text
stringlengths 308
15.4k
| answer
stringlengths 2
16
| query
stringlengths 990
17.6k
| id
stringlengths 6
14
|
|---|---|---|---|
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 3 2014financial instruments ( continued ) accounts receivable trade receivables the company distributes its products through third-party distributors and resellers and directly to certain education , consumer , and commercial customers .the company generally does not require collateral from its customers ; however , the company will require collateral in certain instances to limit credit risk .in addition , when possible , the company does attempt to limit credit risk on trade receivables with credit insurance for certain customers in latin america , europe , asia , and australia and by arranging with third- party financing companies to provide flooring arrangements and other loan and lease programs to the company 2019s direct customers .these credit-financing arrangements are directly between the third-party financing company and the end customer .as such , the company generally does not assume any recourse or credit risk sharing related to any of these arrangements .however , considerable trade receivables that are not covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners .no customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 or september 24 , 2005 .the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 30 , september 24 , september 25 . | september 30 2006 | september 24 2005 | september 25 2004
beginning allowance balance | $ 46 | $ 47 | $ 49
charged to costs and expenses | 17 | 8 | 3
deductions ( a ) | -11 ( 11 ) | -9 ( 9 ) | -5 ( 5 )
ending allowance balance | $ 52 | $ 46 | $ 47 ( a ) represents amounts written off against the allowance , net of recoveries .vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company .the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers .these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 1.6 billion and $ 417 million as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , respectively .the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales .derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk .foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales .from time to time , the company enters into interest rate derivative agreements to modify the interest rate profile of certain investments and debt .the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments .the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the ending allowance balance in the year of 2006?
| 52.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 3 2014financial instruments ( continued ) accounts receivable trade receivables the company distributes its products through third-party distributors and resellers and directly to certain education , consumer , and commercial customers .the company generally does not require collateral from its customers ; however , the company will require collateral in certain instances to limit credit risk .in addition , when possible , the company does attempt to limit credit risk on trade receivables with credit insurance for certain customers in latin america , europe , asia , and australia and by arranging with third- party financing companies to provide flooring arrangements and other loan and lease programs to the company 2019s direct customers .these credit-financing arrangements are directly between the third-party financing company and the end customer .as such , the company generally does not assume any recourse or credit risk sharing related to any of these arrangements .however , considerable trade receivables that are not covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners .no customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 or september 24 , 2005 .the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 30 , september 24 , september 25 . | september 30 2006 | september 24 2005 | september 25 2004
beginning allowance balance | $ 46 | $ 47 | $ 49
charged to costs and expenses | 17 | 8 | 3
deductions ( a ) | -11 ( 11 ) | -9 ( 9 ) | -5 ( 5 )
ending allowance balance | $ 52 | $ 46 | $ 47 ( a ) represents amounts written off against the allowance , net of recoveries .vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company .the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers .these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 1.6 billion and $ 417 million as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , respectively .the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales .derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk .foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales .from time to time , the company enters into interest rate derivative agreements to modify the interest rate profile of certain investments and debt .the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments .the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the ending allowance balance in the year of 2006?
| convfinqa2700 |
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 3 2014financial instruments ( continued ) accounts receivable trade receivables the company distributes its products through third-party distributors and resellers and directly to certain education , consumer , and commercial customers .the company generally does not require collateral from its customers ; however , the company will require collateral in certain instances to limit credit risk .in addition , when possible , the company does attempt to limit credit risk on trade receivables with credit insurance for certain customers in latin america , europe , asia , and australia and by arranging with third- party financing companies to provide flooring arrangements and other loan and lease programs to the company 2019s direct customers .these credit-financing arrangements are directly between the third-party financing company and the end customer .as such , the company generally does not assume any recourse or credit risk sharing related to any of these arrangements .however , considerable trade receivables that are not covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners .no customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 or september 24 , 2005 .the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 30 , september 24 , september 25 . | september 30 2006 | september 24 2005 | september 25 2004
beginning allowance balance | $ 46 | $ 47 | $ 49
charged to costs and expenses | 17 | 8 | 3
deductions ( a ) | -11 ( 11 ) | -9 ( 9 ) | -5 ( 5 )
ending allowance balance | $ 52 | $ 46 | $ 47 ( a ) represents amounts written off against the allowance , net of recoveries .vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company .the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers .these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 1.6 billion and $ 417 million as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , respectively .the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales .derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk .foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales .from time to time , the company enters into interest rate derivative agreements to modify the interest rate profile of certain investments and debt .the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments .the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the ending allowance balance in the year of 2006?
Steps: Ask for number 52
Answer: 52.0
Question: and what was that of 2005?
| 46.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 3 2014financial instruments ( continued ) accounts receivable trade receivables the company distributes its products through third-party distributors and resellers and directly to certain education , consumer , and commercial customers .the company generally does not require collateral from its customers ; however , the company will require collateral in certain instances to limit credit risk .in addition , when possible , the company does attempt to limit credit risk on trade receivables with credit insurance for certain customers in latin america , europe , asia , and australia and by arranging with third- party financing companies to provide flooring arrangements and other loan and lease programs to the company 2019s direct customers .these credit-financing arrangements are directly between the third-party financing company and the end customer .as such , the company generally does not assume any recourse or credit risk sharing related to any of these arrangements .however , considerable trade receivables that are not covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners .no customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 or september 24 , 2005 .the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 30 , september 24 , september 25 . | september 30 2006 | september 24 2005 | september 25 2004
beginning allowance balance | $ 46 | $ 47 | $ 49
charged to costs and expenses | 17 | 8 | 3
deductions ( a ) | -11 ( 11 ) | -9 ( 9 ) | -5 ( 5 )
ending allowance balance | $ 52 | $ 46 | $ 47 ( a ) represents amounts written off against the allowance , net of recoveries .vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company .the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers .these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 1.6 billion and $ 417 million as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , respectively .the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales .derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk .foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales .from time to time , the company enters into interest rate derivative agreements to modify the interest rate profile of certain investments and debt .the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments .the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the ending allowance balance in the year of 2006?
Steps: Ask for number 52
Answer: 52.0
Question: and what was that of 2005?
| convfinqa2701 |
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 3 2014financial instruments ( continued ) accounts receivable trade receivables the company distributes its products through third-party distributors and resellers and directly to certain education , consumer , and commercial customers .the company generally does not require collateral from its customers ; however , the company will require collateral in certain instances to limit credit risk .in addition , when possible , the company does attempt to limit credit risk on trade receivables with credit insurance for certain customers in latin america , europe , asia , and australia and by arranging with third- party financing companies to provide flooring arrangements and other loan and lease programs to the company 2019s direct customers .these credit-financing arrangements are directly between the third-party financing company and the end customer .as such , the company generally does not assume any recourse or credit risk sharing related to any of these arrangements .however , considerable trade receivables that are not covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners .no customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 or september 24 , 2005 .the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 30 , september 24 , september 25 . | september 30 2006 | september 24 2005 | september 25 2004
beginning allowance balance | $ 46 | $ 47 | $ 49
charged to costs and expenses | 17 | 8 | 3
deductions ( a ) | -11 ( 11 ) | -9 ( 9 ) | -5 ( 5 )
ending allowance balance | $ 52 | $ 46 | $ 47 ( a ) represents amounts written off against the allowance , net of recoveries .vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company .the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers .these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 1.6 billion and $ 417 million as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , respectively .the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales .derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk .foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales .from time to time , the company enters into interest rate derivative agreements to modify the interest rate profile of certain investments and debt .the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments .the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the ending allowance balance in the year of 2006?
Steps: Ask for number 52
Answer: 52.0
Question: and what was that of 2005?
Steps: Ask for number 46
Answer: 46.0
Question: what was the change in the ending allowance balance from 2005 to 2006?
| 6.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 3 2014financial instruments ( continued ) accounts receivable trade receivables the company distributes its products through third-party distributors and resellers and directly to certain education , consumer , and commercial customers .the company generally does not require collateral from its customers ; however , the company will require collateral in certain instances to limit credit risk .in addition , when possible , the company does attempt to limit credit risk on trade receivables with credit insurance for certain customers in latin america , europe , asia , and australia and by arranging with third- party financing companies to provide flooring arrangements and other loan and lease programs to the company 2019s direct customers .these credit-financing arrangements are directly between the third-party financing company and the end customer .as such , the company generally does not assume any recourse or credit risk sharing related to any of these arrangements .however , considerable trade receivables that are not covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners .no customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 or september 24 , 2005 .the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 30 , september 24 , september 25 . | september 30 2006 | september 24 2005 | september 25 2004
beginning allowance balance | $ 46 | $ 47 | $ 49
charged to costs and expenses | 17 | 8 | 3
deductions ( a ) | -11 ( 11 ) | -9 ( 9 ) | -5 ( 5 )
ending allowance balance | $ 52 | $ 46 | $ 47 ( a ) represents amounts written off against the allowance , net of recoveries .vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company .the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers .these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 1.6 billion and $ 417 million as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , respectively .the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales .derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk .foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales .from time to time , the company enters into interest rate derivative agreements to modify the interest rate profile of certain investments and debt .the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments .the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the ending allowance balance in the year of 2006?
Steps: Ask for number 52
Answer: 52.0
Question: and what was that of 2005?
Steps: Ask for number 46
Answer: 46.0
Question: what was the change in the ending allowance balance from 2005 to 2006?
| convfinqa2702 |
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 3 2014financial instruments ( continued ) accounts receivable trade receivables the company distributes its products through third-party distributors and resellers and directly to certain education , consumer , and commercial customers .the company generally does not require collateral from its customers ; however , the company will require collateral in certain instances to limit credit risk .in addition , when possible , the company does attempt to limit credit risk on trade receivables with credit insurance for certain customers in latin america , europe , asia , and australia and by arranging with third- party financing companies to provide flooring arrangements and other loan and lease programs to the company 2019s direct customers .these credit-financing arrangements are directly between the third-party financing company and the end customer .as such , the company generally does not assume any recourse or credit risk sharing related to any of these arrangements .however , considerable trade receivables that are not covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners .no customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 or september 24 , 2005 .the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 30 , september 24 , september 25 . | september 30 2006 | september 24 2005 | september 25 2004
beginning allowance balance | $ 46 | $ 47 | $ 49
charged to costs and expenses | 17 | 8 | 3
deductions ( a ) | -11 ( 11 ) | -9 ( 9 ) | -5 ( 5 )
ending allowance balance | $ 52 | $ 46 | $ 47 ( a ) represents amounts written off against the allowance , net of recoveries .vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company .the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers .these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 1.6 billion and $ 417 million as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , respectively .the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales .derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk .foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales .from time to time , the company enters into interest rate derivative agreements to modify the interest rate profile of certain investments and debt .the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments .the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the ending allowance balance in the year of 2006?
Steps: Ask for number 52
Answer: 52.0
Question: and what was that of 2005?
Steps: Ask for number 46
Answer: 46.0
Question: what was the change in the ending allowance balance from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(52, 46)
Answer: 6.0
Question: and how much does that change represent, percentually, in relation to the ending allowance balance of 2005?
| 0.13043 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 3 2014financial instruments ( continued ) accounts receivable trade receivables the company distributes its products through third-party distributors and resellers and directly to certain education , consumer , and commercial customers .the company generally does not require collateral from its customers ; however , the company will require collateral in certain instances to limit credit risk .in addition , when possible , the company does attempt to limit credit risk on trade receivables with credit insurance for certain customers in latin america , europe , asia , and australia and by arranging with third- party financing companies to provide flooring arrangements and other loan and lease programs to the company 2019s direct customers .these credit-financing arrangements are directly between the third-party financing company and the end customer .as such , the company generally does not assume any recourse or credit risk sharing related to any of these arrangements .however , considerable trade receivables that are not covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners .no customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 or september 24 , 2005 .the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 30 , september 24 , september 25 . | september 30 2006 | september 24 2005 | september 25 2004
beginning allowance balance | $ 46 | $ 47 | $ 49
charged to costs and expenses | 17 | 8 | 3
deductions ( a ) | -11 ( 11 ) | -9 ( 9 ) | -5 ( 5 )
ending allowance balance | $ 52 | $ 46 | $ 47 ( a ) represents amounts written off against the allowance , net of recoveries .vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company .the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers .these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 1.6 billion and $ 417 million as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , respectively .the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales .derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk .foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales .from time to time , the company enters into interest rate derivative agreements to modify the interest rate profile of certain investments and debt .the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments .the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the ending allowance balance in the year of 2006?
Steps: Ask for number 52
Answer: 52.0
Question: and what was that of 2005?
Steps: Ask for number 46
Answer: 46.0
Question: what was the change in the ending allowance balance from 2005 to 2006?
Steps: subtract(52, 46)
Answer: 6.0
Question: and how much does that change represent, percentually, in relation to the ending allowance balance of 2005?
| convfinqa2703 |
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 125 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to meet the financing needs of its customers .the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the counterparties draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfills its obligations under these guarantees , and the counterparties subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts .in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s actual future credit exposure or funding requirements .in determining the amount of credit risk exposure the firm has to wholesale lending-related commitments , which is used as the basis for allocating credit risk capital to these commitments , the firm has established a 201cloan-equivalent 201d amount for each commitment ; this amount represents the portion of the unused commitment or other contingent exposure that is expected , based on average portfolio historical experience , to become drawn upon in an event of a default by an obligor .the loan-equivalent amount of the firm 2019s lending- related commitments was $ 229.6 billion and $ 218.9 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into securities and derivative transactions .through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by central counterparties ( 201cccps 201d ) .where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement .for further discussion of clearing services , see note 29 .derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities .derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets .the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit exposure .the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed .for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty .for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp .where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements .for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 .the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented .derivative receivables . december 31 ( in millions ) | 2014 | 2013
interest rate | $ 33725 | $ 25782
credit derivatives | 1838 | 1516
foreign exchange | 21253 | 16790
equity | 8177 | 12227
commodity | 13982 | 9444
total net of cash collateral | 78975 | 65759
liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables | -19604 ( 19604 ) | -14435 ( 14435 )
total net of all collateral | $ 59371 | $ 51324 derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 79.0 billion and $ 65.8 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts , after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm .however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s .government and agency securities and other g7 government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 19.6 billion and $ 14.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor .in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily : cash ; g7 government securities ; other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities ; and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date .although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor .as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the firm held $ 48.6 billion and $ 50.8 billion , respectively , of this additional collateral .the prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation .the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit .for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6. .
Question: what is the total balance of liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables in 2014 and 2013?
| 34039.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 125 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to meet the financing needs of its customers .the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the counterparties draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfills its obligations under these guarantees , and the counterparties subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts .in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s actual future credit exposure or funding requirements .in determining the amount of credit risk exposure the firm has to wholesale lending-related commitments , which is used as the basis for allocating credit risk capital to these commitments , the firm has established a 201cloan-equivalent 201d amount for each commitment ; this amount represents the portion of the unused commitment or other contingent exposure that is expected , based on average portfolio historical experience , to become drawn upon in an event of a default by an obligor .the loan-equivalent amount of the firm 2019s lending- related commitments was $ 229.6 billion and $ 218.9 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into securities and derivative transactions .through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by central counterparties ( 201cccps 201d ) .where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement .for further discussion of clearing services , see note 29 .derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities .derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets .the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit exposure .the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed .for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty .for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp .where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements .for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 .the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented .derivative receivables . december 31 ( in millions ) | 2014 | 2013
interest rate | $ 33725 | $ 25782
credit derivatives | 1838 | 1516
foreign exchange | 21253 | 16790
equity | 8177 | 12227
commodity | 13982 | 9444
total net of cash collateral | 78975 | 65759
liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables | -19604 ( 19604 ) | -14435 ( 14435 )
total net of all collateral | $ 59371 | $ 51324 derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 79.0 billion and $ 65.8 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts , after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm .however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s .government and agency securities and other g7 government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 19.6 billion and $ 14.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor .in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily : cash ; g7 government securities ; other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities ; and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date .although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor .as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the firm held $ 48.6 billion and $ 50.8 billion , respectively , of this additional collateral .the prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation .the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit .for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6. .
Question: what is the total balance of liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables in 2014 and 2013?
| convfinqa2704 |
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 125 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to meet the financing needs of its customers .the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the counterparties draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfills its obligations under these guarantees , and the counterparties subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts .in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s actual future credit exposure or funding requirements .in determining the amount of credit risk exposure the firm has to wholesale lending-related commitments , which is used as the basis for allocating credit risk capital to these commitments , the firm has established a 201cloan-equivalent 201d amount for each commitment ; this amount represents the portion of the unused commitment or other contingent exposure that is expected , based on average portfolio historical experience , to become drawn upon in an event of a default by an obligor .the loan-equivalent amount of the firm 2019s lending- related commitments was $ 229.6 billion and $ 218.9 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into securities and derivative transactions .through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by central counterparties ( 201cccps 201d ) .where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement .for further discussion of clearing services , see note 29 .derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities .derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets .the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit exposure .the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed .for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty .for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp .where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements .for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 .the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented .derivative receivables . december 31 ( in millions ) | 2014 | 2013
interest rate | $ 33725 | $ 25782
credit derivatives | 1838 | 1516
foreign exchange | 21253 | 16790
equity | 8177 | 12227
commodity | 13982 | 9444
total net of cash collateral | 78975 | 65759
liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables | -19604 ( 19604 ) | -14435 ( 14435 )
total net of all collateral | $ 59371 | $ 51324 derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 79.0 billion and $ 65.8 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts , after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm .however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s .government and agency securities and other g7 government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 19.6 billion and $ 14.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor .in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily : cash ; g7 government securities ; other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities ; and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date .although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor .as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the firm held $ 48.6 billion and $ 50.8 billion , respectively , of this additional collateral .the prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation .the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit .for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6. .
Question: what is the total balance of liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables in 2014 and 2013?
Steps: add(19604, 14435)
Answer: 34039.0
Question: what is the average for these two years?
| 17019.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 125 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to meet the financing needs of its customers .the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the counterparties draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfills its obligations under these guarantees , and the counterparties subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts .in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s actual future credit exposure or funding requirements .in determining the amount of credit risk exposure the firm has to wholesale lending-related commitments , which is used as the basis for allocating credit risk capital to these commitments , the firm has established a 201cloan-equivalent 201d amount for each commitment ; this amount represents the portion of the unused commitment or other contingent exposure that is expected , based on average portfolio historical experience , to become drawn upon in an event of a default by an obligor .the loan-equivalent amount of the firm 2019s lending- related commitments was $ 229.6 billion and $ 218.9 billion as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into securities and derivative transactions .through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by central counterparties ( 201cccps 201d ) .where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement .for further discussion of clearing services , see note 29 .derivative contracts in the normal course of business , the firm uses derivative instruments predominantly for market-making activities .derivatives enable customers to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates , currencies and other markets .the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit exposure .the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed .for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty .for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp .where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative transactions through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements .for further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , see note 6 .the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented .derivative receivables . december 31 ( in millions ) | 2014 | 2013
interest rate | $ 33725 | $ 25782
credit derivatives | 1838 | 1516
foreign exchange | 21253 | 16790
equity | 8177 | 12227
commodity | 13982 | 9444
total net of cash collateral | 78975 | 65759
liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables | -19604 ( 19604 ) | -14435 ( 14435 )
total net of all collateral | $ 59371 | $ 51324 derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 79.0 billion and $ 65.8 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .these amounts represent the fair value of the derivative contracts , after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm .however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s .government and agency securities and other g7 government bonds ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 19.6 billion and $ 14.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor .in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily : cash ; g7 government securities ; other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities ; and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date .although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative transactions move in the firm 2019s favor .as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , the firm held $ 48.6 billion and $ 50.8 billion , respectively , of this additional collateral .the prior period amount has been revised to conform with the current period presentation .the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit .for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , see note 6. .
Question: what is the total balance of liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables in 2014 and 2013?
Steps: add(19604, 14435)
Answer: 34039.0
Question: what is the average for these two years?
| convfinqa2705 |
item 7 .management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are an international energy company with operations in the u.s. , canada , africa , the middle east and europe .our operations are organized into three reportable segments : 2022 e&p which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis .2022 osm which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil .2022 ig which produces and markets products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in e.g .certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward- looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business .these statements typically contain words such as "anticipates" "believes" "estimates" "expects" "targets" "plans" "projects" "could" "may" "should" "would" or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain .in accordance with "safe harbor" provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements .for additional risk factors affecting our business , see item 1a .risk factors in this annual report on form 10-k .management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 .business , item 1a .risk factors and item 8 .financial statements and supplementary data found in this annual report on form 10-k .spin-off downstream business on june 30 , 2011 , the spin-off of marathon 2019s downstream business was completed , creating two independent energy companies : marathon oil and mpc .marathon stockholders at the close of business on the record date of june 27 , 2011 received one share of mpc common stock for every two shares of marathon common stock held .a private letter tax ruling received in june 2011 from the irs affirmed the tax-free nature of the spin-off .activities related to the downstream business have been treated as discontinued operations in 2011 and 2010 ( see item 8 .financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information ) .overview 2013 market conditions exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows .the following table lists benchmark crude oil and natural gas price annual averages for the past three years. . benchmark | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) | $ 94.15 | $ 95.11 | $ 79.61
brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) | $ 111.65 | $ 111.26 | $ 79.51
henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) | $ 2.79 | $ 4.04 | $ 4.39 henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) $ 2.79 $ 4.04 $ 4.39 ( a ) settlement date average .liquid hydrocarbon 2013 prices of crude oil have been volatile in recent years , but less so when comparing annual averages for 2012 and 2011 .in 2011 , crude prices increased over 2010 levels , with increases in brent averages outstripping those in wti .the quality , location and composition of our liquid hydrocarbon production mix will cause our u.s .liquid hydrocarbon realizations to differ from the wti benchmark .in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the percentage of our u.s .crude oil and condensate production that was sour averaged 37 percent , 58 percent and 68 percent .sour crude contains more sulfur and tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil so that refining it is more costly and produces lower value products ; therefore , sour crude is considered of lower quality and typically sells at a discount to wti .the percentage of our u.s .crude and condensate production that is sour has been decreasing as onshore production from the eagle ford and bakken shale plays increases and production from the gulf of mexico declines .in recent years , crude oil sold along the u.s .gulf coast has been priced at a premium to wti because the louisiana light sweet benchmark has been tracking brent , while production from inland areas farther from large refineries has been at a discount to wti .ngls were 10 percent , 7 percent and 6 percent of our u.s .liquid hydrocarbon sales in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 .in 2012 , our sales of ngls increased due to our development of u.s .unconventional liquids-rich plays. .
Question: what was the change in the percentage of crude oil and condensate production that was sour between 2011 and 2012?
| -21.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 .management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are an international energy company with operations in the u.s. , canada , africa , the middle east and europe .our operations are organized into three reportable segments : 2022 e&p which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis .2022 osm which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil .2022 ig which produces and markets products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in e.g .certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward- looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business .these statements typically contain words such as "anticipates" "believes" "estimates" "expects" "targets" "plans" "projects" "could" "may" "should" "would" or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain .in accordance with "safe harbor" provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements .for additional risk factors affecting our business , see item 1a .risk factors in this annual report on form 10-k .management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 .business , item 1a .risk factors and item 8 .financial statements and supplementary data found in this annual report on form 10-k .spin-off downstream business on june 30 , 2011 , the spin-off of marathon 2019s downstream business was completed , creating two independent energy companies : marathon oil and mpc .marathon stockholders at the close of business on the record date of june 27 , 2011 received one share of mpc common stock for every two shares of marathon common stock held .a private letter tax ruling received in june 2011 from the irs affirmed the tax-free nature of the spin-off .activities related to the downstream business have been treated as discontinued operations in 2011 and 2010 ( see item 8 .financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information ) .overview 2013 market conditions exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows .the following table lists benchmark crude oil and natural gas price annual averages for the past three years. . benchmark | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) | $ 94.15 | $ 95.11 | $ 79.61
brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) | $ 111.65 | $ 111.26 | $ 79.51
henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) | $ 2.79 | $ 4.04 | $ 4.39 henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) $ 2.79 $ 4.04 $ 4.39 ( a ) settlement date average .liquid hydrocarbon 2013 prices of crude oil have been volatile in recent years , but less so when comparing annual averages for 2012 and 2011 .in 2011 , crude prices increased over 2010 levels , with increases in brent averages outstripping those in wti .the quality , location and composition of our liquid hydrocarbon production mix will cause our u.s .liquid hydrocarbon realizations to differ from the wti benchmark .in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the percentage of our u.s .crude oil and condensate production that was sour averaged 37 percent , 58 percent and 68 percent .sour crude contains more sulfur and tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil so that refining it is more costly and produces lower value products ; therefore , sour crude is considered of lower quality and typically sells at a discount to wti .the percentage of our u.s .crude and condensate production that is sour has been decreasing as onshore production from the eagle ford and bakken shale plays increases and production from the gulf of mexico declines .in recent years , crude oil sold along the u.s .gulf coast has been priced at a premium to wti because the louisiana light sweet benchmark has been tracking brent , while production from inland areas farther from large refineries has been at a discount to wti .ngls were 10 percent , 7 percent and 6 percent of our u.s .liquid hydrocarbon sales in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 .in 2012 , our sales of ngls increased due to our development of u.s .unconventional liquids-rich plays. .
Question: what was the change in the percentage of crude oil and condensate production that was sour between 2011 and 2012?
| convfinqa2706 |
item 7 .management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are an international energy company with operations in the u.s. , canada , africa , the middle east and europe .our operations are organized into three reportable segments : 2022 e&p which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis .2022 osm which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil .2022 ig which produces and markets products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in e.g .certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward- looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business .these statements typically contain words such as "anticipates" "believes" "estimates" "expects" "targets" "plans" "projects" "could" "may" "should" "would" or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain .in accordance with "safe harbor" provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements .for additional risk factors affecting our business , see item 1a .risk factors in this annual report on form 10-k .management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 .business , item 1a .risk factors and item 8 .financial statements and supplementary data found in this annual report on form 10-k .spin-off downstream business on june 30 , 2011 , the spin-off of marathon 2019s downstream business was completed , creating two independent energy companies : marathon oil and mpc .marathon stockholders at the close of business on the record date of june 27 , 2011 received one share of mpc common stock for every two shares of marathon common stock held .a private letter tax ruling received in june 2011 from the irs affirmed the tax-free nature of the spin-off .activities related to the downstream business have been treated as discontinued operations in 2011 and 2010 ( see item 8 .financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information ) .overview 2013 market conditions exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows .the following table lists benchmark crude oil and natural gas price annual averages for the past three years. . benchmark | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) | $ 94.15 | $ 95.11 | $ 79.61
brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) | $ 111.65 | $ 111.26 | $ 79.51
henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) | $ 2.79 | $ 4.04 | $ 4.39 henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) $ 2.79 $ 4.04 $ 4.39 ( a ) settlement date average .liquid hydrocarbon 2013 prices of crude oil have been volatile in recent years , but less so when comparing annual averages for 2012 and 2011 .in 2011 , crude prices increased over 2010 levels , with increases in brent averages outstripping those in wti .the quality , location and composition of our liquid hydrocarbon production mix will cause our u.s .liquid hydrocarbon realizations to differ from the wti benchmark .in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the percentage of our u.s .crude oil and condensate production that was sour averaged 37 percent , 58 percent and 68 percent .sour crude contains more sulfur and tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil so that refining it is more costly and produces lower value products ; therefore , sour crude is considered of lower quality and typically sells at a discount to wti .the percentage of our u.s .crude and condensate production that is sour has been decreasing as onshore production from the eagle ford and bakken shale plays increases and production from the gulf of mexico declines .in recent years , crude oil sold along the u.s .gulf coast has been priced at a premium to wti because the louisiana light sweet benchmark has been tracking brent , while production from inland areas farther from large refineries has been at a discount to wti .ngls were 10 percent , 7 percent and 6 percent of our u.s .liquid hydrocarbon sales in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 .in 2012 , our sales of ngls increased due to our development of u.s .unconventional liquids-rich plays. .
Question: what was the change in the percentage of crude oil and condensate production that was sour between 2011 and 2012?
Steps: subtract(37, 58)
Answer: -21.0
Question: what was the change in the price of brent crude oil between 2010 and 2012?
| 32.14 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 .management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are an international energy company with operations in the u.s. , canada , africa , the middle east and europe .our operations are organized into three reportable segments : 2022 e&p which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis .2022 osm which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil .2022 ig which produces and markets products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in e.g .certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward- looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business .these statements typically contain words such as "anticipates" "believes" "estimates" "expects" "targets" "plans" "projects" "could" "may" "should" "would" or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain .in accordance with "safe harbor" provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements .for additional risk factors affecting our business , see item 1a .risk factors in this annual report on form 10-k .management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 .business , item 1a .risk factors and item 8 .financial statements and supplementary data found in this annual report on form 10-k .spin-off downstream business on june 30 , 2011 , the spin-off of marathon 2019s downstream business was completed , creating two independent energy companies : marathon oil and mpc .marathon stockholders at the close of business on the record date of june 27 , 2011 received one share of mpc common stock for every two shares of marathon common stock held .a private letter tax ruling received in june 2011 from the irs affirmed the tax-free nature of the spin-off .activities related to the downstream business have been treated as discontinued operations in 2011 and 2010 ( see item 8 .financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information ) .overview 2013 market conditions exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows .the following table lists benchmark crude oil and natural gas price annual averages for the past three years. . benchmark | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) | $ 94.15 | $ 95.11 | $ 79.61
brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) | $ 111.65 | $ 111.26 | $ 79.51
henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) | $ 2.79 | $ 4.04 | $ 4.39 henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) $ 2.79 $ 4.04 $ 4.39 ( a ) settlement date average .liquid hydrocarbon 2013 prices of crude oil have been volatile in recent years , but less so when comparing annual averages for 2012 and 2011 .in 2011 , crude prices increased over 2010 levels , with increases in brent averages outstripping those in wti .the quality , location and composition of our liquid hydrocarbon production mix will cause our u.s .liquid hydrocarbon realizations to differ from the wti benchmark .in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the percentage of our u.s .crude oil and condensate production that was sour averaged 37 percent , 58 percent and 68 percent .sour crude contains more sulfur and tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil so that refining it is more costly and produces lower value products ; therefore , sour crude is considered of lower quality and typically sells at a discount to wti .the percentage of our u.s .crude and condensate production that is sour has been decreasing as onshore production from the eagle ford and bakken shale plays increases and production from the gulf of mexico declines .in recent years , crude oil sold along the u.s .gulf coast has been priced at a premium to wti because the louisiana light sweet benchmark has been tracking brent , while production from inland areas farther from large refineries has been at a discount to wti .ngls were 10 percent , 7 percent and 6 percent of our u.s .liquid hydrocarbon sales in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 .in 2012 , our sales of ngls increased due to our development of u.s .unconventional liquids-rich plays. .
Question: what was the change in the percentage of crude oil and condensate production that was sour between 2011 and 2012?
Steps: subtract(37, 58)
Answer: -21.0
Question: what was the change in the price of brent crude oil between 2010 and 2012?
| convfinqa2707 |
item 7 .management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are an international energy company with operations in the u.s. , canada , africa , the middle east and europe .our operations are organized into three reportable segments : 2022 e&p which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis .2022 osm which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil .2022 ig which produces and markets products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in e.g .certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward- looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business .these statements typically contain words such as "anticipates" "believes" "estimates" "expects" "targets" "plans" "projects" "could" "may" "should" "would" or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain .in accordance with "safe harbor" provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements .for additional risk factors affecting our business , see item 1a .risk factors in this annual report on form 10-k .management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 .business , item 1a .risk factors and item 8 .financial statements and supplementary data found in this annual report on form 10-k .spin-off downstream business on june 30 , 2011 , the spin-off of marathon 2019s downstream business was completed , creating two independent energy companies : marathon oil and mpc .marathon stockholders at the close of business on the record date of june 27 , 2011 received one share of mpc common stock for every two shares of marathon common stock held .a private letter tax ruling received in june 2011 from the irs affirmed the tax-free nature of the spin-off .activities related to the downstream business have been treated as discontinued operations in 2011 and 2010 ( see item 8 .financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information ) .overview 2013 market conditions exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows .the following table lists benchmark crude oil and natural gas price annual averages for the past three years. . benchmark | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) | $ 94.15 | $ 95.11 | $ 79.61
brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) | $ 111.65 | $ 111.26 | $ 79.51
henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) | $ 2.79 | $ 4.04 | $ 4.39 henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) $ 2.79 $ 4.04 $ 4.39 ( a ) settlement date average .liquid hydrocarbon 2013 prices of crude oil have been volatile in recent years , but less so when comparing annual averages for 2012 and 2011 .in 2011 , crude prices increased over 2010 levels , with increases in brent averages outstripping those in wti .the quality , location and composition of our liquid hydrocarbon production mix will cause our u.s .liquid hydrocarbon realizations to differ from the wti benchmark .in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the percentage of our u.s .crude oil and condensate production that was sour averaged 37 percent , 58 percent and 68 percent .sour crude contains more sulfur and tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil so that refining it is more costly and produces lower value products ; therefore , sour crude is considered of lower quality and typically sells at a discount to wti .the percentage of our u.s .crude and condensate production that is sour has been decreasing as onshore production from the eagle ford and bakken shale plays increases and production from the gulf of mexico declines .in recent years , crude oil sold along the u.s .gulf coast has been priced at a premium to wti because the louisiana light sweet benchmark has been tracking brent , while production from inland areas farther from large refineries has been at a discount to wti .ngls were 10 percent , 7 percent and 6 percent of our u.s .liquid hydrocarbon sales in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 .in 2012 , our sales of ngls increased due to our development of u.s .unconventional liquids-rich plays. .
Question: what was the change in the percentage of crude oil and condensate production that was sour between 2011 and 2012?
Steps: subtract(37, 58)
Answer: -21.0
Question: what was the change in the price of brent crude oil between 2010 and 2012?
Steps: subtract(111.65, 79.51)
Answer: 32.14
Question: so what was the percentage change of this value?
| 0.40423 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 .management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are an international energy company with operations in the u.s. , canada , africa , the middle east and europe .our operations are organized into three reportable segments : 2022 e&p which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis .2022 osm which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil .2022 ig which produces and markets products manufactured from natural gas , such as lng and methanol , in e.g .certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward- looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business .these statements typically contain words such as "anticipates" "believes" "estimates" "expects" "targets" "plans" "projects" "could" "may" "should" "would" or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain .in accordance with "safe harbor" provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements .for additional risk factors affecting our business , see item 1a .risk factors in this annual report on form 10-k .management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 .business , item 1a .risk factors and item 8 .financial statements and supplementary data found in this annual report on form 10-k .spin-off downstream business on june 30 , 2011 , the spin-off of marathon 2019s downstream business was completed , creating two independent energy companies : marathon oil and mpc .marathon stockholders at the close of business on the record date of june 27 , 2011 received one share of mpc common stock for every two shares of marathon common stock held .a private letter tax ruling received in june 2011 from the irs affirmed the tax-free nature of the spin-off .activities related to the downstream business have been treated as discontinued operations in 2011 and 2010 ( see item 8 .financial statements and supplementary data 2013 note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information ) .overview 2013 market conditions exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows .the following table lists benchmark crude oil and natural gas price annual averages for the past three years. . benchmark | 2012 | 2011 | 2010
wti crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) | $ 94.15 | $ 95.11 | $ 79.61
brent ( europe ) crude oil ( dollars per bbl ) | $ 111.65 | $ 111.26 | $ 79.51
henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) | $ 2.79 | $ 4.04 | $ 4.39 henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mmbtu ) ( a ) $ 2.79 $ 4.04 $ 4.39 ( a ) settlement date average .liquid hydrocarbon 2013 prices of crude oil have been volatile in recent years , but less so when comparing annual averages for 2012 and 2011 .in 2011 , crude prices increased over 2010 levels , with increases in brent averages outstripping those in wti .the quality , location and composition of our liquid hydrocarbon production mix will cause our u.s .liquid hydrocarbon realizations to differ from the wti benchmark .in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the percentage of our u.s .crude oil and condensate production that was sour averaged 37 percent , 58 percent and 68 percent .sour crude contains more sulfur and tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil so that refining it is more costly and produces lower value products ; therefore , sour crude is considered of lower quality and typically sells at a discount to wti .the percentage of our u.s .crude and condensate production that is sour has been decreasing as onshore production from the eagle ford and bakken shale plays increases and production from the gulf of mexico declines .in recent years , crude oil sold along the u.s .gulf coast has been priced at a premium to wti because the louisiana light sweet benchmark has been tracking brent , while production from inland areas farther from large refineries has been at a discount to wti .ngls were 10 percent , 7 percent and 6 percent of our u.s .liquid hydrocarbon sales in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 .in 2012 , our sales of ngls increased due to our development of u.s .unconventional liquids-rich plays. .
Question: what was the change in the percentage of crude oil and condensate production that was sour between 2011 and 2012?
Steps: subtract(37, 58)
Answer: -21.0
Question: what was the change in the price of brent crude oil between 2010 and 2012?
Steps: subtract(111.65, 79.51)
Answer: 32.14
Question: so what was the percentage change of this value?
| convfinqa2708 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following table presents average u.s .and non-u.s .short-duration advances for the years ended december 31 : years ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
average u.s . short-duration advances | $ 2356 | $ 1972 | $ 1994
average non-u.s . short-duration advances | 1393 | 1393 | 1585
average total short-duration advances | $ 3749 | $ 3365 | $ 3579 although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2013 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2012 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity .average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.38 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 109.25 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 98.39 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .this increase was mainly due to higher levels of non-u.s .transaction accounts associated with the growth of new and existing business in assets under custody and administration .future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates .average other short-term borrowings declined to $ 3.79 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 4.68 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , as higher levels of client deposits provided additional liquidity .average long-term debt increased to $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.01 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of extendible notes by state street bank in december 2012 , the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , and the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of senior debt in november 2013 .this increase was partly offset by maturities of $ 1.75 billion of senior debt in the second quarter of 2012 .average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 5.90 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured .based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay- downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s .treasury and agency securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s .and non-u.s .mortgage- and asset-backed securities .the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time .we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to dictate what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .
Question: what was the change in the average total short-duration advances from 2012 to 2013?
| 384.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following table presents average u.s .and non-u.s .short-duration advances for the years ended december 31 : years ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
average u.s . short-duration advances | $ 2356 | $ 1972 | $ 1994
average non-u.s . short-duration advances | 1393 | 1393 | 1585
average total short-duration advances | $ 3749 | $ 3365 | $ 3579 although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2013 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2012 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity .average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.38 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 109.25 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 98.39 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .this increase was mainly due to higher levels of non-u.s .transaction accounts associated with the growth of new and existing business in assets under custody and administration .future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates .average other short-term borrowings declined to $ 3.79 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 4.68 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , as higher levels of client deposits provided additional liquidity .average long-term debt increased to $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.01 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of extendible notes by state street bank in december 2012 , the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , and the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of senior debt in november 2013 .this increase was partly offset by maturities of $ 1.75 billion of senior debt in the second quarter of 2012 .average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 5.90 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured .based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay- downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s .treasury and agency securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s .and non-u.s .mortgage- and asset-backed securities .the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time .we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to dictate what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .
Question: what was the change in the average total short-duration advances from 2012 to 2013?
| convfinqa2709 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following table presents average u.s .and non-u.s .short-duration advances for the years ended december 31 : years ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
average u.s . short-duration advances | $ 2356 | $ 1972 | $ 1994
average non-u.s . short-duration advances | 1393 | 1393 | 1585
average total short-duration advances | $ 3749 | $ 3365 | $ 3579 although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2013 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2012 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity .average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.38 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 109.25 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 98.39 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .this increase was mainly due to higher levels of non-u.s .transaction accounts associated with the growth of new and existing business in assets under custody and administration .future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates .average other short-term borrowings declined to $ 3.79 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 4.68 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , as higher levels of client deposits provided additional liquidity .average long-term debt increased to $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.01 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of extendible notes by state street bank in december 2012 , the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , and the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of senior debt in november 2013 .this increase was partly offset by maturities of $ 1.75 billion of senior debt in the second quarter of 2012 .average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 5.90 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured .based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay- downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s .treasury and agency securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s .and non-u.s .mortgage- and asset-backed securities .the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time .we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to dictate what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .
Question: what was the change in the average total short-duration advances from 2012 to 2013?
Steps: subtract(3749, 3365)
Answer: 384.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to those advances in 2012?
| 0.11412 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following table presents average u.s .and non-u.s .short-duration advances for the years ended december 31 : years ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
average u.s . short-duration advances | $ 2356 | $ 1972 | $ 1994
average non-u.s . short-duration advances | 1393 | 1393 | 1585
average total short-duration advances | $ 3749 | $ 3365 | $ 3579 although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2013 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2012 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity .average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.38 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 109.25 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 98.39 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .this increase was mainly due to higher levels of non-u.s .transaction accounts associated with the growth of new and existing business in assets under custody and administration .future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates .average other short-term borrowings declined to $ 3.79 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 4.68 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , as higher levels of client deposits provided additional liquidity .average long-term debt increased to $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.01 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of extendible notes by state street bank in december 2012 , the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , and the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of senior debt in november 2013 .this increase was partly offset by maturities of $ 1.75 billion of senior debt in the second quarter of 2012 .average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 5.90 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured .based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay- downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s .treasury and agency securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s .and non-u.s .mortgage- and asset-backed securities .the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time .we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to dictate what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .
Question: what was the change in the average total short-duration advances from 2012 to 2013?
Steps: subtract(3749, 3365)
Answer: 384.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to those advances in 2012?
| convfinqa2710 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following table presents average u.s .and non-u.s .short-duration advances for the years ended december 31 : years ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
average u.s . short-duration advances | $ 2356 | $ 1972 | $ 1994
average non-u.s . short-duration advances | 1393 | 1393 | 1585
average total short-duration advances | $ 3749 | $ 3365 | $ 3579 although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2013 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2012 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity .average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.38 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 109.25 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 98.39 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .this increase was mainly due to higher levels of non-u.s .transaction accounts associated with the growth of new and existing business in assets under custody and administration .future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates .average other short-term borrowings declined to $ 3.79 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 4.68 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , as higher levels of client deposits provided additional liquidity .average long-term debt increased to $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.01 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of extendible notes by state street bank in december 2012 , the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , and the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of senior debt in november 2013 .this increase was partly offset by maturities of $ 1.75 billion of senior debt in the second quarter of 2012 .average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 5.90 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured .based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay- downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s .treasury and agency securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s .and non-u.s .mortgage- and asset-backed securities .the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time .we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to dictate what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .
Question: what was the change in the average total short-duration advances from 2012 to 2013?
Steps: subtract(3749, 3365)
Answer: 384.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to those advances in 2012?
Steps: divide(#0, 3365)
Answer: 0.11412
Question: and from 2011 to 2012, what was the change in these advances?
| -214.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following table presents average u.s .and non-u.s .short-duration advances for the years ended december 31 : years ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
average u.s . short-duration advances | $ 2356 | $ 1972 | $ 1994
average non-u.s . short-duration advances | 1393 | 1393 | 1585
average total short-duration advances | $ 3749 | $ 3365 | $ 3579 although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2013 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2012 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity .average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.38 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 109.25 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 98.39 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .this increase was mainly due to higher levels of non-u.s .transaction accounts associated with the growth of new and existing business in assets under custody and administration .future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates .average other short-term borrowings declined to $ 3.79 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 4.68 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , as higher levels of client deposits provided additional liquidity .average long-term debt increased to $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.01 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of extendible notes by state street bank in december 2012 , the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , and the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of senior debt in november 2013 .this increase was partly offset by maturities of $ 1.75 billion of senior debt in the second quarter of 2012 .average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 5.90 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured .based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay- downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s .treasury and agency securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s .and non-u.s .mortgage- and asset-backed securities .the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time .we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to dictate what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .
Question: what was the change in the average total short-duration advances from 2012 to 2013?
Steps: subtract(3749, 3365)
Answer: 384.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to those advances in 2012?
Steps: divide(#0, 3365)
Answer: 0.11412
Question: and from 2011 to 2012, what was the change in these advances?
| convfinqa2711 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following table presents average u.s .and non-u.s .short-duration advances for the years ended december 31 : years ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
average u.s . short-duration advances | $ 2356 | $ 1972 | $ 1994
average non-u.s . short-duration advances | 1393 | 1393 | 1585
average total short-duration advances | $ 3749 | $ 3365 | $ 3579 although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2013 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2012 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity .average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.38 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 109.25 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 98.39 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .this increase was mainly due to higher levels of non-u.s .transaction accounts associated with the growth of new and existing business in assets under custody and administration .future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates .average other short-term borrowings declined to $ 3.79 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 4.68 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , as higher levels of client deposits provided additional liquidity .average long-term debt increased to $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.01 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of extendible notes by state street bank in december 2012 , the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , and the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of senior debt in november 2013 .this increase was partly offset by maturities of $ 1.75 billion of senior debt in the second quarter of 2012 .average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 5.90 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured .based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay- downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s .treasury and agency securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s .and non-u.s .mortgage- and asset-backed securities .the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time .we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to dictate what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .
Question: what was the change in the average total short-duration advances from 2012 to 2013?
Steps: subtract(3749, 3365)
Answer: 384.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to those advances in 2012?
Steps: divide(#0, 3365)
Answer: 0.11412
Question: and from 2011 to 2012, what was the change in these advances?
Steps: subtract(3365, 3579)
Answer: -214.0
Question: what is this change as a portion of those average total short-duration advances in 2011?
| -0.05979 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following table presents average u.s .and non-u.s .short-duration advances for the years ended december 31 : years ended december 31 . ( in millions ) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
average u.s . short-duration advances | $ 2356 | $ 1972 | $ 1994
average non-u.s . short-duration advances | 1393 | 1393 | 1585
average total short-duration advances | $ 3749 | $ 3365 | $ 3579 although average short-duration advances for the year ended december 31 , 2013 increased compared to the year ended december 31 , 2012 , such average advances remained low relative to historical levels , mainly the result of clients continuing to hold higher levels of liquidity .average other interest-earning assets increased to $ 11.16 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.38 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increased levels were primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral provided in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .aggregate average interest-bearing deposits increased to $ 109.25 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 98.39 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .this increase was mainly due to higher levels of non-u.s .transaction accounts associated with the growth of new and existing business in assets under custody and administration .future transaction account levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business , as well as market conditions , including the general levels of u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates .average other short-term borrowings declined to $ 3.79 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 4.68 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , as higher levels of client deposits provided additional liquidity .average long-term debt increased to $ 8.42 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 7.01 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .the increase primarily reflected the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of extendible notes by state street bank in december 2012 , the issuance of $ 1.5 billion of senior and subordinated debt in may 2013 , and the issuance of $ 1.0 billion of senior debt in november 2013 .this increase was partly offset by maturities of $ 1.75 billion of senior debt in the second quarter of 2012 .average other interest-bearing liabilities increased to $ 6.46 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2013 from $ 5.90 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2012 , primarily the result of higher levels of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions .several factors could affect future levels of our net interest revenue and margin , including the mix of client liabilities ; actions of various central banks ; changes in u.s .and non-u.s .interest rates ; changes in the various yield curves around the world ; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards , or interpretations of those standards ; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio ; and the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured .based on market conditions and other factors , we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay- downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated securities , such as u.s .treasury and agency securities , federal agency mortgage-backed securities and u.s .and non-u.s .mortgage- and asset-backed securities .the pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions and other factors over time .we expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to dictate what effect our reinvestment program will have on future levels of our net interest revenue and net interest margin. .
Question: what was the change in the average total short-duration advances from 2012 to 2013?
Steps: subtract(3749, 3365)
Answer: 384.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to those advances in 2012?
Steps: divide(#0, 3365)
Answer: 0.11412
Question: and from 2011 to 2012, what was the change in these advances?
Steps: subtract(3365, 3579)
Answer: -214.0
Question: what is this change as a portion of those average total short-duration advances in 2011?
| convfinqa2712 |
page 59 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 13 .debt and interest costs ( continued ) long-term debt obligations outstanding at december 31 , 2007 , have maturities of $ 127.1 million , $ 160 million , $ 388.4 million , $ 625.1 million and $ 550.3 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and $ 456.1 million thereafter .ball provides letters of credit in the ordinary course of business to secure liabilities recorded in connection with industrial development revenue bonds and certain self-insurance arrangements .letters of credit outstanding at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , were $ 41 million and $ 52.4 million , respectively .the notes payable and senior credit facilities are guaranteed on a full , unconditional and joint and several basis by certain of the company 2019s domestic wholly owned subsidiaries .certain foreign denominated tranches of the senior credit facilities are similarly guaranteed by certain of the company 2019s wholly owned foreign subsidiaries .note 22 contains further details as well as condensed , consolidating financial information for the company , segregating the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries .the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all debt payment obligations .the u.s .note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividend payments , share repurchases , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness .on march 27 , 2006 , ball expanded its senior secured credit facilities with the addition of a $ 500 million term d loan facility due in installments through october 2011 .also on march 27 , 2006 , ball issued at a price of 99.799 percent $ 450 million of 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) senior notes ( effective yield to maturity of 6.65 percent ) due in march 2018 .the proceeds from these financings were used to refinance existing u.s .can debt with ball corporation debt at lower interest rates , acquire certain north american plastic container net assets from alcan and reduce seasonal working capital debt .( see note 3 for further details of the acquisitions. ) on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities to extend debt maturities at lower interest rate spreads and provide the company with additional borrowing capacity for future growth .during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due in august 2006 .the refinancing and senior note redemptions resulted in a debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) for the related call premium and unamortized debt issuance costs .a summary of total interest cost paid and accrued follows: . ( $ in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
interest costs before refinancing costs | $ 155.8 | $ 142.5 | $ 102.4
debt refinancing costs | 2013 | 2013 | 19.3
total interest costs | 155.8 | 142.5 | 121.7
amounts capitalized | -6.4 ( 6.4 ) | -8.1 ( 8.1 ) | -5.3 ( 5.3 )
interest expense | $ 149.4 | $ 134.4 | $ 116.4
interest paid during the year ( a ) | $ 153.9 | $ 125.4 | $ 138.5 ( a ) includes $ 6.6 million paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption of the company 2019s senior and senior subordinated notes. .
Question: what was the difference in interest expense between 2005 and 2006?
| 18.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 59 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 13 .debt and interest costs ( continued ) long-term debt obligations outstanding at december 31 , 2007 , have maturities of $ 127.1 million , $ 160 million , $ 388.4 million , $ 625.1 million and $ 550.3 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and $ 456.1 million thereafter .ball provides letters of credit in the ordinary course of business to secure liabilities recorded in connection with industrial development revenue bonds and certain self-insurance arrangements .letters of credit outstanding at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , were $ 41 million and $ 52.4 million , respectively .the notes payable and senior credit facilities are guaranteed on a full , unconditional and joint and several basis by certain of the company 2019s domestic wholly owned subsidiaries .certain foreign denominated tranches of the senior credit facilities are similarly guaranteed by certain of the company 2019s wholly owned foreign subsidiaries .note 22 contains further details as well as condensed , consolidating financial information for the company , segregating the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries .the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all debt payment obligations .the u.s .note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividend payments , share repurchases , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness .on march 27 , 2006 , ball expanded its senior secured credit facilities with the addition of a $ 500 million term d loan facility due in installments through october 2011 .also on march 27 , 2006 , ball issued at a price of 99.799 percent $ 450 million of 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) senior notes ( effective yield to maturity of 6.65 percent ) due in march 2018 .the proceeds from these financings were used to refinance existing u.s .can debt with ball corporation debt at lower interest rates , acquire certain north american plastic container net assets from alcan and reduce seasonal working capital debt .( see note 3 for further details of the acquisitions. ) on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities to extend debt maturities at lower interest rate spreads and provide the company with additional borrowing capacity for future growth .during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due in august 2006 .the refinancing and senior note redemptions resulted in a debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) for the related call premium and unamortized debt issuance costs .a summary of total interest cost paid and accrued follows: . ( $ in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
interest costs before refinancing costs | $ 155.8 | $ 142.5 | $ 102.4
debt refinancing costs | 2013 | 2013 | 19.3
total interest costs | 155.8 | 142.5 | 121.7
amounts capitalized | -6.4 ( 6.4 ) | -8.1 ( 8.1 ) | -5.3 ( 5.3 )
interest expense | $ 149.4 | $ 134.4 | $ 116.4
interest paid during the year ( a ) | $ 153.9 | $ 125.4 | $ 138.5 ( a ) includes $ 6.6 million paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption of the company 2019s senior and senior subordinated notes. .
Question: what was the difference in interest expense between 2005 and 2006?
| convfinqa2713 |
page 59 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 13 .debt and interest costs ( continued ) long-term debt obligations outstanding at december 31 , 2007 , have maturities of $ 127.1 million , $ 160 million , $ 388.4 million , $ 625.1 million and $ 550.3 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and $ 456.1 million thereafter .ball provides letters of credit in the ordinary course of business to secure liabilities recorded in connection with industrial development revenue bonds and certain self-insurance arrangements .letters of credit outstanding at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , were $ 41 million and $ 52.4 million , respectively .the notes payable and senior credit facilities are guaranteed on a full , unconditional and joint and several basis by certain of the company 2019s domestic wholly owned subsidiaries .certain foreign denominated tranches of the senior credit facilities are similarly guaranteed by certain of the company 2019s wholly owned foreign subsidiaries .note 22 contains further details as well as condensed , consolidating financial information for the company , segregating the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries .the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all debt payment obligations .the u.s .note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividend payments , share repurchases , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness .on march 27 , 2006 , ball expanded its senior secured credit facilities with the addition of a $ 500 million term d loan facility due in installments through october 2011 .also on march 27 , 2006 , ball issued at a price of 99.799 percent $ 450 million of 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) senior notes ( effective yield to maturity of 6.65 percent ) due in march 2018 .the proceeds from these financings were used to refinance existing u.s .can debt with ball corporation debt at lower interest rates , acquire certain north american plastic container net assets from alcan and reduce seasonal working capital debt .( see note 3 for further details of the acquisitions. ) on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities to extend debt maturities at lower interest rate spreads and provide the company with additional borrowing capacity for future growth .during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due in august 2006 .the refinancing and senior note redemptions resulted in a debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) for the related call premium and unamortized debt issuance costs .a summary of total interest cost paid and accrued follows: . ( $ in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
interest costs before refinancing costs | $ 155.8 | $ 142.5 | $ 102.4
debt refinancing costs | 2013 | 2013 | 19.3
total interest costs | 155.8 | 142.5 | 121.7
amounts capitalized | -6.4 ( 6.4 ) | -8.1 ( 8.1 ) | -5.3 ( 5.3 )
interest expense | $ 149.4 | $ 134.4 | $ 116.4
interest paid during the year ( a ) | $ 153.9 | $ 125.4 | $ 138.5 ( a ) includes $ 6.6 million paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption of the company 2019s senior and senior subordinated notes. .
Question: what was the difference in interest expense between 2005 and 2006?
Steps: subtract(134.4, 116.4)
Answer: 18.0
Question: and the specific value for 2005?
| 116.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 59 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 13 .debt and interest costs ( continued ) long-term debt obligations outstanding at december 31 , 2007 , have maturities of $ 127.1 million , $ 160 million , $ 388.4 million , $ 625.1 million and $ 550.3 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and $ 456.1 million thereafter .ball provides letters of credit in the ordinary course of business to secure liabilities recorded in connection with industrial development revenue bonds and certain self-insurance arrangements .letters of credit outstanding at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , were $ 41 million and $ 52.4 million , respectively .the notes payable and senior credit facilities are guaranteed on a full , unconditional and joint and several basis by certain of the company 2019s domestic wholly owned subsidiaries .certain foreign denominated tranches of the senior credit facilities are similarly guaranteed by certain of the company 2019s wholly owned foreign subsidiaries .note 22 contains further details as well as condensed , consolidating financial information for the company , segregating the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries .the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all debt payment obligations .the u.s .note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividend payments , share repurchases , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness .on march 27 , 2006 , ball expanded its senior secured credit facilities with the addition of a $ 500 million term d loan facility due in installments through october 2011 .also on march 27 , 2006 , ball issued at a price of 99.799 percent $ 450 million of 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) senior notes ( effective yield to maturity of 6.65 percent ) due in march 2018 .the proceeds from these financings were used to refinance existing u.s .can debt with ball corporation debt at lower interest rates , acquire certain north american plastic container net assets from alcan and reduce seasonal working capital debt .( see note 3 for further details of the acquisitions. ) on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities to extend debt maturities at lower interest rate spreads and provide the company with additional borrowing capacity for future growth .during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due in august 2006 .the refinancing and senior note redemptions resulted in a debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) for the related call premium and unamortized debt issuance costs .a summary of total interest cost paid and accrued follows: . ( $ in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
interest costs before refinancing costs | $ 155.8 | $ 142.5 | $ 102.4
debt refinancing costs | 2013 | 2013 | 19.3
total interest costs | 155.8 | 142.5 | 121.7
amounts capitalized | -6.4 ( 6.4 ) | -8.1 ( 8.1 ) | -5.3 ( 5.3 )
interest expense | $ 149.4 | $ 134.4 | $ 116.4
interest paid during the year ( a ) | $ 153.9 | $ 125.4 | $ 138.5 ( a ) includes $ 6.6 million paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption of the company 2019s senior and senior subordinated notes. .
Question: what was the difference in interest expense between 2005 and 2006?
Steps: subtract(134.4, 116.4)
Answer: 18.0
Question: and the specific value for 2005?
| convfinqa2714 |
page 59 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 13 .debt and interest costs ( continued ) long-term debt obligations outstanding at december 31 , 2007 , have maturities of $ 127.1 million , $ 160 million , $ 388.4 million , $ 625.1 million and $ 550.3 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and $ 456.1 million thereafter .ball provides letters of credit in the ordinary course of business to secure liabilities recorded in connection with industrial development revenue bonds and certain self-insurance arrangements .letters of credit outstanding at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , were $ 41 million and $ 52.4 million , respectively .the notes payable and senior credit facilities are guaranteed on a full , unconditional and joint and several basis by certain of the company 2019s domestic wholly owned subsidiaries .certain foreign denominated tranches of the senior credit facilities are similarly guaranteed by certain of the company 2019s wholly owned foreign subsidiaries .note 22 contains further details as well as condensed , consolidating financial information for the company , segregating the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries .the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all debt payment obligations .the u.s .note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividend payments , share repurchases , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness .on march 27 , 2006 , ball expanded its senior secured credit facilities with the addition of a $ 500 million term d loan facility due in installments through october 2011 .also on march 27 , 2006 , ball issued at a price of 99.799 percent $ 450 million of 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) senior notes ( effective yield to maturity of 6.65 percent ) due in march 2018 .the proceeds from these financings were used to refinance existing u.s .can debt with ball corporation debt at lower interest rates , acquire certain north american plastic container net assets from alcan and reduce seasonal working capital debt .( see note 3 for further details of the acquisitions. ) on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities to extend debt maturities at lower interest rate spreads and provide the company with additional borrowing capacity for future growth .during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due in august 2006 .the refinancing and senior note redemptions resulted in a debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) for the related call premium and unamortized debt issuance costs .a summary of total interest cost paid and accrued follows: . ( $ in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
interest costs before refinancing costs | $ 155.8 | $ 142.5 | $ 102.4
debt refinancing costs | 2013 | 2013 | 19.3
total interest costs | 155.8 | 142.5 | 121.7
amounts capitalized | -6.4 ( 6.4 ) | -8.1 ( 8.1 ) | -5.3 ( 5.3 )
interest expense | $ 149.4 | $ 134.4 | $ 116.4
interest paid during the year ( a ) | $ 153.9 | $ 125.4 | $ 138.5 ( a ) includes $ 6.6 million paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption of the company 2019s senior and senior subordinated notes. .
Question: what was the difference in interest expense between 2005 and 2006?
Steps: subtract(134.4, 116.4)
Answer: 18.0
Question: and the specific value for 2005?
Steps: Ask for number 116.4
Answer: 116.4
Question: so what was the difference as a percentage of the original value?
| 0.15464 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 59 of 94 notes to consolidated financial statements ball corporation and subsidiaries 13 .debt and interest costs ( continued ) long-term debt obligations outstanding at december 31 , 2007 , have maturities of $ 127.1 million , $ 160 million , $ 388.4 million , $ 625.1 million and $ 550.3 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and $ 456.1 million thereafter .ball provides letters of credit in the ordinary course of business to secure liabilities recorded in connection with industrial development revenue bonds and certain self-insurance arrangements .letters of credit outstanding at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , were $ 41 million and $ 52.4 million , respectively .the notes payable and senior credit facilities are guaranteed on a full , unconditional and joint and several basis by certain of the company 2019s domestic wholly owned subsidiaries .certain foreign denominated tranches of the senior credit facilities are similarly guaranteed by certain of the company 2019s wholly owned foreign subsidiaries .note 22 contains further details as well as condensed , consolidating financial information for the company , segregating the guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries .the company was not in default of any loan agreement at december 31 , 2007 , and has met all debt payment obligations .the u.s .note agreements , bank credit agreement and industrial development revenue bond agreements contain certain restrictions relating to dividend payments , share repurchases , investments , financial ratios , guarantees and the incurrence of additional indebtedness .on march 27 , 2006 , ball expanded its senior secured credit facilities with the addition of a $ 500 million term d loan facility due in installments through october 2011 .also on march 27 , 2006 , ball issued at a price of 99.799 percent $ 450 million of 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) senior notes ( effective yield to maturity of 6.65 percent ) due in march 2018 .the proceeds from these financings were used to refinance existing u.s .can debt with ball corporation debt at lower interest rates , acquire certain north american plastic container net assets from alcan and reduce seasonal working capital debt .( see note 3 for further details of the acquisitions. ) on october 13 , 2005 , ball refinanced its senior secured credit facilities to extend debt maturities at lower interest rate spreads and provide the company with additional borrowing capacity for future growth .during the third and fourth quarters of 2005 , ball redeemed its 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) senior notes due in august 2006 .the refinancing and senior note redemptions resulted in a debt refinancing charge of $ 19.3 million ( $ 12.3 million after tax ) for the related call premium and unamortized debt issuance costs .a summary of total interest cost paid and accrued follows: . ( $ in millions ) | 2007 | 2006 | 2005
interest costs before refinancing costs | $ 155.8 | $ 142.5 | $ 102.4
debt refinancing costs | 2013 | 2013 | 19.3
total interest costs | 155.8 | 142.5 | 121.7
amounts capitalized | -6.4 ( 6.4 ) | -8.1 ( 8.1 ) | -5.3 ( 5.3 )
interest expense | $ 149.4 | $ 134.4 | $ 116.4
interest paid during the year ( a ) | $ 153.9 | $ 125.4 | $ 138.5 ( a ) includes $ 6.6 million paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption of the company 2019s senior and senior subordinated notes. .
Question: what was the difference in interest expense between 2005 and 2006?
Steps: subtract(134.4, 116.4)
Answer: 18.0
Question: and the specific value for 2005?
Steps: Ask for number 116.4
Answer: 116.4
Question: so what was the difference as a percentage of the original value?
| convfinqa2715 |
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers .these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements .income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , was approximately $ 2.7 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively .these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , of approximately $ 7.1 million , $ 7.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.4 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 5.7 million , respectively , and an amount which , in management 2019s estimate , reasonably provides for the recovery of the investment over a period representing the expected remaining term of the retail store leases .the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2009 , $ 5.6 and $ 3.8 ; 2010 , $ 5.4 and $ 3.7 ; 2011 , $ 4.5 and $ 3.1 ; 2012 , $ 2.3 and $ 2.1 ; 2013 , $ 1.0 and $ 1.3 and thereafter , $ 1.4 and $ 0.5 , respectively .leveraged lease during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties .the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights .the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million .this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with sfas no .13 , accounting for leases ( as amended ) .from 2002 to 2007 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million .as of december 31 , 2008 , the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 42.8 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease .as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease .accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease .at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . | 2008 | 2007
remaining net rentals | $ 53.8 | $ 55.0
estimated unguaranteed residual value | 31.7 | 36.0
non-recourse mortgage debt | -38.5 ( 38.5 ) | -43.9 ( 43.9 )
unearned and deferred income | -43.0 ( 43.0 ) | -43.3 ( 43.3 )
net investment in leveraged lease | $ 4.0 | $ 3.8 9 .mortgages and other financing receivables : the company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the company .for a complete listing of the company 2019s mortgages and other financing receivables at december 31 , 2008 , see financial statement schedule iv included on page 141 of this annual report on form 10-k .reconciliation of mortgage loans and other financing receivables on real estate: .
Question: what is the sum of the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases for 2009 and 2010?
| 11.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers .these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements .income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , was approximately $ 2.7 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively .these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , of approximately $ 7.1 million , $ 7.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.4 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 5.7 million , respectively , and an amount which , in management 2019s estimate , reasonably provides for the recovery of the investment over a period representing the expected remaining term of the retail store leases .the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2009 , $ 5.6 and $ 3.8 ; 2010 , $ 5.4 and $ 3.7 ; 2011 , $ 4.5 and $ 3.1 ; 2012 , $ 2.3 and $ 2.1 ; 2013 , $ 1.0 and $ 1.3 and thereafter , $ 1.4 and $ 0.5 , respectively .leveraged lease during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties .the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights .the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million .this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with sfas no .13 , accounting for leases ( as amended ) .from 2002 to 2007 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million .as of december 31 , 2008 , the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 42.8 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease .as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease .accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease .at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . | 2008 | 2007
remaining net rentals | $ 53.8 | $ 55.0
estimated unguaranteed residual value | 31.7 | 36.0
non-recourse mortgage debt | -38.5 ( 38.5 ) | -43.9 ( 43.9 )
unearned and deferred income | -43.0 ( 43.0 ) | -43.3 ( 43.3 )
net investment in leveraged lease | $ 4.0 | $ 3.8 9 .mortgages and other financing receivables : the company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the company .for a complete listing of the company 2019s mortgages and other financing receivables at december 31 , 2008 , see financial statement schedule iv included on page 141 of this annual report on form 10-k .reconciliation of mortgage loans and other financing receivables on real estate: .
Question: what is the sum of the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases for 2009 and 2010?
| convfinqa2716 |
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers .these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements .income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , was approximately $ 2.7 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively .these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , of approximately $ 7.1 million , $ 7.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.4 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 5.7 million , respectively , and an amount which , in management 2019s estimate , reasonably provides for the recovery of the investment over a period representing the expected remaining term of the retail store leases .the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2009 , $ 5.6 and $ 3.8 ; 2010 , $ 5.4 and $ 3.7 ; 2011 , $ 4.5 and $ 3.1 ; 2012 , $ 2.3 and $ 2.1 ; 2013 , $ 1.0 and $ 1.3 and thereafter , $ 1.4 and $ 0.5 , respectively .leveraged lease during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties .the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights .the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million .this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with sfas no .13 , accounting for leases ( as amended ) .from 2002 to 2007 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million .as of december 31 , 2008 , the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 42.8 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease .as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease .accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease .at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . | 2008 | 2007
remaining net rentals | $ 53.8 | $ 55.0
estimated unguaranteed residual value | 31.7 | 36.0
non-recourse mortgage debt | -38.5 ( 38.5 ) | -43.9 ( 43.9 )
unearned and deferred income | -43.0 ( 43.0 ) | -43.3 ( 43.3 )
net investment in leveraged lease | $ 4.0 | $ 3.8 9 .mortgages and other financing receivables : the company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the company .for a complete listing of the company 2019s mortgages and other financing receivables at december 31 , 2008 , see financial statement schedule iv included on page 141 of this annual report on form 10-k .reconciliation of mortgage loans and other financing receivables on real estate: .
Question: what is the sum of the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases for 2009 and 2010?
Steps: add(5.6, 5.4)
Answer: 11.0
Question: what is the total sum including 2011?
| 15.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued investment in retail store leases the company has interests in various retail store leases relating to the anchor store premises in neighborhood and community shopping centers .these premises have been sublet to retailers who lease the stores pursuant to net lease agreements .income from the investment in these retail store leases during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , was approximately $ 2.7 million , $ 1.2 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively .these amounts represent sublease revenues during the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , of approximately $ 7.1 million , $ 7.7 million and $ 8.2 million , respectively , less related expenses of $ 4.4 million , $ 5.1 million and $ 5.7 million , respectively , and an amount which , in management 2019s estimate , reasonably provides for the recovery of the investment over a period representing the expected remaining term of the retail store leases .the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases and future minimum obligations through the remaining terms of its retail store leases , assuming no new or renegotiated leases are executed for such premises , for future years are as follows ( in millions ) : 2009 , $ 5.6 and $ 3.8 ; 2010 , $ 5.4 and $ 3.7 ; 2011 , $ 4.5 and $ 3.1 ; 2012 , $ 2.3 and $ 2.1 ; 2013 , $ 1.0 and $ 1.3 and thereafter , $ 1.4 and $ 0.5 , respectively .leveraged lease during june 2002 , the company acquired a 90% ( 90 % ) equity participation interest in an existing leveraged lease of 30 properties .the properties are leased under a long-term bond-type net lease whose primary term expires in 2016 , with the lessee having certain renewal option rights .the company 2019s cash equity investment was approximately $ 4.0 million .this equity investment is reported as a net investment in leveraged lease in accordance with sfas no .13 , accounting for leases ( as amended ) .from 2002 to 2007 , 18 of these properties were sold , whereby the proceeds from the sales were used to pay down the mortgage debt by approximately $ 31.2 million .as of december 31 , 2008 , the remaining 12 properties were encumbered by third-party non-recourse debt of approximately $ 42.8 million that is scheduled to fully amortize during the primary term of the lease from a portion of the periodic net rents receivable under the net lease .as an equity participant in the leveraged lease , the company has no recourse obligation for principal or interest payments on the debt , which is collateralized by a first mortgage lien on the properties and collateral assignment of the lease .accordingly , this obligation has been offset against the related net rental receivable under the lease .at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company 2019s net investment in the leveraged lease consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . | 2008 | 2007
remaining net rentals | $ 53.8 | $ 55.0
estimated unguaranteed residual value | 31.7 | 36.0
non-recourse mortgage debt | -38.5 ( 38.5 ) | -43.9 ( 43.9 )
unearned and deferred income | -43.0 ( 43.0 ) | -43.3 ( 43.3 )
net investment in leveraged lease | $ 4.0 | $ 3.8 9 .mortgages and other financing receivables : the company has various mortgages and other financing receivables which consist of loans acquired and loans originated by the company .for a complete listing of the company 2019s mortgages and other financing receivables at december 31 , 2008 , see financial statement schedule iv included on page 141 of this annual report on form 10-k .reconciliation of mortgage loans and other financing receivables on real estate: .
Question: what is the sum of the company 2019s future minimum revenues under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant subleases for 2009 and 2010?
Steps: add(5.6, 5.4)
Answer: 11.0
Question: what is the total sum including 2011?
| convfinqa2717 |
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 119.89 | $ 139.55 | $ 124.88 | $ 127.08 | $ 122.64
s&p 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 128.68 | $ 142.68 | $ 149.69 | $ 173.33 | $ 182.85
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 131.84 | $ 168.39 | $ 188.00 | $ 206.46 | $ 209.40 securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2004?
| 139.55 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 119.89 | $ 139.55 | $ 124.88 | $ 127.08 | $ 122.64
s&p 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 128.68 | $ 142.68 | $ 149.69 | $ 173.33 | $ 182.85
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 131.84 | $ 168.39 | $ 188.00 | $ 206.46 | $ 209.40 securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2004?
| convfinqa2718 |
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 119.89 | $ 139.55 | $ 124.88 | $ 127.08 | $ 122.64
s&p 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 128.68 | $ 142.68 | $ 149.69 | $ 173.33 | $ 182.85
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 131.84 | $ 168.39 | $ 188.00 | $ 206.46 | $ 209.40 securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 139.55
Answer: 139.55
Question: and what was it in 2003?
| 119.89 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 119.89 | $ 139.55 | $ 124.88 | $ 127.08 | $ 122.64
s&p 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 128.68 | $ 142.68 | $ 149.69 | $ 173.33 | $ 182.85
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 131.84 | $ 168.39 | $ 188.00 | $ 206.46 | $ 209.40 securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 139.55
Answer: 139.55
Question: and what was it in 2003?
| convfinqa2719 |
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 119.89 | $ 139.55 | $ 124.88 | $ 127.08 | $ 122.64
s&p 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 128.68 | $ 142.68 | $ 149.69 | $ 173.33 | $ 182.85
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 131.84 | $ 168.39 | $ 188.00 | $ 206.46 | $ 209.40 securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 139.55
Answer: 139.55
Question: and what was it in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 119.89
Answer: 119.89
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 19.66 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 119.89 | $ 139.55 | $ 124.88 | $ 127.08 | $ 122.64
s&p 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 128.68 | $ 142.68 | $ 149.69 | $ 173.33 | $ 182.85
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 131.84 | $ 168.39 | $ 188.00 | $ 206.46 | $ 209.40 securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 139.55
Answer: 139.55
Question: and what was it in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 119.89
Answer: 119.89
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| convfinqa2720 |
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 119.89 | $ 139.55 | $ 124.88 | $ 127.08 | $ 122.64
s&p 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 128.68 | $ 142.68 | $ 149.69 | $ 173.33 | $ 182.85
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 131.84 | $ 168.39 | $ 188.00 | $ 206.46 | $ 209.40 securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 139.55
Answer: 139.55
Question: and what was it in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 119.89
Answer: 119.89
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(139.55, 119.89)
Answer: 19.66
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2003?
| 119.89 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 119.89 | $ 139.55 | $ 124.88 | $ 127.08 | $ 122.64
s&p 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 128.68 | $ 142.68 | $ 149.69 | $ 173.33 | $ 182.85
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 131.84 | $ 168.39 | $ 188.00 | $ 206.46 | $ 209.40 securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 139.55
Answer: 139.55
Question: and what was it in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 119.89
Answer: 119.89
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(139.55, 119.89)
Answer: 19.66
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2003?
| convfinqa2721 |
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 119.89 | $ 139.55 | $ 124.88 | $ 127.08 | $ 122.64
s&p 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 128.68 | $ 142.68 | $ 149.69 | $ 173.33 | $ 182.85
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 131.84 | $ 168.39 | $ 188.00 | $ 206.46 | $ 209.40 securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 139.55
Answer: 139.55
Question: and what was it in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 119.89
Answer: 119.89
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(139.55, 119.89)
Answer: 19.66
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 119.89
Answer: 119.89
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2003 value?
| 0.16398 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . | 12/31/02 | 12/31/03 | 12/31/04 | 12/31/05 | 12/31/06 | 12/31/07
united parcel service inc . | $ 100.00 | $ 119.89 | $ 139.55 | $ 124.88 | $ 127.08 | $ 122.64
s&p 500 index | $ 100.00 | $ 128.68 | $ 142.68 | $ 149.69 | $ 173.33 | $ 182.85
dow jones transportation average | $ 100.00 | $ 131.84 | $ 168.39 | $ 188.00 | $ 206.46 | $ 209.40 securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2004?
Steps: Ask for number 139.55
Answer: 139.55
Question: and what was it in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 119.89
Answer: 119.89
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(139.55, 119.89)
Answer: 19.66
Question: what was the value of the ups in 2003?
Steps: Ask for number 119.89
Answer: 119.89
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2003 value?
| convfinqa2722 |
item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. . name and location | number of rooms | owned leased or managed
loews annapolis hotel annapolis maryland | 220 | owned
loews coronado bay san diego california | 440 | land lease expiring 2034
loews denver hotel denver colorado | 185 | owned
the don cesar a loews hotel st . pete beach florida | 347 | management contract ( a ) ( b )
hard rock hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 650 | management contract ( c )
loews lake las vegas henderson nevada | 493 | management contract ( a )
loews le concorde hotel quebec city canada | 405 | land lease expiring 2069
the madison a loews hotel washington d.c . | 353 | management contract expiring 2021 ( a )
loews miami beach hotel miami beach florida | 790 | owned
loews new orleans hotel new orleans louisiana | 285 | management contract expiring 2018 ( a )
loews philadelphia hotel philadelphia pennsylvania | 585 | owned
loews portofino bay hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 750 | management contract ( c )
loews regency hotel new york new york | 350 | land lease expiring 2013 with renewal option for 47 years
loews royal pacific resort at universal orlando orlando florida | 1000 | management contract ( c )
loews santa monica beach hotel santa monica california | 340 | management contract expiring 2018 with renewal option for5 years ( a )
loews vanderbilt hotel nashville tennessee | 340 | owned
loews ventana canyon tucson arizona | 400 | management contract expiring 2019 ( a )
loews hotel vogue montreal canada | 140 | owned item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. .
Question: how many rooms does loews hotel have in montreal, canada?
| 140.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. . name and location | number of rooms | owned leased or managed
loews annapolis hotel annapolis maryland | 220 | owned
loews coronado bay san diego california | 440 | land lease expiring 2034
loews denver hotel denver colorado | 185 | owned
the don cesar a loews hotel st . pete beach florida | 347 | management contract ( a ) ( b )
hard rock hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 650 | management contract ( c )
loews lake las vegas henderson nevada | 493 | management contract ( a )
loews le concorde hotel quebec city canada | 405 | land lease expiring 2069
the madison a loews hotel washington d.c . | 353 | management contract expiring 2021 ( a )
loews miami beach hotel miami beach florida | 790 | owned
loews new orleans hotel new orleans louisiana | 285 | management contract expiring 2018 ( a )
loews philadelphia hotel philadelphia pennsylvania | 585 | owned
loews portofino bay hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 750 | management contract ( c )
loews regency hotel new york new york | 350 | land lease expiring 2013 with renewal option for 47 years
loews royal pacific resort at universal orlando orlando florida | 1000 | management contract ( c )
loews santa monica beach hotel santa monica california | 340 | management contract expiring 2018 with renewal option for5 years ( a )
loews vanderbilt hotel nashville tennessee | 340 | owned
loews ventana canyon tucson arizona | 400 | management contract expiring 2019 ( a )
loews hotel vogue montreal canada | 140 | owned item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. .
Question: how many rooms does loews hotel have in montreal, canada?
| convfinqa2723 |
item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. . name and location | number of rooms | owned leased or managed
loews annapolis hotel annapolis maryland | 220 | owned
loews coronado bay san diego california | 440 | land lease expiring 2034
loews denver hotel denver colorado | 185 | owned
the don cesar a loews hotel st . pete beach florida | 347 | management contract ( a ) ( b )
hard rock hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 650 | management contract ( c )
loews lake las vegas henderson nevada | 493 | management contract ( a )
loews le concorde hotel quebec city canada | 405 | land lease expiring 2069
the madison a loews hotel washington d.c . | 353 | management contract expiring 2021 ( a )
loews miami beach hotel miami beach florida | 790 | owned
loews new orleans hotel new orleans louisiana | 285 | management contract expiring 2018 ( a )
loews philadelphia hotel philadelphia pennsylvania | 585 | owned
loews portofino bay hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 750 | management contract ( c )
loews regency hotel new york new york | 350 | land lease expiring 2013 with renewal option for 47 years
loews royal pacific resort at universal orlando orlando florida | 1000 | management contract ( c )
loews santa monica beach hotel santa monica california | 340 | management contract expiring 2018 with renewal option for5 years ( a )
loews vanderbilt hotel nashville tennessee | 340 | owned
loews ventana canyon tucson arizona | 400 | management contract expiring 2019 ( a )
loews hotel vogue montreal canada | 140 | owned item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. .
Question: how many rooms does loews hotel have in montreal, canada?
Steps: Ask for number 140
Answer: 140.0
Question: and what is that number for quebec city, canada?
| 405.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. . name and location | number of rooms | owned leased or managed
loews annapolis hotel annapolis maryland | 220 | owned
loews coronado bay san diego california | 440 | land lease expiring 2034
loews denver hotel denver colorado | 185 | owned
the don cesar a loews hotel st . pete beach florida | 347 | management contract ( a ) ( b )
hard rock hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 650 | management contract ( c )
loews lake las vegas henderson nevada | 493 | management contract ( a )
loews le concorde hotel quebec city canada | 405 | land lease expiring 2069
the madison a loews hotel washington d.c . | 353 | management contract expiring 2021 ( a )
loews miami beach hotel miami beach florida | 790 | owned
loews new orleans hotel new orleans louisiana | 285 | management contract expiring 2018 ( a )
loews philadelphia hotel philadelphia pennsylvania | 585 | owned
loews portofino bay hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 750 | management contract ( c )
loews regency hotel new york new york | 350 | land lease expiring 2013 with renewal option for 47 years
loews royal pacific resort at universal orlando orlando florida | 1000 | management contract ( c )
loews santa monica beach hotel santa monica california | 340 | management contract expiring 2018 with renewal option for5 years ( a )
loews vanderbilt hotel nashville tennessee | 340 | owned
loews ventana canyon tucson arizona | 400 | management contract expiring 2019 ( a )
loews hotel vogue montreal canada | 140 | owned item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. .
Question: how many rooms does loews hotel have in montreal, canada?
Steps: Ask for number 140
Answer: 140.0
Question: and what is that number for quebec city, canada?
| convfinqa2724 |
item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. . name and location | number of rooms | owned leased or managed
loews annapolis hotel annapolis maryland | 220 | owned
loews coronado bay san diego california | 440 | land lease expiring 2034
loews denver hotel denver colorado | 185 | owned
the don cesar a loews hotel st . pete beach florida | 347 | management contract ( a ) ( b )
hard rock hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 650 | management contract ( c )
loews lake las vegas henderson nevada | 493 | management contract ( a )
loews le concorde hotel quebec city canada | 405 | land lease expiring 2069
the madison a loews hotel washington d.c . | 353 | management contract expiring 2021 ( a )
loews miami beach hotel miami beach florida | 790 | owned
loews new orleans hotel new orleans louisiana | 285 | management contract expiring 2018 ( a )
loews philadelphia hotel philadelphia pennsylvania | 585 | owned
loews portofino bay hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 750 | management contract ( c )
loews regency hotel new york new york | 350 | land lease expiring 2013 with renewal option for 47 years
loews royal pacific resort at universal orlando orlando florida | 1000 | management contract ( c )
loews santa monica beach hotel santa monica california | 340 | management contract expiring 2018 with renewal option for5 years ( a )
loews vanderbilt hotel nashville tennessee | 340 | owned
loews ventana canyon tucson arizona | 400 | management contract expiring 2019 ( a )
loews hotel vogue montreal canada | 140 | owned item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. .
Question: how many rooms does loews hotel have in montreal, canada?
Steps: Ask for number 140
Answer: 140.0
Question: and what is that number for quebec city, canada?
Steps: Ask for number 405
Answer: 405.0
Question: what is, then, the total of rooms in both locations, combined?
| 545.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. . name and location | number of rooms | owned leased or managed
loews annapolis hotel annapolis maryland | 220 | owned
loews coronado bay san diego california | 440 | land lease expiring 2034
loews denver hotel denver colorado | 185 | owned
the don cesar a loews hotel st . pete beach florida | 347 | management contract ( a ) ( b )
hard rock hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 650 | management contract ( c )
loews lake las vegas henderson nevada | 493 | management contract ( a )
loews le concorde hotel quebec city canada | 405 | land lease expiring 2069
the madison a loews hotel washington d.c . | 353 | management contract expiring 2021 ( a )
loews miami beach hotel miami beach florida | 790 | owned
loews new orleans hotel new orleans louisiana | 285 | management contract expiring 2018 ( a )
loews philadelphia hotel philadelphia pennsylvania | 585 | owned
loews portofino bay hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 750 | management contract ( c )
loews regency hotel new york new york | 350 | land lease expiring 2013 with renewal option for 47 years
loews royal pacific resort at universal orlando orlando florida | 1000 | management contract ( c )
loews santa monica beach hotel santa monica california | 340 | management contract expiring 2018 with renewal option for5 years ( a )
loews vanderbilt hotel nashville tennessee | 340 | owned
loews ventana canyon tucson arizona | 400 | management contract expiring 2019 ( a )
loews hotel vogue montreal canada | 140 | owned item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. .
Question: how many rooms does loews hotel have in montreal, canada?
Steps: Ask for number 140
Answer: 140.0
Question: and what is that number for quebec city, canada?
Steps: Ask for number 405
Answer: 405.0
Question: what is, then, the total of rooms in both locations, combined?
| convfinqa2725 |
item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. . name and location | number of rooms | owned leased or managed
loews annapolis hotel annapolis maryland | 220 | owned
loews coronado bay san diego california | 440 | land lease expiring 2034
loews denver hotel denver colorado | 185 | owned
the don cesar a loews hotel st . pete beach florida | 347 | management contract ( a ) ( b )
hard rock hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 650 | management contract ( c )
loews lake las vegas henderson nevada | 493 | management contract ( a )
loews le concorde hotel quebec city canada | 405 | land lease expiring 2069
the madison a loews hotel washington d.c . | 353 | management contract expiring 2021 ( a )
loews miami beach hotel miami beach florida | 790 | owned
loews new orleans hotel new orleans louisiana | 285 | management contract expiring 2018 ( a )
loews philadelphia hotel philadelphia pennsylvania | 585 | owned
loews portofino bay hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 750 | management contract ( c )
loews regency hotel new york new york | 350 | land lease expiring 2013 with renewal option for 47 years
loews royal pacific resort at universal orlando orlando florida | 1000 | management contract ( c )
loews santa monica beach hotel santa monica california | 340 | management contract expiring 2018 with renewal option for5 years ( a )
loews vanderbilt hotel nashville tennessee | 340 | owned
loews ventana canyon tucson arizona | 400 | management contract expiring 2019 ( a )
loews hotel vogue montreal canada | 140 | owned item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. .
Question: how many rooms does loews hotel have in montreal, canada?
Steps: Ask for number 140
Answer: 140.0
Question: and what is that number for quebec city, canada?
Steps: Ask for number 405
Answer: 405.0
Question: what is, then, the total of rooms in both locations, combined?
Steps: add(140, 405)
Answer: 545.0
Question: and concerning only the santa monica location, what is the final year of the management contract, including the renewals?
| 2023.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. . name and location | number of rooms | owned leased or managed
loews annapolis hotel annapolis maryland | 220 | owned
loews coronado bay san diego california | 440 | land lease expiring 2034
loews denver hotel denver colorado | 185 | owned
the don cesar a loews hotel st . pete beach florida | 347 | management contract ( a ) ( b )
hard rock hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 650 | management contract ( c )
loews lake las vegas henderson nevada | 493 | management contract ( a )
loews le concorde hotel quebec city canada | 405 | land lease expiring 2069
the madison a loews hotel washington d.c . | 353 | management contract expiring 2021 ( a )
loews miami beach hotel miami beach florida | 790 | owned
loews new orleans hotel new orleans louisiana | 285 | management contract expiring 2018 ( a )
loews philadelphia hotel philadelphia pennsylvania | 585 | owned
loews portofino bay hotel at universal orlando orlando florida | 750 | management contract ( c )
loews regency hotel new york new york | 350 | land lease expiring 2013 with renewal option for 47 years
loews royal pacific resort at universal orlando orlando florida | 1000 | management contract ( c )
loews santa monica beach hotel santa monica california | 340 | management contract expiring 2018 with renewal option for5 years ( a )
loews vanderbilt hotel nashville tennessee | 340 | owned
loews ventana canyon tucson arizona | 400 | management contract expiring 2019 ( a )
loews hotel vogue montreal canada | 140 | owned item 1 .business loews hotels holding corporation the subsidiaries of loews hotels holding corporation ( 201cloews hotels 201d ) , our wholly owned subsidiary , presently operate the following 18 hotels .loews hotels accounted for 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) , 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) and 2.7% ( 2.7 % ) of our consolidated total revenue for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .number of name and location rooms owned , leased or managed loews annapolis hotel 220 owned annapolis , maryland loews coronado bay 440 land lease expiring 2034 san diego , california loews denver hotel 185 owned denver , colorado the don cesar , a loews hotel 347 management contract ( a ) ( b ) st .pete beach , florida hard rock hotel , 650 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews lake las vegas 493 management contract ( a ) henderson , nevada loews le concorde hotel 405 land lease expiring 2069 quebec city , canada the madison , a loews hotel 353 management contract expiring 2021 ( a ) washington , d.c .loews miami beach hotel 790 owned miami beach , florida loews new orleans hotel 285 management contract expiring 2018 ( a ) new orleans , louisiana loews philadelphia hotel 585 owned philadelphia , pennsylvania loews portofino bay hotel , 750 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews regency hotel 350 land lease expiring 2013 , with renewal option new york , new york for 47 years loews royal pacific resort 1000 management contract ( c ) at universal orlando orlando , florida loews santa monica beach hotel 340 management contract expiring 2018 , with santa monica , california renewal option for 5 years ( a ) loews vanderbilt hotel 340 owned nashville , tennessee loews ventana canyon 400 management contract expiring 2019 ( a ) tucson , arizona loews hotel vogue 140 owned montreal , canada ( a ) these management contracts are subject to termination rights .( b ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 20% ( 20 % ) owner of the hotel , which is being operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract .( c ) a loews hotels subsidiary is a 50% ( 50 % ) owner of these hotels located at the universal orlando theme park , through a joint venture with universal studios and the rank group .the hotels are on land leased by the joint venture and are operated by loews hotels pursuant to a management contract. .
Question: how many rooms does loews hotel have in montreal, canada?
Steps: Ask for number 140
Answer: 140.0
Question: and what is that number for quebec city, canada?
Steps: Ask for number 405
Answer: 405.0
Question: what is, then, the total of rooms in both locations, combined?
Steps: add(140, 405)
Answer: 545.0
Question: and concerning only the santa monica location, what is the final year of the management contract, including the renewals?
| convfinqa2726 |
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued ciel ii .ciel ii , a canadian dbs satellite , was launched in december 2008 and commenced commercial operation during february 2009 .this satellite is accounted for as a capital lease and depreciated over the term of the satellite service agreement .we have leased 100% ( 100 % ) of the capacity on ciel ii for an initial 10 year term .as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we had $ 500 million capitalized for the estimated fair value of satellites acquired under capital leases included in 201cproperty and equipment , net , 201d with related accumulated depreciation of $ 151 million and $ 109 million , respectively .in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) , we recognized $ 43 million , $ 43 million and $ 40 million in depreciation expense on satellites acquired under capital lease agreements during the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 . 2012 | $ 84715
2013 | 77893
2014 | 76296
2015 | 75970
2016 | 75970
thereafter | 314269
total minimum lease payments | 705113
less : amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs ( primarily insurance and maintenance ) including profit thereon included in total minimum lease payments | -323382 ( 323382 )
net minimum lease payments | 381731
less : amount representing interest | -109823 ( 109823 )
present value of net minimum lease payments | 271908
less : current portion | -29202 ( 29202 )
long-term portion of capital lease obligations | $ 242706 the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2011 is included in the commitments table in note 16 .12 .income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards .deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized .we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance .determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities .we file consolidated tax returns in the u.s .the income taxes of domestic and foreign subsidiaries not included in the u.s .tax group are presented in our consolidated financial statements based on a separate return basis for each tax paying entity .as of december 31 , 2011 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 13 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes .the state nols begin to expire in the year 2020 .in addition , there are $ 5 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance and $ 14 million benefit of capital loss carryforwards which are fully offset by a valuation allowance .the credit carryforwards begin to expire in the year 2012. .
Question: as of december 31, 2011, what percentage of the total future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation were due after 2016?
| 0.4457 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued ciel ii .ciel ii , a canadian dbs satellite , was launched in december 2008 and commenced commercial operation during february 2009 .this satellite is accounted for as a capital lease and depreciated over the term of the satellite service agreement .we have leased 100% ( 100 % ) of the capacity on ciel ii for an initial 10 year term .as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we had $ 500 million capitalized for the estimated fair value of satellites acquired under capital leases included in 201cproperty and equipment , net , 201d with related accumulated depreciation of $ 151 million and $ 109 million , respectively .in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) , we recognized $ 43 million , $ 43 million and $ 40 million in depreciation expense on satellites acquired under capital lease agreements during the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 . 2012 | $ 84715
2013 | 77893
2014 | 76296
2015 | 75970
2016 | 75970
thereafter | 314269
total minimum lease payments | 705113
less : amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs ( primarily insurance and maintenance ) including profit thereon included in total minimum lease payments | -323382 ( 323382 )
net minimum lease payments | 381731
less : amount representing interest | -109823 ( 109823 )
present value of net minimum lease payments | 271908
less : current portion | -29202 ( 29202 )
long-term portion of capital lease obligations | $ 242706 the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2011 is included in the commitments table in note 16 .12 .income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards .deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized .we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance .determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities .we file consolidated tax returns in the u.s .the income taxes of domestic and foreign subsidiaries not included in the u.s .tax group are presented in our consolidated financial statements based on a separate return basis for each tax paying entity .as of december 31 , 2011 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 13 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes .the state nols begin to expire in the year 2020 .in addition , there are $ 5 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance and $ 14 million benefit of capital loss carryforwards which are fully offset by a valuation allowance .the credit carryforwards begin to expire in the year 2012. .
Question: as of december 31, 2011, what percentage of the total future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation were due after 2016?
| convfinqa2727 |
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued ciel ii .ciel ii , a canadian dbs satellite , was launched in december 2008 and commenced commercial operation during february 2009 .this satellite is accounted for as a capital lease and depreciated over the term of the satellite service agreement .we have leased 100% ( 100 % ) of the capacity on ciel ii for an initial 10 year term .as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we had $ 500 million capitalized for the estimated fair value of satellites acquired under capital leases included in 201cproperty and equipment , net , 201d with related accumulated depreciation of $ 151 million and $ 109 million , respectively .in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) , we recognized $ 43 million , $ 43 million and $ 40 million in depreciation expense on satellites acquired under capital lease agreements during the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 . 2012 | $ 84715
2013 | 77893
2014 | 76296
2015 | 75970
2016 | 75970
thereafter | 314269
total minimum lease payments | 705113
less : amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs ( primarily insurance and maintenance ) including profit thereon included in total minimum lease payments | -323382 ( 323382 )
net minimum lease payments | 381731
less : amount representing interest | -109823 ( 109823 )
present value of net minimum lease payments | 271908
less : current portion | -29202 ( 29202 )
long-term portion of capital lease obligations | $ 242706 the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2011 is included in the commitments table in note 16 .12 .income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards .deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized .we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance .determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities .we file consolidated tax returns in the u.s .the income taxes of domestic and foreign subsidiaries not included in the u.s .tax group are presented in our consolidated financial statements based on a separate return basis for each tax paying entity .as of december 31 , 2011 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 13 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes .the state nols begin to expire in the year 2020 .in addition , there are $ 5 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance and $ 14 million benefit of capital loss carryforwards which are fully offset by a valuation allowance .the credit carryforwards begin to expire in the year 2012. .
Question: as of december 31, 2011, what percentage of the total future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation were due after 2016?
Steps: divide(314269, 705113)
Answer: 0.4457
Question: and what percentage were due in the year of 2016?
| 0.10774 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued ciel ii .ciel ii , a canadian dbs satellite , was launched in december 2008 and commenced commercial operation during february 2009 .this satellite is accounted for as a capital lease and depreciated over the term of the satellite service agreement .we have leased 100% ( 100 % ) of the capacity on ciel ii for an initial 10 year term .as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we had $ 500 million capitalized for the estimated fair value of satellites acquired under capital leases included in 201cproperty and equipment , net , 201d with related accumulated depreciation of $ 151 million and $ 109 million , respectively .in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) , we recognized $ 43 million , $ 43 million and $ 40 million in depreciation expense on satellites acquired under capital lease agreements during the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2011 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 . 2012 | $ 84715
2013 | 77893
2014 | 76296
2015 | 75970
2016 | 75970
thereafter | 314269
total minimum lease payments | 705113
less : amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs ( primarily insurance and maintenance ) including profit thereon included in total minimum lease payments | -323382 ( 323382 )
net minimum lease payments | 381731
less : amount representing interest | -109823 ( 109823 )
present value of net minimum lease payments | 271908
less : current portion | -29202 ( 29202 )
long-term portion of capital lease obligations | $ 242706 the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2011 is included in the commitments table in note 16 .12 .income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards .deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized .we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance .determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities .we file consolidated tax returns in the u.s .the income taxes of domestic and foreign subsidiaries not included in the u.s .tax group are presented in our consolidated financial statements based on a separate return basis for each tax paying entity .as of december 31 , 2011 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 13 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes .the state nols begin to expire in the year 2020 .in addition , there are $ 5 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance and $ 14 million benefit of capital loss carryforwards which are fully offset by a valuation allowance .the credit carryforwards begin to expire in the year 2012. .
Question: as of december 31, 2011, what percentage of the total future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation were due after 2016?
Steps: divide(314269, 705113)
Answer: 0.4457
Question: and what percentage were due in the year of 2016?
| convfinqa2728 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2012 versus 2011 .net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 .the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , and collateralized agreements .2011 versus 2010 .net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 5.19 billion for 2011 , 6% ( 6 % ) lower than 2010 .the decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to higher interest expense related to our long-term borrowings and higher dividend expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , partially offset by an increase in interest income from higher yielding collateralized agreements .operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits .discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment .in the context of more difficult economic and financial conditions , the firm launched an initiative during the second quarter of 2011 to identify areas where we can operate more efficiently and reduce our operating expenses .during 2012 and 2011 , we announced targeted annual run rate compensation and non-compensation reductions of approximately $ 1.9 billion in aggregate .the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff. . $ in millions | year ended december 2012 | year ended december 2011 | year ended december 2010
compensation and benefits | $ 12944 | $ 12223 | $ 15376
u.k . bank payrolltax | 2014 | 2014 | 465
brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees | 2208 | 2463 | 2281
market development | 509 | 640 | 530
communications and technology | 782 | 828 | 758
depreciation and amortization | 1738 | 1865 | 1889
occupancy | 875 | 1030 | 1086
professional fees | 867 | 992 | 927
insurance reserves1 | 598 | 529 | 398
other expenses | 2435 | 2072 | 2559
total non-compensation expenses | 10012 | 10419 | 10428
total operating expenses | $ 22956 | $ 22642 | $ 26269
total staff atperiod-end2 | 32400 | 33300 | 35700 total staff at period-end 2 32400 33300 35700 1 .related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d on the consolidated statements of earnings .2 .includes employees , consultants and temporary staff .48 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the change in the number of staff from 2011 to 2012?
| -900.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2012 versus 2011 .net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 .the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , and collateralized agreements .2011 versus 2010 .net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 5.19 billion for 2011 , 6% ( 6 % ) lower than 2010 .the decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to higher interest expense related to our long-term borrowings and higher dividend expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , partially offset by an increase in interest income from higher yielding collateralized agreements .operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits .discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment .in the context of more difficult economic and financial conditions , the firm launched an initiative during the second quarter of 2011 to identify areas where we can operate more efficiently and reduce our operating expenses .during 2012 and 2011 , we announced targeted annual run rate compensation and non-compensation reductions of approximately $ 1.9 billion in aggregate .the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff. . $ in millions | year ended december 2012 | year ended december 2011 | year ended december 2010
compensation and benefits | $ 12944 | $ 12223 | $ 15376
u.k . bank payrolltax | 2014 | 2014 | 465
brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees | 2208 | 2463 | 2281
market development | 509 | 640 | 530
communications and technology | 782 | 828 | 758
depreciation and amortization | 1738 | 1865 | 1889
occupancy | 875 | 1030 | 1086
professional fees | 867 | 992 | 927
insurance reserves1 | 598 | 529 | 398
other expenses | 2435 | 2072 | 2559
total non-compensation expenses | 10012 | 10419 | 10428
total operating expenses | $ 22956 | $ 22642 | $ 26269
total staff atperiod-end2 | 32400 | 33300 | 35700 total staff at period-end 2 32400 33300 35700 1 .related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d on the consolidated statements of earnings .2 .includes employees , consultants and temporary staff .48 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the change in the number of staff from 2011 to 2012?
| convfinqa2729 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2012 versus 2011 .net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 .the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , and collateralized agreements .2011 versus 2010 .net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 5.19 billion for 2011 , 6% ( 6 % ) lower than 2010 .the decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to higher interest expense related to our long-term borrowings and higher dividend expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , partially offset by an increase in interest income from higher yielding collateralized agreements .operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits .discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment .in the context of more difficult economic and financial conditions , the firm launched an initiative during the second quarter of 2011 to identify areas where we can operate more efficiently and reduce our operating expenses .during 2012 and 2011 , we announced targeted annual run rate compensation and non-compensation reductions of approximately $ 1.9 billion in aggregate .the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff. . $ in millions | year ended december 2012 | year ended december 2011 | year ended december 2010
compensation and benefits | $ 12944 | $ 12223 | $ 15376
u.k . bank payrolltax | 2014 | 2014 | 465
brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees | 2208 | 2463 | 2281
market development | 509 | 640 | 530
communications and technology | 782 | 828 | 758
depreciation and amortization | 1738 | 1865 | 1889
occupancy | 875 | 1030 | 1086
professional fees | 867 | 992 | 927
insurance reserves1 | 598 | 529 | 398
other expenses | 2435 | 2072 | 2559
total non-compensation expenses | 10012 | 10419 | 10428
total operating expenses | $ 22956 | $ 22642 | $ 26269
total staff atperiod-end2 | 32400 | 33300 | 35700 total staff at period-end 2 32400 33300 35700 1 .related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d on the consolidated statements of earnings .2 .includes employees , consultants and temporary staff .48 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the change in the number of staff from 2011 to 2012?
Steps: subtract(32400, 33300)
Answer: -900.0
Question: and what was the total number of staff in 2011?
| 33300.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2012 versus 2011 .net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 .the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , and collateralized agreements .2011 versus 2010 .net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 5.19 billion for 2011 , 6% ( 6 % ) lower than 2010 .the decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to higher interest expense related to our long-term borrowings and higher dividend expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , partially offset by an increase in interest income from higher yielding collateralized agreements .operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits .discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment .in the context of more difficult economic and financial conditions , the firm launched an initiative during the second quarter of 2011 to identify areas where we can operate more efficiently and reduce our operating expenses .during 2012 and 2011 , we announced targeted annual run rate compensation and non-compensation reductions of approximately $ 1.9 billion in aggregate .the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff. . $ in millions | year ended december 2012 | year ended december 2011 | year ended december 2010
compensation and benefits | $ 12944 | $ 12223 | $ 15376
u.k . bank payrolltax | 2014 | 2014 | 465
brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees | 2208 | 2463 | 2281
market development | 509 | 640 | 530
communications and technology | 782 | 828 | 758
depreciation and amortization | 1738 | 1865 | 1889
occupancy | 875 | 1030 | 1086
professional fees | 867 | 992 | 927
insurance reserves1 | 598 | 529 | 398
other expenses | 2435 | 2072 | 2559
total non-compensation expenses | 10012 | 10419 | 10428
total operating expenses | $ 22956 | $ 22642 | $ 26269
total staff atperiod-end2 | 32400 | 33300 | 35700 total staff at period-end 2 32400 33300 35700 1 .related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d on the consolidated statements of earnings .2 .includes employees , consultants and temporary staff .48 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the change in the number of staff from 2011 to 2012?
Steps: subtract(32400, 33300)
Answer: -900.0
Question: and what was the total number of staff in 2011?
| convfinqa2730 |
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2012 versus 2011 .net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 .the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , and collateralized agreements .2011 versus 2010 .net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 5.19 billion for 2011 , 6% ( 6 % ) lower than 2010 .the decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to higher interest expense related to our long-term borrowings and higher dividend expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , partially offset by an increase in interest income from higher yielding collateralized agreements .operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits .discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment .in the context of more difficult economic and financial conditions , the firm launched an initiative during the second quarter of 2011 to identify areas where we can operate more efficiently and reduce our operating expenses .during 2012 and 2011 , we announced targeted annual run rate compensation and non-compensation reductions of approximately $ 1.9 billion in aggregate .the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff. . $ in millions | year ended december 2012 | year ended december 2011 | year ended december 2010
compensation and benefits | $ 12944 | $ 12223 | $ 15376
u.k . bank payrolltax | 2014 | 2014 | 465
brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees | 2208 | 2463 | 2281
market development | 509 | 640 | 530
communications and technology | 782 | 828 | 758
depreciation and amortization | 1738 | 1865 | 1889
occupancy | 875 | 1030 | 1086
professional fees | 867 | 992 | 927
insurance reserves1 | 598 | 529 | 398
other expenses | 2435 | 2072 | 2559
total non-compensation expenses | 10012 | 10419 | 10428
total operating expenses | $ 22956 | $ 22642 | $ 26269
total staff atperiod-end2 | 32400 | 33300 | 35700 total staff at period-end 2 32400 33300 35700 1 .related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d on the consolidated statements of earnings .2 .includes employees , consultants and temporary staff .48 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the change in the number of staff from 2011 to 2012?
Steps: subtract(32400, 33300)
Answer: -900.0
Question: and what was the total number of staff in 2011?
Steps: Ask for number 33300
Answer: 33300.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2011 total?
| -0.02703 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2012 versus 2011 .net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 .the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , and collateralized agreements .2011 versus 2010 .net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 5.19 billion for 2011 , 6% ( 6 % ) lower than 2010 .the decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to higher interest expense related to our long-term borrowings and higher dividend expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , partially offset by an increase in interest income from higher yielding collateralized agreements .operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits .discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment .in the context of more difficult economic and financial conditions , the firm launched an initiative during the second quarter of 2011 to identify areas where we can operate more efficiently and reduce our operating expenses .during 2012 and 2011 , we announced targeted annual run rate compensation and non-compensation reductions of approximately $ 1.9 billion in aggregate .the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff. . $ in millions | year ended december 2012 | year ended december 2011 | year ended december 2010
compensation and benefits | $ 12944 | $ 12223 | $ 15376
u.k . bank payrolltax | 2014 | 2014 | 465
brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees | 2208 | 2463 | 2281
market development | 509 | 640 | 530
communications and technology | 782 | 828 | 758
depreciation and amortization | 1738 | 1865 | 1889
occupancy | 875 | 1030 | 1086
professional fees | 867 | 992 | 927
insurance reserves1 | 598 | 529 | 398
other expenses | 2435 | 2072 | 2559
total non-compensation expenses | 10012 | 10419 | 10428
total operating expenses | $ 22956 | $ 22642 | $ 26269
total staff atperiod-end2 | 32400 | 33300 | 35700 total staff at period-end 2 32400 33300 35700 1 .related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d on the consolidated statements of earnings .2 .includes employees , consultants and temporary staff .48 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the change in the number of staff from 2011 to 2012?
Steps: subtract(32400, 33300)
Answer: -900.0
Question: and what was the total number of staff in 2011?
Steps: Ask for number 33300
Answer: 33300.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2011 total?
| convfinqa2731 |
the hartford financial services group , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 10 .sales inducements accounting policy the company currently offers enhanced crediting rates or bonus payments to contract holders on certain of its individual and group annuity products .the expense associated with offering a bonus is deferred and amortized over the life of the related contract in a pattern consistent with the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs .amortization expense associated with expenses previously deferred is recorded over the remaining life of the contract .consistent with the unlock , the company unlocked the amortization of the sales inducement asset .see note 7 for more information concerning the unlock .changes in deferred sales inducement activity were as follows for the years ended december 31: . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
balance beginning of year | $ 459 | $ 438 | $ 553
sales inducements deferred | 20 | 31 | 59
amortization charged to income | -17 ( 17 ) | -8 ( 8 ) | -105 ( 105 )
amortization 2014 unlock | -28 ( 28 ) | -2 ( 2 ) | -69 ( 69 )
balance end of year | $ 434 | $ 459 | $ 438 11 .reserves for future policy benefits and unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses life insurance products accounting policy liabilities for future policy benefits are calculated by the net level premium method using interest , withdrawal and mortality assumptions appropriate at the time the policies were issued .the methods used in determining the liability for unpaid losses and future policy benefits are standard actuarial methods recognized by the american academy of actuaries .for the tabular reserves , discount rates are based on the company 2019s earned investment yield and the morbidity/mortality tables used are standard industry tables modified to reflect the company 2019s actual experience when appropriate .in particular , for the company 2019s group disability known claim reserves , the morbidity table for the early durations of claim is based exclusively on the company 2019s experience , incorporating factors such as gender , elimination period and diagnosis .these reserves are computed such that they are expected to meet the company 2019s future policy obligations .future policy benefits are computed at amounts that , with additions from estimated premiums to be received and with interest on such reserves compounded annually at certain assumed rates , are expected to be sufficient to meet the company 2019s policy obligations at their maturities or in the event of an insured 2019s death .changes in or deviations from the assumptions used for mortality , morbidity , expected future premiums and interest can significantly affect the company 2019s reserve levels and related future operations and , as such , provisions for adverse deviation are built into the long-tailed liability assumptions .liabilities for the company 2019s group life and disability contracts , as well as its individual term life insurance policies , include amounts for unpaid losses and future policy benefits .liabilities for unpaid losses include estimates of amounts to fully settle known reported claims , as well as claims related to insured events that the company estimates have been incurred but have not yet been reported .these reserve estimates are based on known facts and interpretations of circumstances , and consideration of various internal factors including the hartford 2019s experience with similar cases , historical trends involving claim payment patterns , loss payments , pending levels of unpaid claims , loss control programs and product mix .in addition , the reserve estimates are influenced by consideration of various external factors including court decisions , economic conditions and public attitudes .the effects of inflation are implicitly considered in the reserving process. .
Question: what was the combined value of sales inducements deferred in 2010 and 2011?
| 51.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the hartford financial services group , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 10 .sales inducements accounting policy the company currently offers enhanced crediting rates or bonus payments to contract holders on certain of its individual and group annuity products .the expense associated with offering a bonus is deferred and amortized over the life of the related contract in a pattern consistent with the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs .amortization expense associated with expenses previously deferred is recorded over the remaining life of the contract .consistent with the unlock , the company unlocked the amortization of the sales inducement asset .see note 7 for more information concerning the unlock .changes in deferred sales inducement activity were as follows for the years ended december 31: . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
balance beginning of year | $ 459 | $ 438 | $ 553
sales inducements deferred | 20 | 31 | 59
amortization charged to income | -17 ( 17 ) | -8 ( 8 ) | -105 ( 105 )
amortization 2014 unlock | -28 ( 28 ) | -2 ( 2 ) | -69 ( 69 )
balance end of year | $ 434 | $ 459 | $ 438 11 .reserves for future policy benefits and unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses life insurance products accounting policy liabilities for future policy benefits are calculated by the net level premium method using interest , withdrawal and mortality assumptions appropriate at the time the policies were issued .the methods used in determining the liability for unpaid losses and future policy benefits are standard actuarial methods recognized by the american academy of actuaries .for the tabular reserves , discount rates are based on the company 2019s earned investment yield and the morbidity/mortality tables used are standard industry tables modified to reflect the company 2019s actual experience when appropriate .in particular , for the company 2019s group disability known claim reserves , the morbidity table for the early durations of claim is based exclusively on the company 2019s experience , incorporating factors such as gender , elimination period and diagnosis .these reserves are computed such that they are expected to meet the company 2019s future policy obligations .future policy benefits are computed at amounts that , with additions from estimated premiums to be received and with interest on such reserves compounded annually at certain assumed rates , are expected to be sufficient to meet the company 2019s policy obligations at their maturities or in the event of an insured 2019s death .changes in or deviations from the assumptions used for mortality , morbidity , expected future premiums and interest can significantly affect the company 2019s reserve levels and related future operations and , as such , provisions for adverse deviation are built into the long-tailed liability assumptions .liabilities for the company 2019s group life and disability contracts , as well as its individual term life insurance policies , include amounts for unpaid losses and future policy benefits .liabilities for unpaid losses include estimates of amounts to fully settle known reported claims , as well as claims related to insured events that the company estimates have been incurred but have not yet been reported .these reserve estimates are based on known facts and interpretations of circumstances , and consideration of various internal factors including the hartford 2019s experience with similar cases , historical trends involving claim payment patterns , loss payments , pending levels of unpaid claims , loss control programs and product mix .in addition , the reserve estimates are influenced by consideration of various external factors including court decisions , economic conditions and public attitudes .the effects of inflation are implicitly considered in the reserving process. .
Question: what was the combined value of sales inducements deferred in 2010 and 2011?
| convfinqa2732 |
the hartford financial services group , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 10 .sales inducements accounting policy the company currently offers enhanced crediting rates or bonus payments to contract holders on certain of its individual and group annuity products .the expense associated with offering a bonus is deferred and amortized over the life of the related contract in a pattern consistent with the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs .amortization expense associated with expenses previously deferred is recorded over the remaining life of the contract .consistent with the unlock , the company unlocked the amortization of the sales inducement asset .see note 7 for more information concerning the unlock .changes in deferred sales inducement activity were as follows for the years ended december 31: . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
balance beginning of year | $ 459 | $ 438 | $ 553
sales inducements deferred | 20 | 31 | 59
amortization charged to income | -17 ( 17 ) | -8 ( 8 ) | -105 ( 105 )
amortization 2014 unlock | -28 ( 28 ) | -2 ( 2 ) | -69 ( 69 )
balance end of year | $ 434 | $ 459 | $ 438 11 .reserves for future policy benefits and unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses life insurance products accounting policy liabilities for future policy benefits are calculated by the net level premium method using interest , withdrawal and mortality assumptions appropriate at the time the policies were issued .the methods used in determining the liability for unpaid losses and future policy benefits are standard actuarial methods recognized by the american academy of actuaries .for the tabular reserves , discount rates are based on the company 2019s earned investment yield and the morbidity/mortality tables used are standard industry tables modified to reflect the company 2019s actual experience when appropriate .in particular , for the company 2019s group disability known claim reserves , the morbidity table for the early durations of claim is based exclusively on the company 2019s experience , incorporating factors such as gender , elimination period and diagnosis .these reserves are computed such that they are expected to meet the company 2019s future policy obligations .future policy benefits are computed at amounts that , with additions from estimated premiums to be received and with interest on such reserves compounded annually at certain assumed rates , are expected to be sufficient to meet the company 2019s policy obligations at their maturities or in the event of an insured 2019s death .changes in or deviations from the assumptions used for mortality , morbidity , expected future premiums and interest can significantly affect the company 2019s reserve levels and related future operations and , as such , provisions for adverse deviation are built into the long-tailed liability assumptions .liabilities for the company 2019s group life and disability contracts , as well as its individual term life insurance policies , include amounts for unpaid losses and future policy benefits .liabilities for unpaid losses include estimates of amounts to fully settle known reported claims , as well as claims related to insured events that the company estimates have been incurred but have not yet been reported .these reserve estimates are based on known facts and interpretations of circumstances , and consideration of various internal factors including the hartford 2019s experience with similar cases , historical trends involving claim payment patterns , loss payments , pending levels of unpaid claims , loss control programs and product mix .in addition , the reserve estimates are influenced by consideration of various external factors including court decisions , economic conditions and public attitudes .the effects of inflation are implicitly considered in the reserving process. .
Question: what was the combined value of sales inducements deferred in 2010 and 2011?
Steps: add(20, 31)
Answer: 51.0
Question: and including 2009?
| 110.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the hartford financial services group , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 10 .sales inducements accounting policy the company currently offers enhanced crediting rates or bonus payments to contract holders on certain of its individual and group annuity products .the expense associated with offering a bonus is deferred and amortized over the life of the related contract in a pattern consistent with the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs .amortization expense associated with expenses previously deferred is recorded over the remaining life of the contract .consistent with the unlock , the company unlocked the amortization of the sales inducement asset .see note 7 for more information concerning the unlock .changes in deferred sales inducement activity were as follows for the years ended december 31: . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
balance beginning of year | $ 459 | $ 438 | $ 553
sales inducements deferred | 20 | 31 | 59
amortization charged to income | -17 ( 17 ) | -8 ( 8 ) | -105 ( 105 )
amortization 2014 unlock | -28 ( 28 ) | -2 ( 2 ) | -69 ( 69 )
balance end of year | $ 434 | $ 459 | $ 438 11 .reserves for future policy benefits and unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses life insurance products accounting policy liabilities for future policy benefits are calculated by the net level premium method using interest , withdrawal and mortality assumptions appropriate at the time the policies were issued .the methods used in determining the liability for unpaid losses and future policy benefits are standard actuarial methods recognized by the american academy of actuaries .for the tabular reserves , discount rates are based on the company 2019s earned investment yield and the morbidity/mortality tables used are standard industry tables modified to reflect the company 2019s actual experience when appropriate .in particular , for the company 2019s group disability known claim reserves , the morbidity table for the early durations of claim is based exclusively on the company 2019s experience , incorporating factors such as gender , elimination period and diagnosis .these reserves are computed such that they are expected to meet the company 2019s future policy obligations .future policy benefits are computed at amounts that , with additions from estimated premiums to be received and with interest on such reserves compounded annually at certain assumed rates , are expected to be sufficient to meet the company 2019s policy obligations at their maturities or in the event of an insured 2019s death .changes in or deviations from the assumptions used for mortality , morbidity , expected future premiums and interest can significantly affect the company 2019s reserve levels and related future operations and , as such , provisions for adverse deviation are built into the long-tailed liability assumptions .liabilities for the company 2019s group life and disability contracts , as well as its individual term life insurance policies , include amounts for unpaid losses and future policy benefits .liabilities for unpaid losses include estimates of amounts to fully settle known reported claims , as well as claims related to insured events that the company estimates have been incurred but have not yet been reported .these reserve estimates are based on known facts and interpretations of circumstances , and consideration of various internal factors including the hartford 2019s experience with similar cases , historical trends involving claim payment patterns , loss payments , pending levels of unpaid claims , loss control programs and product mix .in addition , the reserve estimates are influenced by consideration of various external factors including court decisions , economic conditions and public attitudes .the effects of inflation are implicitly considered in the reserving process. .
Question: what was the combined value of sales inducements deferred in 2010 and 2011?
Steps: add(20, 31)
Answer: 51.0
Question: and including 2009?
| convfinqa2733 |
the hartford financial services group , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 10 .sales inducements accounting policy the company currently offers enhanced crediting rates or bonus payments to contract holders on certain of its individual and group annuity products .the expense associated with offering a bonus is deferred and amortized over the life of the related contract in a pattern consistent with the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs .amortization expense associated with expenses previously deferred is recorded over the remaining life of the contract .consistent with the unlock , the company unlocked the amortization of the sales inducement asset .see note 7 for more information concerning the unlock .changes in deferred sales inducement activity were as follows for the years ended december 31: . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
balance beginning of year | $ 459 | $ 438 | $ 553
sales inducements deferred | 20 | 31 | 59
amortization charged to income | -17 ( 17 ) | -8 ( 8 ) | -105 ( 105 )
amortization 2014 unlock | -28 ( 28 ) | -2 ( 2 ) | -69 ( 69 )
balance end of year | $ 434 | $ 459 | $ 438 11 .reserves for future policy benefits and unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses life insurance products accounting policy liabilities for future policy benefits are calculated by the net level premium method using interest , withdrawal and mortality assumptions appropriate at the time the policies were issued .the methods used in determining the liability for unpaid losses and future policy benefits are standard actuarial methods recognized by the american academy of actuaries .for the tabular reserves , discount rates are based on the company 2019s earned investment yield and the morbidity/mortality tables used are standard industry tables modified to reflect the company 2019s actual experience when appropriate .in particular , for the company 2019s group disability known claim reserves , the morbidity table for the early durations of claim is based exclusively on the company 2019s experience , incorporating factors such as gender , elimination period and diagnosis .these reserves are computed such that they are expected to meet the company 2019s future policy obligations .future policy benefits are computed at amounts that , with additions from estimated premiums to be received and with interest on such reserves compounded annually at certain assumed rates , are expected to be sufficient to meet the company 2019s policy obligations at their maturities or in the event of an insured 2019s death .changes in or deviations from the assumptions used for mortality , morbidity , expected future premiums and interest can significantly affect the company 2019s reserve levels and related future operations and , as such , provisions for adverse deviation are built into the long-tailed liability assumptions .liabilities for the company 2019s group life and disability contracts , as well as its individual term life insurance policies , include amounts for unpaid losses and future policy benefits .liabilities for unpaid losses include estimates of amounts to fully settle known reported claims , as well as claims related to insured events that the company estimates have been incurred but have not yet been reported .these reserve estimates are based on known facts and interpretations of circumstances , and consideration of various internal factors including the hartford 2019s experience with similar cases , historical trends involving claim payment patterns , loss payments , pending levels of unpaid claims , loss control programs and product mix .in addition , the reserve estimates are influenced by consideration of various external factors including court decisions , economic conditions and public attitudes .the effects of inflation are implicitly considered in the reserving process. .
Question: what was the combined value of sales inducements deferred in 2010 and 2011?
Steps: add(20, 31)
Answer: 51.0
Question: and including 2009?
Steps: add(59, A0)
Answer: 110.0
Question: so what was the average value during this time?
| 36.66667 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the hartford financial services group , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 10 .sales inducements accounting policy the company currently offers enhanced crediting rates or bonus payments to contract holders on certain of its individual and group annuity products .the expense associated with offering a bonus is deferred and amortized over the life of the related contract in a pattern consistent with the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs .amortization expense associated with expenses previously deferred is recorded over the remaining life of the contract .consistent with the unlock , the company unlocked the amortization of the sales inducement asset .see note 7 for more information concerning the unlock .changes in deferred sales inducement activity were as follows for the years ended december 31: . | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
balance beginning of year | $ 459 | $ 438 | $ 553
sales inducements deferred | 20 | 31 | 59
amortization charged to income | -17 ( 17 ) | -8 ( 8 ) | -105 ( 105 )
amortization 2014 unlock | -28 ( 28 ) | -2 ( 2 ) | -69 ( 69 )
balance end of year | $ 434 | $ 459 | $ 438 11 .reserves for future policy benefits and unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses life insurance products accounting policy liabilities for future policy benefits are calculated by the net level premium method using interest , withdrawal and mortality assumptions appropriate at the time the policies were issued .the methods used in determining the liability for unpaid losses and future policy benefits are standard actuarial methods recognized by the american academy of actuaries .for the tabular reserves , discount rates are based on the company 2019s earned investment yield and the morbidity/mortality tables used are standard industry tables modified to reflect the company 2019s actual experience when appropriate .in particular , for the company 2019s group disability known claim reserves , the morbidity table for the early durations of claim is based exclusively on the company 2019s experience , incorporating factors such as gender , elimination period and diagnosis .these reserves are computed such that they are expected to meet the company 2019s future policy obligations .future policy benefits are computed at amounts that , with additions from estimated premiums to be received and with interest on such reserves compounded annually at certain assumed rates , are expected to be sufficient to meet the company 2019s policy obligations at their maturities or in the event of an insured 2019s death .changes in or deviations from the assumptions used for mortality , morbidity , expected future premiums and interest can significantly affect the company 2019s reserve levels and related future operations and , as such , provisions for adverse deviation are built into the long-tailed liability assumptions .liabilities for the company 2019s group life and disability contracts , as well as its individual term life insurance policies , include amounts for unpaid losses and future policy benefits .liabilities for unpaid losses include estimates of amounts to fully settle known reported claims , as well as claims related to insured events that the company estimates have been incurred but have not yet been reported .these reserve estimates are based on known facts and interpretations of circumstances , and consideration of various internal factors including the hartford 2019s experience with similar cases , historical trends involving claim payment patterns , loss payments , pending levels of unpaid claims , loss control programs and product mix .in addition , the reserve estimates are influenced by consideration of various external factors including court decisions , economic conditions and public attitudes .the effects of inflation are implicitly considered in the reserving process. .
Question: what was the combined value of sales inducements deferred in 2010 and 2011?
Steps: add(20, 31)
Answer: 51.0
Question: and including 2009?
Steps: add(59, A0)
Answer: 110.0
Question: so what was the average value during this time?
| convfinqa2734 |
hologic , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future debt principal payments under these debt arrangements are approximately as follows: . fiscal 2008 | $ 1977
fiscal 2009 | 1977
fiscal 2010 | 1977
fiscal 2011 | 1422
fiscal 2012 | 3846
thereafter | 2014
total | $ 11199 6 .derivative financial instruments and hedging agreements interest rate swaps in connection with the debt assumed from the aeg acquisition ( see notes 3 and 5 ) , the company acquired interest rate swap contracts used to convert the floating interest-rate component of certain debt obligations to fixed rates .these agreements did not qualify for hedge accounting under statements of financial accounting standards no .133 , accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities ( 201csfas 133 201d ) and thus were marked to market each reporting period with the change in fair value recorded to other income ( expense ) , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income .the company terminated all outstanding interest rate swaps in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 which resulted in a gain of $ 75 recorded in consolidated statement of income .forward contracts also in connection with the aeg acquisition , the company assumed certain foreign currency forward contracts to hedge , on a net basis , the foreign currency fluctuations associated with a portion of the aeg 2019s assets and liabilities that were denominated in the us dollar , including inter-company accounts .increases or decreases in the company 2019s foreign currency exposures are partially offset by gains and losses on the forward contracts , so as to mitigate foreign currency transaction gains and losses .the terms of these forward contracts are of a short- term nature ( 6 to 12 months ) .the company does not use forward contracts for trading or speculative purposes .the forward contracts are not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges under sfas no .133 and do not represent effective hedges .all outstanding forward contracts are marked to market at the end of the period and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value in other current assets and other current liabilities .the changes in fair value from these contracts and from the underlying hedged exposures are generally offsetting were recorded in other income , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and these amounts were not material .as of september 29 , 2007 , all of the forward exchange contracts assumed in the aeg acquisition had matured and the company had no forward exchange contracts outstanding .7 .pension and other employee benefits in conjunction with the may 2 , 2006 acquisition of aeg , the company assumed certain defined benefit pension plans covering the employees of the aeg german subsidiary ( pension benefits ) .on september 29 , 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no .158 , employers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) ( sfas 158 ) .sfas 158 requires an entity to recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a defined benefit postretirement .
Question: what is the sum of the debt principal payments for 2008 and 2009?
| 3954.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future debt principal payments under these debt arrangements are approximately as follows: . fiscal 2008 | $ 1977
fiscal 2009 | 1977
fiscal 2010 | 1977
fiscal 2011 | 1422
fiscal 2012 | 3846
thereafter | 2014
total | $ 11199 6 .derivative financial instruments and hedging agreements interest rate swaps in connection with the debt assumed from the aeg acquisition ( see notes 3 and 5 ) , the company acquired interest rate swap contracts used to convert the floating interest-rate component of certain debt obligations to fixed rates .these agreements did not qualify for hedge accounting under statements of financial accounting standards no .133 , accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities ( 201csfas 133 201d ) and thus were marked to market each reporting period with the change in fair value recorded to other income ( expense ) , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income .the company terminated all outstanding interest rate swaps in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 which resulted in a gain of $ 75 recorded in consolidated statement of income .forward contracts also in connection with the aeg acquisition , the company assumed certain foreign currency forward contracts to hedge , on a net basis , the foreign currency fluctuations associated with a portion of the aeg 2019s assets and liabilities that were denominated in the us dollar , including inter-company accounts .increases or decreases in the company 2019s foreign currency exposures are partially offset by gains and losses on the forward contracts , so as to mitigate foreign currency transaction gains and losses .the terms of these forward contracts are of a short- term nature ( 6 to 12 months ) .the company does not use forward contracts for trading or speculative purposes .the forward contracts are not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges under sfas no .133 and do not represent effective hedges .all outstanding forward contracts are marked to market at the end of the period and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value in other current assets and other current liabilities .the changes in fair value from these contracts and from the underlying hedged exposures are generally offsetting were recorded in other income , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and these amounts were not material .as of september 29 , 2007 , all of the forward exchange contracts assumed in the aeg acquisition had matured and the company had no forward exchange contracts outstanding .7 .pension and other employee benefits in conjunction with the may 2 , 2006 acquisition of aeg , the company assumed certain defined benefit pension plans covering the employees of the aeg german subsidiary ( pension benefits ) .on september 29 , 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no .158 , employers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) ( sfas 158 ) .sfas 158 requires an entity to recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a defined benefit postretirement .
Question: what is the sum of the debt principal payments for 2008 and 2009?
| convfinqa2735 |
hologic , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future debt principal payments under these debt arrangements are approximately as follows: . fiscal 2008 | $ 1977
fiscal 2009 | 1977
fiscal 2010 | 1977
fiscal 2011 | 1422
fiscal 2012 | 3846
thereafter | 2014
total | $ 11199 6 .derivative financial instruments and hedging agreements interest rate swaps in connection with the debt assumed from the aeg acquisition ( see notes 3 and 5 ) , the company acquired interest rate swap contracts used to convert the floating interest-rate component of certain debt obligations to fixed rates .these agreements did not qualify for hedge accounting under statements of financial accounting standards no .133 , accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities ( 201csfas 133 201d ) and thus were marked to market each reporting period with the change in fair value recorded to other income ( expense ) , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income .the company terminated all outstanding interest rate swaps in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 which resulted in a gain of $ 75 recorded in consolidated statement of income .forward contracts also in connection with the aeg acquisition , the company assumed certain foreign currency forward contracts to hedge , on a net basis , the foreign currency fluctuations associated with a portion of the aeg 2019s assets and liabilities that were denominated in the us dollar , including inter-company accounts .increases or decreases in the company 2019s foreign currency exposures are partially offset by gains and losses on the forward contracts , so as to mitigate foreign currency transaction gains and losses .the terms of these forward contracts are of a short- term nature ( 6 to 12 months ) .the company does not use forward contracts for trading or speculative purposes .the forward contracts are not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges under sfas no .133 and do not represent effective hedges .all outstanding forward contracts are marked to market at the end of the period and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value in other current assets and other current liabilities .the changes in fair value from these contracts and from the underlying hedged exposures are generally offsetting were recorded in other income , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and these amounts were not material .as of september 29 , 2007 , all of the forward exchange contracts assumed in the aeg acquisition had matured and the company had no forward exchange contracts outstanding .7 .pension and other employee benefits in conjunction with the may 2 , 2006 acquisition of aeg , the company assumed certain defined benefit pension plans covering the employees of the aeg german subsidiary ( pension benefits ) .on september 29 , 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no .158 , employers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) ( sfas 158 ) .sfas 158 requires an entity to recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a defined benefit postretirement .
Question: what is the sum of the debt principal payments for 2008 and 2009?
Steps: add(1977, 1977)
Answer: 3954.0
Question: what is the debt payment for 2010?
| 1977.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future debt principal payments under these debt arrangements are approximately as follows: . fiscal 2008 | $ 1977
fiscal 2009 | 1977
fiscal 2010 | 1977
fiscal 2011 | 1422
fiscal 2012 | 3846
thereafter | 2014
total | $ 11199 6 .derivative financial instruments and hedging agreements interest rate swaps in connection with the debt assumed from the aeg acquisition ( see notes 3 and 5 ) , the company acquired interest rate swap contracts used to convert the floating interest-rate component of certain debt obligations to fixed rates .these agreements did not qualify for hedge accounting under statements of financial accounting standards no .133 , accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities ( 201csfas 133 201d ) and thus were marked to market each reporting period with the change in fair value recorded to other income ( expense ) , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income .the company terminated all outstanding interest rate swaps in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 which resulted in a gain of $ 75 recorded in consolidated statement of income .forward contracts also in connection with the aeg acquisition , the company assumed certain foreign currency forward contracts to hedge , on a net basis , the foreign currency fluctuations associated with a portion of the aeg 2019s assets and liabilities that were denominated in the us dollar , including inter-company accounts .increases or decreases in the company 2019s foreign currency exposures are partially offset by gains and losses on the forward contracts , so as to mitigate foreign currency transaction gains and losses .the terms of these forward contracts are of a short- term nature ( 6 to 12 months ) .the company does not use forward contracts for trading or speculative purposes .the forward contracts are not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges under sfas no .133 and do not represent effective hedges .all outstanding forward contracts are marked to market at the end of the period and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value in other current assets and other current liabilities .the changes in fair value from these contracts and from the underlying hedged exposures are generally offsetting were recorded in other income , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and these amounts were not material .as of september 29 , 2007 , all of the forward exchange contracts assumed in the aeg acquisition had matured and the company had no forward exchange contracts outstanding .7 .pension and other employee benefits in conjunction with the may 2 , 2006 acquisition of aeg , the company assumed certain defined benefit pension plans covering the employees of the aeg german subsidiary ( pension benefits ) .on september 29 , 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no .158 , employers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) ( sfas 158 ) .sfas 158 requires an entity to recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a defined benefit postretirement .
Question: what is the sum of the debt principal payments for 2008 and 2009?
Steps: add(1977, 1977)
Answer: 3954.0
Question: what is the debt payment for 2010?
| convfinqa2736 |
hologic , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future debt principal payments under these debt arrangements are approximately as follows: . fiscal 2008 | $ 1977
fiscal 2009 | 1977
fiscal 2010 | 1977
fiscal 2011 | 1422
fiscal 2012 | 3846
thereafter | 2014
total | $ 11199 6 .derivative financial instruments and hedging agreements interest rate swaps in connection with the debt assumed from the aeg acquisition ( see notes 3 and 5 ) , the company acquired interest rate swap contracts used to convert the floating interest-rate component of certain debt obligations to fixed rates .these agreements did not qualify for hedge accounting under statements of financial accounting standards no .133 , accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities ( 201csfas 133 201d ) and thus were marked to market each reporting period with the change in fair value recorded to other income ( expense ) , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income .the company terminated all outstanding interest rate swaps in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 which resulted in a gain of $ 75 recorded in consolidated statement of income .forward contracts also in connection with the aeg acquisition , the company assumed certain foreign currency forward contracts to hedge , on a net basis , the foreign currency fluctuations associated with a portion of the aeg 2019s assets and liabilities that were denominated in the us dollar , including inter-company accounts .increases or decreases in the company 2019s foreign currency exposures are partially offset by gains and losses on the forward contracts , so as to mitigate foreign currency transaction gains and losses .the terms of these forward contracts are of a short- term nature ( 6 to 12 months ) .the company does not use forward contracts for trading or speculative purposes .the forward contracts are not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges under sfas no .133 and do not represent effective hedges .all outstanding forward contracts are marked to market at the end of the period and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value in other current assets and other current liabilities .the changes in fair value from these contracts and from the underlying hedged exposures are generally offsetting were recorded in other income , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and these amounts were not material .as of september 29 , 2007 , all of the forward exchange contracts assumed in the aeg acquisition had matured and the company had no forward exchange contracts outstanding .7 .pension and other employee benefits in conjunction with the may 2 , 2006 acquisition of aeg , the company assumed certain defined benefit pension plans covering the employees of the aeg german subsidiary ( pension benefits ) .on september 29 , 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no .158 , employers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) ( sfas 158 ) .sfas 158 requires an entity to recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a defined benefit postretirement .
Question: what is the sum of the debt principal payments for 2008 and 2009?
Steps: add(1977, 1977)
Answer: 3954.0
Question: what is the debt payment for 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 1977
Answer: 1977.0
Question: what is the total sum including 2010?
| 5931.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
hologic , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) future debt principal payments under these debt arrangements are approximately as follows: . fiscal 2008 | $ 1977
fiscal 2009 | 1977
fiscal 2010 | 1977
fiscal 2011 | 1422
fiscal 2012 | 3846
thereafter | 2014
total | $ 11199 6 .derivative financial instruments and hedging agreements interest rate swaps in connection with the debt assumed from the aeg acquisition ( see notes 3 and 5 ) , the company acquired interest rate swap contracts used to convert the floating interest-rate component of certain debt obligations to fixed rates .these agreements did not qualify for hedge accounting under statements of financial accounting standards no .133 , accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities ( 201csfas 133 201d ) and thus were marked to market each reporting period with the change in fair value recorded to other income ( expense ) , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income .the company terminated all outstanding interest rate swaps in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 which resulted in a gain of $ 75 recorded in consolidated statement of income .forward contracts also in connection with the aeg acquisition , the company assumed certain foreign currency forward contracts to hedge , on a net basis , the foreign currency fluctuations associated with a portion of the aeg 2019s assets and liabilities that were denominated in the us dollar , including inter-company accounts .increases or decreases in the company 2019s foreign currency exposures are partially offset by gains and losses on the forward contracts , so as to mitigate foreign currency transaction gains and losses .the terms of these forward contracts are of a short- term nature ( 6 to 12 months ) .the company does not use forward contracts for trading or speculative purposes .the forward contracts are not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges under sfas no .133 and do not represent effective hedges .all outstanding forward contracts are marked to market at the end of the period and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value in other current assets and other current liabilities .the changes in fair value from these contracts and from the underlying hedged exposures are generally offsetting were recorded in other income , net in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and these amounts were not material .as of september 29 , 2007 , all of the forward exchange contracts assumed in the aeg acquisition had matured and the company had no forward exchange contracts outstanding .7 .pension and other employee benefits in conjunction with the may 2 , 2006 acquisition of aeg , the company assumed certain defined benefit pension plans covering the employees of the aeg german subsidiary ( pension benefits ) .on september 29 , 2006 , the fasb issued sfas no .158 , employers 2019 accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans , an amendment of fasb statements no .87 , 88 , 106 and 132 ( r ) ( sfas 158 ) .sfas 158 requires an entity to recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a defined benefit postretirement .
Question: what is the sum of the debt principal payments for 2008 and 2009?
Steps: add(1977, 1977)
Answer: 3954.0
Question: what is the debt payment for 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 1977
Answer: 1977.0
Question: what is the total sum including 2010?
| convfinqa2737 |
pension plan assets pension assets include public equities , government and corporate bonds , cash and cash equivalents , private real estate funds , private partnerships , hedge funds , and other assets .plan assets are held in a master trust and overseen by the company's investment committee .all assets are externally managed through a combination of active and passive strategies .managers may only invest in the asset classes for which they have been appointed .the investment committee is responsible for setting the policy that provides the framework for management of the plan assets .the investment committee has set the minimum and maximum permitted values for each asset class in the company's pension plan master trust for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , as follows: . u.s . equities | range 15 | range - | range 36% ( 36 % )
international equities | 10 | - | 29% ( 29 % )
fixed income securities | 25 | - | 50% ( 50 % )
alternative investments | 10 | - | 25% ( 25 % ) the general objectives of the company's pension asset strategy are to earn a rate of return over time to satisfy the benefit obligations of the plans , meet minimum erisa funding requirements , and maintain sufficient liquidity to pay benefits and address other cash requirements within the master trust .specific investment objectives include reducing the volatility of pension assets relative to benefit obligations , achieving a competitive , total investment return , achieving diversification between and within asset classes , and managing other risks .investment objectives for each asset class are determined based on specific risks and investment opportunities identified .decisions regarding investment policies and asset allocation are made with the understanding of the historical and prospective return and risk characteristics of various asset classes , the effect of asset allocations on funded status , future company contributions , and projected expenditures , including benefits .the company updates its asset allocations periodically .the company uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset mix and considers plan obligation characteristics , duration , liquidity characteristics , funding requirements , expected rates of return , regular rebalancing , and the distribution of returns .actual allocations to each asset class could vary from target allocations due to periodic investment strategy changes , short-term market value fluctuations , the length of time it takes to fully implement investment allocation positions , such as real estate and other alternative investments , and the timing of benefit payments and company contributions .taking into account the asset allocation ranges , the company determines the specific allocation of the master trust's investments within various asset classes .the master trust utilizes select investment strategies , which are executed through separate account or fund structures with external investment managers who demonstrate experience and expertise in the appropriate asset classes and styles .the selection of investment managers is done with careful evaluation of all aspects of performance and risk , demonstrated fiduciary responsibility , investment management experience , and a review of the investment managers' policies and processes .investment performance is monitored frequently against appropriate benchmarks and tracked to compliance guidelines with the assistance of third party consultants and performance evaluation tools and metrics .plan assets are stated at fair value .the company employs a variety of pricing sources to estimate the fair value of its pension plan assets , including independent pricing vendors , dealer or counterparty-supplied valuations , third- party appraisals , and appraisals prepared by the company's investment managers or other experts .investments in equity securities , common and preferred , are valued at the last reported sales price when an active market exists .securities for which official or last trade pricing on an active exchange is available are classified as level 1 .if closing prices are not available , securities are valued at the last trade price , if deemed reasonable , or a broker's quote in a non-active market , and are typically categorized as level 2 .investments in fixed-income securities are generally valued by independent pricing services or dealers who make markets in such securities .pricing methods are based upon market transactions for comparable securities and various relationships between securities that are generally recognized by institutional traders , and fixed-income securities typically are categorized as level 2. .
Question: what is the maximum permitted value for u.s equities in the company's pension plan?
| 0.36 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
pension plan assets pension assets include public equities , government and corporate bonds , cash and cash equivalents , private real estate funds , private partnerships , hedge funds , and other assets .plan assets are held in a master trust and overseen by the company's investment committee .all assets are externally managed through a combination of active and passive strategies .managers may only invest in the asset classes for which they have been appointed .the investment committee is responsible for setting the policy that provides the framework for management of the plan assets .the investment committee has set the minimum and maximum permitted values for each asset class in the company's pension plan master trust for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , as follows: . u.s . equities | range 15 | range - | range 36% ( 36 % )
international equities | 10 | - | 29% ( 29 % )
fixed income securities | 25 | - | 50% ( 50 % )
alternative investments | 10 | - | 25% ( 25 % ) the general objectives of the company's pension asset strategy are to earn a rate of return over time to satisfy the benefit obligations of the plans , meet minimum erisa funding requirements , and maintain sufficient liquidity to pay benefits and address other cash requirements within the master trust .specific investment objectives include reducing the volatility of pension assets relative to benefit obligations , achieving a competitive , total investment return , achieving diversification between and within asset classes , and managing other risks .investment objectives for each asset class are determined based on specific risks and investment opportunities identified .decisions regarding investment policies and asset allocation are made with the understanding of the historical and prospective return and risk characteristics of various asset classes , the effect of asset allocations on funded status , future company contributions , and projected expenditures , including benefits .the company updates its asset allocations periodically .the company uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset mix and considers plan obligation characteristics , duration , liquidity characteristics , funding requirements , expected rates of return , regular rebalancing , and the distribution of returns .actual allocations to each asset class could vary from target allocations due to periodic investment strategy changes , short-term market value fluctuations , the length of time it takes to fully implement investment allocation positions , such as real estate and other alternative investments , and the timing of benefit payments and company contributions .taking into account the asset allocation ranges , the company determines the specific allocation of the master trust's investments within various asset classes .the master trust utilizes select investment strategies , which are executed through separate account or fund structures with external investment managers who demonstrate experience and expertise in the appropriate asset classes and styles .the selection of investment managers is done with careful evaluation of all aspects of performance and risk , demonstrated fiduciary responsibility , investment management experience , and a review of the investment managers' policies and processes .investment performance is monitored frequently against appropriate benchmarks and tracked to compliance guidelines with the assistance of third party consultants and performance evaluation tools and metrics .plan assets are stated at fair value .the company employs a variety of pricing sources to estimate the fair value of its pension plan assets , including independent pricing vendors , dealer or counterparty-supplied valuations , third- party appraisals , and appraisals prepared by the company's investment managers or other experts .investments in equity securities , common and preferred , are valued at the last reported sales price when an active market exists .securities for which official or last trade pricing on an active exchange is available are classified as level 1 .if closing prices are not available , securities are valued at the last trade price , if deemed reasonable , or a broker's quote in a non-active market , and are typically categorized as level 2 .investments in fixed-income securities are generally valued by independent pricing services or dealers who make markets in such securities .pricing methods are based upon market transactions for comparable securities and various relationships between securities that are generally recognized by institutional traders , and fixed-income securities typically are categorized as level 2. .
Question: what is the maximum permitted value for u.s equities in the company's pension plan?
| convfinqa2738 |
pension plan assets pension assets include public equities , government and corporate bonds , cash and cash equivalents , private real estate funds , private partnerships , hedge funds , and other assets .plan assets are held in a master trust and overseen by the company's investment committee .all assets are externally managed through a combination of active and passive strategies .managers may only invest in the asset classes for which they have been appointed .the investment committee is responsible for setting the policy that provides the framework for management of the plan assets .the investment committee has set the minimum and maximum permitted values for each asset class in the company's pension plan master trust for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , as follows: . u.s . equities | range 15 | range - | range 36% ( 36 % )
international equities | 10 | - | 29% ( 29 % )
fixed income securities | 25 | - | 50% ( 50 % )
alternative investments | 10 | - | 25% ( 25 % ) the general objectives of the company's pension asset strategy are to earn a rate of return over time to satisfy the benefit obligations of the plans , meet minimum erisa funding requirements , and maintain sufficient liquidity to pay benefits and address other cash requirements within the master trust .specific investment objectives include reducing the volatility of pension assets relative to benefit obligations , achieving a competitive , total investment return , achieving diversification between and within asset classes , and managing other risks .investment objectives for each asset class are determined based on specific risks and investment opportunities identified .decisions regarding investment policies and asset allocation are made with the understanding of the historical and prospective return and risk characteristics of various asset classes , the effect of asset allocations on funded status , future company contributions , and projected expenditures , including benefits .the company updates its asset allocations periodically .the company uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset mix and considers plan obligation characteristics , duration , liquidity characteristics , funding requirements , expected rates of return , regular rebalancing , and the distribution of returns .actual allocations to each asset class could vary from target allocations due to periodic investment strategy changes , short-term market value fluctuations , the length of time it takes to fully implement investment allocation positions , such as real estate and other alternative investments , and the timing of benefit payments and company contributions .taking into account the asset allocation ranges , the company determines the specific allocation of the master trust's investments within various asset classes .the master trust utilizes select investment strategies , which are executed through separate account or fund structures with external investment managers who demonstrate experience and expertise in the appropriate asset classes and styles .the selection of investment managers is done with careful evaluation of all aspects of performance and risk , demonstrated fiduciary responsibility , investment management experience , and a review of the investment managers' policies and processes .investment performance is monitored frequently against appropriate benchmarks and tracked to compliance guidelines with the assistance of third party consultants and performance evaluation tools and metrics .plan assets are stated at fair value .the company employs a variety of pricing sources to estimate the fair value of its pension plan assets , including independent pricing vendors , dealer or counterparty-supplied valuations , third- party appraisals , and appraisals prepared by the company's investment managers or other experts .investments in equity securities , common and preferred , are valued at the last reported sales price when an active market exists .securities for which official or last trade pricing on an active exchange is available are classified as level 1 .if closing prices are not available , securities are valued at the last trade price , if deemed reasonable , or a broker's quote in a non-active market , and are typically categorized as level 2 .investments in fixed-income securities are generally valued by independent pricing services or dealers who make markets in such securities .pricing methods are based upon market transactions for comparable securities and various relationships between securities that are generally recognized by institutional traders , and fixed-income securities typically are categorized as level 2. .
Question: what is the maximum permitted value for u.s equities in the company's pension plan?
Steps: Ask for number 36%
Answer: 0.36
Question: and what is the minimum?
| 15.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
pension plan assets pension assets include public equities , government and corporate bonds , cash and cash equivalents , private real estate funds , private partnerships , hedge funds , and other assets .plan assets are held in a master trust and overseen by the company's investment committee .all assets are externally managed through a combination of active and passive strategies .managers may only invest in the asset classes for which they have been appointed .the investment committee is responsible for setting the policy that provides the framework for management of the plan assets .the investment committee has set the minimum and maximum permitted values for each asset class in the company's pension plan master trust for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , as follows: . u.s . equities | range 15 | range - | range 36% ( 36 % )
international equities | 10 | - | 29% ( 29 % )
fixed income securities | 25 | - | 50% ( 50 % )
alternative investments | 10 | - | 25% ( 25 % ) the general objectives of the company's pension asset strategy are to earn a rate of return over time to satisfy the benefit obligations of the plans , meet minimum erisa funding requirements , and maintain sufficient liquidity to pay benefits and address other cash requirements within the master trust .specific investment objectives include reducing the volatility of pension assets relative to benefit obligations , achieving a competitive , total investment return , achieving diversification between and within asset classes , and managing other risks .investment objectives for each asset class are determined based on specific risks and investment opportunities identified .decisions regarding investment policies and asset allocation are made with the understanding of the historical and prospective return and risk characteristics of various asset classes , the effect of asset allocations on funded status , future company contributions , and projected expenditures , including benefits .the company updates its asset allocations periodically .the company uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset mix and considers plan obligation characteristics , duration , liquidity characteristics , funding requirements , expected rates of return , regular rebalancing , and the distribution of returns .actual allocations to each asset class could vary from target allocations due to periodic investment strategy changes , short-term market value fluctuations , the length of time it takes to fully implement investment allocation positions , such as real estate and other alternative investments , and the timing of benefit payments and company contributions .taking into account the asset allocation ranges , the company determines the specific allocation of the master trust's investments within various asset classes .the master trust utilizes select investment strategies , which are executed through separate account or fund structures with external investment managers who demonstrate experience and expertise in the appropriate asset classes and styles .the selection of investment managers is done with careful evaluation of all aspects of performance and risk , demonstrated fiduciary responsibility , investment management experience , and a review of the investment managers' policies and processes .investment performance is monitored frequently against appropriate benchmarks and tracked to compliance guidelines with the assistance of third party consultants and performance evaluation tools and metrics .plan assets are stated at fair value .the company employs a variety of pricing sources to estimate the fair value of its pension plan assets , including independent pricing vendors , dealer or counterparty-supplied valuations , third- party appraisals , and appraisals prepared by the company's investment managers or other experts .investments in equity securities , common and preferred , are valued at the last reported sales price when an active market exists .securities for which official or last trade pricing on an active exchange is available are classified as level 1 .if closing prices are not available , securities are valued at the last trade price , if deemed reasonable , or a broker's quote in a non-active market , and are typically categorized as level 2 .investments in fixed-income securities are generally valued by independent pricing services or dealers who make markets in such securities .pricing methods are based upon market transactions for comparable securities and various relationships between securities that are generally recognized by institutional traders , and fixed-income securities typically are categorized as level 2. .
Question: what is the maximum permitted value for u.s equities in the company's pension plan?
Steps: Ask for number 36%
Answer: 0.36
Question: and what is the minimum?
| convfinqa2739 |
pension plan assets pension assets include public equities , government and corporate bonds , cash and cash equivalents , private real estate funds , private partnerships , hedge funds , and other assets .plan assets are held in a master trust and overseen by the company's investment committee .all assets are externally managed through a combination of active and passive strategies .managers may only invest in the asset classes for which they have been appointed .the investment committee is responsible for setting the policy that provides the framework for management of the plan assets .the investment committee has set the minimum and maximum permitted values for each asset class in the company's pension plan master trust for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , as follows: . u.s . equities | range 15 | range - | range 36% ( 36 % )
international equities | 10 | - | 29% ( 29 % )
fixed income securities | 25 | - | 50% ( 50 % )
alternative investments | 10 | - | 25% ( 25 % ) the general objectives of the company's pension asset strategy are to earn a rate of return over time to satisfy the benefit obligations of the plans , meet minimum erisa funding requirements , and maintain sufficient liquidity to pay benefits and address other cash requirements within the master trust .specific investment objectives include reducing the volatility of pension assets relative to benefit obligations , achieving a competitive , total investment return , achieving diversification between and within asset classes , and managing other risks .investment objectives for each asset class are determined based on specific risks and investment opportunities identified .decisions regarding investment policies and asset allocation are made with the understanding of the historical and prospective return and risk characteristics of various asset classes , the effect of asset allocations on funded status , future company contributions , and projected expenditures , including benefits .the company updates its asset allocations periodically .the company uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset mix and considers plan obligation characteristics , duration , liquidity characteristics , funding requirements , expected rates of return , regular rebalancing , and the distribution of returns .actual allocations to each asset class could vary from target allocations due to periodic investment strategy changes , short-term market value fluctuations , the length of time it takes to fully implement investment allocation positions , such as real estate and other alternative investments , and the timing of benefit payments and company contributions .taking into account the asset allocation ranges , the company determines the specific allocation of the master trust's investments within various asset classes .the master trust utilizes select investment strategies , which are executed through separate account or fund structures with external investment managers who demonstrate experience and expertise in the appropriate asset classes and styles .the selection of investment managers is done with careful evaluation of all aspects of performance and risk , demonstrated fiduciary responsibility , investment management experience , and a review of the investment managers' policies and processes .investment performance is monitored frequently against appropriate benchmarks and tracked to compliance guidelines with the assistance of third party consultants and performance evaluation tools and metrics .plan assets are stated at fair value .the company employs a variety of pricing sources to estimate the fair value of its pension plan assets , including independent pricing vendors , dealer or counterparty-supplied valuations , third- party appraisals , and appraisals prepared by the company's investment managers or other experts .investments in equity securities , common and preferred , are valued at the last reported sales price when an active market exists .securities for which official or last trade pricing on an active exchange is available are classified as level 1 .if closing prices are not available , securities are valued at the last trade price , if deemed reasonable , or a broker's quote in a non-active market , and are typically categorized as level 2 .investments in fixed-income securities are generally valued by independent pricing services or dealers who make markets in such securities .pricing methods are based upon market transactions for comparable securities and various relationships between securities that are generally recognized by institutional traders , and fixed-income securities typically are categorized as level 2. .
Question: what is the maximum permitted value for u.s equities in the company's pension plan?
Steps: Ask for number 36%
Answer: 0.36
Question: and what is the minimum?
Steps: Ask for number 15
Answer: 15.0
Question: what is, then, the range of that value?
| -14.64 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
pension plan assets pension assets include public equities , government and corporate bonds , cash and cash equivalents , private real estate funds , private partnerships , hedge funds , and other assets .plan assets are held in a master trust and overseen by the company's investment committee .all assets are externally managed through a combination of active and passive strategies .managers may only invest in the asset classes for which they have been appointed .the investment committee is responsible for setting the policy that provides the framework for management of the plan assets .the investment committee has set the minimum and maximum permitted values for each asset class in the company's pension plan master trust for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , as follows: . u.s . equities | range 15 | range - | range 36% ( 36 % )
international equities | 10 | - | 29% ( 29 % )
fixed income securities | 25 | - | 50% ( 50 % )
alternative investments | 10 | - | 25% ( 25 % ) the general objectives of the company's pension asset strategy are to earn a rate of return over time to satisfy the benefit obligations of the plans , meet minimum erisa funding requirements , and maintain sufficient liquidity to pay benefits and address other cash requirements within the master trust .specific investment objectives include reducing the volatility of pension assets relative to benefit obligations , achieving a competitive , total investment return , achieving diversification between and within asset classes , and managing other risks .investment objectives for each asset class are determined based on specific risks and investment opportunities identified .decisions regarding investment policies and asset allocation are made with the understanding of the historical and prospective return and risk characteristics of various asset classes , the effect of asset allocations on funded status , future company contributions , and projected expenditures , including benefits .the company updates its asset allocations periodically .the company uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset mix and considers plan obligation characteristics , duration , liquidity characteristics , funding requirements , expected rates of return , regular rebalancing , and the distribution of returns .actual allocations to each asset class could vary from target allocations due to periodic investment strategy changes , short-term market value fluctuations , the length of time it takes to fully implement investment allocation positions , such as real estate and other alternative investments , and the timing of benefit payments and company contributions .taking into account the asset allocation ranges , the company determines the specific allocation of the master trust's investments within various asset classes .the master trust utilizes select investment strategies , which are executed through separate account or fund structures with external investment managers who demonstrate experience and expertise in the appropriate asset classes and styles .the selection of investment managers is done with careful evaluation of all aspects of performance and risk , demonstrated fiduciary responsibility , investment management experience , and a review of the investment managers' policies and processes .investment performance is monitored frequently against appropriate benchmarks and tracked to compliance guidelines with the assistance of third party consultants and performance evaluation tools and metrics .plan assets are stated at fair value .the company employs a variety of pricing sources to estimate the fair value of its pension plan assets , including independent pricing vendors , dealer or counterparty-supplied valuations , third- party appraisals , and appraisals prepared by the company's investment managers or other experts .investments in equity securities , common and preferred , are valued at the last reported sales price when an active market exists .securities for which official or last trade pricing on an active exchange is available are classified as level 1 .if closing prices are not available , securities are valued at the last trade price , if deemed reasonable , or a broker's quote in a non-active market , and are typically categorized as level 2 .investments in fixed-income securities are generally valued by independent pricing services or dealers who make markets in such securities .pricing methods are based upon market transactions for comparable securities and various relationships between securities that are generally recognized by institutional traders , and fixed-income securities typically are categorized as level 2. .
Question: what is the maximum permitted value for u.s equities in the company's pension plan?
Steps: Ask for number 36%
Answer: 0.36
Question: and what is the minimum?
Steps: Ask for number 15
Answer: 15.0
Question: what is, then, the range of that value?
| convfinqa2740 |
pension plan assets pension assets include public equities , government and corporate bonds , cash and cash equivalents , private real estate funds , private partnerships , hedge funds , and other assets .plan assets are held in a master trust and overseen by the company's investment committee .all assets are externally managed through a combination of active and passive strategies .managers may only invest in the asset classes for which they have been appointed .the investment committee is responsible for setting the policy that provides the framework for management of the plan assets .the investment committee has set the minimum and maximum permitted values for each asset class in the company's pension plan master trust for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , as follows: . u.s . equities | range 15 | range - | range 36% ( 36 % )
international equities | 10 | - | 29% ( 29 % )
fixed income securities | 25 | - | 50% ( 50 % )
alternative investments | 10 | - | 25% ( 25 % ) the general objectives of the company's pension asset strategy are to earn a rate of return over time to satisfy the benefit obligations of the plans , meet minimum erisa funding requirements , and maintain sufficient liquidity to pay benefits and address other cash requirements within the master trust .specific investment objectives include reducing the volatility of pension assets relative to benefit obligations , achieving a competitive , total investment return , achieving diversification between and within asset classes , and managing other risks .investment objectives for each asset class are determined based on specific risks and investment opportunities identified .decisions regarding investment policies and asset allocation are made with the understanding of the historical and prospective return and risk characteristics of various asset classes , the effect of asset allocations on funded status , future company contributions , and projected expenditures , including benefits .the company updates its asset allocations periodically .the company uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset mix and considers plan obligation characteristics , duration , liquidity characteristics , funding requirements , expected rates of return , regular rebalancing , and the distribution of returns .actual allocations to each asset class could vary from target allocations due to periodic investment strategy changes , short-term market value fluctuations , the length of time it takes to fully implement investment allocation positions , such as real estate and other alternative investments , and the timing of benefit payments and company contributions .taking into account the asset allocation ranges , the company determines the specific allocation of the master trust's investments within various asset classes .the master trust utilizes select investment strategies , which are executed through separate account or fund structures with external investment managers who demonstrate experience and expertise in the appropriate asset classes and styles .the selection of investment managers is done with careful evaluation of all aspects of performance and risk , demonstrated fiduciary responsibility , investment management experience , and a review of the investment managers' policies and processes .investment performance is monitored frequently against appropriate benchmarks and tracked to compliance guidelines with the assistance of third party consultants and performance evaluation tools and metrics .plan assets are stated at fair value .the company employs a variety of pricing sources to estimate the fair value of its pension plan assets , including independent pricing vendors , dealer or counterparty-supplied valuations , third- party appraisals , and appraisals prepared by the company's investment managers or other experts .investments in equity securities , common and preferred , are valued at the last reported sales price when an active market exists .securities for which official or last trade pricing on an active exchange is available are classified as level 1 .if closing prices are not available , securities are valued at the last trade price , if deemed reasonable , or a broker's quote in a non-active market , and are typically categorized as level 2 .investments in fixed-income securities are generally valued by independent pricing services or dealers who make markets in such securities .pricing methods are based upon market transactions for comparable securities and various relationships between securities that are generally recognized by institutional traders , and fixed-income securities typically are categorized as level 2. .
Question: what is the maximum permitted value for u.s equities in the company's pension plan?
Steps: Ask for number 36%
Answer: 0.36
Question: and what is the minimum?
Steps: Ask for number 15
Answer: 15.0
Question: what is, then, the range of that value?
Steps: subtract(36%, 15)
Answer: -14.64
Question: and what is this range for the international equities?
| -9.71 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
pension plan assets pension assets include public equities , government and corporate bonds , cash and cash equivalents , private real estate funds , private partnerships , hedge funds , and other assets .plan assets are held in a master trust and overseen by the company's investment committee .all assets are externally managed through a combination of active and passive strategies .managers may only invest in the asset classes for which they have been appointed .the investment committee is responsible for setting the policy that provides the framework for management of the plan assets .the investment committee has set the minimum and maximum permitted values for each asset class in the company's pension plan master trust for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , as follows: . u.s . equities | range 15 | range - | range 36% ( 36 % )
international equities | 10 | - | 29% ( 29 % )
fixed income securities | 25 | - | 50% ( 50 % )
alternative investments | 10 | - | 25% ( 25 % ) the general objectives of the company's pension asset strategy are to earn a rate of return over time to satisfy the benefit obligations of the plans , meet minimum erisa funding requirements , and maintain sufficient liquidity to pay benefits and address other cash requirements within the master trust .specific investment objectives include reducing the volatility of pension assets relative to benefit obligations , achieving a competitive , total investment return , achieving diversification between and within asset classes , and managing other risks .investment objectives for each asset class are determined based on specific risks and investment opportunities identified .decisions regarding investment policies and asset allocation are made with the understanding of the historical and prospective return and risk characteristics of various asset classes , the effect of asset allocations on funded status , future company contributions , and projected expenditures , including benefits .the company updates its asset allocations periodically .the company uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset mix and considers plan obligation characteristics , duration , liquidity characteristics , funding requirements , expected rates of return , regular rebalancing , and the distribution of returns .actual allocations to each asset class could vary from target allocations due to periodic investment strategy changes , short-term market value fluctuations , the length of time it takes to fully implement investment allocation positions , such as real estate and other alternative investments , and the timing of benefit payments and company contributions .taking into account the asset allocation ranges , the company determines the specific allocation of the master trust's investments within various asset classes .the master trust utilizes select investment strategies , which are executed through separate account or fund structures with external investment managers who demonstrate experience and expertise in the appropriate asset classes and styles .the selection of investment managers is done with careful evaluation of all aspects of performance and risk , demonstrated fiduciary responsibility , investment management experience , and a review of the investment managers' policies and processes .investment performance is monitored frequently against appropriate benchmarks and tracked to compliance guidelines with the assistance of third party consultants and performance evaluation tools and metrics .plan assets are stated at fair value .the company employs a variety of pricing sources to estimate the fair value of its pension plan assets , including independent pricing vendors , dealer or counterparty-supplied valuations , third- party appraisals , and appraisals prepared by the company's investment managers or other experts .investments in equity securities , common and preferred , are valued at the last reported sales price when an active market exists .securities for which official or last trade pricing on an active exchange is available are classified as level 1 .if closing prices are not available , securities are valued at the last trade price , if deemed reasonable , or a broker's quote in a non-active market , and are typically categorized as level 2 .investments in fixed-income securities are generally valued by independent pricing services or dealers who make markets in such securities .pricing methods are based upon market transactions for comparable securities and various relationships between securities that are generally recognized by institutional traders , and fixed-income securities typically are categorized as level 2. .
Question: what is the maximum permitted value for u.s equities in the company's pension plan?
Steps: Ask for number 36%
Answer: 0.36
Question: and what is the minimum?
Steps: Ask for number 15
Answer: 15.0
Question: what is, then, the range of that value?
Steps: subtract(36%, 15)
Answer: -14.64
Question: and what is this range for the international equities?
| convfinqa2741 |
fiscal 2004 acquisitions in february 2004 , the company completed the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of accelerant networks , inc .( accelerant ) for total consideration of $ 23.8 million , and the acquisition of the technology assets of analog design automation , inc .( ada ) for total consideration of $ 12.2 million .the company acquired accelerant in order to enhance the company 2019s standards-based ip solutions .the company acquired the assets of ada in order to enhance the company 2019s analog and mixed signal offerings .in october 2004 , the company completed the acquisition of cascade semiconductor solutions , inc .( cascade ) for total upfront consideration of $ 15.8 million and contingent consideration of up to $ 10.0 million to be paid upon the achievement of certain performance milestones over the three years following the acquisition .contingent consideration totaling $ 2.1 million was paid during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and has been allocated to goodwill .the company acquired cascade , an ip provider , in order to augment synopsys 2019 offerings of pci express products .included in the total consideration for the accelerant and cascade acquisitions are aggregate acquisition costs of $ 4.3 million , consisting primarily of legal and accounting fees and other directly related charges .as of october 31 , 2006 the company has paid substantially all the costs related to these acquisitions .in fiscal 2004 , the company completed one additional acquisition and two additional asset acquisition transactions for aggregate consideration of $ 12.3 million in upfront payments and acquisition-related costs .in process research and development expenses associated with these acquisitions totaled $ 1.6 million for fiscal 2004 .these acquisitions are not considered material , individually or in the aggregate , to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations .as of october 31 , 2006 , the company has paid substantially all the costs related to these acquisitions .the company allocated the total aggregate purchase consideration for these transactions to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets , based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in aggregate goodwill of $ 24.5 million .aggregate identifiable intangible assets as a result of these acquisitions , consisting primarily of purchased technology and other intangibles , are $ 44.8 million , and are being amortized over three to five years .the company includes the amortization of purchased technology in cost of revenue in its statements of operations .note 4 .goodwill and intangible assets goodwill consists of the following: . | ( in thousands )
balance at october 31 2004 | $ 593706
additions ( 1 ) | 169142
other adjustments ( 2 ) | -33869 ( 33869 )
balance at october 31 2005 | $ 728979
additions ( 3 ) | 27745
other adjustments ( 4 ) | -21081 ( 21081 )
balance at october 31 2006 | $ 735643 ( 1 ) during fiscal year 2005 , additions represent goodwill acquired in acquisitions of ise and nassda of $ 72.9 million and $ 92.4 million , respectively , and contingent consideration earned and paid of $ 1.7 million and $ 2.1 million related to an immaterial acquisition and the acquisition of cascade , respectively .( 2 ) during fiscal year 2005 , synopsys reduced goodwill primarily related to tax reserves for avant! no longer probable due to expiration of the federal statute of limitations for claims. .
Question: what is the ratio of the balance of 2005 to 2004?
| 1.22785 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
fiscal 2004 acquisitions in february 2004 , the company completed the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of accelerant networks , inc .( accelerant ) for total consideration of $ 23.8 million , and the acquisition of the technology assets of analog design automation , inc .( ada ) for total consideration of $ 12.2 million .the company acquired accelerant in order to enhance the company 2019s standards-based ip solutions .the company acquired the assets of ada in order to enhance the company 2019s analog and mixed signal offerings .in october 2004 , the company completed the acquisition of cascade semiconductor solutions , inc .( cascade ) for total upfront consideration of $ 15.8 million and contingent consideration of up to $ 10.0 million to be paid upon the achievement of certain performance milestones over the three years following the acquisition .contingent consideration totaling $ 2.1 million was paid during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and has been allocated to goodwill .the company acquired cascade , an ip provider , in order to augment synopsys 2019 offerings of pci express products .included in the total consideration for the accelerant and cascade acquisitions are aggregate acquisition costs of $ 4.3 million , consisting primarily of legal and accounting fees and other directly related charges .as of october 31 , 2006 the company has paid substantially all the costs related to these acquisitions .in fiscal 2004 , the company completed one additional acquisition and two additional asset acquisition transactions for aggregate consideration of $ 12.3 million in upfront payments and acquisition-related costs .in process research and development expenses associated with these acquisitions totaled $ 1.6 million for fiscal 2004 .these acquisitions are not considered material , individually or in the aggregate , to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations .as of october 31 , 2006 , the company has paid substantially all the costs related to these acquisitions .the company allocated the total aggregate purchase consideration for these transactions to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets , based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in aggregate goodwill of $ 24.5 million .aggregate identifiable intangible assets as a result of these acquisitions , consisting primarily of purchased technology and other intangibles , are $ 44.8 million , and are being amortized over three to five years .the company includes the amortization of purchased technology in cost of revenue in its statements of operations .note 4 .goodwill and intangible assets goodwill consists of the following: . | ( in thousands )
balance at october 31 2004 | $ 593706
additions ( 1 ) | 169142
other adjustments ( 2 ) | -33869 ( 33869 )
balance at october 31 2005 | $ 728979
additions ( 3 ) | 27745
other adjustments ( 4 ) | -21081 ( 21081 )
balance at october 31 2006 | $ 735643 ( 1 ) during fiscal year 2005 , additions represent goodwill acquired in acquisitions of ise and nassda of $ 72.9 million and $ 92.4 million , respectively , and contingent consideration earned and paid of $ 1.7 million and $ 2.1 million related to an immaterial acquisition and the acquisition of cascade , respectively .( 2 ) during fiscal year 2005 , synopsys reduced goodwill primarily related to tax reserves for avant! no longer probable due to expiration of the federal statute of limitations for claims. .
Question: what is the ratio of the balance of 2005 to 2004?
| convfinqa2742 |
fiscal 2004 acquisitions in february 2004 , the company completed the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of accelerant networks , inc .( accelerant ) for total consideration of $ 23.8 million , and the acquisition of the technology assets of analog design automation , inc .( ada ) for total consideration of $ 12.2 million .the company acquired accelerant in order to enhance the company 2019s standards-based ip solutions .the company acquired the assets of ada in order to enhance the company 2019s analog and mixed signal offerings .in october 2004 , the company completed the acquisition of cascade semiconductor solutions , inc .( cascade ) for total upfront consideration of $ 15.8 million and contingent consideration of up to $ 10.0 million to be paid upon the achievement of certain performance milestones over the three years following the acquisition .contingent consideration totaling $ 2.1 million was paid during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and has been allocated to goodwill .the company acquired cascade , an ip provider , in order to augment synopsys 2019 offerings of pci express products .included in the total consideration for the accelerant and cascade acquisitions are aggregate acquisition costs of $ 4.3 million , consisting primarily of legal and accounting fees and other directly related charges .as of october 31 , 2006 the company has paid substantially all the costs related to these acquisitions .in fiscal 2004 , the company completed one additional acquisition and two additional asset acquisition transactions for aggregate consideration of $ 12.3 million in upfront payments and acquisition-related costs .in process research and development expenses associated with these acquisitions totaled $ 1.6 million for fiscal 2004 .these acquisitions are not considered material , individually or in the aggregate , to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations .as of october 31 , 2006 , the company has paid substantially all the costs related to these acquisitions .the company allocated the total aggregate purchase consideration for these transactions to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets , based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in aggregate goodwill of $ 24.5 million .aggregate identifiable intangible assets as a result of these acquisitions , consisting primarily of purchased technology and other intangibles , are $ 44.8 million , and are being amortized over three to five years .the company includes the amortization of purchased technology in cost of revenue in its statements of operations .note 4 .goodwill and intangible assets goodwill consists of the following: . | ( in thousands )
balance at october 31 2004 | $ 593706
additions ( 1 ) | 169142
other adjustments ( 2 ) | -33869 ( 33869 )
balance at october 31 2005 | $ 728979
additions ( 3 ) | 27745
other adjustments ( 4 ) | -21081 ( 21081 )
balance at october 31 2006 | $ 735643 ( 1 ) during fiscal year 2005 , additions represent goodwill acquired in acquisitions of ise and nassda of $ 72.9 million and $ 92.4 million , respectively , and contingent consideration earned and paid of $ 1.7 million and $ 2.1 million related to an immaterial acquisition and the acquisition of cascade , respectively .( 2 ) during fiscal year 2005 , synopsys reduced goodwill primarily related to tax reserves for avant! no longer probable due to expiration of the federal statute of limitations for claims. .
Question: what is the ratio of the balance of 2005 to 2004?
Steps: divide(728979, 593706)
Answer: 1.22785
Question: what is that less 1?
| 0.22785 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
fiscal 2004 acquisitions in february 2004 , the company completed the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of accelerant networks , inc .( accelerant ) for total consideration of $ 23.8 million , and the acquisition of the technology assets of analog design automation , inc .( ada ) for total consideration of $ 12.2 million .the company acquired accelerant in order to enhance the company 2019s standards-based ip solutions .the company acquired the assets of ada in order to enhance the company 2019s analog and mixed signal offerings .in october 2004 , the company completed the acquisition of cascade semiconductor solutions , inc .( cascade ) for total upfront consideration of $ 15.8 million and contingent consideration of up to $ 10.0 million to be paid upon the achievement of certain performance milestones over the three years following the acquisition .contingent consideration totaling $ 2.1 million was paid during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 and has been allocated to goodwill .the company acquired cascade , an ip provider , in order to augment synopsys 2019 offerings of pci express products .included in the total consideration for the accelerant and cascade acquisitions are aggregate acquisition costs of $ 4.3 million , consisting primarily of legal and accounting fees and other directly related charges .as of october 31 , 2006 the company has paid substantially all the costs related to these acquisitions .in fiscal 2004 , the company completed one additional acquisition and two additional asset acquisition transactions for aggregate consideration of $ 12.3 million in upfront payments and acquisition-related costs .in process research and development expenses associated with these acquisitions totaled $ 1.6 million for fiscal 2004 .these acquisitions are not considered material , individually or in the aggregate , to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations .as of october 31 , 2006 , the company has paid substantially all the costs related to these acquisitions .the company allocated the total aggregate purchase consideration for these transactions to the assets and liabilities acquired , including identifiable intangible assets , based on their respective fair values at the acquisition dates , resulting in aggregate goodwill of $ 24.5 million .aggregate identifiable intangible assets as a result of these acquisitions , consisting primarily of purchased technology and other intangibles , are $ 44.8 million , and are being amortized over three to five years .the company includes the amortization of purchased technology in cost of revenue in its statements of operations .note 4 .goodwill and intangible assets goodwill consists of the following: . | ( in thousands )
balance at october 31 2004 | $ 593706
additions ( 1 ) | 169142
other adjustments ( 2 ) | -33869 ( 33869 )
balance at october 31 2005 | $ 728979
additions ( 3 ) | 27745
other adjustments ( 4 ) | -21081 ( 21081 )
balance at october 31 2006 | $ 735643 ( 1 ) during fiscal year 2005 , additions represent goodwill acquired in acquisitions of ise and nassda of $ 72.9 million and $ 92.4 million , respectively , and contingent consideration earned and paid of $ 1.7 million and $ 2.1 million related to an immaterial acquisition and the acquisition of cascade , respectively .( 2 ) during fiscal year 2005 , synopsys reduced goodwill primarily related to tax reserves for avant! no longer probable due to expiration of the federal statute of limitations for claims. .
Question: what is the ratio of the balance of 2005 to 2004?
Steps: divide(728979, 593706)
Answer: 1.22785
Question: what is that less 1?
| convfinqa2743 |
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy including the continued effectiveness of the clean energy standards/zero emissions credit program ( ces/zec ) , the establishment of certain long-term agreements on acceptable terms with the energy research and development authority of the state of new york in connection with the ces/zec program , and nypsc approval of the transaction on acceptable terms , entergy refueled the fitzpatrick plant in january and february 2017 .in october 2015 , entergy determined that it would close the pilgrim plant .the decision came after management 2019s extensive analysis of the economics and operating life of the plant following the nrc 2019s decision in september 2015 to place the plant in its 201cmultiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column 201d ( column 4 ) of its reactor oversight process action matrix .the pilgrim plant is expected to cease operations on may 31 , 2019 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle .in december 2015 , entergy wholesale commodities closed on the sale of its 583 mw rhode island state energy center ( risec ) , in johnston , rhode island .the base sales price , excluding adjustments , was approximately $ 490 million .entergy wholesale commodities purchased risec for $ 346 million in december 2011 .in december 2016 , entergy announced that it reached an agreement with consumers energy to terminate the ppa for the palisades plant on may 31 , 2018 .pursuant to the ppa termination agreement , consumers energy will pay entergy $ 172 million for the early termination of the ppa .the ppa termination agreement is subject to regulatory approvals .separately , and assuming regulatory approvals are obtained for the ppa termination agreement , entergy intends to shut down the palisades nuclear power plant permanently on october 1 , 2018 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle .entergy expects to enter into a new ppa with consumers energy under which the plant would continue to operate through october 1 , 2018 .in january 2017 , entergy announced that it reached a settlement with new york state to shut down indian point 2 by april 30 , 2020 and indian point 3 by april 30 , 2021 , and resolve all new york state-initiated legal challenges to indian point 2019s operating license renewal .as part of the settlement , new york state has agreed to issue indian point 2019s water quality certification and coastal zone management act consistency certification and to withdraw its objection to license renewal before the nrc .new york state also has agreed to issue a water discharge permit , which is required regardless of whether the plant is seeking a renewed nrc license .the shutdowns are conditioned , among other things , upon such actions being taken by new york state .even without opposition , the nrc license renewal process is expected to continue at least into 2018 .with the settlement concerning indian point , entergy now has announced plans for the disposition of all of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants , including the sales of vermont yankee and fitzpatrick , and the earlier than previously expected shutdowns of pilgrim , palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 .see 201centergy wholesale commodities exit from the merchant power business 201d for further discussion .property nuclear generating stations entergy wholesale commodities includes the ownership of the following nuclear power plants : power plant market service year acquired location capacity - reactor type license expiration . power plant | market | in service year | acquired | location | capacity - reactor type | license expiration date
pilgrim ( a ) | is0-ne | 1972 | july 1999 | plymouth ma | 688 mw - boiling water | 2032 ( a )
fitzpatrick ( b ) | nyiso | 1975 | nov . 2000 | oswego ny | 838 mw - boiling water | 2034 ( b )
indian point 3 ( c ) | nyiso | 1976 | nov . 2000 | buchanan ny | 1041 mw - pressurized water | 2015 ( c )
indian point 2 ( c ) | nyiso | 1974 | sept . 2001 | buchanan ny | 1028 mw - pressurized water | 2013 ( c )
vermont yankee ( d ) | is0-ne | 1972 | july 2002 | vernon vt | 605 mw - boiling water | 2032 ( d )
palisades ( e ) | miso | 1971 | apr . 2007 | covert mi | 811 mw - pressurized water | 2031 ( e ) .
Question: what is the sum of the pilgrim and fitzpatrick facilities' capacity?
| 1526.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy including the continued effectiveness of the clean energy standards/zero emissions credit program ( ces/zec ) , the establishment of certain long-term agreements on acceptable terms with the energy research and development authority of the state of new york in connection with the ces/zec program , and nypsc approval of the transaction on acceptable terms , entergy refueled the fitzpatrick plant in january and february 2017 .in october 2015 , entergy determined that it would close the pilgrim plant .the decision came after management 2019s extensive analysis of the economics and operating life of the plant following the nrc 2019s decision in september 2015 to place the plant in its 201cmultiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column 201d ( column 4 ) of its reactor oversight process action matrix .the pilgrim plant is expected to cease operations on may 31 , 2019 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle .in december 2015 , entergy wholesale commodities closed on the sale of its 583 mw rhode island state energy center ( risec ) , in johnston , rhode island .the base sales price , excluding adjustments , was approximately $ 490 million .entergy wholesale commodities purchased risec for $ 346 million in december 2011 .in december 2016 , entergy announced that it reached an agreement with consumers energy to terminate the ppa for the palisades plant on may 31 , 2018 .pursuant to the ppa termination agreement , consumers energy will pay entergy $ 172 million for the early termination of the ppa .the ppa termination agreement is subject to regulatory approvals .separately , and assuming regulatory approvals are obtained for the ppa termination agreement , entergy intends to shut down the palisades nuclear power plant permanently on october 1 , 2018 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle .entergy expects to enter into a new ppa with consumers energy under which the plant would continue to operate through october 1 , 2018 .in january 2017 , entergy announced that it reached a settlement with new york state to shut down indian point 2 by april 30 , 2020 and indian point 3 by april 30 , 2021 , and resolve all new york state-initiated legal challenges to indian point 2019s operating license renewal .as part of the settlement , new york state has agreed to issue indian point 2019s water quality certification and coastal zone management act consistency certification and to withdraw its objection to license renewal before the nrc .new york state also has agreed to issue a water discharge permit , which is required regardless of whether the plant is seeking a renewed nrc license .the shutdowns are conditioned , among other things , upon such actions being taken by new york state .even without opposition , the nrc license renewal process is expected to continue at least into 2018 .with the settlement concerning indian point , entergy now has announced plans for the disposition of all of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants , including the sales of vermont yankee and fitzpatrick , and the earlier than previously expected shutdowns of pilgrim , palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 .see 201centergy wholesale commodities exit from the merchant power business 201d for further discussion .property nuclear generating stations entergy wholesale commodities includes the ownership of the following nuclear power plants : power plant market service year acquired location capacity - reactor type license expiration . power plant | market | in service year | acquired | location | capacity - reactor type | license expiration date
pilgrim ( a ) | is0-ne | 1972 | july 1999 | plymouth ma | 688 mw - boiling water | 2032 ( a )
fitzpatrick ( b ) | nyiso | 1975 | nov . 2000 | oswego ny | 838 mw - boiling water | 2034 ( b )
indian point 3 ( c ) | nyiso | 1976 | nov . 2000 | buchanan ny | 1041 mw - pressurized water | 2015 ( c )
indian point 2 ( c ) | nyiso | 1974 | sept . 2001 | buchanan ny | 1028 mw - pressurized water | 2013 ( c )
vermont yankee ( d ) | is0-ne | 1972 | july 2002 | vernon vt | 605 mw - boiling water | 2032 ( d )
palisades ( e ) | miso | 1971 | apr . 2007 | covert mi | 811 mw - pressurized water | 2031 ( e ) .
Question: what is the sum of the pilgrim and fitzpatrick facilities' capacity?
| convfinqa2744 |
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy including the continued effectiveness of the clean energy standards/zero emissions credit program ( ces/zec ) , the establishment of certain long-term agreements on acceptable terms with the energy research and development authority of the state of new york in connection with the ces/zec program , and nypsc approval of the transaction on acceptable terms , entergy refueled the fitzpatrick plant in january and february 2017 .in october 2015 , entergy determined that it would close the pilgrim plant .the decision came after management 2019s extensive analysis of the economics and operating life of the plant following the nrc 2019s decision in september 2015 to place the plant in its 201cmultiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column 201d ( column 4 ) of its reactor oversight process action matrix .the pilgrim plant is expected to cease operations on may 31 , 2019 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle .in december 2015 , entergy wholesale commodities closed on the sale of its 583 mw rhode island state energy center ( risec ) , in johnston , rhode island .the base sales price , excluding adjustments , was approximately $ 490 million .entergy wholesale commodities purchased risec for $ 346 million in december 2011 .in december 2016 , entergy announced that it reached an agreement with consumers energy to terminate the ppa for the palisades plant on may 31 , 2018 .pursuant to the ppa termination agreement , consumers energy will pay entergy $ 172 million for the early termination of the ppa .the ppa termination agreement is subject to regulatory approvals .separately , and assuming regulatory approvals are obtained for the ppa termination agreement , entergy intends to shut down the palisades nuclear power plant permanently on october 1 , 2018 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle .entergy expects to enter into a new ppa with consumers energy under which the plant would continue to operate through october 1 , 2018 .in january 2017 , entergy announced that it reached a settlement with new york state to shut down indian point 2 by april 30 , 2020 and indian point 3 by april 30 , 2021 , and resolve all new york state-initiated legal challenges to indian point 2019s operating license renewal .as part of the settlement , new york state has agreed to issue indian point 2019s water quality certification and coastal zone management act consistency certification and to withdraw its objection to license renewal before the nrc .new york state also has agreed to issue a water discharge permit , which is required regardless of whether the plant is seeking a renewed nrc license .the shutdowns are conditioned , among other things , upon such actions being taken by new york state .even without opposition , the nrc license renewal process is expected to continue at least into 2018 .with the settlement concerning indian point , entergy now has announced plans for the disposition of all of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants , including the sales of vermont yankee and fitzpatrick , and the earlier than previously expected shutdowns of pilgrim , palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 .see 201centergy wholesale commodities exit from the merchant power business 201d for further discussion .property nuclear generating stations entergy wholesale commodities includes the ownership of the following nuclear power plants : power plant market service year acquired location capacity - reactor type license expiration . power plant | market | in service year | acquired | location | capacity - reactor type | license expiration date
pilgrim ( a ) | is0-ne | 1972 | july 1999 | plymouth ma | 688 mw - boiling water | 2032 ( a )
fitzpatrick ( b ) | nyiso | 1975 | nov . 2000 | oswego ny | 838 mw - boiling water | 2034 ( b )
indian point 3 ( c ) | nyiso | 1976 | nov . 2000 | buchanan ny | 1041 mw - pressurized water | 2015 ( c )
indian point 2 ( c ) | nyiso | 1974 | sept . 2001 | buchanan ny | 1028 mw - pressurized water | 2013 ( c )
vermont yankee ( d ) | is0-ne | 1972 | july 2002 | vernon vt | 605 mw - boiling water | 2032 ( d )
palisades ( e ) | miso | 1971 | apr . 2007 | covert mi | 811 mw - pressurized water | 2031 ( e ) .
Question: what is the sum of the pilgrim and fitzpatrick facilities' capacity?
Steps: add(688, 838)
Answer: 1526.0
Question: what is the sum including vermont yankee capacity?
| 2131.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy including the continued effectiveness of the clean energy standards/zero emissions credit program ( ces/zec ) , the establishment of certain long-term agreements on acceptable terms with the energy research and development authority of the state of new york in connection with the ces/zec program , and nypsc approval of the transaction on acceptable terms , entergy refueled the fitzpatrick plant in january and february 2017 .in october 2015 , entergy determined that it would close the pilgrim plant .the decision came after management 2019s extensive analysis of the economics and operating life of the plant following the nrc 2019s decision in september 2015 to place the plant in its 201cmultiple/repetitive degraded cornerstone column 201d ( column 4 ) of its reactor oversight process action matrix .the pilgrim plant is expected to cease operations on may 31 , 2019 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle .in december 2015 , entergy wholesale commodities closed on the sale of its 583 mw rhode island state energy center ( risec ) , in johnston , rhode island .the base sales price , excluding adjustments , was approximately $ 490 million .entergy wholesale commodities purchased risec for $ 346 million in december 2011 .in december 2016 , entergy announced that it reached an agreement with consumers energy to terminate the ppa for the palisades plant on may 31 , 2018 .pursuant to the ppa termination agreement , consumers energy will pay entergy $ 172 million for the early termination of the ppa .the ppa termination agreement is subject to regulatory approvals .separately , and assuming regulatory approvals are obtained for the ppa termination agreement , entergy intends to shut down the palisades nuclear power plant permanently on october 1 , 2018 , after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle .entergy expects to enter into a new ppa with consumers energy under which the plant would continue to operate through october 1 , 2018 .in january 2017 , entergy announced that it reached a settlement with new york state to shut down indian point 2 by april 30 , 2020 and indian point 3 by april 30 , 2021 , and resolve all new york state-initiated legal challenges to indian point 2019s operating license renewal .as part of the settlement , new york state has agreed to issue indian point 2019s water quality certification and coastal zone management act consistency certification and to withdraw its objection to license renewal before the nrc .new york state also has agreed to issue a water discharge permit , which is required regardless of whether the plant is seeking a renewed nrc license .the shutdowns are conditioned , among other things , upon such actions being taken by new york state .even without opposition , the nrc license renewal process is expected to continue at least into 2018 .with the settlement concerning indian point , entergy now has announced plans for the disposition of all of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants , including the sales of vermont yankee and fitzpatrick , and the earlier than previously expected shutdowns of pilgrim , palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 .see 201centergy wholesale commodities exit from the merchant power business 201d for further discussion .property nuclear generating stations entergy wholesale commodities includes the ownership of the following nuclear power plants : power plant market service year acquired location capacity - reactor type license expiration . power plant | market | in service year | acquired | location | capacity - reactor type | license expiration date
pilgrim ( a ) | is0-ne | 1972 | july 1999 | plymouth ma | 688 mw - boiling water | 2032 ( a )
fitzpatrick ( b ) | nyiso | 1975 | nov . 2000 | oswego ny | 838 mw - boiling water | 2034 ( b )
indian point 3 ( c ) | nyiso | 1976 | nov . 2000 | buchanan ny | 1041 mw - pressurized water | 2015 ( c )
indian point 2 ( c ) | nyiso | 1974 | sept . 2001 | buchanan ny | 1028 mw - pressurized water | 2013 ( c )
vermont yankee ( d ) | is0-ne | 1972 | july 2002 | vernon vt | 605 mw - boiling water | 2032 ( d )
palisades ( e ) | miso | 1971 | apr . 2007 | covert mi | 811 mw - pressurized water | 2031 ( e ) .
Question: what is the sum of the pilgrim and fitzpatrick facilities' capacity?
Steps: add(688, 838)
Answer: 1526.0
Question: what is the sum including vermont yankee capacity?
| convfinqa2745 |
individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment .specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent .for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance .a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses .the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower .effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio .in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses .if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses .we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods .during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices .this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review .valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit .goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 .judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment .estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium .management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit .there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units .in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data .the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : . reporting unit | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2012
retail brokerage | $ 1791.8 | $ 1791.8
market making | 2014 | 142.4
total goodwill | $ 1791.8 | $ 1934.2 .
Question: what is the amount of the goodwill in 2012 that is allocated to market making?
| 142.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment .specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent .for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance .a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses .the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower .effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio .in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses .if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses .we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods .during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices .this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review .valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit .goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 .judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment .estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium .management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit .there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units .in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data .the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : . reporting unit | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2012
retail brokerage | $ 1791.8 | $ 1791.8
market making | 2014 | 142.4
total goodwill | $ 1791.8 | $ 1934.2 .
Question: what is the amount of the goodwill in 2012 that is allocated to market making?
| convfinqa2746 |
individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment .specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent .for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance .a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses .the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower .effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio .in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses .if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses .we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods .during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices .this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review .valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit .goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 .judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment .estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium .management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit .there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units .in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data .the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : . reporting unit | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2012
retail brokerage | $ 1791.8 | $ 1791.8
market making | 2014 | 142.4
total goodwill | $ 1791.8 | $ 1934.2 .
Question: what is the amount of the goodwill in 2012 that is allocated to market making?
Steps: Ask for number 142.4
Answer: 142.4
Question: and what is that total goodwill?
| 1934.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment .specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent .for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance .a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses .the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower .effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio .in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses .if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses .we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods .during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices .this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review .valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit .goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 .judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment .estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium .management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit .there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units .in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data .the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : . reporting unit | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2012
retail brokerage | $ 1791.8 | $ 1791.8
market making | 2014 | 142.4
total goodwill | $ 1791.8 | $ 1934.2 .
Question: what is the amount of the goodwill in 2012 that is allocated to market making?
Steps: Ask for number 142.4
Answer: 142.4
Question: and what is that total goodwill?
| convfinqa2747 |
individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment .specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent .for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance .a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses .the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower .effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio .in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses .if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses .we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods .during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices .this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review .valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit .goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 .judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment .estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium .management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit .there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units .in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data .the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : . reporting unit | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2012
retail brokerage | $ 1791.8 | $ 1791.8
market making | 2014 | 142.4
total goodwill | $ 1791.8 | $ 1934.2 .
Question: what is the amount of the goodwill in 2012 that is allocated to market making?
Steps: Ask for number 142.4
Answer: 142.4
Question: and what is that total goodwill?
Steps: Ask for number 1934.2
Answer: 1934.2
Question: what is, then, that amount as a percentage of this total goodwill?
| 0.07362 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment .specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent .for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance .a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses .the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower .effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio .in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses .if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses .we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods .during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices .this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review .valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit .goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 .judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment .estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium .management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit .there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units .in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data .the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : . reporting unit | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2012
retail brokerage | $ 1791.8 | $ 1791.8
market making | 2014 | 142.4
total goodwill | $ 1791.8 | $ 1934.2 .
Question: what is the amount of the goodwill in 2012 that is allocated to market making?
Steps: Ask for number 142.4
Answer: 142.4
Question: and what is that total goodwill?
Steps: Ask for number 1934.2
Answer: 1934.2
Question: what is, then, that amount as a percentage of this total goodwill?
| convfinqa2748 |
individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment .specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent .for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance .a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses .the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower .effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio .in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses .if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses .we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods .during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices .this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review .valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit .goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 .judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment .estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium .management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit .there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units .in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data .the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : . reporting unit | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2012
retail brokerage | $ 1791.8 | $ 1791.8
market making | 2014 | 142.4
total goodwill | $ 1791.8 | $ 1934.2 .
Question: what is the amount of the goodwill in 2012 that is allocated to market making?
Steps: Ask for number 142.4
Answer: 142.4
Question: and what is that total goodwill?
Steps: Ask for number 1934.2
Answer: 1934.2
Question: what is, then, that amount as a percentage of this total goodwill?
Steps: divide(142.4, 1934.2)
Answer: 0.07362
Question: in that same year, what was the retail brokerage value?
| 1791.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment .specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent .for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance .a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses .the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower .effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio .in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses .if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses .we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods .during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices .this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review .valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit .goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 .judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment .estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium .management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit .there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units .in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data .the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : . reporting unit | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2012
retail brokerage | $ 1791.8 | $ 1791.8
market making | 2014 | 142.4
total goodwill | $ 1791.8 | $ 1934.2 .
Question: what is the amount of the goodwill in 2012 that is allocated to market making?
Steps: Ask for number 142.4
Answer: 142.4
Question: and what is that total goodwill?
Steps: Ask for number 1934.2
Answer: 1934.2
Question: what is, then, that amount as a percentage of this total goodwill?
Steps: divide(142.4, 1934.2)
Answer: 0.07362
Question: in that same year, what was the retail brokerage value?
| convfinqa2749 |
individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment .specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent .for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance .a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses .the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower .effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio .in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses .if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses .we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods .during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices .this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review .valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit .goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 .judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment .estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium .management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit .there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units .in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data .the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : . reporting unit | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2012
retail brokerage | $ 1791.8 | $ 1791.8
market making | 2014 | 142.4
total goodwill | $ 1791.8 | $ 1934.2 .
Question: what is the amount of the goodwill in 2012 that is allocated to market making?
Steps: Ask for number 142.4
Answer: 142.4
Question: and what is that total goodwill?
Steps: Ask for number 1934.2
Answer: 1934.2
Question: what is, then, that amount as a percentage of this total goodwill?
Steps: divide(142.4, 1934.2)
Answer: 0.07362
Question: in that same year, what was the retail brokerage value?
Steps: Ask for number 1791.8
Answer: 1791.8
Question: and what was the market making one?
| 142.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment .specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent .for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance .a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses .the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower .effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio .in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses .if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses .we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods .during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices .this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review .valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit .goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 .judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment .estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium .management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit .there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units .in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data .the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : . reporting unit | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2012
retail brokerage | $ 1791.8 | $ 1791.8
market making | 2014 | 142.4
total goodwill | $ 1791.8 | $ 1934.2 .
Question: what is the amount of the goodwill in 2012 that is allocated to market making?
Steps: Ask for number 142.4
Answer: 142.4
Question: and what is that total goodwill?
Steps: Ask for number 1934.2
Answer: 1934.2
Question: what is, then, that amount as a percentage of this total goodwill?
Steps: divide(142.4, 1934.2)
Answer: 0.07362
Question: in that same year, what was the retail brokerage value?
Steps: Ask for number 1791.8
Answer: 1791.8
Question: and what was the market making one?
| convfinqa2750 |
individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment .specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent .for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance .a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses .the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower .effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio .in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses .if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses .we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods .during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices .this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review .valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit .goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 .judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment .estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium .management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit .there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units .in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data .the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : . reporting unit | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2012
retail brokerage | $ 1791.8 | $ 1791.8
market making | 2014 | 142.4
total goodwill | $ 1791.8 | $ 1934.2 .
Question: what is the amount of the goodwill in 2012 that is allocated to market making?
Steps: Ask for number 142.4
Answer: 142.4
Question: and what is that total goodwill?
Steps: Ask for number 1934.2
Answer: 1934.2
Question: what is, then, that amount as a percentage of this total goodwill?
Steps: divide(142.4, 1934.2)
Answer: 0.07362
Question: in that same year, what was the retail brokerage value?
Steps: Ask for number 1791.8
Answer: 1791.8
Question: and what was the market making one?
Steps: Ask for number 142.4
Answer: 142.4
Question: how much, then, did the retail brokerage value represent in relation to this market making one?
| 12.58287 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
individual loan before being modified as a tdr in the discounted cash flow analysis in order to determine that specific loan 2019s expected impairment .specifically , a loan that has a more severe delinquency history prior to modification will have a higher future default rate in the discounted cash flow analysis than a loan that was not as severely delinquent .for both of the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolio segments , the pre- modification delinquency status , the borrower 2019s current credit score and other credit bureau attributes , in addition to each loan 2019s individual default experience and credit characteristics , are incorporated into the calculation of the specific allowance .a specific allowance is established to the extent that the recorded investment exceeds the discounted cash flows of a tdr with a corresponding charge to provision for loan losses .the specific allowance for these individually impaired loans represents the forecasted losses over the estimated remaining life of the loan , including the economic concession to the borrower .effects if actual results differ historic volatility in the credit markets has substantially increased the complexity and uncertainty involved in estimating the losses inherent in the loan portfolio .in the current market it is difficult to estimate how potential changes in the quantitative and qualitative factors , including the impact of home equity lines of credit converting from interest only to amortizing loans or requiring borrowers to repay the loan in full at the end of the draw period , might impact the allowance for loan losses .if our underlying assumptions and judgments prove to be inaccurate , the allowance for loan losses could be insufficient to cover actual losses .we may be required under such circumstances to further increase the provision for loan losses , which could have an adverse effect on the regulatory capital position and results of operations in future periods .during the normal course of conducting examinations , our banking regulators , the occ and federal reserve , continue to review our business and practices .this process is dynamic and ongoing and we cannot be certain that additional changes or actions will not result from their continuing review .valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets description goodwill and other intangible assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of november 30 and in interim periods when events or changes indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable , such as a significant deterioration in the operating environment or a decision to sell or dispose of a reporting unit .goodwill and other intangible assets net of amortization were $ 1.8 billion and $ 0.2 billion , respectively , at december 31 , 2013 .judgments goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .reporting units are evaluated for impairment individually during the annual assessment .estimating the fair value of reporting units and the assets , liabilities and intangible assets of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments , particularly related to cash flows , the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium .management judgment is required to assess whether the carrying value of the reporting unit can be supported by the fair value of the individual reporting unit .there are various valuation methodologies , such as the market approach or discounted cash flow methods , that may be used to estimate the fair value of reporting units .in applying these methodologies , we utilize a number of factors , including actual operating results , future business plans , economic projections , and market data .the following table shows the comparative data for the amount of goodwill allocated to our reporting units ( dollars in millions ) : . reporting unit | december 31 , 2013 | december 31 , 2012
retail brokerage | $ 1791.8 | $ 1791.8
market making | 2014 | 142.4
total goodwill | $ 1791.8 | $ 1934.2 .
Question: what is the amount of the goodwill in 2012 that is allocated to market making?
Steps: Ask for number 142.4
Answer: 142.4
Question: and what is that total goodwill?
Steps: Ask for number 1934.2
Answer: 1934.2
Question: what is, then, that amount as a percentage of this total goodwill?
Steps: divide(142.4, 1934.2)
Answer: 0.07362
Question: in that same year, what was the retail brokerage value?
Steps: Ask for number 1791.8
Answer: 1791.8
Question: and what was the market making one?
Steps: Ask for number 142.4
Answer: 142.4
Question: how much, then, did the retail brokerage value represent in relation to this market making one?
| convfinqa2751 |
the long term .in addition , we have focused on building relationships with large multinational carriers such as airtel , telef f3nica s.a .and vodafone group plc .we believe that consistent carrier investments in their networks across our international markets position us to generate meaningful organic revenue growth going forward .in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas .a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low .in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway .carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate .in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g network build outs , with select investments in 4g technology .consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially .recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks .smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service .finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage amongst their customer base .with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity .we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets .as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 60190 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth .we have holistic master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and a reduction in the likelihood of churn .our holistic master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced collocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites .property operations new site revenue growth .during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 25370 sites .in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the acquisition or construction of new sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass- through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses .we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . new sites ( acquired or constructed ) | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
u.s . | 11595 | 900 | 5260
asia | 2330 | 1560 | 1260
emea | 4910 | 190 | 485
latin america | 6535 | 5800 | 6065 property operations expenses .direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance .these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations .in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year .as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow .we may , however , incur additional segment .
Question: what is the sum of new sites acquired or constructed in the u.s. and asia in 2015?
| 13925.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the long term .in addition , we have focused on building relationships with large multinational carriers such as airtel , telef f3nica s.a .and vodafone group plc .we believe that consistent carrier investments in their networks across our international markets position us to generate meaningful organic revenue growth going forward .in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas .a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low .in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway .carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate .in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g network build outs , with select investments in 4g technology .consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially .recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks .smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service .finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage amongst their customer base .with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity .we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets .as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 60190 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth .we have holistic master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and a reduction in the likelihood of churn .our holistic master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced collocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites .property operations new site revenue growth .during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 25370 sites .in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the acquisition or construction of new sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass- through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses .we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . new sites ( acquired or constructed ) | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
u.s . | 11595 | 900 | 5260
asia | 2330 | 1560 | 1260
emea | 4910 | 190 | 485
latin america | 6535 | 5800 | 6065 property operations expenses .direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance .these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations .in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year .as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow .we may , however , incur additional segment .
Question: what is the sum of new sites acquired or constructed in the u.s. and asia in 2015?
| convfinqa2752 |
the long term .in addition , we have focused on building relationships with large multinational carriers such as airtel , telef f3nica s.a .and vodafone group plc .we believe that consistent carrier investments in their networks across our international markets position us to generate meaningful organic revenue growth going forward .in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas .a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low .in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway .carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate .in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g network build outs , with select investments in 4g technology .consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially .recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks .smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service .finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage amongst their customer base .with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity .we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets .as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 60190 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth .we have holistic master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and a reduction in the likelihood of churn .our holistic master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced collocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites .property operations new site revenue growth .during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 25370 sites .in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the acquisition or construction of new sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass- through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses .we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . new sites ( acquired or constructed ) | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
u.s . | 11595 | 900 | 5260
asia | 2330 | 1560 | 1260
emea | 4910 | 190 | 485
latin america | 6535 | 5800 | 6065 property operations expenses .direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance .these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations .in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year .as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow .we may , however , incur additional segment .
Question: what is the sum of new sites acquired or constructed in the u.s. and asia in 2015?
Steps: add(11595, 2330)
Answer: 13925.0
Question: what is the sum including emea?
| 18835.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the long term .in addition , we have focused on building relationships with large multinational carriers such as airtel , telef f3nica s.a .and vodafone group plc .we believe that consistent carrier investments in their networks across our international markets position us to generate meaningful organic revenue growth going forward .in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas .a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low .in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway .carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate .in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g network build outs , with select investments in 4g technology .consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially .recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks .smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service .finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage amongst their customer base .with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity .we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets .as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 60190 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth .we have holistic master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and a reduction in the likelihood of churn .our holistic master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced collocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites .property operations new site revenue growth .during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 25370 sites .in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the acquisition or construction of new sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass- through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses .we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . new sites ( acquired or constructed ) | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
u.s . | 11595 | 900 | 5260
asia | 2330 | 1560 | 1260
emea | 4910 | 190 | 485
latin america | 6535 | 5800 | 6065 property operations expenses .direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance .these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations .in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year .as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow .we may , however , incur additional segment .
Question: what is the sum of new sites acquired or constructed in the u.s. and asia in 2015?
Steps: add(11595, 2330)
Answer: 13925.0
Question: what is the sum including emea?
| convfinqa2753 |
the long term .in addition , we have focused on building relationships with large multinational carriers such as airtel , telef f3nica s.a .and vodafone group plc .we believe that consistent carrier investments in their networks across our international markets position us to generate meaningful organic revenue growth going forward .in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas .a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low .in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway .carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate .in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g network build outs , with select investments in 4g technology .consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially .recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks .smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service .finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage amongst their customer base .with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity .we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets .as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 60190 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth .we have holistic master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and a reduction in the likelihood of churn .our holistic master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced collocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites .property operations new site revenue growth .during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 25370 sites .in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the acquisition or construction of new sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass- through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses .we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . new sites ( acquired or constructed ) | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
u.s . | 11595 | 900 | 5260
asia | 2330 | 1560 | 1260
emea | 4910 | 190 | 485
latin america | 6535 | 5800 | 6065 property operations expenses .direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance .these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations .in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year .as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow .we may , however , incur additional segment .
Question: what is the sum of new sites acquired or constructed in the u.s. and asia in 2015?
Steps: add(11595, 2330)
Answer: 13925.0
Question: what is the sum including emea?
Steps: add(A0, 4910)
Answer: 18835.0
Question: what is the total sum including latin america?
| 25370.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the long term .in addition , we have focused on building relationships with large multinational carriers such as airtel , telef f3nica s.a .and vodafone group plc .we believe that consistent carrier investments in their networks across our international markets position us to generate meaningful organic revenue growth going forward .in emerging markets , such as ghana , india , nigeria and uganda , wireless networks tend to be significantly less advanced than those in the united states , and initial voice networks continue to be deployed in underdeveloped areas .a majority of consumers in these markets still utilize basic wireless services , predominantly on feature phones , while advanced device penetration remains low .in more developed urban locations within these markets , early-stage data network deployments are underway .carriers are focused on completing voice network build-outs while also investing in initial data networks as wireless data usage and smartphone penetration within their customer bases begin to accelerate .in markets with rapidly evolving network technology , such as south africa and most of the countries in latin america where we do business , initial voice networks , for the most part , have already been built out , and carriers are focused on 3g network build outs , with select investments in 4g technology .consumers in these regions are increasingly adopting smartphones and other advanced devices , and as a result , the usage of bandwidth-intensive mobile applications is growing materially .recent spectrum auctions in these rapidly evolving markets have allowed incumbent carriers to accelerate their data network deployments and have also enabled new entrants to begin initial investments in data networks .smartphone penetration and wireless data usage in these markets are growing rapidly , which typically requires that carriers continue to invest in their networks in order to maintain and augment their quality of service .finally , in markets with more mature network technology , such as germany , carriers are focused on deploying 4g data networks to account for rapidly increasing wireless data usage amongst their customer base .with higher smartphone and advanced device penetration and significantly higher per capita data usage , carrier investment in networks is focused on 4g coverage and capacity .we believe that the network technology migration we have seen in the united states , which has led to significantly denser networks and meaningful new business commencements for us over a number of years , will ultimately be replicated in our less advanced international markets .as a result , we expect to be able to leverage our extensive international portfolio of approximately 60190 communications sites and the relationships we have built with our carrier customers to drive sustainable , long-term growth .we have holistic master lease agreements with certain of our tenants that provide for consistent , long-term revenue and a reduction in the likelihood of churn .our holistic master lease agreements build and augment strong strategic partnerships with our tenants and have significantly reduced collocation cycle times , thereby providing our tenants with the ability to rapidly and efficiently deploy equipment on our sites .property operations new site revenue growth .during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 25370 sites .in a majority of our asia , emea and latin america markets , the acquisition or construction of new sites resulted in increases in both tenant and pass- through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses .we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. . new sites ( acquired or constructed ) | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
u.s . | 11595 | 900 | 5260
asia | 2330 | 1560 | 1260
emea | 4910 | 190 | 485
latin america | 6535 | 5800 | 6065 property operations expenses .direct operating expenses incurred by our property segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance .these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations .in general , our property segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year .as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow .we may , however , incur additional segment .
Question: what is the sum of new sites acquired or constructed in the u.s. and asia in 2015?
Steps: add(11595, 2330)
Answer: 13925.0
Question: what is the sum including emea?
Steps: add(A0, 4910)
Answer: 18835.0
Question: what is the total sum including latin america?
| convfinqa2754 |
table of contents hologic , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) location during fiscal 2009 .the company was responsible for a significant portion of the construction costs and therefore was deemed , for accounting purposes , to be the owner of the building during the construction period , in accordance with asc 840 , leases , subsection 40-15-5 .during the year ended september 27 , 2008 , the company recorded an additional $ 4400 in fair market value of the building , which was completed in fiscal 2008 .this is in addition to the $ 3000 fair market value of the land and the $ 7700 fair market value related to the building constructed that cytyc had recorded as of october 22 , 2007 .the company has recorded such fair market value within property and equipment on its consolidated balance sheets .at september 26 , 2009 , the company has recorded $ 1508 in accrued expenses and $ 16329 in other long-term liabilities related to this obligation in the consolidated balance sheet .the term of the lease is for a period of approximately ten years with the option to extend for two consecutive five-year terms .the lease term commenced in may 2008 , at which time the company began transferring the company 2019s costa rican operations to this facility .it is expected that this process will be complete by february 2009 .at the completion of the construction period , the company reviewed the lease for potential sale-leaseback treatment in accordance with asc 840 , subsection 40 , sale-leaseback transactions ( formerly sfas no .98 ( 201csfas 98 201d ) , accounting for leases : sale-leaseback transactions involving real estate , sales-type leases of real estate , definition of the lease term , and initial direct costs of direct financing leases 2014an amendment of financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) statements no .13 , 66 , and 91 and a rescission of fasb statement no .26 and technical bulletin no .79-11 ) .based on its analysis , the company determined that the lease did not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment .therefore , the building , leasehold improvements and associated liabilities will remain on the company 2019s financial statements throughout the lease term , and the building and leasehold improvements will be depreciated on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of 35 years .future minimum lease payments , including principal and interest , under this lease were as follows at september 26 , 2009: . | amount
fiscal 2010 | $ 1508
fiscal 2011 | 1561
fiscal 2012 | 1616
fiscal 2013 | 1672
fiscal 2014 | 1731
thereafter | 7288
total minimum payments | 15376
less-amount representing interest | -6094 ( 6094 )
total | $ 9282 in addition , as a result of the merger with cytyc , the company assumed the obligation to a non-cancelable lease agreement for a building with approximately 146000 square feet located in marlborough , massachusetts , to be principally used as an additional manufacturing facility .in 2011 , the company will have an option to lease an additional 30000 square feet .as part of the lease agreement , the lessor agreed to allow the company to make significant renovations to the facility to prepare the facility for the company 2019s manufacturing needs .the company was responsible for a significant amount of the construction costs and therefore was deemed , for accounting purposes , to be the owner of the building during the construction period in accordance with asc 840-40-15-5 .the $ 13200 fair market value of the facility is included within property and equipment , net on the consolidated balance sheet .at september 26 , 2009 , the company has recorded $ 982 in accrued expenses and source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 24 , 2009 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .
Question: what is the sum of the value of construction of the finished cytyc building in 2008?
| 7400.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents hologic , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) location during fiscal 2009 .the company was responsible for a significant portion of the construction costs and therefore was deemed , for accounting purposes , to be the owner of the building during the construction period , in accordance with asc 840 , leases , subsection 40-15-5 .during the year ended september 27 , 2008 , the company recorded an additional $ 4400 in fair market value of the building , which was completed in fiscal 2008 .this is in addition to the $ 3000 fair market value of the land and the $ 7700 fair market value related to the building constructed that cytyc had recorded as of october 22 , 2007 .the company has recorded such fair market value within property and equipment on its consolidated balance sheets .at september 26 , 2009 , the company has recorded $ 1508 in accrued expenses and $ 16329 in other long-term liabilities related to this obligation in the consolidated balance sheet .the term of the lease is for a period of approximately ten years with the option to extend for two consecutive five-year terms .the lease term commenced in may 2008 , at which time the company began transferring the company 2019s costa rican operations to this facility .it is expected that this process will be complete by february 2009 .at the completion of the construction period , the company reviewed the lease for potential sale-leaseback treatment in accordance with asc 840 , subsection 40 , sale-leaseback transactions ( formerly sfas no .98 ( 201csfas 98 201d ) , accounting for leases : sale-leaseback transactions involving real estate , sales-type leases of real estate , definition of the lease term , and initial direct costs of direct financing leases 2014an amendment of financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) statements no .13 , 66 , and 91 and a rescission of fasb statement no .26 and technical bulletin no .79-11 ) .based on its analysis , the company determined that the lease did not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment .therefore , the building , leasehold improvements and associated liabilities will remain on the company 2019s financial statements throughout the lease term , and the building and leasehold improvements will be depreciated on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of 35 years .future minimum lease payments , including principal and interest , under this lease were as follows at september 26 , 2009: . | amount
fiscal 2010 | $ 1508
fiscal 2011 | 1561
fiscal 2012 | 1616
fiscal 2013 | 1672
fiscal 2014 | 1731
thereafter | 7288
total minimum payments | 15376
less-amount representing interest | -6094 ( 6094 )
total | $ 9282 in addition , as a result of the merger with cytyc , the company assumed the obligation to a non-cancelable lease agreement for a building with approximately 146000 square feet located in marlborough , massachusetts , to be principally used as an additional manufacturing facility .in 2011 , the company will have an option to lease an additional 30000 square feet .as part of the lease agreement , the lessor agreed to allow the company to make significant renovations to the facility to prepare the facility for the company 2019s manufacturing needs .the company was responsible for a significant amount of the construction costs and therefore was deemed , for accounting purposes , to be the owner of the building during the construction period in accordance with asc 840-40-15-5 .the $ 13200 fair market value of the facility is included within property and equipment , net on the consolidated balance sheet .at september 26 , 2009 , the company has recorded $ 982 in accrued expenses and source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 24 , 2009 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .
Question: what is the sum of the value of construction of the finished cytyc building in 2008?
| convfinqa2755 |
table of contents hologic , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) location during fiscal 2009 .the company was responsible for a significant portion of the construction costs and therefore was deemed , for accounting purposes , to be the owner of the building during the construction period , in accordance with asc 840 , leases , subsection 40-15-5 .during the year ended september 27 , 2008 , the company recorded an additional $ 4400 in fair market value of the building , which was completed in fiscal 2008 .this is in addition to the $ 3000 fair market value of the land and the $ 7700 fair market value related to the building constructed that cytyc had recorded as of october 22 , 2007 .the company has recorded such fair market value within property and equipment on its consolidated balance sheets .at september 26 , 2009 , the company has recorded $ 1508 in accrued expenses and $ 16329 in other long-term liabilities related to this obligation in the consolidated balance sheet .the term of the lease is for a period of approximately ten years with the option to extend for two consecutive five-year terms .the lease term commenced in may 2008 , at which time the company began transferring the company 2019s costa rican operations to this facility .it is expected that this process will be complete by february 2009 .at the completion of the construction period , the company reviewed the lease for potential sale-leaseback treatment in accordance with asc 840 , subsection 40 , sale-leaseback transactions ( formerly sfas no .98 ( 201csfas 98 201d ) , accounting for leases : sale-leaseback transactions involving real estate , sales-type leases of real estate , definition of the lease term , and initial direct costs of direct financing leases 2014an amendment of financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) statements no .13 , 66 , and 91 and a rescission of fasb statement no .26 and technical bulletin no .79-11 ) .based on its analysis , the company determined that the lease did not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment .therefore , the building , leasehold improvements and associated liabilities will remain on the company 2019s financial statements throughout the lease term , and the building and leasehold improvements will be depreciated on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of 35 years .future minimum lease payments , including principal and interest , under this lease were as follows at september 26 , 2009: . | amount
fiscal 2010 | $ 1508
fiscal 2011 | 1561
fiscal 2012 | 1616
fiscal 2013 | 1672
fiscal 2014 | 1731
thereafter | 7288
total minimum payments | 15376
less-amount representing interest | -6094 ( 6094 )
total | $ 9282 in addition , as a result of the merger with cytyc , the company assumed the obligation to a non-cancelable lease agreement for a building with approximately 146000 square feet located in marlborough , massachusetts , to be principally used as an additional manufacturing facility .in 2011 , the company will have an option to lease an additional 30000 square feet .as part of the lease agreement , the lessor agreed to allow the company to make significant renovations to the facility to prepare the facility for the company 2019s manufacturing needs .the company was responsible for a significant amount of the construction costs and therefore was deemed , for accounting purposes , to be the owner of the building during the construction period in accordance with asc 840-40-15-5 .the $ 13200 fair market value of the facility is included within property and equipment , net on the consolidated balance sheet .at september 26 , 2009 , the company has recorded $ 982 in accrued expenses and source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 24 , 2009 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .
Question: what is the sum of the value of construction of the finished cytyc building in 2008?
Steps: add(3000, 4400)
Answer: 7400.0
Question: what is the sum including the value of the land?
| 15100.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents hologic , inc .notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) location during fiscal 2009 .the company was responsible for a significant portion of the construction costs and therefore was deemed , for accounting purposes , to be the owner of the building during the construction period , in accordance with asc 840 , leases , subsection 40-15-5 .during the year ended september 27 , 2008 , the company recorded an additional $ 4400 in fair market value of the building , which was completed in fiscal 2008 .this is in addition to the $ 3000 fair market value of the land and the $ 7700 fair market value related to the building constructed that cytyc had recorded as of october 22 , 2007 .the company has recorded such fair market value within property and equipment on its consolidated balance sheets .at september 26 , 2009 , the company has recorded $ 1508 in accrued expenses and $ 16329 in other long-term liabilities related to this obligation in the consolidated balance sheet .the term of the lease is for a period of approximately ten years with the option to extend for two consecutive five-year terms .the lease term commenced in may 2008 , at which time the company began transferring the company 2019s costa rican operations to this facility .it is expected that this process will be complete by february 2009 .at the completion of the construction period , the company reviewed the lease for potential sale-leaseback treatment in accordance with asc 840 , subsection 40 , sale-leaseback transactions ( formerly sfas no .98 ( 201csfas 98 201d ) , accounting for leases : sale-leaseback transactions involving real estate , sales-type leases of real estate , definition of the lease term , and initial direct costs of direct financing leases 2014an amendment of financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) statements no .13 , 66 , and 91 and a rescission of fasb statement no .26 and technical bulletin no .79-11 ) .based on its analysis , the company determined that the lease did not qualify for sale-leaseback treatment .therefore , the building , leasehold improvements and associated liabilities will remain on the company 2019s financial statements throughout the lease term , and the building and leasehold improvements will be depreciated on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of 35 years .future minimum lease payments , including principal and interest , under this lease were as follows at september 26 , 2009: . | amount
fiscal 2010 | $ 1508
fiscal 2011 | 1561
fiscal 2012 | 1616
fiscal 2013 | 1672
fiscal 2014 | 1731
thereafter | 7288
total minimum payments | 15376
less-amount representing interest | -6094 ( 6094 )
total | $ 9282 in addition , as a result of the merger with cytyc , the company assumed the obligation to a non-cancelable lease agreement for a building with approximately 146000 square feet located in marlborough , massachusetts , to be principally used as an additional manufacturing facility .in 2011 , the company will have an option to lease an additional 30000 square feet .as part of the lease agreement , the lessor agreed to allow the company to make significant renovations to the facility to prepare the facility for the company 2019s manufacturing needs .the company was responsible for a significant amount of the construction costs and therefore was deemed , for accounting purposes , to be the owner of the building during the construction period in accordance with asc 840-40-15-5 .the $ 13200 fair market value of the facility is included within property and equipment , net on the consolidated balance sheet .at september 26 , 2009 , the company has recorded $ 982 in accrued expenses and source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 24 , 2009 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .
Question: what is the sum of the value of construction of the finished cytyc building in 2008?
Steps: add(3000, 4400)
Answer: 7400.0
Question: what is the sum including the value of the land?
| convfinqa2756 |
when the likelihood of clawback is considered mathematically improbable .the company records a deferred carried interest liability to the extent it receives cash or capital allocations related to carried interest prior to meeting the revenue recognition criteria .at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company had $ 219 million and $ 152 million , respectively , of deferred carried interest recorded in other liabilities/other liabilities of consolidated vies on the consolidated statements of financial condition .a portion of the deferred carried interest liability will be paid to certain employees .the ultimate timing of the recognition of performance fee revenue , if any , for these products is unknown .the following table presents changes in the deferred carried interest liability ( including the portion related to consolidated vies ) for 2017 and 2016: . ( in millions ) | 2017 | 2016
beginning balance | $ 152 | $ 143
net increase ( decrease ) in unrealized allocations | 75 | 37
performance fee revenue recognized | -21 ( 21 ) | -28 ( 28 )
acquisition | 13 | 2014
ending balance | $ 219 | $ 152 for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , performance fee revenue ( which included recognized carried interest ) totaled $ 594 million , $ 295 million and $ 621 million , respectively .fees earned for technology and risk management revenue are recorded as services are performed and are generally determined using the value of positions on the aladdin platform or on a fixed-rate basis .for 2017 , 2016 and 2016 , technology and risk management revenue totaled $ 677 million , $ 595 million and $ 528 million , respectively .adjustments to revenue arising from initial estimates recorded historically have been immaterial since the majority of blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration revenue is calculated based on aum and since the company does not record performance fee revenue until performance thresholds have been exceeded and the likelihood of clawback is mathematically improbable .accounting developments recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted .revenue from contracts with customers .in may 2014 , the financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) issued accounting standards update ( 201casu 201d ) 2014-09 , revenue from contracts with customers ( 201casu 2014-09 201d ) .asu 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance , including industry-specific guidance .the guidance also changes the accounting for certain contract costs and revises the criteria for determining if an entity is acting as a principal or agent in certain arrangements .the key changes in the standard that impact the company 2019s revenue recognition relate to the presentation of certain revenue contracts and associated contract costs .the most significant of these changes relates to the presentation of certain distribution costs , which are currently presented net against revenues ( contra-revenue ) and will be presented as an expense on a gross basis .the company adopted asu 2014-09 effective january 1 , 2018 on a full retrospective basis , which will require 2016 and 2017 to be restated in future filings .the cumulative effect adjustment to the 2016 opening retained earnings was not material .the company currently expects the net gross up to revenue to be approximately $ 1 billion with a corresponding gross up to expense for both 2016 and 2017 .consequently , the company expects its gaap operating margin to decline upon adoption due to the gross up of revenue .however , no material impact is expected on the company 2019s as adjusted operating margin .for accounting pronouncements that the company adopted during the year ended december 31 , 2017 and for additional recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted , see note 2 , significant accounting policies , in the consolidated financial statements contained in part ii , item 8 of this filing .item 7a .quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk aum market price risk .blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration fees are primarily comprised of fees based on a percentage of the value of aum and , in some cases , performance fees expressed as a percentage of the returns realized on aum .at december 31 , 2017 , the majority of the company 2019s investment advisory and administration fees were based on average or period end aum of the applicable investment funds or separate accounts .movements in equity market prices , interest rates/credit spreads , foreign exchange rates or all three could cause the value of aum to decline , which would result in lower investment advisory and administration fees .corporate investments portfolio risks .as a leading investment management firm , blackrock devotes significant resources across all of its operations to identifying , measuring , monitoring , managing and analyzing market and operating risks , including the management and oversight of its own investment portfolio .the board of directors of the company has adopted guidelines for the review of investments to be made by the company , requiring , among other things , that investments be reviewed by certain senior officers of the company , and that certain investments may be referred to the audit committee or the board of directors , depending on the circumstances , for approval .in the normal course of its business , blackrock is exposed to equity market price risk , interest rate/credit spread risk and foreign exchange rate risk associated with its corporate investments .blackrock has investments primarily in sponsored investment products that invest in a variety of asset classes , including real assets , private equity and hedge funds .investments generally are made for co-investment purposes , to establish a performance track record , to hedge exposure to certain deferred compensation plans or for regulatory purposes .currently , the company has a seed capital hedging program in which it enters into swaps to hedge market and interest rate exposure to certain investments .at december 31 , 2017 , the company had outstanding total return swaps with an aggregate notional value of approximately $ 587 million .at december 31 , 2017 , there were no outstanding interest rate swaps. .
Question: how much does the balance in the end of 2017 represent in relation to the one in the beginning of 2016?
| 1.53147 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
when the likelihood of clawback is considered mathematically improbable .the company records a deferred carried interest liability to the extent it receives cash or capital allocations related to carried interest prior to meeting the revenue recognition criteria .at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company had $ 219 million and $ 152 million , respectively , of deferred carried interest recorded in other liabilities/other liabilities of consolidated vies on the consolidated statements of financial condition .a portion of the deferred carried interest liability will be paid to certain employees .the ultimate timing of the recognition of performance fee revenue , if any , for these products is unknown .the following table presents changes in the deferred carried interest liability ( including the portion related to consolidated vies ) for 2017 and 2016: . ( in millions ) | 2017 | 2016
beginning balance | $ 152 | $ 143
net increase ( decrease ) in unrealized allocations | 75 | 37
performance fee revenue recognized | -21 ( 21 ) | -28 ( 28 )
acquisition | 13 | 2014
ending balance | $ 219 | $ 152 for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , performance fee revenue ( which included recognized carried interest ) totaled $ 594 million , $ 295 million and $ 621 million , respectively .fees earned for technology and risk management revenue are recorded as services are performed and are generally determined using the value of positions on the aladdin platform or on a fixed-rate basis .for 2017 , 2016 and 2016 , technology and risk management revenue totaled $ 677 million , $ 595 million and $ 528 million , respectively .adjustments to revenue arising from initial estimates recorded historically have been immaterial since the majority of blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration revenue is calculated based on aum and since the company does not record performance fee revenue until performance thresholds have been exceeded and the likelihood of clawback is mathematically improbable .accounting developments recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted .revenue from contracts with customers .in may 2014 , the financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) issued accounting standards update ( 201casu 201d ) 2014-09 , revenue from contracts with customers ( 201casu 2014-09 201d ) .asu 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance , including industry-specific guidance .the guidance also changes the accounting for certain contract costs and revises the criteria for determining if an entity is acting as a principal or agent in certain arrangements .the key changes in the standard that impact the company 2019s revenue recognition relate to the presentation of certain revenue contracts and associated contract costs .the most significant of these changes relates to the presentation of certain distribution costs , which are currently presented net against revenues ( contra-revenue ) and will be presented as an expense on a gross basis .the company adopted asu 2014-09 effective january 1 , 2018 on a full retrospective basis , which will require 2016 and 2017 to be restated in future filings .the cumulative effect adjustment to the 2016 opening retained earnings was not material .the company currently expects the net gross up to revenue to be approximately $ 1 billion with a corresponding gross up to expense for both 2016 and 2017 .consequently , the company expects its gaap operating margin to decline upon adoption due to the gross up of revenue .however , no material impact is expected on the company 2019s as adjusted operating margin .for accounting pronouncements that the company adopted during the year ended december 31 , 2017 and for additional recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted , see note 2 , significant accounting policies , in the consolidated financial statements contained in part ii , item 8 of this filing .item 7a .quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk aum market price risk .blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration fees are primarily comprised of fees based on a percentage of the value of aum and , in some cases , performance fees expressed as a percentage of the returns realized on aum .at december 31 , 2017 , the majority of the company 2019s investment advisory and administration fees were based on average or period end aum of the applicable investment funds or separate accounts .movements in equity market prices , interest rates/credit spreads , foreign exchange rates or all three could cause the value of aum to decline , which would result in lower investment advisory and administration fees .corporate investments portfolio risks .as a leading investment management firm , blackrock devotes significant resources across all of its operations to identifying , measuring , monitoring , managing and analyzing market and operating risks , including the management and oversight of its own investment portfolio .the board of directors of the company has adopted guidelines for the review of investments to be made by the company , requiring , among other things , that investments be reviewed by certain senior officers of the company , and that certain investments may be referred to the audit committee or the board of directors , depending on the circumstances , for approval .in the normal course of its business , blackrock is exposed to equity market price risk , interest rate/credit spread risk and foreign exchange rate risk associated with its corporate investments .blackrock has investments primarily in sponsored investment products that invest in a variety of asset classes , including real assets , private equity and hedge funds .investments generally are made for co-investment purposes , to establish a performance track record , to hedge exposure to certain deferred compensation plans or for regulatory purposes .currently , the company has a seed capital hedging program in which it enters into swaps to hedge market and interest rate exposure to certain investments .at december 31 , 2017 , the company had outstanding total return swaps with an aggregate notional value of approximately $ 587 million .at december 31 , 2017 , there were no outstanding interest rate swaps. .
Question: how much does the balance in the end of 2017 represent in relation to the one in the beginning of 2016?
| convfinqa2757 |
when the likelihood of clawback is considered mathematically improbable .the company records a deferred carried interest liability to the extent it receives cash or capital allocations related to carried interest prior to meeting the revenue recognition criteria .at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company had $ 219 million and $ 152 million , respectively , of deferred carried interest recorded in other liabilities/other liabilities of consolidated vies on the consolidated statements of financial condition .a portion of the deferred carried interest liability will be paid to certain employees .the ultimate timing of the recognition of performance fee revenue , if any , for these products is unknown .the following table presents changes in the deferred carried interest liability ( including the portion related to consolidated vies ) for 2017 and 2016: . ( in millions ) | 2017 | 2016
beginning balance | $ 152 | $ 143
net increase ( decrease ) in unrealized allocations | 75 | 37
performance fee revenue recognized | -21 ( 21 ) | -28 ( 28 )
acquisition | 13 | 2014
ending balance | $ 219 | $ 152 for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , performance fee revenue ( which included recognized carried interest ) totaled $ 594 million , $ 295 million and $ 621 million , respectively .fees earned for technology and risk management revenue are recorded as services are performed and are generally determined using the value of positions on the aladdin platform or on a fixed-rate basis .for 2017 , 2016 and 2016 , technology and risk management revenue totaled $ 677 million , $ 595 million and $ 528 million , respectively .adjustments to revenue arising from initial estimates recorded historically have been immaterial since the majority of blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration revenue is calculated based on aum and since the company does not record performance fee revenue until performance thresholds have been exceeded and the likelihood of clawback is mathematically improbable .accounting developments recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted .revenue from contracts with customers .in may 2014 , the financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) issued accounting standards update ( 201casu 201d ) 2014-09 , revenue from contracts with customers ( 201casu 2014-09 201d ) .asu 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance , including industry-specific guidance .the guidance also changes the accounting for certain contract costs and revises the criteria for determining if an entity is acting as a principal or agent in certain arrangements .the key changes in the standard that impact the company 2019s revenue recognition relate to the presentation of certain revenue contracts and associated contract costs .the most significant of these changes relates to the presentation of certain distribution costs , which are currently presented net against revenues ( contra-revenue ) and will be presented as an expense on a gross basis .the company adopted asu 2014-09 effective january 1 , 2018 on a full retrospective basis , which will require 2016 and 2017 to be restated in future filings .the cumulative effect adjustment to the 2016 opening retained earnings was not material .the company currently expects the net gross up to revenue to be approximately $ 1 billion with a corresponding gross up to expense for both 2016 and 2017 .consequently , the company expects its gaap operating margin to decline upon adoption due to the gross up of revenue .however , no material impact is expected on the company 2019s as adjusted operating margin .for accounting pronouncements that the company adopted during the year ended december 31 , 2017 and for additional recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted , see note 2 , significant accounting policies , in the consolidated financial statements contained in part ii , item 8 of this filing .item 7a .quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk aum market price risk .blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration fees are primarily comprised of fees based on a percentage of the value of aum and , in some cases , performance fees expressed as a percentage of the returns realized on aum .at december 31 , 2017 , the majority of the company 2019s investment advisory and administration fees were based on average or period end aum of the applicable investment funds or separate accounts .movements in equity market prices , interest rates/credit spreads , foreign exchange rates or all three could cause the value of aum to decline , which would result in lower investment advisory and administration fees .corporate investments portfolio risks .as a leading investment management firm , blackrock devotes significant resources across all of its operations to identifying , measuring , monitoring , managing and analyzing market and operating risks , including the management and oversight of its own investment portfolio .the board of directors of the company has adopted guidelines for the review of investments to be made by the company , requiring , among other things , that investments be reviewed by certain senior officers of the company , and that certain investments may be referred to the audit committee or the board of directors , depending on the circumstances , for approval .in the normal course of its business , blackrock is exposed to equity market price risk , interest rate/credit spread risk and foreign exchange rate risk associated with its corporate investments .blackrock has investments primarily in sponsored investment products that invest in a variety of asset classes , including real assets , private equity and hedge funds .investments generally are made for co-investment purposes , to establish a performance track record , to hedge exposure to certain deferred compensation plans or for regulatory purposes .currently , the company has a seed capital hedging program in which it enters into swaps to hedge market and interest rate exposure to certain investments .at december 31 , 2017 , the company had outstanding total return swaps with an aggregate notional value of approximately $ 587 million .at december 31 , 2017 , there were no outstanding interest rate swaps. .
Question: how much does the balance in the end of 2017 represent in relation to the one in the beginning of 2016?
Steps: divide(219, 143)
Answer: 1.53147
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
| 0.53147 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
when the likelihood of clawback is considered mathematically improbable .the company records a deferred carried interest liability to the extent it receives cash or capital allocations related to carried interest prior to meeting the revenue recognition criteria .at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company had $ 219 million and $ 152 million , respectively , of deferred carried interest recorded in other liabilities/other liabilities of consolidated vies on the consolidated statements of financial condition .a portion of the deferred carried interest liability will be paid to certain employees .the ultimate timing of the recognition of performance fee revenue , if any , for these products is unknown .the following table presents changes in the deferred carried interest liability ( including the portion related to consolidated vies ) for 2017 and 2016: . ( in millions ) | 2017 | 2016
beginning balance | $ 152 | $ 143
net increase ( decrease ) in unrealized allocations | 75 | 37
performance fee revenue recognized | -21 ( 21 ) | -28 ( 28 )
acquisition | 13 | 2014
ending balance | $ 219 | $ 152 for 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , performance fee revenue ( which included recognized carried interest ) totaled $ 594 million , $ 295 million and $ 621 million , respectively .fees earned for technology and risk management revenue are recorded as services are performed and are generally determined using the value of positions on the aladdin platform or on a fixed-rate basis .for 2017 , 2016 and 2016 , technology and risk management revenue totaled $ 677 million , $ 595 million and $ 528 million , respectively .adjustments to revenue arising from initial estimates recorded historically have been immaterial since the majority of blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration revenue is calculated based on aum and since the company does not record performance fee revenue until performance thresholds have been exceeded and the likelihood of clawback is mathematically improbable .accounting developments recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted .revenue from contracts with customers .in may 2014 , the financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) issued accounting standards update ( 201casu 201d ) 2014-09 , revenue from contracts with customers ( 201casu 2014-09 201d ) .asu 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance , including industry-specific guidance .the guidance also changes the accounting for certain contract costs and revises the criteria for determining if an entity is acting as a principal or agent in certain arrangements .the key changes in the standard that impact the company 2019s revenue recognition relate to the presentation of certain revenue contracts and associated contract costs .the most significant of these changes relates to the presentation of certain distribution costs , which are currently presented net against revenues ( contra-revenue ) and will be presented as an expense on a gross basis .the company adopted asu 2014-09 effective january 1 , 2018 on a full retrospective basis , which will require 2016 and 2017 to be restated in future filings .the cumulative effect adjustment to the 2016 opening retained earnings was not material .the company currently expects the net gross up to revenue to be approximately $ 1 billion with a corresponding gross up to expense for both 2016 and 2017 .consequently , the company expects its gaap operating margin to decline upon adoption due to the gross up of revenue .however , no material impact is expected on the company 2019s as adjusted operating margin .for accounting pronouncements that the company adopted during the year ended december 31 , 2017 and for additional recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted , see note 2 , significant accounting policies , in the consolidated financial statements contained in part ii , item 8 of this filing .item 7a .quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk aum market price risk .blackrock 2019s investment advisory and administration fees are primarily comprised of fees based on a percentage of the value of aum and , in some cases , performance fees expressed as a percentage of the returns realized on aum .at december 31 , 2017 , the majority of the company 2019s investment advisory and administration fees were based on average or period end aum of the applicable investment funds or separate accounts .movements in equity market prices , interest rates/credit spreads , foreign exchange rates or all three could cause the value of aum to decline , which would result in lower investment advisory and administration fees .corporate investments portfolio risks .as a leading investment management firm , blackrock devotes significant resources across all of its operations to identifying , measuring , monitoring , managing and analyzing market and operating risks , including the management and oversight of its own investment portfolio .the board of directors of the company has adopted guidelines for the review of investments to be made by the company , requiring , among other things , that investments be reviewed by certain senior officers of the company , and that certain investments may be referred to the audit committee or the board of directors , depending on the circumstances , for approval .in the normal course of its business , blackrock is exposed to equity market price risk , interest rate/credit spread risk and foreign exchange rate risk associated with its corporate investments .blackrock has investments primarily in sponsored investment products that invest in a variety of asset classes , including real assets , private equity and hedge funds .investments generally are made for co-investment purposes , to establish a performance track record , to hedge exposure to certain deferred compensation plans or for regulatory purposes .currently , the company has a seed capital hedging program in which it enters into swaps to hedge market and interest rate exposure to certain investments .at december 31 , 2017 , the company had outstanding total return swaps with an aggregate notional value of approximately $ 587 million .at december 31 , 2017 , there were no outstanding interest rate swaps. .
Question: how much does the balance in the end of 2017 represent in relation to the one in the beginning of 2016?
Steps: divide(219, 143)
Answer: 1.53147
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
| convfinqa2758 |
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively .these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value .the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above .these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 .the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively .these notes are not callable .the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases .some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased .the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . | 2017 | 2016
vehicles | $ 70 | $ 68
aircraft | 2291 | 2291
buildings | 285 | 190
accumulated amortization | -990 ( 990 ) | -896 ( 896 )
property plant and equipment subject to capital leases | $ 1656 | $ 1653 these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 .facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s .domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states .these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania .under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities .the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) .2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million .these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2017?
| 285.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively .these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value .the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above .these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 .the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively .these notes are not callable .the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases .some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased .the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . | 2017 | 2016
vehicles | $ 70 | $ 68
aircraft | 2291 | 2291
buildings | 285 | 190
accumulated amortization | -990 ( 990 ) | -896 ( 896 )
property plant and equipment subject to capital leases | $ 1656 | $ 1653 these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 .facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s .domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states .these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania .under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities .the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) .2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million .these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2017?
| convfinqa2759 |
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively .these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value .the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above .these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 .the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively .these notes are not callable .the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases .some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased .the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . | 2017 | 2016
vehicles | $ 70 | $ 68
aircraft | 2291 | 2291
buildings | 285 | 190
accumulated amortization | -990 ( 990 ) | -896 ( 896 )
property plant and equipment subject to capital leases | $ 1656 | $ 1653 these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 .facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s .domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states .these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania .under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities .the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) .2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million .these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 285
Answer: 285.0
Question: what about in 2016?
| 190.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively .these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value .the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above .these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 .the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively .these notes are not callable .the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases .some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased .the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . | 2017 | 2016
vehicles | $ 70 | $ 68
aircraft | 2291 | 2291
buildings | 285 | 190
accumulated amortization | -990 ( 990 ) | -896 ( 896 )
property plant and equipment subject to capital leases | $ 1656 | $ 1653 these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 .facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s .domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states .these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania .under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities .the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) .2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million .these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 285
Answer: 285.0
Question: what about in 2016?
| convfinqa2760 |
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively .these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value .the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above .these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 .the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively .these notes are not callable .the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases .some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased .the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . | 2017 | 2016
vehicles | $ 70 | $ 68
aircraft | 2291 | 2291
buildings | 285 | 190
accumulated amortization | -990 ( 990 ) | -896 ( 896 )
property plant and equipment subject to capital leases | $ 1656 | $ 1653 these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 .facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s .domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states .these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania .under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities .the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) .2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million .these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 285
Answer: 285.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 190
Answer: 190.0
Question: what is the net change value between 2016 and 2017?
| 95.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively .these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value .the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above .these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 .the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively .these notes are not callable .the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases .some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased .the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . | 2017 | 2016
vehicles | $ 70 | $ 68
aircraft | 2291 | 2291
buildings | 285 | 190
accumulated amortization | -990 ( 990 ) | -896 ( 896 )
property plant and equipment subject to capital leases | $ 1656 | $ 1653 these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 .facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s .domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states .these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania .under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities .the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) .2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million .these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 285
Answer: 285.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 190
Answer: 190.0
Question: what is the net change value between 2016 and 2017?
| convfinqa2761 |
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively .these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value .the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above .these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 .the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively .these notes are not callable .the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases .some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased .the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . | 2017 | 2016
vehicles | $ 70 | $ 68
aircraft | 2291 | 2291
buildings | 285 | 190
accumulated amortization | -990 ( 990 ) | -896 ( 896 )
property plant and equipment subject to capital leases | $ 1656 | $ 1653 these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 .facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s .domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states .these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania .under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities .the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) .2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million .these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 285
Answer: 285.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 190
Answer: 190.0
Question: what is the net change value between 2016 and 2017?
Steps: subtract(285, 190)
Answer: 95.0
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2016?
| 190.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively .these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value .the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above .these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 .the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively .these notes are not callable .the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases .some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased .the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . | 2017 | 2016
vehicles | $ 70 | $ 68
aircraft | 2291 | 2291
buildings | 285 | 190
accumulated amortization | -990 ( 990 ) | -896 ( 896 )
property plant and equipment subject to capital leases | $ 1656 | $ 1653 these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 .facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s .domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states .these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania .under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities .the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) .2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million .these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 285
Answer: 285.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 190
Answer: 190.0
Question: what is the net change value between 2016 and 2017?
Steps: subtract(285, 190)
Answer: 95.0
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2016?
| convfinqa2762 |
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively .these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value .the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above .these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 .the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively .these notes are not callable .the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases .some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased .the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . | 2017 | 2016
vehicles | $ 70 | $ 68
aircraft | 2291 | 2291
buildings | 285 | 190
accumulated amortization | -990 ( 990 ) | -896 ( 896 )
property plant and equipment subject to capital leases | $ 1656 | $ 1653 these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 .facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s .domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states .these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania .under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities .the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) .2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million .these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 285
Answer: 285.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 190
Answer: 190.0
Question: what is the net change value between 2016 and 2017?
Steps: subtract(285, 190)
Answer: 95.0
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 190
Answer: 190.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
united parcel service , inc .and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively .these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value .the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above .these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 .the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively .these notes are not callable .the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 .we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder .capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases .some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased .the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : . | 2017 | 2016
vehicles | $ 70 | $ 68
aircraft | 2291 | 2291
buildings | 285 | 190
accumulated amortization | -990 ( 990 ) | -896 ( 896 )
property plant and equipment subject to capital leases | $ 1656 | $ 1653 these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 .facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s .domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states .these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania .under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky .the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively .2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities .the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) .2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million .these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate .the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 285
Answer: 285.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 190
Answer: 190.0
Question: what is the net change value between 2016 and 2017?
Steps: subtract(285, 190)
Answer: 95.0
Question: what is the balance of buildings subject to capital lease in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 190
Answer: 190.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| convfinqa2763 |
in 2017 , the company granted 440076 shares of restricted class a common stock and 7568 shares of restricted stock units .restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of two to four years .the fair value related to these grants was $ 58.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period .dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests .in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares .the fair value related to these grants was $ 25.3 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period .the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions .the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2017 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value . | number of shares | weightedaveragegrant datefair value
outstanding at december 31 2016 | 1820578 | $ 98
granted | 650942 | 129
vested | -510590 ( 510590 ) | 87
cancelled | -401699 ( 401699 ) | 95
outstanding at december 31 2017 | 1559231 | 116 the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 66.0 million , $ 59.8 million and $ 43.3 million , respectively .under the espp , eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration .shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market .compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price .in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees .these shares are subject to a six-month holding period .annual expense of $ 0.3 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2017 , and $ 0.2 million was recognized in both 2016 and 2015 .non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 100000 .non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 60000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution .as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions .expense of $ 2.5 million , $ 2.4 million and $ 2.5 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of outstanding number of shares during 2017?
| -261347.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in 2017 , the company granted 440076 shares of restricted class a common stock and 7568 shares of restricted stock units .restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of two to four years .the fair value related to these grants was $ 58.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period .dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests .in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares .the fair value related to these grants was $ 25.3 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period .the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions .the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2017 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value . | number of shares | weightedaveragegrant datefair value
outstanding at december 31 2016 | 1820578 | $ 98
granted | 650942 | 129
vested | -510590 ( 510590 ) | 87
cancelled | -401699 ( 401699 ) | 95
outstanding at december 31 2017 | 1559231 | 116 the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 66.0 million , $ 59.8 million and $ 43.3 million , respectively .under the espp , eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration .shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market .compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price .in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees .these shares are subject to a six-month holding period .annual expense of $ 0.3 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2017 , and $ 0.2 million was recognized in both 2016 and 2015 .non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 100000 .non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 60000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution .as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions .expense of $ 2.5 million , $ 2.4 million and $ 2.5 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of outstanding number of shares during 2017?
| convfinqa2764 |
in 2017 , the company granted 440076 shares of restricted class a common stock and 7568 shares of restricted stock units .restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of two to four years .the fair value related to these grants was $ 58.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period .dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests .in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares .the fair value related to these grants was $ 25.3 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period .the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions .the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2017 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value . | number of shares | weightedaveragegrant datefair value
outstanding at december 31 2016 | 1820578 | $ 98
granted | 650942 | 129
vested | -510590 ( 510590 ) | 87
cancelled | -401699 ( 401699 ) | 95
outstanding at december 31 2017 | 1559231 | 116 the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 66.0 million , $ 59.8 million and $ 43.3 million , respectively .under the espp , eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration .shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market .compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price .in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees .these shares are subject to a six-month holding period .annual expense of $ 0.3 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2017 , and $ 0.2 million was recognized in both 2016 and 2015 .non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 100000 .non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 60000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution .as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions .expense of $ 2.5 million , $ 2.4 million and $ 2.5 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of outstanding number of shares during 2017?
Steps: subtract(1559231, 1820578)
Answer: -261347.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.14355 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
in 2017 , the company granted 440076 shares of restricted class a common stock and 7568 shares of restricted stock units .restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of two to four years .the fair value related to these grants was $ 58.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period .dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests .in 2017 , the company also granted 203298 performance shares .the fair value related to these grants was $ 25.3 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period .the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions .the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2017 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value . | number of shares | weightedaveragegrant datefair value
outstanding at december 31 2016 | 1820578 | $ 98
granted | 650942 | 129
vested | -510590 ( 510590 ) | 87
cancelled | -401699 ( 401699 ) | 95
outstanding at december 31 2017 | 1559231 | 116 the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 66.0 million , $ 59.8 million and $ 43.3 million , respectively .under the espp , eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration .shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market .compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price .in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , a total of 19936 , 19858 and 19756 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees .these shares are subject to a six-month holding period .annual expense of $ 0.3 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2017 , and $ 0.2 million was recognized in both 2016 and 2015 .non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 100000 .non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 60000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution .as a result , 19736 shares , 26439 shares and 25853 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions .expense of $ 2.5 million , $ 2.4 million and $ 2.5 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of outstanding number of shares during 2017?
Steps: subtract(1559231, 1820578)
Answer: -261347.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| convfinqa2765 |
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the change in value from net revenues from 2016 to 2017?
| 139.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the change in value from net revenues from 2016 to 2017?
| convfinqa2766 |
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the change in value from net revenues from 2016 to 2017?
Steps: subtract(6318, 6179)
Answer: 139.0
Question: what was the net revenue in 2016?
| 6179.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the change in value from net revenues from 2016 to 2017?
Steps: subtract(6318, 6179)
Answer: 139.0
Question: what was the net revenue in 2016?
| convfinqa2767 |
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the change in value from net revenues from 2016 to 2017?
Steps: subtract(6318, 6179)
Answer: 139.0
Question: what was the net revenue in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.0225 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the change in value from net revenues from 2016 to 2017?
Steps: subtract(6318, 6179)
Answer: 139.0
Question: what was the net revenue in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| convfinqa2768 |
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
| 6318.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
| convfinqa2769 |
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 6318
Answer: 6318.0
Question: what about in 2016?
| 6179.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 6318
Answer: 6318.0
Question: what about in 2016?
| convfinqa2770 |
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 6318
Answer: 6318.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 139.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 6318
Answer: 6318.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what is the net change?
| convfinqa2771 |
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 6318
Answer: 6318.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what is the net change?
Steps: subtract(6318, 6179)
Answer: 139.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
| 0.0225 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 6318
Answer: 6318.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what is the net change?
Steps: subtract(6318, 6179)
Answer: 139.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
| convfinqa2772 |
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 6318
Answer: 6318.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what is the net change?
Steps: subtract(6318, 6179)
Answer: 139.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
Steps: divide(#0, 6179)
Answer: 0.0225
Question: what is the reduction in income tax expense?
| 238.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 6318
Answer: 6318.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what is the net change?
Steps: subtract(6318, 6179)
Answer: 139.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
Steps: divide(#0, 6179)
Answer: 0.0225
Question: what is the reduction in income tax expense?
| convfinqa2773 |
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 6318
Answer: 6318.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what is the net change?
Steps: subtract(6318, 6179)
Answer: 139.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
Steps: divide(#0, 6179)
Answer: 0.0225
Question: what is the reduction in income tax expense?
Steps: Ask for number 238
Answer: 238.0
Question: what is the net revenue in 2016?
| 6179.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 6318
Answer: 6318.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what is the net change?
Steps: subtract(6318, 6179)
Answer: 139.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
Steps: divide(#0, 6179)
Answer: 0.0225
Question: what is the reduction in income tax expense?
Steps: Ask for number 238
Answer: 238.0
Question: what is the net revenue in 2016?
| convfinqa2774 |
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 6318
Answer: 6318.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what is the net change?
Steps: subtract(6318, 6179)
Answer: 139.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
Steps: divide(#0, 6179)
Answer: 0.0225
Question: what is the reduction in income tax expense?
Steps: Ask for number 238
Answer: 238.0
Question: what is the net revenue in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what is the net effective tax rate in 2016?
| 0.03852 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
results of operations for 2016 include : 1 ) $ 2836 million ( $ 1829 million net-of-tax ) of impairment and related charges primarily to write down the carrying values of the entergy wholesale commodities 2019 palisades , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 plants and related assets to their fair values ; 2 ) a reduction of income tax expense , net of unrecognized tax benefits , of $ 238 million as a result of a change in the tax classification of a legal entity that owned one of the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear power plants ; income tax benefits as a result of the settlement of the 2010-2011 irs audit , including a $ 75 million tax benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of the vidalia purchased power agreement and a $ 54 million net benefit recognized by entergy louisiana related to the treatment of proceeds received in 2010 for the financing of hurricane gustav and hurricane ike storm costs pursuant to louisiana act 55 ; and 3 ) a reduction in expenses of $ 100 million ( $ 64 million net-of-tax ) due to the effects of recording in 2016 the final court decisions in several lawsuits against the doe related to spent nuclear fuel storage costs .see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the impairment and related charges , see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the income tax items , and see note 8 to the financial statements for discussion of the spent nuclear fuel litigation .net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue | $ 6179
retail electric price | 91
regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate | 56
grand gulf recovery | 27
louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation | 17
volume/weather | -61 ( 61 )
other | 9
2017 net revenue | $ 6318 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 at entergy arkansas and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 ; 2022 a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding ; 2022 the implementation of the transmission cost recovery factor rider at entergy texas , effective september 2016 , and an increase in the transmission cost recovery factor rider rate , effective march 2017 , as approved by the puct ; and 2022 an increase in rates at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 .see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase .entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 6318
Answer: 6318.0
Question: what about in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what is the net change?
Steps: subtract(6318, 6179)
Answer: 139.0
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
Steps: divide(#0, 6179)
Answer: 0.0225
Question: what is the reduction in income tax expense?
Steps: Ask for number 238
Answer: 238.0
Question: what is the net revenue in 2016?
Steps: Ask for number 6179
Answer: 6179.0
Question: what is the net effective tax rate in 2016?
| convfinqa2775 |
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 lease obligation and entergy louisiana 2019s acquisition of the equity participant 2019s beneficial interest in the waterford 3 leased assets and for further discussion of the grand gulf lease obligation .( e ) this note does not have a stated interest rate , but has an implicit interest rate of 7.458% ( 7.458 % ) .( f ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 57 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , and long-term doe obligations of $ 182 million at entergy arkansas , and includes debt due within one year .fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 15 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . | amount ( in thousands )
2017 | $ 307403
2018 | $ 828084
2019 | $ 724899
2020 | $ 795000
2021 | $ 1674548 in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .as part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .in october 2015 , entergy announced a planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its fuel cycle .as a result of the announcement , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .in august 2016 , entergy entered into a trust transfer agreement with nypa to transfer the decommissioning trust funds and decommissioning liabilities for the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants to entergy .as part of the trust transfer agreement , the original decommissioning agreements were amended , and the entergy subsidiaries 2019 obligation to make additional license extension payments to nypa was eliminated .in the third quarter 2016 , entergy removed the note payable of $ 35.1 million from the consolidated balance sheet .entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through june 2018 .capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .
Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in 2017?
| 307403.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 lease obligation and entergy louisiana 2019s acquisition of the equity participant 2019s beneficial interest in the waterford 3 leased assets and for further discussion of the grand gulf lease obligation .( e ) this note does not have a stated interest rate , but has an implicit interest rate of 7.458% ( 7.458 % ) .( f ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 57 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , and long-term doe obligations of $ 182 million at entergy arkansas , and includes debt due within one year .fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 15 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . | amount ( in thousands )
2017 | $ 307403
2018 | $ 828084
2019 | $ 724899
2020 | $ 795000
2021 | $ 1674548 in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .as part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .in october 2015 , entergy announced a planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its fuel cycle .as a result of the announcement , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .in august 2016 , entergy entered into a trust transfer agreement with nypa to transfer the decommissioning trust funds and decommissioning liabilities for the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants to entergy .as part of the trust transfer agreement , the original decommissioning agreements were amended , and the entergy subsidiaries 2019 obligation to make additional license extension payments to nypa was eliminated .in the third quarter 2016 , entergy removed the note payable of $ 35.1 million from the consolidated balance sheet .entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through june 2018 .capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .
Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in 2017?
| convfinqa2776 |
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 lease obligation and entergy louisiana 2019s acquisition of the equity participant 2019s beneficial interest in the waterford 3 leased assets and for further discussion of the grand gulf lease obligation .( e ) this note does not have a stated interest rate , but has an implicit interest rate of 7.458% ( 7.458 % ) .( f ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 57 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , and long-term doe obligations of $ 182 million at entergy arkansas , and includes debt due within one year .fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 15 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . | amount ( in thousands )
2017 | $ 307403
2018 | $ 828084
2019 | $ 724899
2020 | $ 795000
2021 | $ 1674548 in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .as part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .in october 2015 , entergy announced a planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its fuel cycle .as a result of the announcement , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .in august 2016 , entergy entered into a trust transfer agreement with nypa to transfer the decommissioning trust funds and decommissioning liabilities for the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants to entergy .as part of the trust transfer agreement , the original decommissioning agreements were amended , and the entergy subsidiaries 2019 obligation to make additional license extension payments to nypa was eliminated .in the third quarter 2016 , entergy removed the note payable of $ 35.1 million from the consolidated balance sheet .entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through june 2018 .capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .
Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 307403
Answer: 307403.0
Question: what about in 2018?
| 828084.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 lease obligation and entergy louisiana 2019s acquisition of the equity participant 2019s beneficial interest in the waterford 3 leased assets and for further discussion of the grand gulf lease obligation .( e ) this note does not have a stated interest rate , but has an implicit interest rate of 7.458% ( 7.458 % ) .( f ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 57 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , and long-term doe obligations of $ 182 million at entergy arkansas , and includes debt due within one year .fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 15 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . | amount ( in thousands )
2017 | $ 307403
2018 | $ 828084
2019 | $ 724899
2020 | $ 795000
2021 | $ 1674548 in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .as part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .in october 2015 , entergy announced a planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its fuel cycle .as a result of the announcement , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .in august 2016 , entergy entered into a trust transfer agreement with nypa to transfer the decommissioning trust funds and decommissioning liabilities for the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants to entergy .as part of the trust transfer agreement , the original decommissioning agreements were amended , and the entergy subsidiaries 2019 obligation to make additional license extension payments to nypa was eliminated .in the third quarter 2016 , entergy removed the note payable of $ 35.1 million from the consolidated balance sheet .entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through june 2018 .capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .
Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 307403
Answer: 307403.0
Question: what about in 2018?
| convfinqa2777 |
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 lease obligation and entergy louisiana 2019s acquisition of the equity participant 2019s beneficial interest in the waterford 3 leased assets and for further discussion of the grand gulf lease obligation .( e ) this note does not have a stated interest rate , but has an implicit interest rate of 7.458% ( 7.458 % ) .( f ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 57 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , and long-term doe obligations of $ 182 million at entergy arkansas , and includes debt due within one year .fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 15 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . | amount ( in thousands )
2017 | $ 307403
2018 | $ 828084
2019 | $ 724899
2020 | $ 795000
2021 | $ 1674548 in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .as part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .in october 2015 , entergy announced a planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its fuel cycle .as a result of the announcement , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .in august 2016 , entergy entered into a trust transfer agreement with nypa to transfer the decommissioning trust funds and decommissioning liabilities for the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants to entergy .as part of the trust transfer agreement , the original decommissioning agreements were amended , and the entergy subsidiaries 2019 obligation to make additional license extension payments to nypa was eliminated .in the third quarter 2016 , entergy removed the note payable of $ 35.1 million from the consolidated balance sheet .entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through june 2018 .capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .
Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 307403
Answer: 307403.0
Question: what about in 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 828084
Answer: 828084.0
Question: what amount is due in next 24 months?
| 1135487.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 lease obligation and entergy louisiana 2019s acquisition of the equity participant 2019s beneficial interest in the waterford 3 leased assets and for further discussion of the grand gulf lease obligation .( e ) this note does not have a stated interest rate , but has an implicit interest rate of 7.458% ( 7.458 % ) .( f ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 57 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , and long-term doe obligations of $ 182 million at entergy arkansas , and includes debt due within one year .fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 15 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . | amount ( in thousands )
2017 | $ 307403
2018 | $ 828084
2019 | $ 724899
2020 | $ 795000
2021 | $ 1674548 in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .as part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .in october 2015 , entergy announced a planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its fuel cycle .as a result of the announcement , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .in august 2016 , entergy entered into a trust transfer agreement with nypa to transfer the decommissioning trust funds and decommissioning liabilities for the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants to entergy .as part of the trust transfer agreement , the original decommissioning agreements were amended , and the entergy subsidiaries 2019 obligation to make additional license extension payments to nypa was eliminated .in the third quarter 2016 , entergy removed the note payable of $ 35.1 million from the consolidated balance sheet .entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through june 2018 .capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .
Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 307403
Answer: 307403.0
Question: what about in 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 828084
Answer: 828084.0
Question: what amount is due in next 24 months?
| convfinqa2778 |
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 lease obligation and entergy louisiana 2019s acquisition of the equity participant 2019s beneficial interest in the waterford 3 leased assets and for further discussion of the grand gulf lease obligation .( e ) this note does not have a stated interest rate , but has an implicit interest rate of 7.458% ( 7.458 % ) .( f ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 57 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , and long-term doe obligations of $ 182 million at entergy arkansas , and includes debt due within one year .fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 15 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . | amount ( in thousands )
2017 | $ 307403
2018 | $ 828084
2019 | $ 724899
2020 | $ 795000
2021 | $ 1674548 in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .as part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .in october 2015 , entergy announced a planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its fuel cycle .as a result of the announcement , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .in august 2016 , entergy entered into a trust transfer agreement with nypa to transfer the decommissioning trust funds and decommissioning liabilities for the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants to entergy .as part of the trust transfer agreement , the original decommissioning agreements were amended , and the entergy subsidiaries 2019 obligation to make additional license extension payments to nypa was eliminated .in the third quarter 2016 , entergy removed the note payable of $ 35.1 million from the consolidated balance sheet .entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through june 2018 .capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .
Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 307403
Answer: 307403.0
Question: what about in 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 828084
Answer: 828084.0
Question: what amount is due in next 24 months?
Steps: add(307403, 828084)
Answer: 1135487.0
Question: what about in 36 months?
| 1860386.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 lease obligation and entergy louisiana 2019s acquisition of the equity participant 2019s beneficial interest in the waterford 3 leased assets and for further discussion of the grand gulf lease obligation .( e ) this note does not have a stated interest rate , but has an implicit interest rate of 7.458% ( 7.458 % ) .( f ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 57 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , and long-term doe obligations of $ 182 million at entergy arkansas , and includes debt due within one year .fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 15 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . | amount ( in thousands )
2017 | $ 307403
2018 | $ 828084
2019 | $ 724899
2020 | $ 795000
2021 | $ 1674548 in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .as part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .in october 2015 , entergy announced a planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its fuel cycle .as a result of the announcement , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .in august 2016 , entergy entered into a trust transfer agreement with nypa to transfer the decommissioning trust funds and decommissioning liabilities for the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants to entergy .as part of the trust transfer agreement , the original decommissioning agreements were amended , and the entergy subsidiaries 2019 obligation to make additional license extension payments to nypa was eliminated .in the third quarter 2016 , entergy removed the note payable of $ 35.1 million from the consolidated balance sheet .entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through june 2018 .capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .
Question: what amount of long-term debt is due in 2017?
Steps: Ask for number 307403
Answer: 307403.0
Question: what about in 2018?
Steps: Ask for number 828084
Answer: 828084.0
Question: what amount is due in next 24 months?
Steps: add(307403, 828084)
Answer: 1135487.0
Question: what about in 36 months?
| convfinqa2779 |
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue | $ 942.1
base revenues | 78.4
volume/weather | 37.5
transmission revenue | 9.2
purchased power capacity | -80.0 ( 80.0 )
other | 3.9
2007 net revenue | $ 991.1 the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period .billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 .see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates .the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 .a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above .fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above .other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what was the 2007 net revenue?
| 991.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue | $ 942.1
base revenues | 78.4
volume/weather | 37.5
transmission revenue | 9.2
purchased power capacity | -80.0 ( 80.0 )
other | 3.9
2007 net revenue | $ 991.1 the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period .billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 .see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates .the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 .a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above .fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above .other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what was the 2007 net revenue?
| convfinqa2780 |
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue | $ 942.1
base revenues | 78.4
volume/weather | 37.5
transmission revenue | 9.2
purchased power capacity | -80.0 ( 80.0 )
other | 3.9
2007 net revenue | $ 991.1 the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period .billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 .see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates .the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 .a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above .fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above .other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what was the 2007 net revenue?
Steps: Ask for number 991.1
Answer: 991.1
Question: and for 2006?
| 942.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue | $ 942.1
base revenues | 78.4
volume/weather | 37.5
transmission revenue | 9.2
purchased power capacity | -80.0 ( 80.0 )
other | 3.9
2007 net revenue | $ 991.1 the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period .billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 .see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates .the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 .a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above .fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above .other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what was the 2007 net revenue?
Steps: Ask for number 991.1
Answer: 991.1
Question: and for 2006?
| convfinqa2781 |
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue | $ 942.1
base revenues | 78.4
volume/weather | 37.5
transmission revenue | 9.2
purchased power capacity | -80.0 ( 80.0 )
other | 3.9
2007 net revenue | $ 991.1 the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period .billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 .see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates .the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 .a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above .fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above .other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what was the 2007 net revenue?
Steps: Ask for number 991.1
Answer: 991.1
Question: and for 2006?
Steps: Ask for number 942.1
Answer: 942.1
Question: so what was the change during this time?
| 49.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue | $ 942.1
base revenues | 78.4
volume/weather | 37.5
transmission revenue | 9.2
purchased power capacity | -80.0 ( 80.0 )
other | 3.9
2007 net revenue | $ 991.1 the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period .billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 .see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates .the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 .a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above .fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above .other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what was the 2007 net revenue?
Steps: Ask for number 991.1
Answer: 991.1
Question: and for 2006?
Steps: Ask for number 942.1
Answer: 942.1
Question: so what was the change during this time?
| convfinqa2782 |
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue | $ 942.1
base revenues | 78.4
volume/weather | 37.5
transmission revenue | 9.2
purchased power capacity | -80.0 ( 80.0 )
other | 3.9
2007 net revenue | $ 991.1 the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period .billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 .see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates .the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 .a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above .fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above .other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what was the 2007 net revenue?
Steps: Ask for number 991.1
Answer: 991.1
Question: and for 2006?
Steps: Ask for number 942.1
Answer: 942.1
Question: so what was the change during this time?
Steps: subtract(991.1, 942.1)
Answer: 49.0
Question: and the growth rate?
| 0.05201 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue | $ 942.1
base revenues | 78.4
volume/weather | 37.5
transmission revenue | 9.2
purchased power capacity | -80.0 ( 80.0 )
other | 3.9
2007 net revenue | $ 991.1 the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period .billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 .see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates .the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 .a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above .see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above .fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above .other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 .see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what was the 2007 net revenue?
Steps: Ask for number 991.1
Answer: 991.1
Question: and for 2006?
Steps: Ask for number 942.1
Answer: 942.1
Question: so what was the change during this time?
Steps: subtract(991.1, 942.1)
Answer: 49.0
Question: and the growth rate?
| convfinqa2783 |
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years .the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends .comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc .s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends .fiscal year ending may 31 .global payments s&p 500 information technology . | global payments | s&p 500 | s&p information technology
may 31 2002 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
may 31 2003 | 94.20 | 91.94 | 94.48
may 31 2004 | 129.77 | 108.79 | 115.24
may 31 2005 | 193.30 | 117.75 | 116.29
may 31 2006 | 260.35 | 127.92 | 117.14
may 31 2007 | 224.24 | 157.08 | 144.11 issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million .the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit .there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization .no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the value of global payments at the end of 2003 less 100?
| -5.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years .the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends .comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc .s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends .fiscal year ending may 31 .global payments s&p 500 information technology . | global payments | s&p 500 | s&p information technology
may 31 2002 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
may 31 2003 | 94.20 | 91.94 | 94.48
may 31 2004 | 129.77 | 108.79 | 115.24
may 31 2005 | 193.30 | 117.75 | 116.29
may 31 2006 | 260.35 | 127.92 | 117.14
may 31 2007 | 224.24 | 157.08 | 144.11 issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million .the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit .there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization .no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the value of global payments at the end of 2003 less 100?
| convfinqa2784 |
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years .the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends .comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc .s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends .fiscal year ending may 31 .global payments s&p 500 information technology . | global payments | s&p 500 | s&p information technology
may 31 2002 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
may 31 2003 | 94.20 | 91.94 | 94.48
may 31 2004 | 129.77 | 108.79 | 115.24
may 31 2005 | 193.30 | 117.75 | 116.29
may 31 2006 | 260.35 | 127.92 | 117.14
may 31 2007 | 224.24 | 157.08 | 144.11 issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million .the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit .there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization .no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the value of global payments at the end of 2003 less 100?
Steps: subtract(94.20, const_100)
Answer: -5.8
Question: now, what is that value divided by 100?
| -0.058 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years .the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends .comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc .s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends .fiscal year ending may 31 .global payments s&p 500 information technology . | global payments | s&p 500 | s&p information technology
may 31 2002 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 | $ 100.00
may 31 2003 | 94.20 | 91.94 | 94.48
may 31 2004 | 129.77 | 108.79 | 115.24
may 31 2005 | 193.30 | 117.75 | 116.29
may 31 2006 | 260.35 | 127.92 | 117.14
may 31 2007 | 224.24 | 157.08 | 144.11 issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million .the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit .there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization .no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .
Question: what was the value of global payments at the end of 2003 less 100?
Steps: subtract(94.20, const_100)
Answer: -5.8
Question: now, what is that value divided by 100?
| convfinqa2785 |
the fair value of performance awards is calculated using the market value of a share of snap-on 2019s common stock on the date of grant .the weighted-average grant date fair value of performance awards granted during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 77.33 , $ 60.00 and $ 55.97 , respectively .vested performance share units approximated 148000 shares as of 2013 year end , 213000 shares as of 2012 year end and 54208 shares as of 2011 year end .performance share units of 213459 shares were paid out in 2013 and 53990 shares were paid out in 2012 ; no performance share units were paid out in 2011 .earned performance share units are generally paid out following the conclusion of the applicable performance period upon approval by the organization and executive compensation committee of the company 2019s board of directors ( the 201cboard 201d ) .based on the company 2019s 2013 performance , 84413 rsus granted in 2013 were earned ; assuming continued employment , these rsus will vest at the end of fiscal 2015 .based on the company 2019s 2012 performance , 95047 rsus granted in 2012 were earned ; assuming continued employment , these rsus will vest at the end of fiscal 2014 .based on the company 2019s 2011 performance , 159970 rsus granted in 2011 were earned ; these rsus vested as of fiscal 2013 year end and were paid out shortly thereafter .as a result of employee retirements , a total of 1614 of the rsus earned in 2012 and 2011 vested pursuant to the terms of the related award agreements and the underlying shares were paid out in the third quarter of 2013 .the changes to the company 2019s non-vested performance awards in 2013 are as follows : shares ( in thousands ) fair value price per share* . | shares ( in thousands ) | fair valueprice pershare*
non-vested performance awards at beginning of year | 509 | $ 59.36
granted | 180 | 77.33
vested | -306 ( 306 ) | 58.94
cancellations | -2 ( 2 ) | 69.23
non-vested performance awards at end of year | 381 | 68.13 * weighted-average as of 2013 year end there was approximately $ 12.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance awards that is expected to be recognized as a charge to earnings over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years .stock appreciation rights ( 201csars 201d ) the company also issues cash-settled and stock-settled sars to certain key non-u.s .employees .sars have a contractual term of ten years and vest ratably on the first , second and third anniversaries of the date of grant .sars are granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of a share of snap-on 2019s common stock on the date of grant .cash-settled sars provide for the cash payment of the excess of the fair market value of snap-on 2019s common stock price on the date of exercise over the grant price .cash-settled sars have no effect on dilutive shares or shares outstanding as any appreciation of snap-on 2019s common stock value over the grant price is paid in cash and not in common stock .in 2013 , the company began issuing stock-settled sars that are accounted for as equity instruments and provide for the issuance of snap-on common stock equal to the amount by which the company 2019s stock has appreciated over the exercise price .stock-settled sars have an effect on dilutive shares and shares outstanding as any appreciation of snap-on 2019s common stock value over the exercise price will be settled in shares of common stock .2013 annual report 101 .
Question: what was the change in value of non-vested performance awards during the year?
| -128.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the fair value of performance awards is calculated using the market value of a share of snap-on 2019s common stock on the date of grant .the weighted-average grant date fair value of performance awards granted during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 77.33 , $ 60.00 and $ 55.97 , respectively .vested performance share units approximated 148000 shares as of 2013 year end , 213000 shares as of 2012 year end and 54208 shares as of 2011 year end .performance share units of 213459 shares were paid out in 2013 and 53990 shares were paid out in 2012 ; no performance share units were paid out in 2011 .earned performance share units are generally paid out following the conclusion of the applicable performance period upon approval by the organization and executive compensation committee of the company 2019s board of directors ( the 201cboard 201d ) .based on the company 2019s 2013 performance , 84413 rsus granted in 2013 were earned ; assuming continued employment , these rsus will vest at the end of fiscal 2015 .based on the company 2019s 2012 performance , 95047 rsus granted in 2012 were earned ; assuming continued employment , these rsus will vest at the end of fiscal 2014 .based on the company 2019s 2011 performance , 159970 rsus granted in 2011 were earned ; these rsus vested as of fiscal 2013 year end and were paid out shortly thereafter .as a result of employee retirements , a total of 1614 of the rsus earned in 2012 and 2011 vested pursuant to the terms of the related award agreements and the underlying shares were paid out in the third quarter of 2013 .the changes to the company 2019s non-vested performance awards in 2013 are as follows : shares ( in thousands ) fair value price per share* . | shares ( in thousands ) | fair valueprice pershare*
non-vested performance awards at beginning of year | 509 | $ 59.36
granted | 180 | 77.33
vested | -306 ( 306 ) | 58.94
cancellations | -2 ( 2 ) | 69.23
non-vested performance awards at end of year | 381 | 68.13 * weighted-average as of 2013 year end there was approximately $ 12.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance awards that is expected to be recognized as a charge to earnings over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years .stock appreciation rights ( 201csars 201d ) the company also issues cash-settled and stock-settled sars to certain key non-u.s .employees .sars have a contractual term of ten years and vest ratably on the first , second and third anniversaries of the date of grant .sars are granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of a share of snap-on 2019s common stock on the date of grant .cash-settled sars provide for the cash payment of the excess of the fair market value of snap-on 2019s common stock price on the date of exercise over the grant price .cash-settled sars have no effect on dilutive shares or shares outstanding as any appreciation of snap-on 2019s common stock value over the grant price is paid in cash and not in common stock .in 2013 , the company began issuing stock-settled sars that are accounted for as equity instruments and provide for the issuance of snap-on common stock equal to the amount by which the company 2019s stock has appreciated over the exercise price .stock-settled sars have an effect on dilutive shares and shares outstanding as any appreciation of snap-on 2019s common stock value over the exercise price will be settled in shares of common stock .2013 annual report 101 .
Question: what was the change in value of non-vested performance awards during the year?
| convfinqa2786 |
the fair value of performance awards is calculated using the market value of a share of snap-on 2019s common stock on the date of grant .the weighted-average grant date fair value of performance awards granted during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 77.33 , $ 60.00 and $ 55.97 , respectively .vested performance share units approximated 148000 shares as of 2013 year end , 213000 shares as of 2012 year end and 54208 shares as of 2011 year end .performance share units of 213459 shares were paid out in 2013 and 53990 shares were paid out in 2012 ; no performance share units were paid out in 2011 .earned performance share units are generally paid out following the conclusion of the applicable performance period upon approval by the organization and executive compensation committee of the company 2019s board of directors ( the 201cboard 201d ) .based on the company 2019s 2013 performance , 84413 rsus granted in 2013 were earned ; assuming continued employment , these rsus will vest at the end of fiscal 2015 .based on the company 2019s 2012 performance , 95047 rsus granted in 2012 were earned ; assuming continued employment , these rsus will vest at the end of fiscal 2014 .based on the company 2019s 2011 performance , 159970 rsus granted in 2011 were earned ; these rsus vested as of fiscal 2013 year end and were paid out shortly thereafter .as a result of employee retirements , a total of 1614 of the rsus earned in 2012 and 2011 vested pursuant to the terms of the related award agreements and the underlying shares were paid out in the third quarter of 2013 .the changes to the company 2019s non-vested performance awards in 2013 are as follows : shares ( in thousands ) fair value price per share* . | shares ( in thousands ) | fair valueprice pershare*
non-vested performance awards at beginning of year | 509 | $ 59.36
granted | 180 | 77.33
vested | -306 ( 306 ) | 58.94
cancellations | -2 ( 2 ) | 69.23
non-vested performance awards at end of year | 381 | 68.13 * weighted-average as of 2013 year end there was approximately $ 12.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance awards that is expected to be recognized as a charge to earnings over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years .stock appreciation rights ( 201csars 201d ) the company also issues cash-settled and stock-settled sars to certain key non-u.s .employees .sars have a contractual term of ten years and vest ratably on the first , second and third anniversaries of the date of grant .sars are granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of a share of snap-on 2019s common stock on the date of grant .cash-settled sars provide for the cash payment of the excess of the fair market value of snap-on 2019s common stock price on the date of exercise over the grant price .cash-settled sars have no effect on dilutive shares or shares outstanding as any appreciation of snap-on 2019s common stock value over the grant price is paid in cash and not in common stock .in 2013 , the company began issuing stock-settled sars that are accounted for as equity instruments and provide for the issuance of snap-on common stock equal to the amount by which the company 2019s stock has appreciated over the exercise price .stock-settled sars have an effect on dilutive shares and shares outstanding as any appreciation of snap-on 2019s common stock value over the exercise price will be settled in shares of common stock .2013 annual report 101 .
Question: what was the change in value of non-vested performance awards during the year?
Steps: subtract(381, 509)
Answer: -128.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.25147 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the fair value of performance awards is calculated using the market value of a share of snap-on 2019s common stock on the date of grant .the weighted-average grant date fair value of performance awards granted during 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 77.33 , $ 60.00 and $ 55.97 , respectively .vested performance share units approximated 148000 shares as of 2013 year end , 213000 shares as of 2012 year end and 54208 shares as of 2011 year end .performance share units of 213459 shares were paid out in 2013 and 53990 shares were paid out in 2012 ; no performance share units were paid out in 2011 .earned performance share units are generally paid out following the conclusion of the applicable performance period upon approval by the organization and executive compensation committee of the company 2019s board of directors ( the 201cboard 201d ) .based on the company 2019s 2013 performance , 84413 rsus granted in 2013 were earned ; assuming continued employment , these rsus will vest at the end of fiscal 2015 .based on the company 2019s 2012 performance , 95047 rsus granted in 2012 were earned ; assuming continued employment , these rsus will vest at the end of fiscal 2014 .based on the company 2019s 2011 performance , 159970 rsus granted in 2011 were earned ; these rsus vested as of fiscal 2013 year end and were paid out shortly thereafter .as a result of employee retirements , a total of 1614 of the rsus earned in 2012 and 2011 vested pursuant to the terms of the related award agreements and the underlying shares were paid out in the third quarter of 2013 .the changes to the company 2019s non-vested performance awards in 2013 are as follows : shares ( in thousands ) fair value price per share* . | shares ( in thousands ) | fair valueprice pershare*
non-vested performance awards at beginning of year | 509 | $ 59.36
granted | 180 | 77.33
vested | -306 ( 306 ) | 58.94
cancellations | -2 ( 2 ) | 69.23
non-vested performance awards at end of year | 381 | 68.13 * weighted-average as of 2013 year end there was approximately $ 12.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance awards that is expected to be recognized as a charge to earnings over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years .stock appreciation rights ( 201csars 201d ) the company also issues cash-settled and stock-settled sars to certain key non-u.s .employees .sars have a contractual term of ten years and vest ratably on the first , second and third anniversaries of the date of grant .sars are granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of a share of snap-on 2019s common stock on the date of grant .cash-settled sars provide for the cash payment of the excess of the fair market value of snap-on 2019s common stock price on the date of exercise over the grant price .cash-settled sars have no effect on dilutive shares or shares outstanding as any appreciation of snap-on 2019s common stock value over the grant price is paid in cash and not in common stock .in 2013 , the company began issuing stock-settled sars that are accounted for as equity instruments and provide for the issuance of snap-on common stock equal to the amount by which the company 2019s stock has appreciated over the exercise price .stock-settled sars have an effect on dilutive shares and shares outstanding as any appreciation of snap-on 2019s common stock value over the exercise price will be settled in shares of common stock .2013 annual report 101 .
Question: what was the change in value of non-vested performance awards during the year?
Steps: subtract(381, 509)
Answer: -128.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| convfinqa2787 |
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds .these awards vested in january 2015 .the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited .in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded .in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) .distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period .during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan .the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service .because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date .rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years .rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant .rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model .expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years .the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s .treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date .the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
expected volatility | 14.93% ( 14.93 % ) | 17.78% ( 17.78 % ) | 19.37% ( 19.37 % )
risk-free interest rate | 1.07% ( 1.07 % ) | 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) | 0.40% ( 0.40 % )
expected life ( years ) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0
grant date fair value per share | $ 62.10 | $ 45.45 | $ 40.13 the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method .rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years .the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
| 62.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds .these awards vested in january 2015 .the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited .in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded .in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) .distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period .during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan .the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service .because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date .rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years .rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant .rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model .expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years .the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s .treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date .the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
expected volatility | 14.93% ( 14.93 % ) | 17.78% ( 17.78 % ) | 19.37% ( 19.37 % )
risk-free interest rate | 1.07% ( 1.07 % ) | 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) | 0.40% ( 0.40 % )
expected life ( years ) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0
grant date fair value per share | $ 62.10 | $ 45.45 | $ 40.13 the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method .rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years .the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
| convfinqa2788 |
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds .these awards vested in january 2015 .the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited .in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded .in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) .distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period .during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan .the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service .because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date .rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years .rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant .rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model .expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years .the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s .treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date .the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
expected volatility | 14.93% ( 14.93 % ) | 17.78% ( 17.78 % ) | 19.37% ( 19.37 % )
risk-free interest rate | 1.07% ( 1.07 % ) | 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) | 0.40% ( 0.40 % )
expected life ( years ) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0
grant date fair value per share | $ 62.10 | $ 45.45 | $ 40.13 the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method .rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years .the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 62.10
Answer: 62.1
Question: and what was it in 2013?
| 40.13 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds .these awards vested in january 2015 .the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited .in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded .in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) .distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period .during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan .the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service .because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date .rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years .rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant .rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model .expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years .the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s .treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date .the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
expected volatility | 14.93% ( 14.93 % ) | 17.78% ( 17.78 % ) | 19.37% ( 19.37 % )
risk-free interest rate | 1.07% ( 1.07 % ) | 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) | 0.40% ( 0.40 % )
expected life ( years ) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0
grant date fair value per share | $ 62.10 | $ 45.45 | $ 40.13 the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method .rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years .the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 62.10
Answer: 62.1
Question: and what was it in 2013?
| convfinqa2789 |
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds .these awards vested in january 2015 .the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited .in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded .in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) .distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period .during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan .the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service .because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date .rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years .rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant .rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model .expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years .the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s .treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date .the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
expected volatility | 14.93% ( 14.93 % ) | 17.78% ( 17.78 % ) | 19.37% ( 19.37 % )
risk-free interest rate | 1.07% ( 1.07 % ) | 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) | 0.40% ( 0.40 % )
expected life ( years ) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0
grant date fair value per share | $ 62.10 | $ 45.45 | $ 40.13 the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method .rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years .the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 62.10
Answer: 62.1
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 40.13
Answer: 40.13
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 21.97 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds .these awards vested in january 2015 .the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited .in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded .in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) .distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period .during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan .the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service .because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date .rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years .rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant .rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model .expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years .the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s .treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date .the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
expected volatility | 14.93% ( 14.93 % ) | 17.78% ( 17.78 % ) | 19.37% ( 19.37 % )
risk-free interest rate | 1.07% ( 1.07 % ) | 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) | 0.40% ( 0.40 % )
expected life ( years ) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0
grant date fair value per share | $ 62.10 | $ 45.45 | $ 40.13 the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method .rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years .the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 62.10
Answer: 62.1
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 40.13
Answer: 40.13
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| convfinqa2790 |
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds .these awards vested in january 2015 .the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited .in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded .in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) .distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period .during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan .the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service .because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date .rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years .rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant .rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model .expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years .the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s .treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date .the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
expected volatility | 14.93% ( 14.93 % ) | 17.78% ( 17.78 % ) | 19.37% ( 19.37 % )
risk-free interest rate | 1.07% ( 1.07 % ) | 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) | 0.40% ( 0.40 % )
expected life ( years ) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0
grant date fair value per share | $ 62.10 | $ 45.45 | $ 40.13 the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method .rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years .the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 62.10
Answer: 62.1
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 40.13
Answer: 40.13
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(62.10, 40.13)
Answer: 21.97
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2013 fair value?
| 0.54747 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds .these awards vested in january 2015 .the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited .in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded .in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) .distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period .during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan .the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service .because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date .rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years .rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant .rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model .expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years .the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s .treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date .the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
expected volatility | 14.93% ( 14.93 % ) | 17.78% ( 17.78 % ) | 19.37% ( 19.37 % )
risk-free interest rate | 1.07% ( 1.07 % ) | 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) | 0.40% ( 0.40 % )
expected life ( years ) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0
grant date fair value per share | $ 62.10 | $ 45.45 | $ 40.13 the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method .rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years .the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 62.10
Answer: 62.1
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 40.13
Answer: 40.13
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(62.10, 40.13)
Answer: 21.97
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2013 fair value?
| convfinqa2791 |
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds .these awards vested in january 2015 .the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited .in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded .in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) .distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period .during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan .the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service .because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date .rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years .rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant .rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model .expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years .the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s .treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date .the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
expected volatility | 14.93% ( 14.93 % ) | 17.78% ( 17.78 % ) | 19.37% ( 19.37 % )
risk-free interest rate | 1.07% ( 1.07 % ) | 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) | 0.40% ( 0.40 % )
expected life ( years ) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0
grant date fair value per share | $ 62.10 | $ 45.45 | $ 40.13 the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method .rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years .the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 62.10
Answer: 62.1
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 40.13
Answer: 40.13
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(62.10, 40.13)
Answer: 21.97
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2013 fair value?
Steps: Ask for number 40.13
Answer: 0.54747
Question: and only during the last year of that period, what was the change in that fair value?
| 16.65 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds .these awards vested in january 2015 .the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited .in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded .in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) .distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period .during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan .the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service .because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date .rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years .rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant .rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model .expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years .the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s .treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date .the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
expected volatility | 14.93% ( 14.93 % ) | 17.78% ( 17.78 % ) | 19.37% ( 19.37 % )
risk-free interest rate | 1.07% ( 1.07 % ) | 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) | 0.40% ( 0.40 % )
expected life ( years ) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0
grant date fair value per share | $ 62.10 | $ 45.45 | $ 40.13 the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method .rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years .the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 62.10
Answer: 62.1
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 40.13
Answer: 40.13
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(62.10, 40.13)
Answer: 21.97
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2013 fair value?
Steps: Ask for number 40.13
Answer: 0.54747
Question: and only during the last year of that period, what was the change in that fair value?
| convfinqa2792 |
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds .these awards vested in january 2015 .the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited .in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded .in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) .distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period .during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan .the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service .because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date .rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years .rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant .rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model .expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years .the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s .treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date .the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
expected volatility | 14.93% ( 14.93 % ) | 17.78% ( 17.78 % ) | 19.37% ( 19.37 % )
risk-free interest rate | 1.07% ( 1.07 % ) | 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) | 0.40% ( 0.40 % )
expected life ( years ) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0
grant date fair value per share | $ 62.10 | $ 45.45 | $ 40.13 the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method .rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years .the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 62.10
Answer: 62.1
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 40.13
Answer: 40.13
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(62.10, 40.13)
Answer: 21.97
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2013 fair value?
Steps: Ask for number 40.13
Answer: 0.54747
Question: and only during the last year of that period, what was the change in that fair value?
Steps: divide(#0, 40.13)
Answer: 16.65
Question: and what percentage does this change represent in relation to the 2014 value?
| 0.36634 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2012 , the company granted selected employees an aggregate of 139 thousand rsus with internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds .these awards vested in january 2015 .the terms of the grants specified that to the extent certain performance goals , comprised of internal measures and , separately , market thresholds were achieved , the rsus would vest ; if performance goals were surpassed , up to 175% ( 175 % ) of the target awards would be distributed ; and if performance goals were not met , the awards would be forfeited .in january 2015 , an additional 93 thousand rsus were granted and distributed because performance thresholds were exceeded .in 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus , both with and without performance conditions , to certain employees under the 2007 plan .the rsus without performance conditions vest ratably over the three- year service period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant and the rsus with performance conditions vest ratably over the three-year performance period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant ( the 201cperformance period 201d ) .distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of internal performance measures and , separately , certain market thresholds over the performance period .during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , the company granted rsus to non-employee directors under the 2007 plan .the rsus vested on the date of grant ; however , distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of : ( i ) 15 months after grant date , subject to any deferral election by the director ; or ( ii ) the participant 2019s separation from service .because these rsus vested on the grant date , the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense included in the expense table above on the grant date .rsus generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years .rsus granted with service-only conditions and those with internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the company 2019s common stock on the date of grant .rsus granted with market conditions are valued using a monte carlo model .expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years .the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s .treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date .the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted-average grant date fair values of rsus granted for the years ended december 31: . | 2015 | 2014 | 2013
expected volatility | 14.93% ( 14.93 % ) | 17.78% ( 17.78 % ) | 19.37% ( 19.37 % )
risk-free interest rate | 1.07% ( 1.07 % ) | 0.75% ( 0.75 % ) | 0.40% ( 0.40 % )
expected life ( years ) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0
grant date fair value per share | $ 62.10 | $ 45.45 | $ 40.13 the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards that vest ratably and have market and/or performance and service conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method .rsus that have no performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and are included in operations expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 4 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.4 years .the total grant date fair value of rsus vested was $ 12 , $ 11 and $ 9 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013. .
Question: what was the grant date fair value per share in 2015?
Steps: Ask for number 62.10
Answer: 62.1
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Steps: Ask for number 40.13
Answer: 40.13
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Steps: subtract(62.10, 40.13)
Answer: 21.97
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of the 2013 fair value?
Steps: Ask for number 40.13
Answer: 0.54747
Question: and only during the last year of that period, what was the change in that fair value?
Steps: divide(#0, 40.13)
Answer: 16.65
Question: and what percentage does this change represent in relation to the 2014 value?
| convfinqa2793 |
investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million .average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 .these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and sub-advised portfolios .net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts .decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 .administrative fees increased $ 5.8 million to $ 353.9 million , primarily from increased costs of servicing activities for the mutual funds and their investors .changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .our largest expense , compensation and related costs , increased $ 18.4 million or 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) from 2007 .this increase includes $ 37.2 million in salaries resulting from an 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) increase in our average staff count and an increase of our associates 2019 base salaries at the beginning of the year .at december 31 , 2008 , we employed 5385 associates , up 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) from the end of 2007 , primarily to add capabilities and support increased volume-related activities and other growth over the past few years .over the course of 2008 , we slowed the growth of our associate base from earlier plans and the prior year .we do not expect the number of our associates to increase in 2009 .we also reduced our annual bonuses $ 27.6 million versus the 2007 year in response to recent and ongoing unfavorable financial market conditions that negatively impacted our operating results .the balance of the increase is attributable to higher employee benefits and employment- related expenses , including an increase of $ 5.7 million in stock-based compensation .entering 2009 , we did not increase the salaries of our highest paid associates .after higher spending during the first quarter of 2008 versus 2007 , investor sentiment in the uncertain and volatile market environment caused us to reduce advertising and promotion spending , which for the year was down $ 3.8 million from 2007 .we expect to reduce these expenditures for 2009 versus 2008 , and estimate that spending in the first quarter of 2009 will be down about $ 5 million from the fourth quarter of 2008 .we vary our level of spending based on market conditions and investor demand as well as our efforts to expand our investor base in the united states and abroad .occupancy and facility costs together with depreciation expense increased $ 18 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) compared to 2007 .we have been expanding and renovating our facilities to accommodate the growth in our associates to meet business demands .other operating expenses were up $ 3.3 million from 2007 .we increased our spending $ 9.8 million , primarily for professional fees and information and other third-party services .reductions in travel and charitable contributions partially offset these increases .our non-operating investment activity resulted in a net loss of $ 52.3 million in 2008 as compared to a net gain of $ 80.4 million in 2007 .this change of $ 132.7 million is primarily attributable to losses recognized in 2008 on our investments in sponsored mutual funds , which resulted from declines in financial market values during the year. . | 2007 | 2008 | change
capital gain distributions received | $ 22.1 | $ 5.6 | $ -16.5 ( 16.5 )
other than temporary impairments recognized | -.3 ( .3 ) | -91.3 ( 91.3 ) | -91.0 ( 91.0 )
net gains ( losses ) realized on funddispositions | 5.5 | -4.5 ( 4.5 ) | -10.0 ( 10.0 )
net gain ( loss ) recognized on fund holdings | $ 27.3 | $ -90.2 ( 90.2 ) | $ -117.5 ( 117.5 ) we recognized other than temporary impairments of our investments in sponsored mutual funds because of declines in fair value below cost for an extended period .the significant declines in fair value below cost that occurred in 2008 were generally attributable to the adverse and ongoing market conditions discussed in the background section on page 18 of this report .see also the discussion on page 24 of critical accounting policies for other than temporary impairments of available-for-sale securities .in addition , income from money market and bond fund holdings was $ 19.3 million lower than in 2007 due to the significantly lower interest rate environment of 2008 .lower interest rates also led to substantial capital appreciation on our $ 40 million holding of u.s .treasury notes that we sold in december 2008 at a $ 2.6 million gain .management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .
Question: in 2007, considering the percentage increase and the amount equivalent to it of the total of occupancy and facility costs together with depreciation expense from that year to 2008, what can be concluded to have been, in 2007, that total?
| 150.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million .average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 .these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and sub-advised portfolios .net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts .decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 .administrative fees increased $ 5.8 million to $ 353.9 million , primarily from increased costs of servicing activities for the mutual funds and their investors .changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .our largest expense , compensation and related costs , increased $ 18.4 million or 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) from 2007 .this increase includes $ 37.2 million in salaries resulting from an 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) increase in our average staff count and an increase of our associates 2019 base salaries at the beginning of the year .at december 31 , 2008 , we employed 5385 associates , up 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) from the end of 2007 , primarily to add capabilities and support increased volume-related activities and other growth over the past few years .over the course of 2008 , we slowed the growth of our associate base from earlier plans and the prior year .we do not expect the number of our associates to increase in 2009 .we also reduced our annual bonuses $ 27.6 million versus the 2007 year in response to recent and ongoing unfavorable financial market conditions that negatively impacted our operating results .the balance of the increase is attributable to higher employee benefits and employment- related expenses , including an increase of $ 5.7 million in stock-based compensation .entering 2009 , we did not increase the salaries of our highest paid associates .after higher spending during the first quarter of 2008 versus 2007 , investor sentiment in the uncertain and volatile market environment caused us to reduce advertising and promotion spending , which for the year was down $ 3.8 million from 2007 .we expect to reduce these expenditures for 2009 versus 2008 , and estimate that spending in the first quarter of 2009 will be down about $ 5 million from the fourth quarter of 2008 .we vary our level of spending based on market conditions and investor demand as well as our efforts to expand our investor base in the united states and abroad .occupancy and facility costs together with depreciation expense increased $ 18 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) compared to 2007 .we have been expanding and renovating our facilities to accommodate the growth in our associates to meet business demands .other operating expenses were up $ 3.3 million from 2007 .we increased our spending $ 9.8 million , primarily for professional fees and information and other third-party services .reductions in travel and charitable contributions partially offset these increases .our non-operating investment activity resulted in a net loss of $ 52.3 million in 2008 as compared to a net gain of $ 80.4 million in 2007 .this change of $ 132.7 million is primarily attributable to losses recognized in 2008 on our investments in sponsored mutual funds , which resulted from declines in financial market values during the year. . | 2007 | 2008 | change
capital gain distributions received | $ 22.1 | $ 5.6 | $ -16.5 ( 16.5 )
other than temporary impairments recognized | -.3 ( .3 ) | -91.3 ( 91.3 ) | -91.0 ( 91.0 )
net gains ( losses ) realized on funddispositions | 5.5 | -4.5 ( 4.5 ) | -10.0 ( 10.0 )
net gain ( loss ) recognized on fund holdings | $ 27.3 | $ -90.2 ( 90.2 ) | $ -117.5 ( 117.5 ) we recognized other than temporary impairments of our investments in sponsored mutual funds because of declines in fair value below cost for an extended period .the significant declines in fair value below cost that occurred in 2008 were generally attributable to the adverse and ongoing market conditions discussed in the background section on page 18 of this report .see also the discussion on page 24 of critical accounting policies for other than temporary impairments of available-for-sale securities .in addition , income from money market and bond fund holdings was $ 19.3 million lower than in 2007 due to the significantly lower interest rate environment of 2008 .lower interest rates also led to substantial capital appreciation on our $ 40 million holding of u.s .treasury notes that we sold in december 2008 at a $ 2.6 million gain .management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .
Question: in 2007, considering the percentage increase and the amount equivalent to it of the total of occupancy and facility costs together with depreciation expense from that year to 2008, what can be concluded to have been, in 2007, that total?
| convfinqa2794 |
investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million .average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 .these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and sub-advised portfolios .net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts .decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 .administrative fees increased $ 5.8 million to $ 353.9 million , primarily from increased costs of servicing activities for the mutual funds and their investors .changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .our largest expense , compensation and related costs , increased $ 18.4 million or 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) from 2007 .this increase includes $ 37.2 million in salaries resulting from an 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) increase in our average staff count and an increase of our associates 2019 base salaries at the beginning of the year .at december 31 , 2008 , we employed 5385 associates , up 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) from the end of 2007 , primarily to add capabilities and support increased volume-related activities and other growth over the past few years .over the course of 2008 , we slowed the growth of our associate base from earlier plans and the prior year .we do not expect the number of our associates to increase in 2009 .we also reduced our annual bonuses $ 27.6 million versus the 2007 year in response to recent and ongoing unfavorable financial market conditions that negatively impacted our operating results .the balance of the increase is attributable to higher employee benefits and employment- related expenses , including an increase of $ 5.7 million in stock-based compensation .entering 2009 , we did not increase the salaries of our highest paid associates .after higher spending during the first quarter of 2008 versus 2007 , investor sentiment in the uncertain and volatile market environment caused us to reduce advertising and promotion spending , which for the year was down $ 3.8 million from 2007 .we expect to reduce these expenditures for 2009 versus 2008 , and estimate that spending in the first quarter of 2009 will be down about $ 5 million from the fourth quarter of 2008 .we vary our level of spending based on market conditions and investor demand as well as our efforts to expand our investor base in the united states and abroad .occupancy and facility costs together with depreciation expense increased $ 18 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) compared to 2007 .we have been expanding and renovating our facilities to accommodate the growth in our associates to meet business demands .other operating expenses were up $ 3.3 million from 2007 .we increased our spending $ 9.8 million , primarily for professional fees and information and other third-party services .reductions in travel and charitable contributions partially offset these increases .our non-operating investment activity resulted in a net loss of $ 52.3 million in 2008 as compared to a net gain of $ 80.4 million in 2007 .this change of $ 132.7 million is primarily attributable to losses recognized in 2008 on our investments in sponsored mutual funds , which resulted from declines in financial market values during the year. . | 2007 | 2008 | change
capital gain distributions received | $ 22.1 | $ 5.6 | $ -16.5 ( 16.5 )
other than temporary impairments recognized | -.3 ( .3 ) | -91.3 ( 91.3 ) | -91.0 ( 91.0 )
net gains ( losses ) realized on funddispositions | 5.5 | -4.5 ( 4.5 ) | -10.0 ( 10.0 )
net gain ( loss ) recognized on fund holdings | $ 27.3 | $ -90.2 ( 90.2 ) | $ -117.5 ( 117.5 ) we recognized other than temporary impairments of our investments in sponsored mutual funds because of declines in fair value below cost for an extended period .the significant declines in fair value below cost that occurred in 2008 were generally attributable to the adverse and ongoing market conditions discussed in the background section on page 18 of this report .see also the discussion on page 24 of critical accounting policies for other than temporary impairments of available-for-sale securities .in addition , income from money market and bond fund holdings was $ 19.3 million lower than in 2007 due to the significantly lower interest rate environment of 2008 .lower interest rates also led to substantial capital appreciation on our $ 40 million holding of u.s .treasury notes that we sold in december 2008 at a $ 2.6 million gain .management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .
Question: in 2007, considering the percentage increase and the amount equivalent to it of the total of occupancy and facility costs together with depreciation expense from that year to 2008, what can be concluded to have been, in 2007, that total?
Steps: divide(18, 12%)
Answer: 150.0
Question: and between these same two years, what percentage did the change in net gains ( losses ) realized on fund dispositions represent in relation to those net gains in 2007?
| -1.81818 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million .average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 .these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and sub-advised portfolios .net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts .decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 .administrative fees increased $ 5.8 million to $ 353.9 million , primarily from increased costs of servicing activities for the mutual funds and their investors .changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .our largest expense , compensation and related costs , increased $ 18.4 million or 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) from 2007 .this increase includes $ 37.2 million in salaries resulting from an 8.4% ( 8.4 % ) increase in our average staff count and an increase of our associates 2019 base salaries at the beginning of the year .at december 31 , 2008 , we employed 5385 associates , up 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) from the end of 2007 , primarily to add capabilities and support increased volume-related activities and other growth over the past few years .over the course of 2008 , we slowed the growth of our associate base from earlier plans and the prior year .we do not expect the number of our associates to increase in 2009 .we also reduced our annual bonuses $ 27.6 million versus the 2007 year in response to recent and ongoing unfavorable financial market conditions that negatively impacted our operating results .the balance of the increase is attributable to higher employee benefits and employment- related expenses , including an increase of $ 5.7 million in stock-based compensation .entering 2009 , we did not increase the salaries of our highest paid associates .after higher spending during the first quarter of 2008 versus 2007 , investor sentiment in the uncertain and volatile market environment caused us to reduce advertising and promotion spending , which for the year was down $ 3.8 million from 2007 .we expect to reduce these expenditures for 2009 versus 2008 , and estimate that spending in the first quarter of 2009 will be down about $ 5 million from the fourth quarter of 2008 .we vary our level of spending based on market conditions and investor demand as well as our efforts to expand our investor base in the united states and abroad .occupancy and facility costs together with depreciation expense increased $ 18 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) compared to 2007 .we have been expanding and renovating our facilities to accommodate the growth in our associates to meet business demands .other operating expenses were up $ 3.3 million from 2007 .we increased our spending $ 9.8 million , primarily for professional fees and information and other third-party services .reductions in travel and charitable contributions partially offset these increases .our non-operating investment activity resulted in a net loss of $ 52.3 million in 2008 as compared to a net gain of $ 80.4 million in 2007 .this change of $ 132.7 million is primarily attributable to losses recognized in 2008 on our investments in sponsored mutual funds , which resulted from declines in financial market values during the year. . | 2007 | 2008 | change
capital gain distributions received | $ 22.1 | $ 5.6 | $ -16.5 ( 16.5 )
other than temporary impairments recognized | -.3 ( .3 ) | -91.3 ( 91.3 ) | -91.0 ( 91.0 )
net gains ( losses ) realized on funddispositions | 5.5 | -4.5 ( 4.5 ) | -10.0 ( 10.0 )
net gain ( loss ) recognized on fund holdings | $ 27.3 | $ -90.2 ( 90.2 ) | $ -117.5 ( 117.5 ) we recognized other than temporary impairments of our investments in sponsored mutual funds because of declines in fair value below cost for an extended period .the significant declines in fair value below cost that occurred in 2008 were generally attributable to the adverse and ongoing market conditions discussed in the background section on page 18 of this report .see also the discussion on page 24 of critical accounting policies for other than temporary impairments of available-for-sale securities .in addition , income from money market and bond fund holdings was $ 19.3 million lower than in 2007 due to the significantly lower interest rate environment of 2008 .lower interest rates also led to substantial capital appreciation on our $ 40 million holding of u.s .treasury notes that we sold in december 2008 at a $ 2.6 million gain .management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .
Question: in 2007, considering the percentage increase and the amount equivalent to it of the total of occupancy and facility costs together with depreciation expense from that year to 2008, what can be concluded to have been, in 2007, that total?
Steps: divide(18, 12%)
Answer: 150.0
Question: and between these same two years, what percentage did the change in net gains ( losses ) realized on fund dispositions represent in relation to those net gains in 2007?
| convfinqa2795 |
entergy arkansas , inc .and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2010 net revenue | $ 1216.7
retail electric price | 31.0
ano decommissioning trust | 26.4
transmission revenue | 13.1
volume/weather | -15.9 ( 15.9 )
net wholesale revenue | -11.9 ( 11.9 )
capacity acquisition recovery | -10.3 ( 10.3 )
other | 3.2
2011 net revenue | $ 1252.3 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .
Question: what was the 2011 net revenue?
| 1252.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc .and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2010 net revenue | $ 1216.7
retail electric price | 31.0
ano decommissioning trust | 26.4
transmission revenue | 13.1
volume/weather | -15.9 ( 15.9 )
net wholesale revenue | -11.9 ( 11.9 )
capacity acquisition recovery | -10.3 ( 10.3 )
other | 3.2
2011 net revenue | $ 1252.3 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .
Question: what was the 2011 net revenue?
| convfinqa2796 |
entergy arkansas , inc .and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2010 net revenue | $ 1216.7
retail electric price | 31.0
ano decommissioning trust | 26.4
transmission revenue | 13.1
volume/weather | -15.9 ( 15.9 )
net wholesale revenue | -11.9 ( 11.9 )
capacity acquisition recovery | -10.3 ( 10.3 )
other | 3.2
2011 net revenue | $ 1252.3 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .
Question: what was the 2011 net revenue?
Steps: Ask for number 1252.3
Answer: 1252.3
Question: and for 2010?
| 1216.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc .and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2010 net revenue | $ 1216.7
retail electric price | 31.0
ano decommissioning trust | 26.4
transmission revenue | 13.1
volume/weather | -15.9 ( 15.9 )
net wholesale revenue | -11.9 ( 11.9 )
capacity acquisition recovery | -10.3 ( 10.3 )
other | 3.2
2011 net revenue | $ 1252.3 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .
Question: what was the 2011 net revenue?
Steps: Ask for number 1252.3
Answer: 1252.3
Question: and for 2010?
| convfinqa2797 |
entergy arkansas , inc .and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2010 net revenue | $ 1216.7
retail electric price | 31.0
ano decommissioning trust | 26.4
transmission revenue | 13.1
volume/weather | -15.9 ( 15.9 )
net wholesale revenue | -11.9 ( 11.9 )
capacity acquisition recovery | -10.3 ( 10.3 )
other | 3.2
2011 net revenue | $ 1252.3 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .
Question: what was the 2011 net revenue?
Steps: Ask for number 1252.3
Answer: 1252.3
Question: and for 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 1216.7
Answer: 1216.7
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
| 35.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc .and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2010 net revenue | $ 1216.7
retail electric price | 31.0
ano decommissioning trust | 26.4
transmission revenue | 13.1
volume/weather | -15.9 ( 15.9 )
net wholesale revenue | -11.9 ( 11.9 )
capacity acquisition recovery | -10.3 ( 10.3 )
other | 3.2
2011 net revenue | $ 1252.3 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .
Question: what was the 2011 net revenue?
Steps: Ask for number 1252.3
Answer: 1252.3
Question: and for 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 1216.7
Answer: 1216.7
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
| convfinqa2798 |
entergy arkansas , inc .and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2010 net revenue | $ 1216.7
retail electric price | 31.0
ano decommissioning trust | 26.4
transmission revenue | 13.1
volume/weather | -15.9 ( 15.9 )
net wholesale revenue | -11.9 ( 11.9 )
capacity acquisition recovery | -10.3 ( 10.3 )
other | 3.2
2011 net revenue | $ 1252.3 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .
Question: what was the 2011 net revenue?
Steps: Ask for number 1252.3
Answer: 1252.3
Question: and for 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 1216.7
Answer: 1216.7
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
Steps: subtract(1252.3, 1216.7)
Answer: 35.6
Question: and the percentage increase during this time?
| 0.02926 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy arkansas , inc .and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .amount ( in millions ) . | amount ( in millions )
2010 net revenue | $ 1216.7
retail electric price | 31.0
ano decommissioning trust | 26.4
transmission revenue | 13.1
volume/weather | -15.9 ( 15.9 )
net wholesale revenue | -11.9 ( 11.9 )
capacity acquisition recovery | -10.3 ( 10.3 )
other | 3.2
2011 net revenue | $ 1252.3 the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .
Question: what was the 2011 net revenue?
Steps: Ask for number 1252.3
Answer: 1252.3
Question: and for 2010?
Steps: Ask for number 1216.7
Answer: 1216.7
Question: so what was the difference between these two years?
Steps: subtract(1252.3, 1216.7)
Answer: 35.6
Question: and the percentage increase during this time?
| convfinqa2799 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.