post_id
stringlengths
5
7
domain
stringclasses
69 values
upvote_ratio
float64
0.5
1
history
stringlengths
11
39.7k
c_root_id_A
stringlengths
7
7
c_root_id_B
stringlengths
7
7
created_at_utc_A
int64
1.27B
1.68B
created_at_utc_B
int64
1.27B
1.68B
score_A
int64
-644
43.5k
score_B
int64
-2,846
43.5k
human_ref_A
stringlengths
0
18k
human_ref_B
stringlengths
0
13.6k
labels
int64
0
1
seconds_difference
float64
0
346M
score_ratio
float64
-2,292
2.5M
metadata_A
stringclasses
1 value
metadata_B
stringclasses
1 value
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0k5lii
j0l9ni8
1,671,259,365
1,671,288,748
2
5
I feel like some people can naturally write better and other people, like myself, have to learn by making mistakes which may take longer. That’s not to say “the best writers” don’t make mistakes, but they have a way with words. That doesn’t mean you should give up. It can take years to develop a good craft and even longer to publish. Everyone has to learn, study, read, and practice to get better. You have every right to feel what you’re feeling, but we all have our owns paths to take. Some get there sooner than others. Some days I don’t feel like showing up to write because everything sounds like trash! I didn’t go to college or have any writing friends. It’s a lonely craft. If you ever feel discouraged though, I recommend watching: https://youtu.be/nQhSz5jyd9s This literally got me out of a slump the other day and I will probably watch it every time I need encouragement.
There's a nice thick line between not believing in yourself at all and becoming a total diva. I've seen too many writers wallow in the disbelief side and more than a few turn into raging jerks. Take a few steps toward the middle and try having some faith in your work. Doubtless, it's not as bad you think it is just like no one's work is ever as good as they think it is. Also, like someone else pointed out, the stuff on the bookshelves is probably way different than the 1st cut of the manuscript and it wasn't just Lynch that did all that work.
0
29,383
2.5
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0l9ni8
j0l1mll
1,671,288,748
1,671,284,468
5
3
There's a nice thick line between not believing in yourself at all and becoming a total diva. I've seen too many writers wallow in the disbelief side and more than a few turn into raging jerks. Take a few steps toward the middle and try having some faith in your work. Doubtless, it's not as bad you think it is just like no one's work is ever as good as they think it is. Also, like someone else pointed out, the stuff on the bookshelves is probably way different than the 1st cut of the manuscript and it wasn't just Lynch that did all that work.
Trust the process and yourself. There's always luck involved in publishing but if you tell the story you want to tell and work hard at promoting it you'll get there.
1
4,280
1.666667
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0l9ni8
j0l89ub
1,671,288,748
1,671,288,059
5
3
There's a nice thick line between not believing in yourself at all and becoming a total diva. I've seen too many writers wallow in the disbelief side and more than a few turn into raging jerks. Take a few steps toward the middle and try having some faith in your work. Doubtless, it's not as bad you think it is just like no one's work is ever as good as they think it is. Also, like someone else pointed out, the stuff on the bookshelves is probably way different than the 1st cut of the manuscript and it wasn't just Lynch that did all that work.
Thank you for posting this, OP. I am looking at the comments and it is spurring me to actually begin the writing of my first novel - which I really want to do before I die. Really, thank you!
1
689
1.666667
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0l9ni8
j0l8exo
1,671,288,748
1,671,288,130
5
3
There's a nice thick line between not believing in yourself at all and becoming a total diva. I've seen too many writers wallow in the disbelief side and more than a few turn into raging jerks. Take a few steps toward the middle and try having some faith in your work. Doubtless, it's not as bad you think it is just like no one's work is ever as good as they think it is. Also, like someone else pointed out, the stuff on the bookshelves is probably way different than the 1st cut of the manuscript and it wasn't just Lynch that did all that work.
I published my first book at 26. It sold decent for a small press starting out (and subsequently folding the next year), and I have sold one book a year after followed by over a decade of rejections. You just keep trying and see what works.
1
618
1.666667
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0k5lii
j0ld1hd
1,671,259,365
1,671,290,362
2
5
I feel like some people can naturally write better and other people, like myself, have to learn by making mistakes which may take longer. That’s not to say “the best writers” don’t make mistakes, but they have a way with words. That doesn’t mean you should give up. It can take years to develop a good craft and even longer to publish. Everyone has to learn, study, read, and practice to get better. You have every right to feel what you’re feeling, but we all have our owns paths to take. Some get there sooner than others. Some days I don’t feel like showing up to write because everything sounds like trash! I didn’t go to college or have any writing friends. It’s a lonely craft. If you ever feel discouraged though, I recommend watching: https://youtu.be/nQhSz5jyd9s This literally got me out of a slump the other day and I will probably watch it every time I need encouragement.
>Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. On the flip side, look how much garbage gets published and sells. Might as well sell your garbage too!
0
30,997
2.5
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0l1mll
j0ld1hd
1,671,284,468
1,671,290,362
3
5
Trust the process and yourself. There's always luck involved in publishing but if you tell the story you want to tell and work hard at promoting it you'll get there.
>Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. On the flip side, look how much garbage gets published and sells. Might as well sell your garbage too!
0
5,894
1.666667
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0l89ub
j0ld1hd
1,671,288,059
1,671,290,362
3
5
Thank you for posting this, OP. I am looking at the comments and it is spurring me to actually begin the writing of my first novel - which I really want to do before I die. Really, thank you!
>Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. On the flip side, look how much garbage gets published and sells. Might as well sell your garbage too!
0
2,303
1.666667
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0l8exo
j0ld1hd
1,671,288,130
1,671,290,362
3
5
I published my first book at 26. It sold decent for a small press starting out (and subsequently folding the next year), and I have sold one book a year after followed by over a decade of rejections. You just keep trying and see what works.
>Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. On the flip side, look how much garbage gets published and sells. Might as well sell your garbage too!
0
2,232
1.666667
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0mplzl
j0ml73j
1,671,310,957
1,671,309,086
5
4
Adding to the "TLOLL is probably not Scott Lynch's first novel" point, I dug around a bit... Ok, not really "dug". I googled "Scott Lynch interview" and clicked on the first link. Here you go: >**Speaking of structural issues, on your blog you said one of your friends took you to a Disney movie and said, “I’ve already seen this movie but I want you to watch it to learn basic plot structure.”** \Laughter\] That was several years before The Lies of Locke Lamora, when I was even more of a neo-neophyte writer. Apparently it was his impression that basic story structure was eluding me and to some extent he was right. Also: >One of the failed prologues that I wrote for the first book became a chapter in Republic of Thieves called “The Undrowned Girl.” It’s there in Republic of Thieves in more or less its original form. And, from this [other interview: >Writing was something that I had always been interested, at least from the age of about ten. That’s when I tried to write my first actual book, and made it roughly a page and a half. I also spent a great many years convinced that I was going to draw comic books, but in high school my art hit a plateau and I didn’t have the discipline to drag myself off of it…so voila, plan B was writing. I started seriously planning the book that eventually became TLOLL sometime in 2000, and was making half-assed attempts to write it the year after that. Until 2003, mostly what I had was a very large pile of notes, research, genealogies, and two-page fragments that went nowhere. So basically, he was writing long before TLOLL.
The author of red rising talks about how the early drafts of the series were so garbage he would stop writing completely for months at a time. The first draft will never ever look good. I'm willing to bet if you have a story you really love and you get all the time and editing assistance you'd be surprised at how stellar your work is.
1
1,871
1.25
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0k5lii
j0ml73j
1,671,259,365
1,671,309,086
2
4
I feel like some people can naturally write better and other people, like myself, have to learn by making mistakes which may take longer. That’s not to say “the best writers” don’t make mistakes, but they have a way with words. That doesn’t mean you should give up. It can take years to develop a good craft and even longer to publish. Everyone has to learn, study, read, and practice to get better. You have every right to feel what you’re feeling, but we all have our owns paths to take. Some get there sooner than others. Some days I don’t feel like showing up to write because everything sounds like trash! I didn’t go to college or have any writing friends. It’s a lonely craft. If you ever feel discouraged though, I recommend watching: https://youtu.be/nQhSz5jyd9s This literally got me out of a slump the other day and I will probably watch it every time I need encouragement.
The author of red rising talks about how the early drafts of the series were so garbage he would stop writing completely for months at a time. The first draft will never ever look good. I'm willing to bet if you have a story you really love and you get all the time and editing assistance you'd be surprised at how stellar your work is.
0
49,721
2
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0ml73j
j0l1mll
1,671,309,086
1,671,284,468
4
3
The author of red rising talks about how the early drafts of the series were so garbage he would stop writing completely for months at a time. The first draft will never ever look good. I'm willing to bet if you have a story you really love and you get all the time and editing assistance you'd be surprised at how stellar your work is.
Trust the process and yourself. There's always luck involved in publishing but if you tell the story you want to tell and work hard at promoting it you'll get there.
1
24,618
1.333333
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0l89ub
j0ml73j
1,671,288,059
1,671,309,086
3
4
Thank you for posting this, OP. I am looking at the comments and it is spurring me to actually begin the writing of my first novel - which I really want to do before I die. Really, thank you!
The author of red rising talks about how the early drafts of the series were so garbage he would stop writing completely for months at a time. The first draft will never ever look good. I'm willing to bet if you have a story you really love and you get all the time and editing assistance you'd be surprised at how stellar your work is.
0
21,027
1.333333
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0l8exo
j0ml73j
1,671,288,130
1,671,309,086
3
4
I published my first book at 26. It sold decent for a small press starting out (and subsequently folding the next year), and I have sold one book a year after followed by over a decade of rejections. You just keep trying and see what works.
The author of red rising talks about how the early drafts of the series were so garbage he would stop writing completely for months at a time. The first draft will never ever look good. I'm willing to bet if you have a story you really love and you get all the time and editing assistance you'd be surprised at how stellar your work is.
0
20,956
1.333333
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0ljvww
j0ml73j
1,671,293,446
1,671,309,086
3
4
Go the other way. Find the worst reviewed paid book you can find, and force yourself through it. Every time you cringe, remember that this asshole made at least a few cents for making you read this utter garbage, and how you can for sure do better than this.
The author of red rising talks about how the early drafts of the series were so garbage he would stop writing completely for months at a time. The first draft will never ever look good. I'm willing to bet if you have a story you really love and you get all the time and editing assistance you'd be surprised at how stellar your work is.
0
15,640
1.333333
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0mftlh
j0ml73j
1,671,306,788
1,671,309,086
3
4
I'm in my early 40s, and my first and second books came out this year. My second one (not a novel) will probably be more successful than my first one, at least judging by initial sales and hype. I poured my heart and soul into the first for seven years and co-wrote the second in 12 days. Of course I wanted my first novel to come out in my teens or 20s when I could be critically acclaimed as a young genius! But life didn't pan out that way for me. But I couldn't have written the novel I did when I was in my teens or 20s—I just didn't have the life experience. I was also much more sensitive then and the reality that most books actually don't do that well might have been very discouraging and stopped me from writing more. As it is, I can now put a list of books, multiple, that I've written, when applying for grants or seeking out agents and publishers. Which, at least in my country, is often the only type of success that any creator has. And I'm making up for lost time now.
The author of red rising talks about how the early drafts of the series were so garbage he would stop writing completely for months at a time. The first draft will never ever look good. I'm willing to bet if you have a story you really love and you get all the time and editing assistance you'd be surprised at how stellar your work is.
0
2,298
1.333333
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0mplzl
j0k5lii
1,671,310,957
1,671,259,365
5
2
Adding to the "TLOLL is probably not Scott Lynch's first novel" point, I dug around a bit... Ok, not really "dug". I googled "Scott Lynch interview" and clicked on the first link. Here you go: >**Speaking of structural issues, on your blog you said one of your friends took you to a Disney movie and said, “I’ve already seen this movie but I want you to watch it to learn basic plot structure.”** \Laughter\] That was several years before The Lies of Locke Lamora, when I was even more of a neo-neophyte writer. Apparently it was his impression that basic story structure was eluding me and to some extent he was right. Also: >One of the failed prologues that I wrote for the first book became a chapter in Republic of Thieves called “The Undrowned Girl.” It’s there in Republic of Thieves in more or less its original form. And, from this [other interview: >Writing was something that I had always been interested, at least from the age of about ten. That’s when I tried to write my first actual book, and made it roughly a page and a half. I also spent a great many years convinced that I was going to draw comic books, but in high school my art hit a plateau and I didn’t have the discipline to drag myself off of it…so voila, plan B was writing. I started seriously planning the book that eventually became TLOLL sometime in 2000, and was making half-assed attempts to write it the year after that. Until 2003, mostly what I had was a very large pile of notes, research, genealogies, and two-page fragments that went nowhere. So basically, he was writing long before TLOLL.
I feel like some people can naturally write better and other people, like myself, have to learn by making mistakes which may take longer. That’s not to say “the best writers” don’t make mistakes, but they have a way with words. That doesn’t mean you should give up. It can take years to develop a good craft and even longer to publish. Everyone has to learn, study, read, and practice to get better. You have every right to feel what you’re feeling, but we all have our owns paths to take. Some get there sooner than others. Some days I don’t feel like showing up to write because everything sounds like trash! I didn’t go to college or have any writing friends. It’s a lonely craft. If you ever feel discouraged though, I recommend watching: https://youtu.be/nQhSz5jyd9s This literally got me out of a slump the other day and I will probably watch it every time I need encouragement.
1
51,592
2.5
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0mplzl
j0l1mll
1,671,310,957
1,671,284,468
5
3
Adding to the "TLOLL is probably not Scott Lynch's first novel" point, I dug around a bit... Ok, not really "dug". I googled "Scott Lynch interview" and clicked on the first link. Here you go: >**Speaking of structural issues, on your blog you said one of your friends took you to a Disney movie and said, “I’ve already seen this movie but I want you to watch it to learn basic plot structure.”** \Laughter\] That was several years before The Lies of Locke Lamora, when I was even more of a neo-neophyte writer. Apparently it was his impression that basic story structure was eluding me and to some extent he was right. Also: >One of the failed prologues that I wrote for the first book became a chapter in Republic of Thieves called “The Undrowned Girl.” It’s there in Republic of Thieves in more or less its original form. And, from this [other interview: >Writing was something that I had always been interested, at least from the age of about ten. That’s when I tried to write my first actual book, and made it roughly a page and a half. I also spent a great many years convinced that I was going to draw comic books, but in high school my art hit a plateau and I didn’t have the discipline to drag myself off of it…so voila, plan B was writing. I started seriously planning the book that eventually became TLOLL sometime in 2000, and was making half-assed attempts to write it the year after that. Until 2003, mostly what I had was a very large pile of notes, research, genealogies, and two-page fragments that went nowhere. So basically, he was writing long before TLOLL.
Trust the process and yourself. There's always luck involved in publishing but if you tell the story you want to tell and work hard at promoting it you'll get there.
1
26,489
1.666667
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0mplzl
j0l89ub
1,671,310,957
1,671,288,059
5
3
Adding to the "TLOLL is probably not Scott Lynch's first novel" point, I dug around a bit... Ok, not really "dug". I googled "Scott Lynch interview" and clicked on the first link. Here you go: >**Speaking of structural issues, on your blog you said one of your friends took you to a Disney movie and said, “I’ve already seen this movie but I want you to watch it to learn basic plot structure.”** \Laughter\] That was several years before The Lies of Locke Lamora, when I was even more of a neo-neophyte writer. Apparently it was his impression that basic story structure was eluding me and to some extent he was right. Also: >One of the failed prologues that I wrote for the first book became a chapter in Republic of Thieves called “The Undrowned Girl.” It’s there in Republic of Thieves in more or less its original form. And, from this [other interview: >Writing was something that I had always been interested, at least from the age of about ten. That’s when I tried to write my first actual book, and made it roughly a page and a half. I also spent a great many years convinced that I was going to draw comic books, but in high school my art hit a plateau and I didn’t have the discipline to drag myself off of it…so voila, plan B was writing. I started seriously planning the book that eventually became TLOLL sometime in 2000, and was making half-assed attempts to write it the year after that. Until 2003, mostly what I had was a very large pile of notes, research, genealogies, and two-page fragments that went nowhere. So basically, he was writing long before TLOLL.
Thank you for posting this, OP. I am looking at the comments and it is spurring me to actually begin the writing of my first novel - which I really want to do before I die. Really, thank you!
1
22,898
1.666667
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0mplzl
j0l8exo
1,671,310,957
1,671,288,130
5
3
Adding to the "TLOLL is probably not Scott Lynch's first novel" point, I dug around a bit... Ok, not really "dug". I googled "Scott Lynch interview" and clicked on the first link. Here you go: >**Speaking of structural issues, on your blog you said one of your friends took you to a Disney movie and said, “I’ve already seen this movie but I want you to watch it to learn basic plot structure.”** \Laughter\] That was several years before The Lies of Locke Lamora, when I was even more of a neo-neophyte writer. Apparently it was his impression that basic story structure was eluding me and to some extent he was right. Also: >One of the failed prologues that I wrote for the first book became a chapter in Republic of Thieves called “The Undrowned Girl.” It’s there in Republic of Thieves in more or less its original form. And, from this [other interview: >Writing was something that I had always been interested, at least from the age of about ten. That’s when I tried to write my first actual book, and made it roughly a page and a half. I also spent a great many years convinced that I was going to draw comic books, but in high school my art hit a plateau and I didn’t have the discipline to drag myself off of it…so voila, plan B was writing. I started seriously planning the book that eventually became TLOLL sometime in 2000, and was making half-assed attempts to write it the year after that. Until 2003, mostly what I had was a very large pile of notes, research, genealogies, and two-page fragments that went nowhere. So basically, he was writing long before TLOLL.
I published my first book at 26. It sold decent for a small press starting out (and subsequently folding the next year), and I have sold one book a year after followed by over a decade of rejections. You just keep trying and see what works.
1
22,827
1.666667
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0ljvww
j0mplzl
1,671,293,446
1,671,310,957
3
5
Go the other way. Find the worst reviewed paid book you can find, and force yourself through it. Every time you cringe, remember that this asshole made at least a few cents for making you read this utter garbage, and how you can for sure do better than this.
Adding to the "TLOLL is probably not Scott Lynch's first novel" point, I dug around a bit... Ok, not really "dug". I googled "Scott Lynch interview" and clicked on the first link. Here you go: >**Speaking of structural issues, on your blog you said one of your friends took you to a Disney movie and said, “I’ve already seen this movie but I want you to watch it to learn basic plot structure.”** \Laughter\] That was several years before The Lies of Locke Lamora, when I was even more of a neo-neophyte writer. Apparently it was his impression that basic story structure was eluding me and to some extent he was right. Also: >One of the failed prologues that I wrote for the first book became a chapter in Republic of Thieves called “The Undrowned Girl.” It’s there in Republic of Thieves in more or less its original form. And, from this [other interview: >Writing was something that I had always been interested, at least from the age of about ten. That’s when I tried to write my first actual book, and made it roughly a page and a half. I also spent a great many years convinced that I was going to draw comic books, but in high school my art hit a plateau and I didn’t have the discipline to drag myself off of it…so voila, plan B was writing. I started seriously planning the book that eventually became TLOLL sometime in 2000, and was making half-assed attempts to write it the year after that. Until 2003, mostly what I had was a very large pile of notes, research, genealogies, and two-page fragments that went nowhere. So basically, he was writing long before TLOLL.
0
17,511
1.666667
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0mftlh
j0mplzl
1,671,306,788
1,671,310,957
3
5
I'm in my early 40s, and my first and second books came out this year. My second one (not a novel) will probably be more successful than my first one, at least judging by initial sales and hype. I poured my heart and soul into the first for seven years and co-wrote the second in 12 days. Of course I wanted my first novel to come out in my teens or 20s when I could be critically acclaimed as a young genius! But life didn't pan out that way for me. But I couldn't have written the novel I did when I was in my teens or 20s—I just didn't have the life experience. I was also much more sensitive then and the reality that most books actually don't do that well might have been very discouraging and stopped me from writing more. As it is, I can now put a list of books, multiple, that I've written, when applying for grants or seeking out agents and publishers. Which, at least in my country, is often the only type of success that any creator has. And I'm making up for lost time now.
Adding to the "TLOLL is probably not Scott Lynch's first novel" point, I dug around a bit... Ok, not really "dug". I googled "Scott Lynch interview" and clicked on the first link. Here you go: >**Speaking of structural issues, on your blog you said one of your friends took you to a Disney movie and said, “I’ve already seen this movie but I want you to watch it to learn basic plot structure.”** \Laughter\] That was several years before The Lies of Locke Lamora, when I was even more of a neo-neophyte writer. Apparently it was his impression that basic story structure was eluding me and to some extent he was right. Also: >One of the failed prologues that I wrote for the first book became a chapter in Republic of Thieves called “The Undrowned Girl.” It’s there in Republic of Thieves in more or less its original form. And, from this [other interview: >Writing was something that I had always been interested, at least from the age of about ten. That’s when I tried to write my first actual book, and made it roughly a page and a half. I also spent a great many years convinced that I was going to draw comic books, but in high school my art hit a plateau and I didn’t have the discipline to drag myself off of it…so voila, plan B was writing. I started seriously planning the book that eventually became TLOLL sometime in 2000, and was making half-assed attempts to write it the year after that. Until 2003, mostly what I had was a very large pile of notes, research, genealogies, and two-page fragments that went nowhere. So basically, he was writing long before TLOLL.
0
4,169
1.666667
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0mueg3
j0k5lii
1,671,312,966
1,671,259,365
3
2
Brandon Sanderson didn't get his first novel published, I think he said it wasn't even until his \~12th book that he published. I actually recommend watching his lectures on YouTube, particularly the first lecture, where he covers "Why do you want to write" instead of actual structure.
I feel like some people can naturally write better and other people, like myself, have to learn by making mistakes which may take longer. That’s not to say “the best writers” don’t make mistakes, but they have a way with words. That doesn’t mean you should give up. It can take years to develop a good craft and even longer to publish. Everyone has to learn, study, read, and practice to get better. You have every right to feel what you’re feeling, but we all have our owns paths to take. Some get there sooner than others. Some days I don’t feel like showing up to write because everything sounds like trash! I didn’t go to college or have any writing friends. It’s a lonely craft. If you ever feel discouraged though, I recommend watching: https://youtu.be/nQhSz5jyd9s This literally got me out of a slump the other day and I will probably watch it every time I need encouragement.
1
53,601
1.5
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0l1mll
j0k5lii
1,671,284,468
1,671,259,365
3
2
Trust the process and yourself. There's always luck involved in publishing but if you tell the story you want to tell and work hard at promoting it you'll get there.
I feel like some people can naturally write better and other people, like myself, have to learn by making mistakes which may take longer. That’s not to say “the best writers” don’t make mistakes, but they have a way with words. That doesn’t mean you should give up. It can take years to develop a good craft and even longer to publish. Everyone has to learn, study, read, and practice to get better. You have every right to feel what you’re feeling, but we all have our owns paths to take. Some get there sooner than others. Some days I don’t feel like showing up to write because everything sounds like trash! I didn’t go to college or have any writing friends. It’s a lonely craft. If you ever feel discouraged though, I recommend watching: https://youtu.be/nQhSz5jyd9s This literally got me out of a slump the other day and I will probably watch it every time I need encouragement.
1
25,103
1.5
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0l89ub
j0k5lii
1,671,288,059
1,671,259,365
3
2
Thank you for posting this, OP. I am looking at the comments and it is spurring me to actually begin the writing of my first novel - which I really want to do before I die. Really, thank you!
I feel like some people can naturally write better and other people, like myself, have to learn by making mistakes which may take longer. That’s not to say “the best writers” don’t make mistakes, but they have a way with words. That doesn’t mean you should give up. It can take years to develop a good craft and even longer to publish. Everyone has to learn, study, read, and practice to get better. You have every right to feel what you’re feeling, but we all have our owns paths to take. Some get there sooner than others. Some days I don’t feel like showing up to write because everything sounds like trash! I didn’t go to college or have any writing friends. It’s a lonely craft. If you ever feel discouraged though, I recommend watching: https://youtu.be/nQhSz5jyd9s This literally got me out of a slump the other day and I will probably watch it every time I need encouragement.
1
28,694
1.5
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0l8exo
j0k5lii
1,671,288,130
1,671,259,365
3
2
I published my first book at 26. It sold decent for a small press starting out (and subsequently folding the next year), and I have sold one book a year after followed by over a decade of rejections. You just keep trying and see what works.
I feel like some people can naturally write better and other people, like myself, have to learn by making mistakes which may take longer. That’s not to say “the best writers” don’t make mistakes, but they have a way with words. That doesn’t mean you should give up. It can take years to develop a good craft and even longer to publish. Everyone has to learn, study, read, and practice to get better. You have every right to feel what you’re feeling, but we all have our owns paths to take. Some get there sooner than others. Some days I don’t feel like showing up to write because everything sounds like trash! I didn’t go to college or have any writing friends. It’s a lonely craft. If you ever feel discouraged though, I recommend watching: https://youtu.be/nQhSz5jyd9s This literally got me out of a slump the other day and I will probably watch it every time I need encouragement.
1
28,765
1.5
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0ljvww
j0k5lii
1,671,293,446
1,671,259,365
3
2
Go the other way. Find the worst reviewed paid book you can find, and force yourself through it. Every time you cringe, remember that this asshole made at least a few cents for making you read this utter garbage, and how you can for sure do better than this.
I feel like some people can naturally write better and other people, like myself, have to learn by making mistakes which may take longer. That’s not to say “the best writers” don’t make mistakes, but they have a way with words. That doesn’t mean you should give up. It can take years to develop a good craft and even longer to publish. Everyone has to learn, study, read, and practice to get better. You have every right to feel what you’re feeling, but we all have our owns paths to take. Some get there sooner than others. Some days I don’t feel like showing up to write because everything sounds like trash! I didn’t go to college or have any writing friends. It’s a lonely craft. If you ever feel discouraged though, I recommend watching: https://youtu.be/nQhSz5jyd9s This literally got me out of a slump the other day and I will probably watch it every time I need encouragement.
1
34,081
1.5
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0mftlh
j0k5lii
1,671,306,788
1,671,259,365
3
2
I'm in my early 40s, and my first and second books came out this year. My second one (not a novel) will probably be more successful than my first one, at least judging by initial sales and hype. I poured my heart and soul into the first for seven years and co-wrote the second in 12 days. Of course I wanted my first novel to come out in my teens or 20s when I could be critically acclaimed as a young genius! But life didn't pan out that way for me. But I couldn't have written the novel I did when I was in my teens or 20s—I just didn't have the life experience. I was also much more sensitive then and the reality that most books actually don't do that well might have been very discouraging and stopped me from writing more. As it is, I can now put a list of books, multiple, that I've written, when applying for grants or seeking out agents and publishers. Which, at least in my country, is often the only type of success that any creator has. And I'm making up for lost time now.
I feel like some people can naturally write better and other people, like myself, have to learn by making mistakes which may take longer. That’s not to say “the best writers” don’t make mistakes, but they have a way with words. That doesn’t mean you should give up. It can take years to develop a good craft and even longer to publish. Everyone has to learn, study, read, and practice to get better. You have every right to feel what you’re feeling, but we all have our owns paths to take. Some get there sooner than others. Some days I don’t feel like showing up to write because everything sounds like trash! I didn’t go to college or have any writing friends. It’s a lonely craft. If you ever feel discouraged though, I recommend watching: https://youtu.be/nQhSz5jyd9s This literally got me out of a slump the other day and I will probably watch it every time I need encouragement.
1
47,423
1.5
znzb3n
writing_train
0.9
Other people’s successful first novels are putting me off from publishing Like, takes The Lies of Locke Lamora. It was Scott Lynch’s FIRST novel and he was only 26 when he published it. Mine obviously isn’t as good, so I feel I should start over or write more novels until my quality of writing improves. That would get me caught in an endless loop, though, and I’d get nothing published. Anyone else have issues with this feeling of inadequacy?
j0k5lii
j0na12c
1,671,259,365
1,671,319,857
2
3
I feel like some people can naturally write better and other people, like myself, have to learn by making mistakes which may take longer. That’s not to say “the best writers” don’t make mistakes, but they have a way with words. That doesn’t mean you should give up. It can take years to develop a good craft and even longer to publish. Everyone has to learn, study, read, and practice to get better. You have every right to feel what you’re feeling, but we all have our owns paths to take. Some get there sooner than others. Some days I don’t feel like showing up to write because everything sounds like trash! I didn’t go to college or have any writing friends. It’s a lonely craft. If you ever feel discouraged though, I recommend watching: https://youtu.be/nQhSz5jyd9s This literally got me out of a slump the other day and I will probably watch it every time I need encouragement.
I ditched my last novel because it didn't work. The characters were good, but their motivations were muddy and the way the story all fit together was hard to untangle. It didn't have the easy-to-see escalation a good story needs. I chose to ditch it because, even if it did get accepted for publication, I would be embarrassed by it. But I also submitted a short story to a few publications because I know it's high quality. So there's self-doubt and anxiety, but then there's also knowing you screwed up. You sound more like there's self-doubt and anxiety going on. Share with readers whose opinions respect and who read your genre. You'll know when you're ready.
0
60,492
1.5
v5bv46
writing_train
0.88
Apart from the weekly thread, what's a good place for having my work critiqued or reviewed? p.s I have posted my work in this week's thread (*why do we love the rain*) and recently joined Wattpad, but due to being new to all this, I don't know how and where to get my work reviewed and get advice from. This isn't for professional purposes as I'm only a recent high school graduate, instead this is for personal interests.
ib8vo78
ib92eo7
1,654,432,390
1,654,436,518
4
5
There are (at least) three good writers workshops you can join online: * Scribophile - Must be 18+. * Absolute Write * Critique Circle
r/betareaders You can offer to betaread others in the monthly thread in exchange for critique swap
0
4,128
1.25
v5bv46
writing_train
0.88
Apart from the weekly thread, what's a good place for having my work critiqued or reviewed? p.s I have posted my work in this week's thread (*why do we love the rain*) and recently joined Wattpad, but due to being new to all this, I don't know how and where to get my work reviewed and get advice from. This isn't for professional purposes as I'm only a recent high school graduate, instead this is for personal interests.
ib8w5vg
ib92eo7
1,654,432,715
1,654,436,518
2
5
I've used Critique Circle . You'll have to critique others first before you can submit one yourself. But you'll get good advice mostly.
r/betareaders You can offer to betaread others in the monthly thread in exchange for critique swap
0
3,803
2.5
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii889hz
ii89rrj
1,659,161,634
1,659,162,743
14
98
Just have more influences and let your imagination and the context of your story shape things. You can be much more original than you think, but it takes some experimentation and just trial and error, also seeing what styles you resonate with etc.
I'm 100% certain that everyone's creative process is just "I like this idea, but I think I could do it a little bit better." That's it. That's the entire creative process of every artistic medium throughout all of human history.
0
1,109
7
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii889hz
ii91gal
1,659,161,634
1,659,184,152
14
47
Just have more influences and let your imagination and the context of your story shape things. You can be much more original than you think, but it takes some experimentation and just trial and error, also seeing what styles you resonate with etc.
One of the things a college professor told me about writing was that “invent” and “inventory” have the same root word. Essentially, he argued that nothing was invented out of thin air— everything we come up with comes from bits and pieces of things we’ve held onto over our lives. As a concrete example, both Eowyn and Fangorn Forest exist because Tolkien looked at MacBeth and went “I can do that better”
0
22,518
3.357143
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii8cs1y
ii91gal
1,659,165,042
1,659,184,152
13
47
No. We tell stories because they're a fun way of exploring ideas or teaching morals among other things. Some ideas and themes are just more persistent than others. Just have fun telling a story your own way.
One of the things a college professor told me about writing was that “invent” and “inventory” have the same root word. Essentially, he argued that nothing was invented out of thin air— everything we come up with comes from bits and pieces of things we’ve held onto over our lives. As a concrete example, both Eowyn and Fangorn Forest exist because Tolkien looked at MacBeth and went “I can do that better”
0
19,110
3.615385
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii91gal
ii8xjrq
1,659,184,152
1,659,181,708
47
12
One of the things a college professor told me about writing was that “invent” and “inventory” have the same root word. Essentially, he argued that nothing was invented out of thin air— everything we come up with comes from bits and pieces of things we’ve held onto over our lives. As a concrete example, both Eowyn and Fangorn Forest exist because Tolkien looked at MacBeth and went “I can do that better”
You're probably fine. Harry Potter's broad concept is just stereotypical wizards + boarding school. It's the execution that matters
1
2,444
3.916667
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii90ntq
ii91gal
1,659,183,672
1,659,184,152
11
47
There's a reason for word "trope" haha
One of the things a college professor told me about writing was that “invent” and “inventory” have the same root word. Essentially, he argued that nothing was invented out of thin air— everything we come up with comes from bits and pieces of things we’ve held onto over our lives. As a concrete example, both Eowyn and Fangorn Forest exist because Tolkien looked at MacBeth and went “I can do that better”
0
480
4.272727
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii8pjx1
ii91gal
1,659,175,662
1,659,184,152
10
47
The problem you have isn't plagiarism or originality, it will be that you'll end up with situations and characters which are inauthentic if you're using other peoples' fiction as your research meaterial. So if you're inspired to write something in the style of Tom Clancy, cool, do that, but do your own research. Read 'Warfighting' and the other military handbooks for instance. Reach out and speak with soldiers. Do the hard work. That's what will make it *your* story, not just fan-fiction.
One of the things a college professor told me about writing was that “invent” and “inventory” have the same root word. Essentially, he argued that nothing was invented out of thin air— everything we come up with comes from bits and pieces of things we’ve held onto over our lives. As a concrete example, both Eowyn and Fangorn Forest exist because Tolkien looked at MacBeth and went “I can do that better”
0
8,490
4.7
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii91gal
ii8z67g
1,659,184,152
1,659,182,747
47
10
One of the things a college professor told me about writing was that “invent” and “inventory” have the same root word. Essentially, he argued that nothing was invented out of thin air— everything we come up with comes from bits and pieces of things we’ve held onto over our lives. As a concrete example, both Eowyn and Fangorn Forest exist because Tolkien looked at MacBeth and went “I can do that better”
Most stories in general are basically Frankensteined from other stories. It's like cutting a piece of banana and putting it in your smoothie, it's not 100% a banana smoothie, but it does taste like banana. All you've gotta do is to make sure it blends well with the other smoothie ingredients.
1
1,405
4.7
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii91gal
ii8zlo5
1,659,184,152
1,659,183,015
47
7
One of the things a college professor told me about writing was that “invent” and “inventory” have the same root word. Essentially, he argued that nothing was invented out of thin air— everything we come up with comes from bits and pieces of things we’ve held onto over our lives. As a concrete example, both Eowyn and Fangorn Forest exist because Tolkien looked at MacBeth and went “I can do that better”
As long as you don't write the exact same story (with or without changing names), you're fine. Many stories share similarities anyway. Taking inspiration from an already existing story is fine, as long as it's just an inspiration and not a copy/paste. Stories have been around for ages, so it's almost impossible to write one that's 100% original. Twilight was not the first book (or the last) to have a vampire and a werewolf fall for the same girl. The idea of a "chosen one" comes up in many many many stories (off the top of my head: Harry Potter, Star Wars, King Arthur, pretty much any fantasy/adventure story). What you're doing can be considered fanfic (if you keep the original characters), but if you change that (and from what you've said, it seems like most details are different), then you're writing your own stories. Are they completely original? Probably not, but they're yours nonetheless.
1
1,137
6.714286
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii8xjrq
ii8pjx1
1,659,181,708
1,659,175,662
12
10
You're probably fine. Harry Potter's broad concept is just stereotypical wizards + boarding school. It's the execution that matters
The problem you have isn't plagiarism or originality, it will be that you'll end up with situations and characters which are inauthentic if you're using other peoples' fiction as your research meaterial. So if you're inspired to write something in the style of Tom Clancy, cool, do that, but do your own research. Read 'Warfighting' and the other military handbooks for instance. Reach out and speak with soldiers. Do the hard work. That's what will make it *your* story, not just fan-fiction.
1
6,046
1.2
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii90ntq
ii8pjx1
1,659,183,672
1,659,175,662
11
10
There's a reason for word "trope" haha
The problem you have isn't plagiarism or originality, it will be that you'll end up with situations and characters which are inauthentic if you're using other peoples' fiction as your research meaterial. So if you're inspired to write something in the style of Tom Clancy, cool, do that, but do your own research. Read 'Warfighting' and the other military handbooks for instance. Reach out and speak with soldiers. Do the hard work. That's what will make it *your* story, not just fan-fiction.
1
8,010
1.1
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii90ntq
ii8z67g
1,659,183,672
1,659,182,747
11
10
There's a reason for word "trope" haha
Most stories in general are basically Frankensteined from other stories. It's like cutting a piece of banana and putting it in your smoothie, it's not 100% a banana smoothie, but it does taste like banana. All you've gotta do is to make sure it blends well with the other smoothie ingredients.
1
925
1.1
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii90ntq
ii8zlo5
1,659,183,672
1,659,183,015
11
7
There's a reason for word "trope" haha
As long as you don't write the exact same story (with or without changing names), you're fine. Many stories share similarities anyway. Taking inspiration from an already existing story is fine, as long as it's just an inspiration and not a copy/paste. Stories have been around for ages, so it's almost impossible to write one that's 100% original. Twilight was not the first book (or the last) to have a vampire and a werewolf fall for the same girl. The idea of a "chosen one" comes up in many many many stories (off the top of my head: Harry Potter, Star Wars, King Arthur, pretty much any fantasy/adventure story). What you're doing can be considered fanfic (if you keep the original characters), but if you change that (and from what you've said, it seems like most details are different), then you're writing your own stories. Are they completely original? Probably not, but they're yours nonetheless.
1
657
1.571429
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii94wxh
ii95tzp
1,659,186,133
1,659,186,639
5
6
Think about it this way. If you research how novels actually get published, you'll often see agents and publishers asking for "comps." A "comp" (aka comparison title) is a work similar to what you just wrote. This can include similarities in plot, style, theme, etc. They want these comps to get an idea of how your novel would be placed in the market and how well they could expect it to sell. If your work were unlike anything else out there, publishers wouldn't know how to position it and wouldn't have any confidence in sales projections. So go forth, Admirable\_Elk\_965, with the blessing of a bunch of anonymous scribblers on Reddit to fill the gaps of those imperfect plots and incomplete stories with your own inventiveness. I hope I can one day steal from you as well.
Currently writing a book where I’ve taken ideas from books and movies this year that really pissed me off and I’m writing them to be better and actually work. I’m looking at you Obiwan and Thor: Love and Thunder! Of course the story, characters, plot is all my own but some ideas have been taken
0
506
1.2
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii94wxh
ii929mj
1,659,186,133
1,659,184,626
5
3
Think about it this way. If you research how novels actually get published, you'll often see agents and publishers asking for "comps." A "comp" (aka comparison title) is a work similar to what you just wrote. This can include similarities in plot, style, theme, etc. They want these comps to get an idea of how your novel would be placed in the market and how well they could expect it to sell. If your work were unlike anything else out there, publishers wouldn't know how to position it and wouldn't have any confidence in sales projections. So go forth, Admirable\_Elk\_965, with the blessing of a bunch of anonymous scribblers on Reddit to fill the gaps of those imperfect plots and incomplete stories with your own inventiveness. I hope I can one day steal from you as well.
As almost every author or artist get their start like that, I'd say no, it's not bad. Just do remember to improve yourself and your writing and you'd be fine.
1
1,507
1.666667
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii95tzp
ii929mj
1,659,186,639
1,659,184,626
6
3
Currently writing a book where I’ve taken ideas from books and movies this year that really pissed me off and I’m writing them to be better and actually work. I’m looking at you Obiwan and Thor: Love and Thunder! Of course the story, characters, plot is all my own but some ideas have been taken
As almost every author or artist get their start like that, I'd say no, it's not bad. Just do remember to improve yourself and your writing and you'd be fine.
1
2,013
2
wbqcw9
writing_train
0.9
Is is bad most of my ideas and stories are essentially “stolen” from other stuff? Obviously these are not not one to one. Let me explain. Whenever I play a video game, watch a movie or read a book, When I see holes in the writing I think “ok, how could I fix this?” A lot of my stories, or maybe ideas as most aren’t concrete thoughts, are based off things I’ve seen or done. For example as a kid I really liked Star Wars the clone wars and we were learning about dinosaurs in school, so I wrote a series of books (not published but did hand them out to classmates) about an army of clones fighting dinosaurs and humanoid dinosaurs. My first real big project, a video game I made with friends, had a similar concept to the game F.E.A.R. and I made it somewhat as an homage to that game as I grew up playing it. Right now I’m currently writing a book similar to the Tom Clancy Rainbow Six group, but a smaller and more secret and somewhat illegal group. I love Tom Clancy stuff, especially Rainbow Six, and I want to make my own thing. But the more ideas I get the more I think “ok, but, this has been done before. Would that make me seem like a lesser writer/creator if I made this?” This thought process has prevented me from actually going through with a lot of things. I don’t want to be seen as “unoriginal” or a “copycat.” This isn’t to say I don’t have original ideas (or at least things I’ve never seen other people do) that I am focusing a lot of effort on, but these are usually smaller and more simple stories compared to my longer ones that are based off things that inspired me I don’t know where it started but ever since I was little I’ve always tried to mimic things I’ve liked. But I’m worried I’d be walking the line of inspiration and plagiarism. Am I just bad at coming up with things or is this normal?
ii95gws
ii95tzp
1,659,186,436
1,659,186,639
3
6
A lot of fantasy writers are inspired by mythology, and at the end of the day those myths were created by people.
Currently writing a book where I’ve taken ideas from books and movies this year that really pissed me off and I’m writing them to be better and actually work. I’m looking at you Obiwan and Thor: Love and Thunder! Of course the story, characters, plot is all my own but some ideas have been taken
0
203
2
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix1puzd
ix1oi89
1,668,908,862
1,668,908,213
5
3
I love the general assumption that there’s another incredible idea just waiting to be written about, to “pass the time,” as you wait to edit.
Set it aside and write another first draft to a completely different story. If you're good enough at writing, then another idea should already be in your chamber waiting to be fired off. When that vomit draft is done, finish whatever book you're reading (you better be reading), and then go back to the aforementioned first draft of a story you feel like you're no longer invested in because the other story you wrote was even better... invest all your time into that. Rewrite, either copy and paste style (not recommended), or beat by beat and feel your way back through the story. If it was any good then you won't have trouble retracing your steps.
1
649
1.666667
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix1csa4
ix1puzd
1,668,902,550
1,668,908,862
1
5
What are you exactly writing for? Is it going to be published?
I love the general assumption that there’s another incredible idea just waiting to be written about, to “pass the time,” as you wait to edit.
0
6,312
5
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix1puzd
ix1pqpy
1,668,908,862
1,668,908,804
5
1
I love the general assumption that there’s another incredible idea just waiting to be written about, to “pass the time,” as you wait to edit.
I’m not sure if it is a book for a series or not but if it is, work on the next books, get your ideas down. Then whenever you feel ready, you can work on the first. This is just my way of doing it and yeah it might be slightly problematic.
1
58
5
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix1csa4
ix1oi89
1,668,902,550
1,668,908,213
1
3
What are you exactly writing for? Is it going to be published?
Set it aside and write another first draft to a completely different story. If you're good enough at writing, then another idea should already be in your chamber waiting to be fired off. When that vomit draft is done, finish whatever book you're reading (you better be reading), and then go back to the aforementioned first draft of a story you feel like you're no longer invested in because the other story you wrote was even better... invest all your time into that. Rewrite, either copy and paste style (not recommended), or beat by beat and feel your way back through the story. If it was any good then you won't have trouble retracing your steps.
0
5,663
3
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix26axh
ix1csa4
1,668,917,265
1,668,902,550
2
1
Next step is to put it aside. You can't see the forest for the trees right now. I say at lest a couple of months. Then do a really quick edit and give it to a friend to give some quick feedback. Then start your first major rewrite.
What are you exactly writing for? Is it going to be published?
1
14,715
2
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix26axh
ix1pqpy
1,668,917,265
1,668,908,804
2
1
Next step is to put it aside. You can't see the forest for the trees right now. I say at lest a couple of months. Then do a really quick edit and give it to a friend to give some quick feedback. Then start your first major rewrite.
I’m not sure if it is a book for a series or not but if it is, work on the next books, get your ideas down. Then whenever you feel ready, you can work on the first. This is just my way of doing it and yeah it might be slightly problematic.
1
8,461
2
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix26axh
ix1w5ca
1,668,917,265
1,668,911,981
2
1
Next step is to put it aside. You can't see the forest for the trees right now. I say at lest a couple of months. Then do a really quick edit and give it to a friend to give some quick feedback. Then start your first major rewrite.
Put the draft away, then begin a rewrite. Once the rewrite is done, find beta readers. Then update accordingly.
1
5,284
2
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix2hepv
ix3b49o
1,668,924,055
1,668,948,274
1
2
Editing your first draft
Put it away and work on your next story. Preferably one that isn't a sequel or tied to the universe of what you've just written (in case you have to make some major (or even minor) revisions while editing the one you just finished - this isn't uncommon). I usually avoid messing with it for at least 30-60 days. This gives your brain a break from that story, especially if you're working on something else. After the break, read & edit, make revisions where necessary, clean up the spelling, grammar, and punctuation as much as you can. Personally, I put it away again for another break and work on other stories, then pick it up and go over it a third time. You don't have to, but either way, once you've revised it, hand it off to an editor. Do NOT make the mistake of thinking you don't need one. You do. Every professional author will assure you that they believe they are excellent wordsmiths but absolutely need an editor (or two). Find a competent editor who works within your genre. Trust me on this. It's infuriating to have an editor who doesn't read scifi to constantly question or mark stuff about FTL drives or space marine armor and weapons as wrong because they don't understand what any scifi reader inherently knows. And don't use your family or friends or professors as editors. Pay for a real editor. Do some research to find one that is a professional. They cost money and they are worth every penny. Be aware that just because an editor is expensive doesn't mean they are good (or good for you). Good editors will have a waiting list and/or will ask for a chapter or sample so they can see how much work they'll need to do, and you'll see if they're a good fit for you. (I do editing on the side and I've turned down plenty of authors after seeing their samples because it would be far too much work to the point it wouldn't be cost effective for me. I've also turned down authors who refuse to believe their masterwork needs cleaning up - I don't have the energy to argue with an author) From here, decide if you're going to self publish or submit to a publishing company. You don't need an agent for this. If you're going to submit, make sure you do your research and find submission agents who are looking for your genre, read their submission guidelines and FOLLOW THEM TO THE LETTER. They get hundreds, thousands of submissions and will instantly trashcan your manuscript if you didn't do exactly as they instructed. If you're going to self pub, hire a proofreader (separate from your editor) to do another pass to fix any remaining spelling, punctuation mistakes (sometimes grammar too, but proofers are not always going to offer that service). In the meantime, find a cover artist. You can buy pre-made "photoshopped" covers for very cheap, they look good, and tons of choices. Or you can spend a few hundred to a few thousand to have an artist custom paint you a cover. When I decided to self pub after a bad experience with a publisher, I bought pre-made covers for $30 to $100. By my 6th book or so, I only used custom artwork from pro illustrators who charged $350+. Tom Edward's (UK artist) did a few for me for $1500 each and they are amazing. Trevor Smith and Keith Draws have done amazing covers for me for $650-$800 each. Most importantly is don't expect to suddenly blwo up and make money, get on bestseller lists. It CAN happen, but maybe only 1% of the time. It took me (and most others who are making a living at it) anywhere between 5 and 7 years to start earning enough to quit our day jobs. This is true for both self pub (harder but you earn more of each sale) and traditional pub (you will get a small advance since you're a nobody, won't earn royalties until you've earned out that advance, won't get any real promotional help unless you're somehow special... Google JA Konrath as trad pub is a whole other long thing to read about and he breaks it down better than anyone). Tl;Dr put it away and work on something else for a month or two, and in the meantime, research the hell out of self and traditional publishing, editors, decide which route you want to take, do a second pass and revise, then hire an editor (even if you opt for trad pub, you want your sample manuscript to be in excellent shape when it hits the agent's desk).
0
24,219
2
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix3b49o
ix1csa4
1,668,948,274
1,668,902,550
2
1
Put it away and work on your next story. Preferably one that isn't a sequel or tied to the universe of what you've just written (in case you have to make some major (or even minor) revisions while editing the one you just finished - this isn't uncommon). I usually avoid messing with it for at least 30-60 days. This gives your brain a break from that story, especially if you're working on something else. After the break, read & edit, make revisions where necessary, clean up the spelling, grammar, and punctuation as much as you can. Personally, I put it away again for another break and work on other stories, then pick it up and go over it a third time. You don't have to, but either way, once you've revised it, hand it off to an editor. Do NOT make the mistake of thinking you don't need one. You do. Every professional author will assure you that they believe they are excellent wordsmiths but absolutely need an editor (or two). Find a competent editor who works within your genre. Trust me on this. It's infuriating to have an editor who doesn't read scifi to constantly question or mark stuff about FTL drives or space marine armor and weapons as wrong because they don't understand what any scifi reader inherently knows. And don't use your family or friends or professors as editors. Pay for a real editor. Do some research to find one that is a professional. They cost money and they are worth every penny. Be aware that just because an editor is expensive doesn't mean they are good (or good for you). Good editors will have a waiting list and/or will ask for a chapter or sample so they can see how much work they'll need to do, and you'll see if they're a good fit for you. (I do editing on the side and I've turned down plenty of authors after seeing their samples because it would be far too much work to the point it wouldn't be cost effective for me. I've also turned down authors who refuse to believe their masterwork needs cleaning up - I don't have the energy to argue with an author) From here, decide if you're going to self publish or submit to a publishing company. You don't need an agent for this. If you're going to submit, make sure you do your research and find submission agents who are looking for your genre, read their submission guidelines and FOLLOW THEM TO THE LETTER. They get hundreds, thousands of submissions and will instantly trashcan your manuscript if you didn't do exactly as they instructed. If you're going to self pub, hire a proofreader (separate from your editor) to do another pass to fix any remaining spelling, punctuation mistakes (sometimes grammar too, but proofers are not always going to offer that service). In the meantime, find a cover artist. You can buy pre-made "photoshopped" covers for very cheap, they look good, and tons of choices. Or you can spend a few hundred to a few thousand to have an artist custom paint you a cover. When I decided to self pub after a bad experience with a publisher, I bought pre-made covers for $30 to $100. By my 6th book or so, I only used custom artwork from pro illustrators who charged $350+. Tom Edward's (UK artist) did a few for me for $1500 each and they are amazing. Trevor Smith and Keith Draws have done amazing covers for me for $650-$800 each. Most importantly is don't expect to suddenly blwo up and make money, get on bestseller lists. It CAN happen, but maybe only 1% of the time. It took me (and most others who are making a living at it) anywhere between 5 and 7 years to start earning enough to quit our day jobs. This is true for both self pub (harder but you earn more of each sale) and traditional pub (you will get a small advance since you're a nobody, won't earn royalties until you've earned out that advance, won't get any real promotional help unless you're somehow special... Google JA Konrath as trad pub is a whole other long thing to read about and he breaks it down better than anyone). Tl;Dr put it away and work on something else for a month or two, and in the meantime, research the hell out of self and traditional publishing, editors, decide which route you want to take, do a second pass and revise, then hire an editor (even if you opt for trad pub, you want your sample manuscript to be in excellent shape when it hits the agent's desk).
What are you exactly writing for? Is it going to be published?
1
45,724
2
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix1pqpy
ix3b49o
1,668,908,804
1,668,948,274
1
2
I’m not sure if it is a book for a series or not but if it is, work on the next books, get your ideas down. Then whenever you feel ready, you can work on the first. This is just my way of doing it and yeah it might be slightly problematic.
Put it away and work on your next story. Preferably one that isn't a sequel or tied to the universe of what you've just written (in case you have to make some major (or even minor) revisions while editing the one you just finished - this isn't uncommon). I usually avoid messing with it for at least 30-60 days. This gives your brain a break from that story, especially if you're working on something else. After the break, read & edit, make revisions where necessary, clean up the spelling, grammar, and punctuation as much as you can. Personally, I put it away again for another break and work on other stories, then pick it up and go over it a third time. You don't have to, but either way, once you've revised it, hand it off to an editor. Do NOT make the mistake of thinking you don't need one. You do. Every professional author will assure you that they believe they are excellent wordsmiths but absolutely need an editor (or two). Find a competent editor who works within your genre. Trust me on this. It's infuriating to have an editor who doesn't read scifi to constantly question or mark stuff about FTL drives or space marine armor and weapons as wrong because they don't understand what any scifi reader inherently knows. And don't use your family or friends or professors as editors. Pay for a real editor. Do some research to find one that is a professional. They cost money and they are worth every penny. Be aware that just because an editor is expensive doesn't mean they are good (or good for you). Good editors will have a waiting list and/or will ask for a chapter or sample so they can see how much work they'll need to do, and you'll see if they're a good fit for you. (I do editing on the side and I've turned down plenty of authors after seeing their samples because it would be far too much work to the point it wouldn't be cost effective for me. I've also turned down authors who refuse to believe their masterwork needs cleaning up - I don't have the energy to argue with an author) From here, decide if you're going to self publish or submit to a publishing company. You don't need an agent for this. If you're going to submit, make sure you do your research and find submission agents who are looking for your genre, read their submission guidelines and FOLLOW THEM TO THE LETTER. They get hundreds, thousands of submissions and will instantly trashcan your manuscript if you didn't do exactly as they instructed. If you're going to self pub, hire a proofreader (separate from your editor) to do another pass to fix any remaining spelling, punctuation mistakes (sometimes grammar too, but proofers are not always going to offer that service). In the meantime, find a cover artist. You can buy pre-made "photoshopped" covers for very cheap, they look good, and tons of choices. Or you can spend a few hundred to a few thousand to have an artist custom paint you a cover. When I decided to self pub after a bad experience with a publisher, I bought pre-made covers for $30 to $100. By my 6th book or so, I only used custom artwork from pro illustrators who charged $350+. Tom Edward's (UK artist) did a few for me for $1500 each and they are amazing. Trevor Smith and Keith Draws have done amazing covers for me for $650-$800 each. Most importantly is don't expect to suddenly blwo up and make money, get on bestseller lists. It CAN happen, but maybe only 1% of the time. It took me (and most others who are making a living at it) anywhere between 5 and 7 years to start earning enough to quit our day jobs. This is true for both self pub (harder but you earn more of each sale) and traditional pub (you will get a small advance since you're a nobody, won't earn royalties until you've earned out that advance, won't get any real promotional help unless you're somehow special... Google JA Konrath as trad pub is a whole other long thing to read about and he breaks it down better than anyone). Tl;Dr put it away and work on something else for a month or two, and in the meantime, research the hell out of self and traditional publishing, editors, decide which route you want to take, do a second pass and revise, then hire an editor (even if you opt for trad pub, you want your sample manuscript to be in excellent shape when it hits the agent's desk).
0
39,470
2
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix3b49o
ix1w5ca
1,668,948,274
1,668,911,981
2
1
Put it away and work on your next story. Preferably one that isn't a sequel or tied to the universe of what you've just written (in case you have to make some major (or even minor) revisions while editing the one you just finished - this isn't uncommon). I usually avoid messing with it for at least 30-60 days. This gives your brain a break from that story, especially if you're working on something else. After the break, read & edit, make revisions where necessary, clean up the spelling, grammar, and punctuation as much as you can. Personally, I put it away again for another break and work on other stories, then pick it up and go over it a third time. You don't have to, but either way, once you've revised it, hand it off to an editor. Do NOT make the mistake of thinking you don't need one. You do. Every professional author will assure you that they believe they are excellent wordsmiths but absolutely need an editor (or two). Find a competent editor who works within your genre. Trust me on this. It's infuriating to have an editor who doesn't read scifi to constantly question or mark stuff about FTL drives or space marine armor and weapons as wrong because they don't understand what any scifi reader inherently knows. And don't use your family or friends or professors as editors. Pay for a real editor. Do some research to find one that is a professional. They cost money and they are worth every penny. Be aware that just because an editor is expensive doesn't mean they are good (or good for you). Good editors will have a waiting list and/or will ask for a chapter or sample so they can see how much work they'll need to do, and you'll see if they're a good fit for you. (I do editing on the side and I've turned down plenty of authors after seeing their samples because it would be far too much work to the point it wouldn't be cost effective for me. I've also turned down authors who refuse to believe their masterwork needs cleaning up - I don't have the energy to argue with an author) From here, decide if you're going to self publish or submit to a publishing company. You don't need an agent for this. If you're going to submit, make sure you do your research and find submission agents who are looking for your genre, read their submission guidelines and FOLLOW THEM TO THE LETTER. They get hundreds, thousands of submissions and will instantly trashcan your manuscript if you didn't do exactly as they instructed. If you're going to self pub, hire a proofreader (separate from your editor) to do another pass to fix any remaining spelling, punctuation mistakes (sometimes grammar too, but proofers are not always going to offer that service). In the meantime, find a cover artist. You can buy pre-made "photoshopped" covers for very cheap, they look good, and tons of choices. Or you can spend a few hundred to a few thousand to have an artist custom paint you a cover. When I decided to self pub after a bad experience with a publisher, I bought pre-made covers for $30 to $100. By my 6th book or so, I only used custom artwork from pro illustrators who charged $350+. Tom Edward's (UK artist) did a few for me for $1500 each and they are amazing. Trevor Smith and Keith Draws have done amazing covers for me for $650-$800 each. Most importantly is don't expect to suddenly blwo up and make money, get on bestseller lists. It CAN happen, but maybe only 1% of the time. It took me (and most others who are making a living at it) anywhere between 5 and 7 years to start earning enough to quit our day jobs. This is true for both self pub (harder but you earn more of each sale) and traditional pub (you will get a small advance since you're a nobody, won't earn royalties until you've earned out that advance, won't get any real promotional help unless you're somehow special... Google JA Konrath as trad pub is a whole other long thing to read about and he breaks it down better than anyone). Tl;Dr put it away and work on something else for a month or two, and in the meantime, research the hell out of self and traditional publishing, editors, decide which route you want to take, do a second pass and revise, then hire an editor (even if you opt for trad pub, you want your sample manuscript to be in excellent shape when it hits the agent's desk).
Put the draft away, then begin a rewrite. Once the rewrite is done, find beta readers. Then update accordingly.
1
36,293
2
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix3qjlw
ix2hepv
1,668,956,592
1,668,924,055
2
1
Let it "simmer" for a couple weeks while you work on a completely different project. Right now you're firmly within the can't-see-the-forest-for-the-trees zone and won't spot obvious problems because you're too close to the draft. If things occur to you about it, keep a list, but under no circumstances do you crack open that file for a while.
Editing your first draft
1
32,537
2
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix3qjlw
ix1csa4
1,668,956,592
1,668,902,550
2
1
Let it "simmer" for a couple weeks while you work on a completely different project. Right now you're firmly within the can't-see-the-forest-for-the-trees zone and won't spot obvious problems because you're too close to the draft. If things occur to you about it, keep a list, but under no circumstances do you crack open that file for a while.
What are you exactly writing for? Is it going to be published?
1
54,042
2
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix1pqpy
ix3qjlw
1,668,908,804
1,668,956,592
1
2
I’m not sure if it is a book for a series or not but if it is, work on the next books, get your ideas down. Then whenever you feel ready, you can work on the first. This is just my way of doing it and yeah it might be slightly problematic.
Let it "simmer" for a couple weeks while you work on a completely different project. Right now you're firmly within the can't-see-the-forest-for-the-trees zone and won't spot obvious problems because you're too close to the draft. If things occur to you about it, keep a list, but under no circumstances do you crack open that file for a while.
0
47,788
2
yzpofj
writing_train
0.93
I'm about two days away from finishing my first draft. What are my next steps? If this is frequently asked, I apologize and will gladly redirect my attention to a previously answered post. If not, then here we go. My story is virtually done, and I'm so glad. I know there is still much to do, perhaps even more than what I've done, but I don't mind at all. I just am lost on the general steps; if writing my first draft was step 1, what is step 2, and 3, and 10?
ix1w5ca
ix3qjlw
1,668,911,981
1,668,956,592
1
2
Put the draft away, then begin a rewrite. Once the rewrite is done, find beta readers. Then update accordingly.
Let it "simmer" for a couple weeks while you work on a completely different project. Right now you're firmly within the can't-see-the-forest-for-the-trees zone and won't spot obvious problems because you're too close to the draft. If things occur to you about it, keep a list, but under no circumstances do you crack open that file for a while.
0
44,611
2
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7b5na
il78dbb
1,661,095,911
1,661,094,719
589
175
Female characters who are a mess, but not in a funny or cutesy way. I feel like female characters are rarely allowed to be disasters in ugly ways. They can have emotional breakdowns, but they have to be on the couch in their underwear looking cute while they do it.
Women who aren't just there to be someone's love interest. Women who are old or fat or ugly or legitimately weird and/or awkward--but aren't the butt of a joke or there to be a tragic character. Women who are rude, brash, self-serving, aggressive, etc. but are allowed to be flawed and grow through the narrative without anyone ever "putting her in her place." Women who don't have to be the heart and moral compass for everyone else. Women who aren't cold or evil for not wanting marriage or kids. Women who have goals and dreams unrelated to romance or motherhood. Women who aren't compared to, and don't compare themselves to, other women. Women who are just people, both the good and the bad. Women who aren't motivated by a sexual assault. Honestly, don't mention her breasts and never have anyone attempt to sexually harass or assault her, and you'll be heads above many other male authors. But yay for a gay couple at the lead. I'm all about that shiz.
1
1,192
3.365714
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7b5na
il72x32
1,661,095,911
1,661,092,384
589
148
Female characters who are a mess, but not in a funny or cutesy way. I feel like female characters are rarely allowed to be disasters in ugly ways. They can have emotional breakdowns, but they have to be on the couch in their underwear looking cute while they do it.
I just want to see a female character who isn't characterized by her gender. "Hot girl in an adventure movie? Give her a crop top, tight shorts and have her constantly pose like she's a magazine cover, but don't give her any personality other than she's a sexy bad ass" I'm tired of that trope in American movies. I want to see girls with personality that can do things on their own without needing a man to help! Bc it's either they're sexy and independent or need help!
1
3,527
3.97973
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7b5na
il77p0u
1,661,095,911
1,661,094,430
589
23
Female characters who are a mess, but not in a funny or cutesy way. I feel like female characters are rarely allowed to be disasters in ugly ways. They can have emotional breakdowns, but they have to be on the couch in their underwear looking cute while they do it.
My friend, one thing.. only one thing. Make a woman strong when the time comes. A strong woman doesn't go around acting all rough and tough slapping males. They needn't be loud, as another redditor mentioned. And i hate that extremely high pitched girl scream.. don't do that. Make the girl fearless, and make her a worthy protagonist or partner of the protagonist, who really helps, instead of being Mary Jane and screaming all the time without helping. I like it when they know martial arts, like Black Widow. Don't make her a Mary Sue though. No "Mary"s 😅😂 I like the silent female characters, who act like they don't like a male character first, then suddenly, you can use it as a plot twist, she reveals that she likes him.
1
1,481
25.608696
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7ufw3
il7mgkm
1,661,103,778
1,661,100,538
352
272
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
Female friendships, relationships, rivalries that aren't about a man. That means you have to have more than one female character.
1
3,240
1.294118
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7ufw3
il7guh4
1,661,103,778
1,661,098,257
352
214
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
I would like to see her flaws and strengths counteract each other and it not all be related to crying haha. I say this as a huge crier, but the first thing people will say about me is that while I am extremely empathetic and helpful, I am SO STUBBORN AND GOD HELP YOU ALL. Also, how a woman's helpfulness gets her into trouble and trouble not meaning rape, but instead, it ruins her relationships with others. And less sexual trauma please. A woman can have a hard life without her bodily agency being brutally taken a way from her. Give her a complicated upbringing, maybe someone she was close to died, maybe she's a washed up wonder kid, maybe she's the chosen one who rather stay at home and play video games. Idk. But...sexual trauma and violence aren't always the answer...
1
5,521
1.64486
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7ufw3
il78dbb
1,661,103,778
1,661,094,719
352
175
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
Women who aren't just there to be someone's love interest. Women who are old or fat or ugly or legitimately weird and/or awkward--but aren't the butt of a joke or there to be a tragic character. Women who are rude, brash, self-serving, aggressive, etc. but are allowed to be flawed and grow through the narrative without anyone ever "putting her in her place." Women who don't have to be the heart and moral compass for everyone else. Women who aren't cold or evil for not wanting marriage or kids. Women who have goals and dreams unrelated to romance or motherhood. Women who aren't compared to, and don't compare themselves to, other women. Women who are just people, both the good and the bad. Women who aren't motivated by a sexual assault. Honestly, don't mention her breasts and never have anyone attempt to sexually harass or assault her, and you'll be heads above many other male authors. But yay for a gay couple at the lead. I'm all about that shiz.
1
9,059
2.011429
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il72x32
il7ufw3
1,661,092,384
1,661,103,778
148
352
I just want to see a female character who isn't characterized by her gender. "Hot girl in an adventure movie? Give her a crop top, tight shorts and have her constantly pose like she's a magazine cover, but don't give her any personality other than she's a sexy bad ass" I'm tired of that trope in American movies. I want to see girls with personality that can do things on their own without needing a man to help! Bc it's either they're sexy and independent or need help!
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
0
11,394
2.378378
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7ufw3
il7jkvx
1,661,103,778
1,661,099,370
352
132
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
Thanks for asking! One thing I personally would love to see is a female protagonist or major character whose main struggle isn’t, directly or indirectly, about her being a woman. I understand and even sometimes appreciate the value of stories where women stand up to abusive men or sexist bosses but I’d really like to see more stories where the struggle would have been most the same if she was a man or in a non-misogynistic society. Misogyny is an irritating at best part of my life, I don’t want it in my “escapism” all the time Edit: one more thing is a little more balance in how many women there are. Most stories have like one women for every two to three men if not more skewed. It doesn’t have to be a perfect 1:1 but female people make up 50-52 percent of the world depending on what statistics you look at so it’s both annoying and unrealistic for it to be so heavily skewed so often
1
4,408
2.666667
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7ufw3
il7g4md
1,661,103,778
1,661,097,962
352
56
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
I really like when it's not all about a man. I totally like love stories too but it's nice once in a while to a (potentiell) partner doesn't play any role. Or ar least only small one. There is often a big difference as to important the general adventure is and how important the love interest. With male protagonist it often feels like a 70:30 split in favor of the adventure or whatever storyline. With female protagonist is feels like the other way around. Obviously that's still fine, just something i personally like in female protagonist or Charakters.
1
5,816
6.285714
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7ihrg
il7ufw3
1,661,098,926
1,661,103,778
45
352
If you stop thinking about side characters as side characters, but as the heroes of their own adventures, ones you don't happen to be telling at the moment, it helps. Thus, female side characters can be like protagonists: say, like Maddie Ross in *True Grit,* Kel or Alanna in Tamora Pierce's novels, Anne in *Anne of Green Gables,* Ripley in *Alien,* Sarah Connor in *Terminator,* Emma in *Emma,* and so on. Another gimmick is to model characters on actresses. Mae West and Betty White leap to mind. When in doubt, surprise the reader. Characters that are or do what the reader expects are poison.
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
0
4,852
7.822222
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7ufw3
il7d8ya
1,661,103,778
1,661,096,789
352
47
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
I’m in a similar boat. All of my 3 POVs are male characters so I felt more responsibility to do right by my most prominent female character (all of them really). I was very happy with how my beta readers responded to her. Some even told me they wished she was a POV. The only thing I look for in characters, male or female is that they’re not defined by their relationship with someone else, romantic or otherwise. One of my most frustrating pains in fiction of any media is female characters that only exist as a man’s _____. One thing that worked for me. I used the same profile sheet to construct all my main characters so that means, I’m answering the same questions about all of them - background, goals, fears, strengths, weaknesses etc. Of course, not all of this makes it into the story for supporting characters but that knowledge informs how I write them. They exist solely to tip the plot forward. SN: OP, are you Irish?
1
6,989
7.489362
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7ufw3
il7ef2o
1,661,103,778
1,661,097,270
352
31
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
Watch promising young woman. The protagonist in that film is such a good example. I also like the trope of dying for a cause in my fiction but it seems like it's only ever males that do this.
1
6,508
11.354839
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7ufw3
il7nhao
1,661,103,778
1,661,100,945
352
30
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
You already know what you're doing because you're already doing it with your gay leads. How do you write two gay men who are definitely gay and in a relationship without turning them into stereotypes or cliches? Well, you treat them like people who happen to be gay. How do you write good female characters? You treat them like people who happen to be female. Each one will be different. How they view makeup and how much they use it, how physically strong they are, how comfortable they are asking for help (and their reason for being or not being comfortable with this), how much they swear, their jobs, what they wear ... it's all different. I work in a warehouse and I've started wearing mostly men's clothes because it's more practical. But I'm 100% straight, married to a great guy, with two kids. My hair is super long. I wear dresses and make up if I'm going out or feel like spoiling my husband, but I rarely shave my legs. Each character you write is going to be this weird mix of trad femme, practical, masculine, quirky, damaged, strong, vulnerable, weird ...
1
2,833
11.733333
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7ufw3
il77p0u
1,661,103,778
1,661,094,430
352
23
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
My friend, one thing.. only one thing. Make a woman strong when the time comes. A strong woman doesn't go around acting all rough and tough slapping males. They needn't be loud, as another redditor mentioned. And i hate that extremely high pitched girl scream.. don't do that. Make the girl fearless, and make her a worthy protagonist or partner of the protagonist, who really helps, instead of being Mary Jane and screaming all the time without helping. I like it when they know martial arts, like Black Widow. Don't make her a Mary Sue though. No "Mary"s 😅😂 I like the silent female characters, who act like they don't like a male character first, then suddenly, you can use it as a plot twist, she reveals that she likes him.
1
9,348
15.304348
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7ufw3
il7rtpa
1,661,103,778
1,661,102,714
352
25
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
No rape and don’t objectify the character. Have actually goals. Have her life not revolve around the love interest.
1
1,064
14.08
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7ufw3
il7oooa
1,661,103,778
1,661,101,435
352
20
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
Don’t make them ‘not like other girls.’ Theres nothing interesting about reading about a girl who just bashes other women for wearing make up or sleeping with a lot of people, like they feel superior to them just because they like ‘masculine hobbies’ shut up.
1
2,343
17.6
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7iav7
il7ufw3
1,661,098,850
1,661,103,778
18
352
A buff strong woman. Not those skinny women in bikinis that go and fight. Or just a female character that is genuinely funny, and can be strong at the same time. Not the “oh she’s broken but she’s strong” trope. I can’t even find any funny female characters. They’re always just sassy or strong. The men get to be strong and funny, the women seem to only be strong. Edit: and heavier female characters. I rarely ever see any big female characters. Sometimes there are heavier men in the books I read, but all the women are really skinny and fit beauty standards.
More platonic friendships between men and women where neither of them ever had a crush on each other or saw the other romantically.
0
4,928
19.555556
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7mgkm
il7guh4
1,661,100,538
1,661,098,257
272
214
Female friendships, relationships, rivalries that aren't about a man. That means you have to have more than one female character.
I would like to see her flaws and strengths counteract each other and it not all be related to crying haha. I say this as a huge crier, but the first thing people will say about me is that while I am extremely empathetic and helpful, I am SO STUBBORN AND GOD HELP YOU ALL. Also, how a woman's helpfulness gets her into trouble and trouble not meaning rape, but instead, it ruins her relationships with others. And less sexual trauma please. A woman can have a hard life without her bodily agency being brutally taken a way from her. Give her a complicated upbringing, maybe someone she was close to died, maybe she's a washed up wonder kid, maybe she's the chosen one who rather stay at home and play video games. Idk. But...sexual trauma and violence aren't always the answer...
1
2,281
1.271028
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7mgkm
il78dbb
1,661,100,538
1,661,094,719
272
175
Female friendships, relationships, rivalries that aren't about a man. That means you have to have more than one female character.
Women who aren't just there to be someone's love interest. Women who are old or fat or ugly or legitimately weird and/or awkward--but aren't the butt of a joke or there to be a tragic character. Women who are rude, brash, self-serving, aggressive, etc. but are allowed to be flawed and grow through the narrative without anyone ever "putting her in her place." Women who don't have to be the heart and moral compass for everyone else. Women who aren't cold or evil for not wanting marriage or kids. Women who have goals and dreams unrelated to romance or motherhood. Women who aren't compared to, and don't compare themselves to, other women. Women who are just people, both the good and the bad. Women who aren't motivated by a sexual assault. Honestly, don't mention her breasts and never have anyone attempt to sexually harass or assault her, and you'll be heads above many other male authors. But yay for a gay couple at the lead. I'm all about that shiz.
1
5,819
1.554286
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7mgkm
il72x32
1,661,100,538
1,661,092,384
272
148
Female friendships, relationships, rivalries that aren't about a man. That means you have to have more than one female character.
I just want to see a female character who isn't characterized by her gender. "Hot girl in an adventure movie? Give her a crop top, tight shorts and have her constantly pose like she's a magazine cover, but don't give her any personality other than she's a sexy bad ass" I'm tired of that trope in American movies. I want to see girls with personality that can do things on their own without needing a man to help! Bc it's either they're sexy and independent or need help!
1
8,154
1.837838
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7jkvx
il7mgkm
1,661,099,370
1,661,100,538
132
272
Thanks for asking! One thing I personally would love to see is a female protagonist or major character whose main struggle isn’t, directly or indirectly, about her being a woman. I understand and even sometimes appreciate the value of stories where women stand up to abusive men or sexist bosses but I’d really like to see more stories where the struggle would have been most the same if she was a man or in a non-misogynistic society. Misogyny is an irritating at best part of my life, I don’t want it in my “escapism” all the time Edit: one more thing is a little more balance in how many women there are. Most stories have like one women for every two to three men if not more skewed. It doesn’t have to be a perfect 1:1 but female people make up 50-52 percent of the world depending on what statistics you look at so it’s both annoying and unrealistic for it to be so heavily skewed so often
Female friendships, relationships, rivalries that aren't about a man. That means you have to have more than one female character.
0
1,168
2.060606
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7g4md
il7mgkm
1,661,097,962
1,661,100,538
56
272
I really like when it's not all about a man. I totally like love stories too but it's nice once in a while to a (potentiell) partner doesn't play any role. Or ar least only small one. There is often a big difference as to important the general adventure is and how important the love interest. With male protagonist it often feels like a 70:30 split in favor of the adventure or whatever storyline. With female protagonist is feels like the other way around. Obviously that's still fine, just something i personally like in female protagonist or Charakters.
Female friendships, relationships, rivalries that aren't about a man. That means you have to have more than one female character.
0
2,576
4.857143
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7mgkm
il7ihrg
1,661,100,538
1,661,098,926
272
45
Female friendships, relationships, rivalries that aren't about a man. That means you have to have more than one female character.
If you stop thinking about side characters as side characters, but as the heroes of their own adventures, ones you don't happen to be telling at the moment, it helps. Thus, female side characters can be like protagonists: say, like Maddie Ross in *True Grit,* Kel or Alanna in Tamora Pierce's novels, Anne in *Anne of Green Gables,* Ripley in *Alien,* Sarah Connor in *Terminator,* Emma in *Emma,* and so on. Another gimmick is to model characters on actresses. Mae West and Betty White leap to mind. When in doubt, surprise the reader. Characters that are or do what the reader expects are poison.
1
1,612
6.044444
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7d8ya
il7mgkm
1,661,096,789
1,661,100,538
47
272
I’m in a similar boat. All of my 3 POVs are male characters so I felt more responsibility to do right by my most prominent female character (all of them really). I was very happy with how my beta readers responded to her. Some even told me they wished she was a POV. The only thing I look for in characters, male or female is that they’re not defined by their relationship with someone else, romantic or otherwise. One of my most frustrating pains in fiction of any media is female characters that only exist as a man’s _____. One thing that worked for me. I used the same profile sheet to construct all my main characters so that means, I’m answering the same questions about all of them - background, goals, fears, strengths, weaknesses etc. Of course, not all of this makes it into the story for supporting characters but that knowledge informs how I write them. They exist solely to tip the plot forward. SN: OP, are you Irish?
Female friendships, relationships, rivalries that aren't about a man. That means you have to have more than one female character.
0
3,749
5.787234
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7mgkm
il7ef2o
1,661,100,538
1,661,097,270
272
31
Female friendships, relationships, rivalries that aren't about a man. That means you have to have more than one female character.
Watch promising young woman. The protagonist in that film is such a good example. I also like the trope of dying for a cause in my fiction but it seems like it's only ever males that do this.
1
3,268
8.774194
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7mgkm
il77p0u
1,661,100,538
1,661,094,430
272
23
Female friendships, relationships, rivalries that aren't about a man. That means you have to have more than one female character.
My friend, one thing.. only one thing. Make a woman strong when the time comes. A strong woman doesn't go around acting all rough and tough slapping males. They needn't be loud, as another redditor mentioned. And i hate that extremely high pitched girl scream.. don't do that. Make the girl fearless, and make her a worthy protagonist or partner of the protagonist, who really helps, instead of being Mary Jane and screaming all the time without helping. I like it when they know martial arts, like Black Widow. Don't make her a Mary Sue though. No "Mary"s 😅😂 I like the silent female characters, who act like they don't like a male character first, then suddenly, you can use it as a plot twist, she reveals that she likes him.
1
6,108
11.826087
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7iav7
il7mgkm
1,661,098,850
1,661,100,538
18
272
A buff strong woman. Not those skinny women in bikinis that go and fight. Or just a female character that is genuinely funny, and can be strong at the same time. Not the “oh she’s broken but she’s strong” trope. I can’t even find any funny female characters. They’re always just sassy or strong. The men get to be strong and funny, the women seem to only be strong. Edit: and heavier female characters. I rarely ever see any big female characters. Sometimes there are heavier men in the books I read, but all the women are really skinny and fit beauty standards.
Female friendships, relationships, rivalries that aren't about a man. That means you have to have more than one female character.
0
1,688
15.111111
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il78dbb
il7guh4
1,661,094,719
1,661,098,257
175
214
Women who aren't just there to be someone's love interest. Women who are old or fat or ugly or legitimately weird and/or awkward--but aren't the butt of a joke or there to be a tragic character. Women who are rude, brash, self-serving, aggressive, etc. but are allowed to be flawed and grow through the narrative without anyone ever "putting her in her place." Women who don't have to be the heart and moral compass for everyone else. Women who aren't cold or evil for not wanting marriage or kids. Women who have goals and dreams unrelated to romance or motherhood. Women who aren't compared to, and don't compare themselves to, other women. Women who are just people, both the good and the bad. Women who aren't motivated by a sexual assault. Honestly, don't mention her breasts and never have anyone attempt to sexually harass or assault her, and you'll be heads above many other male authors. But yay for a gay couple at the lead. I'm all about that shiz.
I would like to see her flaws and strengths counteract each other and it not all be related to crying haha. I say this as a huge crier, but the first thing people will say about me is that while I am extremely empathetic and helpful, I am SO STUBBORN AND GOD HELP YOU ALL. Also, how a woman's helpfulness gets her into trouble and trouble not meaning rape, but instead, it ruins her relationships with others. And less sexual trauma please. A woman can have a hard life without her bodily agency being brutally taken a way from her. Give her a complicated upbringing, maybe someone she was close to died, maybe she's a washed up wonder kid, maybe she's the chosen one who rather stay at home and play video games. Idk. But...sexual trauma and violence aren't always the answer...
0
3,538
1.222857
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7guh4
il72x32
1,661,098,257
1,661,092,384
214
148
I would like to see her flaws and strengths counteract each other and it not all be related to crying haha. I say this as a huge crier, but the first thing people will say about me is that while I am extremely empathetic and helpful, I am SO STUBBORN AND GOD HELP YOU ALL. Also, how a woman's helpfulness gets her into trouble and trouble not meaning rape, but instead, it ruins her relationships with others. And less sexual trauma please. A woman can have a hard life without her bodily agency being brutally taken a way from her. Give her a complicated upbringing, maybe someone she was close to died, maybe she's a washed up wonder kid, maybe she's the chosen one who rather stay at home and play video games. Idk. But...sexual trauma and violence aren't always the answer...
I just want to see a female character who isn't characterized by her gender. "Hot girl in an adventure movie? Give her a crop top, tight shorts and have her constantly pose like she's a magazine cover, but don't give her any personality other than she's a sexy bad ass" I'm tired of that trope in American movies. I want to see girls with personality that can do things on their own without needing a man to help! Bc it's either they're sexy and independent or need help!
1
5,873
1.445946
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7g4md
il7guh4
1,661,097,962
1,661,098,257
56
214
I really like when it's not all about a man. I totally like love stories too but it's nice once in a while to a (potentiell) partner doesn't play any role. Or ar least only small one. There is often a big difference as to important the general adventure is and how important the love interest. With male protagonist it often feels like a 70:30 split in favor of the adventure or whatever storyline. With female protagonist is feels like the other way around. Obviously that's still fine, just something i personally like in female protagonist or Charakters.
I would like to see her flaws and strengths counteract each other and it not all be related to crying haha. I say this as a huge crier, but the first thing people will say about me is that while I am extremely empathetic and helpful, I am SO STUBBORN AND GOD HELP YOU ALL. Also, how a woman's helpfulness gets her into trouble and trouble not meaning rape, but instead, it ruins her relationships with others. And less sexual trauma please. A woman can have a hard life without her bodily agency being brutally taken a way from her. Give her a complicated upbringing, maybe someone she was close to died, maybe she's a washed up wonder kid, maybe she's the chosen one who rather stay at home and play video games. Idk. But...sexual trauma and violence aren't always the answer...
0
295
3.821429
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7d8ya
il7guh4
1,661,096,789
1,661,098,257
47
214
I’m in a similar boat. All of my 3 POVs are male characters so I felt more responsibility to do right by my most prominent female character (all of them really). I was very happy with how my beta readers responded to her. Some even told me they wished she was a POV. The only thing I look for in characters, male or female is that they’re not defined by their relationship with someone else, romantic or otherwise. One of my most frustrating pains in fiction of any media is female characters that only exist as a man’s _____. One thing that worked for me. I used the same profile sheet to construct all my main characters so that means, I’m answering the same questions about all of them - background, goals, fears, strengths, weaknesses etc. Of course, not all of this makes it into the story for supporting characters but that knowledge informs how I write them. They exist solely to tip the plot forward. SN: OP, are you Irish?
I would like to see her flaws and strengths counteract each other and it not all be related to crying haha. I say this as a huge crier, but the first thing people will say about me is that while I am extremely empathetic and helpful, I am SO STUBBORN AND GOD HELP YOU ALL. Also, how a woman's helpfulness gets her into trouble and trouble not meaning rape, but instead, it ruins her relationships with others. And less sexual trauma please. A woman can have a hard life without her bodily agency being brutally taken a way from her. Give her a complicated upbringing, maybe someone she was close to died, maybe she's a washed up wonder kid, maybe she's the chosen one who rather stay at home and play video games. Idk. But...sexual trauma and violence aren't always the answer...
0
1,468
4.553191
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7guh4
il7ef2o
1,661,098,257
1,661,097,270
214
31
I would like to see her flaws and strengths counteract each other and it not all be related to crying haha. I say this as a huge crier, but the first thing people will say about me is that while I am extremely empathetic and helpful, I am SO STUBBORN AND GOD HELP YOU ALL. Also, how a woman's helpfulness gets her into trouble and trouble not meaning rape, but instead, it ruins her relationships with others. And less sexual trauma please. A woman can have a hard life without her bodily agency being brutally taken a way from her. Give her a complicated upbringing, maybe someone she was close to died, maybe she's a washed up wonder kid, maybe she's the chosen one who rather stay at home and play video games. Idk. But...sexual trauma and violence aren't always the answer...
Watch promising young woman. The protagonist in that film is such a good example. I also like the trope of dying for a cause in my fiction but it seems like it's only ever males that do this.
1
987
6.903226
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7guh4
il77p0u
1,661,098,257
1,661,094,430
214
23
I would like to see her flaws and strengths counteract each other and it not all be related to crying haha. I say this as a huge crier, but the first thing people will say about me is that while I am extremely empathetic and helpful, I am SO STUBBORN AND GOD HELP YOU ALL. Also, how a woman's helpfulness gets her into trouble and trouble not meaning rape, but instead, it ruins her relationships with others. And less sexual trauma please. A woman can have a hard life without her bodily agency being brutally taken a way from her. Give her a complicated upbringing, maybe someone she was close to died, maybe she's a washed up wonder kid, maybe she's the chosen one who rather stay at home and play video games. Idk. But...sexual trauma and violence aren't always the answer...
My friend, one thing.. only one thing. Make a woman strong when the time comes. A strong woman doesn't go around acting all rough and tough slapping males. They needn't be loud, as another redditor mentioned. And i hate that extremely high pitched girl scream.. don't do that. Make the girl fearless, and make her a worthy protagonist or partner of the protagonist, who really helps, instead of being Mary Jane and screaming all the time without helping. I like it when they know martial arts, like Black Widow. Don't make her a Mary Sue though. No "Mary"s 😅😂 I like the silent female characters, who act like they don't like a male character first, then suddenly, you can use it as a plot twist, she reveals that she likes him.
1
3,827
9.304348
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il78dbb
il72x32
1,661,094,719
1,661,092,384
175
148
Women who aren't just there to be someone's love interest. Women who are old or fat or ugly or legitimately weird and/or awkward--but aren't the butt of a joke or there to be a tragic character. Women who are rude, brash, self-serving, aggressive, etc. but are allowed to be flawed and grow through the narrative without anyone ever "putting her in her place." Women who don't have to be the heart and moral compass for everyone else. Women who aren't cold or evil for not wanting marriage or kids. Women who have goals and dreams unrelated to romance or motherhood. Women who aren't compared to, and don't compare themselves to, other women. Women who are just people, both the good and the bad. Women who aren't motivated by a sexual assault. Honestly, don't mention her breasts and never have anyone attempt to sexually harass or assault her, and you'll be heads above many other male authors. But yay for a gay couple at the lead. I'm all about that shiz.
I just want to see a female character who isn't characterized by her gender. "Hot girl in an adventure movie? Give her a crop top, tight shorts and have her constantly pose like she's a magazine cover, but don't give her any personality other than she's a sexy bad ass" I'm tired of that trope in American movies. I want to see girls with personality that can do things on their own without needing a man to help! Bc it's either they're sexy and independent or need help!
1
2,335
1.182432
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il77p0u
il78dbb
1,661,094,430
1,661,094,719
23
175
My friend, one thing.. only one thing. Make a woman strong when the time comes. A strong woman doesn't go around acting all rough and tough slapping males. They needn't be loud, as another redditor mentioned. And i hate that extremely high pitched girl scream.. don't do that. Make the girl fearless, and make her a worthy protagonist or partner of the protagonist, who really helps, instead of being Mary Jane and screaming all the time without helping. I like it when they know martial arts, like Black Widow. Don't make her a Mary Sue though. No "Mary"s 😅😂 I like the silent female characters, who act like they don't like a male character first, then suddenly, you can use it as a plot twist, she reveals that she likes him.
Women who aren't just there to be someone's love interest. Women who are old or fat or ugly or legitimately weird and/or awkward--but aren't the butt of a joke or there to be a tragic character. Women who are rude, brash, self-serving, aggressive, etc. but are allowed to be flawed and grow through the narrative without anyone ever "putting her in her place." Women who don't have to be the heart and moral compass for everyone else. Women who aren't cold or evil for not wanting marriage or kids. Women who have goals and dreams unrelated to romance or motherhood. Women who aren't compared to, and don't compare themselves to, other women. Women who are just people, both the good and the bad. Women who aren't motivated by a sexual assault. Honestly, don't mention her breasts and never have anyone attempt to sexually harass or assault her, and you'll be heads above many other male authors. But yay for a gay couple at the lead. I'm all about that shiz.
0
289
7.608696
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7jkvx
il7g4md
1,661,099,370
1,661,097,962
132
56
Thanks for asking! One thing I personally would love to see is a female protagonist or major character whose main struggle isn’t, directly or indirectly, about her being a woman. I understand and even sometimes appreciate the value of stories where women stand up to abusive men or sexist bosses but I’d really like to see more stories where the struggle would have been most the same if she was a man or in a non-misogynistic society. Misogyny is an irritating at best part of my life, I don’t want it in my “escapism” all the time Edit: one more thing is a little more balance in how many women there are. Most stories have like one women for every two to three men if not more skewed. It doesn’t have to be a perfect 1:1 but female people make up 50-52 percent of the world depending on what statistics you look at so it’s both annoying and unrealistic for it to be so heavily skewed so often
I really like when it's not all about a man. I totally like love stories too but it's nice once in a while to a (potentiell) partner doesn't play any role. Or ar least only small one. There is often a big difference as to important the general adventure is and how important the love interest. With male protagonist it often feels like a 70:30 split in favor of the adventure or whatever storyline. With female protagonist is feels like the other way around. Obviously that's still fine, just something i personally like in female protagonist or Charakters.
1
1,408
2.357143
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7ihrg
il7jkvx
1,661,098,926
1,661,099,370
45
132
If you stop thinking about side characters as side characters, but as the heroes of their own adventures, ones you don't happen to be telling at the moment, it helps. Thus, female side characters can be like protagonists: say, like Maddie Ross in *True Grit,* Kel or Alanna in Tamora Pierce's novels, Anne in *Anne of Green Gables,* Ripley in *Alien,* Sarah Connor in *Terminator,* Emma in *Emma,* and so on. Another gimmick is to model characters on actresses. Mae West and Betty White leap to mind. When in doubt, surprise the reader. Characters that are or do what the reader expects are poison.
Thanks for asking! One thing I personally would love to see is a female protagonist or major character whose main struggle isn’t, directly or indirectly, about her being a woman. I understand and even sometimes appreciate the value of stories where women stand up to abusive men or sexist bosses but I’d really like to see more stories where the struggle would have been most the same if she was a man or in a non-misogynistic society. Misogyny is an irritating at best part of my life, I don’t want it in my “escapism” all the time Edit: one more thing is a little more balance in how many women there are. Most stories have like one women for every two to three men if not more skewed. It doesn’t have to be a perfect 1:1 but female people make up 50-52 percent of the world depending on what statistics you look at so it’s both annoying and unrealistic for it to be so heavily skewed so often
0
444
2.933333
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7d8ya
il7jkvx
1,661,096,789
1,661,099,370
47
132
I’m in a similar boat. All of my 3 POVs are male characters so I felt more responsibility to do right by my most prominent female character (all of them really). I was very happy with how my beta readers responded to her. Some even told me they wished she was a POV. The only thing I look for in characters, male or female is that they’re not defined by their relationship with someone else, romantic or otherwise. One of my most frustrating pains in fiction of any media is female characters that only exist as a man’s _____. One thing that worked for me. I used the same profile sheet to construct all my main characters so that means, I’m answering the same questions about all of them - background, goals, fears, strengths, weaknesses etc. Of course, not all of this makes it into the story for supporting characters but that knowledge informs how I write them. They exist solely to tip the plot forward. SN: OP, are you Irish?
Thanks for asking! One thing I personally would love to see is a female protagonist or major character whose main struggle isn’t, directly or indirectly, about her being a woman. I understand and even sometimes appreciate the value of stories where women stand up to abusive men or sexist bosses but I’d really like to see more stories where the struggle would have been most the same if she was a man or in a non-misogynistic society. Misogyny is an irritating at best part of my life, I don’t want it in my “escapism” all the time Edit: one more thing is a little more balance in how many women there are. Most stories have like one women for every two to three men if not more skewed. It doesn’t have to be a perfect 1:1 but female people make up 50-52 percent of the world depending on what statistics you look at so it’s both annoying and unrealistic for it to be so heavily skewed so often
0
2,581
2.808511
wtzzia
writing_train
0.9
What is something you want to see from female characters in stories that you normally don’t see? I’m a writer and I have two male main characters who are gay (for each other). I wanted that representation as a bi guy, but have to sacrifice writing a strong female lead. I want my side characters to feel like more than side characters and would love your input! I’d hate for my side characters to be another case of female side characters.
il7jkvx
il7ef2o
1,661,099,370
1,661,097,270
132
31
Thanks for asking! One thing I personally would love to see is a female protagonist or major character whose main struggle isn’t, directly or indirectly, about her being a woman. I understand and even sometimes appreciate the value of stories where women stand up to abusive men or sexist bosses but I’d really like to see more stories where the struggle would have been most the same if she was a man or in a non-misogynistic society. Misogyny is an irritating at best part of my life, I don’t want it in my “escapism” all the time Edit: one more thing is a little more balance in how many women there are. Most stories have like one women for every two to three men if not more skewed. It doesn’t have to be a perfect 1:1 but female people make up 50-52 percent of the world depending on what statistics you look at so it’s both annoying and unrealistic for it to be so heavily skewed so often
Watch promising young woman. The protagonist in that film is such a good example. I also like the trope of dying for a cause in my fiction but it seems like it's only ever males that do this.
1
2,100
4.258065