text
stringlengths 0
44.4k
|
---|
Thestringtheorylandscapealsoprovidesaplayground |
for eternal inflation. Eternal inflation is an very early |
stage of inflation, during which the universe reproduces |
itself, so that inflation becomes eternal to the future. |
Eternal inflation, if indeed happened (for counter ar- |
guments see, for example [9]), can populate the string |
theory landscape, providing an explanation for the cos- |
mological constant problem in our bubble universe by |
anthropic arguments. |
In this Letter, we shall focus on the multi-stream infla- |
tion scenario. Multi-stream inflation is proposed in [4]. |
And in [5], it is pointed out that the bifurcations can |
lead to multiverse. Multi-stream inflation assumes that |
during inflation there exist bifurcation(s) in the inflation |
trajectory. For example, the bifurcations take place nat- |
urally in a random potential, as illustrated in Fig. 1. We |
briefly review multi-stream inflation in Section II. The |
details of some contents in Section II can be found in |
[4]. We discuss some new implications of multi-stream |
inflation for the inflationary multiverse in Section III. |
∗wangyi@hep.physics.mcgill.ca |
FIG. 1. In this figure, we use a tilted random potential to |
mimic a inflationary potential in the string theory landscap e. |
One can expect that in such a random potential, bifurcation |
effects happens generically, as illustrated in the trajecto ries |
in the figure. |
FIG. 2. One sample bifurcation in multi-stream inflation. |
The inflation trajectory bifurcates into AandBwhen the |
comoving scale k1exits the horizon, and recombines when |
the comoving scale k2exits the horizon. |
II. OBSERVABLE BIFURCATIONS |
In this section, we discuss the possibility that the bi- |
furcation of multi-stream inflation happens during the |
observable stage of inflation. We review the production |
of non-Gaussianities, features and asymmetries [4] in the2 |
FIG. 3. In multi-stream inflation, the universe breaks up |
into patches with comoving scale k1. Each patch experienced |
inflation either along trajectories AorB. These different |
patches can be responsible for the asymmetries in the CMB. |
CMB, and investigate some other possible observational |
effects. |
To be explicit, we focus on one single bifurcation, as |
illustrated in Fig. 2. We denote the initial (before bifur- |
cation) inflationary direction by ϕ, and the initial isocur- |
vature direction by χ. For simplicity, we let χ= 0 before |
bifurcation. When comoving wave number k1exits the |
horizon, the inflation trajectory bifurcates into Aand |
B. When comoving wave number k2exits the horizon, |
the trajectories recombines into a single trajectory. The |
universe breaks into of order k1/k0patches (where k0de- |
notes the comoving scale of the current observable uni- |
verse), each patch experienced inflation either along tra- |
jectories AorB. The choice of the trajectories is made |
by the isocurvature perturbation δχat scale k1. This |
picture is illustrated in Fig. 3. |
We shall classify the bifurcation into three cases: |
Symmetric bifurcation . If the bifurcation is symmetric, |
in other words, V(ϕ,χ) =V(ϕ,−χ), then there are two |
potentially observable effects, namely, quasi-single field |
inflation, and a effect from a domain-wall-like objects, |
which we call domain fences. |
As discussed in [4], the discussion of the bifurcation |
effect becomes simpler when the isocurvature direction |
has mass of order the Hubble parameter. In this case, |
except for the bifurcation and recombination points, tra- |
jectoryAand trajectory Bexperience quasi-single field |
inflation respectively. As there are turnings of these tra- |
jectories, the analysis in [6] can be applied here. The |
perturbations, especially non-Gaussianities in the isocur- |
vature directions are projected onto the curvature direc- |
tion, resultingin a correctionto the powerspectrum, and |
potentially large non-Gaussianities. As shown in [6], the |
amount of non-Gaussianity is of order |
fNL∼P−1/2 |
ζ/parenleftbigg1 |
H∂3V |
∂χ3/parenrightbigg/parenleftBigg˙θ |
H/parenrightBigg3 |
, (1) |
whereθdenotes the angle between the true inflation di- |
rection and the ϕdirection. |
As shown in Fig. 3, the universe is broken into patches |
during multi-stream inflation. There arewall-likebound- |
aries between these patches. During inflation, theseboundaries are initially domain walls. However, after |
the recombination of the trajectories, the tensions of |
these domain walls vanish. We call these objects domain |
fences. As is well known, domain wall causes disasters |
in cosmology because of its tension. However, without |
tension, domain fence does not necessarily cause such |
disasters. It is interesting to investigate whether there |
are observational sequences of these domain fences. |
Nearly symmetric bifurcation If the bifurcation is |
nearly symmetric, in other words, V(ϕ,χ)≃V(ϕ,−χ), |
but not equal exactly, which can be achieved by a spon- |
taneous breaking and restoring of an approximate sym- |
metry, then besides the quasi-single field effect and the |
domain fence effect, there will be four more potentially |
observable effects in multi-stream inflation, namely, the |
features and asymmetries in CMB, non-Gaussianity at |
scalek1and squeezed non-Gaussianity correlating scale |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.