question
stringlengths 11
149
| article
stringlengths 529
63.5k
| summary
stringlengths 4
444
| model source
stringclasses 3
values | length bucket
int8 0
2
| url
stringlengths 35
310
| qa classifier score
float32 0.1
0.85
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
When will local schools play in the Ohio high school hockey state tournament? | The puck drops for the Ohio High School Athletic Association state tournament on Friday, Feb. 15. Here is a look at the Greater Cincinnati area teams that will be competing. Moeller: The Crusaders enter the Columbus District Hockey Tournament with the highest seed of all Greater Cincinnati teams at No. 6, earning them a first-round bye. Moeller plays in the Capital Hockey Conference based out of Columbus, where they finished sixth in the Red Division with a 14-12-1 record. Senior Jordan Walter closed out the regular season tied for second in the division with 14 goals. Junior goalie Ryan Morton Strauss registered an 86.9 save percentage, good for 10th in the Red Division. Moeller will take on the winner of Alter versus Gahanna at 5:15 p.m., Sunday, Feb. 17, at the OhioHealth Ice Haus in Columbus. St. Xavier: St. X registered an undefeated 2018-19 Southwest Ohio High School Hockey League campaign, going 13-0 and 16-8-1 overall to garner the No. 8 seed in the tournament. The Bombers are set to take on Mason at 6 p.m., Saturday, Feb. 16, at the OhioHealth Chiller North in Columbus. St. Xavier beat the Comets 11-0 earlier in the season. Talawanda: The Braves finished second to St. X in the SWOHSHL Red Division with a 10-3 record and 21-9 record overall, earning them the No. 11 seed. Talawanda is led by forward Josh Shrader, who is sixth in the conference in goals (7), ninth in assists (6) and eighth in total points (14). The Braves will face Thomas Worthington in the opening round of the tournament at 6:45 p.m., Saturday, Feb. 15, at the OhioHealth Chiller North in Columbus. Buy Photo Moeller's Jarrod Gorczynski (17) arrests control of the puck from St. Xavier's Nick DeCarlo at US Bank Arena, December 7, 2018. (Photo11: Geoff Blankenship for the Enquirer) Sycamore: With a 4-8-1 conference record and 5-10-1 record overall, Sycamore comes into the tournament as the 24th seed. Aviators forward Johnny Ciotola ranks third in goals (11) and tied for fourth in totals points (15) in the SWOHSHL this season. Sycamore is set to face No. 17 seed Bishop Watterson in the opening round at 4 p.m., Saturday, Feb. 16, at the OhioHealth Ice Haus in Columbus. Elder: The Panthers enter the tournament as the 25th seed, registering a 1-12 SWOHSHL record and 3-19 overall record on the season. Elder will face Dublin Scioto in the opening round on 6:45 p.m., Friday, Feb. 15, at the OhioHealth Ice Haus in Columbus. The winner will move on to face top-seeded Dublin Jerome. Mason: The Comets come in at the final spot of the tournament, seed No. 26. Mason was winless in 13 SWOHSHL matches and finished 2-18 overall on the season. They will play St. Xavier in the opening round, who they played Feb. 1 and fell 11-0. The match is set for 6 p.m., Saturday, Feb. 16, at the OhioHealth Chiller North in Columbus and the winner will take on the winner of Olentangy and Orange Feb. 17. | The puck drops for the Ohio High School Athletic Association state tournament on Friday, Feb. 15. | pegasus | 0 | https://www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/high-school/high-school-sports/2019/02/15/ohio-high-school-hockeys-state-tournament-greater-cincinnati-teams/2872530002/ | 0.264485 |
When will local schools play in the Ohio high school hockey state tournament? | The puck drops for the Ohio High School Athletic Association state tournament on Friday, Feb. 15. Here is a look at the Greater Cincinnati area teams that will be competing. Moeller: The Crusaders enter the Columbus District Hockey Tournament with the highest seed of all Greater Cincinnati teams at No. 6, earning them a first-round bye. Moeller plays in the Capital Hockey Conference based out of Columbus, where they finished sixth in the Red Division with a 14-12-1 record. Senior Jordan Walter closed out the regular season tied for second in the division with 14 goals. Junior goalie Ryan Morton Strauss registered an 86.9 save percentage, good for 10th in the Red Division. Moeller will take on the winner of Alter versus Gahanna at 5:15 p.m., Sunday, Feb. 17, at the OhioHealth Ice Haus in Columbus. St. Xavier: St. X registered an undefeated 2018-19 Southwest Ohio High School Hockey League campaign, going 13-0 and 16-8-1 overall to garner the No. 8 seed in the tournament. The Bombers are set to take on Mason at 6 p.m., Saturday, Feb. 16, at the OhioHealth Chiller North in Columbus. St. Xavier beat the Comets 11-0 earlier in the season. Talawanda: The Braves finished second to St. X in the SWOHSHL Red Division with a 10-3 record and 21-9 record overall, earning them the No. 11 seed. Talawanda is led by forward Josh Shrader, who is sixth in the conference in goals (7), ninth in assists (6) and eighth in total points (14). The Braves will face Thomas Worthington in the opening round of the tournament at 6:45 p.m., Saturday, Feb. 15, at the OhioHealth Chiller North in Columbus. Buy Photo Moeller's Jarrod Gorczynski (17) arrests control of the puck from St. Xavier's Nick DeCarlo at US Bank Arena, December 7, 2018. (Photo11: Geoff Blankenship for the Enquirer) Sycamore: With a 4-8-1 conference record and 5-10-1 record overall, Sycamore comes into the tournament as the 24th seed. Aviators forward Johnny Ciotola ranks third in goals (11) and tied for fourth in totals points (15) in the SWOHSHL this season. Sycamore is set to face No. 17 seed Bishop Watterson in the opening round at 4 p.m., Saturday, Feb. 16, at the OhioHealth Ice Haus in Columbus. Elder: The Panthers enter the tournament as the 25th seed, registering a 1-12 SWOHSHL record and 3-19 overall record on the season. Elder will face Dublin Scioto in the opening round on 6:45 p.m., Friday, Feb. 15, at the OhioHealth Ice Haus in Columbus. The winner will move on to face top-seeded Dublin Jerome. Mason: The Comets come in at the final spot of the tournament, seed No. 26. Mason was winless in 13 SWOHSHL matches and finished 2-18 overall on the season. They will play St. Xavier in the opening round, who they played Feb. 1 and fell 11-0. The match is set for 6 p.m., Saturday, Feb. 16, at the OhioHealth Chiller North in Columbus and the winner will take on the winner of Olentangy and Orange Feb. 17. | The puck drops for the Ohio High School Athletic Association state tournament on Friday, Feb. 15. Here is a look at the Greater Cincinnati area teams that will be competing. | bart | 1 | https://www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/high-school/high-school-sports/2019/02/15/ohio-high-school-hockeys-state-tournament-greater-cincinnati-teams/2872530002/ | 0.216462 |
When will local schools play in the Ohio high school hockey state tournament? | The puck drops for the Ohio High School Athletic Association state tournament on Friday, Feb. 15. Here is a look at the Greater Cincinnati area teams that will be competing. Moeller: The Crusaders enter the Columbus District Hockey Tournament with the highest seed of all Greater Cincinnati teams at No. 6, earning them a first-round bye. Moeller plays in the Capital Hockey Conference based out of Columbus, where they finished sixth in the Red Division with a 14-12-1 record. Senior Jordan Walter closed out the regular season tied for second in the division with 14 goals. Junior goalie Ryan Morton Strauss registered an 86.9 save percentage, good for 10th in the Red Division. Moeller will take on the winner of Alter versus Gahanna at 5:15 p.m., Sunday, Feb. 17, at the OhioHealth Ice Haus in Columbus. St. Xavier: St. X registered an undefeated 2018-19 Southwest Ohio High School Hockey League campaign, going 13-0 and 16-8-1 overall to garner the No. 8 seed in the tournament. The Bombers are set to take on Mason at 6 p.m., Saturday, Feb. 16, at the OhioHealth Chiller North in Columbus. St. Xavier beat the Comets 11-0 earlier in the season. Talawanda: The Braves finished second to St. X in the SWOHSHL Red Division with a 10-3 record and 21-9 record overall, earning them the No. 11 seed. Talawanda is led by forward Josh Shrader, who is sixth in the conference in goals (7), ninth in assists (6) and eighth in total points (14). The Braves will face Thomas Worthington in the opening round of the tournament at 6:45 p.m., Saturday, Feb. 15, at the OhioHealth Chiller North in Columbus. Buy Photo Moeller's Jarrod Gorczynski (17) arrests control of the puck from St. Xavier's Nick DeCarlo at US Bank Arena, December 7, 2018. (Photo11: Geoff Blankenship for the Enquirer) Sycamore: With a 4-8-1 conference record and 5-10-1 record overall, Sycamore comes into the tournament as the 24th seed. Aviators forward Johnny Ciotola ranks third in goals (11) and tied for fourth in totals points (15) in the SWOHSHL this season. Sycamore is set to face No. 17 seed Bishop Watterson in the opening round at 4 p.m., Saturday, Feb. 16, at the OhioHealth Ice Haus in Columbus. Elder: The Panthers enter the tournament as the 25th seed, registering a 1-12 SWOHSHL record and 3-19 overall record on the season. Elder will face Dublin Scioto in the opening round on 6:45 p.m., Friday, Feb. 15, at the OhioHealth Ice Haus in Columbus. The winner will move on to face top-seeded Dublin Jerome. Mason: The Comets come in at the final spot of the tournament, seed No. 26. Mason was winless in 13 SWOHSHL matches and finished 2-18 overall on the season. They will play St. Xavier in the opening round, who they played Feb. 1 and fell 11-0. The match is set for 6 p.m., Saturday, Feb. 16, at the OhioHealth Chiller North in Columbus and the winner will take on the winner of Olentangy and Orange Feb. 17. | The puck drops for the Ohio High School Athletic Association state tournament on Friday, Feb. 15. The Crusaders enter the tournament with the highest seed of all Greater Cincinnati teams at No. 6. Moeller plays in the Capital Hockey Conference based out of Columbus, where they finished sixth in the Red Division with a 14-12-1 record. | pegasus | 2 | https://www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/high-school/high-school-sports/2019/02/15/ohio-high-school-hockeys-state-tournament-greater-cincinnati-teams/2872530002/ | 0.433182 |
Does Anthony Joshua Have International Superstar Potential Like LeBron James And Cristiano Ronaldo? | The term international superstar isn't something to be thrown around lightly. Especially when discussing where one athlete currently ranks or has the potential to rank amongst other elite athletes that dominate their respective sports. Being an international superstar isn't purely determined by the performance of an athlete, but better yet, if that athlete has the qualities and that "it factor" that allows them to transcend their sport. Many athletes win championships and go on to have Hall of Fame careers, but very few are considered international superstars. Obviously, the big news this week in the heavyweight division was the announcement that Anthony Joshua was going to make his USA debut on June 1 at Madison Square Garden when he defends 75 percent of the undisputed heavyweight titles against Brooklyn, New York native, undefeated Jarrell Miller. To many people, well, at least DAZN Network Executive Chairman John Skipper, Joshua has the potential to be an international superstar similar to LeBron James and Cristiano Ronaldo. . @anthonyfjoshua has the potential to be an international superstar at the level of LeBron or Ronaldo. AJs U.S. debut on June 1 @TheGarden is his next step to global awareness. Keep in mind, there was a time when the heavyweight champion was the most famous man in the world. John Skipper (@JohnSkipper) February 13, 2019 POTENTIAL Reminding people that there was a time when the heavyweight champion was the most famous man in the world isn't exactly the most compelling argument these days when making a case for Joshua and the term international superstar being used in the same sentence. Back then, for the United States at least, baseball, horse racing and boxing were the top three sports, while soccer dominated Europe and Latin America. Now, of course, Skipper and all of Joshua's fans will argue that Skipper used the word potential. Sure, there's no doubt that Joshua has the potential, but it might be out of his control. You see, Joshua and his promoter Eddie Hearn can do everything right, which in large part, they have done already, but it still doesn't guarantee Joshua international superstar status. In addition, with the amount of money DAZN has invested in Joshua, you better believe Skipper needs Joshua to become an international superstar, and quick. Especially with DAZN having reportedly invested $100 million into Joshua over the course of their deal. FINANCIAL COMPARISON Before we get into whether or not Joshua has that potential, let's first take a look at where he ranks among his peers across all sports in the earnings department. According to Forbes, in 2018, Joshua earned $38 million placing him at number 25 on the world's highest-paid athletes list. Not too shabby. The Joseph Parker fight almost a year ago generated nearly 1.5 million pay-per-view buys and a live gate of 78,000 at Principality Stadium in Cardiff, Wales. Joshua is a sponsorship phenom with more than a dozen sponsors that include Under Armour, Jaguar, Beats, StubHub, Hugo Boss, Lucozade Sport and Audemars Piguet. All of this bodes well for Joshua's aspirations of being an international star, simply because of the fact that these partnerships further increase his profile. Let's not also forget, like Ronaldo, Joshua's not hard on the eyes (no offense LeBron). At 29 years old, Joshua is in his physical prime and has the looks to go with his Adonis-like physique. For comparison, Joshua isn't even the highest paid boxer on the list. Canelo Alvarez came in at number 15 having earned $44.5 million. We'll get to the other boxer in a moment. Ronaldo brought in an impressive $108 million ranking at number three in 2018 with Lebron trailing at number six bringing in $85.5 million. For comparison, both Ronaldo and LeBron both earned more in sponsorships than Joshua earned in total. Oh, and just for perspective, the highest paid athlete in 2018 weighs almost hundreds pounds less than Joshua and competes in the same sport. That's right, Floyd Mayweather earned a staggering $285 million, placing him number one on the 2018 list. That's more than Ronaldo, LeBron and Joshua put together. Talk about international star power. Someone had to be watching Mayweather vs. McGregor. RECIPE FOR STARDOM The truth of the matter is that becoming an international superstar isn't something that Joshua or DAZN can make happen. There's no magic formula or step by step plan to follow. It just happens. It's a combination of so many variables that are out of anyone's control mixed with timing, that even the best marketers and strategists can't "will it" into existence. Absolutely. That remains to be seen, but he's moving in the right direction by taking his talents to New York City and June 1 is his first step in global domination. | Anthony Joshua has the potential to be an international superstar like LeBron James and Cristiano Ronaldo, according to John Skipper of DAZN Network. | ctrlsum | 0 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterkahn/2019/02/15/does-anthony-joshua-have-international-superstar-potential-like-lebron-james-and-cristiano-ronaldo/ | 0.584379 |
Does Anthony Joshua Have International Superstar Potential Like LeBron James And Cristiano Ronaldo? | The term international superstar isn't something to be thrown around lightly. Especially when discussing where one athlete currently ranks or has the potential to rank amongst other elite athletes that dominate their respective sports. Being an international superstar isn't purely determined by the performance of an athlete, but better yet, if that athlete has the qualities and that "it factor" that allows them to transcend their sport. Many athletes win championships and go on to have Hall of Fame careers, but very few are considered international superstars. Obviously, the big news this week in the heavyweight division was the announcement that Anthony Joshua was going to make his USA debut on June 1 at Madison Square Garden when he defends 75 percent of the undisputed heavyweight titles against Brooklyn, New York native, undefeated Jarrell Miller. To many people, well, at least DAZN Network Executive Chairman John Skipper, Joshua has the potential to be an international superstar similar to LeBron James and Cristiano Ronaldo. . @anthonyfjoshua has the potential to be an international superstar at the level of LeBron or Ronaldo. AJs U.S. debut on June 1 @TheGarden is his next step to global awareness. Keep in mind, there was a time when the heavyweight champion was the most famous man in the world. John Skipper (@JohnSkipper) February 13, 2019 POTENTIAL Reminding people that there was a time when the heavyweight champion was the most famous man in the world isn't exactly the most compelling argument these days when making a case for Joshua and the term international superstar being used in the same sentence. Back then, for the United States at least, baseball, horse racing and boxing were the top three sports, while soccer dominated Europe and Latin America. Now, of course, Skipper and all of Joshua's fans will argue that Skipper used the word potential. Sure, there's no doubt that Joshua has the potential, but it might be out of his control. You see, Joshua and his promoter Eddie Hearn can do everything right, which in large part, they have done already, but it still doesn't guarantee Joshua international superstar status. In addition, with the amount of money DAZN has invested in Joshua, you better believe Skipper needs Joshua to become an international superstar, and quick. Especially with DAZN having reportedly invested $100 million into Joshua over the course of their deal. FINANCIAL COMPARISON Before we get into whether or not Joshua has that potential, let's first take a look at where he ranks among his peers across all sports in the earnings department. According to Forbes, in 2018, Joshua earned $38 million placing him at number 25 on the world's highest-paid athletes list. Not too shabby. The Joseph Parker fight almost a year ago generated nearly 1.5 million pay-per-view buys and a live gate of 78,000 at Principality Stadium in Cardiff, Wales. Joshua is a sponsorship phenom with more than a dozen sponsors that include Under Armour, Jaguar, Beats, StubHub, Hugo Boss, Lucozade Sport and Audemars Piguet. All of this bodes well for Joshua's aspirations of being an international star, simply because of the fact that these partnerships further increase his profile. Let's not also forget, like Ronaldo, Joshua's not hard on the eyes (no offense LeBron). At 29 years old, Joshua is in his physical prime and has the looks to go with his Adonis-like physique. For comparison, Joshua isn't even the highest paid boxer on the list. Canelo Alvarez came in at number 15 having earned $44.5 million. We'll get to the other boxer in a moment. Ronaldo brought in an impressive $108 million ranking at number three in 2018 with Lebron trailing at number six bringing in $85.5 million. For comparison, both Ronaldo and LeBron both earned more in sponsorships than Joshua earned in total. Oh, and just for perspective, the highest paid athlete in 2018 weighs almost hundreds pounds less than Joshua and competes in the same sport. That's right, Floyd Mayweather earned a staggering $285 million, placing him number one on the 2018 list. That's more than Ronaldo, LeBron and Joshua put together. Talk about international star power. Someone had to be watching Mayweather vs. McGregor. RECIPE FOR STARDOM The truth of the matter is that becoming an international superstar isn't something that Joshua or DAZN can make happen. There's no magic formula or step by step plan to follow. It just happens. It's a combination of so many variables that are out of anyone's control mixed with timing, that even the best marketers and strategists can't "will it" into existence. Absolutely. That remains to be seen, but he's moving in the right direction by taking his talents to New York City and June 1 is his first step in global domination. | Anthony Joshua will make his USA debut on June 1 at Madison Square Garden. DAZN Network Executive Chairman John Skipper believes Joshua has the potential to be an international superstar. | bart | 1 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterkahn/2019/02/15/does-anthony-joshua-have-international-superstar-potential-like-lebron-james-and-cristiano-ronaldo/ | 0.269965 |
Does Anthony Joshua Have International Superstar Potential Like LeBron James And Cristiano Ronaldo? | The term international superstar isn't something to be thrown around lightly. Especially when discussing where one athlete currently ranks or has the potential to rank amongst other elite athletes that dominate their respective sports. Being an international superstar isn't purely determined by the performance of an athlete, but better yet, if that athlete has the qualities and that "it factor" that allows them to transcend their sport. Many athletes win championships and go on to have Hall of Fame careers, but very few are considered international superstars. Obviously, the big news this week in the heavyweight division was the announcement that Anthony Joshua was going to make his USA debut on June 1 at Madison Square Garden when he defends 75 percent of the undisputed heavyweight titles against Brooklyn, New York native, undefeated Jarrell Miller. To many people, well, at least DAZN Network Executive Chairman John Skipper, Joshua has the potential to be an international superstar similar to LeBron James and Cristiano Ronaldo. . @anthonyfjoshua has the potential to be an international superstar at the level of LeBron or Ronaldo. AJs U.S. debut on June 1 @TheGarden is his next step to global awareness. Keep in mind, there was a time when the heavyweight champion was the most famous man in the world. John Skipper (@JohnSkipper) February 13, 2019 POTENTIAL Reminding people that there was a time when the heavyweight champion was the most famous man in the world isn't exactly the most compelling argument these days when making a case for Joshua and the term international superstar being used in the same sentence. Back then, for the United States at least, baseball, horse racing and boxing were the top three sports, while soccer dominated Europe and Latin America. Now, of course, Skipper and all of Joshua's fans will argue that Skipper used the word potential. Sure, there's no doubt that Joshua has the potential, but it might be out of his control. You see, Joshua and his promoter Eddie Hearn can do everything right, which in large part, they have done already, but it still doesn't guarantee Joshua international superstar status. In addition, with the amount of money DAZN has invested in Joshua, you better believe Skipper needs Joshua to become an international superstar, and quick. Especially with DAZN having reportedly invested $100 million into Joshua over the course of their deal. FINANCIAL COMPARISON Before we get into whether or not Joshua has that potential, let's first take a look at where he ranks among his peers across all sports in the earnings department. According to Forbes, in 2018, Joshua earned $38 million placing him at number 25 on the world's highest-paid athletes list. Not too shabby. The Joseph Parker fight almost a year ago generated nearly 1.5 million pay-per-view buys and a live gate of 78,000 at Principality Stadium in Cardiff, Wales. Joshua is a sponsorship phenom with more than a dozen sponsors that include Under Armour, Jaguar, Beats, StubHub, Hugo Boss, Lucozade Sport and Audemars Piguet. All of this bodes well for Joshua's aspirations of being an international star, simply because of the fact that these partnerships further increase his profile. Let's not also forget, like Ronaldo, Joshua's not hard on the eyes (no offense LeBron). At 29 years old, Joshua is in his physical prime and has the looks to go with his Adonis-like physique. For comparison, Joshua isn't even the highest paid boxer on the list. Canelo Alvarez came in at number 15 having earned $44.5 million. We'll get to the other boxer in a moment. Ronaldo brought in an impressive $108 million ranking at number three in 2018 with Lebron trailing at number six bringing in $85.5 million. For comparison, both Ronaldo and LeBron both earned more in sponsorships than Joshua earned in total. Oh, and just for perspective, the highest paid athlete in 2018 weighs almost hundreds pounds less than Joshua and competes in the same sport. That's right, Floyd Mayweather earned a staggering $285 million, placing him number one on the 2018 list. That's more than Ronaldo, LeBron and Joshua put together. Talk about international star power. Someone had to be watching Mayweather vs. McGregor. RECIPE FOR STARDOM The truth of the matter is that becoming an international superstar isn't something that Joshua or DAZN can make happen. There's no magic formula or step by step plan to follow. It just happens. It's a combination of so many variables that are out of anyone's control mixed with timing, that even the best marketers and strategists can't "will it" into existence. Absolutely. That remains to be seen, but he's moving in the right direction by taking his talents to New York City and June 1 is his first step in global domination. | Anthony Joshua has the potential to be an international superstar like LeBron James and Cristiano Ronaldo, according to John Skipper of DAZN Network. The 29-year-old heavyweight champion is a sponsorship phenom with more than a dozen sponsors that include Under Armour, Jaguar, Beats, StubHub and Hugo Boss. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterkahn/2019/02/15/does-anthony-joshua-have-international-superstar-potential-like-lebron-james-and-cristiano-ronaldo/ | 0.588726 |
How many national emergencies have been called by presidents? | President Trump declared a national emergency to free up funds to build a wall without congressional approval on Friday, adding that other presidents have called national emergencies on other topics "many times before." The National Emergencies Act of 1975 allows the president to declare a national emergency, but he must outline the specific emergency powers he is using under existing statutes. According to the Brennan Center, there have been 58 national emergencies called by presidents since 1979. Thirty-one of those national emergencies are still in effect. Here is a list of when national emergencies have been used, and what their purpose was: President Jimmy Carter Nov. 14, 1979 (still in effect): A national emergency in response to the Iran hostage crisis, which froze Iran's assets in the United States. President Ronald Reagan April 17, 1980: Further Prohibitions on Transactions with Iran, never terminated or continued; Further Prohibitions on Transactions with Iran, never terminated or continued; Oct. 14, 1983: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked in 1983; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked in 1983; March 30, 1984: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked in 1985; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked in 1985; May 1, 1985: Prohibiting Trade and Certain Other Transactions Involving Nicaragua, revoked in 1990; Prohibiting Trade and Certain Other Transactions Involving Nicaragua, revoked in 1990; Sept. 9, 1985: Prohibiting Trade and Certain Other Transactions Involving South Africa (in response to apartheid), revoked 1991; Prohibiting Trade and Certain Other Transactions Involving South Africa (in response to apartheid), revoked 1991; Jan. 17, 1986: Prohibiting Trade and Certain Transactions Involving Libya, revoked 2004; Prohibiting Trade and Certain Transactions Involving Libya, revoked 2004; April 8, 1988: Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to Panama, revoked 1990. President George H.W. Bush August 2, 1990: Blocking Iraqi Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Iraq, revoked 2004; Blocking Iraqi Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Iraq, revoked 2004; Sept. 30, 1990: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 1993; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 1993; Nov. 16, 1990: Chemical and Biological Weapons Proliferation, revoked 1994; Chemical and Biological Weapons Proliferation, revoked 1994; Oct. 4, 1991: Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to Haiti, revoked 1994; Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to Haiti, revoked 1994; May 30, 1992: Blocking "Yugoslav Government" Property and Property of the Governments of Serbia and Montenegro, revoked 2003. President Bill Clinton Sept. 26, 1993: Prohibiting Certain Transactions Involving UNITA (a political party in Angola), revoked 2003; Prohibiting Certain Transactions Involving UNITA (a political party in Angola), revoked 2003; Sept. 30, 1993: Measures to Restrict the Participation by United States Persons in Weapons Proliferation Activities, revoked 1994; Measures to Restrict the Participation by United States Persons in Weapons Proliferation Activities, revoked 1994; June 30, 1994: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 1994; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 1994; Aug. 19, 1994: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 2001; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 2001; Sept. 29, 1994: Measures to Restrict the Participation by United States Persons in Weapons Proliferation Activities, revoked 1994; Measures to Restrict the Participation by United States Persons in Weapons Proliferation Activities, revoked 1994; Oct. 25, 1994: Blocking Property and Additional Measures With Respect to the Bosnian Serb- Controlled Areas of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, revoked 2003; Blocking Property and Additional Measures With Respect to the Bosnian Serb- Controlled Areas of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, revoked 2003; Nov. 14, 1994 (still in effect): Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, continued in November 2018; Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, continued in November 2018; Jan. 23, 1995 (still in effect): Prohibiting Transactions with Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process, continued in January 2018; Prohibiting Transactions with Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process, continued in January 2018; March 15, 1995 (still in effect): Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum Resources, continued in March 2018 and expanded in August 2018; Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum Resources, continued in March 2018 and expanded in August 2018; Oct. 21, 1995 (still in effect): Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers, continued in October 2018; Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers, continued in October 2018; March 1, 1996 (still in effect): Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels with Respect to Cuba, modified by President Obama in 2016 and again by President Trump in February 2018; Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels with Respect to Cuba, modified by President Obama in 2016 and again by President Trump in February 2018; May 22, 1997: Prohibiting New Investment in Burma, terminated in October 2016; Prohibiting New Investment in Burma, terminated in October 2016; Nov. 3, 1997 (still in effect): Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan, continued in October 2018; Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan, continued in October 2018; June 9, 1998: Blocking Property of the Governments of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), the Republic of Serbia, and the Republic of Montenegro, and Prohibiting New Investment in the Republic of Serbia in Response to the Situation in Kosovo, revoked in 2003; Blocking Property of the Governments of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), the Republic of Serbia, and the Republic of Montenegro, and Prohibiting New Investment in the Republic of Serbia in Response to the Situation in Kosovo, revoked in 2003; July 4, 1999: Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with the Taliban, revoked in 2002; Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with the Taliban, revoked in 2002; June 21, 2000: Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, expired 2012; Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, expired 2012; Jan. 18, 2001: Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, revoked in 2004. President George W. Bush June 26, 2001 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans, continued in June 2018; Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans, continued in June 2018; Aug. 17, 2001 (still in effect): Continuation of Export Control Regulations, continued August 2018; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, continued August 2018; Sept. 14, 2001 (still in effect): Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks, continued in September 2018; Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks, continued in September 2018; Sept. 23, 2001 (still in effect): Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism, continued in September 2017; Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism, continued in September 2017; March 6, 2003 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe, continued in March 2018; Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe, continued in March 2018; May 22, 2003 (still in effect): Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq has an Interest, continued in May 2018; Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq has an Interest, continued in May 2018; May 11, 2004 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods to Syria, continued in May 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods to Syria, continued in May 2018; July 22, 2004: Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Importation of Certain Goods from Liberia, revoked in November 2015; Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Importation of Certain Goods from Liberia, revoked in November 2015; Feb. 7, 2006: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Cte d'Ivoire, terminated in September 2016; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Cte d'Ivoire, terminated in September 2016; June 16, 2006 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus, continued in June 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus, continued in June 2018; Oct. 27, 2006 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, continued in October 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, continued in October 2018; Aug. 1, 2007 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or Its Democratic Processes and Institutions, continued in July 2018; Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or Its Democratic Processes and Institutions, continued in July 2018; June 26, 2008 (still in effect): Continuing Certain Restrictions With Respect to North Korea and North Korean Nationals, continued in October 2018. President Barack Obama Oct. 23, 2009: Declaration of a National Emergency With Respect to the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, was never terminated or continued; Declaration of a National Emergency With Respect to the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, was never terminated or continued; April 12, 2010 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia, continued in 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia, continued in 2018; Feb. 25, 2011 (still in effect): Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related to Libya, continued in February 2018; Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related to Libya, continued in February 2018; July 24, 2011 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal Organizations, continued in July 2018; Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal Organizations, continued in July 2018; May 16, 2012 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen, continued in May 2012; Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen, continued in May 2012; June 25, 2012: Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, revoked in 2015; Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, revoked in 2015; March 6, 2014 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine, continued in March 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine, continued in March 2018; April 3, 2014 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons With Respect to South Sudan, continued in March 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons With Respect to South Sudan, continued in March 2018; May 12, 2014 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic, continued in May 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic, continued in May 2018; March 8, 2015 (still in effect): Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela, continued in March 2018; Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela, continued in March 2018; April 1, 2015 (still in effect): Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities, continued in March 2018; Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities, continued in March 2018; Nov. 22, 2015 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Burundi, continued in November 2018. President Donald Trump | There have been 58 national emergencies called by presidents since 1979. Thirty-one of those national emergencies are still in effect. | pegasus | 0 | https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-many-national-emergencies-have-been-called-by-presidents/ | 0.677461 |
How many national emergencies have been called by presidents? | President Trump declared a national emergency to free up funds to build a wall without congressional approval on Friday, adding that other presidents have called national emergencies on other topics "many times before." The National Emergencies Act of 1975 allows the president to declare a national emergency, but he must outline the specific emergency powers he is using under existing statutes. According to the Brennan Center, there have been 58 national emergencies called by presidents since 1979. Thirty-one of those national emergencies are still in effect. Here is a list of when national emergencies have been used, and what their purpose was: President Jimmy Carter Nov. 14, 1979 (still in effect): A national emergency in response to the Iran hostage crisis, which froze Iran's assets in the United States. President Ronald Reagan April 17, 1980: Further Prohibitions on Transactions with Iran, never terminated or continued; Further Prohibitions on Transactions with Iran, never terminated or continued; Oct. 14, 1983: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked in 1983; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked in 1983; March 30, 1984: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked in 1985; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked in 1985; May 1, 1985: Prohibiting Trade and Certain Other Transactions Involving Nicaragua, revoked in 1990; Prohibiting Trade and Certain Other Transactions Involving Nicaragua, revoked in 1990; Sept. 9, 1985: Prohibiting Trade and Certain Other Transactions Involving South Africa (in response to apartheid), revoked 1991; Prohibiting Trade and Certain Other Transactions Involving South Africa (in response to apartheid), revoked 1991; Jan. 17, 1986: Prohibiting Trade and Certain Transactions Involving Libya, revoked 2004; Prohibiting Trade and Certain Transactions Involving Libya, revoked 2004; April 8, 1988: Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to Panama, revoked 1990. President George H.W. Bush August 2, 1990: Blocking Iraqi Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Iraq, revoked 2004; Blocking Iraqi Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Iraq, revoked 2004; Sept. 30, 1990: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 1993; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 1993; Nov. 16, 1990: Chemical and Biological Weapons Proliferation, revoked 1994; Chemical and Biological Weapons Proliferation, revoked 1994; Oct. 4, 1991: Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to Haiti, revoked 1994; Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to Haiti, revoked 1994; May 30, 1992: Blocking "Yugoslav Government" Property and Property of the Governments of Serbia and Montenegro, revoked 2003. President Bill Clinton Sept. 26, 1993: Prohibiting Certain Transactions Involving UNITA (a political party in Angola), revoked 2003; Prohibiting Certain Transactions Involving UNITA (a political party in Angola), revoked 2003; Sept. 30, 1993: Measures to Restrict the Participation by United States Persons in Weapons Proliferation Activities, revoked 1994; Measures to Restrict the Participation by United States Persons in Weapons Proliferation Activities, revoked 1994; June 30, 1994: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 1994; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 1994; Aug. 19, 1994: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 2001; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 2001; Sept. 29, 1994: Measures to Restrict the Participation by United States Persons in Weapons Proliferation Activities, revoked 1994; Measures to Restrict the Participation by United States Persons in Weapons Proliferation Activities, revoked 1994; Oct. 25, 1994: Blocking Property and Additional Measures With Respect to the Bosnian Serb- Controlled Areas of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, revoked 2003; Blocking Property and Additional Measures With Respect to the Bosnian Serb- Controlled Areas of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, revoked 2003; Nov. 14, 1994 (still in effect): Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, continued in November 2018; Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, continued in November 2018; Jan. 23, 1995 (still in effect): Prohibiting Transactions with Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process, continued in January 2018; Prohibiting Transactions with Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process, continued in January 2018; March 15, 1995 (still in effect): Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum Resources, continued in March 2018 and expanded in August 2018; Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum Resources, continued in March 2018 and expanded in August 2018; Oct. 21, 1995 (still in effect): Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers, continued in October 2018; Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers, continued in October 2018; March 1, 1996 (still in effect): Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels with Respect to Cuba, modified by President Obama in 2016 and again by President Trump in February 2018; Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels with Respect to Cuba, modified by President Obama in 2016 and again by President Trump in February 2018; May 22, 1997: Prohibiting New Investment in Burma, terminated in October 2016; Prohibiting New Investment in Burma, terminated in October 2016; Nov. 3, 1997 (still in effect): Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan, continued in October 2018; Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan, continued in October 2018; June 9, 1998: Blocking Property of the Governments of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), the Republic of Serbia, and the Republic of Montenegro, and Prohibiting New Investment in the Republic of Serbia in Response to the Situation in Kosovo, revoked in 2003; Blocking Property of the Governments of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), the Republic of Serbia, and the Republic of Montenegro, and Prohibiting New Investment in the Republic of Serbia in Response to the Situation in Kosovo, revoked in 2003; July 4, 1999: Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with the Taliban, revoked in 2002; Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with the Taliban, revoked in 2002; June 21, 2000: Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, expired 2012; Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, expired 2012; Jan. 18, 2001: Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, revoked in 2004. President George W. Bush June 26, 2001 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans, continued in June 2018; Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans, continued in June 2018; Aug. 17, 2001 (still in effect): Continuation of Export Control Regulations, continued August 2018; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, continued August 2018; Sept. 14, 2001 (still in effect): Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks, continued in September 2018; Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks, continued in September 2018; Sept. 23, 2001 (still in effect): Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism, continued in September 2017; Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism, continued in September 2017; March 6, 2003 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe, continued in March 2018; Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe, continued in March 2018; May 22, 2003 (still in effect): Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq has an Interest, continued in May 2018; Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq has an Interest, continued in May 2018; May 11, 2004 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods to Syria, continued in May 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods to Syria, continued in May 2018; July 22, 2004: Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Importation of Certain Goods from Liberia, revoked in November 2015; Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Importation of Certain Goods from Liberia, revoked in November 2015; Feb. 7, 2006: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Cte d'Ivoire, terminated in September 2016; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Cte d'Ivoire, terminated in September 2016; June 16, 2006 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus, continued in June 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus, continued in June 2018; Oct. 27, 2006 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, continued in October 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, continued in October 2018; Aug. 1, 2007 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or Its Democratic Processes and Institutions, continued in July 2018; Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or Its Democratic Processes and Institutions, continued in July 2018; June 26, 2008 (still in effect): Continuing Certain Restrictions With Respect to North Korea and North Korean Nationals, continued in October 2018. President Barack Obama Oct. 23, 2009: Declaration of a National Emergency With Respect to the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, was never terminated or continued; Declaration of a National Emergency With Respect to the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, was never terminated or continued; April 12, 2010 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia, continued in 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia, continued in 2018; Feb. 25, 2011 (still in effect): Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related to Libya, continued in February 2018; Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related to Libya, continued in February 2018; July 24, 2011 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal Organizations, continued in July 2018; Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal Organizations, continued in July 2018; May 16, 2012 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen, continued in May 2012; Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen, continued in May 2012; June 25, 2012: Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, revoked in 2015; Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, revoked in 2015; March 6, 2014 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine, continued in March 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine, continued in March 2018; April 3, 2014 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons With Respect to South Sudan, continued in March 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons With Respect to South Sudan, continued in March 2018; May 12, 2014 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic, continued in May 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic, continued in May 2018; March 8, 2015 (still in effect): Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela, continued in March 2018; Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela, continued in March 2018; April 1, 2015 (still in effect): Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities, continued in March 2018; Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities, continued in March 2018; Nov. 22, 2015 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Burundi, continued in November 2018. President Donald Trump | There have been 58 national emergencies called by presidents since 1979. Thirty-one of those national emergencies are still in effect. President Trump declared a national emergency to free up funds to build a wall without congressional approval on Friday. | pegasus | 1 | https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-many-national-emergencies-have-been-called-by-presidents/ | 0.699019 |
How many national emergencies have been called by presidents? | President Trump declared a national emergency to free up funds to build a wall without congressional approval on Friday, adding that other presidents have called national emergencies on other topics "many times before." The National Emergencies Act of 1975 allows the president to declare a national emergency, but he must outline the specific emergency powers he is using under existing statutes. According to the Brennan Center, there have been 58 national emergencies called by presidents since 1979. Thirty-one of those national emergencies are still in effect. Here is a list of when national emergencies have been used, and what their purpose was: President Jimmy Carter Nov. 14, 1979 (still in effect): A national emergency in response to the Iran hostage crisis, which froze Iran's assets in the United States. President Ronald Reagan April 17, 1980: Further Prohibitions on Transactions with Iran, never terminated or continued; Further Prohibitions on Transactions with Iran, never terminated or continued; Oct. 14, 1983: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked in 1983; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked in 1983; March 30, 1984: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked in 1985; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked in 1985; May 1, 1985: Prohibiting Trade and Certain Other Transactions Involving Nicaragua, revoked in 1990; Prohibiting Trade and Certain Other Transactions Involving Nicaragua, revoked in 1990; Sept. 9, 1985: Prohibiting Trade and Certain Other Transactions Involving South Africa (in response to apartheid), revoked 1991; Prohibiting Trade and Certain Other Transactions Involving South Africa (in response to apartheid), revoked 1991; Jan. 17, 1986: Prohibiting Trade and Certain Transactions Involving Libya, revoked 2004; Prohibiting Trade and Certain Transactions Involving Libya, revoked 2004; April 8, 1988: Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to Panama, revoked 1990. President George H.W. Bush August 2, 1990: Blocking Iraqi Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Iraq, revoked 2004; Blocking Iraqi Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Iraq, revoked 2004; Sept. 30, 1990: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 1993; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 1993; Nov. 16, 1990: Chemical and Biological Weapons Proliferation, revoked 1994; Chemical and Biological Weapons Proliferation, revoked 1994; Oct. 4, 1991: Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to Haiti, revoked 1994; Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to Haiti, revoked 1994; May 30, 1992: Blocking "Yugoslav Government" Property and Property of the Governments of Serbia and Montenegro, revoked 2003. President Bill Clinton Sept. 26, 1993: Prohibiting Certain Transactions Involving UNITA (a political party in Angola), revoked 2003; Prohibiting Certain Transactions Involving UNITA (a political party in Angola), revoked 2003; Sept. 30, 1993: Measures to Restrict the Participation by United States Persons in Weapons Proliferation Activities, revoked 1994; Measures to Restrict the Participation by United States Persons in Weapons Proliferation Activities, revoked 1994; June 30, 1994: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 1994; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 1994; Aug. 19, 1994: Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 2001; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, revoked 2001; Sept. 29, 1994: Measures to Restrict the Participation by United States Persons in Weapons Proliferation Activities, revoked 1994; Measures to Restrict the Participation by United States Persons in Weapons Proliferation Activities, revoked 1994; Oct. 25, 1994: Blocking Property and Additional Measures With Respect to the Bosnian Serb- Controlled Areas of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, revoked 2003; Blocking Property and Additional Measures With Respect to the Bosnian Serb- Controlled Areas of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, revoked 2003; Nov. 14, 1994 (still in effect): Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, continued in November 2018; Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, continued in November 2018; Jan. 23, 1995 (still in effect): Prohibiting Transactions with Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process, continued in January 2018; Prohibiting Transactions with Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process, continued in January 2018; March 15, 1995 (still in effect): Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum Resources, continued in March 2018 and expanded in August 2018; Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum Resources, continued in March 2018 and expanded in August 2018; Oct. 21, 1995 (still in effect): Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers, continued in October 2018; Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers, continued in October 2018; March 1, 1996 (still in effect): Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels with Respect to Cuba, modified by President Obama in 2016 and again by President Trump in February 2018; Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels with Respect to Cuba, modified by President Obama in 2016 and again by President Trump in February 2018; May 22, 1997: Prohibiting New Investment in Burma, terminated in October 2016; Prohibiting New Investment in Burma, terminated in October 2016; Nov. 3, 1997 (still in effect): Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan, continued in October 2018; Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan, continued in October 2018; June 9, 1998: Blocking Property of the Governments of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), the Republic of Serbia, and the Republic of Montenegro, and Prohibiting New Investment in the Republic of Serbia in Response to the Situation in Kosovo, revoked in 2003; Blocking Property of the Governments of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro), the Republic of Serbia, and the Republic of Montenegro, and Prohibiting New Investment in the Republic of Serbia in Response to the Situation in Kosovo, revoked in 2003; July 4, 1999: Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with the Taliban, revoked in 2002; Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with the Taliban, revoked in 2002; June 21, 2000: Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, expired 2012; Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, expired 2012; Jan. 18, 2001: Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, revoked in 2004. President George W. Bush June 26, 2001 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans, continued in June 2018; Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans, continued in June 2018; Aug. 17, 2001 (still in effect): Continuation of Export Control Regulations, continued August 2018; Continuation of Export Control Regulations, continued August 2018; Sept. 14, 2001 (still in effect): Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks, continued in September 2018; Declaration of National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks, continued in September 2018; Sept. 23, 2001 (still in effect): Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism, continued in September 2017; Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism, continued in September 2017; March 6, 2003 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe, continued in March 2018; Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe, continued in March 2018; May 22, 2003 (still in effect): Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq has an Interest, continued in May 2018; Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq has an Interest, continued in May 2018; May 11, 2004 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods to Syria, continued in May 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods to Syria, continued in May 2018; July 22, 2004: Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Importation of Certain Goods from Liberia, revoked in November 2015; Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Importation of Certain Goods from Liberia, revoked in November 2015; Feb. 7, 2006: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Cte d'Ivoire, terminated in September 2016; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Cte d'Ivoire, terminated in September 2016; June 16, 2006 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus, continued in June 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus, continued in June 2018; Oct. 27, 2006 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, continued in October 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, continued in October 2018; Aug. 1, 2007 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or Its Democratic Processes and Institutions, continued in July 2018; Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon or Its Democratic Processes and Institutions, continued in July 2018; June 26, 2008 (still in effect): Continuing Certain Restrictions With Respect to North Korea and North Korean Nationals, continued in October 2018. President Barack Obama Oct. 23, 2009: Declaration of a National Emergency With Respect to the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, was never terminated or continued; Declaration of a National Emergency With Respect to the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic, was never terminated or continued; April 12, 2010 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia, continued in 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia, continued in 2018; Feb. 25, 2011 (still in effect): Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related to Libya, continued in February 2018; Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related to Libya, continued in February 2018; July 24, 2011 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal Organizations, continued in July 2018; Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal Organizations, continued in July 2018; May 16, 2012 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen, continued in May 2012; Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen, continued in May 2012; June 25, 2012: Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, revoked in 2015; Blocking Property of the Government of the Russian Federation Relating to the Disposition of Highly Enriched Uranium Extracted from Nuclear Weapons, revoked in 2015; March 6, 2014 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine, continued in March 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine, continued in March 2018; April 3, 2014 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons With Respect to South Sudan, continued in March 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons With Respect to South Sudan, continued in March 2018; May 12, 2014 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic, continued in May 2018; Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic, continued in May 2018; March 8, 2015 (still in effect): Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela, continued in March 2018; Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela, continued in March 2018; April 1, 2015 (still in effect): Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities, continued in March 2018; Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities, continued in March 2018; Nov. 22, 2015 (still in effect): Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Burundi, continued in November 2018. President Donald Trump | The National Emergencies Act of 1975 allows the president to declare a national emergency. According to the Brennan Center, there have been 58 national emergencies called by presidents since 1979. Thirty-one of those national emergencies are still in effect. President Jimmy Carter declared an emergency in response to the Iran hostage crisis. | bart | 2 | https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-many-national-emergencies-have-been-called-by-presidents/ | 0.687279 |
Will Arizona lawmakers act to save abused women? | Opinion: It's a law to take away weapons from abusers. It has passed in more than half the states. There's an opportunity to keep weapons away from domestic abusers. (Photo11: Rex_Wholster, Getty Images/iStockphoto) Time is running out. Arizona lawmakers have one week to do what they can to save the lives of potential domestic abuse victims. Or, more precisely, one week to begin the process to save the lives of domestic abuse victims. Feb. 22 is the crossover deadline for introduced bills to make the jump from one chamber to the next. Filling loopholes in the law In order for that to happen, of course, bills must be voted on and approved. That process cant begin if a bill doesnt even get a committee hearing. A bipartisan bill to make it illegal for a person convicted of domestic violence or a crime against children from having a firearm hasnt gotten a hearing. SB 1219 fills loopholes in federal law and Arizona law. Federal law says those convicted of domestic abuse of a spouse cant own a gun, but it doesnt include dating partners, even though that is where a high percentage of abuse takes place. Over half the states have such laws And Arizona law keeps convicted individuals from possessing a weapon only during probation. SB1219 expands that indefinitely and requires offenders to turn in all guns they own. Bills similar to this have passed in more than half the states and, unlike so much at the State Capitol, this bill has support from Democrats and Republicans. One of the sponsors, Republican State Sen. Heather Carter, a sponsor of SB 1219, said of the bill, The gaps in both state and federal law as it stands make it too easy for domestic abusers to get their hands on a gun. Between 2012 and 2016, the rate of intimate partner gun homicide in Arizona was 66 percent higher than the national average. That is unacceptable. There is bipartisan support "Across the country, Republican and Democratic lawmakers have worked across the aisle to keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers, and its time we did the same. Im proud to introduce legislation that protects victims of domestic violence in our state. NEWSLETTERS Get the Opinions Newsletter newsletter delivered to your inbox We're sorry, but something went wrong Our best and latest in commentary in daily digest form. Please try again soon, or contact Customer Service at 1-800-332-6733. Delivery: Mon-Fri Invalid email address Thank you! You're almost signed up for Opinions Newsletter Keep an eye out for an email to confirm your newsletter registration. More newsletters Organizations like the Arizona chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America and others have been working hard to get such a law on the books. Its stuck for now in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where Chairman Eddie Farnsworth (602-926-5735 or efarnsworth@azleg.gov) has yet to give it a hearing. That means no Arizona lawmakers have had to vote on the matter. To take a stand. MORE BY MONTINI: Read or Share this story: https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2019/02/15/domestic-violence-arizona-legislature-gun-politics/2880798002/ | Arizona lawmakers have one week to do what they can to save the lives of domestic abuse victims. | pegasus | 0 | https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2019/02/15/domestic-violence-arizona-legislature-gun-politics/2880798002/ | 0.332921 |
Will Arizona lawmakers act to save abused women? | Opinion: It's a law to take away weapons from abusers. It has passed in more than half the states. There's an opportunity to keep weapons away from domestic abusers. (Photo11: Rex_Wholster, Getty Images/iStockphoto) Time is running out. Arizona lawmakers have one week to do what they can to save the lives of potential domestic abuse victims. Or, more precisely, one week to begin the process to save the lives of domestic abuse victims. Feb. 22 is the crossover deadline for introduced bills to make the jump from one chamber to the next. Filling loopholes in the law In order for that to happen, of course, bills must be voted on and approved. That process cant begin if a bill doesnt even get a committee hearing. A bipartisan bill to make it illegal for a person convicted of domestic violence or a crime against children from having a firearm hasnt gotten a hearing. SB 1219 fills loopholes in federal law and Arizona law. Federal law says those convicted of domestic abuse of a spouse cant own a gun, but it doesnt include dating partners, even though that is where a high percentage of abuse takes place. Over half the states have such laws And Arizona law keeps convicted individuals from possessing a weapon only during probation. SB1219 expands that indefinitely and requires offenders to turn in all guns they own. Bills similar to this have passed in more than half the states and, unlike so much at the State Capitol, this bill has support from Democrats and Republicans. One of the sponsors, Republican State Sen. Heather Carter, a sponsor of SB 1219, said of the bill, The gaps in both state and federal law as it stands make it too easy for domestic abusers to get their hands on a gun. Between 2012 and 2016, the rate of intimate partner gun homicide in Arizona was 66 percent higher than the national average. That is unacceptable. There is bipartisan support "Across the country, Republican and Democratic lawmakers have worked across the aisle to keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers, and its time we did the same. Im proud to introduce legislation that protects victims of domestic violence in our state. NEWSLETTERS Get the Opinions Newsletter newsletter delivered to your inbox We're sorry, but something went wrong Our best and latest in commentary in daily digest form. Please try again soon, or contact Customer Service at 1-800-332-6733. Delivery: Mon-Fri Invalid email address Thank you! You're almost signed up for Opinions Newsletter Keep an eye out for an email to confirm your newsletter registration. More newsletters Organizations like the Arizona chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America and others have been working hard to get such a law on the books. Its stuck for now in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where Chairman Eddie Farnsworth (602-926-5735 or efarnsworth@azleg.gov) has yet to give it a hearing. That means no Arizona lawmakers have had to vote on the matter. To take a stand. MORE BY MONTINI: Read or Share this story: https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2019/02/15/domestic-violence-arizona-legislature-gun-politics/2880798002/ | Arizona lawmakers have one week to do what they can to save the lives of domestic abuse victims. A bipartisan bill to make it illegal for a person convicted of domestic violence or a crime against children from having a firearm hasn't gotten a hearing. | pegasus | 1 | https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2019/02/15/domestic-violence-arizona-legislature-gun-politics/2880798002/ | 0.333973 |
Will Arizona lawmakers act to save abused women? | Opinion: It's a law to take away weapons from abusers. It has passed in more than half the states. There's an opportunity to keep weapons away from domestic abusers. (Photo11: Rex_Wholster, Getty Images/iStockphoto) Time is running out. Arizona lawmakers have one week to do what they can to save the lives of potential domestic abuse victims. Or, more precisely, one week to begin the process to save the lives of domestic abuse victims. Feb. 22 is the crossover deadline for introduced bills to make the jump from one chamber to the next. Filling loopholes in the law In order for that to happen, of course, bills must be voted on and approved. That process cant begin if a bill doesnt even get a committee hearing. A bipartisan bill to make it illegal for a person convicted of domestic violence or a crime against children from having a firearm hasnt gotten a hearing. SB 1219 fills loopholes in federal law and Arizona law. Federal law says those convicted of domestic abuse of a spouse cant own a gun, but it doesnt include dating partners, even though that is where a high percentage of abuse takes place. Over half the states have such laws And Arizona law keeps convicted individuals from possessing a weapon only during probation. SB1219 expands that indefinitely and requires offenders to turn in all guns they own. Bills similar to this have passed in more than half the states and, unlike so much at the State Capitol, this bill has support from Democrats and Republicans. One of the sponsors, Republican State Sen. Heather Carter, a sponsor of SB 1219, said of the bill, The gaps in both state and federal law as it stands make it too easy for domestic abusers to get their hands on a gun. Between 2012 and 2016, the rate of intimate partner gun homicide in Arizona was 66 percent higher than the national average. That is unacceptable. There is bipartisan support "Across the country, Republican and Democratic lawmakers have worked across the aisle to keep guns out of the hands of domestic abusers, and its time we did the same. Im proud to introduce legislation that protects victims of domestic violence in our state. NEWSLETTERS Get the Opinions Newsletter newsletter delivered to your inbox We're sorry, but something went wrong Our best and latest in commentary in daily digest form. Please try again soon, or contact Customer Service at 1-800-332-6733. Delivery: Mon-Fri Invalid email address Thank you! You're almost signed up for Opinions Newsletter Keep an eye out for an email to confirm your newsletter registration. More newsletters Organizations like the Arizona chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America and others have been working hard to get such a law on the books. Its stuck for now in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where Chairman Eddie Farnsworth (602-926-5735 or efarnsworth@azleg.gov) has yet to give it a hearing. That means no Arizona lawmakers have had to vote on the matter. To take a stand. MORE BY MONTINI: Read or Share this story: https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2019/02/15/domestic-violence-arizona-legislature-gun-politics/2880798002/ | Arizona lawmakers have one week to do what they can to save the lives of potential domestic abuse victims. A bipartisan bill to make it illegal for a person convicted of domestic violence or a crime against children from having a firearm hasn't gotten a hearing. Between 2012 and 2016, the rate of intimate partner gun homicide in Arizona was 66 percent higher than national average. | bart | 2 | https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2019/02/15/domestic-violence-arizona-legislature-gun-politics/2880798002/ | 0.373271 |
What are people saying about Trump's national emergency? | Image copyright Getty Images Image caption US immigration agents parked on the US side of the southern border President Donald Trump has declared a national emergency on the US southern border, claiming that he needs special powers to build a wall to halt all illegal migration. His decision comes as he signs a bipartisan budget deal to avoid a government shutdown. But the deal does not provide funding for the wall, his signature campaign pledge that he repeatedly claimed Mexico would pay for. Some Republicans oppose the move, saying it creates a precedent for other presidents to bypass Congress if they do not fund his the administration's priorities. Democrats are uniformly opposed while legal experts are uncertain about the constitutionality of the executive action. South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, who often supports the president, said: "I think this is a political fight worth having." North Carolina Congressman Mark Meadows, who helped pressure Mr Trump to withhold his signature from a spending bill, triggering a 35-day government shutdown, said he supports the decision. Mr Meadows told Fox News that the declaration is necessary "because Congress has failed this president and the American people". Skip Twitter post by @RepMarkMeadows Democrats refusal to negotiate has rendered Congress inept at doing its job to protect Americans. At this point POTUS is absolutely right to use constitutional executive action authority to build the wall and secure our border. This is a national emergency. I fully support him. Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) February 14, 2019 Report Alabama Senator Richard Shelby said that legally, Mr Trump is "probably on pretty solid ground". "If I were the president, I'm not, I would do what I thought was best regardless of what - as long as I had the legal authority," he said, adding that he does not think Mr Trump is circumventing Congress' appropriation role. Conservative radio host Steve Deace said that Mr Trump should either declare a national emergency or back the spending bill, but not both. Mr Trump, he said, is "caving" and effectively saying it's not really an emergency by putting his signature to the budget deal. Skip Twitter post by @SteveDeaceShow I was in favor of national emergency when Trump said it was one. But if he signs omnibus Im opposed. Horrible precedent to set that every time a president doesnt get appropriations they want they can declare this. By caving on this, hes saying its not an emergency. Maine Senator Susan Collins, a moderate Republican, called it "a mistake," adding that it is of "dubious constitutionality" and "undermines the role of Congress". Conservative author Ann Coulter, who supports efforts to build the wall, lashed out at the president on Twitter saying, "No court will allow a president to claim it's an 'emergency' to violate a law he just signed" - referring to the bipartisan budget deal. "The goal of a national emergency is for Trump to scam the stupidest people in his base," until the 2020 election, she wrote. "I think she's fine, I think she's great. I just don't speak to her," Mr Trump said in the White House Rose Garden in response to her criticism as he prepared to sign the order. Pennsylvania Senator Pat Toomey told reporters: "I never thought that was a good idea. I still don't." He called for the matter to be "resolved through the legislative process". Washington Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers, who is the highest ranking female in Republican leadership, said it "sets a very dangerous precedent". She warned that progressive senators Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders might use this precedent "to force the Green New Deal on the American people". Image copyright Getty Images Image caption Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers Utah Senator Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential nominee in 2012, said he would "reserve judgment" on the executive action "until I'm able to fully evaluate it". But he said he disagreed with a national emergency, and called on the president to "stay within statutory and constitutional limits". Must be very, very careful here." Puerto Rico Republican Congresswoman Jenniffer Gonzalez-Colon said in a letter to the president that she is concerned that he will divert hurricane recovery funds from the island - and other states and territories recovering from natural disasters - in order to build a border wall. Democrats are unified in their opposition to Mr Trump's decision, and the attorney general of New York has already threatened to sue over the "abuse of power" which "could create a constitutional crisis". "Climate change is a national emergency. The absence of a wall is not," tweeted Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana and a 2020 presidential hopeful. California Senator Kamala Harris said Mr Trump's "vanity project is ridiculous". Image copyright Getty Images Image caption Democratic presidential contender Kamala Harris is among those opposed "We don't need a wall. Instead, we should address the actual emergencies facing our country - everything from gun violence to the opioid crisis," she wrote. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said Republicans "should have some dismay to the door that they are opening, the threshold they are crossing". "The precedent that the president is setting here is something that should be met with great unease and dismay by the Republicans and of course we will respond accordingly," Mrs Pelosi said, calling it an effort to make "an end run around Congress". Hawaii Senator Brian Schatz joked about Mr Trump's plan to go to Florida for the weekend after signing the order. "Apparently this thing is such an emergency that it will immediately be followed by golf," he tweeted. Skip Twitter post by @brianschatz Apparently this thing is such an emergency that it will immediately be followed by golf. Brian Schatz (@brianschatz) February 15, 2019 Report Legal and political experts Lawfare blog writes that for 39 years, the US has been under a state of emergency for various reasons, and notes that a 1979 order that is still in effect today was first signed by President Jimmy Carter 10 days into the Iran hostage crisis. The ACLU called the decision a "clear abuse of presidential power", and warned Republicans: "The chickens will come to roost when the next president uses these powers to call a national emergency on gun control or climate change." According to a CBS News poll, two-thirds of Americans said this month that they oppose declaring a national emergency to build the wall. But a majority of Republicans - 73% - back the plan. Pollster Nate Silver cautioned that it could harm Mr Trump's re-election prospects, tweeting "it's unclear whether it would fade into the background as it got tied up in the courts, or would remain a salient issue for some time". Brianne Gorod of the liberal-leaning think tank the Constitutional Accountability Center told the Associated Press that a national emergency is not "a blank cheque to invoke 'emergency' powers simply because he couldn't get what he wanted through the normal political process". | President Donald Trump declares a national emergency on the US southern border. He says he needs special powers to build a wall to halt all illegal migration. | bart | 0 | https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-47247042 | 0.218813 |
What are people saying about Trump's national emergency? | Image copyright Getty Images Image caption US immigration agents parked on the US side of the southern border President Donald Trump has declared a national emergency on the US southern border, claiming that he needs special powers to build a wall to halt all illegal migration. His decision comes as he signs a bipartisan budget deal to avoid a government shutdown. But the deal does not provide funding for the wall, his signature campaign pledge that he repeatedly claimed Mexico would pay for. Some Republicans oppose the move, saying it creates a precedent for other presidents to bypass Congress if they do not fund his the administration's priorities. Democrats are uniformly opposed while legal experts are uncertain about the constitutionality of the executive action. South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, who often supports the president, said: "I think this is a political fight worth having." North Carolina Congressman Mark Meadows, who helped pressure Mr Trump to withhold his signature from a spending bill, triggering a 35-day government shutdown, said he supports the decision. Mr Meadows told Fox News that the declaration is necessary "because Congress has failed this president and the American people". Skip Twitter post by @RepMarkMeadows Democrats refusal to negotiate has rendered Congress inept at doing its job to protect Americans. At this point POTUS is absolutely right to use constitutional executive action authority to build the wall and secure our border. This is a national emergency. I fully support him. Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) February 14, 2019 Report Alabama Senator Richard Shelby said that legally, Mr Trump is "probably on pretty solid ground". "If I were the president, I'm not, I would do what I thought was best regardless of what - as long as I had the legal authority," he said, adding that he does not think Mr Trump is circumventing Congress' appropriation role. Conservative radio host Steve Deace said that Mr Trump should either declare a national emergency or back the spending bill, but not both. Mr Trump, he said, is "caving" and effectively saying it's not really an emergency by putting his signature to the budget deal. Skip Twitter post by @SteveDeaceShow I was in favor of national emergency when Trump said it was one. But if he signs omnibus Im opposed. Horrible precedent to set that every time a president doesnt get appropriations they want they can declare this. By caving on this, hes saying its not an emergency. Maine Senator Susan Collins, a moderate Republican, called it "a mistake," adding that it is of "dubious constitutionality" and "undermines the role of Congress". Conservative author Ann Coulter, who supports efforts to build the wall, lashed out at the president on Twitter saying, "No court will allow a president to claim it's an 'emergency' to violate a law he just signed" - referring to the bipartisan budget deal. "The goal of a national emergency is for Trump to scam the stupidest people in his base," until the 2020 election, she wrote. "I think she's fine, I think she's great. I just don't speak to her," Mr Trump said in the White House Rose Garden in response to her criticism as he prepared to sign the order. Pennsylvania Senator Pat Toomey told reporters: "I never thought that was a good idea. I still don't." He called for the matter to be "resolved through the legislative process". Washington Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers, who is the highest ranking female in Republican leadership, said it "sets a very dangerous precedent". She warned that progressive senators Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders might use this precedent "to force the Green New Deal on the American people". Image copyright Getty Images Image caption Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers Utah Senator Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential nominee in 2012, said he would "reserve judgment" on the executive action "until I'm able to fully evaluate it". But he said he disagreed with a national emergency, and called on the president to "stay within statutory and constitutional limits". Must be very, very careful here." Puerto Rico Republican Congresswoman Jenniffer Gonzalez-Colon said in a letter to the president that she is concerned that he will divert hurricane recovery funds from the island - and other states and territories recovering from natural disasters - in order to build a border wall. Democrats are unified in their opposition to Mr Trump's decision, and the attorney general of New York has already threatened to sue over the "abuse of power" which "could create a constitutional crisis". "Climate change is a national emergency. The absence of a wall is not," tweeted Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana and a 2020 presidential hopeful. California Senator Kamala Harris said Mr Trump's "vanity project is ridiculous". Image copyright Getty Images Image caption Democratic presidential contender Kamala Harris is among those opposed "We don't need a wall. Instead, we should address the actual emergencies facing our country - everything from gun violence to the opioid crisis," she wrote. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said Republicans "should have some dismay to the door that they are opening, the threshold they are crossing". "The precedent that the president is setting here is something that should be met with great unease and dismay by the Republicans and of course we will respond accordingly," Mrs Pelosi said, calling it an effort to make "an end run around Congress". Hawaii Senator Brian Schatz joked about Mr Trump's plan to go to Florida for the weekend after signing the order. "Apparently this thing is such an emergency that it will immediately be followed by golf," he tweeted. Skip Twitter post by @brianschatz Apparently this thing is such an emergency that it will immediately be followed by golf. Brian Schatz (@brianschatz) February 15, 2019 Report Legal and political experts Lawfare blog writes that for 39 years, the US has been under a state of emergency for various reasons, and notes that a 1979 order that is still in effect today was first signed by President Jimmy Carter 10 days into the Iran hostage crisis. The ACLU called the decision a "clear abuse of presidential power", and warned Republicans: "The chickens will come to roost when the next president uses these powers to call a national emergency on gun control or climate change." According to a CBS News poll, two-thirds of Americans said this month that they oppose declaring a national emergency to build the wall. But a majority of Republicans - 73% - back the plan. Pollster Nate Silver cautioned that it could harm Mr Trump's re-election prospects, tweeting "it's unclear whether it would fade into the background as it got tied up in the courts, or would remain a salient issue for some time". Brianne Gorod of the liberal-leaning think tank the Constitutional Accountability Center told the Associated Press that a national emergency is not "a blank cheque to invoke 'emergency' powers simply because he couldn't get what he wanted through the normal political process". | President Donald Trump declares a national emergency on the US southern border. Democrats are uniformly opposed while legal experts are uncertain about the constitutionality of the executive action. Some Republicans oppose the move, saying it creates a precedent for other presidents to bypass Congress. | ctrlsum | 1 | https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-47247042 | 0.413068 |
What are people saying about Trump's national emergency? | Image copyright Getty Images Image caption US immigration agents parked on the US side of the southern border President Donald Trump has declared a national emergency on the US southern border, claiming that he needs special powers to build a wall to halt all illegal migration. His decision comes as he signs a bipartisan budget deal to avoid a government shutdown. But the deal does not provide funding for the wall, his signature campaign pledge that he repeatedly claimed Mexico would pay for. Some Republicans oppose the move, saying it creates a precedent for other presidents to bypass Congress if they do not fund his the administration's priorities. Democrats are uniformly opposed while legal experts are uncertain about the constitutionality of the executive action. South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, who often supports the president, said: "I think this is a political fight worth having." North Carolina Congressman Mark Meadows, who helped pressure Mr Trump to withhold his signature from a spending bill, triggering a 35-day government shutdown, said he supports the decision. Mr Meadows told Fox News that the declaration is necessary "because Congress has failed this president and the American people". Skip Twitter post by @RepMarkMeadows Democrats refusal to negotiate has rendered Congress inept at doing its job to protect Americans. At this point POTUS is absolutely right to use constitutional executive action authority to build the wall and secure our border. This is a national emergency. I fully support him. Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) February 14, 2019 Report Alabama Senator Richard Shelby said that legally, Mr Trump is "probably on pretty solid ground". "If I were the president, I'm not, I would do what I thought was best regardless of what - as long as I had the legal authority," he said, adding that he does not think Mr Trump is circumventing Congress' appropriation role. Conservative radio host Steve Deace said that Mr Trump should either declare a national emergency or back the spending bill, but not both. Mr Trump, he said, is "caving" and effectively saying it's not really an emergency by putting his signature to the budget deal. Skip Twitter post by @SteveDeaceShow I was in favor of national emergency when Trump said it was one. But if he signs omnibus Im opposed. Horrible precedent to set that every time a president doesnt get appropriations they want they can declare this. By caving on this, hes saying its not an emergency. Maine Senator Susan Collins, a moderate Republican, called it "a mistake," adding that it is of "dubious constitutionality" and "undermines the role of Congress". Conservative author Ann Coulter, who supports efforts to build the wall, lashed out at the president on Twitter saying, "No court will allow a president to claim it's an 'emergency' to violate a law he just signed" - referring to the bipartisan budget deal. "The goal of a national emergency is for Trump to scam the stupidest people in his base," until the 2020 election, she wrote. "I think she's fine, I think she's great. I just don't speak to her," Mr Trump said in the White House Rose Garden in response to her criticism as he prepared to sign the order. Pennsylvania Senator Pat Toomey told reporters: "I never thought that was a good idea. I still don't." He called for the matter to be "resolved through the legislative process". Washington Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers, who is the highest ranking female in Republican leadership, said it "sets a very dangerous precedent". She warned that progressive senators Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders might use this precedent "to force the Green New Deal on the American people". Image copyright Getty Images Image caption Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers Utah Senator Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential nominee in 2012, said he would "reserve judgment" on the executive action "until I'm able to fully evaluate it". But he said he disagreed with a national emergency, and called on the president to "stay within statutory and constitutional limits". Must be very, very careful here." Puerto Rico Republican Congresswoman Jenniffer Gonzalez-Colon said in a letter to the president that she is concerned that he will divert hurricane recovery funds from the island - and other states and territories recovering from natural disasters - in order to build a border wall. Democrats are unified in their opposition to Mr Trump's decision, and the attorney general of New York has already threatened to sue over the "abuse of power" which "could create a constitutional crisis". "Climate change is a national emergency. The absence of a wall is not," tweeted Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana and a 2020 presidential hopeful. California Senator Kamala Harris said Mr Trump's "vanity project is ridiculous". Image copyright Getty Images Image caption Democratic presidential contender Kamala Harris is among those opposed "We don't need a wall. Instead, we should address the actual emergencies facing our country - everything from gun violence to the opioid crisis," she wrote. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said Republicans "should have some dismay to the door that they are opening, the threshold they are crossing". "The precedent that the president is setting here is something that should be met with great unease and dismay by the Republicans and of course we will respond accordingly," Mrs Pelosi said, calling it an effort to make "an end run around Congress". Hawaii Senator Brian Schatz joked about Mr Trump's plan to go to Florida for the weekend after signing the order. "Apparently this thing is such an emergency that it will immediately be followed by golf," he tweeted. Skip Twitter post by @brianschatz Apparently this thing is such an emergency that it will immediately be followed by golf. Brian Schatz (@brianschatz) February 15, 2019 Report Legal and political experts Lawfare blog writes that for 39 years, the US has been under a state of emergency for various reasons, and notes that a 1979 order that is still in effect today was first signed by President Jimmy Carter 10 days into the Iran hostage crisis. The ACLU called the decision a "clear abuse of presidential power", and warned Republicans: "The chickens will come to roost when the next president uses these powers to call a national emergency on gun control or climate change." According to a CBS News poll, two-thirds of Americans said this month that they oppose declaring a national emergency to build the wall. But a majority of Republicans - 73% - back the plan. Pollster Nate Silver cautioned that it could harm Mr Trump's re-election prospects, tweeting "it's unclear whether it would fade into the background as it got tied up in the courts, or would remain a salient issue for some time". Brianne Gorod of the liberal-leaning think tank the Constitutional Accountability Center told the Associated Press that a national emergency is not "a blank cheque to invoke 'emergency' powers simply because he couldn't get what he wanted through the normal political process". | President Donald Trump declares a national emergency on the US southern border. Democrats are uniformly opposed while legal experts are uncertain about the constitutionality of the executive action. Some Republicans oppose the move, saying it creates a precedent for other presidents to bypass Congress if they do not fund his the administration's priorities. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-47247042 | 0.418253 |
When does daylight saving time start in 2019? | Daylight saving time, that weird bi-annual experiment on our sleep patterns that some experts consider deadly, is on its way. Yes, it still feels like deep winter. Yes, they sky is gray pretty much all day every day. But its almost time to spring forward and set our clocks one hour ahead. End daylight saving time now (commentary) Twice a year, for no real reason, we give ourselves what amounts to jet lag. It's time to stop this outrage. Daylight saving time in 2019 in Oregon starts at 2 a.m. on Sunday, March 10. That means on March 10 in the early morning, 2 a.m. becomes 3 a.m. and you have to get up an hour earlier to be to work on time. Happy daylight saving time. If some Oregon lawmakers get their way, it could be one of our last. | Daylight saving time in 2019 in Oregon starts at 2 a.m. on Sunday, March 10. | bart | 0 | https://www.oregonlive.com/living/2019/02/when-does-daylight-saving-time-start-in-2019.html | 0.271664 |
When does daylight saving time start in 2019? | Daylight saving time, that weird bi-annual experiment on our sleep patterns that some experts consider deadly, is on its way. Yes, it still feels like deep winter. Yes, they sky is gray pretty much all day every day. But its almost time to spring forward and set our clocks one hour ahead. End daylight saving time now (commentary) Twice a year, for no real reason, we give ourselves what amounts to jet lag. It's time to stop this outrage. Daylight saving time in 2019 in Oregon starts at 2 a.m. on Sunday, March 10. That means on March 10 in the early morning, 2 a.m. becomes 3 a.m. and you have to get up an hour earlier to be to work on time. Happy daylight saving time. If some Oregon lawmakers get their way, it could be one of our last. | Daylight saving time in 2019 in Oregon starts at 2 a.m. on Sunday, March 10. That means on March 10 in the early morning, 2 a.m. becomes 3 a.m. | pegasus | 1 | https://www.oregonlive.com/living/2019/02/when-does-daylight-saving-time-start-in-2019.html | 0.276909 |
When does daylight saving time start in 2019? | Daylight saving time, that weird bi-annual experiment on our sleep patterns that some experts consider deadly, is on its way. Yes, it still feels like deep winter. Yes, they sky is gray pretty much all day every day. But its almost time to spring forward and set our clocks one hour ahead. End daylight saving time now (commentary) Twice a year, for no real reason, we give ourselves what amounts to jet lag. It's time to stop this outrage. Daylight saving time in 2019 in Oregon starts at 2 a.m. on Sunday, March 10. That means on March 10 in the early morning, 2 a.m. becomes 3 a.m. and you have to get up an hour earlier to be to work on time. Happy daylight saving time. If some Oregon lawmakers get their way, it could be one of our last. | It's almost time to spring forward and set our clocks one hour ahead. Daylight saving time in 2019 in Oregon starts at 2 a.m. on Sunday, March 10. If some Oregon lawmakers get their way, it could be one of our last days of daylight saving time. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.oregonlive.com/living/2019/02/when-does-daylight-saving-time-start-in-2019.html | 0.294516 |
Can President Trump Legally Invoke A National Emergency At The Border? | This is NOT an opinion piece about how to best defend our borders, or about how to go about accepting immigrants to our country. Those unable to distinguish between their own politics and a legal analysis are asked to stop reading NOW. This is a legal opinion, about the legality of the President's invokation of an emergency to authorize the building of a permanent barrier over parts of the land border with Mexico. In a nutshell, I think the President does have this power. Legal (not political) analysis follows. First, there are literally dozens of laws that give the president special powers to act in an emergency. Every president in recent memory has declared emergencies. According to one statute, for example, in an emergency, the president is allowed to divert money already authorized by Congress to be spent by the Defense Department on other military items to military construction projects. He might designate the "border wall" as a military construction project. Three issues arise, however. One issue is whether there is a true emergency. Another issue that the Department of Homeland Security, not the Department of Defense, would normally control the building of the barrier. Both these issues might be enough for a judge chomping at the bit to stop the president. "I think the president would be wide open to a court challenge saying, 'Where's the emergency?' " Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, told ABC News. The president has described the situation on the U.S.-Mexico border as both a humanitarian and national security crisis. "We have criminals coming in," he noted. "We have human traffickers coming in. We have drugs pouring in. We have things happening that you don't want to even know about." That last sentence presumably refers to his claim that terrorists are crossing the border. Whether these claims are exaggerated or not, there is clearly some truth to all of them. I grant Rep. Smith that there are District Court judges ready to substitute their own views here for those of the president. It is true that President Truman tried to nationalize the country's steel industry citing a state of emergency because of the Korean War, but the Supreme Court ruled Truman didn't have the authority. However, the recent statutory authority to declare an emergency largely moots World-War-II-era decisions. My own view of judicial restraint is that the issue of whether there truly is an emergency is a "political question" under our constitutional structure. The judiciary traditionally refrains from deciding political questions. As to the claim that a border wall is not a "military expenditure" because DHS and not DOD would manage it, there too we're to some extent in a boat without a legal paddle. My own view is that the defense of our borders is a core military concern that legitimately concerns the president's duty to protect the nation from invasion. I think that it should not particularly matter which government department manages that concern. However, the president's ability to divert funds might quite plausibly be legislatively confined to intra-department funding. I assume therefore that the President will order the military to have the wall built. The interstate highway system was authorized as a requirement of national defense, after all.... A third issue is whether the declaration of an emergency can authorize a long-term institutional change (as opposed to a short term fix). For example, I don't think a president could invoke a national emergency to establish a "Space Force" as a fifth branch of the military -- that's a permanent policy change that properly belongs to the Congress. A permanent barrier is more of a technological solution to a security problem than the establishment of a new military branch, though. Again, were I a judge, judicial restraint would compel me to accept both the president's proposed emergency and the solution he favors, subject of course to the Congressional check I discuss immediately below. Well, in the post-Viet-Nam era, Congress gave itself the statutory right to restrain the president's emergency powers. The National Emergencies Act (NEA) requires the president to notify Congress every time he or she declares an emergency. The president must list which powers are being invoked and must provide regular updates on the execution of the declared emergency powers. Crucially, NEA allows Congress to terminate an emergency by joint votes of the House of Representatives and the Senate. Whether this veto power over presidential action is valid or is an unconstitutional breach of our separation of powers is not discussed here, since it seems clear to me that such a joint vote will not be forthcoming in this divided Congress. So, in general, I think the president is on solid legal ground here. As to the wisdom of the wall, that's for voters to figure out. | President has declared an emergency on the U.S.-Mexico border. David Gergen: There are dozens of laws that give the president special powers to act in an emergency. He says one issue is whether there is a true emergency. | pegasus | 1 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelkrauss/2019/02/15/can-president-trump-legally-invoke-a-national-emergency-at-the-border/ | 0.112681 |
Can President Trump Legally Invoke A National Emergency At The Border? | This is NOT an opinion piece about how to best defend our borders, or about how to go about accepting immigrants to our country. Those unable to distinguish between their own politics and a legal analysis are asked to stop reading NOW. This is a legal opinion, about the legality of the President's invokation of an emergency to authorize the building of a permanent barrier over parts of the land border with Mexico. In a nutshell, I think the President does have this power. Legal (not political) analysis follows. First, there are literally dozens of laws that give the president special powers to act in an emergency. Every president in recent memory has declared emergencies. According to one statute, for example, in an emergency, the president is allowed to divert money already authorized by Congress to be spent by the Defense Department on other military items to military construction projects. He might designate the "border wall" as a military construction project. Three issues arise, however. One issue is whether there is a true emergency. Another issue that the Department of Homeland Security, not the Department of Defense, would normally control the building of the barrier. Both these issues might be enough for a judge chomping at the bit to stop the president. "I think the president would be wide open to a court challenge saying, 'Where's the emergency?' " Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, told ABC News. The president has described the situation on the U.S.-Mexico border as both a humanitarian and national security crisis. "We have criminals coming in," he noted. "We have human traffickers coming in. We have drugs pouring in. We have things happening that you don't want to even know about." That last sentence presumably refers to his claim that terrorists are crossing the border. Whether these claims are exaggerated or not, there is clearly some truth to all of them. I grant Rep. Smith that there are District Court judges ready to substitute their own views here for those of the president. It is true that President Truman tried to nationalize the country's steel industry citing a state of emergency because of the Korean War, but the Supreme Court ruled Truman didn't have the authority. However, the recent statutory authority to declare an emergency largely moots World-War-II-era decisions. My own view of judicial restraint is that the issue of whether there truly is an emergency is a "political question" under our constitutional structure. The judiciary traditionally refrains from deciding political questions. As to the claim that a border wall is not a "military expenditure" because DHS and not DOD would manage it, there too we're to some extent in a boat without a legal paddle. My own view is that the defense of our borders is a core military concern that legitimately concerns the president's duty to protect the nation from invasion. I think that it should not particularly matter which government department manages that concern. However, the president's ability to divert funds might quite plausibly be legislatively confined to intra-department funding. I assume therefore that the President will order the military to have the wall built. The interstate highway system was authorized as a requirement of national defense, after all.... A third issue is whether the declaration of an emergency can authorize a long-term institutional change (as opposed to a short term fix). For example, I don't think a president could invoke a national emergency to establish a "Space Force" as a fifth branch of the military -- that's a permanent policy change that properly belongs to the Congress. A permanent barrier is more of a technological solution to a security problem than the establishment of a new military branch, though. Again, were I a judge, judicial restraint would compel me to accept both the president's proposed emergency and the solution he favors, subject of course to the Congressional check I discuss immediately below. Well, in the post-Viet-Nam era, Congress gave itself the statutory right to restrain the president's emergency powers. The National Emergencies Act (NEA) requires the president to notify Congress every time he or she declares an emergency. The president must list which powers are being invoked and must provide regular updates on the execution of the declared emergency powers. Crucially, NEA allows Congress to terminate an emergency by joint votes of the House of Representatives and the Senate. Whether this veto power over presidential action is valid or is an unconstitutional breach of our separation of powers is not discussed here, since it seems clear to me that such a joint vote will not be forthcoming in this divided Congress. So, in general, I think the president is on solid legal ground here. As to the wisdom of the wall, that's for voters to figure out. | Ruben Navarrette: The President does have the power to declare an emergency. He says there are dozens of laws that give the president special powers to act in emergency. The Department of Homeland Security, not the Department of Defense, would normally control the building of the barrier, he says. | bart | 2 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelkrauss/2019/02/15/can-president-trump-legally-invoke-a-national-emergency-at-the-border/ | 0.143554 |
Could Facebook Track The Locations Of Journalists And Politicians It Deems A 'Threat'? | Yesterday CNBC broke the story that Facebook uses its platform and mobile app to track the location of its users that it deems to be threats to the company. Leveraging the fact that more than 2 billion people around the world have Facebook accounts and allow the company to track their location and even realtime location through their IP addresses and smartphone app, Facebook uses this information to track users it believes pose a threat to the company, creating geofencing alerts when they come near Facebook facilities. This previously unpublicized practice raises serious concerns about the ways in which Facebook may repurpose its users most intimate information for its own business purposes. Most seriously, it raises the question of whether Facebook may use a similar tactic to track the realtime location of journalists, diplomats and politicians around the world that it considers to be threats to the companys business interests. Like many large global companies, Facebook maintains lists of individuals that are banned from its premises. Most companies, however, are limited to matching these lists against visitor requests and alerting their security staff to be on the lookout for particularly high-risk individuals. According to CNBC, Facebook, on the other hand, has leveraged its position as a global surveillance and intelligence database to repurpose its own platform to track problematic users in realtime. Given how many users install the Facebook mobile app on their smartphones, Facebook can use its own app to secretly track those users as they go about their lives. Without any notice or warning to the user, Facebook can simply flip a switch and view where that user is on a map and even create a geofence around its facilities to know when that individual comes near them. On paper, Facebooks location tracking operation exists to protect its facilities and employees from physical threats. In a request for comment, the company stated that it performs location tracking when it believes there is a credible risk of physical violence against one of its employees. However, notably, the companys response specifically avoided stating that this is the only reason it uses location tracking, leaving open the possibility that it may track users for other reasons. Asked about the ethics of using user location data, the company noted that users consent to allow the company to do whatever it wishes with their realtime location information, per its Data Policy: Data from device settings: information you allow us to receive through device settings you turn on, such as access to your GPS location, camera or photos. It is worth noting that that the line above, which Facebook cited in defense of its location tracking program, also permits it to access the users camera and photos stored on their phone. Such access has eerie echoes of the NSA phone hacking activities publicized by Edward Snowden. The company also cited this line in its Data Policy: We use the information we have to verify accounts and activity, combat harmful conduct, detect and prevent spam and other bad experiences, maintain the integrity of our Products, and promote safety and security on and off of Facebook Products. For example, we use data we have to investigate suspicious activity or violations of our terms or policies, or to detect when someone needs help. It also cited a third line in its Data Policy with regards to accessing private user data: When we have a good-faith belief it is necessary to: detect, prevent and address fraud, unauthorized use of the Products, violations of our terms or policies, or other harmful or illegal activity; to protect ourselves (including our rights, property or Products), you or others, including as part of investigations or regulatory inquiries; or to prevent death or imminent bodily harm. For example, if relevant, we provide information to and receive information from third-party partners about the reliability of your account to prevent fraud, abuse and other harmful activity on and off our Products. The fact that Facebook would cite such an extraordinarily broad set of circumstances when asked the reasons it might perform location tracking of a user suggests that the company may not always restrict accesses solely to cases of threats of physical harm. Specifically, those clauses raise the possibility that Facebook might consider it justified to track elected officials that it considers to be threats to its business model due to legislation they have proposed and journalists it considers to be threats to the confidentiality of its business practices for exposing damaging information about the company. For example, the company could use its location tracking to monitor journalists it suspects of meeting with company employees or former employees and monitor to see if their phones appear nearby any of its current or former employees or contractors. It could also monitor policymakers that have proposed legislation that could impact the companys bottom line and track what phones appear near them or their aides on a day-to-day basis to determine who they might be meeting with to get an edge on what legislation proposals might be coming. Asked whether it has ever tracked journalists that have exposed confidential business practices or policymakers that have threatened legislation that would curtail the companys business activities, a spokesperson reiterated that it has very specific policies governing how it decides to use location tracking and that location tracking is permitted for physical threats. However, notably, the company stopped short of explicitly denying that it has ever tracked a journalist or lawmaker for a reason other than a perceived immediate physical threat of violence against the company. Asked to state for the record that Facebook has never tracked the location of a journalist in order to determine their confidential sources or a policymaker to determine who they are meeting with, a company spokesperson responded that the company would not be commenting. For a company that has forcefully pushed back on many claims surrounding its most controversial practices, the companys refusal to state for the record that it has not tracked journalists and policymakers for reasons outside of physical threats is nothing short of extraordinary and suggests there may be far more to this program than the company has acknowledged. In many cases the program resembles Ubers former God mode capability that could track its users in realtime. Facebooks ability to use user location data for its own purposes suggests governments are likely using the same capability to track dissidents and others they dislike. Asked whether Facebook has complied with lawful court orders from the US or foreign governments to track individuals around the world for any purpose, the company noted that it has an obligation to comply with legal requests and did not deny doing so. Facebooks global reach means that countries around the world can in effect outsource their global surveillance operations to the company, using court orders to track anyone anywhere as they move about their daily lives. A dissident fleeing a repressive government can no longer escape surveillance, with their government able to turn to Facebook not only to track them around the world, but observe who they meet with. Even if the dissident does not use Facebook, anyone they meet with who does will be tracked. Asked whether the company would permit third party auditing of its use of location tracking to ensure that it has complied with its own policies and to determine all of the situations under which it has used such tracking, a spokesperson said the company would not be commenting. Once again, we are reminded that for all of Facebooks reassurances and calls to trust us, we have absolutely no independent verification of any of its claims. Putting this all together it is nothing short of extraordinary that Facebook not only is secretly mapping the locations of users it considers threats but that it refuses to deny on the record having used that capability to track journalists and policymakers that pose a threat to its business activities rather than a physical threat. Even if it turns out that the company has not yet exploited its tracking for such purposes, there is absolutely nothing preventing it from doing so. With a flip of a switch, Facebook could create a map that tracks the location of every policymaker and their aides, every journalist and every business leader that has installed the Facebook app, tracking them worldwide in every country and watch them travel around the world, having a global intelligence map rivaling that of the NSA. Even heads of state that use secure phones without Facebook installed are trailed by a phalanx of aides with personal phones who likely do have Facebook installed. In the end, as we condemn repressive regimes around the world for secret surveillance and realtime location tracking of their dissidents, it is becoming increasingly clear that Facebook may be the worst offender of them all. | Facebook uses its platform and mobile app to track the location of its users that it deems to be threats to the company. | bart | 0 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2019/02/15/could-facebook-track-the-locations-of-journalists-and-politicians-it-deems-a-threat/ | 0.193223 |
Could Facebook Track The Locations Of Journalists And Politicians It Deems A 'Threat'? | Yesterday CNBC broke the story that Facebook uses its platform and mobile app to track the location of its users that it deems to be threats to the company. Leveraging the fact that more than 2 billion people around the world have Facebook accounts and allow the company to track their location and even realtime location through their IP addresses and smartphone app, Facebook uses this information to track users it believes pose a threat to the company, creating geofencing alerts when they come near Facebook facilities. This previously unpublicized practice raises serious concerns about the ways in which Facebook may repurpose its users most intimate information for its own business purposes. Most seriously, it raises the question of whether Facebook may use a similar tactic to track the realtime location of journalists, diplomats and politicians around the world that it considers to be threats to the companys business interests. Like many large global companies, Facebook maintains lists of individuals that are banned from its premises. Most companies, however, are limited to matching these lists against visitor requests and alerting their security staff to be on the lookout for particularly high-risk individuals. According to CNBC, Facebook, on the other hand, has leveraged its position as a global surveillance and intelligence database to repurpose its own platform to track problematic users in realtime. Given how many users install the Facebook mobile app on their smartphones, Facebook can use its own app to secretly track those users as they go about their lives. Without any notice or warning to the user, Facebook can simply flip a switch and view where that user is on a map and even create a geofence around its facilities to know when that individual comes near them. On paper, Facebooks location tracking operation exists to protect its facilities and employees from physical threats. In a request for comment, the company stated that it performs location tracking when it believes there is a credible risk of physical violence against one of its employees. However, notably, the companys response specifically avoided stating that this is the only reason it uses location tracking, leaving open the possibility that it may track users for other reasons. Asked about the ethics of using user location data, the company noted that users consent to allow the company to do whatever it wishes with their realtime location information, per its Data Policy: Data from device settings: information you allow us to receive through device settings you turn on, such as access to your GPS location, camera or photos. It is worth noting that that the line above, which Facebook cited in defense of its location tracking program, also permits it to access the users camera and photos stored on their phone. Such access has eerie echoes of the NSA phone hacking activities publicized by Edward Snowden. The company also cited this line in its Data Policy: We use the information we have to verify accounts and activity, combat harmful conduct, detect and prevent spam and other bad experiences, maintain the integrity of our Products, and promote safety and security on and off of Facebook Products. For example, we use data we have to investigate suspicious activity or violations of our terms or policies, or to detect when someone needs help. It also cited a third line in its Data Policy with regards to accessing private user data: When we have a good-faith belief it is necessary to: detect, prevent and address fraud, unauthorized use of the Products, violations of our terms or policies, or other harmful or illegal activity; to protect ourselves (including our rights, property or Products), you or others, including as part of investigations or regulatory inquiries; or to prevent death or imminent bodily harm. For example, if relevant, we provide information to and receive information from third-party partners about the reliability of your account to prevent fraud, abuse and other harmful activity on and off our Products. The fact that Facebook would cite such an extraordinarily broad set of circumstances when asked the reasons it might perform location tracking of a user suggests that the company may not always restrict accesses solely to cases of threats of physical harm. Specifically, those clauses raise the possibility that Facebook might consider it justified to track elected officials that it considers to be threats to its business model due to legislation they have proposed and journalists it considers to be threats to the confidentiality of its business practices for exposing damaging information about the company. For example, the company could use its location tracking to monitor journalists it suspects of meeting with company employees or former employees and monitor to see if their phones appear nearby any of its current or former employees or contractors. It could also monitor policymakers that have proposed legislation that could impact the companys bottom line and track what phones appear near them or their aides on a day-to-day basis to determine who they might be meeting with to get an edge on what legislation proposals might be coming. Asked whether it has ever tracked journalists that have exposed confidential business practices or policymakers that have threatened legislation that would curtail the companys business activities, a spokesperson reiterated that it has very specific policies governing how it decides to use location tracking and that location tracking is permitted for physical threats. However, notably, the company stopped short of explicitly denying that it has ever tracked a journalist or lawmaker for a reason other than a perceived immediate physical threat of violence against the company. Asked to state for the record that Facebook has never tracked the location of a journalist in order to determine their confidential sources or a policymaker to determine who they are meeting with, a company spokesperson responded that the company would not be commenting. For a company that has forcefully pushed back on many claims surrounding its most controversial practices, the companys refusal to state for the record that it has not tracked journalists and policymakers for reasons outside of physical threats is nothing short of extraordinary and suggests there may be far more to this program than the company has acknowledged. In many cases the program resembles Ubers former God mode capability that could track its users in realtime. Facebooks ability to use user location data for its own purposes suggests governments are likely using the same capability to track dissidents and others they dislike. Asked whether Facebook has complied with lawful court orders from the US or foreign governments to track individuals around the world for any purpose, the company noted that it has an obligation to comply with legal requests and did not deny doing so. Facebooks global reach means that countries around the world can in effect outsource their global surveillance operations to the company, using court orders to track anyone anywhere as they move about their daily lives. A dissident fleeing a repressive government can no longer escape surveillance, with their government able to turn to Facebook not only to track them around the world, but observe who they meet with. Even if the dissident does not use Facebook, anyone they meet with who does will be tracked. Asked whether the company would permit third party auditing of its use of location tracking to ensure that it has complied with its own policies and to determine all of the situations under which it has used such tracking, a spokesperson said the company would not be commenting. Once again, we are reminded that for all of Facebooks reassurances and calls to trust us, we have absolutely no independent verification of any of its claims. Putting this all together it is nothing short of extraordinary that Facebook not only is secretly mapping the locations of users it considers threats but that it refuses to deny on the record having used that capability to track journalists and policymakers that pose a threat to its business activities rather than a physical threat. Even if it turns out that the company has not yet exploited its tracking for such purposes, there is absolutely nothing preventing it from doing so. With a flip of a switch, Facebook could create a map that tracks the location of every policymaker and their aides, every journalist and every business leader that has installed the Facebook app, tracking them worldwide in every country and watch them travel around the world, having a global intelligence map rivaling that of the NSA. Even heads of state that use secure phones without Facebook installed are trailed by a phalanx of aides with personal phones who likely do have Facebook installed. In the end, as we condemn repressive regimes around the world for secret surveillance and realtime location tracking of their dissidents, it is becoming increasingly clear that Facebook may be the worst offender of them all. | Facebook tracks users it believes pose a threat to the company, creating geofencing alerts when they come near Facebook facilities. Facebooks location tracking operation exists to protect its facilities and employees from physical threats. | pegasus | 1 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2019/02/15/could-facebook-track-the-locations-of-journalists-and-politicians-it-deems-a-threat/ | 0.207404 |
Could Facebook Track The Locations Of Journalists And Politicians It Deems A 'Threat'? | Yesterday CNBC broke the story that Facebook uses its platform and mobile app to track the location of its users that it deems to be threats to the company. Leveraging the fact that more than 2 billion people around the world have Facebook accounts and allow the company to track their location and even realtime location through their IP addresses and smartphone app, Facebook uses this information to track users it believes pose a threat to the company, creating geofencing alerts when they come near Facebook facilities. This previously unpublicized practice raises serious concerns about the ways in which Facebook may repurpose its users most intimate information for its own business purposes. Most seriously, it raises the question of whether Facebook may use a similar tactic to track the realtime location of journalists, diplomats and politicians around the world that it considers to be threats to the companys business interests. Like many large global companies, Facebook maintains lists of individuals that are banned from its premises. Most companies, however, are limited to matching these lists against visitor requests and alerting their security staff to be on the lookout for particularly high-risk individuals. According to CNBC, Facebook, on the other hand, has leveraged its position as a global surveillance and intelligence database to repurpose its own platform to track problematic users in realtime. Given how many users install the Facebook mobile app on their smartphones, Facebook can use its own app to secretly track those users as they go about their lives. Without any notice or warning to the user, Facebook can simply flip a switch and view where that user is on a map and even create a geofence around its facilities to know when that individual comes near them. On paper, Facebooks location tracking operation exists to protect its facilities and employees from physical threats. In a request for comment, the company stated that it performs location tracking when it believes there is a credible risk of physical violence against one of its employees. However, notably, the companys response specifically avoided stating that this is the only reason it uses location tracking, leaving open the possibility that it may track users for other reasons. Asked about the ethics of using user location data, the company noted that users consent to allow the company to do whatever it wishes with their realtime location information, per its Data Policy: Data from device settings: information you allow us to receive through device settings you turn on, such as access to your GPS location, camera or photos. It is worth noting that that the line above, which Facebook cited in defense of its location tracking program, also permits it to access the users camera and photos stored on their phone. Such access has eerie echoes of the NSA phone hacking activities publicized by Edward Snowden. The company also cited this line in its Data Policy: We use the information we have to verify accounts and activity, combat harmful conduct, detect and prevent spam and other bad experiences, maintain the integrity of our Products, and promote safety and security on and off of Facebook Products. For example, we use data we have to investigate suspicious activity or violations of our terms or policies, or to detect when someone needs help. It also cited a third line in its Data Policy with regards to accessing private user data: When we have a good-faith belief it is necessary to: detect, prevent and address fraud, unauthorized use of the Products, violations of our terms or policies, or other harmful or illegal activity; to protect ourselves (including our rights, property or Products), you or others, including as part of investigations or regulatory inquiries; or to prevent death or imminent bodily harm. For example, if relevant, we provide information to and receive information from third-party partners about the reliability of your account to prevent fraud, abuse and other harmful activity on and off our Products. The fact that Facebook would cite such an extraordinarily broad set of circumstances when asked the reasons it might perform location tracking of a user suggests that the company may not always restrict accesses solely to cases of threats of physical harm. Specifically, those clauses raise the possibility that Facebook might consider it justified to track elected officials that it considers to be threats to its business model due to legislation they have proposed and journalists it considers to be threats to the confidentiality of its business practices for exposing damaging information about the company. For example, the company could use its location tracking to monitor journalists it suspects of meeting with company employees or former employees and monitor to see if their phones appear nearby any of its current or former employees or contractors. It could also monitor policymakers that have proposed legislation that could impact the companys bottom line and track what phones appear near them or their aides on a day-to-day basis to determine who they might be meeting with to get an edge on what legislation proposals might be coming. Asked whether it has ever tracked journalists that have exposed confidential business practices or policymakers that have threatened legislation that would curtail the companys business activities, a spokesperson reiterated that it has very specific policies governing how it decides to use location tracking and that location tracking is permitted for physical threats. However, notably, the company stopped short of explicitly denying that it has ever tracked a journalist or lawmaker for a reason other than a perceived immediate physical threat of violence against the company. Asked to state for the record that Facebook has never tracked the location of a journalist in order to determine their confidential sources or a policymaker to determine who they are meeting with, a company spokesperson responded that the company would not be commenting. For a company that has forcefully pushed back on many claims surrounding its most controversial practices, the companys refusal to state for the record that it has not tracked journalists and policymakers for reasons outside of physical threats is nothing short of extraordinary and suggests there may be far more to this program than the company has acknowledged. In many cases the program resembles Ubers former God mode capability that could track its users in realtime. Facebooks ability to use user location data for its own purposes suggests governments are likely using the same capability to track dissidents and others they dislike. Asked whether Facebook has complied with lawful court orders from the US or foreign governments to track individuals around the world for any purpose, the company noted that it has an obligation to comply with legal requests and did not deny doing so. Facebooks global reach means that countries around the world can in effect outsource their global surveillance operations to the company, using court orders to track anyone anywhere as they move about their daily lives. A dissident fleeing a repressive government can no longer escape surveillance, with their government able to turn to Facebook not only to track them around the world, but observe who they meet with. Even if the dissident does not use Facebook, anyone they meet with who does will be tracked. Asked whether the company would permit third party auditing of its use of location tracking to ensure that it has complied with its own policies and to determine all of the situations under which it has used such tracking, a spokesperson said the company would not be commenting. Once again, we are reminded that for all of Facebooks reassurances and calls to trust us, we have absolutely no independent verification of any of its claims. Putting this all together it is nothing short of extraordinary that Facebook not only is secretly mapping the locations of users it considers threats but that it refuses to deny on the record having used that capability to track journalists and policymakers that pose a threat to its business activities rather than a physical threat. Even if it turns out that the company has not yet exploited its tracking for such purposes, there is absolutely nothing preventing it from doing so. With a flip of a switch, Facebook could create a map that tracks the location of every policymaker and their aides, every journalist and every business leader that has installed the Facebook app, tracking them worldwide in every country and watch them travel around the world, having a global intelligence map rivaling that of the NSA. Even heads of state that use secure phones without Facebook installed are trailed by a phalanx of aides with personal phones who likely do have Facebook installed. In the end, as we condemn repressive regimes around the world for secret surveillance and realtime location tracking of their dissidents, it is becoming increasingly clear that Facebook may be the worst offender of them all. | Facebook tracks users it believes pose a threat to the company, creating geofencing alerts when they come near Facebook facilities. On paper, Facebooks location tracking operation exists to protect its facilities and employees from physical threats. Facebook noted that users consent to allow the company to do whatever it wishes with their realtime location information. | pegasus | 2 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2019/02/15/could-facebook-track-the-locations-of-journalists-and-politicians-it-deems-a-threat/ | 0.258288 |
What Are Estee Lauder's Key Sources Of Revenue? | Estee Lauder (NYSE: EL) has continued with its growth momentum the past few years, primarily driven by strong performance in its Skin Care and Makeup segments. Its Skin Care and Makeup Divisions account for 80% of the companys revenue. Recently, during the Q2 earnings for FY19, the company reported better-than-expected growth in sales growing by 11% y-o-y. Estee Lauders Skin Care segment, which constitutes over one-third of Estee Lauders sales, posted 16% growth in Q2 sales. The company posted this exceptional performance driven by strong innovations, increasing demand from younger consumers, and gains from its hero products: Este Lauder, La Mer, Origins, and Clinique brands. Driven by continued success of the recent launches Advanced Night Repair Eye Concentrate Matrix the Estee Lauder brand saw strong growth from China and the travel retail segment. La Mer saw growth coming from new products in the Genaissance collection and launch of The Moisturizing Matte Lotion. In addition, Origins generated sales growth from every geographic region, led by Asia. The division is continuing to perform well in e-commerce and is outpacing growth in the mass Skin Care segment. ELs makeup segment continued to see increased sales from the acquisitions of Too Faced and BECCA in the last fiscal year. The 3% increase in this segment was driven by strong growth from its brands viz. Este Lauder and Tom Ford, Too Faced, BECCA, and La Mer. Other sources of revenue for EL is the Hair Care segment, which increased by 5% primarily driven by higher sales of the Aveda brand and continued growth from the Invati Advanced line of products. Driven by this earning performance, which has been fueled by growth in most of their segments and brands, Estee Lauder is projecting growth in its Q3 2019 sales to increase between the band of 8% 9% (Excluding a 5% impact from currency translation and a 2% impact from the adoption of ASC 606), net earnings per share between $1.17 and $1.20. ELs growth drivers and aggressive growth strategies will help it in maintaining its dominance in the beauty market. Also, the company is on track with the implementation of the Leading Beauty Forward initiative, directed toward better-management of costs and operations, which will help it grow stronger in the coming years. We have created an interactive dashboard on Estee Lauders Key Sources of Revenues that shows Estee Lauders key revenue sources and the expected performance in 2019. You can adjust the revenues to see the impact on earnings. In addition, all Trefis Consumer Discretionary Data is here. Explore example interactive dashboards and create your own. | Estee Lauder's Skin Care and Makeup Divisions account for 80% of the company's revenue. | bart | 0 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2019/02/15/what-are-estee-lauders-key-sources-of-revenue/ | 0.260262 |
What To Expect From Activision Blizzard In 2019? | Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI) recently posted its Q4 results, which were in line with our estimates. The top line grew in mid-teens while its bottom line saw strong double-digit growth, primarily led by a higher contribution from Blizzard. However, the segment saw continued softness in net bookings. In fact, the company has guided for a significant decline in the Blizzard segment in 2019. We forecast a low double-digit decline in the companys top line, and a low thirties percent decline in the adjusted earnings, primarily due to the expected trends in the Blizzard segment, which we discuss below. We have created an interactive dashboard ~ A Quick Snapshot of Activision Blizzards Q4 Performance And Trefis Estimates For The Full Year 2019. You can adjust various drivers to see the impact on the companys earnings, and price estimate. In addition, here is more Information Technology data. Expect Revenues To Decline In Low Single-Digits Activision revenues were up in mid-single-digits in 2018, primarily led by Call of Duty: Black Ops 4, The game has seen strong sales in the recent months. In fact, it was No. 2 in NPDs top 10 grossers list for 2018. The game will likely see continued demand in Q1 as well, and the company plans to release the next line up in the franchise in Q4 2019. However, the companys management in its recent earnings conference call stated that the segment revenues wont see any significant growth (y-o-y) in 2019, given that Destinys publishing rights were sold to Bungie. The Blizzard segment saw high single-digit revenue growth in 2018, led by World of Warcraft: Battle of Azeroth. However, the company saw softness in net bookings (in-game). There is no release planned for World of Warcraft in 2019, and this will have a significant impact on the companys performance. We forecast the decline to be as steep as 50% on the segments revenues. Looking at King Digital, the segment revenue grew 7%, led by its new game ~ Candy Crush Friends. However, its monthly active user base of around 271 million was down in low double-digits (y-o-y). We forecast the segment revenues to grow in low double-digits in 2019, led by an expected pick up in its active user base, with the launches in the Candy Crush franchise, and an uptick in advertising revenues. Overall, we forecast the companys revenues to decline in low double digits to $6.67 billion in 2019, primarily due to the plunge in the Blizzard segment. Note that our forecast is above the companys guidance of $6.30 billion. We expect the earnings to be $1.90 per share for the full year 2019, on an adjusted basis. Our price estimate of $52 for Activision Blizzard is based of a 28x forward price to earnings multiple. Explore example interactive dashboards and create your own. | We forecast Activision Blizzard's revenues to decline in low double digits to $6.67 billion in 2019. | ctrlsum | 0 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2019/02/15/what-to-expect-from-activision-blizzard-in-2019/ | 0.286824 |
What To Expect From Activision Blizzard In 2019? | Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI) recently posted its Q4 results, which were in line with our estimates. The top line grew in mid-teens while its bottom line saw strong double-digit growth, primarily led by a higher contribution from Blizzard. However, the segment saw continued softness in net bookings. In fact, the company has guided for a significant decline in the Blizzard segment in 2019. We forecast a low double-digit decline in the companys top line, and a low thirties percent decline in the adjusted earnings, primarily due to the expected trends in the Blizzard segment, which we discuss below. We have created an interactive dashboard ~ A Quick Snapshot of Activision Blizzards Q4 Performance And Trefis Estimates For The Full Year 2019. You can adjust various drivers to see the impact on the companys earnings, and price estimate. In addition, here is more Information Technology data. Expect Revenues To Decline In Low Single-Digits Activision revenues were up in mid-single-digits in 2018, primarily led by Call of Duty: Black Ops 4, The game has seen strong sales in the recent months. In fact, it was No. 2 in NPDs top 10 grossers list for 2018. The game will likely see continued demand in Q1 as well, and the company plans to release the next line up in the franchise in Q4 2019. However, the companys management in its recent earnings conference call stated that the segment revenues wont see any significant growth (y-o-y) in 2019, given that Destinys publishing rights were sold to Bungie. The Blizzard segment saw high single-digit revenue growth in 2018, led by World of Warcraft: Battle of Azeroth. However, the company saw softness in net bookings (in-game). There is no release planned for World of Warcraft in 2019, and this will have a significant impact on the companys performance. We forecast the decline to be as steep as 50% on the segments revenues. Looking at King Digital, the segment revenue grew 7%, led by its new game ~ Candy Crush Friends. However, its monthly active user base of around 271 million was down in low double-digits (y-o-y). We forecast the segment revenues to grow in low double-digits in 2019, led by an expected pick up in its active user base, with the launches in the Candy Crush franchise, and an uptick in advertising revenues. Overall, we forecast the companys revenues to decline in low double digits to $6.67 billion in 2019, primarily due to the plunge in the Blizzard segment. Note that our forecast is above the companys guidance of $6.30 billion. We expect the earnings to be $1.90 per share for the full year 2019, on an adjusted basis. Our price estimate of $52 for Activision Blizzard is based of a 28x forward price to earnings multiple. Explore example interactive dashboards and create your own. | Activision Blizzard recently posted its Q4 results, which were in line with our estimates. The company has guided for a significant decline in the Blizzard segment in 2019. We forecast a low double-digit decline in the companys top line, and a low thirties percent decline in the adjusted earnings. | pegasus | 2 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2019/02/15/what-to-expect-from-activision-blizzard-in-2019/ | 0.327288 |
What's Next For Namaste Technologies After Ousting CEO? | Namaste Technologies stock has tanked of late, after the company announced that CEO Sean Dollinger had been terminated for cause after an internal investigation found evidence of self-dealing and breaches of fiduciary duty. The company also announced that it will be undergoing a review of strategic options, which could potentially include the outright sale of the company. The stock is now trading below $1, down from nearly $3 in late September when a short-seller leveled allegations of fraud that prompted the companys internal investigation. Investors will be eagerly awaiting the results of the review of strategic options, though given the turmoil and depressed valuation, it may not be an opportune time to seek a buyout. Namaste is an emerging company in the cannabis-related market, selling vaporizers and other accessories through its 30 e-commerce websites across 20 countries. While the company focused primarily on the medical side until recently, it has taken steps to capitalize on the growth potential of Canadas recreational cannabis market. Given the turmoil surrounding the company, and its relatively murky outlook, we have cut our price estimate for Namaste Technologies to CAD 2 per share (around $1.50). Our interactive dashboard analysis on Namaste Technologies Valuation outlines our near-term expectations for the company. You can modify any of our key estimates or forecasts to gauge the impact changes have on the companys valuation, and see all Trefis Consumer company data. Namastes board elevated Meni Morim, the companys Chief Product Officer and Director of AI, to the position of CEO. The company sent a letter to shareholders stating that the companys operations will continue uninterrupted during the strategic review, and discussing its ongoing innovation initiatives including Artificial Intelligence capabilities that are being deeply integrated into [the] customer experience. However, at this point it is very possible that the company ultimately pursues a buyout, despite the depressed valuation. Given its potential in the fast-growing market, solid technological capabilities and sales pipeline, there could be a few suitors for its business (such as Canadian cannabis competitors or even a larger tobacco company potentially). With the stock trading well below the levels it saw for much of 2018, a suitor could potentially acquire the company at a relatively attractive price tag. | Namaste Technologies stock has tanked of late, after the company announced that CEO Sean Dollinger had been terminated for cause. The company also announced that it will be undergoing a review of strategic options, which could potentially include the outright sale of the company. | bart | 2 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2019/02/15/whats-next-for-namaste-technologies-after-ousting-ceo/ | 0.291426 |
Wheres the closest place to find snow near San Francisco? | You could leave right now and in a matter of hours find yourself throwing a snowball, sailing down a ski run, tubing on a hill or cruising on cross-country skis on a route in a national forest. The snow country is this close: Dodge Ridge, 160 miles from the San Francisco Peninsula, is the closest ski area to the Bay Area. On Highway 108, Sonora is the gateway to Stanislaus National Forest, Dodge Ridge Ski Area and destinations for cross country and snow play. In addition, if youre not comfortable driving in snow country or your vehicle is not equipped for it, rides on a ski bus are available for the final 30 miles from Sonora (1,800 feet elevation) to Dodge Ridge (6,600 feet). Tuolumne County Transit is providing the Dodge Ridge Ski Bus, $10 round trip per person, or a $25 family four-pack, on weekends and holidays through March. Dodge Ridge is near Pinecrest in the heart of the central Sierra. The pretty drive up takes you through Manteca and Oakdale in the San Joaquin Valley and then up through the foothills past Sonora to the west flank of the Sierra. You pass little towns like Mi-Wuk Village, Sierra Village and Pinecrest. Heres what youll find: Dodge Ridge Ski Area For many, Dodge Ridge feels just right. Not too big, not too small. Not too crowded, not too expensive. At the lifts, if you need a little extra time to get your seat, the attendant wont use a cattle prod on you to speed it up. Dodge has 12 lifts, 67 trails and 1,600 feet of vertical, and a layout where the beginner runs are well separated from intermediate and advanced runs higher on the hill. Dodge has no snow making, no lake view and no nightlife, so many bypass it. Yet this past week, snowfall hit 300 inches for the season, 130 percent of average. Intermediate skiers should take the Canyon Quad to the top of the ridge at 8,200 feet. Just off to your left, take the Graceland Run, a 2-mile-long intermediate run, great for cruisers. Theres a cafe and a free ski or board check when you take a break at the lodge. Ive been coming here a long time and have never had a bad trip. One year, what looked like a Volkswagen with hair was spotted sliding down one of the ski runs. It was a black bear. If you go: Current base depths 74 to 106 inches. Lift tickets: $78 for full day, discounts for half day, seniors, youth, active military, free for those over 82 or 5 and under, with advance ticket vouchers at Save Mart or Lucky. Rentals: Adult ski or snowboard package $43, Nordic $25, snowshoes $20. Contacts: Dodge Ridge, snow phone, 209-536-5300; guest relations, 209-965-3474; www.DodgeRidge.com. Cross-country ski Getting there GPS location: 1 Dodge Ridge Road, Pinecrest How to get there: From San Francisco, take the Bay Bridge east for 6.4 miles to the split and Highway 580. Bear right on 580 and drive 45 miles to the split (stay left) with Interstate 205. Bear left on on I-205E and drive 14.6 miles to the merge with I-5N. Merge with I-5 (stay in right lane) and go 1 mile to the exit for Highway 120E/Manteca-Sonora. Take that exit onto Highway 120 and drive 6.3 miles to Manteca area and fork with Highway 99/120. Keep left at fork, merge on 120/99 and go 1.7 miles to exit for Highway 120. Take that exit, turn right on 120 and drive 20 miles to Oakdale and continue into town to signed, lighted intersection with Highway 108/120. Turn left on 108 (still in town) and drive 37 miles to Sonora. In Sonora, continue east on 108 and drive 25 miles into Sierra and to Pinecrest and Pinecrest Lake Road. Turn right and drive 0.4 miles to second right to Dodge Ridge Road. Turn right and go 3.5 miles to Dodge Ridge Ski Area. Distances:65 miles from Oakdale, 86 miles from Manteca, 121 miles from Livermore, 144 miles from Concord, 157 miles from San Jose, 160 miles from San Mateo, 163 miles from San Francisco, 173 miles from San Rafael. Dodge Ridge Ski Bus:$10 round trip service, $25 family four-pack, from Sonora to Dodge Ridge. Reserve at (209) 532-0404, www.tuolumnecountytransit.com/skibus Read More Near Highway 108 and Dodge Ridge, Stanislaus National Forest operates two free trailheads, Crabtree and Gooseberry, for access to a network of cross-country ski trails. Its free, yet you are not on your own. At the trailhead, cross-country ski trail maps are available. On weekends and holidays, and on occasional weekdays, members of the Pinecrest Nordic Ski Patrol roam the terrain and have your back. Rentals available at Dodge Ridge. Info: Trail map, www.pinecrestnordic.org. Leland Snow Play Leland Snow Play is the largest stand-alone, developed snow play site in Northern California. This is a 12-acre hill with lift tows and groomed lanes, equipment provided. Older kids can sail down the fast lanes at a higher speed. Small youngsters can can ride double or triple with their parents in the slower lanes. Warming lodge available. It is 7 miles east of Strawberry, elevation 6,300 feet. Rates vary according to size (under/over 40 inches), $22 to $30, all day. Info: Leland Snow Play, 209-965-4719, www.snowplay.com. Highway 108 Sno-Park A Sno-Park is at the winter closure gate on Highway 108, east of Strawberry. Near the gate, visitors have snowball fights, with a small hill nearby for sledding. It is also a launch spot for cross-country skiing and to a lesser extent snowmobiling and dog sledding. Parking is good. Day permits, $5 (buy in advance). Info, link to purchase permits: California State Parks, OHV program, http://ohv.parks.ca.gov click on winter recreation. Cabins at Strawberry To turn the trip into an overnighter, the most popular choice is to book lodging at the Cabins at Strawberry or rent a vacation cabin at Mi-Wuk Village through www.airbnb.com or similar rental services. The rates for vacation cabins at Mi-Wuk are low compared to many other regions, where $75 to $125 per night is common. At the Cabins at Strawberry, rates are higher, an average of $269 per night, but the location and setting are gorgeous. Info: AirBnb at www.airbnb.com; Cabins at Strawberry, info at (209) 965-0885, reservations at 888-965-0885; www.cabinsatstrawberry.com. Tom Stienstra is The San Francisco Chronicles outdoors writer. Email: tstienstra@sfchronicle.com. Twitter: @StienstraTom. Facebook: www.facebook.com/tomstienstraoutdoors. | Dodge Ridge, 160 miles from San Francisco, is the closest ski area to the Bay Area. | pegasus | 0 | https://www.sfchronicle.com/outdoors/stienstra/article/Where-s-the-closest-place-to-find-snow-near-San-13619931.php | 0.188299 |
Wheres the closest place to find snow near San Francisco? | You could leave right now and in a matter of hours find yourself throwing a snowball, sailing down a ski run, tubing on a hill or cruising on cross-country skis on a route in a national forest. The snow country is this close: Dodge Ridge, 160 miles from the San Francisco Peninsula, is the closest ski area to the Bay Area. On Highway 108, Sonora is the gateway to Stanislaus National Forest, Dodge Ridge Ski Area and destinations for cross country and snow play. In addition, if youre not comfortable driving in snow country or your vehicle is not equipped for it, rides on a ski bus are available for the final 30 miles from Sonora (1,800 feet elevation) to Dodge Ridge (6,600 feet). Tuolumne County Transit is providing the Dodge Ridge Ski Bus, $10 round trip per person, or a $25 family four-pack, on weekends and holidays through March. Dodge Ridge is near Pinecrest in the heart of the central Sierra. The pretty drive up takes you through Manteca and Oakdale in the San Joaquin Valley and then up through the foothills past Sonora to the west flank of the Sierra. You pass little towns like Mi-Wuk Village, Sierra Village and Pinecrest. Heres what youll find: Dodge Ridge Ski Area For many, Dodge Ridge feels just right. Not too big, not too small. Not too crowded, not too expensive. At the lifts, if you need a little extra time to get your seat, the attendant wont use a cattle prod on you to speed it up. Dodge has 12 lifts, 67 trails and 1,600 feet of vertical, and a layout where the beginner runs are well separated from intermediate and advanced runs higher on the hill. Dodge has no snow making, no lake view and no nightlife, so many bypass it. Yet this past week, snowfall hit 300 inches for the season, 130 percent of average. Intermediate skiers should take the Canyon Quad to the top of the ridge at 8,200 feet. Just off to your left, take the Graceland Run, a 2-mile-long intermediate run, great for cruisers. Theres a cafe and a free ski or board check when you take a break at the lodge. Ive been coming here a long time and have never had a bad trip. One year, what looked like a Volkswagen with hair was spotted sliding down one of the ski runs. It was a black bear. If you go: Current base depths 74 to 106 inches. Lift tickets: $78 for full day, discounts for half day, seniors, youth, active military, free for those over 82 or 5 and under, with advance ticket vouchers at Save Mart or Lucky. Rentals: Adult ski or snowboard package $43, Nordic $25, snowshoes $20. Contacts: Dodge Ridge, snow phone, 209-536-5300; guest relations, 209-965-3474; www.DodgeRidge.com. Cross-country ski Getting there GPS location: 1 Dodge Ridge Road, Pinecrest How to get there: From San Francisco, take the Bay Bridge east for 6.4 miles to the split and Highway 580. Bear right on 580 and drive 45 miles to the split (stay left) with Interstate 205. Bear left on on I-205E and drive 14.6 miles to the merge with I-5N. Merge with I-5 (stay in right lane) and go 1 mile to the exit for Highway 120E/Manteca-Sonora. Take that exit onto Highway 120 and drive 6.3 miles to Manteca area and fork with Highway 99/120. Keep left at fork, merge on 120/99 and go 1.7 miles to exit for Highway 120. Take that exit, turn right on 120 and drive 20 miles to Oakdale and continue into town to signed, lighted intersection with Highway 108/120. Turn left on 108 (still in town) and drive 37 miles to Sonora. In Sonora, continue east on 108 and drive 25 miles into Sierra and to Pinecrest and Pinecrest Lake Road. Turn right and drive 0.4 miles to second right to Dodge Ridge Road. Turn right and go 3.5 miles to Dodge Ridge Ski Area. Distances:65 miles from Oakdale, 86 miles from Manteca, 121 miles from Livermore, 144 miles from Concord, 157 miles from San Jose, 160 miles from San Mateo, 163 miles from San Francisco, 173 miles from San Rafael. Dodge Ridge Ski Bus:$10 round trip service, $25 family four-pack, from Sonora to Dodge Ridge. Reserve at (209) 532-0404, www.tuolumnecountytransit.com/skibus Read More Near Highway 108 and Dodge Ridge, Stanislaus National Forest operates two free trailheads, Crabtree and Gooseberry, for access to a network of cross-country ski trails. Its free, yet you are not on your own. At the trailhead, cross-country ski trail maps are available. On weekends and holidays, and on occasional weekdays, members of the Pinecrest Nordic Ski Patrol roam the terrain and have your back. Rentals available at Dodge Ridge. Info: Trail map, www.pinecrestnordic.org. Leland Snow Play Leland Snow Play is the largest stand-alone, developed snow play site in Northern California. This is a 12-acre hill with lift tows and groomed lanes, equipment provided. Older kids can sail down the fast lanes at a higher speed. Small youngsters can can ride double or triple with their parents in the slower lanes. Warming lodge available. It is 7 miles east of Strawberry, elevation 6,300 feet. Rates vary according to size (under/over 40 inches), $22 to $30, all day. Info: Leland Snow Play, 209-965-4719, www.snowplay.com. Highway 108 Sno-Park A Sno-Park is at the winter closure gate on Highway 108, east of Strawberry. Near the gate, visitors have snowball fights, with a small hill nearby for sledding. It is also a launch spot for cross-country skiing and to a lesser extent snowmobiling and dog sledding. Parking is good. Day permits, $5 (buy in advance). Info, link to purchase permits: California State Parks, OHV program, http://ohv.parks.ca.gov click on winter recreation. Cabins at Strawberry To turn the trip into an overnighter, the most popular choice is to book lodging at the Cabins at Strawberry or rent a vacation cabin at Mi-Wuk Village through www.airbnb.com or similar rental services. The rates for vacation cabins at Mi-Wuk are low compared to many other regions, where $75 to $125 per night is common. At the Cabins at Strawberry, rates are higher, an average of $269 per night, but the location and setting are gorgeous. Info: AirBnb at www.airbnb.com; Cabins at Strawberry, info at (209) 965-0885, reservations at 888-965-0885; www.cabinsatstrawberry.com. Tom Stienstra is The San Francisco Chronicles outdoors writer. Email: tstienstra@sfchronicle.com. Twitter: @StienstraTom. Facebook: www.facebook.com/tomstienstraoutdoors. | Dodge Ridge Ski Area is 160 miles from the San Francisco Peninsula. It has 12 lifts, 67 trails and 1,600 feet of vertical. This past week, snowfall hit 300 inches for the season, 130 percent of average. | bart | 1 | https://www.sfchronicle.com/outdoors/stienstra/article/Where-s-the-closest-place-to-find-snow-near-San-13619931.php | 0.187318 |
Wheres the closest place to find snow near San Francisco? | You could leave right now and in a matter of hours find yourself throwing a snowball, sailing down a ski run, tubing on a hill or cruising on cross-country skis on a route in a national forest. The snow country is this close: Dodge Ridge, 160 miles from the San Francisco Peninsula, is the closest ski area to the Bay Area. On Highway 108, Sonora is the gateway to Stanislaus National Forest, Dodge Ridge Ski Area and destinations for cross country and snow play. In addition, if youre not comfortable driving in snow country or your vehicle is not equipped for it, rides on a ski bus are available for the final 30 miles from Sonora (1,800 feet elevation) to Dodge Ridge (6,600 feet). Tuolumne County Transit is providing the Dodge Ridge Ski Bus, $10 round trip per person, or a $25 family four-pack, on weekends and holidays through March. Dodge Ridge is near Pinecrest in the heart of the central Sierra. The pretty drive up takes you through Manteca and Oakdale in the San Joaquin Valley and then up through the foothills past Sonora to the west flank of the Sierra. You pass little towns like Mi-Wuk Village, Sierra Village and Pinecrest. Heres what youll find: Dodge Ridge Ski Area For many, Dodge Ridge feels just right. Not too big, not too small. Not too crowded, not too expensive. At the lifts, if you need a little extra time to get your seat, the attendant wont use a cattle prod on you to speed it up. Dodge has 12 lifts, 67 trails and 1,600 feet of vertical, and a layout where the beginner runs are well separated from intermediate and advanced runs higher on the hill. Dodge has no snow making, no lake view and no nightlife, so many bypass it. Yet this past week, snowfall hit 300 inches for the season, 130 percent of average. Intermediate skiers should take the Canyon Quad to the top of the ridge at 8,200 feet. Just off to your left, take the Graceland Run, a 2-mile-long intermediate run, great for cruisers. Theres a cafe and a free ski or board check when you take a break at the lodge. Ive been coming here a long time and have never had a bad trip. One year, what looked like a Volkswagen with hair was spotted sliding down one of the ski runs. It was a black bear. If you go: Current base depths 74 to 106 inches. Lift tickets: $78 for full day, discounts for half day, seniors, youth, active military, free for those over 82 or 5 and under, with advance ticket vouchers at Save Mart or Lucky. Rentals: Adult ski or snowboard package $43, Nordic $25, snowshoes $20. Contacts: Dodge Ridge, snow phone, 209-536-5300; guest relations, 209-965-3474; www.DodgeRidge.com. Cross-country ski Getting there GPS location: 1 Dodge Ridge Road, Pinecrest How to get there: From San Francisco, take the Bay Bridge east for 6.4 miles to the split and Highway 580. Bear right on 580 and drive 45 miles to the split (stay left) with Interstate 205. Bear left on on I-205E and drive 14.6 miles to the merge with I-5N. Merge with I-5 (stay in right lane) and go 1 mile to the exit for Highway 120E/Manteca-Sonora. Take that exit onto Highway 120 and drive 6.3 miles to Manteca area and fork with Highway 99/120. Keep left at fork, merge on 120/99 and go 1.7 miles to exit for Highway 120. Take that exit, turn right on 120 and drive 20 miles to Oakdale and continue into town to signed, lighted intersection with Highway 108/120. Turn left on 108 (still in town) and drive 37 miles to Sonora. In Sonora, continue east on 108 and drive 25 miles into Sierra and to Pinecrest and Pinecrest Lake Road. Turn right and drive 0.4 miles to second right to Dodge Ridge Road. Turn right and go 3.5 miles to Dodge Ridge Ski Area. Distances:65 miles from Oakdale, 86 miles from Manteca, 121 miles from Livermore, 144 miles from Concord, 157 miles from San Jose, 160 miles from San Mateo, 163 miles from San Francisco, 173 miles from San Rafael. Dodge Ridge Ski Bus:$10 round trip service, $25 family four-pack, from Sonora to Dodge Ridge. Reserve at (209) 532-0404, www.tuolumnecountytransit.com/skibus Read More Near Highway 108 and Dodge Ridge, Stanislaus National Forest operates two free trailheads, Crabtree and Gooseberry, for access to a network of cross-country ski trails. Its free, yet you are not on your own. At the trailhead, cross-country ski trail maps are available. On weekends and holidays, and on occasional weekdays, members of the Pinecrest Nordic Ski Patrol roam the terrain and have your back. Rentals available at Dodge Ridge. Info: Trail map, www.pinecrestnordic.org. Leland Snow Play Leland Snow Play is the largest stand-alone, developed snow play site in Northern California. This is a 12-acre hill with lift tows and groomed lanes, equipment provided. Older kids can sail down the fast lanes at a higher speed. Small youngsters can can ride double or triple with their parents in the slower lanes. Warming lodge available. It is 7 miles east of Strawberry, elevation 6,300 feet. Rates vary according to size (under/over 40 inches), $22 to $30, all day. Info: Leland Snow Play, 209-965-4719, www.snowplay.com. Highway 108 Sno-Park A Sno-Park is at the winter closure gate on Highway 108, east of Strawberry. Near the gate, visitors have snowball fights, with a small hill nearby for sledding. It is also a launch spot for cross-country skiing and to a lesser extent snowmobiling and dog sledding. Parking is good. Day permits, $5 (buy in advance). Info, link to purchase permits: California State Parks, OHV program, http://ohv.parks.ca.gov click on winter recreation. Cabins at Strawberry To turn the trip into an overnighter, the most popular choice is to book lodging at the Cabins at Strawberry or rent a vacation cabin at Mi-Wuk Village through www.airbnb.com or similar rental services. The rates for vacation cabins at Mi-Wuk are low compared to many other regions, where $75 to $125 per night is common. At the Cabins at Strawberry, rates are higher, an average of $269 per night, but the location and setting are gorgeous. Info: AirBnb at www.airbnb.com; Cabins at Strawberry, info at (209) 965-0885, reservations at 888-965-0885; www.cabinsatstrawberry.com. Tom Stienstra is The San Francisco Chronicles outdoors writer. Email: tstienstra@sfchronicle.com. Twitter: @StienstraTom. Facebook: www.facebook.com/tomstienstraoutdoors. | Dodge Ridge, 160 miles from San Francisco, is the closest ski area to the Bay Area. A ski bus is available for the final 30 miles from Sonora to Dodge Ridge. Dodge Ridge has 12 lifts, 67 trails and 1,600 feet of vertical. | pegasus | 2 | https://www.sfchronicle.com/outdoors/stienstra/article/Where-s-the-closest-place-to-find-snow-near-San-13619931.php | 0.154068 |
Can gambling boost flagging interest in NASCAR? | CLOSE USA TODAY Sports A.J. Perez looks to the Daytona 500 and the five drivers that racing fans should keep their eye on this Sunday. USA TODAY Sports DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. Brendan Gaughan has a unique perspective on sports gambling. He's a part-time driver, and his family has been in the casino business for decades. The more readily available it is the more people will pay attention (to NASCAR), said Gaughan before he qualified for his forth Daytona 500 this week. The more that NASCAR allows (fans) to embrace it and allows TV to embrace it, the more people will pay attention. They'll watch the race longer, which means all value goes up. MORE NASCAR: Dale Earnhardt Jr. on couples therapy, changing diapers and why it's OK to like Troy Aikman NASCAR hasn't exactly embraced legalized sports betting since the the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a decision last May that allows all states to offer legalized sports betting. The racing series has given gambling more of a nod at this point its seeks to reignite interest among casual fans. Las Vegas casinos typically see increased interest in NASCAR leading into the Daytona 500. (Photo11: John Locher, AP) We see a tremendous fan engagement opportunity in the gaming space both for the sanctioning body and the larger NASCAR industry, Brian Herbst, NASCAR vice president of global media strategy and distribution, said in a statement to USA TODAY Sports. Were in the process of refining our gaming strategy and the new props game on NASCAR.com is an example of priming the ecosystem and getting fans accustomed to the idea of in-race betting. NASCAR's website has featured Daytona 500 odds prominently the past several days. While the series fantasy game has been in place for a couple seasons, theres a new wrinkle for 2019: the Props Challenge. Prop bets, typically a wager on an in-game result, have grown in popularity in the U.S., largely thanks to the Super Bowl. But unlike betting on the coin toss at a sportsbook, theres no money changing hands in NASCARs version. Players compete for free with weekly prizes awarded. "Younger betters and younger viewers enjoy these game aspects," said Gaughan, who has made four Cup starts in each of the past two seasons. They have the new Props Challenge. These are all versions of games that are hopefully get people interested." NASCAR has not drawn a lot of action in Nevada casinos, outside of two events: the Daytona 500 and races at Las Vegas Motor Speedway. Seven more states now offer sports betting, including two that host multiple Cup races: Delaware (Dover International Speedway) and Pennsylvania (Pocono Raceway). Nick Bogdanovich, the director of trading at William Hill U.S., told USA TODAY Sports that NASCAR is the equivalent to golf far behind football (NFL and college) , basketball, baseball, hockey, soccer and even tennis. I dont know if thats going to grow, said Bogdanovich, who oversees more than 100 sportsbooks in Nevada, New Jersey and West Virginia. Certainly, theres a segment of fans and those people get in on the action, but Im not sure how much will grow as betting is allowed in more jurisdictions. Another change this season is that NASCAR will allow teams to take sponsorships from sports betting companies. No team as of yet has entered into such a deal. Teams and tracks have been able to partner with brick-and-mortar casinos. There's also a strong possibility that NASCAR could have an official gaming sponsor, like MLB, NBA and NHL with MGM Resorts and the NFL's partnership with Cesars. NASCAR could also potentially license some of its proprietary data, a trove of statistics that track everything from laps led to quality passes (passing a top-15 car under a green flag) to sportsbooks. The NFL advocated sportsbooks use official data from leagues in written testimony to a Congressional hearing in September, a suggestion that was largely dismissed as a money grab. The difference for NASCARs data is that theres no alternative for such statistics elsewhere. In response to this new betting landscape, the series added language to its 2019 rulebook that mandates drivers, crew members, team owners and NASCAR officials "shall not engage, nor attempt to engage, in any legal or illegal gambling" on NASCAR events. The new policy, however, allows for NASCAR-related fantasy sports participation as long as the prize money doesn't exceed $250. The new rules describe "as games of skill rather than gambling activity." "I'll never forget the phone call when they said they wanted to do a fantasy show," said Gaughan, who has hosted NASCAR fantasy show on SiriusXM since 2016. "I said, 'Oh, yeah. That's just another form of gambling.' " Gaughan said theres never been a need to worry about the integrity of NASCAR when it comes to gambling and took the opportunity to again refute a report which was recirculated in a recent Associated Press story this week that he bet on himself to win the 2004 Daytona 500. This new policy I think is kind of useless because NASCAR does not have the same integrity issues that every other sport has where one man can affect other sport and thats an official or referee, Gaughan said. A NASCAR official cant change our race. Everything we have now when it comes to penalty in a live race is done by a computer. There's no integrity issues in NASCAR." | NASCAR has given gambling more of a nod at this point its seeks to reignite interest among casual fans. | pegasus | 0 | https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nascar/2019/02/15/daytona-500-can-gambling-boost-flagging-interest-nascar/2879159002/ | 0.283322 |
Can gambling boost flagging interest in NASCAR? | CLOSE USA TODAY Sports A.J. Perez looks to the Daytona 500 and the five drivers that racing fans should keep their eye on this Sunday. USA TODAY Sports DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. Brendan Gaughan has a unique perspective on sports gambling. He's a part-time driver, and his family has been in the casino business for decades. The more readily available it is the more people will pay attention (to NASCAR), said Gaughan before he qualified for his forth Daytona 500 this week. The more that NASCAR allows (fans) to embrace it and allows TV to embrace it, the more people will pay attention. They'll watch the race longer, which means all value goes up. MORE NASCAR: Dale Earnhardt Jr. on couples therapy, changing diapers and why it's OK to like Troy Aikman NASCAR hasn't exactly embraced legalized sports betting since the the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a decision last May that allows all states to offer legalized sports betting. The racing series has given gambling more of a nod at this point its seeks to reignite interest among casual fans. Las Vegas casinos typically see increased interest in NASCAR leading into the Daytona 500. (Photo11: John Locher, AP) We see a tremendous fan engagement opportunity in the gaming space both for the sanctioning body and the larger NASCAR industry, Brian Herbst, NASCAR vice president of global media strategy and distribution, said in a statement to USA TODAY Sports. Were in the process of refining our gaming strategy and the new props game on NASCAR.com is an example of priming the ecosystem and getting fans accustomed to the idea of in-race betting. NASCAR's website has featured Daytona 500 odds prominently the past several days. While the series fantasy game has been in place for a couple seasons, theres a new wrinkle for 2019: the Props Challenge. Prop bets, typically a wager on an in-game result, have grown in popularity in the U.S., largely thanks to the Super Bowl. But unlike betting on the coin toss at a sportsbook, theres no money changing hands in NASCARs version. Players compete for free with weekly prizes awarded. "Younger betters and younger viewers enjoy these game aspects," said Gaughan, who has made four Cup starts in each of the past two seasons. They have the new Props Challenge. These are all versions of games that are hopefully get people interested." NASCAR has not drawn a lot of action in Nevada casinos, outside of two events: the Daytona 500 and races at Las Vegas Motor Speedway. Seven more states now offer sports betting, including two that host multiple Cup races: Delaware (Dover International Speedway) and Pennsylvania (Pocono Raceway). Nick Bogdanovich, the director of trading at William Hill U.S., told USA TODAY Sports that NASCAR is the equivalent to golf far behind football (NFL and college) , basketball, baseball, hockey, soccer and even tennis. I dont know if thats going to grow, said Bogdanovich, who oversees more than 100 sportsbooks in Nevada, New Jersey and West Virginia. Certainly, theres a segment of fans and those people get in on the action, but Im not sure how much will grow as betting is allowed in more jurisdictions. Another change this season is that NASCAR will allow teams to take sponsorships from sports betting companies. No team as of yet has entered into such a deal. Teams and tracks have been able to partner with brick-and-mortar casinos. There's also a strong possibility that NASCAR could have an official gaming sponsor, like MLB, NBA and NHL with MGM Resorts and the NFL's partnership with Cesars. NASCAR could also potentially license some of its proprietary data, a trove of statistics that track everything from laps led to quality passes (passing a top-15 car under a green flag) to sportsbooks. The NFL advocated sportsbooks use official data from leagues in written testimony to a Congressional hearing in September, a suggestion that was largely dismissed as a money grab. The difference for NASCARs data is that theres no alternative for such statistics elsewhere. In response to this new betting landscape, the series added language to its 2019 rulebook that mandates drivers, crew members, team owners and NASCAR officials "shall not engage, nor attempt to engage, in any legal or illegal gambling" on NASCAR events. The new policy, however, allows for NASCAR-related fantasy sports participation as long as the prize money doesn't exceed $250. The new rules describe "as games of skill rather than gambling activity." "I'll never forget the phone call when they said they wanted to do a fantasy show," said Gaughan, who has hosted NASCAR fantasy show on SiriusXM since 2016. "I said, 'Oh, yeah. That's just another form of gambling.' " Gaughan said theres never been a need to worry about the integrity of NASCAR when it comes to gambling and took the opportunity to again refute a report which was recirculated in a recent Associated Press story this week that he bet on himself to win the 2004 Daytona 500. This new policy I think is kind of useless because NASCAR does not have the same integrity issues that every other sport has where one man can affect other sport and thats an official or referee, Gaughan said. A NASCAR official cant change our race. Everything we have now when it comes to penalty in a live race is done by a computer. There's no integrity issues in NASCAR." | NASCAR has given gambling more of a nod at this point its seeks to reignite interest among casual fans. Las Vegas casinos typically see increased interest in NASCAR leading into the Daytona 500. | pegasus | 1 | https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nascar/2019/02/15/daytona-500-can-gambling-boost-flagging-interest-nascar/2879159002/ | 0.332244 |
Can gambling boost flagging interest in NASCAR? | CLOSE USA TODAY Sports A.J. Perez looks to the Daytona 500 and the five drivers that racing fans should keep their eye on this Sunday. USA TODAY Sports DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. Brendan Gaughan has a unique perspective on sports gambling. He's a part-time driver, and his family has been in the casino business for decades. The more readily available it is the more people will pay attention (to NASCAR), said Gaughan before he qualified for his forth Daytona 500 this week. The more that NASCAR allows (fans) to embrace it and allows TV to embrace it, the more people will pay attention. They'll watch the race longer, which means all value goes up. MORE NASCAR: Dale Earnhardt Jr. on couples therapy, changing diapers and why it's OK to like Troy Aikman NASCAR hasn't exactly embraced legalized sports betting since the the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a decision last May that allows all states to offer legalized sports betting. The racing series has given gambling more of a nod at this point its seeks to reignite interest among casual fans. Las Vegas casinos typically see increased interest in NASCAR leading into the Daytona 500. (Photo11: John Locher, AP) We see a tremendous fan engagement opportunity in the gaming space both for the sanctioning body and the larger NASCAR industry, Brian Herbst, NASCAR vice president of global media strategy and distribution, said in a statement to USA TODAY Sports. Were in the process of refining our gaming strategy and the new props game on NASCAR.com is an example of priming the ecosystem and getting fans accustomed to the idea of in-race betting. NASCAR's website has featured Daytona 500 odds prominently the past several days. While the series fantasy game has been in place for a couple seasons, theres a new wrinkle for 2019: the Props Challenge. Prop bets, typically a wager on an in-game result, have grown in popularity in the U.S., largely thanks to the Super Bowl. But unlike betting on the coin toss at a sportsbook, theres no money changing hands in NASCARs version. Players compete for free with weekly prizes awarded. "Younger betters and younger viewers enjoy these game aspects," said Gaughan, who has made four Cup starts in each of the past two seasons. They have the new Props Challenge. These are all versions of games that are hopefully get people interested." NASCAR has not drawn a lot of action in Nevada casinos, outside of two events: the Daytona 500 and races at Las Vegas Motor Speedway. Seven more states now offer sports betting, including two that host multiple Cup races: Delaware (Dover International Speedway) and Pennsylvania (Pocono Raceway). Nick Bogdanovich, the director of trading at William Hill U.S., told USA TODAY Sports that NASCAR is the equivalent to golf far behind football (NFL and college) , basketball, baseball, hockey, soccer and even tennis. I dont know if thats going to grow, said Bogdanovich, who oversees more than 100 sportsbooks in Nevada, New Jersey and West Virginia. Certainly, theres a segment of fans and those people get in on the action, but Im not sure how much will grow as betting is allowed in more jurisdictions. Another change this season is that NASCAR will allow teams to take sponsorships from sports betting companies. No team as of yet has entered into such a deal. Teams and tracks have been able to partner with brick-and-mortar casinos. There's also a strong possibility that NASCAR could have an official gaming sponsor, like MLB, NBA and NHL with MGM Resorts and the NFL's partnership with Cesars. NASCAR could also potentially license some of its proprietary data, a trove of statistics that track everything from laps led to quality passes (passing a top-15 car under a green flag) to sportsbooks. The NFL advocated sportsbooks use official data from leagues in written testimony to a Congressional hearing in September, a suggestion that was largely dismissed as a money grab. The difference for NASCARs data is that theres no alternative for such statistics elsewhere. In response to this new betting landscape, the series added language to its 2019 rulebook that mandates drivers, crew members, team owners and NASCAR officials "shall not engage, nor attempt to engage, in any legal or illegal gambling" on NASCAR events. The new policy, however, allows for NASCAR-related fantasy sports participation as long as the prize money doesn't exceed $250. The new rules describe "as games of skill rather than gambling activity." "I'll never forget the phone call when they said they wanted to do a fantasy show," said Gaughan, who has hosted NASCAR fantasy show on SiriusXM since 2016. "I said, 'Oh, yeah. That's just another form of gambling.' " Gaughan said theres never been a need to worry about the integrity of NASCAR when it comes to gambling and took the opportunity to again refute a report which was recirculated in a recent Associated Press story this week that he bet on himself to win the 2004 Daytona 500. This new policy I think is kind of useless because NASCAR does not have the same integrity issues that every other sport has where one man can affect other sport and thats an official or referee, Gaughan said. A NASCAR official cant change our race. Everything we have now when it comes to penalty in a live race is done by a computer. There's no integrity issues in NASCAR." | NASCAR has given gambling more of a nod at this point its seeks to reignite interest among casual fans. Las Vegas casinos typically see increased interest in NASCAR leading into the Daytona 500. Another change this season is that NASCAR will allow teams to take sponsorships from sports betting companies. | pegasus | 2 | https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nascar/2019/02/15/daytona-500-can-gambling-boost-flagging-interest-nascar/2879159002/ | 0.416845 |
Whats open, closed on Presidents Day 2019? | CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Presidents Day, celebrated the third Monday of February, falls on Feb. 18 this year. The federal holiday is officially called Washingtons Birthday, though thats not until Feb. 22. Federal, county and state buildings are closed on Presidents Day, but the RTA will run its normal weekday service. The majority of local libraries are open, though Cleveland Public Library is closed. Heres whats open and closed: Banks: Individual banks differ but most are closed. Libraries Cleveland Public Library: Closed Cuyahoga County Public Library: Open Heights Libraries: Open Lakewood Public Library: Open Akron-Summit County Library: Open Federal offices: Closed County offices: Closed State offices: Closed Post offices: Closed RTA: Regular weekday service, office closed Schools: Closed. Some universities, such as Cleveland State, also closed. Trash service and city hall operations: Trash pickup services and city hall services vary between communities. Contact your city hall to see whats happening. | Presidents Day, celebrated the third Monday of February, falls on Feb. 18 this year. Federal, county and state buildings are closed. | pegasus | 0 | https://www.cleveland.com/news/2019/02/whats-open-closed-on-presidents-day-2019.html | 0.208526 |
Whats open, closed on Presidents Day 2019? | CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Presidents Day, celebrated the third Monday of February, falls on Feb. 18 this year. The federal holiday is officially called Washingtons Birthday, though thats not until Feb. 22. Federal, county and state buildings are closed on Presidents Day, but the RTA will run its normal weekday service. The majority of local libraries are open, though Cleveland Public Library is closed. Heres whats open and closed: Banks: Individual banks differ but most are closed. Libraries Cleveland Public Library: Closed Cuyahoga County Public Library: Open Heights Libraries: Open Lakewood Public Library: Open Akron-Summit County Library: Open Federal offices: Closed County offices: Closed State offices: Closed Post offices: Closed RTA: Regular weekday service, office closed Schools: Closed. Some universities, such as Cleveland State, also closed. Trash service and city hall operations: Trash pickup services and city hall services vary between communities. Contact your city hall to see whats happening. | Presidents Day, celebrated the third Monday of February, falls on Feb. 18 this year. Federal, county and state buildings are closed. The majority of local libraries are open, though Cleveland Public Library is closed. | pegasus | 1 | https://www.cleveland.com/news/2019/02/whats-open-closed-on-presidents-day-2019.html | 0.323139 |
Whats open, closed on Presidents Day 2019? | CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Presidents Day, celebrated the third Monday of February, falls on Feb. 18 this year. The federal holiday is officially called Washingtons Birthday, though thats not until Feb. 22. Federal, county and state buildings are closed on Presidents Day, but the RTA will run its normal weekday service. The majority of local libraries are open, though Cleveland Public Library is closed. Heres whats open and closed: Banks: Individual banks differ but most are closed. Libraries Cleveland Public Library: Closed Cuyahoga County Public Library: Open Heights Libraries: Open Lakewood Public Library: Open Akron-Summit County Library: Open Federal offices: Closed County offices: Closed State offices: Closed Post offices: Closed RTA: Regular weekday service, office closed Schools: Closed. Some universities, such as Cleveland State, also closed. Trash service and city hall operations: Trash pickup services and city hall services vary between communities. Contact your city hall to see whats happening. | Presidents Day, celebrated the third Monday of February, falls on Feb. 18 this year. Federal, county and state buildings are closed, but the RTA will run its normal weekday service. The majority of local libraries are open, though Cleveland Public Library is closed. | pegasus | 2 | https://www.cleveland.com/news/2019/02/whats-open-closed-on-presidents-day-2019.html | 0.288593 |
What's in the Cards for Bausch Health (BHC) Q4 Earnings? | Bausch Health Companies Inc. BHC is scheduled to report fourth quarter and full-year 2018 results on Feb 20. In the last reported quarter, the companys earnings beat estimates by 32.2%. Bauschs earnings track record has been pretty decent so far. Over the last four quarters, the company beat earnings expectations thrice, delivering average positive earnings surprise of 83.2%. Bauschs stock has gained 19.5% in the past six months compared to a 22.2% decline for the industry. . Factors Likely to Impact Results Bausch conducts its business in four operating segments the Bausch + Lomb/International segment, the Salix segment, the Ortho Dermatologics segment and the Diversified Products segment. The Bausch + Lomb/International segment primarily comprises products with a focus on the vision care, surgical, consumer and ophthalmology Rx products. The Salix segment consists of sales of gastrointestinal products. The Ortho Dermatologics segment consists of sales of Ortho Dermatologics (dermatological) products in the United States and global sales of Solta medical dermatological devices. The Diversified Products segment comprises sales of pharmaceutical products in the areas of neurology and certain other therapeutic classes in the United States, generic products, and dentistry products. Approximately 75% of the companys total third-quarter revenues was generated by the Bausch + Lomb/International and the Salix segments. Hence, the focus will be on these two segments in the fourth quarter. Revenues in 2018 are expected between $8.15 billion and $8.35 billion. The company expects R&D expenses of $415 million in 2018. The Salix business continues to drive growth and contribute to the top line. In particular, increased sales of Xiaflex and Relistor are boosting the segment. In August, Bausch launched Lucemrya for the mitigation of withdrawal symptoms to facilitate abrupt discontinuation of opioids in adults. The company also entered into an exclusive agreement with Dova Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to co-promote Doptelet in the United States for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in adult patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to undergo a procedure. Bausch also launched Plenvu, a one-liter PEG bowel cleansing preparation for colonoscopies, in the United States. Meanwhile, investors are expected to focus on pipeline development, apart from the regular top and bottom-line numbers. Bausch has narrowed its focus on seven recently launched or expected to be launched products pending completion of testing and receipt of FDA approval. The products include Vyzulta, Siliq, Bryhali (psoriasis), Lumify, Duobrii, Relistor and SiHy Daily. Bausch also obtained FDA approval for Vyzulta, a treatment option for glaucoma. The FDA also approved Lumify, the over-the-counter eye drop with low-dose brimonidine for the treatment of eye redness. The approval of new drugs should boost the top line. The company successfully launched Lumify. The FDA also approved Altreno (IDP-121), an acne treatment in lotion form. The company launched Bryhali lotion, a topical treatment for plaque psoriasis, following the receipt of final FDA approval. The FDA accepted the resubmission of the NDA for Duobrii Lotion for the topical treatment of plaque psoriasis with a PDUFA action date of Feb 15, 2019. The phase III studies for IDP 120 are expected to begin shortly and the company expects to submit an NDA for IDP 123 in the first half of 2019. | Bausch Health Companies Inc. (BHC) is scheduled to report fourth quarter and full-year 2018 results on Feb 20. The company beat earnings expectations thrice, delivering average positive earnings surprise of 83.2%. The company's stock has gained 19.5% in the past six months compared to a 22.2% decline for the industry. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://news.yahoo.com/whats-cards-bausch-health-bhc-210809975.html | 0.126947 |
Should NBA have moved All-Star Game back to North Carolina? | The NBA landed itself a public-relations slam dunk, especially among social justice supporters, when in 2016 it striped Charlotte of the All-Star Game. Far less certain, and much thornier. On the surface it would seem like another win. The NBA was among many other business including the NCAA to pull trade from North Carolina in the wake of the much-maligned House Bill 2 (HB2) legislation. HB2, implemented in 2016, curtailed the ability of individual cities to enact anti-discrimination policy and controversially barred transgender people from using the bathroom corresponding to their preferred identity. Charlotte prepares for the All-Star Game that was originally scheduled to be played in the city in 2017. (Photo11: Streeter Lecka, Getty Images) The league said it wouldnt return until the law was changed. Under heavy and pressure, HB2 was repealed and replaced. And so, the NBA said it would make good on its promise. But it wasnt that simple. I think it is disappointing that the NBA is returning the All-Star Game to North Carolina, even though the discrimination has been maintained in many respects, Chase Strangio, a staff attorney for the ACLU, told USA TODAY Sports. It was great that they took that stand in 2016 and hopefully they can be more consistent in their opposition to these discriminatory measures moving forward. The position of Strangio is that the replacement bill, HB142, has offered little in the way of a satisfactory solution. While the headline provision regarding bathroom usage has been altered, the new rules have been described as offering inappropriate protection to at-risk groups. It has put the league in a tough spot, as opinions will always differ as to just how far the social responsibility of a sports league should reach, especially in these times when splits in political opinion have rarely been wider. A sampling of fans in Charlotte this week seemed satisfied with the NBA deciding to bring the event back to the city in the wake of the policy shift, with some reservations. Its a tricky game for them because, I mean, this is Michael Jordans hometown, said Kahmakreeah Lofty, a business strategist visiting from Atlanta. So I think they wanted to come back here anyways, so they were just looking for something to come. Id say maybe its enough to come back. I dont know. I think its more of a political thing. Loftys husband Mohamed, a fifth-grade teacher, agreed. I think the NBA does more than most leagues in taking a social stance, Lofty added. I think they did the right thing by moving the game. They shouldnt have punished the city of Charlotte once they corrected themselves. Advertising executive Andrew Freeman, who traveled with family members from Bloomington, Ill., to watch the game, commended the NBA for being on the forefront of major sports organizations in regards to the leagues 2016 action. I applaud their efforts of basically pulling out of Charlotte until they got that resolved. Kendra Johnson, executive director of Equality North Carolina, says she doesnt believe the issue really got fixed at all, but is at ease with the NBA coming back. I dont think the NBA thinks (HB142) was a perfect bill and the LGBTQ community knows it was devastating, Johnson said. The reality for me is I would much rather have allies in the state who are here bringing business and employing LGBTQ people and continuing to fight for equality than to not have those allies in the cities. Certainly the NBA is at pains to avoid its return to North Carolina as being seen as an endorsement of HB142 and has implemented a range of measures. Charlotte Hornets president Fred Whitfield lobbied against HB2 and the Spectrum Center has a policy enforcing freedom of choice for spectators. As part of its schedule of events for the week, the league is staging three separate LGBTQ-equality themed conversations and forums in a bid to raise awareness and to make its position clear. We felt the partial repeal didnt go as far as we would have liked it, NBA president of social responsibility Kathy Behrens said. But we felt it was enough of a change for us to bring it back. This also gives us the chance to demonstrate our values and show how inclusive and diverse an All-Star Game can be. Maybe by being here we can build some bridges. Contributing: Martin Rogers, Trysta Krick and Jeff Zegas in Charlotte | The NBA All-Star Game was originally scheduled to be played in Charlotte, North Carolina in 2017. | pegasus | 0 | https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2019/02/15/should-nba-have-moved-all-star-game-back-north-carolina/2884081002/ | 0.117374 |
Should NBA have moved All-Star Game back to North Carolina? | The NBA landed itself a public-relations slam dunk, especially among social justice supporters, when in 2016 it striped Charlotte of the All-Star Game. Far less certain, and much thornier. On the surface it would seem like another win. The NBA was among many other business including the NCAA to pull trade from North Carolina in the wake of the much-maligned House Bill 2 (HB2) legislation. HB2, implemented in 2016, curtailed the ability of individual cities to enact anti-discrimination policy and controversially barred transgender people from using the bathroom corresponding to their preferred identity. Charlotte prepares for the All-Star Game that was originally scheduled to be played in the city in 2017. (Photo11: Streeter Lecka, Getty Images) The league said it wouldnt return until the law was changed. Under heavy and pressure, HB2 was repealed and replaced. And so, the NBA said it would make good on its promise. But it wasnt that simple. I think it is disappointing that the NBA is returning the All-Star Game to North Carolina, even though the discrimination has been maintained in many respects, Chase Strangio, a staff attorney for the ACLU, told USA TODAY Sports. It was great that they took that stand in 2016 and hopefully they can be more consistent in their opposition to these discriminatory measures moving forward. The position of Strangio is that the replacement bill, HB142, has offered little in the way of a satisfactory solution. While the headline provision regarding bathroom usage has been altered, the new rules have been described as offering inappropriate protection to at-risk groups. It has put the league in a tough spot, as opinions will always differ as to just how far the social responsibility of a sports league should reach, especially in these times when splits in political opinion have rarely been wider. A sampling of fans in Charlotte this week seemed satisfied with the NBA deciding to bring the event back to the city in the wake of the policy shift, with some reservations. Its a tricky game for them because, I mean, this is Michael Jordans hometown, said Kahmakreeah Lofty, a business strategist visiting from Atlanta. So I think they wanted to come back here anyways, so they were just looking for something to come. Id say maybe its enough to come back. I dont know. I think its more of a political thing. Loftys husband Mohamed, a fifth-grade teacher, agreed. I think the NBA does more than most leagues in taking a social stance, Lofty added. I think they did the right thing by moving the game. They shouldnt have punished the city of Charlotte once they corrected themselves. Advertising executive Andrew Freeman, who traveled with family members from Bloomington, Ill., to watch the game, commended the NBA for being on the forefront of major sports organizations in regards to the leagues 2016 action. I applaud their efforts of basically pulling out of Charlotte until they got that resolved. Kendra Johnson, executive director of Equality North Carolina, says she doesnt believe the issue really got fixed at all, but is at ease with the NBA coming back. I dont think the NBA thinks (HB142) was a perfect bill and the LGBTQ community knows it was devastating, Johnson said. The reality for me is I would much rather have allies in the state who are here bringing business and employing LGBTQ people and continuing to fight for equality than to not have those allies in the cities. Certainly the NBA is at pains to avoid its return to North Carolina as being seen as an endorsement of HB142 and has implemented a range of measures. Charlotte Hornets president Fred Whitfield lobbied against HB2 and the Spectrum Center has a policy enforcing freedom of choice for spectators. As part of its schedule of events for the week, the league is staging three separate LGBTQ-equality themed conversations and forums in a bid to raise awareness and to make its position clear. We felt the partial repeal didnt go as far as we would have liked it, NBA president of social responsibility Kathy Behrens said. But we felt it was enough of a change for us to bring it back. This also gives us the chance to demonstrate our values and show how inclusive and diverse an All-Star Game can be. Maybe by being here we can build some bridges. Contributing: Martin Rogers, Trysta Krick and Jeff Zegas in Charlotte | In 2016, the NBA pulled the All-Star Game from Charlotte, North Carolina. The league said it wouldn't return until the law was changed. The new law, HB142, has been described as inadequate protection to at-risk groups. | ctrlsum | 1 | https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2019/02/15/should-nba-have-moved-all-star-game-back-north-carolina/2884081002/ | 0.165417 |
Should NBA have moved All-Star Game back to North Carolina? | The NBA landed itself a public-relations slam dunk, especially among social justice supporters, when in 2016 it striped Charlotte of the All-Star Game. Far less certain, and much thornier. On the surface it would seem like another win. The NBA was among many other business including the NCAA to pull trade from North Carolina in the wake of the much-maligned House Bill 2 (HB2) legislation. HB2, implemented in 2016, curtailed the ability of individual cities to enact anti-discrimination policy and controversially barred transgender people from using the bathroom corresponding to their preferred identity. Charlotte prepares for the All-Star Game that was originally scheduled to be played in the city in 2017. (Photo11: Streeter Lecka, Getty Images) The league said it wouldnt return until the law was changed. Under heavy and pressure, HB2 was repealed and replaced. And so, the NBA said it would make good on its promise. But it wasnt that simple. I think it is disappointing that the NBA is returning the All-Star Game to North Carolina, even though the discrimination has been maintained in many respects, Chase Strangio, a staff attorney for the ACLU, told USA TODAY Sports. It was great that they took that stand in 2016 and hopefully they can be more consistent in their opposition to these discriminatory measures moving forward. The position of Strangio is that the replacement bill, HB142, has offered little in the way of a satisfactory solution. While the headline provision regarding bathroom usage has been altered, the new rules have been described as offering inappropriate protection to at-risk groups. It has put the league in a tough spot, as opinions will always differ as to just how far the social responsibility of a sports league should reach, especially in these times when splits in political opinion have rarely been wider. A sampling of fans in Charlotte this week seemed satisfied with the NBA deciding to bring the event back to the city in the wake of the policy shift, with some reservations. Its a tricky game for them because, I mean, this is Michael Jordans hometown, said Kahmakreeah Lofty, a business strategist visiting from Atlanta. So I think they wanted to come back here anyways, so they were just looking for something to come. Id say maybe its enough to come back. I dont know. I think its more of a political thing. Loftys husband Mohamed, a fifth-grade teacher, agreed. I think the NBA does more than most leagues in taking a social stance, Lofty added. I think they did the right thing by moving the game. They shouldnt have punished the city of Charlotte once they corrected themselves. Advertising executive Andrew Freeman, who traveled with family members from Bloomington, Ill., to watch the game, commended the NBA for being on the forefront of major sports organizations in regards to the leagues 2016 action. I applaud their efforts of basically pulling out of Charlotte until they got that resolved. Kendra Johnson, executive director of Equality North Carolina, says she doesnt believe the issue really got fixed at all, but is at ease with the NBA coming back. I dont think the NBA thinks (HB142) was a perfect bill and the LGBTQ community knows it was devastating, Johnson said. The reality for me is I would much rather have allies in the state who are here bringing business and employing LGBTQ people and continuing to fight for equality than to not have those allies in the cities. Certainly the NBA is at pains to avoid its return to North Carolina as being seen as an endorsement of HB142 and has implemented a range of measures. Charlotte Hornets president Fred Whitfield lobbied against HB2 and the Spectrum Center has a policy enforcing freedom of choice for spectators. As part of its schedule of events for the week, the league is staging three separate LGBTQ-equality themed conversations and forums in a bid to raise awareness and to make its position clear. We felt the partial repeal didnt go as far as we would have liked it, NBA president of social responsibility Kathy Behrens said. But we felt it was enough of a change for us to bring it back. This also gives us the chance to demonstrate our values and show how inclusive and diverse an All-Star Game can be. Maybe by being here we can build some bridges. Contributing: Martin Rogers, Trysta Krick and Jeff Zegas in Charlotte | The NBA All-Star Game was originally scheduled to be played in Charlotte, North Carolina in 2017. The league moved the event out of the state after controversial House Bill 2 legislation. The law was repealed and replaced, but the league has decided to return. | pegasus | 2 | https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2019/02/15/should-nba-have-moved-all-star-game-back-north-carolina/2884081002/ | 0.213916 |
How does the search of Cuyahoga County Executive Armond Budishs office differ from the big raid more than ten years ago? | CLEVELAND, Ohio - Thursdays high-profile search by law enforcement agents of the offices of Cuyahoga County Executive Armond Budish is reminiscent of the dramatic raids more than 10 years ago on the homes and offices of top county officials. In both cases, FBI agents and others arrived with search warrants in hand and, as part of a public corruption investigation, seized documents and computer files. One difference, however, is this: The raids in July 2008 made public for the first time an investigation that had been under way for months, had dozens of targets, and evidence gathered through wiretaps and secretly recorded videos. Thursdays search involves a much narrower investigation that has been known to all for nearly a year, coming after 17 subpoenas publicly served on a county administration that is cooperating with investigators. Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, who took over the investigation earlier this month from county Prosecutor Michael OMalley, has declined to discuss the search. Budish, meanwhile, told cleveland.com that he believes the search was politically motivated to sully his good name. Yost is a Republican and Budish is a Democrat represented by former U.S. Attorney Steve Dettelbach, who ran against Yost last year. The buildup to the 2008 raid on county offices, officials homes, and private businesses, was far more secretive. The first public inkling that a massive investigation was underway was the raid itself. By that time, the FBI had secretly already collected mounds of evidence against the targets of their probe, including incriminating video from a trip to Las Vegas by then-County Commissioner Jimmy Dimora, county Auditor Frank Russo and others that was financed by cronies looking for favors. By Thursdays search, on the other hand, the public was well aware of the current investigation. The 17 subpoenas show the probe began with concerns about possible contract steering in the IT Department and an improper employee-incentive policy endorsed by county officials. But the probe transitioned over time into an examination of the county jails and whether actions resulting in a nursing shortage inside the jails rose to the level of a crime. The complexion of the corruption investigation has changed in recent weeks, particularly the political optics involved. OMalley turned over supervision of the investigation to Yost, although two of OMalley assistant prosecutors remain involved, because OMalley had a conflict of interest stemming from the charges against Mills. OMalley said he could not defend the county against jail-related civil lawsuits that crossed over into his offices criminal investigation. Complicating matters is the fact that the attorney representing Budish is Dettelbach, former U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Ohio. Dettelbach ran for attorney general last year and lost a contentious campaign to Yost. After Yost took over, investigators took more of an interest in Budish. Last week, the grand jury issued a subpoena seeking the complete email accounts of Budish and several of his top officials. That information was to be turned over on Thursday morning, the day of the raid, but according to Budish, the county had received a one-day extension. The search warrant used to justify Thursdays search focused on Budish and records related to jail operations, including any criminal investigations by the county Sheriff Department into deaths at the jail. Its unclear if the raid is connected to the subpoenaed records, but when nine agents with the FBI and BCI entered Budishs offices on the 8th floor, his computer and personal cell phone were among the items seized. Also taken was the computer of Budishs assistant. Budish has insisted he has done nothing wrong and that he has been cooperating with authorities. He said Thursday that the there was no justification for the raid and that the investigation has become a political circus. The 2008 corruption probe, the largest in the history of the county, resulted in the convictions of Dimora and Russo and dozens of other officials and contractors who participated in pay-to-play schemes. The current investigation has so far resulted in three indictments. Former IT administrator Emily McNeeley, former Corrections Director Ken Mills and current Chief Talent Officer Douglas Dykes have been charged with various felonies and misdemeanors. All three have pleaded not guilty McNeeley and Mills have resigned. Dykes remains on the job and Budish has resisted a call for Dykes to be placed on leave, stating in a letter to a county councilman, There is no allegation or suggestion that Mr. Dykes benefitted personally from his actions but instead was simply implementing an HR decision. | The search of Cuyahoga County Executive Armond Budish's office is reminiscent of 2008 raids. The raids in July 2008 made public an investigation that had been under way for months. | ctrlsum | 1 | https://www.cleveland.com/news/2019/02/how-does-the-search-of-cuyahoga-county-executive-armond-budishs-office-differ-from-the-big-raid-more-than-ten-years-ago.html | 0.331553 |
How does the search of Cuyahoga County Executive Armond Budishs office differ from the big raid more than ten years ago? | CLEVELAND, Ohio - Thursdays high-profile search by law enforcement agents of the offices of Cuyahoga County Executive Armond Budish is reminiscent of the dramatic raids more than 10 years ago on the homes and offices of top county officials. In both cases, FBI agents and others arrived with search warrants in hand and, as part of a public corruption investigation, seized documents and computer files. One difference, however, is this: The raids in July 2008 made public for the first time an investigation that had been under way for months, had dozens of targets, and evidence gathered through wiretaps and secretly recorded videos. Thursdays search involves a much narrower investigation that has been known to all for nearly a year, coming after 17 subpoenas publicly served on a county administration that is cooperating with investigators. Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, who took over the investigation earlier this month from county Prosecutor Michael OMalley, has declined to discuss the search. Budish, meanwhile, told cleveland.com that he believes the search was politically motivated to sully his good name. Yost is a Republican and Budish is a Democrat represented by former U.S. Attorney Steve Dettelbach, who ran against Yost last year. The buildup to the 2008 raid on county offices, officials homes, and private businesses, was far more secretive. The first public inkling that a massive investigation was underway was the raid itself. By that time, the FBI had secretly already collected mounds of evidence against the targets of their probe, including incriminating video from a trip to Las Vegas by then-County Commissioner Jimmy Dimora, county Auditor Frank Russo and others that was financed by cronies looking for favors. By Thursdays search, on the other hand, the public was well aware of the current investigation. The 17 subpoenas show the probe began with concerns about possible contract steering in the IT Department and an improper employee-incentive policy endorsed by county officials. But the probe transitioned over time into an examination of the county jails and whether actions resulting in a nursing shortage inside the jails rose to the level of a crime. The complexion of the corruption investigation has changed in recent weeks, particularly the political optics involved. OMalley turned over supervision of the investigation to Yost, although two of OMalley assistant prosecutors remain involved, because OMalley had a conflict of interest stemming from the charges against Mills. OMalley said he could not defend the county against jail-related civil lawsuits that crossed over into his offices criminal investigation. Complicating matters is the fact that the attorney representing Budish is Dettelbach, former U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Ohio. Dettelbach ran for attorney general last year and lost a contentious campaign to Yost. After Yost took over, investigators took more of an interest in Budish. Last week, the grand jury issued a subpoena seeking the complete email accounts of Budish and several of his top officials. That information was to be turned over on Thursday morning, the day of the raid, but according to Budish, the county had received a one-day extension. The search warrant used to justify Thursdays search focused on Budish and records related to jail operations, including any criminal investigations by the county Sheriff Department into deaths at the jail. Its unclear if the raid is connected to the subpoenaed records, but when nine agents with the FBI and BCI entered Budishs offices on the 8th floor, his computer and personal cell phone were among the items seized. Also taken was the computer of Budishs assistant. Budish has insisted he has done nothing wrong and that he has been cooperating with authorities. He said Thursday that the there was no justification for the raid and that the investigation has become a political circus. The 2008 corruption probe, the largest in the history of the county, resulted in the convictions of Dimora and Russo and dozens of other officials and contractors who participated in pay-to-play schemes. The current investigation has so far resulted in three indictments. Former IT administrator Emily McNeeley, former Corrections Director Ken Mills and current Chief Talent Officer Douglas Dykes have been charged with various felonies and misdemeanors. All three have pleaded not guilty McNeeley and Mills have resigned. Dykes remains on the job and Budish has resisted a call for Dykes to be placed on leave, stating in a letter to a county councilman, There is no allegation or suggestion that Mr. Dykes benefitted personally from his actions but instead was simply implementing an HR decision. | The search of Cuyahoga County Executive Armond Budish's office is reminiscent of 2008 raids. The raids in July 2008 made public for the first time an investigation that had been under way for months. The search involves a much narrower investigation that has been known to all for nearly a year. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.cleveland.com/news/2019/02/how-does-the-search-of-cuyahoga-county-executive-armond-budishs-office-differ-from-the-big-raid-more-than-ten-years-ago.html | 0.497974 |
Are Target-Date Funds a Good Investment? | If you find retirement planning daunting, a target-date fund purports to offer relief. They're designed to provide a "set it and forget it" investment solution for individuals with a long-term savings goal, like retirement. While target-date funds have certain benefits, their cookie-cutter approach also has its drawbacks. You may already have a target-date fund in your retirement account, as it's the default fund used by employers who auto-enroll their workers into workplace savings plans. But you can override your employer's deicison, and you should do some research before investing your precious retirement savings in target-date funds. Here's a look at the pros and cons of target-date funds and how to choose one that's right for you. Tabletop calendar More Image source: Getty Images. Offered by retirement accounts providers and brokerages, target-date funds usually have names that include the targeted retirement year. For example, if you plan to retire in 2030, you would choose a 2030 target-date fund within your 401(k) or IRA. Target-date funds are often mutual funds containing a variety of investment products, like stocks and bonds, to keep your money diversified. As you near the fund's target date, its asset allocation automatically shifts to align with your decreasing risk tolerance, so you don't have to worry about reallocating the funds yourself as you near the end of your career. The benefits of target-date funds Target-date funds are popular among hands-off investors for their simplicity. In theory, all you have to do is choose the right fund that corresponds to your planned retirement year and then sit back and wait. The risk is selected for you by the pros: If the planned retirement date is a long way off, the fund will contain a larger percentage of higher-risk investments, like stocks. Then, as your retirement date gets closer, it will automatically adjust the asset allocation to account for your diminishing risk tolerance, moving more of your money into more stable investments that deliver income, like bonds. This way, you don't have to worry about losing a large chunk of your nest egg on the eve of your retirement if the stock market takes a dip. The automated nature of these funds can also help to prevent emotional decision-making. Some investors may be tempted to buy or sell an asset impulsively based on recent performance if they're managing their own investments, which hurts the value of their savings over time. But with target-date funds, you don't have to worry about when to reallocate or what to invest in because these decisions are already made for you. The drawbacks of target-date funds The simplicity that makes target-date funds so appealing can also be their biggest drawback. The cookie-cutter approach cannot account for individual lifestyle changes or changing market conditions. A target-date fund may seem like a good fit for you today, but it may not be in the future. For example, say you planned to retire in 2050, but then something happens and you end up retiring in 2040 instead. While the investments in your 2050 target-date fund may be well-suited to someone who is actually retiring in 2050, they may be too volatile for your new, diminished risk tolerance. All target-date funds are different, even those with the same target year. The mix of investments and when your assets are reallocated varies from one to the next. This can not only impact the performance of the target-date fund, but also its cost. | A target-date fund is designed to provide a "set it and forget it" investment solution for individuals with a long-term savings goal, like retirement. | bart | 1 | https://news.yahoo.com/target-date-funds-good-investment-224500873.html | 0.129137 |
Are Target-Date Funds a Good Investment? | If you find retirement planning daunting, a target-date fund purports to offer relief. They're designed to provide a "set it and forget it" investment solution for individuals with a long-term savings goal, like retirement. While target-date funds have certain benefits, their cookie-cutter approach also has its drawbacks. You may already have a target-date fund in your retirement account, as it's the default fund used by employers who auto-enroll their workers into workplace savings plans. But you can override your employer's deicison, and you should do some research before investing your precious retirement savings in target-date funds. Here's a look at the pros and cons of target-date funds and how to choose one that's right for you. Tabletop calendar More Image source: Getty Images. Offered by retirement accounts providers and brokerages, target-date funds usually have names that include the targeted retirement year. For example, if you plan to retire in 2030, you would choose a 2030 target-date fund within your 401(k) or IRA. Target-date funds are often mutual funds containing a variety of investment products, like stocks and bonds, to keep your money diversified. As you near the fund's target date, its asset allocation automatically shifts to align with your decreasing risk tolerance, so you don't have to worry about reallocating the funds yourself as you near the end of your career. The benefits of target-date funds Target-date funds are popular among hands-off investors for their simplicity. In theory, all you have to do is choose the right fund that corresponds to your planned retirement year and then sit back and wait. The risk is selected for you by the pros: If the planned retirement date is a long way off, the fund will contain a larger percentage of higher-risk investments, like stocks. Then, as your retirement date gets closer, it will automatically adjust the asset allocation to account for your diminishing risk tolerance, moving more of your money into more stable investments that deliver income, like bonds. This way, you don't have to worry about losing a large chunk of your nest egg on the eve of your retirement if the stock market takes a dip. The automated nature of these funds can also help to prevent emotional decision-making. Some investors may be tempted to buy or sell an asset impulsively based on recent performance if they're managing their own investments, which hurts the value of their savings over time. But with target-date funds, you don't have to worry about when to reallocate or what to invest in because these decisions are already made for you. The drawbacks of target-date funds The simplicity that makes target-date funds so appealing can also be their biggest drawback. The cookie-cutter approach cannot account for individual lifestyle changes or changing market conditions. A target-date fund may seem like a good fit for you today, but it may not be in the future. For example, say you planned to retire in 2050, but then something happens and you end up retiring in 2040 instead. While the investments in your 2050 target-date fund may be well-suited to someone who is actually retiring in 2050, they may be too volatile for your new, diminished risk tolerance. All target-date funds are different, even those with the same target year. The mix of investments and when your assets are reallocated varies from one to the next. This can not only impact the performance of the target-date fund, but also its cost. | A target-date fund is designed to provide a "set it and forget it" investment solution for individuals with a long-term savings goal, like retirement. Target-date funds are often mutual funds containing a variety of investment products, like stocks and bonds. As you near the fund's target date, its asset allocation automatically shifts. | bart | 2 | https://news.yahoo.com/target-date-funds-good-investment-224500873.html | 0.230718 |
Will a big-name Democrat run for John Cornyn's Senate seat? | WASHINGTON U.S. Sen. John Cornyn is preparing for re-election in 2020 as if he were running scared hiring top staff, raising money early and traveling around Texas touting his accomplishments. We are taking due note of what happened in 2018. Im getting ready, said Cornyn, who is seeking a fourth term and has nearly $5.8 million cash on hand according to federal election reports. After fellow Texas Republican U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz received a scare from Democrat Beto ORourke last year, Cornyn isnt taking anything for granted. But, with ORourke eying the presidency, Julin Castro, the former San Antonio mayor and Obama Cabinet official, already in the presidential race, and his brother U.S. Rep. Joaqun Castro, D-San Antonio, serving as his campaign manager, the three Texas Democrats seen as most likely to run a strong statewide campaign seem likely to steer clear of Cornyn. That leaves a bench of potential challengers with little name recognition or losing campaigns to their credit, or both. The message of the 2018 midterm elections was youd better be prepared, Cornyn told reporters this week. Texas is evolving. Its no longer a reliably red state. No Republican has come forward to challenge Cornyn either, but Cornyn headed off his most potentially potent primary rival, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who endorsed Cornyn in December. Democrats who are said to be considering a Senate run: MJ Hegar, an Afghanistan war hero and author who came within 2.9 points of toppling U.S. Rep. John Carter, R-Rock, and North Texas farmer Kim Olson, who lost by 4.9 points to Republican Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller. Another potential candidate, according to party activists: former state Sen. Wendy Davis, D-Fort Worth, who lost a lopsided governors race in 2014. On Valentines Day, Cornyns campaign launched an online fundraising appeal citing Hegar and Davis as possible candidates. But some Texas Democrats see the party's best chances for success in a reprise of O'Rourke's Senate campaign. O'Rourke hasn't publicly mentioned a Senate run as a possibility he told Oprah Winfrey last week that he'll decide whether to run for president by the end of the month but Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., met with O'Rourke last week to discuss a possible challenge to Cornyn, according to Politico. Its very significant that Schumer is talking to Texans, said Matt Angle, director of the Lone Star Project, a political action committee, who said the Democratic leader had spoken to other potential candidates. It signifies that Schumer and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee think Cornyn is vulnerable and theyre right, said Angle. O'Rourke, who left his congressional seat at the end of the year, has spent some of the past six weeks traveling outside Texas he is speaking in Madison, Wis., Friday and Chicago on Saturday suggesting that he's seeking to build a national profile. This week, O'Rourke garnered attention from the media and President Donald Trump, who singled out O'Rourke for belittlement at a political rally in El Paso. O'Rourke spoke at a counterrally, sharing national television split screens with Trump. From all outward aspects, he seems to be contemplating a run for president and not Congress, said Sherri Greenberg, clinical professor at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas. But the wait is having an impact. Right now, Texas Democrats are in a holding pattern until they know what Beto ORourke is going to do: run for president, run for the Senate, head into the wild in Alaska, or something else, said Mark Jones, political science professor at Rice University. Even a decision by Beto to run for president would not clear the way entirely, since if he ended up dropping out before September or October, he could always throw his hat into the senatorial race, he said. After doing so well in 2018, Jones said Beto has effectively earned the right of first refusal for the Democratic Senate nomination. For his part, Cornyn gave a preview Wednesday of a potential line of attack, telling reporters that the Democratic presidential hopefuls embracing Medicare for all would wipe out private insurance and the new Green deal of environmental programs would require all of us, I assume, to become vegans. | Texas Sen. John Cornyn is preparing for re-election in 2020 as if he were running scared. After fellow Texas Republican U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz received a scare from Democrat Beto O'Rourke last year, Cornyn isn't taking anything for granted. No Republican has come forward to challenge Cornyn either. | bart | 2 | https://www.statesman.com/news/20190215/will-big-name-democrat-run-for-john-cornyns-senate-seat | 0.139363 |
Whats next for New Orleans Pelicans and Mickey Loomis? | A change in the organizational structure of the New Orleans Pelicans front office is in the works. A statement from Saints-Pelicans owner Gayle Benson on Friday (Feb. 15) indicated that the Pelicans will feature a different internal chain of command going forward. We will immediately begin the process of restructuring our basketball operations department, Benson said in a statement released by the team. This will include a comprehensive, but confidential, search aided by outside consultants to identify a new leader of our basketball operations, directly reporting to me. Since 2012, Mickey Loomis has occupied the top spot in the clubs basketball operations. Loomis continued to serve as the general manager of the Saints, but moved into his role as the executive vice president of basketball operations after Tom Benson bought the New Orleans Hornets in 2012. Loomis assumed the role with the basketball franchise while he was facing an eight-game suspension from his role with the Saints following the BountyGate scandal, but he still works with the Pelicans today. Before he was fired, Dell Demps reported to Loomis in the hierarchy of the Pelicans structure. But just how long Loomis will remain in that role is up in the air. Danny Ferry, who has served as a consultant to Demps for the past three years, will take over as the teams interim general manager, but Benson saying that the new leader of the basketball operations team will report directly to her signifies a shift in the Pelicans structure. The hire for New Orleans could end up being two-fold: first, a president of basketball operations that reports to Benson and second, a general manager that would report to the president of basketball operations. Despite his title, Loomis doesnt spend much of his time with the Pelicans. He said in an interview back in 2017 that his role was overblown. Honestly, I dont have a lot to do with that, Loomis said at the time. "Weve got Dell as the general manager and Alvin (Gentry as coach), and they do a great job. So, I think its probably overblown the amount of actual time and work that I have to do with the Pelicans. Its something Mr. (Tom) Benson has asked me to do, but, again, I think its overblown the amount of actual work that I do (with the Pelicans). If Loomis is moved out of his current position with the Pelicans, he could still serve in an advisory role with the team. | Mickey Loomis has been the Pelicans' executive vice president of basketball operations since 2012. The Pelicans are searching for a new basketball operations team leader to report to owner Gayle Benson. | ctrlsum | 1 | https://www.nola.com/pelicans/2019/02/whats-next-for-new-orleans-pelicans-and-mickey-loomis.html | 0.122418 |
Whats next for New Orleans Pelicans and Mickey Loomis? | A change in the organizational structure of the New Orleans Pelicans front office is in the works. A statement from Saints-Pelicans owner Gayle Benson on Friday (Feb. 15) indicated that the Pelicans will feature a different internal chain of command going forward. We will immediately begin the process of restructuring our basketball operations department, Benson said in a statement released by the team. This will include a comprehensive, but confidential, search aided by outside consultants to identify a new leader of our basketball operations, directly reporting to me. Since 2012, Mickey Loomis has occupied the top spot in the clubs basketball operations. Loomis continued to serve as the general manager of the Saints, but moved into his role as the executive vice president of basketball operations after Tom Benson bought the New Orleans Hornets in 2012. Loomis assumed the role with the basketball franchise while he was facing an eight-game suspension from his role with the Saints following the BountyGate scandal, but he still works with the Pelicans today. Before he was fired, Dell Demps reported to Loomis in the hierarchy of the Pelicans structure. But just how long Loomis will remain in that role is up in the air. Danny Ferry, who has served as a consultant to Demps for the past three years, will take over as the teams interim general manager, but Benson saying that the new leader of the basketball operations team will report directly to her signifies a shift in the Pelicans structure. The hire for New Orleans could end up being two-fold: first, a president of basketball operations that reports to Benson and second, a general manager that would report to the president of basketball operations. Despite his title, Loomis doesnt spend much of his time with the Pelicans. He said in an interview back in 2017 that his role was overblown. Honestly, I dont have a lot to do with that, Loomis said at the time. "Weve got Dell as the general manager and Alvin (Gentry as coach), and they do a great job. So, I think its probably overblown the amount of actual time and work that I have to do with the Pelicans. Its something Mr. (Tom) Benson has asked me to do, but, again, I think its overblown the amount of actual work that I do (with the Pelicans). If Loomis is moved out of his current position with the Pelicans, he could still serve in an advisory role with the team. | Mickey Loomis has been the Pelicans' executive vice president of basketball operations since 2012. The Pelicans are searching for a new basketball operations team leader to report to Gayle Benson, the teams owner. The search is expected to take place in the coming weeks. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.nola.com/pelicans/2019/02/whats-next-for-new-orleans-pelicans-and-mickey-loomis.html | 0.2446 |
Is it Laura Miller's time, again? | Laura Miller is back in a familiar role. In 2002, she rode the shoulders of pro-neighborhood voters to become mayor of Dallas, a stunning feat since much of the city's business elite was against her, as well as minority voters. During her more than five years as mayor, she pushed her basic-services agenda, promised to make Dallas more neighborhood-friendly and stop chasing the big-ticket initiatives that had defined her predecessor, Ron Kirk. Under Miller's leadership, the city implemented a smoking ban and development anti-discrimination laws aimed at helping the city's gay and lesbian residents. The city also developed a $23 million homeless assistance center. Now, 12 years after leaving City Hall, Miller is making a comeback, running for City Council against Jennifer Staubach Gates, a veteran incumbent who decided against a run for mayor. Gates, perhaps more than any other council member, is a darling of the city's business elite, though also popular in her council district. She's the daughter of former Dallas Cowboys quarterback and NFL Hall-of-Famer Roger Staubach. Miller and Gates have clashed over the redevelopment of Preston Center in northwest Dallas. In running against Gates, Miller is returning to her roots as an unabashed champion of neighborhoods, particularly when it means standing up against the city's business establishment. Miller is the most effective retail campaigner in the history of Dallas politics. Her bids for council and then mayor were marvelous displays of a candidate identifying issues that matter to a base of voters that would carry her to victory. Yes, a lot of her popularity came from being the fierce opponent of Kirk, and she was often on the losing side of major votes. The media treated her as the council's opposition leader, and it paid off when Kirk left City Hall for an unsuccessful run for Senate against Republican John Cornyn, and Miller defeated Dallas businessman Tom Dunning in a special election. She would go on to beat former acting mayor Mary Poss in 2002 and was re-elected to a full four-year term in 2003. One of her few campaign blemishes was a failed attempt to lead a 2005 referendum that would have given the office of mayor broader power. Voters in southern Dallas, where Miller was unpopular, overwhelmingly rejected the proposal. During her stint as mayor, the Cowboys flirted with moving the team to Dallas, but ultimately struck a deal with Arlington. Cowboys owner Jerry Jones blamed Miller for failing to negotiate a deal. | Laura Miller is running for Dallas City Council against Jennifer Staubach Gates. Miller served as mayor of Dallas from 2002 to 2003. Miller is a strong advocate for the city's neighborhoods. | ctrlsum | 1 | https://www.dallasnews.com/news/dallas-city-council/2019/02/15/laura-millers-time-again | 0.115972 |
Is it Laura Miller's time, again? | Laura Miller is back in a familiar role. In 2002, she rode the shoulders of pro-neighborhood voters to become mayor of Dallas, a stunning feat since much of the city's business elite was against her, as well as minority voters. During her more than five years as mayor, she pushed her basic-services agenda, promised to make Dallas more neighborhood-friendly and stop chasing the big-ticket initiatives that had defined her predecessor, Ron Kirk. Under Miller's leadership, the city implemented a smoking ban and development anti-discrimination laws aimed at helping the city's gay and lesbian residents. The city also developed a $23 million homeless assistance center. Now, 12 years after leaving City Hall, Miller is making a comeback, running for City Council against Jennifer Staubach Gates, a veteran incumbent who decided against a run for mayor. Gates, perhaps more than any other council member, is a darling of the city's business elite, though also popular in her council district. She's the daughter of former Dallas Cowboys quarterback and NFL Hall-of-Famer Roger Staubach. Miller and Gates have clashed over the redevelopment of Preston Center in northwest Dallas. In running against Gates, Miller is returning to her roots as an unabashed champion of neighborhoods, particularly when it means standing up against the city's business establishment. Miller is the most effective retail campaigner in the history of Dallas politics. Her bids for council and then mayor were marvelous displays of a candidate identifying issues that matter to a base of voters that would carry her to victory. Yes, a lot of her popularity came from being the fierce opponent of Kirk, and she was often on the losing side of major votes. The media treated her as the council's opposition leader, and it paid off when Kirk left City Hall for an unsuccessful run for Senate against Republican John Cornyn, and Miller defeated Dallas businessman Tom Dunning in a special election. She would go on to beat former acting mayor Mary Poss in 2002 and was re-elected to a full four-year term in 2003. One of her few campaign blemishes was a failed attempt to lead a 2005 referendum that would have given the office of mayor broader power. Voters in southern Dallas, where Miller was unpopular, overwhelmingly rejected the proposal. During her stint as mayor, the Cowboys flirted with moving the team to Dallas, but ultimately struck a deal with Arlington. Cowboys owner Jerry Jones blamed Miller for failing to negotiate a deal. | Laura Miller rode the shoulders of pro-neighborhood voters to become mayor of Dallas. Miller is making a comeback, running for City Council against Jennifer Staubach Gates. Miller and Gates have clashed over the redevelopment of Preston Center in northwest Dallas. | bart | 2 | https://www.dallasnews.com/news/dallas-city-council/2019/02/15/laura-millers-time-again | 0.123302 |
Which laws are being used by Trump for the national emergency? | President Trump declared a national emergency on Friday to obtain sufficient funds to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico, in order to stem what he called an "invasion" of illegal immigrants. The National Emergencies Act of 1975 dictates that a president must use existing law to justify the national emergency. The Department of Defense (DOD) released a statement saying that the president invoked sections 12302, 284(b)(7), and 2808 of Title X of the U.S. Code. Section 12302 authorizes "involuntary activation" of reserve troops to perform a "federal mission at the direction of the secretary of defense." Section 284(b)(7) allows the DOD to support counter-drug activities of other federal agencies, such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) "with the construction of roads, fences, and lighting" to disrupt drug trafficking. Section 2808 of Title X authorizes the Defense secretary to decide whether barriers are necessary to support the actions of the armed services, and to redirect unobligated military construction funds to construct the border barriers. Mr. Trump is expecting to use $8 billion to build the wall, including the $1.375 billion approved by Congress, with an additional $600 million expected to come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture funds, $2.5 billion coming from the Defense Department's drug interdiction program, and an additional $3.5 billion coming from the Pentagon's military construction budget. However, the national emergency declaration is already facing pushback, especially from Democrats. House Judiciary Committee Jerry Nadler wrote a letter to Mr. Trump Friday afternoon announcing an investigation into the national emergency declaration. Nadler cited a line from Mr. Trump's press conference Friday morning, where the president said about the national emergency: "I didn't need to do this, but I'd rather do it much faster." "We believe your declaration of an emergency shows a reckless disregard for the separation of powers and your own responsibilities under our constitutional system," the letter said. Democratic attorneys general have also indicated that they are willing to challenge the national emergency in court. Even some Republicans have shown opposition to the declaration, in part out of concern that expanding executive power now could result in Democratic presidents using national emergencies for non-emergencies in the future. | The National Emergencies Act of 1975 dictates that a president must use existing law to justify the national emergency. | ctrlsum | 0 | https://www.cbsnews.com/news/which-laws-are-being-used-by-trump-for-the-national-emergency/ | 0.245888 |
Which laws are being used by Trump for the national emergency? | President Trump declared a national emergency on Friday to obtain sufficient funds to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico, in order to stem what he called an "invasion" of illegal immigrants. The National Emergencies Act of 1975 dictates that a president must use existing law to justify the national emergency. The Department of Defense (DOD) released a statement saying that the president invoked sections 12302, 284(b)(7), and 2808 of Title X of the U.S. Code. Section 12302 authorizes "involuntary activation" of reserve troops to perform a "federal mission at the direction of the secretary of defense." Section 284(b)(7) allows the DOD to support counter-drug activities of other federal agencies, such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) "with the construction of roads, fences, and lighting" to disrupt drug trafficking. Section 2808 of Title X authorizes the Defense secretary to decide whether barriers are necessary to support the actions of the armed services, and to redirect unobligated military construction funds to construct the border barriers. Mr. Trump is expecting to use $8 billion to build the wall, including the $1.375 billion approved by Congress, with an additional $600 million expected to come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture funds, $2.5 billion coming from the Defense Department's drug interdiction program, and an additional $3.5 billion coming from the Pentagon's military construction budget. However, the national emergency declaration is already facing pushback, especially from Democrats. House Judiciary Committee Jerry Nadler wrote a letter to Mr. Trump Friday afternoon announcing an investigation into the national emergency declaration. Nadler cited a line from Mr. Trump's press conference Friday morning, where the president said about the national emergency: "I didn't need to do this, but I'd rather do it much faster." "We believe your declaration of an emergency shows a reckless disregard for the separation of powers and your own responsibilities under our constitutional system," the letter said. Democratic attorneys general have also indicated that they are willing to challenge the national emergency in court. Even some Republicans have shown opposition to the declaration, in part out of concern that expanding executive power now could result in Democratic presidents using national emergencies for non-emergencies in the future. | President Trump declared a national emergency on Friday to obtain sufficient funds to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico. The National Emergencies Act of 1975 dictates that a president must use existing law to justify the national emergency. | ctrlsum | 1 | https://www.cbsnews.com/news/which-laws-are-being-used-by-trump-for-the-national-emergency/ | 0.38597 |
Which laws are being used by Trump for the national emergency? | President Trump declared a national emergency on Friday to obtain sufficient funds to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico, in order to stem what he called an "invasion" of illegal immigrants. The National Emergencies Act of 1975 dictates that a president must use existing law to justify the national emergency. The Department of Defense (DOD) released a statement saying that the president invoked sections 12302, 284(b)(7), and 2808 of Title X of the U.S. Code. Section 12302 authorizes "involuntary activation" of reserve troops to perform a "federal mission at the direction of the secretary of defense." Section 284(b)(7) allows the DOD to support counter-drug activities of other federal agencies, such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) "with the construction of roads, fences, and lighting" to disrupt drug trafficking. Section 2808 of Title X authorizes the Defense secretary to decide whether barriers are necessary to support the actions of the armed services, and to redirect unobligated military construction funds to construct the border barriers. Mr. Trump is expecting to use $8 billion to build the wall, including the $1.375 billion approved by Congress, with an additional $600 million expected to come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture funds, $2.5 billion coming from the Defense Department's drug interdiction program, and an additional $3.5 billion coming from the Pentagon's military construction budget. However, the national emergency declaration is already facing pushback, especially from Democrats. House Judiciary Committee Jerry Nadler wrote a letter to Mr. Trump Friday afternoon announcing an investigation into the national emergency declaration. Nadler cited a line from Mr. Trump's press conference Friday morning, where the president said about the national emergency: "I didn't need to do this, but I'd rather do it much faster." "We believe your declaration of an emergency shows a reckless disregard for the separation of powers and your own responsibilities under our constitutional system," the letter said. Democratic attorneys general have also indicated that they are willing to challenge the national emergency in court. Even some Republicans have shown opposition to the declaration, in part out of concern that expanding executive power now could result in Democratic presidents using national emergencies for non-emergencies in the future. | President Trump declared a national emergency on Friday to obtain sufficient funds to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico. The National Emergencies Act of 1975 dictates that a president must use existing law to justify the national emergency. The national emergency declaration is already facing pushback, especially from Democrats. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.cbsnews.com/news/which-laws-are-being-used-by-trump-for-the-national-emergency/ | 0.474521 |
Was Jeff Bezos the weak link in cyber-security? | Image copyright AFP Image caption Amazon chief executive Jeff Bezos A week ago, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos revealed what he described as an extortion attempt by the National Enquirer. The tabloid appeared to have got hold of some very intimate texts and photos he had sent to his girlfriend Lauren Sanchez. In my report for the BBC World Service programme The World This Week, I consider why humans are often the weakest link in cyber-security. Mr Bezos is the world's richest man, building his fortune via a company that is transforming the way we live with innovative technology. His business, Amazon, has cyber-security at the heart of everything it does. On Twitter, someone called counterchekist had the answer to this, saying that all the world's money and experts could not protect a device against its biggest weakness, "the human using it". In other words, technology can only go so far. Good cyber-security depends on educating people not to be idiotic. The suggestion that the human factor is the weakest link is probably the biggest single cliche in the cyber-security industry. Image copyright Getty Images Image caption Mr Bezos sent selfies to TV host Lauren Sanchez Security firms may sell all sorts of expensive tools to protect their customers from attacks, but all too often they are rendered useless when someone in the organisation clicks on a dodgy link or forgets to install a vital software update. Look at any of the major cyber-security incidents of recent years and you are likely to find they begin with a human making a mistake. The fault that took down the O2 mobile phone network in the UK for 24 hours in December 2018 was first thought to have been the result of a hacking attack. It then emerged that someone had failed to renew a software certificate. "One of the most basic systems administration mistakes you can imagine," a waspish comment on the Computing Weekly site said. The attack which saw hackers - presumed to be from North Korea - take over the computer system of Sony Pictures and release all sorts of embarrassing information began with emails designed to trick executives into handing over their Apple ID credentials. Some of those people used the very same passwords for their Sony account. Hey presto, the hackers were in. What is known as social engineering is becoming a key weapon in the hackers' armoury. Rather than mounting some devilishly clever hi-tech attack, they pick out a key individual and work out how to target their weaknesses. Scammed! A while back, I spoke to a cyber-security firm that specialises in countering so-called spear-phishing, where a senior executive is targeted for an attack. They proposed a challenge to me. Some time over the next few days they would prove that they could fool me into clicking on a questionable link in an email. Hah, I thought. Fat chance. I am very cautious about what arrives in my inbox anyway and I will be even more watchful now. A few days later, an email popped up from Jat, the producer of my World Service radio programme Tech Tent. He messages me several times a day. It was about my Twitter account and read: "You really need to take a look at this," pointing to a link. Of course I clicked, and found myself on a web page belonging to the cyber-security company with a message saying: "We got you". Somehow they had spoofed my producer's email address, and so found the gap in my defences. After all, everyone trusts their producer. They might even be cheaper. Of course, the truth is that plugging data leaks is a multi-faceted business. An organisation needs to make sure its employees have secure devices, understand the corporate data protection policies, and have a modicum of common sense. And on that last point, even billionaires can sometimes be found lacking. The World this Week is first broadcast on the World Service at 0900 GMT on Saturday and repeated through the weekend and you can listen to it afterwards on BBC Sounds. | Jeff Bezos revealed an extortion attempt by the National Enquirer. The tabloid appeared to have got hold of intimate texts and photos he sent. Good cyber-security depends on educating people not to be idiotic. The suggestion that the human factor is the weakest link is probably the biggest single cliche in the cyber-security industry. | pegasus | 2 | https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-47253869 | 0.131364 |
Will parts of Trump's emergency border wall be built in Arizona? | Trump declares national emergency in Rose Garden to fund border wall (Photo11: WHITE HOUSE) TUCSON By declaring a national emergency, President Donald Trump is redirecting funds and making available $8 billion dollars to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, his signature campaign promise. Several expected court challenges could hamper Trump's efforts, but U.S. Customs and Border Protection the agency responsible for securing the nation's borders already has identified which areas of the border are most likely to be designated for the construction of new or replacement physical barriers. The agency declined to comment Friday on how the $8 billion would be spent, but previous comments from CBP officials and government reports show how the agency would prioritize spending. The Rio Grande Valley in south Texas would receive the most immediate investments, and is already scheduled this month to have the first section of new physical barriers built under Trump's presidency. But other areas, such as El Centro, California; Laredo, Texas; and Yuma, Arizona, also could see additional construction in the near future, based on CBP's strategy. 55 new miles in the Rio Grande Valley The $8 billion dollars Trump is championing for a border wall includes $1.375 billion that lawmakers hashed out in a compromise deal to avoid another government shutdown. Trump signed that bill on Friday morning, at the same time that he also signed his emergency declaration. Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen immediately issued a statement lauding Trump's emergency declaration and the passage of the spending bill. "I applaud the Presidents decision to declare a national emergency," she said. "This is a crisis pure and simple and we need to respond accordingly. We cannot stand by as our border security is further compromised, and our immigration laws are exploited." Nielsen noted the spending bill "contains no restrictions on total barrier mileage" that can be built using the $1.375 billion. It is estimated to cover the construction of 55 miles of "primary pedestrian fencing, including levee pedestrian fencing" in the Rio Grande Valley. NEWSLETTERS Get the AZ Memo newsletter delivered to your inbox We're sorry, but something went wrong Get the pulse of Arizona -- Local news, in-depth state coverage and what it all means for you Please try again soon, or contact Customer Service at 1-800-332-6733. Delivery: Mon-Fri Invalid email address Thank you! You're almost signed up for AZ Memo Keep an eye out for an email to confirm your newsletter registration. More newsletters READ: Mark Kelly, Arizona Senate candidate, slams Trump's national border emergency declaration As in the previous year, language included in the bill restricts the designs that Customs and Border Protection can deploy, limiting it to existing designs already built on the border. The bulk of the 55 miles is expected to built in Starr County, a sparsely-populated area of the Rio Grande Valley that has no fencing along the Rio Grande. The spending bill instructs the Department of Homeland Security to consult with the elected leaders of five border communities in that county regarding the construction of barriers. Five environmentally sensitive areas of the Rio Grande Valley are spared: the historic La Lomita chapel, the Bentsen-Rio Grande Valley State Park, the Santa Ana Wildlife Refuge, the National Butterfly Center, and a wildlife refuge near a planned SpaceX launchpad. The Rio Grande Valley remains the busiest point for illegal entries along the U.S.-Mexico border, although the majority of apprehensions are migrant families and minors seeking asylum in the United States. The area has about 60 miles of fencing, which Homeland Security officials have called inadequate given the large numbers of drugs and migrants. This month, construction crews are slated to begin construction on the first segment of 14 miles of new levee wall fencing in the Rio Grande Valley. Arizona also slated to get new barriers DHS officials say that they planned for a total of 100 miles of new barriers, mostly in one of the "high-priority area" of Rio Grande Valley. (Photo11: Nick Oza/The Republic) With imminent, drawn out legal challenges ahead, Customs and Border Protection may not have access to the remaining $6.6 billion that Trump is redirecting for construction of a border wall. Still, it has drawn out plans to invest the money, should it become available, in new and replacement projects throughout the Southwest U.S. border. Those plans were submitted to Congress, but CBP has not made them public. The agency says the plans are law-enforcement sensitive. READ: Sens. Kyrsten Sinema, Martha McSally mum over Trump's border emergency However, an analysis of the strategy by the Government Accountability Office, published in July 2018, disclosed additional details about where physical barriers are likely to be built. The GAO analysis identified that in addition to already-announced or ongoing projects in the Rio Grande Valley and San Diego the other three high priority areas based on Border Patrol's criteria to erect new barriers are in the El Centro, Yuma and Laredo border areas. In a background call with reporters in December to discuss their priorities, CBP officials backed up that assessment. They cited investment in the El Centro and Yuma areas as "critical," and said Laredo would also get "significant" investments. But what's unclear is how many miles would be built in each area. During that call, DHS officials also said that they had planned for a total of 100 miles of new barriers, mostly in the Rio Grande Valley. It's an open question whether the areas spared from construction under the spending bill would get barriers if Trump prevails in the legal challenges against his emergency declaration. Up until this week, Customs and Border Protection had received $1.6 billion in the past two years for the construction of new or replacement barriers. To date, they've announced eight projects along the border. Three of those projects have already been completed: in Calexico, California; Santa Teresa, New Mexico. ; and in El Paso, Texas. Two others, in San Diego and the Rio Grande Valley, are ongoing. Three more are slated to begin in the next few months in Calexico, Yuma, and the Rio Grande Valley. Click here to subscribe to azcentral.com. Read or Share this story: https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/border-issues/2019/02/15/parts-trumps-emergency-border-wall-built-arizona/2882335002/ | The Rio Grande Valley in south Texas would receive the most immediate investments. It is already scheduled this month to have the first section of new physical barriers built. Other areas, such as El Centro, California; Laredo, Texas; and Yuma, Arizona, also could see additional construction in the near future. | pegasus | 2 | https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/border-issues/2019/02/15/parts-trumps-emergency-border-wall-built-arizona/2882335002/ | 0.112667 |
Who had the top high school basketball performances from the week? | CLOSE Emoni Bates, who is a freshman this season, is already gaining national attention. Joey Delgado, Special to Detroit Free Press These are the top performances from Michigan high school basketball from Feb. 11-15: Boys Caleb Albrecht, Lapeer: Recorded 22 points in Lapeers 73-53 victory over Flint. Brett Barriger, Sanford Meridian: Accounted for 21 points in Meridians 60-42 win over Midland Dow. Jalal Baydoun, Dearborn Edsel Ford: Had 39 points, five rebounds, five assists and four steals in Edsel Fords 83-73 victory over Gibraltar Carlson. He also eclipsed 1,500 career points, setting a new school record. Ryan Berger, Plymouth: Finished with 26 points in Plymouths 52-31 win against Hartland. Toriano Bibbs, Ecorse: Recorded a double-double 24 points and 12 rebounds to go along with four blocks in Ecorses 73-53 win over Detroit Leadership. Lorne Bowman II, Orchard Lake St. Marys: Scored 19 points in St. Marys 46-38 loss to Detroit U-D Jesuit. Gabe Brady, Sanford Meridian: Finished with 22 points in Meridians 77-38 win over Farwell. Austin Brown, Madison Heights Madison: Logged 20 points in Madisons 56-55 loss to Eastpointe. Muhammad Ceesay, Romulus: Finished with a double-double 24 points and 15 rebounds in Romulus 65-58 win over Dearborn Heights Robichaud Thursday night. He also poured in 15 points in Romulus 42-32 win against Redford Union Friday night. DaVeaun Cole, Pontiac: Finished with 24 points and eight rebounds in Pontiacs 76-39 defeat of Hazel Park. Nate Etnyre, Plymouth Christian: Recorded a game-high 27 points in Christians 82-56 loss to Southfield Christian (14-6). Ty Fortney, Taylor Trillium: Recorded a double-double 18 points and 12 rebounds in Trilliums 67-65 triumph over Ann Arbor Prep. De'Jon Gantz, Warren Mott: Recorded 33 points, six rebounds and six assists in Motts 81-75 win vs. Grosse Pointe North. Chris Gary, Oak Park: Recorded a team-high 28 points in Oak Parks 70-67 defeat at the hands of Troy. Pat Ghaly, Rochester Hills Stoney Creek: Logged 18 points and nine rebounds in Stoney Creeks 50-49 loss to Auburn Hills Avondale. Javaughn Hannah, Mount Clemens: Recorded 18 points and eight rebounds in Mount Clemens 63-50 loss to Hamtramck. Jack Hannon, Pontiac Notre Dame Prep: Recorded a team-high 20 points in Notre Dame Preps 59-44 loss to Lake Orion (10-8) Wednesday night. Da'Jion Humphrey, Southfield Christian: Logged a double-double 19 points and 14 rebounds in Christians defeat of Plymouth Christian. Will Johnson, Grosse Pointe South: Logged a double-double 22 points and 10 rebounds in Souths 73-48 victory against Marysville. Joseph Kimmerer, Hale: Recorded a double-double 28 points and 15 rebounds in Hales 66-40 win against Alcona. Isaiah Lewis, Wayne Memorial: Accounted for 19 points and seven assists in Memorials 61-43 win over Belleville Thursday night. He also had 26 points and four assists in Memorials 80-41 win over Livonia Churchill Friday night. Drew Lowder, Ann Arbor Pioneer: Logged 19 points and six assists in Pioneers 86-47 win against Monroe. Glenn Miller, Pentwater: Finished with 19 points, five boards and five steals in Pentwaters 48-34 defeat of Manistee Catholic Central. Donavan Moore, West Bloomfield: Produced 27 points in West Bloomfields 64-63 triumph over Detroit Edison. Seth Ochoa, Sterling Heights: Recorded 23 points in Sterling Heights 40-38 defeat of Macomb LAnse Creuse North. Brody Parker, Troy: Scored 30 points in Troys triumph over Oak Park. Kendall Perkins, Canton: Logged 18 points and seven rebounds in Cantons 75-62 win against Plymouth. Kasean Pryor, Ann Arbor Pioneer: Recorded 33 points and nine rebounds in Pioneers win over Monroe. Noah Rheker, Southfield Christian: Contributed 21 points in Christians victory vs. Plymouth Christian. Jerez Rinehart, Gibraltar Carlson: Recorded 24 points in Carlsons loss to Dearborn Edsel Ford. Vinson Sigmon, Canton: Scored 23 points, and recorded five assists in Cantons 75-62 victory vs. Plymouth. Nate Talbot, Lake Orion: Finished with 28 points in Lake Orions win over Pontiac Notre Dame Prep Wednesday night. Evan Thomas, Okemos: Finished with a double-double 21 points and 12 rebounds in Okemos 55-53 victory against Lansing Everett. B. Artis White, Canton: Finished with 24 points and four steals in Cantons 75-62 win against Plymouth. Rayvon Williamson, Detroit Community: Posted 37 points in Communitys 58-54 loss to Detroit Cornerstone. Lorenzo Wright, Belleville: Compiled 18 points in Bellevilles 76-44 win vs. Livonia Franklin. Honorable Mentions Gavin Ambrose, Holly: Scored 17 points in Hollys 45-40 loss to Lake Fenton. D'Quarion Cole, Pontiac: Logged 16 points and eight rebounds in Pontiacs 67-24 win over Farmington Hills Harrison Monday night. He also recorded 19 points and seven rebounds in Pontiacs win over Hazel Park Friday night. Davis DiGiovanni, Troy Athens: Compiled a double-double 15 points and 10 rebounds in Athens 59-47 defeat at the hands of Rochester Hills Stoney Creek Monday night. Tarah Hazard, Pontiac: Recorded a double-double 16 points and 10 rebounds in Pontiacs victory over Farmington Hills Harrison Monday night. Joshua Hines, Macomb Dakota: Logged 17 points and three assists in Dakotas 69-55 win over Harrison Twp. LAnse Creuse. Addison McIntosh, Fenton: Drained five triples on his way to 17 points in Fentons 41-35 loss to Flushing. Kendall Simpson, Clawson: Finished with a double-double 13 points and 14 rebounds in Clawsons 56-51 loss to Sterling Heights Thursday night. Zach Topolewski, Livonia Clarenceville: Finished with 17 points in Clarencevilles 64-60 loss to Dearborn Heights Annapolis. Jalen Young, Detroit Cornerstone Health & Technology: Finished with a double-double 16 points and 10 rebounds in Cornerstones 58-54 triumph over Detroit Community. Girls Daisy Ansel, Comstock: Finished with 45 points, nine rebounds and eight steals in Comstocks 71-31 victory vs. Paw Paw Tuesday night. She also accounted for 37 points, 11 rebounds, eight assists and seven steals in Comstocks 69-48 win over Berrien Springs Friday night. Kenzie Bowers, Kent City: Scored 23 points in Kent Citys 80-22 win over Hesperia. Dara Capaldi, New Haven: Logged 17 points in New Havens 51-37 win over St. Clair Shores South Lake Thursday night. Asia Cochran, Dearborn Heights Annapolis: Scored 27 points in Annapolis 50-23 victory over Garden City Monday night. Carlee Crabtree, Coldwater: Compiled 18 points and five rebounds in Coldwaters 52-44 win against Jackson Northwest. Brooke Daniels, Macomb LAnse Creuse North: Led all scorers with 23 points in Norths 56-44 victory over Clinton Twp. Chippewa Valley Monday night. Alexa Downey, Grosse Pointe South: Finished with 21 points in Souths 63-50 win against Romeo Thursday night. DeBraya Edwards, Roseville: Logged a triple-double 20 points, 12 rebounds and 10 steals to go along with six assists in Rosevilles 43-21 win over Clinton Twp. Clintondale Thursday night. Hannah Erla, Lapeer: Finished with 23 points in Lapeers 61-15 win over Flint. Rebecca Fugate, Holly: Logged 21 points in Hollys 40-38 loss to Grand Blanc Wednesday night. Ciara Hardy, Romulus: Finished with 23 points and six rebounds in Romulus 72-40 win against Redford Union. Therese Hebda, Trenton: Finished with 17 points in Trentons 65-42 victory over Brownstown Woodhaven Friday night. Deja Henson, Detroit University Prep: Logged a double-double 19 points and 21 rebounds to go along with six steals in University Preps 56-36 victory over Harper Woods. Mya Hiram, Onsted: Finished with 22 points and eight rebounds in Onsteds 71-30 win over Hillsdale. Kelly Hunter, Southfield Christian: Recorded 19 points in Christians 33-9 victory over Birmingham Roeper. Chloe Idoni, Fenton: Scored a season-high 29 points in Fentons 55-30 win over Flushing. Lindsey Jurecki, Grosse Ile: Posted 18 points in Grosse Iles 55-45 loss to Carleton Airport (15-1). Audrey Medaugh, Romeo: Recorded 19 points in Romeos loss at the hands of Grosse Pointe South Thursday night. Madi Moyer, Hartland: Finished with 17 points in Hartlands 60-20 win against Plymouth. Alayna Mulford, Trenton: Recorded 16 points and 17 rebounds her fifth consecutive double-double in Trentons 55-17 win over Southgate Anderson Tuesday night. Austin Palmer, Millington: Scored 11 points, and grabbed 17 rebounds in Millingtons 64-36 loss to Essexville Garber. Kayla Ross, Onsted: Scored 18 points in a 52-47 loss to Ida Wednesday night. Also, chipped in 14 points and seven rebounds in Onsteds win over Hillsdale Friday night. Carly Scheblo, Charlotte: Recorded 21 points, giving her 1,000 career points, in Charlottes 64-21 victory over Lansing Sexton. Abbie Slate, Allen Park: Recorded 25 points, including her 1,000th career point, in Allen Parks 56-26 victory over Dearborn Edsel Ford. Shawn'ta Standifer, Romulus: Recorded 22 points and five steals in Romulus victory against Redford Union. Sarah Stuart, Pontiac Notre Dame Prep: Led the Irish with 15 points and eight rebounds in Notre Dame Preps 47-42 victory over Warren Regina Tuesday night. Emily Swiercz, Carleton Airport: Produced 18 points in Airports victory vs. Grosse Ile. Zara Weber, Kent City: Contributed 22 points in Kent Citys victory vs. Hesperia. Taylor Williams, Macomb Dakota: Finished with a double-double 11 points and 15 rebounds to go along with five blocks and five assists in Dakotas 41-29 win over Sterling Heights Stevenson Thursday night. Malorie Wilson, Pontiac Notre Dame Prep: Recorded a double-double 10 points and 14 rebounds in Preps victory over Warren Regina. WE WANT YOUR NOMINATIONS! Nominate a high school coach for the 2019 Honda Inspiration Award More: Vote now for the Detroit Free Press 2019 I AM SPORT award winner! | Caleb Albrecht scored 22 points in Lapeer's 73-53 victory over Flint. | bart | 0 | https://www.freep.com/story/sports/high-school/2019/02/15/michigan-high-school-basketball-performances-week/2888429002/ | 0.116431 |
Who had the top high school basketball performances from the week? | CLOSE Emoni Bates, who is a freshman this season, is already gaining national attention. Joey Delgado, Special to Detroit Free Press These are the top performances from Michigan high school basketball from Feb. 11-15: Boys Caleb Albrecht, Lapeer: Recorded 22 points in Lapeers 73-53 victory over Flint. Brett Barriger, Sanford Meridian: Accounted for 21 points in Meridians 60-42 win over Midland Dow. Jalal Baydoun, Dearborn Edsel Ford: Had 39 points, five rebounds, five assists and four steals in Edsel Fords 83-73 victory over Gibraltar Carlson. He also eclipsed 1,500 career points, setting a new school record. Ryan Berger, Plymouth: Finished with 26 points in Plymouths 52-31 win against Hartland. Toriano Bibbs, Ecorse: Recorded a double-double 24 points and 12 rebounds to go along with four blocks in Ecorses 73-53 win over Detroit Leadership. Lorne Bowman II, Orchard Lake St. Marys: Scored 19 points in St. Marys 46-38 loss to Detroit U-D Jesuit. Gabe Brady, Sanford Meridian: Finished with 22 points in Meridians 77-38 win over Farwell. Austin Brown, Madison Heights Madison: Logged 20 points in Madisons 56-55 loss to Eastpointe. Muhammad Ceesay, Romulus: Finished with a double-double 24 points and 15 rebounds in Romulus 65-58 win over Dearborn Heights Robichaud Thursday night. He also poured in 15 points in Romulus 42-32 win against Redford Union Friday night. DaVeaun Cole, Pontiac: Finished with 24 points and eight rebounds in Pontiacs 76-39 defeat of Hazel Park. Nate Etnyre, Plymouth Christian: Recorded a game-high 27 points in Christians 82-56 loss to Southfield Christian (14-6). Ty Fortney, Taylor Trillium: Recorded a double-double 18 points and 12 rebounds in Trilliums 67-65 triumph over Ann Arbor Prep. De'Jon Gantz, Warren Mott: Recorded 33 points, six rebounds and six assists in Motts 81-75 win vs. Grosse Pointe North. Chris Gary, Oak Park: Recorded a team-high 28 points in Oak Parks 70-67 defeat at the hands of Troy. Pat Ghaly, Rochester Hills Stoney Creek: Logged 18 points and nine rebounds in Stoney Creeks 50-49 loss to Auburn Hills Avondale. Javaughn Hannah, Mount Clemens: Recorded 18 points and eight rebounds in Mount Clemens 63-50 loss to Hamtramck. Jack Hannon, Pontiac Notre Dame Prep: Recorded a team-high 20 points in Notre Dame Preps 59-44 loss to Lake Orion (10-8) Wednesday night. Da'Jion Humphrey, Southfield Christian: Logged a double-double 19 points and 14 rebounds in Christians defeat of Plymouth Christian. Will Johnson, Grosse Pointe South: Logged a double-double 22 points and 10 rebounds in Souths 73-48 victory against Marysville. Joseph Kimmerer, Hale: Recorded a double-double 28 points and 15 rebounds in Hales 66-40 win against Alcona. Isaiah Lewis, Wayne Memorial: Accounted for 19 points and seven assists in Memorials 61-43 win over Belleville Thursday night. He also had 26 points and four assists in Memorials 80-41 win over Livonia Churchill Friday night. Drew Lowder, Ann Arbor Pioneer: Logged 19 points and six assists in Pioneers 86-47 win against Monroe. Glenn Miller, Pentwater: Finished with 19 points, five boards and five steals in Pentwaters 48-34 defeat of Manistee Catholic Central. Donavan Moore, West Bloomfield: Produced 27 points in West Bloomfields 64-63 triumph over Detroit Edison. Seth Ochoa, Sterling Heights: Recorded 23 points in Sterling Heights 40-38 defeat of Macomb LAnse Creuse North. Brody Parker, Troy: Scored 30 points in Troys triumph over Oak Park. Kendall Perkins, Canton: Logged 18 points and seven rebounds in Cantons 75-62 win against Plymouth. Kasean Pryor, Ann Arbor Pioneer: Recorded 33 points and nine rebounds in Pioneers win over Monroe. Noah Rheker, Southfield Christian: Contributed 21 points in Christians victory vs. Plymouth Christian. Jerez Rinehart, Gibraltar Carlson: Recorded 24 points in Carlsons loss to Dearborn Edsel Ford. Vinson Sigmon, Canton: Scored 23 points, and recorded five assists in Cantons 75-62 victory vs. Plymouth. Nate Talbot, Lake Orion: Finished with 28 points in Lake Orions win over Pontiac Notre Dame Prep Wednesday night. Evan Thomas, Okemos: Finished with a double-double 21 points and 12 rebounds in Okemos 55-53 victory against Lansing Everett. B. Artis White, Canton: Finished with 24 points and four steals in Cantons 75-62 win against Plymouth. Rayvon Williamson, Detroit Community: Posted 37 points in Communitys 58-54 loss to Detroit Cornerstone. Lorenzo Wright, Belleville: Compiled 18 points in Bellevilles 76-44 win vs. Livonia Franklin. Honorable Mentions Gavin Ambrose, Holly: Scored 17 points in Hollys 45-40 loss to Lake Fenton. D'Quarion Cole, Pontiac: Logged 16 points and eight rebounds in Pontiacs 67-24 win over Farmington Hills Harrison Monday night. He also recorded 19 points and seven rebounds in Pontiacs win over Hazel Park Friday night. Davis DiGiovanni, Troy Athens: Compiled a double-double 15 points and 10 rebounds in Athens 59-47 defeat at the hands of Rochester Hills Stoney Creek Monday night. Tarah Hazard, Pontiac: Recorded a double-double 16 points and 10 rebounds in Pontiacs victory over Farmington Hills Harrison Monday night. Joshua Hines, Macomb Dakota: Logged 17 points and three assists in Dakotas 69-55 win over Harrison Twp. LAnse Creuse. Addison McIntosh, Fenton: Drained five triples on his way to 17 points in Fentons 41-35 loss to Flushing. Kendall Simpson, Clawson: Finished with a double-double 13 points and 14 rebounds in Clawsons 56-51 loss to Sterling Heights Thursday night. Zach Topolewski, Livonia Clarenceville: Finished with 17 points in Clarencevilles 64-60 loss to Dearborn Heights Annapolis. Jalen Young, Detroit Cornerstone Health & Technology: Finished with a double-double 16 points and 10 rebounds in Cornerstones 58-54 triumph over Detroit Community. Girls Daisy Ansel, Comstock: Finished with 45 points, nine rebounds and eight steals in Comstocks 71-31 victory vs. Paw Paw Tuesday night. She also accounted for 37 points, 11 rebounds, eight assists and seven steals in Comstocks 69-48 win over Berrien Springs Friday night. Kenzie Bowers, Kent City: Scored 23 points in Kent Citys 80-22 win over Hesperia. Dara Capaldi, New Haven: Logged 17 points in New Havens 51-37 win over St. Clair Shores South Lake Thursday night. Asia Cochran, Dearborn Heights Annapolis: Scored 27 points in Annapolis 50-23 victory over Garden City Monday night. Carlee Crabtree, Coldwater: Compiled 18 points and five rebounds in Coldwaters 52-44 win against Jackson Northwest. Brooke Daniels, Macomb LAnse Creuse North: Led all scorers with 23 points in Norths 56-44 victory over Clinton Twp. Chippewa Valley Monday night. Alexa Downey, Grosse Pointe South: Finished with 21 points in Souths 63-50 win against Romeo Thursday night. DeBraya Edwards, Roseville: Logged a triple-double 20 points, 12 rebounds and 10 steals to go along with six assists in Rosevilles 43-21 win over Clinton Twp. Clintondale Thursday night. Hannah Erla, Lapeer: Finished with 23 points in Lapeers 61-15 win over Flint. Rebecca Fugate, Holly: Logged 21 points in Hollys 40-38 loss to Grand Blanc Wednesday night. Ciara Hardy, Romulus: Finished with 23 points and six rebounds in Romulus 72-40 win against Redford Union. Therese Hebda, Trenton: Finished with 17 points in Trentons 65-42 victory over Brownstown Woodhaven Friday night. Deja Henson, Detroit University Prep: Logged a double-double 19 points and 21 rebounds to go along with six steals in University Preps 56-36 victory over Harper Woods. Mya Hiram, Onsted: Finished with 22 points and eight rebounds in Onsteds 71-30 win over Hillsdale. Kelly Hunter, Southfield Christian: Recorded 19 points in Christians 33-9 victory over Birmingham Roeper. Chloe Idoni, Fenton: Scored a season-high 29 points in Fentons 55-30 win over Flushing. Lindsey Jurecki, Grosse Ile: Posted 18 points in Grosse Iles 55-45 loss to Carleton Airport (15-1). Audrey Medaugh, Romeo: Recorded 19 points in Romeos loss at the hands of Grosse Pointe South Thursday night. Madi Moyer, Hartland: Finished with 17 points in Hartlands 60-20 win against Plymouth. Alayna Mulford, Trenton: Recorded 16 points and 17 rebounds her fifth consecutive double-double in Trentons 55-17 win over Southgate Anderson Tuesday night. Austin Palmer, Millington: Scored 11 points, and grabbed 17 rebounds in Millingtons 64-36 loss to Essexville Garber. Kayla Ross, Onsted: Scored 18 points in a 52-47 loss to Ida Wednesday night. Also, chipped in 14 points and seven rebounds in Onsteds win over Hillsdale Friday night. Carly Scheblo, Charlotte: Recorded 21 points, giving her 1,000 career points, in Charlottes 64-21 victory over Lansing Sexton. Abbie Slate, Allen Park: Recorded 25 points, including her 1,000th career point, in Allen Parks 56-26 victory over Dearborn Edsel Ford. Shawn'ta Standifer, Romulus: Recorded 22 points and five steals in Romulus victory against Redford Union. Sarah Stuart, Pontiac Notre Dame Prep: Led the Irish with 15 points and eight rebounds in Notre Dame Preps 47-42 victory over Warren Regina Tuesday night. Emily Swiercz, Carleton Airport: Produced 18 points in Airports victory vs. Grosse Ile. Zara Weber, Kent City: Contributed 22 points in Kent Citys victory vs. Hesperia. Taylor Williams, Macomb Dakota: Finished with a double-double 11 points and 15 rebounds to go along with five blocks and five assists in Dakotas 41-29 win over Sterling Heights Stevenson Thursday night. Malorie Wilson, Pontiac Notre Dame Prep: Recorded a double-double 10 points and 14 rebounds in Preps victory over Warren Regina. WE WANT YOUR NOMINATIONS! Nominate a high school coach for the 2019 Honda Inspiration Award More: Vote now for the Detroit Free Press 2019 I AM SPORT award winner! | Jalal Baydoun eclipsed 1,500 career points, setting a new school record. Toriano Bibbs recorded a double-double with 24 points and 12 rebounds. Muhammad Ceesay had a double-double with 24 points and 15 rebounds. Daveaun Cole scored 24 points for Pontiac Notre Dame Prep. | pegasus | 2 | https://www.freep.com/story/sports/high-school/2019/02/15/michigan-high-school-basketball-performances-week/2888429002/ | 0.130312 |
What will happen to the opportunity Rover's dead body on Mars? | NASA's Opportunity Rover has died on Mars. The little solar-paneled robot apparently ran out of battery power during the Red Planet's awesome 2018 dust storm, and after one last attempt to contact it, NASA concluded yesterday (Feb. 13) that the far-off explorer is no more. Many human artifacts wouldn't last very long beyond our protective biosphere. As Live Science reported previously, solar radiation has likely shredded the Tesla Roadster Elon Musk launched into space last year. But Tesla Roadsters have lots of organic fibers and plastics in their bodies. Mars rovers are made of tougher stuff. [Voyager to Mars Rover: NASA's 10 Greatest Innovations] Jeff Moersch, a professor of planetary science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and a member of the Opportunity team, cautioned that he's not an expert in the rover's engineering. But he said that Opportunity does have some plastic bits that might eventually break down under the glare of the sun its insulation, for example. "But, by and large, I think it'll look pretty much as we left it," when and if astronauts ever do come across its resting place, Moersch told Live Science. It'll probably be pretty dusty, though, he added. That's assuming that astronauts do make it to Mars in the relatively near future the next century or two, for example. Over much longer periods, Moersch said, dust will settle on the rover. Opportunity functioned as long as it did because regular Martian winds tended to routinely blow dust off its body. But over longer periods, it's a bit of an open question whether the dust or the wind will win out. "I doubt it will end up buried in a mound, though," he added. On Earth, anything old and dead and sitting in one place on the surface tends to eventually end up underground. But that's thanks to the effects of water and plate tectonics, Moersch said factors that aren't present in the same way on Mars. "Over the very long-term, you're going to get impacts that knock up ejecta [airborne Mars dirt] from where they hit, and that ejecta will very gradually resurface [on] the planet and bury things that were on the surface," he said. If Opportunity were to be left on Mars, aliens who landed there millions and millions of years from now would find the rover somewhere in the rock record much like how paleontologists find dinosaur fossils here on Earth. But NASA is hoping to send humans to Mars one day. And there are dreams of establishing some sort of human settlement there. Steve Squyres, a professor of astronomy at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, and head of the Opportunity science mission, made clear during NASA's press conference announcing the rover's death that the agency has no plans to bring the rover back to Earth. he asked.) That said, Moersch added, when humans do settle Mars, it's not unreasonable to imagine they might make some effort to recover and preserve Opportunity. Perhaps it could end up in museum, or the region explored by the rover might end up as a national park. Of course, if humans never get there, Opportunity might not make it into the fossil record at all. It's at least plausible that, given millions of years, a meteor could strike it directly and smash it to bits. Originally published on Live Science. | NASA's Opportunity Rover has died on Mars. The little solar-paneled robot apparently ran out of battery power. Many human artifacts wouldn't last very long beyond our protective biosphere. On Earth, anything old and dead and sitting in one place on the surface tends to eventually end up underground. | pegasus | 2 | https://www.foxnews.com/science/what-will-happen-to-the-opportunity-rovers-dead-body-on-mars | 0.267901 |
Will Gucci's Comprehensive Diversity And Inclusion Plan Repair The Company's Image? | Luxury fashion brand Gucci was under fire last week due to their new Balaclava sweater, which was widely criticized for being an example of Blackface. Following the incident, the company issued an apology and emphasized its commitment to diversity. The apology was not enough for some. Rapper T.I. as well as Spike Lee called for a boycott of Gucci products. In an effort to rectify the situation, on Thursday Guccis executives created a set of action items to remedy their reputation. Hours ago, Gucci issued a series of tweets that outlined their detailed initiatives moving forward. The first step in creating a more diverse and inclusive company is to be more inclusive in their hiring. Gucci committed to hiring global and regional directors of diversity and inclusion. The goal with this initiative is to find a Global Director of Diversity and Inclusion and execute strategies to foster a more inclusive company. From a financial standpoint, having a company that is more racially and ethnically diverse can equate to greater financial gain for the company, according to McKinsey. Aside from the documented financial gains that having a more diverse company can produce if an organization has more diversity of thought, incidents like what occurred at Gucci are less likely. Guccis second step in their action plan is a multi-cultural design scholarship program aimed at creating more employment opportunities for underrepresented groups. The third step in their action plan is to improve their cultural awareness and sensitivity. The diversity and inclusivity awareness program that they plan to implement will begin in May and will be a one-day training that will continue annually. The training will be completed by all 18,000 global employees. The verdict is still out regarding whether mandatory training is effective. Starbucks received backlash after implementing mandatory training for all employees following a 2018 incident where two Black men were racially profiled. The fourth step is a Global Exchange Program to promote a multicultural and diverse workplace by providing internal mobility for talents to come from regions to work at the headquarter offices in Italy. By laying out these initiatives on their social media page, Gucci is allowing the public to hold them accountable and assess whether they are making progress towards their diversity and inclusion goals. While research does indicate that when a company makes a public guffaw, an apology and taking ownership of the mistake increases favorability, empty promises of change may have irreversible effects on the companys reputation. Ultimately, companies can come back from mistakes and blunders but it takes more than an apology. Implementation is what will help to repair public perception. It is imperative that Gucci continue the conversation of how to build bridges to continue this critical dialogue. Including famed Harlem designer Dapper Dan in conversations about how to build a more inclusive company is a step in the right direction, but more needs to be done. Dapper Dan announced that a town-hall meeting was in the works and that there would be an opportunity to express opinions and concerns. The first step towards concrete and long-lasting changes is increased dialogue. This situation should be a learning lesson not only for Gucci but for other organizations. Beyond talking about the problem though, there must be steps taken to actually implement these action items if lasting changes are ever to be made. | Gucci's diversity and inclusion plan includes hiring a director of diversity and inclusivity. The company also plans to train all 18,000 global employees on cultural awareness and sensitivity. The plan is a step in the right direction, but more needs to be done to repair the company's image. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/janicegassam/2019/02/16/will-guccis-comprehensive-diversity-and-inclusion-plan-repair-the-companys-image/ | 0.439024 |
Are banks guilty of faking signatures on British court papers? | Its a serious charge, but a new campaign group claims there has been alleged industrial-scale forgery of signatures. And the Bank Signature Forgery Campaign has some powerful supporters in high places. The all-party parliamentary group (APPG) on fair business banking a cross-party group of MPs and peers publicly voiced its support this month, as did the high-profile police and crime commissioner for Thames Valley, Anthony Stansfeld. Meanwhile, a signature expert told Guardian Money: The whole thing is highly suspicious. If the campaigns claims are true, it would mean a multibillion-dollar scandal that played out in the US was being repeated in the UK (see box). Julian Watts, the man behind the campaign, says big banks and lenders are linked to documents carrying questionable signatures, and that, in some cases, people were evicted as a direct result. He has amassed a dossier of signatures purporting to be by one person that sometimes appear to be very different. He is asking people to send in photos or photocopies of signatures on bank or company court documents so they can be examined. The central allegation of the campaign, running on Facebook and Twitter, is that signatures on some UK court documents appear to have been forged that is, not signed by the person whose printed name appears under the statement of truth (the bit that typically says something like I believe the facts stated in this document are true). It is claimed that in some cases, employees at the law firms acting on behalf of the banks or the banks representatives, may have faked them in order to speed up the legal process. For example, it might be that the case handler whose name is on the documents was off sick or on holiday when they needed to be signed, so other members of staff simply signed that persons name in order to keep the process moving. Handwriting expert Adam Brand has viewed some of the documents and says they definitely appear worthy of further investigation, adding: There certainly appears to be a case here, although further extensive work is going to be needed. Money asked Brand a forensic handwriting analyst to comment on one set we were shown. They relate to a home repossession, and all the signatures in this case, a squiggle were supposedly made by the same person. Yet there are arguably variations. Brand told us that someone who had adopted a reduced signature, or squiggle, would tend to stick to that same signature. Here we have a totally inconsistent situation. Purely from a common-sense point of view it is unreasonable. However, both the individual named on the documents, and the law firm that employed them, have firmly rejected any suggestions that multiple people had signed in the employees name. Giving its support to the campaign, the APPG on fair business banking, co-chaired by Tory MP Kevin Hollinrake, says it receives frequent and consistent representations from constituents with concerns over the forgery of signatures. It adds: This campaign will provide a vital method of gathering evidence of possible signature forgeries by UK banks in court documents. Some may take the view that even if this did happen, it is hardly the crime of the century, while others may feel that the campaigns real agenda is trying to help people wriggle out of their debts on a technicality. But Watts rejects this and says it is more than just a technicality: While its fine for people to pp letters, people cannot pp the signature on court documents such as witness statements ... signed statements of truth are a foundational aspect of the justice system. He says that if it was conclusively proved that signature forgery had taken place, people may have been fraudulently evicted from their homes, or had court judgments fraudulently secured against them for other consumer debt. It is fair to say that faking a signature on a statement of truth is a very serious business: in late 2017 a UK solicitor was struck off for among other things directing other members of staff to fake signatures on witness statements. The official ruling in that case stated that the seriousness of the misconduct is at the highest level ... the dishonesty was of such gravity that public confidence in the profession would no doubt be undermined were the public to learn of what occurred. However, it should also be pointed out that Watts is no impartial observer: he has an axe to grind in that he and his wife have been the subject of several bank court cases. He wants MPs to review the evidence and, if necessary, pass it on to the National Crime Agency or the Serious Fraud Office. Reckless and abusive forgery, US style In the US, fake signatures on documents in the wake of the housing market bubble bursting in 2006-07, were among the reckless and abusive mortgage practices that resulted in a $25bn (19bn) settlement between mortgage lenders and the US government and most US states in 2012. One of these practices was known as robo-signing, where some staff signed someone elses name, or signed documents they hadnt even read, to speed up the foreclosure process. In one article about fake signatures on American mortgage documents, Associated Press reported that one name, Linda Green, was signed almost two dozen different ways. | Campaign group claims there has been alleged industrial-scale forgery of signatures. If the claims are true, it would mean a multibillion-dollar scandal that played out in the US was being repeated in the UK. The Bank Signature Forgery Campaign has some powerful supporters in high places. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.theguardian.com/money/2019/feb/16/banks-faking-signature-campaign-evidence | 0.110987 |
Have world leaders really got the will to bring peace to Yemen? | During his historic recent visit to the United Arab Emirates, Pope Francis condemned the war in my home country, Yemen, as a terrible humanitarian crisis. Addressing the world he said: Let us pray strongly, because there are children who are hungry, who are thirsty they dont have medicine and they are in danger of death. It is true that all these things are happening, and much worse. Violations are being carried out by all parties involved in the conflict. But whenever I hear that Yemen is the worst humanitarian disaster or listen to my own words, as I address committee after committee I feel like Im listening to a broken record. The need to remind everyone that what we are witnessing is manmade, and not a natural disaster, is constant. In late January, I was invited to deliver a testimony at the European parliament sub-committee on human rights, a place I had visited in 2016 to give a speech about the impact of drones. It is significant how much knowledge and interest about Yemen has increased since then. My speech came at the same time that the UK announced more humanitarian aid to Yemen, while the EU boasted that iit is the biggest donor to the budget. Yet all the while they continue to supply arms and support to the Saudi-led coalition, providing the means to continue the war should the fragile ceasefire fail. It is hypocrisy on a grand scale. Since 2014, my organisation, Mwatana for Human Rights, has documented hundreds of incidents where lives have been lost or violated and civilian infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed not only by the coalition, but also by Houthi armed groups, local armed groups loyal to the Hadi government and others. They are all bound by a common factor: their behaviour. What is really sad about the violations in Yemen is that they are preventable. They occur because the parties dont care. The total lack of accountability, not only to their own but also to the outside world, empowers them to feel as though they can do whatever they want. The last UN Resolution on Yemen was adopted by the security council in December ; it too suggested that the way to maintain peace is though accountability on all sides. The pope referred to hunger, but Yemenis are not suddenly starving. I believe starvation is being used as a weapon of war, by all sides. Since 2017, Mwatana has been conducting advocacy visits around the world. It is clear to us that the disaster caused by the war in Yemen is being ignored as many countries actively continue to supply the weapons that fuel conflict. Peace in Yemen is possible, it always has been. Peace is needed now even more than ever, but what we, the people of Yemen, need above all is the political will to achieve it. We are now witnessing what can happen when the international community takes action, placing serious and balanced pressure on all parties to bring them to the negotiating table in Sweden, in what seems to be the most promising chance for peace. Some urgent actions were discussed in Sweden, from freeing detainees and providing salaries for Yemenis to reopening Sanaa airport and ending the fighting in Hodeida. These confidence-building measures would make the situation significantly less miserable for Yemenis and could, more importantly, lead to a lasting and stable peace agreement. It just needs more pressure. Ive seen how arms sales fuel deadly suffering in Yemen. We must stop them | Radhya al-Mutawakel Read more The international community can play a major role in stopping the war in Yemen, but they need to do much more than just provide aid. Humanitarian support is important, but it is just filling the gaps; you cant feed a whole nation. States should not just act as humanitarian organisations, as they have the ability to do so much more. Yemen can be a success story. It offers a chance for the international community to demonstrate that, by working together, it can end a disaster anywhere in the world. If we lose this opportunity, the conflict will not only continue but is likely to get worse. I dont know if we will have another chance for peace. We all need a success story, none more than the people of Yemen. Radhya Al-Mutawakel is a Yemeni human rights defender and co-founder of the Mwatana Organisation for Human Rights | Radhya al-Mutawakel is the founder of Mwatana for Human Rights. She says the war in Yemen is a manmade disaster, and not a natural disaster. She calls on world leaders to put pressure on all parties to reach a peace deal. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2019/feb/16/have-world-leaders-really-got-the-will-to-bring-peace-to-yemen-radhya-al-mutawakel | 0.113205 |
Are Marie Kondo fans sparking joy at local thrift stores? | CLEVELAND, Ohio While purging everything from furniture to clothing to knickknacks, declutterers likely have not been pondering whether its time to get rid of this stuff because it no longer sparks joy. Until now. Shedding unwanted items has taken on a whole new meaning thanks to organizing and decluttering guru Marie Kondo. In her new Netflix series, Tidying Up With Marie Kondo, and her book, The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up: The Japanese Art of Decluttering and Organizing, Kondo espouses eliminating from ones life things that no longer spark joy. Whats more, if you feel guilty for letting something go, ease the guilt by saying thank you to the item for being there when you needed it, then drop it into a donation binge. Its a less-is-more approach on a spiritual level. How to donate: Scroll to the bottom of this story for links and contact information. From coast to coast, the KonMari effect, as it is called, is said to have ignited a surge in thrift store donations. A few thrift stores in San Francisco reportedly have had to put donation restrictions in place. In Greater Cleveland, some thrift stores have experienced a recent boost in donations that they attribute to Kondos influence. Others say its hard to tell. Compared to January of last year, weve seen an increase of 442,000 pounds coming into our stores, said Debbie Gillum, Marketing and Digital Communications Specialist with Volunteers of America Ohio & Indiana. In the Cleveland area, it has stores in Mansfield, Aurora, Brunswick and North Olmsted. She said there is a waiting list for at-home pickups of donations. "And, yes, we do attribute the increase to Marie Kondos show on Netflix, and the Tidying Up craze has struck a chord with people of all ages,'' Gillum said. "People are starting to ask themselves what in their homes sparks joy and they are donating things that no longer bring them joy. The best part is when they donate their stuff, it can bring joy to someone else. Donations support Volunteers of America programs such as The Veterans Domiciliary at Wade Park, which provides homeless veterans with employment services, homeless prevention, counseling, mental health treatment and housing. Bob and Jennifer Iwan look through tee shirts at Salvation Army store on Biddulph Road in Brooklyn. In the wake of the Marie Kondo's "Tidying Up" series on Netflix, people have been cleaning out their homes, discarding things that do not "spark joy." As a result, donations to some thrift shops and second hand stores are increasing. Donations to faith-based and other thrift stores often benefit the organizations; social service programs. For the Salvation Army, it's alcohol/drug rehabilitation, individual and family shelter, crisis assistance and more. Lynn Ischay, The Plain Dealer In 2014, when Kondos book was released, Volunteers Of America shared some of her decluttering tips on the website tinyurl.com/yaoolsmw. Among the tips: rather than tidying and tossing a little a day, get rid of things in one fell swoop so you dont get caught up in the clutter. Goodwill Industries of Greater Cleveland and East Central reports a 15-percent increase in January, according to its preliminary data. "This is usually the time of year when our donations are light, and it picks up in the spring. So to be up 15 percent is a pretty big deal. And we can only attribute that to the Marie Kondo series,'' said Marureen Ater, Vice President Of Marketing and Development. We have no way to specifically track if its due to Marie Kondo, but weve definitely heard from our donors and customers that they are excited about her techniques, and as a result of the Kondo effect they are definitely donating more to Goodwill.'' Goodwill Industries of Greater Cleveland works closely with other nonprofit agencies as well as community businesses to prepare people for stable career options and, in turn, a more productive and sustainable way of life. For programs, the nonprofit relies on revenue from its retail stores. Roxana Avila processes donated books that will be for sale at Salvation Army store on Biddulph Road in Brooklyn. In the wake of the Marie Kondo's "Tidying Up" series on Netflix, people have been cleaning out their homes, discarding things - including books - that do not "spark joy." As a result, donations to some thrift shops and second hand stores are booming. Lynn Ischay, The Plain Dealer Major Van L. Wirth of the Salvation Army said he reached out to Great Cleveland Salvation Army store managers about donations. While some store managers have heard of Marie Kondo, no one felt or had been informed that more donations were coming into their stores specifically because of the book, Wirth said. Not to say that she has not had an impact. It is just that we are not aware that this has been a driving force. Donations support the faith-based social service programs that include alcohol/drug rehabilitation, individual and family shelter, crisis assistance and more. The National Council of Jewish Womens Thriftique Showroom in Warrensville Heights thus far hasnt experienced a KonMari-inspired donations deluge. We have seen a steady flow of donations, as we usually see in January, but nothing over and beyond that, said Vice President of Communications, Leslie Resnik. NCJW/Cleveland programs include assisting women, inspiring children and engaging at-risk teens, literacy and more. Joe Valente, owner of Flower Child on Clifton Boulevard and in Columbus, said donations are up, but for a couple of reasons. Yes, there definitely are more donations than before, he said. But it isnt just Marie Kondos influences. More babyboomers are selling or donating their parents things. Im getting phone calls from people say, I dont want this. Come get it. Jennifer Iwan of Cleveland checks out a small wooden chest in the housewares section of Salvation Army store on Biddulph Road in Brooklyn. Iwan says the she and her husband, Bob, are minimalists. Shedding unwanted items has taken on a whole new meaning thanks to organizing/decluttering guru Marie Kondo. In her book, The Life-Changing Magic of Tidying Up: The Japanese Art of Decluttering and Organizing, and her new Netflix series, Kondo espouses eliminating from ones life things that no longer spark joy. ing out their homes, discarding things that do not "spark joy." Its less is more on a spiritual level. Lynn Ischay, The Plain Dealer The Gathering Place in Beachwood and Westlake offer free programs and services that address the emotional, spiritual and social needs of people dealing with cancer in their lives. The organization lends support for individuals and families at the time of diagnosis, during treatment and after treatment has ended. The nonprofit organization has a warehouse thrift store in Warrensville Heights that helps finance these services. The warehouse is open to the public about once a month for a sale. Gently used furniture and home accessories are accepted. Cheryl Apisdorf, liason between The Gathering Place and the organizations warehouse, said they are seeing an uptick in donations. We do have lot of pickups, but its hard to know what to attribute it to, she added. At this time of year people are stuck in the house and looking at things they dont want anymore, or that they want to replace due to decorating. I think that has something to do with it. We are grateful for people who consider The Gathering Place Warehouse as a place for their household donations. Libraries in other cities are thanking Marie Kondo for inflated donations of books and other materials. Whether local donaters had Kondo in mind or not, Cleveland Public Library took in 10 percent more books during the past three months compared to the previous year, according to Chief Marketing & Communications Officer, Tana Peckham. How to donate How to donate to some of the area organizations mentioned above: | In her new Netflix series, "Tidying Up With Marie Kondo," Kondo espouses eliminating from one's life things that no longer "spark joy" In Greater Cleveland, some thrift stores have experienced a recent boost in donations that they attribute to Kondos influence. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.cleveland.com/metro/2019/02/are-marie-kondo-fans-sparking-joy-at-local-thrift-stores.html | 0.230855 |
Can Congress or the courts reverse Trump's national emergency? | (The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) Chris Edelson, American University School of Public Affairs (THE CONVERSATION) President Donald Trump declared a national emergency to pay for the construction of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, after Congress, in its new spending bill, denied him the full money to build it. Were talking about an invasion of our country with drugs, with human traffickers, with all types of criminals and gangs, Trump said in a speech on Feb. 15 before signing the declaration. Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi warned Trump against declaring a national emergency, saying that it set a precedent for future Democratic presidents to use that power. A number of liberal organizations have threatened to file challenges in court on the grounds that Trumps move is an abuse of power. As I explain in my book Emergency Presidential Power, presidents generally claim emergency power two ways: through inherent or implied authority under the U.S. Constitution or under statutory authority granted by Congress. Relying on the Constitution as a basis for emergency power is controversial, and less likely to stand up to meaningful congressional or judicial review. The U.S. Constitution says nothing specific about presidential emergency power: Presidents can only claim such authority is implied or inherent. The emergency powers the Constitution does describe are actually assigned to Congress. Congress has delegated some emergency powers to the president through statutes, including the National Emergencies Act. But Congress retains the power to reject a presidents declaration of a national emergency. Gaining congressional approval Since presidents lack any specific constitutional emergency power, they often find it necessary to gain congressional authorization. For instance, at the start of the Civil War, with Congress out of session, President Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and took other unilateral actions. He later sought and gained retroactive approval from Congress for these actions. This precedent of gaining congressional approval was put to the test nearly 100 years later. In 1952, President Harry Truman claimed emergency power to take control of steel factories during the Korean War in response to a labor strike. He invoked a very great inherent power to meet great national emergencies. Congress took no specific action to approve or disapprove, though a preexisting statute on the books weighed against Truman. When factory owners sued the administration, the Supreme Court, by a 6-3 vote, ruled against Truman in the famous Youngstown Sheet decision. Justice Robert H. Jacksons concurring opinion in that case has been especially influential and is often cited by legal scholars and judges. He outlined a three-part test to be used as a starting point in determining when presidential action is constitutionally permissible. Under Jacksons test, presidents are on the strongest possible footing when acting with congressional approval. In this case, Jackson said, Trumans position was weak since he was taking action that did not comply with the relevant legislative framework. In Jacksons view, Trumans reliance on inherent emergency power under the Constitution would dangerously concentrate power in the presidents hands, something the framers would not have wanted. Congresss role Jacksons opinion in Youngstown suggested that emergency power could be defined by Congress in statutes. Congress took up that suggestion with the National Emergencies Act of 1976. Though the act was designed to set limits on presidential power to declare national emergencies of indefinite length, it has ended up providing a largely unregulated way for presidents to take unilateral action. Congress has failed to fulfill its responsibilities under the law. The National Emergencies Act permits the president to declare a national emergency without congressional approval, triggering specific statutory powers that the president can use. For instance, presidents have used this law to impose economic sanctions against terrorists after 9/11 or regulate foreign ships in U.S. waters. Thirty-one emergency declarations are currently in effect under the statute. Congress can vote at any time to terminate a state of emergency, and is required by the statute to meet every six months while an emergency is in effect to consider whether it should continue. However, it has never voted on an emergency declared by a president or held meetings as required by the statute. Perhaps most importantly for Trump, the National Emergencies Act provides no criteria for deciding whether a national emergency exists. We know from history that presidents can contrive emergencies as a pretext for action. For example, in 1846 President James Polk falsely claimed that Mexico had spilled American blood on U.S. soil as a pretext for gaining a declaration of war from Congress. In 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt justified the decision to intern 110,000 Japanese-Americans without trial based on false claims that time was of the essence, and at least some Japanese-Americans were known to be disloyal. Although both of these examples pre-date the 1976 Act, they serve as cautionary tales about the wisdom of accepting at face value a presidents claim that an emergency exists. However, because the law now in effect provides no specific standards to define the existence of an emergency, courts might be inclined to defer to presidential discretion. It is far from clear that courts will strike down Trumps national emergency. By contrast, it would be straightforward for Congress to reverse a declaration of national emergency. The National Emergencies Act gives legislators authority to reject a presidential declaration of national emergency through simple legislation that would require majorities in the House and Senate. President Trump would presumably veto such action. Legislators would have the opportunity to override a presidential veto with a two-thirds majority vote. That of course would be no easy task in the current Congress. Because of the way the National Emergencies Act was drafted, Congress is better positioned to take action than the courts assuming enough members are moved to act. If Congress does nothing, then the law could become a vehicle for presidential abuse, especially because the acts language seems to grant the president broad discretion that could insulate an emergency declaration from legal challenge. All eyes should be on Congress. Editors note: This is an updated version of a story originally published Jan. 12, 2019. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here: http://theconversation.com/can-congress-or-the-courts-reverse-trumps-national-emergency-111939. | Chris Edelson: Can Congress or the courts reverse Trump's national emergency? He says presidents generally claim emergency power two ways: under the U.S. Constitution or under statutory authority granted by Congress. | ctrlsum | 1 | https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/article/Can-Congress-or-the-courts-reverse-Trump-s-13619708.php | 0.158537 |
Can Congress or the courts reverse Trump's national emergency? | (The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) Chris Edelson, American University School of Public Affairs (THE CONVERSATION) President Donald Trump declared a national emergency to pay for the construction of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, after Congress, in its new spending bill, denied him the full money to build it. Were talking about an invasion of our country with drugs, with human traffickers, with all types of criminals and gangs, Trump said in a speech on Feb. 15 before signing the declaration. Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi warned Trump against declaring a national emergency, saying that it set a precedent for future Democratic presidents to use that power. A number of liberal organizations have threatened to file challenges in court on the grounds that Trumps move is an abuse of power. As I explain in my book Emergency Presidential Power, presidents generally claim emergency power two ways: through inherent or implied authority under the U.S. Constitution or under statutory authority granted by Congress. Relying on the Constitution as a basis for emergency power is controversial, and less likely to stand up to meaningful congressional or judicial review. The U.S. Constitution says nothing specific about presidential emergency power: Presidents can only claim such authority is implied or inherent. The emergency powers the Constitution does describe are actually assigned to Congress. Congress has delegated some emergency powers to the president through statutes, including the National Emergencies Act. But Congress retains the power to reject a presidents declaration of a national emergency. Gaining congressional approval Since presidents lack any specific constitutional emergency power, they often find it necessary to gain congressional authorization. For instance, at the start of the Civil War, with Congress out of session, President Abraham Lincoln suspended habeas corpus and took other unilateral actions. He later sought and gained retroactive approval from Congress for these actions. This precedent of gaining congressional approval was put to the test nearly 100 years later. In 1952, President Harry Truman claimed emergency power to take control of steel factories during the Korean War in response to a labor strike. He invoked a very great inherent power to meet great national emergencies. Congress took no specific action to approve or disapprove, though a preexisting statute on the books weighed against Truman. When factory owners sued the administration, the Supreme Court, by a 6-3 vote, ruled against Truman in the famous Youngstown Sheet decision. Justice Robert H. Jacksons concurring opinion in that case has been especially influential and is often cited by legal scholars and judges. He outlined a three-part test to be used as a starting point in determining when presidential action is constitutionally permissible. Under Jacksons test, presidents are on the strongest possible footing when acting with congressional approval. In this case, Jackson said, Trumans position was weak since he was taking action that did not comply with the relevant legislative framework. In Jacksons view, Trumans reliance on inherent emergency power under the Constitution would dangerously concentrate power in the presidents hands, something the framers would not have wanted. Congresss role Jacksons opinion in Youngstown suggested that emergency power could be defined by Congress in statutes. Congress took up that suggestion with the National Emergencies Act of 1976. Though the act was designed to set limits on presidential power to declare national emergencies of indefinite length, it has ended up providing a largely unregulated way for presidents to take unilateral action. Congress has failed to fulfill its responsibilities under the law. The National Emergencies Act permits the president to declare a national emergency without congressional approval, triggering specific statutory powers that the president can use. For instance, presidents have used this law to impose economic sanctions against terrorists after 9/11 or regulate foreign ships in U.S. waters. Thirty-one emergency declarations are currently in effect under the statute. Congress can vote at any time to terminate a state of emergency, and is required by the statute to meet every six months while an emergency is in effect to consider whether it should continue. However, it has never voted on an emergency declared by a president or held meetings as required by the statute. Perhaps most importantly for Trump, the National Emergencies Act provides no criteria for deciding whether a national emergency exists. We know from history that presidents can contrive emergencies as a pretext for action. For example, in 1846 President James Polk falsely claimed that Mexico had spilled American blood on U.S. soil as a pretext for gaining a declaration of war from Congress. In 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt justified the decision to intern 110,000 Japanese-Americans without trial based on false claims that time was of the essence, and at least some Japanese-Americans were known to be disloyal. Although both of these examples pre-date the 1976 Act, they serve as cautionary tales about the wisdom of accepting at face value a presidents claim that an emergency exists. However, because the law now in effect provides no specific standards to define the existence of an emergency, courts might be inclined to defer to presidential discretion. It is far from clear that courts will strike down Trumps national emergency. By contrast, it would be straightforward for Congress to reverse a declaration of national emergency. The National Emergencies Act gives legislators authority to reject a presidential declaration of national emergency through simple legislation that would require majorities in the House and Senate. President Trump would presumably veto such action. Legislators would have the opportunity to override a presidential veto with a two-thirds majority vote. That of course would be no easy task in the current Congress. Because of the way the National Emergencies Act was drafted, Congress is better positioned to take action than the courts assuming enough members are moved to act. If Congress does nothing, then the law could become a vehicle for presidential abuse, especially because the acts language seems to grant the president broad discretion that could insulate an emergency declaration from legal challenge. All eyes should be on Congress. Editors note: This is an updated version of a story originally published Jan. 12, 2019. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here: http://theconversation.com/can-congress-or-the-courts-reverse-trumps-national-emergency-111939. | Chris Edelson: Can Congress or the courts reverse Trump's national emergency? He says presidents generally claim emergency power two ways: under the U.S. Constitution or under statutory authority granted by Congress. He says Congress has the power to reject a presidents declaration of a national emergency. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/article/Can-Congress-or-the-courts-reverse-Trump-s-13619708.php | 0.267809 |
Can passengers in a traffic stop refuse to give an officer their ID? | Arizona Department of Public Safety Trooper Robert Olshaskie makes a traffic stop on Interstate 17 on Friday, July 1, 2016, in Phoenix. (Photo11: Ben Moffat/The Republic) If you are a passenger in a car pulled over in Arizona, refusing to give an officer your ID does not automatically give the officer permission to drag out the traffic stop. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which oversees Arizona and several other western states, recently ruled that law enforcement cannot extend a traffic stop because a passenger refuses to give their identification, unless the officer has a reasonable suspicion the person has committed a crime. The traffic stop in Arizona Alfredo Landeros was sitting in the passenger seat of a car near the Pascua Yaqui Indian reservation near Tucson in 2016. According to court documents, a Pascua Yaqui police officer pulled over the car because it was going 11 miles over the speed limit. During his testimony, Officer Clinton Baker said he smelled alcohol, and thought the two women in the backseat were underage. The Pascua Yaqui Indian reservation has a curfew for minors. In addition to the driver, the officer asked for the identification of the women. He discovered the women were 21 and 19. According to his testimony, Baker said he did not believe Landeros was a minor. "Nonetheless, Officer Baker, in his own words, commanded Landeros to provide identification, the judge stated in court documents. Landeros refused to provide his ID. When officers continued to ask, he continued to refuse. The officers commanded him to exit the vehicle. Baker testified that after Landeros got out of the car, he noticed pocketknives, a machete and two open beer bottles near the passenger seat. Landeros was arrested on suspicion of possessing an open container of alcohol, failing to provide his full name and refusing to follow orders, according to court documents. He was never charged for having an open container. While Landeros was being searched, the officer found a smoking pipe and six bullets inside Landeross pockets. Nearly three months after his arrest, Landeros was indicted for possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. He entered a plea agreement and was sentenced to 405 days in prison and three years of supervised release. CLOSE Reporter Alia Beard Rau talks with Rep. Reginald Bolding, D-Laveen, about his plan to educate drivers about traffic stops. United States v. Landeros The Ninth Circuit addressed whether the police can extend a traffic stop and if law enforcement can require a non-driver to identify themselves. In it's opinion, the court stated that wanting a passenger's identification is not a part of the mission for a traffic stop. Things that are part of that mission include checking the driver's license, checking for proof of insurance and making sure the vehicle operates safely. Regardless of whether the first request for Landeross identification was lawful, law enforcements refusal to take no for an answer was not, Judge Marsha S. Berzon stated in court documents. Also, the court said Baker did not have a reasonable suspicion concerning Landeros, so therefore violated the passenger's Fourth Amendment right. The amendment protects a person from unreasonable seizures. The government argued the officer did have reasonable suspicion because of the smell of alcohol and the possible breaking of curfew, according to court documents. NEWSLETTERS Get the AZ Memo newsletter delivered to your inbox We're sorry, but something went wrong Get the pulse of Arizona -- Local news, in-depth state coverage and what it all means for you Please try again soon, or contact Customer Service at 1-800-332-6733. Delivery: Mon-Fri Invalid email address Thank you! You're almost signed up for AZ Memo Keep an eye out for an email to confirm your newsletter registration. More newsletters However, the court said it was not reasonable because Baker did not believe Landeros was underage and because the officer said he asked for his ID because he thought it was procedure. Also, Berzon stated in court documents that knowing Landeros's name would not have made the officers safer and making the stop longer could actually put their safety more at risk. Tempe criminal defense attorney Russ Richelsoph offered some tips for traffic stops in Arizona. During a stop, a passenger should be quiet and let the driver to talk with the officer. According to Richelsoph, some officers may ask for everyone's identifications to check for warrants. Drivers are required to provide an ID because they need to prove they can drive in the state. "Passengers are not required to produce this information," Richelsoph said. If the officer asks for identification and the passenger doesn't want to provide it, they can say, "I'm not legally required to identify myself to you," Richelsoph said. MORE: Lawmakers: Officers need more disability training However, Richelsoph advised that people not get into arguments with officers on the side of the road, especially about legal matters. People can assert their rights by not wanting to answer questions without a lawyer, but should do so in a polite way. Traffic stops are stressful for officers, who don't know what they may be walking into, he said. He advised those in the car try to keep the officer as comfortable as possible to help ensure the situation doesn't escalate. Reach the reporter at Lauren.Castle@gannett.com. Follow her on Twitter: @Lauren_Castle. Click here to subscribe to azcentral.com. Read or Share this story: https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona/2019/02/16/court-appeals-9th-circuit-weighs-arizona-passenger-rights-police-officer-traffic-stop-id/2842139002/ | Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that law enforcement cannot extend a traffic stop because a passenger refuses to give their ID. | ctrlsum | 0 | https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona/2019/02/16/court-appeals-9th-circuit-weighs-arizona-passenger-rights-police-officer-traffic-stop-id/2842139002/ | 0.341927 |
Can passengers in a traffic stop refuse to give an officer their ID? | Arizona Department of Public Safety Trooper Robert Olshaskie makes a traffic stop on Interstate 17 on Friday, July 1, 2016, in Phoenix. (Photo11: Ben Moffat/The Republic) If you are a passenger in a car pulled over in Arizona, refusing to give an officer your ID does not automatically give the officer permission to drag out the traffic stop. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which oversees Arizona and several other western states, recently ruled that law enforcement cannot extend a traffic stop because a passenger refuses to give their identification, unless the officer has a reasonable suspicion the person has committed a crime. The traffic stop in Arizona Alfredo Landeros was sitting in the passenger seat of a car near the Pascua Yaqui Indian reservation near Tucson in 2016. According to court documents, a Pascua Yaqui police officer pulled over the car because it was going 11 miles over the speed limit. During his testimony, Officer Clinton Baker said he smelled alcohol, and thought the two women in the backseat were underage. The Pascua Yaqui Indian reservation has a curfew for minors. In addition to the driver, the officer asked for the identification of the women. He discovered the women were 21 and 19. According to his testimony, Baker said he did not believe Landeros was a minor. "Nonetheless, Officer Baker, in his own words, commanded Landeros to provide identification, the judge stated in court documents. Landeros refused to provide his ID. When officers continued to ask, he continued to refuse. The officers commanded him to exit the vehicle. Baker testified that after Landeros got out of the car, he noticed pocketknives, a machete and two open beer bottles near the passenger seat. Landeros was arrested on suspicion of possessing an open container of alcohol, failing to provide his full name and refusing to follow orders, according to court documents. He was never charged for having an open container. While Landeros was being searched, the officer found a smoking pipe and six bullets inside Landeross pockets. Nearly three months after his arrest, Landeros was indicted for possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. He entered a plea agreement and was sentenced to 405 days in prison and three years of supervised release. CLOSE Reporter Alia Beard Rau talks with Rep. Reginald Bolding, D-Laveen, about his plan to educate drivers about traffic stops. United States v. Landeros The Ninth Circuit addressed whether the police can extend a traffic stop and if law enforcement can require a non-driver to identify themselves. In it's opinion, the court stated that wanting a passenger's identification is not a part of the mission for a traffic stop. Things that are part of that mission include checking the driver's license, checking for proof of insurance and making sure the vehicle operates safely. Regardless of whether the first request for Landeross identification was lawful, law enforcements refusal to take no for an answer was not, Judge Marsha S. Berzon stated in court documents. Also, the court said Baker did not have a reasonable suspicion concerning Landeros, so therefore violated the passenger's Fourth Amendment right. The amendment protects a person from unreasonable seizures. The government argued the officer did have reasonable suspicion because of the smell of alcohol and the possible breaking of curfew, according to court documents. NEWSLETTERS Get the AZ Memo newsletter delivered to your inbox We're sorry, but something went wrong Get the pulse of Arizona -- Local news, in-depth state coverage and what it all means for you Please try again soon, or contact Customer Service at 1-800-332-6733. Delivery: Mon-Fri Invalid email address Thank you! You're almost signed up for AZ Memo Keep an eye out for an email to confirm your newsletter registration. More newsletters However, the court said it was not reasonable because Baker did not believe Landeros was underage and because the officer said he asked for his ID because he thought it was procedure. Also, Berzon stated in court documents that knowing Landeros's name would not have made the officers safer and making the stop longer could actually put their safety more at risk. Tempe criminal defense attorney Russ Richelsoph offered some tips for traffic stops in Arizona. During a stop, a passenger should be quiet and let the driver to talk with the officer. According to Richelsoph, some officers may ask for everyone's identifications to check for warrants. Drivers are required to provide an ID because they need to prove they can drive in the state. "Passengers are not required to produce this information," Richelsoph said. If the officer asks for identification and the passenger doesn't want to provide it, they can say, "I'm not legally required to identify myself to you," Richelsoph said. MORE: Lawmakers: Officers need more disability training However, Richelsoph advised that people not get into arguments with officers on the side of the road, especially about legal matters. People can assert their rights by not wanting to answer questions without a lawyer, but should do so in a polite way. Traffic stops are stressful for officers, who don't know what they may be walking into, he said. He advised those in the car try to keep the officer as comfortable as possible to help ensure the situation doesn't escalate. Reach the reporter at Lauren.Castle@gannett.com. Follow her on Twitter: @Lauren_Castle. Click here to subscribe to azcentral.com. Read or Share this story: https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona/2019/02/16/court-appeals-9th-circuit-weighs-arizona-passenger-rights-police-officer-traffic-stop-id/2842139002/ | Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that law enforcement cannot extend a traffic stop because a passenger refuses to give their ID. A man in Arizona was arrested for refusing to give his ID. | ctrlsum | 1 | https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona/2019/02/16/court-appeals-9th-circuit-weighs-arizona-passenger-rights-police-officer-traffic-stop-id/2842139002/ | 0.389809 |
Can passengers in a traffic stop refuse to give an officer their ID? | Arizona Department of Public Safety Trooper Robert Olshaskie makes a traffic stop on Interstate 17 on Friday, July 1, 2016, in Phoenix. (Photo11: Ben Moffat/The Republic) If you are a passenger in a car pulled over in Arizona, refusing to give an officer your ID does not automatically give the officer permission to drag out the traffic stop. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which oversees Arizona and several other western states, recently ruled that law enforcement cannot extend a traffic stop because a passenger refuses to give their identification, unless the officer has a reasonable suspicion the person has committed a crime. The traffic stop in Arizona Alfredo Landeros was sitting in the passenger seat of a car near the Pascua Yaqui Indian reservation near Tucson in 2016. According to court documents, a Pascua Yaqui police officer pulled over the car because it was going 11 miles over the speed limit. During his testimony, Officer Clinton Baker said he smelled alcohol, and thought the two women in the backseat were underage. The Pascua Yaqui Indian reservation has a curfew for minors. In addition to the driver, the officer asked for the identification of the women. He discovered the women were 21 and 19. According to his testimony, Baker said he did not believe Landeros was a minor. "Nonetheless, Officer Baker, in his own words, commanded Landeros to provide identification, the judge stated in court documents. Landeros refused to provide his ID. When officers continued to ask, he continued to refuse. The officers commanded him to exit the vehicle. Baker testified that after Landeros got out of the car, he noticed pocketknives, a machete and two open beer bottles near the passenger seat. Landeros was arrested on suspicion of possessing an open container of alcohol, failing to provide his full name and refusing to follow orders, according to court documents. He was never charged for having an open container. While Landeros was being searched, the officer found a smoking pipe and six bullets inside Landeross pockets. Nearly three months after his arrest, Landeros was indicted for possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. He entered a plea agreement and was sentenced to 405 days in prison and three years of supervised release. CLOSE Reporter Alia Beard Rau talks with Rep. Reginald Bolding, D-Laveen, about his plan to educate drivers about traffic stops. United States v. Landeros The Ninth Circuit addressed whether the police can extend a traffic stop and if law enforcement can require a non-driver to identify themselves. In it's opinion, the court stated that wanting a passenger's identification is not a part of the mission for a traffic stop. Things that are part of that mission include checking the driver's license, checking for proof of insurance and making sure the vehicle operates safely. Regardless of whether the first request for Landeross identification was lawful, law enforcements refusal to take no for an answer was not, Judge Marsha S. Berzon stated in court documents. Also, the court said Baker did not have a reasonable suspicion concerning Landeros, so therefore violated the passenger's Fourth Amendment right. The amendment protects a person from unreasonable seizures. The government argued the officer did have reasonable suspicion because of the smell of alcohol and the possible breaking of curfew, according to court documents. NEWSLETTERS Get the AZ Memo newsletter delivered to your inbox We're sorry, but something went wrong Get the pulse of Arizona -- Local news, in-depth state coverage and what it all means for you Please try again soon, or contact Customer Service at 1-800-332-6733. Delivery: Mon-Fri Invalid email address Thank you! You're almost signed up for AZ Memo Keep an eye out for an email to confirm your newsletter registration. More newsletters However, the court said it was not reasonable because Baker did not believe Landeros was underage and because the officer said he asked for his ID because he thought it was procedure. Also, Berzon stated in court documents that knowing Landeros's name would not have made the officers safer and making the stop longer could actually put their safety more at risk. Tempe criminal defense attorney Russ Richelsoph offered some tips for traffic stops in Arizona. During a stop, a passenger should be quiet and let the driver to talk with the officer. According to Richelsoph, some officers may ask for everyone's identifications to check for warrants. Drivers are required to provide an ID because they need to prove they can drive in the state. "Passengers are not required to produce this information," Richelsoph said. If the officer asks for identification and the passenger doesn't want to provide it, they can say, "I'm not legally required to identify myself to you," Richelsoph said. MORE: Lawmakers: Officers need more disability training However, Richelsoph advised that people not get into arguments with officers on the side of the road, especially about legal matters. People can assert their rights by not wanting to answer questions without a lawyer, but should do so in a polite way. Traffic stops are stressful for officers, who don't know what they may be walking into, he said. He advised those in the car try to keep the officer as comfortable as possible to help ensure the situation doesn't escalate. Reach the reporter at Lauren.Castle@gannett.com. Follow her on Twitter: @Lauren_Castle. Click here to subscribe to azcentral.com. Read or Share this story: https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona/2019/02/16/court-appeals-9th-circuit-weighs-arizona-passenger-rights-police-officer-traffic-stop-id/2842139002/ | Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that law enforcement cannot extend a traffic stop because a passenger refuses to give their ID. A man in Arizona was arrested for refusing to give his ID. The court said the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion concerning Landeros, so therefore violated his Fourth Amendment right. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona/2019/02/16/court-appeals-9th-circuit-weighs-arizona-passenger-rights-police-officer-traffic-stop-id/2842139002/ | 0.4686 |
Is Danaher Stock Still a Good Investment? | Danaher (NYSE: DHR) has a reputation as a go-to industrial stock in times of trouble. In other words, it's the sort of stock that you want to hold in a slowdown. Indeed, its combination of medical-focused businesses and industrial businesses with secular growth prospects (such as water quality and environmental solutions) means it has a defensive quality lacking in many other industrial stocks. Let's take a look. Defensive end markets Danaher stock isn't cheap, but no one said you can buy high-quality companies at bargain prices. The investment thesis behind the stock is based on the defensive nature of its end markets, which means the stock should command a premium to reflect its ability to generate growth in any business cycle. A man considering buying or selling a stock. More Image source: Getty Images. As you can see below, the company currently generates the overwhelming majority of its earnings from relatively defensive sources such as life sciences, diagnostics, dental, and environmental solutions. Danaher's operating profit in 2018 More Data source: Danaher Corporation presentations. The defensive nature of these businesses was further confirmed during the recent fourth-quarter earnings call. Whereas other companies are seeing slowing growth in China, Danaher's CEO Tom Joyce said: " We are not seeing anything specific that we could point to today that is impacting our businesses in China." In fact, Danaher's double-digit revenue growth in China was "the eighth consecutive quarter -- or, better said, the second straight year of double-digit growth for us in China," according to Joyce. He went on to outline that Danaher's exposure to industrial end markets is "probably less than 10% of Danaher wide today." And finally, Danaher's segment performance in the last recession shows how well its life sciences and diagnostics segments held up under very difficult circumstances. The near- and mid-term outlook A quick look at Danaher's core revenue growth trends by segment shows ongoing growth at the three most important segments -- the underperforming dental segment is set to be spun off in 2019 -- and the return to organic growth in the fourth quarter is very welcome. | Danaher stock isn't cheap, but no one said you can buy high-quality companies at bargain prices. The investment thesis behind the stock is based on the defensive nature of its end markets. | pegasus | 1 | https://news.yahoo.com/danaher-stock-still-good-investment-131700939.html | 0.122041 |
Is Danaher Stock Still a Good Investment? | Danaher (NYSE: DHR) has a reputation as a go-to industrial stock in times of trouble. In other words, it's the sort of stock that you want to hold in a slowdown. Indeed, its combination of medical-focused businesses and industrial businesses with secular growth prospects (such as water quality and environmental solutions) means it has a defensive quality lacking in many other industrial stocks. Let's take a look. Defensive end markets Danaher stock isn't cheap, but no one said you can buy high-quality companies at bargain prices. The investment thesis behind the stock is based on the defensive nature of its end markets, which means the stock should command a premium to reflect its ability to generate growth in any business cycle. A man considering buying or selling a stock. More Image source: Getty Images. As you can see below, the company currently generates the overwhelming majority of its earnings from relatively defensive sources such as life sciences, diagnostics, dental, and environmental solutions. Danaher's operating profit in 2018 More Data source: Danaher Corporation presentations. The defensive nature of these businesses was further confirmed during the recent fourth-quarter earnings call. Whereas other companies are seeing slowing growth in China, Danaher's CEO Tom Joyce said: " We are not seeing anything specific that we could point to today that is impacting our businesses in China." In fact, Danaher's double-digit revenue growth in China was "the eighth consecutive quarter -- or, better said, the second straight year of double-digit growth for us in China," according to Joyce. He went on to outline that Danaher's exposure to industrial end markets is "probably less than 10% of Danaher wide today." And finally, Danaher's segment performance in the last recession shows how well its life sciences and diagnostics segments held up under very difficult circumstances. The near- and mid-term outlook A quick look at Danaher's core revenue growth trends by segment shows ongoing growth at the three most important segments -- the underperforming dental segment is set to be spun off in 2019 -- and the return to organic growth in the fourth quarter is very welcome. | Danaher (NYSE: DHR) has a reputation as a go-to industrial stock in times of trouble. Its combination of medical-focused businesses and industrial businesses with secular growth prospects means it has a defensive quality lacking in many other industrial stocks. The investment thesis behind the stock is based on the defensive nature of its end markets. | bart | 2 | https://news.yahoo.com/danaher-stock-still-good-investment-131700939.html | 0.142438 |
Is honey vegan? | By Jessie Blaeser Vegans do not eat any animal byproducts -- no meat, no dairy, no eggs. But when it comes to honey, there's a bit of a gray area. Bees make honey and store it in honeycombs as a future food source, and beekeepers extract excess honey for consumers. Some vegans feel that raw honey is acceptable, as long as it was harvested humanely. Others say that honey is an animal byproduct and is therefore off-limits. PERSPECTIVES For some vegans, this comes down to one things: bees are animals. If the bees make the honey, the honey itself is an animal byproduct, making it off-limits. Plus, taking the bees' honey is exploitive. According to Your Daily Vegan: Vegans avoid honey and bee products because bees make them. This avoidance makes sense. Vegans avoid animal products, and a bee is an animal. Others argue that if the reason to abstain from honey is the exploitation of bees or accidental bee deaths that occur during the honey-collection process, then there are many more foods vegans should eliminate from their diets. According to ThoughtCo's Doris Lin: There are, however, some self-described vegans who do eat honey and argue that insects are killed in other types of agriculture, so they are reluctant to draw the line at honey. Pure vegans point out the line between intentional exploitation and incidental killings, and beekeeping falls into the former category. Beekeepers are also known to clip the queen bee's wings in order to control bee populations. Some vegans see this practice as inhumane. To prevent the queen bee from leaving the hive, honey industry sometimes cut off her wings. #DigOutYourSoul #vegan pic.twitter.com/4IwvVbr5Ni -- RightsForAnimals [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] (@No2Speciesism1) January 17, 2019 But some vegans worry that by eliminating honey from their diet, the vegan movement will seem too extreme to the masses, preventing potential newcomers from joining the ethics-based diet. ThoughtCo's Lin looks to Michael Greger, M.D, one of the leaders of the animal rights movement, for insight: He's also concerned that over-zealous vegans will turn off a lot of potential new vegans because it makes our movement look radical if even bees (bugs) are considered sacred. The Tylt is focused on debates and conversations around news, current events and pop culture. We provide our community with the opportunity to share their opinions and vote on topics that matter most to them. We actively engage the community and present meaningful data on the debates and conversations as they progress. The Tylt is a place where your opinion counts, literally. The Tylt is an Advance Local Media, LLC property. Join us on Twitter @TheTylt, on Instagram @TheTylt or on Facebook, we'd love to hear what you have to say. | Some vegans feel that raw honey is acceptable, as long as it was harvested humanely. Others say that honey is an animal byproduct and is therefore off-limits. Pure vegans point out the line between intentional exploitation and incidental killings. | bart | 1 | https://www.nola.com/interact/2019/02/is_honey_vegan.html | 0.260498 |
Is honey vegan? | By Jessie Blaeser Vegans do not eat any animal byproducts -- no meat, no dairy, no eggs. But when it comes to honey, there's a bit of a gray area. Bees make honey and store it in honeycombs as a future food source, and beekeepers extract excess honey for consumers. Some vegans feel that raw honey is acceptable, as long as it was harvested humanely. Others say that honey is an animal byproduct and is therefore off-limits. PERSPECTIVES For some vegans, this comes down to one things: bees are animals. If the bees make the honey, the honey itself is an animal byproduct, making it off-limits. Plus, taking the bees' honey is exploitive. According to Your Daily Vegan: Vegans avoid honey and bee products because bees make them. This avoidance makes sense. Vegans avoid animal products, and a bee is an animal. Others argue that if the reason to abstain from honey is the exploitation of bees or accidental bee deaths that occur during the honey-collection process, then there are many more foods vegans should eliminate from their diets. According to ThoughtCo's Doris Lin: There are, however, some self-described vegans who do eat honey and argue that insects are killed in other types of agriculture, so they are reluctant to draw the line at honey. Pure vegans point out the line between intentional exploitation and incidental killings, and beekeeping falls into the former category. Beekeepers are also known to clip the queen bee's wings in order to control bee populations. Some vegans see this practice as inhumane. To prevent the queen bee from leaving the hive, honey industry sometimes cut off her wings. #DigOutYourSoul #vegan pic.twitter.com/4IwvVbr5Ni -- RightsForAnimals [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] (@No2Speciesism1) January 17, 2019 But some vegans worry that by eliminating honey from their diet, the vegan movement will seem too extreme to the masses, preventing potential newcomers from joining the ethics-based diet. ThoughtCo's Lin looks to Michael Greger, M.D, one of the leaders of the animal rights movement, for insight: He's also concerned that over-zealous vegans will turn off a lot of potential new vegans because it makes our movement look radical if even bees (bugs) are considered sacred. The Tylt is focused on debates and conversations around news, current events and pop culture. We provide our community with the opportunity to share their opinions and vote on topics that matter most to them. We actively engage the community and present meaningful data on the debates and conversations as they progress. The Tylt is a place where your opinion counts, literally. The Tylt is an Advance Local Media, LLC property. Join us on Twitter @TheTylt, on Instagram @TheTylt or on Facebook, we'd love to hear what you have to say. | Vegans do not eat any animal byproducts -- no meat, no dairy, no eggs -- but when it comes to honey, there's a bit of a gray area. Some vegans feel that raw honey is acceptable, as long as it was harvested humanely. Others say that honey is an animal byproduct and is therefore off-limits. | pegasus | 2 | https://www.nola.com/interact/2019/02/is_honey_vegan.html | 0.332614 |
Could Thunder be a blueprint for post-Anthony Davis Pelicans? | The New Orleans Pelicans might have seen a glimpse of their future Thursday night. They still have to deal with this awkward Anthony Davis situation for the next two months, but once the Pelicans end the saga and trade the superstar in the offseason, their best chance to be successful might be to imitate the Oklahoma City Thunder. The Pelicans losing Davis and the Thunder losing Kevin Durant is not an apples-to-apples comparison by any means, but if Oklahoma City could so quickly overcome losing one of the best players in the NBA, perhaps New Orleans could, too. When Durant left in free agency in July 2016 to sign with the Warriors, the Thunder obviously had the benefit of having Russell Westbrook, who already was one of the best players in the league and had proven capable of carrying the team. I think the one thing is when Kevin left, I think it takes a special individual like a Russell Westbrook, whos got an enormous amount of confidence and belief in the organization (and) in himself, Thunder coach Billy Donovan said Thursday, noting how young the team became after Durant left. A lot of guys are looking for some direction, and when you have a player like Russell who can provide that kind of direction for the group and can kind of stabilize the group, that really, really helps, and I think that during that time, Russell was probably a very, very key component in that. The question for the Pelicans is whether or not Jrue Holiday can provide that same leadership in the Davis aftermath. Anthony Davis suffered muscle contusion in shoulder: source Westbrook is certainly a better player than Holiday, but Holiday has proven he can play as well on a given night as just about anyone in the league. Holiday showed that again Thursday when he contributed 32 points, seven assists, five rebounds, three blocks, two steals and played stellar defensively against Paul George in the Pelicans 131-122 victory at the Smoothie King Center. Hes scrappy, and he takes pride in his defense not a lot of guys do, George said of Holiday. I have the utmost respect for his approach, how he defends and wants to play defense. When the Pelicans eventually trade Davis, the apple of their eye should be a young player with potential to become a superstar, whether its Bostons Jayson Tatum or a high draft pick. Either way, Holiday is going to have to be the leader of the team and help the new players adjust quickly if the Pelicans hope to compete in the high-powered Western Conference. The Thunder made it to the postseason in 2017, the first season after Durants exit. Their top three players were Westbrook, Steven Adams and Victor Oladipo, whom they acquired in a trade before Durant signed with the Warriors. In addition to Holiday, the Pelicans next year will have Julius Randle, a skilled but flawed big man like Adams although Randle thrives offensively while Adams does his best work on defense. If the Pelicans can find a talented third piece in their Davis trade, either on Oladipos 2016-17 level or better, and improve the role players on the roster, they could be competitive immediately next season. After that 2016-17 season in which the Thunder lost in the first round of the playoffs, they traded Oladipo for Paul George and suffered the same fate despite the upgrade. Still, theyre on track to make the postseason again this year, and if New Orleans somehow manages to go to the playoffs three straight years after losing Davis, after all of the drama and poor roster construction under Dell Demps, it would be an incredible feat. The Pelicans beat the Thunder on Thursday with Davis playing 16 first-half minutes and then leaving the Smoothie King Center in the second half. The performances of Holiday and Randle (33 points, 11 rebounds and six assists) are indicative of what the future could hold, and if the Pelicans can extract appropriate value in their big offseason trade, perhaps life after Davis wont be as moribund as some expect. Anthony Davis, Rich Paul lit the torch for the Pelicans dumpster fire | Oklahoma City Thunder beat New Orleans Pelicans 131-122 Thursday night. Thunder's success after losing Kevin Durant could be a blueprint for Pelicans. | ctrlsum | 0 | https://www.nola.com/pelicans/2019/02/could-thunder-be-a-blueprint-for-post-anthony-davis-pelicans.html | 0.290813 |
Could Thunder be a blueprint for post-Anthony Davis Pelicans? | The New Orleans Pelicans might have seen a glimpse of their future Thursday night. They still have to deal with this awkward Anthony Davis situation for the next two months, but once the Pelicans end the saga and trade the superstar in the offseason, their best chance to be successful might be to imitate the Oklahoma City Thunder. The Pelicans losing Davis and the Thunder losing Kevin Durant is not an apples-to-apples comparison by any means, but if Oklahoma City could so quickly overcome losing one of the best players in the NBA, perhaps New Orleans could, too. When Durant left in free agency in July 2016 to sign with the Warriors, the Thunder obviously had the benefit of having Russell Westbrook, who already was one of the best players in the league and had proven capable of carrying the team. I think the one thing is when Kevin left, I think it takes a special individual like a Russell Westbrook, whos got an enormous amount of confidence and belief in the organization (and) in himself, Thunder coach Billy Donovan said Thursday, noting how young the team became after Durant left. A lot of guys are looking for some direction, and when you have a player like Russell who can provide that kind of direction for the group and can kind of stabilize the group, that really, really helps, and I think that during that time, Russell was probably a very, very key component in that. The question for the Pelicans is whether or not Jrue Holiday can provide that same leadership in the Davis aftermath. Anthony Davis suffered muscle contusion in shoulder: source Westbrook is certainly a better player than Holiday, but Holiday has proven he can play as well on a given night as just about anyone in the league. Holiday showed that again Thursday when he contributed 32 points, seven assists, five rebounds, three blocks, two steals and played stellar defensively against Paul George in the Pelicans 131-122 victory at the Smoothie King Center. Hes scrappy, and he takes pride in his defense not a lot of guys do, George said of Holiday. I have the utmost respect for his approach, how he defends and wants to play defense. When the Pelicans eventually trade Davis, the apple of their eye should be a young player with potential to become a superstar, whether its Bostons Jayson Tatum or a high draft pick. Either way, Holiday is going to have to be the leader of the team and help the new players adjust quickly if the Pelicans hope to compete in the high-powered Western Conference. The Thunder made it to the postseason in 2017, the first season after Durants exit. Their top three players were Westbrook, Steven Adams and Victor Oladipo, whom they acquired in a trade before Durant signed with the Warriors. In addition to Holiday, the Pelicans next year will have Julius Randle, a skilled but flawed big man like Adams although Randle thrives offensively while Adams does his best work on defense. If the Pelicans can find a talented third piece in their Davis trade, either on Oladipos 2016-17 level or better, and improve the role players on the roster, they could be competitive immediately next season. After that 2016-17 season in which the Thunder lost in the first round of the playoffs, they traded Oladipo for Paul George and suffered the same fate despite the upgrade. Still, theyre on track to make the postseason again this year, and if New Orleans somehow manages to go to the playoffs three straight years after losing Davis, after all of the drama and poor roster construction under Dell Demps, it would be an incredible feat. The Pelicans beat the Thunder on Thursday with Davis playing 16 first-half minutes and then leaving the Smoothie King Center in the second half. The performances of Holiday and Randle (33 points, 11 rebounds and six assists) are indicative of what the future could hold, and if the Pelicans can extract appropriate value in their big offseason trade, perhaps life after Davis wont be as moribund as some expect. Anthony Davis, Rich Paul lit the torch for the Pelicans dumpster fire | Oklahoma City Thunder beat New Orleans Pelicans 131-122 Thursday night. Thunder's success after losing Kevin Durant could be a blueprint for Pelicans. Pelicans must find a talented third player to replace Anthony Davis. | ctrlsum | 1 | https://www.nola.com/pelicans/2019/02/could-thunder-be-a-blueprint-for-post-anthony-davis-pelicans.html | 0.499928 |
Could Thunder be a blueprint for post-Anthony Davis Pelicans? | The New Orleans Pelicans might have seen a glimpse of their future Thursday night. They still have to deal with this awkward Anthony Davis situation for the next two months, but once the Pelicans end the saga and trade the superstar in the offseason, their best chance to be successful might be to imitate the Oklahoma City Thunder. The Pelicans losing Davis and the Thunder losing Kevin Durant is not an apples-to-apples comparison by any means, but if Oklahoma City could so quickly overcome losing one of the best players in the NBA, perhaps New Orleans could, too. When Durant left in free agency in July 2016 to sign with the Warriors, the Thunder obviously had the benefit of having Russell Westbrook, who already was one of the best players in the league and had proven capable of carrying the team. I think the one thing is when Kevin left, I think it takes a special individual like a Russell Westbrook, whos got an enormous amount of confidence and belief in the organization (and) in himself, Thunder coach Billy Donovan said Thursday, noting how young the team became after Durant left. A lot of guys are looking for some direction, and when you have a player like Russell who can provide that kind of direction for the group and can kind of stabilize the group, that really, really helps, and I think that during that time, Russell was probably a very, very key component in that. The question for the Pelicans is whether or not Jrue Holiday can provide that same leadership in the Davis aftermath. Anthony Davis suffered muscle contusion in shoulder: source Westbrook is certainly a better player than Holiday, but Holiday has proven he can play as well on a given night as just about anyone in the league. Holiday showed that again Thursday when he contributed 32 points, seven assists, five rebounds, three blocks, two steals and played stellar defensively against Paul George in the Pelicans 131-122 victory at the Smoothie King Center. Hes scrappy, and he takes pride in his defense not a lot of guys do, George said of Holiday. I have the utmost respect for his approach, how he defends and wants to play defense. When the Pelicans eventually trade Davis, the apple of their eye should be a young player with potential to become a superstar, whether its Bostons Jayson Tatum or a high draft pick. Either way, Holiday is going to have to be the leader of the team and help the new players adjust quickly if the Pelicans hope to compete in the high-powered Western Conference. The Thunder made it to the postseason in 2017, the first season after Durants exit. Their top three players were Westbrook, Steven Adams and Victor Oladipo, whom they acquired in a trade before Durant signed with the Warriors. In addition to Holiday, the Pelicans next year will have Julius Randle, a skilled but flawed big man like Adams although Randle thrives offensively while Adams does his best work on defense. If the Pelicans can find a talented third piece in their Davis trade, either on Oladipos 2016-17 level or better, and improve the role players on the roster, they could be competitive immediately next season. After that 2016-17 season in which the Thunder lost in the first round of the playoffs, they traded Oladipo for Paul George and suffered the same fate despite the upgrade. Still, theyre on track to make the postseason again this year, and if New Orleans somehow manages to go to the playoffs three straight years after losing Davis, after all of the drama and poor roster construction under Dell Demps, it would be an incredible feat. The Pelicans beat the Thunder on Thursday with Davis playing 16 first-half minutes and then leaving the Smoothie King Center in the second half. The performances of Holiday and Randle (33 points, 11 rebounds and six assists) are indicative of what the future could hold, and if the Pelicans can extract appropriate value in their big offseason trade, perhaps life after Davis wont be as moribund as some expect. Anthony Davis, Rich Paul lit the torch for the Pelicans dumpster fire | Oklahoma City Thunder beat New Orleans Pelicans 131-122 on Thursday night. Thunder's success after losing Kevin Durant could be a blueprint for Pelicans. Pelicans must find a talented third player to replace Anthony Davis in the offseason, and improve role players on the roster, to compete immediately. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.nola.com/pelicans/2019/02/could-thunder-be-a-blueprint-for-post-anthony-davis-pelicans.html | 0.596005 |
Why Is Bank OZK (OZK) Up 19.2% Since Last Earnings Report? | Bank OZK (OZK) reported earnings 30 days ago. We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues. It has been about a month since the last earnings report for Bank OZK (OZK). Shares have added about 19.2% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. Bank OZK Q4 Earnings & Revenues Beat, Costs Flare Up Bank OZKs fourth-quarter 2018 earnings per share of 89 cents surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 83 cents. The figure, however, compares unfavorably with the prior-year tally of $1.14. The year-ago number included adjustment related to the implementation of the tax act. Results primarily benefited from an improvement in net interest income. Loan and deposit balances displayed improvement. However, lower non-interest income, and higher expenses and provisions were the undermining factors. Net income available to common shareholders was $115 million, down 21.3% from the year-ago quarter. Earnings per share for 2018 came in at $3.24, down 3.3% from the prior year. Net income available to common shareholders was $417.1 million, down 1.1% from 2017. Figures of both the years included certain nonrecurring items. Revenues Improve, Costs Soar Net revenues for the fourth quarter came in at $255.9 million, up nearly 4.4% year over year. The top line also handily outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $246.08 million. Net revenues for 2018 came in at $999.2 million, up nearly 6.2% year over year. The revenue figure also beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $989.46 million. Net interest income for the quarter grew 6.3% year over year to $228.4 million. However, net interest margin, on a fully-taxable equivalent basis, shrunk 17 basis points (bps) to 4.55%. Non-interest income totaled $27.6 million, down 8.8% from the year-ago quarter. The fall mainly reflects the companys exit from mortgage-lending operation and decrease in bank service charges on deposits primarily due to the Durbin Amendments impact on the banks interchange revenues. Non-interest expenses were $94.9 million, up 10.1% year over year. The upsurge resulted from a rise in most of the expense components except professional and outside services, ATM expense, FDIC and state assessments, and advertising and public relations. Bank OZKs efficiency ratio was 36.9% compared with 34.82% in the prior-year quarter. A rise in efficiency ratio indicates lower profitability. Rise in Loans & Deposits As of Dec 31, 2018, total loans were $17.11 billion, up 6.7% from the year-ago quarter. As of the same date, total deposits grew 4.3% from the prior-year quarter end to $17.94 billion. Furthermore, the company had total assets of $22.39 billion compared to $21.28 billion in the prior-year quarter and shareholders equity was $3.77 billion compared to $3.45 billion in the year ago quarter. Credit Quality Worsens In the fourth quarter, Bank OZK incurred combined net charge-offs (NCOs) of $45.5 million on two Real Estate Specialties Group credits, which had been in its portfolio over more than a decade. Notably, these were previously classified as substandard. This was the primary reason for deterioration of the companys asset quality during 2018. The ratio of non-performing loans, as a percentage of total loans, expanded 13 bps year over year to 0.23% as of Dec 31, 2018. Additionally, annualized NCO ratio to average total loans rose 2 bps year over year to 0.07%. In addition, provision for loan and lease losses jumped significantly from the year-earlier quarter to $7.27 million. Profitability Ratios Deteriorate At the end of the reported quarter, return on average assets was 2.04%, down from 2.81% in the year-earlier quarter. Moreover, return on average common equity declined to 12.36% from 17.23% a year ago. Outlook Bank OZK expects non-purchased loans and leases to grow in the low to mid-teens in 2019. However, growth may vary quarter to quarter and on the current expectations of economic conditions, competitive environment and other factors. RESG loan repayments are expected to remain high in 2019. Despite repayments headwinds, 2019 non-purchased loan growth is projected to be better than 2018 level. The company expects its core spread to decrease in some quarters in 2019. Also, it expects factors such as the Feds decision to hike rates and movement in LIBOR rates to affect spread. Management expects first-quarter 2019 non-interest expenses to be higher on account of annual salary adjustments, increase in employee count and health insurance premiums. The company expects the effective tax rate to be 24-26% in 2019. | Bank OZK (OZK) reported earnings 30 days ago. Shares have added about 19.2% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Results primarily benefited from an improvement in net interest income. | bart | 1 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-bank-ozk-ozk-19-143002077.html | 0.37542 |
Why Is Bank OZK (OZK) Up 19.2% Since Last Earnings Report? | Bank OZK (OZK) reported earnings 30 days ago. We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues. It has been about a month since the last earnings report for Bank OZK (OZK). Shares have added about 19.2% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. Bank OZK Q4 Earnings & Revenues Beat, Costs Flare Up Bank OZKs fourth-quarter 2018 earnings per share of 89 cents surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 83 cents. The figure, however, compares unfavorably with the prior-year tally of $1.14. The year-ago number included adjustment related to the implementation of the tax act. Results primarily benefited from an improvement in net interest income. Loan and deposit balances displayed improvement. However, lower non-interest income, and higher expenses and provisions were the undermining factors. Net income available to common shareholders was $115 million, down 21.3% from the year-ago quarter. Earnings per share for 2018 came in at $3.24, down 3.3% from the prior year. Net income available to common shareholders was $417.1 million, down 1.1% from 2017. Figures of both the years included certain nonrecurring items. Revenues Improve, Costs Soar Net revenues for the fourth quarter came in at $255.9 million, up nearly 4.4% year over year. The top line also handily outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $246.08 million. Net revenues for 2018 came in at $999.2 million, up nearly 6.2% year over year. The revenue figure also beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $989.46 million. Net interest income for the quarter grew 6.3% year over year to $228.4 million. However, net interest margin, on a fully-taxable equivalent basis, shrunk 17 basis points (bps) to 4.55%. Non-interest income totaled $27.6 million, down 8.8% from the year-ago quarter. The fall mainly reflects the companys exit from mortgage-lending operation and decrease in bank service charges on deposits primarily due to the Durbin Amendments impact on the banks interchange revenues. Non-interest expenses were $94.9 million, up 10.1% year over year. The upsurge resulted from a rise in most of the expense components except professional and outside services, ATM expense, FDIC and state assessments, and advertising and public relations. Bank OZKs efficiency ratio was 36.9% compared with 34.82% in the prior-year quarter. A rise in efficiency ratio indicates lower profitability. Rise in Loans & Deposits As of Dec 31, 2018, total loans were $17.11 billion, up 6.7% from the year-ago quarter. As of the same date, total deposits grew 4.3% from the prior-year quarter end to $17.94 billion. Furthermore, the company had total assets of $22.39 billion compared to $21.28 billion in the prior-year quarter and shareholders equity was $3.77 billion compared to $3.45 billion in the year ago quarter. Credit Quality Worsens In the fourth quarter, Bank OZK incurred combined net charge-offs (NCOs) of $45.5 million on two Real Estate Specialties Group credits, which had been in its portfolio over more than a decade. Notably, these were previously classified as substandard. This was the primary reason for deterioration of the companys asset quality during 2018. The ratio of non-performing loans, as a percentage of total loans, expanded 13 bps year over year to 0.23% as of Dec 31, 2018. Additionally, annualized NCO ratio to average total loans rose 2 bps year over year to 0.07%. In addition, provision for loan and lease losses jumped significantly from the year-earlier quarter to $7.27 million. Profitability Ratios Deteriorate At the end of the reported quarter, return on average assets was 2.04%, down from 2.81% in the year-earlier quarter. Moreover, return on average common equity declined to 12.36% from 17.23% a year ago. Outlook Bank OZK expects non-purchased loans and leases to grow in the low to mid-teens in 2019. However, growth may vary quarter to quarter and on the current expectations of economic conditions, competitive environment and other factors. RESG loan repayments are expected to remain high in 2019. Despite repayments headwinds, 2019 non-purchased loan growth is projected to be better than 2018 level. The company expects its core spread to decrease in some quarters in 2019. Also, it expects factors such as the Feds decision to hike rates and movement in LIBOR rates to affect spread. Management expects first-quarter 2019 non-interest expenses to be higher on account of annual salary adjustments, increase in employee count and health insurance premiums. The company expects the effective tax rate to be 24-26% in 2019. | Bank OZK (OZK) reported earnings 30 days ago. Shares have added about 19.2% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Results primarily benefited from an improvement in net interest income. Lower non-interest income, and higher expenses and provisions were the undermining factors. | bart | 2 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-bank-ozk-ozk-19-143002077.html | 0.545083 |
Why Is M&T Bank (MTB) Up 5.6% Since Last Earnings Report? | M&T Bank (MTB) reported earnings 30 days ago. We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues. A month has gone by since the last earnings report for M&T Bank (MTB). Shares have added about 5.6% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. M&T Bank Q4 Earnings Beat Estimates, Expenses Rise M&T Bank reported net operating earnings of $3.79 per share in fourth-quarter 2018, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.51. Also, the bottom line improved 85.8% year over year. The company recorded rise in net interest income with support from margin expansion and loan growth. However, deterioration of credit quality and higher expenses were some negative factors. Also, fall in deposit balances was a headwind. Net operating income came in at $550.2 million, up around 68.4% from $326.7 million recorded in year-ago quarter. On a GAAP basis, M&T Banks fourth-quarter earnings per share of $3.76 jumped 87% year over year. Net income soared 69.6% to $546 million. For full-year 2018, the bank reported net operating earnings of $1.94 billion or $12.86 per share, up from $1.43 billion or $8.82 per share in the prior year. Revenues Increase, Loans Climb, Expenses Rise For 2018, the bank reported revenues of $5.95 billion, up 4.9% from the previous year. Also, it outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $5.89 billion. M&T Banks revenues came in at $1.54 billion, comparing favorably with the year-ago figure of $1.46 billion. Also, it surpassed the Zacks consensus estimate of $1.50 billion. Taxable-equivalent net interest income increased 9% year over year to $1.07 billion in the quarter, driven by higher net interest margin, partly offset by lower average earning assets. Furthermore, net interest margin expanded 36 basis points (bps) to 3.92%. The companys non-interest income came in at $481 million compared with $484 million in the year-ago quarter. Lower gain on bank investment securities and mortgage banking revenues were partially offset by higher trust, brokerage services and other income. Non-interest expenses were $802.2 million, up nearly 1% from the prior-year quarter. Excluding certain non-operating items, non-interest operating expenses came in at $797 million, rising 1%. The rise was attributable to higher salaries and employee benefits expenses in the recent quarter, partially offset by lower charitable contributions and FDIC assessments. Efficiency ratio came in at 51.7%, down from 54.7% in the prior-year quarter. Lower ratio indicates rise in profitability. Loans and leases, net of unearned discount, rose 1% year over year to $86.5 billion at the end of the reported quarter. However, total deposits declined 2.4% to $90.2 billion. M&T Bank's net operating income highlighted an annualized rate of return on average tangible assets and average tangible common shareholder equity of 1.93% and 22.16%, respectively, compared with 1.12% and 11.77% recorded in the prior-year quarter. Credit Quality Deteriorates Provision for credit losses rose 22.6% year over year to $38 million. Also, net charge-offs of loans came in at $38 million, up 40.7%. The ratio of non-accrual loans to total net loans was 1.01%, up 1 bp. Non-performing assets increased 1.4% year over year to $972 million. Capital Position M&T Banks estimated Common Equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets under regulatory capital rules were around 10.13%. Tangible equity per share came in at $69.28, up 0.3% year over year from $69.08. Share Repurchase During the December-end quarter, M&T Bank repurchased a total of 3.06 million shares of its common stock for a total cost of $500 million. Outlook for 2019 Management expects continued runoff of the residential real estate portfolio mostly at low double-digits. In 2019, average total loans are likely to grow on a full-year basis at a low single-digit pace. Further, the company expects to exceed this pace if C&I portfolio continues to grow like in fourth-quarter 2018 and slowdown in paydown continues. Management foresees slight benefit to NIM in case Fed doesnt announces further rate hikes. However, better upside is expected if the Fed continues to raise interest rates in 2019. | M&T Bank (MTB) reported earnings 30 days ago. Shares have added about 5.6% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. The company recorded rise in net interest income with support from margin expansion and loan growth. However, deterioration of credit quality and higher expenses were some negative factors. | bart | 2 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-m-t-bank-mtb-143002792.html | 0.491303 |
Why Is Morgan Stanley (MS) Down 1.3% Since Last Earnings Report? | A month has gone by since the last earnings report for Morgan Stanley (MS). Shares have lost about 1.3% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important drivers. Morgan Stanleys Q4 Earnings & Revenues Lag on Trading Woe Weak trading and underwriting performance affected Morgan Stanleys fourth-quarter 2018 adjusted earnings of 73 cents per share, which lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 90 cents. The figure also reflected 13% decline from the prior-year quarter. Dismal underwriting (both equity and fixed income) revenues (down 25%) and fixed income trading revenues (down 30%) hurt Morgan Stanleys quarterly results. Additionally, net interest income recorded a fall. However, stable equity trading income and improvement in advisory revenues (up 41%) acted as tailwinds. Further, operating expenses witnessed a decline. Also, the companys capital ratios remained strong. Net income applicable to Morgan Stanley was $1.53 billion, up substantially from $643 million in the prior-year quarter. In 2018, adjusted earnings of $4.61 per share missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $4.86. However, the figure was up 28% year over year. Net income applicable to Morgan Stanley was $8.74 billion, up 43%. Trading, Investment Banking Hurt Revenues, Costs Down Net revenues amounted to $8.54 billion, a decline of 10% from the prior-year quarter. In addition, the top line lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $9.44 billion. In 2018, net revenues rose 6% year over year to $40.11 billion. However, it marginally missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $40.99 billion. Net interest income was $989 million, down 1% from the year-ago quarter. This was largely due to a rise in interest expenses, partially offset by higher interest income. Total non-interest revenues of $7.56 billion fell 11% year over year, primarily due to dismal investment banking and trading performance. Total non-interest expenses were $6.69 billion, down 5% year over year. Quarterly Segmental Performance Disappoints Institutional Securities: Pre-tax income from continuing operations was $780 million, decreasing 37% year over year. Net revenues of $3.84 billion fell 15%. The decline was mainly due to lower trading income and underwriting revenues. Wealth Management: Pre-tax income from continuing operations totaled $1.1 billion, down 12% on a year-over-year basis. Net revenues were $4.14 billion, decreasing 6% due to a decline in transactional revenues, partly offset by higher asset management revenues and net interest income. Investment Management: Pre-tax income from continuing operations was $74 million, down 8% from the year-ago quarter. Net revenues were $684 million, up 5%. The increase was mainly driven by higher asset management fees, partially offset by fall in investment revenues. As of Dec 31, 2018, total assets under management or supervision were $463 billion, down 4% on a year-over-year basis. Strong Capital Position As of Dec 31, 2018, book value per share was $42.20, up from $38.52 as of Dec 31, 2017. Tangible book value per share was $36.99, up from $33.46 a year ago. Morgan Stanleys Tier 1 capital ratio Advanced (Fully Phased-in) was 19.4% compared with 19.3% in the year-ago quarter. Tier 1 common equity ratio Advanced (Fully Phased-in) was 17.0% compared with 16.9% a year ago. Share Repurchase Update During the reported quarter, Morgan Stanley bought back around 27 million shares for nearly $1.2 billion. This was part of the company's 2018 capital plan. In the past month, investors have witnessed a downward trend in fresh estimates. VGM Scores Currently, Morgan Stanley has an average Growth Score of C, though it is lagging a bit on the Momentum Score front with a D. However, the stock was allocated a grade of B on the value side, putting it in the top 40% for this investment strategy. Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of C. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in. | Shares of Morgan Stanley (MS) have lost about 1.3% since the last earnings report. Morgan Stanley missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $4.61 per share. | ctrlsum | 1 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-morgan-stanley-ms-down-143002251.html | 0.39193 |
Why Is Morgan Stanley (MS) Down 1.3% Since Last Earnings Report? | A month has gone by since the last earnings report for Morgan Stanley (MS). Shares have lost about 1.3% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important drivers. Morgan Stanleys Q4 Earnings & Revenues Lag on Trading Woe Weak trading and underwriting performance affected Morgan Stanleys fourth-quarter 2018 adjusted earnings of 73 cents per share, which lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 90 cents. The figure also reflected 13% decline from the prior-year quarter. Dismal underwriting (both equity and fixed income) revenues (down 25%) and fixed income trading revenues (down 30%) hurt Morgan Stanleys quarterly results. Additionally, net interest income recorded a fall. However, stable equity trading income and improvement in advisory revenues (up 41%) acted as tailwinds. Further, operating expenses witnessed a decline. Also, the companys capital ratios remained strong. Net income applicable to Morgan Stanley was $1.53 billion, up substantially from $643 million in the prior-year quarter. In 2018, adjusted earnings of $4.61 per share missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $4.86. However, the figure was up 28% year over year. Net income applicable to Morgan Stanley was $8.74 billion, up 43%. Trading, Investment Banking Hurt Revenues, Costs Down Net revenues amounted to $8.54 billion, a decline of 10% from the prior-year quarter. In addition, the top line lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $9.44 billion. In 2018, net revenues rose 6% year over year to $40.11 billion. However, it marginally missed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $40.99 billion. Net interest income was $989 million, down 1% from the year-ago quarter. This was largely due to a rise in interest expenses, partially offset by higher interest income. Total non-interest revenues of $7.56 billion fell 11% year over year, primarily due to dismal investment banking and trading performance. Total non-interest expenses were $6.69 billion, down 5% year over year. Quarterly Segmental Performance Disappoints Institutional Securities: Pre-tax income from continuing operations was $780 million, decreasing 37% year over year. Net revenues of $3.84 billion fell 15%. The decline was mainly due to lower trading income and underwriting revenues. Wealth Management: Pre-tax income from continuing operations totaled $1.1 billion, down 12% on a year-over-year basis. Net revenues were $4.14 billion, decreasing 6% due to a decline in transactional revenues, partly offset by higher asset management revenues and net interest income. Investment Management: Pre-tax income from continuing operations was $74 million, down 8% from the year-ago quarter. Net revenues were $684 million, up 5%. The increase was mainly driven by higher asset management fees, partially offset by fall in investment revenues. As of Dec 31, 2018, total assets under management or supervision were $463 billion, down 4% on a year-over-year basis. Strong Capital Position As of Dec 31, 2018, book value per share was $42.20, up from $38.52 as of Dec 31, 2017. Tangible book value per share was $36.99, up from $33.46 a year ago. Morgan Stanleys Tier 1 capital ratio Advanced (Fully Phased-in) was 19.4% compared with 19.3% in the year-ago quarter. Tier 1 common equity ratio Advanced (Fully Phased-in) was 17.0% compared with 16.9% a year ago. Share Repurchase Update During the reported quarter, Morgan Stanley bought back around 27 million shares for nearly $1.2 billion. This was part of the company's 2018 capital plan. In the past month, investors have witnessed a downward trend in fresh estimates. VGM Scores Currently, Morgan Stanley has an average Growth Score of C, though it is lagging a bit on the Momentum Score front with a D. However, the stock was allocated a grade of B on the value side, putting it in the top 40% for this investment strategy. Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of C. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in. | Shares of Morgan Stanley (MS) have lost about 1.3% since the last earnings report. Morgan Stanley's fourth-quarter 2018 adjusted earnings of 73 cents per share lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 90 cents. The companys capital ratios remained strong. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-morgan-stanley-ms-down-143002251.html | 0.190712 |
Why Is Signature Bank (SBNY) Up 10.2% Since Last Earnings Report? | A month has gone by since the last earnings report for Signature Bank (SBNY). Shares have added about 10.2% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at the most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. Signature Bank's Q4 Earnings Beat on High Revenues Signature Banks fourth-quarter 2018 earnings per share of $2.94 surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.79. Further, the bottom line compares favorably with $2.11 earned in the prior-year quarter. Results reflected overall growth in revenues. In addition, loan and deposit balances displayed continued improvement. Moreover, lower provisions acted as tailwinds. However, rise in expenses was a drag. Net income for the fourth quarter was $160.8 million compared with $114.9 million recorded in the year-ago quarter. For full-year 2018, earnings per share were $9.23 per share, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $9.10. Further, the figure compares favorably with $7.12 per share earned in the prior year. Rise in Revenues Partially Offset by Higher Expenses For full-year 2018, the company reported revenues of $1.32 billion, up around 3.8% year over year. Moreover, the revenue figure surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.31 billion. Signature Banks total revenues in the quarter rose 3.9% from the prior-year quarter to $341 million. Also, the top line surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $331.5 million. Net interest income increased 4.8% year over year to $335 million backed by rise in average interest earning assets. However, net interest margin contracted 17 basis points to 2.90%. Non-interest income was $5.9 million, down nearly 30.3% year over year. The decline was primarily on account of an increase in tax credit investment amortization. Non-interest expenses of $119.2 million were up 8.4% from the prior-year quarter. The rise was primarily a result of the addition of private client banking teams, and an increase in costs in risk management and compliance-related activities. Efficiency ratio was 34.94% compared with 33.50% reported as of Dec 31, 2017. Higher ratio indicates fall in profitability. The companys loans and leases, net as of Dec 31, 2018, were $36.2 billion, up 11.7% from Dec 31, 2017. Further, total deposits rose 8.8% from 2017 end to $36.4 billion. Credit Quality: A Mixed Bag The company recorded net recoveries of $2.9 million in the quarter against net-charge offs of $38.8 million in the prior-year quarter. In addition, provision for loan and lease losses declined 84.6% to $6.4 million. However, the allowance for loan losses represented 0.63% of total loans as of Dec 31, 2018, compared with 0.60% as of Dec 31, 2017. Capital Ratios As of Dec 31, 2018, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 12.09% compared with 11.99% as of Dec 31, 2017. Further, total risk-based capital ratio was 13.39% compared with 13.32% in the prior-year quarter. Tangible common equity ratio was 9.21%, down from 9.29% as of Dec 31, 2017. Return on average assets was 1.37% in the reported quarter compared with 1.08% in the prior-year quarter. As of Dec 31, 2018, return on average common stockholders' equity was 14.76%, up from 11.44% as of Dec 31, 2017. During the reported quarter, the company repurchased 358,492 shares of common stock for a total cost of $41.8 million. Outlook NIM is expected to contract 2-4 bps in first-quarter 2019. Management expects the tax rate to be around 25%. Management anticipates balance sheet to be up in the range of $3-$5 billion in 2019. Increase in loans is expected to contribute to 75% of total assets growth. Growth in commercial and industrial loans is expected in 2019. In the past month, investors have witnessed an upward trend in fresh estimates. VGM Scores At this time, Signature Bank has a subpar Growth Score of D, however its Momentum Score is doing a lot better with a B. Following the exact same course, the stock was allocated a grade of B on the value side, putting it in the second quintile for this investment strategy. | Shares of Signature Bank (SBNY) have added about 10.2% since the last earnings report. Q4 Earnings Beat on High Revenues, But Rise in Expenses Partially Offset by Higher Expenses. | ctrlsum | 1 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-signature-bank-sbny-10-143002644.html | 0.443101 |
Why Is Signature Bank (SBNY) Up 10.2% Since Last Earnings Report? | A month has gone by since the last earnings report for Signature Bank (SBNY). Shares have added about 10.2% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at the most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. Signature Bank's Q4 Earnings Beat on High Revenues Signature Banks fourth-quarter 2018 earnings per share of $2.94 surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2.79. Further, the bottom line compares favorably with $2.11 earned in the prior-year quarter. Results reflected overall growth in revenues. In addition, loan and deposit balances displayed continued improvement. Moreover, lower provisions acted as tailwinds. However, rise in expenses was a drag. Net income for the fourth quarter was $160.8 million compared with $114.9 million recorded in the year-ago quarter. For full-year 2018, earnings per share were $9.23 per share, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $9.10. Further, the figure compares favorably with $7.12 per share earned in the prior year. Rise in Revenues Partially Offset by Higher Expenses For full-year 2018, the company reported revenues of $1.32 billion, up around 3.8% year over year. Moreover, the revenue figure surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.31 billion. Signature Banks total revenues in the quarter rose 3.9% from the prior-year quarter to $341 million. Also, the top line surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $331.5 million. Net interest income increased 4.8% year over year to $335 million backed by rise in average interest earning assets. However, net interest margin contracted 17 basis points to 2.90%. Non-interest income was $5.9 million, down nearly 30.3% year over year. The decline was primarily on account of an increase in tax credit investment amortization. Non-interest expenses of $119.2 million were up 8.4% from the prior-year quarter. The rise was primarily a result of the addition of private client banking teams, and an increase in costs in risk management and compliance-related activities. Efficiency ratio was 34.94% compared with 33.50% reported as of Dec 31, 2017. Higher ratio indicates fall in profitability. The companys loans and leases, net as of Dec 31, 2018, were $36.2 billion, up 11.7% from Dec 31, 2017. Further, total deposits rose 8.8% from 2017 end to $36.4 billion. Credit Quality: A Mixed Bag The company recorded net recoveries of $2.9 million in the quarter against net-charge offs of $38.8 million in the prior-year quarter. In addition, provision for loan and lease losses declined 84.6% to $6.4 million. However, the allowance for loan losses represented 0.63% of total loans as of Dec 31, 2018, compared with 0.60% as of Dec 31, 2017. Capital Ratios As of Dec 31, 2018, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 12.09% compared with 11.99% as of Dec 31, 2017. Further, total risk-based capital ratio was 13.39% compared with 13.32% in the prior-year quarter. Tangible common equity ratio was 9.21%, down from 9.29% as of Dec 31, 2017. Return on average assets was 1.37% in the reported quarter compared with 1.08% in the prior-year quarter. As of Dec 31, 2018, return on average common stockholders' equity was 14.76%, up from 11.44% as of Dec 31, 2017. During the reported quarter, the company repurchased 358,492 shares of common stock for a total cost of $41.8 million. Outlook NIM is expected to contract 2-4 bps in first-quarter 2019. Management expects the tax rate to be around 25%. Management anticipates balance sheet to be up in the range of $3-$5 billion in 2019. Increase in loans is expected to contribute to 75% of total assets growth. Growth in commercial and industrial loans is expected in 2019. In the past month, investors have witnessed an upward trend in fresh estimates. VGM Scores At this time, Signature Bank has a subpar Growth Score of D, however its Momentum Score is doing a lot better with a B. Following the exact same course, the stock was allocated a grade of B on the value side, putting it in the second quintile for this investment strategy. | Shares of Signature Bank (SBNY) have added about 10.2% since the last earnings report. The bank's fourth-quarter 2018 earnings per share of $2.94 surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.79. The company's full-year 2018 earnings were $9.23 per share. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-signature-bank-sbny-10-143002644.html | 0.121649 |
Why Is KeyCorp (KEY) Up 7.2% Since Last Earnings Report? | A month has gone by since the last earnings report for KeyCorp (KEY). Shares have added about 7.2% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. KeyCorp Q4 Earnings Top as Revenues Rise, Costs Fall KeyCorps fourth-quarter 2018 adjusted earnings of 48 cents per share surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by a penny. Also, the figure compared favorably with earnings of 36 cents recorded in the prior-year quarter. Improvement in net interest income and a decline in expenses drove the results. Further, loans and deposits witnessed growth and capital ratios improved. However, higher provision for credit losses and a decrease in fee income were the undermining factors. After taking into consideration certain non-recurring items, net income from continuing operations was $459 million or 45 cents per share, up from $181 million or 17 cents per share in the prior-year quarter. In 2018, earnings of $1.70 per share increased 51.7% year over year. Net income from continuing operations (GAAP basis) was $1.79 billion, up 47.1% from the prior year. Revenues Improve, Expenses Decline Total revenues in the reported quarter were up 2.8% year over year to $1.65 billion. Also, the figure beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.63 billion. In 2018, total revenues were $6.46 billion, up 2.3% year over year. However, the figure surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $6.41 billion. Tax-equivalent net interest income increased 5.9% year over year to $1 billion. This included $23 million of purchase accounting accretion. Also, taxable-equivalent net interest margin from continuing operations increased 7 bps year over year to 3.16%. Non-interest income was $645 million, reflecting a fall of 1.7% from the year-ago quarter. The decline was mainly due to lower cards and payments income, trust and investment services income and investment banking and debt placement fees. Non-interest expenses decreased 7.8% year over year to $1.01 billion. The decline was due to a fall in both personnel costs and non-personnel expenses. Loans & Deposits Rise At the end of the fourth quarter, average total deposits were $108 billion, up 2.2% from the prior quarter. Average total loans were $89.3 billion, up nearly 1% on a sequential basis. Credit Quality Worsens Net loan charge-offs, as a percentage of average loans, increased 3 bps year over year to 0.27%. Provision for credit losses increased 20.4% to $59 million. Further, KeyCorps allowance for loan and lease losses was $883 million, up marginally from the prior-year quarter. Also, non-performing assets, as a percentage of period-end portfolio loans, other real estate owned properties assets and other nonperforming assets were 0.64%, up 2 bps year over year. Capital Ratios Improve KeyCorp's tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio was 8.30% as of Dec 31, 2018, up from 8.23% as of Dec 31, 2017. Also, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 11.07%, up from 11.01% as of Dec 31, 2017. The companys estimated Basel III Common Equity Tier 1 ratio was 9.92% at the end of the quarter. Share Repurchases During the reported quarter, KeyCorp repurchased $278 million worth of shares as part of its 2018 capital plan. 2019 Outlook (includes impact of Laurel Road acquisition) Management expects average loans to be in the range of $90-$91 billion, up from 2018-level. Further, average deposits are expected increase year over year and be in the range of $108-$109 billion. NII (FTE basis) is anticipated to remain relatively stable or increase marginally to the $4-$4.1 billion range. This is based on the assumption of no interest rate hikes this year. NIM is expected to remain relatively stable with the 2018 level. Similarly, non-interest income is also expected to remain relatively stable or increase marginally to the range of $2.5-$2.6 billion. The rise is expected to be driven by growth in most of its core fee-based businesses, with growth in investment banking and debt placement business to continue. On cost front, non-interest expenses are expected to be in the range of $3.85-$3.95 billion (includes realization of $200 million of cost savings in second half of 2019). Notably, the outlook includes the impact of the Laurel Road acquisition, which adds roughly $50 million to the range. Further, the company targets to achieve cash efficiency ratio of 54-56% by the second half. NCOs rate is expected to be lower than the target range of 40-60 bps. Also, provisions are anticipated to increase marginally and exceed NCOs, given the loan growth. The effective tax rate (GAAP basis) is likely to be 18-19%. | KeyCorps fourth-quarter 2018 adjusted earnings of 48 cents per share surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by a penny. Improvement in net interest income and a decline in expenses drove the results. Shares have added about 7.2% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. | bart | 2 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-keycorp-key-7-2-143002912.html | 0.191956 |
Why Is JB Hunt (JBHT) Up 13.7% Since Last Earnings Report? | A month has gone by since the last earnings report for JB Hunt (JBHT). Shares have added about 13.7% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. J.B. Hunt's Q4 Earnings & Revenues Beat Estimates The companys earnings (excluding 96 cents from non-recurring items) of $1.77 per share outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.48. However, increased costs associated with the ongoing arbitration with BNSF Railway Company hurt the bottom line. Total operating revenues increased 16.5% year over year to $2,317.84 million and beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2,297.8 million. The upside can be attributed to strong segmental performance. Additionally, operating income decreased 15.8% to $122.74 million (on a reported basis) due to costs associated with rail purchase transportation. Also, operating ratio (operating expenses as a percentage of revenues) deteriorated to 94.7% from 92.7% in the prior-year quarter due to 19% rise in operating expenses from the year-ago quarters tally. Notably, effective tax rate increased to 20.5% sequentially in the quarter under discussion from 20.4% in the third quarter of 2018. Segmental Performance The Intermodal (JBI) division reported quarterly revenues of $1.26 billion, up 15% year over year. However, load volumes in the segment dipped 1%. Revenue per load excluding fuel surcharge revenues climbed 15% on a year-over-year basis. Operating income plunged 65% year over year, due to increased costs stemming from service delays and congestion. Dedicated Contract Services (DCS) revenues rallied 25% year over year to $596 million. The company added 458 trucks to the fleet during the fourth quarter, while customer retention rates were above 98%. Operating income surged 70% year over year to $59.4 million due to addition of new trucks and increased productivity. Integrated Capacity Solutions (ICS) revenues increased 7% year over year to $345 million. Revenue per load declined 6.4% year over year due to customer mix changes and reduced spot market activity compared with the year-ago quarters level. Meanwhile, volumes improved 14% year over year. The segment delivered an operating income of $16.1 million, up 43% year over year owing to higher gross profit margin. Truck (JBT) revenues improved 21% year over year to $118 million. At the end of the fourth quarter, J.B. Hunt operated 2,112 tractors compared with 2,032 in the year-ago quarter. Trailers fell to 6,800 in the period compared with 7,120 a year ago. Operating income soared 131% to $14.7 million, courtesy of favorable factors like higher rates per loaded mile and lower equipment ownership costs. Liquidity The company exited 2018 with cash and cash equivalents of $7.6 million compared with $14.61 million at the end of 2017. Long-term debt was $898.4 million compared with $1.09 billion at 2017-end. Net capital expenditures for 2018 totaled $885 million compared with $511 million in 2017. 2019 Outlook Capex for 2019 is estimated to be around $200 million less than the 2018 level. J.B. Hunt expects to allocate a major portion of Capex spending toward DCS and JBI segments and spend around $50 million for technological improvement in digital platforms. In the past month, investors have witnessed a downward trend in fresh estimates. VGM Scores Currently, JB Hunt has a great Growth Score of A, though it is lagging a lot on the Momentum Score front with an F. However, the stock was allocated a grade of B on the value side, putting it in the second quintile for this investment strategy. Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of B. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in. Outlook Estimates have been broadly trending downward for the stock, and the magnitude of this revision indicates a downward shift. Notably, JB Hunt has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). We expect an in-line return from the stock in the next few months. Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) : Free Stock Analysis Report To read this article on Zacks.com click here. | Shares of JB Hunt (JBHT) have added about 13.7% since the last earnings report. The company reported quarterly revenues of $1.26 billion, up 15% year over year. | ctrlsum | 1 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-jb-hunt-jbht-13-143002867.html | 0.355229 |
Why Is JB Hunt (JBHT) Up 13.7% Since Last Earnings Report? | A month has gone by since the last earnings report for JB Hunt (JBHT). Shares have added about 13.7% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. J.B. Hunt's Q4 Earnings & Revenues Beat Estimates The companys earnings (excluding 96 cents from non-recurring items) of $1.77 per share outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.48. However, increased costs associated with the ongoing arbitration with BNSF Railway Company hurt the bottom line. Total operating revenues increased 16.5% year over year to $2,317.84 million and beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $2,297.8 million. The upside can be attributed to strong segmental performance. Additionally, operating income decreased 15.8% to $122.74 million (on a reported basis) due to costs associated with rail purchase transportation. Also, operating ratio (operating expenses as a percentage of revenues) deteriorated to 94.7% from 92.7% in the prior-year quarter due to 19% rise in operating expenses from the year-ago quarters tally. Notably, effective tax rate increased to 20.5% sequentially in the quarter under discussion from 20.4% in the third quarter of 2018. Segmental Performance The Intermodal (JBI) division reported quarterly revenues of $1.26 billion, up 15% year over year. However, load volumes in the segment dipped 1%. Revenue per load excluding fuel surcharge revenues climbed 15% on a year-over-year basis. Operating income plunged 65% year over year, due to increased costs stemming from service delays and congestion. Dedicated Contract Services (DCS) revenues rallied 25% year over year to $596 million. The company added 458 trucks to the fleet during the fourth quarter, while customer retention rates were above 98%. Operating income surged 70% year over year to $59.4 million due to addition of new trucks and increased productivity. Integrated Capacity Solutions (ICS) revenues increased 7% year over year to $345 million. Revenue per load declined 6.4% year over year due to customer mix changes and reduced spot market activity compared with the year-ago quarters level. Meanwhile, volumes improved 14% year over year. The segment delivered an operating income of $16.1 million, up 43% year over year owing to higher gross profit margin. Truck (JBT) revenues improved 21% year over year to $118 million. At the end of the fourth quarter, J.B. Hunt operated 2,112 tractors compared with 2,032 in the year-ago quarter. Trailers fell to 6,800 in the period compared with 7,120 a year ago. Operating income soared 131% to $14.7 million, courtesy of favorable factors like higher rates per loaded mile and lower equipment ownership costs. Liquidity The company exited 2018 with cash and cash equivalents of $7.6 million compared with $14.61 million at the end of 2017. Long-term debt was $898.4 million compared with $1.09 billion at 2017-end. Net capital expenditures for 2018 totaled $885 million compared with $511 million in 2017. 2019 Outlook Capex for 2019 is estimated to be around $200 million less than the 2018 level. J.B. Hunt expects to allocate a major portion of Capex spending toward DCS and JBI segments and spend around $50 million for technological improvement in digital platforms. In the past month, investors have witnessed a downward trend in fresh estimates. VGM Scores Currently, JB Hunt has a great Growth Score of A, though it is lagging a lot on the Momentum Score front with an F. However, the stock was allocated a grade of B on the value side, putting it in the second quintile for this investment strategy. Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of B. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in. Outlook Estimates have been broadly trending downward for the stock, and the magnitude of this revision indicates a downward shift. Notably, JB Hunt has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). We expect an in-line return from the stock in the next few months. Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) : Free Stock Analysis Report To read this article on Zacks.com click here. | JB Hunt's Q4 Earnings & Revenues Beat Estimates. Shares have added about 13.7% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Total operating revenues increased 16.5% year over year to $2,317.84 million. The upside can be attributed to strong segmental performance. | bart | 2 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-jb-hunt-jbht-13-143002867.html | 0.386279 |
Why Is MGIC (MTG) Up 12.5% Since Last Earnings Report? | MGIC (MTG) reported earnings 30 days ago. We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues. A month has gone by since the last earnings report for MGIC Investment (MTG). Shares have added about 12.5% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. MGIC Investment Q4 Earnings Beat, Revenues Up Y/Y MGIC Investment reported fourth-quarter 2018 operating net income per share of 42 cents, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 13.5%. However, the bottom line declined 2.3% year over year. The quarter witnessed favorable operating environment including better employment, wage growth, higher housing demand and lower credit losses of recently written business. Operational Update MGIC Investment recorded total operating revenues of $285.9 million, increasing 5.5% year over year on higher net investment income (up 19.7%) and higher premiums earned (up 3.5%). Net premiums earned increased on higher average insurance in force and a decrease in ceded premiums during the quarter, partially offset by the effect of lower premium rates. Net investment income increased on higher yields. New insurance written was $14.2 billion, down 4.7% year over year. Net underwriting and other expenses totaled $50 million, up 14.2% year over year attributable to higher compensation and other expenses. Total loss and expenses increased more than threefold on higher losses incurred and increase in underwriting and other expenses. Loss ratio was 11.3% in the quarter under review compared with (13.1%) a year ago. Underwriting expense ratio of 19.1% deteriorated 32 basis points (bps) year over year. Full Year Highlights MGIC Investment earned $1.78 per share in 2018, up 30.9% on 5.6% higher operating revenues of $1.1 billion. As of Dec 31, 2018, insurance in force was $209.7 billion, up 7.6% year over year on higher new insurance written and higher annual persistency. Persistency or the percentage of insurance remaining in force from the preceding year was 81.7% as of Dec 31, 2018, expanding 160 bps year over year. Primary delinquent inventory declined 29.3% year over year to 32,898 loans as of Dec 31, 2018 Financial Update Book value per share, a measure of net worth, grew nearly 4.6% year over year to $10.08 as of Dec 31, 2018. MGIC Investment had $151.9 million in cash and investments, up 52.1% year over year. Risk-to-capital ratio was 9.8:1 as of Dec 31, 2018 compared with 10.5:1 as of Dec 31, 2017. Debt to total capital ratio was 19% at the end of the quarter, improving 100 bps from the third quarter of 2018. The company spent $75.2 million to buy back 6.8 million shares in the fourth quarter of 2018, taking full year buyback to 16 million shares for $175 million. The company had $5 million remaining under its authorization. Fresh estimates followed an upward path over the past two months. The consensus estimate has shifted 5.56% due to these changes. VGM Scores Currently, MGIC has a subpar Growth Score of D, however its Momentum Score is doing a lot better with a B. Following the exact same course, the stock was allocated a grade of B on the value side, putting it in the top 40% for this investment strategy. Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of C. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in. Outlook MGIC has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). We expect an above average return from the stock in the next few months. Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) : Free Stock Analysis Report To read this article on Zacks.com click here. | MGIC Investment (MTG) reported fourth-quarter 2018 operating net income per share of 42 cents, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 13.5%. Shares have added about 12.5% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-mgic-mtg-12-5-143002366.html | 0.153456 |
Why Is Commerce (CBSH) Up 2.8% Since Last Earnings Report? | Commerce (CBSH) reported earnings 30 days ago. We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues. It has been about a month since the last earnings report for Commerce Bancshares (CBSH). Shares have added about 2.8% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at the most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. Commerce Bancshares Q4 Earnings Beat on Higher Revenues Commerce Bancshares reported earnings per share of 96 cents which surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate by a penny. The figure also reflects an improvement of 17.1% from the year-ago tally. Results primarily benefited from improvement in total revenues. Moreover, lower provisions and non-interest expenses supported the bottom line to quite an extent. Improvement in capital and profitability ratios was another positive for the company. Net income attributable to common shareholders was $109.7 million, up 16.2% from the prior-year quarter. Earnings per share for 2018 came in at $3.78, up 37% from the prior year. The figure also outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $3.77. Net income available to common shareholders was $424.5 million, up 36.8% from 2017. Revenues Grow, Expenses Decline Total revenues for the quarter came in at $345.3 million, reflecting a year-over-year increase of 11.6%. In addition, the reported figure outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $335.7 million. Total revenues for 2018 were $1.33 billion, reflecting a year-over-year increase of 10.9%. The annual revenue figure, however, lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.37 billion. Net interest income for the quarter came in at $212.2 million, up 11.7% year over year. Non-interest income was $133.1 million, up 11.5% year over year. This upside stemmed from improvement in almost all components except loan fees and sales. Non-interest expenses decreased 9.7% year over year to $188.6 million. Other than salaries and employee benefits, marketing and data processing, and software, all expense components declined. Efficiency ratio for the quarter under review decreased to 54.53% from 67.40% reported in the year-ago quarter. Fall in efficiency ratio indicates improvement in profitability. Loans & Deposits Improve Marginally As of Dec 31, 2018, total loans were $14.1 billion, up 1.1% from the prior-quarter level. Also, total deposits, as of the same date, were $20.3 billion, up marginally from the previous quarter. Total stockholders equity was $2.9 billion as of Dec 31, 2018, reflecting rise of 8% from the third quarter. Credit Quality: A Mixed Bag Provision for loan losses decreased 3.1% year over year to $12.3 million for the quarter under review. Additionally, allowance for loan losses, as a percentage of total loans, came in at 1.13%, contracting 1 bps year over year. However, the ratio of net loan charge-offs to average loans was 0.34%, up from 0.32% witnessed in the prior-year quarter. Capital & Profitability Ratios Improve As of Dec 31, 2018, Tier I leverage ratio was 11.52%, up from 10.39% recorded in the year-earlier quarter. Moreover, tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio grew to 10.45% from 9.84% as of Dec 31, 2017. At the end of the reported quarter, return on average assets was 1.75%, up from 1.50% witnessed in the year-ago quarter. Return on average common equity was 15.85%, up from 14.17% in the prior-year quarter. Share Repurchase Update Commerce Bancshares repurchased nearly 0.6 million shares of treasury stock during the reported quarter at an average price of $61.63 per share. In the past month, investors have witnessed a downward trend in fresh estimates. VGM Scores At this time, Commerce has an average Growth Score of C, however its Momentum Score is doing a lot better with an A. However, the stock was allocated a grade of C on the value side, putting it in the middle 20% for this investment strategy. Overall, the stock has an aggregate VGM Score of C. If you aren't focused on one strategy, this score is the one you should be interested in. Outlook Estimates have been broadly trending downward for the stock, and the magnitude of this revision indicates a downward shift. Notably, Commerce has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). We expect an in-line return from the stock in the next few months. Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) : Free Stock Analysis Report To read this article on Zacks.com click here. | Commerce (CBSH) reported earnings 30 days ago. We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues. Commerce Bancshares Q4 Earnings Beat on Higher Revenues. Shares have added about 2.8% in that time frame, underperforming the S&P 500. | bart | 2 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-commerce-cbsh-2-8-143002997.html | 0.370442 |
Why Is People's United (PBCT) Up 8.4% Since Last Earnings Report? | It has been about a month since the last earnings report for People's United (PBCT). Shares have added about 8.4% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. Before we dive into how investors and analysts have reacted as of late, let's take a quick look at its most recent earnings report in order to get a better handle on the important catalysts. People's United Q4 Earnings Beat, Expenses Escalate People's United reported fourth-quarter 2018 operating earnings of 36 cents per share, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 34 cents. Also, the reported figure improved 16% year over year. Improvement in loans and deposit balances reflected organic growth, with its capital position remaining strong. Also, rising rates and higher fee income supported the results. However, elevated expenses and provisions were major drags. Net income available to common shareholders came in at $129.4 million compared with $102.7 million reported in the prior-year quarter. For full-year 2018, earnings per share were $1.29, in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate. Further, the figure compares favorably with 97 cents earned in the prior year. Revenue Growth Offsets Higher Expenses For full-year 2018, the company reported revenues of $1.6 billion, up around 10.3% year over year. Moreover, the revenue figure came in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate. Total revenues, on a fully-taxable basis, were up 11% year over year to $421.3 million in the quarter. However, the figure lagged the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $427.9 million. Net interest income, on a fully-taxable basis, totaled $339.5 million, up 11.6% year over year. Further, net interest margin expanded 10 basis points (bps) to 3.17%. Non-interest income climbed 1.6% year over year to $88.7 million. The rise in almost all components of income drove the results. These were partially offset by lower investment management fees. Non-interest expenses flared up 9.6% on a year-over-year basis to $262.7 million. Rise in almost all components led to higher expenses. Efficiency ratio was 55.1% compared with 56.1% recorded a year ago. A decrease in the ratio indicates improved profitability. As of Dec 31, 2018, total loans were $35.2 billion, up 8.9% from the previous quarter. Furthermore, total deposits increased approximately 9% to $36.2 billion, sequentially. Credit Quality: A Mixed Bag As of Dec 31, 2018, non-performing assets were $186 million, down slightly year over year. Ratio of non-performing loans to total originated loans contracted 1 bp from the year-earlier quarter to 0.55%. However, net loan charge-offs climbed 15.4% year over year to $7.5 million. Net loan charge-offs as a percentage of average total loans were 0.09% on an annualized basis, up 1 bp. Provision for loan losses came in at $9.9 million, up 32%. Capital Position and Profitability Ratios Improve Capital ratios of Peoples United remained strong. As of Dec 31, 2018, total risk-based capital ratio increased to 12.6% from 12.2% recorded in the last-year quarter. Tangible equity ratio was 7.6%, up from 7.2%. The companys profitability ratios improved. Return on average tangible stockholders equity was 14.9%, up from 13.8% in the prior-year quarter. Return on average assets of 1.11% inched up from 0.96%. 2019 Outlook (includes full year of Farmington and Vend Lease acquisition and excludes BSB Bancorp acquisition) Loan portfolio in the range of 3% to 5% on both period-end and average balances basis is anticipated. This goal excludes the transactional portion of New York multifamily portfolio, which is in runoff mode. Management expects the runoff in the transactional New York multifamily portfolio to be $400-$500 million. Deposits are projected to grow 3-5% on both period-end and average balance basis. Net interest income is projected to grow in the range of 10-12%. This is based on the expectation of NIM in the range of 3.15-3.25%, on assumption of no increases in fed funds during the year. Further, the company expects non-interest income to rise 2-4%. Management expects expenses (excluding merger-related expenses) to be in the range of $1.04-$1.06 billion. Notably, the range includes full year results from Vend Lease, Farmington and VAR Technology. Further, it assumes an increase of around $12 million in expenses as a result of adopting the new lease accounting standard on Jan 1, 2019, which limits the type of lease origination costs eligible for deferral in the companys equipment financing businesses. The company expects to maintain excellent credit quality with provisions in the range of $35-$45 million. Effective tax rate is expected to remain in the range of 20-22%. The company expects Common equity tier 1 capital ratio to be between 10% and 10.5%. | People's United (PBCT) reported fourth-quarter 2018 operating earnings of 36 cents per share, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 34 cents. Shares have added about 8.4% in that time frame, outperforming the S&P 500. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-peoples-united-pbct-8-143002713.html | 0.177801 |
Could gold ash be a magic bullet for treating cancer? | Around the turn of the 20th century, Nobel Prize-winning scientist Paul Ehrlich coined the medical use of the phrase magic bullet. He was referring to a type of medical treatment that did not yet exist: one that could find a specific target in the body like a tumour, for example and deliver a precise therapeutic dosage to kill or contain a disease without harming healthy cells. A pioneer in the emerging field of chemotherapy, Ehrlich never found his magic bullet. But by the end of the century, his concept would become a cornerstone of modern nanomedicine, with nanoparticles proving capable of carrying cancer drugs directly to cancer cells. Researchers at Concordia University are studying how different types of nanoparticles behave at a fundamental level in human cells. Through this research, they have identified that an ancient Ayurvedic medicine called Swarna Bhasma, or gold ash, may have enormous potential as a magic bullet for cancer treatment. Ayurvedic or Sidha medicine was developed in India, its roots dating back at least 5,000 years. Bhasmas, or ashes or Paspams, have been used medicinally by Ayurvedic and Sidha practitioners since at least the seventh century. Resembling a fine powder, gold ash is derived from gold sheets, which are exposed to heat and mixed with botanicals and herbal juices during a lengthy preparation process. Gold ash may be prescribed for a range of ailments from infertility and sexual dysfunction, to cardiac disease. It may also be administered as a preventive treatment, believed to support immunity and good health in older adulthood. More recently, clinical studies in India have considered gold ash as a primary treatment for cancer, said Dr. Muthukumaran Packirisamy, a professor in Concordias department of mechanical, industrial and aerospace engineering at the Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science. A specialist in nanotechnology, Packirisamy was intrigued. These gold ash (particles) are nothing but nanoparticles, he said. On average, gold ash particles measure around 60 nanometres, or billionths of a metre. (For scale, a typical sheet of paper is 100,000 nm thick.) Together with Dr. Alisa Piekny, an associate professor in Concordias department of biology, and their graduate students, Packirisamy set out to study the gold ash particles and their behaviour in human cells. While researchers in Packirisamys lab analyzed the composition of the gold ash particles for example, determining what elements they contained, apart from gold Pieknys team exposed gold ash particles to two types of human cells: HeLa cells, derived from cervical cancer, and HFF-1 cells, derived from human foreskin fibroblasts. Pieknys team also exposed chemically synthesized (or lab-made) gold nanoparticles to these same cell types. Significantly, the gold ash particles proved non-toxic; that means they didnt kill the cancer cells or harm the healthy ones. In fact, there were no notable differences in how these particles affected the different cell types. They did, however, behave differently from their chemically synthesized counterparts. [Gold ash] was able to get into locations of the cell where other gold materials were not able to get to, said Piekny. Whats pretty amazing is that the cells didnt seem to mind having this material inside them. Thats unusual; when a particle enters a cell, it usually remains enclosed by a sort of protective bubble. As Piekny explained it, chemically engineered nanoparticles get stuck in these vesicles in certain locations in the cell. But the gold ash particles proved able to break free from them and into the general cell environment, even accumulating in the nucleus during cell division. The reason for this behaviour remains uncertain, although it likely results from the tendency of the gold ash particles to group together in bulky formations. Because these particles are so large, we think that the cells cant retain them in the vesicles, Piekny said. Theres another advantage to the size of these particles: They have such a large surface area that maybe they can have really large, what we call payloads, said Piekny. Shes referring to drug delivery the idea that gold ash particles could carry therapeutics to cells, like a magic bullet. Their capacity, coupled with their unique access to locations within cells, might allow the gold ash particles to deliver cancer treatments in ways that other nanoparticles cannot. Theyve been using these nanoparticles [in Ayurvedic medicine] for thousands of years, said Packirisamy. Ive been trying to develop [synthetic nanoparticles] in the lab for the last 10 years. While the researchers stress that their work is still in its earliest stages, these preliminary findings are a welcome reminder that tradition and innovation arent mutually exclusive. Packirisamy pointed out that interdisciplinary studies like this one which was driven by Simona Badilescu, one of his postdoctoral researchers teach students to approach problems from different angles. I think it creates a new kind of thinking, he said. Piekny, too, noted the importance of collaboration between departments; at Concordia, she said, this is facilitated by research centres built around natural areas of synergy. This [interdisciplinary work] is where I see the future of science, she said. Discover more about Concordias health expertise: concordia.ca/nextgenhealth This story was created by Content Works, Postmedias commercial content division, on behalf of Concordia University. | Researchers at Concordia University have identified an ancient Ayurvedic medicine called Swarna Bhasma, or gold ash, may have enormous potential as a magic bullet for cancer treatment. The ancient medicine was developed in India, its roots dating back at least 5,000 years. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://montrealgazette.com/sponsored/news-sponsored/could-gold-ash-be-a-magic-bullet-for-treating-cancer | 0.469018 |
What Makes A 547(b) Plan Different? | A 547(b) plan is likely your main retirement savings option if you work for the state or local government, or certain non-profits such as a church. With a 547(b) things can be a little confusing because plans such as the 547(b) (and also 403(b) plans), typically get less attention. That's a shame because 457(b)s are just as important and in many cases just as useful at 401(k)s, they just happen to be less common. However, 547(b) plans are hardly obscure, since millions of Americans have access to them. Fortunately, the differences to a 401(k) are not that great and 457(b) plans have some benefits over 401(k)s. The Similarities Just like a 401(k) a 547(b) plan is a workplace scheme to help you save for retirement. You can put aside money from your paycheck to build up a retirement nest-egg. That can be a nice setup because many people don't save enough for retirement. Saving automatically can help you stick to a saving plan. As a nice bonus, since you're saving for retirement pre-tax it can reduce the tax you pay now. However, remember it's only tax-deferral, so you will pay the tax in retirement. 547(b) are tax-deferred plans. This means that you don't pay when the money goes in, or should it grow or pay dividends. Typically, you end up paying the tax when you take the money out to spend it, normally in retirement. This means that by using a 547(b) you may save on taxes for your retirement savings. This is especially true if you expect to be in a lower tax-bracket in retirement, as many retirees are. If you elect to use a Roth 457(b), then that changes the tax angle. There are still tax benefits with a Roth, but they occur when the money comes out, not when it goes in. So like 401(k) plans 547(b) plans can offer both traditional and Roth versions. A Roth version may make sense if you are younger and expect to see your tax bracket increase in retirement. However, not all 457(b) plans have a Roth option. As its fundamentally a retirement scheme, you do, typically, have to use the money in retirement. Generally this means you have to start making withdrawals from your 401(k) or 457(b) by the time you are 70.5, though 457(b) plans are more flexible on potential earlier withdrawals (see below). In both, cases your employer may make contributions into the 401(k) or 457(b) plan as well if they choose to. For most people, the annual contribution limits are the same too. For 2019, that's $19,000 or $25,000 if you're 50 or over. Remember too, that your contribution amount can never exceed your pay. Also, if you're very close to retirement, contribution limits may differ (see below). The Differences 547(b) plans more flexible on withdrawal than 401(k)s. If you have left your employer, then you can normally take out money from your 457(b) without the 10% penalty that a 401(k) plan may incur for early withdrawal. That extra flexibility for 457(b) plans is helpful, but remember these plans are intended for retirement, so if you are that anxious to get at your money, then perhaps a retirement plan is not right for you, though the tax-deferral element may still be advantageous. 547(b) plans also have an accelerated way to contribute when you're close to retirement. 401(k) plans do not have this feature. You must be within 3 years of normal retirement age to use it. If you haven't used your contribution limit in prior years, then you can contribute up to $36,000 a year if you qualify, so it gives you a way to build your tax-deferred savings rapidly if you can afford to. Of course, you cannot save more than your salary. Summary So in fundamental ways 401(k) plans and 457(b) plans are quite similar, as a tax-advantaged way to save for retirement from your paycheck. However, 457(b) offer potential benefits if you're close to retirement and want to make additional contributions based on under-contributing in past years. Plus 457(b) plans can give you easier access to your retirement funds after you leave your employer. That said, here we are dealing with the plans at a high level in terms of rules and tax consequences. The specifics of any employer-matching and investment options can ultimately make a big difference to your savings outcomes regardless of the specific type of retirement account they are in. | A 547(b) plan is a workplace scheme to help you save for retirement. | ctrlsum | 0 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonmoore/2019/02/16/what-makes-a-547b-plan-different/ | 0.217469 |
What Makes A 547(b) Plan Different? | A 547(b) plan is likely your main retirement savings option if you work for the state or local government, or certain non-profits such as a church. With a 547(b) things can be a little confusing because plans such as the 547(b) (and also 403(b) plans), typically get less attention. That's a shame because 457(b)s are just as important and in many cases just as useful at 401(k)s, they just happen to be less common. However, 547(b) plans are hardly obscure, since millions of Americans have access to them. Fortunately, the differences to a 401(k) are not that great and 457(b) plans have some benefits over 401(k)s. The Similarities Just like a 401(k) a 547(b) plan is a workplace scheme to help you save for retirement. You can put aside money from your paycheck to build up a retirement nest-egg. That can be a nice setup because many people don't save enough for retirement. Saving automatically can help you stick to a saving plan. As a nice bonus, since you're saving for retirement pre-tax it can reduce the tax you pay now. However, remember it's only tax-deferral, so you will pay the tax in retirement. 547(b) are tax-deferred plans. This means that you don't pay when the money goes in, or should it grow or pay dividends. Typically, you end up paying the tax when you take the money out to spend it, normally in retirement. This means that by using a 547(b) you may save on taxes for your retirement savings. This is especially true if you expect to be in a lower tax-bracket in retirement, as many retirees are. If you elect to use a Roth 457(b), then that changes the tax angle. There are still tax benefits with a Roth, but they occur when the money comes out, not when it goes in. So like 401(k) plans 547(b) plans can offer both traditional and Roth versions. A Roth version may make sense if you are younger and expect to see your tax bracket increase in retirement. However, not all 457(b) plans have a Roth option. As its fundamentally a retirement scheme, you do, typically, have to use the money in retirement. Generally this means you have to start making withdrawals from your 401(k) or 457(b) by the time you are 70.5, though 457(b) plans are more flexible on potential earlier withdrawals (see below). In both, cases your employer may make contributions into the 401(k) or 457(b) plan as well if they choose to. For most people, the annual contribution limits are the same too. For 2019, that's $19,000 or $25,000 if you're 50 or over. Remember too, that your contribution amount can never exceed your pay. Also, if you're very close to retirement, contribution limits may differ (see below). The Differences 547(b) plans more flexible on withdrawal than 401(k)s. If you have left your employer, then you can normally take out money from your 457(b) without the 10% penalty that a 401(k) plan may incur for early withdrawal. That extra flexibility for 457(b) plans is helpful, but remember these plans are intended for retirement, so if you are that anxious to get at your money, then perhaps a retirement plan is not right for you, though the tax-deferral element may still be advantageous. 547(b) plans also have an accelerated way to contribute when you're close to retirement. 401(k) plans do not have this feature. You must be within 3 years of normal retirement age to use it. If you haven't used your contribution limit in prior years, then you can contribute up to $36,000 a year if you qualify, so it gives you a way to build your tax-deferred savings rapidly if you can afford to. Of course, you cannot save more than your salary. Summary So in fundamental ways 401(k) plans and 457(b) plans are quite similar, as a tax-advantaged way to save for retirement from your paycheck. However, 457(b) offer potential benefits if you're close to retirement and want to make additional contributions based on under-contributing in past years. Plus 457(b) plans can give you easier access to your retirement funds after you leave your employer. That said, here we are dealing with the plans at a high level in terms of rules and tax consequences. The specifics of any employer-matching and investment options can ultimately make a big difference to your savings outcomes regardless of the specific type of retirement account they are in. | A 547(b) plan is likely your main retirement savings option if you work for the state or local government, or certain non-profits such as a church. | bart | 1 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonmoore/2019/02/16/what-makes-a-547b-plan-different/ | 0.158123 |
What Makes A 547(b) Plan Different? | A 547(b) plan is likely your main retirement savings option if you work for the state or local government, or certain non-profits such as a church. With a 547(b) things can be a little confusing because plans such as the 547(b) (and also 403(b) plans), typically get less attention. That's a shame because 457(b)s are just as important and in many cases just as useful at 401(k)s, they just happen to be less common. However, 547(b) plans are hardly obscure, since millions of Americans have access to them. Fortunately, the differences to a 401(k) are not that great and 457(b) plans have some benefits over 401(k)s. The Similarities Just like a 401(k) a 547(b) plan is a workplace scheme to help you save for retirement. You can put aside money from your paycheck to build up a retirement nest-egg. That can be a nice setup because many people don't save enough for retirement. Saving automatically can help you stick to a saving plan. As a nice bonus, since you're saving for retirement pre-tax it can reduce the tax you pay now. However, remember it's only tax-deferral, so you will pay the tax in retirement. 547(b) are tax-deferred plans. This means that you don't pay when the money goes in, or should it grow or pay dividends. Typically, you end up paying the tax when you take the money out to spend it, normally in retirement. This means that by using a 547(b) you may save on taxes for your retirement savings. This is especially true if you expect to be in a lower tax-bracket in retirement, as many retirees are. If you elect to use a Roth 457(b), then that changes the tax angle. There are still tax benefits with a Roth, but they occur when the money comes out, not when it goes in. So like 401(k) plans 547(b) plans can offer both traditional and Roth versions. A Roth version may make sense if you are younger and expect to see your tax bracket increase in retirement. However, not all 457(b) plans have a Roth option. As its fundamentally a retirement scheme, you do, typically, have to use the money in retirement. Generally this means you have to start making withdrawals from your 401(k) or 457(b) by the time you are 70.5, though 457(b) plans are more flexible on potential earlier withdrawals (see below). In both, cases your employer may make contributions into the 401(k) or 457(b) plan as well if they choose to. For most people, the annual contribution limits are the same too. For 2019, that's $19,000 or $25,000 if you're 50 or over. Remember too, that your contribution amount can never exceed your pay. Also, if you're very close to retirement, contribution limits may differ (see below). The Differences 547(b) plans more flexible on withdrawal than 401(k)s. If you have left your employer, then you can normally take out money from your 457(b) without the 10% penalty that a 401(k) plan may incur for early withdrawal. That extra flexibility for 457(b) plans is helpful, but remember these plans are intended for retirement, so if you are that anxious to get at your money, then perhaps a retirement plan is not right for you, though the tax-deferral element may still be advantageous. 547(b) plans also have an accelerated way to contribute when you're close to retirement. 401(k) plans do not have this feature. You must be within 3 years of normal retirement age to use it. If you haven't used your contribution limit in prior years, then you can contribute up to $36,000 a year if you qualify, so it gives you a way to build your tax-deferred savings rapidly if you can afford to. Of course, you cannot save more than your salary. Summary So in fundamental ways 401(k) plans and 457(b) plans are quite similar, as a tax-advantaged way to save for retirement from your paycheck. However, 457(b) offer potential benefits if you're close to retirement and want to make additional contributions based on under-contributing in past years. Plus 457(b) plans can give you easier access to your retirement funds after you leave your employer. That said, here we are dealing with the plans at a high level in terms of rules and tax consequences. The specifics of any employer-matching and investment options can ultimately make a big difference to your savings outcomes regardless of the specific type of retirement account they are in. | A 547(b) plan is a workplace scheme to help you save for retirement. The differences to a 401(k) are not that great and 457(B) plans have some benefits over 401(K)s. The 547 (b) is tax-deferred, so you will pay the tax in retirement. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonmoore/2019/02/16/what-makes-a-547b-plan-different/ | 0.26672 |
Who won the NBA Slam Dunk Contest last year? | The NBA's All-Star Weekend is back for the 68th edition of the exhibition weekend, with the All-Star contests taking place on Saturday, Feb. 16 before Sunday night's game. While Saturday night will feature a skill competition and three-point shootout, the real spectacle is the evening's final event: the slam dunk contest. The dunk competition was added to the weekend's lineup in 1984, with 2019 marking the events 34th annual appearance. Utah Jazz shooting guard Donovan Mitchell won last year's dunk competition in Los Angeles, Calif., during his rookie season to follow up Glenn Robinson III's 2017 victory. Mitchell was named to the NBA All-Rookie First Team that same season. The former Louisville star finished his first year campaign with 20.5 points, 3.7 rebounds and 3.7 assists per game in 2017-18. Bulls guard Zach LaVine won two-straight slam dunk contests prior to Mitchell and Robinson's wins. He won back-to-back titles in 2015 and 2016 while with the Timberwolves. Here is a year-by-year look at the event's previous winners: 2018: Donovan Mitchell (Jazz) 2017: Glenn Robinson III (Pacers) 2016: Zach LaVine (Timberwolves) 2015: Zach LaVine (Timberwolves) 2014: John Wall (Wizards) 2013: Terrence Ross (Raptors) 2012: Jeremy Evans (Jazz) 2011: Blake Griffin (Clippers) 2010: Nate Robinson (Knicks) 2009: Nate Robinson (Knicks) 2008: Dwight Howard (Magic) 2007: Gerald Green (Celtics) 2006: Nate Robinson (Knicks) 2005: Josh Smith (Hawks) 2004: Fred Jones (Pacers) 2003: Jason Richardson (Warriors) 2002: Jason Richardson (Warriors) 2001: Desmond Mason (Sonics) 2000: Vince Carter (Raptors) 1997: Kobe Bryant (Lakers) 1996: Brent Barry (Clippers) 1995: Harold Miner (Heat) 1994: Isiah Rider (Timberwolves) 1993: Harold Miner (Heat) 1992: Cedric Ceballos (Suns) 1991: Dee Brown (Celtics) 1990: Dominique Wilkins (Hawks) 1989: Kenny Walker (Knicks) 1988: Michael Jordan (Bulls) 1987: Michael Jordan (Bulls) 1986: Spud Webb (Hawks) 1985: Dominique Wilkins (Hawks) 1984: Larry Nance (Suns) Saturday night's showdown in Charlotte's Spectrum Center will take place at 8 p.m. ET. | Donovan Mitchell won last year's slam dunk competition. Glenn Robinson III won the event in 2017. | bart | 0 | https://www.si.com/nba/2019/02/16/nba-all-star-slam-dunk-2018-winner-history | 0.570997 |
Who won the NBA Slam Dunk Contest last year? | The NBA's All-Star Weekend is back for the 68th edition of the exhibition weekend, with the All-Star contests taking place on Saturday, Feb. 16 before Sunday night's game. While Saturday night will feature a skill competition and three-point shootout, the real spectacle is the evening's final event: the slam dunk contest. The dunk competition was added to the weekend's lineup in 1984, with 2019 marking the events 34th annual appearance. Utah Jazz shooting guard Donovan Mitchell won last year's dunk competition in Los Angeles, Calif., during his rookie season to follow up Glenn Robinson III's 2017 victory. Mitchell was named to the NBA All-Rookie First Team that same season. The former Louisville star finished his first year campaign with 20.5 points, 3.7 rebounds and 3.7 assists per game in 2017-18. Bulls guard Zach LaVine won two-straight slam dunk contests prior to Mitchell and Robinson's wins. He won back-to-back titles in 2015 and 2016 while with the Timberwolves. Here is a year-by-year look at the event's previous winners: 2018: Donovan Mitchell (Jazz) 2017: Glenn Robinson III (Pacers) 2016: Zach LaVine (Timberwolves) 2015: Zach LaVine (Timberwolves) 2014: John Wall (Wizards) 2013: Terrence Ross (Raptors) 2012: Jeremy Evans (Jazz) 2011: Blake Griffin (Clippers) 2010: Nate Robinson (Knicks) 2009: Nate Robinson (Knicks) 2008: Dwight Howard (Magic) 2007: Gerald Green (Celtics) 2006: Nate Robinson (Knicks) 2005: Josh Smith (Hawks) 2004: Fred Jones (Pacers) 2003: Jason Richardson (Warriors) 2002: Jason Richardson (Warriors) 2001: Desmond Mason (Sonics) 2000: Vince Carter (Raptors) 1997: Kobe Bryant (Lakers) 1996: Brent Barry (Clippers) 1995: Harold Miner (Heat) 1994: Isiah Rider (Timberwolves) 1993: Harold Miner (Heat) 1992: Cedric Ceballos (Suns) 1991: Dee Brown (Celtics) 1990: Dominique Wilkins (Hawks) 1989: Kenny Walker (Knicks) 1988: Michael Jordan (Bulls) 1987: Michael Jordan (Bulls) 1986: Spud Webb (Hawks) 1985: Dominique Wilkins (Hawks) 1984: Larry Nance (Suns) Saturday night's showdown in Charlotte's Spectrum Center will take place at 8 p.m. ET. | Donovan Mitchell won last year's slam dunk competition. Glenn Robinson III won the event in 2017. Zach LaVine won back-to-back titles in 2015 and 2016 while with the Timberwolves. | bart | 1 | https://www.si.com/nba/2019/02/16/nba-all-star-slam-dunk-2018-winner-history | 0.652471 |
Who won the NBA Slam Dunk Contest last year? | The NBA's All-Star Weekend is back for the 68th edition of the exhibition weekend, with the All-Star contests taking place on Saturday, Feb. 16 before Sunday night's game. While Saturday night will feature a skill competition and three-point shootout, the real spectacle is the evening's final event: the slam dunk contest. The dunk competition was added to the weekend's lineup in 1984, with 2019 marking the events 34th annual appearance. Utah Jazz shooting guard Donovan Mitchell won last year's dunk competition in Los Angeles, Calif., during his rookie season to follow up Glenn Robinson III's 2017 victory. Mitchell was named to the NBA All-Rookie First Team that same season. The former Louisville star finished his first year campaign with 20.5 points, 3.7 rebounds and 3.7 assists per game in 2017-18. Bulls guard Zach LaVine won two-straight slam dunk contests prior to Mitchell and Robinson's wins. He won back-to-back titles in 2015 and 2016 while with the Timberwolves. Here is a year-by-year look at the event's previous winners: 2018: Donovan Mitchell (Jazz) 2017: Glenn Robinson III (Pacers) 2016: Zach LaVine (Timberwolves) 2015: Zach LaVine (Timberwolves) 2014: John Wall (Wizards) 2013: Terrence Ross (Raptors) 2012: Jeremy Evans (Jazz) 2011: Blake Griffin (Clippers) 2010: Nate Robinson (Knicks) 2009: Nate Robinson (Knicks) 2008: Dwight Howard (Magic) 2007: Gerald Green (Celtics) 2006: Nate Robinson (Knicks) 2005: Josh Smith (Hawks) 2004: Fred Jones (Pacers) 2003: Jason Richardson (Warriors) 2002: Jason Richardson (Warriors) 2001: Desmond Mason (Sonics) 2000: Vince Carter (Raptors) 1997: Kobe Bryant (Lakers) 1996: Brent Barry (Clippers) 1995: Harold Miner (Heat) 1994: Isiah Rider (Timberwolves) 1993: Harold Miner (Heat) 1992: Cedric Ceballos (Suns) 1991: Dee Brown (Celtics) 1990: Dominique Wilkins (Hawks) 1989: Kenny Walker (Knicks) 1988: Michael Jordan (Bulls) 1987: Michael Jordan (Bulls) 1986: Spud Webb (Hawks) 1985: Dominique Wilkins (Hawks) 1984: Larry Nance (Suns) Saturday night's showdown in Charlotte's Spectrum Center will take place at 8 p.m. ET. | Donovan Mitchell won last year's slam dunk competition. Glenn Robinson III won the event in 2017. Zach LaVine won back-to-back titles in 2015 and 2016 while with the Timberwolves. The dunk competition was added to the weekend's lineup in 1984, with 2019 marking the events 34th appearance. | bart | 2 | https://www.si.com/nba/2019/02/16/nba-all-star-slam-dunk-2018-winner-history | 0.744978 |
Is benefit of having trees 'oversold' in green space planning? | Trees in the city may not be as green as we think. They produce rotting leaves that pollute lakes and streams with too much phosphorus. They can actually trap air pollution right at nose level. And what with watering, maintenance, and replacement when they die, they are not always an efficient way to store carbon. In short, often trees are oversold as a natural solution for environmental problems in cities, according to Bonnie Keeler, a University of Minnesota professor who studies ways of valuing nature. In fact, she reviewed 1,200 scientific studies on increasingly popular green infrastructures such as urban forests, parks, rain gardens, and wetlands and found in a recent paper that its unclear how well any of them stack up against gray solutions like concrete storm sewers and air conditioning. Its an increasingly urgent question for the Twin Cities. At projects such as the Ford site in St. Paul, the Mississippi River Upper Harbor in Minneapolis and a redesign for sections of Minnehaha Creek, planners face complex choices for managing stormwater and air pollution. The answers will help define the future for a growing share of the worlds population. By 2050, two out of three people will live in urban areas that will affect their health and well-being, Keeler said. Immense social challenges like climate change, public health and public funding will have the greatest impact on people who live in cities. There is a huge interest in expanding funding for green infrastructures, she said. But we dont have a tool to understand their value. Take trees, for instance. There is no question that they are crucial to global ecosystem health. But in the city it can be a different story. Keelers review, published last month in Nature Sustainability, found that most evaluations of urban trees focused on two benefits: filtering air and sequestering carbon. Few considered the costs of maintenance, replacement, or public health. Even their estimated ecosystem values ranged widely from $5 to $402 per tree. At the same time, theres no widely accepted method to calculate the more ephemeral value that trees provide, such as joy in their beauty, a resting places for birds, or the coolness of their shade. Green is sometimes more expensive, but it can carry other benefits that are not as well captured in markets, Keeler said. Nonetheless, urban planners around the Twin Cities area are now incorporating these hard-to-measure benefits into their decisions on managing land and water. Minnehaha Creek is a showcase for the way different cities along its route increasingly see the waterway as tool to leverage green solutions for an array of social and environmental problems. As the western Twin Cities suburbs grew around it, the creek became an easy place to get rid of water that ran off streets and parking lots. Along much of its length it was forgotten, hidden by buildings and covered by streets. But that changed in 2009, starting with Methodist Hospital in St. Louis Park. Like many buildings along its banks, the hospital had turned its back to the creek and a nearby wetland. But the hospitals expansion plans brought officials of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District into the conversation. The district officials, who help manage the creek from Lake Minnetonka to the Mississippi River, saw a chance to improve water quality in the creek by bringing back its natural curves, which had long ago been straightened so stormwater could move along faster to the Mississippi. Curves would slow down the flow of water, increase flood plain along the banks and expand the size of the wetland behind the hospital, filtering out more dirt and pollutants. A decade later the entire health care complex has turned around to face to the wetland. Its paid for boardwalks that allow patients and staff to unwind outdoors everyday, and even pulled the theme of water and wildlife into its interior design. The staff can feel the joy of coming to a workplace where they can enjoy nature, said Duane Spiegel, vice president of real estate for HealthPartners, which merged with the hospitals parent organization, Park Nicollet, in 2013. Patients and their families are no longer confined to the hospital they can go outside. A good healing environment, that helps them in recovery, said Dr. Tom Kottke, medical director for health and healing at HealthPartners. Hopkins replants a park There is no question, Keeler said, that improved mental health is one of the clear benefits of green infrastructure in urban areas. But how do cities determine the nature of the nature? she asked. Do people just need to walk by trees, or do they need an immersive walk with the sound of birds? The difference matters, she added. Some people want lawns, soccer fields and picnic tables. Others want dog parks, urban wilderness or farmers markets. Put in the wrong one, and instead of a thriving outdoor space, she said, you eventually get a blighted eyesore. But put in the right one, as Hopkins did with its Cottageville Park improvement project along Minnehaha Creek near Blake Road and Highway 7, and it can revive a neighborhood. A tiny park surrounded by apartment buildings along the creek had become a place where crime could happen unseen, said Kersten Elverum, Hopkins director of economic development and planning. The area was redesigned in 2015 as part of a larger project with the watershed district, with water and flood control included as part of the package. The creek banks were replanted, the park was enlarged, and a sweep of grass in the center now covers a basin to hold and treat stormwater. The larger, open park now includes a community garden, trails, a basketball court and playground, making it safer and a destination for the entire neighborhood. There are a lot of ways that this diverse community that lives around the park can get together and get to know each other, Elverum said. The environmental benefits of the project are less obvious, but significant: Some 400 feet of stream bank were restored, and the new site treats stormwater runoff from 22 surrounding acres, removing 26 pounds of phosphorus a year. And that impacts everyone downstream, Elverum said. A stream is born There are places, however, where gray infrastructure still tops the green version especially where its already built. Downtown Minneapolis, for instance, relies on 16-foot concrete stormwater tunnels to drain millions of gallons and lots of pollutants from the streets directly into the Mississippi River. But they keep downtown functioning, said Kristina Kessler, the citys director of surface waters and sewers. And while a rain garden on every corner of the city would certainly help, she said, the long-term maintenance cost is beyond what we can do. Often, said Keeler, the best opportunity to get the most out of green infrastructure, is a new development such as the massive project underway at Ford Motor site in St. Pauls Highland neighborhood. Even so, as that site makes clear, justifying the added expense is still a new exercise in public policy. One of the most popular features of the new development is the novel treatment of stormwater. Instead of passing through underground sewers, the water will flow above ground in a stream running through the center of the complex which will also provide the water to re-create the falls at nearby Hidden Falls park. It will be aesthetically beautiful and, on its face, cost about the same as underground pipes, said Wes Saunders-Pearce, St. Pauls water manager. But using a complex computer model, planners were able to quantify the added benefits from the aboveground version, including factors such as water quality improvements and energy- and greenhouse-gas reduction from all the extra trees that could be planted along the stream. That was a huge turning point, he said. It was twice the benefit compared to the traditional way of planning. Josephine Marcotty is a Twin Cities science writer and former Star Tribune environment reporter. She can be reached at josephinemarcotty@gmail.com. | University of Minnesota professor: "Trees are oversold" in green space planning. | ctrlsum | 0 | http://www.startribune.com/green-value-of-twin-cities-trees-get-second-look/505843392/ | 0.101314 |
Is benefit of having trees 'oversold' in green space planning? | Trees in the city may not be as green as we think. They produce rotting leaves that pollute lakes and streams with too much phosphorus. They can actually trap air pollution right at nose level. And what with watering, maintenance, and replacement when they die, they are not always an efficient way to store carbon. In short, often trees are oversold as a natural solution for environmental problems in cities, according to Bonnie Keeler, a University of Minnesota professor who studies ways of valuing nature. In fact, she reviewed 1,200 scientific studies on increasingly popular green infrastructures such as urban forests, parks, rain gardens, and wetlands and found in a recent paper that its unclear how well any of them stack up against gray solutions like concrete storm sewers and air conditioning. Its an increasingly urgent question for the Twin Cities. At projects such as the Ford site in St. Paul, the Mississippi River Upper Harbor in Minneapolis and a redesign for sections of Minnehaha Creek, planners face complex choices for managing stormwater and air pollution. The answers will help define the future for a growing share of the worlds population. By 2050, two out of three people will live in urban areas that will affect their health and well-being, Keeler said. Immense social challenges like climate change, public health and public funding will have the greatest impact on people who live in cities. There is a huge interest in expanding funding for green infrastructures, she said. But we dont have a tool to understand their value. Take trees, for instance. There is no question that they are crucial to global ecosystem health. But in the city it can be a different story. Keelers review, published last month in Nature Sustainability, found that most evaluations of urban trees focused on two benefits: filtering air and sequestering carbon. Few considered the costs of maintenance, replacement, or public health. Even their estimated ecosystem values ranged widely from $5 to $402 per tree. At the same time, theres no widely accepted method to calculate the more ephemeral value that trees provide, such as joy in their beauty, a resting places for birds, or the coolness of their shade. Green is sometimes more expensive, but it can carry other benefits that are not as well captured in markets, Keeler said. Nonetheless, urban planners around the Twin Cities area are now incorporating these hard-to-measure benefits into their decisions on managing land and water. Minnehaha Creek is a showcase for the way different cities along its route increasingly see the waterway as tool to leverage green solutions for an array of social and environmental problems. As the western Twin Cities suburbs grew around it, the creek became an easy place to get rid of water that ran off streets and parking lots. Along much of its length it was forgotten, hidden by buildings and covered by streets. But that changed in 2009, starting with Methodist Hospital in St. Louis Park. Like many buildings along its banks, the hospital had turned its back to the creek and a nearby wetland. But the hospitals expansion plans brought officials of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District into the conversation. The district officials, who help manage the creek from Lake Minnetonka to the Mississippi River, saw a chance to improve water quality in the creek by bringing back its natural curves, which had long ago been straightened so stormwater could move along faster to the Mississippi. Curves would slow down the flow of water, increase flood plain along the banks and expand the size of the wetland behind the hospital, filtering out more dirt and pollutants. A decade later the entire health care complex has turned around to face to the wetland. Its paid for boardwalks that allow patients and staff to unwind outdoors everyday, and even pulled the theme of water and wildlife into its interior design. The staff can feel the joy of coming to a workplace where they can enjoy nature, said Duane Spiegel, vice president of real estate for HealthPartners, which merged with the hospitals parent organization, Park Nicollet, in 2013. Patients and their families are no longer confined to the hospital they can go outside. A good healing environment, that helps them in recovery, said Dr. Tom Kottke, medical director for health and healing at HealthPartners. Hopkins replants a park There is no question, Keeler said, that improved mental health is one of the clear benefits of green infrastructure in urban areas. But how do cities determine the nature of the nature? she asked. Do people just need to walk by trees, or do they need an immersive walk with the sound of birds? The difference matters, she added. Some people want lawns, soccer fields and picnic tables. Others want dog parks, urban wilderness or farmers markets. Put in the wrong one, and instead of a thriving outdoor space, she said, you eventually get a blighted eyesore. But put in the right one, as Hopkins did with its Cottageville Park improvement project along Minnehaha Creek near Blake Road and Highway 7, and it can revive a neighborhood. A tiny park surrounded by apartment buildings along the creek had become a place where crime could happen unseen, said Kersten Elverum, Hopkins director of economic development and planning. The area was redesigned in 2015 as part of a larger project with the watershed district, with water and flood control included as part of the package. The creek banks were replanted, the park was enlarged, and a sweep of grass in the center now covers a basin to hold and treat stormwater. The larger, open park now includes a community garden, trails, a basketball court and playground, making it safer and a destination for the entire neighborhood. There are a lot of ways that this diverse community that lives around the park can get together and get to know each other, Elverum said. The environmental benefits of the project are less obvious, but significant: Some 400 feet of stream bank were restored, and the new site treats stormwater runoff from 22 surrounding acres, removing 26 pounds of phosphorus a year. And that impacts everyone downstream, Elverum said. A stream is born There are places, however, where gray infrastructure still tops the green version especially where its already built. Downtown Minneapolis, for instance, relies on 16-foot concrete stormwater tunnels to drain millions of gallons and lots of pollutants from the streets directly into the Mississippi River. But they keep downtown functioning, said Kristina Kessler, the citys director of surface waters and sewers. And while a rain garden on every corner of the city would certainly help, she said, the long-term maintenance cost is beyond what we can do. Often, said Keeler, the best opportunity to get the most out of green infrastructure, is a new development such as the massive project underway at Ford Motor site in St. Pauls Highland neighborhood. Even so, as that site makes clear, justifying the added expense is still a new exercise in public policy. One of the most popular features of the new development is the novel treatment of stormwater. Instead of passing through underground sewers, the water will flow above ground in a stream running through the center of the complex which will also provide the water to re-create the falls at nearby Hidden Falls park. It will be aesthetically beautiful and, on its face, cost about the same as underground pipes, said Wes Saunders-Pearce, St. Pauls water manager. But using a complex computer model, planners were able to quantify the added benefits from the aboveground version, including factors such as water quality improvements and energy- and greenhouse-gas reduction from all the extra trees that could be planted along the stream. That was a huge turning point, he said. It was twice the benefit compared to the traditional way of planning. Josephine Marcotty is a Twin Cities science writer and former Star Tribune environment reporter. She can be reached at josephinemarcotty@gmail.com. | University of Minnesota professor: "Trees are oversold" in green space planning. "Green is sometimes more expensive, but it can carry other benefits that are not as well captured in markets," she says. | ctrlsum | 1 | http://www.startribune.com/green-value-of-twin-cities-trees-get-second-look/505843392/ | 0.576198 |
Is benefit of having trees 'oversold' in green space planning? | Trees in the city may not be as green as we think. They produce rotting leaves that pollute lakes and streams with too much phosphorus. They can actually trap air pollution right at nose level. And what with watering, maintenance, and replacement when they die, they are not always an efficient way to store carbon. In short, often trees are oversold as a natural solution for environmental problems in cities, according to Bonnie Keeler, a University of Minnesota professor who studies ways of valuing nature. In fact, she reviewed 1,200 scientific studies on increasingly popular green infrastructures such as urban forests, parks, rain gardens, and wetlands and found in a recent paper that its unclear how well any of them stack up against gray solutions like concrete storm sewers and air conditioning. Its an increasingly urgent question for the Twin Cities. At projects such as the Ford site in St. Paul, the Mississippi River Upper Harbor in Minneapolis and a redesign for sections of Minnehaha Creek, planners face complex choices for managing stormwater and air pollution. The answers will help define the future for a growing share of the worlds population. By 2050, two out of three people will live in urban areas that will affect their health and well-being, Keeler said. Immense social challenges like climate change, public health and public funding will have the greatest impact on people who live in cities. There is a huge interest in expanding funding for green infrastructures, she said. But we dont have a tool to understand their value. Take trees, for instance. There is no question that they are crucial to global ecosystem health. But in the city it can be a different story. Keelers review, published last month in Nature Sustainability, found that most evaluations of urban trees focused on two benefits: filtering air and sequestering carbon. Few considered the costs of maintenance, replacement, or public health. Even their estimated ecosystem values ranged widely from $5 to $402 per tree. At the same time, theres no widely accepted method to calculate the more ephemeral value that trees provide, such as joy in their beauty, a resting places for birds, or the coolness of their shade. Green is sometimes more expensive, but it can carry other benefits that are not as well captured in markets, Keeler said. Nonetheless, urban planners around the Twin Cities area are now incorporating these hard-to-measure benefits into their decisions on managing land and water. Minnehaha Creek is a showcase for the way different cities along its route increasingly see the waterway as tool to leverage green solutions for an array of social and environmental problems. As the western Twin Cities suburbs grew around it, the creek became an easy place to get rid of water that ran off streets and parking lots. Along much of its length it was forgotten, hidden by buildings and covered by streets. But that changed in 2009, starting with Methodist Hospital in St. Louis Park. Like many buildings along its banks, the hospital had turned its back to the creek and a nearby wetland. But the hospitals expansion plans brought officials of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District into the conversation. The district officials, who help manage the creek from Lake Minnetonka to the Mississippi River, saw a chance to improve water quality in the creek by bringing back its natural curves, which had long ago been straightened so stormwater could move along faster to the Mississippi. Curves would slow down the flow of water, increase flood plain along the banks and expand the size of the wetland behind the hospital, filtering out more dirt and pollutants. A decade later the entire health care complex has turned around to face to the wetland. Its paid for boardwalks that allow patients and staff to unwind outdoors everyday, and even pulled the theme of water and wildlife into its interior design. The staff can feel the joy of coming to a workplace where they can enjoy nature, said Duane Spiegel, vice president of real estate for HealthPartners, which merged with the hospitals parent organization, Park Nicollet, in 2013. Patients and their families are no longer confined to the hospital they can go outside. A good healing environment, that helps them in recovery, said Dr. Tom Kottke, medical director for health and healing at HealthPartners. Hopkins replants a park There is no question, Keeler said, that improved mental health is one of the clear benefits of green infrastructure in urban areas. But how do cities determine the nature of the nature? she asked. Do people just need to walk by trees, or do they need an immersive walk with the sound of birds? The difference matters, she added. Some people want lawns, soccer fields and picnic tables. Others want dog parks, urban wilderness or farmers markets. Put in the wrong one, and instead of a thriving outdoor space, she said, you eventually get a blighted eyesore. But put in the right one, as Hopkins did with its Cottageville Park improvement project along Minnehaha Creek near Blake Road and Highway 7, and it can revive a neighborhood. A tiny park surrounded by apartment buildings along the creek had become a place where crime could happen unseen, said Kersten Elverum, Hopkins director of economic development and planning. The area was redesigned in 2015 as part of a larger project with the watershed district, with water and flood control included as part of the package. The creek banks were replanted, the park was enlarged, and a sweep of grass in the center now covers a basin to hold and treat stormwater. The larger, open park now includes a community garden, trails, a basketball court and playground, making it safer and a destination for the entire neighborhood. There are a lot of ways that this diverse community that lives around the park can get together and get to know each other, Elverum said. The environmental benefits of the project are less obvious, but significant: Some 400 feet of stream bank were restored, and the new site treats stormwater runoff from 22 surrounding acres, removing 26 pounds of phosphorus a year. And that impacts everyone downstream, Elverum said. A stream is born There are places, however, where gray infrastructure still tops the green version especially where its already built. Downtown Minneapolis, for instance, relies on 16-foot concrete stormwater tunnels to drain millions of gallons and lots of pollutants from the streets directly into the Mississippi River. But they keep downtown functioning, said Kristina Kessler, the citys director of surface waters and sewers. And while a rain garden on every corner of the city would certainly help, she said, the long-term maintenance cost is beyond what we can do. Often, said Keeler, the best opportunity to get the most out of green infrastructure, is a new development such as the massive project underway at Ford Motor site in St. Pauls Highland neighborhood. Even so, as that site makes clear, justifying the added expense is still a new exercise in public policy. One of the most popular features of the new development is the novel treatment of stormwater. Instead of passing through underground sewers, the water will flow above ground in a stream running through the center of the complex which will also provide the water to re-create the falls at nearby Hidden Falls park. It will be aesthetically beautiful and, on its face, cost about the same as underground pipes, said Wes Saunders-Pearce, St. Pauls water manager. But using a complex computer model, planners were able to quantify the added benefits from the aboveground version, including factors such as water quality improvements and energy- and greenhouse-gas reduction from all the extra trees that could be planted along the stream. That was a huge turning point, he said. It was twice the benefit compared to the traditional way of planning. Josephine Marcotty is a Twin Cities science writer and former Star Tribune environment reporter. She can be reached at josephinemarcotty@gmail.com. | University of Minnesota professor: "Trees are oversold" in green space planning. "Green is sometimes more expensive, but it can carry other benefits that are not as well captured in markets, Bonnie Keeler said. There is a huge interest in expanding funding for green infrastructures, she said. | ctrlsum | 2 | http://www.startribune.com/green-value-of-twin-cities-trees-get-second-look/505843392/ | 0.650335 |
Why Is Macy's Closing So Many Seattle and Bay Area Stores? | The San Francisco Bay Area and Seattle are the two biggest hubs of the U.S. tech industry. Not surprisingly, they have been among the fastest-growing parts of the country in recent years. In fact, the San Francisco, San Jose, and Seattle metropolitan areas account for 3 of the 4 strongest regional economies in the U.S., according to Business Insider. Despite this breakneck economic growth, both the Bay Area and Seattle have been hit hard by Macy's (NYSE: M) store closures and store downsizings in recent years. Let's take a look at why the No. 1 department store chain is shrinking in these fast-growing markets. Rapid downsizing Over the past five years, Macy's has significantly reduced its footprint in the Bay Area. In 2015, it closed its store in Cupertino. In early 2018, it closed a furniture store in Novato (in the North Bay area) and a full-line store at Stonestown Galleria in San Francisco proper. Last September, it closed its men's store in downtown San Francisco. Right now, Macy's Sunnyvale store is in the midst of a final clearance sale. The company is also preparing to shrink its San Francisco flagship store, and recent local media reports indicate that Macy's is planning to close its men's store in Palo Alto. The exterior of Macy's Union Square flagship store in San Francisco. More Macy's recently sold a portion of its San Francisco flagship store. Image source: Macy's. The downsizing has been somewhat less stark in Seattle, but unmistakable nonetheless. In the past few years, Macy's has shrunk the size of its downtown flagship store by about two-thirds. Additionally, Macy's is in the midst of a final clearance sale for its Redmond full-line store and has already announced that it will close its store at Seattle's Northgate Mall next year. Weighing the real estate against the business Macy's retrenchment in the Bay Area and Seattle doesn't mean the retailer is doing especially poorly in those markets. Instead, it is reacting to several important changes in the retail and real estate markets. First, mall traffic has been falling, particularly at lower-quality malls. Second, the rise of e-commerce means it's no longer essential to blanket the country with stores just for the sake of convenience. Third, real estate values have soared over the past decade -- especially in the Bay Area and Seattle. The result is that in many cases, the profits Macy's can earn from continuing to operate a particular store can't match up to the value of the underlying real estate. Indeed, Macy's has collected an enormous amount of cash in exchange for downsizing in these regions. It received a total of $115 million for the upper floors of its Seattle flagship store. It sold the ground lease for its Cupertino store for $32 million. Its mall-based stores in Sunnyvale and San Francisco sold for $40 million and $41 million, respectively. Most notably, Macy's brought in about $250 million from selling the Union Square men's store and recently received a similar amount for a 240,000-square-foot piece of its main San Francisco flagship store. Even where it hasn't received huge sums for closing stores in the Bay Area and Seattle, high real estate values may be accelerating Macy's downsizing initiative by driving up rents. Of all the stores discussed above, the only location that appears to have been closed purely due to underperformance was the Redmond, Washington, store. | Macy's is closing stores in the San Francisco Bay Area and Seattle. The retailer is downsizing because of rapid growth in the tech industry. | ctrlsum | 0 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-macy-apos-closing-many-170500976.html | 0.703627 |
Why Is Macy's Closing So Many Seattle and Bay Area Stores? | The San Francisco Bay Area and Seattle are the two biggest hubs of the U.S. tech industry. Not surprisingly, they have been among the fastest-growing parts of the country in recent years. In fact, the San Francisco, San Jose, and Seattle metropolitan areas account for 3 of the 4 strongest regional economies in the U.S., according to Business Insider. Despite this breakneck economic growth, both the Bay Area and Seattle have been hit hard by Macy's (NYSE: M) store closures and store downsizings in recent years. Let's take a look at why the No. 1 department store chain is shrinking in these fast-growing markets. Rapid downsizing Over the past five years, Macy's has significantly reduced its footprint in the Bay Area. In 2015, it closed its store in Cupertino. In early 2018, it closed a furniture store in Novato (in the North Bay area) and a full-line store at Stonestown Galleria in San Francisco proper. Last September, it closed its men's store in downtown San Francisco. Right now, Macy's Sunnyvale store is in the midst of a final clearance sale. The company is also preparing to shrink its San Francisco flagship store, and recent local media reports indicate that Macy's is planning to close its men's store in Palo Alto. The exterior of Macy's Union Square flagship store in San Francisco. More Macy's recently sold a portion of its San Francisco flagship store. Image source: Macy's. The downsizing has been somewhat less stark in Seattle, but unmistakable nonetheless. In the past few years, Macy's has shrunk the size of its downtown flagship store by about two-thirds. Additionally, Macy's is in the midst of a final clearance sale for its Redmond full-line store and has already announced that it will close its store at Seattle's Northgate Mall next year. Weighing the real estate against the business Macy's retrenchment in the Bay Area and Seattle doesn't mean the retailer is doing especially poorly in those markets. Instead, it is reacting to several important changes in the retail and real estate markets. First, mall traffic has been falling, particularly at lower-quality malls. Second, the rise of e-commerce means it's no longer essential to blanket the country with stores just for the sake of convenience. Third, real estate values have soared over the past decade -- especially in the Bay Area and Seattle. The result is that in many cases, the profits Macy's can earn from continuing to operate a particular store can't match up to the value of the underlying real estate. Indeed, Macy's has collected an enormous amount of cash in exchange for downsizing in these regions. It received a total of $115 million for the upper floors of its Seattle flagship store. It sold the ground lease for its Cupertino store for $32 million. Its mall-based stores in Sunnyvale and San Francisco sold for $40 million and $41 million, respectively. Most notably, Macy's brought in about $250 million from selling the Union Square men's store and recently received a similar amount for a 240,000-square-foot piece of its main San Francisco flagship store. Even where it hasn't received huge sums for closing stores in the Bay Area and Seattle, high real estate values may be accelerating Macy's downsizing initiative by driving up rents. Of all the stores discussed above, the only location that appears to have been closed purely due to underperformance was the Redmond, Washington, store. | Macy's is closing stores in the San Francisco Bay Area and Seattle. The retailer is downsizing because of rapid growth in the tech industry and rising real estate values. | ctrlsum | 1 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-macy-apos-closing-many-170500976.html | 0.734072 |
Why Is Macy's Closing So Many Seattle and Bay Area Stores? | The San Francisco Bay Area and Seattle are the two biggest hubs of the U.S. tech industry. Not surprisingly, they have been among the fastest-growing parts of the country in recent years. In fact, the San Francisco, San Jose, and Seattle metropolitan areas account for 3 of the 4 strongest regional economies in the U.S., according to Business Insider. Despite this breakneck economic growth, both the Bay Area and Seattle have been hit hard by Macy's (NYSE: M) store closures and store downsizings in recent years. Let's take a look at why the No. 1 department store chain is shrinking in these fast-growing markets. Rapid downsizing Over the past five years, Macy's has significantly reduced its footprint in the Bay Area. In 2015, it closed its store in Cupertino. In early 2018, it closed a furniture store in Novato (in the North Bay area) and a full-line store at Stonestown Galleria in San Francisco proper. Last September, it closed its men's store in downtown San Francisco. Right now, Macy's Sunnyvale store is in the midst of a final clearance sale. The company is also preparing to shrink its San Francisco flagship store, and recent local media reports indicate that Macy's is planning to close its men's store in Palo Alto. The exterior of Macy's Union Square flagship store in San Francisco. More Macy's recently sold a portion of its San Francisco flagship store. Image source: Macy's. The downsizing has been somewhat less stark in Seattle, but unmistakable nonetheless. In the past few years, Macy's has shrunk the size of its downtown flagship store by about two-thirds. Additionally, Macy's is in the midst of a final clearance sale for its Redmond full-line store and has already announced that it will close its store at Seattle's Northgate Mall next year. Weighing the real estate against the business Macy's retrenchment in the Bay Area and Seattle doesn't mean the retailer is doing especially poorly in those markets. Instead, it is reacting to several important changes in the retail and real estate markets. First, mall traffic has been falling, particularly at lower-quality malls. Second, the rise of e-commerce means it's no longer essential to blanket the country with stores just for the sake of convenience. Third, real estate values have soared over the past decade -- especially in the Bay Area and Seattle. The result is that in many cases, the profits Macy's can earn from continuing to operate a particular store can't match up to the value of the underlying real estate. Indeed, Macy's has collected an enormous amount of cash in exchange for downsizing in these regions. It received a total of $115 million for the upper floors of its Seattle flagship store. It sold the ground lease for its Cupertino store for $32 million. Its mall-based stores in Sunnyvale and San Francisco sold for $40 million and $41 million, respectively. Most notably, Macy's brought in about $250 million from selling the Union Square men's store and recently received a similar amount for a 240,000-square-foot piece of its main San Francisco flagship store. Even where it hasn't received huge sums for closing stores in the Bay Area and Seattle, high real estate values may be accelerating Macy's downsizing initiative by driving up rents. Of all the stores discussed above, the only location that appears to have been closed purely due to underperformance was the Redmond, Washington, store. | Macy's is closing stores in the San Francisco Bay Area and Seattle. The retailer is downsizing because of rapid growth in the tech industry and rising real estate values. Macy's isn't doing especially poorly in those markets, but it's reacting to several important changes in the retail and real estate markets. | ctrlsum | 2 | https://news.yahoo.com/why-macy-apos-closing-many-170500976.html | 0.7857 |
Can Rockies Mike Dunn, his shoulder finally pain free, bolster bullpen? | SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. Mike Dunn is the Rockies forgotten reliever, but a major cleanup of his ailing left shoulder could give a suspect bullpen a major boost. Hes doing a great, manager Bud Black said Saturday. Hes another veteran arm that has pitched well in the back of the bullpen. Hes done that in his career, but here, hes been a little bit off, because hes been hurt. But a healthy Mike Dunn will be very beneficial to our bullpen. Dunn, 33, knew something was wrong with his shoulder. He was sure there was a reason for the pain that forced him to shut down in early July last season after pitching in just 25 games and being limited to 17 innings, with an ugly 9.00 ERA. What Dunn didnt know was just how messed up his shoulder really was, until he underwent surgery near the end of the season. They went in and cleaned up the AC joint, Dunn said. The doctors said it looked like crab meat floating in water. Surgery also included shaving down his collarbone to reduce friction. The results, Dunn said, have given his career a rebirth. For the first time in a long time, Im able to throw with no pain, Dunn said. It was something where I really didnt realize I was going through it. Once I recovered enough to play catch, I was like, I havent felt like this for a long time. I realized Id been fighting this for at least two years. It all finally came to a head. Dunn has thrown nine bullpen sessions this winter and figures hes about a week behind the rest of the relievers. He has no doubt hell be ready for opening day. My arm feels free and easy again, he said. Dunn signed a three-year, $19 million deal prior to the 2017 season and went 5-1 with a 4.47 ERA over 50 innings in a club-high 68 appearances. Hell make $7 million this season and the club holds a $6 million option on his contract next season, with a $1 million buyout. Tech time. The Rockies have joined a number of teams in using the Rapsodo machine to analyze spin-rate data for pitchers. The Rapsodo camera is used to understand how much movement, velocity and spin pitchers are getting during their bullpen sessions. With where technology is these days, I look at it as a tool to help us evaluate, Black said. Its also a tool for our scouts and player development (staff). It can also be used as a coaching tool. We will use it and are using it. Our coaches and I are getting up to speed with the measurements. I think players in general are curious about technology and how it can help them improve. | Mike Dunn is the Rockies forgotten reliever, but a major cleanup of his ailing left shoulder could give a suspect bullpen a major boost. | bart | 0 | https://www.denverpost.com/2019/02/16/mike-dunn-rockies-shoulder-pain-free-bolster-bullpen/ | 0.254713 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.