887 | $ 2081 | $ 1925
increases based on tax positions related to the current year | 190 | 171 | 171
increases based on tax positions related to prior years | 336 | 278 | 162
decreases related to tax positions of prior years | -109 ( 109 ) | -41 ( 41 ) | -104 ( 104 )
decreases related to settlements | -35 ( 35 ) | -638 ( 638 ) | -128 ( 128 )
acquisitions/ ( dispositions ) | -47 ( 47 ) | 47 | 56
exchange rate fluctuations | 15 | -11 ( 11 ) | -1 ( 1 )
balance end of year | $ 2237 | $ 1887 | $ 2081
related deferred income tax asset1 | 685 | 569 | 972
net unrecognized tax benefit2 | $ 1552 | $ 1318 | $ 1109 related deferred income tax asset 1 685 569 972 net unrecognized tax benefit 2 $ 1552 $ 1318 $ 1109 1 .included in 201cother assets . 201d see note 12 .2 .if recognized , the net tax benefit would reduce the firm 2019s effective income tax rate .194 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the difference in net unrecognized tax benefit values from 2011 to 2012?
Steps: subtract(1552, 1318)
Answer: 234.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.17754 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements the firm permanently reinvests eligible earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries and , accordingly , does not accrue any u.s .income taxes that would arise if such earnings were repatriated .as of december 2012 and december 2011 , this policy resulted in an unrecognized net deferred tax liability of $ 3.75 billion and $ 3.32 billion , respectively , attributable to reinvested earnings of $ 21.69 billion and $ 20.63 billion , respectively .unrecognized tax benefits the firm recognizes tax positions in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on examination by the relevant taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position .a position that meets this standard is measured at the largest amount of benefit that will more likely than not be realized on settlement .a liability is established for differences between positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements .as of december 2012 and december 2011 , the accrued liability for interest expense related to income tax matters and income tax penalties was $ 374 million and $ 233 million , respectively .the firm recognized $ 95 million , $ 21 million and $ 28 million of interest and income tax penalties for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively .it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits could change significantly during the twelve months subsequent to december 2012 due to potential audit settlements , however , at this time it is not possible to estimate any potential change .the table below presents the changes in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits .this liability is included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 17 for further information. . in millions | as of december 2012 | as of december 2011 | as of december 2010
balance beginning of year | $ 1887 | $ 2081 | $ 1925
increases based on tax positions related to the current year | 190 | 171 | 171
increases based on tax positions related to prior years | 336 | 278 | 162
decreases related to tax positions of prior years | -109 ( 109 ) | -41 ( 41 ) | -104 ( 104 )
decreases related to settlements | -35 ( 35 ) | -638 ( 638 ) | -128 ( 128 )
acquisitions/ ( dispositions ) | -47 ( 47 ) | 47 | 56
exchange rate fluctuations | 15 | -11 ( 11 ) | -1 ( 1 )
balance end of year | $ 2237 | $ 1887 | $ 2081
related deferred income tax asset1 | 685 | 569 | 972
net unrecognized tax benefit2 | $ 1552 | $ 1318 | $ 1109 related deferred income tax asset 1 685 569 972 net unrecognized tax benefit 2 $ 1552 $ 1318 $ 1109 1 .included in 201cother assets . 201d see note 12 .2 .if recognized , the net tax benefit would reduce the firm 2019s effective income tax rate .194 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the difference in net unrecognized tax benefit values from 2011 to 2012?
Steps: subtract(1552, 1318)
Answer: 234.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| convfinqa2407 |
the following table presents the estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation reported in both cost of revenue and operating expenses : fiscal year ( in thousands ) . fiscal year | ( in thousands )
2004 | $ 3677
2005 | 2403
2006 | 840
2007 | 250
total estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation | $ 7170 impairment of intangible assets .in fiscal 2002 , we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $ 3.8 million to reduce the amount of certain intangible assets associated with prior acquisitions to their estimated fair value .approximately $ 3.7 million and $ 0.1 million are included in integration expense and amortization of intangible assets , respectively , on the consolidated statement of operations .the impairment charge is primarily attributable to certain technology acquired from and goodwill related to the acquisition of stanza , inc .( stanza ) in 1999 .during fiscal 2002 , we determined that we would not allocate future resources to assist in the market growth of this technology as products acquired in the merger with avant! provided customers with superior capabilities .as a result , we do not anticipate any future sales of the stanza product .in fiscal 2001 , we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $ 2.2 million to reduce the amount of certain intangible assets associated with prior acquisitions to their estimated fair value .approximately $ 1.8 million and $ 0.4 million are included in cost of revenues and amortization of intangible assets , respectively , on the consolidated statement of operations .the impairment charge is attributable to certain technology acquired from and goodwill related to the acquisition of eagle design automation , inc .( eagle ) in 1997 .during fiscal 2001 , we determined that we would not allocate future resources to assist in the market growth of this technology .as a result , we do not anticipate any future sales of the eagle product .there were no impairment charges during fiscal 2003 .other ( expense ) income , net .other income , net was $ 24.1 million in fiscal 2003 and consisted primarily of ( i ) realized gain on investments of $ 20.7 million ; ( ii ) rental income of $ 6.3 million ; ( iii ) interest income of $ 5.2 million ; ( iv ) impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio of ( $ 4.5 ) million ; ( vii ) foundation contributions of ( $ 2.1 ) million ; and ( viii ) interest expense of ( $ 1.6 ) million .other ( expense ) , net of other income was ( $ 208.6 ) million in fiscal 2002 and consisted primarily of ( i ) ( $ 240.8 ) million expense due to the settlement of the cadence design systems , inc .( cadence ) litigation ; ( ii ) ( $ 11.3 ) million in impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio ; ( iii ) realized gains on investments of $ 22.7 million ; ( iv ) a gain of $ 3.1 million for the termination fee on the ikos systems , inc .( ikos ) merger agreement ; ( v ) rental income of $ 10.0 million ; ( vi ) interest income of $ 8.3 million ; and ( vii ) and other miscellaneous expenses including amortization of premium forwards and foreign exchange gains and losses recognized during the fiscal year of ( $ 0.6 ) million .other income , net was $ 83.8 million in fiscal 2001 and consisted primarily of ( i ) a gain of $ 10.6 million on the sale of our silicon libraries business to artisan components , inc. ; ( ii ) ( $ 5.8 ) million in impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio ; ( iii ) realized gains on investments of $ 55.3 million ; ( iv ) rental income of $ 8.6 million ; ( v ) interest income of $ 12.8 million ; and ( vi ) other miscellaneous income including amortization of premium forwards and foreign exchange gains and losses recognized during the fiscal year of $ 2.3 million .termination of agreement to acquire ikos systems , inc .on july 2 , 2001 , we entered into an agreement and plan of merger and reorganization ( the ikos merger agreement ) with ikos systems , inc .the ikos merger agreement provided for the acquisition of all outstanding shares of ikos common stock by synopsys. .
Question: what was the estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation in 2005 less that in 2004?
| -1274.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table presents the estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation reported in both cost of revenue and operating expenses : fiscal year ( in thousands ) . fiscal year | ( in thousands )
2004 | $ 3677
2005 | 2403
2006 | 840
2007 | 250
total estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation | $ 7170 impairment of intangible assets .in fiscal 2002 , we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $ 3.8 million to reduce the amount of certain intangible assets associated with prior acquisitions to their estimated fair value .approximately $ 3.7 million and $ 0.1 million are included in integration expense and amortization of intangible assets , respectively , on the consolidated statement of operations .the impairment charge is primarily attributable to certain technology acquired from and goodwill related to the acquisition of stanza , inc .( stanza ) in 1999 .during fiscal 2002 , we determined that we would not allocate future resources to assist in the market growth of this technology as products acquired in the merger with avant! provided customers with superior capabilities .as a result , we do not anticipate any future sales of the stanza product .in fiscal 2001 , we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $ 2.2 million to reduce the amount of certain intangible assets associated with prior acquisitions to their estimated fair value .approximately $ 1.8 million and $ 0.4 million are included in cost of revenues and amortization of intangible assets , respectively , on the consolidated statement of operations .the impairment charge is attributable to certain technology acquired from and goodwill related to the acquisition of eagle design automation , inc .( eagle ) in 1997 .during fiscal 2001 , we determined that we would not allocate future resources to assist in the market growth of this technology .as a result , we do not anticipate any future sales of the eagle product .there were no impairment charges during fiscal 2003 .other ( expense ) income , net .other income , net was $ 24.1 million in fiscal 2003 and consisted primarily of ( i ) realized gain on investments of $ 20.7 million ; ( ii ) rental income of $ 6.3 million ; ( iii ) interest income of $ 5.2 million ; ( iv ) impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio of ( $ 4.5 ) million ; ( vii ) foundation contributions of ( $ 2.1 ) million ; and ( viii ) interest expense of ( $ 1.6 ) million .other ( expense ) , net of other income was ( $ 208.6 ) million in fiscal 2002 and consisted primarily of ( i ) ( $ 240.8 ) million expense due to the settlement of the cadence design systems , inc .( cadence ) litigation ; ( ii ) ( $ 11.3 ) million in impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio ; ( iii ) realized gains on investments of $ 22.7 million ; ( iv ) a gain of $ 3.1 million for the termination fee on the ikos systems , inc .( ikos ) merger agreement ; ( v ) rental income of $ 10.0 million ; ( vi ) interest income of $ 8.3 million ; and ( vii ) and other miscellaneous expenses including amortization of premium forwards and foreign exchange gains and losses recognized during the fiscal year of ( $ 0.6 ) million .other income , net was $ 83.8 million in fiscal 2001 and consisted primarily of ( i ) a gain of $ 10.6 million on the sale of our silicon libraries business to artisan components , inc. ; ( ii ) ( $ 5.8 ) million in impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio ; ( iii ) realized gains on investments of $ 55.3 million ; ( iv ) rental income of $ 8.6 million ; ( v ) interest income of $ 12.8 million ; and ( vi ) other miscellaneous income including amortization of premium forwards and foreign exchange gains and losses recognized during the fiscal year of $ 2.3 million .termination of agreement to acquire ikos systems , inc .on july 2 , 2001 , we entered into an agreement and plan of merger and reorganization ( the ikos merger agreement ) with ikos systems , inc .the ikos merger agreement provided for the acquisition of all outstanding shares of ikos common stock by synopsys. .
Question: what was the estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation in 2005 less that in 2004?
| convfinqa2408 |
the following table presents the estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation reported in both cost of revenue and operating expenses : fiscal year ( in thousands ) . fiscal year | ( in thousands )
2004 | $ 3677
2005 | 2403
2006 | 840
2007 | 250
total estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation | $ 7170 impairment of intangible assets .in fiscal 2002 , we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $ 3.8 million to reduce the amount of certain intangible assets associated with prior acquisitions to their estimated fair value .approximately $ 3.7 million and $ 0.1 million are included in integration expense and amortization of intangible assets , respectively , on the consolidated statement of operations .the impairment charge is primarily attributable to certain technology acquired from and goodwill related to the acquisition of stanza , inc .( stanza ) in 1999 .during fiscal 2002 , we determined that we would not allocate future resources to assist in the market growth of this technology as products acquired in the merger with avant! provided customers with superior capabilities .as a result , we do not anticipate any future sales of the stanza product .in fiscal 2001 , we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $ 2.2 million to reduce the amount of certain intangible assets associated with prior acquisitions to their estimated fair value .approximately $ 1.8 million and $ 0.4 million are included in cost of revenues and amortization of intangible assets , respectively , on the consolidated statement of operations .the impairment charge is attributable to certain technology acquired from and goodwill related to the acquisition of eagle design automation , inc .( eagle ) in 1997 .during fiscal 2001 , we determined that we would not allocate future resources to assist in the market growth of this technology .as a result , we do not anticipate any future sales of the eagle product .there were no impairment charges during fiscal 2003 .other ( expense ) income , net .other income , net was $ 24.1 million in fiscal 2003 and consisted primarily of ( i ) realized gain on investments of $ 20.7 million ; ( ii ) rental income of $ 6.3 million ; ( iii ) interest income of $ 5.2 million ; ( iv ) impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio of ( $ 4.5 ) million ; ( vii ) foundation contributions of ( $ 2.1 ) million ; and ( viii ) interest expense of ( $ 1.6 ) million .other ( expense ) , net of other income was ( $ 208.6 ) million in fiscal 2002 and consisted primarily of ( i ) ( $ 240.8 ) million expense due to the settlement of the cadence design systems , inc .( cadence ) litigation ; ( ii ) ( $ 11.3 ) million in impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio ; ( iii ) realized gains on investments of $ 22.7 million ; ( iv ) a gain of $ 3.1 million for the termination fee on the ikos systems , inc .( ikos ) merger agreement ; ( v ) rental income of $ 10.0 million ; ( vi ) interest income of $ 8.3 million ; and ( vii ) and other miscellaneous expenses including amortization of premium forwards and foreign exchange gains and losses recognized during the fiscal year of ( $ 0.6 ) million .other income , net was $ 83.8 million in fiscal 2001 and consisted primarily of ( i ) a gain of $ 10.6 million on the sale of our silicon libraries business to artisan components , inc. ; ( ii ) ( $ 5.8 ) million in impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio ; ( iii ) realized gains on investments of $ 55.3 million ; ( iv ) rental income of $ 8.6 million ; ( v ) interest income of $ 12.8 million ; and ( vi ) other miscellaneous income including amortization of premium forwards and foreign exchange gains and losses recognized during the fiscal year of $ 2.3 million .termination of agreement to acquire ikos systems , inc .on july 2 , 2001 , we entered into an agreement and plan of merger and reorganization ( the ikos merger agreement ) with ikos systems , inc .the ikos merger agreement provided for the acquisition of all outstanding shares of ikos common stock by synopsys. .
Question: what was the estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation in 2005 less that in 2004?
Steps: subtract(2403, 3677)
Answer: -1274.0
Question: what is that change divided by the 2004 balance?
| -0.34648 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table presents the estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation reported in both cost of revenue and operating expenses : fiscal year ( in thousands ) . fiscal year | ( in thousands )
2004 | $ 3677
2005 | 2403
2006 | 840
2007 | 250
total estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation | $ 7170 impairment of intangible assets .in fiscal 2002 , we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $ 3.8 million to reduce the amount of certain intangible assets associated with prior acquisitions to their estimated fair value .approximately $ 3.7 million and $ 0.1 million are included in integration expense and amortization of intangible assets , respectively , on the consolidated statement of operations .the impairment charge is primarily attributable to certain technology acquired from and goodwill related to the acquisition of stanza , inc .( stanza ) in 1999 .during fiscal 2002 , we determined that we would not allocate future resources to assist in the market growth of this technology as products acquired in the merger with avant! provided customers with superior capabilities .as a result , we do not anticipate any future sales of the stanza product .in fiscal 2001 , we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $ 2.2 million to reduce the amount of certain intangible assets associated with prior acquisitions to their estimated fair value .approximately $ 1.8 million and $ 0.4 million are included in cost of revenues and amortization of intangible assets , respectively , on the consolidated statement of operations .the impairment charge is attributable to certain technology acquired from and goodwill related to the acquisition of eagle design automation , inc .( eagle ) in 1997 .during fiscal 2001 , we determined that we would not allocate future resources to assist in the market growth of this technology .as a result , we do not anticipate any future sales of the eagle product .there were no impairment charges during fiscal 2003 .other ( expense ) income , net .other income , net was $ 24.1 million in fiscal 2003 and consisted primarily of ( i ) realized gain on investments of $ 20.7 million ; ( ii ) rental income of $ 6.3 million ; ( iii ) interest income of $ 5.2 million ; ( iv ) impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio of ( $ 4.5 ) million ; ( vii ) foundation contributions of ( $ 2.1 ) million ; and ( viii ) interest expense of ( $ 1.6 ) million .other ( expense ) , net of other income was ( $ 208.6 ) million in fiscal 2002 and consisted primarily of ( i ) ( $ 240.8 ) million expense due to the settlement of the cadence design systems , inc .( cadence ) litigation ; ( ii ) ( $ 11.3 ) million in impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio ; ( iii ) realized gains on investments of $ 22.7 million ; ( iv ) a gain of $ 3.1 million for the termination fee on the ikos systems , inc .( ikos ) merger agreement ; ( v ) rental income of $ 10.0 million ; ( vi ) interest income of $ 8.3 million ; and ( vii ) and other miscellaneous expenses including amortization of premium forwards and foreign exchange gains and losses recognized during the fiscal year of ( $ 0.6 ) million .other income , net was $ 83.8 million in fiscal 2001 and consisted primarily of ( i ) a gain of $ 10.6 million on the sale of our silicon libraries business to artisan components , inc. ; ( ii ) ( $ 5.8 ) million in impairment charges related to certain assets in our venture portfolio ; ( iii ) realized gains on investments of $ 55.3 million ; ( iv ) rental income of $ 8.6 million ; ( v ) interest income of $ 12.8 million ; and ( vi ) other miscellaneous income including amortization of premium forwards and foreign exchange gains and losses recognized during the fiscal year of $ 2.3 million .termination of agreement to acquire ikos systems , inc .on july 2 , 2001 , we entered into an agreement and plan of merger and reorganization ( the ikos merger agreement ) with ikos systems , inc .the ikos merger agreement provided for the acquisition of all outstanding shares of ikos common stock by synopsys. .
Question: what was the estimated future amortization of deferred stock compensation in 2005 less that in 2004?
Steps: subtract(2403, 3677)
Answer: -1274.0
Question: what is that change divided by the 2004 balance?
| convfinqa2409 |
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities .in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property .the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value .the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 .the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid .the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type .the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required .the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property .the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) .in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs .as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million .in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts .as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets .interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above .8 .commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases .the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments .the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit .the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . ( in thousands ) | operating
2012 | $ 22926
2013 | 23470
2014 | 26041
2015 | 24963
2016 | 18734
2017 and thereafter | 69044
total future minimum lease payments | $ 185178 included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: in 2012, what were the future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property?
| 22926.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities .in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property .the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value .the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 .the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid .the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type .the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required .the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property .the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) .in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs .as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million .in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts .as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets .interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above .8 .commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases .the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments .the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit .the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . ( in thousands ) | operating
2012 | $ 22926
2013 | 23470
2014 | 26041
2015 | 24963
2016 | 18734
2017 and thereafter | 69044
total future minimum lease payments | $ 185178 included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: in 2012, what were the future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property?
| convfinqa2410 |
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities .in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property .the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value .the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 .the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid .the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type .the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required .the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property .the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) .in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs .as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million .in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts .as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets .interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above .8 .commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases .the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments .the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit .the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . ( in thousands ) | operating
2012 | $ 22926
2013 | 23470
2014 | 26041
2015 | 24963
2016 | 18734
2017 and thereafter | 69044
total future minimum lease payments | $ 185178 included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: in 2012, what were the future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property?
Steps: Ask for number 22926
Answer: 22926.0
Question: and what is the total of future minimum lease payments?
| 185178.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities .in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property .the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value .the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 .the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid .the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type .the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required .the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property .the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) .in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs .as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million .in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts .as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets .interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above .8 .commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases .the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments .the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit .the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . ( in thousands ) | operating
2012 | $ 22926
2013 | 23470
2014 | 26041
2015 | 24963
2016 | 18734
2017 and thereafter | 69044
total future minimum lease payments | $ 185178 included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: in 2012, what were the future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property?
Steps: Ask for number 22926
Answer: 22926.0
Question: and what is the total of future minimum lease payments?
| convfinqa2411 |
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities .in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property .the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value .the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 .the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid .the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type .the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required .the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property .the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) .in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs .as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million .in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts .as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets .interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above .8 .commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases .the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments .the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit .the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . ( in thousands ) | operating
2012 | $ 22926
2013 | 23470
2014 | 26041
2015 | 24963
2016 | 18734
2017 and thereafter | 69044
total future minimum lease payments | $ 185178 included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: in 2012, what were the future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property?
Steps: Ask for number 22926
Answer: 22926.0
Question: and what is the total of future minimum lease payments?
Steps: Ask for number 185178
Answer: 185178.0
Question: what percentage, then, does 2012 represent in relation to this total?
| 0.12381 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities .in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property .the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value .the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 .the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid .the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type .the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required .the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property .the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) .in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs .as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million .in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts .as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets .interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above .8 .commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases .the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments .the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit .the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . ( in thousands ) | operating
2012 | $ 22926
2013 | 23470
2014 | 26041
2015 | 24963
2016 | 18734
2017 and thereafter | 69044
total future minimum lease payments | $ 185178 included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: in 2012, what were the future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property?
Steps: Ask for number 22926
Answer: 22926.0
Question: and what is the total of future minimum lease payments?
Steps: Ask for number 185178
Answer: 185178.0
Question: what percentage, then, does 2012 represent in relation to this total?
| convfinqa2412 |
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities .in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property .the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value .the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 .the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid .the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type .the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required .the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property .the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) .in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs .as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million .in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts .as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets .interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above .8 .commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases .the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments .the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit .the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . ( in thousands ) | operating
2012 | $ 22926
2013 | 23470
2014 | 26041
2015 | 24963
2016 | 18734
2017 and thereafter | 69044
total future minimum lease payments | $ 185178 included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: in 2012, what were the future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property?
Steps: Ask for number 22926
Answer: 22926.0
Question: and what is the total of future minimum lease payments?
Steps: Ask for number 185178
Answer: 185178.0
Question: what percentage, then, does 2012 represent in relation to this total?
Steps: divide(22926, 185178)
Answer: 0.12381
Question: and for the two precedent years, what was the change in the rent expense?
| 5.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities .in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property .the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value .the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 .the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid .the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type .the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required .the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property .the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) .in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs .as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million .in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts .as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets .interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above .8 .commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases .the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments .the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit .the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . ( in thousands ) | operating
2012 | $ 22926
2013 | 23470
2014 | 26041
2015 | 24963
2016 | 18734
2017 and thereafter | 69044
total future minimum lease payments | $ 185178 included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: in 2012, what were the future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property?
Steps: Ask for number 22926
Answer: 22926.0
Question: and what is the total of future minimum lease payments?
Steps: Ask for number 185178
Answer: 185178.0
Question: what percentage, then, does 2012 represent in relation to this total?
Steps: divide(22926, 185178)
Answer: 0.12381
Question: and for the two precedent years, what was the change in the rent expense?
| convfinqa2413 |
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities .in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property .the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value .the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 .the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid .the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type .the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required .the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property .the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) .in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs .as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million .in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts .as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets .interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above .8 .commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases .the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments .the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit .the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . ( in thousands ) | operating
2012 | $ 22926
2013 | 23470
2014 | 26041
2015 | 24963
2016 | 18734
2017 and thereafter | 69044
total future minimum lease payments | $ 185178 included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: in 2012, what were the future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property?
Steps: Ask for number 22926
Answer: 22926.0
Question: and what is the total of future minimum lease payments?
Steps: Ask for number 185178
Answer: 185178.0
Question: what percentage, then, does 2012 represent in relation to this total?
Steps: divide(22926, 185178)
Answer: 0.12381
Question: and for the two precedent years, what was the change in the rent expense?
Steps: subtract(26.7, 21.3)
Answer: 5.4
Question: what is this change as a percentage of that rent expense in 2010?
| 0.25352 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the revolving credit and long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities .in july 2011 , in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company assumed a $ 38.6 million nonrecourse loan secured by a mortgage on the acquired property .the acquisition of the company 2019s corporate headquarters was accounted for as a business combination , and the carrying value of the loan secured by the acquired property approximates fair value .the assumed loan had an original term of approximately ten years with a scheduled maturity date of march 1 , 2013 .the loan includes a balloon payment of $ 37.3 million due at maturity , and may not be prepaid .the assumed loan is nonrecourse with the lender 2019s remedies for non-performance limited to action against the acquired property and certain required reserves and a cash collateral account , except for nonrecourse carve outs related to fraud , breaches of certain representations , warranties or covenants , including those related to environmental matters , and other standard carve outs for a loan of this type .the loan requires certain minimum cash flows and financial results from the property , and if those requirements are not met , additional reserves may be required .the assumed loan requires prior approval of the lender for certain matters related to the property , including material leases , changes to property management , transfers of any part of the property and material alterations to the property .the loan has an interest rate of 6.73% ( 6.73 % ) .in connection with the assumed loan , the company incurred and capitalized $ 0.8 million in deferred financing costs .as of december 31 , 2011 , the outstanding balance on the loan was $ 38.2 million .in addition , in connection with the assumed loan for the acquisition of its corporate headquarters , the company was required to set aside amounts in reserve and cash collateral accounts .as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 2.0 million of restricted cash was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets , and the remaining $ 3.0 million of restricted cash was included in other long term assets .interest expense was $ 3.9 million , $ 2.3 million and $ 2.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs and interest expense under the credit and long term debt facilities , as well as the assumed loan discussed above .8 .commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its retail stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases .the leases expire at various dates through 2023 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments .the table below includes executed lease agreements for factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2011 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its retail stores based on future sales above a specified limit .the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2011 : ( in thousands ) operating . ( in thousands ) | operating
2012 | $ 22926
2013 | 23470
2014 | 26041
2015 | 24963
2016 | 18734
2017 and thereafter | 69044
total future minimum lease payments | $ 185178 included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 26.7 million , $ 21.3 million and $ 14.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , under non-cancelable .
Question: in 2012, what were the future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property?
Steps: Ask for number 22926
Answer: 22926.0
Question: and what is the total of future minimum lease payments?
Steps: Ask for number 185178
Answer: 185178.0
Question: what percentage, then, does 2012 represent in relation to this total?
Steps: divide(22926, 185178)
Answer: 0.12381
Question: and for the two precedent years, what was the change in the rent expense?
Steps: subtract(26.7, 21.3)
Answer: 5.4
Question: what is this change as a percentage of that rent expense in 2010?
| convfinqa2414 |
long-term product offerings include active and index strategies .our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile .we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction .in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index .index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs .althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ .for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class .in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates .this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings .equity year-end 2014 equity aum of $ 2.451 trillion increased by $ 133.4 billion , or 6% ( 6 % ) , from the end of 2013 due to net new business of $ 52.4 billion and net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements of $ 81.0 billion .net inflows were driven by $ 59.6 billion and $ 17.7 billion into ishares and non-etf index accounts , respectively .index inflows were offset by active net outflows of $ 24.9 billion , with outflows of $ 18.0 billion and $ 6.9 billion from fundamental and scientific active equity products , respectively .blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix .approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than similar u.s .equity strategies .accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s .markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues .fixed income fixed income aum ended 2014 at $ 1.394 trillion , increasing $ 151.5 billion , or 12% ( 12 % ) , from december 31 , 2013 .the increase in aum reflected $ 96.4 billion in net new business and $ 55.1 billion in net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements .in 2014 , net new business was diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield products .flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income global opportunities funds , with net inflows of $ 13.3 billion and $ 4.2 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion .fixed income net inflows were positive across investment styles , with ishares , non- etf index , and active net inflows of $ 40.0 billion , $ 28.7 billion and $ 27.7 billion , respectively .multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , currencies , bonds and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities .investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays .component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2014 are presented below .( in millions ) december 31 , 2013 net inflows ( outflows ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2014 . ( in millions ) | december 31 2013 | net inflows ( outflows ) | market change | fx impact | december 31 2014
asset allocation and balanced | $ 169604 | $ 18387 | $ -827 ( 827 ) | $ -4132 ( 4132 ) | $ 183032
target date/risk | 111408 | 10992 | 7083 | -872 ( 872 ) | 128611
fiduciary | 60202 | -474 ( 474 ) | 14788 | -8322 ( 8322 ) | 66194
multi-asset | $ 341214 | $ 28905 | $ 21044 | $ -13326 ( 13326 ) | $ 377837 flows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 15.1 billion , or 52% ( 52 % ) , of net inflows coming from institutional clients .defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 12.8 billion to institutional multi- asset class net new business in 2014 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings .retail net inflows of $ 13.4 billion were driven by particular demand for our multi- asset income fund , which raised $ 6.3 billion in 2014 .the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 48% ( 48 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 18.4 billion .these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget .in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions .flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites .2022 target date and target risk products grew 10% ( 10 % ) organically in 2014 .institutional investors represented 90% ( 90 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for over 80% ( 80 % ) of aum .the remaining 10% ( 10 % ) of target date and target risk aum consisted of retail client investments .flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath and lifepath retirement income ae offerings .lifepath products utilize a proprietary asset allocation model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing .2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of planmanagement .these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what was the net change in value of multi asset and fx impact?
| 364511.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term product offerings include active and index strategies .our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile .we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction .in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index .index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs .althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ .for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class .in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates .this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings .equity year-end 2014 equity aum of $ 2.451 trillion increased by $ 133.4 billion , or 6% ( 6 % ) , from the end of 2013 due to net new business of $ 52.4 billion and net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements of $ 81.0 billion .net inflows were driven by $ 59.6 billion and $ 17.7 billion into ishares and non-etf index accounts , respectively .index inflows were offset by active net outflows of $ 24.9 billion , with outflows of $ 18.0 billion and $ 6.9 billion from fundamental and scientific active equity products , respectively .blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix .approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than similar u.s .equity strategies .accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s .markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues .fixed income fixed income aum ended 2014 at $ 1.394 trillion , increasing $ 151.5 billion , or 12% ( 12 % ) , from december 31 , 2013 .the increase in aum reflected $ 96.4 billion in net new business and $ 55.1 billion in net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements .in 2014 , net new business was diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield products .flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income global opportunities funds , with net inflows of $ 13.3 billion and $ 4.2 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion .fixed income net inflows were positive across investment styles , with ishares , non- etf index , and active net inflows of $ 40.0 billion , $ 28.7 billion and $ 27.7 billion , respectively .multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , currencies , bonds and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities .investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays .component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2014 are presented below .( in millions ) december 31 , 2013 net inflows ( outflows ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2014 . ( in millions ) | december 31 2013 | net inflows ( outflows ) | market change | fx impact | december 31 2014
asset allocation and balanced | $ 169604 | $ 18387 | $ -827 ( 827 ) | $ -4132 ( 4132 ) | $ 183032
target date/risk | 111408 | 10992 | 7083 | -872 ( 872 ) | 128611
fiduciary | 60202 | -474 ( 474 ) | 14788 | -8322 ( 8322 ) | 66194
multi-asset | $ 341214 | $ 28905 | $ 21044 | $ -13326 ( 13326 ) | $ 377837 flows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 15.1 billion , or 52% ( 52 % ) , of net inflows coming from institutional clients .defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 12.8 billion to institutional multi- asset class net new business in 2014 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings .retail net inflows of $ 13.4 billion were driven by particular demand for our multi- asset income fund , which raised $ 6.3 billion in 2014 .the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 48% ( 48 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 18.4 billion .these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget .in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions .flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites .2022 target date and target risk products grew 10% ( 10 % ) organically in 2014 .institutional investors represented 90% ( 90 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for over 80% ( 80 % ) of aum .the remaining 10% ( 10 % ) of target date and target risk aum consisted of retail client investments .flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath and lifepath retirement income ae offerings .lifepath products utilize a proprietary asset allocation model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing .2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of planmanagement .these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what was the net change in value of multi asset and fx impact?
| convfinqa2415 |
long-term product offerings include active and index strategies .our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile .we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction .in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index .index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs .althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ .for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class .in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates .this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings .equity year-end 2014 equity aum of $ 2.451 trillion increased by $ 133.4 billion , or 6% ( 6 % ) , from the end of 2013 due to net new business of $ 52.4 billion and net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements of $ 81.0 billion .net inflows were driven by $ 59.6 billion and $ 17.7 billion into ishares and non-etf index accounts , respectively .index inflows were offset by active net outflows of $ 24.9 billion , with outflows of $ 18.0 billion and $ 6.9 billion from fundamental and scientific active equity products , respectively .blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix .approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than similar u.s .equity strategies .accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s .markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues .fixed income fixed income aum ended 2014 at $ 1.394 trillion , increasing $ 151.5 billion , or 12% ( 12 % ) , from december 31 , 2013 .the increase in aum reflected $ 96.4 billion in net new business and $ 55.1 billion in net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements .in 2014 , net new business was diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield products .flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income global opportunities funds , with net inflows of $ 13.3 billion and $ 4.2 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion .fixed income net inflows were positive across investment styles , with ishares , non- etf index , and active net inflows of $ 40.0 billion , $ 28.7 billion and $ 27.7 billion , respectively .multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , currencies , bonds and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities .investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays .component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2014 are presented below .( in millions ) december 31 , 2013 net inflows ( outflows ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2014 . ( in millions ) | december 31 2013 | net inflows ( outflows ) | market change | fx impact | december 31 2014
asset allocation and balanced | $ 169604 | $ 18387 | $ -827 ( 827 ) | $ -4132 ( 4132 ) | $ 183032
target date/risk | 111408 | 10992 | 7083 | -872 ( 872 ) | 128611
fiduciary | 60202 | -474 ( 474 ) | 14788 | -8322 ( 8322 ) | 66194
multi-asset | $ 341214 | $ 28905 | $ 21044 | $ -13326 ( 13326 ) | $ 377837 flows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 15.1 billion , or 52% ( 52 % ) , of net inflows coming from institutional clients .defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 12.8 billion to institutional multi- asset class net new business in 2014 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings .retail net inflows of $ 13.4 billion were driven by particular demand for our multi- asset income fund , which raised $ 6.3 billion in 2014 .the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 48% ( 48 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 18.4 billion .these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget .in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions .flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites .2022 target date and target risk products grew 10% ( 10 % ) organically in 2014 .institutional investors represented 90% ( 90 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for over 80% ( 80 % ) of aum .the remaining 10% ( 10 % ) of target date and target risk aum consisted of retail client investments .flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath and lifepath retirement income ae offerings .lifepath products utilize a proprietary asset allocation model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing .2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of planmanagement .these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what was the net change in value of multi asset and fx impact?
Steps: subtract(377837, 13326)
Answer: 364511.0
Question: what is the quotient of the multi asset total to the net change?
| 1.03656 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term product offerings include active and index strategies .our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile .we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction .in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index .index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs .althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ .for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class .in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates .this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings .equity year-end 2014 equity aum of $ 2.451 trillion increased by $ 133.4 billion , or 6% ( 6 % ) , from the end of 2013 due to net new business of $ 52.4 billion and net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements of $ 81.0 billion .net inflows were driven by $ 59.6 billion and $ 17.7 billion into ishares and non-etf index accounts , respectively .index inflows were offset by active net outflows of $ 24.9 billion , with outflows of $ 18.0 billion and $ 6.9 billion from fundamental and scientific active equity products , respectively .blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix .approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than similar u.s .equity strategies .accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s .markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues .fixed income fixed income aum ended 2014 at $ 1.394 trillion , increasing $ 151.5 billion , or 12% ( 12 % ) , from december 31 , 2013 .the increase in aum reflected $ 96.4 billion in net new business and $ 55.1 billion in net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements .in 2014 , net new business was diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield products .flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income global opportunities funds , with net inflows of $ 13.3 billion and $ 4.2 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion .fixed income net inflows were positive across investment styles , with ishares , non- etf index , and active net inflows of $ 40.0 billion , $ 28.7 billion and $ 27.7 billion , respectively .multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , currencies , bonds and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities .investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays .component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2014 are presented below .( in millions ) december 31 , 2013 net inflows ( outflows ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2014 . ( in millions ) | december 31 2013 | net inflows ( outflows ) | market change | fx impact | december 31 2014
asset allocation and balanced | $ 169604 | $ 18387 | $ -827 ( 827 ) | $ -4132 ( 4132 ) | $ 183032
target date/risk | 111408 | 10992 | 7083 | -872 ( 872 ) | 128611
fiduciary | 60202 | -474 ( 474 ) | 14788 | -8322 ( 8322 ) | 66194
multi-asset | $ 341214 | $ 28905 | $ 21044 | $ -13326 ( 13326 ) | $ 377837 flows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 15.1 billion , or 52% ( 52 % ) , of net inflows coming from institutional clients .defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 12.8 billion to institutional multi- asset class net new business in 2014 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings .retail net inflows of $ 13.4 billion were driven by particular demand for our multi- asset income fund , which raised $ 6.3 billion in 2014 .the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 48% ( 48 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 18.4 billion .these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget .in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions .flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites .2022 target date and target risk products grew 10% ( 10 % ) organically in 2014 .institutional investors represented 90% ( 90 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for over 80% ( 80 % ) of aum .the remaining 10% ( 10 % ) of target date and target risk aum consisted of retail client investments .flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath and lifepath retirement income ae offerings .lifepath products utilize a proprietary asset allocation model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing .2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of planmanagement .these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what was the net change in value of multi asset and fx impact?
Steps: subtract(377837, 13326)
Answer: 364511.0
Question: what is the quotient of the multi asset total to the net change?
| convfinqa2416 |
long-term product offerings include active and index strategies .our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile .we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction .in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index .index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs .althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ .for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class .in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates .this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings .equity year-end 2014 equity aum of $ 2.451 trillion increased by $ 133.4 billion , or 6% ( 6 % ) , from the end of 2013 due to net new business of $ 52.4 billion and net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements of $ 81.0 billion .net inflows were driven by $ 59.6 billion and $ 17.7 billion into ishares and non-etf index accounts , respectively .index inflows were offset by active net outflows of $ 24.9 billion , with outflows of $ 18.0 billion and $ 6.9 billion from fundamental and scientific active equity products , respectively .blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix .approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than similar u.s .equity strategies .accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s .markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues .fixed income fixed income aum ended 2014 at $ 1.394 trillion , increasing $ 151.5 billion , or 12% ( 12 % ) , from december 31 , 2013 .the increase in aum reflected $ 96.4 billion in net new business and $ 55.1 billion in net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements .in 2014 , net new business was diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield products .flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income global opportunities funds , with net inflows of $ 13.3 billion and $ 4.2 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion .fixed income net inflows were positive across investment styles , with ishares , non- etf index , and active net inflows of $ 40.0 billion , $ 28.7 billion and $ 27.7 billion , respectively .multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , currencies , bonds and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities .investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays .component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2014 are presented below .( in millions ) december 31 , 2013 net inflows ( outflows ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2014 . ( in millions ) | december 31 2013 | net inflows ( outflows ) | market change | fx impact | december 31 2014
asset allocation and balanced | $ 169604 | $ 18387 | $ -827 ( 827 ) | $ -4132 ( 4132 ) | $ 183032
target date/risk | 111408 | 10992 | 7083 | -872 ( 872 ) | 128611
fiduciary | 60202 | -474 ( 474 ) | 14788 | -8322 ( 8322 ) | 66194
multi-asset | $ 341214 | $ 28905 | $ 21044 | $ -13326 ( 13326 ) | $ 377837 flows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 15.1 billion , or 52% ( 52 % ) , of net inflows coming from institutional clients .defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 12.8 billion to institutional multi- asset class net new business in 2014 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings .retail net inflows of $ 13.4 billion were driven by particular demand for our multi- asset income fund , which raised $ 6.3 billion in 2014 .the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 48% ( 48 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 18.4 billion .these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget .in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions .flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites .2022 target date and target risk products grew 10% ( 10 % ) organically in 2014 .institutional investors represented 90% ( 90 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for over 80% ( 80 % ) of aum .the remaining 10% ( 10 % ) of target date and target risk aum consisted of retail client investments .flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath and lifepath retirement income ae offerings .lifepath products utilize a proprietary asset allocation model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing .2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of planmanagement .these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what was the net change in value of multi asset and fx impact?
Steps: subtract(377837, 13326)
Answer: 364511.0
Question: what is the quotient of the multi asset total to the net change?
Steps: divide(377837, A0)
Answer: 1.03656
Question: what is 1 less the prior quotient?
| -0.03656 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
long-term product offerings include active and index strategies .our active strategies seek to earn attractive returns in excess of a market benchmark or performance hurdle while maintaining an appropriate risk profile .we offer two types of active strategies : those that rely primarily on fundamental research and those that utilize primarily quantitative models to drive portfolio construction .in contrast , index strategies seek to closely track the returns of a corresponding index , generally by investing in substantially the same underlying securities within the index or in a subset of those securities selected to approximate a similar risk and return profile of the index .index strategies include both our non-etf index products and ishares etfs .althoughmany clients use both active and index strategies , the application of these strategies may differ .for example , clients may use index products to gain exposure to a market or asset class .in addition , institutional non-etf index assignments tend to be very large ( multi-billion dollars ) and typically reflect low fee rates .this has the potential to exaggerate the significance of net flows in institutional index products on blackrock 2019s revenues and earnings .equity year-end 2014 equity aum of $ 2.451 trillion increased by $ 133.4 billion , or 6% ( 6 % ) , from the end of 2013 due to net new business of $ 52.4 billion and net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements of $ 81.0 billion .net inflows were driven by $ 59.6 billion and $ 17.7 billion into ishares and non-etf index accounts , respectively .index inflows were offset by active net outflows of $ 24.9 billion , with outflows of $ 18.0 billion and $ 6.9 billion from fundamental and scientific active equity products , respectively .blackrock 2019s effective fee rates fluctuate due to changes in aummix .approximately half of blackrock 2019s equity aum is tied to international markets , including emerging markets , which tend to have higher fee rates than similar u.s .equity strategies .accordingly , fluctuations in international equity markets , which do not consistently move in tandemwith u.s .markets , may have a greater impact on blackrock 2019s effective equity fee rates and revenues .fixed income fixed income aum ended 2014 at $ 1.394 trillion , increasing $ 151.5 billion , or 12% ( 12 % ) , from december 31 , 2013 .the increase in aum reflected $ 96.4 billion in net new business and $ 55.1 billion in net market appreciation and foreign exchange movements .in 2014 , net new business was diversified across fixed income offerings , with strong flows into our unconstrained , total return and high yield products .flagship funds in these product areas include our unconstrained strategic income opportunities and fixed income global opportunities funds , with net inflows of $ 13.3 billion and $ 4.2 billion , respectively ; our total return fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion ; and our high yield bond fund with net inflows of $ 2.1 billion .fixed income net inflows were positive across investment styles , with ishares , non- etf index , and active net inflows of $ 40.0 billion , $ 28.7 billion and $ 27.7 billion , respectively .multi-asset class blackrock 2019s multi-asset class teammanages a variety of balanced funds and bespoke mandates for a diversified client base that leverages our broad investment expertise in global equities , currencies , bonds and commodities , and our extensive risk management capabilities .investment solutions might include a combination of long-only portfolios and alternative investments as well as tactical asset allocation overlays .component changes in multi-asset class aum for 2014 are presented below .( in millions ) december 31 , 2013 net inflows ( outflows ) market change fx impact december 31 , 2014 . ( in millions ) | december 31 2013 | net inflows ( outflows ) | market change | fx impact | december 31 2014
asset allocation and balanced | $ 169604 | $ 18387 | $ -827 ( 827 ) | $ -4132 ( 4132 ) | $ 183032
target date/risk | 111408 | 10992 | 7083 | -872 ( 872 ) | 128611
fiduciary | 60202 | -474 ( 474 ) | 14788 | -8322 ( 8322 ) | 66194
multi-asset | $ 341214 | $ 28905 | $ 21044 | $ -13326 ( 13326 ) | $ 377837 flows reflected ongoing institutional demand for our solutions-based advice with $ 15.1 billion , or 52% ( 52 % ) , of net inflows coming from institutional clients .defined contribution plans of institutional clients remained a significant driver of flows , and contributed $ 12.8 billion to institutional multi- asset class net new business in 2014 , primarily into target date and target risk product offerings .retail net inflows of $ 13.4 billion were driven by particular demand for our multi- asset income fund , which raised $ 6.3 billion in 2014 .the company 2019s multi-asset strategies include the following : 2022 asset allocation and balanced products represented 48% ( 48 % ) of multi-asset class aum at year-end , with growth in aum driven by net new business of $ 18.4 billion .these strategies combine equity , fixed income and alternative components for investors seeking a tailored solution relative to a specific benchmark and within a risk budget .in certain cases , these strategies seek to minimize downside risk through diversification , derivatives strategies and tactical asset allocation decisions .flagship products in this category include our global allocation andmulti-asset income suites .2022 target date and target risk products grew 10% ( 10 % ) organically in 2014 .institutional investors represented 90% ( 90 % ) of target date and target risk aum , with defined contribution plans accounting for over 80% ( 80 % ) of aum .the remaining 10% ( 10 % ) of target date and target risk aum consisted of retail client investments .flows were driven by defined contribution investments in our lifepath and lifepath retirement income ae offerings .lifepath products utilize a proprietary asset allocation model that seeks to balance risk and return over an investment horizon based on the investor 2019s expected retirement timing .2022 fiduciary management services are complex mandates in which pension plan sponsors or endowments and foundations retain blackrock to assume responsibility for some or all aspects of planmanagement .these customized services require strong partnership with the clients 2019 investment staff and trustees in order to tailor investment strategies to meet client-specific risk budgets and return objectives. .
Question: what was the net change in value of multi asset and fx impact?
Steps: subtract(377837, 13326)
Answer: 364511.0
Question: what is the quotient of the multi asset total to the net change?
Steps: divide(377837, A0)
Answer: 1.03656
Question: what is 1 less the prior quotient?
| convfinqa2417 |
fidelity national information services , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) contingent consideration liabilities recorded in connection with business acquisitions must also be adjusted for changes in fair value until settled .see note 3 for discussion of the capital markets company bvba ( "capco" ) contingent consideration liability .( d ) derivative financial instruments the company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with financial accounting standards board accounting standards codification ( 201cfasb asc 201d ) topic 815 , derivatives and hedging .during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company engaged in g hedging activities relating to its variable rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps .the company designates these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges .the estimated fair values of the cash flow hedges are determined using level 2 type measurements .thh ey are recorded as an asset or liability of the company and are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in prepaid expenses and other current assets , other non-current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities , as appropriate , and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes .a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is recorded in interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on then company 2019s term and revolving loans ( note 10 ) .the company 2019s existing cash flow hedge is highly effective and there was no impact on 2016 earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness .it is our policy to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes .as of december 31 , 2016 , we believe that our interest rate swap counterparty will be able to fulfill its obligations under our agreement .the company's foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in the company's results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations .during 2016 and 2015 , the company entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans .as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 143 million and aa $ 81 million , respectively , and the fair value was nominal .these derivatives have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes .we also use currency forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in costs caused by variations in indian rupee ( "inr" ) ii exchange rates .as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 7 million and the fair value was l less than $ 1 million , which is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets .these inr forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges .the fair value of these currency forward contracts is determined using currency uu exchange market rates , obtained from reliable , independent , third party banks , at the balance sheet date .the fair value of forward rr contracts is subject to changes in currency exchange rates .the company has no ineffectiveness related to its use of currency forward ff contracts in connection with inr cash flow hedges .in september 2015 , the company entered into treasury lock hedges with a total notional amount of $ 1.0 billion , reducing the risk of changes in the benchmark index component of the 10-year treasury yield .the company def signated these derivatives as cash flow hedges .on october 13 , 2015 , in conjunction with the pricing of the $ 4.5 billion senior notes , the companyr terminated these treasury lock contracts for a cash settlement payment of $ 16 million , which was recorded as a component of other comprehensive earnings and will be reclassified as an adjustment to interest expense over the ten years during which the related interest payments that were hedged will be recognized in income .( e ) trade receivables a summary of trade receivables , net , as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows ( in millions ) : . | 2016 | 2015
trade receivables 2014 billed | $ 1452 | $ 1546
trade receivables 2014 unbilled | 228 | 201
total trade receivables | 1680 | 1747
allowance for doubtful accounts | -41 ( 41 ) | -16 ( 16 )
total trade receivables net | $ 1639 | $ 1731 .
Question: what was the change in total trade net receivables from 2015 to 2016?
| -92.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
fidelity national information services , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) contingent consideration liabilities recorded in connection with business acquisitions must also be adjusted for changes in fair value until settled .see note 3 for discussion of the capital markets company bvba ( "capco" ) contingent consideration liability .( d ) derivative financial instruments the company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with financial accounting standards board accounting standards codification ( 201cfasb asc 201d ) topic 815 , derivatives and hedging .during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company engaged in g hedging activities relating to its variable rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps .the company designates these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges .the estimated fair values of the cash flow hedges are determined using level 2 type measurements .thh ey are recorded as an asset or liability of the company and are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in prepaid expenses and other current assets , other non-current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities , as appropriate , and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes .a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is recorded in interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on then company 2019s term and revolving loans ( note 10 ) .the company 2019s existing cash flow hedge is highly effective and there was no impact on 2016 earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness .it is our policy to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes .as of december 31 , 2016 , we believe that our interest rate swap counterparty will be able to fulfill its obligations under our agreement .the company's foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in the company's results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations .during 2016 and 2015 , the company entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans .as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 143 million and aa $ 81 million , respectively , and the fair value was nominal .these derivatives have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes .we also use currency forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in costs caused by variations in indian rupee ( "inr" ) ii exchange rates .as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 7 million and the fair value was l less than $ 1 million , which is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets .these inr forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges .the fair value of these currency forward contracts is determined using currency uu exchange market rates , obtained from reliable , independent , third party banks , at the balance sheet date .the fair value of forward rr contracts is subject to changes in currency exchange rates .the company has no ineffectiveness related to its use of currency forward ff contracts in connection with inr cash flow hedges .in september 2015 , the company entered into treasury lock hedges with a total notional amount of $ 1.0 billion , reducing the risk of changes in the benchmark index component of the 10-year treasury yield .the company def signated these derivatives as cash flow hedges .on october 13 , 2015 , in conjunction with the pricing of the $ 4.5 billion senior notes , the companyr terminated these treasury lock contracts for a cash settlement payment of $ 16 million , which was recorded as a component of other comprehensive earnings and will be reclassified as an adjustment to interest expense over the ten years during which the related interest payments that were hedged will be recognized in income .( e ) trade receivables a summary of trade receivables , net , as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows ( in millions ) : . | 2016 | 2015
trade receivables 2014 billed | $ 1452 | $ 1546
trade receivables 2014 unbilled | 228 | 201
total trade receivables | 1680 | 1747
allowance for doubtful accounts | -41 ( 41 ) | -16 ( 16 )
total trade receivables net | $ 1639 | $ 1731 .
Question: what was the change in total trade net receivables from 2015 to 2016?
| convfinqa2418 |
fidelity national information services , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) contingent consideration liabilities recorded in connection with business acquisitions must also be adjusted for changes in fair value until settled .see note 3 for discussion of the capital markets company bvba ( "capco" ) contingent consideration liability .( d ) derivative financial instruments the company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with financial accounting standards board accounting standards codification ( 201cfasb asc 201d ) topic 815 , derivatives and hedging .during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company engaged in g hedging activities relating to its variable rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps .the company designates these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges .the estimated fair values of the cash flow hedges are determined using level 2 type measurements .thh ey are recorded as an asset or liability of the company and are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in prepaid expenses and other current assets , other non-current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities , as appropriate , and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes .a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is recorded in interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on then company 2019s term and revolving loans ( note 10 ) .the company 2019s existing cash flow hedge is highly effective and there was no impact on 2016 earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness .it is our policy to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes .as of december 31 , 2016 , we believe that our interest rate swap counterparty will be able to fulfill its obligations under our agreement .the company's foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in the company's results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations .during 2016 and 2015 , the company entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans .as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 143 million and aa $ 81 million , respectively , and the fair value was nominal .these derivatives have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes .we also use currency forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in costs caused by variations in indian rupee ( "inr" ) ii exchange rates .as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 7 million and the fair value was l less than $ 1 million , which is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets .these inr forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges .the fair value of these currency forward contracts is determined using currency uu exchange market rates , obtained from reliable , independent , third party banks , at the balance sheet date .the fair value of forward rr contracts is subject to changes in currency exchange rates .the company has no ineffectiveness related to its use of currency forward ff contracts in connection with inr cash flow hedges .in september 2015 , the company entered into treasury lock hedges with a total notional amount of $ 1.0 billion , reducing the risk of changes in the benchmark index component of the 10-year treasury yield .the company def signated these derivatives as cash flow hedges .on october 13 , 2015 , in conjunction with the pricing of the $ 4.5 billion senior notes , the companyr terminated these treasury lock contracts for a cash settlement payment of $ 16 million , which was recorded as a component of other comprehensive earnings and will be reclassified as an adjustment to interest expense over the ten years during which the related interest payments that were hedged will be recognized in income .( e ) trade receivables a summary of trade receivables , net , as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows ( in millions ) : . | 2016 | 2015
trade receivables 2014 billed | $ 1452 | $ 1546
trade receivables 2014 unbilled | 228 | 201
total trade receivables | 1680 | 1747
allowance for doubtful accounts | -41 ( 41 ) | -16 ( 16 )
total trade receivables net | $ 1639 | $ 1731 .
Question: what was the change in total trade net receivables from 2015 to 2016?
Steps: subtract(1639, 1731)
Answer: -92.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the total trade net receivables in 2015, in percentage?
| -0.05315 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
fidelity national information services , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) contingent consideration liabilities recorded in connection with business acquisitions must also be adjusted for changes in fair value until settled .see note 3 for discussion of the capital markets company bvba ( "capco" ) contingent consideration liability .( d ) derivative financial instruments the company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with financial accounting standards board accounting standards codification ( 201cfasb asc 201d ) topic 815 , derivatives and hedging .during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company engaged in g hedging activities relating to its variable rate debt through the use of interest rate swaps .the company designates these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges .the estimated fair values of the cash flow hedges are determined using level 2 type measurements .thh ey are recorded as an asset or liability of the company and are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in prepaid expenses and other current assets , other non-current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities , as appropriate , and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes .a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is recorded in interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on then company 2019s term and revolving loans ( note 10 ) .the company 2019s existing cash flow hedge is highly effective and there was no impact on 2016 earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness .it is our policy to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes .as of december 31 , 2016 , we believe that our interest rate swap counterparty will be able to fulfill its obligations under our agreement .the company's foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in the company's results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations .during 2016 and 2015 , the company entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans .as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 143 million and aa $ 81 million , respectively , and the fair value was nominal .these derivatives have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes .we also use currency forward contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in costs caused by variations in indian rupee ( "inr" ) ii exchange rates .as of december 31 , 2016 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 7 million and the fair value was l less than $ 1 million , which is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets .these inr forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges .the fair value of these currency forward contracts is determined using currency uu exchange market rates , obtained from reliable , independent , third party banks , at the balance sheet date .the fair value of forward rr contracts is subject to changes in currency exchange rates .the company has no ineffectiveness related to its use of currency forward ff contracts in connection with inr cash flow hedges .in september 2015 , the company entered into treasury lock hedges with a total notional amount of $ 1.0 billion , reducing the risk of changes in the benchmark index component of the 10-year treasury yield .the company def signated these derivatives as cash flow hedges .on october 13 , 2015 , in conjunction with the pricing of the $ 4.5 billion senior notes , the companyr terminated these treasury lock contracts for a cash settlement payment of $ 16 million , which was recorded as a component of other comprehensive earnings and will be reclassified as an adjustment to interest expense over the ten years during which the related interest payments that were hedged will be recognized in income .( e ) trade receivables a summary of trade receivables , net , as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows ( in millions ) : . | 2016 | 2015
trade receivables 2014 billed | $ 1452 | $ 1546
trade receivables 2014 unbilled | 228 | 201
total trade receivables | 1680 | 1747
allowance for doubtful accounts | -41 ( 41 ) | -16 ( 16 )
total trade receivables net | $ 1639 | $ 1731 .
Question: what was the change in total trade net receivables from 2015 to 2016?
Steps: subtract(1639, 1731)
Answer: -92.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the total trade net receivables in 2015, in percentage?
| convfinqa2419 |
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
| 71.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
| convfinqa2420 |
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(-29.5, -100.7)
Answer: 71.2
Question: and what is the percentage this change represents of those losses in 2005?
| 0.70705 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(-29.5, -100.7)
Answer: 71.2
Question: and what is the percentage this change represents of those losses in 2005?
| convfinqa2421 |
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(-29.5, -100.7)
Answer: 71.2
Question: and what is the percentage this change represents of those losses in 2005?
Steps: divide(#0, 100.7)
Answer: 0.70705
Question: and in that year of 2006, what was the related tax expense, in millions?
| 5.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(-29.5, -100.7)
Answer: 71.2
Question: and what is the percentage this change represents of those losses in 2005?
Steps: divide(#0, 100.7)
Answer: 0.70705
Question: and in that year of 2006, what was the related tax expense, in millions?
| convfinqa2422 |
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(-29.5, -100.7)
Answer: 71.2
Question: and what is the percentage this change represents of those losses in 2005?
Steps: divide(#0, 100.7)
Answer: 0.70705
Question: and in that year of 2006, what was the related tax expense, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5.7
Answer: 5.7
Question: what was it in 2007, also in millions?
| 3.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(-29.5, -100.7)
Answer: 71.2
Question: and what is the percentage this change represents of those losses in 2005?
Steps: divide(#0, 100.7)
Answer: 0.70705
Question: and in that year of 2006, what was the related tax expense, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5.7
Answer: 5.7
Question: what was it in 2007, also in millions?
| convfinqa2423 |
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(-29.5, -100.7)
Answer: 71.2
Question: and what is the percentage this change represents of those losses in 2005?
Steps: divide(#0, 100.7)
Answer: 0.70705
Question: and in that year of 2006, what was the related tax expense, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5.7
Answer: 5.7
Question: what was it in 2007, also in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.2
Answer: 3.2
Question: what is, then, the difference between the 2006 and the 2007 one?
| 2.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(-29.5, -100.7)
Answer: 71.2
Question: and what is the percentage this change represents of those losses in 2005?
Steps: divide(#0, 100.7)
Answer: 0.70705
Question: and in that year of 2006, what was the related tax expense, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5.7
Answer: 5.7
Question: what was it in 2007, also in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.2
Answer: 3.2
Question: what is, then, the difference between the 2006 and the 2007 one?
| convfinqa2424 |
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(-29.5, -100.7)
Answer: 71.2
Question: and what is the percentage this change represents of those losses in 2005?
Steps: divide(#0, 100.7)
Answer: 0.70705
Question: and in that year of 2006, what was the related tax expense, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5.7
Answer: 5.7
Question: what was it in 2007, also in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.2
Answer: 3.2
Question: what is, then, the difference between the 2006 and the 2007 one?
Steps: subtract(5.7, 3.2)
Answer: 2.5
Question: and what was that tax expense in 2005, in millions?
| 10.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(-29.5, -100.7)
Answer: 71.2
Question: and what is the percentage this change represents of those losses in 2005?
Steps: divide(#0, 100.7)
Answer: 0.70705
Question: and in that year of 2006, what was the related tax expense, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5.7
Answer: 5.7
Question: what was it in 2007, also in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.2
Answer: 3.2
Question: what is, then, the difference between the 2006 and the 2007 one?
Steps: subtract(5.7, 3.2)
Answer: 2.5
Question: and what was that tax expense in 2005, in millions?
| convfinqa2425 |
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(-29.5, -100.7)
Answer: 71.2
Question: and what is the percentage this change represents of those losses in 2005?
Steps: divide(#0, 100.7)
Answer: 0.70705
Question: and in that year of 2006, what was the related tax expense, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5.7
Answer: 5.7
Question: what was it in 2007, also in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.2
Answer: 3.2
Question: what is, then, the difference between the 2006 and the 2007 one?
Steps: subtract(5.7, 3.2)
Answer: 2.5
Question: and what was that tax expense in 2005, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 10.7
Answer: 10.7
Question: what is, then, the difference between that difference value and this 2005 amount?
| -8.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 71 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 16 .shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) on october 24 , 2007 , ball announced the discontinuance of the company 2019s discount on the reinvestment of dividends associated with the company 2019s dividend reinvestment and voluntary stock purchase plan for non- employee shareholders .the 5 percent discount was discontinued on november 1 , 2007 .accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) the activity related to accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) was as follows : ( $ in millions ) foreign currency translation pension and postretirement items , net of tax effective financial derivatives , net of tax accumulated comprehensive earnings ( loss ) . ( $ in millions ) | foreign currency translation | pension and other postretirement items net of tax | effective financial derivatives net of tax | accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss )
december 31 2004 | $ 148.9 | $ -126.3 ( 126.3 ) | $ 10.6 | $ 33.2
2005 change | -74.3 ( 74.3 ) | -43.6 ( 43.6 ) | -16.0 ( 16.0 ) | -133.9 ( 133.9 )
december 31 2005 | 74.6 | -169.9 ( 169.9 ) | -5.4 ( 5.4 ) | -100.7 ( 100.7 )
2006 change | 57.2 | 55.9 | 6.0 | 119.1
effect of sfas no . 158 adoption ( a ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 ) | 2013 | -47.9 ( 47.9 )
december 31 2006 | 131.8 | -161.9 ( 161.9 ) | 0.6 | -29.5 ( 29.5 )
2007 change | 90.0 | 57.9 | -11.5 ( 11.5 ) | 136.4
december 31 2007 | $ 221.8 | $ -104.0 ( 104.0 ) | $ -10.9 ( 10.9 ) | $ 106.9 ( a ) within the company 2019s 2006 annual report , the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included a transition adjustment of $ 47.9 million , net of tax , related to the adoption of sfas no .158 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) , 201d as a component of 2006 comprehensive earnings rather than only as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss .the 2006 amounts have been revised to correct the previous reporting .notwithstanding the 2005 distribution pursuant to the jobs act , management 2019s intention is to indefinitely reinvest foreign earnings .therefore , no taxes have been provided on the foreign currency translation component for any period .the change in the pension and other postretirement items is presented net of related tax expense of $ 31.3 million and $ 2.9 million for 2007 and 2006 , respectively , and a related tax benefit of $ 27.3 million for 2005 .the change in the effective financial derivatives is presented net of related tax benefit of $ 3.2 million for 2007 , related tax expense of $ 5.7 million for 2006 and related tax benefit of $ 10.7 million for 2005 .stock-based compensation programs effective january 1 , 2006 , ball adopted sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , 201cshare based payment , 201d which is a revision of sfas no .123 and supersedes apb opinion no .25 .the new standard establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services , including stock option and restricted stock grants .the major differences for ball are that ( 1 ) expense is now recorded in the consolidated statements of earnings for the fair value of new stock option grants and nonvested portions of grants made prior to january 1 , 2006 , and ( 2 ) the company 2019s deposit share program ( discussed below ) is no longer a variable plan that is marked to current market value each month through earnings .upon adoption of sfas no .123 ( revised 2004 ) , ball has chosen to use the modified prospective transition method and the black-scholes valuation model. .
Question: what was the change in accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(-29.5, -100.7)
Answer: 71.2
Question: and what is the percentage this change represents of those losses in 2005?
Steps: divide(#0, 100.7)
Answer: 0.70705
Question: and in that year of 2006, what was the related tax expense, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 5.7
Answer: 5.7
Question: what was it in 2007, also in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.2
Answer: 3.2
Question: what is, then, the difference between the 2006 and the 2007 one?
Steps: subtract(5.7, 3.2)
Answer: 2.5
Question: and what was that tax expense in 2005, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 10.7
Answer: 10.7
Question: what is, then, the difference between that difference value and this 2005 amount?
| convfinqa2426 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services .as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds .as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies .we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits .for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year .as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances .table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | december 31 , 2014 | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2014 | 2013
client deposits ( 1 ) | $ 195276 | $ 182268 | $ 167470 | $ 143043 client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively .short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy .these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales .in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors .as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral .short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase .these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities .these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations .the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice .as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit .long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion .as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority .as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt .we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof .we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration .the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors .agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies .factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments .high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings .a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what was the value of deposits of clients in 2014?
| 195276.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services .as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds .as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies .we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits .for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year .as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances .table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | december 31 , 2014 | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2014 | 2013
client deposits ( 1 ) | $ 195276 | $ 182268 | $ 167470 | $ 143043 client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively .short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy .these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales .in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors .as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral .short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase .these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities .these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations .the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice .as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit .long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion .as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority .as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt .we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof .we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration .the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors .agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies .factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments .high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings .a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what was the value of deposits of clients in 2014?
| convfinqa2427 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services .as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds .as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies .we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits .for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year .as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances .table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | december 31 , 2014 | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2014 | 2013
client deposits ( 1 ) | $ 195276 | $ 182268 | $ 167470 | $ 143043 client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively .short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy .these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales .in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors .as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral .short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase .these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities .these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations .the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice .as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit .long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion .as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority .as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt .we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof .we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration .the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors .agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies .factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments .high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings .a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what was the value of deposits of clients in 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 195276
Answer: 195276.0
Question: what was the value in 2013?
| 182268.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services .as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds .as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies .we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits .for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year .as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances .table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | december 31 , 2014 | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2014 | 2013
client deposits ( 1 ) | $ 195276 | $ 182268 | $ 167470 | $ 143043 client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively .short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy .these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales .in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors .as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral .short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase .these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities .these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations .the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice .as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit .long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion .as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority .as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt .we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof .we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration .the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors .agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies .factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments .high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings .a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what was the value of deposits of clients in 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 195276
Answer: 195276.0
Question: what was the value in 2013?
| convfinqa2428 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services .as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds .as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies .we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits .for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year .as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances .table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | december 31 , 2014 | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2014 | 2013
client deposits ( 1 ) | $ 195276 | $ 182268 | $ 167470 | $ 143043 client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively .short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy .these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales .in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors .as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral .short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase .these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities .these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations .the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice .as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit .long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion .as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority .as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt .we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof .we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration .the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors .agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies .factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments .high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings .a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what was the value of deposits of clients in 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 195276
Answer: 195276.0
Question: what was the value in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 182268
Answer: 182268.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
| 13008.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services .as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds .as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies .we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits .for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year .as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances .table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | december 31 , 2014 | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2014 | 2013
client deposits ( 1 ) | $ 195276 | $ 182268 | $ 167470 | $ 143043 client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively .short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy .these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales .in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors .as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral .short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase .these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities .these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations .the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice .as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit .long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion .as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority .as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt .we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof .we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration .the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors .agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies .factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments .high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings .a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what was the value of deposits of clients in 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 195276
Answer: 195276.0
Question: what was the value in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 182268
Answer: 182268.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
| convfinqa2429 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services .as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds .as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies .we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits .for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year .as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances .table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | december 31 , 2014 | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2014 | 2013
client deposits ( 1 ) | $ 195276 | $ 182268 | $ 167470 | $ 143043 client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively .short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy .these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales .in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors .as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral .short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase .these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities .these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations .the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice .as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit .long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion .as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority .as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt .we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof .we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration .the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors .agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies .factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments .high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings .a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what was the value of deposits of clients in 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 195276
Answer: 195276.0
Question: what was the value in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 182268
Answer: 182268.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Steps: subtract(195276, 182268)
Answer: 13008.0
Question: what was the 2013 value?
| 182268.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services .as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds .as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies .we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits .for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year .as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances .table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | december 31 , 2014 | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2014 | 2013
client deposits ( 1 ) | $ 195276 | $ 182268 | $ 167470 | $ 143043 client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively .short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy .these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales .in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors .as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral .short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase .these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities .these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations .the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice .as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit .long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion .as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority .as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt .we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof .we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration .the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors .agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies .factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments .high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings .a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what was the value of deposits of clients in 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 195276
Answer: 195276.0
Question: what was the value in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 182268
Answer: 182268.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Steps: subtract(195276, 182268)
Answer: 13008.0
Question: what was the 2013 value?
| convfinqa2430 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services .as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds .as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies .we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits .for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year .as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances .table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | december 31 , 2014 | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2014 | 2013
client deposits ( 1 ) | $ 195276 | $ 182268 | $ 167470 | $ 143043 client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively .short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy .these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales .in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors .as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral .short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase .these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities .these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations .the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice .as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit .long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion .as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority .as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt .we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof .we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration .the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors .agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies .factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments .high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings .a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what was the value of deposits of clients in 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 195276
Answer: 195276.0
Question: what was the value in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 182268
Answer: 182268.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Steps: subtract(195276, 182268)
Answer: 13008.0
Question: what was the 2013 value?
Steps: Ask for number 182268
Answer: 182268.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.07137 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) funding deposits : we provide products and services including custody , accounting , administration , daily pricing , foreign exchange services , cash management , financial asset management , securities finance and investment advisory services .as a provider of these products and services , we generate client deposits , which have generally provided a stable , low-cost source of funds .as a global custodian , clients place deposits with state street entities in various currencies .we invest these client deposits in a combination of investment securities and short- duration financial instruments whose mix is determined by the characteristics of the deposits .for the past several years , we have experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of the quarter or the end of the year .as a result , we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances .table 33 : client deposits average balance december 31 , year ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | december 31 , 2014 | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2014 | 2013
client deposits ( 1 ) | $ 195276 | $ 182268 | $ 167470 | $ 143043 client deposits ( 1 ) $ 195276 $ 182268 $ 167470 $ 143043 ( 1 ) balance as of december 31 , 2014 excluded term wholesale certificates of deposit , or cds , of $ 13.76 billion ; average balances for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 excluded average cds of $ 6.87 billion and $ 2.50 billion , respectively .short-term funding : our corporate commercial paper program , under which we can issue up to $ 3.0 billion of commercial paper with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issuance , had $ 2.48 billion and $ 1.82 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy .these assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets , but more importantly , they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales .in addition , our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors .as discussed earlier under 201casset liquidity , 201d state street bank's membership in the fhlb allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral .short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase .these transactions are short-term in nature , generally overnight , and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities .these balances were $ 8.93 billion and $ 7.95 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .state street bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 690 million as of december 31 , 2014 , to support its canadian securities processing operations .the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice .as of december 31 , 2014 , there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit .long-term funding : as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank had board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time , provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $ 5 billion .as of december 31 , 2014 , $ 4.1 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority .as of december 31 , 2014 , state street bank also had board authority to issue an additional $ 500 million of subordinated debt .we maintain an effective universal shelf registration that allows for the public offering and sale of debt securities , capital securities , common stock , depositary shares and preferred stock , and warrants to purchase such securities , including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible , or any combination thereof .we have issued in the past , and we may issue in the future , securities pursuant to our shelf registration .the issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions , funding needs and other factors .agency credit ratings our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies .factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include diverse and stable core earnings ; relative market position ; strong risk management ; strong capital ratios ; diverse liquidity sources , including the global capital markets and client deposits ; strong liquidity monitoring procedures ; and preparedness for current or future regulatory developments .high ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors , increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products , serve markets , and engage in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings .a downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital .
Question: what was the value of deposits of clients in 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 195276
Answer: 195276.0
Question: what was the value in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 182268
Answer: 182268.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Steps: subtract(195276, 182268)
Answer: 13008.0
Question: what was the 2013 value?
Steps: Ask for number 182268
Answer: 182268.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| convfinqa2431 |
reinvested for continued use in foreign operations .if the total undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were remitted , a significant amount of the additional tax would be offset by the allowable foreign tax credits .it is not practical for us to determine the additional tax of remitting these earnings .in september 2007 , we reached a settlement with the united states department of justice to resolve an investigation into financial relationships between major orthopaedic manufacturers and consulting orthopaedic surgeons .under the terms of the settlement , we paid a civil settlement amount of $ 169.5 million and we recorded an expense in that amount .at the time , no tax benefit was recorded related to the settlement expense due to the uncertainty as to the tax treatment .during the third quarter of 2008 , we reached an agreement with the u.s .internal revenue service ( irs ) confirming the deductibility of a portion of the settlement payment .as a result , during 2008 we recorded a current tax benefit of $ 31.7 million .in june 2006 , the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) issued interpretation no .48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no .109 , accounting for income taxes ( fin 48 ) .fin 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements .under fin 48 , we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities , based on the technical merits of the position .the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement .fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties on income taxes , accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures .we adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 .prior to the adoption of fin 48 we had a long term tax liability for expected settlement of various federal , state and foreign income tax liabilities that was reflected net of the corollary tax impact of these expected settlements of $ 102.1 million , as well as a separate accrued interest liability of $ 1.7 million .as a result of the adoption of fin 48 , we are required to present the different components of such liability on a gross basis versus the historical net presentation .the adoption resulted in the financial statement liability for unrecognized tax benefits decreasing by $ 6.4 million as of january 1 , 2007 .the adoption resulted in this decrease in the liability as well as a reduction to retained earnings of $ 4.8 million , a reduction in goodwill of $ 61.4 million , the establishment of a tax receivable of $ 58.2 million , which was recorded in other current and non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet , and an increase in an interest/penalty payable of $ 7.9 million , all as of january 1 , 2007 .therefore , after the adoption of fin 48 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 95.7 million as of january 1 , 2007 .as of december 31 , 2008 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 129.5 million .of this amount , $ 45.5 million would impact our effective tax rate if recognized .$ 38.2 million of the $ 129.5 million liability for unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions of acquired entities taken prior to their acquisition by us .under fas 141 ( r ) , if these liabilities are settled for different amounts , they will affect the income tax expense in the period of reversal or settlement .the following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . | 2008 | 2007
balance at january 1 | $ 135.2 | $ 95.7
increases related to prior periods | 12.1 | 27.4
decreases related to prior periods | -32.0 ( 32.0 ) | -5.5 ( 5.5 )
increases related to current period | 15.8 | 21.9
decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities | -1.3 ( 1.3 ) | -1.3 ( 1.3 )
decreases related to lapse of statue of limitations | -0.3 ( 0.3 ) | -3.0 ( 3.0 )
balance at december 31 | $ 129.5 | $ 135.2 we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods .as of december 31 , 2007 , we recorded a liability of $ 19.6 million for accrued interest and penalties , of which $ 14.7 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .the amount of this liability is $ 22.9 million as of december 31 , 2008 .of this amount , $ 17.1 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .we expect that the amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect these changes will have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position .the u.s .federal statute of limitations remains open for the year 2003 and onward .the u.s .federal returns for years 2003 and 2004 are currently under examination by the irs .on july 15 , 2008 , the irs issued its examination report .we filed a formal protest on august 15 , 2008 and requested a conference with the appeals office regarding disputed issues .although the appeals process could take several years , we do not anticipate resolution of the audit will result in any significant impact on our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .in addition , for the 1999 tax year of centerpulse , which we acquired in october 2003 , one issue remains in dispute .state income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return .the state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states .we have various state income tax returns in the process of examination , administrative appeals or litigation .it is z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 057000000 ***%%pcmsg|57 |00010|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what were unrecognized tax benefits in 2008?
| 129.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
reinvested for continued use in foreign operations .if the total undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were remitted , a significant amount of the additional tax would be offset by the allowable foreign tax credits .it is not practical for us to determine the additional tax of remitting these earnings .in september 2007 , we reached a settlement with the united states department of justice to resolve an investigation into financial relationships between major orthopaedic manufacturers and consulting orthopaedic surgeons .under the terms of the settlement , we paid a civil settlement amount of $ 169.5 million and we recorded an expense in that amount .at the time , no tax benefit was recorded related to the settlement expense due to the uncertainty as to the tax treatment .during the third quarter of 2008 , we reached an agreement with the u.s .internal revenue service ( irs ) confirming the deductibility of a portion of the settlement payment .as a result , during 2008 we recorded a current tax benefit of $ 31.7 million .in june 2006 , the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) issued interpretation no .48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no .109 , accounting for income taxes ( fin 48 ) .fin 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements .under fin 48 , we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities , based on the technical merits of the position .the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement .fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties on income taxes , accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures .we adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 .prior to the adoption of fin 48 we had a long term tax liability for expected settlement of various federal , state and foreign income tax liabilities that was reflected net of the corollary tax impact of these expected settlements of $ 102.1 million , as well as a separate accrued interest liability of $ 1.7 million .as a result of the adoption of fin 48 , we are required to present the different components of such liability on a gross basis versus the historical net presentation .the adoption resulted in the financial statement liability for unrecognized tax benefits decreasing by $ 6.4 million as of january 1 , 2007 .the adoption resulted in this decrease in the liability as well as a reduction to retained earnings of $ 4.8 million , a reduction in goodwill of $ 61.4 million , the establishment of a tax receivable of $ 58.2 million , which was recorded in other current and non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet , and an increase in an interest/penalty payable of $ 7.9 million , all as of january 1 , 2007 .therefore , after the adoption of fin 48 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 95.7 million as of january 1 , 2007 .as of december 31 , 2008 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 129.5 million .of this amount , $ 45.5 million would impact our effective tax rate if recognized .$ 38.2 million of the $ 129.5 million liability for unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions of acquired entities taken prior to their acquisition by us .under fas 141 ( r ) , if these liabilities are settled for different amounts , they will affect the income tax expense in the period of reversal or settlement .the following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . | 2008 | 2007
balance at january 1 | $ 135.2 | $ 95.7
increases related to prior periods | 12.1 | 27.4
decreases related to prior periods | -32.0 ( 32.0 ) | -5.5 ( 5.5 )
increases related to current period | 15.8 | 21.9
decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities | -1.3 ( 1.3 ) | -1.3 ( 1.3 )
decreases related to lapse of statue of limitations | -0.3 ( 0.3 ) | -3.0 ( 3.0 )
balance at december 31 | $ 129.5 | $ 135.2 we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods .as of december 31 , 2007 , we recorded a liability of $ 19.6 million for accrued interest and penalties , of which $ 14.7 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .the amount of this liability is $ 22.9 million as of december 31 , 2008 .of this amount , $ 17.1 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .we expect that the amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect these changes will have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position .the u.s .federal statute of limitations remains open for the year 2003 and onward .the u.s .federal returns for years 2003 and 2004 are currently under examination by the irs .on july 15 , 2008 , the irs issued its examination report .we filed a formal protest on august 15 , 2008 and requested a conference with the appeals office regarding disputed issues .although the appeals process could take several years , we do not anticipate resolution of the audit will result in any significant impact on our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .in addition , for the 1999 tax year of centerpulse , which we acquired in october 2003 , one issue remains in dispute .state income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return .the state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states .we have various state income tax returns in the process of examination , administrative appeals or litigation .it is z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 057000000 ***%%pcmsg|57 |00010|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what were unrecognized tax benefits in 2008?
| convfinqa2432 |
reinvested for continued use in foreign operations .if the total undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were remitted , a significant amount of the additional tax would be offset by the allowable foreign tax credits .it is not practical for us to determine the additional tax of remitting these earnings .in september 2007 , we reached a settlement with the united states department of justice to resolve an investigation into financial relationships between major orthopaedic manufacturers and consulting orthopaedic surgeons .under the terms of the settlement , we paid a civil settlement amount of $ 169.5 million and we recorded an expense in that amount .at the time , no tax benefit was recorded related to the settlement expense due to the uncertainty as to the tax treatment .during the third quarter of 2008 , we reached an agreement with the u.s .internal revenue service ( irs ) confirming the deductibility of a portion of the settlement payment .as a result , during 2008 we recorded a current tax benefit of $ 31.7 million .in june 2006 , the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) issued interpretation no .48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no .109 , accounting for income taxes ( fin 48 ) .fin 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements .under fin 48 , we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities , based on the technical merits of the position .the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement .fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties on income taxes , accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures .we adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 .prior to the adoption of fin 48 we had a long term tax liability for expected settlement of various federal , state and foreign income tax liabilities that was reflected net of the corollary tax impact of these expected settlements of $ 102.1 million , as well as a separate accrued interest liability of $ 1.7 million .as a result of the adoption of fin 48 , we are required to present the different components of such liability on a gross basis versus the historical net presentation .the adoption resulted in the financial statement liability for unrecognized tax benefits decreasing by $ 6.4 million as of january 1 , 2007 .the adoption resulted in this decrease in the liability as well as a reduction to retained earnings of $ 4.8 million , a reduction in goodwill of $ 61.4 million , the establishment of a tax receivable of $ 58.2 million , which was recorded in other current and non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet , and an increase in an interest/penalty payable of $ 7.9 million , all as of january 1 , 2007 .therefore , after the adoption of fin 48 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 95.7 million as of january 1 , 2007 .as of december 31 , 2008 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 129.5 million .of this amount , $ 45.5 million would impact our effective tax rate if recognized .$ 38.2 million of the $ 129.5 million liability for unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions of acquired entities taken prior to their acquisition by us .under fas 141 ( r ) , if these liabilities are settled for different amounts , they will affect the income tax expense in the period of reversal or settlement .the following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . | 2008 | 2007
balance at january 1 | $ 135.2 | $ 95.7
increases related to prior periods | 12.1 | 27.4
decreases related to prior periods | -32.0 ( 32.0 ) | -5.5 ( 5.5 )
increases related to current period | 15.8 | 21.9
decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities | -1.3 ( 1.3 ) | -1.3 ( 1.3 )
decreases related to lapse of statue of limitations | -0.3 ( 0.3 ) | -3.0 ( 3.0 )
balance at december 31 | $ 129.5 | $ 135.2 we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods .as of december 31 , 2007 , we recorded a liability of $ 19.6 million for accrued interest and penalties , of which $ 14.7 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .the amount of this liability is $ 22.9 million as of december 31 , 2008 .of this amount , $ 17.1 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .we expect that the amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect these changes will have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position .the u.s .federal statute of limitations remains open for the year 2003 and onward .the u.s .federal returns for years 2003 and 2004 are currently under examination by the irs .on july 15 , 2008 , the irs issued its examination report .we filed a formal protest on august 15 , 2008 and requested a conference with the appeals office regarding disputed issues .although the appeals process could take several years , we do not anticipate resolution of the audit will result in any significant impact on our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .in addition , for the 1999 tax year of centerpulse , which we acquired in october 2003 , one issue remains in dispute .state income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return .the state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states .we have various state income tax returns in the process of examination , administrative appeals or litigation .it is z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 057000000 ***%%pcmsg|57 |00010|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what were unrecognized tax benefits in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 129.5
Answer: 129.5
Question: what were they in 2007?
| 135.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
reinvested for continued use in foreign operations .if the total undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were remitted , a significant amount of the additional tax would be offset by the allowable foreign tax credits .it is not practical for us to determine the additional tax of remitting these earnings .in september 2007 , we reached a settlement with the united states department of justice to resolve an investigation into financial relationships between major orthopaedic manufacturers and consulting orthopaedic surgeons .under the terms of the settlement , we paid a civil settlement amount of $ 169.5 million and we recorded an expense in that amount .at the time , no tax benefit was recorded related to the settlement expense due to the uncertainty as to the tax treatment .during the third quarter of 2008 , we reached an agreement with the u.s .internal revenue service ( irs ) confirming the deductibility of a portion of the settlement payment .as a result , during 2008 we recorded a current tax benefit of $ 31.7 million .in june 2006 , the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) issued interpretation no .48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no .109 , accounting for income taxes ( fin 48 ) .fin 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements .under fin 48 , we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities , based on the technical merits of the position .the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement .fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties on income taxes , accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures .we adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 .prior to the adoption of fin 48 we had a long term tax liability for expected settlement of various federal , state and foreign income tax liabilities that was reflected net of the corollary tax impact of these expected settlements of $ 102.1 million , as well as a separate accrued interest liability of $ 1.7 million .as a result of the adoption of fin 48 , we are required to present the different components of such liability on a gross basis versus the historical net presentation .the adoption resulted in the financial statement liability for unrecognized tax benefits decreasing by $ 6.4 million as of january 1 , 2007 .the adoption resulted in this decrease in the liability as well as a reduction to retained earnings of $ 4.8 million , a reduction in goodwill of $ 61.4 million , the establishment of a tax receivable of $ 58.2 million , which was recorded in other current and non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet , and an increase in an interest/penalty payable of $ 7.9 million , all as of january 1 , 2007 .therefore , after the adoption of fin 48 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 95.7 million as of january 1 , 2007 .as of december 31 , 2008 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 129.5 million .of this amount , $ 45.5 million would impact our effective tax rate if recognized .$ 38.2 million of the $ 129.5 million liability for unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions of acquired entities taken prior to their acquisition by us .under fas 141 ( r ) , if these liabilities are settled for different amounts , they will affect the income tax expense in the period of reversal or settlement .the following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . | 2008 | 2007
balance at january 1 | $ 135.2 | $ 95.7
increases related to prior periods | 12.1 | 27.4
decreases related to prior periods | -32.0 ( 32.0 ) | -5.5 ( 5.5 )
increases related to current period | 15.8 | 21.9
decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities | -1.3 ( 1.3 ) | -1.3 ( 1.3 )
decreases related to lapse of statue of limitations | -0.3 ( 0.3 ) | -3.0 ( 3.0 )
balance at december 31 | $ 129.5 | $ 135.2 we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods .as of december 31 , 2007 , we recorded a liability of $ 19.6 million for accrued interest and penalties , of which $ 14.7 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .the amount of this liability is $ 22.9 million as of december 31 , 2008 .of this amount , $ 17.1 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .we expect that the amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect these changes will have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position .the u.s .federal statute of limitations remains open for the year 2003 and onward .the u.s .federal returns for years 2003 and 2004 are currently under examination by the irs .on july 15 , 2008 , the irs issued its examination report .we filed a formal protest on august 15 , 2008 and requested a conference with the appeals office regarding disputed issues .although the appeals process could take several years , we do not anticipate resolution of the audit will result in any significant impact on our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .in addition , for the 1999 tax year of centerpulse , which we acquired in october 2003 , one issue remains in dispute .state income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return .the state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states .we have various state income tax returns in the process of examination , administrative appeals or litigation .it is z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 057000000 ***%%pcmsg|57 |00010|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what were unrecognized tax benefits in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 129.5
Answer: 129.5
Question: what were they in 2007?
| convfinqa2433 |
reinvested for continued use in foreign operations .if the total undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were remitted , a significant amount of the additional tax would be offset by the allowable foreign tax credits .it is not practical for us to determine the additional tax of remitting these earnings .in september 2007 , we reached a settlement with the united states department of justice to resolve an investigation into financial relationships between major orthopaedic manufacturers and consulting orthopaedic surgeons .under the terms of the settlement , we paid a civil settlement amount of $ 169.5 million and we recorded an expense in that amount .at the time , no tax benefit was recorded related to the settlement expense due to the uncertainty as to the tax treatment .during the third quarter of 2008 , we reached an agreement with the u.s .internal revenue service ( irs ) confirming the deductibility of a portion of the settlement payment .as a result , during 2008 we recorded a current tax benefit of $ 31.7 million .in june 2006 , the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) issued interpretation no .48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no .109 , accounting for income taxes ( fin 48 ) .fin 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements .under fin 48 , we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities , based on the technical merits of the position .the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement .fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties on income taxes , accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures .we adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 .prior to the adoption of fin 48 we had a long term tax liability for expected settlement of various federal , state and foreign income tax liabilities that was reflected net of the corollary tax impact of these expected settlements of $ 102.1 million , as well as a separate accrued interest liability of $ 1.7 million .as a result of the adoption of fin 48 , we are required to present the different components of such liability on a gross basis versus the historical net presentation .the adoption resulted in the financial statement liability for unrecognized tax benefits decreasing by $ 6.4 million as of january 1 , 2007 .the adoption resulted in this decrease in the liability as well as a reduction to retained earnings of $ 4.8 million , a reduction in goodwill of $ 61.4 million , the establishment of a tax receivable of $ 58.2 million , which was recorded in other current and non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet , and an increase in an interest/penalty payable of $ 7.9 million , all as of january 1 , 2007 .therefore , after the adoption of fin 48 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 95.7 million as of january 1 , 2007 .as of december 31 , 2008 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 129.5 million .of this amount , $ 45.5 million would impact our effective tax rate if recognized .$ 38.2 million of the $ 129.5 million liability for unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions of acquired entities taken prior to their acquisition by us .under fas 141 ( r ) , if these liabilities are settled for different amounts , they will affect the income tax expense in the period of reversal or settlement .the following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . | 2008 | 2007
balance at january 1 | $ 135.2 | $ 95.7
increases related to prior periods | 12.1 | 27.4
decreases related to prior periods | -32.0 ( 32.0 ) | -5.5 ( 5.5 )
increases related to current period | 15.8 | 21.9
decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities | -1.3 ( 1.3 ) | -1.3 ( 1.3 )
decreases related to lapse of statue of limitations | -0.3 ( 0.3 ) | -3.0 ( 3.0 )
balance at december 31 | $ 129.5 | $ 135.2 we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods .as of december 31 , 2007 , we recorded a liability of $ 19.6 million for accrued interest and penalties , of which $ 14.7 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .the amount of this liability is $ 22.9 million as of december 31 , 2008 .of this amount , $ 17.1 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .we expect that the amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect these changes will have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position .the u.s .federal statute of limitations remains open for the year 2003 and onward .the u.s .federal returns for years 2003 and 2004 are currently under examination by the irs .on july 15 , 2008 , the irs issued its examination report .we filed a formal protest on august 15 , 2008 and requested a conference with the appeals office regarding disputed issues .although the appeals process could take several years , we do not anticipate resolution of the audit will result in any significant impact on our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .in addition , for the 1999 tax year of centerpulse , which we acquired in october 2003 , one issue remains in dispute .state income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return .the state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states .we have various state income tax returns in the process of examination , administrative appeals or litigation .it is z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 057000000 ***%%pcmsg|57 |00010|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what were unrecognized tax benefits in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 129.5
Answer: 129.5
Question: what were they in 2007?
Steps: Ask for number 135.2
Answer: 135.2
Question: what was the net change?
| -5.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
reinvested for continued use in foreign operations .if the total undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were remitted , a significant amount of the additional tax would be offset by the allowable foreign tax credits .it is not practical for us to determine the additional tax of remitting these earnings .in september 2007 , we reached a settlement with the united states department of justice to resolve an investigation into financial relationships between major orthopaedic manufacturers and consulting orthopaedic surgeons .under the terms of the settlement , we paid a civil settlement amount of $ 169.5 million and we recorded an expense in that amount .at the time , no tax benefit was recorded related to the settlement expense due to the uncertainty as to the tax treatment .during the third quarter of 2008 , we reached an agreement with the u.s .internal revenue service ( irs ) confirming the deductibility of a portion of the settlement payment .as a result , during 2008 we recorded a current tax benefit of $ 31.7 million .in june 2006 , the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) issued interpretation no .48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no .109 , accounting for income taxes ( fin 48 ) .fin 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements .under fin 48 , we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities , based on the technical merits of the position .the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement .fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties on income taxes , accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures .we adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 .prior to the adoption of fin 48 we had a long term tax liability for expected settlement of various federal , state and foreign income tax liabilities that was reflected net of the corollary tax impact of these expected settlements of $ 102.1 million , as well as a separate accrued interest liability of $ 1.7 million .as a result of the adoption of fin 48 , we are required to present the different components of such liability on a gross basis versus the historical net presentation .the adoption resulted in the financial statement liability for unrecognized tax benefits decreasing by $ 6.4 million as of january 1 , 2007 .the adoption resulted in this decrease in the liability as well as a reduction to retained earnings of $ 4.8 million , a reduction in goodwill of $ 61.4 million , the establishment of a tax receivable of $ 58.2 million , which was recorded in other current and non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet , and an increase in an interest/penalty payable of $ 7.9 million , all as of january 1 , 2007 .therefore , after the adoption of fin 48 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 95.7 million as of january 1 , 2007 .as of december 31 , 2008 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 129.5 million .of this amount , $ 45.5 million would impact our effective tax rate if recognized .$ 38.2 million of the $ 129.5 million liability for unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions of acquired entities taken prior to their acquisition by us .under fas 141 ( r ) , if these liabilities are settled for different amounts , they will affect the income tax expense in the period of reversal or settlement .the following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . | 2008 | 2007
balance at january 1 | $ 135.2 | $ 95.7
increases related to prior periods | 12.1 | 27.4
decreases related to prior periods | -32.0 ( 32.0 ) | -5.5 ( 5.5 )
increases related to current period | 15.8 | 21.9
decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities | -1.3 ( 1.3 ) | -1.3 ( 1.3 )
decreases related to lapse of statue of limitations | -0.3 ( 0.3 ) | -3.0 ( 3.0 )
balance at december 31 | $ 129.5 | $ 135.2 we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods .as of december 31 , 2007 , we recorded a liability of $ 19.6 million for accrued interest and penalties , of which $ 14.7 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .the amount of this liability is $ 22.9 million as of december 31 , 2008 .of this amount , $ 17.1 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .we expect that the amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect these changes will have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position .the u.s .federal statute of limitations remains open for the year 2003 and onward .the u.s .federal returns for years 2003 and 2004 are currently under examination by the irs .on july 15 , 2008 , the irs issued its examination report .we filed a formal protest on august 15 , 2008 and requested a conference with the appeals office regarding disputed issues .although the appeals process could take several years , we do not anticipate resolution of the audit will result in any significant impact on our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .in addition , for the 1999 tax year of centerpulse , which we acquired in october 2003 , one issue remains in dispute .state income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return .the state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states .we have various state income tax returns in the process of examination , administrative appeals or litigation .it is z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 057000000 ***%%pcmsg|57 |00010|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what were unrecognized tax benefits in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 129.5
Answer: 129.5
Question: what were they in 2007?
Steps: Ask for number 135.2
Answer: 135.2
Question: what was the net change?
| convfinqa2434 |
reinvested for continued use in foreign operations .if the total undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were remitted , a significant amount of the additional tax would be offset by the allowable foreign tax credits .it is not practical for us to determine the additional tax of remitting these earnings .in september 2007 , we reached a settlement with the united states department of justice to resolve an investigation into financial relationships between major orthopaedic manufacturers and consulting orthopaedic surgeons .under the terms of the settlement , we paid a civil settlement amount of $ 169.5 million and we recorded an expense in that amount .at the time , no tax benefit was recorded related to the settlement expense due to the uncertainty as to the tax treatment .during the third quarter of 2008 , we reached an agreement with the u.s .internal revenue service ( irs ) confirming the deductibility of a portion of the settlement payment .as a result , during 2008 we recorded a current tax benefit of $ 31.7 million .in june 2006 , the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) issued interpretation no .48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no .109 , accounting for income taxes ( fin 48 ) .fin 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements .under fin 48 , we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities , based on the technical merits of the position .the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement .fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties on income taxes , accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures .we adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 .prior to the adoption of fin 48 we had a long term tax liability for expected settlement of various federal , state and foreign income tax liabilities that was reflected net of the corollary tax impact of these expected settlements of $ 102.1 million , as well as a separate accrued interest liability of $ 1.7 million .as a result of the adoption of fin 48 , we are required to present the different components of such liability on a gross basis versus the historical net presentation .the adoption resulted in the financial statement liability for unrecognized tax benefits decreasing by $ 6.4 million as of january 1 , 2007 .the adoption resulted in this decrease in the liability as well as a reduction to retained earnings of $ 4.8 million , a reduction in goodwill of $ 61.4 million , the establishment of a tax receivable of $ 58.2 million , which was recorded in other current and non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet , and an increase in an interest/penalty payable of $ 7.9 million , all as of january 1 , 2007 .therefore , after the adoption of fin 48 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 95.7 million as of january 1 , 2007 .as of december 31 , 2008 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 129.5 million .of this amount , $ 45.5 million would impact our effective tax rate if recognized .$ 38.2 million of the $ 129.5 million liability for unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions of acquired entities taken prior to their acquisition by us .under fas 141 ( r ) , if these liabilities are settled for different amounts , they will affect the income tax expense in the period of reversal or settlement .the following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . | 2008 | 2007
balance at january 1 | $ 135.2 | $ 95.7
increases related to prior periods | 12.1 | 27.4
decreases related to prior periods | -32.0 ( 32.0 ) | -5.5 ( 5.5 )
increases related to current period | 15.8 | 21.9
decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities | -1.3 ( 1.3 ) | -1.3 ( 1.3 )
decreases related to lapse of statue of limitations | -0.3 ( 0.3 ) | -3.0 ( 3.0 )
balance at december 31 | $ 129.5 | $ 135.2 we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods .as of december 31 , 2007 , we recorded a liability of $ 19.6 million for accrued interest and penalties , of which $ 14.7 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .the amount of this liability is $ 22.9 million as of december 31 , 2008 .of this amount , $ 17.1 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .we expect that the amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect these changes will have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position .the u.s .federal statute of limitations remains open for the year 2003 and onward .the u.s .federal returns for years 2003 and 2004 are currently under examination by the irs .on july 15 , 2008 , the irs issued its examination report .we filed a formal protest on august 15 , 2008 and requested a conference with the appeals office regarding disputed issues .although the appeals process could take several years , we do not anticipate resolution of the audit will result in any significant impact on our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .in addition , for the 1999 tax year of centerpulse , which we acquired in october 2003 , one issue remains in dispute .state income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return .the state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states .we have various state income tax returns in the process of examination , administrative appeals or litigation .it is z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 057000000 ***%%pcmsg|57 |00010|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what were unrecognized tax benefits in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 129.5
Answer: 129.5
Question: what were they in 2007?
Steps: Ask for number 135.2
Answer: 135.2
Question: what was the net change?
Steps: subtract(129.5, 135.2)
Answer: -5.7
Question: was is the percent change?
| -0.04216 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
reinvested for continued use in foreign operations .if the total undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries were remitted , a significant amount of the additional tax would be offset by the allowable foreign tax credits .it is not practical for us to determine the additional tax of remitting these earnings .in september 2007 , we reached a settlement with the united states department of justice to resolve an investigation into financial relationships between major orthopaedic manufacturers and consulting orthopaedic surgeons .under the terms of the settlement , we paid a civil settlement amount of $ 169.5 million and we recorded an expense in that amount .at the time , no tax benefit was recorded related to the settlement expense due to the uncertainty as to the tax treatment .during the third quarter of 2008 , we reached an agreement with the u.s .internal revenue service ( irs ) confirming the deductibility of a portion of the settlement payment .as a result , during 2008 we recorded a current tax benefit of $ 31.7 million .in june 2006 , the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) issued interpretation no .48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2013 an interpretation of fasb statement no .109 , accounting for income taxes ( fin 48 ) .fin 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements .under fin 48 , we may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities , based on the technical merits of the position .the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement .fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties on income taxes , accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures .we adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 .prior to the adoption of fin 48 we had a long term tax liability for expected settlement of various federal , state and foreign income tax liabilities that was reflected net of the corollary tax impact of these expected settlements of $ 102.1 million , as well as a separate accrued interest liability of $ 1.7 million .as a result of the adoption of fin 48 , we are required to present the different components of such liability on a gross basis versus the historical net presentation .the adoption resulted in the financial statement liability for unrecognized tax benefits decreasing by $ 6.4 million as of january 1 , 2007 .the adoption resulted in this decrease in the liability as well as a reduction to retained earnings of $ 4.8 million , a reduction in goodwill of $ 61.4 million , the establishment of a tax receivable of $ 58.2 million , which was recorded in other current and non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheet , and an increase in an interest/penalty payable of $ 7.9 million , all as of january 1 , 2007 .therefore , after the adoption of fin 48 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 95.7 million as of january 1 , 2007 .as of december 31 , 2008 , the amount of unrecognized tax benefits is $ 129.5 million .of this amount , $ 45.5 million would impact our effective tax rate if recognized .$ 38.2 million of the $ 129.5 million liability for unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions of acquired entities taken prior to their acquisition by us .under fas 141 ( r ) , if these liabilities are settled for different amounts , they will affect the income tax expense in the period of reversal or settlement .the following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : . | 2008 | 2007
balance at january 1 | $ 135.2 | $ 95.7
increases related to prior periods | 12.1 | 27.4
decreases related to prior periods | -32.0 ( 32.0 ) | -5.5 ( 5.5 )
increases related to current period | 15.8 | 21.9
decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities | -1.3 ( 1.3 ) | -1.3 ( 1.3 )
decreases related to lapse of statue of limitations | -0.3 ( 0.3 ) | -3.0 ( 3.0 )
balance at december 31 | $ 129.5 | $ 135.2 we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of earnings , which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods .as of december 31 , 2007 , we recorded a liability of $ 19.6 million for accrued interest and penalties , of which $ 14.7 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .the amount of this liability is $ 22.9 million as of december 31 , 2008 .of this amount , $ 17.1 million would impact our effective tax rate , if recognized .we expect that the amount of tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months ; however , we do not expect these changes will have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position .the u.s .federal statute of limitations remains open for the year 2003 and onward .the u.s .federal returns for years 2003 and 2004 are currently under examination by the irs .on july 15 , 2008 , the irs issued its examination report .we filed a formal protest on august 15 , 2008 and requested a conference with the appeals office regarding disputed issues .although the appeals process could take several years , we do not anticipate resolution of the audit will result in any significant impact on our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .in addition , for the 1999 tax year of centerpulse , which we acquired in october 2003 , one issue remains in dispute .state income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of 3 to 5 years after filing of the respective return .the state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states .we have various state income tax returns in the process of examination , administrative appeals or litigation .it is z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 057000000 ***%%pcmsg|57 |00010|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .
Question: what were unrecognized tax benefits in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 129.5
Answer: 129.5
Question: what were they in 2007?
Steps: Ask for number 135.2
Answer: 135.2
Question: what was the net change?
Steps: subtract(129.5, 135.2)
Answer: -5.7
Question: was is the percent change?
| convfinqa2435 |
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
| 852353.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
| convfinqa2436 |
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
| 51206.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
| convfinqa2437 |
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
Steps: Ask for number 51206
Answer: 51206.0
Question: how much, then, did the granted number represent in relation to the vested one?
| 16.64557 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
Steps: Ask for number 51206
Answer: 51206.0
Question: how much, then, did the granted number represent in relation to the vested one?
| convfinqa2438 |
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
Steps: Ask for number 51206
Answer: 51206.0
Question: how much, then, did the granted number represent in relation to the vested one?
Steps: divide(852353, 51206)
Answer: 16.64557
Question: and in that same year, what was the fair value of these vested shares, in millions?
| 3.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
Steps: Ask for number 51206
Answer: 51206.0
Question: how much, then, did the granted number represent in relation to the vested one?
Steps: divide(852353, 51206)
Answer: 16.64557
Question: and in that same year, what was the fair value of these vested shares, in millions?
| convfinqa2439 |
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
Steps: Ask for number 51206
Answer: 51206.0
Question: how much, then, did the granted number represent in relation to the vested one?
Steps: divide(852353, 51206)
Answer: 16.64557
Question: and in that same year, what was the fair value of these vested shares, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.4
Answer: 3.4
Question: what was it for 2005?
| 0.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
Steps: Ask for number 51206
Answer: 51206.0
Question: how much, then, did the granted number represent in relation to the vested one?
Steps: divide(852353, 51206)
Answer: 16.64557
Question: and in that same year, what was the fair value of these vested shares, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.4
Answer: 3.4
Question: what was it for 2005?
| convfinqa2440 |
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
Steps: Ask for number 51206
Answer: 51206.0
Question: how much, then, did the granted number represent in relation to the vested one?
Steps: divide(852353, 51206)
Answer: 16.64557
Question: and in that same year, what was the fair value of these vested shares, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.4
Answer: 3.4
Question: what was it for 2005?
Steps: Ask for number 0.6
Answer: 0.6
Question: what was, then, the total combined fair value for both years, in millions?
| 4.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
Steps: Ask for number 51206
Answer: 51206.0
Question: how much, then, did the granted number represent in relation to the vested one?
Steps: divide(852353, 51206)
Answer: 16.64557
Question: and in that same year, what was the fair value of these vested shares, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.4
Answer: 3.4
Question: what was it for 2005?
Steps: Ask for number 0.6
Answer: 0.6
Question: what was, then, the total combined fair value for both years, in millions?
| convfinqa2441 |
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
Steps: Ask for number 51206
Answer: 51206.0
Question: how much, then, did the granted number represent in relation to the vested one?
Steps: divide(852353, 51206)
Answer: 16.64557
Question: and in that same year, what was the fair value of these vested shares, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.4
Answer: 3.4
Question: what was it for 2005?
Steps: Ask for number 0.6
Answer: 0.6
Question: what was, then, the total combined fair value for both years, in millions?
Steps: add(3.4, 0.6)
Answer: 4.0
Question: including 2006, what becomes this total?
| 6.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
Steps: Ask for number 51206
Answer: 51206.0
Question: how much, then, did the granted number represent in relation to the vested one?
Steps: divide(852353, 51206)
Answer: 16.64557
Question: and in that same year, what was the fair value of these vested shares, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.4
Answer: 3.4
Question: what was it for 2005?
Steps: Ask for number 0.6
Answer: 0.6
Question: what was, then, the total combined fair value for both years, in millions?
Steps: add(3.4, 0.6)
Answer: 4.0
Question: including 2006, what becomes this total?
| convfinqa2442 |
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
Steps: Ask for number 51206
Answer: 51206.0
Question: how much, then, did the granted number represent in relation to the vested one?
Steps: divide(852353, 51206)
Answer: 16.64557
Question: and in that same year, what was the fair value of these vested shares, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.4
Answer: 3.4
Question: what was it for 2005?
Steps: Ask for number 0.6
Answer: 0.6
Question: what was, then, the total combined fair value for both years, in millions?
Steps: add(3.4, 0.6)
Answer: 4.0
Question: including 2006, what becomes this total?
Steps: add(#1, 2.3)
Answer: 6.3
Question: and what was, in millions, the average between the three years?
| 2.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value . | shares | weighted average grant-date fair value
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 | 1107455 | $ 45.86
granted | 852353 | 63.59
vested | -51206 ( 51206 ) | 56.93
forfeited | -63624 ( 63624 ) | 49.65
nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 | 1844978 | $ 53.61 the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .
Question: in the year of 2007, what was the number of granted shares?
Steps: Ask for number 852353
Answer: 852353.0
Question: and what was it for vested ones?
Steps: Ask for number 51206
Answer: 51206.0
Question: how much, then, did the granted number represent in relation to the vested one?
Steps: divide(852353, 51206)
Answer: 16.64557
Question: and in that same year, what was the fair value of these vested shares, in millions?
Steps: Ask for number 3.4
Answer: 3.4
Question: what was it for 2005?
Steps: Ask for number 0.6
Answer: 0.6
Question: what was, then, the total combined fair value for both years, in millions?
Steps: add(3.4, 0.6)
Answer: 4.0
Question: including 2006, what becomes this total?
Steps: add(#1, 2.3)
Answer: 6.3
Question: and what was, in millions, the average between the three years?
| convfinqa2443 |
the facility is considered 201cdebt 201d for purposes of a support agreement between american water and awcc , which serves as a functional equivalent of a guarantee by american water of awcc 2019s payment obligations under the credit facility .also , the company acquired an additional revolving line of credit as part of its keystone acquisition .the total commitment under this credit facility was $ 16 million of which $ 2 million was outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 .the following table summarizes information regarding the company 2019s aggregate credit facility commitments , letter of credit sub-limits and available funds under those revolving credit facilities , as well as outstanding amounts of commercial paper and outstanding borrowings under the respective facilities as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 : credit facility commitment available credit facility capacity letter of credit sublimit available letter of credit capacity outstanding commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing ( in millions ) december 31 , 2015 .....$ 1266 $ 1182 $ 150 $ 68 $ 626 $ 2 december 31 , 2014 .....$ 1250 $ 1212 $ 150 $ 112 $ 450 $ 2014 the weighted-average interest rate on awcc short-term borrowings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately 0.49% ( 0.49 % ) and 0.31% ( 0.31 % ) , respectively .interest accrues on the keystone revolving line of credit daily at a rate per annum equal to 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) above the greater of the one month or one day libor .capital structure the following table indicates the percentage of our capitalization represented by the components of our capital structure as of december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
total common stockholders' equity | 43.5% ( 43.5 % ) | 45.2% ( 45.2 % ) | 44.6% ( 44.6 % )
long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value | 50.6% ( 50.6 % ) | 50.1% ( 50.1 % ) | 49.3% ( 49.3 % )
short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt | 5.9% ( 5.9 % ) | 4.7% ( 4.7 % ) | 6.1% ( 6.1 % )
total | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) the changes in the capital structure between periods were mainly attributable to changes in outstanding commercial paper balances .debt covenants our debt agreements contain financial and non-financial covenants .to the extent that we are not in compliance with these covenants such an event may create an event of default under the debt agreement and we or our subsidiaries may be restricted in our ability to pay dividends , issue new debt or access our revolving credit facility .for two of our smaller operating companies , we have informed our counterparties that we will provide only unaudited financial information at the subsidiary level , which resulted in technical non-compliance with certain of their reporting requirements under debt agreements with respect to $ 8 million of outstanding debt .we do not believe this event will materially impact us .our long-term debt indentures contain a number of covenants that , among other things , limit the company from issuing debt secured by the company 2019s assets , subject to certain exceptions .our failure to comply with any of these covenants could accelerate repayment obligations .certain long-term notes and the revolving credit facility require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization ( as defined in the relevant documents ) of not more than 0.70 to 1.00 .on december 31 , 2015 , our ratio was 0.56 to 1.00 and therefore we were in compliance with the covenant. .
Question: what percent of capital structure is related to long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value in 2015?
| 0.506 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the facility is considered 201cdebt 201d for purposes of a support agreement between american water and awcc , which serves as a functional equivalent of a guarantee by american water of awcc 2019s payment obligations under the credit facility .also , the company acquired an additional revolving line of credit as part of its keystone acquisition .the total commitment under this credit facility was $ 16 million of which $ 2 million was outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 .the following table summarizes information regarding the company 2019s aggregate credit facility commitments , letter of credit sub-limits and available funds under those revolving credit facilities , as well as outstanding amounts of commercial paper and outstanding borrowings under the respective facilities as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 : credit facility commitment available credit facility capacity letter of credit sublimit available letter of credit capacity outstanding commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing ( in millions ) december 31 , 2015 .....$ 1266 $ 1182 $ 150 $ 68 $ 626 $ 2 december 31 , 2014 .....$ 1250 $ 1212 $ 150 $ 112 $ 450 $ 2014 the weighted-average interest rate on awcc short-term borrowings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately 0.49% ( 0.49 % ) and 0.31% ( 0.31 % ) , respectively .interest accrues on the keystone revolving line of credit daily at a rate per annum equal to 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) above the greater of the one month or one day libor .capital structure the following table indicates the percentage of our capitalization represented by the components of our capital structure as of december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
total common stockholders' equity | 43.5% ( 43.5 % ) | 45.2% ( 45.2 % ) | 44.6% ( 44.6 % )
long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value | 50.6% ( 50.6 % ) | 50.1% ( 50.1 % ) | 49.3% ( 49.3 % )
short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt | 5.9% ( 5.9 % ) | 4.7% ( 4.7 % ) | 6.1% ( 6.1 % )
total | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) the changes in the capital structure between periods were mainly attributable to changes in outstanding commercial paper balances .debt covenants our debt agreements contain financial and non-financial covenants .to the extent that we are not in compliance with these covenants such an event may create an event of default under the debt agreement and we or our subsidiaries may be restricted in our ability to pay dividends , issue new debt or access our revolving credit facility .for two of our smaller operating companies , we have informed our counterparties that we will provide only unaudited financial information at the subsidiary level , which resulted in technical non-compliance with certain of their reporting requirements under debt agreements with respect to $ 8 million of outstanding debt .we do not believe this event will materially impact us .our long-term debt indentures contain a number of covenants that , among other things , limit the company from issuing debt secured by the company 2019s assets , subject to certain exceptions .our failure to comply with any of these covenants could accelerate repayment obligations .certain long-term notes and the revolving credit facility require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization ( as defined in the relevant documents ) of not more than 0.70 to 1.00 .on december 31 , 2015 , our ratio was 0.56 to 1.00 and therefore we were in compliance with the covenant. .
Question: what percent of capital structure is related to long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value in 2015?
| convfinqa2444 |
the facility is considered 201cdebt 201d for purposes of a support agreement between american water and awcc , which serves as a functional equivalent of a guarantee by american water of awcc 2019s payment obligations under the credit facility .also , the company acquired an additional revolving line of credit as part of its keystone acquisition .the total commitment under this credit facility was $ 16 million of which $ 2 million was outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 .the following table summarizes information regarding the company 2019s aggregate credit facility commitments , letter of credit sub-limits and available funds under those revolving credit facilities , as well as outstanding amounts of commercial paper and outstanding borrowings under the respective facilities as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 : credit facility commitment available credit facility capacity letter of credit sublimit available letter of credit capacity outstanding commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing ( in millions ) december 31 , 2015 .....$ 1266 $ 1182 $ 150 $ 68 $ 626 $ 2 december 31 , 2014 .....$ 1250 $ 1212 $ 150 $ 112 $ 450 $ 2014 the weighted-average interest rate on awcc short-term borrowings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately 0.49% ( 0.49 % ) and 0.31% ( 0.31 % ) , respectively .interest accrues on the keystone revolving line of credit daily at a rate per annum equal to 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) above the greater of the one month or one day libor .capital structure the following table indicates the percentage of our capitalization represented by the components of our capital structure as of december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
total common stockholders' equity | 43.5% ( 43.5 % ) | 45.2% ( 45.2 % ) | 44.6% ( 44.6 % )
long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value | 50.6% ( 50.6 % ) | 50.1% ( 50.1 % ) | 49.3% ( 49.3 % )
short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt | 5.9% ( 5.9 % ) | 4.7% ( 4.7 % ) | 6.1% ( 6.1 % )
total | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) the changes in the capital structure between periods were mainly attributable to changes in outstanding commercial paper balances .debt covenants our debt agreements contain financial and non-financial covenants .to the extent that we are not in compliance with these covenants such an event may create an event of default under the debt agreement and we or our subsidiaries may be restricted in our ability to pay dividends , issue new debt or access our revolving credit facility .for two of our smaller operating companies , we have informed our counterparties that we will provide only unaudited financial information at the subsidiary level , which resulted in technical non-compliance with certain of their reporting requirements under debt agreements with respect to $ 8 million of outstanding debt .we do not believe this event will materially impact us .our long-term debt indentures contain a number of covenants that , among other things , limit the company from issuing debt secured by the company 2019s assets , subject to certain exceptions .our failure to comply with any of these covenants could accelerate repayment obligations .certain long-term notes and the revolving credit facility require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization ( as defined in the relevant documents ) of not more than 0.70 to 1.00 .on december 31 , 2015 , our ratio was 0.56 to 1.00 and therefore we were in compliance with the covenant. .
Question: what percent of capital structure is related to long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 50.6%
Answer: 0.506
Question: what about in 2013?
| 0.493 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the facility is considered 201cdebt 201d for purposes of a support agreement between american water and awcc , which serves as a functional equivalent of a guarantee by american water of awcc 2019s payment obligations under the credit facility .also , the company acquired an additional revolving line of credit as part of its keystone acquisition .the total commitment under this credit facility was $ 16 million of which $ 2 million was outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 .the following table summarizes information regarding the company 2019s aggregate credit facility commitments , letter of credit sub-limits and available funds under those revolving credit facilities , as well as outstanding amounts of commercial paper and outstanding borrowings under the respective facilities as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 : credit facility commitment available credit facility capacity letter of credit sublimit available letter of credit capacity outstanding commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing ( in millions ) december 31 , 2015 .....$ 1266 $ 1182 $ 150 $ 68 $ 626 $ 2 december 31 , 2014 .....$ 1250 $ 1212 $ 150 $ 112 $ 450 $ 2014 the weighted-average interest rate on awcc short-term borrowings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately 0.49% ( 0.49 % ) and 0.31% ( 0.31 % ) , respectively .interest accrues on the keystone revolving line of credit daily at a rate per annum equal to 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) above the greater of the one month or one day libor .capital structure the following table indicates the percentage of our capitalization represented by the components of our capital structure as of december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
total common stockholders' equity | 43.5% ( 43.5 % ) | 45.2% ( 45.2 % ) | 44.6% ( 44.6 % )
long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value | 50.6% ( 50.6 % ) | 50.1% ( 50.1 % ) | 49.3% ( 49.3 % )
short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt | 5.9% ( 5.9 % ) | 4.7% ( 4.7 % ) | 6.1% ( 6.1 % )
total | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) the changes in the capital structure between periods were mainly attributable to changes in outstanding commercial paper balances .debt covenants our debt agreements contain financial and non-financial covenants .to the extent that we are not in compliance with these covenants such an event may create an event of default under the debt agreement and we or our subsidiaries may be restricted in our ability to pay dividends , issue new debt or access our revolving credit facility .for two of our smaller operating companies , we have informed our counterparties that we will provide only unaudited financial information at the subsidiary level , which resulted in technical non-compliance with certain of their reporting requirements under debt agreements with respect to $ 8 million of outstanding debt .we do not believe this event will materially impact us .our long-term debt indentures contain a number of covenants that , among other things , limit the company from issuing debt secured by the company 2019s assets , subject to certain exceptions .our failure to comply with any of these covenants could accelerate repayment obligations .certain long-term notes and the revolving credit facility require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization ( as defined in the relevant documents ) of not more than 0.70 to 1.00 .on december 31 , 2015 , our ratio was 0.56 to 1.00 and therefore we were in compliance with the covenant. .
Question: what percent of capital structure is related to long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 50.6%
Answer: 0.506
Question: what about in 2013?
| convfinqa2445 |
the facility is considered 201cdebt 201d for purposes of a support agreement between american water and awcc , which serves as a functional equivalent of a guarantee by american water of awcc 2019s payment obligations under the credit facility .also , the company acquired an additional revolving line of credit as part of its keystone acquisition .the total commitment under this credit facility was $ 16 million of which $ 2 million was outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 .the following table summarizes information regarding the company 2019s aggregate credit facility commitments , letter of credit sub-limits and available funds under those revolving credit facilities , as well as outstanding amounts of commercial paper and outstanding borrowings under the respective facilities as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 : credit facility commitment available credit facility capacity letter of credit sublimit available letter of credit capacity outstanding commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing ( in millions ) december 31 , 2015 .....$ 1266 $ 1182 $ 150 $ 68 $ 626 $ 2 december 31 , 2014 .....$ 1250 $ 1212 $ 150 $ 112 $ 450 $ 2014 the weighted-average interest rate on awcc short-term borrowings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately 0.49% ( 0.49 % ) and 0.31% ( 0.31 % ) , respectively .interest accrues on the keystone revolving line of credit daily at a rate per annum equal to 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) above the greater of the one month or one day libor .capital structure the following table indicates the percentage of our capitalization represented by the components of our capital structure as of december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
total common stockholders' equity | 43.5% ( 43.5 % ) | 45.2% ( 45.2 % ) | 44.6% ( 44.6 % )
long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value | 50.6% ( 50.6 % ) | 50.1% ( 50.1 % ) | 49.3% ( 49.3 % )
short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt | 5.9% ( 5.9 % ) | 4.7% ( 4.7 % ) | 6.1% ( 6.1 % )
total | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) the changes in the capital structure between periods were mainly attributable to changes in outstanding commercial paper balances .debt covenants our debt agreements contain financial and non-financial covenants .to the extent that we are not in compliance with these covenants such an event may create an event of default under the debt agreement and we or our subsidiaries may be restricted in our ability to pay dividends , issue new debt or access our revolving credit facility .for two of our smaller operating companies , we have informed our counterparties that we will provide only unaudited financial information at the subsidiary level , which resulted in technical non-compliance with certain of their reporting requirements under debt agreements with respect to $ 8 million of outstanding debt .we do not believe this event will materially impact us .our long-term debt indentures contain a number of covenants that , among other things , limit the company from issuing debt secured by the company 2019s assets , subject to certain exceptions .our failure to comply with any of these covenants could accelerate repayment obligations .certain long-term notes and the revolving credit facility require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization ( as defined in the relevant documents ) of not more than 0.70 to 1.00 .on december 31 , 2015 , our ratio was 0.56 to 1.00 and therefore we were in compliance with the covenant. .
Question: what percent of capital structure is related to long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 50.6%
Answer: 0.506
Question: what about in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 49.3%
Answer: 0.493
Question: what is the net change from 2013 to 2015?
| 0.013 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the facility is considered 201cdebt 201d for purposes of a support agreement between american water and awcc , which serves as a functional equivalent of a guarantee by american water of awcc 2019s payment obligations under the credit facility .also , the company acquired an additional revolving line of credit as part of its keystone acquisition .the total commitment under this credit facility was $ 16 million of which $ 2 million was outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 .the following table summarizes information regarding the company 2019s aggregate credit facility commitments , letter of credit sub-limits and available funds under those revolving credit facilities , as well as outstanding amounts of commercial paper and outstanding borrowings under the respective facilities as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 : credit facility commitment available credit facility capacity letter of credit sublimit available letter of credit capacity outstanding commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing ( in millions ) december 31 , 2015 .....$ 1266 $ 1182 $ 150 $ 68 $ 626 $ 2 december 31 , 2014 .....$ 1250 $ 1212 $ 150 $ 112 $ 450 $ 2014 the weighted-average interest rate on awcc short-term borrowings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately 0.49% ( 0.49 % ) and 0.31% ( 0.31 % ) , respectively .interest accrues on the keystone revolving line of credit daily at a rate per annum equal to 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) above the greater of the one month or one day libor .capital structure the following table indicates the percentage of our capitalization represented by the components of our capital structure as of december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
total common stockholders' equity | 43.5% ( 43.5 % ) | 45.2% ( 45.2 % ) | 44.6% ( 44.6 % )
long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value | 50.6% ( 50.6 % ) | 50.1% ( 50.1 % ) | 49.3% ( 49.3 % )
short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt | 5.9% ( 5.9 % ) | 4.7% ( 4.7 % ) | 6.1% ( 6.1 % )
total | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) the changes in the capital structure between periods were mainly attributable to changes in outstanding commercial paper balances .debt covenants our debt agreements contain financial and non-financial covenants .to the extent that we are not in compliance with these covenants such an event may create an event of default under the debt agreement and we or our subsidiaries may be restricted in our ability to pay dividends , issue new debt or access our revolving credit facility .for two of our smaller operating companies , we have informed our counterparties that we will provide only unaudited financial information at the subsidiary level , which resulted in technical non-compliance with certain of their reporting requirements under debt agreements with respect to $ 8 million of outstanding debt .we do not believe this event will materially impact us .our long-term debt indentures contain a number of covenants that , among other things , limit the company from issuing debt secured by the company 2019s assets , subject to certain exceptions .our failure to comply with any of these covenants could accelerate repayment obligations .certain long-term notes and the revolving credit facility require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization ( as defined in the relevant documents ) of not more than 0.70 to 1.00 .on december 31 , 2015 , our ratio was 0.56 to 1.00 and therefore we were in compliance with the covenant. .
Question: what percent of capital structure is related to long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 50.6%
Answer: 0.506
Question: what about in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 49.3%
Answer: 0.493
Question: what is the net change from 2013 to 2015?
| convfinqa2446 |
the facility is considered 201cdebt 201d for purposes of a support agreement between american water and awcc , which serves as a functional equivalent of a guarantee by american water of awcc 2019s payment obligations under the credit facility .also , the company acquired an additional revolving line of credit as part of its keystone acquisition .the total commitment under this credit facility was $ 16 million of which $ 2 million was outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 .the following table summarizes information regarding the company 2019s aggregate credit facility commitments , letter of credit sub-limits and available funds under those revolving credit facilities , as well as outstanding amounts of commercial paper and outstanding borrowings under the respective facilities as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 : credit facility commitment available credit facility capacity letter of credit sublimit available letter of credit capacity outstanding commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing ( in millions ) december 31 , 2015 .....$ 1266 $ 1182 $ 150 $ 68 $ 626 $ 2 december 31 , 2014 .....$ 1250 $ 1212 $ 150 $ 112 $ 450 $ 2014 the weighted-average interest rate on awcc short-term borrowings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately 0.49% ( 0.49 % ) and 0.31% ( 0.31 % ) , respectively .interest accrues on the keystone revolving line of credit daily at a rate per annum equal to 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) above the greater of the one month or one day libor .capital structure the following table indicates the percentage of our capitalization represented by the components of our capital structure as of december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
total common stockholders' equity | 43.5% ( 43.5 % ) | 45.2% ( 45.2 % ) | 44.6% ( 44.6 % )
long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value | 50.6% ( 50.6 % ) | 50.1% ( 50.1 % ) | 49.3% ( 49.3 % )
short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt | 5.9% ( 5.9 % ) | 4.7% ( 4.7 % ) | 6.1% ( 6.1 % )
total | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) the changes in the capital structure between periods were mainly attributable to changes in outstanding commercial paper balances .debt covenants our debt agreements contain financial and non-financial covenants .to the extent that we are not in compliance with these covenants such an event may create an event of default under the debt agreement and we or our subsidiaries may be restricted in our ability to pay dividends , issue new debt or access our revolving credit facility .for two of our smaller operating companies , we have informed our counterparties that we will provide only unaudited financial information at the subsidiary level , which resulted in technical non-compliance with certain of their reporting requirements under debt agreements with respect to $ 8 million of outstanding debt .we do not believe this event will materially impact us .our long-term debt indentures contain a number of covenants that , among other things , limit the company from issuing debt secured by the company 2019s assets , subject to certain exceptions .our failure to comply with any of these covenants could accelerate repayment obligations .certain long-term notes and the revolving credit facility require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization ( as defined in the relevant documents ) of not more than 0.70 to 1.00 .on december 31 , 2015 , our ratio was 0.56 to 1.00 and therefore we were in compliance with the covenant. .
Question: what percent of capital structure is related to long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 50.6%
Answer: 0.506
Question: what about in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 49.3%
Answer: 0.493
Question: what is the net change from 2013 to 2015?
Steps: subtract(50.6%, 49.3%)
Answer: 0.013
Question: what is the ratio of 2015 commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing to 2014?
| 1.39111 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the facility is considered 201cdebt 201d for purposes of a support agreement between american water and awcc , which serves as a functional equivalent of a guarantee by american water of awcc 2019s payment obligations under the credit facility .also , the company acquired an additional revolving line of credit as part of its keystone acquisition .the total commitment under this credit facility was $ 16 million of which $ 2 million was outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 .the following table summarizes information regarding the company 2019s aggregate credit facility commitments , letter of credit sub-limits and available funds under those revolving credit facilities , as well as outstanding amounts of commercial paper and outstanding borrowings under the respective facilities as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 : credit facility commitment available credit facility capacity letter of credit sublimit available letter of credit capacity outstanding commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing ( in millions ) december 31 , 2015 .....$ 1266 $ 1182 $ 150 $ 68 $ 626 $ 2 december 31 , 2014 .....$ 1250 $ 1212 $ 150 $ 112 $ 450 $ 2014 the weighted-average interest rate on awcc short-term borrowings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately 0.49% ( 0.49 % ) and 0.31% ( 0.31 % ) , respectively .interest accrues on the keystone revolving line of credit daily at a rate per annum equal to 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) above the greater of the one month or one day libor .capital structure the following table indicates the percentage of our capitalization represented by the components of our capital structure as of december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
total common stockholders' equity | 43.5% ( 43.5 % ) | 45.2% ( 45.2 % ) | 44.6% ( 44.6 % )
long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value | 50.6% ( 50.6 % ) | 50.1% ( 50.1 % ) | 49.3% ( 49.3 % )
short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt | 5.9% ( 5.9 % ) | 4.7% ( 4.7 % ) | 6.1% ( 6.1 % )
total | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) | 100% ( 100 % ) the changes in the capital structure between periods were mainly attributable to changes in outstanding commercial paper balances .debt covenants our debt agreements contain financial and non-financial covenants .to the extent that we are not in compliance with these covenants such an event may create an event of default under the debt agreement and we or our subsidiaries may be restricted in our ability to pay dividends , issue new debt or access our revolving credit facility .for two of our smaller operating companies , we have informed our counterparties that we will provide only unaudited financial information at the subsidiary level , which resulted in technical non-compliance with certain of their reporting requirements under debt agreements with respect to $ 8 million of outstanding debt .we do not believe this event will materially impact us .our long-term debt indentures contain a number of covenants that , among other things , limit the company from issuing debt secured by the company 2019s assets , subject to certain exceptions .our failure to comply with any of these covenants could accelerate repayment obligations .certain long-term notes and the revolving credit facility require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization ( as defined in the relevant documents ) of not more than 0.70 to 1.00 .on december 31 , 2015 , our ratio was 0.56 to 1.00 and therefore we were in compliance with the covenant. .
Question: what percent of capital structure is related to long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 50.6%
Answer: 0.506
Question: what about in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 49.3%
Answer: 0.493
Question: what is the net change from 2013 to 2015?
Steps: subtract(50.6%, 49.3%)
Answer: 0.013
Question: what is the ratio of 2015 commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing to 2014?
| convfinqa2447 |
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd .total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . year | weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 ) | royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) | globalcruiseguests ( 1 ) | north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) | european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) | asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )
2012 | 425000 | 98650 | 20813 | 11641 | 6225 | 1474
2013 | 432000 | 98750 | 21343 | 11710 | 6430 | 2045
2014 | 448000 | 105750 | 22039 | 12269 | 6387 | 2382
2015 | 469000 | 112700 | 23000 | 12004 | 6587 | 3129
2016 | 493000 | 123270 | 24000 | 12581 | 6542 | 3636 _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources .we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p .wild to estimate cruise guest information .in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base .( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands .( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada .( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) .( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions .north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america .competition we compete with a number of cruise lines .our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises .cruise lines compete with .
Question: what was the difference in asia/pacific cruise guests between 2012 and 2016?
| 2162.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd .total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . year | weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 ) | royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) | globalcruiseguests ( 1 ) | north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) | european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) | asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )
2012 | 425000 | 98650 | 20813 | 11641 | 6225 | 1474
2013 | 432000 | 98750 | 21343 | 11710 | 6430 | 2045
2014 | 448000 | 105750 | 22039 | 12269 | 6387 | 2382
2015 | 469000 | 112700 | 23000 | 12004 | 6587 | 3129
2016 | 493000 | 123270 | 24000 | 12581 | 6542 | 3636 _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources .we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p .wild to estimate cruise guest information .in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base .( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands .( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada .( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) .( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions .north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america .competition we compete with a number of cruise lines .our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises .cruise lines compete with .
Question: what was the difference in asia/pacific cruise guests between 2012 and 2016?
| convfinqa2448 |
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd .total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . year | weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 ) | royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) | globalcruiseguests ( 1 ) | north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) | european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) | asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )
2012 | 425000 | 98650 | 20813 | 11641 | 6225 | 1474
2013 | 432000 | 98750 | 21343 | 11710 | 6430 | 2045
2014 | 448000 | 105750 | 22039 | 12269 | 6387 | 2382
2015 | 469000 | 112700 | 23000 | 12004 | 6587 | 3129
2016 | 493000 | 123270 | 24000 | 12581 | 6542 | 3636 _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources .we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p .wild to estimate cruise guest information .in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base .( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands .( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada .( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) .( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions .north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america .competition we compete with a number of cruise lines .our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises .cruise lines compete with .
Question: what was the difference in asia/pacific cruise guests between 2012 and 2016?
Steps: subtract(3636, 1474)
Answer: 2162.0
Question: and the value for 2012 again?
| 1474.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd .total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . year | weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 ) | royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) | globalcruiseguests ( 1 ) | north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) | european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) | asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )
2012 | 425000 | 98650 | 20813 | 11641 | 6225 | 1474
2013 | 432000 | 98750 | 21343 | 11710 | 6430 | 2045
2014 | 448000 | 105750 | 22039 | 12269 | 6387 | 2382
2015 | 469000 | 112700 | 23000 | 12004 | 6587 | 3129
2016 | 493000 | 123270 | 24000 | 12581 | 6542 | 3636 _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources .we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p .wild to estimate cruise guest information .in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base .( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands .( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada .( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) .( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions .north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america .competition we compete with a number of cruise lines .our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises .cruise lines compete with .
Question: what was the difference in asia/pacific cruise guests between 2012 and 2016?
Steps: subtract(3636, 1474)
Answer: 2162.0
Question: and the value for 2012 again?
| convfinqa2449 |
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd .total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . year | weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 ) | royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) | globalcruiseguests ( 1 ) | north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) | european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) | asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )
2012 | 425000 | 98650 | 20813 | 11641 | 6225 | 1474
2013 | 432000 | 98750 | 21343 | 11710 | 6430 | 2045
2014 | 448000 | 105750 | 22039 | 12269 | 6387 | 2382
2015 | 469000 | 112700 | 23000 | 12004 | 6587 | 3129
2016 | 493000 | 123270 | 24000 | 12581 | 6542 | 3636 _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources .we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p .wild to estimate cruise guest information .in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base .( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands .( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada .( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) .( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions .north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america .competition we compete with a number of cruise lines .our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises .cruise lines compete with .
Question: what was the difference in asia/pacific cruise guests between 2012 and 2016?
Steps: subtract(3636, 1474)
Answer: 2162.0
Question: and the value for 2012 again?
Steps: Ask for number 1474
Answer: 1474.0
Question: so what was the percentage increase during this time?
| 1.46676 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd .total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . year | weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 ) | royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) | globalcruiseguests ( 1 ) | north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) | european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) | asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )
2012 | 425000 | 98650 | 20813 | 11641 | 6225 | 1474
2013 | 432000 | 98750 | 21343 | 11710 | 6430 | 2045
2014 | 448000 | 105750 | 22039 | 12269 | 6387 | 2382
2015 | 469000 | 112700 | 23000 | 12004 | 6587 | 3129
2016 | 493000 | 123270 | 24000 | 12581 | 6542 | 3636 _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources .we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p .wild to estimate cruise guest information .in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base .( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands .( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada .( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) .( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions .north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america .competition we compete with a number of cruise lines .our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises .cruise lines compete with .
Question: what was the difference in asia/pacific cruise guests between 2012 and 2016?
Steps: subtract(3636, 1474)
Answer: 2162.0
Question: and the value for 2012 again?
Steps: Ask for number 1474
Answer: 1474.0
Question: so what was the percentage increase during this time?
| convfinqa2450 |
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd .total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . year | weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 ) | royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) | globalcruiseguests ( 1 ) | north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) | european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) | asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )
2012 | 425000 | 98650 | 20813 | 11641 | 6225 | 1474
2013 | 432000 | 98750 | 21343 | 11710 | 6430 | 2045
2014 | 448000 | 105750 | 22039 | 12269 | 6387 | 2382
2015 | 469000 | 112700 | 23000 | 12004 | 6587 | 3129
2016 | 493000 | 123270 | 24000 | 12581 | 6542 | 3636 _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources .we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p .wild to estimate cruise guest information .in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base .( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands .( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada .( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) .( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions .north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america .competition we compete with a number of cruise lines .our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises .cruise lines compete with .
Question: what was the difference in asia/pacific cruise guests between 2012 and 2016?
Steps: subtract(3636, 1474)
Answer: 2162.0
Question: and the value for 2012 again?
Steps: Ask for number 1474
Answer: 1474.0
Question: so what was the percentage increase during this time?
Steps: divide(A0, 1474)
Answer: 1.46676
Question: and converted to a percentage from a decimal?
| 146.67571 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd .total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . year | weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 ) | royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) | globalcruiseguests ( 1 ) | north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) | european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) | asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )
2012 | 425000 | 98650 | 20813 | 11641 | 6225 | 1474
2013 | 432000 | 98750 | 21343 | 11710 | 6430 | 2045
2014 | 448000 | 105750 | 22039 | 12269 | 6387 | 2382
2015 | 469000 | 112700 | 23000 | 12004 | 6587 | 3129
2016 | 493000 | 123270 | 24000 | 12581 | 6542 | 3636 _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources .we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p .wild to estimate cruise guest information .in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base .( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands .( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada .( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) .( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions .north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 .the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 .the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america .competition we compete with a number of cruise lines .our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises .cruise lines compete with .
Question: what was the difference in asia/pacific cruise guests between 2012 and 2016?
Steps: subtract(3636, 1474)
Answer: 2162.0
Question: and the value for 2012 again?
Steps: Ask for number 1474
Answer: 1474.0
Question: so what was the percentage increase during this time?
Steps: divide(A0, 1474)
Answer: 1.46676
Question: and converted to a percentage from a decimal?
| convfinqa2451 |
note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively .the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . | 2017 | 2016
balance beginning of year | $ 94417 | $ 10258
goodwill acquired as part of acquisition | 2014 | 84159
working capital settlement | -1225 ( 1225 ) | 2014
impairment loss | 2014 | 2014
balance end of year | $ 93192 | $ 94417 goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment .goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable .the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate .the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value .an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified .the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit .in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach .under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data .other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 .the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon .with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable .we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. .
Question: what was the change in the company's goodwill balance between the beginning of 2016 and the end of 2017?
| 82934.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively .the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . | 2017 | 2016
balance beginning of year | $ 94417 | $ 10258
goodwill acquired as part of acquisition | 2014 | 84159
working capital settlement | -1225 ( 1225 ) | 2014
impairment loss | 2014 | 2014
balance end of year | $ 93192 | $ 94417 goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment .goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable .the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate .the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value .an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified .the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit .in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach .under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data .other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 .the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon .with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable .we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. .
Question: what was the change in the company's goodwill balance between the beginning of 2016 and the end of 2017?
| convfinqa2452 |
note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively .the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . | 2017 | 2016
balance beginning of year | $ 94417 | $ 10258
goodwill acquired as part of acquisition | 2014 | 84159
working capital settlement | -1225 ( 1225 ) | 2014
impairment loss | 2014 | 2014
balance end of year | $ 93192 | $ 94417 goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment .goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable .the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate .the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value .an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified .the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit .in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach .under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data .other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 .the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon .with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable .we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. .
Question: what was the change in the company's goodwill balance between the beginning of 2016 and the end of 2017?
Steps: subtract(93192, 10258)
Answer: 82934.0
Question: and what was the total value of the company's goodwill balance in the beginning of 2016?
| 10258.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively .the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . | 2017 | 2016
balance beginning of year | $ 94417 | $ 10258
goodwill acquired as part of acquisition | 2014 | 84159
working capital settlement | -1225 ( 1225 ) | 2014
impairment loss | 2014 | 2014
balance end of year | $ 93192 | $ 94417 goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment .goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable .the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate .the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value .an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified .the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit .in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach .under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data .other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 .the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon .with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable .we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. .
Question: what was the change in the company's goodwill balance between the beginning of 2016 and the end of 2017?
Steps: subtract(93192, 10258)
Answer: 82934.0
Question: and what was the total value of the company's goodwill balance in the beginning of 2016?
| convfinqa2453 |
note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively .the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . | 2017 | 2016
balance beginning of year | $ 94417 | $ 10258
goodwill acquired as part of acquisition | 2014 | 84159
working capital settlement | -1225 ( 1225 ) | 2014
impairment loss | 2014 | 2014
balance end of year | $ 93192 | $ 94417 goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment .goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable .the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate .the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value .an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified .the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit .in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach .under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data .other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 .the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon .with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable .we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. .
Question: what was the change in the company's goodwill balance between the beginning of 2016 and the end of 2017?
Steps: subtract(93192, 10258)
Answer: 82934.0
Question: and what was the total value of the company's goodwill balance in the beginning of 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 10258
Answer: 10258.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this total value, in percentage?
| 8.08481 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively .the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . | 2017 | 2016
balance beginning of year | $ 94417 | $ 10258
goodwill acquired as part of acquisition | 2014 | 84159
working capital settlement | -1225 ( 1225 ) | 2014
impairment loss | 2014 | 2014
balance end of year | $ 93192 | $ 94417 goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment .goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable .the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate .the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value .an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified .the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit .in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach .under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data .other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 .the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon .with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable .we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value .in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. .
Question: what was the change in the company's goodwill balance between the beginning of 2016 and the end of 2017?
Steps: subtract(93192, 10258)
Answer: 82934.0
Question: and what was the total value of the company's goodwill balance in the beginning of 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 10258
Answer: 10258.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this total value, in percentage?
| convfinqa2454 |
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations .management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks .instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract .the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities .as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions .total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . ( millions ) | 2012 | 2011
foreign currency exchange contracts | $ 570 | $ 1265
interest rate contracts | 2150 | 600
commodity contracts | 136 | 175
total | $ 2856 | $ 2040 following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis .level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market .for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts .level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability .for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts .the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve .over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk .level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement .these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability .the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 .the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .
Question: what was the change in the total notional amount of the company's derivatives from 2011 to 2012?
| 816.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations .management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks .instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract .the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities .as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions .total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . ( millions ) | 2012 | 2011
foreign currency exchange contracts | $ 570 | $ 1265
interest rate contracts | 2150 | 600
commodity contracts | 136 | 175
total | $ 2856 | $ 2040 following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis .level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market .for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts .level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability .for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts .the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve .over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk .level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement .these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability .the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 .the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .
Question: what was the change in the total notional amount of the company's derivatives from 2011 to 2012?
| convfinqa2455 |
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations .management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks .instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract .the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities .as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions .total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . ( millions ) | 2012 | 2011
foreign currency exchange contracts | $ 570 | $ 1265
interest rate contracts | 2150 | 600
commodity contracts | 136 | 175
total | $ 2856 | $ 2040 following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis .level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market .for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts .level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability .for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts .the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve .over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk .level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement .these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability .the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 .the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .
Question: what was the change in the total notional amount of the company's derivatives from 2011 to 2012?
Steps: subtract(2856, 2040)
Answer: 816.0
Question: and what was that amount in 2011?
| 2040.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations .management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks .instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract .the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities .as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions .total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . ( millions ) | 2012 | 2011
foreign currency exchange contracts | $ 570 | $ 1265
interest rate contracts | 2150 | 600
commodity contracts | 136 | 175
total | $ 2856 | $ 2040 following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis .level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market .for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts .level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability .for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts .the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve .over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk .level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement .these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability .the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 .the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .
Question: what was the change in the total notional amount of the company's derivatives from 2011 to 2012?
Steps: subtract(2856, 2040)
Answer: 816.0
Question: and what was that amount in 2011?
| convfinqa2456 |
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations .management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks .instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract .the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities .as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions .total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . ( millions ) | 2012 | 2011
foreign currency exchange contracts | $ 570 | $ 1265
interest rate contracts | 2150 | 600
commodity contracts | 136 | 175
total | $ 2856 | $ 2040 following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis .level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market .for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts .level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability .for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts .the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve .over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk .level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement .these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability .the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 .the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .
Question: what was the change in the total notional amount of the company's derivatives from 2011 to 2012?
Steps: subtract(2856, 2040)
Answer: 816.0
Question: and what was that amount in 2011?
Steps: Ask for number 2040
Answer: 2040.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2011 amount, in percentage?
| 0.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations .management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks .instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract .the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities .as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions .total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 were as follows: . ( millions ) | 2012 | 2011
foreign currency exchange contracts | $ 570 | $ 1265
interest rate contracts | 2150 | 600
commodity contracts | 136 | 175
total | $ 2856 | $ 2040 following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , measured on a recurring basis .level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market .for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts .level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability .for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts .the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve .over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk .level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement .these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability .the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 29 , 2012 or december 31 , 2011 .the following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis as of december 29 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 : derivatives designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current assets $ 2014 $ 4 $ 4 $ 2014 $ 11 $ 11 interest rate contracts ( a ) : other assets 2014 64 64 2014 23 23 commodity contracts : other current assets 2014 2014 2014 2 2014 2 total assets $ 2014 $ 68 $ 68 $ 2 $ 34 $ 36 liabilities : foreign currency exchange contracts : other current liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 18 ) $ ( 18 ) commodity contracts : other current liabilities 2014 ( 11 ) ( 11 ) ( 4 ) ( 12 ) ( 16 ) other liabilities 2014 ( 27 ) ( 27 ) 2014 ( 34 ) ( 34 ) total liabilities $ 2014 $ ( 41 ) $ ( 41 ) $ ( 4 ) $ ( 64 ) $ ( 68 ) ( a ) the fair value of the related hedged portion of the company 2019s long-term debt , a level 2 liability , was $ 2.3 billion as of december 29 , 2012 and $ 626 million as of december 31 , derivatives not designated as hedging instruments : 2012 2011 ( millions ) level 1 level 2 total level 1 level 2 total assets : commodity contracts : other current assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total assets $ 5 $ 2014 $ 5 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 liabilities : commodity contracts : other current liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 total liabilities $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ ( 3 ) $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 2014 .
Question: what was the change in the total notional amount of the company's derivatives from 2011 to 2012?
Steps: subtract(2856, 2040)
Answer: 816.0
Question: and what was that amount in 2011?
Steps: Ask for number 2040
Answer: 2040.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2011 amount, in percentage?
| convfinqa2457 |
the following tables present a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) for 2017 and 2016 , respectively: . | level 3
balance as of january 1 2017 | $ 140
actual return on assets | 2
purchases issuances and settlements net | 136
balance as of december 31 2017 | $ 278 purchases , issuances and settlements , net ............................................( 4 ) balance as of december 31 , 2016 ......................................................$ 140 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts .the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust .in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company .the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation .considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns .strategies to address the goal of ensuring sufficient assets to pay benefits include target allocations to a broad array of asset classes and , within asset classes , strategies are employed to provide adequate returns , diversification and liquidity .in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan .as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed-income assets relative to liabilities .the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond-like and long-dated nature of the postretirement liabilities .in 2017 , the company further increased its exposure to liability-driven investing and increased its fixed-income allocation to 50% ( 50 % ) , up from 40% ( 40 % ) , in an effort to further decrease the funded status volatility of the plan and hedge the portfolio from movements in interest rates .in 2012 , the company also implemented a de-risking strategy for the medical bargaining trust within the plan to minimize volatility .in 2017 , the company conducted a new asset-liability study that indicated medical trend inflation that outpaced the consumer price index by more than 2% ( 2 % ) for the last 20 years .given continuously rising medical costs , the company decided to increase the equity exposure of the portfolio to 30% ( 30 % ) , up from 20% ( 20 % ) , while reducing the fixed-income portion of the portfolio from 80% ( 80 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) .the company also conducted an asset-liability study for the post-retirement non-bargaining medical plan .its allocation was adjusted to make it more conservative , reducing the equity allocation from 70% ( 70 % ) to 60% ( 60 % ) and increasing the fixed- income allocation from 30% ( 30 % ) to 40% ( 40 % ) .the post-retirement medical non-bargaining plan 2019s equity allocation was reduced due to the cap on benefits for some non-union participants and resultant reduction in the plan 2019s liabilities .these changes will take place in 2018 .the company engages third party investment managers for all invested assets .managers are not permitted to invest outside of the asset class ( e.g .fixed income , equity , alternatives ) or strategy for which they have been appointed .investment management agreements and recurring performance and attribution analysis are used as tools to ensure investment managers invest solely within the investment strategy they have been provided .futures and options may be used to adjust portfolio duration to align with a plan 2019s targeted investment policy. .
Question: what was the change in the balance throughout 2017?
| 138.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following tables present a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) for 2017 and 2016 , respectively: . | level 3
balance as of january 1 2017 | $ 140
actual return on assets | 2
purchases issuances and settlements net | 136
balance as of december 31 2017 | $ 278 purchases , issuances and settlements , net ............................................( 4 ) balance as of december 31 , 2016 ......................................................$ 140 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts .the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust .in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company .the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation .considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns .strategies to address the goal of ensuring sufficient assets to pay benefits include target allocations to a broad array of asset classes and , within asset classes , strategies are employed to provide adequate returns , diversification and liquidity .in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan .as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed-income assets relative to liabilities .the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond-like and long-dated nature of the postretirement liabilities .in 2017 , the company further increased its exposure to liability-driven investing and increased its fixed-income allocation to 50% ( 50 % ) , up from 40% ( 40 % ) , in an effort to further decrease the funded status volatility of the plan and hedge the portfolio from movements in interest rates .in 2012 , the company also implemented a de-risking strategy for the medical bargaining trust within the plan to minimize volatility .in 2017 , the company conducted a new asset-liability study that indicated medical trend inflation that outpaced the consumer price index by more than 2% ( 2 % ) for the last 20 years .given continuously rising medical costs , the company decided to increase the equity exposure of the portfolio to 30% ( 30 % ) , up from 20% ( 20 % ) , while reducing the fixed-income portion of the portfolio from 80% ( 80 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) .the company also conducted an asset-liability study for the post-retirement non-bargaining medical plan .its allocation was adjusted to make it more conservative , reducing the equity allocation from 70% ( 70 % ) to 60% ( 60 % ) and increasing the fixed- income allocation from 30% ( 30 % ) to 40% ( 40 % ) .the post-retirement medical non-bargaining plan 2019s equity allocation was reduced due to the cap on benefits for some non-union participants and resultant reduction in the plan 2019s liabilities .these changes will take place in 2018 .the company engages third party investment managers for all invested assets .managers are not permitted to invest outside of the asset class ( e.g .fixed income , equity , alternatives ) or strategy for which they have been appointed .investment management agreements and recurring performance and attribution analysis are used as tools to ensure investment managers invest solely within the investment strategy they have been provided .futures and options may be used to adjust portfolio duration to align with a plan 2019s targeted investment policy. .
Question: what was the change in the balance throughout 2017?
| convfinqa2458 |
the following tables present a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) for 2017 and 2016 , respectively: . | level 3
balance as of january 1 2017 | $ 140
actual return on assets | 2
purchases issuances and settlements net | 136
balance as of december 31 2017 | $ 278 purchases , issuances and settlements , net ............................................( 4 ) balance as of december 31 , 2016 ......................................................$ 140 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts .the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust .in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company .the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation .considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns .strategies to address the goal of ensuring sufficient assets to pay benefits include target allocations to a broad array of asset classes and , within asset classes , strategies are employed to provide adequate returns , diversification and liquidity .in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan .as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed-income assets relative to liabilities .the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond-like and long-dated nature of the postretirement liabilities .in 2017 , the company further increased its exposure to liability-driven investing and increased its fixed-income allocation to 50% ( 50 % ) , up from 40% ( 40 % ) , in an effort to further decrease the funded status volatility of the plan and hedge the portfolio from movements in interest rates .in 2012 , the company also implemented a de-risking strategy for the medical bargaining trust within the plan to minimize volatility .in 2017 , the company conducted a new asset-liability study that indicated medical trend inflation that outpaced the consumer price index by more than 2% ( 2 % ) for the last 20 years .given continuously rising medical costs , the company decided to increase the equity exposure of the portfolio to 30% ( 30 % ) , up from 20% ( 20 % ) , while reducing the fixed-income portion of the portfolio from 80% ( 80 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) .the company also conducted an asset-liability study for the post-retirement non-bargaining medical plan .its allocation was adjusted to make it more conservative , reducing the equity allocation from 70% ( 70 % ) to 60% ( 60 % ) and increasing the fixed- income allocation from 30% ( 30 % ) to 40% ( 40 % ) .the post-retirement medical non-bargaining plan 2019s equity allocation was reduced due to the cap on benefits for some non-union participants and resultant reduction in the plan 2019s liabilities .these changes will take place in 2018 .the company engages third party investment managers for all invested assets .managers are not permitted to invest outside of the asset class ( e.g .fixed income , equity , alternatives ) or strategy for which they have been appointed .investment management agreements and recurring performance and attribution analysis are used as tools to ensure investment managers invest solely within the investment strategy they have been provided .futures and options may be used to adjust portfolio duration to align with a plan 2019s targeted investment policy. .
Question: what was the change in the balance throughout 2017?
Steps: subtract(278, 140)
Answer: 138.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that balance at the beginning of the year?
| 0.98571 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following tables present a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) for 2017 and 2016 , respectively: . | level 3
balance as of january 1 2017 | $ 140
actual return on assets | 2
purchases issuances and settlements net | 136
balance as of december 31 2017 | $ 278 purchases , issuances and settlements , net ............................................( 4 ) balance as of december 31 , 2016 ......................................................$ 140 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts .the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust .in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company .the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation .considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns .strategies to address the goal of ensuring sufficient assets to pay benefits include target allocations to a broad array of asset classes and , within asset classes , strategies are employed to provide adequate returns , diversification and liquidity .in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan .as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed-income assets relative to liabilities .the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond-like and long-dated nature of the postretirement liabilities .in 2017 , the company further increased its exposure to liability-driven investing and increased its fixed-income allocation to 50% ( 50 % ) , up from 40% ( 40 % ) , in an effort to further decrease the funded status volatility of the plan and hedge the portfolio from movements in interest rates .in 2012 , the company also implemented a de-risking strategy for the medical bargaining trust within the plan to minimize volatility .in 2017 , the company conducted a new asset-liability study that indicated medical trend inflation that outpaced the consumer price index by more than 2% ( 2 % ) for the last 20 years .given continuously rising medical costs , the company decided to increase the equity exposure of the portfolio to 30% ( 30 % ) , up from 20% ( 20 % ) , while reducing the fixed-income portion of the portfolio from 80% ( 80 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) .the company also conducted an asset-liability study for the post-retirement non-bargaining medical plan .its allocation was adjusted to make it more conservative , reducing the equity allocation from 70% ( 70 % ) to 60% ( 60 % ) and increasing the fixed- income allocation from 30% ( 30 % ) to 40% ( 40 % ) .the post-retirement medical non-bargaining plan 2019s equity allocation was reduced due to the cap on benefits for some non-union participants and resultant reduction in the plan 2019s liabilities .these changes will take place in 2018 .the company engages third party investment managers for all invested assets .managers are not permitted to invest outside of the asset class ( e.g .fixed income , equity , alternatives ) or strategy for which they have been appointed .investment management agreements and recurring performance and attribution analysis are used as tools to ensure investment managers invest solely within the investment strategy they have been provided .futures and options may be used to adjust portfolio duration to align with a plan 2019s targeted investment policy. .
Question: what was the change in the balance throughout 2017?
Steps: subtract(278, 140)
Answer: 138.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that balance at the beginning of the year?
| convfinqa2459 |
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . date | pmi | pmi peer group ( 1 ) | s&p 500 index
december 31 2012 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
december 31 2013 | $ 108.50 | $ 122.80 | $ 132.40
december 31 2014 | $ 106.20 | $ 132.50 | $ 150.50
december 31 2015 | $ 120.40 | $ 143.50 | $ 152.60
december 31 2016 | $ 130.80 | $ 145.60 | $ 170.80
december 31 2017 | $ 156.80 | $ 172.70 | $ 208.10 ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc .was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c .on july 25 , 2017 .the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the change in the pmi's share price from 2014 to 2015?
| 14.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . date | pmi | pmi peer group ( 1 ) | s&p 500 index
december 31 2012 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
december 31 2013 | $ 108.50 | $ 122.80 | $ 132.40
december 31 2014 | $ 106.20 | $ 132.50 | $ 150.50
december 31 2015 | $ 120.40 | $ 143.50 | $ 152.60
december 31 2016 | $ 130.80 | $ 145.60 | $ 170.80
december 31 2017 | $ 156.80 | $ 172.70 | $ 208.10 ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc .was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c .on july 25 , 2017 .the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the change in the pmi's share price from 2014 to 2015?
| convfinqa2460 |
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . date | pmi | pmi peer group ( 1 ) | s&p 500 index
december 31 2012 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
december 31 2013 | $ 108.50 | $ 122.80 | $ 132.40
december 31 2014 | $ 106.20 | $ 132.50 | $ 150.50
december 31 2015 | $ 120.40 | $ 143.50 | $ 152.60
december 31 2016 | $ 130.80 | $ 145.60 | $ 170.80
december 31 2017 | $ 156.80 | $ 172.70 | $ 208.10 ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc .was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c .on july 25 , 2017 .the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the change in the pmi's share price from 2014 to 2015?
Steps: subtract(120.40, 106.20)
Answer: 14.2
Question: and what was that share price in 2014?
| 106.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . date | pmi | pmi peer group ( 1 ) | s&p 500 index
december 31 2012 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
december 31 2013 | $ 108.50 | $ 122.80 | $ 132.40
december 31 2014 | $ 106.20 | $ 132.50 | $ 150.50
december 31 2015 | $ 120.40 | $ 143.50 | $ 152.60
december 31 2016 | $ 130.80 | $ 145.60 | $ 170.80
december 31 2017 | $ 156.80 | $ 172.70 | $ 208.10 ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc .was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c .on july 25 , 2017 .the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the change in the pmi's share price from 2014 to 2015?
Steps: subtract(120.40, 106.20)
Answer: 14.2
Question: and what was that share price in 2014?
| convfinqa2461 |
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . date | pmi | pmi peer group ( 1 ) | s&p 500 index
december 31 2012 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
december 31 2013 | $ 108.50 | $ 122.80 | $ 132.40
december 31 2014 | $ 106.20 | $ 132.50 | $ 150.50
december 31 2015 | $ 120.40 | $ 143.50 | $ 152.60
december 31 2016 | $ 130.80 | $ 145.60 | $ 170.80
december 31 2017 | $ 156.80 | $ 172.70 | $ 208.10 ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc .was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c .on july 25 , 2017 .the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the change in the pmi's share price from 2014 to 2015?
Steps: subtract(120.40, 106.20)
Answer: 14.2
Question: and what was that share price in 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 106.20
Answer: 106.2
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2014 share price?
| 0.13371 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . date | pmi | pmi peer group ( 1 ) | s&p 500 index
december 31 2012 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
december 31 2013 | $ 108.50 | $ 122.80 | $ 132.40
december 31 2014 | $ 106.20 | $ 132.50 | $ 150.50
december 31 2015 | $ 120.40 | $ 143.50 | $ 152.60
december 31 2016 | $ 130.80 | $ 145.60 | $ 170.80
december 31 2017 | $ 156.80 | $ 172.70 | $ 208.10 ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc .was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c .on july 25 , 2017 .the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the change in the pmi's share price from 2014 to 2015?
Steps: subtract(120.40, 106.20)
Answer: 14.2
Question: and what was that share price in 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 106.20
Answer: 106.2
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2014 share price?
| convfinqa2462 |
entergy mississippi may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable .all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy mississippi require prior regulatory approval . a0 a0preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its corporate charter , bond indenture , and other agreements . a0 a0entergy mississippi has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs .entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014
( in thousands ) | ( in thousands ) | ( in thousands ) | ( in thousands )
$ 1633 | $ 10595 | $ 25930 | $ 644 see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .entergy mississippi has four separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $ 102.5 million scheduled to expire may 2018 .no borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of december a031 , 2017 . a0 a0in addition , entergy mississippi is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso .as of december a031 , 2017 , a $ 15.3 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy mississippi 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility .see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities .entergy mississippi obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 175 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings and security issuances .see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy mississippi 2019s short-term borrowing limits .entergy mississippi , inc .management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery the rates that entergy mississippi charges for electricity significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity .entergy mississippi is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings .a governmental agency , the mpsc , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers .formula rate plan in march 2016 , entergy mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2016 test year filing showing entergy mississippi 2019s projected earned return for the 2016 calendar year to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth .the filing showed a $ 32.6 million rate increase was necessary to reset entergy mississippi 2019s earned return on common equity to the specified point of adjustment of 9.96% ( 9.96 % ) , within the formula rate plan bandwidth .in june 2016 the mpsc approved entergy mississippi 2019s joint stipulation with the mississippi public utilities staff .the joint stipulation provided for a total revenue increase of $ 23.7 million .the revenue increase includes a $ 19.4 million increase through the formula rate plan , resulting in a return on common equity point of adjustment of 10.07% ( 10.07 % ) .the revenue increase also includes $ 4.3 million in incremental ad valorem tax expenses to be collected through an updated ad valorem tax adjustment rider .the revenue increase and ad valorem tax adjustment rider were effective with the july 2016 bills .in march 2017 , entergy mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2017 test year filing and 2016 look-back filing showing entergy mississippi 2019s earned return for the historical 2016 calendar year and projected earned return for the 2017 calendar year to be within the formula rate plan bandwidth , resulting in no change in rates .in june 2017 , entergy mississippi and the mississippi public utilities staff entered into a stipulation that confirmed that entergy .
Question: what is the sum of receivables from the money pool in 2017 and 2016?
| 12228.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable .all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy mississippi require prior regulatory approval . a0 a0preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its corporate charter , bond indenture , and other agreements . a0 a0entergy mississippi has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs .entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014
( in thousands ) | ( in thousands ) | ( in thousands ) | ( in thousands )
$ 1633 | $ 10595 | $ 25930 | $ 644 see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .entergy mississippi has four separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $ 102.5 million scheduled to expire may 2018 .no borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of december a031 , 2017 . a0 a0in addition , entergy mississippi is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso .as of december a031 , 2017 , a $ 15.3 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy mississippi 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility .see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities .entergy mississippi obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 175 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings and security issuances .see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy mississippi 2019s short-term borrowing limits .entergy mississippi , inc .management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery the rates that entergy mississippi charges for electricity significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity .entergy mississippi is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings .a governmental agency , the mpsc , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers .formula rate plan in march 2016 , entergy mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2016 test year filing showing entergy mississippi 2019s projected earned return for the 2016 calendar year to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth .the filing showed a $ 32.6 million rate increase was necessary to reset entergy mississippi 2019s earned return on common equity to the specified point of adjustment of 9.96% ( 9.96 % ) , within the formula rate plan bandwidth .in june 2016 the mpsc approved entergy mississippi 2019s joint stipulation with the mississippi public utilities staff .the joint stipulation provided for a total revenue increase of $ 23.7 million .the revenue increase includes a $ 19.4 million increase through the formula rate plan , resulting in a return on common equity point of adjustment of 10.07% ( 10.07 % ) .the revenue increase also includes $ 4.3 million in incremental ad valorem tax expenses to be collected through an updated ad valorem tax adjustment rider .the revenue increase and ad valorem tax adjustment rider were effective with the july 2016 bills .in march 2017 , entergy mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2017 test year filing and 2016 look-back filing showing entergy mississippi 2019s earned return for the historical 2016 calendar year and projected earned return for the 2017 calendar year to be within the formula rate plan bandwidth , resulting in no change in rates .in june 2017 , entergy mississippi and the mississippi public utilities staff entered into a stipulation that confirmed that entergy .
Question: what is the sum of receivables from the money pool in 2017 and 2016?
| convfinqa2463 |
entergy mississippi may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable .all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy mississippi require prior regulatory approval . a0 a0preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its corporate charter , bond indenture , and other agreements . a0 a0entergy mississippi has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs .entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014
( in thousands ) | ( in thousands ) | ( in thousands ) | ( in thousands )
$ 1633 | $ 10595 | $ 25930 | $ 644 see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .entergy mississippi has four separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $ 102.5 million scheduled to expire may 2018 .no borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of december a031 , 2017 . a0 a0in addition , entergy mississippi is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso .as of december a031 , 2017 , a $ 15.3 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy mississippi 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility .see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities .entergy mississippi obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 175 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings and security issuances .see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy mississippi 2019s short-term borrowing limits .entergy mississippi , inc .management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery the rates that entergy mississippi charges for electricity significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity .entergy mississippi is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings .a governmental agency , the mpsc , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers .formula rate plan in march 2016 , entergy mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2016 test year filing showing entergy mississippi 2019s projected earned return for the 2016 calendar year to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth .the filing showed a $ 32.6 million rate increase was necessary to reset entergy mississippi 2019s earned return on common equity to the specified point of adjustment of 9.96% ( 9.96 % ) , within the formula rate plan bandwidth .in june 2016 the mpsc approved entergy mississippi 2019s joint stipulation with the mississippi public utilities staff .the joint stipulation provided for a total revenue increase of $ 23.7 million .the revenue increase includes a $ 19.4 million increase through the formula rate plan , resulting in a return on common equity point of adjustment of 10.07% ( 10.07 % ) .the revenue increase also includes $ 4.3 million in incremental ad valorem tax expenses to be collected through an updated ad valorem tax adjustment rider .the revenue increase and ad valorem tax adjustment rider were effective with the july 2016 bills .in march 2017 , entergy mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2017 test year filing and 2016 look-back filing showing entergy mississippi 2019s earned return for the historical 2016 calendar year and projected earned return for the 2017 calendar year to be within the formula rate plan bandwidth , resulting in no change in rates .in june 2017 , entergy mississippi and the mississippi public utilities staff entered into a stipulation that confirmed that entergy .
Question: what is the sum of receivables from the money pool in 2017 and 2016?
Steps: add(1633, 10595)
Answer: 12228.0
Question: what is the sum including 2015?
| 38158.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt and preferred stock prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable .all debt and common and preferred stock issuances by entergy mississippi require prior regulatory approval . a0 a0preferred stock and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its corporate charter , bond indenture , and other agreements . a0 a0entergy mississippi has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs .entergy mississippi 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014
( in thousands ) | ( in thousands ) | ( in thousands ) | ( in thousands )
$ 1633 | $ 10595 | $ 25930 | $ 644 see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .entergy mississippi has four separate credit facilities in the aggregate amount of $ 102.5 million scheduled to expire may 2018 .no borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of december a031 , 2017 . a0 a0in addition , entergy mississippi is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations to miso .as of december a031 , 2017 , a $ 15.3 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy mississippi 2019s uncommitted letter of credit facility .see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities .entergy mississippi obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2019 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 175 million at any time outstanding and long-term borrowings and security issuances .see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy mississippi 2019s short-term borrowing limits .entergy mississippi , inc .management 2019s financial discussion and analysis state and local rate regulation and fuel-cost recovery the rates that entergy mississippi charges for electricity significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity .entergy mississippi is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings .a governmental agency , the mpsc , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers .formula rate plan in march 2016 , entergy mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2016 test year filing showing entergy mississippi 2019s projected earned return for the 2016 calendar year to be below the formula rate plan bandwidth .the filing showed a $ 32.6 million rate increase was necessary to reset entergy mississippi 2019s earned return on common equity to the specified point of adjustment of 9.96% ( 9.96 % ) , within the formula rate plan bandwidth .in june 2016 the mpsc approved entergy mississippi 2019s joint stipulation with the mississippi public utilities staff .the joint stipulation provided for a total revenue increase of $ 23.7 million .the revenue increase includes a $ 19.4 million increase through the formula rate plan , resulting in a return on common equity point of adjustment of 10.07% ( 10.07 % ) .the revenue increase also includes $ 4.3 million in incremental ad valorem tax expenses to be collected through an updated ad valorem tax adjustment rider .the revenue increase and ad valorem tax adjustment rider were effective with the july 2016 bills .in march 2017 , entergy mississippi submitted its formula rate plan 2017 test year filing and 2016 look-back filing showing entergy mississippi 2019s earned return for the historical 2016 calendar year and projected earned return for the 2017 calendar year to be within the formula rate plan bandwidth , resulting in no change in rates .in june 2017 , entergy mississippi and the mississippi public utilities staff entered into a stipulation that confirmed that entergy .
Question: what is the sum of receivables from the money pool in 2017 and 2016?
Steps: add(1633, 10595)
Answer: 12228.0
Question: what is the sum including 2015?
| convfinqa2464 |
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
| 7.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
| convfinqa2465 |
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 7.4
Answer: 7.4
Question: and what was it in 2008?
| 9.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 7.4
Answer: 7.4
Question: and what was it in 2008?
| convfinqa2466 |
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 7.4
Answer: 7.4
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: 9.3
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| -1.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 7.4
Answer: 7.4
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: 9.3
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| convfinqa2467 |
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 7.4
Answer: 7.4
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: 9.3
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(7.4, 9.3)
Answer: -1.9
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2008 amortization expense?
| -0.2043 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 7.4
Answer: 7.4
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: 9.3
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(7.4, 9.3)
Answer: -1.9
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2008 amortization expense?
| convfinqa2468 |
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 7.4
Answer: 7.4
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: 9.3
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(7.4, 9.3)
Answer: -1.9
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2008 amortization expense?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: -0.2043
Question: and in 2010, what was this amortization expense, in millions?
| 5.425 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 7.4
Answer: 7.4
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: 9.3
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(7.4, 9.3)
Answer: -1.9
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2008 amortization expense?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: -0.2043
Question: and in 2010, what was this amortization expense, in millions?
| convfinqa2469 |
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 7.4
Answer: 7.4
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: 9.3
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(7.4, 9.3)
Answer: -1.9
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2008 amortization expense?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: -0.2043
Question: and in 2010, what was this amortization expense, in millions?
Steps: divide(#0, 9.3)
Answer: 5.425
Question: what was, then, the change since 2009?
| -1.975 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 7.4
Answer: 7.4
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: 9.3
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(7.4, 9.3)
Answer: -1.9
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2008 amortization expense?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: -0.2043
Question: and in 2010, what was this amortization expense, in millions?
Steps: divide(#0, 9.3)
Answer: 5.425
Question: what was, then, the change since 2009?
| convfinqa2470 |
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 7.4
Answer: 7.4
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: 9.3
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(7.4, 9.3)
Answer: -1.9
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2008 amortization expense?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: -0.2043
Question: and in 2010, what was this amortization expense, in millions?
Steps: divide(#0, 9.3)
Answer: 5.425
Question: what was, then, the change since 2009?
Steps: divide(5425, const_1000)
Answer: -1.975
Question: and what is this change as a portion of the 2009 amortization expense?
| -0.26689 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or on an accelerated method of amortization that is expected to reflect the estimated pattern of economic use .the remaining amortization expense will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.9 years .amortization expense from continuing operations , related to intangibles was $ 7.4 million , $ 9.3 million and $ 9.2 million in fiscal 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .the company expects annual amortization expense for these intangible assets to be: . fiscal years | amortization expense
2010 | $ 5425
2011 | $ 1430 g .grant accounting certain of the company 2019s foreign subsidiaries have received various grants from governmental agencies .these grants include capital , employment and research and development grants .capital grants for the acquisition of property and equipment are netted against the related capital expenditures and amortized as a credit to depreciation expense over the useful life of the related asset .employment grants , which relate to employee hiring and training , and research and development grants are recognized in earnings in the period in which the related expenditures are incurred by the company .h .translation of foreign currencies the functional currency for the company 2019s foreign sales and research and development operations is the applicable local currency .gains and losses resulting from translation of these foreign currencies into u.s .dollars are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income .transaction gains and losses and remeasurement of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are included in income currently , including those at the company 2019s principal foreign manufacturing operations where the functional currency is the u.s .dollar .foreign currency transaction gains or losses included in other expenses , net , were not material in fiscal 2009 , 2008 or 2007 .i .derivative instruments and hedging agreements foreign exchange exposure management 2014 the company enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to offset certain operational and balance sheet exposures from the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates .such exposures result from the portion of the company 2019s operations , assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the u.s .dollar , primarily the euro ; other exposures include the philippine peso and the british pound .these foreign currency exchange contracts are entered into to support transactions made in the normal course of business , and accordingly , are not speculative in nature .the contracts are for periods consistent with the terms of the underlying transactions , generally one year or less .hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the respective hedges as cash flow hedges and are evaluated for effectiveness monthly .derivative instruments are employed to eliminate or minimize certain foreign currency exposures that can be confidently identified and quantified .as the terms of the contract and the underlying transaction are matched at inception , forward contract effectiveness is calculated by comparing the change in fair value of the contract to the change in the forward value of the anticipated transaction , with the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income ( oci ) in shareholders 2019 equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings .any residual change in fair value of the instruments , or ineffectiveness , is recognized immediately in other income/expense .additionally , the company enters into forward foreign currency contracts that economically hedge the gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain recorded assets and liabilities in a non-functional currency .changes in the fair value of these undesignated hedges are recognized in other income/expense immediately as an offset to the changes in the fair value of the asset or liability being hedged .analog devices , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the amortization expense in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 7.4
Answer: 7.4
Question: and what was it in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: 9.3
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(7.4, 9.3)
Answer: -1.9
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2008 amortization expense?
Steps: Ask for number 9.3
Answer: -0.2043
Question: and in 2010, what was this amortization expense, in millions?
Steps: divide(#0, 9.3)
Answer: 5.425
Question: what was, then, the change since 2009?
Steps: divide(5425, const_1000)
Answer: -1.975
Question: and what is this change as a portion of the 2009 amortization expense?
| convfinqa2471 |
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index .the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index december 31 , december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 2 , december 31 . company/index | december 31 2011 | december 29 2012 | december 28 2013 | january 3 2015 | january 2 2016 | december 31 2016
advance auto parts | $ 100.00 | $ 102.87 | $ 158.46 | $ 228.88 | $ 217.49 | $ 244.64
s&p 500 index | 100.00 | 114.07 | 152.98 | 174.56 | 177.01 | 198.18
s&p retail index | 100.00 | 122.23 | 178.55 | 196.06 | 245.31 | 256.69 .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in advance auto parts from 2015 to 2016?
| -11.39 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index .the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index december 31 , december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 2 , december 31 . company/index | december 31 2011 | december 29 2012 | december 28 2013 | january 3 2015 | january 2 2016 | december 31 2016
advance auto parts | $ 100.00 | $ 102.87 | $ 158.46 | $ 228.88 | $ 217.49 | $ 244.64
s&p 500 index | 100.00 | 114.07 | 152.98 | 174.56 | 177.01 | 198.18
s&p retail index | 100.00 | 122.23 | 178.55 | 196.06 | 245.31 | 256.69 .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in advance auto parts from 2015 to 2016?
| convfinqa2472 |
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index .the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index december 31 , december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 2 , december 31 . company/index | december 31 2011 | december 29 2012 | december 28 2013 | january 3 2015 | january 2 2016 | december 31 2016
advance auto parts | $ 100.00 | $ 102.87 | $ 158.46 | $ 228.88 | $ 217.49 | $ 244.64
s&p 500 index | 100.00 | 114.07 | 152.98 | 174.56 | 177.01 | 198.18
s&p retail index | 100.00 | 122.23 | 178.55 | 196.06 | 245.31 | 256.69 .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in advance auto parts from 2015 to 2016?
Steps: subtract(217.49, 228.88)
Answer: -11.39
Question: what roi does this represent?
| -0.04976 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index .the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index december 31 , december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 2 , december 31 . company/index | december 31 2011 | december 29 2012 | december 28 2013 | january 3 2015 | january 2 2016 | december 31 2016
advance auto parts | $ 100.00 | $ 102.87 | $ 158.46 | $ 228.88 | $ 217.49 | $ 244.64
s&p 500 index | 100.00 | 114.07 | 152.98 | 174.56 | 177.01 | 198.18
s&p retail index | 100.00 | 122.23 | 178.55 | 196.06 | 245.31 | 256.69 .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in advance auto parts from 2015 to 2016?
Steps: subtract(217.49, 228.88)
Answer: -11.39
Question: what roi does this represent?
| convfinqa2473 |
zimmer holdings , inc .2013 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions .treasury stock 2013 we account for repurchases of common stock under the cost method and present treasury stock as a reduction of stockholders 2019 equity .we reissue common stock held in treasury only for limited purposes .noncontrolling interest 2013 in 2011 , we made an investment in a company in which we acquired a controlling financial interest , but not 100 percent of the equity .in 2013 , we purchased additional shares of the company from the minority shareholders .further information related to the noncontrolling interests of that investment has not been provided as it is not significant to our consolidated financial statements .accounting pronouncements 2013 effective january 1 , 2013 , we adopted the fasb 2019s accounting standard updates ( asus ) requiring reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( oci ) and balance sheet offsetting between derivative assets and liabilities .these asus only change financial statement disclosure requirements and therefore do not impact our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .see note 12 for disclosures relating to oci .see note 13 for disclosures relating to balance sheet offsetting .there are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not yet adopted that are expected to have a material effect on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .3 .share-based compensation our share-based payments primarily consist of stock options , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , and an employee stock purchase plan .share-based compensation expense is as follows ( in millions ) : . for the years ended december 31, | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
stock options | $ 24.7 | $ 32.4 | $ 41.7
rsus and other | 23.8 | 22.6 | 18.8
total expense pre-tax | 48.5 | 55.0 | 60.5
tax benefit related to awards | -15.6 ( 15.6 ) | -16.6 ( 16.6 ) | -17.8 ( 17.8 )
total expense net of tax | $ 32.9 | $ 38.4 | $ 42.7 share-based compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 4.1 million , $ 6.1 million , and $ 8.8 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , approximately $ 2.4 million and $ 3.3 million of capitalized costs remained in finished goods inventory .stock options we had two equity compensation plans in effect at december 31 , 2013 : the 2009 stock incentive plan ( 2009 plan ) and the stock plan for non-employee directors .the 2009 plan succeeded the 2006 stock incentive plan ( 2006 plan ) and the teamshare stock option plan ( teamshare plan ) .no further awards have been granted under the 2006 plan or under the teamshare plan since may 2009 , and shares remaining available for grant under those plans have been merged into the 2009 plan .vested and unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock and rsus previously granted under the 2006 plan , the teamshare plan and another prior plan , the 2001 stock incentive plan , remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 .we have reserved the maximum number of shares of common stock available for award under the terms of each of these plans .we have registered 57.9 million shares of common stock under these plans .the 2009 plan provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options , long-term performance awards in the form of performance shares or units , restricted stock , rsus and stock appreciation rights .the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors determines the grant date for annual grants under our equity compensation plans .the date for annual grants under the 2009 plan to our executive officers is expected to occur in the first quarter of each year following the earnings announcements for the previous quarter and full year .the stock plan for non-employee directors provides for awards of stock options , restricted stock and rsus to non-employee directors .it has been our practice to issue shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options from previously unissued shares , except in limited circumstances where they are issued from treasury stock .the total number of awards which may be granted in a given year and/or over the life of the plan under each of our equity compensation plans is limited .at december 31 , 2013 , an aggregate of 10.4 million shares were available for future grants and awards under these plans .stock options granted to date under our plans generally vest over four years and generally have a maximum contractual life of 10 years .as established under our equity compensation plans , vesting may accelerate upon retirement after the first anniversary date of the award if certain criteria are met .we recognize expense related to stock options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period , less awards expected to be forfeited using estimated forfeiture rates .due to the accelerated retirement provisions , the requisite service period of our stock options range from one to four years .stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant , except in limited circumstances where local law may dictate otherwise. .
Question: what was the difference in the total expense net of tax between the years of 2013 and 2012?
| -5.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
zimmer holdings , inc .2013 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions .treasury stock 2013 we account for repurchases of common stock under the cost method and present treasury stock as a reduction of stockholders 2019 equity .we reissue common stock held in treasury only for limited purposes .noncontrolling interest 2013 in 2011 , we made an investment in a company in which we acquired a controlling financial interest , but not 100 percent of the equity .in 2013 , we purchased additional shares of the company from the minority shareholders .further information related to the noncontrolling interests of that investment has not been provided as it is not significant to our consolidated financial statements .accounting pronouncements 2013 effective january 1 , 2013 , we adopted the fasb 2019s accounting standard updates ( asus ) requiring reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( oci ) and balance sheet offsetting between derivative assets and liabilities .these asus only change financial statement disclosure requirements and therefore do not impact our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .see note 12 for disclosures relating to oci .see note 13 for disclosures relating to balance sheet offsetting .there are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not yet adopted that are expected to have a material effect on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .3 .share-based compensation our share-based payments primarily consist of stock options , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , and an employee stock purchase plan .share-based compensation expense is as follows ( in millions ) : . for the years ended december 31, | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
stock options | $ 24.7 | $ 32.4 | $ 41.7
rsus and other | 23.8 | 22.6 | 18.8
total expense pre-tax | 48.5 | 55.0 | 60.5
tax benefit related to awards | -15.6 ( 15.6 ) | -16.6 ( 16.6 ) | -17.8 ( 17.8 )
total expense net of tax | $ 32.9 | $ 38.4 | $ 42.7 share-based compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 4.1 million , $ 6.1 million , and $ 8.8 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , approximately $ 2.4 million and $ 3.3 million of capitalized costs remained in finished goods inventory .stock options we had two equity compensation plans in effect at december 31 , 2013 : the 2009 stock incentive plan ( 2009 plan ) and the stock plan for non-employee directors .the 2009 plan succeeded the 2006 stock incentive plan ( 2006 plan ) and the teamshare stock option plan ( teamshare plan ) .no further awards have been granted under the 2006 plan or under the teamshare plan since may 2009 , and shares remaining available for grant under those plans have been merged into the 2009 plan .vested and unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock and rsus previously granted under the 2006 plan , the teamshare plan and another prior plan , the 2001 stock incentive plan , remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 .we have reserved the maximum number of shares of common stock available for award under the terms of each of these plans .we have registered 57.9 million shares of common stock under these plans .the 2009 plan provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options , long-term performance awards in the form of performance shares or units , restricted stock , rsus and stock appreciation rights .the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors determines the grant date for annual grants under our equity compensation plans .the date for annual grants under the 2009 plan to our executive officers is expected to occur in the first quarter of each year following the earnings announcements for the previous quarter and full year .the stock plan for non-employee directors provides for awards of stock options , restricted stock and rsus to non-employee directors .it has been our practice to issue shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options from previously unissued shares , except in limited circumstances where they are issued from treasury stock .the total number of awards which may be granted in a given year and/or over the life of the plan under each of our equity compensation plans is limited .at december 31 , 2013 , an aggregate of 10.4 million shares were available for future grants and awards under these plans .stock options granted to date under our plans generally vest over four years and generally have a maximum contractual life of 10 years .as established under our equity compensation plans , vesting may accelerate upon retirement after the first anniversary date of the award if certain criteria are met .we recognize expense related to stock options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period , less awards expected to be forfeited using estimated forfeiture rates .due to the accelerated retirement provisions , the requisite service period of our stock options range from one to four years .stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant , except in limited circumstances where local law may dictate otherwise. .
Question: what was the difference in the total expense net of tax between the years of 2013 and 2012?
| convfinqa2474 |
zimmer holdings , inc .2013 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions .treasury stock 2013 we account for repurchases of common stock under the cost method and present treasury stock as a reduction of stockholders 2019 equity .we reissue common stock held in treasury only for limited purposes .noncontrolling interest 2013 in 2011 , we made an investment in a company in which we acquired a controlling financial interest , but not 100 percent of the equity .in 2013 , we purchased additional shares of the company from the minority shareholders .further information related to the noncontrolling interests of that investment has not been provided as it is not significant to our consolidated financial statements .accounting pronouncements 2013 effective january 1 , 2013 , we adopted the fasb 2019s accounting standard updates ( asus ) requiring reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( oci ) and balance sheet offsetting between derivative assets and liabilities .these asus only change financial statement disclosure requirements and therefore do not impact our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .see note 12 for disclosures relating to oci .see note 13 for disclosures relating to balance sheet offsetting .there are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not yet adopted that are expected to have a material effect on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .3 .share-based compensation our share-based payments primarily consist of stock options , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , and an employee stock purchase plan .share-based compensation expense is as follows ( in millions ) : . for the years ended december 31, | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
stock options | $ 24.7 | $ 32.4 | $ 41.7
rsus and other | 23.8 | 22.6 | 18.8
total expense pre-tax | 48.5 | 55.0 | 60.5
tax benefit related to awards | -15.6 ( 15.6 ) | -16.6 ( 16.6 ) | -17.8 ( 17.8 )
total expense net of tax | $ 32.9 | $ 38.4 | $ 42.7 share-based compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 4.1 million , $ 6.1 million , and $ 8.8 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , approximately $ 2.4 million and $ 3.3 million of capitalized costs remained in finished goods inventory .stock options we had two equity compensation plans in effect at december 31 , 2013 : the 2009 stock incentive plan ( 2009 plan ) and the stock plan for non-employee directors .the 2009 plan succeeded the 2006 stock incentive plan ( 2006 plan ) and the teamshare stock option plan ( teamshare plan ) .no further awards have been granted under the 2006 plan or under the teamshare plan since may 2009 , and shares remaining available for grant under those plans have been merged into the 2009 plan .vested and unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock and rsus previously granted under the 2006 plan , the teamshare plan and another prior plan , the 2001 stock incentive plan , remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 .we have reserved the maximum number of shares of common stock available for award under the terms of each of these plans .we have registered 57.9 million shares of common stock under these plans .the 2009 plan provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options , long-term performance awards in the form of performance shares or units , restricted stock , rsus and stock appreciation rights .the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors determines the grant date for annual grants under our equity compensation plans .the date for annual grants under the 2009 plan to our executive officers is expected to occur in the first quarter of each year following the earnings announcements for the previous quarter and full year .the stock plan for non-employee directors provides for awards of stock options , restricted stock and rsus to non-employee directors .it has been our practice to issue shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options from previously unissued shares , except in limited circumstances where they are issued from treasury stock .the total number of awards which may be granted in a given year and/or over the life of the plan under each of our equity compensation plans is limited .at december 31 , 2013 , an aggregate of 10.4 million shares were available for future grants and awards under these plans .stock options granted to date under our plans generally vest over four years and generally have a maximum contractual life of 10 years .as established under our equity compensation plans , vesting may accelerate upon retirement after the first anniversary date of the award if certain criteria are met .we recognize expense related to stock options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period , less awards expected to be forfeited using estimated forfeiture rates .due to the accelerated retirement provisions , the requisite service period of our stock options range from one to four years .stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant , except in limited circumstances where local law may dictate otherwise. .
Question: what was the difference in the total expense net of tax between the years of 2013 and 2012?
Steps: subtract(32.9, 38.4)
Answer: -5.5
Question: and what was the total expense net of tax in 2012?
| 38.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
zimmer holdings , inc .2013 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions .treasury stock 2013 we account for repurchases of common stock under the cost method and present treasury stock as a reduction of stockholders 2019 equity .we reissue common stock held in treasury only for limited purposes .noncontrolling interest 2013 in 2011 , we made an investment in a company in which we acquired a controlling financial interest , but not 100 percent of the equity .in 2013 , we purchased additional shares of the company from the minority shareholders .further information related to the noncontrolling interests of that investment has not been provided as it is not significant to our consolidated financial statements .accounting pronouncements 2013 effective january 1 , 2013 , we adopted the fasb 2019s accounting standard updates ( asus ) requiring reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( oci ) and balance sheet offsetting between derivative assets and liabilities .these asus only change financial statement disclosure requirements and therefore do not impact our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .see note 12 for disclosures relating to oci .see note 13 for disclosures relating to balance sheet offsetting .there are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not yet adopted that are expected to have a material effect on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .3 .share-based compensation our share-based payments primarily consist of stock options , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , and an employee stock purchase plan .share-based compensation expense is as follows ( in millions ) : . for the years ended december 31, | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
stock options | $ 24.7 | $ 32.4 | $ 41.7
rsus and other | 23.8 | 22.6 | 18.8
total expense pre-tax | 48.5 | 55.0 | 60.5
tax benefit related to awards | -15.6 ( 15.6 ) | -16.6 ( 16.6 ) | -17.8 ( 17.8 )
total expense net of tax | $ 32.9 | $ 38.4 | $ 42.7 share-based compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 4.1 million , $ 6.1 million , and $ 8.8 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , approximately $ 2.4 million and $ 3.3 million of capitalized costs remained in finished goods inventory .stock options we had two equity compensation plans in effect at december 31 , 2013 : the 2009 stock incentive plan ( 2009 plan ) and the stock plan for non-employee directors .the 2009 plan succeeded the 2006 stock incentive plan ( 2006 plan ) and the teamshare stock option plan ( teamshare plan ) .no further awards have been granted under the 2006 plan or under the teamshare plan since may 2009 , and shares remaining available for grant under those plans have been merged into the 2009 plan .vested and unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock and rsus previously granted under the 2006 plan , the teamshare plan and another prior plan , the 2001 stock incentive plan , remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 .we have reserved the maximum number of shares of common stock available for award under the terms of each of these plans .we have registered 57.9 million shares of common stock under these plans .the 2009 plan provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options , long-term performance awards in the form of performance shares or units , restricted stock , rsus and stock appreciation rights .the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors determines the grant date for annual grants under our equity compensation plans .the date for annual grants under the 2009 plan to our executive officers is expected to occur in the first quarter of each year following the earnings announcements for the previous quarter and full year .the stock plan for non-employee directors provides for awards of stock options , restricted stock and rsus to non-employee directors .it has been our practice to issue shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options from previously unissued shares , except in limited circumstances where they are issued from treasury stock .the total number of awards which may be granted in a given year and/or over the life of the plan under each of our equity compensation plans is limited .at december 31 , 2013 , an aggregate of 10.4 million shares were available for future grants and awards under these plans .stock options granted to date under our plans generally vest over four years and generally have a maximum contractual life of 10 years .as established under our equity compensation plans , vesting may accelerate upon retirement after the first anniversary date of the award if certain criteria are met .we recognize expense related to stock options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period , less awards expected to be forfeited using estimated forfeiture rates .due to the accelerated retirement provisions , the requisite service period of our stock options range from one to four years .stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant , except in limited circumstances where local law may dictate otherwise. .
Question: what was the difference in the total expense net of tax between the years of 2013 and 2012?
Steps: subtract(32.9, 38.4)
Answer: -5.5
Question: and what was the total expense net of tax in 2012?
| convfinqa2475 |
zimmer holdings , inc .2013 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions .treasury stock 2013 we account for repurchases of common stock under the cost method and present treasury stock as a reduction of stockholders 2019 equity .we reissue common stock held in treasury only for limited purposes .noncontrolling interest 2013 in 2011 , we made an investment in a company in which we acquired a controlling financial interest , but not 100 percent of the equity .in 2013 , we purchased additional shares of the company from the minority shareholders .further information related to the noncontrolling interests of that investment has not been provided as it is not significant to our consolidated financial statements .accounting pronouncements 2013 effective january 1 , 2013 , we adopted the fasb 2019s accounting standard updates ( asus ) requiring reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( oci ) and balance sheet offsetting between derivative assets and liabilities .these asus only change financial statement disclosure requirements and therefore do not impact our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .see note 12 for disclosures relating to oci .see note 13 for disclosures relating to balance sheet offsetting .there are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not yet adopted that are expected to have a material effect on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .3 .share-based compensation our share-based payments primarily consist of stock options , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , and an employee stock purchase plan .share-based compensation expense is as follows ( in millions ) : . for the years ended december 31, | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
stock options | $ 24.7 | $ 32.4 | $ 41.7
rsus and other | 23.8 | 22.6 | 18.8
total expense pre-tax | 48.5 | 55.0 | 60.5
tax benefit related to awards | -15.6 ( 15.6 ) | -16.6 ( 16.6 ) | -17.8 ( 17.8 )
total expense net of tax | $ 32.9 | $ 38.4 | $ 42.7 share-based compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 4.1 million , $ 6.1 million , and $ 8.8 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , approximately $ 2.4 million and $ 3.3 million of capitalized costs remained in finished goods inventory .stock options we had two equity compensation plans in effect at december 31 , 2013 : the 2009 stock incentive plan ( 2009 plan ) and the stock plan for non-employee directors .the 2009 plan succeeded the 2006 stock incentive plan ( 2006 plan ) and the teamshare stock option plan ( teamshare plan ) .no further awards have been granted under the 2006 plan or under the teamshare plan since may 2009 , and shares remaining available for grant under those plans have been merged into the 2009 plan .vested and unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock and rsus previously granted under the 2006 plan , the teamshare plan and another prior plan , the 2001 stock incentive plan , remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 .we have reserved the maximum number of shares of common stock available for award under the terms of each of these plans .we have registered 57.9 million shares of common stock under these plans .the 2009 plan provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options , long-term performance awards in the form of performance shares or units , restricted stock , rsus and stock appreciation rights .the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors determines the grant date for annual grants under our equity compensation plans .the date for annual grants under the 2009 plan to our executive officers is expected to occur in the first quarter of each year following the earnings announcements for the previous quarter and full year .the stock plan for non-employee directors provides for awards of stock options , restricted stock and rsus to non-employee directors .it has been our practice to issue shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options from previously unissued shares , except in limited circumstances where they are issued from treasury stock .the total number of awards which may be granted in a given year and/or over the life of the plan under each of our equity compensation plans is limited .at december 31 , 2013 , an aggregate of 10.4 million shares were available for future grants and awards under these plans .stock options granted to date under our plans generally vest over four years and generally have a maximum contractual life of 10 years .as established under our equity compensation plans , vesting may accelerate upon retirement after the first anniversary date of the award if certain criteria are met .we recognize expense related to stock options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period , less awards expected to be forfeited using estimated forfeiture rates .due to the accelerated retirement provisions , the requisite service period of our stock options range from one to four years .stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant , except in limited circumstances where local law may dictate otherwise. .
Question: what was the difference in the total expense net of tax between the years of 2013 and 2012?
Steps: subtract(32.9, 38.4)
Answer: -5.5
Question: and what was the total expense net of tax in 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 38.4
Answer: 38.4
Question: how much, then, does that difference represent in relation to the total expense net of tax in 2012?
| -0.14323 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
zimmer holdings , inc .2013 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions .treasury stock 2013 we account for repurchases of common stock under the cost method and present treasury stock as a reduction of stockholders 2019 equity .we reissue common stock held in treasury only for limited purposes .noncontrolling interest 2013 in 2011 , we made an investment in a company in which we acquired a controlling financial interest , but not 100 percent of the equity .in 2013 , we purchased additional shares of the company from the minority shareholders .further information related to the noncontrolling interests of that investment has not been provided as it is not significant to our consolidated financial statements .accounting pronouncements 2013 effective january 1 , 2013 , we adopted the fasb 2019s accounting standard updates ( asus ) requiring reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( oci ) and balance sheet offsetting between derivative assets and liabilities .these asus only change financial statement disclosure requirements and therefore do not impact our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .see note 12 for disclosures relating to oci .see note 13 for disclosures relating to balance sheet offsetting .there are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not yet adopted that are expected to have a material effect on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .3 .share-based compensation our share-based payments primarily consist of stock options , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , and an employee stock purchase plan .share-based compensation expense is as follows ( in millions ) : . for the years ended december 31, | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
stock options | $ 24.7 | $ 32.4 | $ 41.7
rsus and other | 23.8 | 22.6 | 18.8
total expense pre-tax | 48.5 | 55.0 | 60.5
tax benefit related to awards | -15.6 ( 15.6 ) | -16.6 ( 16.6 ) | -17.8 ( 17.8 )
total expense net of tax | $ 32.9 | $ 38.4 | $ 42.7 share-based compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 4.1 million , $ 6.1 million , and $ 8.8 million , respectively .as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , approximately $ 2.4 million and $ 3.3 million of capitalized costs remained in finished goods inventory .stock options we had two equity compensation plans in effect at december 31 , 2013 : the 2009 stock incentive plan ( 2009 plan ) and the stock plan for non-employee directors .the 2009 plan succeeded the 2006 stock incentive plan ( 2006 plan ) and the teamshare stock option plan ( teamshare plan ) .no further awards have been granted under the 2006 plan or under the teamshare plan since may 2009 , and shares remaining available for grant under those plans have been merged into the 2009 plan .vested and unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock and rsus previously granted under the 2006 plan , the teamshare plan and another prior plan , the 2001 stock incentive plan , remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 .we have reserved the maximum number of shares of common stock available for award under the terms of each of these plans .we have registered 57.9 million shares of common stock under these plans .the 2009 plan provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options , long-term performance awards in the form of performance shares or units , restricted stock , rsus and stock appreciation rights .the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors determines the grant date for annual grants under our equity compensation plans .the date for annual grants under the 2009 plan to our executive officers is expected to occur in the first quarter of each year following the earnings announcements for the previous quarter and full year .the stock plan for non-employee directors provides for awards of stock options , restricted stock and rsus to non-employee directors .it has been our practice to issue shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options from previously unissued shares , except in limited circumstances where they are issued from treasury stock .the total number of awards which may be granted in a given year and/or over the life of the plan under each of our equity compensation plans is limited .at december 31 , 2013 , an aggregate of 10.4 million shares were available for future grants and awards under these plans .stock options granted to date under our plans generally vest over four years and generally have a maximum contractual life of 10 years .as established under our equity compensation plans , vesting may accelerate upon retirement after the first anniversary date of the award if certain criteria are met .we recognize expense related to stock options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period , less awards expected to be forfeited using estimated forfeiture rates .due to the accelerated retirement provisions , the requisite service period of our stock options range from one to four years .stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant , except in limited circumstances where local law may dictate otherwise. .
Question: what was the difference in the total expense net of tax between the years of 2013 and 2012?
Steps: subtract(32.9, 38.4)
Answer: -5.5
Question: and what was the total expense net of tax in 2012?
Steps: Ask for number 38.4
Answer: 38.4
Question: how much, then, does that difference represent in relation to the total expense net of tax in 2012?
| convfinqa2476 |
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry .the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2014 net revenue | $ 2246.1
retail electric price | 180.0
volume/weather | 39.5
waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision | -32.0 ( 32.0 )
miso deferral | -32.0 ( 32.0 )
other | 7.2
2015 net revenue | $ 2408.8 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 .entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer .the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc .the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. .
Question: what was the difference in net revenue between 2015 and 2014?
| 162.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry .the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2014 net revenue | $ 2246.1
retail electric price | 180.0
volume/weather | 39.5
waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision | -32.0 ( 32.0 )
miso deferral | -32.0 ( 32.0 )
other | 7.2
2015 net revenue | $ 2408.8 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 .entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer .the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc .the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. .
Question: what was the difference in net revenue between 2015 and 2014?
| convfinqa2477 |
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry .the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2014 net revenue | $ 2246.1
retail electric price | 180.0
volume/weather | 39.5
waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision | -32.0 ( 32.0 )
miso deferral | -32.0 ( 32.0 )
other | 7.2
2015 net revenue | $ 2408.8 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 .entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer .the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc .the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. .
Question: what was the difference in net revenue between 2015 and 2014?
Steps: subtract(2408.8, 2246.1)
Answer: 162.7
Question: and what was the net revenue in 2014?
| 2246.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry .the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2014 net revenue | $ 2246.1
retail electric price | 180.0
volume/weather | 39.5
waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision | -32.0 ( 32.0 )
miso deferral | -32.0 ( 32.0 )
other | 7.2
2015 net revenue | $ 2408.8 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 .entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer .the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc .the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. .
Question: what was the difference in net revenue between 2015 and 2014?
Steps: subtract(2408.8, 2246.1)
Answer: 162.7
Question: and what was the net revenue in 2014?
| convfinqa2478 |
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry .the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2014 net revenue | $ 2246.1
retail electric price | 180.0
volume/weather | 39.5
waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision | -32.0 ( 32.0 )
miso deferral | -32.0 ( 32.0 )
other | 7.2
2015 net revenue | $ 2408.8 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 .entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer .the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc .the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. .
Question: what was the difference in net revenue between 2015 and 2014?
Steps: subtract(2408.8, 2246.1)
Answer: 162.7
Question: and what was the net revenue in 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 2246.1
Answer: 2246.1
Question: how much, then, does that difference represent in relation to the 2014 net revenue?
| 0.07244 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry .the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2014 net revenue | $ 2246.1
retail electric price | 180.0
volume/weather | 39.5
waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision | -32.0 ( 32.0 )
miso deferral | -32.0 ( 32.0 )
other | 7.2
2015 net revenue | $ 2408.8 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 .entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer .the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc .the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. .
Question: what was the difference in net revenue between 2015 and 2014?
Steps: subtract(2408.8, 2246.1)
Answer: 162.7
Question: and what was the net revenue in 2014?
Steps: Ask for number 2246.1
Answer: 2246.1
Question: how much, then, does that difference represent in relation to the 2014 net revenue?
| convfinqa2479 |
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .1 .nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s .we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . millions | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
agricultural | $ 3018 | $ 2666 | $ 3174
automotive | 1271 | 854 | 1344
chemicals | 2425 | 2102 | 2494
energy | 3489 | 3118 | 3810
industrial products | 2639 | 2147 | 3273
intermodal | 3227 | 2486 | 3023
total freight revenues | $ 16069 | $ 13373 | $ 17118
other revenues | 896 | 770 | 852
total operating revenues | $ 16965 | $ 14143 | $ 17970 although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s .basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .2 .significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .all intercompany transactions are eliminated .we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position .investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2010?
| 3018.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .1 .nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s .we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . millions | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
agricultural | $ 3018 | $ 2666 | $ 3174
automotive | 1271 | 854 | 1344
chemicals | 2425 | 2102 | 2494
energy | 3489 | 3118 | 3810
industrial products | 2639 | 2147 | 3273
intermodal | 3227 | 2486 | 3023
total freight revenues | $ 16069 | $ 13373 | $ 17118
other revenues | 896 | 770 | 852
total operating revenues | $ 16965 | $ 14143 | $ 17970 although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s .basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .2 .significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .all intercompany transactions are eliminated .we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position .investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2010?
| convfinqa2480 |
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .1 .nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s .we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . millions | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
agricultural | $ 3018 | $ 2666 | $ 3174
automotive | 1271 | 854 | 1344
chemicals | 2425 | 2102 | 2494
energy | 3489 | 3118 | 3810
industrial products | 2639 | 2147 | 3273
intermodal | 3227 | 2486 | 3023
total freight revenues | $ 16069 | $ 13373 | $ 17118
other revenues | 896 | 770 | 852
total operating revenues | $ 16965 | $ 14143 | $ 17970 although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s .basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .2 .significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .all intercompany transactions are eliminated .we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position .investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 3018
Answer: 3018.0
Question: what about in 2009?
| 2666.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .1 .nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s .we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . millions | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
agricultural | $ 3018 | $ 2666 | $ 3174
automotive | 1271 | 854 | 1344
chemicals | 2425 | 2102 | 2494
energy | 3489 | 3118 | 3810
industrial products | 2639 | 2147 | 3273
intermodal | 3227 | 2486 | 3023
total freight revenues | $ 16069 | $ 13373 | $ 17118
other revenues | 896 | 770 | 852
total operating revenues | $ 16965 | $ 14143 | $ 17970 although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s .basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .2 .significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .all intercompany transactions are eliminated .we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position .investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 3018
Answer: 3018.0
Question: what about in 2009?
| convfinqa2481 |
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .1 .nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s .we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . millions | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
agricultural | $ 3018 | $ 2666 | $ 3174
automotive | 1271 | 854 | 1344
chemicals | 2425 | 2102 | 2494
energy | 3489 | 3118 | 3810
industrial products | 2639 | 2147 | 3273
intermodal | 3227 | 2486 | 3023
total freight revenues | $ 16069 | $ 13373 | $ 17118
other revenues | 896 | 770 | 852
total operating revenues | $ 16965 | $ 14143 | $ 17970 although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s .basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .2 .significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .all intercompany transactions are eliminated .we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position .investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 3018
Answer: 3018.0
Question: what about in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 2666
Answer: 2666.0
Question: what is the total revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2009 and 2010?
| 5684.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .1 .nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s .we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . millions | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
agricultural | $ 3018 | $ 2666 | $ 3174
automotive | 1271 | 854 | 1344
chemicals | 2425 | 2102 | 2494
energy | 3489 | 3118 | 3810
industrial products | 2639 | 2147 | 3273
intermodal | 3227 | 2486 | 3023
total freight revenues | $ 16069 | $ 13373 | $ 17118
other revenues | 896 | 770 | 852
total operating revenues | $ 16965 | $ 14143 | $ 17970 although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s .basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .2 .significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .all intercompany transactions are eliminated .we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position .investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 3018
Answer: 3018.0
Question: what about in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 2666
Answer: 2666.0
Question: what is the total revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2009 and 2010?
| convfinqa2482 |
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .1 .nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s .we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . millions | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
agricultural | $ 3018 | $ 2666 | $ 3174
automotive | 1271 | 854 | 1344
chemicals | 2425 | 2102 | 2494
energy | 3489 | 3118 | 3810
industrial products | 2639 | 2147 | 3273
intermodal | 3227 | 2486 | 3023
total freight revenues | $ 16069 | $ 13373 | $ 17118
other revenues | 896 | 770 | 852
total operating revenues | $ 16965 | $ 14143 | $ 17970 although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s .basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .2 .significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .all intercompany transactions are eliminated .we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position .investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 3018
Answer: 3018.0
Question: what about in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 2666
Answer: 2666.0
Question: what is the total revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2009 and 2010?
Steps: add(3018, 2666)
Answer: 5684.0
Question: what about revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2008?
| 3174.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .1 .nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s .we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . millions | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
agricultural | $ 3018 | $ 2666 | $ 3174
automotive | 1271 | 854 | 1344
chemicals | 2425 | 2102 | 2494
energy | 3489 | 3118 | 3810
industrial products | 2639 | 2147 | 3273
intermodal | 3227 | 2486 | 3023
total freight revenues | $ 16069 | $ 13373 | $ 17118
other revenues | 896 | 770 | 852
total operating revenues | $ 16965 | $ 14143 | $ 17970 although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s .basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .2 .significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .all intercompany transactions are eliminated .we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position .investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 3018
Answer: 3018.0
Question: what about in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 2666
Answer: 2666.0
Question: what is the total revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2009 and 2010?
Steps: add(3018, 2666)
Answer: 5684.0
Question: what about revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2008?
| convfinqa2483 |
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .1 .nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s .we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . millions | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
agricultural | $ 3018 | $ 2666 | $ 3174
automotive | 1271 | 854 | 1344
chemicals | 2425 | 2102 | 2494
energy | 3489 | 3118 | 3810
industrial products | 2639 | 2147 | 3273
intermodal | 3227 | 2486 | 3023
total freight revenues | $ 16069 | $ 13373 | $ 17118
other revenues | 896 | 770 | 852
total operating revenues | $ 16965 | $ 14143 | $ 17970 although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s .basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .2 .significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .all intercompany transactions are eliminated .we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position .investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 3018
Answer: 3018.0
Question: what about in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 2666
Answer: 2666.0
Question: what is the total revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2009 and 2010?
Steps: add(3018, 2666)
Answer: 5684.0
Question: what about revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 3174
Answer: 3174.0
Question: what is the total revenue generated by agricultural commodity group from 2008 to 2010?
| 8858.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .1 .nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s .we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . millions | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
agricultural | $ 3018 | $ 2666 | $ 3174
automotive | 1271 | 854 | 1344
chemicals | 2425 | 2102 | 2494
energy | 3489 | 3118 | 3810
industrial products | 2639 | 2147 | 3273
intermodal | 3227 | 2486 | 3023
total freight revenues | $ 16069 | $ 13373 | $ 17118
other revenues | 896 | 770 | 852
total operating revenues | $ 16965 | $ 14143 | $ 17970 although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s .basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .2 .significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .all intercompany transactions are eliminated .we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position .investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 3018
Answer: 3018.0
Question: what about in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 2666
Answer: 2666.0
Question: what is the total revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2009 and 2010?
Steps: add(3018, 2666)
Answer: 5684.0
Question: what about revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 3174
Answer: 3174.0
Question: what is the total revenue generated by agricultural commodity group from 2008 to 2010?
| convfinqa2484 |
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .1 .nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s .we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . millions | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
agricultural | $ 3018 | $ 2666 | $ 3174
automotive | 1271 | 854 | 1344
chemicals | 2425 | 2102 | 2494
energy | 3489 | 3118 | 3810
industrial products | 2639 | 2147 | 3273
intermodal | 3227 | 2486 | 3023
total freight revenues | $ 16069 | $ 13373 | $ 17118
other revenues | 896 | 770 | 852
total operating revenues | $ 16965 | $ 14143 | $ 17970 although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s .basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .2 .significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .all intercompany transactions are eliminated .we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position .investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 3018
Answer: 3018.0
Question: what about in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 2666
Answer: 2666.0
Question: what is the total revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2009 and 2010?
Steps: add(3018, 2666)
Answer: 5684.0
Question: what about revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 3174
Answer: 3174.0
Question: what is the total revenue generated by agricultural commodity group from 2008 to 2010?
Steps: add(A0, 3174)
Answer: 8858.0
Question: what is the yearly average?
| 2952.66667 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .1 .nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the u.s .we have 31953 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions 2010 2009 2008 . millions | 2010 | 2009 | 2008
agricultural | $ 3018 | $ 2666 | $ 3174
automotive | 1271 | 854 | 1344
chemicals | 2425 | 2102 | 2494
energy | 3489 | 3118 | 3810
industrial products | 2639 | 2147 | 3273
intermodal | 3227 | 2486 | 3023
total freight revenues | $ 16069 | $ 13373 | $ 17118
other revenues | 896 | 770 | 852
total operating revenues | $ 16965 | $ 14143 | $ 17970 although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the u.s .basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .2 .significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .all intercompany transactions are eliminated .we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position .investments 2013 investments represent our investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and investments in companies ( less than 20% ( 20 % ) owned ) accounted for under the cost method of accounting. .
Question: what is the revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 3018
Answer: 3018.0
Question: what about in 2009?
Steps: Ask for number 2666
Answer: 2666.0
Question: what is the total revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2009 and 2010?
Steps: add(3018, 2666)
Answer: 5684.0
Question: what about revenue generated by agricultural commodity group in 2008?
Steps: Ask for number 3174
Answer: 3174.0
Question: what is the total revenue generated by agricultural commodity group from 2008 to 2010?
Steps: add(A0, 3174)
Answer: 8858.0
Question: what is the yearly average?
| convfinqa2485 |
sources of liquidity primary sources of liquidity for citigroup and its principal subsidiaries include : 2022 deposits ; 2022 collateralized financing transactions ; 2022 senior and subordinated debt ; 2022 commercial paper ; 2022 trust preferred and preferred securities ; and 2022 purchased/wholesale funds .citigroup 2019s funding sources are diversified across funding types and geography , a benefit of its global franchise .funding for citigroup and its major operating subsidiaries includes a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base of $ 774.2 billion .these deposits are diversified across products and regions , with approximately two-thirds of them outside of the u.s .this diversification provides the company with an important , stable and low-cost source of funding .a significant portion of these deposits has been , and is expected to be , long-term and stable , and are considered to be core .there are qualitative as well as quantitative assessments that determine the company 2019s calculation of core deposits .the first step in this process is a qualitative assessment of the deposits .for example , as a result of the company 2019s qualitative analysis certain deposits with wholesale funding characteristics are excluded from consideration as core .deposits that qualify under the company 2019s qualitative assessments are then subjected to quantitative analysis .excluding the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates and the sale of our retail banking operations in germany during the year ending december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s deposit base remained stable .on a volume basis , deposit increases were noted in transaction services , u.s .retail banking and smith barney .this was partially offset by the company 2019s decision to reduce deposits considered wholesale funding , consistent with the company 2019s de-leveraging efforts , and declines in international consumer banking and the private bank .citigroup and its subsidiaries have historically had a significant presence in the global capital markets .the company 2019s capital markets funding activities have been primarily undertaken by two legal entities : ( i ) citigroup inc. , which issues long-term debt , medium-term notes , trust preferred securities , and preferred and common stock ; and ( ii ) citigroup funding inc .( cfi ) , a first-tier subsidiary of citigroup , which issues commercial paper , medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes , all of which are guaranteed by citigroup .other significant elements of long- term debt on the consolidated balance sheet include collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank system , long-term debt related to the consolidation of icg 2019s structured investment vehicles , asset-backed outstandings , and certain borrowings of foreign subsidiaries .each of citigroup 2019s major operating subsidiaries finances its operations on a basis consistent with its capitalization , regulatory structure and the environment in which it operates .particular attention is paid to those businesses that for tax , sovereign risk , or regulatory reasons cannot be freely and readily funded in the international markets .citigroup 2019s borrowings have historically been diversified by geography , investor , instrument and currency .decisions regarding the ultimate currency and interest rate profile of liquidity generated through these borrowings can be separated from the actual issuance through the use of derivative instruments .citigroup is a provider of liquidity facilities to the commercial paper programs of the two primary credit card securitization trusts with which it transacts .citigroup may also provide other types of support to the trusts .as a result of the recent economic downturn , its impact on the cashflows of the trusts , and in response to credit rating agency reviews of the trusts , the company increased the credit enhancement in the omni trust , and plans to provide additional enhancement to the master trust ( see note 23 to consolidated financial statements on page 175 for a further discussion ) .this support preserves investor sponsorship of our card securitization franchise , an important source of liquidity .banking subsidiaries there are various legal limitations on the ability of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions to extend credit , pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries .the approval of the office of the comptroller of the currency , in the case of national banks , or the office of thrift supervision , in the case of federal savings banks , is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agency 2019s regulations .state-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by applicable state law .in determining the declaration of dividends , each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements , as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings .non-banking subsidiaries citigroup also receives dividends from its non-bank subsidiaries .these non-bank subsidiaries are generally not subject to regulatory restrictions on dividends .however , as discussed in 201ccapital resources and liquidity 201d on page 94 , the ability of cgmhi to declare dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries .cgmhi 2019s consolidated balance sheet is liquid , with the vast majority of its assets consisting of marketable securities and collateralized short-term financing agreements arising from securities transactions .cgmhi monitors and evaluates the adequacy of its capital and borrowing base on a daily basis to maintain liquidity and to ensure that its capital base supports the regulatory capital requirements of its subsidiaries .some of citigroup 2019s non-bank subsidiaries , including cgmhi , have credit facilities with citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions , including citibank , n.a .borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with section 23a of the federal reserve act .there are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its non-bank subsidiaries can borrow or obtain credit from citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions or engage in certain other transactions with them .in general , these restrictions require that transactions be on arm 2019s length terms and be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral .see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements on page 169 .at december 31 , 2008 , long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for citigroup , cgmhi , cfi and citigroup 2019s subsidiaries were as follows : in billions of dollars citigroup parent company cgmhi ( 2 ) citigroup funding inc .( 2 ) citigroup subsidiaries long-term debt $ 192.3 $ 20.6 $ 37.4 $ 109.3 ( 1 ) . in billions of dollars | citigroup parent company | cgmhi ( 2 ) | citigroup funding inc. ( 2 ) | other citigroup subsidiaries |
long-term debt | $ 192.3 | $ 20.6 | $ 37.4 | $ 109.3 | -1 ( 1 )
commercial paper | $ 2014 | $ 2014 | $ 28.6 | $ 0.5 | ( 1 ) at december 31 , 2008 , approximately $ 67.4 billion relates to collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank .( 2 ) citigroup inc .guarantees all of cfi 2019s debt and cgmhi 2019s publicly issued securities. .
Question: what is the sum of long-term debt of citigroup and cgmhi?
| 212.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sources of liquidity primary sources of liquidity for citigroup and its principal subsidiaries include : 2022 deposits ; 2022 collateralized financing transactions ; 2022 senior and subordinated debt ; 2022 commercial paper ; 2022 trust preferred and preferred securities ; and 2022 purchased/wholesale funds .citigroup 2019s funding sources are diversified across funding types and geography , a benefit of its global franchise .funding for citigroup and its major operating subsidiaries includes a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base of $ 774.2 billion .these deposits are diversified across products and regions , with approximately two-thirds of them outside of the u.s .this diversification provides the company with an important , stable and low-cost source of funding .a significant portion of these deposits has been , and is expected to be , long-term and stable , and are considered to be core .there are qualitative as well as quantitative assessments that determine the company 2019s calculation of core deposits .the first step in this process is a qualitative assessment of the deposits .for example , as a result of the company 2019s qualitative analysis certain deposits with wholesale funding characteristics are excluded from consideration as core .deposits that qualify under the company 2019s qualitative assessments are then subjected to quantitative analysis .excluding the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates and the sale of our retail banking operations in germany during the year ending december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s deposit base remained stable .on a volume basis , deposit increases were noted in transaction services , u.s .retail banking and smith barney .this was partially offset by the company 2019s decision to reduce deposits considered wholesale funding , consistent with the company 2019s de-leveraging efforts , and declines in international consumer banking and the private bank .citigroup and its subsidiaries have historically had a significant presence in the global capital markets .the company 2019s capital markets funding activities have been primarily undertaken by two legal entities : ( i ) citigroup inc. , which issues long-term debt , medium-term notes , trust preferred securities , and preferred and common stock ; and ( ii ) citigroup funding inc .( cfi ) , a first-tier subsidiary of citigroup , which issues commercial paper , medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes , all of which are guaranteed by citigroup .other significant elements of long- term debt on the consolidated balance sheet include collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank system , long-term debt related to the consolidation of icg 2019s structured investment vehicles , asset-backed outstandings , and certain borrowings of foreign subsidiaries .each of citigroup 2019s major operating subsidiaries finances its operations on a basis consistent with its capitalization , regulatory structure and the environment in which it operates .particular attention is paid to those businesses that for tax , sovereign risk , or regulatory reasons cannot be freely and readily funded in the international markets .citigroup 2019s borrowings have historically been diversified by geography , investor , instrument and currency .decisions regarding the ultimate currency and interest rate profile of liquidity generated through these borrowings can be separated from the actual issuance through the use of derivative instruments .citigroup is a provider of liquidity facilities to the commercial paper programs of the two primary credit card securitization trusts with which it transacts .citigroup may also provide other types of support to the trusts .as a result of the recent economic downturn , its impact on the cashflows of the trusts , and in response to credit rating agency reviews of the trusts , the company increased the credit enhancement in the omni trust , and plans to provide additional enhancement to the master trust ( see note 23 to consolidated financial statements on page 175 for a further discussion ) .this support preserves investor sponsorship of our card securitization franchise , an important source of liquidity .banking subsidiaries there are various legal limitations on the ability of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions to extend credit , pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries .the approval of the office of the comptroller of the currency , in the case of national banks , or the office of thrift supervision , in the case of federal savings banks , is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agency 2019s regulations .state-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by applicable state law .in determining the declaration of dividends , each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements , as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings .non-banking subsidiaries citigroup also receives dividends from its non-bank subsidiaries .these non-bank subsidiaries are generally not subject to regulatory restrictions on dividends .however , as discussed in 201ccapital resources and liquidity 201d on page 94 , the ability of cgmhi to declare dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries .cgmhi 2019s consolidated balance sheet is liquid , with the vast majority of its assets consisting of marketable securities and collateralized short-term financing agreements arising from securities transactions .cgmhi monitors and evaluates the adequacy of its capital and borrowing base on a daily basis to maintain liquidity and to ensure that its capital base supports the regulatory capital requirements of its subsidiaries .some of citigroup 2019s non-bank subsidiaries , including cgmhi , have credit facilities with citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions , including citibank , n.a .borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with section 23a of the federal reserve act .there are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its non-bank subsidiaries can borrow or obtain credit from citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions or engage in certain other transactions with them .in general , these restrictions require that transactions be on arm 2019s length terms and be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral .see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements on page 169 .at december 31 , 2008 , long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for citigroup , cgmhi , cfi and citigroup 2019s subsidiaries were as follows : in billions of dollars citigroup parent company cgmhi ( 2 ) citigroup funding inc .( 2 ) citigroup subsidiaries long-term debt $ 192.3 $ 20.6 $ 37.4 $ 109.3 ( 1 ) . in billions of dollars | citigroup parent company | cgmhi ( 2 ) | citigroup funding inc. ( 2 ) | other citigroup subsidiaries |
long-term debt | $ 192.3 | $ 20.6 | $ 37.4 | $ 109.3 | -1 ( 1 )
commercial paper | $ 2014 | $ 2014 | $ 28.6 | $ 0.5 | ( 1 ) at december 31 , 2008 , approximately $ 67.4 billion relates to collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank .( 2 ) citigroup inc .guarantees all of cfi 2019s debt and cgmhi 2019s publicly issued securities. .
Question: what is the sum of long-term debt of citigroup and cgmhi?
| convfinqa2486 |
sources of liquidity primary sources of liquidity for citigroup and its principal subsidiaries include : 2022 deposits ; 2022 collateralized financing transactions ; 2022 senior and subordinated debt ; 2022 commercial paper ; 2022 trust preferred and preferred securities ; and 2022 purchased/wholesale funds .citigroup 2019s funding sources are diversified across funding types and geography , a benefit of its global franchise .funding for citigroup and its major operating subsidiaries includes a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base of $ 774.2 billion .these deposits are diversified across products and regions , with approximately two-thirds of them outside of the u.s .this diversification provides the company with an important , stable and low-cost source of funding .a significant portion of these deposits has been , and is expected to be , long-term and stable , and are considered to be core .there are qualitative as well as quantitative assessments that determine the company 2019s calculation of core deposits .the first step in this process is a qualitative assessment of the deposits .for example , as a result of the company 2019s qualitative analysis certain deposits with wholesale funding characteristics are excluded from consideration as core .deposits that qualify under the company 2019s qualitative assessments are then subjected to quantitative analysis .excluding the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates and the sale of our retail banking operations in germany during the year ending december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s deposit base remained stable .on a volume basis , deposit increases were noted in transaction services , u.s .retail banking and smith barney .this was partially offset by the company 2019s decision to reduce deposits considered wholesale funding , consistent with the company 2019s de-leveraging efforts , and declines in international consumer banking and the private bank .citigroup and its subsidiaries have historically had a significant presence in the global capital markets .the company 2019s capital markets funding activities have been primarily undertaken by two legal entities : ( i ) citigroup inc. , which issues long-term debt , medium-term notes , trust preferred securities , and preferred and common stock ; and ( ii ) citigroup funding inc .( cfi ) , a first-tier subsidiary of citigroup , which issues commercial paper , medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes , all of which are guaranteed by citigroup .other significant elements of long- term debt on the consolidated balance sheet include collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank system , long-term debt related to the consolidation of icg 2019s structured investment vehicles , asset-backed outstandings , and certain borrowings of foreign subsidiaries .each of citigroup 2019s major operating subsidiaries finances its operations on a basis consistent with its capitalization , regulatory structure and the environment in which it operates .particular attention is paid to those businesses that for tax , sovereign risk , or regulatory reasons cannot be freely and readily funded in the international markets .citigroup 2019s borrowings have historically been diversified by geography , investor , instrument and currency .decisions regarding the ultimate currency and interest rate profile of liquidity generated through these borrowings can be separated from the actual issuance through the use of derivative instruments .citigroup is a provider of liquidity facilities to the commercial paper programs of the two primary credit card securitization trusts with which it transacts .citigroup may also provide other types of support to the trusts .as a result of the recent economic downturn , its impact on the cashflows of the trusts , and in response to credit rating agency reviews of the trusts , the company increased the credit enhancement in the omni trust , and plans to provide additional enhancement to the master trust ( see note 23 to consolidated financial statements on page 175 for a further discussion ) .this support preserves investor sponsorship of our card securitization franchise , an important source of liquidity .banking subsidiaries there are various legal limitations on the ability of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions to extend credit , pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries .the approval of the office of the comptroller of the currency , in the case of national banks , or the office of thrift supervision , in the case of federal savings banks , is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agency 2019s regulations .state-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by applicable state law .in determining the declaration of dividends , each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements , as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings .non-banking subsidiaries citigroup also receives dividends from its non-bank subsidiaries .these non-bank subsidiaries are generally not subject to regulatory restrictions on dividends .however , as discussed in 201ccapital resources and liquidity 201d on page 94 , the ability of cgmhi to declare dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries .cgmhi 2019s consolidated balance sheet is liquid , with the vast majority of its assets consisting of marketable securities and collateralized short-term financing agreements arising from securities transactions .cgmhi monitors and evaluates the adequacy of its capital and borrowing base on a daily basis to maintain liquidity and to ensure that its capital base supports the regulatory capital requirements of its subsidiaries .some of citigroup 2019s non-bank subsidiaries , including cgmhi , have credit facilities with citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions , including citibank , n.a .borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with section 23a of the federal reserve act .there are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its non-bank subsidiaries can borrow or obtain credit from citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions or engage in certain other transactions with them .in general , these restrictions require that transactions be on arm 2019s length terms and be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral .see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements on page 169 .at december 31 , 2008 , long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for citigroup , cgmhi , cfi and citigroup 2019s subsidiaries were as follows : in billions of dollars citigroup parent company cgmhi ( 2 ) citigroup funding inc .( 2 ) citigroup subsidiaries long-term debt $ 192.3 $ 20.6 $ 37.4 $ 109.3 ( 1 ) . in billions of dollars | citigroup parent company | cgmhi ( 2 ) | citigroup funding inc. ( 2 ) | other citigroup subsidiaries |
long-term debt | $ 192.3 | $ 20.6 | $ 37.4 | $ 109.3 | -1 ( 1 )
commercial paper | $ 2014 | $ 2014 | $ 28.6 | $ 0.5 | ( 1 ) at december 31 , 2008 , approximately $ 67.4 billion relates to collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank .( 2 ) citigroup inc .guarantees all of cfi 2019s debt and cgmhi 2019s publicly issued securities. .
Question: what is the sum of long-term debt of citigroup and cgmhi?
Steps: add(192.3, 20.6)
Answer: 212.9
Question: what is the sum including citigroup funding?
| 250.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sources of liquidity primary sources of liquidity for citigroup and its principal subsidiaries include : 2022 deposits ; 2022 collateralized financing transactions ; 2022 senior and subordinated debt ; 2022 commercial paper ; 2022 trust preferred and preferred securities ; and 2022 purchased/wholesale funds .citigroup 2019s funding sources are diversified across funding types and geography , a benefit of its global franchise .funding for citigroup and its major operating subsidiaries includes a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base of $ 774.2 billion .these deposits are diversified across products and regions , with approximately two-thirds of them outside of the u.s .this diversification provides the company with an important , stable and low-cost source of funding .a significant portion of these deposits has been , and is expected to be , long-term and stable , and are considered to be core .there are qualitative as well as quantitative assessments that determine the company 2019s calculation of core deposits .the first step in this process is a qualitative assessment of the deposits .for example , as a result of the company 2019s qualitative analysis certain deposits with wholesale funding characteristics are excluded from consideration as core .deposits that qualify under the company 2019s qualitative assessments are then subjected to quantitative analysis .excluding the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates and the sale of our retail banking operations in germany during the year ending december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s deposit base remained stable .on a volume basis , deposit increases were noted in transaction services , u.s .retail banking and smith barney .this was partially offset by the company 2019s decision to reduce deposits considered wholesale funding , consistent with the company 2019s de-leveraging efforts , and declines in international consumer banking and the private bank .citigroup and its subsidiaries have historically had a significant presence in the global capital markets .the company 2019s capital markets funding activities have been primarily undertaken by two legal entities : ( i ) citigroup inc. , which issues long-term debt , medium-term notes , trust preferred securities , and preferred and common stock ; and ( ii ) citigroup funding inc .( cfi ) , a first-tier subsidiary of citigroup , which issues commercial paper , medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes , all of which are guaranteed by citigroup .other significant elements of long- term debt on the consolidated balance sheet include collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank system , long-term debt related to the consolidation of icg 2019s structured investment vehicles , asset-backed outstandings , and certain borrowings of foreign subsidiaries .each of citigroup 2019s major operating subsidiaries finances its operations on a basis consistent with its capitalization , regulatory structure and the environment in which it operates .particular attention is paid to those businesses that for tax , sovereign risk , or regulatory reasons cannot be freely and readily funded in the international markets .citigroup 2019s borrowings have historically been diversified by geography , investor , instrument and currency .decisions regarding the ultimate currency and interest rate profile of liquidity generated through these borrowings can be separated from the actual issuance through the use of derivative instruments .citigroup is a provider of liquidity facilities to the commercial paper programs of the two primary credit card securitization trusts with which it transacts .citigroup may also provide other types of support to the trusts .as a result of the recent economic downturn , its impact on the cashflows of the trusts , and in response to credit rating agency reviews of the trusts , the company increased the credit enhancement in the omni trust , and plans to provide additional enhancement to the master trust ( see note 23 to consolidated financial statements on page 175 for a further discussion ) .this support preserves investor sponsorship of our card securitization franchise , an important source of liquidity .banking subsidiaries there are various legal limitations on the ability of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions to extend credit , pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries .the approval of the office of the comptroller of the currency , in the case of national banks , or the office of thrift supervision , in the case of federal savings banks , is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agency 2019s regulations .state-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by applicable state law .in determining the declaration of dividends , each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements , as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings .non-banking subsidiaries citigroup also receives dividends from its non-bank subsidiaries .these non-bank subsidiaries are generally not subject to regulatory restrictions on dividends .however , as discussed in 201ccapital resources and liquidity 201d on page 94 , the ability of cgmhi to declare dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries .cgmhi 2019s consolidated balance sheet is liquid , with the vast majority of its assets consisting of marketable securities and collateralized short-term financing agreements arising from securities transactions .cgmhi monitors and evaluates the adequacy of its capital and borrowing base on a daily basis to maintain liquidity and to ensure that its capital base supports the regulatory capital requirements of its subsidiaries .some of citigroup 2019s non-bank subsidiaries , including cgmhi , have credit facilities with citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions , including citibank , n.a .borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with section 23a of the federal reserve act .there are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its non-bank subsidiaries can borrow or obtain credit from citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions or engage in certain other transactions with them .in general , these restrictions require that transactions be on arm 2019s length terms and be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral .see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements on page 169 .at december 31 , 2008 , long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for citigroup , cgmhi , cfi and citigroup 2019s subsidiaries were as follows : in billions of dollars citigroup parent company cgmhi ( 2 ) citigroup funding inc .( 2 ) citigroup subsidiaries long-term debt $ 192.3 $ 20.6 $ 37.4 $ 109.3 ( 1 ) . in billions of dollars | citigroup parent company | cgmhi ( 2 ) | citigroup funding inc. ( 2 ) | other citigroup subsidiaries |
long-term debt | $ 192.3 | $ 20.6 | $ 37.4 | $ 109.3 | -1 ( 1 )
commercial paper | $ 2014 | $ 2014 | $ 28.6 | $ 0.5 | ( 1 ) at december 31 , 2008 , approximately $ 67.4 billion relates to collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank .( 2 ) citigroup inc .guarantees all of cfi 2019s debt and cgmhi 2019s publicly issued securities. .
Question: what is the sum of long-term debt of citigroup and cgmhi?
Steps: add(192.3, 20.6)
Answer: 212.9
Question: what is the sum including citigroup funding?
| convfinqa2487 |
sources of liquidity primary sources of liquidity for citigroup and its principal subsidiaries include : 2022 deposits ; 2022 collateralized financing transactions ; 2022 senior and subordinated debt ; 2022 commercial paper ; 2022 trust preferred and preferred securities ; and 2022 purchased/wholesale funds .citigroup 2019s funding sources are diversified across funding types and geography , a benefit of its global franchise .funding for citigroup and its major operating subsidiaries includes a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base of $ 774.2 billion .these deposits are diversified across products and regions , with approximately two-thirds of them outside of the u.s .this diversification provides the company with an important , stable and low-cost source of funding .a significant portion of these deposits has been , and is expected to be , long-term and stable , and are considered to be core .there are qualitative as well as quantitative assessments that determine the company 2019s calculation of core deposits .the first step in this process is a qualitative assessment of the deposits .for example , as a result of the company 2019s qualitative analysis certain deposits with wholesale funding characteristics are excluded from consideration as core .deposits that qualify under the company 2019s qualitative assessments are then subjected to quantitative analysis .excluding the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates and the sale of our retail banking operations in germany during the year ending december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s deposit base remained stable .on a volume basis , deposit increases were noted in transaction services , u.s .retail banking and smith barney .this was partially offset by the company 2019s decision to reduce deposits considered wholesale funding , consistent with the company 2019s de-leveraging efforts , and declines in international consumer banking and the private bank .citigroup and its subsidiaries have historically had a significant presence in the global capital markets .the company 2019s capital markets funding activities have been primarily undertaken by two legal entities : ( i ) citigroup inc. , which issues long-term debt , medium-term notes , trust preferred securities , and preferred and common stock ; and ( ii ) citigroup funding inc .( cfi ) , a first-tier subsidiary of citigroup , which issues commercial paper , medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes , all of which are guaranteed by citigroup .other significant elements of long- term debt on the consolidated balance sheet include collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank system , long-term debt related to the consolidation of icg 2019s structured investment vehicles , asset-backed outstandings , and certain borrowings of foreign subsidiaries .each of citigroup 2019s major operating subsidiaries finances its operations on a basis consistent with its capitalization , regulatory structure and the environment in which it operates .particular attention is paid to those businesses that for tax , sovereign risk , or regulatory reasons cannot be freely and readily funded in the international markets .citigroup 2019s borrowings have historically been diversified by geography , investor , instrument and currency .decisions regarding the ultimate currency and interest rate profile of liquidity generated through these borrowings can be separated from the actual issuance through the use of derivative instruments .citigroup is a provider of liquidity facilities to the commercial paper programs of the two primary credit card securitization trusts with which it transacts .citigroup may also provide other types of support to the trusts .as a result of the recent economic downturn , its impact on the cashflows of the trusts , and in response to credit rating agency reviews of the trusts , the company increased the credit enhancement in the omni trust , and plans to provide additional enhancement to the master trust ( see note 23 to consolidated financial statements on page 175 for a further discussion ) .this support preserves investor sponsorship of our card securitization franchise , an important source of liquidity .banking subsidiaries there are various legal limitations on the ability of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions to extend credit , pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries .the approval of the office of the comptroller of the currency , in the case of national banks , or the office of thrift supervision , in the case of federal savings banks , is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agency 2019s regulations .state-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by applicable state law .in determining the declaration of dividends , each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements , as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings .non-banking subsidiaries citigroup also receives dividends from its non-bank subsidiaries .these non-bank subsidiaries are generally not subject to regulatory restrictions on dividends .however , as discussed in 201ccapital resources and liquidity 201d on page 94 , the ability of cgmhi to declare dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries .cgmhi 2019s consolidated balance sheet is liquid , with the vast majority of its assets consisting of marketable securities and collateralized short-term financing agreements arising from securities transactions .cgmhi monitors and evaluates the adequacy of its capital and borrowing base on a daily basis to maintain liquidity and to ensure that its capital base supports the regulatory capital requirements of its subsidiaries .some of citigroup 2019s non-bank subsidiaries , including cgmhi , have credit facilities with citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions , including citibank , n.a .borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with section 23a of the federal reserve act .there are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its non-bank subsidiaries can borrow or obtain credit from citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions or engage in certain other transactions with them .in general , these restrictions require that transactions be on arm 2019s length terms and be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral .see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements on page 169 .at december 31 , 2008 , long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for citigroup , cgmhi , cfi and citigroup 2019s subsidiaries were as follows : in billions of dollars citigroup parent company cgmhi ( 2 ) citigroup funding inc .( 2 ) citigroup subsidiaries long-term debt $ 192.3 $ 20.6 $ 37.4 $ 109.3 ( 1 ) . in billions of dollars | citigroup parent company | cgmhi ( 2 ) | citigroup funding inc. ( 2 ) | other citigroup subsidiaries |
long-term debt | $ 192.3 | $ 20.6 | $ 37.4 | $ 109.3 | -1 ( 1 )
commercial paper | $ 2014 | $ 2014 | $ 28.6 | $ 0.5 | ( 1 ) at december 31 , 2008 , approximately $ 67.4 billion relates to collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank .( 2 ) citigroup inc .guarantees all of cfi 2019s debt and cgmhi 2019s publicly issued securities. .
Question: what is the sum of long-term debt of citigroup and cgmhi?
Steps: add(192.3, 20.6)
Answer: 212.9
Question: what is the sum including citigroup funding?
Steps: add(A0, 37.4)
Answer: 250.3
Question: what is the total sum including citigroup subsidiaries?
| 359.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sources of liquidity primary sources of liquidity for citigroup and its principal subsidiaries include : 2022 deposits ; 2022 collateralized financing transactions ; 2022 senior and subordinated debt ; 2022 commercial paper ; 2022 trust preferred and preferred securities ; and 2022 purchased/wholesale funds .citigroup 2019s funding sources are diversified across funding types and geography , a benefit of its global franchise .funding for citigroup and its major operating subsidiaries includes a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base of $ 774.2 billion .these deposits are diversified across products and regions , with approximately two-thirds of them outside of the u.s .this diversification provides the company with an important , stable and low-cost source of funding .a significant portion of these deposits has been , and is expected to be , long-term and stable , and are considered to be core .there are qualitative as well as quantitative assessments that determine the company 2019s calculation of core deposits .the first step in this process is a qualitative assessment of the deposits .for example , as a result of the company 2019s qualitative analysis certain deposits with wholesale funding characteristics are excluded from consideration as core .deposits that qualify under the company 2019s qualitative assessments are then subjected to quantitative analysis .excluding the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates and the sale of our retail banking operations in germany during the year ending december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s deposit base remained stable .on a volume basis , deposit increases were noted in transaction services , u.s .retail banking and smith barney .this was partially offset by the company 2019s decision to reduce deposits considered wholesale funding , consistent with the company 2019s de-leveraging efforts , and declines in international consumer banking and the private bank .citigroup and its subsidiaries have historically had a significant presence in the global capital markets .the company 2019s capital markets funding activities have been primarily undertaken by two legal entities : ( i ) citigroup inc. , which issues long-term debt , medium-term notes , trust preferred securities , and preferred and common stock ; and ( ii ) citigroup funding inc .( cfi ) , a first-tier subsidiary of citigroup , which issues commercial paper , medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes , all of which are guaranteed by citigroup .other significant elements of long- term debt on the consolidated balance sheet include collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank system , long-term debt related to the consolidation of icg 2019s structured investment vehicles , asset-backed outstandings , and certain borrowings of foreign subsidiaries .each of citigroup 2019s major operating subsidiaries finances its operations on a basis consistent with its capitalization , regulatory structure and the environment in which it operates .particular attention is paid to those businesses that for tax , sovereign risk , or regulatory reasons cannot be freely and readily funded in the international markets .citigroup 2019s borrowings have historically been diversified by geography , investor , instrument and currency .decisions regarding the ultimate currency and interest rate profile of liquidity generated through these borrowings can be separated from the actual issuance through the use of derivative instruments .citigroup is a provider of liquidity facilities to the commercial paper programs of the two primary credit card securitization trusts with which it transacts .citigroup may also provide other types of support to the trusts .as a result of the recent economic downturn , its impact on the cashflows of the trusts , and in response to credit rating agency reviews of the trusts , the company increased the credit enhancement in the omni trust , and plans to provide additional enhancement to the master trust ( see note 23 to consolidated financial statements on page 175 for a further discussion ) .this support preserves investor sponsorship of our card securitization franchise , an important source of liquidity .banking subsidiaries there are various legal limitations on the ability of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions to extend credit , pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries .the approval of the office of the comptroller of the currency , in the case of national banks , or the office of thrift supervision , in the case of federal savings banks , is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agency 2019s regulations .state-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by applicable state law .in determining the declaration of dividends , each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements , as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings .non-banking subsidiaries citigroup also receives dividends from its non-bank subsidiaries .these non-bank subsidiaries are generally not subject to regulatory restrictions on dividends .however , as discussed in 201ccapital resources and liquidity 201d on page 94 , the ability of cgmhi to declare dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries .cgmhi 2019s consolidated balance sheet is liquid , with the vast majority of its assets consisting of marketable securities and collateralized short-term financing agreements arising from securities transactions .cgmhi monitors and evaluates the adequacy of its capital and borrowing base on a daily basis to maintain liquidity and to ensure that its capital base supports the regulatory capital requirements of its subsidiaries .some of citigroup 2019s non-bank subsidiaries , including cgmhi , have credit facilities with citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions , including citibank , n.a .borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with section 23a of the federal reserve act .there are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its non-bank subsidiaries can borrow or obtain credit from citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions or engage in certain other transactions with them .in general , these restrictions require that transactions be on arm 2019s length terms and be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral .see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements on page 169 .at december 31 , 2008 , long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for citigroup , cgmhi , cfi and citigroup 2019s subsidiaries were as follows : in billions of dollars citigroup parent company cgmhi ( 2 ) citigroup funding inc .( 2 ) citigroup subsidiaries long-term debt $ 192.3 $ 20.6 $ 37.4 $ 109.3 ( 1 ) . in billions of dollars | citigroup parent company | cgmhi ( 2 ) | citigroup funding inc. ( 2 ) | other citigroup subsidiaries |
long-term debt | $ 192.3 | $ 20.6 | $ 37.4 | $ 109.3 | -1 ( 1 )
commercial paper | $ 2014 | $ 2014 | $ 28.6 | $ 0.5 | ( 1 ) at december 31 , 2008 , approximately $ 67.4 billion relates to collateralized advances from the federal home loan bank .( 2 ) citigroup inc .guarantees all of cfi 2019s debt and cgmhi 2019s publicly issued securities. .
Question: what is the sum of long-term debt of citigroup and cgmhi?
Steps: add(192.3, 20.6)
Answer: 212.9
Question: what is the sum including citigroup funding?
Steps: add(A0, 37.4)
Answer: 250.3
Question: what is the total sum including citigroup subsidiaries?
| convfinqa2488 |
consolidated income statement review net income for 2009 was $ 2.4 billion and for 2008 was $ 914 million .amounts for 2009 include operating results of national city and the fourth quarter impact of a $ 687 million after-tax gain related to blackrock 2019s acquisition of bgi .increases in income statement comparisons to 2008 , except as noted , are primarily due to the operating results of national city .our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report .net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2009 2008 . year ended december 31 dollars in millions | 2009 | 2008
net interest income | $ 9083 | $ 3854
net interest margin | 3.82% ( 3.82 % ) | 3.37% ( 3.37 % ) changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding .see statistical information 2013 analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest ( unaudited ) income and average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis in item 8 of this report for additional information .higher net interest income for 2009 compared with 2008 reflected the increase in average interest-earning assets due to national city and the improvement in the net interest margin .the net interest margin was 3.82% ( 3.82 % ) for 2009 and 3.37% ( 3.37 % ) for 2008 .the following factors impacted the comparison : 2022 a decrease in the rate accrued on interest-bearing liabilities of 97 basis points .the rate accrued on interest-bearing deposits , the largest component , decreased 107 basis points .2022 these factors were partially offset by a 45 basis point decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets .the yield on loans , which represented the largest portion of our earning assets in 2009 , decreased 30 basis points .2022 in addition , the impact of noninterest-bearing sources of funding decreased 7 basis points .for comparing to the broader market , the average federal funds rate was .16% ( .16 % ) for 2009 compared with 1.94% ( 1.94 % ) for 2008 .we expect our net interest income for 2010 will likely be modestly lower as a result of cash recoveries on purchased impaired loans in 2009 and additional run-off of higher- yielding assets , which could be mitigated by rising interest rates .this assumes our current expectations for interest rates and economic conditions 2013 we include our current economic assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements in the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information section of this item 7 .noninterest income summary noninterest income was $ 7.1 billion for 2009 and $ 2.4 billion for 2008 .noninterest income for 2009 included the following : 2022 the gain on blackrock/bgi transaction of $ 1.076 billion , 2022 net credit-related other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) on debt and equity securities of $ 577 million , 2022 net gains on sales of securities of $ 550 million , 2022 gains on hedging of residential mortgage servicing rights of $ 355 million , 2022 valuation and sale income related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , of $ 107 million , 2022 gains of $ 103 million related to our blackrock ltip shares adjustment in the first quarter , and net losses on private equity and alternative investments of $ 93 million .noninterest income for 2008 included the following : 2022 net otti on debt and equity securities of $ 312 million , 2022 gains of $ 246 million related to our blackrock ltip shares adjustment , 2022 valuation and sale losses related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , of $ 197 million , 2022 impairment and other losses related to private equity and alternative investments of $ 180 million , 2022 income from hilliard lyons totaling $ 164 million , including the first quarter gain of $ 114 million from the sale of this business , 2022 net gains on sales of securities of $ 106 million , and 2022 a gain of $ 95 million related to the redemption of a portion of our visa class b common shares related to visa 2019s march 2008 initial public offering .additional analysis asset management revenue increased $ 172 million to $ 858 million in 2009 , compared with $ 686 million in 2008 .this increase reflected improving equity markets , new business generation and a shift in assets into higher yielding equity investments during the second half of 2009 .assets managed totaled $ 103 billion at both december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , including the impact of national city .the asset management group section of the business segments review section of this item 7 includes further discussion of assets under management .consumer services fees totaled $ 1.290 billion in 2009 compared with $ 623 million in 2008 .service charges on deposits totaled $ 950 million for 2009 and $ 372 million for 2008 .both increases were primarily driven by the impact of the national city acquisition .reduced consumer spending .
Question: what is the sum of the values of non-interest income in 2008 and 2009?
| 9.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consolidated income statement review net income for 2009 was $ 2.4 billion and for 2008 was $ 914 million .amounts for 2009 include operating results of national city and the fourth quarter impact of a $ 687 million after-tax gain related to blackrock 2019s acquisition of bgi .increases in income statement comparisons to 2008 , except as noted , are primarily due to the operating results of national city .our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report .net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2009 2008 . year ended december 31 dollars in millions | 2009 | 2008
net interest income | $ 9083 | $ 3854
net interest margin | 3.82% ( 3.82 % ) | 3.37% ( 3.37 % ) changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding .see statistical information 2013 analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest ( unaudited ) income and average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis in item 8 of this report for additional information .higher net interest income for 2009 compared with 2008 reflected the increase in average interest-earning assets due to national city and the improvement in the net interest margin .the net interest margin was 3.82% ( 3.82 % ) for 2009 and 3.37% ( 3.37 % ) for 2008 .the following factors impacted the comparison : 2022 a decrease in the rate accrued on interest-bearing liabilities of 97 basis points .the rate accrued on interest-bearing deposits , the largest component , decreased 107 basis points .2022 these factors were partially offset by a 45 basis point decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets .the yield on loans , which represented the largest portion of our earning assets in 2009 , decreased 30 basis points .2022 in addition , the impact of noninterest-bearing sources of funding decreased 7 basis points .for comparing to the broader market , the average federal funds rate was .16% ( .16 % ) for 2009 compared with 1.94% ( 1.94 % ) for 2008 .we expect our net interest income for 2010 will likely be modestly lower as a result of cash recoveries on purchased impaired loans in 2009 and additional run-off of higher- yielding assets , which could be mitigated by rising interest rates .this assumes our current expectations for interest rates and economic conditions 2013 we include our current economic assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements in the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information section of this item 7 .noninterest income summary noninterest income was $ 7.1 billion for 2009 and $ 2.4 billion for 2008 .noninterest income for 2009 included the following : 2022 the gain on blackrock/bgi transaction of $ 1.076 billion , 2022 net credit-related other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) on debt and equity securities of $ 577 million , 2022 net gains on sales of securities of $ 550 million , 2022 gains on hedging of residential mortgage servicing rights of $ 355 million , 2022 valuation and sale income related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , of $ 107 million , 2022 gains of $ 103 million related to our blackrock ltip shares adjustment in the first quarter , and net losses on private equity and alternative investments of $ 93 million .noninterest income for 2008 included the following : 2022 net otti on debt and equity securities of $ 312 million , 2022 gains of $ 246 million related to our blackrock ltip shares adjustment , 2022 valuation and sale losses related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , of $ 197 million , 2022 impairment and other losses related to private equity and alternative investments of $ 180 million , 2022 income from hilliard lyons totaling $ 164 million , including the first quarter gain of $ 114 million from the sale of this business , 2022 net gains on sales of securities of $ 106 million , and 2022 a gain of $ 95 million related to the redemption of a portion of our visa class b common shares related to visa 2019s march 2008 initial public offering .additional analysis asset management revenue increased $ 172 million to $ 858 million in 2009 , compared with $ 686 million in 2008 .this increase reflected improving equity markets , new business generation and a shift in assets into higher yielding equity investments during the second half of 2009 .assets managed totaled $ 103 billion at both december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , including the impact of national city .the asset management group section of the business segments review section of this item 7 includes further discussion of assets under management .consumer services fees totaled $ 1.290 billion in 2009 compared with $ 623 million in 2008 .service charges on deposits totaled $ 950 million for 2009 and $ 372 million for 2008 .both increases were primarily driven by the impact of the national city acquisition .reduced consumer spending .
Question: what is the sum of the values of non-interest income in 2008 and 2009?
| convfinqa2489 |
consolidated income statement review net income for 2009 was $ 2.4 billion and for 2008 was $ 914 million .amounts for 2009 include operating results of national city and the fourth quarter impact of a $ 687 million after-tax gain related to blackrock 2019s acquisition of bgi .increases in income statement comparisons to 2008 , except as noted , are primarily due to the operating results of national city .our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report .net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2009 2008 . year ended december 31 dollars in millions | 2009 | 2008
net interest income | $ 9083 | $ 3854
net interest margin | 3.82% ( 3.82 % ) | 3.37% ( 3.37 % ) changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding .see statistical information 2013 analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest ( unaudited ) income and average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis in item 8 of this report for additional information .higher net interest income for 2009 compared with 2008 reflected the increase in average interest-earning assets due to national city and the improvement in the net interest margin .the net interest margin was 3.82% ( 3.82 % ) for 2009 and 3.37% ( 3.37 % ) for 2008 .the following factors impacted the comparison : 2022 a decrease in the rate accrued on interest-bearing liabilities of 97 basis points .the rate accrued on interest-bearing deposits , the largest component , decreased 107 basis points .2022 these factors were partially offset by a 45 basis point decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets .the yield on loans , which represented the largest portion of our earning assets in 2009 , decreased 30 basis points .2022 in addition , the impact of noninterest-bearing sources of funding decreased 7 basis points .for comparing to the broader market , the average federal funds rate was .16% ( .16 % ) for 2009 compared with 1.94% ( 1.94 % ) for 2008 .we expect our net interest income for 2010 will likely be modestly lower as a result of cash recoveries on purchased impaired loans in 2009 and additional run-off of higher- yielding assets , which could be mitigated by rising interest rates .this assumes our current expectations for interest rates and economic conditions 2013 we include our current economic assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements in the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information section of this item 7 .noninterest income summary noninterest income was $ 7.1 billion for 2009 and $ 2.4 billion for 2008 .noninterest income for 2009 included the following : 2022 the gain on blackrock/bgi transaction of $ 1.076 billion , 2022 net credit-related other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) on debt and equity securities of $ 577 million , 2022 net gains on sales of securities of $ 550 million , 2022 gains on hedging of residential mortgage servicing rights of $ 355 million , 2022 valuation and sale income related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , of $ 107 million , 2022 gains of $ 103 million related to our blackrock ltip shares adjustment in the first quarter , and net losses on private equity and alternative investments of $ 93 million .noninterest income for 2008 included the following : 2022 net otti on debt and equity securities of $ 312 million , 2022 gains of $ 246 million related to our blackrock ltip shares adjustment , 2022 valuation and sale losses related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , of $ 197 million , 2022 impairment and other losses related to private equity and alternative investments of $ 180 million , 2022 income from hilliard lyons totaling $ 164 million , including the first quarter gain of $ 114 million from the sale of this business , 2022 net gains on sales of securities of $ 106 million , and 2022 a gain of $ 95 million related to the redemption of a portion of our visa class b common shares related to visa 2019s march 2008 initial public offering .additional analysis asset management revenue increased $ 172 million to $ 858 million in 2009 , compared with $ 686 million in 2008 .this increase reflected improving equity markets , new business generation and a shift in assets into higher yielding equity investments during the second half of 2009 .assets managed totaled $ 103 billion at both december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , including the impact of national city .the asset management group section of the business segments review section of this item 7 includes further discussion of assets under management .consumer services fees totaled $ 1.290 billion in 2009 compared with $ 623 million in 2008 .service charges on deposits totaled $ 950 million for 2009 and $ 372 million for 2008 .both increases were primarily driven by the impact of the national city acquisition .reduced consumer spending .
Question: what is the sum of the values of non-interest income in 2008 and 2009?
Steps: add(7.1, 2.4)
Answer: 9.5
Question: what is that sum divided by 2?
| 4.75 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consolidated income statement review net income for 2009 was $ 2.4 billion and for 2008 was $ 914 million .amounts for 2009 include operating results of national city and the fourth quarter impact of a $ 687 million after-tax gain related to blackrock 2019s acquisition of bgi .increases in income statement comparisons to 2008 , except as noted , are primarily due to the operating results of national city .our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report .net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2009 2008 . year ended december 31 dollars in millions | 2009 | 2008
net interest income | $ 9083 | $ 3854
net interest margin | 3.82% ( 3.82 % ) | 3.37% ( 3.37 % ) changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding .see statistical information 2013 analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest ( unaudited ) income and average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis in item 8 of this report for additional information .higher net interest income for 2009 compared with 2008 reflected the increase in average interest-earning assets due to national city and the improvement in the net interest margin .the net interest margin was 3.82% ( 3.82 % ) for 2009 and 3.37% ( 3.37 % ) for 2008 .the following factors impacted the comparison : 2022 a decrease in the rate accrued on interest-bearing liabilities of 97 basis points .the rate accrued on interest-bearing deposits , the largest component , decreased 107 basis points .2022 these factors were partially offset by a 45 basis point decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets .the yield on loans , which represented the largest portion of our earning assets in 2009 , decreased 30 basis points .2022 in addition , the impact of noninterest-bearing sources of funding decreased 7 basis points .for comparing to the broader market , the average federal funds rate was .16% ( .16 % ) for 2009 compared with 1.94% ( 1.94 % ) for 2008 .we expect our net interest income for 2010 will likely be modestly lower as a result of cash recoveries on purchased impaired loans in 2009 and additional run-off of higher- yielding assets , which could be mitigated by rising interest rates .this assumes our current expectations for interest rates and economic conditions 2013 we include our current economic assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements in the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information section of this item 7 .noninterest income summary noninterest income was $ 7.1 billion for 2009 and $ 2.4 billion for 2008 .noninterest income for 2009 included the following : 2022 the gain on blackrock/bgi transaction of $ 1.076 billion , 2022 net credit-related other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) on debt and equity securities of $ 577 million , 2022 net gains on sales of securities of $ 550 million , 2022 gains on hedging of residential mortgage servicing rights of $ 355 million , 2022 valuation and sale income related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , of $ 107 million , 2022 gains of $ 103 million related to our blackrock ltip shares adjustment in the first quarter , and net losses on private equity and alternative investments of $ 93 million .noninterest income for 2008 included the following : 2022 net otti on debt and equity securities of $ 312 million , 2022 gains of $ 246 million related to our blackrock ltip shares adjustment , 2022 valuation and sale losses related to our commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , of $ 197 million , 2022 impairment and other losses related to private equity and alternative investments of $ 180 million , 2022 income from hilliard lyons totaling $ 164 million , including the first quarter gain of $ 114 million from the sale of this business , 2022 net gains on sales of securities of $ 106 million , and 2022 a gain of $ 95 million related to the redemption of a portion of our visa class b common shares related to visa 2019s march 2008 initial public offering .additional analysis asset management revenue increased $ 172 million to $ 858 million in 2009 , compared with $ 686 million in 2008 .this increase reflected improving equity markets , new business generation and a shift in assets into higher yielding equity investments during the second half of 2009 .assets managed totaled $ 103 billion at both december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , including the impact of national city .the asset management group section of the business segments review section of this item 7 includes further discussion of assets under management .consumer services fees totaled $ 1.290 billion in 2009 compared with $ 623 million in 2008 .service charges on deposits totaled $ 950 million for 2009 and $ 372 million for 2008 .both increases were primarily driven by the impact of the national city acquisition .reduced consumer spending .
Question: what is the sum of the values of non-interest income in 2008 and 2009?
Steps: add(7.1, 2.4)
Answer: 9.5
Question: what is that sum divided by 2?
| convfinqa2490 |
derivative instruments see quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for a discussion of derivative instruments and associated market risk .dividends to stockholders dividends of $ 0.92 per common share or $ 637 million were paid during 2007 .on january 27 , 2008 , our board of directors declared a dividend of $ 0.24 cents per share on our common stock , payable march 10 , 2008 , to stockholders of record at the close of business on february 20 , 2008 .liquidity and capital resources our main sources of liquidity and capital resources are internally generated cash flow from operations , committed credit facilities and access to both the debt and equity capital markets .our ability to access the debt capital market is supported by our investment grade credit ratings .our senior unsecured debt is currently rated investment grade by standard and poor 2019s corporation , moody 2019s investor services , inc .and fitch ratings with ratings of bbb+ , baa1 , and bbb+ .these ratings were reaffirmed in july 2007 after the western acquisition was announced .because of the alternatives available to us , including internally generated cash flow and potential asset sales , we believe that our short-term and long-term liquidity is adequate to fund operations , including our capital spending programs , stock repurchase program , repayment of debt maturities and any amounts that ultimately may be paid in connection with contingencies .we have a committed $ 3.0 billion revolving credit facility with third-party financial institutions terminating in may 2012 .at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings against this facility and we had no commercial paper outstanding under our u.s .commercial paper program that is backed by this revolving credit facility .on july 26 , 2007 , we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the securities and exchange commission , under which we , as a well-known seasoned issuer , have the ability to issue and sell an indeterminate amount of various types of debt and equity securities .our cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio ( total debt-minus-cash to total debt-plus-equity-minus-cash ) was 22 percent at december 31 , 2007 , compared to six percent at year-end 2006 as shown below .this includes $ 498 million of debt that is serviced by united states steel .( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) | 2007 | 2006
long-term debt due within one year | $ 1131 | $ 471
long-term debt | 6084 | 3061
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
cash | $ 1199 | $ 2585
trusteed funds from revenue bonds ( a ) | $ 744 | $ 2013
equity | $ 19223 | $ 14607
calculation: | |
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt minus cash | 5272 | 947
total debt | 7215 | 3532
plus equity | 19223 | 14607
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt plus equity minus cash | $ 24495 | $ 15554
cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio | 22% ( 22 % ) | 6% ( 6 % ) ( a ) following the issuance of the $ 1.0 billion of revenue bonds by the parish of st .john the baptist , the proceeds were trusteed and will be disbursed to us upon our request for reimbursement of expenditures related to the garyville refinery expansion .the trusteed funds are reflected as other noncurrent assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the amount committed to the credit facility?
| 3.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
derivative instruments see quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for a discussion of derivative instruments and associated market risk .dividends to stockholders dividends of $ 0.92 per common share or $ 637 million were paid during 2007 .on january 27 , 2008 , our board of directors declared a dividend of $ 0.24 cents per share on our common stock , payable march 10 , 2008 , to stockholders of record at the close of business on february 20 , 2008 .liquidity and capital resources our main sources of liquidity and capital resources are internally generated cash flow from operations , committed credit facilities and access to both the debt and equity capital markets .our ability to access the debt capital market is supported by our investment grade credit ratings .our senior unsecured debt is currently rated investment grade by standard and poor 2019s corporation , moody 2019s investor services , inc .and fitch ratings with ratings of bbb+ , baa1 , and bbb+ .these ratings were reaffirmed in july 2007 after the western acquisition was announced .because of the alternatives available to us , including internally generated cash flow and potential asset sales , we believe that our short-term and long-term liquidity is adequate to fund operations , including our capital spending programs , stock repurchase program , repayment of debt maturities and any amounts that ultimately may be paid in connection with contingencies .we have a committed $ 3.0 billion revolving credit facility with third-party financial institutions terminating in may 2012 .at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings against this facility and we had no commercial paper outstanding under our u.s .commercial paper program that is backed by this revolving credit facility .on july 26 , 2007 , we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the securities and exchange commission , under which we , as a well-known seasoned issuer , have the ability to issue and sell an indeterminate amount of various types of debt and equity securities .our cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio ( total debt-minus-cash to total debt-plus-equity-minus-cash ) was 22 percent at december 31 , 2007 , compared to six percent at year-end 2006 as shown below .this includes $ 498 million of debt that is serviced by united states steel .( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) | 2007 | 2006
long-term debt due within one year | $ 1131 | $ 471
long-term debt | 6084 | 3061
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
cash | $ 1199 | $ 2585
trusteed funds from revenue bonds ( a ) | $ 744 | $ 2013
equity | $ 19223 | $ 14607
calculation: | |
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt minus cash | 5272 | 947
total debt | 7215 | 3532
plus equity | 19223 | 14607
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt plus equity minus cash | $ 24495 | $ 15554
cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio | 22% ( 22 % ) | 6% ( 6 % ) ( a ) following the issuance of the $ 1.0 billion of revenue bonds by the parish of st .john the baptist , the proceeds were trusteed and will be disbursed to us upon our request for reimbursement of expenditures related to the garyville refinery expansion .the trusteed funds are reflected as other noncurrent assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the amount committed to the credit facility?
| convfinqa2491 |
derivative instruments see quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for a discussion of derivative instruments and associated market risk .dividends to stockholders dividends of $ 0.92 per common share or $ 637 million were paid during 2007 .on january 27 , 2008 , our board of directors declared a dividend of $ 0.24 cents per share on our common stock , payable march 10 , 2008 , to stockholders of record at the close of business on february 20 , 2008 .liquidity and capital resources our main sources of liquidity and capital resources are internally generated cash flow from operations , committed credit facilities and access to both the debt and equity capital markets .our ability to access the debt capital market is supported by our investment grade credit ratings .our senior unsecured debt is currently rated investment grade by standard and poor 2019s corporation , moody 2019s investor services , inc .and fitch ratings with ratings of bbb+ , baa1 , and bbb+ .these ratings were reaffirmed in july 2007 after the western acquisition was announced .because of the alternatives available to us , including internally generated cash flow and potential asset sales , we believe that our short-term and long-term liquidity is adequate to fund operations , including our capital spending programs , stock repurchase program , repayment of debt maturities and any amounts that ultimately may be paid in connection with contingencies .we have a committed $ 3.0 billion revolving credit facility with third-party financial institutions terminating in may 2012 .at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings against this facility and we had no commercial paper outstanding under our u.s .commercial paper program that is backed by this revolving credit facility .on july 26 , 2007 , we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the securities and exchange commission , under which we , as a well-known seasoned issuer , have the ability to issue and sell an indeterminate amount of various types of debt and equity securities .our cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio ( total debt-minus-cash to total debt-plus-equity-minus-cash ) was 22 percent at december 31 , 2007 , compared to six percent at year-end 2006 as shown below .this includes $ 498 million of debt that is serviced by united states steel .( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) | 2007 | 2006
long-term debt due within one year | $ 1131 | $ 471
long-term debt | 6084 | 3061
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
cash | $ 1199 | $ 2585
trusteed funds from revenue bonds ( a ) | $ 744 | $ 2013
equity | $ 19223 | $ 14607
calculation: | |
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt minus cash | 5272 | 947
total debt | 7215 | 3532
plus equity | 19223 | 14607
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt plus equity minus cash | $ 24495 | $ 15554
cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio | 22% ( 22 % ) | 6% ( 6 % ) ( a ) following the issuance of the $ 1.0 billion of revenue bonds by the parish of st .john the baptist , the proceeds were trusteed and will be disbursed to us upon our request for reimbursement of expenditures related to the garyville refinery expansion .the trusteed funds are reflected as other noncurrent assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the amount committed to the credit facility?
Steps: Ask for number 3.0
Answer: 3.0
Question: and converted to the thousands?
| 3000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
derivative instruments see quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for a discussion of derivative instruments and associated market risk .dividends to stockholders dividends of $ 0.92 per common share or $ 637 million were paid during 2007 .on january 27 , 2008 , our board of directors declared a dividend of $ 0.24 cents per share on our common stock , payable march 10 , 2008 , to stockholders of record at the close of business on february 20 , 2008 .liquidity and capital resources our main sources of liquidity and capital resources are internally generated cash flow from operations , committed credit facilities and access to both the debt and equity capital markets .our ability to access the debt capital market is supported by our investment grade credit ratings .our senior unsecured debt is currently rated investment grade by standard and poor 2019s corporation , moody 2019s investor services , inc .and fitch ratings with ratings of bbb+ , baa1 , and bbb+ .these ratings were reaffirmed in july 2007 after the western acquisition was announced .because of the alternatives available to us , including internally generated cash flow and potential asset sales , we believe that our short-term and long-term liquidity is adequate to fund operations , including our capital spending programs , stock repurchase program , repayment of debt maturities and any amounts that ultimately may be paid in connection with contingencies .we have a committed $ 3.0 billion revolving credit facility with third-party financial institutions terminating in may 2012 .at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings against this facility and we had no commercial paper outstanding under our u.s .commercial paper program that is backed by this revolving credit facility .on july 26 , 2007 , we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the securities and exchange commission , under which we , as a well-known seasoned issuer , have the ability to issue and sell an indeterminate amount of various types of debt and equity securities .our cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio ( total debt-minus-cash to total debt-plus-equity-minus-cash ) was 22 percent at december 31 , 2007 , compared to six percent at year-end 2006 as shown below .this includes $ 498 million of debt that is serviced by united states steel .( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) | 2007 | 2006
long-term debt due within one year | $ 1131 | $ 471
long-term debt | 6084 | 3061
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
cash | $ 1199 | $ 2585
trusteed funds from revenue bonds ( a ) | $ 744 | $ 2013
equity | $ 19223 | $ 14607
calculation: | |
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt minus cash | 5272 | 947
total debt | 7215 | 3532
plus equity | 19223 | 14607
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt plus equity minus cash | $ 24495 | $ 15554
cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio | 22% ( 22 % ) | 6% ( 6 % ) ( a ) following the issuance of the $ 1.0 billion of revenue bonds by the parish of st .john the baptist , the proceeds were trusteed and will be disbursed to us upon our request for reimbursement of expenditures related to the garyville refinery expansion .the trusteed funds are reflected as other noncurrent assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the amount committed to the credit facility?
Steps: Ask for number 3.0
Answer: 3.0
Question: and converted to the thousands?
| convfinqa2492 |
derivative instruments see quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for a discussion of derivative instruments and associated market risk .dividends to stockholders dividends of $ 0.92 per common share or $ 637 million were paid during 2007 .on january 27 , 2008 , our board of directors declared a dividend of $ 0.24 cents per share on our common stock , payable march 10 , 2008 , to stockholders of record at the close of business on february 20 , 2008 .liquidity and capital resources our main sources of liquidity and capital resources are internally generated cash flow from operations , committed credit facilities and access to both the debt and equity capital markets .our ability to access the debt capital market is supported by our investment grade credit ratings .our senior unsecured debt is currently rated investment grade by standard and poor 2019s corporation , moody 2019s investor services , inc .and fitch ratings with ratings of bbb+ , baa1 , and bbb+ .these ratings were reaffirmed in july 2007 after the western acquisition was announced .because of the alternatives available to us , including internally generated cash flow and potential asset sales , we believe that our short-term and long-term liquidity is adequate to fund operations , including our capital spending programs , stock repurchase program , repayment of debt maturities and any amounts that ultimately may be paid in connection with contingencies .we have a committed $ 3.0 billion revolving credit facility with third-party financial institutions terminating in may 2012 .at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings against this facility and we had no commercial paper outstanding under our u.s .commercial paper program that is backed by this revolving credit facility .on july 26 , 2007 , we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the securities and exchange commission , under which we , as a well-known seasoned issuer , have the ability to issue and sell an indeterminate amount of various types of debt and equity securities .our cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio ( total debt-minus-cash to total debt-plus-equity-minus-cash ) was 22 percent at december 31 , 2007 , compared to six percent at year-end 2006 as shown below .this includes $ 498 million of debt that is serviced by united states steel .( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) | 2007 | 2006
long-term debt due within one year | $ 1131 | $ 471
long-term debt | 6084 | 3061
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
cash | $ 1199 | $ 2585
trusteed funds from revenue bonds ( a ) | $ 744 | $ 2013
equity | $ 19223 | $ 14607
calculation: | |
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt minus cash | 5272 | 947
total debt | 7215 | 3532
plus equity | 19223 | 14607
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt plus equity minus cash | $ 24495 | $ 15554
cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio | 22% ( 22 % ) | 6% ( 6 % ) ( a ) following the issuance of the $ 1.0 billion of revenue bonds by the parish of st .john the baptist , the proceeds were trusteed and will be disbursed to us upon our request for reimbursement of expenditures related to the garyville refinery expansion .the trusteed funds are reflected as other noncurrent assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the amount committed to the credit facility?
Steps: Ask for number 3.0
Answer: 3.0
Question: and converted to the thousands?
Steps: multiply(3.0, const_1000)
Answer: 3000.0
Question: and how much was the total debt in 2007?
| 7215.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
derivative instruments see quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for a discussion of derivative instruments and associated market risk .dividends to stockholders dividends of $ 0.92 per common share or $ 637 million were paid during 2007 .on january 27 , 2008 , our board of directors declared a dividend of $ 0.24 cents per share on our common stock , payable march 10 , 2008 , to stockholders of record at the close of business on february 20 , 2008 .liquidity and capital resources our main sources of liquidity and capital resources are internally generated cash flow from operations , committed credit facilities and access to both the debt and equity capital markets .our ability to access the debt capital market is supported by our investment grade credit ratings .our senior unsecured debt is currently rated investment grade by standard and poor 2019s corporation , moody 2019s investor services , inc .and fitch ratings with ratings of bbb+ , baa1 , and bbb+ .these ratings were reaffirmed in july 2007 after the western acquisition was announced .because of the alternatives available to us , including internally generated cash flow and potential asset sales , we believe that our short-term and long-term liquidity is adequate to fund operations , including our capital spending programs , stock repurchase program , repayment of debt maturities and any amounts that ultimately may be paid in connection with contingencies .we have a committed $ 3.0 billion revolving credit facility with third-party financial institutions terminating in may 2012 .at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings against this facility and we had no commercial paper outstanding under our u.s .commercial paper program that is backed by this revolving credit facility .on july 26 , 2007 , we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the securities and exchange commission , under which we , as a well-known seasoned issuer , have the ability to issue and sell an indeterminate amount of various types of debt and equity securities .our cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio ( total debt-minus-cash to total debt-plus-equity-minus-cash ) was 22 percent at december 31 , 2007 , compared to six percent at year-end 2006 as shown below .this includes $ 498 million of debt that is serviced by united states steel .( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) | 2007 | 2006
long-term debt due within one year | $ 1131 | $ 471
long-term debt | 6084 | 3061
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
cash | $ 1199 | $ 2585
trusteed funds from revenue bonds ( a ) | $ 744 | $ 2013
equity | $ 19223 | $ 14607
calculation: | |
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt minus cash | 5272 | 947
total debt | 7215 | 3532
plus equity | 19223 | 14607
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt plus equity minus cash | $ 24495 | $ 15554
cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio | 22% ( 22 % ) | 6% ( 6 % ) ( a ) following the issuance of the $ 1.0 billion of revenue bonds by the parish of st .john the baptist , the proceeds were trusteed and will be disbursed to us upon our request for reimbursement of expenditures related to the garyville refinery expansion .the trusteed funds are reflected as other noncurrent assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the amount committed to the credit facility?
Steps: Ask for number 3.0
Answer: 3.0
Question: and converted to the thousands?
Steps: multiply(3.0, const_1000)
Answer: 3000.0
Question: and how much was the total debt in 2007?
| convfinqa2493 |
derivative instruments see quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for a discussion of derivative instruments and associated market risk .dividends to stockholders dividends of $ 0.92 per common share or $ 637 million were paid during 2007 .on january 27 , 2008 , our board of directors declared a dividend of $ 0.24 cents per share on our common stock , payable march 10 , 2008 , to stockholders of record at the close of business on february 20 , 2008 .liquidity and capital resources our main sources of liquidity and capital resources are internally generated cash flow from operations , committed credit facilities and access to both the debt and equity capital markets .our ability to access the debt capital market is supported by our investment grade credit ratings .our senior unsecured debt is currently rated investment grade by standard and poor 2019s corporation , moody 2019s investor services , inc .and fitch ratings with ratings of bbb+ , baa1 , and bbb+ .these ratings were reaffirmed in july 2007 after the western acquisition was announced .because of the alternatives available to us , including internally generated cash flow and potential asset sales , we believe that our short-term and long-term liquidity is adequate to fund operations , including our capital spending programs , stock repurchase program , repayment of debt maturities and any amounts that ultimately may be paid in connection with contingencies .we have a committed $ 3.0 billion revolving credit facility with third-party financial institutions terminating in may 2012 .at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings against this facility and we had no commercial paper outstanding under our u.s .commercial paper program that is backed by this revolving credit facility .on july 26 , 2007 , we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the securities and exchange commission , under which we , as a well-known seasoned issuer , have the ability to issue and sell an indeterminate amount of various types of debt and equity securities .our cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio ( total debt-minus-cash to total debt-plus-equity-minus-cash ) was 22 percent at december 31 , 2007 , compared to six percent at year-end 2006 as shown below .this includes $ 498 million of debt that is serviced by united states steel .( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) | 2007 | 2006
long-term debt due within one year | $ 1131 | $ 471
long-term debt | 6084 | 3061
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
cash | $ 1199 | $ 2585
trusteed funds from revenue bonds ( a ) | $ 744 | $ 2013
equity | $ 19223 | $ 14607
calculation: | |
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt minus cash | 5272 | 947
total debt | 7215 | 3532
plus equity | 19223 | 14607
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt plus equity minus cash | $ 24495 | $ 15554
cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio | 22% ( 22 % ) | 6% ( 6 % ) ( a ) following the issuance of the $ 1.0 billion of revenue bonds by the parish of st .john the baptist , the proceeds were trusteed and will be disbursed to us upon our request for reimbursement of expenditures related to the garyville refinery expansion .the trusteed funds are reflected as other noncurrent assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the amount committed to the credit facility?
Steps: Ask for number 3.0
Answer: 3.0
Question: and converted to the thousands?
Steps: multiply(3.0, const_1000)
Answer: 3000.0
Question: and how much was the total debt in 2007?
Steps: Ask for number 7215
Answer: 7215.0
Question: and combined with the amount committed to the credit facility?
| 10215.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
derivative instruments see quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for a discussion of derivative instruments and associated market risk .dividends to stockholders dividends of $ 0.92 per common share or $ 637 million were paid during 2007 .on january 27 , 2008 , our board of directors declared a dividend of $ 0.24 cents per share on our common stock , payable march 10 , 2008 , to stockholders of record at the close of business on february 20 , 2008 .liquidity and capital resources our main sources of liquidity and capital resources are internally generated cash flow from operations , committed credit facilities and access to both the debt and equity capital markets .our ability to access the debt capital market is supported by our investment grade credit ratings .our senior unsecured debt is currently rated investment grade by standard and poor 2019s corporation , moody 2019s investor services , inc .and fitch ratings with ratings of bbb+ , baa1 , and bbb+ .these ratings were reaffirmed in july 2007 after the western acquisition was announced .because of the alternatives available to us , including internally generated cash flow and potential asset sales , we believe that our short-term and long-term liquidity is adequate to fund operations , including our capital spending programs , stock repurchase program , repayment of debt maturities and any amounts that ultimately may be paid in connection with contingencies .we have a committed $ 3.0 billion revolving credit facility with third-party financial institutions terminating in may 2012 .at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings against this facility and we had no commercial paper outstanding under our u.s .commercial paper program that is backed by this revolving credit facility .on july 26 , 2007 , we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the securities and exchange commission , under which we , as a well-known seasoned issuer , have the ability to issue and sell an indeterminate amount of various types of debt and equity securities .our cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio ( total debt-minus-cash to total debt-plus-equity-minus-cash ) was 22 percent at december 31 , 2007 , compared to six percent at year-end 2006 as shown below .this includes $ 498 million of debt that is serviced by united states steel .( dollars in millions ) 2007 2006 . ( dollars in millions ) | 2007 | 2006
long-term debt due within one year | $ 1131 | $ 471
long-term debt | 6084 | 3061
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
cash | $ 1199 | $ 2585
trusteed funds from revenue bonds ( a ) | $ 744 | $ 2013
equity | $ 19223 | $ 14607
calculation: | |
total debt | $ 7215 | $ 3532
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt minus cash | 5272 | 947
total debt | 7215 | 3532
plus equity | 19223 | 14607
minus cash | 1199 | 2585
minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds | 744 | 2013
total debt plus equity minus cash | $ 24495 | $ 15554
cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio | 22% ( 22 % ) | 6% ( 6 % ) ( a ) following the issuance of the $ 1.0 billion of revenue bonds by the parish of st .john the baptist , the proceeds were trusteed and will be disbursed to us upon our request for reimbursement of expenditures related to the garyville refinery expansion .the trusteed funds are reflected as other noncurrent assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the amount committed to the credit facility?
Steps: Ask for number 3.0
Answer: 3.0
Question: and converted to the thousands?
Steps: multiply(3.0, const_1000)
Answer: 3000.0
Question: and how much was the total debt in 2007?
Steps: Ask for number 7215
Answer: 7215.0
Question: and combined with the amount committed to the credit facility?
| convfinqa2494 |
augusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business .consumer packaging . in millions | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
sales | $ 2940 | $ 3403 | $ 3435
operating profit ( loss ) | -25 ( 25 ) | 178 | 161 north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2014 and $ 2.0 billion in 2013 .operating profits were $ 81 million ( $ 91 million excluding the cost associated with the planned conversion of our riegelwood mill to 100% ( 100 % ) pulp production , net of proceeds from the sale of the carolina coated bristols brand , and sheet plant closure costs ) in 2015 compared with $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 and $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 .coated paperboard sales volumes in 2015 were lower than in 2014 reflecting weaker market demand .the business took about 77000 tons of market-related downtime in 2015 compared with about 41000 tons in 2014 .average sales price realizations increased modestly year over year as competitive pressures in the current year only partially offset the impact of sales price increases implemented in 2014 .input costs decreased for energy and chemicals , but wood costs increased .planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 10 million lower in 2015 .operating costs were higher , mainly due to inflation and overhead costs .foodservice sales volumes increased in 2015 compared with 2014 reflecting strong market demand .average sales margins increased due to lower resin costs and a more favorable mix .operating costs and distribution costs were both higher .looking ahead to the first quarter of 2016 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to be slightly lower than in the fourth quarter of 2015 due to our exit from the coated bristols market .average sales price realizations are expected to be flat , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix .input costs are expected to be higher for wood , chemicals and energy .planned maintenance downtime costs should be $ 4 million higher with a planned maintenance outage scheduled at our augusta mill in the first quarter .foodservice sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower .average sales margins are expected to improve due to a more favorable mix .operating costs are expected to decrease .european consumer packaging net sales in 2015 were $ 319 million compared with $ 365 million in 2014 and $ 380 million in 2013 .operating profits in 2015 were $ 87 million compared with $ 91 million in 2014 and $ 100 million in 2013 .sales volumes in 2015 compared with 2014 increased in europe , but decreased in russia .average sales margins improved in russia due to slightly higher average sales price realizations and a more favorable mix .in europe average sales margins decreased reflecting lower average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix .input costs were lower in europe , primarily for wood and energy , but were higher in russia , primarily for wood .looking forward to the first quarter of 2016 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be stable .average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly higher in both russia and europe .input costs are expected to be flat , while operating costs are expected to increase .asian consumer packaging the company sold its 55% ( 55 % ) equity share in the ip-sun jv in october 2015 .net sales and operating profits presented below include results through september 30 , 2015 .net sales were $ 682 million in 2015 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 .operating profits in 2015 were a loss of $ 193 million ( a loss of $ 19 million excluding goodwill and other asset impairment costs ) compared with losses of $ 5 million in 2014 and $ 2 million in 2013 .sales volumes and average sales price realizations were lower in 2015 due to over-supplied market conditions and competitive pressures .average sales margins were also negatively impacted by a less favorable mix .input costs and freight costs were lower and operating costs also decreased .on october 13 , 2015 , the company finalized the sale of its 55% ( 55 % ) interest in ip asia coated paperboard ( ip- sun jv ) business , within the company's consumer packaging segment , to its chinese coated board joint venture partner , shandong sun holding group co. , ltd .for rmb 149 million ( approximately usd $ 23 million ) .during the third quarter of 2015 , a determination was made that the current book value of the asset group exceeded its estimated fair value of $ 23 million , which was the agreed upon selling price .the 2015 loss includes the net pre-tax impairment charge of $ 174 million ( $ 113 million after taxes ) .a pre-tax charge of $ 186 million was recorded during the third quarter in the company's consumer packaging segment to write down the long-lived assets of this business to their estimated fair value .in the fourth quarter of 2015 , upon the sale and corresponding deconsolidation of ip-sun jv from the company's consolidated balance sheet , final adjustments were made resulting in a reduction of the impairment of $ 12 million .the amount of pre-tax losses related to noncontrolling interest of the ip-sun jv included in the company's consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 19 million , $ 12 million and $ 8 million , respectively .the amount of pre-tax losses related to the ip-sun jv included in the company's .
Question: in 2015, what was the amount of the north american consumer packaging net sales, in millions?
| 1900.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
augusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business .consumer packaging . in millions | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
sales | $ 2940 | $ 3403 | $ 3435
operating profit ( loss ) | -25 ( 25 ) | 178 | 161 north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2014 and $ 2.0 billion in 2013 .operating profits were $ 81 million ( $ 91 million excluding the cost associated with the planned conversion of our riegelwood mill to 100% ( 100 % ) pulp production , net of proceeds from the sale of the carolina coated bristols brand , and sheet plant closure costs ) in 2015 compared with $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 and $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 .coated paperboard sales volumes in 2015 were lower than in 2014 reflecting weaker market demand .the business took about 77000 tons of market-related downtime in 2015 compared with about 41000 tons in 2014 .average sales price realizations increased modestly year over year as competitive pressures in the current year only partially offset the impact of sales price increases implemented in 2014 .input costs decreased for energy and chemicals , but wood costs increased .planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 10 million lower in 2015 .operating costs were higher , mainly due to inflation and overhead costs .foodservice sales volumes increased in 2015 compared with 2014 reflecting strong market demand .average sales margins increased due to lower resin costs and a more favorable mix .operating costs and distribution costs were both higher .looking ahead to the first quarter of 2016 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to be slightly lower than in the fourth quarter of 2015 due to our exit from the coated bristols market .average sales price realizations are expected to be flat , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix .input costs are expected to be higher for wood , chemicals and energy .planned maintenance downtime costs should be $ 4 million higher with a planned maintenance outage scheduled at our augusta mill in the first quarter .foodservice sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower .average sales margins are expected to improve due to a more favorable mix .operating costs are expected to decrease .european consumer packaging net sales in 2015 were $ 319 million compared with $ 365 million in 2014 and $ 380 million in 2013 .operating profits in 2015 were $ 87 million compared with $ 91 million in 2014 and $ 100 million in 2013 .sales volumes in 2015 compared with 2014 increased in europe , but decreased in russia .average sales margins improved in russia due to slightly higher average sales price realizations and a more favorable mix .in europe average sales margins decreased reflecting lower average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix .input costs were lower in europe , primarily for wood and energy , but were higher in russia , primarily for wood .looking forward to the first quarter of 2016 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be stable .average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly higher in both russia and europe .input costs are expected to be flat , while operating costs are expected to increase .asian consumer packaging the company sold its 55% ( 55 % ) equity share in the ip-sun jv in october 2015 .net sales and operating profits presented below include results through september 30 , 2015 .net sales were $ 682 million in 2015 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 .operating profits in 2015 were a loss of $ 193 million ( a loss of $ 19 million excluding goodwill and other asset impairment costs ) compared with losses of $ 5 million in 2014 and $ 2 million in 2013 .sales volumes and average sales price realizations were lower in 2015 due to over-supplied market conditions and competitive pressures .average sales margins were also negatively impacted by a less favorable mix .input costs and freight costs were lower and operating costs also decreased .on october 13 , 2015 , the company finalized the sale of its 55% ( 55 % ) interest in ip asia coated paperboard ( ip- sun jv ) business , within the company's consumer packaging segment , to its chinese coated board joint venture partner , shandong sun holding group co. , ltd .for rmb 149 million ( approximately usd $ 23 million ) .during the third quarter of 2015 , a determination was made that the current book value of the asset group exceeded its estimated fair value of $ 23 million , which was the agreed upon selling price .the 2015 loss includes the net pre-tax impairment charge of $ 174 million ( $ 113 million after taxes ) .a pre-tax charge of $ 186 million was recorded during the third quarter in the company's consumer packaging segment to write down the long-lived assets of this business to their estimated fair value .in the fourth quarter of 2015 , upon the sale and corresponding deconsolidation of ip-sun jv from the company's consolidated balance sheet , final adjustments were made resulting in a reduction of the impairment of $ 12 million .the amount of pre-tax losses related to noncontrolling interest of the ip-sun jv included in the company's consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 19 million , $ 12 million and $ 8 million , respectively .the amount of pre-tax losses related to the ip-sun jv included in the company's .
Question: in 2015, what was the amount of the north american consumer packaging net sales, in millions?
| convfinqa2495 |
augusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business .consumer packaging . in millions | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
sales | $ 2940 | $ 3403 | $ 3435
operating profit ( loss ) | -25 ( 25 ) | 178 | 161 north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2014 and $ 2.0 billion in 2013 .operating profits were $ 81 million ( $ 91 million excluding the cost associated with the planned conversion of our riegelwood mill to 100% ( 100 % ) pulp production , net of proceeds from the sale of the carolina coated bristols brand , and sheet plant closure costs ) in 2015 compared with $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 and $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 .coated paperboard sales volumes in 2015 were lower than in 2014 reflecting weaker market demand .the business took about 77000 tons of market-related downtime in 2015 compared with about 41000 tons in 2014 .average sales price realizations increased modestly year over year as competitive pressures in the current year only partially offset the impact of sales price increases implemented in 2014 .input costs decreased for energy and chemicals , but wood costs increased .planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 10 million lower in 2015 .operating costs were higher , mainly due to inflation and overhead costs .foodservice sales volumes increased in 2015 compared with 2014 reflecting strong market demand .average sales margins increased due to lower resin costs and a more favorable mix .operating costs and distribution costs were both higher .looking ahead to the first quarter of 2016 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to be slightly lower than in the fourth quarter of 2015 due to our exit from the coated bristols market .average sales price realizations are expected to be flat , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix .input costs are expected to be higher for wood , chemicals and energy .planned maintenance downtime costs should be $ 4 million higher with a planned maintenance outage scheduled at our augusta mill in the first quarter .foodservice sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower .average sales margins are expected to improve due to a more favorable mix .operating costs are expected to decrease .european consumer packaging net sales in 2015 were $ 319 million compared with $ 365 million in 2014 and $ 380 million in 2013 .operating profits in 2015 were $ 87 million compared with $ 91 million in 2014 and $ 100 million in 2013 .sales volumes in 2015 compared with 2014 increased in europe , but decreased in russia .average sales margins improved in russia due to slightly higher average sales price realizations and a more favorable mix .in europe average sales margins decreased reflecting lower average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix .input costs were lower in europe , primarily for wood and energy , but were higher in russia , primarily for wood .looking forward to the first quarter of 2016 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be stable .average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly higher in both russia and europe .input costs are expected to be flat , while operating costs are expected to increase .asian consumer packaging the company sold its 55% ( 55 % ) equity share in the ip-sun jv in october 2015 .net sales and operating profits presented below include results through september 30 , 2015 .net sales were $ 682 million in 2015 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 .operating profits in 2015 were a loss of $ 193 million ( a loss of $ 19 million excluding goodwill and other asset impairment costs ) compared with losses of $ 5 million in 2014 and $ 2 million in 2013 .sales volumes and average sales price realizations were lower in 2015 due to over-supplied market conditions and competitive pressures .average sales margins were also negatively impacted by a less favorable mix .input costs and freight costs were lower and operating costs also decreased .on october 13 , 2015 , the company finalized the sale of its 55% ( 55 % ) interest in ip asia coated paperboard ( ip- sun jv ) business , within the company's consumer packaging segment , to its chinese coated board joint venture partner , shandong sun holding group co. , ltd .for rmb 149 million ( approximately usd $ 23 million ) .during the third quarter of 2015 , a determination was made that the current book value of the asset group exceeded its estimated fair value of $ 23 million , which was the agreed upon selling price .the 2015 loss includes the net pre-tax impairment charge of $ 174 million ( $ 113 million after taxes ) .a pre-tax charge of $ 186 million was recorded during the third quarter in the company's consumer packaging segment to write down the long-lived assets of this business to their estimated fair value .in the fourth quarter of 2015 , upon the sale and corresponding deconsolidation of ip-sun jv from the company's consolidated balance sheet , final adjustments were made resulting in a reduction of the impairment of $ 12 million .the amount of pre-tax losses related to noncontrolling interest of the ip-sun jv included in the company's consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 19 million , $ 12 million and $ 8 million , respectively .the amount of pre-tax losses related to the ip-sun jv included in the company's .
Question: in 2015, what was the amount of the north american consumer packaging net sales, in millions?
Steps: multiply(1.9, const_1000)
Answer: 1900.0
Question: and what percentage did this amount represent in relation to the total of those consumer packaging sales for that year?
| 0.64626 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
augusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business .consumer packaging . in millions | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
sales | $ 2940 | $ 3403 | $ 3435
operating profit ( loss ) | -25 ( 25 ) | 178 | 161 north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2014 and $ 2.0 billion in 2013 .operating profits were $ 81 million ( $ 91 million excluding the cost associated with the planned conversion of our riegelwood mill to 100% ( 100 % ) pulp production , net of proceeds from the sale of the carolina coated bristols brand , and sheet plant closure costs ) in 2015 compared with $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 and $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 .coated paperboard sales volumes in 2015 were lower than in 2014 reflecting weaker market demand .the business took about 77000 tons of market-related downtime in 2015 compared with about 41000 tons in 2014 .average sales price realizations increased modestly year over year as competitive pressures in the current year only partially offset the impact of sales price increases implemented in 2014 .input costs decreased for energy and chemicals , but wood costs increased .planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 10 million lower in 2015 .operating costs were higher , mainly due to inflation and overhead costs .foodservice sales volumes increased in 2015 compared with 2014 reflecting strong market demand .average sales margins increased due to lower resin costs and a more favorable mix .operating costs and distribution costs were both higher .looking ahead to the first quarter of 2016 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to be slightly lower than in the fourth quarter of 2015 due to our exit from the coated bristols market .average sales price realizations are expected to be flat , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix .input costs are expected to be higher for wood , chemicals and energy .planned maintenance downtime costs should be $ 4 million higher with a planned maintenance outage scheduled at our augusta mill in the first quarter .foodservice sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower .average sales margins are expected to improve due to a more favorable mix .operating costs are expected to decrease .european consumer packaging net sales in 2015 were $ 319 million compared with $ 365 million in 2014 and $ 380 million in 2013 .operating profits in 2015 were $ 87 million compared with $ 91 million in 2014 and $ 100 million in 2013 .sales volumes in 2015 compared with 2014 increased in europe , but decreased in russia .average sales margins improved in russia due to slightly higher average sales price realizations and a more favorable mix .in europe average sales margins decreased reflecting lower average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix .input costs were lower in europe , primarily for wood and energy , but were higher in russia , primarily for wood .looking forward to the first quarter of 2016 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be stable .average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly higher in both russia and europe .input costs are expected to be flat , while operating costs are expected to increase .asian consumer packaging the company sold its 55% ( 55 % ) equity share in the ip-sun jv in october 2015 .net sales and operating profits presented below include results through september 30 , 2015 .net sales were $ 682 million in 2015 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 .operating profits in 2015 were a loss of $ 193 million ( a loss of $ 19 million excluding goodwill and other asset impairment costs ) compared with losses of $ 5 million in 2014 and $ 2 million in 2013 .sales volumes and average sales price realizations were lower in 2015 due to over-supplied market conditions and competitive pressures .average sales margins were also negatively impacted by a less favorable mix .input costs and freight costs were lower and operating costs also decreased .on october 13 , 2015 , the company finalized the sale of its 55% ( 55 % ) interest in ip asia coated paperboard ( ip- sun jv ) business , within the company's consumer packaging segment , to its chinese coated board joint venture partner , shandong sun holding group co. , ltd .for rmb 149 million ( approximately usd $ 23 million ) .during the third quarter of 2015 , a determination was made that the current book value of the asset group exceeded its estimated fair value of $ 23 million , which was the agreed upon selling price .the 2015 loss includes the net pre-tax impairment charge of $ 174 million ( $ 113 million after taxes ) .a pre-tax charge of $ 186 million was recorded during the third quarter in the company's consumer packaging segment to write down the long-lived assets of this business to their estimated fair value .in the fourth quarter of 2015 , upon the sale and corresponding deconsolidation of ip-sun jv from the company's consolidated balance sheet , final adjustments were made resulting in a reduction of the impairment of $ 12 million .the amount of pre-tax losses related to noncontrolling interest of the ip-sun jv included in the company's consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 19 million , $ 12 million and $ 8 million , respectively .the amount of pre-tax losses related to the ip-sun jv included in the company's .
Question: in 2015, what was the amount of the north american consumer packaging net sales, in millions?
Steps: multiply(1.9, const_1000)
Answer: 1900.0
Question: and what percentage did this amount represent in relation to the total of those consumer packaging sales for that year?
| convfinqa2496 |
augusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business .consumer packaging . in millions | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
sales | $ 2940 | $ 3403 | $ 3435
operating profit ( loss ) | -25 ( 25 ) | 178 | 161 north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2014 and $ 2.0 billion in 2013 .operating profits were $ 81 million ( $ 91 million excluding the cost associated with the planned conversion of our riegelwood mill to 100% ( 100 % ) pulp production , net of proceeds from the sale of the carolina coated bristols brand , and sheet plant closure costs ) in 2015 compared with $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 and $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 .coated paperboard sales volumes in 2015 were lower than in 2014 reflecting weaker market demand .the business took about 77000 tons of market-related downtime in 2015 compared with about 41000 tons in 2014 .average sales price realizations increased modestly year over year as competitive pressures in the current year only partially offset the impact of sales price increases implemented in 2014 .input costs decreased for energy and chemicals , but wood costs increased .planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 10 million lower in 2015 .operating costs were higher , mainly due to inflation and overhead costs .foodservice sales volumes increased in 2015 compared with 2014 reflecting strong market demand .average sales margins increased due to lower resin costs and a more favorable mix .operating costs and distribution costs were both higher .looking ahead to the first quarter of 2016 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to be slightly lower than in the fourth quarter of 2015 due to our exit from the coated bristols market .average sales price realizations are expected to be flat , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix .input costs are expected to be higher for wood , chemicals and energy .planned maintenance downtime costs should be $ 4 million higher with a planned maintenance outage scheduled at our augusta mill in the first quarter .foodservice sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower .average sales margins are expected to improve due to a more favorable mix .operating costs are expected to decrease .european consumer packaging net sales in 2015 were $ 319 million compared with $ 365 million in 2014 and $ 380 million in 2013 .operating profits in 2015 were $ 87 million compared with $ 91 million in 2014 and $ 100 million in 2013 .sales volumes in 2015 compared with 2014 increased in europe , but decreased in russia .average sales margins improved in russia due to slightly higher average sales price realizations and a more favorable mix .in europe average sales margins decreased reflecting lower average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix .input costs were lower in europe , primarily for wood and energy , but were higher in russia , primarily for wood .looking forward to the first quarter of 2016 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be stable .average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly higher in both russia and europe .input costs are expected to be flat , while operating costs are expected to increase .asian consumer packaging the company sold its 55% ( 55 % ) equity share in the ip-sun jv in october 2015 .net sales and operating profits presented below include results through september 30 , 2015 .net sales were $ 682 million in 2015 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 .operating profits in 2015 were a loss of $ 193 million ( a loss of $ 19 million excluding goodwill and other asset impairment costs ) compared with losses of $ 5 million in 2014 and $ 2 million in 2013 .sales volumes and average sales price realizations were lower in 2015 due to over-supplied market conditions and competitive pressures .average sales margins were also negatively impacted by a less favorable mix .input costs and freight costs were lower and operating costs also decreased .on october 13 , 2015 , the company finalized the sale of its 55% ( 55 % ) interest in ip asia coated paperboard ( ip- sun jv ) business , within the company's consumer packaging segment , to its chinese coated board joint venture partner , shandong sun holding group co. , ltd .for rmb 149 million ( approximately usd $ 23 million ) .during the third quarter of 2015 , a determination was made that the current book value of the asset group exceeded its estimated fair value of $ 23 million , which was the agreed upon selling price .the 2015 loss includes the net pre-tax impairment charge of $ 174 million ( $ 113 million after taxes ) .a pre-tax charge of $ 186 million was recorded during the third quarter in the company's consumer packaging segment to write down the long-lived assets of this business to their estimated fair value .in the fourth quarter of 2015 , upon the sale and corresponding deconsolidation of ip-sun jv from the company's consolidated balance sheet , final adjustments were made resulting in a reduction of the impairment of $ 12 million .the amount of pre-tax losses related to noncontrolling interest of the ip-sun jv included in the company's consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 19 million , $ 12 million and $ 8 million , respectively .the amount of pre-tax losses related to the ip-sun jv included in the company's .
Question: in 2015, what was the amount of the north american consumer packaging net sales, in millions?
Steps: multiply(1.9, const_1000)
Answer: 1900.0
Question: and what percentage did this amount represent in relation to the total of those consumer packaging sales for that year?
Steps: divide(#0, 2940)
Answer: 0.64626
Question: and what was this percentage representation in the year before, in 2014, concerning the same categories?
| 0.58772 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
augusta , georgia mill and $ 2 million of costs associated with the sale of the shorewood business .consumer packaging . in millions | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
sales | $ 2940 | $ 3403 | $ 3435
operating profit ( loss ) | -25 ( 25 ) | 178 | 161 north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 1.9 billion in 2015 compared with $ 2.0 billion in 2014 and $ 2.0 billion in 2013 .operating profits were $ 81 million ( $ 91 million excluding the cost associated with the planned conversion of our riegelwood mill to 100% ( 100 % ) pulp production , net of proceeds from the sale of the carolina coated bristols brand , and sheet plant closure costs ) in 2015 compared with $ 92 million ( $ 100 million excluding sheet plant closure costs ) in 2014 and $ 63 million ( $ 110 million excluding paper machine shutdown costs and costs related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2013 .coated paperboard sales volumes in 2015 were lower than in 2014 reflecting weaker market demand .the business took about 77000 tons of market-related downtime in 2015 compared with about 41000 tons in 2014 .average sales price realizations increased modestly year over year as competitive pressures in the current year only partially offset the impact of sales price increases implemented in 2014 .input costs decreased for energy and chemicals , but wood costs increased .planned maintenance downtime costs were $ 10 million lower in 2015 .operating costs were higher , mainly due to inflation and overhead costs .foodservice sales volumes increased in 2015 compared with 2014 reflecting strong market demand .average sales margins increased due to lower resin costs and a more favorable mix .operating costs and distribution costs were both higher .looking ahead to the first quarter of 2016 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to be slightly lower than in the fourth quarter of 2015 due to our exit from the coated bristols market .average sales price realizations are expected to be flat , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix .input costs are expected to be higher for wood , chemicals and energy .planned maintenance downtime costs should be $ 4 million higher with a planned maintenance outage scheduled at our augusta mill in the first quarter .foodservice sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower .average sales margins are expected to improve due to a more favorable mix .operating costs are expected to decrease .european consumer packaging net sales in 2015 were $ 319 million compared with $ 365 million in 2014 and $ 380 million in 2013 .operating profits in 2015 were $ 87 million compared with $ 91 million in 2014 and $ 100 million in 2013 .sales volumes in 2015 compared with 2014 increased in europe , but decreased in russia .average sales margins improved in russia due to slightly higher average sales price realizations and a more favorable mix .in europe average sales margins decreased reflecting lower average sales price realizations and an unfavorable mix .input costs were lower in europe , primarily for wood and energy , but were higher in russia , primarily for wood .looking forward to the first quarter of 2016 , compared with the fourth quarter of 2015 , sales volumes are expected to be stable .average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly higher in both russia and europe .input costs are expected to be flat , while operating costs are expected to increase .asian consumer packaging the company sold its 55% ( 55 % ) equity share in the ip-sun jv in october 2015 .net sales and operating profits presented below include results through september 30 , 2015 .net sales were $ 682 million in 2015 compared with $ 1.0 billion in 2014 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 .operating profits in 2015 were a loss of $ 193 million ( a loss of $ 19 million excluding goodwill and other asset impairment costs ) compared with losses of $ 5 million in 2014 and $ 2 million in 2013 .sales volumes and average sales price realizations were lower in 2015 due to over-supplied market conditions and competitive pressures .average sales margins were also negatively impacted by a less favorable mix .input costs and freight costs were lower and operating costs also decreased .on october 13 , 2015 , the company finalized the sale of its 55% ( 55 % ) interest in ip asia coated paperboard ( ip- sun jv ) business , within the company's consumer packaging segment , to its chinese coated board joint venture partner , shandong sun holding group co. , ltd .for rmb 149 million ( approximately usd $ 23 million ) .during the third quarter of 2015 , a determination was made that the current book value of the asset group exceeded its estimated fair value of $ 23 million , which was the agreed upon selling price .the 2015 loss includes the net pre-tax impairment charge of $ 174 million ( $ 113 million after taxes ) .a pre-tax charge of $ 186 million was recorded during the third quarter in the company's consumer packaging segment to write down the long-lived assets of this business to their estimated fair value .in the fourth quarter of 2015 , upon the sale and corresponding deconsolidation of ip-sun jv from the company's consolidated balance sheet , final adjustments were made resulting in a reduction of the impairment of $ 12 million .the amount of pre-tax losses related to noncontrolling interest of the ip-sun jv included in the company's consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 19 million , $ 12 million and $ 8 million , respectively .the amount of pre-tax losses related to the ip-sun jv included in the company's .
Question: in 2015, what was the amount of the north american consumer packaging net sales, in millions?
Steps: multiply(1.9, const_1000)
Answer: 1900.0
Question: and what percentage did this amount represent in relation to the total of those consumer packaging sales for that year?
Steps: divide(#0, 2940)
Answer: 0.64626
Question: and what was this percentage representation in the year before, in 2014, concerning the same categories?
| convfinqa2497 |
notes to consolidated financial statements fifth third bancorp 81 vii held by the trust vii bear a fixed rate of interest of 8.875% ( 8.875 % ) until may 15 , 2058 .thereafter , the notes pay a floating rate at three-month libor plus 500 bp .the bancorp entered into an interest rate swap to convert $ 275 million of the fixed-rate debt into floating .at december 31 , 2008 , the rate paid on the swap was 6.05% ( 6.05 % ) .the jsn vii may be redeemed at the option of the bancorp on or after may 15 , 2013 , or in certain other limited circumstances , at a redemption price of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount plus accrued but unpaid interest .all redemptions are subject to certain conditions and generally require approval by the federal reserve board .subsidiary long-term borrowings the senior fixed-rate bank notes due from 2009 to 2019 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank .the maturities of the face value of the senior fixed-rate bank notes are as follows : $ 36 million in 2009 , $ 800 million in 2010 and $ 275 million in 2019 .the bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert $ 1.1 billion of the fixed-rate debt into floating rates .at december 31 , 2008 , the rates paid on these swaps were 2.19% ( 2.19 % ) on $ 800 million and 2.20% ( 2.20 % ) on $ 275 million .in august 2008 , $ 500 million of senior fixed-rate bank notes issued in july of 2003 matured and were paid .these long-term bank notes were issued to third-party investors at a fixed rate of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) .the senior floating-rate bank notes due in 2013 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank .the notes pay a floating rate at three-month libor plus 11 bp .the senior extendable notes consist of $ 797 million that currently pay interest at three-month libor plus 4 bp and $ 400 million that pay at the federal funds open rate plus 12 bp .the subordinated fixed-rate bank notes due in 2015 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank .the bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert the fixed-rate debt into floating rate .at december 31 , 2008 , the weighted-average rate paid on the swaps was 3.29% ( 3.29 % ) .the junior subordinated floating-rate bank notes due in 2032 and 2033 were assumed by a bancorp subsidiary as part of the acquisition of crown in november 2007 .two of the notes pay floating at three-month libor plus 310 and 325 bp .the third note pays floating at six-month libor plus 370 bp .the three-month libor plus 290 bp and the three-month libor plus 279 bp junior subordinated debentures due in 2033 and 2034 , respectively , were assumed by a subsidiary of the bancorp in connection with the acquisition of first national bank .the obligations were issued to fnb statutory trusts i and ii , respectively .the junior subordinated floating-rate bank notes due in 2035 were assumed by a bancorp subsidiary as part of the acquisition of first charter in may 2008 .the obligations were issued to first charter capital trust i and ii , respectively .the notes of first charter capital trust i and ii pay floating at three-month libor plus 169 bp and 142 bp , respectively .the bancorp has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all obligations under the acquired trust preferred securities .at december 31 , 2008 , fhlb advances have rates ranging from 0% ( 0 % ) to 8.34% ( 8.34 % ) , with interest payable monthly .the advances are secured by certain residential mortgage loans and securities totaling $ 8.6 billion .at december 31 , 2008 , $ 2.5 billion of fhlb advances are floating rate .the bancorp has interest rate caps , with a notional of $ 1.5 billion , held against its fhlb advance borrowings .the $ 3.6 billion in advances mature as follows : $ 1.5 billion in 2009 , $ 1 million in 2010 , $ 2 million in 2011 , $ 1 billion in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 and thereafter .medium-term senior notes and subordinated bank notes with maturities ranging from one year to 30 years can be issued by two subsidiary banks , of which $ 3.8 billion was outstanding at december 31 , 2008 with $ 16.2 billion available for future issuance .there were no other medium-term senior notes outstanding on either of the two subsidiary banks as of december 31 , 2008 .15 .commitments , contingent liabilities and guarantees the bancorp , in the normal course of business , enters into financial instruments and various agreements to meet the financing needs of its customers .the bancorp also enters into certain transactions and agreements to manage its interest rate and prepayment risks , provide funding , equipment and locations for its operations and invest in its communities .these instruments and agreements involve , to varying degrees , elements of credit risk , counterparty risk and market risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the bancorp 2019s consolidated balance sheets .creditworthiness for all instruments and agreements is evaluated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the bancorp 2019s credit policies .the bancorp 2019s significant commitments , contingent liabilities and guarantees in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets are summarized as follows : commitments the bancorp has certain commitments to make future payments under contracts .a summary of significant commitments at december 31: . ( $ in millions ) | 2008 | 2007
commitments to extend credit | $ 49470 | 49788
letters of credit ( including standby letters of credit ) | 8951 | 8522
forward contracts to sell mortgage loans | 3235 | 1511
noncancelable lease obligations | 937 | 734
purchase obligations | 81 | 52
capital expenditures | 68 | 94 commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend , typically having fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee .since many of the commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements .the bancorp is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance for the amount of the contract .fixed-rate commitments are also subject to market risk resulting from fluctuations in interest rates and the bancorp 2019s exposure is limited to the replacement value of those commitments .as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the bancorp had a reserve for unfunded commitments totaling $ 195 million and $ 95 million , respectively , included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets .standby and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party .at december 31 , 2008 , approximately $ 3.3 billion of letters of credit expire within one year ( including $ 57 million issued on behalf of commercial customers to facilitate trade payments in dollars and foreign currencies ) , $ 5.3 billion expire between one to five years and $ 0.4 billion expire thereafter .standby letters of credit are considered guarantees in accordance with fasb interpretation no .45 , 201cguarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others 201d ( fin 45 ) .at december 31 , 2008 , the reserve related to these standby letters of credit was $ 3 million .approximately 66% ( 66 % ) and 70% ( 70 % ) of the total standby letters of credit were secured as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .in the event of nonperformance by the customers , the bancorp has rights to the underlying collateral , which can include commercial real estate , physical plant and property , inventory , receivables , cash and marketable securities .the bancorp monitors the credit risk associated with the standby letters of credit using the same dual risk rating system utilized for .
Question: what is the sum of the percentages of the total standby letters of credit in 2007 and 2008?
| 1.36 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements fifth third bancorp 81 vii held by the trust vii bear a fixed rate of interest of 8.875% ( 8.875 % ) until may 15 , 2058 .thereafter , the notes pay a floating rate at three-month libor plus 500 bp .the bancorp entered into an interest rate swap to convert $ 275 million of the fixed-rate debt into floating .at december 31 , 2008 , the rate paid on the swap was 6.05% ( 6.05 % ) .the jsn vii may be redeemed at the option of the bancorp on or after may 15 , 2013 , or in certain other limited circumstances , at a redemption price of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount plus accrued but unpaid interest .all redemptions are subject to certain conditions and generally require approval by the federal reserve board .subsidiary long-term borrowings the senior fixed-rate bank notes due from 2009 to 2019 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank .the maturities of the face value of the senior fixed-rate bank notes are as follows : $ 36 million in 2009 , $ 800 million in 2010 and $ 275 million in 2019 .the bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert $ 1.1 billion of the fixed-rate debt into floating rates .at december 31 , 2008 , the rates paid on these swaps were 2.19% ( 2.19 % ) on $ 800 million and 2.20% ( 2.20 % ) on $ 275 million .in august 2008 , $ 500 million of senior fixed-rate bank notes issued in july of 2003 matured and were paid .these long-term bank notes were issued to third-party investors at a fixed rate of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) .the senior floating-rate bank notes due in 2013 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank .the notes pay a floating rate at three-month libor plus 11 bp .the senior extendable notes consist of $ 797 million that currently pay interest at three-month libor plus 4 bp and $ 400 million that pay at the federal funds open rate plus 12 bp .the subordinated fixed-rate bank notes due in 2015 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank .the bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert the fixed-rate debt into floating rate .at december 31 , 2008 , the weighted-average rate paid on the swaps was 3.29% ( 3.29 % ) .the junior subordinated floating-rate bank notes due in 2032 and 2033 were assumed by a bancorp subsidiary as part of the acquisition of crown in november 2007 .two of the notes pay floating at three-month libor plus 310 and 325 bp .the third note pays floating at six-month libor plus 370 bp .the three-month libor plus 290 bp and the three-month libor plus 279 bp junior subordinated debentures due in 2033 and 2034 , respectively , were assumed by a subsidiary of the bancorp in connection with the acquisition of first national bank .the obligations were issued to fnb statutory trusts i and ii , respectively .the junior subordinated floating-rate bank notes due in 2035 were assumed by a bancorp subsidiary as part of the acquisition of first charter in may 2008 .the obligations were issued to first charter capital trust i and ii , respectively .the notes of first charter capital trust i and ii pay floating at three-month libor plus 169 bp and 142 bp , respectively .the bancorp has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all obligations under the acquired trust preferred securities .at december 31 , 2008 , fhlb advances have rates ranging from 0% ( 0 % ) to 8.34% ( 8.34 % ) , with interest payable monthly .the advances are secured by certain residential mortgage loans and securities totaling $ 8.6 billion .at december 31 , 2008 , $ 2.5 billion of fhlb advances are floating rate .the bancorp has interest rate caps , with a notional of $ 1.5 billion , held against its fhlb advance borrowings .the $ 3.6 billion in advances mature as follows : $ 1.5 billion in 2009 , $ 1 million in 2010 , $ 2 million in 2011 , $ 1 billion in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 and thereafter .medium-term senior notes and subordinated bank notes with maturities ranging from one year to 30 years can be issued by two subsidiary banks , of which $ 3.8 billion was outstanding at december 31 , 2008 with $ 16.2 billion available for future issuance .there were no other medium-term senior notes outstanding on either of the two subsidiary banks as of december 31 , 2008 .15 .commitments , contingent liabilities and guarantees the bancorp , in the normal course of business , enters into financial instruments and various agreements to meet the financing needs of its customers .the bancorp also enters into certain transactions and agreements to manage its interest rate and prepayment risks , provide funding , equipment and locations for its operations and invest in its communities .these instruments and agreements involve , to varying degrees , elements of credit risk , counterparty risk and market risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the bancorp 2019s consolidated balance sheets .creditworthiness for all instruments and agreements is evaluated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the bancorp 2019s credit policies .the bancorp 2019s significant commitments , contingent liabilities and guarantees in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets are summarized as follows : commitments the bancorp has certain commitments to make future payments under contracts .a summary of significant commitments at december 31: . ( $ in millions ) | 2008 | 2007
commitments to extend credit | $ 49470 | 49788
letters of credit ( including standby letters of credit ) | 8951 | 8522
forward contracts to sell mortgage loans | 3235 | 1511
noncancelable lease obligations | 937 | 734
purchase obligations | 81 | 52
capital expenditures | 68 | 94 commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend , typically having fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee .since many of the commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements .the bancorp is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance for the amount of the contract .fixed-rate commitments are also subject to market risk resulting from fluctuations in interest rates and the bancorp 2019s exposure is limited to the replacement value of those commitments .as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the bancorp had a reserve for unfunded commitments totaling $ 195 million and $ 95 million , respectively , included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets .standby and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party .at december 31 , 2008 , approximately $ 3.3 billion of letters of credit expire within one year ( including $ 57 million issued on behalf of commercial customers to facilitate trade payments in dollars and foreign currencies ) , $ 5.3 billion expire between one to five years and $ 0.4 billion expire thereafter .standby letters of credit are considered guarantees in accordance with fasb interpretation no .45 , 201cguarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others 201d ( fin 45 ) .at december 31 , 2008 , the reserve related to these standby letters of credit was $ 3 million .approximately 66% ( 66 % ) and 70% ( 70 % ) of the total standby letters of credit were secured as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .in the event of nonperformance by the customers , the bancorp has rights to the underlying collateral , which can include commercial real estate , physical plant and property , inventory , receivables , cash and marketable securities .the bancorp monitors the credit risk associated with the standby letters of credit using the same dual risk rating system utilized for .
Question: what is the sum of the percentages of the total standby letters of credit in 2007 and 2008?
| convfinqa2498 |
notes to consolidated financial statements fifth third bancorp 81 vii held by the trust vii bear a fixed rate of interest of 8.875% ( 8.875 % ) until may 15 , 2058 .thereafter , the notes pay a floating rate at three-month libor plus 500 bp .the bancorp entered into an interest rate swap to convert $ 275 million of the fixed-rate debt into floating .at december 31 , 2008 , the rate paid on the swap was 6.05% ( 6.05 % ) .the jsn vii may be redeemed at the option of the bancorp on or after may 15 , 2013 , or in certain other limited circumstances , at a redemption price of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount plus accrued but unpaid interest .all redemptions are subject to certain conditions and generally require approval by the federal reserve board .subsidiary long-term borrowings the senior fixed-rate bank notes due from 2009 to 2019 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank .the maturities of the face value of the senior fixed-rate bank notes are as follows : $ 36 million in 2009 , $ 800 million in 2010 and $ 275 million in 2019 .the bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert $ 1.1 billion of the fixed-rate debt into floating rates .at december 31 , 2008 , the rates paid on these swaps were 2.19% ( 2.19 % ) on $ 800 million and 2.20% ( 2.20 % ) on $ 275 million .in august 2008 , $ 500 million of senior fixed-rate bank notes issued in july of 2003 matured and were paid .these long-term bank notes were issued to third-party investors at a fixed rate of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) .the senior floating-rate bank notes due in 2013 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank .the notes pay a floating rate at three-month libor plus 11 bp .the senior extendable notes consist of $ 797 million that currently pay interest at three-month libor plus 4 bp and $ 400 million that pay at the federal funds open rate plus 12 bp .the subordinated fixed-rate bank notes due in 2015 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank .the bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert the fixed-rate debt into floating rate .at december 31 , 2008 , the weighted-average rate paid on the swaps was 3.29% ( 3.29 % ) .the junior subordinated floating-rate bank notes due in 2032 and 2033 were assumed by a bancorp subsidiary as part of the acquisition of crown in november 2007 .two of the notes pay floating at three-month libor plus 310 and 325 bp .the third note pays floating at six-month libor plus 370 bp .the three-month libor plus 290 bp and the three-month libor plus 279 bp junior subordinated debentures due in 2033 and 2034 , respectively , were assumed by a subsidiary of the bancorp in connection with the acquisition of first national bank .the obligations were issued to fnb statutory trusts i and ii , respectively .the junior subordinated floating-rate bank notes due in 2035 were assumed by a bancorp subsidiary as part of the acquisition of first charter in may 2008 .the obligations were issued to first charter capital trust i and ii , respectively .the notes of first charter capital trust i and ii pay floating at three-month libor plus 169 bp and 142 bp , respectively .the bancorp has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all obligations under the acquired trust preferred securities .at december 31 , 2008 , fhlb advances have rates ranging from 0% ( 0 % ) to 8.34% ( 8.34 % ) , with interest payable monthly .the advances are secured by certain residential mortgage loans and securities totaling $ 8.6 billion .at december 31 , 2008 , $ 2.5 billion of fhlb advances are floating rate .the bancorp has interest rate caps , with a notional of $ 1.5 billion , held against its fhlb advance borrowings .the $ 3.6 billion in advances mature as follows : $ 1.5 billion in 2009 , $ 1 million in 2010 , $ 2 million in 2011 , $ 1 billion in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 and thereafter .medium-term senior notes and subordinated bank notes with maturities ranging from one year to 30 years can be issued by two subsidiary banks , of which $ 3.8 billion was outstanding at december 31 , 2008 with $ 16.2 billion available for future issuance .there were no other medium-term senior notes outstanding on either of the two subsidiary banks as of december 31 , 2008 .15 .commitments , contingent liabilities and guarantees the bancorp , in the normal course of business , enters into financial instruments and various agreements to meet the financing needs of its customers .the bancorp also enters into certain transactions and agreements to manage its interest rate and prepayment risks , provide funding , equipment and locations for its operations and invest in its communities .these instruments and agreements involve , to varying degrees , elements of credit risk , counterparty risk and market risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the bancorp 2019s consolidated balance sheets .creditworthiness for all instruments and agreements is evaluated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the bancorp 2019s credit policies .the bancorp 2019s significant commitments , contingent liabilities and guarantees in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets are summarized as follows : commitments the bancorp has certain commitments to make future payments under contracts .a summary of significant commitments at december 31: . ( $ in millions ) | 2008 | 2007
commitments to extend credit | $ 49470 | 49788
letters of credit ( including standby letters of credit ) | 8951 | 8522
forward contracts to sell mortgage loans | 3235 | 1511
noncancelable lease obligations | 937 | 734
purchase obligations | 81 | 52
capital expenditures | 68 | 94 commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend , typically having fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee .since many of the commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements .the bancorp is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance for the amount of the contract .fixed-rate commitments are also subject to market risk resulting from fluctuations in interest rates and the bancorp 2019s exposure is limited to the replacement value of those commitments .as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the bancorp had a reserve for unfunded commitments totaling $ 195 million and $ 95 million , respectively , included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets .standby and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party .at december 31 , 2008 , approximately $ 3.3 billion of letters of credit expire within one year ( including $ 57 million issued on behalf of commercial customers to facilitate trade payments in dollars and foreign currencies ) , $ 5.3 billion expire between one to five years and $ 0.4 billion expire thereafter .standby letters of credit are considered guarantees in accordance with fasb interpretation no .45 , 201cguarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others 201d ( fin 45 ) .at december 31 , 2008 , the reserve related to these standby letters of credit was $ 3 million .approximately 66% ( 66 % ) and 70% ( 70 % ) of the total standby letters of credit were secured as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .in the event of nonperformance by the customers , the bancorp has rights to the underlying collateral , which can include commercial real estate , physical plant and property , inventory , receivables , cash and marketable securities .the bancorp monitors the credit risk associated with the standby letters of credit using the same dual risk rating system utilized for .
Question: what is the sum of the percentages of the total standby letters of credit in 2007 and 2008?
Steps: add(66%, 70%)
Answer: 1.36
Question: what is the average value?
| 0.68 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements fifth third bancorp 81 vii held by the trust vii bear a fixed rate of interest of 8.875% ( 8.875 % ) until may 15 , 2058 .thereafter , the notes pay a floating rate at three-month libor plus 500 bp .the bancorp entered into an interest rate swap to convert $ 275 million of the fixed-rate debt into floating .at december 31 , 2008 , the rate paid on the swap was 6.05% ( 6.05 % ) .the jsn vii may be redeemed at the option of the bancorp on or after may 15 , 2013 , or in certain other limited circumstances , at a redemption price of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount plus accrued but unpaid interest .all redemptions are subject to certain conditions and generally require approval by the federal reserve board .subsidiary long-term borrowings the senior fixed-rate bank notes due from 2009 to 2019 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank .the maturities of the face value of the senior fixed-rate bank notes are as follows : $ 36 million in 2009 , $ 800 million in 2010 and $ 275 million in 2019 .the bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert $ 1.1 billion of the fixed-rate debt into floating rates .at december 31 , 2008 , the rates paid on these swaps were 2.19% ( 2.19 % ) on $ 800 million and 2.20% ( 2.20 % ) on $ 275 million .in august 2008 , $ 500 million of senior fixed-rate bank notes issued in july of 2003 matured and were paid .these long-term bank notes were issued to third-party investors at a fixed rate of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) .the senior floating-rate bank notes due in 2013 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank .the notes pay a floating rate at three-month libor plus 11 bp .the senior extendable notes consist of $ 797 million that currently pay interest at three-month libor plus 4 bp and $ 400 million that pay at the federal funds open rate plus 12 bp .the subordinated fixed-rate bank notes due in 2015 are the obligations of a subsidiary bank .the bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert the fixed-rate debt into floating rate .at december 31 , 2008 , the weighted-average rate paid on the swaps was 3.29% ( 3.29 % ) .the junior subordinated floating-rate bank notes due in 2032 and 2033 were assumed by a bancorp subsidiary as part of the acquisition of crown in november 2007 .two of the notes pay floating at three-month libor plus 310 and 325 bp .the third note pays floating at six-month libor plus 370 bp .the three-month libor plus 290 bp and the three-month libor plus 279 bp junior subordinated debentures due in 2033 and 2034 , respectively , were assumed by a subsidiary of the bancorp in connection with the acquisition of first national bank .the obligations were issued to fnb statutory trusts i and ii , respectively .the junior subordinated floating-rate bank notes due in 2035 were assumed by a bancorp subsidiary as part of the acquisition of first charter in may 2008 .the obligations were issued to first charter capital trust i and ii , respectively .the notes of first charter capital trust i and ii pay floating at three-month libor plus 169 bp and 142 bp , respectively .the bancorp has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all obligations under the acquired trust preferred securities .at december 31 , 2008 , fhlb advances have rates ranging from 0% ( 0 % ) to 8.34% ( 8.34 % ) , with interest payable monthly .the advances are secured by certain residential mortgage loans and securities totaling $ 8.6 billion .at december 31 , 2008 , $ 2.5 billion of fhlb advances are floating rate .the bancorp has interest rate caps , with a notional of $ 1.5 billion , held against its fhlb advance borrowings .the $ 3.6 billion in advances mature as follows : $ 1.5 billion in 2009 , $ 1 million in 2010 , $ 2 million in 2011 , $ 1 billion in 2012 and $ 1.1 billion in 2013 and thereafter .medium-term senior notes and subordinated bank notes with maturities ranging from one year to 30 years can be issued by two subsidiary banks , of which $ 3.8 billion was outstanding at december 31 , 2008 with $ 16.2 billion available for future issuance .there were no other medium-term senior notes outstanding on either of the two subsidiary banks as of december 31 , 2008 .15 .commitments , contingent liabilities and guarantees the bancorp , in the normal course of business , enters into financial instruments and various agreements to meet the financing needs of its customers .the bancorp also enters into certain transactions and agreements to manage its interest rate and prepayment risks , provide funding , equipment and locations for its operations and invest in its communities .these instruments and agreements involve , to varying degrees , elements of credit risk , counterparty risk and market risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the bancorp 2019s consolidated balance sheets .creditworthiness for all instruments and agreements is evaluated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the bancorp 2019s credit policies .the bancorp 2019s significant commitments , contingent liabilities and guarantees in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets are summarized as follows : commitments the bancorp has certain commitments to make future payments under contracts .a summary of significant commitments at december 31: . ( $ in millions ) | 2008 | 2007
commitments to extend credit | $ 49470 | 49788
letters of credit ( including standby letters of credit ) | 8951 | 8522
forward contracts to sell mortgage loans | 3235 | 1511
noncancelable lease obligations | 937 | 734
purchase obligations | 81 | 52
capital expenditures | 68 | 94 commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend , typically having fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee .since many of the commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements .the bancorp is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance for the amount of the contract .fixed-rate commitments are also subject to market risk resulting from fluctuations in interest rates and the bancorp 2019s exposure is limited to the replacement value of those commitments .as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the bancorp had a reserve for unfunded commitments totaling $ 195 million and $ 95 million , respectively , included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets .standby and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party .at december 31 , 2008 , approximately $ 3.3 billion of letters of credit expire within one year ( including $ 57 million issued on behalf of commercial customers to facilitate trade payments in dollars and foreign currencies ) , $ 5.3 billion expire between one to five years and $ 0.4 billion expire thereafter .standby letters of credit are considered guarantees in accordance with fasb interpretation no .45 , 201cguarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others 201d ( fin 45 ) .at december 31 , 2008 , the reserve related to these standby letters of credit was $ 3 million .approximately 66% ( 66 % ) and 70% ( 70 % ) of the total standby letters of credit were secured as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .in the event of nonperformance by the customers , the bancorp has rights to the underlying collateral , which can include commercial real estate , physical plant and property , inventory , receivables , cash and marketable securities .the bancorp monitors the credit risk associated with the standby letters of credit using the same dual risk rating system utilized for .
Question: what is the sum of the percentages of the total standby letters of credit in 2007 and 2008?
Steps: add(66%, 70%)
Answer: 1.36
Question: what is the average value?
| convfinqa2499 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.