text
stringlengths 0
44.4k
|
---|
E0x+sgn(x)¯hv |
e/radicalbiggπ |
e|ρ0(x)|+2/integraldisplayd |
0dx′ρ0(x′)lnx+x′ |
|x−x′|= 0, |
(9) |
where it is used that ρ0(x) =−ρ0(−x). Prior to solv- |
ing Eq. (9) it is instructive to analyze validity of the |
semiclassical approach. The first condition implies that |
the change of the electron wavelength is smooth on the |
scale of itself, d/dx(¯hv/µ)≪1. Estimating µ(x)∼eE0x |
we obtain that the distance to the p-njunction line |
(x= 0) should exceed the characteristic electric field |
lengthlE=/radicalbig |
e/E0≪x. The second condition requires |
that the electron wavelength is small compared with the |
width of the system, d≫¯hv/µ. Noting that in graphene3 |
¯hv∼e2we can rewrite this second condition simply as |
lE≪d. Thus, the Thomas-Fermi equation (9) for the |
equilibrium charge density and the hydrodynamic equa- |
tion (5) for its variation are applicable as long as |
lE≪d, q≪1/lE. (10) |
However, the ratio of qand 1/dcan be arbitrary. For a |
moderate external electric field ∼104V/m the value of |
electric length lE∼0.4µm and the first of the conditions |
(10) is satisfied easily for micron-sized samples. |
AnalyticsolutionofEq.(9)ispossiblewhenthe second |
term is small, in which case the charge density is [15] |
ρ0(x) =E0x√ |
d2−x2. (11) |
Substituting this expression back into Eq. (9) we ob- |
serve that the second term is indeed negligible as long |
asx≫l2 |
E/d. This is assured whenever the condi- |
tions (10) are satisfied. It is also worth pointing out |
that Eq. (11) justifies the linear approximation for the |
charge density used in deriving Eq. (1) for q≫1/d, with |
ρ′ |
0/e= 1/(l2 |
Ed). |
We now turn to the analysis of plasma oscillations |
propagating on top of the density distribution, Eq. (11). |
For small plasmon momenta, q≪1/d, electric field ex- |
tends beyond the width of the flake and the equation (5) |
needs to be supplemented with the boundary condition, |
which ensures that electric field (and thus the current) |
vanishes at the edges, x=±d: |
P/integraldisplayd |
−ddxδρ(x) |
x±d= 0. (12) |
The spectrum of the lowest symmetric mode can be most |
easily found by integrating Eq. (5) across the width of |
the flake. The first term in the brackets will then van- |
ish exactly due to the boundary condition (12). The |
remaining integral can now be calculated to the log- |
arithmic accuracy with the help of the approximation |
K0(q|x−x′|) =−lnq|x−x′|: |
/integraldisplayd |
−ddx/radicalbigg |
|ρ0(x)| |
eln(q|x−x′|)≈2dΓ2(3/4) |
lE√πln(qd). |
(13) |
Eqs. (5) and (13) combine to give the equation, [ ω2− |
ω2 |
0(q)]/integraltextd |
−ddxδρ(x) = 0, that yields the dispersion of the |
gapless symmetric plasmon, |
ω2 |
0(q) = Γ2(3/4)4e2vd |
π¯hlEq2ln(1/qd),(14) |
reminiscent of the plasmon spectrum in quasi-one- |
dimensional wires, The remaining modes, n≥1, are |
gapped. For these modes/integraltextd |
−ddxδρ(x) = 0 and simple |
procedure of integrating Eq. (5) over the width of theflake is not useful. Instead, the equation for the n-th fre- |
quency gap can be obtained by setting q= 0 in Eq. (5). |
We observe that |
ω2 |
n(0) =βne2v |
¯hlEd, (15) |
whereβnare the eigenvalues of the equation, |
2√πd |
dξ/radicalbig |
|ξ| |
(1−ξ2)1/4/integraldisplay1 |
−1dξ′δρ(n)(ξ′) |
ξ−ξ′=βnδρ(n)(ξ).(16) |
The zeroth mode β0= 0, see Eq. (14), is found ana- |
lytically: δρ(0)∝1//radicalbig |
1−ξ2. It describes charge dis- |
tribution in the strip in response to a (uniform along |
xdirection and smooth along y-direction) change of its |
chemical potential [16]. Other solutions of Eq. (16) are |
found numerically: |
β1= 1.41, β2= 6.49, β3= 6.75,... (17) |
With increasing nthe eigenmodes of integro-differential |
equation (16) oscillate faster, but in generaldo not follow |
the oscillation theorem familiar from quantum mechan- |
ics. In particular, the solutions with n= 0 andn= 3 are |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.