text
stringlengths 0
44.4k
|
---|
is lighter than the gravitino by an amount determined by the slow roll parameter . The existence of slow-roll conditions |
is directly linked to the values of supersymmetry and R-symmetry breaking scales. We make cosmological predictions |
of our model and compare them to current data. |
Key words: SUSY; cosmology; in |
ation |
1. Introduction |
In spite of the enormous success of in |
ationary cosmol- |
ogy [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] at describing the observed |
properties of the Universe, we are still missing a deriva- |
tion from rst principles where the in |
aton eld is iden- |
tied with one, or several, fundamental elds in particle |
physics. This manifests itself the in the fact that we still |
do not count with a natural way of identifying the in |
aton |
eld and the properties of its potential required to satisfy |
experimental constraints [10, 11]. |
It was quickly realized after the in |
ationary scenario |
was proposed more than 30 years ago, that supersymmetry |
could provide a natural scenario with plenty of |
at direc- |
tions which could lead to in |
ation [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23]. |
When the theory couples to supergravity, there are a num- |
Email addresses: Luis.Alvarez-Gaume@cern.ch (Luis |
Alvarez-Gaum e), cesar.gomez@uam.es (C esar G omez), |
jimenez@icc.ub.edu (Raul Jimenez)ber of new problems that appear [24], and we will discuss |
some of them later on. |
Current observational constraints from CMB tempera- |
ture and polarization experiments and large-scale struc- |
ture limit the amount the in |
aton eld has moved to ap- |
proximately <2Mpl[14], where Mplis the reduced Planck |
mass. Therefore, in |
ationary models that search for the |
in |
aton at very large energies, like for example chaotic |
in |
ation, are severely constrained already by current ob- |
servations. With the current new generation of CMB ex- |
periments (Planck, EBEX, Spider, SPUDS etc...) it will |
be possible to further constraint how much the in |
aton |
eld has displaced during the in |
ationary period that gave |
rise to our current casual horizon. It is therefore useful to |
revisit again the problem of steep directions in SUGRA |
models to understand if a |
at direction can be obtained at |
all. |
In this paper we will suggest a natural embedding of in- |
ationary dynamics in the eective low-energy Lagrangian |
Preprint submitted to Physics Letters B October 26, 2018arXiv:1001.0010v1 [hep-th] 30 Dec 2009describing supersymmetry breaking. Our approach will |
be quite independent of the microphysics underlying su- |
persymmetry breaking, and will only rely on universal |
properties of this symmetry. Since we are not commit- |
ting ourselves to any particular microscopic realization of |
supersymmetry breaking, some of our comments about re- |
heating for instance will be rather sketchy. A more de- |
tailed and precise presentations of our ideas will appear |
elsewhere [25]. Like most in |
ationary theories containing |
supersymmetry, we present a simple model of multield |
in |
ation (sometimes called hybrid) [26], identify naturally |
the in |
aton eld and its potential, and then t a few obser- |
vational data to estimate the few parameters of our model. |
We compute, in particular, the number of e-folding and the |
amplitude of density |
uctuations at horizon crossing. It is |
surprising to nd that the scale of supersymmetry break- |
ing indicated by this analysis is between 1011 1014GeV. |
An interesting spin-o of our model is that the in |
aton is |
lighter than the gravitino by an amountp, whereis |
one of the slow roll parameters (see below). |
We would like to stress that in this paper we are always |
assuming F-breaking of supersymmetry. In D-breaking |
scenarios our arguments do not apply, at least as presented |
here1. |
2. General framework |
Supersymmetry is a natural framework to dene in- |
ationary scenarios for two main reasons. First of all, |
SUSY naturally leads to the existence of |
at, or nearly |
at directions (pseudomoduli), allowing for slow roll sce- |
narios. Second, and more important, the order parameter |
of supersymmetry breaking is the vacuum energy density. |
Hence, naturally associated with its breaking, supersym- |
metry contains two main ingredients necessary in in |
a- |
tionary scenarios: vacuum energy and reasonably |
at di- |
rections. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.