text
stringlengths 0
44.4k
|
---|
k1and scale kwithk1< k < k 2. |
The CMB power asymmetries are produced because, |
as in Fig. 3, patches coming from trajectory AorBcan |
have different power spectra PA |
ζandPB |
ζ, which are de- |
termined by their local potentials. If the scale k1is near |
to the scale of the observational universe k0, then multi- |
stream inflation provides an explanation of the hemi- |
spherical asymmetry problem [10]. |
The features in the CMB (here feature denotes extra |
large perturbation at a single scale k1) are produced as |
a result of the e-folding number difference δNbetween |
two trajectories. From the δNformalism, the curvature |
perturbation in the uniform density slice at scale k1has |
an additional contribution |
δζk1∼δN≡ |NA−NB|. (2) |
These features in the CMB are potentially observable |
in the future precise CMB measurements. As the addi- |
tional fluctuation δζk1does not obey Gaussian distribu- |
tion, there will be non-Gaussianity at scale k1. |
Finally, there are also correlations between scale k1 |
and scale kwithk1< k < k 2. This is because the ad- |
ditional fluctuation δζk1and the asymmetry at scale k |
are both controlled by the isocurvature perturbation at |
scalek1. Thus the fluctuations at these two scales are |
correlated. As estimated in [4], this correlation results in |
a non-Gaussianity of order |
fNL∼δζk1 |
ζk1PA |
ζ−PB |
ζ |
PA |
ζP−1/2 |
ζ. (3) |
Non-symmetric bifurcation If the bifurcation is not |
symmetric at all, especially with large e-folding number |
differences (of order O(1) or greater) along different tra- |
jectories, the anisotropy in the CMB and the large scale |
structure becomes too large at scale k1. However, in |
this case, regions with smaller e-folding number will have |
exponentially small volume compared with regions with |
larger e-folding number. Thus the anisotropy can behave |
in the form of great voids. We shall address this issue in |
more detail in [11]. Trajectories with e-folding number3 |
difference from O(10−5) toO(1) in the observable stage |
of inflation are ruled out by the large scale isotropy of |
the observable universe. |
At the remainderof this section, we would like to make |
several additional comments for multi-stream inflation: |
The possibility that the bifurcated trajectories never re- |
combine. In this case, one needs to worry about the do- |
main walls, which do not become domain fence during |
inflation. These domain walls may eventually become |
domain fence after reheating anyway. Another prob- |
lem is that the e-folding numbers along different tra- |
jectories may differ too much, which produce too much |
anisotropies in the CMB and the large scale structure. |
However, similar to the discussion in the case of non- |
symmetric bifurcation, in this case, the observable effect |
could become great voids due to a large e-folding number |
difference. The case without recombination of trajectory |
also has applications in eternal inflation, as we shall dis- |
cuss in the next section. |
Probabilities for different trajectories . In [4], we con- |
sidered the simple example that during the bifurcation, |
the inflaton will run into trajectories AandBwith equal |
probabilities. Actually, this assumption does not need to |
be satisfied for more general cases. The probability to |
run into different trajectories can be of the same order |
of magnitude, or different exponentially. In the latter |
case, there is a potential barrier in front of one trajec- |
tory, which can be leaped over by a large fluctuation of |
theisocurvaturefield. Alargefluctuationoftheisocurva- |
ture field is exponentially rare, resulting in exponentially |
different probabilities for different trajectories. The bi- |
furcation of this kind is typically non-symmetric. |
Bifurcation point itself does not result in eternal infla- |
tion. As is well known, in single field inflation, if the |
inflaton releases at a local maxima on a “top of the hill”, |
a stage of eternal inflation is usually obtained. However, |
at the bifurcation point, it is not the case. Because al- |
though the χdirection releases at a local maxima, the ϕ |
direction keeps on rolling at the same time. The infla- |
tiondirectionisacombinationofthesetwodirections. So |
multi-stream inflation can coexist with eternal inflation, |
but itself is not necessarily eternal. |
III. ETERNAL BIFURCATIONS |
In multi-stream inflation, the bifurcation effect may ei- |
ther take place at an eternal stage of inflation. In this |
case, it provides interesting ingredients to eternal infla- |
tion. These ingredients include alternative mechanism to |
producedifferentbubble universesandlocalterminations |
for eternal inflation, as we shall discuss separately. |
Multi-stream bubble universes . The most discussed |
mechanisms to produce bubble universes are tunneling |
processes, such as Coleman de Luccia instantons [12] and |
Hawking Moss instantons [13]. In these processes, the |
tunneling events, which are usually exponentially sup- |
pressed, create new bubble universes, while most parts |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.