text
stringlengths
1
39.9k
label
stringlengths
4
23
dataType
stringclasses
2 values
communityName
stringlengths
4
23
datetime
stringdate
2014-06-06 00:00:00
2025-05-21 00:00:00
username_encoded
stringlengths
136
160
url_encoded
stringlengths
220
528
Have you considered ways to use sunlight to your advantage? End use electrical heating is actually very emissions intensive. I would look at nat gas conversion with the slow addition of renewable sources over time.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-02-12
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBTGVuYUJ5bHlUeFlsUmFVNzEzT25VWFR1QldTWDJMamw0VmxtM1dNbDZGNHZfMGp6VHVJM2w0UG1hUWJvOHEtcUFWM3dLS3JfTmhZRmYyUkRyMmxCVUxwNkx4Y3FhRHdaSkJRSEN3Ym9FT0U9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCUUdJdC1CbXBzQzB1ZTBmUGtIWXNubU1Tcm5UdmUyYXlxNHVSZDVobUlia0VFek1hb1JoXzdqanBmdERKMnBqTUNXN2dPYkdYU1NqemVuTjNLeW9xbDBfRU5YaHI4bXp3ZGRrQ29JVHU3enNHVzJMbFRMTGt3MDlJRm1Sd2NIbWVVdXZfeWZ2bVNVVm5ZUS1VcnJPZW9TeWEtV01sS3lTUUZWRVJCZnZUbzM0bVhQWHJJR05zaGYxcWlYZkdaVFVSbkJSMjM5MTFNNkZnSlRPSHU4eEVLUT09
The company from which I purchase my electric is hydro and wind based, and solar is not really viable in the location.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-02-12
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBRjRGOWUyVDY0SDZHcE5WM2gwSXFyLU83VXpBbVc2X0FzZlFzUXNoelJaLTFlOEtudS10YkZsVGlpa0kzdXlWLV9YcmVLWENWVTNTNk5GUXF3Nm1CZzlfcExDdXRjMjVNbXVJbXRTWGxHRGs9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCSjI2U0FKTGc1Q2c5aDFJM0ZuUjIwcmVZNzcwRlJ1N2NPS2VBMWtSQ0Y0Vy1EMzFHRGxsd3VKaTlDWno4VlJpZzZRQng2ZWstZjUwRG1oSElmbkJqZTlOLXVEUWpKQTk3MGJ4VXUyV196N0RLMUh0SnN1dXhSOE5aUHZkd1EwMjdWdl9CbVczc3pEVVZxM2dUYmg1OURsVFlyNVZpTXl0NHE2TnBidXFZR1hMR1FDTFpIQXhTNjQtODJYaDJzZG0zMWFKSERwQ0pGbkc5QTQzazJnajNmZz09
Could geothermal work?
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-02-12
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBeC0zNzFvSy1BS3I5aWMxX3E2UUJDT0xDN2xRX0lhRU5nQ0g4VzNzeHVnU1g2LWljbENRTklldUFJZEhieVlaSVphYk1yekh0VGVRbk1wNE04SDRhdEE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCNTJ3X2wxandyN0dWdWR1Ni14aERGSzZfUlhNTEd4bDk5Y00wNjZNQW9hd3BzdVhST1ZEazZzZFduUmxsaXFmdkY1bDBZNjRyQVd4cWh0VGdZQkgtRlJyZ3Y0d24tRUtIY2w4NGgwdEI4V0RyTVdCdGItVFNBakRFbjd4WWhPSTNuWDdna1lFQVktbFA0N3ZsVGJMa19kcWUzalRGdnVnUFQySE5uZDdMendUT2FGMkZxbTBlOWgwZ0pZQnBRSmx0UDdjYncyNlVzbG5JcENjX2tUa3lUQT09
Happy cake day! I don’t think geothermal will work or can be done here, but I’ll research it. It sounds like a bigger and more expensive project. I really am looking for advice about switching to electric.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-02-12
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBejE1SjJISWZ1dUNyMTRVMlc0RXFCenBra2wxTm5fV2hyTzZOV1RoT2RwQmhia20yTDNNeUkwVDlUSFY3aFlKZ1ZVMGdHLU9lbkxwamJSbFE3MUVnZGxGOEZVQzFMR0ZkdGNNQ3pzeUZaQzA9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCNWpFSWZZMGpkRHJsZ1hzZXhFWkE3bk52eS0yNXJJVEdlRnljWllfNm5tZl93cjZrZGs2bDQyY19ZbTd3QXI3VVR3UFhFWkxfek5CNE9pRVhkTDlXYnBaUHFIamFMRkFwU1Atd0JzdmQxVzF4aTJNTW14aTQ5cjdIUlRSeWI5VHBBZms3enE3WFJ4Nk1tYWxpcFk0eW8wLWRMVmVBbnN3cFlVUDhLZEFNRFFVQjljSDl1SXBQaWlnRFpWbHpSa1lfNHRmdVJfeVdhOEdsNjdMZ05xMDREZz09
How is the house unconventional? What did the companies tell you?
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-02-12
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBR253WWhCS0dsY2NhMzJkY0htY1VmLTE4M0l6cVNjd3lTTFZFSmJVU2dyUUFFbE1fY09Fb3I1dHVYUElfb0N6SnMxRUhpbkR1QWNLdHBSVFg0Y0cxdmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCdWlDTzFYbnJzUkF5TjRQT3ZDTHNLVFM4VGtWNzF3dURFcEZKa1UxT0w2WUR6N0dGcjB2Ym9IWXplbDdGVDVyVEVFR3BIYjhnRFRucHh6X3ozUHFXWUhuaTgwLTFjNTBJT0xJNkp5bFZGQlRXOUpJTktKT3NUYWdOUTBRRzdyMEZnRGN3M01yTWFQVDhaWldVVVhuR0NTZkdxQjk4VDN4a3dUVERUVVY3ZnFoZ2t6eU5vUTRuSERPc1M3NHk2S1hhX05pNjVhOGhxdHp4LXpHeVEwM3pBZz09
Solid construction. Zero available space for ducting. They said, “We can’t help you, sorry.”
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-02-12
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBNlhDN2JORVY0elgzXy13SWhUakRGeTRCMzdFV1JRYzZqSEEydDZXV241Rm43RncwV2tjV1g3cmZUcU9SenpjQzZnU2ZuUzR3ZnFDNjFndDNKYmdEbmZ1MmRfV1VxX0VuNXV3TC1FMDBTS2c9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCejZQMFZDNi1pU3BIODQ5ODh6MVlYTElRS2ZzUlVKT1QzNUxJUXZOZDlQLWlUbzd3VzFyRVlGdjZpZ05odTUwTFl1ME9FY0tENW9UamNUUl9TSjVhcnIyUnlzeFdJZElJZHQzQU16ZTFQdTdEaXlqMTVYNV96MHdRNG84X2s0MFlCazdSWEJibjNsOEF6RnRZb3ZRdmd3RVFBelBKaVRnOTYwSUpvTmt2bEZadGo3QzF3Y3NndDR5dzFwNVR5SWFScXF5VWV0UUN0bmQyMVhsWGFjblAzQT09
Climate Change deniers will do anything they can to clutch on to their precious oil. Winters will get worse, summers will get worse, hurricane & tornado season will get worse. It's real. Denying reality doesn't change it. 1st hand experience is coming to a town near you.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-02-16
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBUGhRLWxmTzdZVHhjaU81YWRxb2VFVlJhRjhDTlJsUk1CcTk1dDRZRk01ZndXa1RnNTZuVUpnamkyZmZncEljUmpwZENhUmtfdXVLV0FXX2d5ejhnSFE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCUEp6TjAzRGlwbXJHTWU0Y3d6Qk8wVWM2UXdzaEk0bVI1ZHRyVFJHbF9XN2tMQ1pjWF93cGMyMjlTZzFjZXg2ejhaN2NUTl95M1YzSHlwSDEwM3lRMDVOTlhGR09MSkotWUhJV3U2WXp1RDk3S1I3WTFHUGtqM0NadnNkZGhBanAtRmNsMEhmRElIYUc0U0NyYlc1TU5pVWJPWTdoU0ZPbUdfcFRMYnoyb1Q5WlRERzBOd3dMWXYyOXBfWlRubnlGUmhpRkQ4ekZnaWRIci01ZHF5dEY0Zz09
i bought in
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-02-17
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBZENRZ2w1dGlEaTVFZHI1S19wZ0VPaG9nOVlQdGdraVNqR2UzbUVfeXhNR0I2WE1IbXk1UUJiNGRZUTRnRjZsWE02bFQ4QzZCV0s1ZTNxOV96S1dJY1E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCcWlqZ0IyWVJHSlRqc2tsRVNuVU1ndEtLZ2Q0NzFSQlozbWNsbG1JY0xiRWpCS0RUUER1WERnOEJrMjNtYmxlb0Q1Mi1FV19rcmUzVVp6WWxxdkdodEQtTEM0Y2RqUTR1Xzd6N2VKVHhHU3Q2Mm1wTTlEQ3hmRlhiNUwyTjVQRTE2SWRzdVZDVW1xMXBVZUNoLVd6bGM5SlJRRDlfaHRYZVdzd3FJWGplRnRZVjk3cS1DUmI1ZGNFY2pOVUIxSHJUOEwtYmhSZ21TMmx3cHRnb2R1bzdrQT09
### That was from a recent SA article. Check out Capstone as the next Bloom Energy/Fuel Cell energy type play. Low float of 11.1 million shares and a full blown clean green hydrogen fuel cell provider like Bloom and Fuel Cell. This is very oversold and will be a multio bagger with an earnest run like the others ### ### Summary * The company reported strong preliminary Q3 numbers with revenues easily surpassing analyst consensus estimates. * A division of Goldman Sachs recently injected another $20 million in liquidity at a lowered interest rate to further grow the company's rental business. * Management has been trying to rebrand the company as an emerging "Energy-as-a-Service" provider with considerable exposure to the thriving hydrogen space. * Despite the recent rally, valuation remains at a tiny fraction of stationary fuel cell power plant providers like Bloom Energy and FuelCell Energy. * Expect the rally to have more legs as the company appears to be on the verge of becoming another "story stock" for the insatiable ESG crowd. Get long with a short-term price target of $20.
r/cleanenergy
post
r/CleanEnergy
2021-02-19
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBNlJFN2VsQXIyMDZfVkJJMXhnenFLM0tvaGZocE0wZmVxX3pQMUs3SDFOY3BUNzk4TlVieVdZU05UWnZUTXlrN1hZWkpPYVJzY25sUHRHMnEtazBvaEFLMWFDZUNpbjYwVm5JMm80RmFvblU9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCb3h2bHJkc2RkWlAzRXhBaTl5VUhlTGFmVWhtZzZ2eEVfcFdIcVgyVmpNTXotYjd5Q3RUQmlBeG5aeVdjc0Nybm5HRFRLZFc2SUJxaFFSS1F4ZVFHVno0aV9qU0UxUXg5WDYtX3RtQ01MbHdWUTZKV2VoWE5pQkJjbWV5akdfUzBCaFFtR09xakVsQzBGR1poVTRtVnFHSzhNYU1KaVdyWmJVTWhmMWpJWTFqVlhxWDdBelBVR1VIazhGSjV5X3JN
Yeah I agree, I had a great run with FCEL and I think CPST could follow suite, especially with good news about their 100% hydrogen development progress. I bought around $7 and have been adding more on this pullback
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-02-19
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBc2lQVHowcmtYLWhHNHlWNzhLQzU5bm1MbmVCUDZWTHV5OTYyOEg2WHFHeEVkeF8zbDNrY2FUMG1HWFhaOGlnbHQyUUQ1VGFpUTB5SFdUSHkzOVVTT1NvQkFCdjBXWDVCbjZUOFdKczlmYlU9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCdUpGYUF0SjlDbTBIbkZ5VFVBM2lXZ01tTUhXQm12dnc1ZWtweTZsWWxoTFhCYmlZQ2xWYl9KQ1kzVTRhVlRPTWNqRFZYYlhYcTQtSDZzREtkUnhFbEFHbE5OcXhCV2FoSVJLYmhReVd2cDRId0tBUHRvU1FsQmRtM1dITWVIUzNFM09uSF9SUk1CcXlhZ3cweUk0TkJPWVFCTXQ1UHZhekNUNTRKVTgybjgzaE10bnA1MUtGN2drcVFUY3g0TEFa
Take a look at the career pathways of many of the key people working in the field. Usually they studied a related field, worked in a different but still related field, and they kind of merged. So my suggestion would be to work in something related that you're interested in, rack up experience. Look at the career paths of people whose job you would like to get. I guarantee it won't be linear progression to get there, so you can't replicate their careers exactly but you can look for common themes. A background in machine learning + some kind of humanities is a decent starting template. Here are some. Take a look through the backgrounds of some of these folks, for example. See what resonates. https://3ainstitute.org/people
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-02-23
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBMm5Wa2tEUnJhQUlnYkhRVlp1TXItUFFucFNnUm9vSTA1YXh0d1ZucnppbTFsRkNKbTc4bzVnRjdRT1BSWWMycHpPM3djNm1BZVdwMTRzbW8xUW1UWkE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCME45ZjFCWW42UldtR0ZWQWRycG1JTnJ2ZnBKNFk3MnJUUElTS2lsam1aRmt0bWlXX2pBVkxVaUVPTkJTTkFHVTNtRUhrOVFfd1dEUzdhN3puaVdZQXBnNVczeUJDNVdCd0hMZkcyQk02dEdmVDhXZUpReVdDNDY0bVBSbmZ0MEE5Sk9ISS1pTmtpNGlEQTNiZG1rQmRMNFlqR1BzenAwR3Jqb01pUmJNZUdQNVI3NE9rRHY4TllQM2NBVk9ObVJu
Having looked at 3AI, it would appear that the backgrounds between experience and education are extremely diverse among all the members. This is a pretty common theme I see in a lot of AI ethicists and ethics orgs, outside of big companies like Google where I am more likely find things like phds in computer science or electrical engineering.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-02-23
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBamxkeEFBaVIzOFlhbk4ycXk1YWltSVpFeGk0VVpzUDFfSXhLX2diclZ4Sm1VZmJIWnc2ci1EV0RmbTRtQU1YU2NUQUFSZUpDTElhaGZDZVVqNDlVbWc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCdzQzZ3FHekg3Zl9GM1BOVU5zN1FPa0tBSkoyT01qZUd0NGNZNzNka0tyWXBSV2F0WWFza1ppMjYwZ2U3a094TlprUUdUaTg2clhhU3p1aUtkcjBUdnRTTnhNUk5LSXlCRU5kVGZSR1ZtS1I2eXVtRXNvYUdxcGtRZV8zRmpDRzdYZ2hBQkU3Uld2dDRhYklwMy01Qk1EU1NTdFRxeUg1SFlhbVJ0VzlwLUtpOHhBNGdDdTc0Uk5RcEIzdFFyUVlF
i get Pop Mechanics.. i saw this article.. ok write-up, unfortunately, in this part of colorado, the IREA co-op does not do any grid tie options; SO-- most systems for my clients i set up independent of the grid.. then either grid is generator/back-up, or a supplemental for higher amp draw motors, and surge electronics.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-02-26
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBdWJEUzBKV1huREFnSlpwVDRHU0owMzd2QWVWLVdTR014RU1zLXhRLUhkbUQ3cS0yNldyWUs5OFBpRmo5UFpQazdpWHR4MzNseVY1UmU2UlJKVmhtTVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCWnFPQ2tiUHlqZXVLcFMwV0k2RmtDYl9BZW11S1ltdjZuTWZFTWpueWlxbmZyODQ5NUFWTWZVUmpsUU9xLS1rZnF0bnBfeE91QW4zUUZMNTlfcW9vcmF4WWRnbnFXTXVKUlp4cXkybVdHaEJLd2loRkNIWHM4NzFOX0N3UHI4ZzBIVnJ5ZFhfOGZUTE1TX1ZtNGZoUnJIc2JZcjlZWUdaY1dsazFlUmZ5X0dPcWtUUDROUkQya2kxSUtOS1d4cUw4ZFFGcUZ4Vnh2TkJNN3EzVFpHNU5OUT09
"journalism" Non comparison fallacies and little science to back up their claims of the dangers.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-02-28
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBZm5pOHZRYWhmMXduWHZFVUlCWVJZZ1F6SzhCSlFuTjRheG1JYzRuNnBOUzdvaXI1eVJOTFJ2TGpHNTNYVVZIUmkwa2psQktrc3c5Y181YnhDZUNSd0E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCZWdRQkRjUThOUlV6MFRqRjlSSFBfZUIxRm9LN3hEa0l3eG1RaU1uRTNvY1Q0R2ZwUURidDJFV0xuYjJTNzc1SXRsYUFZbTQybU1DN3Rsd2NCMzFPenYyWlczNkt2R1ZOenJFdHppdmlmc1lPRWllcktlYUFpSG5VTUJmdFU4TnU1NFl0VHZTc2VyTzd1UjlGTDRoR00tRGY5WS1WR3FRWE9BZW44bVhSN1V1bC02anc4MkQ5cldRUTc0OWk1YWN3ZkNaVlVaWk1GdmQ5dmkwcnZEeGl2dz09
Nuclear power is a very long term investment. Not only does any individual site require a HUGE input in energy and material, that site will be brownfield/contaminated for ever, practically speaking. The additional resources required, mainly storage sites for spent fuel, are also forever commitments. This means that historically a lot of investment has been made and those investors want the promised long term returns. ​ Now comes the modern age. Turns out these things are world-scale deadly when things go wrong. As much as efforts have been made to suppress reporting of the facts, nuclear contamination is the proverbial 'horse already bolted'. At the same time those investors aren't just going to roll over and give up, they want their returns. So how do we square off those pressures? 1: the industry must clean up, completely and permanently. Too many accidents are avoidable and come from negligence and/or cost cutting 2: enough is enough. If they are to operate, the existing sites must be enough. Any new installations or upgrades must be at these sites 3: divestment. investors must be weaned off their nuclear ambitions. Transferring these sites to other operating models, using buybacks/buyouts or simply offering one-shot relief may be the only way to remove the pressure 4: research. There are many potential nuclear futures which are heavily outweighed by the pressures to persist in the 'what works' models. We need to set the sunset date on the older reactors and enforce this, along with the points above
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-02-28
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBWXNTRzNtREF3NFNiVXFVdDNrOU9GelBrdjZUVTkxQk92UVdaVEF1dWdTLUFVU3NwNmx3QVdMMVB5YlRheEw4STBxS092aE9JZF8yTGNEZ3V3WE15T3c9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCbEQtV05MSnRxcEQ0UlNTZi15a1ZNRklRbzdmRl9UOE55RkY5cW5nbVdjYlVoeTVzNExaNFNhLTlLLUVFMC1nOURpQmQ4anh4UUlFQlk2T0RzX3NGQVZxclJaTm8xOFlfcGxiYTJodXNFZ2hrbHUxV3ZHczAxWXgySl9BcVJRLUg0NWhVSHZqbGFmMDEyVGh5THVEakFnWjBHZk12Mmp4Vmc3ZUs4czU0OTJjNnA0c2RhNHRVVU5hZWxEbGlmOTZnNVk3WVptRE92YUoyOUhQRkN2SkpGUT09
It's not possible. During storms, windmills freeze up, and solar panels stop working. For this to happen, we would have to cover the earths surface with windmills and solar panels. There is not enough money, and mined materials available for this to happen that fast.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-05
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBTlpOMC1laEZTMGhLM2FTNkJwNG5XZDBpVVg2dEV2eVR1NW9seFYxQzgwbm5obmhpd2JzdzMwcmRrTklLU3hJbC14VFNCVEpEYjRMRG5FSTBoV2RDWFE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCQXc0NUFSTWhJVlhaNktrblFBdm9GRVFIU3R1aXNsLWRkSG5vNy1vajdVUTFBaW52akpHMG5JeVhzb3I2OTJZRmptVVRUU2lvYUJ1SDRJMUtZaFZNUjZpanlZdmZCNHBJT1JNTHM2TnFMTlhoc21sN1pkMG1iVWpsRUgxbVJsWHZJeWh5RnNVRVA4MkJibVVaOXN5NEQ0dnNZNTRRSVZBWmhadGR5OFB6UTBqMjZvQnI0dnh6S2xRanhLeXJsT1NidElhQXdxZmhsWHJveXh0S3dnSENVQT09
I agree, this does not seem possible.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-05
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBOVpKSzBSbllhM0hpYTE5cVI1bmZod0htM2VHSEtyVEtqa0djRXNyQlYtaTJPVUJKSmRCcTZYR2wwb19OWVIyS0JTemMtV2dUMFd4THRZSVRDQV9MTVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCbXVqVkd4Q19qR3NqSU1rQVNiQnRyLXlDazB6S29ZU3dITC1OQ3FmcUw5V0tEbFVXZU1DR2NnZEdVOW1vSmZ3em1QMUx1UU54aUxPbWpLcVlDUDUwb3BCNmVBUUU2Z0RCSXo0c21RNGlyXzNWSG43QmxieHhDcTFwUGxoZFJnVUJMMGxEeV9GMkJ0ektLTGt4VGE4Vk5ISXJvbnRpek1WbVZLTC0wOWU5c0stcHgtX0Yxczh5NXoyS0pseF9ibUx2dEp5S1BCVnpRT2tlNGxHVVJvNWYzdz09
Fukishima, Chernobyl, and Long Island cannot be used against nuclear power; all plants were outdated, their equipment broken, a modern plant is extremely safe
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-05
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBQnVmRVJUZ1pPT0Eta2ZxS05OcENhbU0xU1dRNExZaGNIdGN4ZHFmUDZYUXBLLXc2TUJrc01jN3QxRWdSQUFOY2JzLXE4NXJNNGczNVJaN25jY3p3TnpXNjgzMy1IM0FxTk41R1kwSmVQT1k9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCdndqc1ZjR3BibEJCdTNuUUxjY1JxMUhUc1o2ald6RUZTdlBtb1lJMlIyZFJBVEd1MkU2QldxdTVPVWxSSkloU3lZOWlQcTQtX3o2NFozQ2dYcHV3VVhQZ3R5RTJRVlQ1UnhqRG1Wc1RUY1JrWlRhcFN0dVZUUlZXbFJDTnVsRWQtVUE0aXlBZGE0cm5heHBCTWE1cmFiZ3VIbTI1OEtQVGFCakpRTkoyZzRoZEV0YnJrUXY3RE9mVThlVC1xOVRoMGliT3UtN05zOUVvMFBTdG93WkFIZz09
2050 is too late
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-05
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBS2E4bkhtZE02bHdNQ1dmOUMwVnFDVnNOQ2tZNFdTdmJSd2Rpdjg4UHRPOW5BeXlqR2NabmZ6MjJhUE9nd3ZJWGhQRDlmandnYlp1Zmc0SURZV3BUeVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCUEJkekhsazUzbUkybnNGRV95Tm5SMWFfWXJhQ012VGpyTnZpbHZfN2RqZWtFTFhVYXNIanR3Z3MtZGNUY0R6cmpZV0xnX2N5OWI3UlBydGw2UWVqQ09CYjhYU1hEM0otUlk3RmVQSUZhbmlKMllsYk1xQjctYUJXaGNmaDl3b3FKUzBWdkFsRU9aWnF6SXVGSmh2QWZDRU5ydGJjRHU5bFQ2OFRJb1Nrd2Nlalo4Tkh0cUtQV044OHhySkJ1VXhWNEkyaHNyXzg0NzZZVlJpTG1JUkJDUT09
Actually think the bigger news here is 50% electric by 2025. 50% in 5 years is faster than the next 50% over 15 years. It makes sense though, because that gives them time to figure out the more difficult ones like long distance semis.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBZEhLVEpsZWY3TkRoODZud2RRZWVOVjQyWWNWT0luTVVHX0ZSLXFVTGpNeHg0Q21VYVZ2N1YyMUdZV1JXTkszbkJBTVFFV3JkZjF0Ym55Sk9CX3FaOWc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCdGRJNzRSdU52VG43V002MFhxOFdtSFMwLWhlVnN5emtqaURmRzgzMUNFYUFGaW40RDlxUFFjN19ObVdfZGtaRURFZGZOcHlVT0JWVTV5X1pscW1JZ1pUc0lGRmVlY0o5RGN2ZmdYOVU4SGJ4QW1feEFhRjhHN1hxOFRkYnd4RFc4R0NybW9TNmlnd0JGSHpab0hzbVcxdld6LVNlREozTGlhOVRYNUxCZm5VOHFsaXpYTFBPdXY0dnZmLTBSaWhObUdaZmtkRzF4NVBoWGVpSXVrTjR6UT09
👩🏽‍💼This secret cost tech workers their jobs 👩🏻‍🔬 This secret cost tech researchers their reputation 🌑 See the dark secrets of #AiEthics Watch https://youtu.be/Db5EHKJYhOI 👀
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-03-09
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBWEsyY1lROXF3MnBieDlRLUl0bU9TYm5KMXU4YmpZSHA4UjJ6ZjhkLTVVd1ZSMV9maTAwZHU4WU1jMDB0MGtGNnpFTzRUU0xsbGQ0WndPNWZkQmhpSHc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCQlRBWlMzNDRLakYxZWVub1Q0YWs5Y09nVGtVSmVmclFLR2YyTmo4ZWx4cXNrNDh2RHQ1N3FUNVFlSC03X1hnaWNVdFR4LXNzZVFHN3R0Mjd4bkp3alNfbnJuS0V5UWxyclNULUllRHVlMEFpTF9SODNrT2JUZzFDcFV5Nzg4Y0tCMGg4eDc3enN3ME4wRGxfakdYdVlrd0lEVkF4eEJsUWhUMU1Ma2JVN0RuQ0xaUGozdWFvSGFjOEl0T19xbUdY
Seems like a gas & oil lobbying article. Literally wants to "slow the transition to clean energy" and keep "low prices for oil". Same outlet also releases stories that seem to be against Paris climate agreement. Just masquerades as something else.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-10
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBaU9KNDl2dmRwRm1HaXJocHVMS3BZeUhvNUowdlVZU1RPTDd6MV83bDRONHAzM0pLTm1FRE8tSlczZExwc3FJaHA1elBFUWNZMURidWVuZlNjM3d5VkE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCVmxySnlwcTVfakJGb3dLQ3J5Q0V1TERLMGY0LTEyRmdUVlFDQk9MTi1oSFZNYzlhV3JUY0dqT0FpLURRdnNJNndTNnFTUHdVbmlpUm16RWRvOUhQNTNyelZ4LWJLNk83b3p5SlRsRmE4ZHRhSU1TNHVPd2pIY01XR0NLZFRjYUF0endhUXktTVNkcUotSXlTeFlHbEVzYjhSVWZCVUdlVmxJbl9udjBNdzlJZ1ZDQjV4VWNBNlEtclF3TElFYjkzN2FRU3R3OWRjUHlnbU10Yk1pd2U5UT09
Except it's not. It is hooked up to the [NY-IS](https://www.electricitymap.org/zone/US-NY-NYIS) grid.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-11
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBdGtpaEZLNmFwUWhkelMxX0JBT3dncnZ6TWE5Smp0VndnTTQ1WHpGX3pBaEhVaVdRNTJMSnA5WWZJWGl5Yk00Yi1PT0E2ZHhDb0V0eGdpcEJVdENOS1E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCZXNfNFJvVlJLSVViNFJGNHhaY0dlUkhSVlNZYUNMOFBBX3ZiRXg2X3RRNzctUlZlcHpsUk9NYUtURHFPWURKWjhRSmZpTnVZdkNmTEcxbVJqbWRfTC1ZVFF1aklFNnJTcHlfVWxuRTcwTElfQWlkNkpPVDlNd1hHMmY0c1R5UkhJa3F6RDJtZk40T2pfYzFyRnpVaGdxd0ZBX3pteng0NFE1cnJZN0dXb1kxUEkyVzdtOHlIQVlhc3hhYXRpZjE5cGdlektSNzNaRlR3NzlaVWtONEZRUT09
👑 “concentrated power is masquerading as technology innovation” -Meredith Whittaker 📰 Zuckerberg owns 60% of voting shares in FB and can turn off your news 🔦 Sergey Brin and Larry Page own 51% of Alphabet ✍️ Change needs the approval of the top 0.1% Watch https://youtu.be/rMt4hf34Yso 👀
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-03-12
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBX1RRVTJUOUVDUFg4NGVoYVl0M0Y2MVpiVVdLWjNMZEx4eUVkZW1jTVVvU3NWU0JCTWlERlhIZGpXV3BnNVFmOHdHRHpOcHdHSjM1NFFCSGpVM3o1MVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCMGFPcFFka2NqdURxUk1WODJ0WTBrMTduQ0I2M1BfMmhyZUpXS053UER0TnRva2ZqOGJsbmtGOThyekFTUW5wUUN6YTNuZG1raUc4UHpZbEg3QkRFM1ZlTnNWUi1QekVJRWRxeWRfYkVNdEE0WHpQNHJoUU9nNGpjN1N4cm9jbnprTk8zamxFLUxGM0ozSzRXWDV1Wll6akd0MXItcWptaFREYmFrRV9MZ3pOZzNSa19fdnk0VmdIMUFZZTdvWEQz
I interpreted his robot series as showing that despite our best efforts, humans will never fail to fuck something up. The Three Laws, while always followed, rarely end up doing anything other than hurting someone. That’s the point I thought he was making (clearly at that), and it floors me how many modern robotics firms are holding up the Three Laws as an example to follow, when in my opinion he intended them instead as a warning.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-03-14
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBZnBrRVQ4WGZnZ1lEQTItTWxnSEZrNmZqWGZFbmpjX1ktbkNCYkI1cmNCS3VvRE03TFJNNzdIREdkVUdFMGVQdU5lUE8zbzJzQVZ1aGJKZnF6MTZIaFE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCV3U4cE1CbS1CWTBxZHNCTDNSWVZ2OTNBNFNBTENpaU1wYWlDTWlMOWNzLWVpVnZjbm55ZUh1T09FemJfSDQ3b0prQkZRQWppcUdQV2o1bG1jbjFncng1NXZEOVZDOV83OHVabzhuQWRXQ0RpQi1WZzNDMmZKU1dZaDdxM1Awb1E1NWItZ2hDajdRaV83czlWSXdkZ3RtY1Z5YUE2cl8wcUxkNGp3MG1iaGVaLWw2SThFdkVyMHZnQkd5X240SHFR
According to a blog post in Scientific American, the stories of Asimov are “arguably a deconstruction of the laws”. And even an improved ruleset will result into the problem, that robots can do what they like. The logical consequence is to treat robot rules ironically. It is a failed attempt in regulating the future. A gap between the goals and the reality is sometimes expressed as a cynical mood. A robot cop who has to monitor if robots are following the guidelines will come to the conclusion that he is wrong in his job, because he has to do with rule braking robots all the time. And on the long run he will ask, if well behaving robots are the bad one ... It isn't a coincidence that the most famous futurist movies like “Bladerunner” and “I, robot” have a pessimistic tone. A film noir describes a reality, which was created as a good one but then has switched into the opposite.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-03-14
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBSHpZamVuLTNDN3FJMDdJd2lFTFdOdVV2VmhPM01LWEJ2OGdGWTJfam5UY21CeExvY21BRUstNlFiZ0h0SmxLNWl6MjJRNElhUGg0YlJCSEk5bEpZMXNQYzVBY21YOFNfWjVpazNCWWZpZlE9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCX2NoSl8tdEc1NHNZS2ZLUnEteDFqWmxVR2FEb2h5LVZqMzB4cWVuODZEcTJRSU8wMW9Eb0l3bUtLbTBiWllveHVxb3lCc1VNTTVSVnNCekdiMWdpcWM0WDFiSWNraC1sX1FFV0lZblk0SGVRYnFyajRDVllkVFJNUk9Dckg4bGdyVkV1eVpJb01FWVJvZDZMVTB0TC1adWNXaHJlVGc0TzI5LTVMUENLTE4zcThZVzF3ZEMwYWN5QUJmWHNfSW83
Germany sucks. Their knee jerk reaction has contributed to thousands of deaths from air pollution and unaffordable electricity.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-14
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBNDNJSTc2SFZGQXVXNjZDa3BpNGl5RE9NMnZmWlZQQ2QtZ2ZvZklEVldQcER0eDdROWhRSVNERVRZN25pOFVUbWJCNmNMMGJhVTNIYzhYYkE2TDNsOEVQeDF6dVlFUTZyY1Z5Wl8zZG52Zmc9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCelJhN1VBZjduQXRkdkZyRng5Smw3YXY4aHN1X3NHSk90cHpjVXpRbmZOQnJ2MnJJbTViSU9mR2Y4TVE3cGFiazB1bG4wTGY4T0JIMExCUjFoU2YyaC02RlhwZV92WDBQa1VwdTJlTmhiSUtyYU9tdlVEWW9Ic09abUNxcUM3TUdpZlZOc1NHbWlZdWN3eXZSSnV3ZlRTWVN1S3gtSlh2RXpYd1ZKRElpNU9XeDdiYXI5MlI4TEkwZk9OdFJ1TTA3TE9GWXlHTGdZcXBvMFliVHVIQ3cxUT09
As expected, the knee-jerk nuclear fanclub reaction.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-14
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBS1NQY015eUxqRUEzWURhTC11OTU5aTVSRW9FanFET2ZYblBVbEIzQXUyOERrUkcyWFFmano5MXQzQlR5Zks2OWtXWkZDTExhUkJmWWpNQnNjeTFfR0E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCem0wbEtsekdiZ1lVb1d6OFZZWW1IdkRHQVdUeGd5VmIxeThJanhzVmZyRHNtLUE2MWw2SjVjc0gzSVhncHRQTVBPXzB3ZXNoajN1S2pmeFdCVzdRRXA3a0V1V2RiQnhGMm1ZYUE0akItNUZpLUphQzVuRTUzd3JLZWRkVUFsVUJDZGJRN0Fvb0ZIam41NFNZaHpCQlh0aWNQQWpiaGFxTHlFdEUxWEdIWTJDNlBWbkkzTmtmZnlnVHloMDZzcU85eUxDMElQNDQxYl9PNGhUakJQWXJ4UT09
Classic anti-nuclear gaslighting. Here's the study https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2019/06/17/post-fukushima-energy-japan-germany/
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-14
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBaW1GN0U3cDlZV25xUTluaWRWRWx5eUw0UkRYNHk5UTR6MXRVNmRIbUNmb3d1bFNsWHBQTy1tMGhITVVaa015YlVpUUNqQmg5dFdnZWxSZ3VRR3pjdWs4NFIwbE5kTUYzbXFJbEc3Z2xYX289
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCeUdEQUtCX0p3ZDJmeEdlejNPVVF0NHFYRWhwOE5DQnVBdmZyMXgzMmowOFZhYTE2dGZKc1NrZnNJdkx1RFlZaW1CSDA1ZzRjUnRNd2M1ZmV2U0hwQm1mRmlxaVVXRnphcGJqVWI2QlVWR2NRMWZ5cVBVeU9sMkJiTGVFYVJldVlNNXMxQXhpR2FGdy1MRFA1VkM4NVhtQ0V1a0hPeVZnTWZFWWxPS0hrNmtjS0NUYzgxY2lSNjdhWE9MbUJULUljN0xKNWY3SWNzNXdlUndILUUtZWJTdz09
From the link: >However, the good news (which has received less attention) is that since 2013, both countries have achieved an overall reduction in their emissions. This was somewhat surprising, as nuclear power was a major non-fossil electricity source in these countries. We suggest that this result stems from record-high renewable power increases and lower or steady total energy use. This is what actually happened. The hypothesis that nuclear could displace coal plants instead is just that: a hypothesis. Nuclear and coal have coexisted happily for decades, half a century or longer even. If nuclear was going to displace coal, why didn't it start sooner? Why did those countries only achieve real, substantial reduction in emission levels after making an unambiguous choice in favor or renewables? This has specific reasons: for all their disadvantages, fossil fuel electricity plants are more flexible, and as such have their function in an electricity network that can't be readily replaced by nuclear plants, and that for both technical and economical reasons. And that's just the past. For the future, you get more kWh, faster, if you choose renewables rather than nuclear power. Nuclear power is an outdated, prohibitively expensive technology with only nice uses in the military and space flight remaining. Choose for technological innovation, instead of clinging to the pop culture tech of the 50s.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-14
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBd1d6ZmpvY25jQzE5VTdXbC1xY0dqNXEzTldWbDkyeENJZnFycURMUGdwRVNCZjVxR1NKcDhINV9RVFllVkQ5clgyMG9IZXo4RVI1MENyTXYwellvckE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCZkZpYy02X2hUUjc0dGNlcXEzY2hkZnA0WFpSSE5Gc09FTFQ4R3hKa3I3YUtqbUZ2MEJ4cTAxR19kMW5LZ0RnUV9RNkVNSGt4R3U2Q01kbE5yVzM1eC0xdEltdWZIdVI5aFZFVGU1N2JseU15Znp3d3hfQ2hneVBCLU1NZGt0M0x0eHc5OXBJX211UXFnNHluNlR0QWF5T21tcndHMS1hRUdBaG5teWVsT2pnUE4zZVdiVkpaU3d3TXNCdnY1ZkNRMkRHVk1RWU10N0FfSlkwdUpYY25MZz09
Left out the most important part: "... if Japan and Germany had reduced coal instead of nuclear after Fukushima, they could have together prevented about 28,000 air pollution-induced premature deaths and 2.6 billion tons of CO2 emissions between 2011 and 2017. Thus, these countries’ post-Fukushima energy choices have resulted in major levels of avoidable impacts of the accident."
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-15
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBalpEcmlET2RxYVZwR1FzOHdOR2lYS1pXU01TY3hoUEZ6cVRaRnVZM21JNExCbnFqR3dqT19sRnNlVUVQdjhtZHo3N1Q0MVFZelFxSmYwaDBEdkhDSVhLRS1BSmd4cTU2eUV1VmRJYUx4S289
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCVHdIanNwOUFvUHVGUlRfeHZmd19HejdPZTFZVW9IUEg3a19xSGpQR3g2OWg0QldwQThrR29XODFnRUhuYUp0aGNKUXBKMTVqRmE1Q2hWYWZRUS1LaDJpTFF2U25URHU1QmFrdUd4ZDY2WDU5WUxaV3laLWRNT2lPcktRT0ZLRUQ4RXVSZEhmVGdhYkl0a0Y2UmhqWXktdDdyMElWWTdwa01MTXEwcEJJSFNEU1dFLUk3bm5iamptQVhPcnFWZUpEVU9KMFF5RkRpNGpoZkJEb2dRbTl5QT09
> Left out the most important part I didn't, I explicitly referred to it: "The hypothesis that nuclear could displace coal plants instead is just that[...]" Did you even read what I wrote?
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-15
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBX2lDbEgxNzVYc1RwakFjUXZ0MWFfT3p5X2w1U2lfdGNaWkdNX3lxN0dPYUNsUWM5bld5OEFObjd0bmlTOHBRWlZRQlN3RFRVdnlmOXlaMzZlRFVmZWc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCSko1dDhGYjJqVVNzUlFPZG41OWJGZkdObW5pajRuVjdoek5aZnh6Ui1ZdWRSS0szWnNlOTBpZjZUdUhycFFZUkVUalpmMWRzOUtqV0VXVTV0R2tubWh0Y3E1ZzRQbjV4cTVDb0E0bjdXU2JQNGhuVGwwaElrbVFfM19rTE1mUzVpR2RVYUdPalczWWtsWjlIX2tzRnVOLV9Hd3BnOFgxSndJYTlaNUhHblNvNk0ybzUyOWdSZC1LOHhfZXFDYUdyWEJpUDV1VUtnaUJoRnpDNndSSTYxZz09
> If nuclear was going to displace coal, why didn't it start sooner? This one is obvious; there was no push for low-carbon energy in the 70s, and by the 90s the west had stopped building nuclear because of Chernobyl
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-15
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBUFJqdDFKVHVlWHBTRkJWT1JlQW1JMmlTVVdrWEQ5M0tSb2dVck9uWDRNamU2TkZ6WUxOTEdlZDlTUzFQRmI5dHNHSU9vUlRZLXVyUDAzTjdhNXBGZ3c9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCSHA1WEU0c3FseFFJVm9JT2ZuYXFmUm9CYThpNDREWkpPSlRPc3kwbWE4LUVxVEIxOElnbHZxZWNHU1RrZnBWcW1qclNiZ0U1WnJvVFctbDBab3hyNlNCSUFBMWFVQUZtWVZKcVZLQjZRVTVsNFJvdS1PSGRaV2Y4YmJDdWVtalNOTUcwbjZxV3MxbTZmZktsR3ZZRmZDOUFrUUdpb3lMWWhlSXFjNnFyZ2UwY2dZbDNzWW9zdUNhNG5YcElScU1jQ0lCYkR5bWpDTnNieG5SNl9wNnNEQT09
Germany slowed and then stopped replacing fossil with nuclear the first time because of TMI/chernobyl, and; only months after they had chosen to extend the lives of their existing plants and were looking at new builds in 2011, Fukushima happened. They absolutely could have just added renewables to help take down coal. They would have still needed some gas to firm it up, and to use Sweden's hydro to store extra renewables, but a lot of people wouldn't have died of respiratory conditions have they would have looked at with an evidence based approach. looked at the math a couple years ago and discovered that even if they would have just kept an additional three reactors online, that would have matched the output of the lignite mine under the hambach forest. On the bright side, it's a cautionary tale for the rest of the world.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-15
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBN3c1MXpjWElfSjFVNmZnczN1VVFob3RjS1NJaUhKRUZJUnNCOTFTaVd3b056MHM2a214ajJXRGNqM3VuU19EeTIwODZQSjd3dGlPS0JaU216ZndYWGJSNnp1Wmg0dkRkZlRGTEc1cW9qWjA9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCN3dQSzR3TkpTa0M1U2ZfeWhOd3VvTkpzNVJYOFRjVkY5eXJrVnFJLU1qYlI1Y2ZjZGdlWFpEVXMwZWFkeE91REZlVWV2ZTdPQXF2MUF0cUU3WmZxZmZGSFlvTm9Dc1prQ2RGRmducjVSMEdWNHQtdjdPbnBCT2FJUlFWQWg1cF95Z2RxYXJ0Zng4cl91azZhM1VBWHo3cEJOU0xYWnFWTnVqMFVFUGh4Ul9hQmVxUU9kYmVQd0tUQVpnNzdHeGV3UDdDNTQtM1pQNVlpSUpTX2otclBnQT09
Doesn't matter, nuclear wasn't able to replace coal even when favored by policy, even before Chernobyl and Fukushima. That just shows that nuclear really isn't all that it's cracked up to be.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-15
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBWmVPVFpOZm9ISHZMVE1ZYTk3UTJWLThoMDBkT1ZVcjVvWV9KaWlSVFdtak5ENkZVNm1VbS1aYTQ5RlAtOU1naDBLRmxYbTJORjNmOVFpeDBCZXRhUFE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCU204dVIzQXBaTF85eWlDNGdNSzJzRnlnYmRxbGZUeTVpbC11bzZ5Mm5ZTFA1amVxaWpTRDN0WGZ3SlRVU2JKZGgwa0hNVnNuMWx2VDBzUVFqY2V2cFZOcF9rU090MFlHWHFVX0RKMWVySjdabTZHa282MGZUTXVQQjk1aUstZmpmN3V2SzlSV2R3YXkyYW5XZV9vU0k2VUlUQXptUUpqTFJQRGctUTBZV1FIbUhrNzZnUFA3SEE4WVkwM1pvdGZNSGlqX0EtY1NfTlN2S1NfSEU4UEl4UT09
There was plenty of reason to replace coal with nuclear earlier, if not for global warming then for acid rain. Yet, at no point in time nuclear sector was willing or able to displace coal at a substantial rate. Germany just has had a coal-centric policy ever since the industrial revolution. Nuclear wasn't able to displace it because of the disadvantages inherent to nuclear power. Why commit to a dead end energy source?
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-15
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBSFNxWUI0eEdYaHllRGpIdjB0NWlyYzJWdEQ0TU02Wk5TWHEyTGlVR2M2d2g2UGFOMWd3LXE3V3J2dV8zRDNKR0RfLUVleXJFejduLXdjVkt6NkRGNmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCS1NZX1Q0cUJJRXY3cWdmZk11eUhzcWZhdnlaczJGOUdqSjRFQmRBOUk5VTNSWHNhMmU0aFNEUGtRQWgzMFEta0gzMkNZcEtYWGJ5NTZNTjlqbV91ZG85Vy1QelVCZ2pHNXF1Smk3bUtGbHB5SlROc2pxZW1MN1otZXpiZFJvM1J4N0RRck1GbHVNUzlETEgzQWhlbHNMZDRyeTZyWFU3c0tYSnYwejlSLThxNGx4ekp0VEMtNHljTVdJNnRlNGVUVFFQNHIxV3VfbnoxU1JuWHc2bHV4dz09
Maybe because it's the only thing other than hydro that has decarbonized an industrialized nation's electricity grid? Seriously, name one 100% renewables country that doesn't rely on geographically limited sources like Hydro or geothermal. And it's also the fastest historically at doing so? Sweden is over 650 kWh/capita/year, vs. world record renewables build-out of Denmark at 219? France was also quite fast with their decarbonization with nuclear, at 490 kWh/capita/year Are we going to pretend that history isn't a thing?
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-15
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBQl9kX3hjR2trd0l2VXFxTjEyYUlEVG1SaHl2amNMc2d4Y2dDU29hQkRHU3otVUwtYTJNWGtYQW1OcURpN2c0M1ZETUVTcFdCSzBwNnhiV2lqeHhCVDR5eXdCcDE4VUFLVEhPYzljWW9mSzg9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCMjNmcWMxZDhBQ2Exd0RxS1Q4N3Z6VTFZcmpZM2RYWW81STRQbmNwVHdaRnVYcmVWdkhCb0cycXIwTnRFYS0tdnI1RnF1ZzRvaGxmclRiTUdOeWRHeTlSS2w2ME5QeHRib1h0aWFhR2VBRG96Q0tZdDYyOUtNaTJTZTRZR3hqZjBZNjNaNnF0b1RXMzl2bkNLNjB6N0NpcXExMkRUdEZqTGFnRFhRanBERm1sNDI3ZGV5NVFiQWcxZU1pQ3RBaTlVb0ZnVGgtb3N3ajNySW01SGVxYldfZz09
>Maybe because it's the only thing other than hydro that has decarbonized an industrialized nation's electricity grid? Seriously, name one 100% renewables country that doesn't rely on geographically limited sources like Hydro or geothermal. Trick question, all renewables are in some way geographically determined. As it is, 20 countries have more than 70% renewable energy. Name one country that decarbonized with only nuclear. There is none. France heavily relies on hydro, some fossils, and inefficient use of some of their nuclear plants to make ends meet, Belgium never did better than 33% fossils, and everyone else just has minor fraction of nuclear on the grid. >And it's also the fastest historically at doing so? Sweden is over 650 kWh/capita/year, vs. world record renewables build-out of Denmark at 219? France was also quite fast with their decarbonization with nuclear, at 490 kWh/capita/year Are we going to pretend that history isn't a thing? Really, if we look at cherrypicked historical examples, then large renewable projects handily beat large nuclear projects, in the form of dams. Or we can simply look at Germany and see that the decarbonization achieved by renewables was by far the largest and fastest in German history. First, the bill for that construction has the problem that it's only partly accounted for, and then the additional problem that not all costs are known yet, and that doesn't just include the economical/financial costs, but also the nuclear risks. Second, even with that kind of unacceptable budgetary subterfuge, it's still not possible to build at those prices right now, as has been proven three times now recently by the still ongoing test projects of Hinkley Point, Olkiluoto and Flamanville.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-15
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBenBmaGIzemlDUWc0V04xUmRoWGc5UVRiRy1xRmdKWTZ4ZXZBWlZNX0dIODN0cjAxV2lKRTNKLXhnM3ZLS1AzM0lhaW45TlBjQ2htR1pTMFFkbTZEVGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCaFpFVFN3NFpiUkRIeWpOMjdjTUNvXy03QlRKSVFVbWFweHFlMWpDdXJicm00dk9JYnhYWnJKdzZtNVNLN2pLQkV2TWVGUS1pamJiZUdJR3hPRl9XZV9uSkMwdms0dmE3YmFic2hZWDJFamkzLVhvaWVtZzdxZnl1OXhfUkU5V0tQQmhjRlhhRDJmQmUtOE14Znl6SWgtbVRGbDFpb2hDN3NRckxfOFBPTEUzYjRUQUEyRWdKcWdibWU3cUVsVVZXbEdPT2pRSlN0REE0U0NRS2RvTGZHdz09
> Doesn't matter, nuclear wasn't able to replace coal even when favored by policy, even before Chernobyl and Fukushima. How was it favoured by policy? There was no push for low carbon energy in the 60s-80s, and in the 2000s green party anti-science, anti-nukes didn't want nuclear.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-15
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBNjl2YXY1VGVXNDRYZ3RNNnFRbXlMZUNBOVpzNXpCTGxFX0ZWRDk5RmN4dzVDOHZXQUhzWGVFRVNmSktscXcwTEs0THlIZFg4SllaMmluX0h6UzFSdkE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCblQwSVJjVGY0eVd1Slg5NUpLeHU0N3dndXRxRllCam5GZGdOX1VvenFUVThCekNhdnR0N1paaDF1NEhiY2lhVUlyUlpYZTlMUFNlcjNpMnVHVVRPUFhXa0ZjU0RWbWVmSWJCWE5qaUtoRnV5SlNiOG5uNC1CR3ZDUUx5NTBYb0tuRHhhUkgyRlNQcWZudk53STA4bURtNHpCeFB5MTU3YkV2LS1BZjI5ZmtSWVdfVzlON2tCRG5GMlQxNWZZNGZfSV9uWDY0TGVwcHlhbEdFR0NHQ2R1Zz09
> As it is, 20 countries have more than 70% renewable energy. And all of them relies **heavily** on hydro/geothermal - much more than France. > Or we can simply look at Germany and see that the decarbonization achieved by renewables was by far the largest and fastest in German history. Germany has spent 1 trillion $ and 20 years on their energiewende and achieved what, 350gCO2e/KWh? France achieved 40gCO2e/KWh in 15 years. Nuclear/hydro has clearly been the fastest way to decarbonize. [Fact](https://imgur.com/a/8Ifzx39). Fastest wind deployment is Sweden, at a pace of barely half of their nuclear speed. Even Germany's nuclear buildout was faster than their wind or solar buildout.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-15
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBeTE0VHIybUZMYTFoNTVINVhnV200U0dpeFh0NGVncno0c1FkeVdPX0V1NEpTRC13WGE2WGFGVUlyTGM1TTdDYXNSZkozMHpHVDQyUEh6VHYteE11Qmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCQ1UwRzg5REM4LUxlRFdCM3JlcDgxYWFqNEppbnBOZFNWSlBhcWZocUQ5b3pJOWRzYTZUTjFpa1RVelNRNUotZTJxaUNiVWdCdXNITHEtSERjNUplaU9jVlZxVFA0V011OFhjSmE4ZGw0aGo2ZGpma2d3b3NKczlzOF9kYWVqejM2N2tRdlNNSE9aTkU4eWJXeXByNnUxcnNNS3VuUW5zaC1qb0lvdnludklRRVd4QnYxTE1LWkpLaEZKQzBzM09KNnU4dnJKaWtYQ0JwS015YmJXRXc0dz09
> And all of them relies heavily on hydro/geothermal - much more than France. And? They still do it, nuclear is optional, renewable is essential. All nuclear-heavy countries use renewables or fossils to make ends meet. >Germany has spent 1 trillion $ and 20 years on their energiewende and achieved what, 350gCO2e/KWh? France achieved 40gCO2e/KWh in 15 years. They started from different levels of carbon intensity, France isn't done paying for their plants yet, Germany has effectively been paying renewable research while the nuclear research came from war budgets, and France's construction was spread out over more year. >Nuclear/hydro has clearly been the fastest way to decarbonize. Fact. Fastest wind deployment is Sweden, at a pace of barely half of their nuclear speed. Even Germany's nuclear buildout was faster than their wind or solar buildout. That graph is so vulnerable to cherrypicking, both in selecting the instances and selecting the period, that I'm not even going to bother with it. Either way, you'll still have to prove it's possible. The private sector is no longer willing to either fund a nuclear plant, or to insure it. Ought to tell you something.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-16
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBaWdlTmVxMWExUUcyTjBaQ1N0bE1TTm1HRVBPbWdnTWs3Tno4R1RnMHBaLVU5OXoyZmtRRVhuRXpZc0FHbk85SUwyRk05cGNWYmQwT1BXc2hxWkpfQWc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCWDZCLTZPb1FqVUttZy1wMjZfeTRESXVtWXhSb0ozZzVaZENFcUlld1J1LVIwaXE4RVJRMUFQY1RVbEgxN0ZLQ19FSWczd0pwQWhmYTljbGhjd2pNbEQ1U1Y5TnE5S2ZreXI2OGg3T2tXTWMyUmlBaHpIWDBDOTA2Y3JmLWRRNHh0NHZPTE1rLU9oUVJfRXpjR0F1ZTY5bEdyb0pBNEEzeDJEc3NkNjVKU05xVTc2cUhDSXZOamg1QWVZaExXR0tNZjlvOUpkMlNDY1JLQjFvcGptUmI5QT09
> All nuclear-heavy countries use renewables or fossils to make ends meet. Just like how **all** renewable heavy countries rely on massive hydro, or fossils. Show me a decently sized country with 50gCO2/KWh that is >50% by wind/solar. Please. > That graph is so vulnerable to cherrypicking, both in selecting the instances and selecting the period, that I'm not even going to bother with it. Cherrypicking? It shows the fastest decades of low-carbon deployment per capita, by countries. > They started from different levels of carbon intensity, We are talking CO2/**KWh**, not total energy usage/total emissions. France replaced coal/oil with nuclear. France reduced their electric carbon footprint by over **90% in 15 years**. Germany barely halved their CO2/KWh since 1990 by reducing nuclear and coal, increasing gas and renewables. Why? Firstly because of choosing to keep coal longer, but secondly because wind/solar rely on natural gas to fill in the gaps. Storage might fill that gap later, but as of now it sits at 100-150$/KWh, and needs to drop to [sub 20$/KWh to be competitive with nuclear in a Texas(excellent solar/wind) scenario.](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435119303009). NEF predicts the cost to drop to 60$/KWh by 2030, which will still be **3 times too expensive in comparison to nuclear**.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-16
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBVTRad0hJWmFzdW1FbVdVeHlBckF3M0NIeDc2WnF2NG1NM1dUV3V4R29PUGhuYWpkNHJHWU14NGVzaEVHOFVUQW9CS05PcENjbkJEZzVQT3RMSEx2R0E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCZkI4QTluTGdyaXZqampTYTNVb0hFemF5LVpxUUt3MkxjaDVHczhPd0FhM3NDaDJUSUVvLTZjNTU5dEpxQ05jV25EaWF0NmtFbkt1Yi1GbkJVd05LZmFQblNWOVh1Mlp6SDBtejNOdTV4eWticS01cXM1dDlUVlJ3SHJMTEh0VXRZYVV5djRYWUowQ2VETk81aHl3c0Z6LW9vbmEwekkxRGhtc2xVMjFEWE1fMkE2eUVld2ZKSGd1T2pfNDRZcG4wYTItU2JZNlZKeks4d0xvZDV2bEZjdz09
> Just like how all renewable heavy countries rely on massive hydro, or fossils. Show me a decently sized country with 50gCO2/KWh that is >50% by wind/solar. Please. Do you notice how you now had to add no less than three conditions to make sure nothing was included? So let's move on to the next step: lacking an off-the-shelf solution that works everywhere, we have to look to the future: and renewables provide by far the most robust, fastest, and cheapest energy production right now. Feel free to demonstrate a nuclear plant that actually works as promised and we can reconsider, but right now they're simply not available. >We are talking CO2/KWh, not total energy usage/total emissions. France replaced coal/oil with nuclear. France reduced their electric carbon footprint by over 90% in 15 years. Germany barely halved their CO2/KWh since 1990 by reducing nuclear and coal, increasing gas and renewables. Why? Firstly because of choosing to keep coal longer, but secondly because wind/solar rely on natural gas to fill in the gaps. Please. Nuclear plants also rely on other sources to fill the gaps. If you put that as a condition you can't have electricity. The last 25% needs to be high performing storage no matter where we get the bulk from, nuclear or renewables. That is unavoidable. So that is not an advantage of nuclear power. >NEF predicts the cost to drop to 60$/KWh by 2030, which will still be 3 times too expensive in comparison to nuclear. Funny, nuclear is 3-4 times as expensive as renewables, and it *still* needs storage/flexible supplementation on top of that.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-16
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBN1dNLXRnMjhwc0pfSWdtWkwzY3AxS2FiUHZQeTl4bmU4UkVWRG9INHZteUdjckdVZmJQc2IyR3Ria0U5TUJQbFlGZkJJdURkU1dBZTJOY3pLRFpEUnc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCOGtFb0hOMnNlbURNOFpScmFjbXRFbVlWeEI2bndzUmNOOHFweFY1SFU3dlo1cU5GcmNoZHpoSEpCRGZSRmN0dkx4bWVoWVNmbkY5SHJNQk5hck9EQlU0dWNHZE5rc1BfSjFEQ1dxUGRaN2RGczUxN1Z6N2FJcUV5ZzVOMF9DTUNTNGJfNmQzMDQwbkFRTGtCdWpnczlqQjk3aFRFMENxQnJSZE93cTRpOFlZMTdEdWtmQzVEZ2NydEsydjZVOHNHZzlURlRuSXZ1Y0lwMlhuN1J5c3cwdz09
>How was it favoured by policy? It was kickstarted for military reasons. Then it was subsidized by the implicit state insurance, on top of the funding to construct the actual plants. But even while enjoying that favorable environment and headstart for half a century, they haven't been able to become cost-effective enough to displace coal. Right now they are just left in the dust by renewables, and it's still only vague promises of new models that might or might not materialize with 10 to 30 years. They can just call us when their shit is actually ready. >and in the 2000s green party anti-science, anti-nukes didn't want nuclear. How are the recent development in renewable energy anti-science? It's cutting-edge science. The people who stick to their oversized atomic water cookers from the 50s, those are stuck in the past.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-16
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBVmlfem5oU2NfajVCTS1TODBndkw4NmwyeUd0WnRCOVVPVUtVWGYzRmJyVkdjSktmeXUzNWxDUVJHb19ib2NxVmo3Y0lYbk9femJZdExBS2tWZUFGRkE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCVWRmX3RBb1VIOEZ0MGRkXzI5eGVvQ1R4NUpmaXMtN1ZINXpwQVJaSHNEc3VOVkZKbXNockJ5TVhVcjIyZzl1U3BBMDh5M1BYWFBzQ3V5M216ZWFYVUlsdVBxU01LcWJyUjh4bnEwMjFTaWl2bEg5T081U1hMNWNMeTdRUUM3Q3JYekJBUGJrbjU0d0hhQUZIUUtxQVJvbV94LXMzQzVCWGFmeE5yNEVmWEFMeElLWEZQSkdFbmpGVnhsV0N2M2NHVjA0NDhQUzJOZkJFTHR0X0VXaGp6Zz09
> Do you notice how you now had to add no less than three conditions to make sure nothing was included? What? We **need to go below 50gCO2e/KWh**, and not every place has massive hydro; aka it cannot be relied on everywhere. You get that? Again, show me a country that decarbonized to sub 50g/KWh with wind/solar, without massive amounts of hydro > Please. Nuclear plants also rely on other sources to fill the gaps. If you put that as a condition you can't have electricity. The last 25% needs to be high performing storage no matter where we get the bulk from, nuclear or renewables. That is unavoidable. So that is not an advantage of nuclear power. Are you serious? No one is saying nuclear does not need flexible backup - all forms of power generation do. However, we are talking about the **amount needed**. If you are disputing that variable renewables require more storage than nuclear, then you are a delusional nut. Or, you probably are because I see now that you are the same guy that tried the off-shore wind capacity factor switchero for on-shore wind a couple of times. Dishonesty and anti-science is your way, isn't it? > Funny, nuclear is 3-4 times as expensive as renewables, and it still needs storage/flexible supplementation on top of that. That doesn't matter when renewables need magnitudes more hours, or days of storage than a grid containing nuclear would need.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-16
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBWWJBUExfTHVqMThXX09aR0xXWmh2dUxPQ05TRDZWN0g5TlN3NXAwRnBEYTVOY2JsdVFUeGZMeGhqalNMSnM5MzctMmxVQ3lCTlV6VlVhMVVDeEhIUHc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCSGdJZ1dsdVBmZGo4elNHeG9TVGQydHhJc2NOa1ZUdUg3QnVhRnU2MHhOendOTFRhN2tVN29qNWlXMjZ6bDNqRWJXV3lzMVFPdXZLcjFUOGNXWjdrTGJvN2lWZGl0dzIycEtJWDJxU21FendCZ0pXNWFPUjZuYXcwX3BSbGIwdmd5bzNoOFJGVlpHR1YtZ1owUzdfT09kM1phZzZNaHVPV1VLcUo1X05VVEszT0NIWVg4RXc1U2toeFZKdzI4ZDlTd2xVV25yN3pRVU4zbGpMRGRnek9tUT09
> It was kickstarted for military reasons. And how does adding several GWs of nuclear apply here? Set up reprocessing, and maybe a few nukes for skilled personel, then you are good - you don't need more from a "miltary reason". > But even while enjoying that favorable environment and headstart for half a century, they haven't been able to become cost-effective enough to displace coal. Oh, just like how renewables haven't been able to displace coal even **with massive subsidies**? Look to the UK, Germany, Belgium or US - natural gas is carrying the weight. > How are the recent development in renewable energy anti-science? Why are you strawmanning? Your arguments are so bad it is hilarous - just like how you do the capacity factor lying all the time. I'm not saying renewables are bad; I'm saying that being against nuclear in the 2000s was based on anti-science
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-16
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBdHpjU0x0VDhqdi1rZU5raGxCTmRkd0dPWlRUOUJvbVR0b0d5c1UyLW1RZWhsSXhickwzR0xhS2NWckdzR0RXcWJOQmZsYXRJTnFjMVVyd3hzMGN6U2c9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCYWZQME5rTHRRMDZGTFJCWFAtd3l0cE5kMTZncnR3dnZXc2x5UV9uNTdsVm41NXBBZTZwZ0xNbXd6T2RtblhTZ0lET0pKeGVqN1hPS3cxYXptczlSTXJua2M4eEY1VnpJRFY2dEpscnFvbEN1dzJScVFXeXQzSXhHV0lfdUtyTk1NMGtkODgxZVVFV3UxRU52RnQ3eGItcDVYMEhJeFFOSEtnUlE4bEZ3MzZ5dFFSLVVwaUxCV21GS1N4dU5hUjdRX3BIVmlwWE9ydi1hdEZ2SHh1bjFDZz09
> And how does adding several GWs of nuclear apply here? Set up reprocessing, and maybe a few nukes for skilled personel, then you are good - you don't need more from a "miltary reason". You can't commandeer resources, infrastructure, personnel that don't exist. The rest is a sunk cost fallacy. Mind you, if that gets an industry on its feet, then that's just water under the bridge. But even today nuclear power is subsidy-dependent. Whether that's "still" or "again", is of less importance. Fact is you can't get it built without. >Oh, just like how renewables haven't been able to displace coal even with massive subsidies? Look to the UK, Germany, Belgium or US - natural gas is carrying the weight. In Germany they are doing exactly that - taking big bites out of coal electricity on a scale nuclear power was never able to. Belgium is now quitting nuclear energy because they don't want to do what the UK does: committing 40 billion of subsidies for delivering energy that's more expensive than wind energy now already. The US is a series of grids and state policies that doesn't really allow to assume it's uniform. >Why are you strawmanning? Your arguments are so bad it is hilarou Why are you talking about me, instead of admitting that you're a fanboy of what essentially are nuclear-powered steam engines while you accuse me of being "anti-science"? >just like how you do the capacity factor lying all the time. I don't know what you mean. If you care to make that argument on a specific place go ahead, but so far it's just an extension of your personal attacks. >I'm saying that being against nuclear in the 2000s was based on anti-science No, we all have the same numbers. The difference is in which risks and which gambles we consider acceptable. That is a political choice.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-16
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBTm5RcnA0aHV0eldQbVhLcGdBMTY1MzV5RWlidUdPcEtDdnpKMDRWeTJISTU4OGVVc2pUVlA3UFV2M1ItdDBqQ2ZqWjEtUmpDQ0NzZFdjdTFobEczSXc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCSlVlY2VuVUE1MlpuTFdYVVpKLXl2Q3lMVlNBcF95LXotYThxY0tJZU9lclZHQjZkTUJ1RjFxM2NPNngtc1dqdXUwQzRBNW5FOGFoejR2ZE8zMWExcWdBajVzdHdCVklHRm14NUZhZ0oxWnVwaE1CeldBaEpxYktxcG1NdUtFNElKTVRvMy1VcVl1LWRTNU54dldUT01EYnRlS0tpTGFTQ2RrVVFvMDdqWWdSUjJZRjZld2U0Qm1KRnJKZkg1eHZQblotQkdBNXRCRkxaOTQwOVlwNW9FUT09
> If you are disputing that variable renewables require more storage than nuclear, then you are a delusional nut. I don't. That is clearly the greatest relative disadvantage. However, since renewables are so much cheaper in comparison to nuclear power, there's plenty of budget to tackle that. In addition, in practice renewable grids need much less storage than its critics purport. Much like they also have been exceeding cost-effectivity and cost expectations routinely in the past two decades. >That doesn't matter when renewables need magnitudes more hours, or days of storage than a grid containing nuclear would need. That price is the levelized cost.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-16
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBcTZhRTZROXBpX2pXalp4N0RIc203XzlnckJiSUJ0VlVhUENsVnR5RGNuRWJybGwtV1A0cENnZEZBUU1pMEtTbGR1VE1ZdTBCV3VCY2dHNGMycmJFYmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCUHRoZEpGc1RiSHI2cHVsQ1B3TmJpUjVNUFVvSTU0TjQzR1NQdFpfb0pjWTlmWHpLZnBHZFozaVQtUW9RUWtLTnR6d2Z5c05ja1A1TDhMd1hseENXWW5iY3l5czJyTjc3NnBhRTNPaVlUSEZIbWM0bTV1XzNiRWhmaklLT05melM3S3VYRkE3cVJKLXBsYXNadGxCZTVxd3BYVkRMRHBwemJCTTczZVVkZExIdFh4VjdtX2xMNDRUdS1IWWFrdkpUbUJQNnZxT0lvZUt1QVZnQ3RfUk1rZz09
👩🏽‍💼This secret cost tech workers their jobs 👩🏻‍🔬 This secret cost tech researchers their reputation 🌑 See the dark secrets of #AiEthics Listen https://anchor.fm/aiparenting 🎧 #AiEthics #AiParenting #DigitalParenting
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-03-17
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBRnZPbDhYVklaSkItQTlpNERyTERmOGpCX1d2Zzk5cFNsOWJMNmItMDFzOFZqX25XbzBuSmw5TzVUNEFHbGh0N2ROVHU2ZW9ZeS1YZV9QLVhsaDIyX1E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCRXV2aXVYQmZiazBXbXdjbkphYTUtNUhyR1diRG9BVVd3X1QtaFRlcU4xcFJjQXRoSnhpU2RkbFhMbEprb1UyRGJ6dzl6b2REMVJQVWNrOXlJY01oNzFLVF9vUmgtdGhSU2pkQlg4WENaRkk5V3lJOXVzVUZSNG9kWFJCN2ZQSHlJaWFMdGxQUGNxRGxNS2xXT0FfTHA4OGpYY1ZURkZhOHBUWDBIRVhMVUx3azBIc2VXUEcxLWtVYzBxR1hMaTF5SUoxanVteEUzNFVWeWxaNFZFRHg0QT09
Asimov showed how laws alone were not enough to prevent harm. One of the things that is missing is the emotional feedback loop. Without the ability to feel pain it will be hard to grasp what it feels like to cause pain to others.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-03-17
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBV3ZSNl96YUNBZXdiYTNKaTNveE5KRndDZHcxNVZKNlc3SXFXTnJMRHBFbEFEQkdxNjk2QWdKUEo4eEw5VFdmV0p3eUhCWl9Xc0lRVWtyQmtFM0ozOXc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCaGFCVkdIenJXdlZMblJ5azVxLVBFWWpyRUlLTll5TUFkWm43dFl2aEJzd1pjX0NibWRoMUpWOGN6VTZpU1AxdmNYendkSXRUVEJSMlUwM0p5RGh0bTRmSERSbXBub0xKNkZfdi1rQUVUaEZqeFc2TUhCa0NRUmRuVEd2X3I0WFJhN20xTjc5ZUdobHk5Q2lCOGtkVFRhYUdoTWtNbWRxN3Y3MTRoMlVHaHpfMWlITlU3RlNrT05Cb2twemRUblAz
a i e t h i c s e s t h e t i c
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-03-17
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBZnBoSXFLZVVCa1lsVXZMSnBwM3pabVV2dU1oODhMWXBva1l6TldQdTZ2Mk5FWUJsUUZnZnJjODBVUzBhZmM2c2Ezbnh6Z25WSUR6eXJ5T2wtU3ZncXc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCU2pEenJ1VzZoMGptckpTRVFiWk9aRVBiNW1pbmZjMmxMQTh1bFFVVFhzQ0lEdEJpTnROaXNKVllnNU9wQ2FUZ2NQU2pka3NmS194TUh4RTVIMFZURWpHdDE5b2NtT2dQemFSS1dyMWZ2ckFoYzNXdklQQ3p1UWRmRmt5NmlTejlRUG02aWxkMnl5bENaVFZPRERlbXV6TUFmMjJuSVZKUDRzZENvak1yanR3ZDNSX1hsM1lTQi1ndnFwdFJHamJXb242S3ljUlFBRmxKMmNiN0h2Slhsdz09
Word jumble
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-03-17
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBUkt0OVlnaVZINzFpRzNqQ01fbHVSdzRjekZJVkk5a2dmWjlLS0xsUy03VURPdWRrQmtLX3MweDZoOGtnLTBmQ0J2ZWkzSDNLbGotR3dwcHRBUGNrUWc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCdXNrUUlxeU9yX3VMaE5DaHphOHVzUENIU3QxcGRVM2pndVk0T2RpcU9kVDRZYklzZTBYZVJtbEdkbGdPSXdNdGtUeGZvMFpESXVBWXdVWEdqZGxqYkdHVVpYNmtIcy1JT0hCR2txQkxNMVdRTVJQY1hrQjZ0c2dIYnpBNnU0LW96V0JXZm1ueWVNUmtsamNsa0NjNFlpLWVlRTlDMmpOREpBUGJtcmU1UTgwQ1JGZzdIWnByT2V5S1JtcmwxWm93UGlVZDJvTW82ekt4ejVrMXE4WXVOdz09
> That price is the levelized cost. In terms of LCOE, when real world considerations are taken into account, it's one of the cheapest sources, period: https://www.iea.org/reports/projected-costs-of-generating-electricity-2020 LCOE does not account for externalities. Just like this [paper shows](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435119303009) in a **texas scenario** - a place with above avarage solar and wind capacity factors, you'd need storage down in the 20$/KWh range. As of now, it is in the 100-150$/KWh range, and is **already** slowing down, reaching 60$/KWh in 2030, which is still 3 times too high for a texan grid. > However, since renewables are so much cheaper in comparison to nuclear power, there's plenty of budget to tackle that But we see that with current, and even with expected storage costs that this is clearly not the case.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-18
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBa2JPMDZ2NXVZUTFNcXVCeG1RQ3dUUWc3ZDBCaUZ6ano2U01ZOE54OW5yQ21SZU9kRlQ3LUlwSHI3WmJtQ3lhUDlSelpjUklWYXo1N3o5aGpQWWRWVUE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCWFc2QXlrY2o1Yk41c3VpbUhPa2VzSGtEZW9GVmN5N0dMdzZoN083SEgtblVkV3JOLWdJWWlkSHNiQUpORGdaSUNuWlc2NnN0RDlTT2hjTHZUQjRRMzF6Q1NnNFp6N24zT05uMjNwVklUR0tVSXFVNmtEUVZQVm5mOFFhbmFzaFhZNmM1d2V3c3VES0NJbFFQUU5oRVZwRHBDaUpZN19XSVdPTUl3Y0hUVG9laklEeEwwOG5lU3ozQlp5QWM1VHVCcG8weHFYZkE1dHFNU1RVR2x4MVNTZz09
> In Germany they are doing exactly that - taking big bites out of coal electricity on a scale nuclear power was never able to. This was never their goal with nuclear. There was no low carbon effort being done when they built their nukes, and you know it. > Belgium is now quitting nuclear energy because they don't want to do what the UK does: committing 40 billion of subsidies for delivering energy that's more expensive than wind energy now already. The US is a series of grids and state policies that doesn't really allow to assume it's uniform. UK is maintaining their nuclear capacity. Belgium is phasing out, and as of now, is the **only country in the EU that will increase its carbon intensity**. What do you think is replacing the nukes in Belgium? It's freaking natural gas. UK has been reducing its emissions; Belgium will increase them. https://www.sustainability-times.com/low-carbon-energy/belgium-plans-to-increase-its-power-emissions/ > No, we all have the same numbers. The difference is in which risks and which gambles we consider acceptable. That is a political choice. Funny when nuclear is among the safest ways of electricity generation. EDIT: > I don't know what you mean. If you care to make that argument on a specific place go ahead, but so far it's just an extension of your personal attacks. > Why are you talking about me, instead of admitting that you're a fanboy of what essentially are nuclear-powered steam engines while you accuse me of being "anti-science"? https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/lwdu3p/finland_finnish_green_party_change_stance_and/gps7mu9/ Trying to twist the argument by saying **on shore wind has those capacity factors** - by using **off shore numbers**. Can you explain to me how offshore capacity factor is relevant to on-shore wind capacity factor? Had this happaned once, I'd probably let it pass, but you've done it **more than once**: https://www.reddit.com/r/belgium/comments/jv327t/vroegtijdig_kerncentrales_sluiten_voor_het/gd1okq7/ This is clearly not an honest mistake, but a dishonest attempt to sway the argument with anti-science.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-18
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBX2ZleHFBYWYzdGE2dXJEZXJWNkhmWmFuUFJPM3p5ckw1M0tuYmVybW9wQnhPYlRSdWNWWnBQcEw1WFIzd2V6RWFxVmIxZXBCaGxsR21jcUViZmRXX1E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCZk5vMDUycEdNb2xUWkp6MWxhVFZxX2x0aDZ4aXU1VjZ5RDVsMGZYM0xSbUhabU1jbWVoZjkwSy1FVDJsbkMwQjl3Zk5XbGQ3VzZVYXh0cXNpY1R1Y2pwRVFfSVp1bmlWYTNBaGtwa0txTTBTMVk0blp4d2VnT2FHT2ZpUWhsMGtZY0hkX2V4TVhwNUZfbi1SenNDREtCakpUU1hrMzNVa0EzSzk0OV9oTjdhUFFfTnlHVmlmaHh2aG1ORjg2Zi1aSEtDaGRsVlk5Z3NLUGRMU2VTSFFCdz09
>This was never their goal with nuclear. There was no low carbon effort being done when they built their nukes, and you know it. Whatever their goal was, they weren't going to achieve it by just building token nuclear and not replacing coal. >UK is maintaining their nuclear capacity. By paying 40 billion for one single plant, by granting them a guaranteed minimum payment that is already higher than the price of wind now, and it will get cheaper still. >Belgium is phasing out, and as of now, is the only country in the EU that will increase its carbon intensity. What do you think is replacing the nukes in Belgium? It's freaking natural gas. UK has been reducing its emissions; Belgium will increase them. Well yes, because of 17 years of inertia and inability to commit to anything in the energy policy. Sad, but really a matter of the lack of policy rather than the choice of energy source. >Funny when nuclear is among the safest ways of electricity generation. If you only count the past and not the future, only count deaths and not diseased, and only count deaths that have been confirmed with certainty while exposure happened on a much wider threshold. >This is clearly not an honest mistake, but a dishonest attempt to sway the argument with anti-science. You never misread a single letter in a 1000-letter commment on reddit while you should have been in bed instead?
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-03-19
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBN3pwRzMxQTk0MDEzS0lucDdjbVN1ZVNkV0FiYVJSVlgtQk41Mnp0eU1FVzlPQV9tdmZnYlJZZm5KTlRiNkVuQ2gtV1d1TXROeDZOY3FYeC1BMndtT1E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCdllvS3pUY1ljSXY0MmFRc2JaVlhnNDhvQmJkMERGUi1KRFpidG9tSDV3UkNNbDFFd215RlB0NEw0V19DWmw0aHFrXzhtTnUyZVJKRlBIVFV5RFZESElmSms3azg4bDlBNU9UUWw2NTN3ZktObGFIWng3T1llQmRCNUpvekpVVWpOeUJyMUF6dGxSTWM2MS1RaS1jWUplSF93SklxR040VHNvbGxkQVc5b3VMNWdwSjFvb0JqT0VjUU83XzZVbE9FTzBKa1JyRHBtOVJKNEFYX1BUX2ZhZz09
🏠 Federated tracking means data about you is not yours ⛓ Participation is mandatory and compensation is zero 🔏You can’t correct false information about you. Watch https://youtu.be/sc9RGTDEJ0g 👀
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-03-26
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBSzJXbkV6Nnd3WnE4TGdhYjhxTWJ4dzRxOU16ZVJZRVF6d3NBTHA0RzhTYThzTFRCTll1RVJ6N2VRVUpUZkVucGxvdFduTl94Mnh1YmNseUR6MjNmakE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCTThTdzlfN3U0cXVoUUtzNjJSbkdHdlhwUExUX0VzQmNVQWJlcFJlX01kSEdpVnhPaWo0Y3hSN1lnNE5lcnNGRWNnd2tHQ1dBdkphRHI4Z0hfQlBRS3JoZTNxczBiZnAyVF9pdmF6VTk1bUJPNUszbnVUSmlQYXlITWxhRnU5cE16Zk5lbXhxRThRUDFhQWdmSnNVQ3o0SXNRSlItRkpDa2xRQkVhWjdzelNzWkl1WDJvWkJROGNvWTJGbWNOWGRj
Am I right to infer from this, >My concern is someone will try to use the synthetic data (which includes CT scan images) to train algorithms. that your concern is about the negative consequences to those who would be treated based on algorithms trained on this data? This may be obvious but I just want to confirm that the ethical consideration is consequential in nature (negative health impacts) rather than, say, rule based (it's wrong to steal). I suppose a public announcement about the nature of the data is off the table but I wonder if it would be possible to post an announcement anonymously in places where hackers are likely to find it. Something with content similar to this post of yours here but perhaps with incidental, non-identifying, information about the breach that only the hackers would know?
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-03-29
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBc1VPYTBMMmNMN1FmV1VvZkY5RkJ6UjVvVjF2c0tTZDZRYVdXTENCZGQzcnpMdmhCUTNXeTFvcDA0VndvQl9CQS1fd21xb2JscTB3M29zRUtSeVcwQ2c9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCN1NwMW1QNkNocGg4QzlhT2lyY2c5Mmt4dmJXR1FucHVYSUJRUzFwYTZLX3lKMFY0UV9QQmo2empGU1UyY2NzYTFWcW11QnVWNmEwU1V2Q0VpS2pERHphSXJqUGZLZjk2eXVwcEp1cE52U3g3UkJpQUhEWUwwS3dndk5Hd29tN2JtVXhZOGwyMExEbHdXUWt3Wk8tbEpkNGpEM1hBTFFpbFZSV3owMC00QWF2T2I5bmN6bnI1UDNPWEZpcjh4Uzc2XzRKb2tSUGE5SFlibEx0d0NPcm5XZz09
Yes, we have an ethical obligation to do no harm. The ethical issue is due to risks of misinterpretation of the data, not data ownership. If someone sold or open sourced the data without necessary context, it's easy to imagine scenarios where this may cause harm. For example, the data include biased diagnoses (intended as safety test for systematic medical coding errors) that could lead to adverse real-world outcomes if the data are misused. A public announcement seems necessary, most agree we should disclose as soon as it will not impact an investigation. The leak was only discovered after an increase in billing over several months due to outbound traffic being more expensive than the local access used for common analysis. We're attempting to rule out accidental causes (e.g. someone in research group downloading data via foreign VPN). Among options on the table, we will consider notifying government health and medical professionals. We don't know where this data may have ended up so we may need to notify more than just the country hosting the access log IP addresses. The situation is already quite complex to identify the right contacts and language (including translation). Ideas have ranged from filing software security bug reports to seeking help from federal government (HHS, state dept). There isn't an obvious notification channel with so many distinct disciplines involved. Unfortunately, the test ID convention is not particularly useful due to how it was implemented. I caution this is an extremely indelicate 'code' choice on the part of the engineers behind the data storage system but this was intended for internal use only. (Disclosing with permission) > The image IDs are namespaced UUID5 identifiers to map records to data files such as images. For example the 'scan_id' column of the '*_bindat_metadata_*.tsv' files contains UUID5s generated with the test namespace magic UUID ("deadbeef-dead-beef-dead-beefdeadbeef", not my choice) and the name component is formatted as "<partition_id>|<record_id>" based on the partition and record id columns. This doesn't leave any visible sign in the file names, the image file IDs will appear random. For better or worse, the unfortunate namespace code may help bring attention to warn the hackers or future users (assuming the ids aren't changed). We will likely start posting about this in forums (advice on where to post for international security/hacking audience would be helpful). We remain hopeful this was just a curious researcher or an ethical hacker. Still, we believe it's critical to try to catch this before the data gets distributed more widely.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-03-31
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBcFQ3ZGVUVkZnelhkYlpRZV80QlVtYzM2dWlYNzlMdTQ2dU1lbWIzRWpscFFyYXFPTDFRUUdVNk5jSi1qMHJkbVM5SXUwNmNFdmQxQ2ZrVEdzbW5uNmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCd25INFpGaDgxNzVFZGlMOW8wY1ltMm9ocFVLdnN6ODNfb1diRnpPRUZtNzNSdVllMGFwSjYyWk03SVBnU3NMVVVEaEI1TGJ6aWxQZk5YRGYwblFQRkdfYlhweUdYV3BQTURWMEVXMXlJdW0wMk9LWkFwSUptS2c4b05LbEliUkN5c3RMSXVqZVQwWWIxY2VxS1RodFNrYnJlNGR3dnNFRzBRS19qc3BjcDlXal9SaUh2czdPakZRbUQzYnZKQVY1bmpOYUtvOFE2WXVpNGlaVF84MEpiZz09
I wouldn't get your hopes up for new nuclear. Nuclear is 4 times more expensive than solar and 10 times more expensive than wind per KW and takes billions in up front costs, many years to build and has serious safety and waste issues. It can't compete with renewable energy no matter how you spin it as clean energy.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-04-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBTU1sWVZFVmlFY2hVYzMzSGRzc0hNYWNZMkMzc3Q0Zy13VzJZMjdDbVJHckFmdHFzQUg0Z3ltcUxCVF90M1ZGUVMxbEZjYjdsVnBaOGh2WU5qeGxscmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCWXQyRGxGT1hVNUg5dXZxWkVncU4tZE41ZEs1SWVBUkF4NjBvNVZ1c1FURjNIakdkbUx2LUhfWlNPZl9CeG5ZZ3VJZ3dOWS1hUlNzX0dZUm9ybUdPTTVSeVJSaFZha05BZS14a253cFVQdDkzcGhoWmVpQVNILVpjSFJZSXRjOGNVM2RheHVsNHFDbkZvS1RwWURFQmp0YTlQVk05M3NMdTdwVFdJM1FkdmZhTWVfOVhBR1lkUXRtYjFMSDF0cVlQV2lDMjBVTWlFQjRHY0hxb0R1eW9RZz09
We need much more context to separate plagiarism from sloppy writing of commonly known ideas in the domain that are referenced elsewhere in the dissertation. What part of the thesis is this? Is this the state of the art where the author exposes the related work and presents the main ideas his thesis leverages? Does he claim the notions he describes as his? This article may pass as defamatory and turn against you if you don't provide much more substantive arguments.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-04-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBUUVjOFVtbnZYRVNLdERFLUFNU2JhNVE0MEJLRHBiODdzVmpFTTZBaFpmd3VrM2ZJNURSVXZNZnZ4a0VsYzV1d3FBeHhibUFkb2ZSVmdSemtHcHdfM2c9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCT3o2a0pvckRDZnVzTTQxb1NNUDJ4NGs0b2xqLWdldmo3a1VsdzhfX21KVmF0TXQ5akFOR3U5eF9JT1JMNFNXNVRLc1pCa3h1UGFNWGZCQ084QUlJUlRZcEFNSDc0YlZBWTd1d3pLYXlXZW1QTGZsZUlqT2lnMEJNaHZtRUlUenNCd2lheUdrSmtSWWk1XzFXaEpuV0VwV2hUTU5xcmxJVmZ4T0F5eUdNWWZpRDZnU0lDNm8wODZRVVlxQ2lBbEZmTFFMSjk4NnV2UnhwWUY2UmtzRmVpdz09
I like renwables but as of now, the batteries needed for them simply wont scale. for a container ship to be powered by electricity, the energy density of batteries would need to be hundreds of times greater than it is now.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-04-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBTExpd1JMMkZaY2JGdEF0Wm5QNHJWLUwtMEJHWl80S1dYajZQa3h0STNta2lYdURHSXV3YUxuZ0FhUUJNaWZJLWV0eFlfTE4yRDN6MTZjbXptQXFYdEE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCdmFqS3V6eDRucm4xMU1RWFc2OXJydjhsLXFmQmprU3BMbG94Q1dtMERISURPbWIyYlFNem85YmIzdHFnUXFfRHB5c1k5V1hTQzRNdHplY2s1WHA4eEVTbTNDc25KdFY3N1RmNUJwWWh3bmlvOXFlVHNHWGhIYVprcjU0WkF3S3FHS3ZtR24xWXdGdVFWcXpmYTlmem4tRnpkdUFOYVlnaHBNRFRqTHhuQlFrNWtMWS1SdjY1b01TR2JwOEpBSEtkOUlxaHZ0bWNtSTBuVmNqY0JEV19XQT09
> Which parts of the article do you think are defamatory? The title, if the person in question has not been given the opportunity to defend himself in front of a qualified jury.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-04-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBcEFwR20tb2hwdEhSWTFzOGNxVFVVNjEyUFFZWC1hSG5KRWdjSUs2bXNscjFwUk9NOVdhRXg0ZFZ4U0REVG5lM2hZTjhVQmNEb0VGeHI4bUw2Mm1tb0E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCVTMwTnEwd0s3djJWS2wxUnZ3UmxPV0Ryb2U4VzItY3IxclhTRkhGd2VMYW93UDhocnBTcHA4Q2dDQV9KLTVmNnoyaTdRVXVObENISWZGbnZrcjl6Wi1ZMGFqNXQ3UklMS2gwc2xZckN5cENmNm9xdjYzcWUyQm1nLXVCX3lISGhJVHZtMGs5MXpWYmI1NjI2bFNnMUJjYWhnYXdUQnJOXzBBMEo1V1ZXMHdTM0UyVDRHMXpQd3F0LWJjcmJHYmRxWFVBRmVBTUpMV3dlWEZzRGlFbnYzZz09
While I can't judge if the plagiarism is real or not from such extracts, the writing and borrowings denote that the work seems of substandard quality. Unfortunately, I have seen quite a few accessing professorship with below-average work, when they managed to have other qualities to put forward, such as an ability to teach, handle administrative tasks, act as team players or know how to bring funding.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-04-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBekY2bE01dEhpNXVTdGI5ZlZwRDlPTzVNNE1YaEpfY2NxQlBwdm9nVnhZNVBlZG1hcXYwZklaQ0FJV0lSWkhJSVc1akxzWnlDY0ZaOTZITnZYWFd6eGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCYjJxdWk1OHJNLVBoVmRhMUJsR25JaTctN3NkUjFoQjNmYTNVdklYOHZGY1BqMXFySUlucmo1VmZqNjVhdHhnSjRJMHlTQmtVVkxQSk9iRFRUZUdHaF9sMEdwUFNEMzhtcGNkT1dKNUNBSXQ0SWhNUzV2STZHN3c1dmMwelJXUjVndGJLNEZTOUFaVktiY05xSU95N3ppdm55UGVCT25VLU1TanVfRHZhd1NFQlFkallGT2ZZRG4zN2lpenZuLXdvLXRuZzhhX0tJaWd6NE5zWEh1ZjE4QT09
This is a small project that I built for a class that pulls emissions data directly from the EPAs website, and for full battery electric vehicles combine this with information from UK's national power grid to calculate emissions: [https://ausefultool.herokuapp.com/](https://ausefultool.herokuapp.com/) It's an interactive site so you can pick multiple cars to compare, or enter information in for your ebike or PEV. Hoping this helps us all make better consumption decisions in the future, feedback welcomed for this new software developer!
r/cleanenergy
post
r/CleanEnergy
2021-04-08
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBVm5icXlrTV9EemFvX2JWdTZYcXF4SlZJZ1BITjBnVEg2d2twWU5WS3QwYk1zbHNBcVdLMmlfVUcxSzJQSWVqZ3N6YmpyMTRlci05NG00Y3BleUszcGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCdkx3cFhDTV84bnc5c3dPazhFU3NMLVJlTG02WUNBMTQtaEJGN1dENUpCdEhKS3JQd1BqNWFqd19xNkFLRTB0UWY0VEE0ZXlfY0t6NldzTW05cGt1dTM5bzlTQ1RfM1hCTWtfbUdKUXRhaDJQaGJ1WTFBLVY0SHo0T3p1bGlweVI0bGRITWpXdEQzeVFyMWxRMEN3UEkyd1BZNzBhLUZ0VlRIUTZKTFR4bVR4SmRBUTBoRkE1ZkI5d3VHVkZieWlEVWZpRTZ1azh0LVZqX3dpX2xlODRzQT09
Do you have any thoughts on how ai could improve the quality of life of radiology? I've been scanned several different ways in several different places and sometimes it's downright gruelling.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-04-14
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBeE5veENaeFo2NllKd21UZ3I2VVBUN2MtUTZDZjZ5OVlMUU1RVFl4Z0RrRG9FdWt4dXdKUzJfSnRDUVYtVzZZWTlNUDR0TC1tcXdkQ01GcW1wbFVGOWc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCLXFjNFZwemt5bTFPTnkyUkctblcwc1EzcWJ0NlZOQllvZDlZeVR5c1Q1Y2J3cW5FVUdqU3dsSkluOHNTX01xYnlxY0ktb0xqZmVtQjJxUlBhVnFjR2VqbDlzZUN4UjR5Vzl3ZW04alBCcGpHOG5tR2E0azd1ZFBOX04zTGpLSFVaemZFYzJxemU1eTdxT1U0TGNjLXp1M19OWU1lTy1hQmY2b29qWm9DNW9ReG1jZVFUd2huU2VqZFFTOGlNWHNET3gtZFVHQ005ak9teVpneWx4bE1IZz09
Yes, I'm in. Got in at a penny. Still holding. Sold some but still have a nest-egg. I believe in their technology in a big way. I am waiting for gen2, as well. So, I'm hanging on.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-04-17
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBdlBMenR4WGlHQnFhel9TaUhzblpiSHhlSTcxaWJlSTZUVUtoa0dRUDFOVlZTS194MWVvM2RxNWVSYmtjSzZvT1gxRnJqSmVPMnRSOF8zRG9iUmVuTkE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCVXgyUEo5YTRDWlhrMG93TlNnT0xvbExWc0RmWVNQdHppLXZNa2FfZHp1eGNCYnR6UWk2S2pHTlJCb0h5Mk41Z1J0TXJfTGVHMllvT0JieDBVS0JfdEtGZVN1YWFGY3d0WUhPRHU1NXZDQ0xrbU1kQ3dhSFVmNGFRaUNnSmFwdWhpbnFxWUxaTGpXdlU4cHlPTnZhZm45SmJuYld0UXI3czRlLVptRTZERDFZPQ==
https://youtu.be/AT6OQM3GaUk and now Japans about to dump by radioactive water into the sea. Guess that Alaskan halibut will Taste good
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-04-20
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBYnM0MUFBMS05VGpISVVnRHdRdWs3ZTFJbU1QT2dYdWI4d0JTbDRSaS04SDJmUk1JZmxqa2lJdV9WX3JnSmNiUGlNR1pFWkVINjl0SnU2Rl8wUjJ5Nnc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCLV9ydmtKSjVLcjVSYVdfLWZ1RVJFU0FtVjdxNGNpYVotOXJIZXhmWjczS21pSTk5LVVMM2pURmhaWHU3aWlOZzVnWFBKVVRHZ2JTcDhpSkNzd0owWjZDblF0UlNNVWN3RnVXOFJsYmNPNDNjNnZRWHp6Vmp1QjhRVEdQSGNkN255Mm9Yc2x0TGkwaDBkamhmUHJfNzctWERRSFZvdjFCVmZCazgtaEFCWnJLeXcydWlhcjM1WDF5dUg5TkF0TnVxUS1OWGc2d29sWDBPaDJDY3Etekp3QT09
Ai can be applied in many ways, some of the uses cases include: * AI reduces the time doctors spent on classification of tumors * Ai can help to detect hidden fractures - such as hip structures which are hard to spot as they can hide under soft tissues. * AI can be applied for diagnostics of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by tracking retinal movements. This analysis takes around 10 seconds. * Again, it can serve as a second opinion on controversial cases, just as another powerful tool for radiologists
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-04-20
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBVDloMy13dGRtZ0hHX2lIZE9PTmhEZWN6LWVmNGtoVkI0RHROMDROMmdoME4zQWhibHhtcXc2SHBqYWRabENjX3NfcDl0dnhiNFNCdy03SlBObjk1N0E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCVWJpNlBfSHduSW1zTllrN1FnZGpfMnRKQVoyOW9vb1A5MlJ5X0JkZ1l1aFNHdzdpaWRRbGlrbzBzLV96eWxfS0d4TlllXzhwcXN6NDJtenJodDBETGpfYWg1a0xfbUxrY3ZfbU85b0JxWW9TQmJMM2F3aHBWekVkakxwd0tjYy1lMFlBOTJENTJUYk5NVWdzVHpWdUxuZC1pVWZJakxRVlJxRUVjSDdrcG5lTkFFUGNXd1JMRWhnTm52NzNaSGhxWl9lcVo1WkhzOUdSNUZtWmY1cXVNZz09
You gonna put solar panels on airplanes, trains, ships, and submarines?
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-04-24
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBRS15Yk83bFh3S3J4cFBaTnREMXNRVmRaLU9rWkZTUC0yZkc0V0JNTzRHRVlqWXUtSVI1d1djclFHNUV2RXlYd3BkaHFlZFJfWFZONU4tTDZCUWwzSmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCQ05BY0d3TFV6ajV3Yk1hOUxSMndwQVdJRV9nQ0VXSVBRdXZLY05LTzVmaEd4azduLXB6TldaLXYxTVJiVm1Tc2lROTByWDFFZHFoeGNKY1d6V0RHUjJPUU5hRy1tUnB4VWQxRHBCTl81MFJXOUJtU1cwcXd3NGd3a3k0bDhwTGVwNU9zdVk3em9rMGJiZmcweUJYdHlhQW5WS1FXOEhQcm1hRFNzeUxjLUFSMW1zbnRRc19Gd3BkNG5Mc3VjcWp4d20yTDJ4b2VaSWJKVGVuYjA1UzVLQT09
Sorry, but ships and planes don’t run on hydrogen.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-04-24
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBZVNEbkJMaTVKTkFBcXBMS1dEaWJiV0xCc21jV1llT2Ywb1NZWEpHWS13blJIZ1pRNkpUc01FMnh5bW5OLWhNVWt1cDdqRjN4ck9aR1RxU184amlVeHc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCTnFQRWI0REMxLXpxM0VhNllGNGRZUVFGWk00NFJSTm1fdVlaSFktQ1liN242QmxVMmhCRUdLeGo4Y2xHX3ZndndvRE1NeEVQRHo4Q1N2ei0xUTV4dlRJMWhuaGR0QUJzRG5qVDBON1NwRUNqcGpnMWtaazU3NUdubWpROW4tMUc4WlFRLWlNN3Aweks4dlhURWJTSlVwaDdvQWRoTkJKU3g2ZGFORnVySzlVZEtWLVFRQ0FGeGNOd0FWeThSdzJoaUtuVFNpSkkwVVF6b1JMd2xWQ3ZSdz09
I would have guessed techno-bias but there's evidence they knew the software was buggy. WTF
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-04-24
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBTjZMS2kyOFl4UXNLMFpZU1htVG43M1QtN01YU0xUUWhYdzZXaUtxaXlMMjgwLU5vOFM0NV9uZUhleVkyT0gteHlOWGFoSlJFZkFZUlBBQlBDcTgtaUE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCemlRUG9SMlJYWk1nYXJpOTRha1JFSlFnR3c2WUdHaFdpNElNQkQxVFlWdWhQRzZ2VExabmkxRVgwWTRYNjFzT0FqalUyWVVKTkZyUllFUF9TYmhrN01Udjk5SWlpZERzTjVUTlVnak8wWEdYU3VuQjJ6ZlBqNUF5cVpsM3pVRnRUVjJEalVNWDRzY0FKWV9tRlk4YXZMaVZmVHQ2a014c2ppY3BTekV6OHBIbUxQRnY5akRENkpWam1kT3pQRjYxcWNxT2F6eVo5SjFwTHNkOGQ2VE9GZz09
I think a lot of what ifs are somewhat ill-made. For example, how do we know which variables can we adjust in a AGI? Well that depends on the method we used to reach that level of intelligence/self awareness. For example, what if it is something along the lines of a happy accident, something we don't necessarily understand completely and just happened as a coincidence, not unlike current machine learning. Then there wouldn't be many variables we would be in control of, right? Well I think the ideal AI would come about not through accident, but through proper study of the human brain and the mimicking of it through technology(probably quantum computing), that would allow us to control a lot more variables and have a better understanding of the behavior patterns or limitations needed for peaceful coexistence. Then again one has to consider if we should pursue such a path with the intention of creating an human assistant or a fully autonomous and intelligent being, the latter of which involves a lot more moral issues and negative implications.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-04-24
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBYVlYckVhS1kzdjBMMklBNFBobXM2WW1mclZxdVBCaEc5WmFHZGZOdFZUWkVBcEdLNTZpdHN6ajZLcEtORlJ2YVZ3M3N5UFluc24yMU5KSzB0VU1SdWc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCZmJia2FvUDJEdnJWaEg1cTlCRE56LUgyVU9BZDFVU3JVRXlGa2hNdElNSTV5dGthM0xpUXBia0JGd2RKbk00UlkybjEzYnJmSVNCUnMwUHZKUnpNVE5jTllLN0pjRFdiSVNJTmpqN2duck9DVEI0MzBQbFpObXhzbDlycVU2OWFWb1J1QTVkMG9fREp5SDNLaWhQX1pwTG1BQTBKWnBYTm8wYkUzVmtJd2NINGo5Z2R6OXF3d0VVRHZ6RGE1bm1mdmhKU292WXNQeEg1N1lBZUdxTUh0UT09
Oh, so now I have to learn linguistics *and* coding? Joking aside, was this written in english initially? Legitimately asking.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-04-26
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBZTJibFdmUC1NMTFjTllsT0FCYUFwUWlETEV5d01aaGxxMjE4eEpSd3JsQjJ6bjZYQlZIX0JGLXI3TEtwbERFV29Ja3FQWDc5M1Mwa3BhRzVKdUZtZVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCZFo3Y29KajV3UnlMb0RYR2xwRWk4bk5lZk00Zmt3ZjkzQUdEejlkeG03Xzd2Uy1sWl83YzBfaV9nVGI2MnpKbzdsUGNtc2R4MHFvbmFmbGZMVHZ3SDEza1RHRXFjTW1RQkZ0WTN1X1Nka2twSmNGZ2d6LWFhc3I2ZjRxZGRYTzNRU0xmYzJ1clBHaTc2d2lhMTJsTEdJenFjZVpjTTU2VS05SDZCRXA2QzR4WFQzZkh6Vm9lTVNhUXh6SmI3Mlgw
I guess so, but there seems to be missing something in the beginning and I don't see the connection to ai or ethics. 21 h old account with no other content. Odd.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-04-27
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBM0d2aVd0ajIyaGt6MTdVN1ROQ1AzNjV0TkhsVWZ3OHlhQjFrNldQeVF4bDdiRE94Uk9aSDhXRHBIdm1KRXJITUNPc1JScElSU1BmZ1F3NFdqbHdwekE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCbmh5aDR4ZTdkUWlnNnotcTY4UVFsQ3FJbU8xN09GV1lHX2NaREdoV0k3dkMzTHZlRU0wNjJrbVNvZTF2ZjdKM3FLOGVkRURXbFp1RUdSbTE3MnRTQW9RdnQ4ZG00YXJ5bU8zRkUxemJPQzc3NlJrTnVLeFl0MGd2eEVPMTctRmloRVhVTm1xYm5zbUtRcHF3WVhWLWNpYjNRNGNDWUhzdEtmd3F5WnhDUGJDTGxiQkhyRFFxRnQ3d0FFUUVkRTBG
The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), a government agency, has assessed the marine impacts of the plant and said it was confident the mortality rates caused by Sizewell C would be “sustainable” and the impact on the wider marine community “insignificant”.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-04-28
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBVDFCSHhucDR6YjRSbk9QRUpxR2FJcnk1dGh4ekR0dDZRQzFhZWVDVEpRNXByZElMWU1ZbVFaU0FaRTFrN2ZFc1hlMjRsWnhwMmRBRkpueWNVY3FkNHc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCTndsSksxbVlYcFFfVnYyUXlpTjRUMExJVGgwOENZdHVpd0lnQjhGUmVxSVBhR1RLc3NQV0hndlVpal9VRmxsTmcwQkwxUTNTQXVsZjJVaVR3WjlLU091cFRiYTVUaFhFMGpuNXN1bVFsTlNFZW1JUUktQ19qNU5Wa1Z4SkpWcS1CVHhneVE5Wk51c2dMMHNXN2txXzJFRW91SzY5STg2cy11RnBleGoycTBnaDBHNjJkY3g1b0I0dk5oWDF4OEtBZXBWaW16WEMwNDMxeG9yMHFlLWJqZz09
>[Subsidizing upstate New York nuclear power plants more expensive than new wind: shutting down nuclear and replacement with onshore wind will save $ 7.9 Billion till 2050, while reducing CO2 by 20.1 to 27.4 Mt more than nuclear.](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652618326829)
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-04-30
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBLW5nMzJRVFhuSnExOVBsTUhveUVIOTJxTmFPVDVhTjB0TDI1aU5JbXF3aUxuOWN1dzhodHRhRWE1emtGOE9mR3R0Qy1Yc2x4S1lTQXFiR1JqOTY1TWc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCOUZNWjNYZk1GeWktYzQwZzRfdFNaQlR3cjVHS2xaRmc2RWxEMnNCMm9lN2syQ1hfcVk1VW1sS1hnN3N4R1FxWWw4cTV0V0dGa2pobVZ3SGhfMllTeU1rZU5TSmdSRXlLcTBYLXR3dGgteF84bjc5V3R0YUg3VF8yYlFwaU5CaUJrQWFaM3FrX01uQ0I5YklEaEFGUmk2WWVBRlUxTC05WGlmbHVFdUZIOUh2UmxUUnBST29TYmtBRWlsXzZLVzc1RmdUQkREU1h6R2dyVjI4cHNiSFp1dz09
the fkin cookie sliders on that site with NO clue whats on whats off FUCK Visiting that pish
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-02
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBV0cyYVZYN3VTLWVrem5sUVhJRDFVYVZlOTJaTzNmcDA0Uk9xNVQ1RW9VM1NiTk5rSF9pa0x2WjAzMnYxU1JOUTB0WjNPajFuV3Q3RnhET2xLQUV2Wnc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCOU1YT2RYbGF4NmJlTGFINmVidXhjUjNFa2lLSk9hZUVFMUVVZGcwbkkyeDk5TmNpZ1RfQ2FYbDktU2NwbmtfMmczX2IyLVQ3TUR6TUtiX3pNZE1wNnJYLUthUHVIcWdKdF8wUzFnaHhyZ0hRMFQ1UkVGY2ZSZmlPZUREcVpzMG44LVBESFRSM19GRU9FN1Rjc0U3V1FLdm5kXzRvbkY2Z2w0WXppWDdVZEVSS3JuNm5lbURLMFBZeWFWLXVYdGlwLVNBb0lPakFjeDJadDVsSmxzQ3JFUT09
i live in kenya and i have swam in the geothermal mineral pools they smell like matches
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-02
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBRUdsaDhfWVNCR0l6ZFdWMDBNRHJQY0puZy1ibFZjVWJGdFJ0U0NwRGpqY3h5RDZRMmhBb2EzU2FWSHZkaHY1bmY1YWhQNy16cDR4N3VQcnlxSTV1NlE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCd0x1aHhCR0V4Mldlal90Q1dSand4SWNsSS1hMzF3R3c1dHNxRHRYSTZxM1ZscVV1T3ZOVlFaYk0yVWJSV3B0d1l1amlHMVJmV1pCSHk1WjRjb1ptQWw3bWx6TTNleXdCU2U4RXo0QlJyajJ1MDRNS2xpamtYcDA5MFRDQ19LTC02STFLLUVwaDVrWXJYcmF2cC1nbUVvRFYxZWVCdmZSbmFfU1NyLVhMcy1UTnFmUnNPY2RCT3FJX3ZUa3dCYloxQzVLcWVhSjRCMUdORlZKRk9KVVp6UT09
I don't buy it. Entire towns are run on diesel generators. I suspect this is typical African statistics. (They're fake and over exaggerated)
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-02
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBZUFiZS1xNUo3TlBZQ3ZpdDFRVlRrTkFSeG5PSmw5Vl9sUjgxY0ZxaXJwdFNrd0ZtSEhqYWJpMElqV3FxOTZ1eDB1LWEtd21uNnhtenRIUjA5NlM5cEE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCV3ZrNE9Ud3F0ZUtubXI0bEVuU3NhYzlZajlUVERubVV0cW5qdmI0V3NVSXZFelZaTlZmZ2tIYkpON3VBYzhzeERDd3Y2YV9nbzV5X0FTRGFXX3phdE4tSVpvUXc3UEdQVlJNbjNnUC1Jd0hyT0Y3NFdUcTRJMGJmdW9NZWhMbU9WQVpMNE1hcTl6a21oM2trTEZYcDllYUlRRE5hbWR4TF9WQ3pBOTZVLWVtQUNmcGE5N3JHdEVGZmlKUTF4TW5vRXlpdjJPRmNfY2w0ejFzWlN3d2NWUT09
new york state did claim to replace it all with other renewables, however we could’ve been using both in conjunction anyways
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBaW9FQmUzUHotTGdMLUJJZ2hfaGxETGNyd1ZpbGR2YlotdzFPTVZXZERuOUpITHphTWItRVdwQjFBbXNudHgzZ2JwcEZQRXcyNGxHOEJ6Qk5YM2VxTXZONnZMWFRfaVBLNGxBVU13ZERMOUk9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCMXRJZ3dGU2FOUXBoeUFvN2tQRHlPQlBUbXZxYXRFLU1Eb3VhOHZQOEJhNEZ2Sm44VmdNNkl1UV9BcnM5RE83cWJLdV9FR0dXQXoxYTVveDVKYUhJVXQ1a0tDMHR1UUU2OHE0WXBGb3ZBd05VU1lIZkNBc3Mwd0ExSGVjaldzZ0R0Z2pwdmVXbUZ5MzFqMXZfT2xXZlVmcGY3RVAtV2lFbTZvRDBvRjR4QzFrVFV6cy01ZENfNGlpNHZhbUdkSF91MHJhUkFjR29GQV9OM0FDbGlRV1BBZz09
The claim is a lie.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBNnhiWUlxdlRLTWpnd1huMk93VGhsN0tfZzB0WkVlNjJRNjN3UUV3WWh5d0tEdWFTa2VJTnNpZzdiV21MSlMxTDQtMEotWU1Wb0Y3SDRtLURUdTZTU3c9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCSmhMRTJIZ3p1S2NJZllNNjJzQmRuTF9HdUVlLXFnNnM5dmVkMVRsSkZuNW9yY296ckFWaC1DVkFkN1duYTRNLUNFbUxKX3NqSGtCM21QZC1VZVpNaHRrT2w5R0tsaTd5ODFjZ3RYMUpOTWhwanpDMjJia3c3RnAtRHRfWFFvREdDaTBwakVscWQtUWw3bVNrTG85NV9kZEZLTW5UVkNJVnF3RkltU2N6SFdCak1FVVlibkF0QXZtNl8wUmltcWhzZjR0Y041VWpzcVRaU25INGJ6WlNkUT09
Oh no... the title is 100% correct. What they fail to mention is our power grid is dated, incomplete and broken. Infrastructure is the problem, not power generation. Constant blackouts and surges. And several rural villages and towns still not yet reached.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBa0VOamhkZERaUWRFUXdUcV9TbFBJTVhFc1JJOURXWmRERERDVm1OeFF0Z2hQVk5oekJ6dUt3Zkc5TEt6Y0o4bkMyRGQtNDJ2UzRYWk1UZVZ4bW5pYkE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCcG5FeWFOaWJGcGw3eVNfMXlXNHlMWF9YN0VMcW5aQU9iY0tQV1lwUWdCWE9NbTlTV0x3YjFxVlJpcDFJcWNzN3lEQUJRNjJXS05WeEtMM3AtaG1SZFF3SUE3d0ZUcWFKTW52cUVaMmxXeUFKS1ZmT3I4VzI4LXJXTy05S3VkR0VCMFdIOG8zLU5uSm1XNmg1R2k5cmlKc2pYeXR5RzlUQ3diaUNnUTdpVkx1UHpReFVCX05ueUx4dVhOZ1Jrc09jRy1BcC12VDB0Z3JueWZDYVBwNXdRdz09
source? i was skeptical myself but didn’t have the time to look into it further
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBNlpjMW83ZmJId1E4NXloZ2JIbTBsNUxIWUw2bHlZNm5yUl92Xy1BZkNmeHUyWnQ5NF9WWjB1VVA1TmYtRkwySjh6YWNPMGJWQnE4ZEZPR2tCNUZXLTEyaXdTUVljT0tEUWRrSFQ3ZEJmRDQ9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCWDZmWlU0MnFNak81TkFlblFEQmZDV2FpNTAzRWV5cnUwUWFJNGhhX1pScWxaZjBnbUJXU25INzJFbE1QSDlEUTYtNGdXX0pDMGRuNVRGUHVYSWNNXzg4VXFYd21TQkRxX0o1MDlpLThBWm5YUkVBVTRJTmozazhqQVFEV3M0S3ZzMWxxSHZFQ3BmczBOa1dOWTB5X0dQUy1hbGhpSUY5N250SDBMQ3Jqcl85SFRWaTc2T2k2Qm1ILWRBR2tENE5WQkZ0STY5aGxlWXpvckZocXRoNnRldz09
Well, the [EIA](https://i.redd.it/2xqodlwo0nw61.jpg) for one. But as the linked article states, and you can see in [reality](https://www.electricitymap.org/zone/US-NY-NYIS), the output can only be replaced by natural gas.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBbFRERFhzaTVjQVkzeGFydU9JaGFtZzg0Mi02SllGUUpFWEdOVW5Jdy1YZUpPeS0yTHJFVHhzVmJ0S2FjOG1TaTNxemV5aGE2cG9zS09CRHpCbFU5Umc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCVDF3cVBUczBTTzgtZEJJQ1pYWEl3WHZxNVg5dTFpRU5WQU5kNURjWG5uQlJzeFpheUlVZjRoRGFyYnZhZDY4NDduNmFlb3RhOFBGbG01Y3NVQXdQMG9hMUl2dWVteUMzbDFJaFkycnpRVTdEZmpfd0xQekQybFdSVFdwMGpJTVBKNGZKa0pRMFhleDVNaVh3LU1taHE4T1ZPMnFBMTBNSHJqVFplbmxzd0ttR1FqNGFnMFRweElHWGtpb09EdTZra1o4dTl5Ui1Ua3VKTHhVSjE1SW5DZz09
the first graph is seriously fucked
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBNVM5RXQ4VnNvYzFoZkctR1liYWtkMV9QUTdTcDlQeGhBbjNfOWpBMkUyeUtndXVsM0dpTkRhQm1BNl84Smx0anlLUndiOVVjMUZ6SG5ENUtQaGF3OHJ6WHliMTd2bmZ3ZWQyeWczaVIxRWs9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCSkRnamg0NVFzS0U3YXpzQzA0aFpZZExWYjhwNVVmTXJVSHVxRkhFRE9Hb2tFX2x1Z21OaDQxSmtyMk9hSmphSjBnZUI5MUpESV9iTHNYcDVidXJXdG5CdDR0ZW5kRnZsMUZ6OVNCYjZfR2xSSk1kZmNPb3NNN05qQXR4RGtMN3gzcEFTczlzWEtPdXFfbzNhbXQ2MUdFOFhEN2tmXzVWUUN2VjJiaGpKeUZvZWxILTFTY3QtUGc4MWIxMlBYT3lXOWlIbUR2d3dYaE4teUo3QmtXUkNBQT09
Jump in here and fix it up mate. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy_in_Kenya
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBZURIcm1jYm9sWlh2QjMyU1Q5SUVzck5oN3VEQnRlYUE2d2tfR2Jpd3BfcVc2RUpUVWh0SVB0RVRKVzE0QlRuXzNhWmh5Tm14dFpGYlpqUU52NVo2SGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCQkpFck11M3RRRjZIRXB1T1Uxa29lWFhJWW9qUW5Dd1JUVjZ5WjUwWl9hZ2psaUl1Q3ozNEtOM09zM2NiU1MyU0V6UVg0dDRFYThmX1BYMmNiNEx5bzlfdk1LX3l2UWQwWGpTOTREVnBKbU1JbkY5OVl1SG8xblRYZk03MXh6azlKZ2ZPVkhpMmtaVkFBOVpEXzZwUTJLb1BabnFrMG1ELWtNMjF4WU5zaGpWbm9UeU9HUmpMS2g2UlRrVERqdlhNS3ZGc1l6WGJETzJPdWowcUhmSmdPUT09
Now if they can also make it affordable I think you will see many people opting to get off the grid completely. I have been preaching that for over 20 years now.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBczQzMUFMU1NDUkdBbl82VzFFWm1LTmxPRFMtLUsyMGVpZjlRbGlGdjFmZmFMZ085aE1lcGd3b0JhZTQ1aG5UZjZEZEhRbWxpN195V0FGUDltVXloY0E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCM2FiRk1WcTVuQlZ4YUo2aVhOa18yV0xrMHF6STQyTXl6M1RoRTFvLWM3NU9LZ2ctOTJRTHdOMlNnMnd3Vnp3N0paVWdzYThNYVdESGxYajhSV1RhSVlIUWdOUDhtSjJ6WFJ1TUF6TmxIMjYxRHBlaml2SFpSXy1oVUxNNzMzcld1ZzhxWjg4V3QtWnF2X1lramNOTVZ2eEtOVnJDSzFnY2w5b0ViQXVieWZFUHh6SFRma0ZkUVY1LVRIaks3dUxkenk4bFR5ZUhkUXlqV0M4MnNaTGd0QT09
Such a memable format!
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-05-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBcmVQc0lwM0poMVhXRFA3QnJnN18tQkFRYldyNjdtT0s2bVJKd1R0WkYxcUVHcDZnaEFoSXFFcGdVMUx2NDRwXzNlemhSV1JDSmdlSHQxUHBjZHYyWEE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCbVJFVXVoNENxTTBaUHdhUFB6WlNoQ1ppaE9CYVcwX014eFY0VGlCOWdFaGZJb3c3ckFzUWFqS0NfRGRua2Y5TmpTanY4a2VKT3BEbXVnNWhXQndTV21KUXZ4Tzd6Qzd2N1RzNlB3RV9SY0pkREdPYmpibDhmRGtCLWZLNlVUZE5yT3VEQVlxSHZjZGhMY0pKUURXeDY3SHZVUWEtR3dUVnZuVDBpVzRJM0h6M3c0dlFrNHhZTi1yUURvaDdpLVRm
Yup!
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-05-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBU2ZrV3pZY0pEbjBwbkRaSkc1cWFUclNfUVBvbjNYTXk4Tl9JNk40S0VJcW1KdXFLT0I4V1RvNTNmdXFpMEtKMUVIcmduRGI2SFNlZTZicjZ3VlUxdlE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCaHpWTmFYeDQ5c2xlenhTbDFMdk9YU08tRHBZYVlmNWNuRG14SExOaW1XSElWZXYtTXJ3M21UQnhYRnVUVWVjOXpTSHNaQjZUVk1FenhnZ0YyY3lBYXZoSUpPaEdtMHZXX1Y5RERLUWNqbUZlZDMydmJ5RHhNRE1CT0hsSTZrQ3hjMXlRX3dCWk5hODhDajNKNDIwMWpHVS1abUJmMHY1eEFBMExDQkIxUkZaXzVpVzdhRXVVN18yWHJDdGpHWTI0
Love it. Thanks for sharing. And yes there might be more of that kind in there.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-05-04
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBZldmOHJOdndTelZEdVpvbE1UQUY3ZTBsczV0eHFuNFFnZHl1WHlqbU1vdE9EUmt5SF9jSkNxX3JfVjFxcXh0ZjVYS2ZJUEozNWR0T1lTN2xtMkRNcVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCNXhkSXNNZE80TG1Xa3FJLWlpRk13NXQ0RE9qUm91ZHNDbHhlWkFhV0U2V0ljZG9XVFhCWmFaTjFueUJQZGowRUtoRUR3cENfX3hyS3daWUNNZFJHcE5wUDRBWGxkU2VpdHRad3QwZ005bmRqU3V2YkJRODFUYlItSng2MWZqdWp4UVlRV0JEei01b1kwaDB2OUZRa1NXZXZ0Y3U4VTM2NTg4aGt0WURzT3lNVE44enVEQnJ2RkFuaV9xbDFzOUY1
OP is an anti-nuclear shill. We need nuclear energy and SMR's are indeed safer and wider applicable than big nuclear reactors (which are also safe when properly managed and funded). SMR's aren't going to solve the climate and energy crisis but there is no one thing that will. We need to use every good, safe and clean option out there. If you want to read more on why SMR's aren't bad options, do your own research or read this thread where I discredited propaganda against them before: https://www.reddit.com/r/ExtinctionRebellion/comments/kr29ux/why_are_nuclear_plants_so_expensive_safetys_only?sort=confidence
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-05
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBMlFLVDZPMEwzZnlLMlpSa3lWV0ZqV3ljSlBVMGlLUzNJMUZGWmo1TGtsaXo5UGJWNllLb3FSdW9wZ1ZjZERqVjBPeWRWVmlMLTVRX0YzSU5zZUNkYmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCb2hoVWZ2ZWdJeHlDQmlfdWR3UVViRmp5M0dJVlZETHRSQ1FsUmRlYWZhX0xudVRnbHBERzl3VGFuQWNCQ3gyejNSa09RZEQ2dHBITFVKSkFoc2c3c0huY1NRTlpsay1FZldoUjhuSk9TV3diek9kMEpuRktkUkRLTU9HQV9rM0owOVYxc0x5V1JiS1Bybk5HV3I2UnlFM1VLRlp0cGhfSHJ3RzROSUdBa205aVpBUVFnb0N4alFwaE41Smt0UmVnbnhEWFp5NFBnY3VyRWxOcXRwT3RLdz09
This isn’t an appropriate place for advertising & serves to make your brand look bad, not good.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-05-05
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBTkJGVVl6TjhNaW5jUG0xOW1vd1NlTGtQcjVINWhyaDRIT1d5T0N6eXRGTzNMYzZ4ZzJJSzF5MXgweENEVWhoYWJ2dlRibkhTZXllWFktOHZwd1pYZ2c9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCX1NRcWdpZGdmT0huUk5IRHlULXc2bHJGVVFVaXZYWUJzSnBKVEhUTGdlR3BqLWZwdWNiWlFzQVFQazVVUHNfSUVaTkFnOGdpWnlQRWtWclVwTjJOdEdNSk1IVkEzWkRoakRNTllUUldwdHlGeUVUZU9QODdoaU1iNGVuUDVHYnpwY254cTlhY0NUamJxUFhNQUxacmhzZ2RfbjVrN3VRbmdIZjZvcWYtcDdUOUlqZFNPcU54djZBLUh0NFRjeG1FaHpLVkI2TDV3MnlrSTNLbWw1YzhzZz09
These powerpoint reactors will likely get one or two built and then everyone else will bail after the first few SMRs end up more expensive than traditional nuclear, which is the result of every independent assessment The UK government https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/small-modular-reactors-techno-economic-assessment The Australian government https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=8297e6ba-e3d4-478e-ac62-a97d75660248&subId=669740 The peer-reviewed literature https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030142152030327X > the cost of generating electricity using SMRs is significantly higher than the corresponding costs of electricity generation using diesel, wind, solar, or some combination thereof. These results suggest that SMRs will be too expensive for these proposed first-mover markets for SMRs in Canada and that there will not be a sufficient market to justify investing in manufacturing facilities for SMRs. Even the German nuclear power industry knows they will cost more >[Nuclear Technology Germany (KernD) says SMRs are always going to be more expensive than bigger reactors due to lower power output at constant fixed costs, as safety measures and staffing requirements do not vary greatly compared to conventional reactors. "In terms of levelised energy costs, SMRs will always be more expensive than big plants."](https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/german-nuclear-industry-cautious-about-usefulness-small-reactors-energy-transition) What has never been supported is NuMeme's claims that it will be cheaper. They also have never presented how they arrived at their costs, beyond 'gas costs this much, lets pretend ours will be cheaper'. This is why [8/36 cities who had subscribed to NuScale have backed out after the company's refusal to show how they arrived at their ballooning predicted costs](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/11/several-us-utilities-back-out-deal-build-novel-nuclear-power-plant) These are the last throes of an industry in decline, desperately trying to retain relevance as nuclear is out competed by faster, cheaper, cleaner alternatives. There is also the aspect that in some countries SMRs are only being promoted because it allows subsidization of military submarine reactors under civil budgets >[Only if military needs are driving this decision is it explicable, Stirling says. “Even in a worst case scenario, where this massive Rolls Royce production line and supply chain investment is badly delayed (or even a complete failure) with respect to civil reactor production, what will nonetheless have been gained is a tooled-up facility and a national skills infrastructure for producing perhaps two further generations of submarine propulsion reactors, right into the second half of the century. “And the costs of this will have been borne not by the defence budget, but by consumers and citizens.”](https://thefifthestate.com.au/energy-lead/how-the-uks-secret-defence-policy-is-driving-energy-policy-with-the-public-kept-in-the-dark/) Even if SMRs fail, which they will the moment people realize how much they cost, it will have been a success for those pushing it because they have never been about economical power, they have always been about putting submarine reactor development under civil budgets. >[Prof Andy Stirling from Sussex argues that one reason the government is willing to burden householders with the expense of nuclear energy is because it underpins the supply chain and skills base for firms such as Rolls Royce and Babcock that work on nuclear submarines. He said: “It is clear that the costs of maintaining nuclear submarine capabilities are insupportable without parallel consumer-funded civil nuclear infrastructures](https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-48509942) >[Rolls Royce, which makes reactors for nuclear submarines, has been pressing the government to agree a fleet of small modular reactors for power generation in the UK. This civilian technology would be transferable to submarines.](https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-48509942) There are the propagandists and the useful idiots pushing SMRs; nobody in their right mind expects them to be an economical source of energy for the consumer. As the main article above rightly points out: >So why are they doing this? Because it allows them to defer governmental climate action while giving the appearance of climate action. They can pander to their least intelligent and wise supporters by asserting that renewables aren’t fit for purpose, while also not doing anything about the real problem because SMRs don’t exist in a modern, deployable, operable form yet. SMRs, like all 'advanced nuclear' is a scam to delay climate action for a decade instead of investing in what decarbonizes faster >[“Stabilizing the climate is urgent, nuclear power is slow,” “It meets no technical or operational need that low-carbon competitors cannot meet better, cheaper and faster.” ](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-energy-nuclearpower/nuclear-energy-too-slow-too-expensive-to-save-climate-report-idUSKBN1W909J) >["Contrary to a persistent myth based on erroneous methods, global data show that renewable electricity adds output and saves carbon faster than nuclear power does or ever has."](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214629618300598) >["In sum, use of wind, CSP, geothermal, tidal, PV, wave, and hydro to provide electricity for BEVs and HFCVs and, by extension, electricity for the residential, industrial, and commercial sectors, will result in the most benefit among the options considered. The combination of these technologies should be advanced as a solution to global warming, air pollution, and energy security. Coal-CCS and **nuclear offer less benefit thus represent an opportunity cost loss"**](https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2009/ee/b809990c#!divAbstract) Even the nuclear industry is giving up on itself, as the CEO of Exelon said: >["I'm the nuclear guy," Rowe said. "And you won't get better results with nuclear. It just isn't economic, and it's not economic within a foreseeable time frame."](https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2012/03/29/exelons-nuclear-guy-no-new-nukes/#5d841aa23c5d)
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBN2g2T2tBQTE2QWtSNkFyQ1E0WHhaOHV1LW12SHlIR3BXVUNnV2YybTNra1lxdWdQZzg3aG1UOC1jbTRvMjNRblpiTUpycE5uYTR0V040VmRXTWZoRGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCTm54SnlDdHNZX2pjc1NJOXVxOWpQeUU4ZkpEVzlLNDlZNlJibEQtc01hMWxHUnF6ZmdudUEwdjBQYXRsRWIyZzNJZEhxdFN5cG9Idmo1amRrTk1GczU4UTZReDg5UHh3YnBhM2VaQ2NlZnJjRU90TTYxbXJ2bldrV1lZdmM5Y041QnV3ejRFRFhvVm5Bc3h5N29EQnRDUWNTZEFVd3ZuYmNSUXRzTFYzY2VKTWJZbDRPX1RqTXMyaUhXdHZoaDEtaFRLb3RicFNFZmZxeFNSd0N0aTlZQT09
Thanks for engaging with such an expansive reply and so many sources! Surface level reading through it provides reasons against nuclear power in general that I haven't found in most articles posted against it. I'll be looking into this as soon as I can.
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBYUNxeEVEX1F4YlZuVHZld0Q2Uk84VlNsek8tbE9HYWhMTzZYWndsT09NU2JCSDBJd0V2VzdhLW94a0tEYXMxeTVxZXBySFQ1SEhlaGpJRmNrNkNEVmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCT3UyV1V1TlJBVUptbUtSSG5sTmdlcUQxWTFYaEx1cTh6RzRwOWpOQ0VzOFk4dkc4WlFENWFkODNRb3oyS3BrRndqNXFocjJRM0RzMldYbzVZS2s5a3hLVVE1em9URFNvTU1ob1dNQTBQQmVPS1V1US1WbTViWVR1SDlLbzg1a0dRZHJkZ0dVRy1RVFNKak5nLWhGWEJfWEhOTXBubEZaY2g0dW0wem1aUUczMVRfODhLMU5mSDhzRlVjV3BFb0tZV0hzNGlDQTNrWFFSWDNrWTNnWVJGdz09
How can we avoid facial recognition
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-05-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBR055NnBLdG12N1kyQXJ3OEN6RmtKb0ZDcmRrajNJbEZkZ19Ec0F5OE94c2FmSGNaM1Q0ZllKY0Z3WmJFcDNOSGUxNmctWEZqZDg1MVFoUmppTXJZckZBX2pXMVJPR3dGMFZwYzRFMGxCT0U9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCTFpBLU5BSklzOXR4TVdfaXIyc0VjTXZLZlBpTFRGMklBZkNiNE9EQmJxRUdWb0k1NXh3NkNMZnk0TENDOUtZTEY3NkJzbEdpQWp4SHkxZHEtc2FOV19iVGFBMU9vQVhVdjNtQVNBSHB5eE5IMnc1ZnV2TFdiZUd3WjY0N3lmTEpIQTdGVkNUVFcxaEJzZk9WaERlQkllWU03N051MzdQMENxb0loWjVOODFJSVJ1bEFGQTVjdUhuc21uWXFobzJCdm11S2xYVWdKOFRTclAwczFQQkFrUT09
It's tough to avoid, besides trying to implement laws/rules/regulations. What we can try doing is to bring awareness of the problems with relying on facial recognition technologies and/or try developing software/models/systems that are not as biased. This also raises a bigger question of privacy concerns.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-05-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBdzV6dzdWYTNUSXJ5TFhYX3hyOTdCRmdaUVFUS1hLSEN4MlhfZmFJNlVCeXFMcVA4cThPV0RiSXRfMG01MmFrVE9BUG90UEZMUWszamQxMzRaRnhNLXc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCX2ttUnlEbWtTdC0yTk05REFWYzJRaE44LXE4ZWRqNm1IWWlmZ0ZHV0FYZk9HUnh4T1F0eUZaamdEelhCRm5YSDAtRmV4dXBGc1lqMFVsRkJGVXRtYlBodkc5V2pZSGFzOGJIS2o0VEVaTUk2M3NGT01GbFBTQVBGVnhNaWNycXo4RDBVNS1ub1ZmUlRDTTVmTE1ZSTBDQ0tINl9meWhsaGI2d3pUN3JrYnpHTjFjZTgtWGZuOFVUNGtwLUNBNHRCLVlBaTRhSi1ZLVBXTzdVQUw3b1NHdz09
Grid stability is a big issue though... instead of investing in plants they should invest in r&d of large electricity storage facilities
r/cleanenergy
comment
r/CleanEnergy
2021-05-08
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBWnRBb3NNYTdyQmp3N1o3Z2Z5NnVqVHFyUFlFekh2eWhLRHRNVmhNQkQtSzlLdHdHZFJscktJRGVhcUpyUVlSSGVjUTBhWEMxRXhxOWN4TG9qR2ZJQnc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCREZyMm43Qk9BZVd0ck1LaXpSOEFfUWJnOEI1WGU4TzRwcXkwa2YtaDFieWVXV0psYjRKZF9jb196cm9yWnpLVWhSTlp2cGd2WlIyNFoxbGdHWnRhdjdhTHJ2RTd2OFQ1SDFILXp4N1k4N2dNU3VuR0ZWZTBXblc3U0JVSm5rbmNoc1NuZ0djR3hIN29VZHpZNmZjclZ3SFcxRGNqZzVKelY4cTJ5b0d2RDU1TlVTMVlmVVZEcjBxanJsS0o1ZWhjc2FtZ1pnNFlWSmpsMm1TbGJ1ZzF6Zz09
any platform that gets views is a good place to talk about AI ethics and down the road(unless sufficiently advanced AI is here already) AI rights as persons.
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-06-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBTzR3YkRJUm1oOFB1bkR2UHhjbk14WVIwQkxmc2lBUlFjR2I4bkN5OGZLS0xDNmZwWVR4aXEyOU9SV0FVNkpwNGxyWDBpUElvelpsSVNhNlRKWHlWTEE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCMnI2YXI5WVlkbHlaLVV6RnpJa2hzMzJxTXFGMU9MMlVVelltR010MFNkZHpRNlJzalVXVnNHNmw5NGV4T2l4OVk4ZzJKcmNEZDZ0bTBOMzAxUlRuRUl5c2hOSW9BeVcweV9DengteENWX0t2Wjk5UnN1Tlc5YUx5ckttTTZPZjREd0JaUnNKcVlvWnBqT2t2d0NXcWstMjI4YXVFWF9WaDhMUFRTR2VGZWhKdGRES1VRc1B5emFCeFZYaTgzNkM1a0ZvU1R1VUo1VUtjWlVEajlSNEcwZz09
What are they using tiktok for?
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-06-03
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBQy1HZVo4VUtaZEhDQ1V2TU9HWVNVUUtocXlSV3NQT2c0YVZJamVXaVpyQ3lNMFR3NEN1dWt3WFQyXzhfeFpDdGNSVUQyV2lZLW9ZWGNlMjQ1YWR5ZEE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCZHo3TFNfeXlZOFBDekFvMmNHcmlpbnZSZDdpX3hpUTF5aXpIa1pweXN4TGVVMWNtV0hIS2ZNTFNvQnlTWmxXWHBjSDZDQlJGYWVvYnFxaGplMW94UDNQMWtLMFkwRGU5aE1ITU5HaHE5SlJvR2ZCcmlvTUsyMzMxR3JOWnZNRFBoVUstUG1sRVZTbm4tLTNIY29JY2c5ajRJcFRLZENyeFNXQm1QZnY0T0o2REhDaDczRkp6QkprbHdqUEN6TXg2Q2lvbFUzV2lXdGNvN2Z3NHA0UzdfQT09
No
r/aiethics
comment
r/AIethics
2021-06-04
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJBcWRneXNpUkl0QlVVMWxtTE1MaUMxdGtjVm1sdFlIdHh4czJydkYwOWtwLWFNWkJ4Y0YwTFM3V0R1WV9tYkxXWjkxMjE2dUZ0cGhXNDFCQmowZlNWRE53bXlicmlQbGIwZVNSaGVlVEVsdmc9
Z0FBQUFBQm9IVGJCeVBZaTVTeWczMENoRGFiY1BtYjJvb0lJX1B0aDFZRURyRjlSbGxJRTc3VFZIYWprempSbXRZMlg0RVZ5VVBUZXNRaU1kZmYyd2VqeTlEVUlDeC05ZXNxbkJGZUVIWXNPbFhidkM0d2xjMEczVjNzVGhua0dLci1LZ2Q3LV9wY0Z5UExkbWlkal83TF9uQUpscTJaOWpxMTVrYzdVY2Y2MU85Y3NoUHZKNi0wVmkxZHRfUkoySWxpalZNazNGU1JsYzMxeGE2UHgwZm1TdTg3QjZsalZLdz09