text
stringlengths
1
41.5k
label
stringlengths
4
23
dataType
stringclasses
2 values
communityName
stringlengths
4
23
datetime
stringdate
2007-06-05 00:00:00
2025-05-14 00:00:00
username_encoded
stringlengths
136
160
url_encoded
stringlengths
188
560
[deleted]
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUZEp0ZHBtY0h4Y09wZFRpOUl4TlpmRk5UX0RybHlvY0xtQk1lYkYtaVdRMEgxVFlVc3ZHUkJFQVFCalMyXzE4Ui12WUZQem4tV3VBdEUtVmJQVGtqNnc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzUW9fSmZPalF1UDdDRzJkaV8wNXp1SUk4cDU4S19tdUZLUlVERE5yV0k2YTBVNE5uU0NyQnlHaUtNcGE3cXBkQzN0LTc2RHdrOVhqMkE5NGxnNDJDckpmNDEwcld3Y2tjYWIwSnpISnZ1dkh3ZHhTT1lHbnBzT3N0d1VNaEY4eHlXWjVUNWcyck9ndlJ2ZzJwZjNIcHBxSHhTelBlSHcycnM2OG5keWE0a0hvSVVTYW43VGs0NmRhU1JqbVloUHRQR1l3WmZFSlJ1VWNfVTFFeU8xWDhVdz09
"after, some say, 60000 years of human 'singing', many critics feel that this form of art may have gone the way of the dinosaur." "after, some say, 60000 years of human 'talking', many critics feel that this form of art may have gone the way of the dinosaur." "after, some say, 60000 years of human 'painting', many critics feel that this form of art may have gone the way of the dinosaur."
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUWjREbGhNcUJNVkxNY3Q4YjFtd1F3cWZ3b2gyaWNDbFNzWTZ1bTVKbkJJa3o0Q0JvWnd3aDFzYTJneGlOdl9MNlFIYnFHZDZvMnIyNTJ2Q1E2VURLU1E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzWUI3ckZnMTcyU2lBbFl3Zm5yeTQwQ2Z1eHJZNlN3b2MybmozM2U4MVZ3ZDdRSU5wTUhJUE4zdUF2M0VpSzkxNnFLSWNmMDhtVUhrYWlUby0tWlRLSnhZZkFVdXlXNUFnS0dWMGs4T0VjRkU2NW52UE5vQVVKSzc3Z1VtVm5rU3ZNZXZwNTdkYlhENUsyWjdDekkxYWdkTkVDNnI3Ny1ERjhEb0ZyOEtnRDY5SmptR0NsUjc5RUZnWEtSdWZoQXpWMWRJMEVadzR5dndFcHVYbWd5aVBkdz09
i must agree. but there are some interesting things on the horizon....
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUQUUyRXphM2I0QkVzZ0E5MUs3MUJaNjk2MUhpRkRhcU92RG9mU2RNdHFNS2dPYTFQdDdBQmpVdGNlMmd2dzB2XzlQYmxTQ0cxUFBqQ1BQeFpEQ3BURWc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzU2t5V2FYS2FrTHRUVGE0ZjU0cWZqZF9CSTluT2tGZE16STZJeU1UUnppUThVbXF0bFRTb1pzRmJwOV9QaWlGMTNrNEc4WlV6Qy1JQXpzTm10MzYzU0gxRkNGRHFDeU00djVtTEZkRmU1ZEVRcmc1TnctMTRDMkxxMWxUX0dWdmUtOXRBZnItZHh3YlJWd09zeUpGd2t5Q0o1TzFtM0YxXzEweUtpRjRaZU9lcTdDWElSbFpJMkRnMzFxSEFpV2duX2prTndldVR3QjJaZ0Vaei0yN0pfUT09
I disagree with smart people.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUaU12RFZJUVlwMEpmRHVKQjRTMk1pTUVVeHNvYWFTM2NJU1ZsX1BCcThwVkRCa0VGRkM4NC1pcXlNRTFZODF4aW1zaUtTbVhVTVJmTzZ6RVVaRTcwRlE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzUTNxQlVCb2ZIM2Q4SXpHS1lXTTcwTTdTSnZDWFB5bVpNTGhRVnlES0lYQ2NKNlRJbUdsUGhqaWxCd1VwSFN0RGlSOWVYMXFoOGFPNEZFZHFZZ3hxMnlpWnA1anFzT0VUczRlWTVyd3YwOXVTLU4wZnIwaS1WOGNWaEdUZVpBMnV2aEdldUtncl9pSmZfLXZTYm9ZUWZFUlFmV1B3cE0wVFFjQXZqTmN0WUl2bHBVXy0wRFNNa3FYbmhORml0Y1ItWkxvZ3BNN2NtZ1FRN1RBRUQ2T1FaQT09
I think that there is more to a work of art than just social confirmation. I think that in order for something to be considered there also must be some formal aesthetic, an idea being communicated, and the intent of an artist to transform something into a work of art. The prehistoric rock fulfills all of these criteria, as does Duchamp's urinal. The Dadas and the fluxus movement did fight against a formal aesthetic in many cases, but an aesthetic ideal was still present. Great art also achieves a high level of craft. Many of Warhol's works do achieve a high level of craft.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUQmdXV3JUYkZKUWR4RnVPYVhMUXFTMk9QYjRIckwtbV81RTF1ckh3RmpIMFYzNmpHZ3lPckwzR3ZJQmNTNW9tVTYyd2JFQTNuTGhnLTktSTJzQmhwLXc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzR1Zpa2pLbzhlRnV5dm83SUJSN1RpWHBlYWU0LVplYy00b0tranU3YkhQTUdWMk5yTlh0aTdIanZNNERFVUJCcXRyQ3BsZTdSZnVjSzdDdWFCY3NLSEpuRG5oU3R4TDNtb1NOa01GV19DbWRiZE1qNWx0NS11SzdaQ3BQbW5UdkkxN3JmSFMxZHFXVEV1eGhicjgxeG1IRGJmUHFGdHVURUpxd25Ia2N5bi1oQTNBek95WndxMFY0cjlvM0ZBVldEaHBrYnVwLXVCQm5YcU5wb2diVHRxdz09
[deleted]
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUcHNQYkE3SDZUOWVTMHBreFFGck4wc2FVeERWajRQTVNBVXJtYUh6YzlsNW53ZlVnczBQM21IZEJzZzAxQnZfU0ZYY081V2JLb0RKQWgwQ0pjTXcycFE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzYllRZUtzUlVBbmt3ZDdyc2J2SGNDSVRfdFdtbkt5MTRFcTVNVDhCNkFwMmpDbW5LU1lKMERKelJNNzlaamVoS2xWRHo2SzdFdUt0OHUzUXdJR2xSVmhRMUU4RWQ0SFluX3VhYWZJWXRuRnpUYXBVYUpOVWpTZ2k0WTA3Yzh6MWdKWmVJVFY2ZDAxQmlpdEFocjd4ZWFlNFBKcnctaS0taG0xTXBzWlAxY3BBNmVnRGJFTEVPUURCMVhSS3hwcHpiNXM1SDNqMFJKUFVWQ19HN2Y4V0RLQT09
I hate people with elitist artistic view
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUR1cxUVQ2NVZUalVFZHBlTWladFNJSE4zSXpNWlAwNmJqZXAyY3pNblhJUkZvWWFxWW9vYzBBMUxKOS1Vc1JzWGRhZ1pjeGpaVm12RW53eTJTRENObmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzTXhkNWtKeTJHcUJRLUFGcnJBSGJkaEhYLUpJbmFIazdwNHI0X0dpTXZtMG9BRTBmRVdrcHVScEFxZ3Q3ck1MQ0VMY1N2R1MyQU1Pb3RTOGVBbkdqMVgxX2c0Z3Z3bG5lWm5zVU9mQzJPWHZnTy05a1JOTmdFTFZ0UE5uSnVSNW1WWUw0Qlh5VHU0SFE3MkRiVWVfY3ZfVFFNcHhDRzVoYkpfNm1EZjM5alNoekVVUVU2N0FXNUtpaWtPb2lmQ0JROTdiNVJIcklBRkxBMG50Sl83WVp4UT09
[deleted]
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUdmRvWjhKSkhIbUFOcG1FNHVvNkdZTUZNbWVINU44WWc3X19VbE53QjJXSGRxV3dBQms0c2VRN0lrTmIxaE0yYjZJODFoREhKVjVjS1NycElIWjY3QVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzSmpNZDgxbjFnazBfbThoY19HbEo4cGpWR3dRa1NFZmc1WWd4N0EwVDlzZElrcDBmSE9HaEZhVW0tajEtZWxqMW55U0J4dTdnQnloZGhveGh4MjNveXNRYVpWNUVQRHhEY1Bhd0VTX3ZweFp0VmxEV203MVY2aTR4OUVwQm1zeVhJb3NMcEl6VTNnM0ZRUVhKa19DOXV0TXlhd1lzcnFsWUpWRlVGSURkSnU4WHJmSnRPU0V2UFljcjkwQ1g4TGFydUVNM1pPWl9iTUNuZDNYZ3BIeEdZZz09
I'd love to discuss whatever the content of that video is with you, but YouTube's blocked here. What does it say? Or better yet, what do *you* have to say?
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUd0pwa3RxQUxBQWEtNWZvQlNXMXE0TmFsQ2JZbWRMdThzUThGYV9iZmJYckQ0dmlRc3BkNWlIMjRCMW1FVFpYbFgya18wUGtieDlRaTQ4S2tyc19qMkE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzV0JwdlZSRThVdnhOVWlzM1o1UUlkVFM1eHhPN1lua19JcXFIaGhCMFp0QTF0Z1dTQzQ5c1pfcVBoUTVucUx6azRYVGVpSkV0bGRtQ3dia1RmLUwyY29qLUZocWVwVE5kR1ltVmp5eEltbWk5cGdZNjdyMHRPcThJbWt6NzJOZEgxTG1QQW5yaklVZlVLbURfSFJSVGpFelBUUlFHb3VEX1lpQzMtWE5SZmp3bWlKcDhONW8yTjIxSHI1dXp4cE9HV2Vibks5SnF6YnlDZFdweXhKNm9hUT09
this. also, according to warhol, "good artists borrow, great artists steal."
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUWnNxbjVKZ3ZkcTdYQjlEenhXbFpFU0pfSzhaSE9DYmxVZ09nckFKSEJxNWRlZFdFWERwWHBwX0FidGlONno3NHJGRVRPVTVVWVc1Q1FvYnJsQ0htOGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzT0tCemdVel8zaC0xa2tycFdzNFFDSFd3cFRfMi1RV3lyU3Y3NmxLeXJKNlV4aXZXNTV4WWVxb1dMLVJibEpQMWFsMlBpUHl3ajVtekx1eEFkc0w2TlBsNWxlNzFzczI4ZTRsTzFMVHMzam82SmZoM3BtdThFb0FfWUtLUXNLamJxbWU0QUU3aTVvcmRsWG9yNWh6bXV3MkIwOXlxelFWOFFPMmNWd2VMcDZ1eHlBbE81Y3JRbDBkdXozb2hpUGowcy15Vl80ano0NlNZR2Jwb0ZIN080dz09
i think that was picasso although it would make sense that warhol would use it. and while i agree completely with your analysis of marketing art, i scream against it coming down to that.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUZ0xUY1FoVnR1Z0JRNTlwT1BwTGROWEs5Q2tVYktiQXlIbVAxUjZCR1VvLS1lQmJqYTBxdkZ5R3dkb25TRmFMSklXcUhld0Jqckt1QUdhNTRLeUVucmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzWXpxa1BuTUJHSUtZc0FUMVZuTXJPYVUyZExpWTNlX0x4QnpFV1VJSXF2MXZUXzZ4eFNEbkFDLVBtU2hNNkpvcEJ3d1lmUUFWaERWV1pWS3dlYkZNUTk4Y0FOc3JlVXo1SDhoMjlKS2k5anRqU1FsZ3pDb2xuS2lzYnlDX3JkNEh5R0V4X1BwOUR6Wlc3bERRRjZidUZkMk84dTRuc0xSNGFJWHBfNk5IRkpFTjk4SXNXSkhWRWI4REtOSFV3a0tsTXFySkdXMVdSaFhaM3pMYkhjWHdRdz09
The original question was about "how was Warhol (considered) an artist" not how he marketed or sold it. Art is not defined by whether it is sold or not. So my brain seems to be functioning much better than yours, thank you very much, considering I actually understood the original question. Douchebag...
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUS05jWmhaeGttYWRQQWZndEh0Q3I2MmZ5Q21SVEV2RUViYnlNZDdVVkJMWXgyNDNUYkNiRzVHeTVuaEw0bEtNU1JocDZQbkpPN0hqN2d5ZU5YdmFKVVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzQ2hiS055TFN1aERWRkZTMkh2b0MyNFBULXhMLUVmVjdaNFVvbGxudjBsbEQ1bXZhRFdBcGJXek5SUFY3RDAtd0drVEdsZDRSeHJrdTdHOC1MWmhaZVU2ZkhuTUJNdnVJSFFEeUZMaW1uVWtybS1UZ2VjdF9wWnhqVlp5NmhtYlYwYWU0LU9iQlRnMURsNjBEZEhyZVNFWjNJV1RvcFBkOGJhTXRiYWdETFZDcE5GSllPck51OFl1eE1iMjlLZzkwQmVOaHk0UlliSVFiZGkyWHJReE5idz09
I know. Everyone should just continue painting portraits, landscapes and still lifes.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUc3ZkUDUyYmJkWER5QVRYOURLZmhXM3JnQVVNMXl1ZlN5Rk1lZDAtSG41aFo1WngxWmxHdkxnMkFITG00MmxrcEVYYTBmNmZuNzFaSXVTZ2piZ3FaTkE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzWW9jZW1hbjFYcWpDVFRKckc5TTV0MVltVE8ycmRPaVdMdlU5eUFBWU92UUR6Q3o1NWgwR2JCMTRTVkRtLTFJZHFyVndRZ0ZvOV9PdGcwQzE0UnpHd3QwRXBCWnBKeGNfR2xZSF9rZDROelJUeUFjQWNKZzlzSWpOMEpRcWNOUmNxQjdUeF92R0FteXJzUk5YVEo3aGZFejhjZVRTVTh5cU43Qi1OZ0JfWXhvenQ3eVFrQm5sM01lS2NsSm5jMjZIbUFaaC1NN2liczBvcjk1WHh2UVkyQT09
I believe (as an illustrator) that Art comes from a discipline that the artist took the time to master and perfect. Randomly throwing paint on a canvas without forethought to color, application, texture, harmony, rhythm, balance, etc etc is not art. I'm sorry, but for years I had to watch my instructors show us examples of "fine art". I was always amazed at how a piece of "fine art" could sell for hundreds of thousands of dollars (without the artist being dead) of the type of work I would get an F for if I were to turn it in for class. I have been drawing since 5 years old, I'm 35 now and finally perfected my line work, now I moving into digital painting, its a whole other animal that will take me the next 10 years to feel confident in. So it angers me when I see an individual who can't draw anything representational sell their "art" for more than I'll make in 10 years. I think its a simple case of trust fund babies with to much time on their hands and family friends who can throw away a few grand for some crap that was created with no art discipline in less than a few hours. Warhol is close to that type of "artist" to me. A lot of hype, in the right place at the right time....but very little actual skill.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUZ1A2SnRMUDh4N1JqRzFPYjhUeEtza3Nha0VSRGxFa1N0YlB5WDBLR09IUEI2ODlRWU5WV3JVRFZiVzdoLWViSWRFUnVadC1jR3dmaVp6RGFPRkVpb1E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzSkhpeml6UUxrc08zS01xVUp6dEVYUkQyZlFLOFRJQU1xVmVNUXMxQnJzVGNwWDFzb3V5d3I1RjlyWHlRNVVwVUo2bExlWGFMb01uTzRHLTczSDZBdVFfS0QzZkh6RHpHWUw0M1JZSllDUlgxZnhJUUdvaUFJa2lGbEM3YzJ3NGRlN0Q2OGFKTzd0ZVFVZTNBMEpEZTRtYS1mY1RPaGlBMlpqNTh6ZlllTk9IQ1RFSlhoaW1TVUNaamFtUFZvY200WmdaM21HZTE4MkJTTFRQdUN6LXpPdz09
I'm sorry, taking a subjective subject matter and trying to force your *opinion* on it as fact does not make you smart, or a realist.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUY20zSV9QYThyZzlIYmJSU1VKTWxJMFFXaWEzbzNORHRzUk9mOWZuR3pWU2szNVJabUpxMXlTbkFvcGhQSUI3TGRHQWtDU3BoVGx2SW91eENHSVptWlE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzR1N3aXdYWlJvZC1BOEpENXp1X3FEY2pzc3JQYk9HdjNva2tza00wVWRhblhEbUFpQ2ZNcGJia0xwVWhyQ0NJUTN3Q0ExQmlRT2w0OEx2aEkxUDVnV0plQVRQRUxDVkZRLWppLVhJZzUyZklEeG95VjUzVElwY3FNalJnS29JcWk1S2lEUTE5ZUV6UU5jREJMUDlPNEJoeXA0UmZxRnY4a1BJaVRPWGZKNU5FNXk0NlBIUFdORUxtdFktTTVaWTVHV1MwQnZMLUcyLURnUkFxa0Vyci0xdz09
[deleted]
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUb3dhNk5qcW96d2huM0xVdTVXdVRzZ3M3RXdkY2d4NTNOek51OTBzN1k1QVl1a2tNUEpDTVFwVTBCdERRZ09NMVBkZVhxWk5nVmFoZ1R2SzBhX01CbEE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzLS1KdXlOaGFSTEtTelJxeHR3S05yNFBVT3Y4TWNyeVVTcjJqTU9lczVLMFQyV21VNzAyU0YxeXhNNC1fSW9rOWpqMS1TVy1iUFZZOGtsVWdBRGctMFMzT1NTd3BfRmVVSFFVV2NJMlZuS21FWWpWNnVjWFIzNTRaSDJlQ3RCRFdsOTgtMEVXbVJPYXRNSEd6MDFOVTktNkl2dEV4MTVTVTEteUlUU3VGNTYxTUM5V0pTUGoyYzd4Q1JPRTl1Q2N5Vk9Id2lRQkU4NjFlT3lsUlhRQXI5dz09
If we are told it is art, then it is art. Imagine an art museum with no writing next to any "works of art" giving a title, artist, and description of the piece. We would just be lost. For all we know a broken toilet stall could be art. With modern (or postmodern) art, there is no real criteria for anything to be art, even intention of the artist is irrelevant.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUWjJON052bFZWaXpxRUZXUjQ2WWxlZGZKY0RYb3F6UFdfaXBlTVpXRm45VzdtdVV4RkRiZ2lIdjROb0ZJTTJoQjhtZl9FbWNxOWNYRnoxODg5SnJCUlE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzRGRHV2JBLTQ0VWxTckVuck9wMEdjVmV0TW1sRklhQlJqNUFfOGRvN1l2WFQ5cHV5TDFoZmdfZFY4bHVSZDBmUEs2LXNoZy0zOE1LUExvY2J6UDFLdUhQNWc5OWFvRGdxcEd0YWlUN3k5dUx3bllrYlZzU0hRX1pjRTFVbFc5cUxGUmNKR2d5cERFb25kd2xSY2hFeThjSjFReWR6dl9rb0cyVUdvVnR5UVVvQ1pyR3N5d2QyVjRYTmtMY25qRVl0WTFZbXhkMEpGZkVNeEs2T2JGb2NiZz09
I'm going to agree with you on the fact that perceived value is what makes these pieces, regardless of skill or talent sell for so much. At that level of art trafficking its more about selling yourself than it is your art. Warhol found this and exploited it. In this sense hes an artist. Once again, as for talent, hes no better than a recent graduate from a graphic design school. However I will not upvote you because your calling people names, when you do that, a kitteh is killed =(
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUUm1rbTFyX1kzUGJBSURRUUtnR2pwWG9xaTlQNWhMWEdKZ1FkRTFpVGppeFVZa1VGQVp4LUF1VW5lU2lURmJ0UUdTdjhNUTAwcWpDQlpjeG9uUmtYM1E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzSWxXQjR6Q01lSFVvNmc5cHpDdzZxc0xONTZCVG02MWNiby1Zd1hremZLMjZoLXpsbnY1NkRZRVVqc0llcVA5eWg5cVpCNkhsc05zUE5Bbmo5ZE9YV1JORTU3SVZwNHV3b1VFMXhVcXZzeHRhamllZ242WVQ0cnNrVjAzX1MzNlYwZmZtRFdnaHZCSHNpNnpnQi1FWHZ1ZnN2Sy1XNHoxZUVzN1c5cWtzMVpvQW1HMmdLUXVaUmhvX2lURU5ONFgxOEdqRmJRZkRRbHN2MkEwLW9sbXh6UT09
[deleted]
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUaDN3WWl6TXA1Wjk2cW96MnlmRlZtZ3JMY0dDYUZCcDZMNFM4U2NOLWdValkyOHM3WG9UZ0JjSVZVWkE3SllNc2tmcGVZM3BSTndYdlJJc1Zra1NOU1E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzX1Nwd1cxWDd4dUliZEUwYlZOOVZDY29ST2xnbjhoS05XX0lJRkVtN0Vmc205eGE2RnR4eHlQbEdWWmpvX3U1WEV4Mk9yWk8wZnR4TFQwWTJFT25ORTJ4UGkzajJHV3UtNFNRSTROd3lKZjIxTGZ4UExqR0FuX0w1SmE5Z19VOGVYRjUzT2FKRldQaXQxT1N6am5KT1lmejJZVEczSXhIUXRHSGlXVExBc3lJU3RNT3gxc1BmRGYwQUw3YWRZMzBRa3dXMU83ZjdtakozMzBGRFNrdHJKZz09
He said he was; therefore, he was. Just like when Duchamp said his urinal was art. It was art, because he said it was. Neither of these mundane truths say anything at all about whether Duchamp's urinal was GOOD art, or whether Warhol was a GOOD artist. A shoe is food, if you eat it. That doesn't necessarily imply it is good as food. The same goes for art. You can eat a painting, if you want, but why would you want to? You can look at a urinal, or a Warhol if you want... sure, why not? Well, because they're boring, that's why not. They're not good at doing what really good art is good at. At least eating a shoe might keep you alive in an emergency. Bad art is the single most useless thing in the world. Well, other than its use to separate fools and their money, that is.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUOXVtSzM5aFpjTkVSY1NvNDFUMG1SR1VwRjlqZ1I4WGtsVnpVbkVKdlczZWpuNjJNZzdRMGpBYmxwOF94NjNCYVZQRkFIcEJScVk0NkxMUnpOVl9kYUE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzRUh0dWQzNTJLMzVDVEhQczhYRVBPYXk1OVBDREt0YmVtRV95TlRxVklhRklxRmtzR09FXy12OVJBeTYtRVVNeTUtYVZBVFc0YTFSZ09RU2dLenFRQ3k1bU1LMXZ6RDE2bEJaU0JqM2gzNFhWclN6MzF1UTFQb09acEo2dnMwWlZDR0xLSldTazdBdjk3ZWx3OG5mb2FMNVFOcHRydEFUMmU0eExESmVNTDA0NGxtaV96ZHpveWVpQTJLaDJjVWtTTFRsdXFtUTRnREI0aWJtNFpvMnNMdz09
I have always been angered by the idea that consumerism and art have become such close friends thanks to Warhol. He seemed just too have sold Da-Daism to big business and ended up prostituting the entire art world along the way. I get that art needs a patron but it doesn't need a fashion as well.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUTGkzUHNYQXJlaWdJYzZpNHVpY18tbkJxcm10eWZCS1FXZUJISENab2J6TkJqMzIwWVFXQXVXRlR5RDZjTzFfN2dQem9GWXhtQllWZlA0R3YwTXg5bFE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzZ2xlYURPSDNfYmpqbTVuMU1FZDFOZzFjUEFaczUxZjVYa3V5aVQ5bzR1RE1mdWt4WFM3Y3VPaUVpeW5WLW1ydjJrTG5hak5IZEJxb2NJekFrV0VTakVDd3Y1amVCZWVGdl9wSWstS1daaEt0bHZYUnRWcmRLa0JzbUhKQVFhcjk1bWt0V192cFNGMm12RjZZZ2RDc0hrdHJoMjB3WWFid0tjVEV2VWlrdUNPTHhWblh5TE1TWERSQlp2cDE3ZktiNHJPRGpKdmR2S3lRSHUwVmNYOERTdz09
also, plenty of smart people agree with him/her.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUZjJsZEpURTBwU1dWUmJQbUUxQ2daYWlUemx3d2hEaWxKOEJPaGx6NlBiTk1QU1ZpX3hXOHRpVW0tUVp0dGczRkU0MU5BZXJYOFVKckdnQmZmaEh3QlE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzMk5JcHdtN1JIQWp3REY3UUhXWjBSV2J4X1BNUDNnS3RBYUNCZEJVUmltTGJ3Qmo4Z19rOU0zQlRNM2NFQWVDa1lvNlg4ejNKeFVaY1FUcFVkMzVpcFpqQVNXU3l4eWJRWlRhNGI3bl9HQV9jTlVRdGZueVRTQTFyVWlkUFJGenBra19xS3JEc0d4R1Ywc1pUTllocFFxcjJpeWdNOW9uVWhOSEZKQ1U4WHJrR0hheTlQOTc3OXN4b3NrSExodENVblFxT2t6QW9PS3UtdWtCS3dkbHB5Zz09
[deleted]
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUei1UZU9GcjhmSXdhMmVrOFo2MmJVaDRsNExhdnFXTUxOTTR6UldPREZ2X00xc01KSnZJcUg2X0NYZFc4bXdodFRPMUplNDZqTy1aN0VMdmFHQ18tU1E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzWFp3S0ZTdnVuRTBfYTRNNEpxQ0JtSERkcTNsZmE2cjBKTlZHeDAyUGgzWmV6NG5SMmthM1I2UTBjakJFUVdxUl9tMFJ4N3JLbXBlclRzMGttMHZCSG1oOHl5OHMzdTJWeUg0MUJ1ZFh1cW1GRmp6NEwxb1dxYjZZMVBIa2NJZFR1MEZINHh6UUdLNWVVVE1UUk1NMkdfT0IzQ29lYzlJSjR6WGdaSmJMQUpkZzIxbl9TZjlIamhMYlc1NGR6QlZyNTZ2cGNWaEJQSmxqZGowSV9yRHhEQT09
yeah, i think it was picasso actually, though i do remember learning about how warhol brought it back, in a sense. the man has essentially stolen almost all of his great work from other artists like rauschenberg. oh yeah that wasn't my analysis i just agreed with what seinkonnen was saying. and i'm totally on your side when you want to scream against it. problem is its hard to scream against a squall :-/
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUY2Zjb2dqTzNDUklJWU1FYlpKN05CVjBGR2pjV0VpZ09VSGNVYmhWc0UxbEIxT1hpRm5KZ1R3TGpmcWFhU3FBcV82elRUd015NEljc1p2UUQyc29iaVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzX2pIcFEwcG91a2UxaldpSGQ5OG8wQU56aEFmOGpzUTYtZGVSSWluUldXcEEzNmg5SlBkYVctMFpGY1VKN092dFR3Uy1nR0lMSFp5X1FnYldSWGN5S054ZHF0SWZBV0d2aFd2ZTBLTEJuWHNBa2RTb0U5TGdpUFowVE5uemVoeUlFWUF1RWE4MXMyNFVlazY2aHNodVB5R1RsX3BQLXJHSnZrS0hRWTJWcnRJRGRtVU5zSWQ0R3duUGFqUW5JaE9EcnhjYjl0eERQYkxEc09qUjZxR1VSUT09
"and this fully satisfies the OP's question. Pay attention." Actually, it doesn't. It doesn't in any way explain how Warhol is considered an artist because it never talks about the art (which is kind of the whole point.) Profiting from art is just something a lucky few get to experience. From your argument I am more of an artist than Warhol since I am a graphic designer and I have had countless more projects sold than he. "The price tag on a work of art is now very much apart of that work's appeal." Appeal has nothing to do with whether something is art - sorry, you failed again - post mod artists have made money selling cans of their own feces. Where is the appeal in a can of feces? Is it art because it sold? Is it art simply because the creator labeled it such? We could argue about it until the dawn of the human race and not reach an answer that everyone could agree on. What is or is not art cannot be defined on some message board by tech geeks over the course of a day or two. There wouldn't be any need for people to go to school for 10 years to get a Phd in art history if that were the case. The ability to sell art does not make one an artist.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUNUxMMWZ4Q0h1SFk0WFpHSGg3cGFZVk9UaTNEWFJiY0h5bjVwQmRDR2tWSjd3VUxwVm4tNXh4UUlnSUJ4dmY3MnNueGxIR0s0UmhNS04wMXByRHluUmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzam1QM3haNTg1T29TZWhCZzRSRGpVcm1iYlFBRndRaGdyUmxXS1h6bGFHdXg3NGswNkJKYU11VkVwaEFTZTZEWkRwaW9CRHcwanAzbDZMSjB6c3l5RzR3WEFTVURYaGMzRWpvd19neDRndmZZTEpKamNteFZPQnk0a2txbzF5MEROcVNJM0J4clZGdV80UklHVWFjRWtkeHluSEtrdzFwUkU0SURFR3lkZGNZcVZOcy12eWIwNXhpdWJZaTV1dmpqMDUzNWVyZHFIZXdnV2JJenJ4OW5mQT09
What do you mean by "an idea being communicated?" Something can't look nice just to look nice, it has to convey some meaning? Also, ditto on formal aesthetic- what is your definition?
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUaXcwZE9MakpjREw0VV9lRTh0UndpZWhhWlRZMENwTkh5c2dCTHlZOEp4bjVrakpQR1p0dUJQUHBhSUI2MHBfNEI2RTdnSHdOSExYdE04VWVzV3NvTlE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzUWh6Zk54bTA4WHNnbmZVZUE5dTFNelU1bHFmSzItM0NmcndjYTV2TTk3eVhWdnE5TlVRVzNzdi05UDlPaVZxanRiQWFjSjAydVlqamlwczFhbGEwWW1aSlZpZUZ2TGZ5WDJZc1hNYTNNdWZtUnNKOERtYlBQWGRQTUFSdGhjSU1QQzdqbm9mcVpFa1BJSE5mY2VUQ2gwS2k4YXY1bVVXSjhVd0VIcU13a3cwdEs2ZHViWmU0azVCZTVvcERRbW1WN0QyX3I5ZGVlZHpid3dDQUItTi1RZz09
I'm sure there are, but will they be "turd in a jar" interesting?
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUOFJjODd4R3FtQWp1OTZGUzEwOUh5VmhXQmEwOWxxaFdYRFQzVFgybHpaNTQ3Q185NjBFdDhsd0xDd2MyLWxnU1l2OUhxMlBVSjI2UTJwQVBENTlwU0E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzQ2Yya0ZGZlpQdXB5TnNMWWRkemxPWFhmYjN4ZjFfdUNYS0Y2TVZfRlM0Mjc2RHdzQUJ2dDc2UEowRGRoZm9XQkVRVExIWVl6WEJ0QTZSOUhaNVBqVnVwNF9rTnM3eGswbTVCM1E3OEJhREFDV204c1RJTVJuckQxOXVFWFgyeFlBV1Q5d2NjLUg5NkpJSmQ2aFA4UmhGbWFBZmdtS21GTzNIYk1Oc1Z5VUhyUW5xMUxyMWp1ejVQODZST2dQa2l1UmE0anplaG5GSUoxSEVYaDktYW1sdz09
lol i *sure hope* so!!
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUa3JrX1BBb0U0dFRGZmZwclpLVFR5b3cxU1RfNU9NOVNXcHp1N2lCYjFXajdUSFpGMDlVWGRTVUoxdTRiaE9oTmJJTW4tQW5yOTR1OF90UzZPRE90Mmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzS21mS29HZVVVeDAwVlFSeF9WWEtyRDZEbzlhMWpSMWQyNUpVUnB4bER5dDRjd3FJYk9pMVpNZE8yMkRLWVNlRU9abHNWaWFzTXhGRU9kQXlPQ1JvZ3dHY0lWek96M0pBREZwNUZvU213MmtOZ0ZZa2ZuZ3ozd05GdUVZVXRjRU55V1lJV2Z6elh6ZFF0aFBvZkYzdXRDbFVlVExpR0dTTlg0MmdtMU9meFJYMzBNSGNrM2lkOWlqMF9lMHU0ZXUxbFpKMG5abkhiVXBrMlZ1Tm5CTFlpQT09
[deleted]
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUTWZMZXpFbk1ldnFvd3FXN3lVa2Y3a3F4b1AyclZ0ZnpJdDNyb1BCQUF4NTdwSW1ZTUFmTzRjUmxiLTZMVGdVcDg2RzVtTHFFSU5SaG9RYWNERjBYOWc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzRUoxWVdvbHZ5WGVsVHhHZEM1cFhIX3FKMGhZeGVfZ05pbzA5c3BhcV95RE03S0dOeVBhcmYzZXF0TFpXeXp2VDA4NndDM1ktdkJ4ZGo0SzR0d0NicjBiNzVzZEktOUFfaEY4cHFGY21MS21yMHNYRldfbENZMEpzTWRzbFFzRWxBSVhWbFVOcGsyVmFpSC1ONmU2Y3Jlb2hIUnpmalRlME5Feml5OVZLRFA1X3hIUDdJU1llLVRyQlQwa05ZQUlYTlJGUXVWdUlEeVkwaDhXVV9OLVBfUT09
I don't see why not. He worked all day and all night for most of his life creating then later producing artwork. The only drug he ever took was a mild dosage of speed so he could stay up and work. Very much a workaholic. (his body couldn't handle anything more than that) Though much of his later work was completely put together by others, he spent all of his time devoted to his job. If you look at the entire catalogue of his work you might find that he was insanely prolific and also a really good draftsman. He had a very unique way of illustrating things. He was also a great writer imo. The aura that he created about himself being nothing and/or a fake artist was all done on purpose to show the world that everybody is an artist.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUOEVEdWFRS21XTFE0SHJqdlloMlZqS0RKNGR5cFdZUUtzanpmOWNfV3NjeEktQWl2TFYtSEdra2dUbTEwY1laRjlzMFVWX0hvR2pNclFyMlFfZVpXeFE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzUXFPWkh3eDNNQ1RIM1RVNWdFT0E0NmhTZ0lfVVlhYTRvWnJwQmRzLU1WV2dyQlgwa296bk9EbTgwRnZUUTVWeWlhNnFxc2FqWElFVEhILXFZWlBPNGJ0aDB3UWRRcWNaRGdDWnhiU0tpeGczR2xqcllkWmx3dkM1bzBUbkgxYlo0S1FrRVF4NzdjSUxMZW5WSnlZc0hoTmc3WENjZE5KUF9uN2tFV0d1TXFUNVZUQURqWDctTENRZzBWcnZhSDNSLW5pYTdSeE1odmh5XzVxNzByblJBZz09
I find it interesting that the manner in which his art was physically created mirrored the way the objects he painted were created. For example, he would crank out soup can prints like an assembly line (often people helped him, ie the factory) which mirrors the way soup cans are actually made. Apply that idea to his portraits and the whole facade he played in public and you'll def need some time to think warhol, his art, and his followers over. So yeah. It is art - should be obvious if o.p knew anything about the guy's biography.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUWExRSC1HMW42cE5KZ0lFUU0ySEtvZzRFbVJ0LWNxZWpiTFJnTVQtZDlKQ1NpeDRwU3RxTGRoa19Mb2x2eUpXcEFVUnR5dHhYMW1YTkdDdFBwVTBiWVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzRmhEaG5GakRmSlNjc2x5UkVaMGJvaWpuTEZpYW1rOUoxUlpHUTFJakhpVGlEZWdLX19qYURHc1RsZ1RHVWxzVEpyNXlSRThoc2NoNDhTenozaFJnRkNtMTFSQ1IxM3FSel9yZVpZbmhOemFRY2M0UlY0V0t3MWJDU2xFRTRCVmNRdWlkX29iRlVITVhQY3RFNnV3TlppQVBESGE2N0RrdmNkekFuWTVmWVhfaTBBS2xZa0hONHlDd3BlbXRoaXVzemRaMWROUjg5djlqVlVnQVJpVUVsdz09
If you look at art in a historical context you will find that one of the main purposes of art is to communicate ideas. From cave paintings to the bleeding edge of the contemporary art scene art is used to communicate ideas. If id does not communicate an idea then it is decoration or decorative arts. That is why we have classifications like decorative arts. Formal aesthetic is the arrangement of things like color texture line shape form and value to communicate feelings like movement, rhythm, balance, contrast etc. An aesthetic judgment is subjective, that is the reason that op posted this thread. Lots of people love Warhol, but many think that is work is crap. But it cannot be denied that a formal aesthetic was in mind when the art was created.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUWTU0Y0ZNb0lRdm1RZmxJRFJDVVFldEdLNEhmS19OTUNCbUU5TmU1akNBMF9mcFJLRC0weGJXLV95c3dhYXZ2NkhWRDRLZWo0enFJWEY3TktrRHoxeGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzU0NOdlg2SkdqcTdDNWNObmtHM2pOUnBMbXAzdTROalY2NVRLZldQaEtSeWpMbmlHWjNoT3Y4LVo0aHpGdjloazJVRkFCaDFocEhhOTNrSkNUMHdaRmFwWXBldk5MRzJtYkZSLXlseVhYYlZaLXJ3YlhrZEpORDEwcUxJb3BLYW1VLXpubjgwbXlLRnBBeVpDWXpyR3RHNmJEeWU2ZHRkVnNzWmpaNUxoeHNDbWhlT3o5ZmJhYjc5Yl81X1R1dlJZeUVBYjBVTHNLNnZNXzFDaGNhdHI1Zz09
Honest question: What is your definition of artist, and in what way does Warhol fall short of this definition?
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUbzk5Q2ZYZVN3X1BabVlzc1NFdXdrZ2xncEsxaXZUYWRQd1duUjc4Z2lzMTBwLUxJTWZoYTBtNHBrRWg3MzZxNUdOR2dRbWhoaVFEVXV2M0UxbXZXTHc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzU29USzZJcnJQbkMzQTZGU1FHVVEzU2MxUlBVeWUyT1pqMTVnc1JxaU1Ib3ZXNE9IMnNCUnN2cXFESkJwM0FVcE80b1lJSDZMeE9lX1Y0ZXNIdjZSLTRZN1o2T3FYSEZUWTZUVHY1Y3FaRXlJSzVvMEc0VVo0M1N6dXdabURPSGlFcmU4MW9xSnZOSG5BejRIUWVhcWZzRVA3MVl0MnFFQ19TdlpTalU3R1l1dGJXajJfVVhBMFRUU0c2bzl3RUJzLXJOUkFvOHhCYkFkQzhmWXU1VkdNdz09
just the same problems i have with him. when one must resort to mass production of pop images to be different (because it *was different* for the time, homage to duchamp), doesn't that suggest that there is no other way to be different? a rough way of saying: its over!
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUTkJPOEptbXJOU2hwSVVFdHMyT3dmWmh4ZmtEb2d1cDNGWGpmZ3YwaW44VVpHY29YZ3VwR1NEaUJvLXdpZFZ4OVZNSlZWUENsWnQ1WnBMNU1jZ0N2dHc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzM0pxVF96SHBTUWg1WlBIRktaVlI1NTJxRHNBbklGaEtmemRpcFplLU1aSUVKMUM5bk82anQ5dUhfMWtLYXE3My1uRzU5Y3gwQ3lkVmNuczRLdVhFM2F1XzBLLUc4RTVxRU05OXZVY0tXNERNNVlyS1hNVU14Vkl2OTZLLUVqTGdVU1dUU0tYVHZZa2VEZXYxeV93S1Z3VE9ScHRPeEZSQ0JMbU1CTjR1dGJuU2xCMGdXVlVrOHBTUnAwdWxTV3VYcFZCdWg3YXJSOXE2LVFQT0RFblFGdz09
>Warhol is close to that type of "artist" to me. A lot of hype, in the right place at the right time....but very little actual skill. I agree. He was a marvelous salesman, but I never considered him an artist. All sizzle, no steak. I think he knew he was bullshitting everyone, and I think that was what he saw as his art -- bullshitting the gullible.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUdlZINTVyQldmdXU0cEVySm9OaVJ5eFJCNkMxR1ZGdm4wYVM2TlIydC1hTjhhZm9zaDhrTlFzSTZJNUJYOEJ3STFYOVdUc2REb0wzWlY5cE5IY1A4T0E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzZXYxUUhDR0s4OS1XaXg0djVra3dBTXNrc1YwYjdIOXFKZWVtTC1rNldfcEhnTjJXVGxEVHNlWnFGc1Y3bnVYdmxvQWdXNG50VENVWjIwcHBDeWR1bzI5YWFxRDZjUlFhcHBkTkdqTnp4YWdSVmFqZHJtaGJqV3kzVW55VXpnd0l1S1NlOGVVSVgxZjNxQnRfRXUxdDVFcEZJMW1oaGVJa2ZINVgwVVdGVjBXQ2JvTlpvTDVoNHVWYjNNdGNHTm10SzN2Q2pYc3NCMEpBcU9FQXFzVnVCQT09
If you ever get a chance read some of philosopher Arthur Danto's stuff on warhol - it will change your entire perspective on art.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUTHEyWC1zRnVQYjVhVGFTMFNXTldvbG14WEhocnRZZUpoX0Q2cnhLQlZtN3UxM0swSEs4bDlIYzMxd0lKbG1jdy1GQXZoU3RkUlNONkVFTHEyclpyT0E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzWkJrNmRvekpDVjE2THpUeFhBLUFwNWJ0RVZWYzEyY2FDYVRXcnkwbDF6VEJNLWVldG4wdnA2aGhhY2F0MDlJYW1jQVp3N0pHZl9OdnVxVi05OVBzZDA2Y0JQLWRVVDRYSXRHeHNic2FWMDNTLUhGNHgwYjBPSmIweWJPdlluOWd3bEZwM0NWZE1sZkdicUw4aXo0aTFKc1AzV25MRUZidEdCZjRoU2NrSTlqMzRjUkhJT244cE9rbV9pSWZjYVBfM2J5N1dfeWVNOWEyMWo5TUdWd29Zdz09
Uh Warhol was a master draftsman dude. He moved from ink and paint to screen printing to video etc He also worked for an unholy amount of his day, every day, almost his whole life.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUNmVFOGNmTUt6RG00c3dsS0ltZGdqTDBvc055SngzcjZVcFZSQndKLXNaWkxQZmRMa1dsTk94dnpydlQ0dFV2c1htY3N6TExxTHpOMXRieW9DcEZJWlE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzSHJ6TjZhY256UXZRWVNvT2lRM0k1RjhRS01yT0V1S3B6Zkx6aUVkdV9VRUJCbTlrNVNkTXZPOWl5dWhsYzRzQVB4VmlJQm9KaFZueWFpVklXc2dxZjBfMTlhZldodUFXQzFJNnFYWHVCcUY2bDRwR3pqUVh5YzQ1Z05JSWJQeEdKdVl4S1dBTWZIWEl2a0lOcmxCbENpVUNzOElkSEUwQ3lybXVSZm5TbmJJYlNfbWZDM3J3UmhGdDlPSmhvVW5fNERDcEFwR3BDaDlfN3M5M2VNLUk3QT09
He is not.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUMW9MOW1sMkFJNm1Bb3lBQkM4aTVRdGJCMlg0Rzk3LUNNbG1ITTFtNXV5RUUzN0YtclV0dTA3anNzZkFZTE5TRWpGZFM2VUtLYkJxNTI3dkRIS1QtWXc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzeWc0UjRnWm5Zc1djcUUzOGNJOWk1MGNJSGVWM0pFVmt3aGJIdV9QZmxEcEtoQzZpWmUyMEJNdWgzOHlDTk9iUFVucjJNejZocmxFZDBySmhOR0Z4Q0ZRZWt2WVREZUYzcHBQRzJKcUJRTnVSemJTaVpMNzFXRHZzLXVyZ0U0clExUFRNTVJCeExXSkRaVEd0NHJEeDJWWE94WTEzZUpmcnFsUDR3QWplbzZobkFBU0dEbWZBMWEwOEJiU0luRm9WV0Z6bUlVWHh2UnNDREdyUWFka1BRUT09
So why did you offer up that example video?
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUV1BXeHNBaW9jSG5RNTMwbmtUTkdBbFg2cWp0QW94NU1oU1IxbkxLeHM3bzkxRjJSdlNmaDg1WkJTWGs3N0tUQXpxcERWQW5iY2JrQzhNYVJ5RzVHYVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzaHhaWHVtNmNqbmRxdTlTdDl3VG1SOUd1TEkyTk94ODJoSEdKRzE4S2FJV2NzZmRJUUwtaTBnSUJvcng3V2Y5dXJzTHB1X1huMVBJQnQ1SW42bm43Tk1OV1R6T2Z6YUI3UFVaLUMyaGRTSG9aU0Y0eGxvaF9WdXNSYXR0TXFsYml2cWhSQklBamZOUkU0Y0NQSG9CdDUzdlpJVm1JWDRyTDJqWGpuRjVCTE9LR2ZvbmNEaE5CZ2s4bGxfVFIzeS1WR0lfWC1BOWRuakh4VzMwblhtM3JWUT09
Ok, I see. I was defining art as being "all arts" (including decorative arts) while you are focused on non-decorative arts. Sorry for the questions. I only have a couple of classes in art theory I took a few years ago, so I don't know all the formal terms.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUSkliM21Ka2lHUlhrN2pUVE9VMVRYUjZXTXZnT3NMNWhsM3ZlaWR4VHFlVkdLdUYydVJiRkw2bWxyNk1WQUMwWXVLYzJVSlNXdFpUcmhnUklaTGhkZ1E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzZFdlbXlxd1F0ZjQtSlMxeXJUM1dyODZfTzNTMnhDMUg4bkcyV181U0ZKeHJpaHRlcWN0bG4yTGthN19YY25Tb2xFUGk1ODFrd211aFQwNTN0LUk0RW15SEs3THlCdzZQdGY1alpUZVRVSVlIOWJkYjlhVkNBTkgyTDJhVHJwa2dNTmhoajF0VXlia0ZUb0swWWdOcUZiZXhxcThSaE1xbjhwV2wwZFpWMTR0UWRRRks0RTNicVNoNU9DVGRQRDZTcERLc1Z0bC1vMXVUZUJyMFJNdFRBZz09
Really? You honestly don't get it? There's not much to it.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUV19RVW15YXhpaUJ0S29Gb0d2Nk9aNzZteU9kcW5McGEzMXQyTFc2VEdaa3BWYWh1NTBpR3NtMENxY3F6Rm5kaU1VUTdPS3FtSW91NnVIT1dwMWlfb2c9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzcUR3aFRsSzZ3UWRVLVJlYlVBZklwczRoUUlxZHlKWi03ZVhUZzcyem5rZnVFOWRFU291blU3SHVvUUMxNWk2TndvVE1LNGFEd2JoS2lHdE9wN3N0cERoUWhVRkUwZEZ5WW4wUFV2WnFDdnB2MFZXMWp1d3NRdUdiRTFqeVRqOUFJUW43Z3M3bGdneUxjckJ6RXV6Wm1aa2NJUGYyaC1oaGFralF0TVlld3h1N05fcFU0V0JzbEFzay1qb2VlQmpKd3VIdE15X3YyTFBLaWI1STd5dXN3QT09
Perhaps an analogy to explain my position? Both The Beatles and Milli Vanilli are artists, by a very clinical definition. Yet one of those groups is considered world renown by their skills and talents, the other by hype and promotion....which one has better art? I think the answer is obvious. So can Milli Vanilli can be called artists with the same breath as the Beatles? My point is just because a piece sells for an outrageous amount of money, or an artist claims super celebrity status, it does not equate necessarily to talent or skill or even art. Perceived value should be perceived via talent, skill, reputation, usage of fundamentals, peer review. Those who sell their art without these are con artists selling themselves, not their skill. Good conversation so far, I've had this discussion so many times with friends =) edit: corrections to sentences
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUMnU2c2d0bDA3dEFIY2dHOHBLcHdiZTEwYV9ja3JGcGFaaFlPRWx6UnVVbmlacnhmcFpzNml2UkRkcXNVUlBodXBISFlHVXpvSnVMVnUzZFhhUElhMmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzM0E0NF8wTEthRkpUNDBJT0pZWVI3em1RWHdHS2NXc0c4TEgyUDVRX0xzQjlwaHVIUWZRQkwzNzhlbkxkSzVJeWc1N2FEMUJZMFFlUnNuZHdTcmhrbEtqdTV0SGVrM0dmQ25BaGIyQ1JEdHFuRVNQXzM3ZGZINE14WjZVelZKbEswMHF2NDB2akRnelBfSE56OHV3LVZBOHlhV2VJS3hncFRtZFpyYjc2cENrSEtUNTU1ZlhPRHZ4VGpiMzgzU1VST1d3RXpqYnlLemN4NEx5akUwY2tkQT09
[Seriously?](http://www.kottke.org/08/07/the-most-beautiful-suicide) there was obviously a fondness for the image. You don't sound like much of an artist nor one who can appreciate it.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUUHluRzVHNzF6V054bGd2LUZyMFBIWjd0VkYzSkVPVXY2SjM3WDlPMjAwcHllMEN2amhhQ1dJWEJkZUMzc3ozaUlBTXNpUlBGYllOeEl4dVRuZDhpSEE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzdTQtYy0yRmRQU2taemtTamlEWFZkemR2VF9XbGxaZmRGN2FrSFV5RVJlNTJhTm9jSHVQaFlvdEsyc29Pc0U2d2FTNmhpV2lmelVqbGt4UEc5alR3dHlXY1U1SjVsa0NyeHNNYjRFYjE3TXZiZGg5NUl4MTZaUWZkYWoyMEZ5X3Vucm5lelNaeUNxNE1uLXBUY19ULWRvSVNYMHNIcVVRT29Fd29xOWx1WG5fUTBaeF90RWRBcnhBM0V3U0FELXN4YWFwMnA1akItN0t3MDZEeG1la2FFUT09
He was a master at doing portraiture. He made millions doing it. I think it was $3k-6k for one and he would do a bunch of variations and then either destroy the rest or offer them for a little more as a package. He was one of the most incredible self-marketers and selflessly built up his empire. Too many artists aren't concerned with variation or changing their styles or even selling anything. Wake up you bastard children hoping to be artists. If you want to be an artist you must sell your stuff. If you don't sell your stuff you are just a poor person that spends time drawings stupid pictures, no matter what they are or how good they are. Also don't forget that his images weren't scanned into a computer and manipulated. He did photo emulsion, took liberties in color, application and size. Variation and experimentation were key.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUdkttQlFsaEdtOXhKb0hIMGZBdWRubjY1LUdKcXJVdmZ0WU0wSUNSbjF5WGNwRDlMSGViNjcxVEF5LUs2cW04QldzNTFBYkZUZEJWcFlPbDAxMzZKc1E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzXzBNYzNPX3loeDQ1QkV1d2NxVjdiWmhBYVQ1VFdrRHBCb1hidlVQTVItRkRsQWVibkpJSkkxWFg4SnAyZl9iUHdMRTZkbXVlaEUzdnRPZWZnZVJ0a05adE1vVXdmSjVqelhLakMtcVM5NVdOMGdpaV95OW5zLUpxN1dZenM1cXhvX2s3ZW9UUTRFQkUydy1rek5yTm9CNF8zelY4aGoyMWxidWVSM0o4Q0VtbnNxN2hWRTEtOGcxVHo0RGxXZ0d6dFJjZzl1ZlhQNkpsX2NxWWJ3OUFzZz09
Composers of films do this too. They provide a sketch and then an orchestrator and copyist make the parts, orchestrate and do the rest of the composition work. This is common (williams, glass, et cetera)
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUU3VMMWxVYlpWTC1TUkJpcHcwa1FQcnhBMFcwRVNzQWx1TjVLZC1tSnBDN2dqZHhmVXdJMDhNYi1PWTFvcmY2NEktV0pnUUFkNmYzSDhuT0dNTDhJUGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzbHBXU1VzbUZhZEk3TDlsZDUySUlVS0dOSWs1V1RmdnFsSklKS2VSbVBLVE80bFJ2bTRxd1VYckNKckUzX3diMjRQaDl1VjFzYi15blNOVm1EQU14ZWVCcFZ0Y2F6ZWlTa2dyN0JaMW5Dd3hVYUJqN2ZHZ3NsWWItVjg4RXVYXzluZmVSUzBjeElrQXo2R1VpaGlRTVpGYy1nSjNGbVVla2gzclJNdk01ZE9Vd3FPNTNJSS1zektlcHJYTFZFSk5VenFoeVRmRmFVTDl5R0QxLTVRMTNzZz09
To add some history to this, briefly, it's worth pointing out that the move to conceptualism came primarily from Duchamp's Urinal. The chief aesthetic question before Duchamp was "what is beauty?" The question afterward became "what is art?" The natural line of thought was 'process' (i.e. through what process(es) does art ensue?). Warhol and The Factory did a lot of work with just this question. Repetition is impossible to omit if you're focusing on process (although the great example or repetition would have to be Monet's Haystacks). Thus the concept behind the piece, as tenzing42 points out, legitimizes the work, while the artist's virtuosity is expressed solely in terms of a repetitive process (thereby at once deromanticizing it, and redefining it in contemporary terms). Jeff Koonz is a more contemporary example of this.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUVzBUM0VoaTZlX29TWXp5UXF1eFZvY2ZKNndiNkt4dENVY0lHXzZ6X245VWFqYU9LV25WdUNLSk1wM2dqZVR2eENpNGxsZHQ4Y19tdHVoN3kybVJSTEE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzNGlfRkZOQnl4b1lDdlE5NS1NbDFkMl96ZU5iSkhselZ4a1RMQUdrNHhRTV9VQ0NIM3BtRVB4RHpEMFU1NDdpSU5xemlpd2RRaGE4cnhEd0JqbXFFX0FPOXFVT2QtMTk5Zmlndnh4NmtrWkluNmszWTkyR3JMQTgyZWREamI3eVo3LVM5cTQ1M2pGSDJNWEVieE80UllRejhaX2FkSXViaTd0SWd6b1FyTEFtUFcyOXE3T0h3U2ludEh0c2RkSGlzcU5GUzN1aDdzV3B6dDgyLXdtQlA0Zz09
Sell some paintings, then go back and read books about people that made illustrious careers selling paintings.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUVkctZ0JlOU1lS1cwTDFKX21WaE1TeVhyT2h1QWRnaFMtZzduLWt5WXJsU2pEWS1qeVRpX1JTVmMtT0tpcElqVGpxMEg4RjhKMUFLX2ZIZ3NTdWp3RlE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzcTRad29OZEJKb3BJckt1ZC1iaWd0SHJHNTZNd0h3MERuU0E4VjU4NFFIQVBYeEVFVnpTU1hJSFpGZVlXbWR1T2VVaGVfdnVwOHhxQm9DeUZQbEhCSVhSUkMtaHBfc3VZODF6bDhteFBURFIzQXUxYnJZVkl2aDBtZng5ZVhRWDNZektVZlNFYk82d0ZXdXhPOE5YY2cyUE1VZUNyNFh0dnJKMHlHbXJRUldZdVkwMVRzdVE5T2J5V20wbUJNeDd0SXdSUEVmUTBrQlB4aFJhS3k4NktEQT09
He just noticed it and parodied it. Artists make money by doing design. Look at Mc Escher. He was a print maker. Artists can be pure artists and sell things they personally design, or do the work of others. The argument that Warhol is not an artist is stupid and inane. He was an artist merely because he said he was. Any new fangled web graphic artist is just an artist that makes stuff for other people.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUWm55RFRGbTYzdE5vbUQ4LWRDRnlfTy1kMnFyUkw1eV83ZjVTeVFDekJQaElJU3YzWEJUWXR4R0dfVVRhSEhMOF91TUNQemltRDVXRkF5d2Zzc0pGd2c9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzV21CUzhUZWpfN3ZoVjFvQkIyYVJmOVIyYjlCWmtuTV83QmRhdlBQTEY0OGl0dkVJaEowSW02QWU5UXlRY210Y3E5M3B1ZERlSlp2bFp6RnNZUU1uYUFWZWdEY2VpZXpWQzFXWHAtT3ltRjNQVlV6cFVJcmFPclBKMmZVMG16VklPd3Q2d3J2ZDlXeVltV3RDSmV5T2NMN1ZVeU1KRHVMWlZhTjFDb01tQ3dNRGdGRUhnc3lkY1FzWkJON1dQLUxjZzJPNXp1Q2NHbkJpMmFPM3pXWnJXdz09
I'm not saying the guy wasn't committed or into it. I'm saying that he had a long way to go before he was propelled to celebrity status. Many artists go from medium to medium, some types can go from one to the other without losing a step. I can draw people and animals for example, and since I trick the eye on paper to project 3 dimensions its easy for me to move into sculpture. I'm also employed as a graphic designer, but those skill sets allow me to drift into photography because I have the universal fundamentals of design to draw from; composition, rhythm, repetition, positive and negative spaces. So Warhol going from one medium to another is something every artist does at some point.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUZmJ1QjdaeEQwb0JMVUt3bEdKVE44VDBHd1Jubk9PSVNka1NHdjZZaVFLcmFPbks2N1dxWEV1eWZhLXA2aGxrcERfNXB1Y2h3RzZkTGYzblUxeHdGbVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzZmlqbm1uaTluMUltcXp6R1VJUkoxWl9BMkNBUkRoY2hEMEdYd01RTnZIaVJ6VU5TTzdqamZqOVA5SXM3TmYyV21udEFsZTRPeGRCaXlaSlNkMGcyN0hOWnE1X2t3by1xZzd5UlZYX3RpODdpYlJoYUR2RGhYVWpJclpJd01tOHRubkYyQS1BSkRncmdlY3AzZkJqR3RfLW5ibWl4RjE1NWRvMmNOMlczdkpVT1o3VVN6US12VTR0NWlubXhzRkJSTUhPRnJkaWUzQUtiUkh1MUU1Z1J2dz09
He sold stuff. You obviously do not.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUTk0zUXJudFZ2dTVINzFkOWZXVnhSMk5zRDZVZG9EWDltemM0TWZSODUtYTNQR2cxejlIRFRTY1QwVDBPQng4RUlsQk1VUHBoSVpmNVNxQTBQbVJ4UFE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzWWFweE0xc1ZwWWd3UGFMSmhJUUVzeWJRdm00TlJqVTJncmRRLWRjdXVoN0RZSEN5VEd6NG5RRmJ4QlNpUW9XSlRoQmlvdm5GNDFRNVAxYUZZZnFscmR5R0pOWTRteTkxT3lkUWpNU0lPYUViZENMbmx6WE1xR1M3eTQ2SWpqWVZmN2c1NWFEeE05eUFGd3dqaktvUUpGdkdZOGRhZHA1ellfRVNKcWszU0YyM1dZdGhCWWkyaDlPbXNEVF9XOEUtNnJLS0FsMkdMdm9UNVEwdVhWODdQZz09
in this sense he was a master. Social engineering his perceived value to the "in crowd" at the time.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUWHBzeF9IR1hwbE1CazNSamdJalpfcEwwTXhVSkY5Z3RVRHhjdWFNdUJYVm9XNUlfdlVHYjhXY1FyQ0RVemY3ay0yNWx4Nzd4OHBINWNFb3pBdHctR0E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzQUlWcVdfMFpBel8yN1I5TE5wSE9UNkEzd2pvNUdiZ1d3cVZva3BIMGV3ZGdpOWhra21hZW9US3c2VDktM1JwbW9MVXl5d2RHWmkxLUdtUVJfczJVblU2MlhReXc5ckZpWGxTQ29OblQ1T0dLeGZoNWpzNV8yaXRBRGVmYmJRNkdBRzJDNEF4NktJZ0xjdzlkdjNvQWFoRjBQVUQzM242U0YxTUlzRE1BeE15c1ZFUkk4dkRKVExwUFlaMjd1WUQ0TXI5TkhULXhHNlc0aGpXcmJ4Mnh0UT09
Yes I've sold plenty pal. So OBVIOUSLY your a troll
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUX3hFOG0wLWFJSUs0OUZBOEV3Vi02RnN2djQtSkV1VktqeHN6S2pqNnJFV2V3TTZfZnBZSGliZnNnRDBpUkxrSWhlS0U3bVFEUkNKX2JLLWw5SlBTcVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzTkhKR1o5Q0xTc1cweFlmQVBuYlZRdjZqT01tVTYzY2dUODJ4dDNLYU5QaC04NEVIcW85M0lWaEtITFR6WHMzM3RkNDctLU15aVZrNDhfSF9HNXRYQWwzZkFTVWN2UUUtalNpbHVibGJ0cGF4MmpmcEFXTnd2VHVxOG1TUTRwRVJCMF92X1BhaHhCam5xRGRrMWhwZFRKdzVqMEs5Q0RJdkJWbzVzN3pyNUxYYVE5RTFkNUV2UV92NEktQlVLRDU4Q0NpMnRQQklTSFpWWkhEcHVCNnZvQT09
Ok, well you honestly can't say that he cared nothing for color, application, harmony... if he made variations. Variation is the heart of real art of any kind. Your term 'skill' means 'photo-realistic drawing capability'. By that definition, sure Warhol wasn't the greatest. Are you going to call Koloman Moser a poseur because he made wallcovering designs? Miles Davis a haphazard composer because he only wrote less than 32 bar songs? The bottom line is that Warhol was a self-proclaimed artist that sold his art for profit. That is enough to be an 'artist'. You seem to be jaded because of something else.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUUFhldW1rVjg4TjF4eFV6TjMxMmd2VDI2QTN5TGRXR0lRTDVUdmN6blhNWEFibUpCcTBEem1JSV9Jcll3R3hhdEpmTzJlUVJraTRLSkhzbk9HaGIwQXc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzQTNoSEZ2UEFJUmlfcDRVNnJmYWVtelI3WmRyblc1am1OWU9ESG9xNlZiZl82Q2hYMFJRaklLNkVpR0FIMkVTMXpCU0luWjd3a055YXNxbExFM1hrMVpFa1NmcGdya0VzRllyaHZFS195amt2MW9MdGFWSHhrWDV3dXo2Q3Y4LVh1SHFZY2NzM1hnSmtFZUhJVDJTZU96UHR0MHVuSllYMEZGQUo1cko4RzFlZTJNYVNSV2pfOGR2TWt1Ykc0VXlPQmtGYUhESkF5eW16aFFydzVaZElMZz09
so does that mean van gogh wasn't an artist? he didn't really spend any time at all "selling his stuff". his brother theo tried, and made a few sales, but it wasn't until well after his death that van gogh's work began to justify itself by summoning high prices at auction. van gogh died a pauper.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUVnJ6b1E3ek40anpCeXVYaVJzZ0ZWZF84c21aVE1DSTZtbnJPSWhZUDJzUVZFOTBCV0FqNFQxSXdnREFxSk5Gd3J5ay1PN3ZHd2RXNnp2VzFyRmRONVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzbGQtSHNhTDF2bUN3eUwtLVRGVFkyUWJ0eS1LNGQxRHpoSFdNTmZKYXVKWm9leUtlNFhWbVQwQWNkeVRTM2VMR1FrejFjUWhDZWVSY3VxTEZzallOcl9PY3U3WE5FNXE3N055eEJGek9Ndkg0cF81U3JwWGlwYW1ZMjdlNGsxdG1TRGdKQUpmMUF4blN1WDl0MHVoeHRZeUZzNmJ3TERERFJHSUMzc1FXLXZlVzRwSGVMSDZ3V2dhNmZySWtpVmJuRk9JN0VXdjZSODE2VjhiMG1CRVJRQT09
I'm not hating on any self-proclaimed artist. It isn't about money, I was just pointing out that Warhol was a successful self-made artist.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUQnpFWEJPdklLelhQTWZZekVXaFE0MktoeWJMbkpCenpaQU5VSWpJRWhWSTVmdk1OaXo2WVVTeHAwYnVnU2lTbjJRclA1S0JyRkJYa0RQejZWY0xTaGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzV1g1cFliQV9tTEMySjhDeG5RVURlaFJrcU10dXdTVE1QTjlVMkc0b1l2aDhnTHV0dHo3UXF5R21wQno3cFRyaDlJRjB2N2lTZmJ3LTU3Qmx2b2dQVlpzbGVDZk5QY29Xa25GSHZ5bTR6RFl2MDlReTEyZEZhT0ZoMmtUSTF0dEE2RVFoTW02cER2WVk1YWROUTEyR2wxR1NCczlfSmo4SFBwZ2NvOXlocm45cWRmS0xiNG5BN0wtaHd2dFh6N1NWWlpUT1NBcmtLX0pYZjN3MlFHN3luUT09
Fair enough Racy, But I can proclaim myself a Ultranuat, doesn't make me one does it? Art for profit versus art for the sake of art is not the topic, rather; what is an artist? Yes he used fundamentals, yes he was an artist, yes he was a very talented salesman and social butterfly. No he was not a very TALENTED artist deserving of his reputation and position in the culture. I lived in Pittsburgh for 5 years and went to his museum several times. There were very good hints at this guys talent and potential, but by and by, you could take 80% of the stuff in that gallery and say it was done by a first year graphics student and people would believe it.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUTUhWVlVLTUxBMTFNTlgxNlpPYktzZHNLcGhhc2l3SXJiN1pXcHpBMXhhVlVXUU1ET1ZUQXhKcXdSRGI1bW5qd2hQdHNLeVVXYlNySTRpMVdINlhVbkE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzSnpDRWJrd3ZaNWFKeXp1Yl9sRTZHaGN3a2h2ZUJUZ0Rsbng1SnNvZ0YtSVlHWWxCRHc4ZkdxSk5fV0xWUWtaMUlIVnE2SGx3RUJEQ19OX29uY2xMRzhfVTYxbFBPc2NoMVhKRC15SmE0cjVLb25VbEx3VG5HSGY2cTdaMExIejZpX2JxTnNvQWZkeUlzcExaU0NzdVVDcEdudWdhaERmcERDMnM1RW1nd0N6ZGlUR0xNTGl6cjI3bDd6WHZDQkducXUtUDhLWjM4VWpyM3BxcHRaa0RFZz09
i don't disagree with you about warhol, for sure. i'm just not so sure that if you don't "sell your stuff", that you are somehow not an artist, but a "poor person spending time drawing stupid pictures". i'm not even sure what the difference between those two might be, other than the removal of the adjective "poor".
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUcGNzSmo0TWp5cmtQLVhnZ00yeElaYmR3cGpXbmlYZmV5bWlSWjNKUmZzY2J5S1VCaWo3SjRfZEZ4dEZNVUVZSURESUhEZFRiMHZ6NGRZVVZqeUNZQnc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzaTJyVmFzRFN6OUZ3R0g5N2VvOW9TZWZZTjJJLVhzR2JxTXdEeEhkY3g5dFExcXlVRl9UUm5pZVhCalhqNnVMV2lBUnJ0WWotMGxYbU9pX2xseVloVjlPWWN6bUVoRkV5TE5YSFJiMTBlc0JZMzk5czg0S0JLaFpuUWo2RXdKc25EdVNuZ3BCTG9jWmZGT1RxMGNXRDBmci0tY3BhOW5Mek5zRG96U1BqWFBLUHhHNWM2QnZpYW81Y0xkV1ZYREdTSkJScWFGZEx2REw4bEtydkp1Mzc2UT09
that comment made no sense. "Look at Mc Escher. He was a print maker." Does that mean print making isn't an art? "Any graphic artists are just artists that make stupid stuff for other people." What do you call shitty portraits other than stupid stuff for other people? I am giving you the up vote because I think you are sorta agreeing with me that Warhol was a scam but please tell me if I am misinterpreting you (and thus deserving of a down vote)
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUcU5HUU81RGVlbDRCc0tjTGJlTzZrMFZONmNjcF9faHFEdFNVWW40ZUNDYmN5U09WRzktanIxR1JiT1UyOVRnMm5mc01mRGxaOFRmcnQ1V2RoNXVocmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzR2VLMmJRQ3hLeWN1azNnS3otX3FlSjdEbzRXNzZBaGdOVko2RWxfZ05qOGNZMjd6R1lrQmUxVElWQWFPTG5aeWNaeWZROXEzRFM0aDc0V05PLTMtVlZJbEdnNTA0Y0JFOE5Ca19SeUFma1NIdDZGRFhDcUhkZGpXNWJtZGpIZkF1TU82eWstbnYzMDQ3LTZtejRBQTBydHg3VEdzQVM3S3hVVEdnaUNtM2FXN3B0MVZBaWJsNHNOQkYtMW0tcldEWS1xLXpReWVoSGlMdU1hc1dFUlRQUT09
No, Mc Escher was a marvelous artist. Warhol may have not made stuff you like, but that doesn't exclude him from being an artist, so no, I guess I don't agree with you.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUWnZqbW04VG9xdHNzYWE2ajJVS1NFMkFkd2EtVHBCalNGby1RazlDVlNrQ0lYb1VjX0JGR1NMMDIxRzNNaDJLWGJkektNVzUyYTFMcjJuWTJFSnpYbGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzOXRLdXd4dzNuX1RCazlBTWZrMnl1bDVmY3pMX1lEUl9MQWowYXBDNERpVFhnZDRjY0VsdHExTG9SYUdkdy12azI2S19RQXNIdmlvSDVYVEtha1FnQTFSZE5ZRHQ0Tm9TZG85bnFHMkJ5NV9Tb3VDODVWWndYUW5SV3FPa1B0RS1wbkdKUWhrVVJycmpCMWVMSDl5ZEVuc3JaaFNuSmpsQ2puNy1ZSGtSbzU0b2xxZ0p6LUpKdl94TndSQl9PQjcwYXNidDIyRU1waUxIUVd5ZnZ0dnBGQT09
The whole modernism movement is about breaking the rules. Thus, you won't get it unless you get it; or you are the artist :p Anyway, he liked to express the degrading effect of mass production. That is, having the same product available to everyone, causes a loss of value. We've become dull. Check out Pyramids 2, it's nice :]
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUbW1YZmFYaUJZblV4eXFHNFhyOGdWeGxQWU10TllVMUJIeDZoSERzSEM3NHQ0OVFPY05oRTdPRVZuWHcxcTRyWmcwSFoyN19pTUt6cVloSHQyZVFxYVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzdDdZMXV6SzNXWHp5UEFjVkg2ZHAyQ2dwUnVOVThURFpxVzFsV2ZsMGNpc20tVnhkSWhtOGgwRVRjZXFQTjhiRDhUVDZKZktzWnR1SGJJb29SS1J5RmoxTTRSMElybDZRTXlVeGcxaWloQTVUd191dHRGWmp3UWh4WGtVWVBCeThCVWRkWExGc3N0RkUyVktmeVM3d2NRbHFKejgxVGdQT0RicGMyX2JLUC1oVzVPTEpzd0JJTndJRUtGZXg2U29rellhSHpVY1BsMkxZdGxweVpxYVVrdz09
[deleted]
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUaTlYNFMydFI5SEhUWUNJTWREYzN5UVpjMDE1LWxpR00wMjc0VUhjZ2x5VS03MWdNbTlGZ0J5MHhKeExzWVViNFRiTzVaYzRxb09vQVEwNXFzekJwZGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzbXBwVjZrenc1UUpCd09nbnBneWlzVFpUWlQxVFVsaHBOVmhRMW56dHRQTGQ2VXBjVHB3Rkg2aG1PZTlOOTd1U09zQVcwSVRsOHNlVWFrTU9MaGRHUnVSSkl1ZkQtbjRMOVdHa3NxUFNvX3Z2SjlDYk1IUkx1c1pQRjBEdTNFbFdTcVJtY1JaQURTdDhKWkJ2Qk5WcDZQRTVJR2FiWG9jQnZQcmpPYmFIeFcwTFZ4azB0cVN5MnpwZGQwcnF4UGhwMTFmT3E1XzZYb29zZkprMVVSZ2RSUT09
Marketing would love to have you believe it is in the same building as Art. Its not. No up votes for you.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVULVJXb3JzY2xQb3JCcUpQVHFudHB6YnJLV2ZaYnFFTDdqRFc4NllNU2JVdjZ1czhUUWlnUzVaMUNhX211djl2SWJLTndFdHp6MERMdy1QT3czcktWaEE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzYnNtbWc0bXY4c2VjMFZtX3NQY2lRWk1KemJ0UFdoT0I2Zkh1MTVxLTBlLXBFdEdOV0FRVGdfeHU5X0lmZXB1UjdvdU96dGphZ2tDZlRhT3FKbDFGZDN6SjNxZUlIbENlSl9pOW8xeVlsNjdlQWRXWi1taENUR0xpaWtkYTBhR21yS2RGZEdPaEZQVGZSTVNaRUFWRkxac1N3aFV6ekxaT2ZCQlJKZF9BTFhDaTBjMFJQM2NhWG9KX0tLV2ZLNG5Dd2V1RTVFMWt1ZXpZUGV1OU1XZHg2UT09
There are artists, there are entrepeneurs, there are marketers and there are people that are all three. If you don't possess one of those skills you have to position yourself with people that do, otherwise you can be the best artist in the world and flounder.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUX3haUm1laGR1RVFDR3ZDbmxfeDBJb0lMUGpHUnhtbzh0WlowT0hZTXZGM3QtajE3NjNOb3dNa2drRmtMUUNKdVVjWC1MQTRDd3prWXpnOTZjY3NGRkE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzMUczQ25ud2o1ejNFOG9fUnNGVU9WdDV0RzdwejU1dHVkdjJSVXd0ZlJvYU5yMGpQN0JOUU5OYjNLM0cwNXFaZkdZOENMbVVZRkg2a21DbVVodU0ydUhXa3dzVXRPMmFENzZtV2FhcGxFRzdxdUdvV1VwVktxZXJaVzFwZU9jYVItRUQyQlFlSXRRT3drRFVSLWR2b19WM3dDMHNDV1hfWDZPVUQwU3RsTDRxU1VxS05aRV9ESE1GcHpYbG5qQTk5dDlBRUdNM0JqR2JPWUJkRXBxeXpOUT09
this guy? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_E._DeBakey He sounds awesome! There is a market for art, you just need to find it and do the right things. There are thriving painters, there are thriving composers and playwrights. That they exist means that it can exist for others. No matter what the climate. I don't see what you are getting at.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUcWdxU1FGRDNpbEZqOEtMSmhEaXRUOEVVNnZHWkQySGpSanN1OVB3R3hfdXJrNndnV2syaVNuaXBiSlFVeGZXWlNybkY1Mno1Q3N0NXJRdGdjUDNVWmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzUE9SbUp5bzdWRlV0VEl6T2xtSVF1SlBaZUticUhrVGtQSDFUSHh5Y19MYV9ZT08xbHh2UW5Ra0Q4LUU1dl8wVHdkRkY2MFR0S1I3ajFYUzVNUFppNVlkRXEyY09GMk9XT2pQUXJZZHU0VWVlNmFDbHhTSEozRFQ0NjZzQ2tGM2pSU2Y3OS1aWmJwYTZlaUdWU1hDcUxISV9pcHU1SW5PVjF4M002eUxhSXJWYWUwZkVNTER5YkxwTkM4dXJVUEtxT19ETktSSHF4V0pzMTU3MHc4Nm9Vdz09
aight
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUUDFZZFhROUxmaUtWOVV6VWh6MzRiVENhZ0ttc1dKZmpwR3RoOUprcXp1MkczOVUzaks3WFVpWDk1R0tQZWVwcS1VS2lBX1g1V2d1eUQyU0V0Sk16TXc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzc1dqVDBnTTREMEJwZVNlVUptME5uR0hsbnN4TkhGRDJFUExEa2ZwbGl0YU03aTFwLVpwYVlBdU5XOUxibHpFc0UtOGNncEE4SmhpR1VXV2ljY0RTLTUycG5lSU9mUFlnX0s1UlFNN1BjMDNDUzJfVHVyNzNLczJuNU05YVhrRFhiR254UnZuMElsU2dtZTFJUl9DdHlkaS1MWHBvWlktNG1Ib2dtdTBreVRrNE5LZnBFVUIwOFpGSUxBZkRDVldNc1ktaFQ5UGlBM05BQXN1UlpBZ2FMZz09
You, as an illustrator, have clearly not studied art history enough to know the intellectual backings behind this kind of work. Art isn't about representation--this has been the case for the past 150 years or so. It began with the Impressionists whereby the painting was no longer a window into the world. Painting became a subjective reality. In the hundred years following that, during the modernist movement, art left representation and tradition, and for the first time these individuals began to explore the canvas fully. They're not schmucks--they're geniuses. People say things like, *Oh, I can do that, too,* and I'm sure you can. But had these sorts of paintings not been around yet, would you have been able to begin to paint like that without the precedent? Would you have thought of it, when nothing of the sort had ever been seen before? I used to be like you when I was about 13 and got really great at rendering. Sure, I had technical skill, but I was no artist. Illustration =/= art. But I was mistaken, and I linked the two. I thought, that to become a great artist, I had to become so technically skilled that I could paint extremely realistically. But that's not the point. There has to be some sort of intentionality, an intellectual premise, not just skill. There are thousands and thousands of skilled people, they can draft, sculpt, paint, what have you, but there are very few geniuses who can create and instill a message or move the viewer to think. This is the point, and you don't get it. And it's not just the message, it's originality. Someone creating works in the style of Warhol isn't the same as Warhol creating works in a style he pioneered.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUaS1qSjZEb2QyWjQzOE5PbGlTT1BWZkxRb1hnUEdVNWd2MmZadGpJamxXQkRGbmwzaDdMblFjUkRNdUdDTW1nRlkzWGVFZmx3MG8wQ2szNjdlMkhxWnc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzMVJBUmtwdTA2ODBlNjcwXzVxa3ZtVzRGN0RNRk90MDFaaFVLcmhaeFlYTHU3dzEzTHZyc21ZQmpjTGJHaDdVeTBKMEttYThSaW0xcm8tSC1Ial9IN0N2YXRsYlk2c2dabjRfdnptS01BTFhra285VzZoaGlCU2ZjcWdNOEZEWXVBaTZmaTRiY2N6czBmZkcxZURIY2VMaEM1OE5VYWJWcUdJQkMxVEJlQ1kwWnY1MWtNVEhwMmRyR1dJVkdxR09VT3ZPdTVRVUFKM3VxYk5La05WTUJkQT09
A bit abrasively put, and omits certain points of nuance and philosophical/aesthetic questions about "art", but I feel this statement is 100% correct and don't understand the downmodding. Sad/awesome/funny/weird (depending on your perspective), but true.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUMnd0OXl1dkluU2JtX2x4RXdxbW96cTN3QWwtSDNpWnhWYXNNM2s0VWJlbE5VZzVLaUpVRTNQVnhQMWdIckhsMk5weU9ITVVJOVl6ZjZPWkE3c3RuRlE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzTVNNTXJ1SzFfMEFuaWFBMWc2S3dySDl3SUl6dFhMM0YwX20yVFNCazNLVE9Fazltc29pcEdUelpyZ3EtU1ZYUXN2WXZ2Sjd5RkhheHB3YTBQSmtUZ3ZiblU3a2dfVk9DNWl4T09mQXBlSG5LTUNUUEdHMUNQQjlSM0RlVmxoQmx4Y01ia3pOc0I3cEZ6ODVTcE9nbHNtRFBYaTdTdHRBZlBzMzk3V2tTanpuVmo2cmJwbzIyUzZOUGpQVDVnMFNHMXYzby1SMG9wQXRMTjg3NHlwRzRyZz09
I had always learned that the repetition represented a dual nature of the subject as both an icon and a commodity.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUYXo1VjZ4eUZUZkU3MFYyVVU5Tkh3QkpHdVdlWlZ3NEhYTVotNVp4NkpFWmtiZm1LcXZMS0ZkM1pJWFYzM3BIZ05yY01SSVMxbkZjeGptdktIbmlyWEE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzQWYzcjVrUHBUWndGeVI2UEFnSTU0MDhZeW9sMTdrT3BQLWtGZmRkbEZDSlhXSndaM05leWdZTnNsTFBqMWkxYUY5S2Vta1JIbUZ5a3VEV25xMmozdkdIZ0pna242RFN6enFYUmRvNlFsaVRWUW13LVdYVXhvLUNaODBQeWF1ZzFZNWI4bEMzSEYtZ0FNUmxXQ29WY1YwQnptYnpoS3hkY2w5dy1JSExaWTUxd0tjeUxIbkp4SFBTdERXUWhHWm9NMlNTRFRXN3RCcUFtNkItYlZsRDhSUT09
Did you expect a positive response to that comment? This is what I read from your tone: You wouldn't understand man, you just have to feel it. Take all you're intellectualizing and your criteria and you're methods of judging things and get out of here, because I can't be bothered to explain them. You're either with us elite better people and get it, or you don't and you'll always be unworthy.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUSW1CV082dlRGX2JYLWdvR2NBcjNEd2tZVVJRaEptbXkzVkp6QmRrbkE0bldOT3I3dlgtSmdTTlVpRTVDcmRJT3dUdl9oWHZ3eXBmT2lxUWVRQTIzcUE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzNXBIYkJFLUFuaVc5R1dqam1WdjQ2SlVueU54MFFscW8zX0NIbHhLSXVFZ3BvNGhUTWdZbmxQakRtSE9aNU12YUlPcU00d0gwbE9VQ2J5TUVnNW5NVXExQk5oeDNQbnJObWFZbHRWalF6RzI1c0NOVm1ERl8wTDhoRm1YWF9RMS1HOHAzZlhXUDhrTDNYZl8ySl9lSzRXSmV6ZXVNeEVJbWhtNGcwNEJlb1F2VFhZSGNZcFFDMGM5N3FrdTloZ3pZSUlTbU1xcnhqbWJQZ3lDWGE0YTRPZz09
Once in an interview Warhol was asked "Why don't you make your own original images?" He replied, with a scoff, "Because I don't have to." As a former student of the arts (though I would never call myself a true artist) I always found this to be bothersome. Like he played the art-world like a fiddle, and everyone danced.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUYTlJeWNfSllhTnhMa0xPRlJibV9udHRleDJzZFRIRmRGTEphcGlBa3p4bTl0bVA0bUVLc0NZYkpBUjdVMTlCVmk1RTRTc2cxTWp1N2hLNHZITlRXdVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzRVZaMUVFcWdJZGhiaHp3VWFxY2JMT0diSEhYLVAxcnA4dmtRLWZMTEkwVDVhcW5vRk9mbWpDbXlZZm1ZQjNMUW9YZkw0ZXhNTmN4cTFrU2d2STRsRkUzT181eXNaT2EzZEY4UERhR1NVSndVYXVTLW0wQk1Sd3ppMjdOTXh6RWRmUHN6ckJXaXlCOVNyeEdIUHRNbDk5R2xZUUNKdFVLU3I3eHp3YmI0TU5ZS1pxN0pNNVJvNE8ySlhUY3h1YUQzMzlRMTRSZzU1RWlCUVFEMmFCbHV0QT09
[deleted]
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUelJaV2VNaFNLOE44SzREUUlTWEprUVFkLUlGQUR5SGNRV29aektYOVZYQnlXazYtQmIwek13M1puU0c3ZTZtUTFCZ2l6YmtLMVlleWNlUE1nZ2NvR1E9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzYVRfQjZfb1MyNkZrOVFFR05DVXd1T1d5WWRJTXYzRlZiWmpFY0N1WlhrNzZ1Q2ZtQ3ZhUGFFLXg3Mjd6NjRtaE82aTBnRXVZbDQyQThNSHRxdThxN3lQdWtxNldpc2RuaUc2eVAxS2kzS2c4WDBsTTN0SVlLTmFvSUtGWDNlYjQ1WEpPQjlCNkc1TFlSZ0lCLUR5SHRSZVBUS1FlcEcwdmJweUhmWm1qYzdBWWUyZEtHV25PMnpEVktzRi1XeU9MNnNxVjhDUWtfLVk1VG5BRXBnS3ZHUT09
I never expect a positive response on Reddit when I don't follow the herd mentality but that is neither here nor there. The reasoning behind my original reply is simply that art cannot be defined (at least in three to four paragraphs) and it would be impossible to "explain why Warhol is considered an artist" to someone with no background in art who would be unfamiliar with the terminology and concepts we would be talking about. In addition, you could dedicate an entire college career to Warhol and still not know if what he created was art. It's not about being elite (although I concede that after re-reading it appears to be) as much as it is about frame of reference. It would be similar to someone trying to explain networking servers together or writing code to me. They would have to break it down to a sticks and stones level leaving me confused and them frustrated. Ironically, there is a certain validity to what I said if you view it from the "elitist" slant: any woman could tell me that being a man I will never understand childbirth until I experience it and they would be right - it's something I can know extensively about on a scientific and intellectual level and not really know anything about in reality. Art is the same - it is creation and cannot be understood on the same level by outsiders. It can be appreciated - much as I appreciate the work of childbirth, but it can't be understood, only experienced.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVULVEyaEdqcnQwWHhRamxwcVl2X1FBbXRzLXhCTGpocUhvTXV3c1FXWEoyM0lIRnRiVkdQd1lhdnlEVU9RdlR1OFJDeE9SN21YeU5mZndqVFF3bUNHTmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzTklnaXRDVHNpQl9kZHRJbkF2T3NvUTFYcHlkTDBZeFllck1XQ3dBQ05wOHN4VGhvREVjbWFFa1g2OGVDN3JISm1LTFZTTDk4UUtzMmRIYjZHYTJTa0dmVGY3eElYUUxiRFhwdEtVMEhNcHpvM1hZZzZURE1FakpFOUVNYlNPMHlrcUNSZ1JraS1lZmo1YURDcnZQc3h0R2RuUWZyQW1xQnU1ZmJJN1pDR0VER25tekp5NjNPSXpuTEswOXBkTGR4WUt1cFZkazQ0X1ludzBrUnJYWkZlZz09
I honestly don't get how "tech nerds" are incapable of reading about artwork they don't understand and then think their narrowly defined aesthetic taste and/or ignorance is somehow interesting enough to share with the world.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUV0tVYXZMVHVvLW50NGM5TEVkY0JmVVhiWDRIeHJMT3pVcjd6cXRzdjBHeEU0VzhsRGtKZTJjaG5RMk4wblhxUFJIR3I3RzBUcWFsX3Rhb1kyX2c1UXc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzb0s0VnY0c3JRVVNBenlmZWVFNDlmMmxyZUd4anV6dFkwdzZnVlk2T1FNYzFmMTRuMUJuMHA5YnZVTHZzUGdhbFhhWDFJMUdTTWxJUUNtQ1lITS0zVjFqSUFoYTdrNjhYSlJMQURaQzRoU3VqZkh3d01rZUR4MS1yem9tTkwzbk9ZY2M5MGxxTFVJVGRlWlJmYVFaU1hFNnk2bEVXT1JQYVFBMmZ6cmJjbFVYZ3lVTF9rb2I2RXVNS3RIWEZrX0hrWG1OZjFqd05FbVNQREJBVC1sZGZndz09
Me neither.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUVXpWZUhTY0JGWURBb3Q5MFl6ejZsM0lfaG52SHZ0MGg4cE5TUTBlTWpBMVJpRVlyUUdJTi04RUdRWmdHRGVEaGd2NEJJRUpEWmxadzRSYUozQUxWalE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzbF95QTh4VjR1Nko0NEM4RDRVU3B5N21SRVQzdTdLaEdwaUdIWFRyQUgwel81UDV2cWVvTWZXSFVzeGZJMWNGWUtpZ1dRZ2ZTS01GV3dMZWdEZ0ItRm82MW84Tkt6eHJtbGtoaHBNWnBIb2FSMi10Umh4QV9EcTM0Y1JfSDl6V09KNU1DaEREbVVScUFDSVdDWGNKVWNPM3hWRm1WWFo0YmIxamRPN3BXNFZJaldGeTBLS3Axb01OZ3lGMC1LbHdoemo1ZnJXOVRUTmdpU2dLV19GZEJadz09
http://www.jwm-art.net/dark.php?p=code&s=0.5 http://pallit.lhi.is/microcodes http://www.whitney.org/arport/commissions/codedoc/ http://artandcode.ning.com/
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUQVhLaTZyWFJMcG80RzdyR0lVMDhhWGNuRkxOTm9RV09mbDJid1Y2WFF5WTR2MHprbFRzZVJ3NFJLWGhOTkh5d3h1VWFzT3JMWF94eElVYzdYY29qcUE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzVWZ4NFNLbDVQTEQ4NGlYVEI0ZDRIYXNTQXIzeG1LRjg3QlBIWkhNc3dpMWRkLVNSOXdacE13U3hwd2NYbzZFbi05NGxmOUZ4ZnIySDVtSlFwQ01MbDhDSllKZmNLd0dIYzg1Nmt2QUREMjgyUmxyTXF6WkdZWlR1TmxoMG5pd1cxN3dHU2c2VUV3c09UeEtsYVlfQWllWDk1SnhsdHFKenNZeU9oWm9JeGt6WnR6UDZBZFBoT2w3SGM1MkdCMTVpR1R1NUNwdUctYmU4aVZhMmEybHpNdz09
Lots of interesting commentary here. Myself, I find it very difficult to find common ground between art and words. It does occur to me that there must have been an enormous evolutionary advantage to being able to persuasively sketch in the dirt a compelling strategy for surrounding and approaching game, or a strategy for finding food or shelter. Making images must run deep in our nature. Also, didn't Wittgenstein (in Tractatus) assert that all thinking is visual in nature? And didn't he also assert that human visualization underlies all language? Forgive me if this is off-base - I find Wittgenstein very challenging. Perhaps someone else can clarify. In any case, it seems to me that making art is as fundamental as speaking. It's odd that we would never assert that someone who was speaking was in fact not speaking. Yet people often feel that someone who is making art is, in fact, not doing so.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-06
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUZWFQbWJjNlhvaGV6NzVIZE1KM1FybFI3dENzYzFxYzZWc2dWN001RW4wV19janlZSDRnTjN2c0szdldxdXJIZldoaXhRLW9yT0lTOXk4MTdVbGlMNmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzOUxYbXRLTzJubG5XMndlTXhEdG5qUkpadnA5Q0RIX3pNVnNWU0xrMDZWRkc5TEc3aEF2TjNkX2NUbkZmMFBCNk1XV1RZQTh3M3B6MHZBVGx1TWs5U08weERsNUZ4dUJsaTFfNlJReldvb0dscG1EY3E4NGw1QnhJZUI2V2swTnZVWUpJbFlaS2V5UGFXdWU5NUhlci1qekE2TmlNdWFQTVdRU3Y5U0t1TDdVc1VpelVfQzlKZ3Y4RTVBTjhIUzhxRDg4dnZQdjlVWkoxUkpDZU9GeWIyUT09
I thought that was an interesting video. I don't know why you received so many downvotes. Though it would be more accurate to say "Robert Hughes disagrees with you." Clearly he is intelligent and well educated, but he is only one person. I assume you also agree with him, but you did not really prove your "smartness" to us. ;) Joking aside, I love hearing counterarguments, so thanks for the link. Hughes raises some valid points, but clearly his opponent was not up to the task of debating him. The collector sounded like a C student in an art history class.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUX0xfanRvUnNpYmh5RW81OVhJMEpvaUlrYlVtNEphOG1MWjZUNXFURm8wV0lmVUhJUW5tMkFIMERnRlpCenJZazdwYVdHWmtDcGVXaW9ZUnEtNmR1TlE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzTUlmV01KdG1LNWZrMHJ1VjNrRHdYS3U3V3cybmo2bXFVX19ITENROUUtbTNPUHZYV05uUUdqdXd5RmpDc0VVSTYyM1MtZlZ6dklUYzhHa05WcE1MODNPcDBUaUVtTkhrRkxudlRuUHRBQ3hlbm5FU2ZNQ0FLWGRBSzBkdnVWVlBrcjJTYVlsakNCMkJjODFiSDEzQXV6ZTNDaUFzbUttMGZjQzhoak9WMlhUVG1uREQwcUc4bFZPVGRnQnZhVlZvcUxSdlBKb2psRzY5bTk5MGZRMF9GUT09
What makes him creepy, exactly?
r/reddit.com
comment
r/reddit.com
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVULWxnUWN6TXFqcmxLZ3JxSnZ3MVdRQ0VldVZacl9TWldiQV9Tb3o4ZnZuXzFWODhZdGNFLWJuWHZIaThNYUlmZFNoZU5oUEQ4Uk5XVTQtZzF1TDRnUnc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzbFlFUFNVX0hWbkxreHZvWFRrTG5ldHdWYWJHSWpuS3BmWDFpWU1FcHMyRG5xTXpUeEM1VmNsaWp0dktoRlExNmhEMDdEQzRYdFUzSjBQQWF2dEhmaWViZm9qSnhlZ2pXaDdxSXppVXNDVXl1cnhyWjhUcU5xa05KM3FTRUk1cnVfS3BuYjBkMmpwaDhyREV5ZHZOSE9wVmdKM2hTV2x5NDBxU3BZakZobGE3VnRTeDBnanhBY3RSWWxQRG9JdWRRVDByakQ3djNEVURPVEpuWHg2UzR2dz09
Because anyone found this comment interesting enough to discuss.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUbDlNaGZSMENDZlpZVUhrWE84cFYyUng4cTVSZFJKamZwXzVhQVFLbnpCZk9yRTBHd2UxRHgwellFaVhsdVgzeXJIcDJtazlscVFjODhQeXMybFJ0NGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzRFNseXA0M3NaNS1QNWlrcUg3ck9UMVdRbzZTV05vRGVtdEtOZUdwbXprTktZMnNnUy1heVFyVjZwYTRycHZhVV8yTlRJT0tXSi1qN3pNa0V3empyYTY5VlE1Ql9jbV9ZRE12WGNsYk5remlHZ1loeDYxeTllWTEySmkzRTc0VW85aFp4ZW5oRjJIQ0EtaEo2ZXNiY2xTQmxVcFVlX29qMGROaDRzNzN4R1ZLNXFfbF9LMjZWUUJQX2t2dlc3R1gtaUNJa0VTeS1hemVGWTNGTGJ2UlBhdz09
:]
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUbWZXM0RiR3owRzRLdmtVaWNOTnc3Xzg1ZWY1Nmd4M2N3cUZndkFGLWgtcjgzNzdKQ0RPUUxyX0JxbGlYREZFcmtSREx1bUh5YmJidlp4U3NlcXh2VUE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzZmtzbzdWWmdiMTExTnhBUkNFSklHN21lZlV5Q0tHQ3FWeVQtSWVkM3JxNlZHVEtycGxBcW9qa0tMZFozU2tUUGx4Y2ROc1lkN0x3V1ozS0JKVXRMelBneF9HN1hfTkRUdjEzR2pXbllLVjFRM2RmOWJFZ1pTVE5EbGcwYXV1VFh3bkNpajhXSHk1RFpxVGhwZjdyZ3VQSC15eVFDa1pvbnp1UEc0aXhKelQ3UDlXdmhqcDllNkRxSmdkMzhzYzRoazRkM1dFUGU4QWdNU0RuYjZLZTNKQT09
I disagree, simply on the fact that we're talking about an artist, and not art. He did not do it first. The mere action of copying images negates this idea. One could argue that he challenged the norm for the first time, but this is also untrue. (ex. Dadaism, Impressionism, etc... All rejected in their first movement.) What he did do, was push that "norm" a little farther, and unlocked the door for everyone else. He took that chance, got noticed by the collectors (not the critics.) and ultimately unlocked the door for everyone else. This is a repeating trend in art, to push the extremes of "But is it art?"
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUSFNEMXRwSWxMVnJrNUg3dVVoYXlGMUl0RExWNG9lQm5TOEFzTW9IWjVtMm1QY0hFbGlNeWZ4eFZiN3ZvMWFxQ191N0VSbDVjRWYzZlo5UG4tYjFlUkE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzamxvVkN4azhWSWwxRlRwcGF6UEdaYl94MC1KV2xEZ052UWhyTzl4aDNpS2o5RGhwSHlwbDZiNlRoTWxIVUhXODNDUVlueDhkb0tKcldQTmhDaEM5OTJrTXhkVHd5cVRQeW5OZ2JsREtBZmNVQUN3RkkybkZrbnNYN293ejhxS0s4RGQ3WEdERkJBUHJtWjlsRlhYNGZfY0dVekRlckNWVnFvcFlfbGJGcER5RWdYeHFsaUVIOG9HSFZoR2NrSjFZODV6ZmNOdlVnQjJfX29JTmR3MW5CZz09
Silk screen paintings are made from photographs. Are photographs art?
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUSTJ1cVptaWloeDg2OXZjSUxzaVRhUEVCaGxTSnp3NnlidG9ic0RDU1FUc2VKVE1adFFsSTRoRzBLTlU4UDNvUGc0cE5hS1hoaGpVTHF2Rmc1Nm5CaFE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzUTNpLUx1Y1FWb2had1pLUVBsT1Z6VWNZNjdPbjhWRmtOTGRhSzZyV1BsUEdjVGJKTGliWFhuTTJETTItS3NnZVRZSkI0azI4WmJUTUdOd0lQR1ZXNUVUazJkSng1OG9MUVVqYUFwd0FPY29kekt2R3E2QjV4NnFrWkVLYXNKQkNpNkdKS2EwWVBlS2xaUGtvMm9KQWF0SGtvYlR1UUhwX3E4MnhmakJhMmxTZDdyOG1zTXRtQloyYXp1MURfX2hxNHlfZnpPZE1QS08wNGxkS1d0UjhSQT09
Its a bunch of crap. I could smear some shit on a canvas into the image of Jesus or Mary and I'd be an instant "artist"
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUVzRXaU1rVVVaY2l3WlZUTFgyb0ZvOHdYam5abDAwZDE2NWNGY2lTWE1rdTBJakxwVlRHUlJFLW9maW12UWQxbkQxa3RPbmJBRGM1Y3p5OGV5Z0VObFE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzVXpZZkE1aHpLalpTWmFRTXlDaHRhQzJienJ3N1haY29pT0U5YnFzM0p4Z3FWZE5vdHcyblRjLWJvMVByVGhralBiTkRNSlJ6NnhsendKRVQyOERKX09ROW5hbUNsWXlnejJ3Qm5ZR1VsZEVWb0prcWdmNW9JbWtEc2ItVDEtYmt4Y1BYUnRBQTdDajRpSTI1WENGTHNuRmhrcGVmbHdidFpWa0dkbmJpeDY5QTFnd3dtNVRUZEJPRXQ2U1ZnMm9SSGxXU3FYaElPV2J1TWxFaUNsdG1FQT09
You don't need text next to a piece of art. In fact, adding captions can change the entire meaning of a work of art because then said work of art is framed in an entirely different way. There are plenty of art exhibits that lack captions. I think that the real debate here is high art vs. low art. The only thing that separates high art from low art is people's definitions of what these things are supposed to be and why one is less important than the other. Graffiti wasn't considered art for ages, and it still isn't to a lot of people, but just because someone says that it isn't art or that "they could easily do the same thing" doesn't make it any less artistic, in the long run.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUUnpETjM2cF9QNFZlQzBRcTVhSXZjTHFsdWJVYkdMb0RmaTRSSlFuVmFnUDlQQjVyUVlUWUMzYkNnY1N1REpkRkM2VVlSaHQzTnRZMGlRS2tiSDItSGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzVk5RRWFCbUN6UXVvSDBRM3JVMkZKVmRuX3UyMElrVlp3RDd3bGdJVlhVa3hCNzN4TndOUE9iZUJ3LVY0RXhqR2tDYnhobmRyaklvVXpmeG5TSVBMemlvSEQ1LWVSXzYyVTNmVlRqWDhldG5tdFR3clA2bWVqRXpHVnRCWHdKT1hoYzFKaFEwd2xQQUNsQWhhUUJqZG1qZ25rUU45MWZweXFyMmFqZ3lXMjBoR0N3TkZaU0M4d1M3R2R4TEVHODhjRURPdGYyQzNIRm5EM3RHRzBjVHR3Zz09
the distance between 'I COULD and I DID' is the same between "LIGHTING BUG and LIGHTNING"
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUVVA1dHJFVkxDMGhKRDhHTXZlMi0zLTlJWjdLTzB2MWJ1QTZGVms5T3FRcGhfWFdyeEpnVjVQMm9uLU5YZkZCeExENHI1dDRhYU1rNTFYclAweEFHYVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzbDh3NXh4SndCbXRxVlVPc3B5ZmNnbHVZRlFUdnBUODh2SmVNVzJCb1Z1MGJ1TmV4QW5xVWFKZUk4R0hJRUdhVkpaYXl1aEJwQV9OTkVUMHhIMEppR2JjSWcwWFZyS2tDN0s2eEJMamZCblFRY3AxYlV6aXJnZjVBdlgyN182ZlRIZFdKZ3pmYkRiXzBpOEVBUHRrOC1TdGNTbzNGcVEwOUhHbXVSclh1em9HUkNCVlBwVHZQVEZhWGJpU1R5WC0xN0I2VmphOEYxVHpvUmFIYjRDU3ZEQT09
And I would appreciate your piece of art as a controversial and provocative artistic statement on the quality and benefits of religion. Art does not have to be pleasant to the eye, it can be simply a way of visually or otherwise sensually expressing an idea. You may have a tough time selling it though :D
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUNW45bjAySGctM0k3d1NPYmxMaG1HOGlXLTUyR3VkVjJqVVlIY1QwSndmUDNqN0VYUllBeExOX1FDODl2TThMMVhvdUhfMHFjRkEwa1lsMXE2alFLSGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzS2RaclctN0gtaXZrVUMyUm4xS2hLWm54LTZwOHJlemdaNmtudDN0bkdMRmRpaFlfX0FlRnd5U01HRnhWYzR6a3FnQmVCOVpzakxfR25GS3RfbGJwaW1yX1VZeW5NYmJvMXBma0xINzNDQWV3MEJUR25tWGE1LTJpNWdWUHItOWdwU3dVWVByZnlkNDJzTlhmZThVSG5YVzZ3b18zWk14TlR1Wnh2M2l4TFdmbGZPNWZaYktaTXhZWUtZQUZJMXdSaW5HZ05sOU1sX3EycG5MTl9PMzVsdz09
They can be, like beauty it is in the eye and mind of the beholder.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUbDZXZG5xX09kQW5jdXBGdGJ3TVpTMmFMQjM5djJDcHlLVDhVNHFXVGhMSDRqWWRWX18wR2RvbEU3UVI5YnFyenlHOFNBcklJd0d0V3dLMzJES2RNUWc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzN3kxNmdqb0dCcld4T2QtbVRYQ3AxTHdTcFRPaEtkaVRUdEZNMVN1SnB1UElnSXNnc1ZMT1pBNFhOS3lKc0NMN05oNEc4V2JSN0tVWnYtRnYtcXl0Mm1tODRKVjh6c1ZfbFVISlBEaEtaUy1ORHBNQXJxNjJpR3lHbU1KWkZnbG1pMFlzR0d5OVVfT0daOFhFSlN4NW52U1RkSFREWVM4QXFyVjJJZG9ZbW1XbDdvcU9FeC1sb08ya3hwaFVlVDZtMHRxcEZnUjUtQkYyRGN3ZmQtZzE2Zz09
There are benefits to being original with original ideas even if expressed with "original images".
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUX3Q5bC1QbVhEZzluWmVkd2tMTUtiZEpzbWxQaXM3QmU0TWhVQUdiVGVWMU90aGtXMEFOWkJnZjNSejBqWFc5MzhVQ29JeWZfVExxczdZcklpSDZfUGc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzcHJqT05RRGlCbFV1OFpubFhiUEt2QlZiVTk5VTVDTjkyd0I2SWp4ZVFXS3dwNHVFOU5uanVBLUkxMC1FT2dPb0ZHaXpjcElXWXZ1bmU4a3NNdDkzOHBqOTRmX0ZSYUkzZzhadUhlbEk5czgyRzByMnItUndnNFpoU3VCN2VGQ0FuOHBCQVlIaDlNMjNnRkVzZ2dKWFlPMmJSRjJTWFh2alhaNFpnQWpRSU9YNEZEMWJEbFYxdVFNd1pTMUpwcWdHVGFTeU5FTzdMcDNEY0pNb3NlVUJpUT09
Fortunately you do not get to determine what is and is not art. Just because you do not appreciate a piece of art, an artist, or an art movement because of your conception of "Art" is too close minded or uninformed does not make it so.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUMEk2aEIxb3ZXZm9MWmVtNWhVWWJoZkNyNGNNanBMNlA3NXdVSkJEQm5WYV9XUVVVMWR2empxYXNLbWJ0Z0U1aXlLTTdXb0FvRDNFcElXLWUxWlJaQUE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzbDVMdGZDVFpkcGtDUExmaTBkU2FWNzhkVFk4SG5LWmJoTzFNb3RtNlNSWEtxVnV5MlptOGdSUFBmUEFlRWdtS2VaVVRvdDJRTF9PSzB5Z0RSbDFOWFlzeEpsV2VrenhUVTZvTUxQdVZWQUp1MDJ3c092MWh2Y1U3SnFZbGdoTkRNdmszWGdJS2JHT1FKY1E4YkI2XzBFVlFaV1J5ZU5oQ0ZNZ3lxR2lLTTF6MWRqTU1laDdMSDVuQ3Vtbm1KS2pqT0pzelRDMWMwc3hVWVY3ZHBELS03Zz09
I think of an artist like a driver, not many of us do it for a living but a lot of us do it. Just because we don't make it a source of income does not make it art.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUUjhKOE1uTE0zc05DZFZ2SHNaVnBONHB2UlpoTVNFVHRMVk43aTFja3Bsaml0Vk1XTVNQN2l0T09FMEV4ZFBfcHRaYVg5S3ZoTXAzMWIxb1NRaUktdnc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzaEhOT2sxbWFoREcwZGpHc3Z0bmp1T2REQzhOczl6Y2dGZUU5TDgtaGVkOUp4MXhoV0N3UWJwOFQzT3d4eTVBdm9rdl96VGY0ZndzLWZHY2hGNE1sYWszY1p2MFdYN1Vzb0YwaU1UOGpVMm1fV2o5S1dpVURaQmlERzVSakdsOTAtRUgxa2ZneF9LVWdaWDdMS3VfMGpjOC0tVjV3dGY0M1pnRjdnRERFR2dsQTRjOHlOcGM3SUFQSXoxMWp6MFFhQ1REZl9hV2NrMFhmcVRFNGdaeXA4Zz09
I think the question brought up by Duchamp is more like "What is the role of the author in art?" But both questions are important.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUVEQyWHBvLWJzSjMwN1FkcjgyMmRUVjZjZnplanRjT0dQTHhIelRDTDQyM09uRWU3ckk1bHVKNmN1SzhKSmJpdWQwSHZRNUdDVGVVVlJBeTY1ZDMxclE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzVVlJX3ZPd2VKRkp2T0swdzhpS2NHRGtXMExfbWZTVFd5TkNiQUR6djV3VnFLeXh3QzQ5dENmNFRxSFBPQk5QUkJSRWVhOTBNSmV4R3NBYURkbG1LdC1Na1h5cV8wQm0wR2RBWW5aZjVJNl9FbXRxaUNacFowUFRvSmRCdnZKTm5WUHROT2JxZ0NZMWlGUDJoOG5SWkc2bVB1SnNqU3c2ak1mVzlWTWNZUkFBX0F2VFBXSnNRNDc3VDE5WWNuT1JwM3VDOTZaQVZPQl9yNmlUVGRyZmU3UT09
Wow I never thought I would meet the person who could prove what is and isn't art. or maybe you are just conceited?
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUblY0WXA3MXBJZ3Nxd1NHckYwWTNzZE1DbmJyMV90cWo2WFlBek1hQmFaQUZqdVRYZXI0QWw0OGlOSFlhRlF5Mk9wSkQ1U1hfQk1RdWJtRlRMUWNPd2c9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzVlVvRVVuNTkzN3hPRTBEaWxqMWE5blhXengxdGFUYWhKWmhZN0ZmcnR3cEc3QnZ3TWdScUJPTGVOcHZrMnZuLWRqZUpwX2pmWk9fQlpJTThoSVJPQ2NhQWpvMWRiZndZeTlNcS12akl1U3lNN0hvVnZrSDR2azg0ai1SeFhaa3VialgxRmJCRlVzXzRuRWhoZkwxQmNkNW5JMEMwcGFEMDBkWFFGSGk2ZVdSQWhEWE9VRnBRb0VSdDVoUXhlMUhQbE1Kek9DLXp4aC1zRWRWcXA4WlROQT09
Just because it is not pretty doesn't stop it being good art, It is great art (at conveying an idea an making people think) just not pretty.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUNEhDUjJ2Mmt3QXEzOUFvNnNsWDlvOXJ1Zm91Rl94RTVUV1lLSWppQWNrQnNiYWkzVVV3VjY2ZHlkSE5TeXpXcGJreFd2VDNVcW5TajhsX2JZSkYxRkE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzYUlvMGQtV1hfWHZkRTM0QzFUQ01zaFNZQk9UYUJzTjgtSDNpNWlIbmh1bHhRR21wMjVhOW1fLXZLWG84T0RtNy1FLTVrQXRLYklQVWRhMFRTTWRjTERULTJfS2k3VVdmWGRzUXVSWjR1c0VVLXQ3RzRZcWlmNm5zNk5ST3ZReEZBVmNyR2toYVh5LVk1THVpejVSYWpEU1VHWFp1ODZRNE9DUUdJdjNGcHVuVTFqM2NqNm8teWgwRlh3a2otdEMxMDc1Mkhxd3FFQWRkUGtlQWJtOEUwdz09
In dark oils!
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVULUJUaFRyc25jYjNsTnVWdXlaUlJfUFMxNmRRM0lrWWozWnI1TmVJMmNZV3hHWGdtOW5BNW1hX1ZZWGh1eTBBcmJtR1hzRllsWEw0a3dCblBveEI0ZXc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzRkR6bmxfTklHUjB4Z2ktUEdSWGI2Q3JXTUptSzMzMDc0WEtrb0VUMDR2VlRIWDlMbzdHZWhOOUZWVE9wSHdPZGU4d2V4X29OX2J1WG50ay1HYVNDeW5fRm1nR0pLSW93RE5BdlFXV1RPQTBVWGpnRjdxZVFsa0doaHFnOWtGcGx0NFd0RkNVT2FuNHhkOHRKUXJBM3N4eGQ1c0JxMVBTZ0xsVm9GQnpPRmFYSWZBcS1GYTQybVlKcldEci1yUGFPZXZDc2NPTlZvZllJV09JZDlxU0Jhdz09
human excrement and religious imagery? [it's been done.](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piss_Christ)
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUek1WcDhSdzBDaDQyY2FVRnZzZ0pTVDFZRmJ0WVNfZk1RelBFV1VsaC1HMV9haHhZVG9QVXdvclJlWkV0YWlfblRiQVdHNXRSYl9UYzRyWnVGa1R0Wmc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzbGZUMWJZb0dxSFB0eHlXUG02MXItQ2F1TExVdmdhWElFWmp1c3liQVBpVGlXU0EwbjNNbkFZTlVUT1puNm1VSk5YQWVhM0Vwb0ZBb0VqcGtDVEdDZ1MyNk81a2RnUWlscEpRR0RMZmUzdTQ0bUVhTjQwekdFbTVwbDZTVTFOckhDa2ZraEZQWFQ3ellsNzRvbU1rZUc0U2JieTlIQnBKdzB6cjEyUHBlSWlLYWl2SzlrVEx1cUlDZGVtMUlUM1hvQXVJUUw5d0pCaE1Sb3lESVJoU0RPdz09
It's been done with piss, but not with *shit*!
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUUGVtUmlvQmttTm5ILXhCTnNiRUc4blhOeUM2enZtQVFTYUhkYW9uaHdIbmVLc2JnNDByT1pXaF9ZbFo2RmhuYllMSFpSNUZrVVctNkhuNU1hTTYwSnc9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzTkI3NU5JcTlrTUtEZUVWRmpDU002Mm0wLWNoaXNFVHk3eGs3MEp6WWNLdFZJa0dzLXFVb3dpeHdWcENfZXVjSzBQMU05b1Blb3RXOUxpYzZqbWxLelhHMmhtc3JuWVV2bFZ0QUljaGdza0dqdnpvMnhpWDNCUW9kZFQxWlhDUEw5M3JXa3l4ZVNSdTg1TjdkbWZIVTFQZ0dsdFo0Y2RTc3NQZXZqbW1kRktfUGp4aENhcEVOc3BOYTNXb2VVZVoySWpBSFJCQ1JicXVlNnU5QnRqWU95dz09
As much as I dislike Word, I need to convert some manuscripts from LaTeX to Word for work. Does anyone have any advice or suggestions? I've never used Chikrii but have heard negative things about it. I don't know anything about the other software programs, like GrindEQ or Ktalk, that Google shows. If you have any experience with these or others, please let me know. Thanks.
r/math
post
r/math
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVURDlXNnMxb2tBREJUS1M3S0lpTEJVc09XVVdDWXotQVR2MEM1N1plX0xMX1RjLVJ2REFpZmp1Nm53NVpPcXExaHl3RXF3ZVNLem9TNEFVcnVQRk0wdENvNDNaQ2VNVjUzNWM2M0ZQd2hUSlk9
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzRUprOG85YnFMVmo3ZlJOcmU5MkxiRmFMYzA3T1FZd0dJS0RvSWJHNnVmUHhlOEpiQzU5a0ZacWtxTnh3a0dhYzBDVVZDU216aXR5Y3RmWlFTR0hTOHlGQ3NnSTN2a2UyUmxyZDdEOVdQV25GczRyaExyVnM5N3FzRlkxYVJDN1g2WFZaV0JhQ242aWFfam5HRHRZbWRQdFBpenE3bkM1Zld0R25qbzZPcGNjPQ==
The earliest examples of art were used for specific ritualistic purposes. It is now believed that many prehistoric cave paintings were not even meant to be viewed by people but were meant to have some sort of magic control over the animals drawn. This is why they found extremely deep in hard to find parts of caves and often are drawn on top of each other. Kill the picture, kill the animal. It seems to me that Art has always had a strong conceptual aspect.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUN3pDcUtmN0xpZ041MTFzb2ZOdGpUeEhEaENwVkFQNkZvTzFQODRHb05yc3dpbHQ2dzVQclYxbmtITnExcl83UVltUnRlSDNrc1Y4azRJQnRtX1Bpc2c9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzVXVqSGxUT2RxcmpLb0JRc2E0N3hOV3FhNGkxRjVkdHBOdXAwdkpmZHhUeFUxaXEwcHAyN2hucDM4VF9tdzVaWm5mRHE4U0hpNHU2NjRzYjdXRlIyOF9fVmhzVjVpMjZjSTV2VjFBWl9BajQwRUF3THk2aXJMSW5xTy1ISXZUa3NBZThJUU9FSE9DZnA0Wm5IZElHa3pLVXBVRHFDT0ZZYmxvN29hT3NZemtxWXg5R2dBYVJrUmhtS0RyQV9uRzA1QzI2cWJYMTFwd2xRU1M1bV9XdTFBdz09
Of course I am using this in the general sense for Photoshop, GIMP, Aperture, etc. I see so much so called "professional photography", and all it contains, is a semi-interesting angle, and about an hour or more of photoshop work per photo. Just because your colors pop because of all the mask hue saturation, doesn't mean your pieces are anything but a hobby. Don't get me wrong, I use digital. I prefer it from all the money and darkroom hours I spent on my film; but let's get real. A good photographer just doesn't need to spend much time in the "photoshop-room". A good photographer doesn't even need really expensive equipment, (it is nice to have though; again, don't get me wrong lol). I just wish people would take the shot, crop it, do their raw white balancing, and poof. If you can take a picture that is amazing with just that... THEN you are a good photographer. If you can't, you are merely a decent editor.
r/photography
post
r/photography
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUOEstdFFRTzZqcDI4dGhSVnJfWF92UXdYS01CWG4tWDZHNFZSdHYwTk5uYkFQdmV2aGdkRkV6NXpIdVJkVGY5ZUhDcUVNd0dzSVdLWEs3cHpTdi1lTVE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzc3lUMmh2NUhxZ1R1SVZucUd0ejRGNzRDRGU0cGxsTHpXd0NCOU1BSWVMSnFJR2FFTVc2bTJ6Zy1NWnRSNXpyNENSaVJXOWRVRlFGLWdaRk5vNVBwbFBqcE1ORDlxUnlFWTZiR3JSV283c09FOHZkcXRmOWZ6ajBGSENIRGtPTmZVcWpUVWdZZ1A3Z3R1d2p6c2sxMHVvQ3d4Z2RMMnFXSzlTcmVreTFZOF9jPQ==
My point was that there is no essential meaning in any art piece. There is no meaning to be "changed" because there is no one true meaning, just different interpretations and descriptions. Art can be anything. All something needs to be considered art is to be interpreted.
r/art
comment
r/Art
2009-07-07
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVVUdV85YTMxd3NkMDBtb3c4bTRWdU5Xb08tU01lVzNaYnFNa0I4N3Z1TDZxemo1OXRHZHRZQS03LTJibWlnUGVtVG14R1pRY3lacmpUS21PWThyS05KQkE9PQ==
Z0FBQUFBQm9MNVUzU2tPMW5nNEJqWkhFNUs3WTB0MVVHZ2cxNVRSeHpzbTNfOGhWU3BWUXhqUHU5MTRGOU1TdHZRVFBNbVA0MGw5d2tUV0RxbDZsbXJIN3dqX0RxeUZCQmJDUU5CX3hUQ1M5VTNZZWF1aUhSYTZvN3hQWWZWbXRaWkVUd0NMZDkzX1hhdUZHZDZEelZlSEJmWkpwNkYzYjFiczQ1aXdpcUdNSWJLaThUdG91MmVOVFg2aVEydmRpU2J4NWFzX0lfT0hZX05jZ1ZrU1VBd1Y4S28zQlBKRXJKdz09