Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
Update reranker.py
Browse files- reranker.py +84 -9
reranker.py
CHANGED
@@ -7,9 +7,60 @@ import google.generativeai as genai
|
|
7 |
genai.configure(api_key=os.environ.get("GEMINI_API_KEY", ""))
|
8 |
model = genai.GenerativeModel("models/gemini-2.0-flash")
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
def rerank(query, candidates):
|
11 |
"""
|
12 |
-
Rerank the candidate assessments using Gemini
|
|
|
13 |
|
14 |
Args:
|
15 |
query: The job description
|
@@ -26,9 +77,22 @@ def rerank(query, candidates):
|
|
26 |
print(f"Reranking {len(candidates)} candidates")
|
27 |
print(f"Sample candidate: {json.dumps(candidates[0], indent=2)}")
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
# Clean up candidates data for API
|
30 |
cleaned_candidates = []
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
for candidate in candidates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
# Create a clean copy
|
33 |
clean_candidate = {}
|
34 |
|
@@ -51,15 +115,25 @@ def rerank(query, candidates):
|
|
51 |
|
52 |
cleaned_candidates.append(clean_candidate)
|
53 |
|
54 |
-
# Create the prompt for Gemini
|
55 |
prompt = f"""
|
56 |
-
|
57 |
|
58 |
Job description: "{query}"
|
59 |
|
60 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
62 |
-
|
63 |
{{
|
64 |
"recommended_assessments": [
|
65 |
{{
|
@@ -76,10 +150,11 @@ def rerank(query, candidates):
|
|
76 |
CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS:
|
77 |
1. Return ONLY valid JSON without any markdown code blocks or extra text
|
78 |
2. Preserve the exact URL values from the input - do not modify them
|
79 |
-
3. Include all fields from the original assessment data
|
80 |
-
4.
|
81 |
-
5. Ensure the
|
82 |
-
6.
|
|
|
83 |
"""
|
84 |
|
85 |
# Generate response
|
|
|
7 |
genai.configure(api_key=os.environ.get("GEMINI_API_KEY", ""))
|
8 |
model = genai.GenerativeModel("models/gemini-2.0-flash")
|
9 |
|
10 |
+
def extract_job_requirements(job_description):
|
11 |
+
"""
|
12 |
+
Extract key job requirements from the job description to improve assessment matching.
|
13 |
+
"""
|
14 |
+
# Common skills and requirements categories to look for
|
15 |
+
skill_categories = [
|
16 |
+
"technical skills", "soft skills", "communication", "leadership",
|
17 |
+
"management", "analytical", "problem-solving", "teamwork", "coding",
|
18 |
+
"programming", "data analysis", "project management", "sales",
|
19 |
+
"customer service", "administrative", "clerical", "organization",
|
20 |
+
"attention to detail", "decision making", "numerical", "verbal"
|
21 |
+
]
|
22 |
+
|
23 |
+
# Education and experience patterns
|
24 |
+
education_patterns = [
|
25 |
+
"bachelor", "master", "phd", "degree", "diploma", "certification",
|
26 |
+
"years of experience", "years experience"
|
27 |
+
]
|
28 |
+
|
29 |
+
# Extract requirements from the job description
|
30 |
+
requirements = []
|
31 |
+
job_desc_lower = job_description.lower()
|
32 |
+
|
33 |
+
# Check for skill categories
|
34 |
+
for skill in skill_categories:
|
35 |
+
if skill in job_desc_lower:
|
36 |
+
requirements.append(f"Need for {skill}")
|
37 |
+
|
38 |
+
# Check for education and experience
|
39 |
+
for pattern in education_patterns:
|
40 |
+
if pattern in job_desc_lower:
|
41 |
+
# Try to find the sentence containing this pattern
|
42 |
+
sentences = job_description.split('.')
|
43 |
+
for sentence in sentences:
|
44 |
+
if pattern in sentence.lower():
|
45 |
+
clean_sentence = sentence.strip()
|
46 |
+
if clean_sentence:
|
47 |
+
requirements.append(clean_sentence)
|
48 |
+
break
|
49 |
+
|
50 |
+
# If we couldn't find specific requirements, add some general ones
|
51 |
+
if not requirements:
|
52 |
+
requirements = [
|
53 |
+
"General job aptitude assessment needed",
|
54 |
+
"Personality and behavior evaluation",
|
55 |
+
"Competency assessment for job fit"
|
56 |
+
]
|
57 |
+
|
58 |
+
return requirements
|
59 |
+
|
60 |
def rerank(query, candidates):
|
61 |
"""
|
62 |
+
Rerank the candidate assessments using Gemini with improved instructions
|
63 |
+
for relevance and diversity.
|
64 |
|
65 |
Args:
|
66 |
query: The job description
|
|
|
77 |
print(f"Reranking {len(candidates)} candidates")
|
78 |
print(f"Sample candidate: {json.dumps(candidates[0], indent=2)}")
|
79 |
|
80 |
+
# Extract key job requirements to improve matching
|
81 |
+
job_requirements = extract_job_requirements(query)
|
82 |
+
job_req_str = "\n".join([f"- {req}" for req in job_requirements])
|
83 |
+
print(f"Extracted job requirements: {len(job_requirements)} items")
|
84 |
+
|
85 |
# Clean up candidates data for API
|
86 |
cleaned_candidates = []
|
87 |
+
unique_urls = set() # Track URLs to avoid duplicates
|
88 |
+
|
89 |
for candidate in candidates:
|
90 |
+
# Skip if we've already seen this URL
|
91 |
+
if candidate.get('url') in unique_urls:
|
92 |
+
continue
|
93 |
+
|
94 |
+
unique_urls.add(candidate.get('url', ''))
|
95 |
+
|
96 |
# Create a clean copy
|
97 |
clean_candidate = {}
|
98 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
116 |
cleaned_candidates.append(clean_candidate)
|
117 |
|
118 |
+
# Create the enhanced prompt for Gemini
|
119 |
prompt = f"""
|
120 |
+
As an SHL assessment expert, your task is to select the most appropriate assessments for a job position.
|
121 |
|
122 |
Job description: "{query}"
|
123 |
|
124 |
+
Key job requirements identified:
|
125 |
+
{job_req_str}
|
126 |
+
|
127 |
+
Available SHL assessments: {json.dumps(cleaned_candidates, indent=2)}
|
128 |
+
|
129 |
+
Rank the 5 most relevant assessments based on how well they match the job requirements.
|
130 |
+
Focus on these ranking factors:
|
131 |
+
1. Direct relevance to the job skills required
|
132 |
+
2. Test types that assess the key job requirements
|
133 |
+
3. Diversity of assessment methods (include different test types)
|
134 |
+
4. Practical duration considering the role's seniority level
|
135 |
|
136 |
+
Return a JSON list in this format:
|
137 |
{{
|
138 |
"recommended_assessments": [
|
139 |
{{
|
|
|
150 |
CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS:
|
151 |
1. Return ONLY valid JSON without any markdown code blocks or extra text
|
152 |
2. Preserve the exact URL values from the input - do not modify them
|
153 |
+
3. Include all fields from the original assessment data exactly as provided
|
154 |
+
4. Provide exactly 5 unique assessments with different URLs
|
155 |
+
5. Ensure the result has diverse test types to comprehensively evaluate candidates
|
156 |
+
6. Do not include duplicate assessments with the same URL
|
157 |
+
7. Keep all test_type values as arrays/lists, even if there's only one type
|
158 |
"""
|
159 |
|
160 |
# Generate response
|