devnote5676's picture
Create README.md
10fefb0
|
raw
history blame
1.77 kB
---
license: mit
datasets:
- webis/Touche23-ValueEval
language:
- en
metrics:
- f1
tags:
- social-values
---
# Schwartz Value Classifier
This classifier is intended to predict the existence of social values from text snippets.
*Disclaimer: this is not the official repo published by the authors of the paper, and may not truly replicate the performance described in the original study*
## Value dimensions
1. security
2. power
3. achievement
4. hedonism
5. stimulation
6. self-direction
7. universalism
8. benevolence
9. conformity
10. tradition
## Datasets
This model is finetuned on two datasets: ValueNet and Touche23-ValueEval
We follow the original paper to convert both datasets into a binary classification task for each dimension.
- ValueNet: a sentence has a positive label if the original label contains 1 (positive) or -1 (negative), and 0 if the original label is 0.
- ValueEval: a sentence is assigned a positive label if the original label vector is marked 1 for that dimension. Since the original paper follows a 20-dimension refined categorization, we map them back to 10 dimensions. Therefore, the same sentence appears ten times, once for each dimension.
## How to use
Start your sentence with a label that indicates which dimension to measure. An example would be:
- <power> [SEP] staying out late after telling my girlfriend I could be home early
Please make sure to follow the exact format "<value\_name>" at the beginning of the sentence as this is a special token in the tokenizer: any spaces or different formats will not be encoded correctly.
## Performances
- F1 score (macro): 0.759
## References
Do Differences in Values Influence Disagreements in Online Discussions? (EMNLP'23) [link](https://aclanthology.org/2023.emnlp-main.992/)