--- license: mit datasets: - webis/Touche23-ValueEval language: - en metrics: - f1 tags: - social-values --- # Schwartz Value Classifier This classifier is intended to predict the existence of social values from text snippets. *Disclaimer: this is not the official repo published by the authors of the paper, and may not truly replicate the performance described in the original study* ## Value dimensions 1. security 2. power 3. achievement 4. hedonism 5. stimulation 6. self-direction 7. universalism 8. benevolence 9. conformity 10. tradition ## Datasets This model is finetuned on two datasets: ValueNet (A New Dataset for Human Value Driven Dialogue System, Qiu et al. 2021) and Touche23-ValueEval (The Touché23-ValueEval Dataset for Identifying Human Values behind Arguments, Mirzakhmedova et al., 2023). We follow the original paper to convert both datasets into a binary classification task for each dimension. - ValueNet - A sentence has a positive label if the original label contains 1 (positive) or -1 (negative), and 0 if the original label is 0. - ValueEval - A sentence is assigned a positive label if the original label vector is marked 1 for that dimension. - Since the original paper follows a 20-dimension refined categorization, we map them back to 10 dimensions. Therefore, the same sentence appears ten times, once for each dimension. ## How to use Start your sentence with a label that indicates which dimension to measure. An example would be: - \ [SEP] staying out late after telling my girlfriend I could be home early Please make sure to follow the exact format "" at the beginning of the sentence as this is a special token in the tokenizer: any spaces or different formats will not be encoded correctly. ## Performances - macro F1 score - on ValueNet: 0.648 - on ValueEval: 0.744 - Combined: 0.759 - ROC-AUC - on ValueNet: 0.736 - on ValueEval:0.847 - Combined: 0.855 ## Training details - Base model: bert-base-uncased - Epochs: 10 w/ early stopping after no F1 increase in 3 epochs - Learning rate: 5e-5 w/ warmup for 0.03 steps and subsequent linear decay - Batch size: 32 - Upsampled training set to maintain 1:1 balance for pos:neg labels ## References - Do Differences in Values Influence Disagreements in Online Discussions? (EMNLP'23) [link](https://aclanthology.org/2023.emnlp-main.992/)