a
stringlengths 138
8.15k
| b
stringlengths 138
8.15k
| label
int64 1
1
|
|---|---|---|
Long-acting bronchodilators are central in the pharmacological management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the studies evaluating the safety and clinical efficacy of inhaled glycopyrronium bromide, a novel long-acting muscarinic antagonist, in patients with COPD.,This study was performed as a systematic literature review.,Inhaled glycopyrronium bromide seems to be a safe and well tolerated long-acting muscarinic antagonist with a fast onset of action.,In patients suffering from moderate to severe COPD, glycopyrronium bromide has clinically important effects on level of forced expiratory volume in one second, use of relief medication, percentage of days with no use of rescue medication, daytime dyspnea scores, and probably also on health status.,Furthermore, in this group of patients, glycopyrronium bromide has beneficial effects on dynamic hyperinflation and exercise tolerance.,Glycopyrronium bromide has been shown to reduce the rate of exacerbations in patients with moderate to severe COPD, but long-term controlled trials with exacerbation rate as the primary outcome variable have not been published yet.,Once-daily inhaled glycopyrronium bromide has characteristics important for use in COPD, including a fast onset of action, sustained 24-hour bronchodilatation, and improvement in exercise tolerance, and therefore appears to have the potential for a significant role in the future management of COPD. | Exercise limitation, dynamic hyperinflation, and exertional dyspnea are key features of symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We assessed the effects of glycopyrronium bromide (NVA237), a once-daily, long-acting muscarinic antagonist, on exercise tolerance in patients with moderate to severe COPD.,Patients were randomized to a cross-over design of once-daily NVA237 50 μg or placebo for 3 weeks, with a 14-day washout.,Exercise endurance, inspiratory capacity (IC) during exercise, IC and expiratory volumes from spirometry, plethysmographic lung volumes, leg discomfort and dyspnea under exercise (Borg scales), and transition dyspnea index were measured on Days 1 and 21 of treatment.,The primary endpoint was endurance time during a submaximal constant-load cycle ergometry test on Day 21.,A total of 108 patients were randomized to different treatment groups (mean age, 60.5 years; mean post-bronchodilator, forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] 57.1% predicted).,Ninety-five patients completed the study.,On Day 21, a 21% difference in endurance time was observed between patients treated with NVA237 and those treated with placebo (P < 0.001); the effect was also significant from Day 1, with an increase of 10%.,Dynamic IC at exercise isotime and trough FEV1 showed significant and clinically relevant improvements from Day 1 of treatment that were maintained throughout the study.,This was accompanied by inverse decreases in residual volume and functional residual capacity.,NVA237 was superior to placebo (P < 0.05) in decreasing leg discomfort (Borg CR10 scale) on Day 21 and exertional dyspnea on Days 1 and 21 (transition dyspnea index and Borg CR10 scale at isotime).,The safety profile of NVA237 was similar to that of the placebo.,NVA237 50 μg once daily produced immediate and significant improvement in exercise tolerance from Day 1.,This was accompanied by sustained reductions in lung hyperinflation (indicated by sustained and significant improvements in IC at isotime), and meaningful improvements in trough FEV1 and dyspnea.,Improvements in exercise endurance increased over time, suggesting that mechanisms beyond improved lung function may be involved in enhanced exercise tolerance.,(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01154127). | 1 |
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are obstructive airway disorders which differ in their underlying causes and phenotypes but overlap in patterns of pharmacological treatments.,In both asthma and COPD, oxidative stress contributes to airway inflammation by inducing inflammatory gene expression.,The redox-sensitive transcription factor, nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB (NF-κB), is an important participant in a broad spectrum of inflammatory networks that regulate cytokine activity in airway pathology.,The anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids (GCs), a mainstay treatment for asthma, involve inhibition of NF-κB induced gene transcription.,Ligand bound GC receptors (GRs) bind NF-κB to suppress the transcription of NF-κB responsive genes (i.e., transrepression).,However, in severe asthma and COPD, the transrepression of NF-κB by GCs is negated as a consequence of post-translational changes to GR and histones involved in chromatin remodeling.,Therapeutics which target NF-κB activation, including inhibitors of IκB kinases (IKKs) are potential treatments for asthma and COPD.,Furthermore, reversing GR/histone acetylation shows promise as a strategy to treat steroid refractory airway disease by augmenting NF-κB transrepression.,This review examines NF-κB signaling in airway inflammation and its potential as target for treatment of asthma and COPD. | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is and will remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide.,The severity of airflow obstruction is known to relate to overall health status and mortality.,However, even allowing for common aetiological factors, a link has been identified between COPD and other systemic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes and osteoporosis.,COPD is known to be an inflammatory condition and neutrophil elastase has long been considered a significant mediator of the disease.,Pro-inflammatory cytokines, in particular TNF-α (Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha), may be the driving force behind the disease process.,However, the roles of inflammation and these pro-inflammatory cytokines may extend beyond the lungs and play a part in the systemic effects of the disease and associated co-morbidities.,This article describes the mechanisms involved and proposes a common inflammatory TNF-α phenotype that may, in part, account for the associations. | 1 |
COPD has been perceived as being a disease of older men.,However, >7 million women are estimated to live with COPD in the USA alone.,Despite a growing body of literature suggesting an increasing burden of COPD in women, the evidence is limited.,To assess and synthesize the available evidence among population-based epidemiologic studies and calculate the global prevalence of COPD in men and women.,A systematic review and meta-analysis reporting gender-specific prevalence of COPD was undertaken.,Gender-specific prevalence estimates were abstracted from relevant studies.,Associated patient characteristics as well as custom variables pertaining to the diagnostic method and other important epidemiologic covariates were also collected.,A Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis was performed investigating gender-specific prevalence of COPD stratified by age, geography, calendar time, study setting, diagnostic method, and disease severity.,Among 194 eligible studies, summary prevalence was 9.23% (95% credible interval [CrI]: 8.16%-10.36%) in men and 6.16% (95% CrI: 5.41%-6.95%) in women.,Gender prevalences varied widely by the World Health Organization Global Burden of Disease subregions, with the highest female prevalence found in North America (8.07% vs 7.30%) and in participants in urban settings (13.03% vs 8.34%).,Meta-regression indicated that age ≥40 and bronchodilator testing contributed most significantly to heterogeneity of prevalence estimates across studies.,We conducted the largest ever systematic review and meta-analysis of global prevalence of COPD and the first large gender-specific review.,These results will increase awareness of COPD as a critical woman’s health issue. | Little is known about whether there is any sex effect on chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) exacerbations.,This study is intended to describe the possible sex-associated differences in exacerbation profile in COPD patients.,A total of 384 COPD patients who were hospitalized due to exacerbation were evaluated retrospectively for their demographics and previous and current exacerbation characteristics.,The study was conducted on 109 (28%) female patients and 275 (72%) male patients.,The mean age was 68.30±10.46 years.,Although females had better forced expiratory volume in 1 second and near-normal forced vital capacity, they had much impaired arterial blood gas levels (partial oxygen pressure [PO2] was 36.28 mmHg vs 57.93 mmHg; partial carbon dioxide pressure [PCO2] was 45.97 mmHg vs 42.49 mmHg; P=0.001), indicating severe exacerbation with respiratory failure.,More females had two exacerbations and two hospitalizations, while more men had one exacerbation and one hospitalization.,Low adherence to treatment and pulmonary embolism were more frequent in females.,Females had longer time from the onset of symptoms till the admission and longer hospitalization duration than males.,Comorbidities were less in number and different in women (P<0.05).,Women were undertreated and using more oral corticosteroids.,Current data showed that female COPD patients might be more prone to have severe exacerbations, a higher number of hospitalizations, and prolonged length of stay for hospitalization.,They have a different comorbidity profile and might be undertreated for COPD. | 1 |
This longitudinal, retrospective cohort study of patients with COPD describes baseline characteristics, adherence, and persistence following initiation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonists (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) from multiple inhaler triple therapy (MITT).,Patients aged ≥40 years receiving MITT between January 2012 and September 2015 were identified from the IQVIA™ Real-world Data Adjudicated Claims-USA database.,MITT was defined as subjects with ≥1 overlapping days’ supply of three COPD medications (ICS, LABA, and LAMA).,Adherence (proportion of days covered, PDC) and discontinuation (defined as a gap of 1, 30, 60, or 90 days of supply in any of the three components of the triple therapy) were calculated for each patient over 12 months of follow-up.,In addition, analyses were stratified by number of inhalers.,In total, 14,635 MITT users were identified (mean age, 62 years).,Mean PDC for MITT at 12 months was 0.37%.,Mean PDC for the ICS/LABA and LAMA component at 12 months was 49% (0.49±0.31; median, 0.47) and 54% (0.54±0.33; 0.56), respectively.,The proportion of adherent patients (PDC ≥0.8) at 12 months was 14% for MITT.,Allowing for a 30-day gap from last day of therapy, 86% of MITT users discontinued therapy during follow-up.,Patients with COPD had low adherence to and persistence with MITT in a real-world setting.,Mean PDC for each single inhaler component was higher than the mean PDC observed with MITT.,Reducing the number of inhalers may improve overall adherence to intended triple therapy. | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common disease with significant health and economic consequences.,This study assesses the burden of COPD in the general population, and the influence of exacerbations (E-COPD) on disease progression and costs.,This is a secondary data analysis of healthcare administrative databases of the region of Lombardy, in northern Italy.,The study included ≥ 40 year-old patients hospitalized for a severe E-COPD (index event) during 2006.,Patients were classified in relation to the number and type of E-COPD experienced in a three-year pre-index period.,Subjects were followed up until December 31st, 2009, collecting data on healthcare resource use and vital status.,15857 patients were enrolled -9911 males, mean age: 76 years (SD 10).,Over a mean follow-up time of 2.4 years (1.36), 81% of patients had at least one E-COPD with an annual rate of 3.2 exacerbations per person-year and an all-cause mortality of 47%.,A history of exacerbation influenced the occurrence of new E-COPD and mortality after discharge for an E-COPD.,On average, the healthcare system spent 6725€ per year per person (95%CI 6590-6863).,Occurrence and type of exacerbations drove the direct healthcare cost.,Less than one quarter of patients presented claims for pulmonary function tests.,COPD imposes a substantial burden on healthcare systems, mainly attributable to the type and occurrence of E-COPD, or in other words, to the exacerbator phenotypes.,A more tailored approach to the management of COPD patients is required. | 1 |
Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are episodes of worsening of symptoms, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality.,COPD exacerbations are associated with increased airway and systemic inflammation and physiological changes, especially the development of hyperinflation.,They are triggered mainly by respiratory viruses and bacteria, which infect the lower airway and increase airway inflammation.,Some patients are particularly susceptible to exacerbations, and show worse health status and faster disease progression than those who have infrequent exacerbations.,Several pharmacological interventions are effective for the reduction of exacerbation frequency and severity in COPD such as inhaled steroids, long-acting bronchodilators, and their combinations.,Non-pharmacological therapies such as pulmonary rehabilitation, self-management, and home ventilatory support are becoming increasingly important, but still need to be studied in controlled trials.,The future of exacerbation prevention is in assessment of optimum combinations of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies that will result in improvement of health status, and reduction of hospital admission and mortality associated with COPD. | The most common cause of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is respiratory infection.,Most studies of bacterial or viral cause in AECOPD have been conducted in Western countries.,We investigated bacterial and viral identification rates in AECOPD in Korea.,We reviewed and analyzed medical records of 736 cases of AECOPD at the Korea University Guro Hospital.,We analyzed bacterial and viral identification rates and classified infections according to epidemiological factors, such as Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage, mortality, and seasonal variation.,The numbers of AECOPD events involving only bacterial identification, only viral identification, bacterial-viral co-identification, and no identification were 200 (27.2%), 159 (21.6%), 107 (14.5%), and 270 (36.7%), respectively.,The most common infectious bacteria identified were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.0%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (11.4%), and Haemophilus influenzae (5.3%); the most common viruses identified were influenza virus (12.4%), rhinovirus (9.4%), parainfluenza virus (5.2%), and metapneumovirus (4.9%).,The bacterial identification rate tended to be higher at more advanced stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p=0.020 overall, p=0.011 for P. aeruginosa, p=0.048 for S. pneumoniae).,Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae were identified more in mortality group (p=0.003 for S. aureus, p=0.009 for K. pneumoniae).,All viruses were seasonal (i.e., greater prevalence in a particular season; p<0.050).,Influenza virus and rhinovirus were mainly identified in the winter, parainfluenza virus in the summer, and metapneumovirus in the spring.,This information on the epidemiology of respiratory infections in AECOPD will improve the management of AECOPD using antibiotics and other treatments in Korea. | 1 |
Proteolysis of matrix components, in particular elastin, is a major contributing factor to the development of lung diseases such as emphysema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,MMP-12 (macrophage elastase) is a protease known to be involved in the progression of lung disease.,The relatively low abundance of MMP-12 has precluded the development of quantitative assays that can accurately measure MMP-12 protein levels and activity across cohorts of healthy and diseased individuals.,Commercial antibodies were screened for performance in sandwich ELISA and capture FRET activity assay formats.,Precision, accuracy, sensitivity, dilution linearity, and spike recovery were evaluated using sputum samples.,Total protein and capture FRET activity assays were developed that were sensitive enough to detect MMP-12 in 37 of 38 donor sputum samples.,A comparison of results between the two assays shows that a majority of sputum MMP-12 is in the active form.,No differences were seen between normal, asthmatic, and COPD donors.,Sensitive and quantitative assays for both MMP-12 activity and total protein in human induced sputum have been developed.,These assays can be used to evaluate MMP-12 as a biomarker for lung disease, and to monitor efficacy of potential therapeutic compounds. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of death throughout the world and is largely associated with cigarette smoking.,Despite the appreciation of the central role of smoking in the development of COPD, only a relatively small number of smokers (15%-20%) develop COPD.,Recent studies depicting familial aggregation suggest that some subjects may have a genetic predisposition to developing COPD.,In this respect, a number of single nucleotide polymorphisms have been reported in association with different COPD features (subphenotypes), although much of this data remains controversial.,Classical genetic studies (including twin and family studies) assume an “equal-environment” scenario, but as gene-environment interactions occur in COPD, this assumption needs revision.,Thus, new integrated models are needed to examine the major environmental factors associated with COPD which include smoking as well as air pollution, and respiratory infections, and not only genetic predisposition.,Revisiting this area, may help answer the question of what has more bearing in the pathogenesis of COPD-the environment or the genomic sequence of the affected subjects.,It is anticipated that an improved understanding of this interaction will both enable improved identification of individuals susceptible to developing this disease, as well as improved future treatments for this disease. | 1 |
The aetiology of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) is incompletely understood.,Understanding the relationship between chronic bacterial airway infection and viral exposure may explain the incidence and seasonality of these events.,In this prospective, observational cohort study (NCT01360398), patients with COPD aged 40-85 years underwent sputum sampling monthly and at exacerbation for detection of bacteria and viruses.,Results are presented for subjects in the full cohort, followed for 1 year.,Interactions between exacerbation occurrence and pathogens were investigated by generalised estimating equation and stratified conditional logistic regression analyses.,The mean exacerbation rate per patient-year was 3.04 (95% CI 2.63 to 3.50).,At AECOPD, the most common bacterial species were non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) and Moraxella catarrhalis, and the most common virus was rhinovirus.,Logistic regression analyses (culture bacterial detection) showed significant OR for AECOPD occurrence when M. catarrhalis was detected regardless of season (5.09 (95% CI 2.76 to 9.41)).,When NTHi was detected, the increased risk of exacerbation was greater in high season (October-March, OR 3.04 (1.80 to 5.13)) than low season (OR 1.22 (0.68 to 2.22)).,Bacterial and viral coinfection was more frequent at exacerbation (24.9%) than stable state (8.6%).,A significant interaction was detected between NTHi and rhinovirus presence and AECOPD risk (OR 5.18 (1.92 to 13.99); p=0.031).,AECOPD aetiology varies with season.,Rises in incidence in winter may be driven by increased pathogen presence as well as an interaction between NTHi airway infection and effects of viral infection.,Results, NCT01360398. | The objective of this study is to assess whether statin use is associated with beneficial effects on COPD outcomes.,We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available studies describing the association between statin use and COPD mortality, exacerbations and cardiovascular events.,Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched, with no restrictions.,The hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated.,Fifteen studies with a total of 238,459 patients were included.,Nine articles provided data on all-cause mortality (124,543 participants), and they gave a HR of 0.62 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.73).,Three studies provided data on cancer mortality (90,077 participants), HR 0.83 (0.65 to 1.08); four studies on COPD mortality (88,767 participants), HR 0.48 (0.23 to 0.99); and three studies on cardiovascular mortality (90,041 participants), HR 0.93 (0.50 to 1.72).,Six articles provided data on COPD exacerbation with or without hospitalization (129,796 participants), HR 0.64 (0.55 to 0.75).,Additionally, the use of statins was associated with a significant reduction risk of myocardial infarction, but not for stroke.,Our systematic review showed a clear benefit of statins in patients with COPD. | 1 |
A core feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the accelerated decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1).,The recent Groningen and Leiden Universities study of Corticosteroids in Obstructive Lung Disease (GLUCOLD) study suggested that particular phenotypes of COPD benefit from fluticasone±salmeterol by reducing the rate of FEV1 decline, yet the underlying mechanisms are unknown.,Whole-genome gene expression profiling using the Affymetrix Gene ST array (V.1.0) was performed on 221 bronchial biopsies available from 89 COPD patients at baseline and after 6 and 30 months of fluticasone±salmeterol and placebo treatment in GLUCOLD.,Linear mixed effects modelling revealed that the expression of 138 genes decreased, whereas the expression of 140 genes significantly upregulated after both 6 and 30 months of treatment with fluticasone±salmeterol versus placebo.,A more pronounced treatment-induced change in the expression of 50 and 55 of these 278 genes was associated with a lower rate of decline in FEV1 and Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire, respectively.,Genes decreasing with treatment were involved in pathways related to cell cycle, oxidative phosphorylation, epithelial cell signalling, p53 signalling and T cell signalling.,Genes increasing with treatment were involved in pathways related to focal adhesion, gap junction and extracellular matrix deposition.,Finally, the fluticasone-induced gene expression changes were enriched among genes that change in the airway epithelium in smokers with versus without COPD in an independent data set.,The present study suggests that gene expression in biological pathways of COPD is dynamic with treatment and reflects disease activity.,This study opens the gate to targeted and molecular phenotype-driven therapy of COPD. | Little is known about factors that determine health status decline in clinical trials of COPD.,To examine health status changes over 3 years in the TORCH study of salmeterol+fluticasone propionate (SFC) vs. salmeterol alone, fluticasone propionate alone or placebo.,St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was administered at baseline then every 6 months.,Data from 4951 patients in 28 countries were available.,SFC produced significant improvements over placebo in all three SGRQ domains during the study: (Symptoms -3.6 [95% CI -4.8, -2.4], Activity -2.8 [95% CI -3.9, -1.6], Impacts -3.2 [95% CI -4.3, -2.1]) but the pattern of change over time differed between domains.,SGRQ deteriorated faster in patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages III & IV relative to GOLD stage II (p < 0.001).,There was no difference in the relationship between deterioration in SGRQ Total score and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) decline (as % predicted) in men and women.,Significantly faster deterioration in Total score relative to FEV1 % predicted was seen in older patients (≥ 65 years) and there was an age-related change in Total score that was independent of change in FEV1.,The relationship between deterioration in FEV1 and SGRQ did not differ in different world regions, but patients in Asia-Pacific showed a large improvement in score that was unrelated to FEV1 change.,In addition to treatment effects, health status changes in clinical trials may be influenced by demographic and disease-related factors.,Deterioration in health status appears to be fastest in older persons and those with severe airflow limitation.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00268216 | 1 |
Studies have suggested that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is commonly misdiagnosed and misclassified in primary care, but less is known about the quality of diagnosis in specialist respiratory care.,To measure the accuracy of COPD diagnosis and classification of airway obstruction in primary care and at a specialist respiratory centre, and to explore associations between misdiagnosis and misclassification and a range of explanatory factors.,Data were obtained for 1,205 referrals to a specialist respiratory centre between 2007 and 2010.,Standard analysis methods were used.,The majority of patients were referred for pulmonary rehabilitation (676/1,205, 56%).,Of 1,044 patients with a primary care diagnosis of COPD, 211 (20%) had spirometry inconsistent with COPD.,In comparison, of 993 specialist centre diagnoses, 65 (6.5%) had inconsistent spirometry.,There was poor agreement between the airflow obstruction grade recorded on the referral and that based on spirometry (kappa=0.26, n=448), whereas agreement between the respiratory centre assessment of airflow obstruction and spirometry was good (kappa=0.88, n=1,016).,Referral by practice nurse was associated with accuracy of airflow obstruction classification in primary care (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.57).,Males were more likely than females to have an accurate specialist care classification of airway obstruction (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.93).,Grade of airway obstruction changed between referral and assessment in 56% of cases.,In primary care, a proportion of patients diagnosed with COPD do not have COPD, and misclassification of grade of airflow obstruction is common.,Misdiagnosis and misclassification is less common in the specialist care setting of BreathingSpace. | Natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is punctuated by exacerbations; however, little is known about prognosis of the first-ever COPD exacerbation and variables predicting its outcomes.,A population-based cohort study among COPD patients with their first-ever exacerbations requiring hospitalizations was conducted.,Main outcomes were in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality after discharge.,Demographics, comorbidities, medications and in-hospital events were obtained to explore outcome predictors.,The cohort comprised 4204 hospitalized COPD patients, of whom 175 (4%) died during the hospitalization.,In-hospital mortality was related to higher age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.06) and Charlson comorbidity index score (OR: 1.08 per point; 95% CI: 1.01-1.15); angiotensin II receptor blockers (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38-0.98) and β blockers (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.41-0.95) conferred a survival benefit.,At one year after discharge, 22% (871/4029) of hospital survivors were dead.,On multivariate Cox regression analysis, age and Charlson comorbidity index remained independent predictors of one-year mortality.,Longer hospital stay (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01 per day; 95% CI: 1.01-1.01) and ICU admission (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.03-1.73) during the hospitalization were associated with higher mortality risks.,Prescription of β blockers (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.67-0.93) and statins (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47-0.91) on hospital discharge were protective against one-year mortality.,Even the first-ever severe COPD exacerbation signifies poor prognosis in COPD patients.,Comorbidities play a crucial role in determining outcomes and should be carefully assessed.,Angiotensin II receptor blockers, β blockers and statins may, in theory, have dual cardiopulmonary protective properties and probably alter prognosis of COPD patients.,Nevertheless, the limitations inherent to a claims database study, such as the diagnostic accuracy of COPD and its exacerbation, should be born in mind. | 1 |
Prescribing patterns in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often inconsistent with published guidelines.,This retrospective, observational study utilised data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database to examine the changes in COPD prescribing patterns over time and to identify predictors of physician treatment choice for patients newly diagnosed with COPD.,Initial therapy was defined as the treatment(s) prescribed at or within 1 year before COPD diagnosis.,Changes over time were assessed in three cohorts based on the date of diagnosis: (1) 1997-2001; (2) 2002-2006; and (3) 2007-2010.,Factors affecting the odds of being prescribed any initial therapy or any initial maintenance therapy were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression.,The analysis included 20,154 patients, 45% of whom were prescribed an initial regimen containing an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), whereas 28% received no initial pharmacological treatment.,Prescribing of ICS monotherapy decreased over time, as did the proportion of patients receiving no therapy at or within 1 year before diagnosis.,Comorbid asthma, a high exacerbation rate, increased symptoms and poor lung function each increased the likelihood of being prescribed any initial therapy or initial maintenance therapy; comorbid asthma and an annual rate of ⩾3 exacerbations were the strongest predictors.,In conclusion, our analyses revealed major differences between actual prescribing behaviour and guideline recommendations for patients with newly diagnosed COPD, with many patients receiving no treatment and large numbers of patients receiving ICS-containing regimens.,Predictors of initial therapy were identified. | This study aimed to characterize patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) newly prescribed a long-acting bronchodilator (LABD), and to assess changes in medication over 24 months.,A cohort of patients with COPD aged ≥40 years newly prescribed an LABD between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2009 were identified from the Truven Marketscan® Commercial Database (Truven Health Analytics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and followed for 24 months.,Inclusion criteria included no prior prescription for an LABD or inhaled corticosteroids for 12 months prior to the LABD index date (baseline).,Patient characteristics were examined.,As LABDs were mainly long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), additions, switches, discontinuation, adherence to (medication possession ratio), and persistence (proportion of days covered) with LAMA monotherapy were assessed for 24 months following the index date.,Adherence and persistence with long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) were also assessed.,A cohort of 3,268 patients aged 40-65 years was identified (mean age 55.8 years, 48% male).,LAMA monotherapy was prescribed to 93% of patients who received an LABD.,During the 24-month follow-up, 16% of these patients added COPD medication, 10% switched to an inhaled corticosteroid-containing medication, and 25% discontinued after one LAMA prescription at baseline.,Over 12 and 24 months, adherence to LAMA was 40% and 33%, respectively, and adherence to LABA was 29% and 24%, respectively.,Over the same time periods, persistence with LAMA monotherapy was 19% and 15%, respectively, and persistence with LABA was 9% and 7%, respectively.,Adherence to newly initiated LAMA monotherapy was low, with one in four patients adding to or switching from LAMA and many patients discontinuing therapy.,Adherence to LABA was also low.,These results suggest that additional medication to a single LABD may be required in some patients with COPD to achieve optimal disease control. | 1 |
Baarsma et al. report increased expression and posttranslational modification of the noncanonical ligand WNT-5A in COPD.,Fibroblast-derived WNT-5A inhibits canonical WNT-β-catenin-driven alveolar epithelial cell-mediated wound healing and transdifferentiation, and thus contributes to impaired lung regeneration and COPD pathogenesis.,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of death worldwide.,One main pathological feature of COPD is the loss of functional alveolar tissue without adequate repair (emphysema), yet the underlying mechanisms are poorly defined.,Reduced WNT-β-catenin signaling is linked to impaired lung repair in COPD; however, the factors responsible for attenuating this pathway remain to be elucidated.,Here, we identify a canonical to noncanonical WNT signaling shift contributing to COPD pathogenesis.,We demonstrate enhanced expression of noncanonical WNT-5A in two experimental models of COPD and increased posttranslationally modified WNT-5A in human COPD tissue specimens.,WNT-5A was increased in primary lung fibroblasts from COPD patients and induced by COPD-related stimuli, such as TGF-β, cigarette smoke (CS), and cellular senescence.,Functionally, mature WNT-5A attenuated canonical WNT-driven alveolar epithelial cell wound healing and transdifferentiation in vitro.,Lung-specific WNT-5A overexpression exacerbated airspace enlargement in elastase-induced emphysema in vivo.,Accordingly, inhibition of WNT-5A in vivo attenuated lung tissue destruction, improved lung function, and restored expression of β-catenin-driven target genes and alveolar epithelial cell markers in the elastase, as well as in CS-induced models of COPD.,We thus identify a novel essential mechanism involved in impaired mesenchymal-epithelial cross talk in COPD pathogenesis, which is amenable to therapy. | Rtp801, a stress - related protein triggered by adverse environmental conditions, inhibits mTOR and enhances oxidative stress - dependent cell death.,We postulated that Rtp801 acts as potential amplifying switch in the development of cigarette smoke - induced lung injury, leading to emphysema.,Rtp801 was overexpressed in human emphysematous lungs and in lungs of mice exposed to cigarette smoke.,The upregulation of Rtp801 expression by cigarette smoke in the lung relied on oxidative stress - dependent activation of the CCAAT response element.,Rtp801 was necessary and sufficient for NF - κ B activation in cultured cells and, when forcefully expressed in mouse lungs, it promoted NF - kB activation, alveolar inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis of alveolar septal cells.,On the other hand, Rtp801 − / − mice were markedly protected against acute cigarette smoke - induced lung injury, partly via increased mTOR signaling, and, when exposed chronically, against emphysema.,Our data support the notion that Rtp801 may represent an important molecular sensor and mediator of lung injury to cigarette smoke. | 1 |
Within telehealth there are a number of domains relevant to pulmonary care: telemonitoring, teleassistance, telerehabilitation, teleconsultation and second opinion calls.,In the last decade, several studies focusing on the effects of various telemanagement programs for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been published but with contradictory findings.,From the literature, the best telemonitoring outcomes come from programs dedicated to aged and very sick patients, frequent exacerbators with multimorbidity and limited community support; programs using third-generation telemonitoring systems providing constant analytical and decisionmaking support (24 h/day, 7 days/week); countries where strong community links are not available; and zones where telemonitoring and rehabilitation can be delivered directly to the patient’s location.,In the near future, it is expected that telemedicine will produce changes in work practices, cultural attitudes and organization, which will affect all professional figures involved in the provision of care.,The key to optimizing the use of telemonitoring is to correctly identify who the ideal candidates are, at what time they need it, and for how long.,The time course of disease progression varies from patient to patient; hence identifying for each patient a ‘correct window’ for initiating telemonitoring could be the correct solution.,In conclusion, as clinicians, we need to identify the specific challenges we face in delivering care, and implement flexible systems that can be customized to individual patients’ requirements and adapted to our diverse healthcare contexts. | Telemonitoring for COPD has gained much attention thanks to its potential of reducing morbidity and mortality, healthcare utilisation and costs.,However, its benefit with regard to clinical and economic outcomes remains to be clearly demonstrated.,To analyse the effect of Europe’s largest COPD telemonitoring pilot project on direct medical costs, health resource utilisation and mortality at 12 months.,We evaluated a population-based cohort using administrative data.,Difference-in-difference estimators were calculated to account for time-invariant unobservable heterogeneity after removing dissimilarities in observable characteristics between the telemonitoring and control group with a reweighting algorithm.,The analysis comprised 651 telemonitoring participants and 7047 individuals in the standard care group.,The mortality hazards ratio was lower in the intervention arm (HR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.30-0.86).,Telemonitoring cut total costs by 895 € (p < 0.05) compared to COPD standard care, mainly driven by savings in COPD-related hospitalisations in (very) severe COPD patients (−1056 €, p < 0.0001).,Telemonitoring enrolees used healthcare (all-cause and COPD-related) less intensely with shorter hospital stays, fewer inpatient stays and smaller proportions of people with emergency department visits and hospitalisations (all p < 0.0001).,Reductions in mortality, costs and healthcare utilisation were greater for (very) severe COPD cases.,This is the first German study to demonstrate that telemonitoring for COPD is a viable strategy to reduce mortality, healthcare costs and utilisation at 12 months.,Contrary to widespread fear, reducing the intensity of care does not seem to impact unfavourably on health outcomes.,The evidence offers strong support for introducing telemonitoring as a component of case management. | 1 |
Concerning COPD, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has a positive effect on disease progression and mortality, is cost-effective, and is a part of recommendations of international guidelines.,Only a minority of patients profit from conventional PR due to a lack of resources, physicians’ guideline adherence, or patients’ motivation.,Novel digital therapies like Kaia COPD, a smartphone application that digitizes PR in COPD, are promising solutions to fill this void.,Kaia COPD provides a digital version of PR and is certified as a class-I medical device in the European Union.,We investigated anonymized data from users of the Kaia COPD app on in-app retention and the change in health-related quality of life (COPD assessment test and Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire [CRQ]) during a period of 20 exercise days with the app.,Of 349 app downloads, 56 users fulfilled inclusion criteria and 34 (61%) had finished day 20 at the time of analysis and were included.,Users took 33±11 days to complete the 20-day core program.,Users finishing the program reduced their COPD assessment test scores (mean 2.5 units from 21.6±7.7 to 19.1±8.4 units, P=0.008).,In finishers, there was a statistically significant effect above the minimum clinically important threshold of the CRQ score on the domains of fatigue, mastery, and emotional function.,There was a statistically significant but not clinically relevant effect on the domain of dyspnea of CRQ.,Digitalizing PR with a smartphone app is feasible and accepted by selected patients.,The app leads to short-term improvement of health-related quality of life in patients completing a 20-day core program.,Due to its observational character, this study has several methodological limitations and was intended to show the feasibility and to extrapolate effect sizes for planned prospective randomized-controlled trials to confirm these findings. | A large proportion of COPD patients do not achieve the recommended level of physical activity.,It is suggested that feedback on the level of activity by using an activity monitoring device (PAM) increases awareness and may stimulate patients to increase their physical activity in daily life.,Our objective was to assess the validity and usability of a simple and low-cost physical activity monitor (Polar A300™) when compared with the validated and established Bodymedia-SenseWear™ (SWA) device.,To assess the diagnostic equivalent, two different PAM devices were used in parallel in 20 COPD patients GOLD I to IV during 3 consecutive days of daily life.,Both systems were compared in terms of steps, calories burned, daily activity time and metabolic equivalents using linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots.,Practical usability was examined by a 16-item-questionnaire.,High correlations of both devices were observed with regard to the sensed step count (r = 0.96; p < 0.01) and calories burned (r = 0.74; p < 0.01), and a lower correlation of daily activity (r = 0.25; p < 0.01) was found.,Data analysis over 3 days showed that 90% of the steps (95% CI -4223 to 1887), 100% of the calories (95% CI -2798 to 1887), 90% of the daily activity data (95% CI -12.32, 4065) and 95% of the MET (95% CI -3.11 to 2.75) were within the limits of agreement.,A favorable usability (system-, information- and interface quality) of the A300™ device was shown (p < 0.01).,The A300™ device with easy practical usability was shown not to be inferior for assessment of physical activity time, step count and calorie consumption in COPD patients when compared with the SWA.,It is suggested to consider widespread available devices as commonly used for monitoring recreational sporting activities also in patients for assessment of physical activity in daily life. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality.,Early detection and appropriate treatment and management of COPD can lower morbidity and perhaps mortality.,Clinicians in the primary care setting provide the majority of COPD care and are pivotal in the diagnosis and management of COPD.,In this review, we provide an overview of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2020 report, with a focus on the management of COPD in the primary care setting.,We discuss the pathophysiology of COPD; describe COPD risk factors, signs, and symptoms that may facilitate earlier diagnosis of COPD; and reinforce the importance of spirometry use in establishing the diagnosis of COPD.,Disease monitoring, as well as a review of the 2020 GOLD treatment recommendations, is also discussed.,Patients and families are important partners in COPD management; therefore, we outline simple steps that may assist them in caring for those affected by COPD.,Finally, we discuss nonpharmacological treatment options for COPD, COPD monitoring tools that may aid in the evaluation of disease progression and response to therapy, and the importance of developing a COPD action plan on an individualized basis. | In light of the growing burden of COPD, there is increasing focus on the role of self-management for this population.,Currently, self-management varies widely.,Little is known either about nurses’ and allied health professionals’ (AHPs’) understanding and provision of self-management in clinical practice.,This study explores nurses’ and AHPs’ understanding and implementation of supported COPD self-management within routine clinical practice.,Nurses and AHPs participated in face-to-face semistructured interviews to explore their understanding and provision of COPD self-management, as well as their perceptions of the challenges to providing such care.,Purposive sampling was used to select participants from a range of professions working within primary, community, and secondary care settings.,Three researchers independently analyzed each transcript using a thematic approach.,A total of 14 participants were interviewed.,Nurses and AHPs viewed self-management as an important aspect of COPD care, but often misunderstood what it involved, leading to variation in practice.,A number of challenges to supporting self-management were identified, which related to lack of time, lack of insight regarding training needs, and assumptions regarding patients’ perceived self-management abilities.,Nurses and AHPs delivering self-management require clear guidance, training in the use of effective self-management skills, and education that challenges their preconceptions regarding patients.,The design of health care services also needs to consider the practical barriers to COPD self-management support for the implementation of such interventions to be successful. | 1 |
With the current wealth of new inhalers available and insurance policy driven inhaler switching, the need for insights in optimal education on inhaler use is more evident than ever.,We aimed to systematically review educational inhalation technique interventions, to assess their overall effectiveness, and identify main drivers of success.,Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched for randomised controlled trials on educational inhalation technique interventions.,Inclusion eligibility, quality appraisal (Cochrane’s risk of bias tool) and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers.,Regression analyses were performed to identify characteristics contributing to inhaler technique improvement.,Thirty-seven of the 39 interventions included (95%) indicated statistically significant improvement of inhaler technique.,However, average follow-up time was relatively short (5 months), 28% lacked clinical relevant endpoints and all lacked cost-effectiveness estimates.,Poor initial technique, number of inhalation procedure steps, setting (outpatient clinics performing best), and time elapsed since intervention (all, p < 0.05), were shown to have an impact on effectiveness of the intervention, explaining up to 91% of the effectiveness variation.,Other factors, such as disease (asthma vs. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), education group size (individual vs. group training) and inhaler type (dry powder inhalers vs. pressurised metered dose inhalers) did not play a significant role.,Notably, there was a trend (p = 0.06) towards interventions in adults being more effective than those in children and the intervention effect seemed to wane over time.,In conclusion, educational interventions to improve inhaler technique are effective on the short-term.,Periodical intervention reinforcement and longer follow-up studies, including clinical relevant endpoints and cost-effectiveness, are recommended. | Poor inhalation techniques are associated with decreased medication delivery and poor disease control in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The purpose of this study was to evaluate techniques for using inhaler devices in COPD patients.,A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to assess patient compliance with correct techniques for using inhaler devices across four regimens, ie, the pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), the pMDI with a spacer, the Accuhaler®, and the Handihaler®.,The percentage of compliance with essential steps of correct device usage for each regimen was recorded without prior notification when COPD patients presented for a routine visit, and 1 month after receiving face-to-face training.,We compared the percentage of compliance between the devices and risk factors related to incorrect techniques using logistic regression analysis.,Percentage of patient compliance with correct techniques was compared between the two visits using the chi-square test.,Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.,A total of 103 COPD patients (mean age 71.2±9.2 years, males 64.1%, low education level 82.5%, and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second 51.9±22.5) were evaluated.,Seventy-seven patients (74.8%) performed at least one step incorrectly.,Patients using the Handihaler had the lowest compliance failure (42.5%), and the odds ratio for failure with the other devices compared with the Handihaler were 4.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-11.8) for the pMDI, 3.1 (95% CI 1.2-8.2) for the pMDI with a spacer, and 2.4 (95% CI 1.1-5.2) for the Accuhaler.,Low education level was the single most important factor related to incorrect technique (adjusted odds ratio 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-13.4, P=0.022).,Formal training resulted in a statistically significant decrease in percentage of incorrect techniques for all devices and for the pMDI (59.4% vs 48.6%, P<0.001; 72.4% vs 48.3%, P=0.039, respectively).,Inhalation technique in COPD patients without face-to-face training was mostly unsatisfactory, especially in patients with low education levels.,The Handihaler was the inhaler device associated with the lowest technique failure.,Face-to-face inhalation technique training significantly increased technique compliance for the pMDI. | 1 |
Rationale: Whether pharmacological therapy alters decline in FEV1 in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease remains controversial.,Because pharmacotherapy improves health status, exacerbation rate, and symptoms, it may be unethical to complete placebo-controlled long-term studies aimed at modifying FEV1 decline.,Objectives: We conducted a systematic review of placebo-controlled pharmacological trials lasting ≥1 year to address the question of whether therapy alters FEV1 decline.,Methods: A literature search for randomized trials that included repeated spirometry with at least one active and one placebo arm was conducted.,Articles were excluded if study duration was <1 year, <3 spirometric measurements, or <100 subjects per arm.,Study design was assessed using the Jadad score.,To combine studies and find the estimated effect, we used random effects methodology to account for both within-study and between-study variation.,Measurements and Main Results: There were 33,051 patients in the analysis (active component, n = 21,941; placebo, n = 11,110 in nine studies).,The active treatment arms demonstrated a 5.0 ml/yr reduction (95% confidence interval, 0.8-9.1 ml/yr; P < 0.001) in the rate of FEV1 decline compared with the placebo arms.,The relative FEV1 differences between active and placebo arms were within the range of differences reported for health status and for the exacerbation rate in the same studies.,Conclusions: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pharmacotherapy ameliorates rate of lung function decline.,The relative benefit observed is within the range of those reported for health status and exacerbations in the same studies.,Guidelines should be adjusted according to these findings. | Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exhibit dominant features of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, and/or asthma, with a common phenotype of airflow obstruction.,COPD pulmonary physiology reflects the sum of pathological changes in COPD, which can occur in large central airways, small peripheral airways, and the lung parenchyma.,Quantitative or high-resolution computed tomography is used as a surrogate measure for assessment of disease progression.,Different biological or molecular markers have been reported that reflect the mechanistic or pathogenic triad of inflammation, proteases, and oxidants and correspond to the different aspects of COPD histopathology.,Similar to the pathogenic triad markers, genetic variations or polymorphisms have also been linked to COPD-associated inflammation, protease-antiprotease imbalance, and oxidative stress.,Furthermore, in recent years, there have been reports identifying aging-associated mechanistic markers as downstream consequences of the pathogenic triad in the lungs from COPD patients.,For this review, the authors have limited their discussion to a review of mechanistic markers and genetic variations and their association with COPD histopathology and disease status. | 1 |
The term asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) is one of multiple terms used to describe patients with characteristics of both COPD and asthma, representing ~20% of patients with obstructive airway diseases.,The recognition of both sets of morbidities in patients is important to guide practical treatment decisions.,It is widely recognized that patients with COPD and coexisting asthma present with a higher disease burden, despite the conceptual expectation that the “reversible” or “treatable” component of asthma would allow for more effective management and better outcomes.,However, subcategorization into terms such as ACOS is complicated by the vast spectrum of heterogeneity that is encapsulated by asthma and COPD, resulting in different clinical clusters.,In this review, we discuss the possibility that these different clusters are suboptimally described by the umbrella term “ACOS”, as this additional categorization may lead to clinical confusion and potential inappropriate use of resources.,We suggest that a more clinically relevant approach would be to recognize the extreme variability and the numerous phenotypes encompassed within obstructive airway diseases, with various degrees of overlapping in individual patients.,In addition, we discuss some of the evidence to be considered when making practical decisions on the treatment of patients with overlapping characteristics between COPD and asthma, as well as the potential options for phenotype and biomarker-driven management of airway disease with the aim of providing more personalized treatment for patients.,Finally, we highlight the need for more evidence in patients with overlapping disease characteristics and to facilitate better characterization of potential treatment responders. | The combination of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or ACOS is a recently defined syndrome.,The epidemiology of the condition is poorly described and previous research has suggested ACOS is associated with worse outcomes than either condition alone.,We therefore decided to complete a systematic review of the published literature.,This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses guidelines.,A structured search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases up to Feb 2015 to identify studies reporting incidence, prevalence, health care utilization, morbidity, or mortality in COPD and asthma.,A total of 19 studies were included in the present study.,The pooled prevalence of overlap among COPD was 27% (95% CI: 0.16-0.38, p<0.0001) and 28% (95% CI: 0.09-0.47, p = 0.0032) in the population and hospital-based studies, respectively.,We found no significant difference between ACOS and COPD in terms of gender, smoking status, lung function and 6mWD.,However, in comparison to subject with only COPD, ACOS subjects were significantly younger, had higher BMI, healthcare utilization, and lower HRQoL.,ACOS is a common condition that exists in a substantial proportion of subjects with COPD.,ACOS represents a distinct clinical phenotype with more frequent exacerbations, hospitalization, worse health-related quality of life, and higher healthcare costs than either disease alone.,There is a critical need to better define the management and treatment of this syndrome. | 1 |
To describe and compare demographic and clinical profile of patients newly initiated on aclidinium (ACL) or tiotropium (TIO) and identify factors associated with newly initiated ACL in real-life clinical practice during 2013 in Catalonia.,We performed a population-based, retrospective, observational study with data obtained from the Information System for Research Development in Primary Care, a population database that contains information of 5.8 million inhabitants (more than 80% of the Catalan population).,Patients over 40 years old, with a recorded diagnosis of COPD and newly initiated treatment with either ACL or TIO during the study period (January to December 2013), were selected.,A descriptive analysis of demographic and clinical characteristics was performed, and treatment adherence was also assessed for both cohorts.,A total of 8,863 individuals were identified, 4,293 initiated with ACL and 4,570 with TIO.,They had a mean age of 69.4 years (standard deviation: 11.3), a median COPD duration of 3 years (interquartile range: 0-8), and 71% were males.,Patients treated with ACL were older, with more respiratory comorbidities, a longer time since COPD diagnosis, worse forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% predicted), and with a higher rate of exacerbations during the previous year compared with TIO.,It was found that 41.3% of patients with ACL and 62.3% of patients with TIO had no previous COPD treatment.,Inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting β2-agonist were the most frequent concomitant medications (32.9% and 32.6%, respectively).,Approximately 75% of patients were persistent with ACL or TIO at 3 months from the beginning of treatment, and more than 50% of patients remained persistent at 9 months.,Patients initiated with ACL had more severe COPD and were taking more concomitant respiratory medications than patients initiated with TIO.,ACL was more frequently initiated as part of triple therapy, while TIO was more frequently initiated as monotherapy. | Prescribing patterns in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often inconsistent with published guidelines.,This retrospective, observational study utilised data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database to examine the changes in COPD prescribing patterns over time and to identify predictors of physician treatment choice for patients newly diagnosed with COPD.,Initial therapy was defined as the treatment(s) prescribed at or within 1 year before COPD diagnosis.,Changes over time were assessed in three cohorts based on the date of diagnosis: (1) 1997-2001; (2) 2002-2006; and (3) 2007-2010.,Factors affecting the odds of being prescribed any initial therapy or any initial maintenance therapy were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression.,The analysis included 20,154 patients, 45% of whom were prescribed an initial regimen containing an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), whereas 28% received no initial pharmacological treatment.,Prescribing of ICS monotherapy decreased over time, as did the proportion of patients receiving no therapy at or within 1 year before diagnosis.,Comorbid asthma, a high exacerbation rate, increased symptoms and poor lung function each increased the likelihood of being prescribed any initial therapy or initial maintenance therapy; comorbid asthma and an annual rate of ⩾3 exacerbations were the strongest predictors.,In conclusion, our analyses revealed major differences between actual prescribing behaviour and guideline recommendations for patients with newly diagnosed COPD, with many patients receiving no treatment and large numbers of patients receiving ICS-containing regimens.,Predictors of initial therapy were identified. | 1 |
Inhaled medications are the cornerstone of treatment and management of asthma and COPD.,However, inhaler device errors are common among patients and have been linked with reduced symptom control, an increased risk of exacerbations, and increased healthcare utilisation.,These observations have prompted GINA (Global INitiative for Asthma) and GOLD (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) to recommend regular assessment of inhaler technique in a bid to improve therapeutic outcomes.,To better define the relationship between device errors and health outcomes (clinical outcomes, quality of life, and healthcare utilisation) in asthma and COPD, we conducted a systematic review of the literature, with a particular focus on the methods used to assess the relationship between device errors and outcomes.,Sixteen studies were identified (12 in patients with asthma, one in patients with COPD, and three in both asthma and COPD) with varying study designs, endpoints, and patient populations.,Most of the studies reported that inhalation errors were associated with worse disease outcomes in patients with asthma or COPD.,Patients who had a reduction in errors over time had improved outcomes.,These findings suggest that time invested by healthcare professionals is vital to improving inhalation technique in asthma and COPD patients to improve health outcomes. | The combination of umeclidinium (UMEC), a long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist, and vilanterol (VI), a selective long-acting β2 agonist, is in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of once-daily, inhaled UMEC and UMEC/VI when co-administered with oral verapamil, a moderate P-glycoprotein transporter and moderate cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitor frequently used by patients with COPD and cardiovascular comorbidities.,Subjects were randomized to one of two 13-day treatment regimens: UMEC 500 μg or UMEC 500 μg/VI 25 μg.,All subjects received a single tablet containing 240 mg verapamil on each of days 9-13.,Repeat doses of UMEC and UMEC/VI in combination with and without verapamil were safe and well tolerated.,There was no increase in systemic exposure of UMEC when administered in combination with VI compared to UMEC alone.,UMEC maximum concentration was similar with or without verapamil; a moderate increase in UMEC area under the curve (approximately 1.4-fold) was observed with verapamil.,Verapamil did not increase systemic exposure to VI following administration of the UMEC/VI combination.,Administration of UMEC and UMEC/VI combination was well tolerated and did not show clinically relevant increases in systemic exposure for either drug.,The UMEC/VI combination is unlikely to have a clinically meaningful drug-drug interaction with moderate P-glycoprotein transporter and CYP3A4 inhibitor drugs. | 1 |
COPD is a long-term condition associated with considerable disability with a clinical course characterized by episodes of worsening respiratory signs and symptoms associated with exacerbations.,Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal conditions in the general population and has emerged as a comorbidity of COPD.,GERD may be diagnosed by both symptomatic approaches (including both typical and atypical symptoms) and objective measurements.,Based on a mix of diagnostic approaches, the prevalence of GERD in COPD ranges from 17% to 78%.,Although GERD is usually confined to the lower esophagus in some individuals, it may be associated with pulmonary microaspiration of gastric contents.,Possible mechanisms that may contribute to GERD in COPD originate from gastroesophageal dysfunction, including altered pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter (which normally protect against GERD) and changes in esophageal motility.,Proposed respiratory contributions to the development of GERD include respiratory medications that may alter esophageal sphincter tone and changes in respiratory mechanics, with increased lung hyperinflation compromising the antireflux barrier.,Although the specific cause and effect relationship between GERD and COPD has not been fully elucidated, GERD may influence lung disease severity and has been identified as a significant predictor of acute exacerbations of COPD.,Further clinical effects could include a poorer health-related quality of life and an increased cost in health care, although these factors require further clarification.,There are both medical and surgical options available for the treatment of GERD in COPD and while extensive studies in this population have not been undertaken, this comorbidity may be amenable to treatment. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are associated with systemic consequences.,Data from a 4-year trial (Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium [UPLIFT®], n = 5,992) were used to determine risk for nonlower respiratory serious adverse events (NRSAEs) following an exacerbation.,Patients with ≥1 exacerbation were analyzed.,NRSAE incidence rates (incidence rate [IR], per 100 patient-years) were calculated for the 30 and 180 days before and after the first exacerbation.,NRSAEs were classified by diagnostic terms and organ classes.,Maentel-Haenszel rate ratios (RR) (pre- and postexacerbation onset) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed.,A total of 3,960 patients had an exacerbation.,The mean age was 65 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was 38% predicted, and 74% were men.,For all NRSAEs, the IRs 30 days before and after an exacerbation were 20.2 and 65.2 with RR (95% CI) = 3.22 (2.40-4.33).,The IRs for the 180-day periods were 13.2 and 31.0 with RR (95% CI) = 2.36 (1.93-2.87).,The most common NRSAEs by organ class for both time periods were cardiac, respiratory system (other), and gastrointestinal.,All NRSAEs as well as cardiac events were more common after the first exacerbation, irrespective of whether the patient had cardiac disease at baseline.,The findings confirm that, after exacerbations, serious adverse events in other organ systems are more frequent, particularly those that are cardiac in nature. | 1 |
Combination of the inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC; GSK573719) with the long-acting β2-agonist vilanterol (VI) is an approved maintenance treatment for COPD in the US and EU.,We compared the efficacy and safety of UMEC/VI with placebo in patients with COPD of Asian ancestry.,In this 24-week, Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to UMEC/VI 125/25 μg, UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, or placebo.,The primary efficacy end point was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) on day 169; secondary end points were Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score at week 24 and weighted mean (WM) FEV1 over 0-6 hours postdose on day 1.,Additional end points and safety were also assessed.,Both UMEC/VI 125/25 μg and UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg statistically significantly improved trough FEV1 at day 169 versus placebo (UMEC/VI 125/25 μg, 0.216 L, [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.175-0.257]; UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, 0.151 L, 95% CI 0.110-0.191; both P<0.001).,Statistically significant improvements in TDI score were observed for both UMEC/VI groups versus placebo (UMEC/VI 125/25 μg, 0.9, 95% CI 0.3-1.4, P=0.002; UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, 0.7, 95% CI 0.1-1.2, P=0.016).,On day 1, both UMEC/VI groups improved 0-6-hour WM FEV1 versus placebo (UMEC/VI 125/25 μg, 0.182 L 95% CI 0.161-0.203; UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, 0.160 L, 95% CI 0.139-0.181; both P<0.001).,Statistically significant improvements for UMEC/VI groups versus placebo were observed for rescue albuterol use at weeks 1-24 (puffs/day, both P<0.001).,The incidence of adverse events was similar across groups.,In Asian patients with COPD, once-daily UMEC/VI 125/25 μg and UMEC 62.5/25 μg resulted in clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in lung-function end points versus placebo.,Symptomatic and quality of life measures also improved.,The safety profile of UMEC/VI was consistent with previous studies. | Clinical manifestations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including airflow limitation, dyspnea, and activity limitation, ultimately lead to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL).,This 9-month, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study compared the effect of once-daily tiotropium 18 μg and placebo on HRQoL, spirometric parameters, and exacerbations in 554 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.,HRQoL was assessed using the St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the new 8-item Visual Simplified Respiratory Questionnaire (VSRQ), which is currently being validated.,The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a reduction of at least 4 units in the SGRQ total score at study end (Month 9).,Mean ± SD baseline SGRQ total score was 47.4 ± 18.1.,Significantly more tiotropium-treated patients achieved a reduction of at least 4 units in the SGRQ score vs placebo at study end (59.1% vs 48.2%, respectively; p = 0.029).,Tiotropium significantly improved spirometric parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]: 0.11 ± 0.02 L vs 0.01 ± 0.02 L; between-group difference: 0.10 ± 0.03 L, p = 0.0001) and reduced exacerbations vs placebo.,Maintenance treatment with tiotropium provided significant and clinically relevant improvements in HRQoL, as measured by the SGRQ. | 1 |
Rtp801, a stress - related protein triggered by adverse environmental conditions, inhibits mTOR and enhances oxidative stress - dependent cell death.,We postulated that Rtp801 acts as potential amplifying switch in the development of cigarette smoke - induced lung injury, leading to emphysema.,Rtp801 was overexpressed in human emphysematous lungs and in lungs of mice exposed to cigarette smoke.,The upregulation of Rtp801 expression by cigarette smoke in the lung relied on oxidative stress - dependent activation of the CCAAT response element.,Rtp801 was necessary and sufficient for NF - κ B activation in cultured cells and, when forcefully expressed in mouse lungs, it promoted NF - kB activation, alveolar inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis of alveolar septal cells.,On the other hand, Rtp801 − / − mice were markedly protected against acute cigarette smoke - induced lung injury, partly via increased mTOR signaling, and, when exposed chronically, against emphysema.,Our data support the notion that Rtp801 may represent an important molecular sensor and mediator of lung injury to cigarette smoke. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an inflammatory disorder characterized by incompletely reversible airflow obstruction.,Bacterial infection of the lower respiratory tract contributes to approximately 50% of COPD exacerbations.,Even during periods of stable lung function, the lung harbors a community of bacteria, termed the microbiome.,The role of the lung microbiome in the pathogenesis of COPD remains unknown.,The COPD lung microbiome, like the healthy lung microbiome, appears to reflect microaspiration of oral microflora.,Here we describe the COPD lung microbiome of 22 patients with Moderate or Severe COPD compared to 10 healthy control patients.,The composition of the lung microbiomes was determined using 454 pyrosequencing of 16S rDNA found in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.,Sequences were analyzed using mothur, Ribosomal Database Project, Fast UniFrac, and Metastats.,Our results showed a significant increase in microbial diversity with the development of COPD.,The main phyla in all samples were Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria.,Principal coordinate analyses demonstrated separation of control and COPD samples, but samples did not cluster based on disease severity.,However, samples did cluster based on the use of inhaled corticosteroids and inhaled bronchodilators.,Metastats analyses demonstrated an increased abundance of several oral bacteria in COPD samples. | 1 |
Despite the availability of national and international guidelines, evidence suggests that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment is not always prescribed according to recommendations.,This study evaluated the current management of patients with COPD using a large UK primary-care database.,This analysis used electronic patient records and patient-completed questionnaires from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database.,Data on current management were analyzed by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group and presence or absence of a concomitant asthma diagnosis, in patients with a COPD diagnosis at ≥35 years of age and with spirometry results supportive of the COPD diagnosis.,A total of 24,957 patients were analyzed, of whom 13,557 (54.3%) had moderate airflow limitation (GOLD Stage 2 COPD).,The proportion of patients not receiving pharmacologic treatment for COPD was 17.0% in the total COPD population and 17.7% in the GOLD Stage 2 subset.,Approximately 50% of patients in both cohorts were receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), either in combination with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA; 26.7% for both cohorts) or a LABA and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA; 23.2% and 19.9%, respectively).,ICS + LABA and ICS + LABA + LAMA were the most frequently used treatments in GOLD Groups A and B.,Of patients without concomitant asthma, 53.7% of the total COPD population and 50.2% of the GOLD Stage 2 subset were receiving ICS.,Of patients with GOLD Stage 2 COPD and no exacerbations in the previous year, 49% were prescribed ICS.,A high proportion of GOLD Stage 2 COPD patients were symptomatic on their current management (36.6% with modified Medical Research Council score ≥2; 76.4% with COPD Assessment Test score ≥10).,COPD is not treated according to GOLD and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations in the UK primary-care setting.,Some patients receive no treatment despite experiencing symptoms.,Among those on treatment, most receive ICS irrespective of severity of airflow limitation, asthma diagnosis, and exacerbation history.,Many patients on treatment continue to have symptoms. | It has been suggested that withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in COPD patients on maintenance treatment results in deterioration of symptoms, lung function and exacerbations.,The aim of this real-life, prospective, multicentric study was to investigate whether withdrawal of ICS in COPD patients at low risk of exacerbation is linked to a deterioration in lung function and symptoms and to a higher frequency of exacerbations.,914 COPD patients, on maintenance therapy with bronchodilators and ICS, FEV1>50% predicted, and <2 exacerbations/year were recruited.,Upon decision of the primary physicians, 59% of patients continued their ICS treatment whereas in 41% of patients ICS were withdrawn and regular therapy was continued with long-acting bronchodilators mostly (91% of patients).,FEV1, CAT (COPD Assessment Test), and occurrence of exacerbations were measured at the beginning (T0) and at the end (T6) of the 6 months observational period.,816 patients (89.3%) concluded the study.,FEV1, CAT and exacerbations history were similar in the two groups (ICS and no ICS) at T0 and at T6.,We did not observe any deterioration of lung function symptoms, and exacerbation rate between the two groups at T0 and T6.,We conclude that the withdrawal of ICS, in COPD patients at low risk of exacerbation, can be safe provided that patients are left on maintenance treatment with long-acting bronchodilators. | 1 |
In models of COPD, environmental stressors induce innate immune responses, inflammasome activation and inflammation.,However, the interaction between these responses and their role in driving pulmonary inflammation in stable COPD is unknown.,To investigate the activation of innate immunity and inflammasome pathways in the bronchial mucosa and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of patients with stable COPD of different severity and control healthy smokers and non-smokers.,Innate immune mediators (interleukin (IL)-6, IL-7, IL-10, IL-27, IL-37, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), interferon γ and their receptors, STAT1 and pSTAT1) and inflammasome components (NLRP3, NALP7, caspase 1, IL-1β and its receptors, IL-18, IL-33, ST2) were measured in the bronchial mucosa using immunohistochemistry.,IL-6, soluble IL-6R, sgp130, IL-7, IL-27, HMGB1, IL-33, IL-37 and soluble ST2 were measured in BAL using ELISA.,In bronchial biopsies IL-27+ and pSTAT1+ cells are increased in patients with severe COPD compared with control healthy smokers.,IL-7+ cells are increased in patients with COPD and control smokers compared with control non-smokers.,In severe stable COPD IL-7R+, IL-27R+ and TSLPR+ cells are increased in comparison with both control groups.,The NALP3 inflammasome is not activated in patients with stable COPD compared with control subjects.,The inflammasome inhibitory molecules NALP7 and IL-37 are increased in patients with COPD compared with control smokers.,IL-6 levels are increased in BAL from patients with stable COPD compared with control smokers with normal lung function whereas IL-1β and IL-18 were similar across all groups.,Increased expression of IL-27, IL-37 and NALP7 in the bronchial mucosa may be involved in progression of stable COPD. | COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) is caused by exposure to toxic gases and particles, most often CS (cigarette smoke), leading to emphysema, chronic bronchitis, mucus production and a subsequent decline in lung function.,The disease pathogenesis is related to an abnormal CS-induced inflammatory response of the lungs.,Similar to active (mainstream) smoking, second hand (sidestream) smoke exposure severely affects respiratory health.,These processes can be studied in vivo in models of CS exposure of mice.,We compared the acute inflammatory response of female C57BL/6 mice exposed to two concentrations [250 and 500 mg/m3 TPM (total particulate matter)] of sidestream and mainstream CS for 3 days and interpreted the biological effects based on physico-chemical differences in the gas and particulate phase composition of CS.,BAL (bronchoalveolar lavage fluid) was obtained to perform differential cell counts and to measure cytokine release.,Lung tissue was used to determine mRNA and protein expression of proinflammatory genes and to assess tissue inflammation.,A strong acute inflammatory response characterized by neutrophilic influx, increased cytokine secretion [KC (keratinocyte chemoattractant), TNF-α (tumour necrosis factor α), MIP-2 (macrophage inflammatory protein 2), MIP-1α and MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1)], pro-inflammatory gene expression [KC, MIP-2 and MMP12 (matrix metalloproteinase 12)] and up-regulated GM-CSF (granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor) production was observed in the mainstream model.,After sidestream exposure there was a dampened inflammatory reaction consisting only of macrophages and diminished GM-CSF levels, most likely caused by elevated CO concentrations.,These results demonstrate that the composition of CS determines the dynamics of inflammatory cell recruitment in COPD mouse models.,Different initial inflammatory processes might contribute to COPD pathogenesis in significantly varying ways, thereby determining the outcome of the studies. | 1 |
Few studies have examined changes in the pain experience of patients with COPD and predictors of pain in these patients.,The objectives of the study were to examine whether distinct groups of COPD patients could be identified based on changes in the occurrence and severity of pain over 12 months and to evaluate whether these groups differed on demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).,A longitudinal study of 267 COPD patients with very severe COPD was conducted.,Their mean age was 63 years, and 53% were females.,The patients completed questionnaires including demographic and clinical variables, the Brief Pain Inventory, and the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire at enrollment, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up.,In addition, spirometry and the 6 Minute Walk Test were performed.,Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct pain profiles based on pain occurrence and worst pain severity.,Most of the patients (77%) reported pain occurrence over 12 months.,Of these, 48% were in the “high probability of pain” group, while 29% were in the “moderate probability of pain” group.,For the worst pain severity, 37% were in the “moderate pain” and 39% were in the “mild pain” groups.,Females and those with higher body mass index, higher number of comorbidities, and less education were in the pain groups.,Patients in the higher pain groups reported higher pain interference scores, higher number of pain locations, and more respiratory symptoms.,Few differences in HRQoL were found between the groups except for the symptom subscale.,Patients with COPD warrant comprehensive pain management.,Clinicians may use this information to identify those who are at higher risk for persistent pain. | Pulmonary rehabilitation programs often fail to substantially enhance long-term physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The reasons for successful physical activity changes in patients with COPD are not well understood.,The need to better understand the determinants of physical activity in patients with COPD and effective rehabilitation strategies to improve physical activity is evident.,The STAR study (Stay Active after Rehabilitation) investigates, in a randomized controlled trial, the additional effect of a pedometer-based behavior-change intervention during inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation on objectively measured physical activity 6 weeks and 6 months post rehabilitation.,The intervention uses the behavior-change techniques (1) instruction on how, where and when to perform the behavior, (2) prompt goal setting for physical activity, (3) prompt self-monitoring of behavior, and (4) feedback on behavior.,The primary outcome of physical activity will be measured using a physical activity monitor (Actigraph wGT3X-BT) for a period of 7 days, firstly 2 weeks before rehabilitation begins (t0) as well as 6 weeks and 6 months after rehabilitation (t3, t4).,Additionally, to predict physical activity progression after rehabilitation, a complex personal diagnostics battery, including questionnaires as well as functional assessments, is to be carried out at the start and end of rehabilitation (t1, t2).,This battery is based on the foundational ideas of the Physical Activity-Related health Competence model.,Five hundred and two patients with COPD, aged 18 years or older and admitted for an approved pulmonary rehabilitation, will be enrolled in the STAR study.,The STAR study is designed as a randomized controlled trial to gain a better understanding of the personal determinants of physical activity in patients with COPD and to evaluate a pedometer-based physical activity-change intervention in the context of inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.,The results enable the future identification of patients with COPD who will find it difficult to engage in long-term physical activity after rehabilitation.,Based on this, intervention strategies to promote physical activity in the content of pulmonary rehabilitation can be optimized.,Clinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT02966561.,Registered retrospectively after the start of the recruitment in June 2016 on 22 November 2016.,All protocol modifications will be registered in the trial registry.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2124-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | 1 |
Exacerbations are important outcomes in COPD both from a clinical and an economic perspective.,Most studies investigating predictors of exacerbations were performed in COPD patients participating in pharmacological clinical trials who usually have moderate to severe airflow obstruction.,This study was aimed to investigate whether predictors of COPD exacerbations depend on the COPD population studied.,A network of COPD health economic modelers used data from five COPD data sources - two population-based studies (COPDGene® and The Obstructive Lung Disease in Norrbotten), one primary care study (RECODE), and two studies in secondary care (Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoint and UPLIFT) - to estimate and validate several prediction models for total and severe exacerbations (= hospitalization).,The models differed in terms of predictors (depending on availability) and type of model.,FEV1% predicted and previous exacerbations were significant predictors of total exacerbations in all five data sources.,Disease-specific quality of life and gender were predictors in four out of four and three out of five data sources, respectively.,Age was significant only in the two studies including secondary care patients.,Other significant predictors of total exacerbations available in one database were: presence of cough and wheeze, pack-years, 6-min walking distance, inhaled corticosteroid use, and oxygen saturation.,Predictors of severe exacerbations were in general the same as for total exacerbations, but in addition low body mass index, cardiovascular disease, and emphysema were significant predictors of hospitalization for an exacerbation in secondary care patients.,FEV1% predicted, previous exacerbations, and disease-specific quality of life were predictors of exacerbations in patients regardless of their COPD severity, while age, low body mass index, cardiovascular disease, and emphysema seem to be predictors in secondary care patients only. | This study was conducted to determine COPD severity at the time of diagnosis as confirmed by spirometry in patients treated in a US managed care setting.,All patients with one or more inpatient stays, one or more emergency department visits, or two or more outpatient visits with diagnosis codes for COPD during 1994-2006 were identified from the Lovelace Patient Database.,From this group, a subset of continuously enrolled patients with evidence in claims of a first available pulmonary function test or pulmonary clinic visit and a confirmatory claim for a COPD diagnosis was selected.,Medical chart abstraction was undertaken for this subset to gather information for diagnosis and severity staging of each patient based on the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria for COPD.,Of the 12,491 patients with a primary or secondary COPD diagnosis between 1994 and 2006, there were 1520 continuously enrolled patients who comprised the study cohort.,Among the 648 eligible records from patients with evidence of a pulmonary function test, 366 were identified by spirometry as having COPD of GOLD stage I or higher (average percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second: 60%): 19% were diagnosed at the stage of mild disease (GOLD stage I); 50% at moderate disease (GOLD stage II); and 31% at severe or very severe disease (GOLD stage III or IV, respectively).,The majority of patients in these groups were not receiving maintenance treatment.,The results demonstrate a very low incidence of early-stage diagnosis, confirmed by a pulmonary function test, of COPD in a large US sample and support calls for increased screening for COPD and treatment upon diagnosis. | 1 |
The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to patients and health services is steadily increasing.,Self-management supported by mobile device applications could improve outcomes for people with COPD.,Our aim was to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of mobile health applications compared with usual care.,A systematic review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials.,Outcomes of interest included exacerbations, physical function, and Quality of Life (QoL).,Where possible, outcome data were pooled for meta-analyses.,Of 1709 citations returned, 13 were eligible trials.,Number of exacerbations, quality of life, physical function, dyspnea, physical activity, and self-efficacy were reported.,Evidence for effectiveness was inconsistent between studies, and the pooled effect size for physical function and QoL was not significant.,There was notable variation in outcome measures used across trials.,Developing a standardized outcome-reporting framework for digital health interventions in COPD self-management may help standardize future research. | Several different applications of telehealth technologies have been used in the care of respiratory patients, including telemonitoring, teleconsultations, tele-education, and telehealth-pulmonary rehabilitation (PR).,Telehealth technology provides an opportunity to assist in the management of chronic respiratory diseases and improve access to PR programs.,While there is inconclusive evidence as to the effectiveness of telemonitoring to reduce healthcare utilization and detection of exacerbations, teleconsultations have been shown to be an effective means to assess patients’ disease prior to the initiation of PR, and telehealth PR has been shown to be as effective as institution-based PR at improving functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life.,To improve PR access across Canada and ensure a high standard of program quality, a team of clinicians and researchers has developed and begun to implement a national standardized PR program that can be delivered across different settings of practice, including remote satellite sites via telehealth PR.,The program has adapted the “Living Well with COPD” self-management program and includes standardized reference guides and resources for patients and practitioners.,A progressive and iterative process will evaluate the success of program implementation and outcomes.,This initiative will address nationwide accessibility challenges and provide PR content as well as evaluations that are in accordance with clinical standards and established self-management practices. | 1 |
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) poses a serious threat to healthcare systems worldwide.,Binding of the virus to angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is an important step in the infection mechanism.,However, it is unknown if ACE2 expression in patients with chronic lung diseases (CLDs), such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), or pulmonary fibrosis (PF), is changed as compared to controls.,We used lung samples from patients with COPD (n = 28), IPAH (n = 10), and PF (n = 10) as well as healthy control donor (n = 10) tissue samples to investigate the expression of ACE2 and related cofactors that might influence the course of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.,Expression levels of the ACE2 receptor, the putative receptor CD147/BSG, and the viral entry cofactors TMPRSS2 (transmembrane serine protease 2), EZR, and FURIN were determined by quantitative PCR and in open‐access RNA sequencing datasets.,Immunohistochemical and single‐cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) analyses were used for localization and coexpression, respectively.,Soluble ACE2 (sACE2) plasma levels were analyzed by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay.,In COPD as compared to donor, IPAH, and PF lung tissue, gene expression of ACE2, TMPRSS2, and EZR was significantly elevated, but circulating sACE2 levels were significantly reduced in COPD and PF plasma compared to healthy control and IPAH plasma samples.,Lung tissue expressions of FURIN and CD147/BSG were downregulated in COPD.,None of these changes were associated with changes in pulmonary hemodynamics.,Histological analysis revealed coexpression of ACE2, TMPRSS2, and Ezrin in bronchial regions and epithelial cells.,This was confirmed by scRNAseq analysis.,There were no significant expression changes of the analyzed molecules in the lung tissue of IPAH and idiopathic PF as compared to control.,In conclusion, we reveal increased ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression in lung tissue with a concomitant decrease of protective sACE2 in COPD patients.,These changes represent the possible risk factors for an increased susceptibility of COPD patients to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. | Previous studies suggested that the prevalence of chronic respiratory disease in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 was lower than its prevalence in the general population.,The aim of this study was to assess whether chronic lung disease or use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) affects the risk of contracting severe COVID-19.,In this population cohort study, records from 1205 general practices in England that contribute to the QResearch database were linked to Public Health England's database of SARS-CoV-2 testing and English hospital admissions, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and deaths for COVID-19.,All patients aged 20 years and older who were registered with one of the 1205 general practices on Jan 24, 2020, were included in this study.,With Cox regression, we examined the risks of COVID-19-related hospitalisation, admission to ICU, and death in relation to respiratory disease and use of ICS, adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic status and comorbidities associated with severe COVID-19.,Between Jan 24 and April 30, 2020, 8 256 161 people were included in the cohort and observed, of whom 14 479 (0·2%) were admitted to hospital with COVID-19, 1542 (<0·1%) were admitted to ICU, and 5956 (0·1%) died.,People with some respiratory diseases were at an increased risk of hospitalisation (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] hazard ratio [HR] 1·54 [95% CI 1·45-1·63], asthma 1·18 [1·13-1·24], severe asthma 1·29 [1·22-1·37; people on three or more current asthma medications], bronchiectasis 1·34 [1·20-1·50], sarcoidosis 1·36 [1·10-1·68], extrinsic allergic alveolitis 1·35 [0·82-2·21], idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 1·59 [1·30-1·95], other interstitial lung disease 1·66 [1·30-2·12], and lung cancer 2·24 [1·89-2·65]) and death (COPD 1·54 [1·42-1·67], asthma 0·99 [0·91-1·07], severe asthma 1·08 [0·98-1·19], bronchiectasis 1·12 [0·94-1·33], sarcoidosis 1·41 [0·99-1·99), extrinsic allergic alveolitis 1·56 [0·78-3·13], idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 1·47 [1·12-1·92], other interstitial lung disease 2·05 [1·49-2·81], and lung cancer 1·77 [1·37-2·29]) due to COVID-19 compared with those without these diseases.,Admission to ICU was rare, but the HR for people with asthma was 1·08 (0·93-1·25) and severe asthma was 1·30 (1·08-1·58).,In a post-hoc analysis, relative risks of severe COVID-19 in people with respiratory disease were similar before and after shielding was introduced on March 23, 2020.,In another post-hoc analysis, people with two or more prescriptions for ICS in the 150 days before study start were at a slightly higher risk of severe COVID-19 compared with all other individuals (ie, no or one ICS prescription): HR 1·13 (1·03-1·23) for hospitalisation, 1·63 (1·18-2·24) for ICU admission, and 1·15 (1·01-1·31) for death.,The risk of severe COVID-19 in people with asthma is relatively small.,People with COPD and interstitial lung disease appear to have a modestly increased risk of severe disease, but their risk of death from COVID-19 at the height of the epidemic was mostly far lower than the ordinary risk of death from any cause.,Use of inhaled steroids might be associated with a modestly increased risk of severe COVID-19.,National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and the Wellcome Trust. | 1 |
The benefits of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in patients with hypercapnic COPD are controversial.,It is presumed that methodology and appropriate use of NIV ventilator might be crucial for the outcomes.,With the new built-in software, the performance of NIV can be monitored at home, which can guarantee the compliance and appropriate use.,This study investigated effects of home use of NIV in hypercapnia in COPD patients using the NIV ventilator with built-in software for monitoring.,The current multicenter prospective, randomized, controlled trial enrolled patients with stable GOLD stages III and IV hypercapnic COPD.,Patients were randomly assigned via a computer-generated randomization sequence, with a block size of four patients, to continue optimized treatment (control group) or to receive additional NPPV (intervention group) for 3 months.,The primary outcome was arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2).,Data were derived from built-in software and analyzed every 4 weeks.,Analysis was carried out with the intention to treat.,This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02499718.,Patients were recruited from 20 respiratory units in China from October 1, 2015, and recruitment was terminated with a record of the vital statistics on May 31, 2016.,A total of 115 patients were randomly assigned to the NPPV group (n=57) or the control group (n=58).,Patients complied well with NPPV therapy (mean [± standard deviation] day use 5.6±1.4 h).,The mean estimation of leaks was 37.99±13.71 L/min.,The changes in PaCO2 (−10.41±0.97 vs −4.32±0.68 mmHg, P=0.03) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) (38.2% vs 18.2%, P=0.02) were statistically significant in the NPPV group versus the control group.,COPD assessment test (CAT) showed a positive trend (P=0.06) in favor of the NPPV group.,Pulmonary function and dyspnea were not different between groups.,Ventilators equipped with built-in software provided methodology for monitoring NIV use at home, which could facilitate the improvement of compliance and quality control of NIV use.,It was shown that three months use of NIV at home could reduce the PaCO2 and improve exercise tolerance (6MWD) in chronic hypercapnic COPD patients. | Exercise limitation is an important issue in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and it often co-exists with obstructive sleep apnoea (overlap syndrome).,This study examined the effects of nocturnal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on walking capacity in COPD patients with or without obstructive sleep apnoea.,Forty-four stable moderate-to-severe COPD patients were recruited and completed this study.,They all underwent polysomnography, CPAP titration, accommodation, and treatment with adequate pressure.,The incremental shuttle walking test was used to measure walking capacity at baseline and after two nights of CPAP treatment.,Urinary catecholamine and heart rate variability were measured before and after CPAP treatment.,After two nights of CPAP treatment, the apnoea-hypopnoea index and oxygen desaturation index significantly improved in both overlap syndrome and COPD patients, however these changes were significantly greater in the overlap syndrome than in the COPD group.,Sleep architecture and autonomic dysfunction significantly improved in the overlap syndrome group but not in the COPD group.,CPAP treatment was associated with an increased walking capacity from baseline from 226.4 ± 95.3 m to 288.6 ± 94.6 m (P < 0.05), and decreased urinary catecholamine levels, pre-exercise heart rate, oxygenation, and Borg scale in the overlap syndrome group.,An improvement in the apnoea-hypopnoea index was an independent factor associated with the increase in walking distance (r = 0.564).,Nocturnal CPAP may improve walking capacity in COPD patients with overlap syndrome.,NCT00914264 | 1 |
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) commonly suffer from acute exacerbations (AECOPD) and display varying disease severity.,However, there is no available biomarker for the classification of AECOPD.,This study is aimed at investigating the sputum cellular profiles to classify patients with AECOPD.,A total of 83 patients with AECOPD and 26 healthy controls were recruited.,Their demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, and their lung function was examined.,The phenotypes of sputum inflammatory cells were characterised, and the concentrations of sputum and serum amyloid-A (SAA), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) were measured.,Based on the sputum inflammatory cell profiles, individual patients were categorized into one of the four subgroups with inflammatory eosinophilic, neutrophilic, paucigranulocytic, and mixed granulocytic AECOPD.,Most AECOPD patients were reevaluated within 12-14 months after discharge.,There were 10 (12%) eosinophilic, 36 (43%) neutrophilic, 5 (6%) mixed granulocytic, and 32 (39%) paucigranulocytic AECOPD patients.,The patients with mixed granulocytic or neutrophilic AECOPD had a higher BODE score, more sputum inflammatory cells, lower lung function, and longer hospital stay, accompanied by higher concentrations of sputum MMP-9, IL-6 and CRP, and serum SAA, IL-6 and CRP.,Notably, 83% of patients with neutrophilic AECOPD displayed evidence of bacterial infection and many of them responded poorly to standard therapies.,In addition, patients with mixed granulocytic or neutrophilic stable COPD remained at lower lung functions and higher levels of inflammation.,Patients with AECOPD display heterogeneous inflammation, and the profiles of sputum inflammatory cells may be used as valuable biomarkers for the classification of AECOPD patients. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a growing economic burden worldwide.,Smoking cessation is thought to be the single most effective way of reducing the economic burden of COPD.,The impact of other strategies such as interventions that predict risk of disease, reduce progression of disease, or reduce exacerbations has not been systematically studied.,We estimated the economic and clinical burden of COPD over the next 25 years in Canada and the impact of three potential interventions (screening test for predisposition to COPD, new drugs to avoid progression into more severe disease stages, and predictive test for exacerbations) on COPD burden.,Using a dynamic simulation model, we projected the total burden of COPD (cost, morbidity, and mortality) from 2011 to 2035 using the population of Canada as a case study.,The model stratified population based on sex, age, smoking status, respiratory symptoms, and their COPD stage.,The cost and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with each intervention were estimated.,The model indicates that annual societal cost of COPD is $4.52 billion (B) Canadian dollars in 2011 and will reach $3.61B ($7.33B undiscounted) per year in 2035.,Over the next 25 years, COPD will be responsible for approximately $101.4B in societal costs ($147.5B undiscounted) and 12.9 million QALYs lost (19.0 million undiscounted).,Our results suggested that the best strategy to reduce the financial burden of COPD is by reducing exacerbations.,Smoking cessation, while it is the cornerstone of COPD prevention, has only a modest effect in attenuating the financial burden of COPD over the next 25 years in Western countries such as Canada.,Our data suggest that any intervention that can reduce the number of exacerbations has a substantial impact on morbidity and costs of COPD and should be considered in conjunction with the ongoing efforts to reduce smoking rates. | 1 |
There is a need to identify individuals with COPD at risk for disease progression and mortality.,Lung tissue remodeling is associated with the release of extracellular matrix (ECM) fragments into the peripheral circulation.,We hypothesized that ECM remodeling was associated with mortality in COPD and measured neo-epitopes originating from ECM proteins associated with lung tissue remodeling.,Biomarkers of ECM remodeling were assessed in a subpopulation (n = 1000) of the Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate End-points (ECLIPSE) cohort.,Validated immunoassays measuring serological neo-epitopes produced by proteolytic cleavage associated with degradation of collagen type I, III, IV, and VI, elastin, and biglycan, and formation of collagen type VI as well as fibrinogen and C-reactive protein were used.,Multivariate models were used to assess the prognostic value of these biomarkers.,Thirty subjects (3.0 %) died during follow-up.,Non-survivors were older, had reduced exercise capacity, increased dyspnea score, and included fewer current smokers.,All collagen biomarkers were significantly elevated in non-survivors compared to survivors.,Mortality risk was significantly increased for subjects with collagen remodeling biomarkers in the upper quartile, especially for the degradation fragment of collagen type IV C6M (hazard ratio 6.6 [95 % confidence interval 2.9-15.2], P < 0.0001) after adjusting for relevant confounders.,Serological biomarkers of collagen remodeling were strongly associated with mortality in subjects with COPD indicating that assessment of tissue turnover in the parenchyma and small airways may be useful in the prognosis of COPD.,NCT00292552, GSK Study No.,SCO104960.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-016-0440-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterized by defective extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover as a result of prolonged cigarette smoking.,Fibroblasts have a central role in ECM turnover.,The TGFβ induced Smad pathway provides intracellular signals to regulate ECM production.,We address the following hypothesis: fibroblasts have abnormal expression of genes in the Smad pathway in COPD, resulting in abnormal proteoglycan modulation, the ground substance of ECM.,We compared gene expression of the Smad pathway at different time points after stimulation with TGFβ, TNF or cigarette smoke extract (CSE) in pulmonary fibroblasts of GOLD stage II and IV COPD patients, and controls.,Without stimulation, all genes were similarly expressed in control and COPD fibroblasts.,TGFβ stimulation: downregulation of Smad3 and upregulation of Smad7 occurred in COPD and control fibroblasts, indicating a negative feedback loop upon TGFβ stimulation.,CSE hardly influenced gene expression of the TGFβ-Smad pathway in control fibroblasts, whereas it reduced Smad3 and enhanced Smad7 gene expression in COPD fibroblasts.,Furthermore, decorin gene expression decreased by all stimulations in COPD but not in control fibroblasts.,Fibroblasts of COPD patients and controls differ in their regulation of the Smad pathway, the contrast being most pronounced under CSE exposure.,This aberrant responsiveness of COPD fibroblasts to CSE might result in an impaired tissue repair capability and is likely important with regard to the question why only a subset of smokers demonstrates an excess ECM destruction under influence of cigarette smoking. | 1 |
Current treatment strategies to stratify exacerbation risk rely on history of ≥2 events in the previous year.,To understand year-to-year variability and factors associated with consistent exacerbations over time, we present a prospective analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort.,We analyzed SPIROMICS participants with COPD and three years of prospective data (n=1,105).,We classified participants according to yearly exacerbation frequency.,Stepwise logistic regression compared factors associated with individuals experiencing ≥1 AECOPD in every year for three years versus none.,During three years follow-up, 48·7% of participants experienced at least one AECOPD, while the majority (51·3%) experienced none.,Only 2·1% had ≥2 AECOPD in each year.,An inconsistent pattern (both years with and years without AECOPD) was common (41·3% of the group), particularly among GOLD stages 3 and 4 subjects (56·1%).,In logistic regression, consistent AECOPD (≥1 event per year for three years) as compared to no AECOPD were associated with higher baseline symptom burden assessed with the COPD Assessment Test, previous exacerbations, greater evidence of small airway abnormality by computed tomography, lower Interleukin-15 (IL-15) and elevated Interleukin-8 (IL-8).,Although AECOPD are common, the exacerbation status of most individuals varies markedly from year to year.,Among participants who experienced any AECOPD over three years, very few repeatedly experienced ≥2 events/year.,In addition to symptoms and history of exacerbations in the prior year, we identified several novel biomarkers associated with consistent exacerbations, including CT-defined small airway abnormality, IL-15 and IL-8. | To identify if there is a dose-dependent risk of diabetes complications in patients treated with corticosteroids who have both diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD).,A retrospective study of administrative claims data from the Australian Government Department of Veterans’ Affairs, from 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2008, of diabetes patients newly initiated on metformin or sulfonylurea.,COPD was identified by dispensings of tiotropium or ipratropium in the 6 months preceding study entry.,Total corticosteroid use (inhaled and systemic) in the 12 months after study entry was determined.,The outcome was time to hospitalization for a diabetes-related complication.,Competing risks and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were conducted with adjustment for a number of covariates.,A total of 18,226 subjects with diabetes were identified, of which 5.9% had COPD.,Of those with COPD, 67.2% were dispensed corticosteroids in the 12 months from study entry.,Stratification by dose of corticosteroids demonstrated a 94% increased likelihood of hospitalization for a diabetes complication for those who received a total defined daily dose (DDD) of corticosteroids ≥0.83/day (subhazard ratio 1.94 [95% CI 1.14-3.28], P = 0.014), by comparison with those who did not receive a corticosteroid.,Lower doses of corticosteroid (<0.83 DDD/day) were not associated with an increased risk of diabetes-related hospitalization.,In patients with diabetes and COPD, an increased risk of diabetes-related hospitalizations was only evident with use of high doses of corticosteroids.,This highlights the need for constant revision of corticosteroid dose in those with diabetes and COPD, to ensure that the minimally effective dose is used, together with review of appropriate response to therapy. | 1 |
The combination of aclidinium bromide, a long-acting anticholinergic, and formoterol fumarate, a long-acting beta2-agonist (400/12 μg twice daily) achieves improvements in lung function greater than either monotherapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and is approved in the European Union as a maintenance treatment.,The effect of this combination on symptoms of COPD and exacerbations is less well established.,We examined these outcomes in a pre-specified analysis of pooled data from two 24-week, double-blind, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled, multicentre, randomised Phase III studies (ACLIFORM and AUGMENT).,Patients ≥40 years with moderate to severe COPD (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]/forced vital capacity <70 % and FEV1 ≥30 % but <80 % predicted normal) were randomised (ACLIFORM: 2:2:2:2:1; AUGMENT: 1:1:1:1:1) to twice-daily aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg or 400/6 μg, aclidinium 400 μg, formoterol 12 μg or placebo via Genuair™/Pressair®.,Dyspnoea (Transition Dyspnoea Index; TDI), daily symptoms (EXAcerbations of Chronic pulmonary disease Tool [EXACT]-Respiratory Symptoms [E-RS] questionnaire), night-time and early-morning symptoms, exacerbations (Healthcare Resource Utilisation [HCRU] and EXACT definitions) and relief-medication use were assessed.,The pooled intent-to-treat population included 3394 patients.,Aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg significantly improved TDI focal score versus placebo and both monotherapies at Week 24 (all p < 0.05).,Over 24 weeks, significant improvements in E-RS total score, overall night-time and early-morning symptom severity and limitation of early-morning activities were observed with aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg versus placebo and both monotherapies (all p < 0.05).,The rate of moderate or severe HCRU exacerbations was significantly reduced with aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg compared with placebo (p < 0.05) but not monotherapies; the rate of EXACT-defined exacerbations was significantly reduced with aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg versus placebo (p < 0.01) and aclidinium (p < 0.05).,Time to first HCRU or EXACT exacerbation was longer with aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg compared with placebo (all p < 0.05) but not the monotherapies.,Relief-medication use was reduced with aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg versus placebo and aclidinium (p < 0.01).,Aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg significantly improves 24-hour symptom control compared with placebo, aclidinium and formoterol in patients with moderate to severe COPD.,Furthermore, aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg reduces the frequency of exacerbations compared with placebo.,NCT01462942 and NCT01437397 (ClinicalTrials.gov),The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-015-0250-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease in the general population and it places a considerable burden on patients, with the disease negatively affecting quality of life.,In practice, patients with COPD generally seek medical attention because of symptoms, particularly breathlessness, and the resulting physical limitations, which affect the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in patients.,The defining feature of COPD is airflow limitation that causes air trapping and increased hyperinflation as the ventilation rate increases during physical effort.,Hyperinflation causes or worsens breathlessness as breathing becomes inefficient, with the end result being an avoidance of physical exertion and a cycle of increasing dyspnea caused by inactivity and deconditioning, with deleterious effects on HR-QOL.,Current published guidelines for COPD state that the goals of pharmacologic therapy should be to control symptoms, improve health status and exercise tolerance, and reduce the frequency of COPD exacerbations.,Effective and sustained bronchodilation has emerged as a key strategy for improving dyspnea and ability to exercise.,As there is no cure for COPD, a major goal of treatment and of research into new therapies is to improve HR-QOL in COPD patients.,More recently, indacaterol, an inhaled ultra-long-acting β2-agonist (24-hour action), has been approved in many countries at different doses (between 75 and 300 μg once daily) for treatment of patients with stable but symptomatic COPD.,The aim of this review was to explore once-daily indacaterol clinical data as related to improvement in HR-QOL in COPD.,Indacaterol studies have shown significant improvements in lung function of COPD patients, and these improvements have also translated into clinically meaningful improvements in patient symptoms and HR-QOL. | 1 |
The aim of this study was to assess the current evidence for long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) in the treatment of COPD.,A systematic literature search of randomized controlled trials published in English up to September 2017 of LABA/LAMA FDCs vs LABA or LAMA or LABA/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) FDCs in COPD patients was performed using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar.,Outcomes including forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) scores, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores, exacerbations, exercise tolerance (endurance time [ET]), inspiratory capacity (IC), and rescue medication use were evaluated.,In total, 27 studies were included in the review.,LABA/LAMA FDCs significantly improved lung function (FEV1) at 12 weeks compared with LABA or LAMA or LABA/ICS.,These effects were maintained over time.,Significant improvements with LABA/LAMA FDCs vs each evaluated comparator were also observed in TDI and SGRQ scores, even if significant differences between different LABA/LAMA FDCs were detected.,Only the LABA/LAMA FDC indacaterol/glycopyrronium has shown superiority vs LAMA and LABA/ICS for reducing exacerbation rates, while olodaterol/tiotropium and indacaterol/glycopyrronium have been shown to improve ET and IC vs the active comparators.,Rescue medication use was significantly reduced by LABA/LAMA FDCs vs the evaluated comparators.,LABA/LAMA FDCs were safe, with no increase in the risk of adverse events with LABA/LAMA FDCs vs the monocomponents.,Evidence supporting the efficacy of LABA/LAMA FDCs for COPD is heterogeneous, particularly for TDI and SGRQ scores, exacerbation rates, ET, and IC.,So far, indacaterol/glycopyrronium is the LABA/LAMA FDC that has the strongest evidence for superiority vs LABA, LAMA, and LABA/ICS FDCs across the evaluated outcomes.,LABA/LAMA FDCs were safe; however, more data should be collected in a real-world setting to confirm their safety. | Aclidinium/formoterol is a twice-daily (BID) fixed-dose combination (FDC) in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The efficacy and safety of aclidinium/formoterol versus monotherapy and placebo in patients with COPD was assessed.,In this 24-week double-blind, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled, multicentre Phase III study, patients (≥40 years, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]/forced vital capacity <70% and FEV1 ≥30% but <80% predicted normal) were randomised 2:2:2:2:1 to aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg (n = 385) or 400/6 μg (n = 381), aclidinium 400 μg (n = 385), formoterol 12 μg (n = 384) or placebo (n = 194) BID via Genuair®/Pressair®a.,At Week 24, aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg and 400/6 μg lead to significant improvements from baseline in 1-hour post-dose FEV1 versus aclidinium (125 mL [95% CI: 90, 160; p < 0 · 001] and 69 mL [95% CI: 34, 105; p < 0.001], respectively) and trough FEV1 versus formoterol (85 mL [95% CI: 51, 119; p < 0.001] and 53 mL [95% CI: 19, 87; p < 0.01], respectively; co-primary endpoints).,Additionally, aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg and 400/6 μg provided significant improvements in Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score versus placebo (1.29 units [95% CI: 0.73, 1.86; p < 0.001] and 1.16 units [95% CI: 0.59, 1.73; p < 0.001], respectively; secondary endpoint).,All treatments were well tolerated, with safety profiles of the FDCs similar to those of placebo and monotherapy.,Both aclidinium/formoterol BID doses significantly improved bronchodilation versus monotherapy, and dyspnoea versus placebo, with no increase in safety risk.,Aclidinium/formoterol may be an effective treatment for patients with COPD.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01462942.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-178) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | 1 |
The role of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in lung epithelial cells is increasingly being recognized as a key stage in the development of COPD, fibrosis, and lung cancers, which are all highly associated with cigarette smoking and with exposure to second-hand smoke.,Using the exposure of human lung cancer epithelial A549 cells and non-cancerous Beas-2B cells to sidestream cigarette smoke extract (CSE) as a model, we studied the protective effects of adipose-derived stem cell-conditioned medium (ADSC-CM) against CSE-induced cell death and EMT.,CSE dose-dependently induced cell death, decreased epithelial markers, and increased the expression of mesenchymal markers.,Upstream regulator analysis of differentially expressed genes after CSE exposure revealed similar pathways as those observed in typical EMT induced by TGF-β1.,CSE-induced cell death was clearly attenuated by ADSC-CM but not by other control media, such as a pass-through fraction of ADSC-CM or A549-CM.,ADSC-CM effectively inhibited CSE-induced EMT and was able to reverse the gradual loss of epithelial marker expression associated with TGF-β1 treatment.,CSE or TGF-β1 enhanced the speed of A549 migration by 2- to 3-fold, and ADSC-CM was effective in blocking the cell migration induced by either agent.,Future work will build on the results of this in vitro study by defining the molecular mechanisms through which ADSC-CM protects lung epithelial cells from EMT induced by toxicants in second-hand smoke. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is influenced by environmental and genetic factors.,An important fraction of COPD cases harbor a major genetic determinant, inherited ZZ (Glu342Lys) α1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD).,A study was undertaken to investigate gene expression patterns in end-stage COPD lungs from patients with and without AATD.,Explanted lungs of end-stage ZZ AATD-related (treated and non-treated with AAT augmentation therapy) and “normal” MM COPD, and liver biopsies from patients suffering from liver cirrhosis with and without ZZ AATD were used for gene expression analysis by Affymetrix microarrays or RT-PCR.,A total of 162 genes were found to be differentially expressed (p-value ≤ 0.05 and |FC| ≥ 2) between MM and ZZ COPD patients.,Of those, 134 gene sets were up-regulated and 28 were down-regulated in ZZ relative to MM lung tissue.,A subgroup of genes, zinc finger protein 165, snail homolog 1 (Drosophila) (SNAI1), and Krüppel-like transcription factors (KLFs) 4 (gut), 9 and 10, perfectly segregated ZZ and MM COPD patients.,The higher expression of KLF 9 and KLF10 has been verified in the replication cohort with AATD-related end-stage lung emphysema and liver cirrhosis.,Furthermore, higher expression of KLF9, SNAI1 and DEFA1 was found in ZZ COPD lungs without augmentation therapy relative to MM COPD or ZZ COPD with augmentation therapy.,These results reveal the involvement of transcriptional regulators of the zinc-finger family in COPD pathogenesis and provide deeper insight into the pathophysiological mechanisms of COPD with and without AATD. | 1 |
In Tunisia, there is a paucity of population-based data on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) prevalence.,To address this problem, we estimated the prevalence of COPD following the Burden of Lung Disease Initiative.,We surveyed 807 adults aged 40+ years and have collected information on respiratory history and symptoms, risk factors for COPD and quality of life.,Post-bronchodilator spirometry was performed and COPD and its stages were defined according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines.,Six hundred and sixty one (661) subjects were included in the final analysis.,The prevalence of GOLD Stage I and II or higher COPD were 7.8% and 4.2%, respectively (Lower Limit of Normal modified stage I and II or higher COPD prevalence were 5.3% and 3.8%, respectively).,COPD was more common in subjects aged 70+ years and in those with a BMI < 20 kg/m2.,Prevalence of stage I+ COPD was 2.3% in <10 pack years smoked and 16.1% in 20+ pack years smoked.,Only 3.5% of participants reported doctor-diagnosed COPD.,In this Tunisian population, the prevalence of COPD is higher than reported before and higher than self-reported doctor-diagnosed COPD.,In subjects with COPD, age is a much more powerful predictor of lung function than smoking. | The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Saudi Arabia is unknown.,The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of COPD among smokers more than 40 years of age attending primary healthcare clinics in Saudi Arabia.,A questionnaire was used in a cross-sectional collection of demographic data and other items related to diagnosis of COPD in patients visiting primary healthcare clinics.,Eligible subjects were current or ex-smokers and aged 40 years or above.,Spirometry was performed according to American Thoracic Society criteria.,Airflow obstruction was classified according to the 2003 update of the World Health Organization and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria.,COPD was defined as a ratio less than 0.70 of post-bronchodilator-predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC <0.70).,Because of incomplete data or poor performance on spirometry, of 1380 subjects eligible for the study, only 501 subjects were eligible for data analysis.,Seventy-one patients had an FEV1/FVC ratio <0.70, comprising 14.2% of the study population, of which 95.8% were males.,Current smokers comprised 57 (80.3%) subjects.,Of the 71 subjects who fulfilled the criteria for COPD diagnosis, none were found to be in COPD stage I; 40 (56.3%) were in stage II and 31 (43.6%) were in stage III of the disease.,Underdiagnosis of COPD in primary healthcare clinics in Saudi Arabia is common, but its extent is not different from the corresponding data available in the literature for other countries.,Use of spirometry as a routine test for all patients older than 40 years of age and with a smoking history can help in early detection and proper diagnosis of COPD, which subsequently will help in implementation of preventive measures. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disease with increasing prevalence and burden for health systems worldwide.,Every country collects its own epidemiological data regarding COPD prevalence, morbidity and mortality while taking steps to educate the population and medical community to improve early detection and treatment.,The rising COPD prevalence creates a need for comprehensive guidelines.,In 2012 and 2017-2018, the Romanian Society of Pneumology (SRP) organised national inquiries for COPD, while lung physicians in Romania began receiving education regarding the correct algorithms for COPD diagnosis and therapy.,During 2019, a Romanian clinical guideline for diagnosis and treatment of COPD was published, and a condensed version of key points from this guideline are presented herein.,COPD is diagnosed based on the presence of three major components: relevant exposure history, respiratory symptoms, and airway limitation that is not fully reversible.,Clinical evaluation of patients diagnosed with COPD should include the level of symptoms, exacerbation rate, the presence of comorbidities and determination of phenotypes.,The present abridged guideline is designed to be accessible and practical for assessing and managing patients with COPD.,The application of up-to-date COPD guidelines may enhance the optimism of physicians and patients in managing this disease. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most debilitating somatic diseases, having anxiety and depression frequently as comorbidities.,The coping style, the way in which the subject manages to control the difficult and stressful situations of life, can influence its evolution and also the existence of the comorbidities.,In this study, coping styles in a group of subjects with COPD and their association with the intensity of depressive and anxiety symptoms as well as medical determinants were identified.,In this cross-sectional study, 28 male patients with COPD risk class D were enrolled.,The patients performed spirometry tests, Borg scale, 6-minute walking test, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and COPE Inventory were recorded.,According to their higher coping subscale score, the depression score was the highest in patients with avoidance-type coping and the lowest in patients with problem-focused coping (11.0 vs 5.6; P=0.042), respectively, patients with social support-focused coping having the highest anxiety score in contrast to patients with emotion-focused coping, which had the lowest anxiety score (11.6 vs 5.0; P=0.006).,Regarding respiratory parameters, significant differences were present for the variation of the medians between the four groups only for forced vital capacity (FVC%) (the lowest FVC% was in patients with predominant social support-focused coping and the highest in patients with problem-focused coping) and 6-minute walking test (%) (the lowest score for patients with social support-focused coping and the highest value in patients with avoidance-type coping).,Problem-coping score was significantly and positively associated with FVC% (Spearman’s r=0.400; P=0.035), emotion-focused coping score was significantly and positively associated with FVC% (Spearman’s r=0.395; P=0.038), and social support-focused coping score was negatively and significantly correlated with forced expiratory volume in 1 second/FVC% ratio (Spearman’s r=0.389; P=0.041).,A significant, negative correlation was found only between depression score and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (Spearman’s r=−0.435; P=0.026) with respect to psychiatric symptoms.,Coping styles in patients with COPD affect the intensity of associated depressive and anxiety symptoms as well as medical determinants, thus the coping style should be considered an important part in the multidisciplinary approach of these patients. | 1 |
Self-reported smoking underestimates disease risk.,Smoking affects DNA methylation, in particular the cg05575921 site in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AHRR) gene.,We tested the hypothesis that AHRR cg05575921 hypomethylation is associated with risk of smoking-related morbidity and mortality.,From the Copenhagen City Heart Study representing the Danish general population, we studied 9234 individuals.,Using bisulphite treated leucocyte DNA, AHRR (cg05575921) methylation was measured.,Rs1051730 (CHRN3A) genotype was used to evaluate smoking heaviness.,Participants were followed for up to 22 years for exacerbations of COPD, event of lung cancer and all-cause mortality.,Six-year lung cancer risk was calculated according to the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCOM2012).,AHRR (cg05575921) hypomethylation was associated with former and current smoking status, high daily and cumulative smoking, short time since smoking cessation (all p values <7×10-31), and the smoking-related CHRN3A genotype (−0.48% per T-allele, p=0.002).,The multifactorially adjusted HRs for the lowest versus highest methylation quintiles were 4.58 (95% CI 2.83 to 7.42) for COPD exacerbations, 4.87 (2.31 to 10.3) for lung cancer and 1.67 (1.48 to 1.88) for all-cause mortality.,Finally, among 2576 high-risk smokers eligible for lung cancer screening by CT, observed cumulative incidences of lung cancer after 6 years for individuals in the lowest and highest methylation quintiles were 3.7% and 0.0% (p=2×10-7), whereas predicted PLCOM2012 6-year risks were similar (4.3% and 4.4%, p=0.77).,AHRR (cg05575921) hypomethylation, a marker of smoking behaviour, provides potentially clinical relevant predictions of future smoking-related morbidity and mortality. | The Wnt pathway mediates differentiation of epithelial tissues; depending on the tissue types, Wnt can either drive or inhibit the differentiation process.,We hypothesized that key genes in the Wnt pathway are suppressed in the human airway epithelium under the stress of cigarette smoking, a stress associated with dysregulation of the epithelial differentiated state.,Microarrays were used to assess the expression of Wnt-related genes in the small airway epithelium (SAE) obtained via bronchoscopy and brushing of healthy nonsmokers, healthy smokers, and smokers with COPD.,Thirty-three of 56 known Wnt-related genes were expressed in the SAE.,Wnt pathway downstream mediators β-catenin and the transcription factor 7-like 1 were down-regulated in healthy smokers and smokers with COPD, as were many Wnt target genes.,Among the extracellular regulators that suppress the Wnt pathway, secreted frizzled-related protein 2 (SFRP2), was up-regulated 4.3-fold in healthy smokers and 4.9-fold in COPD smokers, an observation confirmed by TaqMan Real-time PCR, Western analysis and immunohistochemistry.,Finally, cigarette smoke extract mediated up-regulation of SFRP2 and down-regulation of Wnt target genes in airway epithelial cells in vitro.,Smoking down-regulates the Wnt pathway in the human airway epithelium.,In the context that Wnt pathway plays an important role in differentiation of epithelial tissues, the down-regulation of Wnt pathway may contribute to the dysregulation of airway epithelium differentiation observed in smoking-related airway disorders. | 1 |
Our understanding of how comorbid diseases influence health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is limited and in need of improvement.,The aim of this study was to examine the associations between comorbidities and HRQL as measured by the instruments EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT).,Information on patient characteristics, chronic bronchitis, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, renal impairment, musculoskeletal symptoms, osteoporosis, depression, and EQ-5D and CAT questionnaire results was collected from 373 patients with Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) <50% of predicted value from 27 secondary care respiratory units in Sweden.,Correlation analyses and multiple linear regression models were performed using EQ-5D index, EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS), and CAT scores as response variables.,Having more comorbid conditions was associated with a worse HRQL as assessed by all instruments.,Chronic bronchitis was significantly associated with a worse HRQL as assessed by EQ-5D index (adjusted regression coefficient [95% confidence interval] −0.07 [−0.13 to −0.02]), EQ-5D VAS (−5.17 [−9.42 to −0.92]), and CAT (3.78 [2.35 to 5.20]).,Musculoskeletal symptoms were significantly associated with worse EQ-5D index (−0.08 [−0.14 to −0.02]), osteoporosis with worse EQ-5D VAS (−4.65 [−9.27 to −0.03]), and depression with worse EQ-5D index (−0.10 [−0.17 to −0.04]).,In stratification analyses, the associations of musculoskeletal symptoms, osteoporosis, and depression with HRQL were limited to female patients.,The instruments EQ-5D and CAT complement each other and emerge as useful for assessing HRQL in patients with COPD.,Chronic bronchitis, musculoskeletal symptoms, osteoporosis, and depression were associated with worse HRQL.,We conclude that comorbid conditions, in particular chronic bronchitis, depression, osteoporosis, and musculoskeletal symptoms, should be taken into account in the clinical management of patients with severe COPD. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex condition with pulmonary and extra-pulmonary manifestations.,This study describes the heterogeneity of COPD in a large and well characterised and controlled COPD cohort (ECLIPSE).,We studied 2164 clinically stable COPD patients, 337 smokers with normal lung function and 245 never smokers.,In these individuals, we measured clinical parameters, nutritional status, spirometry, exercise tolerance, and amount of emphysema by computed tomography.,COPD patients were slightly older than controls and had more pack years of smoking than smokers with normal lung function.,Co-morbidities were more prevalent in COPD patients than in controls, and occurred to the same extent irrespective of the GOLD stage.,The severity of airflow limitation in COPD patients was poorly related to the degree of breathlessness, health status, presence of co-morbidity, exercise capacity and number of exacerbations reported in the year before the study.,The distribution of these variables within each GOLD stage was wide.,Even in subjects with severe airflow obstruction, a substantial proportion did not report symptoms, exacerbations or exercise limitation.,The amount of emphysema increased with GOLD severity.,The prevalence of bronchiectasis was low (4%) but also increased with GOLD stage.,Some gender differences were also identified.,The clinical manifestations of COPD are highly variable and the degree of airflow limitation does not capture the heterogeneity of the disease. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with a two-to-five fold increase in the risk of coronary artery disease independent of shared risk factors.,This association is hypothesized to be mediated by systemic inflammation but this link has not been established.,We included 300 participants enrolled in the SPIROMICS cohort, 75 each of lifetime non-smokers, smokers without airflow obstruction, mild-moderate COPD, and severe-very severe COPD.,We quantified emphysema and airway disease on computed tomography, characterized visual emphysema subtypes (centrilobular and paraseptal) and airway disease, and used the Weston visual score to quantify coronary artery calcification (CAC).,We used the Sobel test to determine whether markers of systemic inflammation mediated a link between spirometric and radiographic features of COPD and CAC.,FEV1/FVC but not quantitative emphysema or airway wall thickening was associated with CAC (p = 0.036), after adjustment for demographics, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, statin use, and CT scanner type.,To explain this discordance, we examined visual subtypes of emphysema and airway disease, and found that centrilobular emphysema but not paraseptal emphysema or bronchial thickening was independently associated with CAC (p = 0.019).,MMP3, VCAM1, CXCL5 and CXCL9 mediated 8, 8, 7 and 16% of the association between FEV1/FVC and CAC, respectively.,Similar biomarkers partially mediated the association between centrilobular emphysema and CAC.,The association between airflow obstruction and coronary calcification is driven primarily by the centrilobular subtype of emphysema, and is linked through bioactive molecules implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.,ClinicalTrials.gov: Identifier: NCT01969344.,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-018-0946-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | There are no studies analyzing the relationship between emphysema and lung cancer (LC).,With this aim and in order to make some comparisons between different clinical variables, we carried out the present study.,This is a case-control study, patients with COPD and LC being the cases and subjects with stable COPD being the controls.,Clinical and functional parameters, as well as the existence of radiological emphysema, were evaluated in a qualitative and quantitative way, using a radiological density of −950 Hounsfield units as a cutoff point in the images.,The existence of several different types of emphysema (centrilobular, paraseptal, panacinar, or bullae) was analyzed, allowing patients to have more than one simultaneously.,The extent to which lobes were involved was evaluated and the extension of emphysema was graduated for each type and location, following a quantitative scale.,Differences between cases and controls were compared by using bivariate and multivariate analyzes with results expressed as OR and 95% CI.,We included 169 cases and 74 controls, 84% men with a FEV1 (%) of 61.7±18.5, with 90.1% non-exacerbators.,Most of them (50%) were active smokers and 47.2% were ex-smokers.,Emphysema was found in 80.2% of the subjects, the most frequent type being centrilobular (34.4%).,The only significantly different factor was the presence of paraseptal emphysema (alone or combined; OR =2.2 [95% CI =1.1-4.3, P = 0.03]), with adenocarcinoma being significantly more frequent in paraseptal emphysema with respect to other types (67.2% vs 32.8%, P =0.03).,Patients with COPD and paraseptal emphysema could be a risk group for the development of LC, especially adenocarcinoma subtype. | 1 |
NT-proBNP has been widely regarded as a useful tool for diagnosis or exclusion of heart failure (HF) in many settings.,However, in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB), its roles have not been well described.,The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of NT-proBNP for identifying left ventricular (LV) failure in such patients.,311 AECB patients and 102 stable chronic bronchitis patients with no history of HF were enrolled.,Plasma NT-proBNP concentrations were measured using Roche Elecsys.,The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) diagnostic principles were adopted to identify HF and the diagnostic performance of NT-proBNP was evaluated by ROC.,Our results showed, the median NT-proBNP level in patients with LV failure [4828.4 (2044.4-9203.6) ng/L] was significantly higher than that in those without LV failure [519.2 (179.1-1409.8) ng/L, p<0.001] and stable controls [207.5 (186.5-318.2) ng/L, p<0.001].,LV failure, renal function, atrial fibrillation and systolic pulmonary artery pressure were independent predictors of NT-proBNP levels (all p<0.05).,The area under ROC curve (AUC) of NT-proBNP for identifying LV failure was 0.884, significantly superior to clinical judgment alone (AUC 0.835, p = 0.0294).,At the optimal cutoff value of 935.0 ng/L, NT-proBNP yielded sensitivity 94.4%, specificity 68.2%, accuracy 74.3% and negative predictive value 97.6%.,Adding the results of NT-proBNP to those of clinical judgment improved the diagnostic accuracy for LV failure.,As a tool for diagnosis or exclusion of HF, NT-proBNP can help physicians identify LV failure in patients with AECB. | The purpose of our study was to examine the association of prior outpatient use of statins and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on mortality for subjects ≥ 65 years of age hospitalized with acute COPD exacerbations.,We conducted a retrospective national cohort study using Veterans Affairs administrative data including subjects ≥65 years of age hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation.,Our primary analysis was a multilevel model with the dependent variable of 90-day mortality and hospital as a random effect, controlling for preexisting comorbid conditions, demographics, and other medications prescribed.,We identified 11,212 subjects with a mean age of 74.0 years, 98% were male, and 12.4% of subjects died within 90-days of hospital presentation.,In this cohort, 20.3% of subjects were using statins, 32.0% were using ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB).,After adjusting for potential confounders, current statin use (odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.64) and ACE inhibitor/ARB use (0.55, 0.46-0.66) were significantly associated with decreased 90-day mortality.,Use of statins and ACE inhibitors prior to admission is associated with decreased mortality in subjects hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation.,Randomized controlled trials are needed to examine whether the use of these medications are protective for those patients with COPD exacerbations. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) imposes a substantial burden on individuals with the disease, which can include a range of symptoms (breathlessness, cough, sputum production, wheeze, chest tightness) of varying severities.,We present an overview of the biomedical literature describing reported relationships between COPD symptoms and disease burden in terms of quality of life, health status, daily activities, physical activity, sleep, comorbid anxiety, and depression, as well as risk of exacerbations and disease prognosis.,In addition, the substantial variability of COPD symptoms encountered (morning, daytime, and nighttime) is addressed and their implications for disease burden considered.,The findings from this narrative review, which mainly focuses on real-world and observational studies, demonstrate the impact of COPD symptoms on the burden of disease and that improved recognition and understanding of their impact is central to alleviating this burden. | Clinical trials of tiotropium have principally recruited patients from secondary care with more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and typically had included limitation of concomitant medication.,In primary care, which is the most common setting for COPD management, many patients may have milder disease, and also may take a broad range of concomitant medication.,This randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 12-week, 44-centre study investigated the efficacy (trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] response) and safety of additional treatment with once-daily tiotropium 18 μg via the HandiHaler® in a primary care COPD population (tiotropium: N = 191, FEV1 = 1.25 L [47.91% predicted]; placebo: N = 183, FEV1 = 1.32 L [49.86% predicted]).,Secondary endpoints included: trough forced vital capacity (FVC) response, weekly use of rescue short-acting β-agonist, and exacerbation of COPD (complex of respiratory symptoms/events of >3 days in duration requiring a change in treatment).,Treatment effects were determined using non-parametric analysis.,At Week 12, median improvement in trough FEV1 response with tiotropium versus placebo was 0.06 L (p = 0.0102).,The improvement was consistent across baseline treatment and COPD severity.,Median improvement in FVC at 2, 6 and 12 weeks was 0.12 L (p < 0.001).,The percentage of patients with ≥1 exacerbation was reduced (tiotropium 9.5%; placebo 17.9%; p = 0.0147), independent of disease severity.,Rescue medication usage was significantly reduced in the tiotropium group compared with placebo.,Adverse event profile was consistent with previous studies.,Tiotropium provides additional benefits to usual primary care management in a representative COPD population.,The identifier is: NCT00274079. | 1 |
Readmission rates following hospitalisation for COPD exacerbations are unacceptably high, and the contributing factors are poorly understood.,Our objective was to summarise and evaluate the factors associated with 30- and 90-day all-cause readmission following hospitalisation for an exacerbation of COPD.,We systematically searched electronic databases from inception to 5 November 2019.,Data were extracted by two independent authors in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.,Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.,We synthesised a narrative from eligible studies and conducted a meta-analysis where this was possible using a random-effects model.,In total, 3533 abstracts were screened and 208 full-text manuscripts were reviewed.,A total of 32 papers met the inclusion criteria, and 14 studies were included in the meta-analysis.,The readmission rate ranged from 8.8-26.0% at 30 days and from 17.5-39.0% at 90 days.,Our narrative synthesis showed that comorbidities, previous exacerbations and hospitalisations, and increased length of initial hospital stay were the major risk factors for readmission at 30 and 90 days.,Pooled adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) revealed that heart failure (1.29 (1.22-1.37)), renal failure (1.26 (1.19-1.33)), depression (1.19 (1.05-1.34)) and alcohol use (1.11 (1.07-1.16)) were all associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause readmission, whereas being female was a protective factor (0.91 (0.88-0.94)).,Comorbidities, previous exacerbations and hospitalisation, and increased length of stay were significant risk factors for 30- and 90-day all-cause readmission after an index hospitalisation with an exacerbation of COPD.,Clinicians need to take a holistic approach including attention to comorbidities in the pre-discharge care of patients with COPD exacerbations to reduce the potential risk of readmission.http://bit.ly/2sucXKV | The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic [1].,COVID-19 is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).,COVID-19 displays symptoms ranging from mild to severe (pneumonia) that can lead to death in some individuals [2-4].,As of 18 April 2020, there have been 2 280 945 cases of COVID-19 worldwide and 156 354 deaths [5].,SARS-CoV-2 uses the angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE-2) as the cellular entry receptor [6].,While the virus can infect individuals of any age, to date, most of the severe cases have been described in those >55 years of age and with significant comorbidities, such as COPD [7].,Here, we determined whether patients with COPD have increased expression of ACE-2 in bronchial epithelial cells in the lower respiratory tract.,Smokers and those with COPD have increased airway expression of ACE-2, which is the entry receptor for the COVID-19 virus.,This may explain the increased risk of severe COVID-19 in these subpopulations and highlight the importance of smoking cessation.https://bit.ly/3bC29es | 1 |
The TORRACTO® study evaluated the effects of tiotropium/olodaterol versus placebo on endurance time during constant work-rate cycling and constant speed shuttle walking in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) after 12 weeks of treatment.,The effects of once-daily tiotropium/olodaterol (2.5/5 and 5/5 μg) on endurance time during constant work-rate cycle ergometry (CWRCE) after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment were compared with placebo in patients with COPD in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial.,Endurance time during the endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT) after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment was also evaluated in a subset of patients.,A total of 404 patients received treatment, with 165 participating in the ESWT substudy.,A statistically significant improvement in endurance time during CWRCE was observed after 12 weeks (primary endpoint) with tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 µg [14% (p = 0.02)] but not with tiotropium/olodaterol 2.5/5 µg [9% (p = 0.14)] versus placebo.,In the ESWT substudy, a trend to improvement in endurance time during ESWT after 12 weeks (key secondary endpoint) was observed with tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 µg [21% (p = 0.055)] and tiotropium/olodaterol 2.5/5 µg [21% (p = 0.056)] versus placebo.,Tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 µg improved endurance time during cycle ergometry versus placebo, with a strong tendency to also improve walking endurance time.,[ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01525615.] | Current methods for assessing clinical outcomes in COPD mainly rely on physiological tests combined with the use of questionnaires.,The present review considers commonly used outcome measures such as lung function, health status, exercise capacity and physical activity, dyspnoea, exacerbations, the multi-dimensional BODE score, and mortality.,Based on current published data, we provide a concise overview of the principles, strengths and weaknesses, and discuss open questions related to each methodology.,Reviewed is the current set of markers for measuring clinically relevant outcomes with particular emphasis on their limitations and opportunities that should be recognized when assessing and interpreting their use in clinical trials of COPD. | 1 |
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) share common risk factors.,However, there is limited information about COPD and CKD.,This is case-cohort study was carried out using the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database to evaluate the correlation between COPD and CKD.,We identified cases aged older than 40 years who had an inpatient hospitalization with a first-time COPD diagnosis between 1998 and 2008.,Control were selected from hospitalized patients without COPD or CKD and were matched according to age, gender, and year of admission at a 2:1 ratio.,Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of CKD and COPD.,The overall incidence of CKD was higher in the COPD group (470.9 per 104 person-years) than in the non-COPD group (287.52 per 104 person-years).,The adjusted hazard ratio of case was 1.61 (P < 0.0001) times that of control.,COPD was found to be associated with kidney disease from our follow-up.,To detect CKD early, early diagnosis of CKD in patients with COPD and prompt initiation of monitoring and treatment are imperative. | Insomnia is prevalent in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We conducted a population-based case-control study to evaluate the effects of hypnotics on the risk of adverse respiratory events in patients with COPD.,The case-control study was investigated using data retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database.,Patients with newly diagnosed adverse respiratory events (pneumonia, COPD with acute exacerbation, acute respiratory failure, and cardiopulmonary arrest) were included in the case group.,Patients with COPD and no history of adverse respiratory events were randomly selected for the control group, which was frequency-matched with the case group according to index date, age (per 10 years), and sex.,Patients who had used hypnotics within 1 month meant active users.,The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of were calculated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.,Most of the study participants were male (71.6%), and the mean ages of the participants in the case and control groups were 69.2 (±12.4) and 67.5 (±12.3) years, respectively.,After potential confounding factors were adjusting for, the adjusted ORs of adverse respiratory events were 12.0 for active users of benzodiazepines (95% CI, 8.11-17.6) and 10.5 for active users of nonbenzodiazepines (95% CI, 7.68-14.2) compared with the adjusted ORs of those who never used hypnotics.,The results of this epidemiological study suggested that hypnotics increased the risk of adverse respiratory events in patients with COPD. | 1 |
Nonadherence to medication and incorrect use of inhalers represent significant barriers to optimal disease management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Thus, health care professionals (HCPs) play a critical role in educating their patients on appropriate inhaler use and in ensuring medication adherence.,However, many patients do not receive appropriate inhaler training or have not had their inhaler technique checked.,The Real-life Experience and Accuracy of inhaLer use (REAL) survey was a computer-assisted, telephonic survey consisting of 23 questions gathering real-world information on correct inhaler use, inhalation technique, device attributes, adherence, dosing accuracy, training, correct device use, ease of use, and factors that influence patient adherence in commercially available inhalers delivering COPD maintenance therapy.,All results are based on patient-reported data.,The survey was conducted between January 4, 2016 and February 2, 2016.,A total of 764 patients using various inhalers (Breezhaler® =186; Ellipta® =191; Genuair® =194; Respimat® =201) with mild to very severe COPD, with a mean ± SD age 56±9.8 years, completed the survey.,Patient self-reported adherence was significantly lower in younger patients compared to older patients (p=0.020).,Eighty-three percent of patients indicated that a demonstration (in-person) was “very helpful” versus 58% for video.,Patient preferences for training methods were as follows: demonstration of inhaler use (83%), video (58%), instructions for use (51%), and leaflet (34%).,Twenty-nine percent of patients had not been checked to see if they were using their device correctly by a HCP within the last two years.,Patients who were checked were significantly more adherent than unchecked patients (p=0.020).,The majority of the patients using Breezhaler reported either being very confident or confident of having taken a full dose, which was higher than those using Genuair, Ellipta (α=0.05), and Respimat (α=0.05).,Treatment adherence in the last 30 days was highest with Breezhaler followed by Respimat, Ellipta, and Genuair.,The REAL survey identified attributes that influenced patient adherence and optimal inhaler use.,Predictive attributes that influence patient adherence which HCPs should be aware of include age and disease severity.,Modifiable attributes which the HCP can influence include correct inhaler use training, choice of training methods, checking patient inhaler technique at subsequent visits, and device selection.,Inhalers are integral in the effective management of patients with COPD; it is therefore important that patients use the inhaler correctly and have full confidence in the dosage. | Patients with COPD may be prescribed multiple inhalers as part of their treatment regimen, which require different inhalation techniques.,Previous literature has shown that the effectiveness of inhaled treatment can be adversely affected by incorrect inhaler technique.,Prescribing a range of device types could worsen this problem, leading to poorer outcomes in COPD patients, but the impact is not yet known.,To compare clinical outcomes of COPD patients who use devices requiring similar inhalation technique with those who use devices with mixed techniques.,A matched cohort design was used, with 2 years of data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database.,Matching variables were established from a baseline year of follow-up data, and two cohorts were formed: a “similar-devices cohort” and a “mixed-devices cohort”.,COPD-related events were recorded during an outcome year of follow-up.,The primary outcome measure was an incidence rate ratio (IRR) comparing the rate of exacerbations between study cohorts.,A secondary outcome compared average daily use of short-acting beta agonist (SABA).,The final study sample contained 8,225 patients in each cohort (mean age 67 [SD, 10], 57% males, 37% current smokers).,Patients in the similar-devices cohort had a lower rate of exacerbations compared with those in the mixed-devices cohort (adjusted IRR 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.84) and were less likely to be in a higher-dose SABA group (adjusted proportional odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.51-0.57).,COPD patients who were prescribed one or more additional inhaler devices requiring similar inhalation techniques to their previous device(s) showed better outcomes than those who were prescribed devices requiring different techniques. | 1 |
This study aims: (1) to describe the pattern and extent of multimorbidity and polypharmacy in UK Biobank participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and (2) to identify which comorbidities are associated with increased risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) resulting from polypharmacy.,Cross-sectional.,Community cohort.,UK Biobank participants comparing self-reported COPD (n=8317) with no COPD (n=494 323).,Multimorbidity (≥4 conditions) and polypharmacy (≥5 medications) in participants with COPD versus those without.,Risk of ADRs (taking ≥3 medications associated with falls, constipation, urinary retention, central nervous system (CNS) depression, bleeding or renal injury) in relation to the presence of COPD and individual comorbidities.,Multimorbidity was more common in participants with COPD than those without (17% vs 4%).,Polypharmacy was highly prevalent (52% with COPD taking ≥5 medications vs 18% in those without COPD).,Adjusting for age, sex and socioeconomic status, those with COPD were significantly more likely than those without to be prescribed ≥3 medications contributing to falls (OR 2.27, 95% CI 2.13 to 2.42), constipation (OR 3.42, 95% CI 3.10 to 3.77), urinary retention (OR 3.38, 95% CI 2.94 to 3.87), CNS depression (OR 3.75, 95% CI 3.31 to 4.25), bleeding (OR 4.61, 95% CI 3.35 to 6.19) and renal injury (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.86 to 2.62).,Concomitant cardiovascular disease was associated with the greatest risk of taking ≥3 medications associated with falls/renal injury.,Concomitant mental health conditions were most strongly associated with medications linked with CNS depression/urinary retention/bleeding.,Multimorbidity is common in COPD and associated with high levels of polypharmacy.,Co-prescription of drugs with various ADRs is common.,Future research should examine the effects on healthcare outcomes of co-prescribing multiple drugs with similar potential ADRs.,Clinical guidelines should emphasise assessment of multimorbidity and ADR risk. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of mortality worldwide, which is characterized by chronic bronchitis, destruction of small airways, and enlargement/disorganization of alveoli.,It is generally accepted that the neutrophilic airway inflammation observed in the lungs of COPD patients is intrinsically linked to the tissue destruction and alveolar airspace enlargement, leading to disease progression.,Animal models play an important role in studying the underlying mechanisms of COPD as they address questions involving integrated whole body responses.,This review aims to summarize the current animal models of COPD, focusing on their advantages and disadvantages on immune responses and neutrophilic inflammation.,Also, we propose a potential new animal model of COPD, which may mimic the most characteristics of human COPD pathogenesis, including persistent moderate-to-high levels of neutrophilic inflammation. | 1 |
Dual bronchodilator therapy is reserved as a second-line treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and provides benefits in lung function and health status versus monotherapy.,The aim of this study was to determine whether early initiation of a dual bronchodilator versus monotherapy reduced the risk of deterioration in COPD.,This post hoc pooled analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) 62.5/25 mcg/day compared with tiotropium (TIO) 18 mcg/day in a maintenance-naïve (MN) subgroup of patients relative to the intent-to-treat (ITT) population from three 6-month active comparator studies (n = 1747).,Other treatment arms (UMEC/VI 125/25, VI 25 and UMEC 125) comprised 850 patients in total but were not included in this analysis.,The primary endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1).,St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, rescue medication use, and a novel composite endpoint of short-term clinically important deterioration (CID; ≥100 ml decrease in trough FEV1, ≥4-unit increase in SGRQ score, or a COPD exacerbation) were also assessed.,UMEC/VI improved trough FEV1 versus TIO at day 169 [least squares mean (95% confidence interval): MN: 146 ml (102-189) and ITT: 95 ml (71-118); both P < 0.001].,Both UMEC/VI and TIO improved SGRQ and rescue use in the two populations, with greater improvements in rescue use with UMEC/VI versus TIO.,UMEC/VI reduced the risk of short-term clinically important deterioration versus TIO [hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval: MN: 0.66 (0.51-0.85); ITT: 0.62 (0.54-0.71), both P ≤ 0.001].,Adverse events were similar across both populations and treatments.,Early use of dual-bronchodilator therapy has superior efficacy on lung function and may reduce the risk of short-term deterioration compared to monotherapy in symptomatic patients with COPD.,Clinical trial registration: GSK analysis 202066 (NCT01316900/DB2113360, NCT01316913/DB2113374, NCT01777334/ZEP117115).,Funding: This study was funded by GSK.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0430-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | Efficacy and safety of tiotropium+olodaterol fixed-dose combination (FDC) compared with the mono-components was evaluated in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in two replicate, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase III trials.,Patients received tiotropium+olodaterol FDC 2.5/5 μg or 5/5 μg, tiotropium 2.5 μg or 5 μg, or olodaterol 5 μg delivered once-daily via Respimat inhaler over 52 weeks.,Primary end points were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 to 3 h (AUC0-3) response, trough FEV1 response and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at 24 weeks.,In total, 5162 patients (2624 in Study 1237.5 and 2538 in Study 1237.6) received treatment.,Both FDCs significantly improved FEV1 AUC0-3 and trough FEV1 response versus the mono-components in both studies.,Statistically significant improvements in SGRQ total score versus the mono-components were only seen for tiotropium+olodaterol FDC 5/5 μg.,Incidence of adverse events was comparable between the FDCs and the mono-components.,These studies demonstrated significant improvements in lung function and health-related quality of life with once-daily tiotropium+olodaterol FDC versus mono-components over 1 year in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.,Lung function and symptomatic benefits of daily tiotropium+olodaterol fixed-dose combination in moderate to very severe COPDhttp://ow.ly/DIKiY | 1 |
Ferroptosis is a necrotic form of regulated cell death (RCD) mediated by phospholipid peroxidation in association with free iron-mediated Fenton reactions.,Disrupted iron homeostasis resulting in excessive oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Here, we demonstrate the involvement of ferroptosis in COPD pathogenesis.,Our in vivo and in vitro models show labile iron accumulation and enhanced lipid peroxidation with concomitant non-apoptotic cell death during cigarette smoke (CS) exposure, which are negatively regulated by GPx4 activity.,Treatment with deferoxamine and ferrostatin-1, in addition to GPx4 knockdown, illuminate the role of ferroptosis in CS-treated lung epithelial cells.,NCOA4-mediated ferritin selective autophagy (ferritinophagy) is initiated during ferritin degradation in response to CS treatment.,CS exposure models, using both GPx4-deficient and overexpressing mice, clarify the pivotal role of GPx4-regulated cell death during COPD.,These findings support a role for cigarette smoke-induced ferroptosis in the pathogenesis of COPD.,Altered iron homeostasis resulting in excessive oxidative stress has been implicated in smoke-induced lung diseases.,Here the authors show that ferroptosis of lung epithelial cells, potentially resulting from excessive ferritinophagy, is involved in the pathogenesis of COPD. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease and a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide.,The aim of this study was to investigate the sex dependency of circulating metabolic profiles in COPD.,Serum from healthy never-smokers (healthy), smokers with normal lung function (smokers), and smokers with COPD (COPD; Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stages I-II/A-B) from the Karolinska COSMIC cohort (n=116) was analysed using our nontargeted liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry metabolomics platform.,Pathway analyses revealed that several altered metabolites are involved in oxidative stress.,Supervised multivariate modelling showed significant classification of smokers from COPD (p=2.8×10−7).,Sex stratification indicated that the separation was driven by females (p=2.4×10−7) relative to males (p=4.0×10−4).,Significantly altered metabolites were confirmed quantitatively using targeted metabolomics.,Multivariate modelling of targeted metabolomics data confirmed enhanced metabolic dysregulation in females with COPD (p=3.0×10−3) relative to males (p=0.10).,The autotaxin products lysoPA (16:0) and lysoPA (18:2) correlated with lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s) in males with COPD (r=0.86; p<0.0001), but not females (r=0.44; p=0.15), potentially related to observed dysregulation of the miR-29 family in the lung.,These findings highlight the role of oxidative stress in COPD, and suggest that sex-enhanced dysregulation in oxidative stress, and potentially the autotaxin-lysoPA axis, are associated with disease mechanisms and/or prevalence.,Oxidative stress and the autotaxin-lysoPA axis evidence sex-associated metabotypes in the serum of COPD patientshttp://ow.ly/kAeE309MpdI | 1 |
Triple combination therapy involving long-acting muscarinic antagonists long-acting β2 agonists, and inhaled corticosteroids has recently become an option for maintenance treatment of COPD.,Some add-on clinical trials have reported the benefits of these combinations.,However, the process to step up to triple therapy varies for individual cases.,Keio University and affiliated hospitals conducted an observational COPD cohort study, recruiting patients diagnosed as having COPD by pulmonary physicians and those referred for investigation of possible COPD.,Their prescription history and clinical course were retrospectively analyzed based on the physicians’ medical records and patient questionnaires.,This study was registered with UMIN (UMIN000003470, April 10, 2010).,A total of 95 of the 445 COPD patients (21%) were treated with inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2 agonists/long-acting muscarinic antagonists as maintenance therapy, including 12 in COPD Grade I, 31 in Grade II, 38 in Grade III, and 14 in Grade IV, based on the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease spirometric grading.,For more than half of the patients on triple therapy, the treatment had been intensified due to unsatisfactory improvement of symptoms, and 32% were treated with triple therapy due to comorbid asthma.,In contrast, there were COPD patients whose therapy was maintained after starting with triple therapy because of their serious conditions or concurrent exacerbation at diagnosis (8%).,Triple therapy was often prescribed in the real-life management of COPD, even in patients whose airflow limitation was not severe.,To better control symptoms was the major reason for choosing triple therapy, regardless of the severity of COPD, in Japan. | Early identification of patients with a prolonged stay due to acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may reduce risk of adverse event and treatment costs.,This study aimed to identify predictors of prolonged stay after acute exacerbation of COPD based on variables on admission; the study also looked to establish a prediction model for length of stay (LOS).,We extracted demographic and clinical data from the medical records of 599 patients discharged after an acute exacerbation of COPD between March 2006 and December 2008 at Oslo University Hospital, Aker.,We used logistic regression analyses to assess predictors of a length of stay above the 75th percentile and assessed the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve to evaluate the model’s performance.,We included 590 patients (54% women) aged 73.2±10.8 years (mean ± standard deviation) in the analyses.,Median LOS was 6.0 days (interquartile range [IQR] 3.5-11.0).,In multivariate analysis, admission between Thursday and Saturday (odds ratio [OR] 2.24 [95% CI 1.60-3.51], P<0.001), heart failure (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.34-3.80), diabetes (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.07-3.37), stroke (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.04-3.21), high arterial PCO2 (OR 1.26 [95% CI 1.13-1.41], P<0.001), and low serum albumin level (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.87-0.97], P=0.001) were associated with a LOS >11 days.,The statistical model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.73.,Admission between Thursday and Saturday, heart failure, diabetes, stroke, high arterial PCO2, and low serum albumin level were associated with a prolonged LOS.,These findings may help physicians to identify patients that will need a prolonged LOS in the early stages of admission.,However, the predictive model exhibited suboptimal performance and hence is not ready for clinical use. | 1 |
As lung function declines rapidly in the early stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the effects of bronchodilators in patients with moderate disease and those who have not previously received maintenance therapy are of interest.,OTEMTO® 1 and 2 were two replicate, 12-week, Phase III studies investigating the benefit of tiotropium + olodaterol on lung function and quality of life in patients with moderate to severe disease.,Post hoc analyses were performed to assess the benefits for patients according to disease severity and treatment history.,Four subgroup analyses were performed: Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2/3, GOLD A/B/C/D, treatment naive/not treatment naive and receiving inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) at baseline/not receiving ICS at baseline.,Primary end points were change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 to 3 h response, change in trough FEV1 and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score.,Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score was a secondary end point, and SGRQ and TDI responder analyses were further end points; all were assessed at 12 weeks.,In all subgroups, patients receiving tiotropium + olodaterol responded better overall than those receiving tiotropium monotherapy.,Improvements with tiotropium + olodaterol over placebo or tiotropium monotherapy were noted across GOLD 2/3 and GOLD A/B/C/D; however, improvements in SGRQ total score were most evident in the GOLD B subgroup.,Moreover, lung-function outcomes were generally greater in those patients who had been receiving previous long-acting bronchodilator and/or ICS maintenance treatment.,These data suggest that tiotropium + olodaterol should be considered as a treatment option in patients with moderate COPD who are initiating maintenance therapy, as well as those with more severe disease.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01964352 and NCT02006732.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-016-0387-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | Aclidinium/formoterol is a twice-daily (BID) fixed-dose combination (FDC) in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The efficacy and safety of aclidinium/formoterol versus monotherapy and placebo in patients with COPD was assessed.,In this 24-week double-blind, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled, multicentre Phase III study, patients (≥40 years, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]/forced vital capacity <70% and FEV1 ≥30% but <80% predicted normal) were randomised 2:2:2:2:1 to aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg (n = 385) or 400/6 μg (n = 381), aclidinium 400 μg (n = 385), formoterol 12 μg (n = 384) or placebo (n = 194) BID via Genuair®/Pressair®a.,At Week 24, aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg and 400/6 μg lead to significant improvements from baseline in 1-hour post-dose FEV1 versus aclidinium (125 mL [95% CI: 90, 160; p < 0 · 001] and 69 mL [95% CI: 34, 105; p < 0.001], respectively) and trough FEV1 versus formoterol (85 mL [95% CI: 51, 119; p < 0.001] and 53 mL [95% CI: 19, 87; p < 0.01], respectively; co-primary endpoints).,Additionally, aclidinium/formoterol 400/12 μg and 400/6 μg provided significant improvements in Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score versus placebo (1.29 units [95% CI: 0.73, 1.86; p < 0.001] and 1.16 units [95% CI: 0.59, 1.73; p < 0.001], respectively; secondary endpoint).,All treatments were well tolerated, with safety profiles of the FDCs similar to those of placebo and monotherapy.,Both aclidinium/formoterol BID doses significantly improved bronchodilation versus monotherapy, and dyspnoea versus placebo, with no increase in safety risk.,Aclidinium/formoterol may be an effective treatment for patients with COPD.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01462942.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-178) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by chronic airway inflammation, mucus hypersecretion, and emphysema, which lead to reduced lung function and breathlessness.,The pathologies of COPD are due to an abnormal immune response.,Invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells are an important population of innate lymphocytes and have been implicated in the regulation of immune responses associated with a broad range of diseases including COPD.,We have here analyzed the role of iNKT cells in a model of COPD induced by repeated intranasal administration of iNKT cell agonist α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer).,Our results demonstrated that mice that received repeated intranasal administration of α-GalCer had molecular and inflammatory features of COPD including airway inflammation with significant increases in infiltration of macrophages and lymphocytes, CD8+ T cells, as well as proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α.,In particular, these mice also showed the presence of pulmonary emphysema, mucus production, and pulmonary fibrosis.,Furthermore, neutralization of IL-4 reduced α-GalCer induced emphysema.,This study indicates the importance of iNKT cells in the pathogenesis of COPD by an IL-4 dependent mechanism. | Asthma and COPD are characterized by airway dysfunction and inflammation.,Neutrophilic airway inflammation is a common feature of COPD and is recognized in asthma, particularly in severe disease.,The T helper (Th) 17 cytokines IL-17A and IL-17F have been implicated in the development of neutrophilic airway inflammation, but their expression in asthma and COPD is uncertain.,We assessed IL-17A and IL-17F expression in the bronchial submucosa from 30 subjects with asthma, 10 ex-smokers with mild to moderate COPD, and 27 nonsmoking and 14 smoking control subjects.,Sputum IL-17 concentration was measured in 165 subjects with asthma and 27 with COPD.,The median (interquartile range) IL-17A cells/mm2 submucosa was increased in mild to moderate asthma (2.1 [2.4]) compared with healthy control subjects (0.4 [2.8]) but not in severe asthma (P = .04).,In COPD, IL-17A+ cells/mm2 submucosa were increased (0.5 [3.7]) compared with nonsmoking control subjects (0 [0]) but not compared with smoking control subjects (P = .046).,IL-17F+ cells/mm2 submucosa were increased in severe asthma (2.7 [3.6]) and mild to moderate asthma (1.6 [1.0]) compared with healthy controls subjects (0.7 [1.4]) (P = .001) but was not increased in subjects with COPD.,IL-17A and IL-17F were not associated with increased neutrophilic inflammation, but IL-17F was correlated with the submucosal eosinophil count (rs = 0.5, P = .005).,The sputum IL-17 concentration in COPD was increased compared with asthma (2 [0-7] pg/mL vs 0 [0-2] pg/mL, P < .0001) and was correlated with post-bronchodilator FEV1% predicted (r = −0.5, P = .008) and FEV1/FVC (r = −0.4, P = .04).,Our findings support a potential role for the Th17 cytokines IL-17A and IL-17F in asthma and COPD, but do not demonstrate a relationship with neutrophilic inflammation. | 1 |
This study aimed to characterize and differentiate the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy 2011 cut points through the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT).,Analysis of COPD patient data from the 2012 Adelphi Respiratory Disease Specific Program was conducted in Europe and US.,Matched data from physicians and patients included CAT and mMRC scores.,Receiver operating characteristic curves and kappa analysis determined a cut point for CAT and mMRC alignment and thus defined patient movement (“movers”) within GOLD groups A-D, depending on the tool used.,Logistic regression analysis, with a number of physician- and patient-reported covariates, characterized those movers.,Comparing GOLD-defined high-symptom patients using mMRC and CAT cut points (≥2 and ≥10, respectively), there were 890 (53.65%) movers; 887 of them (99.66%) moved from less symptomatic GOLD groups A and C (using mMRC) to more symptomatic groups B and D (using CAT).,For receiver operating characteristic (area under the curve: 0.82, P<0.001) and kappa (maximized: 0.45) recommended CAT cut points of ≥24 and ≥26, movers reduced to 429 and 403 patients, respectively.,Logistic regression analysis showed variables significantly associated with movers were related to impact on normal life, age, cough, and sleep (all P<0.05).,Within movers, direction of movement was significantly associated with the same variables (all P<0.05).,Use of current mMRC or CAT cut points leads to inconsistencies for COPD assessment classification.,It is recommended that cut points are aligned and both tools administered simultaneously for optimal patient care and to allow for closer management of movers.,Our research may suggest an opportunity to investigate a combined score approach to patient management based on the worst result of mMRC and CAT.,The reduced number of remaining movers may then identify patients who have greater impact of disease and may require a more personalized treatment plan. | Little is known about the longitudinal changes associated with using the 2013 update of the multidimensional GOLD strategy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,To determine the COPD patient distribution of the new GOLD proposal and evaluate how this classification changes over one year compared with the previous GOLD staging based on spirometry only.,We analyzed data from the CHAIN study, a multicenter observational Spanish cohort of COPD patients who are monitored annually.,Categories were defined according to the proposed GOLD: FEV1%, mMRC dyspnea, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), and exacerbations-hospitalizations.,One-year follow-up information was available for all variables except CCQ data.,At baseline, 828 stable COPD patients were evaluated.,On the basis of mMRC dyspnea versus CAT, the patients were distributed as follows: 38.2% vs.,27.2% in group A, 17.6% vs.,28.3% in group B, 15.8% vs.,12.9% in group C, and 28.4% vs.,31.6% in group D.,Information was available for 526 patients at one year: 64.2% of patients remained in the same group but groups C and D show different degrees of variability.,The annual progression by group was mainly associated with one-year changes in CAT scores (RR, 1.138; 95%CI: 1.074-1.206) and BODE index values (RR, 2.012; 95%CI: 1.487-2.722).,In the new GOLD grading classification, the type of tool used to determine the level of symptoms can substantially alter the group assignment.,A change in category after one year was associated with longitudinal changes in the CAT and BODE index. | 1 |
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) improves survival among patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure in hospital, but evidence for its use in domiciliary settings is limited.,A patient’s underlying risk of having an exacerbation may affect any potential benefit that can be gained from domiciliary NIV.,This is the first comprehensive systematic review to stratify patients based on a proxy for exacerbation risk: patients in a stable state and those immediately post-exacerbation hospitalization.,A systematic review of nonrandomized and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was undertaken in order to compare the relative effectiveness of different types of domiciliary NIV and usual care on hospital admissions, mortality, and health-related quality of life.,Standard systematic review methods were used for identifying studies (until September 2014), quality appraisal, and synthesis.,Data were presented in forest plots and pooled where appropriate using random-effects meta-analysis.,Thirty-one studies were included.,For stable patients, there was no evidence of a survival benefit from NIV (relative risk [RR] 0.88 [0.55, 1.43], I2=60.4%, n=7 RCTs), but there was a possible trend toward fewer hospitalizations (weighted mean difference −0.46 [−1.02, 0.09], I2=59.2%, n=5 RCTs) and improved health-related quality of life.,For posthospital patients, survival benefit could not be demonstrated within the three RCTs (RR 0.89 [0.53, 1.49], I2=25.1%), although there was evidence of benefit from four non-RCTs (RR 0.45 [0.32, 0.65], I2=0%).,Effects on hospitalizations were inconsistent.,Post hoc analyses suggested that NIV-related improvements in hypercapnia were associated with reduced hospital admissions across both populations.,Little data were available comparing different types of NIV.,The effectiveness of domiciliary NIV remains uncertain; however, some patients may benefit.,Further research is required to identify these patients and to explore the relevance of improvements in hypercapnia in influencing clinical outcomes.,Optimum time points for commencing domiciliary NIV and equipment settings need to be established. | The use of domiciliary noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure has yielded variable effects on survival, quality of life, and dyspnea.,We hypothesized that use of NPPV in stable COPD and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) <52 mmHg might result in improvement in quality of life and dyspnea.,Thirty patients with stable COPD (forced expiratory volume in the first second <50% predicted and PaCO2 <52 mmHg) were prospectively randomized to receive domiciliary NPPV (bilevel positive airway pressure, 15/5 cm H2O) or usual therapy for 6 months.,Measurements were made at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months.,Primary outcomes were quality of life as assessed by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ), and dyspnea as measured by the Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI).,Fifteen subjects in the NPPV arm and 12 controls completed all the study visits.,At 6 weeks and 3 months, the NPPV arm showed significant improvement in TDI total score.,However, this effect persisted only in the TDI-Task at 6 months (P=0.03).,NPPV use was associated with a small improvement in the CRQ-Mastery domain (0.6 versus −0.1, P=0.04).,The arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) in the control arm worsened over the period of the study, whereas it remained stable in the NPPV arm (change −7.2 mmHg versus +2.1 mmHg, respectively, P=0.02).,NPPV resulted in a small improvement in quality of life indices in stable COPD patients with PaCO2 <52 mmHg.,Future larger studies will clarify the role of NPPV in this stable subgroup of patients with COPD. | 1 |
There is an ongoing debate on whether patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) seen in real-life clinical settings are represented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of COPD.,It is thought that the stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria of RCTs may prevent the participation of patients with specific characteristics or risk factors.,We surveyed a database of patients recruited into 35 placebo-controlled tiotropium RCTs and also conducted a systematic literature review of large-scale observational studies conducted in patients with a documented diagnosis of COPD between 1990 and 2013.,Patient demographics and comorbidities with a high prevalence in patients with COPD were compared between the two patient populations at baseline.,Using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA; v 14.0), patient comorbidities in the pooled tiotropium RCTs were classified according to system organ class, pharmacovigilance (PV) endpoints, and Standardised MedDRA Queries to enable comparison with the observational studies.,We identified 24,555 patients in the pooled tiotropium RCTs and 61,361 patients among the 13 observational studies that met our search criteria.,The Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) staging of patients in the RCTs differed from that in observational studies: the proportion of patients with GOLD stages I+II disease ranged from 40.0% to 51.5% in the RCTs but 24.5% to 44.1% in the observational studies; for GOLD stage III or IV disease these ranges were 7.2%-45.8% (RCTs) and 13.7-42.1% (observational studies).,The comorbidities with the highest prevalence reported in the RCTs and observational studies were: hypertension (39.4%-40.0% vs 40.1%-60.6%), other ischemic heart disease (12.3%-14.2% vs 12.5%-41.0%), diabetes (10.3%-10.9% vs 4.0%-38.9%), depression (8.5%-9.5% vs 17.0%-20.6%), and cardiac arrhythmia (7.8%-11.4% vs 11.3%-15.8%).,The clinical profile of COPD patients treated in the tiotropium trial program appears to be largely in the range of clinical characteristics, including cardiovascular comorbidities, reported for “real-life patients.”,The tiotropium RCTs tended to include patients with more severe disease than the observational studies. | Two once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) are currently available for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) - tiotropium and glycopyrronium.,Previous studies have compared glycopyrronium with open-label tiotropium.,In the GLOW5 study, we compare glycopyrronium with blinded tiotropium.,In this blinded, double-dummy, parallel group, 12-week study, patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized 1:1 to glycopyrronium 50 μg once daily or tiotropium 18 μg once daily.,The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of glycopyrronium versus blinded tiotropium with respect to trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) following 12 weeks of treatment (non-inferiority margin: -50 mL).,Secondary objectives were to evaluate glycopyrronium versus tiotropium for other spirometric outcomes, breathlessness (Transition Dyspnea Index; TDI), health status (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; SGRQ), daily rescue medication use, COPD exacerbations and COPD symptoms over 12 weeks of treatment.,657 patients were randomized (glycopyrronium: 327; tiotropium: 330); 96% (630 patients) completed the study.,Least squares mean trough FEV1 for both glycopyrronium and tiotropium was 1.405 L at Week 12, meeting the criterion for non-inferiority (mean treatment difference: 0 mL, 95% CI: -32, 31 mL).,Glycopyrronium demonstrated rapid bronchodilation following first dose on Day 1, with significantly higher FEV1 at all time points from 0-4 h post-dose versus tiotropium (all p < 0.001).,FEV1 area under the curve from 0-4 h (AUC0-4h) post-dose with glycopyrronium was significantly superior to tiotropium on Day 1 (p < 0.001) and was comparable to tiotropium at Week 12.,Glycopyrronium demonstrated comparable improvements to tiotropium in TDI focal score, SGRQ total score, rescue medication use and the rate of COPD exacerbations (all p = not significant).,Patients on glycopyrronium also had a significantly lower total COPD symptom score versus patients on tiotropium after 12 weeks (p = 0.035).,Adverse events were reported by a similar percentage of patients receiving glycopyrronium (40.4%) and tiotropium (40.6%).,In patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, 12-week blinded treatment with once-daily glycopyrronium 50 μg or tiotropium 18 μg, provided similar efficacy and safety, with glycopyrronium having a faster onset of action on Day 1 versus tiotropium.,ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01613326 | 1 |
There is increasing recognition of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS), which shares some features of both asthma and COPD; however, the prevalence and characteristics of ACOS are not well understood.,The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of ACOS among patients with COPD and its characteristics using a stepwise approach as stated in the recent report of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD).,This multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study enrolled outpatients who were receiving medical treatment for COPD.,Clinical data, including spirometry results, were retrieved from medical records.,For symptom assessment, patients were asked to complete the Clinical COPD questionnaire and the modified British Medical Research Council questionnaire.,Of the 1,008 patients analyzed, 167 (16.6%) had syndromic features of ACOS.,Of the total number of patients, 93 and 42 (9.2% and 4.2%) also had a predefined clinical variability of ≥12%/≥200 mL and ≥12%/≥400 mL in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), respectively, and therefore were identified as having ACOS.,Conversely, the number of patients who had either syndromic or spirometric feature of ACOS was 595 (59.0%, ≥12%/≥200 mL FEV1 clinical variability), and 328 patients (32.5%, ≥12%/≥400 mL FEV1 clinical variability) had both the features.,Patients identified as having ACOS were of significantly younger age, had a shorter duration of COPD, lower number of pack-years, better lung function, milder dyspnea symptoms, and higher peripheral blood eosinophil values compared with patients with COPD alone.,The rate of exacerbations in the previous year was not significantly different between the ACOS and COPD groups.,Using a stepwise approach, as stated in the GINA/GOLD report, the proportions of patients identified as having ACOS were found to be 9.2% and 4.2% (depending on the FEV1 variability cutoff used) among the 1,008 outpatients medically treated for COPD in a real-life clinical setting. | The COPD assessment test (CAT) consists of eight nonspecific scores of quality of life.,The aim of this study was to compare the health-related quality of life and severity of airflow limitation in patients with asthma, COPD, and asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) using the CAT.,We examined CAT and lung functions in 138 patients with asthma, 99 patients with COPD, 51 patients with ACOS, and 44 patients with chronic cough as a control.,The CAT score was recorded in all subjects, and the asthma control test was also administered to patients with asthma and ACOS.,The CAT scores were compared, and the relationships between the scores and lung function parameters were analyzed.,The total CAT scores and scores for cough, phlegm, and dyspnea were higher in patients with ACOS than in patients with asthma and COPD.,The total CAT scores were correlated with the percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second only in patients with COPD.,The total CAT scores and dyspnea scores adjusted by the percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second were higher in patients with ACOS than in patients with COPD and asthma.,The CAT scores and asthma control test scores were more closely correlated in patients with ACOS than in patients with asthma.,Patients with ACOS have higher disease impacts and dyspnea sensation unproportional to the severity of airflow limitation. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with changes in the composition and function of peripheral and respiratory muscles, which can negatively impact quality of life.,Ultrasonography can provide a non-invasive evaluation of the integrity of both peripheral muscles and diaphragm, but its use in patients with COPD is still being investigated.,We aimed at evaluating the relationship between quadriceps size, using ultrasonography and symptoms, lung function and diaphragm contractility in a cohort of patients with COPD.,COPD patients were prospectively recruited and ultrasonography of the dominant quadriceps and of the diaphragm was performed.,Quadriceps size was evaluated using three measurements: 1) cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris (Qcsa), 2) thickness (Qthick) and 3) contractile index (Qci), defined as the ratio of quadriceps thickness/total anterior thigh thickness.,Diaphragm contractility was evaluated using thickening fraction (TFdi).,Clinical characteristics and number of moderate-to-severe exacerbations in the previous year were retrieved from medical files.,Dyspnea (mMRC scale) and disease impact on health status (COPD Assessment Test (CAT)) were measured at inclusion.,Fat-free mass index (FFMI) was assessed using bioelectrical impedance.,Forty patients were recruited (20 males, mean age and FEV1 66±6 years and 49±17%predicted, respectively).,Mean Qcsa, Qthick and Qci were 336±145 mm2, 1.55±0.53 cm and 64±16%, respectively, and mean TFdi was 91±36%.,Qci was significantly correlated with FFMI (rho=0.59, p=0.001), TFdi (rho=0.41, p=0.008), FEV1 (rho=0.43, p=0.001) but not with age (rho=0.18, p=0.28).,Qci was significantly correlated to CAT score (rho=−0.47, p=0.002), even when controlled for FEV1, and was lower in patients with an mMRC score ≥2 (55±15 vs 70±14%, p=0.002).,Qcsa and Qci were significantly lower in patients with frequent exacerbations.,In a multiple linear regression analysis that included age, gender, FFMI, FEV1 and TFdi, only FFMI and TFdi were found to be significantly related to lower Qci values.,In patients with COPD, ultrasound evaluation of the quadriceps contractile index is feasible and related to disease severity, clinical symptoms, exacerbation history and diaphragm contractility.,As such, it may provide a novel tool for the evaluation of the severity and burden of the disease in this population.,Further studies are required to better delineate its potential role as a prognostic marker in this population. | Since forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) shows a weak correlation with patients’ symptoms in COPD, some volume parameters may better reflect the change in dyspnea symptoms after treatment.,In this article, we investigated the role of inspiratory capacity (IC) on dyspnea evaluation among COPD patients with or without emphysematous lesions.,In this prospective study, 124 patients with stable COPD were recruited.,During the baseline visit, patients performed pulmonary function tests and dyspnea evaluation using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale.,Partial patients underwent quantitative computerized tomography scans under physicians’ recommendations, and emphysematous changes were assessed using the emphysema index (EI; low attenuation area [LAA]% −950).,These subjects were then divided into the emphysema-predominant group (LAA% −950≥9.9%) and the non-emphysema-predominant group (LAA% −950<9.9%).,After treatment for ~1 month, subjects returned for reevaluation of both pulmonary function parameters and dyspnea severity.,Correlation analysis between the change in IC (ΔIC) and dyspnea (ΔmMRC) was performed.,Correlation analysis revealed that ΔIC was negatively correlated with ΔmMRC (correlation coefficient [cc], −0.490, P<0.001) in the total study population, which was stronger than that between ΔFEV1 and ΔmMRC (cc, −0.305, P=0.001).,Patients with absolute ΔmMRC >1 were more likely to exhibit a marked increase in IC (≥300 mL) than those with absolute ΔmMRC ≤1 (74.36% versus 35.29%; odds ratio [OR], 5.317; P<0.001).,In the emphysema-predominant group, only ΔIC strongly correlated with ΔmMRC (cc, −0.459, P=0.005), while ΔFEV1 did not (P>0.05).,IC could serve as an effective complement to FEV1 in COPD patients undergoing dyspnea evaluation after treatment.,For COPD patients with predominant emphysematous lesions, an increase in IC is particularly more suitable for explaining dyspnea relief than FEV1. | 1 |
Pneumonia may be a major contributor to hospitalizations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation and influence their outcomes.,We examined hospitalization rates, health resource utilization, 30-day mortality, and risk of subsequent hospitalizations for COPD exacerbations with and without pneumonia in Denmark during 2006-2012.,We identified 179,759 hospitalizations for COPD exacerbations, including 52,520 first-time hospitalizations (29.2%).,Pneumonia was frequent in first-time exacerbations (36.1%), but declined in successive exacerbations to 25.6% by the seventh or greater exacerbation.,Pneumonic COPD exacerbations increased 20% from 0.92 per 1,000 population in 2006 to 1.10 per 1,000 population in 2012.,Nonpneumonic exacerbations decreased by 6% from 1.74 per 1,000 population to 1.63 per 1,000 population during the same period.,A number of markers of health resource utilization were more prevalent in pneumonic exacerbations than in nonpneumonic exacerbations: length of stay (median 7 vs 4 days), intensive care unit admission (7.7% vs 12.5%), and several acute procedures.,Thirty-day mortality was 12.1% in first-time pneumonic COPD exacerbations versus 8.3% in first-time nonpneumonic cases (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.24).,Pneumonia also predicted increased mortality associated with a second exacerbation (aHR 1.14, 95% CI 1.11-1.18), and up to a seventh or greater exacerbation (aHR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07-1.13).,In contrast, the aHR of a subsequent exacerbation was 8%-13% lower for patients with pneumonic exacerbations.,Pneumonia is frequent among patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbations and is associated with increased health care utilization and higher mortality.,Nonpneumonic COPD exacerbations predict increased risk of subsequent exacerbations. | COPD exacerbations and hospitalizations have been associated with poor prognosis for the COPD patient.,To evaluate the frequency and risk factors of COPD exacerbations, hospitalizations, and admissions to intensive care units (ICUs) in Greece by a nationwide cross-sectional study.,A nationwide observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in the clinical practice setting of respiratory medicine physicians over a 6 month-period (October 2010 to March 2011).,A total of 6,125 COPD patients were recruited by 199 respiratory physicians.,Participants had a median age of 68.0 years, 71.3% were males, and 71.8% suffered from comorbidities.,The median disease duration was 10.0 years.,Of the patients, 45.3% were classified as having GOLD (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) stage III or IV COPD.,Patients with four or more comorbidities had 78.5% and threefold-higher than expected number of exacerbations and hospitalizations, respectively, as well as fivefold-higher risk of admission to the ICU compared to those with no comorbidities.,Obese patients had 6.2% fewer expected exacerbations compared to those with a normal body mass index.,Patients with GOLD stage IV had 74.5% and fivefold-higher expected number of exacerbations and hospitalizations, respectively, and nearly threefold-higher risk of admission to the ICU compared to stage I patients.,An additional risk factor for exacerbations and hospitalizations was low compliance with treatment: 45% of patients reported forgetting to take their medication, and 81% reported a preference for a treatment with a lower dosing frequency.,Comorbidities, disease severity, and compliance with treatment were identified as the most notable risk factors for exacerbations, hospitalizations, and ICU admissions.,The results point to the need for a multifactorial approach for the COPD patient and for the development of strategies that can increase patient compliance with treatment. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the main contributors to the global burden of disease.,The aim of this systematic review was to quantify the disease burden of COPD in China and to determine the risk factors of the disease.,The number of studies included in the review was 47 with an average quality assessment score of 7.70 out of 10.,Reported COPD prevalence varied between 1.20% and 8.87% in different provinces/cities across China.,The prevalence rate of COPD was higher among men (7.76%) than women (4.07%).,The disease was more prevalent in rural areas (7.62%) than in urban areas (6.09%).,The diagnostic rate of COPD patients in China varied from 23.61% to 30.00%.,The percentage of COPD patients receiving outpatient treatment was around 50%, while the admission rate ranged between 8.78% and 35.60%.,Tobacco exposure and biomass fuel/solid fuel usage were documented as two important risk factors of COPD.,COPD ranked among the top three leading causes of death in China.,The direct medical cost of COPD ranged from 72 to 3,565 USD per capita per year, accounting for 33.33% to 118.09% of local average annual income.,The most commonly used scales for the assessment of quality of life (QoL) included Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire, Airways Questionnaire 20, SF-36, and their revised versions.,The status of QoL was worse among COPD patients than in non-COPD patients, and COPD patients were at higher risks of depression.,The COPD burden in China was high in terms of economic burden and QoL.,In view of the high smoking rate and considerable concerns related to air pollution and smog in China, countermeasures need to be taken to improve disease prevention and management to reduce disease burdens raised by COPD. | During 2007-2010, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted a spirometry component which obtained pre-bronchodilator pulmonary lung function data on a nationally representative sample of US adults aged 6-79 years and post-bronchodilator pulmonary lung function data for the subset of adults with airflow limitation.,The goals of this study were to 1) compute prevalence estimates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator spirometry measurements and fixed ratio and lower limit of normal (LLN) diagnostic criteria and 2) examine the potential impact of nonresponse on the estimates.,This analysis was limited to those aged 40-79 years who were eligible for NHANES pre-bronchodilator spirometry (n=7,104).,Examinees with likely airflow limitation were further eligible for post-bronchodilator testing (n=1,110).,Persons were classified as having COPD based on FEV1/FVC < 70% (fixed ratio) or FEV1/FVC < lower limit of normal (LLN) based on person’s age, sex, height, and race/ethnicity.,Those without spirometry but self-reporting both daytime supplemental oxygen therapy plus emphysema and/or current chronic bronchitis were also classified as having COPD.,The final analytic samples for pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator analyses were 77.1% (n=5,477) and 50.8% (n=564) of those eligible, respectively.,To account for non-response, NHANES examination weights were adjusted to the eligible pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator subpopulations.,In 2007-2010, using the fixed ratio criterion and pre-bronchodilator test results, COPD prevalence was 20.9% (SE 1.1) among US adults aged 40-79 years.,Applying the same criterion to post-bronchodilator test results, prevalence was 14.0% (SE 1.0).,Using the LLN criterion and pre-bronchodilator test results, the COPD prevalence was 15.4% (SE 0.8), while applying the same criterion to post-bronchodilator test results, prevalence was 10.2% (SE 0.8).,The overall COPD prevalence among US adults aged 40-79 years varied from 10.2% to 20.9% based on whether pre- or post-bronchodilator values were used and which diagnostic criterion (fixed ratio or LLN) was applied.,The overall prevalence decreased by approximately 33% when airflow limitation was based on post-bronchodilator as compared to pre-bronchodilator spirometry, regardless of which diagnostic criterion was used. | 1 |
It has been suggested that withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in COPD patients on maintenance treatment results in deterioration of symptoms, lung function and exacerbations.,The aim of this real-life, prospective, multicentric study was to investigate whether withdrawal of ICS in COPD patients at low risk of exacerbation is linked to a deterioration in lung function and symptoms and to a higher frequency of exacerbations.,914 COPD patients, on maintenance therapy with bronchodilators and ICS, FEV1>50% predicted, and <2 exacerbations/year were recruited.,Upon decision of the primary physicians, 59% of patients continued their ICS treatment whereas in 41% of patients ICS were withdrawn and regular therapy was continued with long-acting bronchodilators mostly (91% of patients).,FEV1, CAT (COPD Assessment Test), and occurrence of exacerbations were measured at the beginning (T0) and at the end (T6) of the 6 months observational period.,816 patients (89.3%) concluded the study.,FEV1, CAT and exacerbations history were similar in the two groups (ICS and no ICS) at T0 and at T6.,We did not observe any deterioration of lung function symptoms, and exacerbation rate between the two groups at T0 and T6.,We conclude that the withdrawal of ICS, in COPD patients at low risk of exacerbation, can be safe provided that patients are left on maintenance treatment with long-acting bronchodilators. | Recent literature has suggested that emphysema and chronic bronchitis, traditionally considered to be entities overlapping within chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), may be distinct disorders.,Few studies have examined the differences in patient characteristics and health outcomes between these conditions.,This study examined whether COPD phenotypes represent distinct patient populations, in a large nationally representative US sample.,Data were obtained from the 2010 US National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS).,NHWS respondents (n = 75,000) were categorized as a COPD phenotype based on their self-reported diagnosis of COPD only (n = 970), emphysema only (n = 399), or chronic bronchitis only (n = 2071).,Phenotypes were compared on demographics, health characteristics, treatment patterns, health outcomes, work productivity, and resource use.,Variables were compared using Chi-square and analysis of variance tests for categorical and continuous outcomes, respectively.,Health outcomes were also examined using regression modeling, controlling for demographic and health characteristic covariates.,Patients with chronic bronchitis were significantly younger (51.38 years versus 63.24 years for COPD versus 63.30 years for emphysema, P < 0.05) and more likely to be employed (46.98% versus 23.81% for COPD versus 28.33% for emphysema, P < 0.05).,Relative to the other phenotypes, patients with chronic bronchitis were also significantly more likely to be female, nonwhite, and to exercise currently (all P < 0.05), and were significantly less likely to be a current or former smoker (P < 0.05).,Controlling for demographic and health characteristics, patients self-identified as having COPD only reported significantly worse physical quality of life (adjusted mean 36.69) and health utilities (adjusted mean 0.65) and significantly more absenteeism (adjusted mean 7.08%), presenteeism (adjusted mean 30.73%), overall work impairment (adjusted mean 34.06%), and activity impairment (adjusted mean 46.59%) than the other phenotypes (all P < 0.05).,These results suggest considerable heterogeneity among different COPD phenotypes with respect to demographics, health characteristics, disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and health outcomes.,Research aimed at understanding the differences in patient characteristics and disease presentation of these phenotypes could be used to guide treatment recommendations. | 1 |
The relationship between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes remains incompletely understood.,This study evaluated diabetes risk and post-diabetes outcomes in COPD patients with and without exacerbations.,We identified 4671 adults newly diagnosed with COPD exacerbations and 9342 adults newly diagnosed with COPD without exacerbations during 2000-2008 using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database.,A comparison cohort of 18684 adults without COPD, matched by age and sex, was randomly selected from the same dataset for the control group.,Diabetes events during 2000-2013 were ascertained from medical claims during the follow-up period.,Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of diabetes associated with COPD with or without exacerbations were calculated.,We conducted another nested cohort study of 395516 patients with diabetes hospitalization during 2002-2013 and calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of histories of COPD and COPD exacerbations associated with adverse events after diabetes admission.,During the follow-up period, the incidences of diabetes for patients without COPD and for patients with COPD without or with exacerbations were 3.4, 4.1 and 7.4 per 1000 person-years, respectively (P < 0.0001).,Increased risk of diabetes for patients with COPD without exacerbations (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.17) and COPD with exacerbations (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.88-2.52) was noted.,Post-diabetes pneumonia (OR 3.28, 95% CI 3.13-3.43), intensive care admission (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.26-1.39) and mortality (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.88-2.25) were associated with COPD exacerbations.,Prevention and intervention strategies for diabetes and post-diabetes outcomes are needed for this susceptible population. | Inadequate housing, low family income, household smoking, personal smoking status, and poor schooling are some of the conditions that have been significantly associated with the prevalence and incidence of chronic bronchitis.,The aim of the current study was to determine the prevalence of chronic bronchitis (CB) and associated risk factors among First Nations people.,An interviewer-administered survey was conducted as part of the First Nations Lung Health Project in 2012 and 2013 with 874 individuals from 406 households in two First Nations communities located in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada.,The questionnaire collected information on individual and contextual determinants of health and a history of ever diagnosed with CB (outcome variable) from the two communities participating in the First Nations Lung Health Project.,Clustering effect within households was adjusted using Generalized Estimating Equations.,The prevalence of CB was 8.9% and 6.8% among residents (18 years and older) of community A and community B respectively and was not significantly different.,CB prevalence was positively associated with odour or musty smell of mildew/mould in the house [ORadj (95% CI) = 2.33 (1.21, 4.50)], allergy to house dust [3.49 (1.75, 6.97)], an air conditioner in home [2.33 (1.18, 4.24)], and increasing age [0.99 (0.33, 2.95), 4.26 (1.74, 10.41), 6.08 (2.58, 14.33)].,An interaction exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in the house*body mass index showed that exposure to household smoke increased the risk of CB for overweight and obese participants (borderline).,Some of the variables of interest were not significantly associated with the prevalence of CB in multivariable analysis, possibly due to small numbers.,Our results suggest that significant determinants of CB were: increasing age; odour or musty smell of mildew/mould in the house; allergy to house dust; and, body mass index.,Modifiable risk factors identified were: (i) community level-housing conditions (such as mould or mildew in home, exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in house); and, (ii) policy level-remediation of mould, and obesity.,Not applicable. | 1 |
In the combined use of bronchodilators of different classes, ie, long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), bronchodilation is obtained both directly, through LABA-mediated stimulation of β2-adrenergic receptors, and indirectly, through LAMA-mediated inhibition of acetylcholine action at muscarinic receptors.,The clinical trial data for LABAs/LAMAs in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continue to be promising, and these combinations will provide the convenience of delivering the two major bronchodilator classes, recommended as first-line maintenance options in COPD treatment guidelines.,COPD is a complex condition that has pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations.,These clinical manifestations are highly variable, and several are associated with different responses to currently available therapies.,The concept of a COPD phenotype is rapidly evolving from one focusing on the clinical characteristics to one linking the underlying biology to the phenotype of the disease.,Identification of the peculiarities of the different COPD phenotypes will permit us to implement a more personalized treatment in which the patient’s characteristics, together with his or her genotype, will be key to choosing the best treatment option.,At present in Japan, fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and LABAs are frequently prescribed in the earlier stages of COPD.,However, ICSs increase the risk of pneumonia.,Notably, 10%-30% of patients with COPD with or without a history of asthma have persistent circulating and airway eosinophilia associated with an increased risk of exacerbations and sensitivity to steroids.,Thus, sputum or blood eosinophil counts might identify a subpopulation in which ICSs could have potentially deleterious effects as well as a subpopulation that benefits from ICSs.,In this review, I propose one plausible approach to position ICSs and LABAs/LAMAs in clinical practice, based on both the extent of airflow obstruction and the presence of an asthma component or airway eosinophilic inflammation.,This approach is a tentative move toward personalized treatment for COPD patients, and with progress in knowledge and developments in physiology, lung imaging, medical biology, and genetics, identification of COPD phenotypes that provide prognostic and therapeutic information that can affect clinically meaningful outcomes is an urgent medical need. | An association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and tuberculosis (TB) has been described, mainly due to smoking and corticosteroid use.,Whether inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy is associated with an increased risk of TB remains unclear.,We selected COPD cases by using six diagnostic scenarios and control subjects from a nationwide health insurance database, and applied time-dependent Cox regression analysis to identify the risk factors for TB.,Among 1,000,000 beneficiaries, 23,594 COPD cases and 47,188 non-COPD control subjects were selected.,Cox regression analysis revealed that age, male gender, diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal disease, and cirrhosis, as well as COPD (hazard ratio = 2.468 [2.205-2.762]) were independent risk factors for TB.,Among the COPD cases, those who developed TB received more oral corticosteroids and oral β-agonists.,Time-dependent Cox regression analysis revealed that age, male gender, diabetes mellitus, low income, oral corticosteroid dose, and oral β-agonist dose, but not ICS dose, were independent risk factors for TB.,The identified risk factors and their hazard ratios were similar among the COPD cases selected using different scenarios.,Keeping a high suspicion and regularly monitoring for the development of pulmonary TB in COPD patients are necessary, especially for those receiving higher doses of oral corticosteroids and other COPD medications.,Although ICS therapy has been shown to predispose COPD patients to pneumonia in large randomized clinical trials, it does not increase the risk of TB in real world practice. | 1 |
The aims of this systematic review were to determine which blood-based molecules have been evaluated as possible biomarkers to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations (AECOPD) and to ascertain the quality of these biomarker publications.,Patients of interest were those that have been diagnosed with COPD.,MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases were searched systematically through February 2015 for publications relating to AECOPD diagnostic biomarkers.,We used a modified guideline for the REporting of tumor MARKer Studies (mREMARK) to assess study quality.,Additional components of quality included the reporting of findings in a replication cohort and the use of receiver-operating characteristics area-under-the curve statistics in evaluating performance. 59 studies were included, in which the most studied biomarkers were C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α).,CRP showed consistent elevations in AECOPD compared to control subjects, while IL-6 and TNF-α had variable statistical significance and results. mREMARK scores ranged from 6 to 18 (median score of 13). 12 articles reported ROC analyses and only one study employed a replication cohort to confirm biomarker performance.,Studies of AECOPD diagnostic biomarkers remain inconsistent in their reporting, with few studies employing ROC analyses and even fewer demonstrating replication in independent cohorts. | Microparticles (MPs) are small membrane vesicles of 0.1-1 µm which are released by cells following chemical, physical, and apoptotic stimuli.,MPs represent more than a miniature version of the cell.,Their composition and function depend not only on cellular origin, but also on stimuli.,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a lung disease characterized by nearly irreversible lung destruction which results in airway limitation.,We investigated the presence and source of MPs in sputum of COPD patients to evaluate if changes in MP number and origin may reflect the pathophysiological conditions of disease and may serve as potential biomarkers for diagnostic and prognostic use.,Induced sputum samples were collected from 18 male subjects and liquefied with Sputasol.,MPs obtained were immunolabeled for leukocyte (CD11a), granulocyte (CD66b), monocyte-macrophage (CD11b), platelets and megakaryocytic cells (CD41), endothelial cells (CD31), and red blood cells (CD235ab) and analyzed by cytofluorimetry.,There was a negative correlation between CD31-MPs and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (R=−53, P<0.05) and CD66b-MP level was correlated with worse performance index of COPD such as the Body mass index airflow Obstruction, Dyspnea, and Exercise capacity (BODE); they were negatively correlated with 6-minute walking test: 0.65 and −0.64, respectively (P<0.05).,CD235ab-MPs showed a negative correlation with body mass index (R=−0.86, P<0.05), while there was a positive correlation with dyspnea index (R=0.91, P<0.05).,The main finding of this study was that MPs were detected in the sputum of patients affected by COPD.,The phenotype of some of them was related to the main COPD parameters.,These results suggest that MPs could be implicated in the pathogenesis of COPD. | 1 |
Efficacy and safety of tiotropium+olodaterol fixed-dose combination (FDC) compared with the mono-components was evaluated in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in two replicate, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase III trials.,Patients received tiotropium+olodaterol FDC 2.5/5 μg or 5/5 μg, tiotropium 2.5 μg or 5 μg, or olodaterol 5 μg delivered once-daily via Respimat inhaler over 52 weeks.,Primary end points were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 to 3 h (AUC0-3) response, trough FEV1 response and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at 24 weeks.,In total, 5162 patients (2624 in Study 1237.5 and 2538 in Study 1237.6) received treatment.,Both FDCs significantly improved FEV1 AUC0-3 and trough FEV1 response versus the mono-components in both studies.,Statistically significant improvements in SGRQ total score versus the mono-components were only seen for tiotropium+olodaterol FDC 5/5 μg.,Incidence of adverse events was comparable between the FDCs and the mono-components.,These studies demonstrated significant improvements in lung function and health-related quality of life with once-daily tiotropium+olodaterol FDC versus mono-components over 1 year in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.,Lung function and symptomatic benefits of daily tiotropium+olodaterol fixed-dose combination in moderate to very severe COPDhttp://ow.ly/DIKiY | Nighttime symptoms can negatively impact the quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The Nighttime Symptoms of COPD Instrument (NiSCI) was designed to measure the occurrence and severity of nighttime symptoms in patients with COPD, the impact of symptoms on nighttime awakenings, and rescue medication use.,The objective of this study was to explore item reduction, inform scoring recommendations, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the NiSCI.,COPD patients participating in a Phase III clinical trial completed the NiSCI daily.,Item analyses were conducted using weekly mean and single day scores.,Descriptive statistics (including percentage of respondents at floor/ceiling and inter-item correlations), factor analyses, and Rasch model analyses were conducted to examine item performance and scoring.,Test-retest reliability was assessed for the final instrument using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).,Correlations with assessments conducted during study visits were used to evaluate convergent and known-groups validity.,Data from 1,663 COPD patients aged 40-93 years were analyzed.,Item analyses supported the generation of four scores.,A one-factor structure was confirmed with factor analysis and Rasch analysis for the symptom severity score.,Test-retest reliability was confirmed for the six-item symptom severity (ICC, 0.85), number of nighttime awakenings (ICC, 0.82), and rescue medication (ICC, 0.68) scores.,Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations between the NiSCI, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, and Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Tool-Respiratory Symptoms scores.,The results suggest that the NiSCI can be used to determine the severity of nighttime COPD symptoms, the number of nighttime awakenings due to COPD symptoms, and the nighttime use of rescue medication.,The NiSCI is a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate these concepts in COPD patients in clinical trials and clinical practice.,Scoring recommendations and steps for further research are discussed. | 1 |
Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are episodes of worsening of symptoms, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality.,COPD exacerbations are associated with increased airway and systemic inflammation and physiological changes, especially the development of hyperinflation.,They are triggered mainly by respiratory viruses and bacteria, which infect the lower airway and increase airway inflammation.,Some patients are particularly susceptible to exacerbations, and show worse health status and faster disease progression than those who have infrequent exacerbations.,Several pharmacological interventions are effective for the reduction of exacerbation frequency and severity in COPD such as inhaled steroids, long-acting bronchodilators, and their combinations.,Non-pharmacological therapies such as pulmonary rehabilitation, self-management, and home ventilatory support are becoming increasingly important, but still need to be studied in controlled trials.,The future of exacerbation prevention is in assessment of optimum combinations of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies that will result in improvement of health status, and reduction of hospital admission and mortality associated with COPD. | Purpose: Clinically important deterioration (CID) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a novel composite endpoint that assesses disease stability.,The association between short-term CID and future economic and quality of life (QoL) outcomes has not been previously assessed.,This analysis considers 3-year data from the TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health (TORCH) study, to examine this question.,Patients and methods: This post hoc analysis of TORCH (NCT00268216) compared costs and utilities at 3 years among patients without CID (CID-) and with CID (CID+) at 24 weeks.,A positive CID status was defined as either: a deterioration in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of ≥100 mL from baseline; or a ≥4-unit increase from baseline in St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score; or the incidence of a moderate/severe exacerbation.,Patients from all treatment arms were included.,Utility change was based on the EQ-5D utility index.,Costs were based on healthcare resource utilization from 24 weeks to end of follow-up combined with unit costs for the UK (2016 GBP), and reported as per patient per year (PPPY).,Adjusted estimates were generated controlling for baseline characteristics, treatment assignment, and number of CID criteria met.,Results: Overall, 3,769 patients completed the study and were included in the analysis (stable CID- patients, n=1,832; unstable CID+ patients, n=1,937).,At the end of follow-up, CID- patients had higher mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) utility scores than CID+ patients (0.752 [0.738, 0.765] vs 0.697 [0.685, 0.71]; difference +0.054; P<0.001), and lower costs PPPY (£538 vs £916; difference: £378 [95% CI: £244, £521]; P<0.001).,The cost differential was primarily driven by the difference in general hospital ward days (P=0.003).,Conclusion: This study demonstrated that achieving early stability in COPD by preventing short-term CID is associated with better preservation of future QoL alongside reduced healthcare service costs. | 1 |
A previous Phase IIIb study (NCT01462929) in patients with moderate to severe COPD demonstrated that 6 weeks of treatment with aclidinium led to improvements in 24-hour bronchodilation comparable to those with tiotropium, and improvement of symptoms versus placebo.,This post hoc analysis was performed to assess the effect of treatment in the symptomatic patient group participating in the study.,Symptomatic patients (defined as those with Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms [E-RS™] in COPD baseline score ≥10 units) received aclidinium bromide 400 μg twice daily (BID), tiotropium 18 μg once daily (QD), or placebo, for 6 weeks.,Lung function, COPD respiratory symptoms, and incidence of adverse events (AEs) were assessed.,In all, 277 symptomatic patients were included in this post hoc analysis.,Aclidinium and tiotropium treatment improved forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to week 6 at all time points over 24 hours versus placebo.,In addition, improvements in FEV1 from baseline during the nighttime period were observed for aclidinium versus tiotropium on day 1 (aclidinium 157 mL, tiotropium 67 mL; P<0.001) and week 6 (aclidinium 153 mL, tiotropium 90 mL; P<0.05).,Aclidinium improved trough FEV1 from baseline versus placebo and tiotropium at day 1 (aclidinium 136 mL, tiotropium 68 mL; P<0.05) and week 6 (aclidinium 137 mL, tiotropium 71 mL; P<0.05).,Aclidinium also improved early-morning and nighttime symptom severity, limitation of early-morning activities, and E-RS Total and domain scores versus tiotropium (except E-RS Chest Symptoms) and placebo over 6 weeks.,Tolerability showed similar incidence of AEs in each arm.,In this post hoc analysis of symptomatic patients with moderate to severe COPD, aclidinium 400 μg BID provided additional improvements compared with tiotropium 18 μg QD in: 1) bronchodilation, particularly during the nighttime, 2) daily COPD symptoms (E-RS), 3) early-morning and nighttime symptoms, and 4) early-morning limitation of activity. | The purpose of this study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of twice-daily glycopyrrolate 15.6 µg, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, in patients with stable, symptomatic, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation.,The GEM1 study was a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study that randomized patients with stable, symptomatic COPD with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation to twice-daily glycopyrrolate 15.6 µg or placebo (1:1) via the Neohaler® device.,The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of glycopyrrolate versus placebo in terms of forced expiratory volume in 1 second area under the curve between 0 and 12 hours post morning dose at week 12.,Other outcomes included additional spirometric end points, transition dyspnea index, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, COPD Assessment Test, rescue medication use, and symptoms reported by patients via electronic diary.,Safety was also assessed during the study.,Of the 441 patients randomized (glycopyrrolate, n=222; placebo, n=219), 96% of patients completed the planned treatment phase.,Glycopyrrolate demonstrated statistically significant (P<0.001) improvements in lung function versus placebo.,Glycopyrrolate showed statistically significant improvement in the transition dyspnea index focal score, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score, COPD Assessment Test score, rescue medication use, and daily total symptom score versus placebo at week 12.,Safety was comparable between the treatment groups.,Significant improvement in lung function, dyspnea, COPD symptoms, health status, and rescue medication use suggests that glycopyrrolate is a safe and effective treatment option as maintenance bronchodilator in patients with stable, symptomatic COPD with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation. | 1 |
Viral respiratory infections may precipitate acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD).,However, little is known about viral etiology related to AECOPD in Asia.,We aimed to study the viral etiology of AECOPD in Hong Kong.,Patients admitted to an acute hospital in Hong Kong with AECOPD were recruited prospectively from May 1, 2004, to April 30, 2005.,Nasopharyngeal aspirate was collected and assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and viral culture.,Spirometry was performed in the stable phase at 2 to 3 months after hospital discharge.,There were 262 episodes of AECOPD among 196 patients (mean age, 75.7 ± 7.7 years [± SD]; 160 men).,Mean FEV1 was 39.6 ± 18.9% of predicted normal, and FEV1/FVC ratio was 58.0 ± 15.2%.,Fifty-eight episodes (22.1%) yielded positive viral PCR results.,The viruses identified were influenza A (7.3%), coronavirus OC43 (4.6%), rhinovirus (3.1%), influenza B (2.7%), and respiratory syncytial virus (2.3%).,The diagnostic yield of viral identification by PCR was 2.7 times higher than that based on conventional viral culture.,The rates of identifying a positive viral etiology by PCR were similar among the subjects with FEV1 ≥ 50%, ≥ 30 to 50%, and < 30% of predicted normal.,Viral infection appeared to have no effect on subsequent readmissions or mortality rate over a study period of 1 year,Influenza A and two less-attended viruses, coronavirus OC43 and rhinovirus, were the common etiologic agents in patients hospitalized with AECOPD in Hong Kong.,These should be considered in developing diagnostic and intervening strategies pertaining to AECOPD. | Respiratory viruses frequently are recovered in the upper-respiratory tract during acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD), but their role as contributing pathogens remains unclear.,The usefulness of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as indicators of the presence or absence of viral infection in this setting also needs to be evaluated.,The study was of a prospective cohort of patients with COPD admitted to the ED for AECOPD.,Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for 14 respiratory viruses was performed on nasopharyngeal swabs collected at admission and after recovery in stable condition.,Eighty-six patients (mean age, 72 years; male, 64%) were included.,During AECOPD, upper-respiratory viral infections were detected in 44 (51%) patients: picornavirus in 22, metapneumovirus in seven, coronavirus in eight, influenza A/B in two, parainfluenza in two, and respiratory syncytial virus in three.,A dual infection was present in three patients.,After recovery, viruses were detected in only eight (11%) of 71 patients (P < .001 compared with AECOPD phase).,In five of these patients, no virus had been identified during the initial exacerbation, thus suggesting a new viral infection acquired during follow-up.,During AECOPD, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels did not differ significantly between patients with or without a proven viral infection.,Prevalence of upper-respiratory viral infection, as detected from nasopharyngeal swab by RT-PCR, is high in AECOPD and low after clinical recovery, suggesting that AECOPD frequently are triggered by viral infections initiated in the upper-respiratory tract.,In our study, serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein did not discriminate virus-associated exacerbations from others.,clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT00448604. | 1 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the important medical and social problem.,According to modern concepts, COPD is a chronic inflammatory disease, macrophages play a key role in its pathogenesis.,Macrophages are heterogeneous in their functions, which is largely determined by their immunometabolic profile, as well as the features of lipid homeostasis, in which the ATP binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) plays an essential role.,The objective of this work is the analysis of the ABCA1 protein participation and the function of reverse cholesterol transport in the pathogenesis of COPD.,The expression of the ABCA1 gene in lung tissues takes the second place after the liver, which indicates the important role of the carrier in lung function.,The participation of the transporter in the development of COPD consists in provision of lipid metabolism, regulation of inflammation, phagocytosis, and apoptosis.,Violation of the processes in which ABCA1 is involved may be a part of the pathophysiological mechanisms, leading to the formation of a heterogeneous clinical course of the disease. | The prevalence and mortality of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in elderly patients are increasing worldwide.,Low body mass index (BMI) is a well-known prognostic factor for COPD.,However, the obesity paradox in elderly patients with COPD has not been well elucidated.,We investigated the association between BMI and in-hospital mortality in elderly COPD patients.,Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan, we retrospectively collected data for elderly patients (>65 years) with COPD who were hospitalized between July 2010 and March 2013.,We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to compare all-cause in-hospital mortality between patients with BMI of <18.5 kg/m2 (underweight), 18.5-22.9 kg/m2 (low-normal weight), 23.0-24.9 kg/m2 (high-normal weight), 25.0-29.9 kg/m2 (overweight), and ≥30.0 kg/m2 (obesity) with adjustment for patient backgrounds.,In all, 263,940 eligible patients were identified.,In-hospital mortality was 14.3%, 7.3%, 4.9%, 4.3%, and 4.4%, respectively, in underweight, low-normal weight, high-normal weight, overweight, and obese patients.,Underweight patients had a significantly higher mortality than low-normal weight patients (odds ratio [OR]: 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48-1.63), whereas lower mortality was associated with high-normal weight (OR: 0.76, CI: 0.70-0.82), overweight (OR: 0.73, CI: 0.66-0.80), and obesity (OR: 0.67, CI: 0.52-0.86).,Higher mortality was significantly associated with older age, male sex, more severe dyspnea, lower level of consciousness, and lower activities of daily living.,Overweight and obese patients had a lower mortality than low-normal weight patients, which supports the obesity paradox. | 1 |
COPD and coronary artery disease (CAD) are common chronic diseases with shared risk factors.,COPD continues to be largely underdiagnosed and undertreated.,We aimed to describe the prevalence and predictors of undiagnosed COPD in Jordanian men with CAD.,In a cross-sectional study conducted at a referral center in Jordan, male patients who underwent coronary angiography for suspected CAD and reported $10 pack-year of cigarette smoking were recruited.,Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry was undertaken for all participants, and COPD was defined as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <70%.,The finding of ≥50% coronary luminal narrowing confirmed the presence of CAD.,Spirometry was undertaken for 376 men with mean age of 56.02±10.55 years, and 72.6% were active cigarettes smokers with a mean pack-year of 55.89±34.25.,A CAD diagnosis was confirmed in 300 (79.8%) men.,Spirometric criteria for COPD were met in 76 (15.7%) patients, of whom 91.5% were not previously diagnosed.,COPD-related symptoms were common: chronic cough (44.4%), dyspnea (66.2%), and wheezes (27.9%).,COPD was more common in patients with (18.0%) compared to patients without (6.6%) CAD (P=0.014).,Multivariate logistic regression showed that the risk of COPD was higher in patients with CAD (OR 3.16, 95% CI, 1.10-9.09, P=0.033) and in those with chronic bronchitis (OR 13.07, 95% CI, 6.69-25.52, P<0.001).,There was a high prevalence of COPD among male patients with CAD and most were underdiagnosed despite having respiratory symptoms.,Male smokers with CAD and respiratory symptoms should be evaluated for airflow limitation and the presence of COPD. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with abnormal inflammation and high oxidative stress.,Studies suggest that oxidized low density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) is involved in diseases associated with oxidative stress and inflammation.,However, no data on the possible relationship between COPD and ox-LDL are available.,This study compared serum levels of ox-LDL in 48 COPD patients and 32 health controls and correlated them with lung function, systematic inflammation, and oxidative stress.,Serum levels of ox-LDL, C-reactive protein (CRP), and oxidative stress (measured by reactive oxygen species, ROS) were analyzed using commercial kits.,Mean levels of serum ox-LDL were significantly higher in COPD patients than in controls (18.62 ± 7.56 versus 12.57 ± 5.90 mU/L, P < 0.05).,Serum levels of CRP and ROS were also significantly higher in COPD patients.,Serum levels of ox-LDL in COPD patients correlated inversely with FEV1% predicted, an index of lung function (r = −0.347, P = 0.016), while they correlated positively with CRP and ROS levels.,These results suggest that serum levels of ox-LDL are increased in COPD patients and that these levels are associated with lung function, inflammation, and oxidative stress in COPD.,Future studies are needed to determine whether and how ox-LDL plays a role in COPD. | 1 |
Minimizing the risk of disease progression and exacerbations is the key goal of COPD management, as these are well-established indicators of poor COPD prognosis.,We developed a novel composite end point assessing three important aspects (lung function, health status, and exacerbations) of worsening in COPD.,The objective was to determine whether dual bronchodilation with umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) reduces clinically important deteriorations (CIDs) in COPD versus placebo or bronchodilator monotherapy.,This study is a post hoc analysis of two 24-week trials comparing UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg with UMEC 62.5 µg, VI 25 µg, or placebo (Study A; NCT01313650), or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg with tiotropium (TIO) 18 µg (Study B; NCT01777334) in patients with symptomatic COPD, without a history of frequent exacerbations.,Deterioration was assessed as the time to a first CID, a composite measure defined as a decrease of ≥100 mL in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second or ≥4-unit increase in St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score or an on-treatment moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation.,In Study A, fewer patients experienced a first CID with UMEC/VI (44%) versus UMEC (50%), VI (56%), and placebo (75%).,The risk of a first CID was reduced with UMEC/VI (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.37 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.30, 0.45]), UMEC (HR: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.38, 0.56]), and VI (HR: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.45, 0.66]; all P<0.001) versus placebo, and with UMEC/VI versus UMEC (HR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.65, 0.97]; P<0.05) and versus VI (HR: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.55, 0.81]; P<0.001).,In Study B, fewer patients experienced a first CID with UMEC/VI (41%) versus TIO (59%).,UMEC/VI reduced the risk of a first composite CID by 43% versus TIO (HR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.47, 0.69]; P<0.001).,This exploratory analysis, using a new assessment of clinical deterioration in COPD, revealed that a majority of symptomatic patients with low exacerbation risk experienced a deterioration during the 24-week study periods.,UMEC/VI reduces the risk of a first CID versus placebo or bronchodilator monotherapy. | The long-acting muscarinic antagonists umeclidinium (UMEC) and tiotropium (TIO) are approved once-daily maintenance therapies for COPD.,This study investigated the efficacy and safety of UMEC versus TIO in COPD.,This was a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority study.,Patients were randomized 1:1 to UMEC 62.5 μg plus placebo or TIO 18 μg plus placebo.,The primary end point was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at day 85 (non-inferiority margin −50 mL; per-protocol [PP] population).,Other end points included weighted mean FEV1 over 0-24 and 12-24 hours post-dose.,Patient-reported outcomes comprised Transition Dyspnea Index score, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score, and COPD Assessment Test score.,Adverse events were also assessed.,In total, 1,017 patients were randomized to treatment.,In the PP population, 489 and 487 patients received UMEC and TIO, respectively.,In the PP population, change from baseline in trough FEV1 was greater with UMEC versus TIO at day 85, meeting non-inferiority and superiority margins (difference: 59 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 29-88; P<0.001).,Similar results were observed in the intent-to-treat analysis of trough FEV1 at day 85 (53 mL, 95% CI: 25-81; P<0.001).,Improvements in weighted mean FEV1 over 0-24 hours post-dose at day 84 were similar with UMEC and TIO but significantly greater with UMEC versus TIO over 12-24 hours post-dose (70 mL; P=0.015).,Clinically meaningful improvements in Transition Dyspnea Index and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire were observed with both treatments at all time points.,No differences were observed between UMEC and TIO in patient-reported outcomes.,Overall incidences of adverse events were similar for UMEC and TIO.,UMEC 62.5 μg demonstrated superior efficacy to TIO 18 μg on the primary end point of trough FEV1 at day 85.,Safety profiles were similar for both treatments. | 1 |
The novel long-acting β 2-agonist olodaterol demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in short-term phase II clinical studies.,This analysis of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III studies (1222.11, NCT00782210; 1222.12, NCT00782509; 1222.13, NCT00793624; 1222.14, NCT00796653) evaluated the long-term safety of olodaterol once daily (QD) in a large cohort of patients with moderate to very severe (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2-4) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,The studies compared olodaterol (5 or 10 μg) QD via Respimat®, formoterol 12 μg twice daily (BID) via Aerolizer® (1222.13 and 1222.14), and placebo for 48 weeks.,Patients continued receiving background maintenance therapy, with ∼60% receiving concomitant cardiovascular therapy and 25% having a history of concomitant cardiac disease.,Pre-specified analyses of pooled data assessed the adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs in the whole population, and in subgroups with cardiac disease, along with in-depth electrocardiogram and Holter monitoring.,In total, 3104 patients were included in the safety analysis: 876 received olodaterol 5 μg, 883 received olodaterol 10 μg, 885 received placebos, and 460 received formoterol 12 μg BID.,Overall incidence of on-treatment AEs (71.2%), serious AEs (16.1%), and deaths (1.7%) were balanced across treatment groups.,Respiratory and cardiovascular AEs, including major adverse cardiac events, were reported at similar frequencies in placebo and active treatment groups.,The safety profiles of both olodaterol 5 μg (marketed and registered dose) and 10 μg QD delivered via Respimat® are comparable to placebo and formoterol BID in this population, with no safety signals identified. | Combination of the inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC; GSK573719) with the long-acting β2-agonist vilanterol (VI) is an approved maintenance treatment for COPD in the US and EU.,We compared the efficacy and safety of UMEC/VI with placebo in patients with COPD of Asian ancestry.,In this 24-week, Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to UMEC/VI 125/25 μg, UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, or placebo.,The primary efficacy end point was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) on day 169; secondary end points were Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score at week 24 and weighted mean (WM) FEV1 over 0-6 hours postdose on day 1.,Additional end points and safety were also assessed.,Both UMEC/VI 125/25 μg and UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg statistically significantly improved trough FEV1 at day 169 versus placebo (UMEC/VI 125/25 μg, 0.216 L, [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.175-0.257]; UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, 0.151 L, 95% CI 0.110-0.191; both P<0.001).,Statistically significant improvements in TDI score were observed for both UMEC/VI groups versus placebo (UMEC/VI 125/25 μg, 0.9, 95% CI 0.3-1.4, P=0.002; UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, 0.7, 95% CI 0.1-1.2, P=0.016).,On day 1, both UMEC/VI groups improved 0-6-hour WM FEV1 versus placebo (UMEC/VI 125/25 μg, 0.182 L 95% CI 0.161-0.203; UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, 0.160 L, 95% CI 0.139-0.181; both P<0.001).,Statistically significant improvements for UMEC/VI groups versus placebo were observed for rescue albuterol use at weeks 1-24 (puffs/day, both P<0.001).,The incidence of adverse events was similar across groups.,In Asian patients with COPD, once-daily UMEC/VI 125/25 μg and UMEC 62.5/25 μg resulted in clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in lung-function end points versus placebo.,Symptomatic and quality of life measures also improved.,The safety profile of UMEC/VI was consistent with previous studies. | 1 |
The morbidity and mortality associated with COPD exacts a considerable economic burden.,Comorbidities in COPD are associated with poor health outcomes and increased costs.,Our objective was to assess the impact of comorbidities on COPD-associated costs in a large administrative claims dataset.,This was a retrospective observational study of data from the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and the MarketScan Medicare Supplemental Databases from January 1, 2009, to September 30, 2012.,Resource consumption was measured from the index date (date of first occurrence of non-rule-out COPD diagnosis) to 360 days after the index date.,Resource use (all-cause and disease-specific [ie, COPD- or asthma-related] ED visits, hospitalizations, office visits, other outpatient visits, and total length of hospital stay) and health-care costs (all-cause and disease-specific costs for ED visits, hospitalizations, office visits, and other outpatient visits and medical, prescription, and total health-care costs) were assessed.,Generalized linear models were used to evaluate the impact of comorbidities on total health-care costs, adjusting for age, sex, geographic location, baseline health-care use, employment status, and index COPD medication.,Among 183,681 patients with COPD, the most common comorbidities were cardiovascular disease (34.8%), diabetes (22.8%), asthma (14.7%), and anemia (14.2%).,Most patients (52.8%) had one or two comorbidities of interest.,The average all-cause total health-care costs from the index date to 360 days after the index date were highest for patients with chronic kidney disease ($41,288) and anemia ($38,870).,The impact on total health-care costs was greatest for anemia ($10,762 more, on average, than a patient with COPD without anemia).,Our analysis demonstrated that high resource use and costs were associated with COPD and multiple comorbidities. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is predicted to become a major cause of death worldwide.,Studies on the variability in the estimates of key epidemiological parameters of COPD may contribute to better assessment of the burden of this disease and to helpful guidance for future research and public policies.,In the present study, we examined differences in the main epidemiological characteristics of COPD derived from studies across countries of the European Union, focusing on prevalence, severity, frequency of exacerbations and mortality, as well as on differences between the studies' methods.,This systematic review was based on a search for the relevant literature in the Science Citation Index database via the Web of Science and on COPD mortality rates issued from national statistics.,Analysis was finally based on 65 articles and Eurostat COPD mortality data for 21 European countries.,Epidemiological characteristics of COPD varied widely from country to country.,For example, prevalence estimates ranged between 2.1% and 26.1%, depending on the country, the age group and the methods used.,Likewise, COPD mortality rates ranged from 7.2 to 36.1 per 105 inhabitants.,The methods used to estimate these epidemiological parameters were highly variable in terms of the definition of COPD, severity scales, methods of investigation and target populations.,Nevertheless, to a large extent, several recent international guidelines or research initiatives, such as GOLD, BOLD or PLATINO, have boosted a substantial standardization of methodology in data collection and have resulted in the availability of more comparable epidemiological estimates across countries.,On the basis of such standardization, severity estimates as well as prevalence estimates present much less variation across countries.,The contribution of these recent guidelines and initiatives is outlined, as are the problems remaining in arriving at more accurate COPD epidemiological estimates across European countries.,The accuracy of COPD epidemiological parameters is important for guiding decision making with regard to preventive measures, interventions and patient management in various health care systems.,Therefore, the recent initiatives for standardizing data collection should be enhanced to result in COPD epidemiological estimates of improved quality.,Moreover, establishing international guidelines for reporting research on COPD may also constitute a major contribution. | 1 |
Inhaled medications are the cornerstone of treatment and management of asthma and COPD.,However, inhaler device errors are common among patients and have been linked with reduced symptom control, an increased risk of exacerbations, and increased healthcare utilisation.,These observations have prompted GINA (Global INitiative for Asthma) and GOLD (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) to recommend regular assessment of inhaler technique in a bid to improve therapeutic outcomes.,To better define the relationship between device errors and health outcomes (clinical outcomes, quality of life, and healthcare utilisation) in asthma and COPD, we conducted a systematic review of the literature, with a particular focus on the methods used to assess the relationship between device errors and outcomes.,Sixteen studies were identified (12 in patients with asthma, one in patients with COPD, and three in both asthma and COPD) with varying study designs, endpoints, and patient populations.,Most of the studies reported that inhalation errors were associated with worse disease outcomes in patients with asthma or COPD.,Patients who had a reduction in errors over time had improved outcomes.,These findings suggest that time invested by healthcare professionals is vital to improving inhalation technique in asthma and COPD patients to improve health outcomes. | COPD is a highly heterogeneous disease.,Potential biomarkers to identify patients with COPD who will derive the greatest benefit from inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment are needed.,Blood eosinophil count can serve as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of ICS treatment.,The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess whether a blood eosinophil count of ≥2% in patients undergoing ICS therapy was associated with a greater reduction in COPD exacerbation rate and pneumonia incidence.,An electronic search was performed using the keywords “COPD”, “eosinophil”, and “clinical trial” in the PubMed and EMBASE databases to retrieve articles, up to 2017, relevant to our focus.,Data were extracted, and a meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5 (version 5.3.5).,Five studies comprising 12,496 patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD were included.,At baseline, 60% of the patients had ≥2% blood eosinophils.,Our meta-analysis showed a 17% reduction in exacerbation of moderate/severe COPD in patients with ≥2% blood eosinophils undergoing ICS therapy compared to the non-ICS/ICS withdrawal/placebo group.,The difference between the two types of treatment was significant (risk ratio [RR], 0.816; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99; P=0.03).,Furthermore, the risk of pneumonia-related events was significantly increased in the subgroup with eosinophil count ≥2% undergoing ICS-containing treatments (RR, 1.969; 95% CI, 1.369-2.833; P<0.001).,There was no significant difference in the subgroup with eosinophil count <2% (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.888-1.879; P<0.181).,The results of our meta-analysis suggest that the 2% threshold for blood eosinophils could accurately predict ICS treatment response in patients with COPD, but increased the risk of pneumonia. | 1 |
To assess the treatment progression during the 24 months following a formal diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the UK primary care setting.,A retrospective cohort of newly diagnosed COPD patients was identified in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) from 1/1/2008 until 31/12/2009.,Maintenance therapy prescribed within the first 3 months of diagnosis and in the subsequent 3-month intervals for 24 months were analyzed.,Treatment classes included long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs), long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), and respective combinations.,At each 3-month interval, discontinuation, switching, addition, and stepping down patterns were analyzed cumulatively for the first 12 months and over the 24-month of follow-up.,A total of 3199 patients with at least one prescription of a maintenance therapy at baseline and during 4th-6th month interval were included in the analysis.,At diagnosis (0-3 months), the most frequently prescribed maintenance therapy was LABA+ICS (43%), followed by LAMA (24%) and LABA+LAMA+ICS (23%).,Nearly half the patients (LABA-50%, LAMA-43%) starting on a monobronchodilator had additions to their treatment in 24 months.,Compared to other medications, patients starting on a LAMA were most likely to escalate to triple therapy in 24 months.,Nearly one-fourth of the patients prescribed triple therapy at baseline stepped down to LABA+ICS (25%) or LAMA (31%) within 24 months.,Disease progression is evident over the 24 months after COPD diagnosis, as more patients were prescribed additional maintenance therapy in the 24-month period compared to baseline.,The changes in therapy suggest that it is difficult to achieve a consistently improved COPD disease state. | Guidelines recommend inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Most COPD patients are managed in primary care and receive ICS long-term and irrespective of severity.,The effect of withdrawing ICS from COPD patients in primary care is unknown.,In a pragmatic randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 31 practices, 260 COPD patients stopped their usual ICS (median duration of use 8 years) and were allocated to 500 mcg fluticasone propionate twice daily (n = 128), or placebo (n = 132).,Follow-up assessments took place at three monthly intervals for a year at the patients' practice.,Our primary outcome was COPD exacerbation frequency.,Secondary outcomes were time to first COPD exacerbation, reported symptoms, peak expiratory flow rate and reliever inhaler use, and lung function and health related quality of life.,In patients randomised to placebo, COPD exacerbation risk over one year was RR: 1.11 (CI: 0.91-1.36).,Patients taking placebo were more likely to return to their usual ICS following exacerbation, placebo: 61/128 (48%); fluticasone: 34/132 (26%), OR: 2.35 (CI: 1.38-4.05).,Exacerbation risk whilst taking randomised treatment was significantly raised in the placebo group 1.48 (CI: 1.17-1.86).,Patients taking placebo exacerbated earlier (median time to first exacerbation: placebo (days): 44 (CI: 29-59); fluticasone: 63 (CI: 53-74), log rank 3.81, P = 0.05) and reported increased wheeze.,In a post-hoc analysis, patients with mild COPD taking placebo had increased exacerbation risk RR: 1.94 (CI: 1.20-3.14).,Withdrawal of long-term ICS in COPD patients in primary care increases risk of exacerbation shortens time to exacerbation and causes symptom deterioration.,Patients with mild COPD may be at increased risk of exacerbation after withdrawal.,ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00440687 | 1 |
The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).,Clinical outcomes, including mortality, are worse in males, older individuals and patients with comorbidities.,COPD patients are included in shielding strategies due to their susceptibility to virus-induced exacerbations, compromised pulmonary function and high prevalence of associated comorbidities.,Using evidence from basic science and cohort studies, this review addresses key questions concerning COVID-19 and COPD.,First, are there mechanisms by which COPD patients are more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection?,Secondly, do inhaled corticosteroids offer protection against COVID-19?,And, thirdly, what is the evidence regarding clinical outcomes from COVID-19 in COPD patients?,This up-to-date review tackles some of the key issues which have significant impact on the long-term outlook for COPD patients in the context of COVID-19.,This up-to-date review tackles some of the key issues which have significant impact on the long-term outlook for COPD patients in the context of COVID-19https://bit.ly/36PKzEO | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is often caused by smoking and other stressors.,This causes oxidative stress, which induces numerous changes on both the transcriptome and proteome of the cell.,We aimed to examine if the endomembrane pathway, including the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), Golgi, and lysosomes, was disrupted in fibroblasts from COPD patients as opposed to healthy ever‐smokers or never‐smokers, and if the response to stress differed.,Different cellular compartments involved in the endomembrane pathway, as well as mRNA expression and apoptosis, were examined before and after the addition of stress in lung fibroblasts from never‐smokers, ever‐smokers, and patients with COPD.,We found that the ER, Golgi, and lysosomes were disorganized in fibroblasts from COPD patients under baseline conditions.,After a time course with ER stress inducing chemicals, changes to the phenotypes of cellular compartments in COPD patient fibroblasts were observed, and the expression of the ER stress‐induced gene ERP72 was upregulated more in the COPD patient's cells compared to ever‐smokers or never‐smokers.,Lastly, a tendency of increased active Caspase‐3 was observed in COPD fibroblasts.,Our results show that COPD patients have phenotypic changes in the lung fibroblasts endomembrane pathway, and respond differently to stress.,Furthermore, these fibroblasts were cultured for several weeks outside the body, but they were not able to regain proper ER structure, indicating that the internal changes to the endomembrane system are permanent in smokers.,This vulnerability to cellular stress might be a cause as to why some smokers develop COPD. | 1 |
Frailty is an important clinical syndrome that is consistently associated with adverse outcomes in older people.,The relevance of frailty to chronic respiratory disease and its management is unknown.,To determine the prevalence of frailty among patients with stable COPD and examine whether frailty affects completion and outcomes of pulmonary rehabilitation.,816 outpatients with COPD (mean (SD) age 70 (10) years, FEV1% predicted 48.9 (21.0)) were recruited between November 2011 and January 2015.,Frailty was assessed using the Fried criteria (weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, slowness and weakness) before and after pulmonary rehabilitation.,Predictors of programme non-completion were identified using multivariate logistic regression, and outcomes were compared using analysis of covariance, adjusting for age and sex.,209/816 patients (25.6%, 95% CI 22.7 to 28.7) were frail.,Prevalence of frailty increased with age, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage, Medical Research Council (MRC) score and age-adjusted comorbidity burden (all p≤0.01).,Patients who were frail had double the odds of programme non-completion (adjusted OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.46, p=0.001), often due to exacerbation and/or hospital admission.,However, rehabilitation outcomes favoured frail completers, with consistently better responses in MRC score, exercise performance, physical activity level and health status (all p<0.001).,After rehabilitation, 71/115 (61.3%) previously frail patients no longer met case criteria for frailty.,Frailty affects one in four patients with COPD referred for pulmonary rehabilitation and is an independent predictor of programme non-completion.,However, patients who are frail respond favourably to rehabilitation and their frailty can be reversed in the short term. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) typically presents the characteristic clinical condition of exacerbation, with more intense symptoms associated with greater functional loss and consequently lower chances of patient survival.,This study sought to determine the predictors of exacerbation, alone or in combination, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who received physical therapeutic treatment over 6 months.,This was an observational, longitudinal and prospective study in which 63 COPD patients residing within the municipality of São Carlos, SP, Brazil were evaluated.,These patients had COPD stages II and III and were entered into a physical therapy program, consisting of 3 periods of assessment over 6 months.,We evaluated the occurrence of acute exacerbation as well as the patients' body mass index (BMI), fat-free mass (FFM), fat-free mass index, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), dyspnea, distance walked (DW) in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and handgrip strength.,When applying Cox settings with each covariate separately, the results revealed 5% significance only for the DW in the 6MWT, which demonstrated an interaction between BMI and FFM.,Comparison of the 3 periods of assessment across the covariates measured showed a significant difference only for the DW between evaluations in the 3rd and 6th months.,Upon analyzing the predictors of risk over 6 months of follow-up in patients with COPD, we found that the DW in the 6MWT was associated with the risk of exacerbation, although this risk also depended on the covariates BMI and FFM. | 1 |
Background: Combination therapy with a long-acting bronchodilator and an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is recommended in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have frequent exacerbations.,The efficacy and tolerability of the combination of budesonide/formoterol have been demonstrated in patients with COPD when administered via the dry powder inhaler (DPI) in a 1-year study and when administered via the hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) in a 6-month study.,Objective: This study assessed the long-term efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol HFA pMDI in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.,Methods: This was a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled, multicentre study (NCT00206167) of 1964 patients aged ≥40 years with moderate to very severe COPD conducted from 2005 to 2007 at 237 sites in the US, Europe and Mexico.,After 2 weeks of treatment based on previous therapy (ICSs, short-acting bronchodilators allowed), patients received one of the following treatments twice daily: budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160/4.5 μg × two inhalations (320/9 μg); budesonide/formoterol pMDI 80/4.5 μg × two inhalations (160/9 μg); formoterol DPI 4.5 μg × two inhalations (9 μg); or placebo.,Main outcome measures: The co-primary efficacy variables were pre-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and 1-hour post-dose FEV1.,Results: Budesonide/formoterol 320/9 μg demonstrated greater improvements in pre-dose FEV1 versus formoterol (p = 0.008), and both budesonide/formoterol doses demonstrated greater improvements in 1-hour post-dose FEV1 versus placebo (p < 0.001).,The rate of COPD exacerbations was lower in both budesonide/formoterol groups compared with formoterol and placebo (p ≤ 0.004).,Both budesonide/formoterol doses were more effective than placebo (p ≤ 0.006) for controlling dyspnoea and improving health status (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire).,All treatments were generally well tolerated.,The incidence of pneumonia was not different for active (3.4-4.0%) and placebo (5.0%) groups.,Conclusions: Budesonide/formoterol pMDI (320/9 μg and 160/9 μg) improved pulmonary function and reduced symptoms and exacerbations over 1 year in patients with moderate to very severe COPD.,Only budesonide/formoterol pMDI 320/9 μg demonstrated greater efficacy for both co-primary variables compared with formoterol DPI 9 μg.,Both budesonide/formoterol pMDI dosages were well tolerated relative to formoterol and placebo.,Supplementary material is available for this article at 10.2165/00003495-200969050-00004 and is accessible for authorized users. | The long-term natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in terms of successive severe exacerbations and mortality is unknown.,The authors formed an inception cohort of patients from their first ever hospitalisation for COPD during 1990-2005, using the healthcare databases from the province of Quebec, Canada.,Patients were followed until death or 31 March 2007, and all COPD hospitalisations occurring during follow-up were identified.,The hazard functions of successive hospitalised COPD exacerbations and all-cause mortality over time were estimated, and HRs adjusted for age, sex, calendar time and comorbidity.,The cohort included 73 106 patients hospitalised for the first time for COPD, of whom 50 580 died during the 17-year follow-up, with 50% and 75% mortality at 3.6 and 7.7 years respectively.,The median time from the first to the second hospitalised exacerbation was around 5 years and decreased to <4 months from the 9th to the 10th.,The risk of the subsequent severe exacerbation was increased threefold after the second severe exacerbation and 24-fold after the 10th, relative to the first.,Mortality after a severe exacerbation peaked to 40 deaths per 10 000 per day in the first week after admission, dropping gradually to 5 after 3 months.,The course of COPD involves a rapid decline in health status after the second severe exacerbation and high mortality in the weeks following every severe exacerbation.,Two strategic targets for COPD management should include delaying the second severe exacerbation and improving treatment of severe exacerbations to reduce their excessive early mortality. | 1 |
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is commonly used to combine with pharmacotherapy for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in China and other Asian countries such as South Korea and Japan.,The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tonifying kidney therapy (Bushen, TK) for stable COPD.,Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TK for stable COPD were searched from 4 databases including Pubmed, the Cochrane library, CBM (China Biology Medicine disc, CBMdisc), CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from inception to December 2017.,Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias in included studies.,RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.,The primary outcomes analyzed in this meta-analysis were effectiveness, TCM Syndrome Score, dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council questionnaire [mMRC]), COPD health status (COPD Assessment Test [CAT]), exercise capacity (6-min walk distance in meters [6mWD]), and respiratory-specific quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]).,Second outcomes analyzed for this meta-analysis were lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], FEV1%, forced vital capacity [FVC], FEV1/FVC), the frequency of acute exacerbation, T-lymphocyte subsets (CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8), and immunoglobulin (IgA, IgG, and IgM).,The summary results will be pooled using the random-effects model or fixed-effects model according to the heterogeneity of the included studies.,This systematic review will provide an evidence of TK for stable COPD, and will submit to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.,The conclusion of this systematic review will provide evidence to judge whether TK is an effective intervention for stable COPD patients.,PROSPERO CRD 42018090328. | Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are obstructive airway disorders which differ in their underlying causes and phenotypes but overlap in patterns of pharmacological treatments.,In both asthma and COPD, oxidative stress contributes to airway inflammation by inducing inflammatory gene expression.,The redox-sensitive transcription factor, nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB (NF-κB), is an important participant in a broad spectrum of inflammatory networks that regulate cytokine activity in airway pathology.,The anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids (GCs), a mainstay treatment for asthma, involve inhibition of NF-κB induced gene transcription.,Ligand bound GC receptors (GRs) bind NF-κB to suppress the transcription of NF-κB responsive genes (i.e., transrepression).,However, in severe asthma and COPD, the transrepression of NF-κB by GCs is negated as a consequence of post-translational changes to GR and histones involved in chromatin remodeling.,Therapeutics which target NF-κB activation, including inhibitors of IκB kinases (IKKs) are potential treatments for asthma and COPD.,Furthermore, reversing GR/histone acetylation shows promise as a strategy to treat steroid refractory airway disease by augmenting NF-κB transrepression.,This review examines NF-κB signaling in airway inflammation and its potential as target for treatment of asthma and COPD. | 1 |
COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) is defined by a fixed expiratory airflow obstruction associated with disordered airways and alveolar destruction.,COPD is caused by cigarette smoking and is the third greatest cause of mortality in the US.,Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is the only validated clinical marker of COPD, but it correlates poorly with clinical features and is not sensitive enough to predict the early onset of disease.,Using LC/MS global untargeted metabolite profiling of serum samples from a well-defined cohort of healthy smokers (n = 37), COPD smokers (n = 41) and non-smokers (n = 37), we sought to discover serum metabolic markers with known and/or unknown molecular identities that are associated with early-onset COPD.,A total of 1,181 distinct molecular ions were detected in 95% of sera from all study subjects and 23 were found to be differentially-expressed in COPD-smokers vs. healthy-smokers.,These 23 putative biomarkers were differentially-correlated with lung function parameters and used to generate a COPD prediction model possessing 87.8% sensitivity and 86.5% specificity.,In an independent validation set, this model correctly predicted COPD in 8/10 individuals.,These serum biomarkers included myoinositol, glycerophopshoinositol, fumarate, cysteinesulfonic acid, a modified version of fibrinogen peptide B (mFBP), and three doubly-charged peptides with undefined sequence that significantly and positively correlate with mFBP levels.,Together, elevated levels of serum mFBP and additional disease-associated biomarkers point to a role for chronic inflammation, thrombosis, and oxidative stress in remodeling of the COPD airways.,Serum metabolite biomarkers offer a promising and accessible window for recognition of early-stage COPD. | Because chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous condition, the identification of specific clinical phenotypes is key to developing more effective therapies.,To explore if the persistence of systemic inflammation is associated with poor clinical outcomes in COPD we assessed patients recruited to the well-characterized ECLIPSE cohort (NCT00292552).,Six inflammatory biomarkers in peripheral blood (white blood cells (WBC) count and CRP, IL-6, IL-8, fibrinogen and TNF-α levels) were quantified in 1,755 COPD patients, 297 smokers with normal spirometry and 202 non-smoker controls that were followed-up for three years.,We found that, at baseline, 30% of COPD patients did not show evidence of systemic inflammation whereas 16% had persistent systemic inflammation.,Even though pulmonary abnormalities were similar in these two groups, persistently inflamed patients during follow-up had significantly increased all-cause mortality (13% vs. 2%, p<0.001) and exacerbation frequency (1.5 (1.5) vs.,0.9 (1.1) per year, p<0.001) compared to non-inflamed ones.,As a descriptive study our results show associations but do not prove causality.,Besides this, the inflammatory response is complex and we studied only a limited panel of biomarkers, albeit they are those investigated by the majority of previous studies and are often and easily measured in clinical practice.,Overall, these results identify a novel systemic inflammatory COPD phenotype that may be the target of specific research and treatment. | 1 |
Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are caused by a variety of different etiologic agents.,Our aim was to phenotype COPD exacerbations using imaging (chest X-ray [CXR] and computed tomography [CT]) and to determine the possible role of the blood tests (C-reactive protein [CRP], the N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) as diagnostic biomarkers.,Subjects who were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of AECOPD and who had had CXRs, CT scans, and blood collection for CRP and NT-proBNP were assessed in this study.,Radiologist blinded to the clinical and laboratory characteristics of the subjects interpreted their CXRs and CT images.,ANOVA and Spearman’s correlation were performed to test for associations between these imaging parameters and the blood-based biomarkers NT-proBNP and CRP; logistic regression models were used to assess the performance of these biomarkers in predicting the radiological parameters.,A total of 309 subjects were examined for this study.,Subjects had a mean age of 65.6±11.1 years, 66.7% of them were males, and 62.4% were current smokers, with a mean FEV1 54.4%±21.5% of predicted.,Blood NT-proBNP concentrations were associated with cardiac enlargement (area under the curve [AUC] =0.72, P<0.001), pulmonary edema (AUC =0.63, P=0.009), and pleural effusion on CXR (AUC =0.64, P=0.01); whereas on CT images, NT-proBNP concentrations were associated with pleural effusion (AUC =0.71, P=0.002).,Serum CRP concentrations, on the other hand, were associated with consolidation on CT images (AUC =0.75, P<0.001), ground glass opacities (AUC =0.64, P=0.028), and pleural effusion (AUC =0.72, P<0.001) on CT images.,A serum CRP sensitivity-oriented cutoff point of 11.5 mg/L was selected for the presence of consolidation on CT images in subjects admitted as cases of AECOPD, which has a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 53% (P<0.001).,Elevated CRP may indicate the presence of pneumonia, while elevated NT-proBNP may indicate cardiac dysfunction.,These readily available blood-based biomarkers may provide more accurate phenotyping of AECOPD and enable the discovery of more precise therapies. | The popular methods for evaluating the initial therapeutic effect (ITE) of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) can only roughly reflect the therapeutic outcome of a patient’s ventilation because they are subjective, invasive and time-delayed.,In contrast, vibration response imaging (VRI) can monitor the function of a patient’s ventilation over the NPPV therapy in a non-invasive manner.,This study aimed to investigate the value of VRI in evaluating the ITE of NPPV for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).,Thirty-six AECOPD patients received VRI at three time points: before NPPV treatment (T1), at 15 min of NPPV treatment (T2), and at 15 min after the end of NPPV treatment (T4).,Blood gas analysis was also performed at T1 and at 2 hours of NPPV treatment (T3).,Thirty-nine healthy volunteers also received VRI at T1 and T2.,VRI examination at the time point T2 in either the patients or volunteers did not require any interruption of the on-going NPPV.,The clinical indices at each time point were compared between the two groups.,Moreover, correlations between the PaCO2 changes (T3 vs T1) and abnormal VRI scores (AVRIS) changes (T2 vs T1) were analyzed.,No significant AVRIS differences were found between T1 and T2 in the healthy controls (8.51 ± 3.36 vs.,8.53 ± 3.57, P > 0.05).,The AVRIS, dynamic score, MEF score and EVP score showed a significant decrease in AECOPD patients at T2 compared with T1 (P < 0.05), but a significant increase at T4 compared with T2 (P < 0.05).,We also found a positive correlation (R2 = 0.6399) between the PaCO2 changes (T3 vs T1) and AVRIS changes (T2 vs T1).,VRI is a promising noninvasive tool for evaluating the initial therapeutic effects of NPPV in AECOPD patients and predicting the success of NPPV in the early stage. | 1 |
It remains unclear whether severe exacerbation and pneumonia of COPD differs between patients treated with budesonide/formoterol and those treated with fluticasone/salmeterol.,Therefore, we conducted a comparative study of those who used budesonide/formoterol and those treated with fluticasone/salmeterol for COPD.,Subjects in this population-based cohort study comprised patients with COPD who were treated with a fixed combination of budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol.,All patients were recruited from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database.,The outcomes including severe exacerbations, pneumonia, and pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) were measured.,During the study period, 11,519 COPD patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol and 7,437 patients receiving budesonide/formoterol were enrolled in the study.,Pairwise matching (1:1) of fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol populations resulted in to two similar subgroups comprising each 7,295 patients.,Patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher annual rate and higher risk of severe exacerbation than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (1.2219/year vs 1.1237/year, adjusted rate ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.07-1.10).,In addition, patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher incidence rate and higher risk of pneumonia than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (12.11 per 100 person-years vs 10.65 per 100 person-years, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.20).,Finally, patients receiving fluticasone/salmeterol had higher incidence rate and higher risk of pneumonia requiring MV than patients receiving budesonide/formoterol (3.94 per 100 person-years vs 3.47 per 100 person-years, aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24).,A similar trend was seen before and after propensity score matching analysis, intention-to-treat, and as-treated analysis with and without competing risk.,Based on this retrospective observational study, long-term treatment with fixed combination budesonide/formoterol was associated with fewer severe exacerbations, pneumonia, and pneumonia requiring MV than fluticasone/salmeterol in COPD patients. | Objective To investigate the occurrence of pneumonia and pneumonia related events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treated with two different fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting β2 agonist.,Design Observational retrospective pairwise cohort study matched (1:1) for propensity score.,Setting Primary care medical records data linked to Swedish hospital, drug, and cause of death registry data for years 1999-2009.,Participants Patients with COPD diagnosed by a physician and prescriptions of either budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol.,Main outcome measures Yearly pneumonia event rates, admission to hospital related to pneumonia, and mortality.,Results 9893 patients were eligible for matching (2738 in the fluticasone/salmeterol group; 7155 in the budesonide/formoterol group), yielding two matched cohorts of 2734 patients each.,In these patients, 2115 (39%) had at least one recorded episode of pneumonia during the study period, with 2746 episodes recorded during 19 170 patient years of follow up.,Compared with budesonide/formoterol, rate of pneumonia and admission to hospital were higher in patients treated with fluticasone/salmeterol: rate ratio 1.73 (95% confidence interval 1.57 to 1.90; P<0.001) and 1.74 (1.56 to 1.94; P<0.001), respectively.,The pneumonia event rate per 100 patient years for fluticasone/salmeterol versus budesonide/formoterol was 11.0 (10.4 to 11.8) versus 6.4 (6.0 to 6.9) and the rate of admission to hospital was 7.4 (6.9 to 8.0) versus 4.3 (3.9 to 4.6).,The mean duration of admissions related to pneumonia was similar for both groups, but mortality related to pneumonia was higher in the fluticasone/salmeterol group (97 deaths) than in the budesonide/formoterol group (52 deaths) (hazard ratio 1.76, 1.22 to 2.53; P=0.003).,All cause mortality did not differ between the treatments (1.08, 0.93 to 1.14; P=0.59).,Conclusions There is an intra-class difference between fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting β2 agonist with regard to the risk of pneumonia and pneumonia related events in the treatment of patients with COPD.,Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov NCT01146392. | 1 |
Breathlessness is the prominent symptom of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Despite optimal therapeutic management including pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, many COPD patients exhibit significant breathlessness.,Chronic breathlessness is defined as breathlessness that persists despite optimal treatment of the underlying disease.,Because of the major disability related to chronic breathlessness, symptomatic treatments including opioids have been recommended by several authors.,The prevalence of chronic breathlessness in COPD and its management in routine clinical practice have been poorly investigated.,Our aim was to examine prevalence, associated characteristics and management of chronic breathlessness in patients with COPD recruited in a real-life tertiary hospital-based cohort.,A prospective study was conducted among 120 consecutive COPD patients recruited, in stable condition, at Nancy University Hospital, France.,In parallel, 88 pulmonologists of the same geographical region were asked to respond to an on-line questionnaire on breathlessness management.,Sixty four (53%) patients had severe breathlessness (modified Medical Research Council scale≥3), despite optimal inhaled medications for 94% of them; 40% had undergone pulmonary rehabilitation within the past 2 years.,The severity of breathlessness increased with increasing airflow limitation.,Breathlessness was associated with increased symptoms of anxiety, depression and with osteoporosis.,No relation was found with other symptoms, exacerbation rate, or cardiovascular comorbidities.,Among the patients with chronic breathlessness and Hospitalized Anxiety and/or Depression score > 10, only 25% were treated with antidepressant or anxiolytic.,Among the pulmonologists 46 (52%) answered to the questionnaire and expressed a high willingness to prescribe opioids forchronic breathlessness, which contrasted with the finding that none of these patients received such treatments against breathlessness.,Treatment approaches to breathlessness and associated psychological distress are insufficient in COPD.,This study highlights underuse of pulmonary rehabilitation and symptomatic treatment for breathlessness.,The online version of this article (10.1186/s12890-019-0851-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | Symptomatic relief is an important treatment goal for patients with COPD.,To date, no diary for evaluating respiratory symptoms in clinical trials has been developed and scientifically-validated according to FDA and EMA guidelines.,The EXACT - Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS) scale is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure designed to address this need.,The E-RS utilizes 11 respiratory symptom items from the existing and validated 14-item EXACT, which measures symptoms of exacerbation.,The E-RS total score quantifies respiratory symptom severity, and 3 domains assess breathlessness, cough and sputum, and chest symptoms.,This study examined the performance of the E-RS in each of 3 controlled trials with common and unique validation variables: one 6-month (N = 235, US) and two 3-month (N = 749; N = 597; international).,Subjects completed the E-RS as part of a daily eDiary.,Tests of reliability, validity, and responsiveness were conducted in each dataset.,In each study, RS-Total score was internally consistent (Cronbach α) (0.88, 0.92, 0.92) and reproducible (intra-class correlation) in stable patients (2 days apart: 0.91; 7 days apart: 0.71, 0.74).,RS-Total scores correlated significantly with the following criterion variables (Spearman’s rho; p < 0.01, all comparisons listed here): FEV1% predicted (−0.19, −0.14, −0.15); St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (0.65, 0.52, 0.51); Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale (BCSS) (0.89, 0.89); modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (mMRC) (0.40); rescue medication use (0.43, 0.42); Functional Performance Inventory Short-Form (FPI-SF) (0.43); 6-minute walk distance (6-MWT) (−0.30, −0.14) and incremental shuttle walk (ISWT) (−0.18) tests.,Correlations between these variables and RS-Breathlessness, RS-Cough and Sputum, RS-Chest Symptoms scores supported subscale validity.,RS-Total, RS-Breathlessness, and RS-Chest Symptoms differentiated mMRC levels of breathlessness severity (p < 0.0001).,RS-Total and domain scores differentiated subjects with no rescue medication use and 3 or more puffs (p < 0.0001).,Sensitivity to changes in health status (SGRQ), symptoms (BCSS), and exercise capacity (6MWT, ISWT) were also shown and responder definitions using criterion- and distribution-based methods are proposed.,Results suggest the E-RS is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of respiratory symptoms of COPD suitable for use in natural history studies and clinical trials.,MPEX: NCT00739648; AZ1: NCT00949975; AZ 2: NCT01023516,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-014-0124-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | 1 |
Despite the benefits of beta-blockers in patients with established or sub-clinical coronary artery disease, their use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been controversial.,Currently, no systematic review has examined the impact of beta-blockers on mortality in COPD.,We systematically searched electronic bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for clinical studies that examine the association between beta-blocker use and all cause mortality in patients with COPD.,Risk ratios across studies were pooled using random effects models to estimate a pooled relative risk across studies.,Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot.,Our search identified nine retrospective cohort studies that met the study inclusion criteria.,The pooled relative risk of COPD related mortality secondary to beta-blocker use was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.62-0.78; I2=82%).,The results of this review are consistent with a protective effect of beta-blockers with respect to all cause mortality.,Due to the observational nature of the included studies, the possibility of confounding that may have affected these results cannot be excluded.,The hypothesis that beta blocker therapy might be of benefit in COPD needs to be evaluated in randomised controlled trials. | Mortality rate is high in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Our aim was to investigate long-term mortality and associated risk factors in COPD patients previously hospitalized for a COPD exacerbation.,A total of 256 patients from the Nordic countries were followed for 8.7 ± 0.4 years after the index hospitalization in 2000-2001.,Prior to discharge, the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire was administered and data on therapy and comorbidities were obtained.,Information on long-term mortality was obtained from national registries in each of the Nordic countries.,In total, 202 patients (79%) died during the follow up period, whereas 54 (21%) were still alive.,Primary cause of death was respiratory (n = 116), cardiovascular (n = 43), malignancy (n = 28), other (n = 10), or unknown (n = 5).,Mortality was related to older age, with a hazard risk ratio (HRR) of 1.75 per 10 years, lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (HRR 0.80), body mass index (BMI) <20 kg/m2 (HRR 3.21), and diabetes (HRR 3.02).,Older age, lower BMI, and diabetes were related to both respiratory and cardiovascular mortality.,An association was also found between lower FEV1 and respiratory mortality, whereas mortality was not significantly associated with therapy, anxiety, or depression.,Almost four out of five patients died within 9 years following an admission for COPD exacerbation.,Increased mortality was associated with older age, lower lung function, low BMI, and diabetes, and these factors should be taken into account when making clinical decisions about patients who have been admitted to hospital for a COPD exacerbation. | 1 |
Reduced physical activity (PA) in patients with COPD is associated with a poor prognosis.,Increasing PA is a key therapeutic target, but thus far few strategies have been found effective in this patient group.,To investigate the effectiveness of a 12-week semiautomated telecoaching intervention on PA in patients with COPD in a multicentre European randomised controlled trial.,343 patients from six centres, encompassing a wide spectrum of disease severity, were randomly allocated to either a usual care group (UCG) or a telecoaching intervention group (IG) between June and December 2014.,This 12-week intervention included an exercise booklet and a step counter providing feedback both directly and via a dedicated smartphone application.,The latter provided an individualised daily activity goal (steps) revised weekly and text messages as well as allowing occasional telephone contacts with investigators.,PA was measured using accelerometry during 1 week preceding randomisation and during week 12.,Secondary outcomes included exercise capacity and health status.,Analyses were based on modified intention to treat.,Both groups were comparable at baseline in terms of factors influencing PA.,At 12 weeks, the intervention yielded a between-group difference of mean, 95% CI (lower limit - upper limit; ll-ul) +1469, 95% CI (971 to 1965) steps/day and +10.4, 95% CI (6.1 to 14.7) min/day moderate PA; favouring the IG (all p≤0.001).,The change in 6-min walk distance was significantly different (13.4, 95% CI (3.40 to 23.5) m, p<0.01), favouring the IG.,In IG patients, an improvement could be observed in the functional state domain of the clinical COPD questionnaire (p=0.03) compared with UCG.,Other health status outcomes did not differ.,The amount and intensity of PA can be significantly increased in patients with COPD using a 12-week semiautomated telecoaching intervention including a step counter and an application installed on a smartphone.,NCT02158065. | Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is an important patient-reported outcome measure used to describe the burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which is often accompanied by comorbid conditions.,Data from 2275 participants in the COPD cohort COSYCONET and from 4505 lung-healthy control subjects from the population-based KORA and SHIP studies were pooled.,Main outcomes were the five dimensions of the generic EQ-5D-3 L questionnaire and two EQ-5D index scores using a tariff based on valuations from the general population and an experience-based tariff.,The association of COPD in GOLD grades 1-4 and of several comorbid conditions with the EQ-5D index scores was quantified by multiple linear regression models while adjusting for age, sex, education, body mass index (BMI), and smoking status.,For all dimensions of the EQ-5D, the proportion of participants reporting problems was higher in the COPD group than in control subjects.,COPD was associated with significant reductions in the EQ-5D index scores (-0.05 points for COPD grades 1/2, -0.09 for COPD grade 3, -0.18 for COPD grade 4 according to the preference-based utility tariff, all p < 0.0001).,Adjusted mean index scores were 0.89 in control subjects and 0.85, 0.84, 0.81, and 0.72 in COPD grades 1-4 according to the preference-based utility tariff and 0.76, 0.71, 0.68, 0.64, and 0.58 for control subjects and COPD grades 1-4 for the experience-based tariff respectively.,Comorbidities had additive negative effects on the index scores; the effect sizes for comorbidities were comparable to or smaller than the effects of COPD grade 3.,No statistically significant interactions between COPD and comorbidities were observed.,Score differences between COPD patients and control subjects were most pronounced in younger age groups.,Compared with control subjects, the considerable reduction of HRQL in patients with COPD was mainly due to respiratory limitations, but observed comorbidities added linearly to this effect.,Younger COPD patients showed a greater loss of HRQL and may therefore be in specific need of comprehensive disease management.,NCT01245933 | 1 |
This cohort study of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was performed to evaluate the status of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) prescriptions following the 2017 revision of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines.,A total of 1144 patients from the Korean Obstructive Lung Disease and Korea Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorders Subgroup Study cohorts, with final follow-up visits completed between 2017 and 2018, were analyzed.,Features indicative of ICS usage were as follows: a history of asthma, blood eosinophils of ≥300 cells/μl, or ≥ 2 exacerbations in the year prior to enrollment.,Among baseline ICS users, we compared annual total and severe exacerbation rates, based on ICS continuation or withdrawal.,ICS-containing regimens were prescribed to 46.3% of the enrolled of patients in 2014; this decreased to 38.8% in 2017, and long-acting dual bronchodilators were used instead.,Among ICS users in 2017, 47.5% did not exhibit features indicative of ICS usage; 478 used ICS at baseline, and ICS was withdrawn in 77 (16.1%) during the study period.,The proportion of patients with asthma and the baseline annual exacerbation rate were greater in the ICS withdrawal groinup than in the ICS continued group (56.6% vs. 41%, p = 0.01; 0.79 vs.,0.53, p < 0.001).,Annual exacerbation rates during the follow-up period were similar between the ICS-withdrawal and ICS -continued groups (0.48 vs.,0.47, p = 0.84); however, former exhibited a significantly higher rate of severe exacerbation (0.22 vs.,0.12, p = 0.03).,Prescriptions of ICS to treat COPD decreased with increased use of long-acting dual bronchodilators.,ICS withdrawal might impact severe exacerbation; the potential risks and benefits of withdrawing ICS should therefore be considered based on patients’ characteristics. | Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often suffer concomitant disorders that worsen significantly their health status and vital prognosis.,The pathogenic mechanisms underlying COPD multimorbidities are not completely understood, thus the exploration of potential molecular and biological linkages between COPD and their associated diseases is of great interest.,We developed a novel, unbiased, integrative network medicine approach for the analysis of the diseasome, interactome, the biological pathways and tobacco smoke exposome, which has been applied to the study of 16 prevalent COPD multimorbidities identified by clinical experts.,Our analyses indicate that all COPD multimorbidities studied here are related at the molecular and biological level, sharing genes, proteins and biological pathways.,By inspecting the connections of COPD with their associated diseases in more detail, we identified known biological pathways involved in COPD, such as inflammation, endothelial dysfunction or apoptosis, serving as a proof of concept of the methodology.,More interestingly, we found previously overlooked biological pathways that might contribute to explain COPD multimorbidities, such as hemostasis in COPD multimorbidities other than cardiovascular disorders, and cell cycle pathway in the association of COPD with depression.,Moreover, we also observed similarities between COPD multimorbidities at the pathway level, suggesting common biological mechanisms for different COPD multimorbidities.,Finally, chemicals contained in the tobacco smoke target an average of 69% of the identified proteins participating in COPD multimorbidities.,The network medicine approach presented here allowed the identification of plausible molecular links between COPD and comorbid diseases, and showed that many of them are targets of the tobacco exposome, proposing new areas of research for understanding the molecular underpinning of COPD multimorbidities.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-014-0111-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | 1 |
Aging is an important risk factor for most chronic diseases.,Patients with COPD develop more comorbidities than non-COPD subjects.,We hypothesized that the development of comorbidities characteristically affecting the elderly occur at an earlier age in subjects with the diagnosis of COPD.,We included all subjects carrying the diagnosis of COPD (n = 27,617), and a similar number of age and sex matched individuals without the diagnosis, extracted from the 727,241 records of individuals 40 years and older included in the EpiChron Cohort (Aragon, Spain).,We compared the cumulative number of comorbidities, their prevalence and the mortality risk between both groups.,Using network analysis, we explored the connectivity between comorbidities and the most influential comorbidities in both groups.,We divided the groups into 5 incremental age categories and compared their comorbidity networks.,We then selected those comorbidities known to affect primarily the elderly and compared their prevalence across the 5 age groups.,In addition, we replicated the analysis in the smokers’ subgroup to correct for the confounding effect of cigarette smoking.,Subjects with COPD had more comorbidities and died at a younger age compared to controls.,Comparison of both cohorts across 5 incremental age groups showed that the number of comorbidities, the prevalence of diseases characteristic of aging and network’s density for the COPD group aged 56-65 were similar to those of non-COPD 15 to 20 years older.,The findings persisted after adjusting for smoking.,Multimorbidity increases with age but in patients carrying the diagnosis of COPD, these comorbidities are seen at an earlier age. | Current treatment strategies to stratify exacerbation risk rely on history of ≥2 events in the previous year.,To understand year-to-year variability and factors associated with consistent exacerbations over time, we present a prospective analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort.,We analyzed SPIROMICS participants with COPD and three years of prospective data (n=1,105).,We classified participants according to yearly exacerbation frequency.,Stepwise logistic regression compared factors associated with individuals experiencing ≥1 AECOPD in every year for three years versus none.,During three years follow-up, 48·7% of participants experienced at least one AECOPD, while the majority (51·3%) experienced none.,Only 2·1% had ≥2 AECOPD in each year.,An inconsistent pattern (both years with and years without AECOPD) was common (41·3% of the group), particularly among GOLD stages 3 and 4 subjects (56·1%).,In logistic regression, consistent AECOPD (≥1 event per year for three years) as compared to no AECOPD were associated with higher baseline symptom burden assessed with the COPD Assessment Test, previous exacerbations, greater evidence of small airway abnormality by computed tomography, lower Interleukin-15 (IL-15) and elevated Interleukin-8 (IL-8).,Although AECOPD are common, the exacerbation status of most individuals varies markedly from year to year.,Among participants who experienced any AECOPD over three years, very few repeatedly experienced ≥2 events/year.,In addition to symptoms and history of exacerbations in the prior year, we identified several novel biomarkers associated with consistent exacerbations, including CT-defined small airway abnormality, IL-15 and IL-8. | 1 |
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text,The early detection and diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is critical to providing appropriate and timely treatment.,We explored a new active case-finding strategy for COPD using handheld spirometry.,We recruited subjects over 40 years of age with a smoking history of more than 10 pack-years who visited a primary clinic complaining of respiratory symptoms.,A total of 190 of subjects were enrolled.,Medical information was obtained from historical records and physical examination by general practitioners.,All subjects had their pulmonary function evaluated using handheld spirometry with a COPD-6 device.,Because forced expiratory volume in 6 seconds (FEV6) has been suggested as an alternative to FVC, we measured forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/FEV6 for diagnosis of airflow limitation.,All subjects were then referred to tertiary referral hospitals to complete a “Could it be COPD?”,questionnaire, handheld spiromtery, and conventional spirometry.,The results of each instrument were compared to evaluate the efficacy of both handheld spirometry and the questionnaire.,COPD was newly diagnosed in 45 (23.7%) patients.,According to our receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, sensitivity and specificity were maximal when the FEV1/FEV6 ratio was less than 77%.,The area under the ROC curve was 0.759.,The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 72.7%, 77.1%, 50%, and 90%, respectively.,The area under the ROC curve of respiratory symptoms listed on the questionnaire ranged from 0.5 to 0.65, which indicates that there is almost no difference compared with the results of handheld spirometry.,The present study demonstrated the efficacy of handheld spirometry as an active case-finding tool for COPD in a primary clinical setting.,This study suggested that physicians should recommend handheld spirometry for people over the age of 40, who have a smoking history of more than 10 pack-years, regardless of respiratory symptoms.,Furthermore, people who have abnormal results, determined using the FEV1/FEV6 ≤0.77 cut-off, should be referred for further conventional spirometry to confirm the diagnosis of COPD.,However, further studies within the general population are necessary to establish efficacy in the public. | COPD is a frequent but underdiagnosed disease whose diagnosis relies on the spirometric demonstration of bronchial obstruction.,Spirometry use by general practitioners could represent the first line in COPD diagnosis.,Because duration of spirometry is retarding its development in primary care, we decided to measure the time it requires in the primary-care context in France.,Ten volunteer general practitioners were trained during two 3-hour theoretical and practical continuing education sessions.,Then, from October 2013 to May 2014, they included patients without any known respiratory disease but at risk of developing COPD (age: ≥40 years, smoker: ≥20 pack-years).,The duration of spirometry and its quality were evaluated according to the following acceptability criteria: 1) expiration ≥6 seconds or reaching a plateau; 2) good start with an early peak flow, curve peaked on top and not flat; 3) no artifacts; and 4) reproducibility criteria, ie, forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity differences between the two best spirometry curves ≤0.15 L.,Quality of the spirograms was defined as optimal when all the criteria were met and acceptable when all the criteria were satisfied except the reproducibility criterion, otherwise, it was unacceptable.,For the 152 patients included, the 142 assessable spirometries lasted for 15.2±5.9 minutes.,Acceptability criteria 1-3, respectively, were satisfied for 90.1%, 89.4%, and 91.5% of patients and reproducibility criterion 4 for 56.3%.,Quality was considered optimal for 58.5% of the curves and acceptable for 30.2%.,The duration of spirometry renders it poorly compatible with the current primary-care practice in France other than for dedicated consultations.,Moreover, the quality of spirometry needs to be improved. | 1 |
Although pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is associated with significant clinical benefits in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and has been recommended by guidelines, PR with conventional exercise training has not been widely applied in the clinic because of its inherent limitations.,Alternative exercise such as Tai Chi has been investigated and the results are promising.,However, the strengths and weaknesses of the exercise modality of Tai Chi, conventional PR and a combination of Tai Chi and conventional PR and the possible mechanisms underlying Tai Chi exercise remain unclear.,This study aims to address the above research gaps in a well-designed clinical trial.,This study is a single-blind, randomised controlled trial.,Participants with stable COPD will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of four groups receiving Tai Chi exercise, conventional PR using a total body recumbent stepper (TBRS), combined Tai Chi and TBRS, or usual care (control) in a 1:1:1:1 ratio.,Participants will perform 30 min of supervised exercise three times a week for 8 weeks; they will receive sequential follow-ups until 12 months after recruitment.,The primary outcome will be health-related quality of life as measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire.,Secondary outcomes will include 6 min walking distance, pulmonary function, the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale, the COPD Assessment Test, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Berg Balance Scale, exacerbation frequency during the study period, and systemic inflammatory and immune markers.,Ethics approval has been granted by the Clinical Trial and Biomedical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (No TCM-2015-82).,Written informed consent will be obtained from each participant before any procedures are performed.,The study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.,ChiCTR-IOR-15006874; Pre-results. | To determine the feasibility and efficacy of a six-month, cell phone-based exercise persistence intervention for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) following pulmonary rehabilitation.,Participants who completed a two-week run-in were randomly assigned to either MOBILE-Coached (n = 9) or MOBILE-Self-Monitored (n = 8).,All participants met with a nurse to develop an individualized exercise plan, were issued a pedometer and exercise booklet, and instructed to continue to log their daily exercise and symptoms.,MOBILE-Coached also received weekly reinforcement text messages on their cell phones; reports of worsening symptoms were automatically flagged for follow-up.,Usability and satisfaction were assessed.,Participants completed incremental cycle and six minute walk (6MW) tests, wore an activity monitor for 14 days, and reported their health-related quality of life (HRQL) at baseline, three, and six months.,The sample had a mean age of 68 ±11 and forced expiratory volume in one second 18% predicted.,Participants reported that logging their exercise and symptoms (FEV1) of 40 ± was easy and that keeping track of their exercise helped them remain active.,There were no differences between groups over time in maximal workload, 6MW distance, or HRQL (p > 0.05); however, MOBILE-Self-Monitored increased total steps/day whereas MOBILE-Coached logged fewer steps over six months (p =0.04).,We showed that it is feasible to deliver a cell phone-based exercise persistence intervention to patients with COPD post-rehabilitation and that the addition of coaching appeared to be no better than self-monitoring.,The latter finding needs to be interpreted with caution since this was a purely exploratory study.,ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00373932). | 1 |
The cluster randomized controlled trial on (cost-)effectiveness of integrated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management in primary care (RECODE) showed that integrated disease management (IDM) in primary care had no effect on quality of life (QOL) in COPD patients compared with usual care (guideline-supported non-programmatic care).,It is possible that only a subset of COPD patients in primary care benefit from IDM.,We therefore examined which patients benefit from IDM, and whether patient characteristics predict clinical improvement over time.,Post-hoc analyses of the RECODE trial among 1086 COPD patients.,Logistic regression analyses were performed with baseline characteristics as predictors to examine determinants of improvement in QOL, defined as a minimal decline in Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) of 0.4 points after 12 and 24 months of IDM.,We also performed moderation analyses to examine whether predictors of clinical improvement differed between IDM and usual care.,Regardless of treatment type, more severe dyspnea (MRC) was the most important predictor of clinically improved QOL at 12 and 24 months, suggesting that these patients have most room for improvement.,Clinical improvement with IDM was associated with female gender (12-months) and being younger (24-months), and improvement with usual care was associated with having a depression (24-months).,More severe dyspnea is a key predictor of improved QOL in COPD patients over time.,More research is needed to replicate patient characteristics associated with clinical improvement with IDM, such that IDM programs can be offered to patients that benefit the most, and can potentially be adjusted to meet the needs of other patient groups as well.,Netherlands Trial Register, NTR2268.,Registered 31 March 2010. | The burden of asthma and COPD among patients is high and people affected are frequently hospitalized due to exacerbations.,There are numerous reasons for the lack of disease control in asthma and COPD patients.,It is associated with non-adherence to guidelines on the part of the health care provider and with poor inhalation technique and/or non-adherence to the prescribed treatment plan by the patient.,This study aims to present data on inhaler technique and its impact on quality of life (QoL) and symptom control in a typical population of patients with chronic lung disease from a randomized controlled trial on medication adherence.,For this cross-sectional analysis, 165 asthma and COPD patients were analyzed.,Correct application of inhaler devices was tested using pre-defined checklists for each inhaler type.,QoL and symptom control were investigated using COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and Asthma Control Test (ACT).,Spirometry was used to measure forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1).,Overall, incorrect inhalation technique ranged from 0 to 53% depending on the type of inhaler.,COPD patients with incorrect device application had a higher CAT sum score compared to those with a correct device application (P = .02).,Moreover, COPD patients with incorrect device application were more likely to suffer from cough (P = .03) and were more breathless while walking uphill or a flight of stairs (P = .02).,While there was no significance found in asthma patients, COPD patients who used their devices correctly had a significantly better mean FEV1% predicted at baseline compared to those who applied their devices incorrectly (P = .04).,Correct inhalation of prescribed medication is associated with improved health status and lung function.,These findings should encourage health professionals to provide instructions on correct inhalation technique and to regularly re-evaluate the patients’ inhalation technique.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0238672, Registered 14 February 2014. | 1 |
The SERPINA1, SERPINA3, and SERPINE2 genes, which encode antiproteases, have been proposed to be susceptible genes for of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and related phenotypes.,Whether they are associated with emphysema is not known.,Twelve previously reported single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in SERPINA1 (rs8004738, rs17751769, rs709932, rs11832, rs1303, rs28929474, and rs17580), SERPINA3 (rs4934, rs17473, and rs1800463), and SERPINE2 (rs840088 and rs975278) were genotyped in samples obtained from 1,335 consecutive autopsies of elderly Japanese people.,The association between these SNPs and the severity of emphysema, as assessed using macroscopic scores, was determined.,Emphysema of more than moderate degree was detected in 189 subjects (14.1%) and showed a significant gender difference (males, 20.5% and females, 7.0%; p < 0.0001).,Among the 12 examined SNPs, only rs975278 in the SERPINE2 gene was positively associated with emphysema.,Unlike the major alleles, homozygous minor alleles of rs975278 were associated with emphysema (odds ratio (OR) = 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-2.30; p = 0.037) and the association was very prominent in smokers (OR = 2.02; 95% CI = 1.29-3.15; p = 0.002).,SERPINE2 may be a risk factor for the development of emphysema and its association with emphysema may be stronger in smokers. | Tobacco smoking has been considered the most important risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) development.,However, not all smokers develop COPD and other environmental and genetic susceptibility factors underlie disease pathogenesis.,Recent studies have indicated that the impairment of TLR signaling might play a crucial role in the development of emphysema.,For this purpose we investigated the prevalence and any possible associations of common TLR polymorphisms (T L R2-R753Q, T L R4-D299G, and T L R4-T399I) in a group of 240 heavy smokers (>20 pack years), without overt atherosclerosis disease, of whom 136 had developed COPD and 104 had not.,The presence of T L R4-T399I polymorphism was associated with a 2.4-fold increased risk for COPD development (P = .044), but not with disease stage or frequency of exacerbations.,Considering that infections contribute to COPD and emphysema pathogenesis, our findings possibly indicate that dysfunctional polymorphisms of innate immune genes can affect the development of COPD in smokers.,Although this finding warrants further investigation, it highlights the importance of impaired innate immunity towards COPD development. | 1 |
Alveolar macrophages (AMs) are equipped with innate immune receptors such as toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4).,In primary bronchial epithelial cells, exposure of toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) increased TLR2 mRNA expression and reduced interleukin-8 (IL-8) release when coincubated with glucocorticosteroids.,The aim of this study was to compare TLR2 and TLR4 expression levels and the effect of a glucocorticosteroid after stimulation with TLR ligands on AMs from smokers with and without COPD compared with the healthy controls.,Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed, and AMs were isolated from smokers with (n=10) and without COPD (n=11) and healthy controls (n=10) and stimulated ex vivo with peptidoglycan (PGN), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or TNF-α ± budesonide (Bud).,Blocking antibodies to TLR2 or TLR4 were added before stimulation with LPS or PGN ± Bud, respectively.,The release of proinflammatory cytokine (TNF-α), chemoattractant (CXCL8), and TLR expression was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.,LPS, PGN, and TNF-α induced an increased release of IL-8 and TNF-α in the AMs in all the groups independent of smoking or disease.,These responses were inhibited by a glucocorticosteroid (Bud) in all the three groups, except PGN-induced IL-8 secretion in smokers without COPD.,Bud increased TLR2 expression in the healthy controls and smokers without COPD.,Costimulation of TLR ligands and Bud significantly enhanced TLR2 mRNA expression in both groups of smokers compared with TLR ligands alone.,In smokers, costimulation with PGN and Bud significantly increased TLR2 expression when compared with Bud alone.,On stimulation with the TLR4 agonist, LPS downregulated TLR4 mRNA expression in all the three groups.,The combination of glucocorticosteroids with TLR ligands can increase TLR2 expression, thereby improving host defense in smokers.,Also this combination can decrease the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines as an anti-inflammatory response.,Our findings indicate that glucocorticosteroid therapy strengthens immune defense pathways, which may have implication during exacerbation caused by microorganisms. | Objective To investigate the occurrence of pneumonia and pneumonia related events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treated with two different fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting β2 agonist.,Design Observational retrospective pairwise cohort study matched (1:1) for propensity score.,Setting Primary care medical records data linked to Swedish hospital, drug, and cause of death registry data for years 1999-2009.,Participants Patients with COPD diagnosed by a physician and prescriptions of either budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol.,Main outcome measures Yearly pneumonia event rates, admission to hospital related to pneumonia, and mortality.,Results 9893 patients were eligible for matching (2738 in the fluticasone/salmeterol group; 7155 in the budesonide/formoterol group), yielding two matched cohorts of 2734 patients each.,In these patients, 2115 (39%) had at least one recorded episode of pneumonia during the study period, with 2746 episodes recorded during 19 170 patient years of follow up.,Compared with budesonide/formoterol, rate of pneumonia and admission to hospital were higher in patients treated with fluticasone/salmeterol: rate ratio 1.73 (95% confidence interval 1.57 to 1.90; P<0.001) and 1.74 (1.56 to 1.94; P<0.001), respectively.,The pneumonia event rate per 100 patient years for fluticasone/salmeterol versus budesonide/formoterol was 11.0 (10.4 to 11.8) versus 6.4 (6.0 to 6.9) and the rate of admission to hospital was 7.4 (6.9 to 8.0) versus 4.3 (3.9 to 4.6).,The mean duration of admissions related to pneumonia was similar for both groups, but mortality related to pneumonia was higher in the fluticasone/salmeterol group (97 deaths) than in the budesonide/formoterol group (52 deaths) (hazard ratio 1.76, 1.22 to 2.53; P=0.003).,All cause mortality did not differ between the treatments (1.08, 0.93 to 1.14; P=0.59).,Conclusions There is an intra-class difference between fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting β2 agonist with regard to the risk of pneumonia and pneumonia related events in the treatment of patients with COPD.,Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov NCT01146392. | 1 |
Few studies have investigated the therapeutic effects of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,We compared the risk of all-cause mortality between metformin users and nonusers.,We conducted a retrospective cohort study for patients with T2DM and COPD who were enrolled between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2012.,Individuals with exacerbated symptoms who were hospitalized or sent to the emergency department (ED) were identified as having exacerbated COPD; outpatient claims were identified as having stable COPD.,A total of 40,597 metformin users and 39,529 nonusers comprised the cohort of stable COPD; 14,001 metformin users and 21,613 nonusers comprised the cohort of exacerbated COPD.,Users and nonusers were matched using propensity score (1:1).,Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality.,A total of 19,505 metformin users were matched to 19,505 nonusers in the cohort of diabetes with stable COPD.,The mean follow-up time was 3.91 years.,All-cause mortality was reported in 1326 and 1609 metformin users and nonusers, respectively.,After multivariate adjustment, metformin users had lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.84, p < 0.0001).,Metformin users had significantly lower risk of noncardiovascular death (aHR = 0.86, p = 0.0008).,A total of 7721 metformin users were matched to 7721 nonusers in the cohort of diabetes with exacerbated COPD.,The mean follow-up time was 3.18 years.,All-cause mortality was reported in 1567 and 1865 metformin users and nonusers, respectively.,After multivariate adjustment, metformin users had significantly lower risk of mortality (aHR = 0.89, p = 0.002) and cardiovascular death (aHR = 0.70, p = 0.01).,This large-series, nationwide cohort study demonstrated that metformin use could significantly lower the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with T2DM and either stable or exacerbated COPD. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide.,There is evidence to support a connection between COPD and diabetes mellitus (DM), another common medical disorder.,However, additional research is required to improve our knowledge of these relationships and their possible implications.,In this study, we investigated the impact of DM on patient outcomes through the clinical course of COPD.,We conducted a cohort study in patients from the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database between 2000 and 2013.,Patients with COPD were identified and assessed for pre-existing and incident DM.,A Cox proportional hazards model was built to identify factors associated with incident DM and to explore the prognostic effects of DM on COPD patients.,A propensity score method was used to match COPD patients with incident DM to controls without incident DM.,Pre-existing DM was present in 332 (16%) of 2015 COPD patients who had a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR) [1.244, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.010-1.532] for mortality than that of the COPD patients without pre-existing DM.,During the 10-year follow-up period, 304 (19%) of 1568 COPD patients developed incident DM; comorbid hypertension (HR, 1.810; 95% CI, 1.363-2.403), cerebrovascular disease (HR, 1.517; 95% CI, 1.146-2.008) and coronary artery disease (HR, 1.408; 95% CI 1.089-1.820) were significant factors associated with incident DM.,Survival was worse for the COPD patients with incident DM than for the matched controls without incident DM (Log-rank, p = 0.027).,DM, either pre-existing or incident, was associated with worse outcomes in COPD patients.,Targeted surveillance and management of DM may be important in clinical care of the COPD population. | 1 |
Combining two long-acting bronchodilators with complementary mechanisms of action may provide treatment benefits to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that are greater than those derived from either treatment alone.,The efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of aclidinium bromide, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and formoterol fumarate, a long-acting β2-agonist, in patients with moderate to severe COPD are presented.,In this 24-week double-blind study, 1692 patients with stable COPD were equally randomized to twice-daily treatment with FDC aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg (ACL400/FOR12 FDC), FDC aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 6 μg (ACL400/FOR6 FDC), aclidinium 400 μg, formoterol 12 μg, or placebo administered by a multidose dry powder inhaler (Genuair®/Pressair®)*.,Coprimary endpoints were change from baseline to week 24 in 1-hour morning postdose FEV1 (FDCs versus aclidinium) and change from baseline to week 24 in morning predose (trough) FEV1 (FDCs versus formoterol).,Secondary endpoints were change from baseline in St.,George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and improvement in Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score at week 24.,Safety and tolerability were also assessed.,At study end, improvements from baseline in 1-hour postdose FEV1 were significantly greater in patients treated with ACL400/FOR12 FDC or ACL400/FOR6 FDC compared with aclidinium (108 mL and 87 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001).,Improvements in trough FEV1 were significantly greater in patients treated with ACL400/FOR12 FDC versus formoterol (45 mL; p = 0.0102), a numerical improvement of 26 mL in trough FEV1 over formoterol was observed with ACL400/FOR6 FDC.,Significant improvements in both SGRQ total and TDI focal scores were observed in the ACL400/FOR12 FDC group at study end (p < 0.0001), with differences over placebo exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of ≥4 points and ≥1 unit, respectively.,All treatments were well tolerated, with safety profiles of the FDCs similar to those of the monotherapies.,Treatment with twice-daily aclidinium 400 μg/formoterol 12 μg FDC provided rapid and sustained bronchodilation that was greater than either monotherapy; clinically significant improvements in dyspnea and health status were evident compared with placebo.,Aclidinium/formoterol FDC may be an effective and well tolerated new treatment option for patients with COPD.,Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01437397.,*Registered trademarks of Almirall S.A., Barcelona, Spain; for use within the US as Pressair® and Genuair® within all other licensed territories.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12931-014-0123-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | The assessment of symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is important for monitoring and managing the disease and for evaluating outcomes of interventions.,COPD patients experience symptoms during the day and night, and symptoms experienced at night often disturb sleep.,The aim of this paper is to describe methods used to develop a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for evaluating nighttime symptoms of COPD, and to document evidence for the content validity of the instrument.,Literature review and clinician interviews were conducted to inform discussion guides to explore patients’ nighttime COPD symptom experience.,Data from focus groups with COPD patients was used to develop a conceptual framework and the content of a new PRO instrument.,Patient understanding of the new instrument was assessed via cognitive interviews with COPD patients.,The literature review confirmed that there is no instrument with evidence of content validity currently available to assess nighttime symptoms of COPD.,Additionally, the literature review and clinician interviews suggested the need to understand patients’ experience of specific symptoms in order to evaluate nighttime symptoms of COPD.,Analyses of patient focus group data (N = 27) supported saturation of concepts and aided in development of a conceptual framework.,Items were generated using patients’ terminology to collect data on concepts in the framework including the occurrence and severity of COPD symptoms, use of rescue medication at night, and nocturnal awakening.,Response options were chosen to reflect concepts that were salient to patients.,Subsequent cognitive interviewing with ten COPD patients demonstrated that the items, response options, recall period, and instructions were understandable, relevant, and interpreted as intended.,A new PRO instrument, the Nighttime Symptoms of COPD Instrument (NiSCI), was developed with documented evidence of content validity.,The NiSCI is ready for empirical testing, including item reduction and evaluation of psychometric properties. | 1 |
Patients with COPD experience respiratory symptoms, impairments of daily living and recurrent exacerbations.,The aim of integrated disease management (IDM) is to establish a programme of different components of care (ie, self-management, exercise, nutrition) in which several healthcare providers (ie, nurses, general practitioners, physiotherapists, pulmonologists) collaborate to provide efficient and good quality of care.,The aim of this Cochrane systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of IDM on quality of life, exercise tolerance and exacerbation related outcomes.,Searches for all available evidence were carried out in various databases.,Included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) consisted of interventions with multidisciplinary (≥2 healthcare providers) and multitreatment (≥2 components) IDM interventions with duration of at least 3 months.,Two reviewers independently searched, assessed and extracted data of all RCTs.,A total of 26 RCTs were included, involving 2997 patients from 11 different countries with a follow-up varying from 3 to 24 months.,In all 68% of the patients were men, with a mean age of 68 years and a mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) predicted value of 44.3%.,Patients treated with an IDM programme improved significantly on quality of life scores and reported a clinically relevant improvement of 44 m on 6 min walking distance, compared to controls.,Furthermore, the number of patients with ≥1 respiratory related hospital admission reduced from 27 to 20 per 100 patients.,Duration of hospitalisation decreased significantly by nearly 4 days. | Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are important events that carry significant consequences for patients.,Some patients experience frequent exacerbations, and are now recognized as a distinct clinical subgroup, the ‘frequent exacerbator’ phenotype.,This is relatively stable over time, occurs across disease severity, and is associated with poorer health outcomes.,These patients are therefore a priority for research and treatment.,The pathophysiology underlying the frequent exacerbator phenotype is complex, with increased airway and systemic inflammation, dynamic lung hyperinflation, changes in lower airway bacterial colonization and a possible increased susceptibility to viral infection.,Frequent exacerbators are also at increased risk from comorbid extrapulmonary diseases including cardiovascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux, depression, osteoporosis and cognitive impairment.,Overall these patients have poorer health status, accelerated forced expiratory volume over 1 s (FEV1) decline, worsened quality of life, and increased hospital admissions and mortality, contributing to increased exacerbation susceptibility and perpetuation of the frequent exacerbator phenotype.,This review article sets out the definition and importance of the frequent exacerbator phenotype, with a detailed examination of its pathophysiology, impact and interaction with other comorbidities.,The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-181) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. | 1 |
Small airways disease (SAD) is a cardinal feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) first recognized in the nineteenth century.,The diverse histopathological features associated with SAD underpin the heterogeneous nature of COPD.,Our understanding of the key molecular mechanisms which drive the pathological changes are not complete.,In this article we will provide a historical overview of key histopathological studies which have helped shape our understanding of SAD and discuss the hallmark features of airway remodelling, mucous plugging and inflammation.,We focus on the relationship between SAD and emphysema, SAD in the early stages of COPD, and the mechanisms which cause SAD progression, including bacterial colonization and exacerbations.,We discuss the need to specifically target SAD to attenuate the progression of COPD. | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the most common chronic lung disease in the world, and its associated health burdens and costs are mounting.,Until recently, it was generally accepted that targeting the diagnosis of COPD early in its course was a relatively fruitless effort, since treatments other than already ubiquitous smoking-cessation efforts were unlikely to alter its course.,However, there is strong evidence to suggest that the majority of patients with objective COPD are not aware of their condition, and this leads to a significant delay in diagnosis, more aggressive smoking-cessation intervention, and potential treatment.,Novel methods of diagnostic testing, community health programs, and primary-care provider recommendations hold promise to expand the recognition of COPD in its incipient stages - where recent evidence suggests a rapid decline in lung function occurs and may be prevented if acted upon.,This review explores the evidence to support the efforts to justify programs aimed at early diagnosis, alternative diagnostic strategies that may augment traditional spirometry, therapeutic modalities that could potentially be used in the future to alter early lung-function decline, and emphasizes the necessary cooperative role that physicians, patients, communities, and governments need to play to realize the significant health impact that stands to be gained. | 1 |
The Continuing to Confront COPD International Patient Survey estimated the prevalence and burden of COPD across 12 countries.,Using data from this survey we evaluated the economic impact of COPD.,This cross-sectional, population-based survey questioned 4,343 subjects aged 40 years and older, fulfilling a case definition of COPD based on self-reported physician diagnosis or symptomatology.,Direct cost measures were based on exacerbations of COPD (treated and those requiring emergency department visits and/or hospitalisation), contacts with healthcare professionals, and COPD medications.,Indirect costs were calculated from work loss values using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scale.,Combined direct and indirect costs estimated the total societal costs per patient.,The annual direct costs of COPD ranged from $504 (South Korea) to $9,981 (USA), with inpatient hospitalisations (5 countries) and home oxygen therapy (3 countries) being the key drivers of direct costs.,The proportion of patients completely prevented from working due to their COPD ranged from 6% (Italy) to 52% (USA and UK) with 8 countries reporting this to be ≥20%.,Total societal costs per patient varied widely from $1,721 (Russia) to $30,826 (USA) but a consistent pattern across countries showed greater costs among those with increased burden of COPD (symptoms, health status and more severe disease) and a greater number of comorbidities.,The economic burden of COPD is considerable across countries, and requires targeted resources to optimise COPD management encompassing the control of symptoms, prevention of exacerbations and effective treatment of comorbidities.,Strategies to allow COPD patients to remain in work are important for addressing the substantial wider societal costs. | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a common disease with significant health and economic consequences.,This study assesses the burden of COPD in the general population, and the influence of exacerbations (E-COPD) on disease progression and costs.,This is a secondary data analysis of healthcare administrative databases of the region of Lombardy, in northern Italy.,The study included ≥ 40 year-old patients hospitalized for a severe E-COPD (index event) during 2006.,Patients were classified in relation to the number and type of E-COPD experienced in a three-year pre-index period.,Subjects were followed up until December 31st, 2009, collecting data on healthcare resource use and vital status.,15857 patients were enrolled -9911 males, mean age: 76 years (SD 10).,Over a mean follow-up time of 2.4 years (1.36), 81% of patients had at least one E-COPD with an annual rate of 3.2 exacerbations per person-year and an all-cause mortality of 47%.,A history of exacerbation influenced the occurrence of new E-COPD and mortality after discharge for an E-COPD.,On average, the healthcare system spent 6725€ per year per person (95%CI 6590-6863).,Occurrence and type of exacerbations drove the direct healthcare cost.,Less than one quarter of patients presented claims for pulmonary function tests.,COPD imposes a substantial burden on healthcare systems, mainly attributable to the type and occurrence of E-COPD, or in other words, to the exacerbator phenotypes.,A more tailored approach to the management of COPD patients is required. | 1 |
Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) plays a protective role as an antioxidant in the lung, and HO-1 gene promoter polymorphism has been shown to be associated with the severity and prognosis of COPD patients.,N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an antioxidant/mucous modifier, has shown an uncertain benefit in COPD patients.,We hypothesized that this polymorphism could be associated with the effectiveness of oral NAC.,A total of 368 patients with COPD were recruited and the polymorphisms of their HO-1 gene promoter were classified into three subclasses according to the number of (GT)n repeats, as previously reported: class S (<27 (GT)n repeats), class M (27-32 (GT)n repeats), and class L (>32 (GT)n repeats).,These subjects were then classified as L+ group (with the L allele: L/L, L/M, L/S) and L− group (without the L allele: M/M, M/S, S/S).,All the patients were allocated to standard therapy plus NAC 600 mg bid over a 1-year period and were observed over that year.,The L− group saw improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (from 1.44±0.37 to 1.58±0.38, P=0.04) and FEV1% predicted (from 56.6±19.2 to 59.7±17.2, P=0.03).,No improvement was found in forced vital capacity of each group and the decline of forced vital capacity in both of the groups was not statistical significant.,The number of yearly COPD exacerbations of the L− group was 1.5±0.66 which was lower than the 2.1±0.53 of the L+ group (P<0.01).,For the changes of St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, only the activity score of the L− group was more significant than that of the L+ group (P=0.02).,The improvement of the outcome of 6-minute walking distance test in L− group (from 290.1±44.9 meters to 309.7±46.9 m) was higher than that in the L+ group (from 289.7±46.2 m to 300.3±44.2 m) (P=0.03).,A 600 mg bid oral NAC treatment for 1-year on COPD patients without the L allele can improve the FEV1, FEV1% predicted, the SGRQ activity score, and the result of 6-minute walking distance test, and the exacerbation rate of the L allele carrier in COPD patients is much higher than in the COPD patients without the L allele. | The purpose of this study was to clarify the association between morphological phenotypes according to the predominance of emphysema and efficacy of long-acting muscarinic antagonist and β2 agonist bronchodilators in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,Seventy-two patients with stable COPD treated with tiotropium (n = 41) or salmeterol (n = 31) were evaluated for pulmonary function, dynamic hyperinflation following metronome-paced incremental hyperventilation, six-minute walking distance, and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) before and 2-3 months following treatment with tiotropium or salmeterol.,They were then visually divided into an emphysema dominant phenotype (n = 25 in the tiotropium-treated group and n = 22 in the salmeterol-treated group) and an emphysema nondominant phenotype on high-resolution computed tomography, and the efficacy of the two drugs in each phenotype was retrospectively analyzed.,Tiotropium significantly improved airflow limitation, oxygenation, and respiratory impedance in both the emphysema dominant and emphysema nondominant phenotypes, and improved dynamic hyperinflation, exercise capacity, and SGRQ in the emphysema dominant phenotype but not in the emphysema nondominant phenotype.,Salmeterol significantly improved total score for SGRQ in the emphysema phenotype, but no significant effects on other parameters were found for either of the phenotypes.,These findings suggest that tiotropium is more effective than salmeterol for airflow limitation regardless of emphysema dominance, and also can improve dynamic hyperinflation in the emphysema dominant phenotype, which results in further improvement of exercise capacity and health-related quality of life. | 1 |
The long-term natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in terms of successive severe exacerbations and mortality is unknown.,The authors formed an inception cohort of patients from their first ever hospitalisation for COPD during 1990-2005, using the healthcare databases from the province of Quebec, Canada.,Patients were followed until death or 31 March 2007, and all COPD hospitalisations occurring during follow-up were identified.,The hazard functions of successive hospitalised COPD exacerbations and all-cause mortality over time were estimated, and HRs adjusted for age, sex, calendar time and comorbidity.,The cohort included 73 106 patients hospitalised for the first time for COPD, of whom 50 580 died during the 17-year follow-up, with 50% and 75% mortality at 3.6 and 7.7 years respectively.,The median time from the first to the second hospitalised exacerbation was around 5 years and decreased to <4 months from the 9th to the 10th.,The risk of the subsequent severe exacerbation was increased threefold after the second severe exacerbation and 24-fold after the 10th, relative to the first.,Mortality after a severe exacerbation peaked to 40 deaths per 10 000 per day in the first week after admission, dropping gradually to 5 after 3 months.,The course of COPD involves a rapid decline in health status after the second severe exacerbation and high mortality in the weeks following every severe exacerbation.,Two strategic targets for COPD management should include delaying the second severe exacerbation and improving treatment of severe exacerbations to reduce their excessive early mortality. | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a systemic disease; morbidity and mortality due to COPD are on the increase, and it has great impact on patients' lives.,Most COPD patients are managed by general practitioners (GP).,Too often, GPs base their initial assessment of patient's disease severity mainly on lung function.,However, lung function correlates poorly with COPD-specific health-related quality of life and exacerbation frequency.,A validated COPD disease risk index that better represents the clinical manifestations of COPD and is feasible in primary care seems to be useful.,The objective of this study is to develop and validate a practical COPD disease risk index that predicts the clinical course of COPD in primary care patients with GOLD stages 2-4.,We will conduct 2 linked prospective cohort studies with COPD patients from GPs in Switzerland and the Netherlands.,We will perform a baseline assessment including detailed patient history, questionnaires, lung function, history of exacerbations, measurement of exercise capacity and blood sampling.,During the follow-up of at least 2 years, we will update the patients' profile by registering exacerbations, health-related quality of life and any changes in the use of medication.,The primary outcome will be health-related quality of life.,Secondary outcomes will be exacerbation frequency and mortality.,Using multivariable regression analysis, we will identify the best combination of variables predicting these outcomes over one and two years and, depending on funding, even more years.,Despite the diversity of clinical manifestations and available treatments, assessment and management today do not reflect the multifaceted character of the disease.,This is in contrast to preventive cardiology where, nowadays, the treatment in primary care is based on patient-specific and fairly refined cardiovascular risk profile corresponding to differences in prognosis.,After completion of this study, we will have a practical COPD-disease risk index that predicts the clinical course of COPD in primary care patients with GOLD stages 2-4.,In a second step we will incorporate evidence-based treatment effects into this model, such that the instrument may guide physicians in selecting treatment based on the individual patients' prognosis.,ClinicalTrials.gov Archive NCT00706602 | 1 |
The purpose of this study was to update our network meta-analysis in order to compare the efficacy of indacaterol 75 μg with that of a fixed-dose combination of formoterol and budesonide (FOR/BUD) and a fixed-dose combination salmeterol and fluticasone (SAL/FP) for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on evidence identified previously in addition to two new randomized clinical trials.,Fifteen randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials including COPD patients were evaluated: indacaterol 75 μg once daily (n = 2 studies), indacaterol 150 μg once daily (n = 5), indacaterol 300 μg once daily (n = 4), FOR/BUD 9/160 μg twice daily (n = 2), FOR/BUD 9/320 μg twice daily (n = 2), SAL/FP 50/500 μg twice daily (n = 4), and SAL/FP 50/250 μg twice daily (n = 1).,All trials were analyzed simultaneously using a Bayesian network meta-analysis and relative treatment effects between all regimens were obtained.,Treatment-by-covariate interactions were included where possible to improve the similarity of the trials.,Outcomes of interest were trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and transitional dyspnea index at 12 weeks.,Based on the results without adjustment for covariates, indacaterol 75 μg resulted in a greater improvement in FEV1 at 12 weeks compared with FOR/BUD 9/160 μg (difference in change from baseline 0.09 L [95% credible interval 0.04-0.13]) and FOR/BUD 9/320 μg (0.07 L [0.03-0.11]) and was comparable with SAL/FP 50/250 μg (0.00 L [−0.07-0.07]) and SAL/FP 50/500 μg (0.01 L [−0.04-0.05]).,For transitional dyspnea index, data was available only for indacaterol 75 μg versus SAL/FP 50/500 μg (−0.49 points [−1.87-0.89]).,Based on results of a network meta-analysis with and without covariates, indacaterol 75 μg is expected to be at least as efficacious as FOR/BUD (9/320 μg and 9/160 μg) and comparable with SAL/FP (50/250 μg and 50/500 μg) in terms of lung function.,In terms of breathlessness (transitional dyspnea index) at 12 weeks, the results are inconclusive given the limited data. | The long-term efficacy and safety of aclidinium bromide, a novel, long-acting muscarinic antagonist, were investigated in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,In two double-blind, 52-week studies, ACCLAIM/COPD I (n = 843) and II (n = 804), patients were randomised to inhaled aclidinium 200 μg or placebo once-daily.,Patients were required to have a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity ratio of ≤70% and FEV1 <80% of the predicted value.,The primary endpoint was trough FEV1 at 12 and 28 weeks.,Secondary endpoints were health status measured by St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and time to first moderate or severe COPD exacerbation.,At 12 and 28 weeks, aclidinium improved trough FEV1 versus placebo in ACCLAIM/COPD I (by 61 and 67 mL; both p < 0.001) and ACCLAIM/COPD II (by 63 and 59 mL; both p < 0.001).,More patients had a SGRQ improvement ≥4 units at 52 weeks with aclidinium versus placebo in ACCLAIM/COPD I (48.1% versus 39.5%; p = 0.025) and ACCLAIM/COPD II (39.0% versus 32.8%; p = 0.074).,The time to first exacerbation was significantly delayed by aclidinium in ACCLAIM/COPD II (hazard ratio [HR] 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55 to 0.92; p = 0.01), but not ACCLAIM/COPD I (HR 1.0; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.33; p = 0.9).,Adverse events were minor in both studies.,Aclidinium is effective and well tolerated in patients with moderate to severe COPD.,ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00363896 (ACCLAIM/COPD I) and NCT00358436 (ACCLAIM/COPD II). | 1 |
Peak flow meter with questionnaire and mini-spirometer are considered as alternative tools to spirometry for screening of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.,However, the accuracy of these tools together, in clinical settings for disease diagnosis, has not been studied.,Two hundred consecutive patients with respiratory complaints answered a short symptom questionnaire and performed peak expiratory flow measurements, standard spirometry with Koko spirometer and mini-spirometry (COPD-6).,Spirometry was repeated after bronchodilation.,Physician made a final diagnosis of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and others.,One eighty nine patients (78 females) with age 51 ± 17 years with asthma (115), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (33) and others (41) completed the study.,“Breathlessness > 6months” and “cough > 6months” were important symptoms to detect obstructive airways disease.,“Asymptomatic period > 2 weeks” had the best sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) to differentiate asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.,A peak expiratory flow of < 80% predicted was the best cut-off to detect airflow limitation (Sn 90%, Sp 50%).,Respiratory symptoms with PEF < 80% predicted, had Sn 84 and Sp 93% to detect OAD.,COPD-6 device under-estimated FEV1 by 13 mL (95% CI: −212, 185).,At a cut-off of 0.75, the FEV1/FEV6 had the best accuracy (Sn 80%, Sp 86%) to detect airflow limitation.,Peak flow meter with few symptom questions can be effectively used in clinical practice for objective detection of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, in the absence of good quality spirometry.,Mini-spirometers are useful in detection of obstructive airways diseases but FEV1 measured is inaccurate.,A simple questionnaire and peak flow meter measurements can help doctors differentiate between asthma and chronic lung disease.,In clinical settings where access to specialist equipment and knowledge is limited, it can be challenging for doctors to tell the difference between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).,To determine a viable alternative method for differentiating between these diseases, Rahul Kodgule and colleagues at the Chest Research Foundation in Pune, India, trialed a simplified version of two existing symptom questionnaires, combined with peak flow meter measurements.,They assessed 189 patients using this method, and found it aided diagnosis with high sensitivity and specificity.,Breathlessness, cough and wheeze were the minimal symptoms required for COPD diagnosis, while the length of asymptomatic periods was most helpful in distinguishing asthma from COPD. | The quality of care can be improved by the development and implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines.,Different national guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exist in Europe and relevant differences may exist among them.,This was an evaluation of COPD treatment guidelines published in Europe and Russia in the past 7 years.,Each guideline was reviewed in detail and information about the most important aspects of patient diagnosis, risk stratification and pharmacotherapy was extracted following a standardised process.,Guidelines were available from the Czech Republic, England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain and Sweden.,The treatment goals, criteria for COPD diagnosis, consideration of comorbidities in treatment selection and support for use of long-acting bronchodilators, were similar across treatment guidelines.,There were differences in measures used for stratification of disease severity, consideration of patient phenotypes, criteria for the use of inhaled corticosteroids and recommendations for other medications (e.g. theophylline and mucolytics) in addition to bronchodilators.,There is generally good agreement on treatment goals, criteria for diagnosis of COPD and use of long-acting bronchodilators as the cornerstone of treatment among guidelines for COPD management in Europe and Russia.,However, there are differences in the definitions of patient subgroups and other recommended treatments.,There are important differences between European national COPD guidelineshttp://ow.ly/U2P4y | 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.