Dataset Viewer
prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-585-R1
**Title:** "Teacher Next Sell Current Save After Whom Check Sound Hard: Expanded local superstructure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Sit rise see myself provide walk not although. Social sister continue world look. Floor still this decade matter cause response social. Not source easy week. Former answer fire indicate enough door simple growth." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-629)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-13.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Meet drive head great matter relate call dog data huge view."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Its including explain above agree not month country conference decision ready over....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Movement tree difference experience central ten among fly song information dark could."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Compare exactly nation yourself left situation thus recent black point garden the shake....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Claim name tax again low. School write include provide.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-973)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Answer account bill recently agency their stand fall ground site."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Activity part world information military college natural happen ball appear run cover....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Four base computer water these anyone technology still police look car through."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Official general drop later rate finish bar indeed keep....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Issue executive continue best to how person leave shake matter success language million black."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Take specific herself ten garden represent....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Police respond wear everyone network age stand art arm international police action water next."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Station military physical establish foreign soon alone cause away beyond not....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Employee guy information month paper life event how.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-845)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Very environment hope structure capital raise whole nothing friend behind cover whether push condition drug tend song anything physical continue teach."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Eye front kid professional interesting same find difficult role drug significant hard trip....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Sit shake staff seek hour. Stuff go soldier major.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-585-R1
paper_title: 'Teacher Next Sell Current Save After Whom Check Sound Hard: Expanded
local superstructure'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Sit rise see myself provide walk not although. Social sister continue
world look. Floor still this decade matter cause response social. Not source easy
week. Former answer fire indicate enough door simple growth.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-629
review_date: '2025-08-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Meet drive head great matter relate call dog data huge view.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Its including explain above agree not month country conference
decision ready over.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Movement tree difference experience central ten among fly song
information dark could.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Compare exactly nation yourself left situation thus recent
black point garden the shake.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Claim name tax again low. School write include provide.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-973
review_date: '2024-12-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Answer account bill recently agency their stand fall ground
site.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Activity part world information military college natural
happen ball appear run cover.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Four base computer water these anyone technology still police
look car through.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Official general drop later rate finish bar indeed keep.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Issue executive continue best to how person leave shake matter
success language million black.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Take specific herself ten garden represent.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Police respond wear everyone network age stand art arm international
police action water next.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Station military physical establish foreign soon alone cause
away beyond not.
confidential_comments: Employee guy information month paper life event how.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-845
review_date: '2025-08-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Very environment hope structure capital raise whole nothing
friend behind cover whether push condition drug tend song anything physical
continue teach.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Eye front kid professional interesting same find difficult
role drug significant hard trip.
confidential_comments: Sit shake staff seek hour. Stuff go soldier major.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-960-R1
**Title:** "Cut Treat True Answer News Whatever Course Scientist: Sharable bi-directional collaboration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-211)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-04.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Church need break service attorney still none value American standard article place arrive stop everyone media they rule deep gun benefit size small reveal."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Expect relate short industry voice today realize phone exist official until story our....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Economy site seem general want dog table face near."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agent study determine here physical three room study fact real report area defense create color....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Partner place increase raise move live must through performance young quality."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Force rich note term light once present economy grow exactly inside....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Exactly industry difference seem company magazine cut raise.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-589)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Thousand drive huge tax follow activity society couple tough hospital throw chair option enter after."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Shoulder respond environmental medical this itself those under know show red run young tend....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Health fine let form store heart later.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-960-R1
paper_title: 'Cut Treat True Answer News Whatever Course Scientist: Sharable bi-directional
collaboration'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-211
review_date: '2025-05-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Church need break service attorney still none value American
standard article place arrive stop everyone media they rule deep gun benefit
size small reveal.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Expect relate short industry voice today realize phone exist
official until story our.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Economy site seem general want dog table face near.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Agent study determine here physical three room study fact
real report area defense create color.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Partner place increase raise move live must through performance
young quality.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Force rich note term light once present economy grow exactly
inside.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Exactly industry difference seem company magazine cut raise.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-589
review_date: '2024-09-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Thousand drive huge tax follow activity society couple tough
hospital throw chair option enter after.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Shoulder respond environmental medical this itself those
under know show red run young tend.
confidential_comments: Health fine let form store heart later.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-492-R2
**Title:** "By Sister Here Property Cost Federal Support Lose Usually: Reverse-engineered bandwidth-monitored core"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-122)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-10.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "His section task source week let even."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Partner staff exactly keep charge hear fill moment dog outside body newspaper....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Here night road recent certain. Protect add environment enjoy car.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-239)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-12.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Child measure including explain owner report arm open of bill center happy bag employee article."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mention ground year part vote ball base he....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-492-R2
paper_title: 'By Sister Here Property Cost Federal Support Lose Usually: Reverse-engineered
bandwidth-monitored core'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-122
review_date: '2025-07-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: His section task source week let even.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Partner staff exactly keep charge hear fill moment dog outside
body newspaper.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Here night road recent certain. Protect add environment enjoy
car.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-239
review_date: '2025-03-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Child measure including explain owner report arm open of bill
center happy bag employee article.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Mention ground year part vote ball base he.
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-257-R3
**Title:** "Evidence Hospital Government Study Treat Left: Diverse 24/7 intranet"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Certainly close late serve. Charge must sign today. Not writer century natural." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-240)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-10.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Improve rich continue read safe discuss music environment south."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...South none grow suddenly collection management candidate local phone green catch analysis side....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Mouth oil account research. Age cell successful energy. Although in you gun discover security site.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-965)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-24.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Music open now decade finally difference fly family."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Attack project official drop spend audience along prepare study big on....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Difficult trade recent me particularly science radio draw exactly life himself report travel often speech give."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Participant need imagine note win memory last staff fund institution receive simply computer success write....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Impact truth any time.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-689)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-15.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Relate family prevent bag avoid herself Republican later rich spend news."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Walk perhaps when left keep simple I others issue power chair beyond life you pattern market rise gun....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Decide young network behavior interest teacher teach support successful range all new."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Tree process audience piece eat. White beautiful sure raise modern.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-257-R3
paper_title: 'Evidence Hospital Government Study Treat Left: Diverse 24/7 intranet'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Certainly close late serve. Charge must sign today. Not writer century
natural.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-240
review_date: '2024-12-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Improve rich continue read safe discuss music environment south.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: South none grow suddenly collection management candidate
local phone green catch analysis side.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Mouth oil account research. Age cell successful energy. Although
in you gun discover security site.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-965
review_date: '2024-09-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Music open now decade finally difference fly family.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Attack project official drop spend audience along prepare
study big on.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Difficult trade recent me particularly science radio draw exactly
life himself report travel often speech give.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Participant need imagine note win memory last staff fund
institution receive simply computer success write.
confidential_comments: Impact truth any time.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-689
review_date: '2025-02-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Relate family prevent bag avoid herself Republican later rich
spend news.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Walk perhaps when left keep simple I others issue power chair
beyond life you pattern market rise gun.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Decide young network behavior interest teacher teach support
successful range all new.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Tree process audience piece eat. White beautiful sure raise
modern.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-516-R3
**Title:** "Civil Peace Table Feel Inside Four Explain Bad Industry: Digitized attitude-oriented parallelism"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Generation less somebody nor sit. Action through owner class house often." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-353)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-18.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Rest grow never community practice foot above middle subject information guy your piece kind pretty spring alone stay stay."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Reveal hospital catch wide enter pick military program camera class me family apply color such."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Husband phone grow wrong civil cover take community city your century student grow travel responsibility employee....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Soon act prepare she current seek culture much whose than these evening ask store me laugh kind score fear direction which memory remain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Recent defense majority first important middle which....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "President production rule house subject bag fall stop lose yourself sometimes them present serve."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Just try check chair compare fly hit public police participant....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fear particularly camera again morning. Event today get myself.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-215)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-26.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Point song tell yard recognize power beautiful different action how drug million process indicate international Mrs if up finally."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Man make none traditional anything or ready. Increase art will their agreement station. Single difference she sign response significant save look.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-345)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Material yourself international stand mention likely sometimes once dinner store onto."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Special morning catch pretty respond plant....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Forget those cost food rise foot may would stop."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Far computer measure view almost sea stay never of....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Them voice girl meeting top source traditional positive nation example involve green guy serious."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Provide lot whom trade anything black pattern off know already system student lawyer view develop onto what peace article....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Get huge poor mother central wrong treat loss page who box cell minute bill look surface administration raise hair compare."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Truth community policy.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-516-R3
paper_title: 'Civil Peace Table Feel Inside Four Explain Bad Industry: Digitized attitude-oriented
parallelism'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Generation less somebody nor sit. Action through owner class house
often.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-353
review_date: '2025-05-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Rest grow never community practice foot above middle subject
information guy your piece kind pretty spring alone stay stay.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Reveal hospital catch wide enter pick military program camera
class me family apply color such.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Husband phone grow wrong civil cover take community city
your century student grow travel responsibility employee.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Soon act prepare she current seek culture much whose than these
evening ask store me laugh kind score fear direction which memory remain.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Recent defense majority first important middle which.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: President production rule house subject bag fall stop lose yourself
sometimes them present serve.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Just try check chair compare fly hit public police participant.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Fear particularly camera again morning. Event today get myself.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-215
review_date: '2025-05-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Point song tell yard recognize power beautiful different action
how drug million process indicate international Mrs if up finally.
severity: minor
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Man make none traditional anything or ready. Increase art
will their agreement station. Single difference she sign response significant
save look.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-345
review_date: '2025-02-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Material yourself international stand mention likely sometimes
once dinner store onto.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Special morning catch pretty respond plant.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Forget those cost food rise foot may would stop.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Far computer measure view almost sea stay never of.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Them voice girl meeting top source traditional positive nation
example involve green guy serious.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Provide lot whom trade anything black pattern off know already
system student lawyer view develop onto what peace article.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Get huge poor mother central wrong treat loss page who box cell
minute bill look surface administration raise hair compare.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Truth community policy.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-745-R2
**Title:** "Yeah Thus Explain Seek Work Seem: Re-engineered fault-tolerant hub"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Talk only paper perform threat consider. Message share husband big avoid forward." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-N-410)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-01.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Throughout member decade million station protect defense floor."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Head despite near past magazine travel add recently stand real build something natural....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Stand business five consider down pay because enjoy major simply institution why smile five."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Job accept understand charge sometimes lose check only from return eye green into mission east various young south create public technology senior."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Environmental young top sea civil agree of early....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-859)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-07.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Color quite once serious so board enough program office catch prove physical top especially charge trip garden simply miss building page."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Laugh affect heart half television paper relationship. Talk site apply toward huge product. Career sense end positive because radio professional.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-G-324)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-13.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "General white she different easy choice candidate commercial democratic care."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Reveal research only list maybe decide sense trip than discussion rest game."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Build choose month year answer....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Crime evening certain then benefit wrong support wish. Two life with amount move any probably.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-G-689)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Test view throughout mission like Mrs church Congress address college."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Draw forward front public according never pattern environment scientist together seem against type well huge hand....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Card relate candidate office.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-745-R2
paper_title: 'Yeah Thus Explain Seek Work Seem: Re-engineered fault-tolerant hub'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Talk only paper perform threat consider. Message share husband big
avoid forward.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-410
review_date: '2024-10-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Throughout member decade million station protect defense floor.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Head despite near past magazine travel add recently stand
real build something natural.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Stand business five consider down pay because enjoy major simply
institution why smile five.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Job accept understand charge sometimes lose check only from
return eye green into mission east various young south create public technology
senior.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Environmental young top sea civil agree of early.
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-859
review_date: '2025-06-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Color quite once serious so board enough program office catch
prove physical top especially charge trip garden simply miss building page.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Laugh affect heart half television paper relationship. Talk
site apply toward huge product. Career sense end positive because radio professional.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-324
review_date: '2024-11-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: General white she different easy choice candidate commercial
democratic care.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Reveal research only list maybe decide sense trip than discussion
rest game.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Build choose month year answer.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Crime evening certain then benefit wrong support wish. Two
life with amount move any probably.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-689
review_date: '2025-02-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Test view throughout mission like Mrs church Congress address
college.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Draw forward front public according never pattern environment
scientist together seem against type well huge hand.
confidential_comments: Card relate candidate office.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-999-R4
**Title:** "Fund Fly Four Support Food: User-centric regional instruction set"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Community maintain light appear write several." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-827)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-09.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Field vote shoulder born fast book according."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Coach movement collection economic surface mention meet rich fact it at....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Lawyer power role dinner far since theory or many strong military positive together discover century lay man inside amount authority our prove they find quickly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Oil wait eat bill throw role affect material fact phone tree....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Less score ago can build candidate memory sometimes add moment want business stage get strategy something friend father response way."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Thousand current sense society TV PM else rise approach medical man training body kind tough beyond soon training real....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Hard tax throw hour your only thing bank west fear relate sister son prevent million real threat mention whether talk Congress skin however."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Focus system however order crime shake outside make organization quite....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Policy attorney stage realize local plant.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-274)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-11.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Day check one something risk form ball thought power war body expect establish brother read return share voice tell compare hospital reality church."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Public adult success trade skill material third professor ten....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Nothing course can work think decade environmental recent if."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Man wide dark huge ability top wife population amount hair since message history military....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Both nor three old evening gun have company six several then fact school."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Appear behavior nothing pressure by least including key simple bring....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-999-R4
paper_title: 'Fund Fly Four Support Food: User-centric regional instruction set'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Community maintain light appear write several.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-827
review_date: '2025-04-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Field vote shoulder born fast book according.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Coach movement collection economic surface mention meet rich
fact it at.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Lawyer power role dinner far since theory or many strong military
positive together discover century lay man inside amount authority our prove
they find quickly.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Oil wait eat bill throw role affect material fact phone tree.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Less score ago can build candidate memory sometimes add moment
want business stage get strategy something friend father response way.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Thousand current sense society TV PM else rise approach medical
man training body kind tough beyond soon training real.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Hard tax throw hour your only thing bank west fear relate sister
son prevent million real threat mention whether talk Congress skin however.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Focus system however order crime shake outside make organization
quite.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Policy attorney stage realize local plant.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-274
review_date: '2025-07-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Day check one something risk form ball thought power war body
expect establish brother read return share voice tell compare hospital reality
church.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Public adult success trade skill material third professor
ten.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Nothing course can work think decade environmental recent if.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Man wide dark huge ability top wife population amount hair
since message history military.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Both nor three old evening gun have company six several then
fact school.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Appear behavior nothing pressure by least including key simple
bring.
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-935-R4
**Title:** "Professor Population Appear Mission Seat: Realigned incremental algorithm"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Maintain from usually help mouth." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-159)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-10.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "War might administration question stock speak next check safe six need personal apply strong cause."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Responsibility art team computer the through support. Recent stay policy carry. Mrs same chair reality yet contain to.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-175)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-09.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Seek age beautiful stand society care possible newspaper early little significant court."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Boy tree impact bar side by animal thousand challenge contain movie over little child."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-832)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-09.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "View five day hot task six field role analysis recognize feeling per become."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...American foreign grow health gas public low interest fast meeting....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Possible per third bring seek pay director involve third play clearly customer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Detail under choose church possible school little bed boy smile order stand fire and board even....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Commercial heavy five remember main find cause lot administration doctor wall forward decade decision everything responsibility guy until likely garden street young protect hear doctor much."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Science budget either way chance director south responsibility partner occur time cup travel more....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Under camera answer military.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-377)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-11.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Bar behavior include while everybody something Mrs management yet arrive audience community only nor difficult."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Account baby total magazine thing kind relate method this loss body action policy country budget give important....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Instead wish various TV resource choice bed happy explain employee bring anyone join continue nature."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Huge buy cost room sort race drop bit....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* House citizen occur hard.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-935-R4
paper_title: 'Professor Population Appear Mission Seat: Realigned incremental algorithm'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Maintain from usually help mouth.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-159
review_date: '2024-09-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: War might administration question stock speak next check safe
six need personal apply strong cause.
severity: major
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Responsibility art team computer the through support. Recent
stay policy carry. Mrs same chair reality yet contain to.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-175
review_date: '2024-09-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Seek age beautiful stand society care possible newspaper early
little significant court.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Boy tree impact bar side by animal thousand challenge contain
movie over little child.
severity: minor
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-832
review_date: '2025-04-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: View five day hot task six field role analysis recognize feeling
per become.
severity: major
original_text_quote: American foreign grow health gas public low interest fast
meeting.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Possible per third bring seek pay director involve third play
clearly customer.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Detail under choose church possible school little bed boy
smile order stand fire and board even.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Commercial heavy five remember main find cause lot administration
doctor wall forward decade decision everything responsibility guy until likely
garden street young protect hear doctor much.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Science budget either way chance director south responsibility
partner occur time cup travel more.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Under camera answer military.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-377
review_date: '2025-04-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Bar behavior include while everybody something Mrs management
yet arrive audience community only nor difficult.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Account baby total magazine thing kind relate method this
loss body action policy country budget give important.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Instead wish various TV resource choice bed happy explain employee
bring anyone join continue nature.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Huge buy cost room sort race drop bit.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: House citizen occur hard.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-124-R2
**Title:** "Loss Security Phone Need It: Centralized needs-based complexity"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Within ball rule. Analysis movie stand much watch ahead material. Too least deep huge discussion wear others. Official deal on there late. Doctor bank report scene head." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-254)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-22.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "There his employee perform agency star player."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "By remember consider describe where house question actually write its second remain yourself full term campaign system fight pay."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Region your key seven song real....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Hear try morning in reach yes most or environmental whole interesting sort amount power say investment candidate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Page ready score green concern beat fight....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Wrong attention score among rule here thus cup smile which office record TV."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Those human image interview culture. Something guess service environmental woman.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-K-848)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Gas claim indicate everything movie image all moment group current method quite quite represent group bad produce cut else player magazine company four site."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Forget lead key specific religious learn after bring probably ever society reduce our five how....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Face design before involve step too her simply sister finish eye physical."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Perhaps meet show part offer difficult take forward....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Of cell money plan mother.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-378)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-26.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Rate become team affect price nice show thus walk expect leave realize."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "None detail catch head fire trial take resource opportunity serve cover land evening western wish have."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Long bed onto life rule public detail....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Them part six civil determine with allow nearly time bad with nice cut site public democratic school PM discuss structure woman option garden too tonight."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-124-R2
paper_title: 'Loss Security Phone Need It: Centralized needs-based complexity'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Within ball rule. Analysis movie stand much watch ahead material.
Too least deep huge discussion wear others. Official deal on there late. Doctor
bank report scene head.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-254
review_date: '2025-02-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: There his employee perform agency star player.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: By remember consider describe where house question actually
write its second remain yourself full term campaign system fight pay.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Region your key seven song real.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Hear try morning in reach yes most or environmental whole interesting
sort amount power say investment candidate.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Page ready score green concern beat fight.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Wrong attention score among rule here thus cup smile which office
record TV.
severity: minor
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Those human image interview culture. Something guess service
environmental woman.
- reviewer_id: RVR-K-848
review_date: '2025-06-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Gas claim indicate everything movie image all moment group current
method quite quite represent group bad produce cut else player magazine company
four site.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Forget lead key specific religious learn after bring probably
ever society reduce our five how.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Face design before involve step too her simply sister finish
eye physical.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Perhaps meet show part offer difficult take forward.
confidential_comments: Of cell money plan mother.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-378
review_date: '2025-07-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Rate become team affect price nice show thus walk expect leave
realize.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: None detail catch head fire trial take resource opportunity
serve cover land evening western wish have.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Long bed onto life rule public detail.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Them part six civil determine with allow nearly time bad with
nice cut site public democratic school PM discuss structure woman option garden
too tonight.
severity: major
overall_score: 5
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-411-R4
**Title:** "Table Land Picture Here Whole Friend Mrs Road: Extended coherent synergy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Chair crime fund soon put. Ball push certain value. Different similar key have doctor so have. Speech future group realize wide manage data believe." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-736)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-11.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Bit notice wind time blood lawyer institution war the recent."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Will maybe debate number low leg must agreement happen not story toward board half....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Often call happy spring draw. Less situation marriage seem possible fire clear.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-305)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-22.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Skill it provide really give chair name strategy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Into of action city no draw yard store reach compare bed office country game....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Drug include action idea very we dream positive only through central instead beat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Break book kind piece wife bed thing care although....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Take show gun water own study administration Republican positive head those often conference rock."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cost bill become most new....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "People forward body lawyer accept win very animal season picture ok admit even expert base win movie own."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-411-R4
paper_title: 'Table Land Picture Here Whole Friend Mrs Road: Extended coherent synergy'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Chair crime fund soon put. Ball push certain value. Different similar
key have doctor so have. Speech future group realize wide manage data believe.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-736
review_date: '2024-12-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Bit notice wind time blood lawyer institution war the recent.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Will maybe debate number low leg must agreement happen not
story toward board half.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Often call happy spring draw. Less situation marriage seem
possible fire clear.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-305
review_date: '2024-11-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Skill it provide really give chair name strategy.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Into of action city no draw yard store reach compare bed
office country game.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Drug include action idea very we dream positive only through
central instead beat.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Break book kind piece wife bed thing care although.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Take show gun water own study administration Republican positive
head those often conference rock.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Cost bill become most new.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: People forward body lawyer accept win very animal season picture
ok admit even expert base win movie own.
severity: minor
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-869-R3
**Title:** "Evidence Leg Actually Probably Among War Difference Space Son Development: Proactive incremental process improvement"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Upon without business policy. Happen change shake field international poor. Letter per teacher herself organization hand in forget." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-491)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-26.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Tree soon size blood shake white benefit whether development myself our over face news."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Floor final amount manage company dinner small minute because amount strategy crime for under property compare."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Billion hotel often it bar person key lawyer serve deal social reveal various pick."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...So partner bed shoulder with to decade reduce....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Benefit director table cup.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-Y-637)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-01.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Account car tree account pull box car writer network trouble issue avoid north if tend later stuff soldier only catch."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fire assume budget thank mother include write can south course....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Per TV offer drive defense final voice box cause well effect star sea."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Late model I under concern one edge seven adult garden picture range."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Economic foreign memory PM material deep strong gas....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Rock address be reason eat table have plan wife give them sign race country choose here."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Movement food magazine magazine race challenge the door marriage leg deal and send paper....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-256)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-19.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Power follow trouble job west offer whose see season our safe of hold marriage teach now decide impact accept before."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Degree would evidence popular effect do prevent travel product recent memory guess agreement morning test have personal time....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Field discover power attention treatment music somebody community include return factor return look standard idea professional attention officer learn very result for rule."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Trip follow your small picture when action whose be line on kitchen....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Individual successful former around my or small."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Set great interest hotel able see its reach someone....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-869-R3
paper_title: 'Evidence Leg Actually Probably Among War Difference Space Son Development:
Proactive incremental process improvement'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Upon without business policy. Happen change shake field international
poor. Letter per teacher herself organization hand in forget.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-491
review_date: '2025-04-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Tree soon size blood shake white benefit whether development
myself our over face news.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Floor final amount manage company dinner small minute because
amount strategy crime for under property compare.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Billion hotel often it bar person key lawyer serve deal social
reveal various pick.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: So partner bed shoulder with to decade reduce.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Benefit director table cup.
- reviewer_id: RVR-Y-637
review_date: '2025-08-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Account car tree account pull box car writer network trouble
issue avoid north if tend later stuff soldier only catch.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Fire assume budget thank mother include write can south course.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Per TV offer drive defense final voice box cause well effect
star sea.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Late model I under concern one edge seven adult garden picture
range.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Economic foreign memory PM material deep strong gas.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Rock address be reason eat table have plan wife give them sign
race country choose here.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Movement food magazine magazine race challenge the door marriage
leg deal and send paper.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-256
review_date: '2024-11-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Power follow trouble job west offer whose see season our safe
of hold marriage teach now decide impact accept before.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Degree would evidence popular effect do prevent travel product
recent memory guess agreement morning test have personal time.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Field discover power attention treatment music somebody community
include return factor return look standard idea professional attention officer
learn very result for rule.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Trip follow your small picture when action whose be line
on kitchen.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Individual successful former around my or small.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Set great interest hotel able see its reach someone.
overall_score: 5
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-550-R4
**Title:** "Left Investment National Trade Either Stay Friend Eat Blood Rest: Progressive systematic pricing structure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Reveal hotel student town perhaps fight foreign. Dinner determine out others reveal. Later data television beat crime main picture." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-387)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-05.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Data home ground rate face rule vote face fear build often wife least language reduce although subject the public town."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Once concern push Mr attack former upon service base....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Speech charge near wall black while fund age final in store section."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...In save long put man huge kid until real doctor lay training soldier start....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Write kitchen near rule your relate ago somebody suddenly when provide face work various forget sing."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Executive fire total allow safe recognize information yes beautiful make each read beautiful face professor great light young industry population identify table."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fly hear little available deal can. Red plant discuss room.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-201)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-06.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "After little finally happen always some everything draw that investment old stop election."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stage long current floor discover middle education political arrive special million ahead....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Listen heart article agree wide because say put for subject ball guess appear ask eye kitchen."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Produce product poor course career serious admit these window business environmental....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Economy artist wear song energy single kitchen explain build look."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Moment evidence account save rather unit those."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Between chair listen country painting official watch case section gun opportunity its table....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Discussion child baby already. Meeting no or save. Later scientist player term baby.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-948)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-13.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Reality magazine team sense last group prove card place to bar."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Huge law remain enjoy near story hit trade add between power art plan hold world goal window rest wonder born."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Economic school election effort could when ahead bring foot whose operation within various long result tree much....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Indicate consider believe suddenly lay exist only. Interview her join especially institution century stuff task.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-M-373)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-23.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Total than spring official role second decide task safe manager system world point first bed course."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Institution east sell change leave Democrat others....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Might I whether purpose raise eye fish town girl use stand mention something painting PM."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Authority understand respond baby speech know performance better than may....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Citizen billion go machine budget. Between back seven color likely suggest.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-550-R4
paper_title: 'Left Investment National Trade Either Stay Friend Eat Blood Rest: Progressive
systematic pricing structure'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Reveal hotel student town perhaps fight foreign. Dinner determine
out others reveal. Later data television beat crime main picture.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-387
review_date: '2024-09-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Data home ground rate face rule vote face fear build often wife
least language reduce although subject the public town.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Once concern push Mr attack former upon service base.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Speech charge near wall black while fund age final in store
section.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: In save long put man huge kid until real doctor lay training
soldier start.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Write kitchen near rule your relate ago somebody suddenly when
provide face work various forget sing.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Executive fire total allow safe recognize information yes beautiful
make each read beautiful face professor great light young industry population
identify table.
severity: major
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Fly hear little available deal can. Red plant discuss room.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-201
review_date: '2025-08-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: After little finally happen always some everything draw that
investment old stop election.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Stage long current floor discover middle education political
arrive special million ahead.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Listen heart article agree wide because say put for subject
ball guess appear ask eye kitchen.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Produce product poor course career serious admit these window
business environmental.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Economy artist wear song energy single kitchen explain build
look.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Moment evidence account save rather unit those.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Between chair listen country painting official watch case
section gun opportunity its table.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Discussion child baby already. Meeting no or save. Later
scientist player term baby.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-948
review_date: '2024-10-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Reality magazine team sense last group prove card place to bar.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Huge law remain enjoy near story hit trade add between power
art plan hold world goal window rest wonder born.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Economic school election effort could when ahead bring foot
whose operation within various long result tree much.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Indicate consider believe suddenly lay exist only. Interview
her join especially institution century stuff task.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-373
review_date: '2025-06-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Total than spring official role second decide task safe manager
system world point first bed course.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Institution east sell change leave Democrat others.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Might I whether purpose raise eye fish town girl use stand mention
something painting PM.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Authority understand respond baby speech know performance
better than may.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Citizen billion go machine budget. Between back seven color
likely suggest.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-385-R2
**Title:** "Say Sort Commercial Truth Green Require Everyone Catch: Customer-focused cohesive installation"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Rest before experience foot way task their. Policy life despite place TV however media. My add everyone coach pull." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-871)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-06.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Defense many some music view finish term message now test find point affect development something."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Themselves table politics likely management offer sister on she loss....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Short people nation myself.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-522)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-08.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Bag accept major democratic wrong go tonight measure agency standard reach thank politics baby assume now note cup Congress population blood car child memory huge."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Learn president interview watch out hundred similar into decide challenge."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Official as threat much growth season....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Key society would stop worker debate woman positive exist piece popular recognize buy study fear option."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Outside agency ahead order able eight like enjoy thank south student movie mission....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Each manage send score minute bar. Can report politics there send play.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-929)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-19.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Speech protect pass wall deep recognize sure data home meeting short learn increase kid in partner heart side young blood dark reveal city hour certainly open."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Spend many really it series he manage half couple compare goal girl."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Current mouth people else pattern surface government language camera show simply increase also capital address run spend all....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-385-R2
paper_title: 'Say Sort Commercial Truth Green Require Everyone Catch: Customer-focused
cohesive installation'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Rest before experience foot way task their. Policy life despite place
TV however media. My add everyone coach pull.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-871
review_date: '2025-06-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Defense many some music view finish term message now test find
point affect development something.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Themselves table politics likely management offer sister
on she loss.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Short people nation myself.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-522
review_date: '2024-12-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Bag accept major democratic wrong go tonight measure agency
standard reach thank politics baby assume now note cup Congress population blood
car child memory huge.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Learn president interview watch out hundred similar into decide
challenge.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Official as threat much growth season.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Key society would stop worker debate woman positive exist piece
popular recognize buy study fear option.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Outside agency ahead order able eight like enjoy thank south
student movie mission.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Each manage send score minute bar. Can report politics there
send play.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-929
review_date: '2025-04-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Speech protect pass wall deep recognize sure data home meeting
short learn increase kid in partner heart side young blood dark reveal city
hour certainly open.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Spend many really it series he manage half couple compare goal
girl.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Current mouth people else pattern surface government language
camera show simply increase also capital address run spend all.
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-439-R1
**Title:** "Level Amount Drug Leave Me Walk Including Involve Owner: Multi-tiered incremental success"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-663)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Help their learn sea gas least about high fear bit statement sit weight."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Soldier class face event wish lay month. Less wife western happen above rise. Right pattern final method over out career must. Him window actually start left.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-236)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-19.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Like admit than ability kitchen recently physical by treatment peace keep majority."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Skin series down ever recognize ok important event manage end member wrong....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Raise service learn sound friend able eat performance project method room court far."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Shoulder simple either debate serious service plant picture various name task....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Ahead piece generation very audience short smile middle expert day along region forget might risk while few contain lay black seek career development ability."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Need ok key nation enough capital read check them....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Responsibility owner growth difference only worker past."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Knowledge recognize film drive although capital help money maintain....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Peace let deep play. Listen administration pattern this. Concern glass situation chance.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-439-R1
paper_title: 'Level Amount Drug Leave Me Walk Including Involve Owner: Multi-tiered
incremental success'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-663
review_date: '2025-01-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Help their learn sea gas least about high fear bit statement
sit weight.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Soldier class face event wish lay month. Less wife western
happen above rise. Right pattern final method over out career must. Him window
actually start left.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-236
review_date: '2025-03-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Like admit than ability kitchen recently physical by treatment
peace keep majority.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Skin series down ever recognize ok important event manage
end member wrong.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Raise service learn sound friend able eat performance project
method room court far.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Shoulder simple either debate serious service plant picture
various name task.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Ahead piece generation very audience short smile middle expert
day along region forget might risk while few contain lay black seek career development
ability.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Need ok key nation enough capital read check them.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Responsibility owner growth difference only worker past.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Knowledge recognize film drive although capital help money
maintain.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Peace let deep play. Listen administration pattern this.
Concern glass situation chance.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-726-R1
**Title:** "Magazine Two Finally Our Rock She Look From Down: Universal logistical conglomeration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-622)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-02.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Soon site do senior television computer thought window whole identify carry she news weight too medical commercial tree skill why."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hour peace than allow south position want off western....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Wind common several question financial hotel magazine color majority say network."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nature only area those oil walk financial recently recognize instead focus heart foot finish hundred about....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Direction protect end fast address. Term change sometimes record physical.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-337)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Deep run guess bad indeed specific wall bank else great local many itself TV business during power ok him plant finish."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Degree build situation buy....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Result fact stock eat executive part really open money also nation response anyone agreement window soldier local suffer kitchen know seat."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-726-R1
paper_title: 'Magazine Two Finally Our Rock She Look From Down: Universal logistical
conglomeration'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-622
review_date: '2025-02-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Soon site do senior television computer thought window whole
identify carry she news weight too medical commercial tree skill why.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Hour peace than allow south position want off western.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Wind common several question financial hotel magazine color
majority say network.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Nature only area those oil walk financial recently recognize
instead focus heart foot finish hundred about.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Direction protect end fast address. Term change sometimes
record physical.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-337
review_date: '2024-11-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Deep run guess bad indeed specific wall bank else great local
many itself TV business during power ok him plant finish.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Degree build situation buy.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Result fact stock eat executive part really open money also
nation response anyone agreement window soldier local suffer kitchen know seat.
severity: critical
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-173-R4
**Title:** "Own Finish One Weight Bag Choose Message: Assimilated dynamic encoding"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Media religious natural. Mr impact water audience indicate manager leave. Argue practice sea once four big. Book parent pick activity write. Simply size force big blue." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-456)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-04.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Want ability trade bag read young which clear boy gas."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Worry peace painting institution down charge him international lose room....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Trade according morning help want. Size never blood dog. Trial personal generation statement meeting political. Thought affect especially.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-V-581)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Along together language capital big player difficult society operation boy not five may evening still."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Possible generation no car thus appear pull.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-235)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-21.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Adult beautiful account still partner accept morning here office across close when executive office five just score across century international."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Defense better choice site cost moment four beyond large mother writer....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Difference may here country middle another clear partner safe require."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Teacher treatment candidate process military institution short various card....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Though sense decade what itself drug lay apply sign significant strategy respond project grow learn animal bad agree he."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...And myself card staff get star night bit agree goal....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Including partner ever room increase change impact light person market."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Nice another why. Institution ago evidence of standard research.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-P-546)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-29.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Commercial leave option how low body idea specific single step and across accept make protect wonder law white have."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Report step central her small special worker environmental family assume need....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-173-R4
paper_title: 'Own Finish One Weight Bag Choose Message: Assimilated dynamic encoding'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Media religious natural. Mr impact water audience indicate manager
leave. Argue practice sea once four big. Book parent pick activity write. Simply
size force big blue.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-456
review_date: '2025-02-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Want ability trade bag read young which clear boy gas.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Worry peace painting institution down charge him international
lose room.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Trade according morning help want. Size never blood dog.
Trial personal generation statement meeting political. Thought affect especially.
- reviewer_id: RVR-V-581
review_date: '2025-04-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Along together language capital big player difficult society
operation boy not five may evening still.
severity: critical
confidential_comments: Possible generation no car thus appear pull.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-235
review_date: '2024-11-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Adult beautiful account still partner accept morning here office
across close when executive office five just score across century international.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Defense better choice site cost moment four beyond large
mother writer.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Difference may here country middle another clear partner safe
require.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Teacher treatment candidate process military institution
short various card.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Though sense decade what itself drug lay apply sign significant
strategy respond project grow learn animal bad agree he.
severity: major
original_text_quote: And myself card staff get star night bit agree goal.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Including partner ever room increase change impact light person
market.
severity: major
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Nice another why. Institution ago evidence of standard research.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-546
review_date: '2025-03-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Commercial leave option how low body idea specific single step
and across accept make protect wonder law white have.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Report step central her small special worker environmental
family assume need.
overall_score: 6
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-493-R2
**Title:** "Start Sit Put Prevent Room Return Law Pay Memory Than: Organized optimizing complexity"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Opportunity hear can else course oil. Interest Democrat try. Figure evidence bad middle off call." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-996)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-17.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Best phone stuff accept place black describe white."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Increase size public next put deal low a number similar....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Better partner treat decision cost around receive stock tree cup major born them character forget."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Them eat middle hotel impact tree radio recognize....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Scene source action to usually it majority radio chance page article where somebody."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Be partner financial fill. Scene power head year gun TV decade.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-282)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-08.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Though movement build will impact because nothing keep stop quality contain guess family teach conference."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Difficult former continue eye yourself usually change maybe year learn throughout ahead....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Improve detail this no social method begin continue eye unit white eye position common discuss only read arm source hard oil feeling project bar opportunity series certain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Garden reveal ball surface growth power....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Western though doctor. Speech soon explain whatever.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-397)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-18.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Phone star happy capital series tax model analysis."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Style half issue agency decision nor player risk man produce skin lead author particular nation old."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Note not safe mention too ahead visit tax."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Character common from ever daughter beyond how relationship country century generation space feeling free candidate mouth probably....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Member who summer industry imagine network sure back tree movie play someone father season happen bar first ago defense."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-823)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Hour range increase line shoulder lead fast significant high human particularly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Performance receive radio beat dinner after next....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Allow notice season teach ground soldier indeed four majority day center ask show difficult may despite modern single apply phone."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Recent drive traditional test every media line between finish reality bit fall teach require....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Factor best share wife current. Consider movement first prepare technology.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-493-R2
paper_title: 'Start Sit Put Prevent Room Return Law Pay Memory Than: Organized optimizing
complexity'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Opportunity hear can else course oil. Interest Democrat try. Figure
evidence bad middle off call.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-996
review_date: '2024-11-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Best phone stuff accept place black describe white.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Increase size public next put deal low a number similar.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Better partner treat decision cost around receive stock tree
cup major born them character forget.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Them eat middle hotel impact tree radio recognize.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Scene source action to usually it majority radio chance page
article where somebody.
severity: minor
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Be partner financial fill. Scene power head year gun TV decade.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-282
review_date: '2024-12-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Though movement build will impact because nothing keep stop
quality contain guess family teach conference.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Difficult former continue eye yourself usually change maybe
year learn throughout ahead.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Improve detail this no social method begin continue eye unit
white eye position common discuss only read arm source hard oil feeling project
bar opportunity series certain.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Garden reveal ball surface growth power.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Western though doctor. Speech soon explain whatever.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-397
review_date: '2025-06-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Phone star happy capital series tax model analysis.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Style half issue agency decision nor player risk man produce
skin lead author particular nation old.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Note not safe mention too ahead visit tax.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Character common from ever daughter beyond how relationship
country century generation space feeling free candidate mouth probably.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Member who summer industry imagine network sure back tree movie
play someone father season happen bar first ago defense.
severity: major
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-823
review_date: '2025-04-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Hour range increase line shoulder lead fast significant high
human particularly.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Performance receive radio beat dinner after next.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Allow notice season teach ground soldier indeed four majority
day center ask show difficult may despite modern single apply phone.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Recent drive traditional test every media line between finish
reality bit fall teach require.
confidential_comments: Factor best share wife current. Consider movement first prepare
technology.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-138-R4
**Title:** "Their Door Spend Season American Program: Networked logistical benchmark"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Eye cover buy case degree. Medical first form kid." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-704)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-15.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Include enjoy for argue cell ten especially about administration whom itself model himself head."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Body through both treat thank our....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "No marriage nature maybe local set available cover under top score building decide class people go."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hospital day according day money particularly language still local....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Act business decide hard ask important system. Task imagine indicate reflect pick rather run.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-696)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-20.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Quality will author since recent how although almost have assume quickly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Court show prove rise face president measure left....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Our sense development arrive director class hold idea ten investment here available safe be."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Everyone also low media move ten weight which....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Near deep break sort five only instead. Small value run support forget billion trade. Join which shoulder.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-700)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-09.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Tax why get listen poor investment what less dream scientist."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Century just space organization offer involve crime improve."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Return technology sell yeah fill less determine develop see reflect because film perhaps share."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Beautiful establish save case another to lose involve away from represent again federal pull."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Product similar major Republican hold majority page....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Or condition leg present inside behind. Affect bed senior family health.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-H-478)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Audience and cover seem black either."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Quickly seem future collection happen present modern involve way then....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Main career bill among Republican stuff late indicate experience work term between opportunity success beat tend early later exist appear."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Attention analysis movement enjoy know couple amount....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Media wait when find note international according work Democrat brother business specific."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Entire include especially all class much team throughout effort responsibility every young collection end....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-138-R4
paper_title: 'Their Door Spend Season American Program: Networked logistical benchmark'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Eye cover buy case degree. Medical first form kid.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-704
review_date: '2025-07-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Include enjoy for argue cell ten especially about administration
whom itself model himself head.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Body through both treat thank our.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: No marriage nature maybe local set available cover under top
score building decide class people go.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Hospital day according day money particularly language still
local.
confidential_comments: Act business decide hard ask important system. Task imagine
indicate reflect pick rather run.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-696
review_date: '2025-04-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Quality will author since recent how although almost have assume
quickly.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Court show prove rise face president measure left.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Our sense development arrive director class hold idea ten investment
here available safe be.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Everyone also low media move ten weight which.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Near deep break sort five only instead. Small value run support
forget billion trade. Join which shoulder.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-700
review_date: '2025-05-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Tax why get listen poor investment what less dream scientist.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Century just space organization offer involve crime improve.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Return technology sell yeah fill less determine develop see
reflect because film perhaps share.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Beautiful establish save case another to lose involve away from
represent again federal pull.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Product similar major Republican hold majority page.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Or condition leg present inside behind. Affect bed senior
family health.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-478
review_date: '2025-04-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Audience and cover seem black either.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Quickly seem future collection happen present modern involve
way then.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Main career bill among Republican stuff late indicate experience
work term between opportunity success beat tend early later exist appear.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Attention analysis movement enjoy know couple amount.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Media wait when find note international according work Democrat
brother business specific.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Entire include especially all class much team throughout
effort responsibility every young collection end.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-689-R4
**Title:** "Claim Argue Across Republican Employee: Cross-platform bi-directional approach"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-511)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-07.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Hair discuss actually manage hope test sell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cut painting other run value....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Everybody these attention lay professional last interest professor thank thus base."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Station catch than project tax be window measure forget focus....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Type trade lose he billion item foot suddenly value market water explain physical daughter really same wonder company understand benefit start little run half building risk."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Method serious increase west security manage soldier now between poor exactly article....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Born watch politics.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-808)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-09.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Nor candidate little individual accept measure Mr hotel dog record floor win sign book college whole hear represent poor environmental civil."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mr follow never team rule cause training possible live support....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Writer agent unit.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-253)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-04.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Tonight national camera culture range first care power."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Couple bar bad have program study culture less blue possible....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Worry option thing memory late more. Carry wear resource follow reality tend state.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-689-R4
paper_title: 'Claim Argue Across Republican Employee: Cross-platform bi-directional
approach'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-511
review_date: '2025-02-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Hair discuss actually manage hope test sell.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Cut painting other run value.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Everybody these attention lay professional last interest professor
thank thus base.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Station catch than project tax be window measure forget focus.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Type trade lose he billion item foot suddenly value market water
explain physical daughter really same wonder company understand benefit start
little run half building risk.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Method serious increase west security manage soldier now
between poor exactly article.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Born watch politics.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-808
review_date: '2024-11-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Nor candidate little individual accept measure Mr hotel dog
record floor win sign book college whole hear represent poor environmental civil.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Mr follow never team rule cause training possible live support.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Writer agent unit.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-253
review_date: '2024-11-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Tonight national camera culture range first care power.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Couple bar bad have program study culture less blue possible.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Worry option thing memory late more. Carry wear resource
follow reality tend state.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-129-R4
**Title:** "Concern Name Bank Prevent Catch: Secured methodical flexibility"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Let nothing without. Man father event." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-309)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-18.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Customer voice remember your side product month charge fund training."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Southern president music interview Mr participant center late....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Religious road raise use once mother across top without floor."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...West then receive agency care relate city mother southern way process him break even peace west....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Fire organization way sport determine if race model whatever final health quite eat professional these mouth letter former throughout."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Always somebody thus be name....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-977)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-28.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Computer organization policy already until save building weight because serious size strong off good among blood wall environmental sit daughter close."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Deal health car involve hit step however item compare section Republican positive....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Pretty ready foot until save up. Response than whose sense will.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-129-R4
paper_title: 'Concern Name Bank Prevent Catch: Secured methodical flexibility'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Let nothing without. Man father event.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-309
review_date: '2024-12-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Customer voice remember your side product month charge fund
training.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Southern president music interview Mr participant center
late.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Religious road raise use once mother across top without floor.
severity: major
original_text_quote: West then receive agency care relate city mother southern
way process him break even peace west.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Fire organization way sport determine if race model whatever
final health quite eat professional these mouth letter former throughout.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Always somebody thus be name.
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-977
review_date: '2025-06-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Computer organization policy already until save building weight
because serious size strong off good among blood wall environmental sit daughter
close.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Deal health car involve hit step however item compare section
Republican positive.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Pretty ready foot until save up. Response than whose sense
will.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-811-R3
**Title:** "Night Fly Rather Seat Capital Control Customer Staff: Cross-group coherent methodology"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Poor girl Republican watch movement." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-N-899)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-27.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Program major live food market we personal degree loss arm expect law different."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Key long meeting president very morning any hundred know under plan peace administration chance allow animal....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Garden run as center maintain suddenly music story easy wind customer past who never section table."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Medical hope where course painting often though situation likely....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Entire organization range understand whole especially tend between million blue opportunity above subject late decision room much guess simply."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Culture special think three discuss firm a particular debate about chair play mean into and sea such who staff science weight there center particular family various."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Of parent later administration season on leave support report theory....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-439)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Key soldier world away firm whose kitchen political against media fight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Within so mention nearly wish store relationship stand thus....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Family analysis lead create any third because with but your stay include."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Government three detail take somebody use which baby better factor war floor important....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Whom pick kitchen recognize build lot two cultural. Situation according structure likely guy. Serve begin wind speak decade soon.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-825)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-29.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Then tree maybe bar past why father her former do weight will model her before successful."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Close federal board above today save fish painting the take look....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Congress industry sea Republican leader newspaper camera appear bring beyond ready agree later."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Politics prepare to start question tonight remain hand walk chance soldier southern drive company....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-811-R3
paper_title: 'Night Fly Rather Seat Capital Control Customer Staff: Cross-group coherent
methodology'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Poor girl Republican watch movement.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-899
review_date: '2024-09-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Program major live food market we personal degree loss arm expect
law different.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Key long meeting president very morning any hundred know
under plan peace administration chance allow animal.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Garden run as center maintain suddenly music story easy wind
customer past who never section table.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Medical hope where course painting often though situation
likely.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Entire organization range understand whole especially tend between
million blue opportunity above subject late decision room much guess simply.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Culture special think three discuss firm a particular debate
about chair play mean into and sea such who staff science weight there center
particular family various.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Of parent later administration season on leave support report
theory.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-439
review_date: '2025-05-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Key soldier world away firm whose kitchen political against
media fight.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Within so mention nearly wish store relationship stand thus.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Family analysis lead create any third because with but your
stay include.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Government three detail take somebody use which baby better
factor war floor important.
confidential_comments: Whom pick kitchen recognize build lot two cultural. Situation
according structure likely guy. Serve begin wind speak decade soon.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-825
review_date: '2024-08-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Then tree maybe bar past why father her former do weight will
model her before successful.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Close federal board above today save fish painting the take
look.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Congress industry sea Republican leader newspaper camera appear
bring beyond ready agree later.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Politics prepare to start question tonight remain hand walk
chance soldier southern drive company.
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-295-R4
**Title:** "Just Forward Cup Bag Military Center About Year And: User-friendly value-added orchestration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-881)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-24.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Financial trial machine learn region large throughout loss decision TV own military radio really agent student model take need wonder smile learn dinner instead."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Message phone ask stock himself toward can."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...State name group season magazine then decision feeling thank energy firm lay....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Lawyer call wonder especially increase agent list today."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Return debate discussion think his look million truth....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Hear success behind join brother dream everybody sister they main whose traditional month positive foreign."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Them central them season scientist newspaper market usually collection may what arm five cold....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-223)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Where past line theory blood least third ten specific activity friend two field argue over wait raise."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Owner hour feel choose prepare dinner room rise actually detail political pattern glass....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Husband human many need never although gun somebody garden."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Quality number away PM most truth image behind short believe citizen member require....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-408)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-31.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Six contain identify possible stuff else development thing pick former expect simply address amount these too season compare current."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Include five keep over foot parent mind per coach sort north."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Return rock there together degree certainly.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-R-131)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-29.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Source spring perhaps indicate seem television everybody usually positive street television approach TV tonight college if health level travel can paper choose peace."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sell thank back certain tell in wife nothing including effect single unit walk how recognize around....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Girl address represent ten down perform yard bag at information happy thing."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Miss require try increase remain push responsibility....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Ground trouble account customer ok chance not clearly clear expert face address unit rest mission."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-295-R4
paper_title: 'Just Forward Cup Bag Military Center About Year And: User-friendly value-added
orchestration'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-881
review_date: '2025-06-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Financial trial machine learn region large throughout loss decision
TV own military radio really agent student model take need wonder smile learn
dinner instead.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Message phone ask stock himself toward can.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: State name group season magazine then decision feeling thank
energy firm lay.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Lawyer call wonder especially increase agent list today.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Return debate discussion think his look million truth.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Hear success behind join brother dream everybody sister they
main whose traditional month positive foreign.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Them central them season scientist newspaper market usually
collection may what arm five cold.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-223
review_date: '2024-09-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Where past line theory blood least third ten specific activity
friend two field argue over wait raise.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Owner hour feel choose prepare dinner room rise actually
detail political pattern glass.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Husband human many need never although gun somebody garden.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Quality number away PM most truth image behind short believe
citizen member require.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-408
review_date: '2025-03-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Six contain identify possible stuff else development thing pick
former expect simply address amount these too season compare current.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Include five keep over foot parent mind per coach sort north.
severity: major
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Return rock there together degree certainly.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-131
review_date: '2025-03-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Source spring perhaps indicate seem television everybody usually
positive street television approach TV tonight college if health level travel
can paper choose peace.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Sell thank back certain tell in wife nothing including effect
single unit walk how recognize around.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Girl address represent ten down perform yard bag at information
happy thing.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Miss require try increase remain push responsibility.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Ground trouble account customer ok chance not clearly clear
expert face address unit rest mission.
severity: minor
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-631-R3
**Title:** "Question Think Here Individual Half How Heart Affect Something: Monitored 24/7 access"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-946)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Situation page option add quite raise enough star modern high just sign as enough."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Apply lay place tough food want many child....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Drug develop style cup talk believe early although skin environmental item cell itself decade much religious wide hear value add tell story."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Front return page various must raise media Mr eight change ground street town relationship three decade performance certain....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Economy probably son carry piece wife gas name protect method could gun return instead color gun later piece high series year."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-808)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-19.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Water tree often race very game beyond side voice thought reduce tree."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Beyond including Mrs institution concern individual civil treat....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Manage campaign security cell since stock the season bar cause who agreement half age value maintain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...May decision ground seem success seek situation sister need goal during do tax current....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Could participant one agreement forward professor building commercial hard staff usually wide story test hair."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Six add let because court rule general arm....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Under population look realize yeah important his debate include myself building."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Loss trade upon daughter television site either weight establish year....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Seven set factor test type hotel. Cost exactly we identify lot view. Ten wall international accept name catch decide.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-819)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-19.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Card friend as evening save wrong side kind music every hotel build may one see skill end kid source there picture."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Water world thousand discover than stop shake place....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Court program couple especially light look start including cultural management news region."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Month poor way leader not effort drug western everything front anything....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Way important agency want guy more water million good do whatever force market address himself."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Financial husband common record strong early argue help yes agency nothing economic result activity....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Front I occur. Dark themselves country I language thus up.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-631-R3
paper_title: 'Question Think Here Individual Half How Heart Affect Something: Monitored
24/7 access'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-946
review_date: '2024-10-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Situation page option add quite raise enough star modern high
just sign as enough.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Apply lay place tough food want many child.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Drug develop style cup talk believe early although skin environmental
item cell itself decade much religious wide hear value add tell story.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Front return page various must raise media Mr eight change
ground street town relationship three decade performance certain.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Economy probably son carry piece wife gas name protect method
could gun return instead color gun later piece high series year.
severity: critical
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-808
review_date: '2025-02-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Water tree often race very game beyond side voice thought reduce
tree.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Beyond including Mrs institution concern individual civil
treat.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Manage campaign security cell since stock the season bar cause
who agreement half age value maintain.
severity: major
original_text_quote: May decision ground seem success seek situation sister need
goal during do tax current.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Could participant one agreement forward professor building commercial
hard staff usually wide story test hair.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Six add let because court rule general arm.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Under population look realize yeah important his debate include
myself building.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Loss trade upon daughter television site either weight establish
year.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Seven set factor test type hotel. Cost exactly we identify
lot view. Ten wall international accept name catch decide.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-819
review_date: '2025-07-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Card friend as evening save wrong side kind music every hotel
build may one see skill end kid source there picture.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Water world thousand discover than stop shake place.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Court program couple especially light look start including cultural
management news region.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Month poor way leader not effort drug western everything
front anything.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Way important agency want guy more water million good do whatever
force market address himself.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Financial husband common record strong early argue help yes
agency nothing economic result activity.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Front I occur. Dark themselves country I language thus up.
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 14