Add files using upload-large-folder tool
Browse filesThis view is limited to 50 files because it contains too many changes.
See raw diff
- .gitattributes +22 -0
- 2018-05-24/18_59_29.ulg +0 -0
- 2018-05-24/19_29_26.ulg +0 -0
- 2018-06-02/14_42_27.ulg +0 -0
- 2018-06-12/18_52_10.ulg.mdat.csv +62 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_05_12.ulg.mdat.csv +62 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_05_12.ulg.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_06_44.ulg.mdat.csv +62 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_24_37.ulg.mdat.csv +62 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_31_16.ulg.mdat.csv +62 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_31_16.ulg.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_37_11.ulg.mdat.csv +62 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_37_11.ulg.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_37_35.ulg.mdat.csv +62 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_38_14.ulg.mdat.csv +62 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_44_57.ulg.mdat.csv +62 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_51_40.ulg.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_55_27.ulg.mdat.csv +62 -0
- 2018-06-12/19_58_56.ulg.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-06-12/population_data.csv +40 -0
- 2018-06-12/population_data.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-06-14/log001.ulg.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-06-14/log002.ulg.mdat.csv +62 -0
- 2018-06-14/log002.ulg.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-06-14/log003.ulg.mdat.csv +62 -0
- 2018-06-14/log004.ulg.mdat.csv +62 -0
- 2018-06-14/log004.ulg.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-06-14/not +4 -0
- 2018-06-14/population_data.pdf +10 -0
- 2018-08-21/sess004/log001.ulg +0 -0
- 2018-08-21/sess005/log002.ulg +0 -0
- 2018-08-21/sess006/log002.ulg +0 -0
- 2018-08-21/sess006/log005.ulg +0 -0
- 2018-08-21/sess006/log006.ulg +0 -0
- 2018-08-21/sess006/log008.ulg +0 -0
- 2018-08-21/sess006/log010.ulg +0 -0
- 2018-08-21/sess006/log011.ulg +0 -0
- 2018-09-07/12_48_42.ulg.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-09-07/12_51_41.ulg.mdat.csv +66 -0
- 2018-09-07/13_07_23.ulg.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-09-07/13_20_12.ulg.mdat.csv +66 -0
- 2018-09-07/13_26_48.ulg.mdat.csv +66 -0
- 2018-09-07/13_39_11.ulg.mdat.csv +66 -0
- 2018-09-07/13_52_43.ulg.mdat.csv +66 -0
- 2018-09-07/13_58_13.ulg.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-09-07/14_03_01.ulg.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-09-07/14_10_59.ulg.pdf +0 -0
- 2018-09-07/14_16_20.ulg.mdat.csv +66 -0
- 2018-09-07/14_19_21.ulg.mdat.csv +66 -0
- 2018-09-07/14_21_20.ulg.pdf +0 -0
.gitattributes
CHANGED
@@ -79,3 +79,25 @@ log_54_2022-4-19-18-17-42_px4_pose_reset.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
|
79 |
2018-09-18/07_44_24.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
80 |
2018-09-18/09_02_23.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
81 |
2018-09-18/07_38_12.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
2018-09-18/07_44_24.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
80 |
2018-09-18/09_02_23.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
81 |
2018-09-18/07_38_12.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
82 |
+
2019-05-24/19_21_36.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
83 |
+
2018-09-18/07_55_26.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
84 |
+
2019-05-24/19_04_17.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
85 |
+
2019-05-24/19_30_46.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
86 |
+
2019-05-24/19_13_59.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
87 |
+
2019-05-24/19_33_59.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
88 |
+
2019-05-24/19_27_14.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
89 |
+
2019-05-24/19_42_10.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
90 |
+
2018-09-18/07_48_03.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
91 |
+
2018-09-18/08_39_17.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
92 |
+
2018-09-18/08_04_48.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
93 |
+
2019-05-24/19_37_19.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
94 |
+
2019-01-01/15_39_02.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
95 |
+
2019-01-01/15_35_34.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
96 |
+
2019-01-01/14_39_39.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
97 |
+
2019-01-01/15_37_30.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
98 |
+
2019-01-01/14_44_02.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
99 |
+
2020-06-18/14_12_22.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
100 |
+
2020-06-18/13_55_18.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
101 |
+
2020-06-18/12_55_16.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
102 |
+
2020-06-18/14_24_22.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
103 |
+
2022-11-16/log_7_2022-12-2-04-40-22_vadi_ilk_otonom_ucus.ulg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
2018-05-24/18_59_29.ulg
ADDED
Binary file (66.1 kB). View file
|
|
2018-05-24/19_29_26.ulg
ADDED
Binary file (65.4 kB). View file
|
|
2018-06-02/14_42_27.ulg
ADDED
Binary file (87.4 kB). View file
|
|
2018-06-12/18_52_10.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
3 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
4 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
5 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
7 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
8 |
+
hagl_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
11 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
13 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
14 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.1945427,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.050006524,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
imu_coning_mean,2.5825352e-07,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
17 |
+
imu_coning_peak,1.0747422e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
18 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,1.3028385230004137e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
20 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.00053458835,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.0011441719,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.015757602,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.026210956,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
24 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning - Vibration,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
25 |
+
in_air_transition_time,293.4,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
26 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
27 |
+
mag_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
28 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
mag_test_max,0.20913145,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
30 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.02915289,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
31 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
32 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
33 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
34 |
+
master_status,Warning,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
35 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,339.0,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
38 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.0010603885,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
39 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.028610872,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
40 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.021115616,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
41 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
42 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,1.86046511628,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
43 |
+
pos_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
44 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Pass,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
45 |
+
pos_test_max,0.8061113,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
46 |
+
pos_test_mean,0.11371472,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
47 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
48 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
49 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
50 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
51 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
52 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
53 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
54 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
55 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
56 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
57 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
58 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
59 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
60 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
61 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
62 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Pass,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-06-12/19_05_12.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
3 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
4 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
5 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
7 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
8 |
+
hagl_test_max,0.0911515,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_mean,0.015060466,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
11 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
13 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
14 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.13412344,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.068739265,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
imu_coning_mean,5.619268e-07,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
17 |
+
imu_coning_peak,3.5316955e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
18 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,2.0052137211591593e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
20 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.0007848049,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.0013464751,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.018863289,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.022908071,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
24 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning - Output Predictor,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
25 |
+
in_air_transition_time,690.3,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
26 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
27 |
+
mag_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
28 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
mag_test_max,0.047168974,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
30 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.0167662,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
31 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
32 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
33 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
34 |
+
master_status,Warning,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
35 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,744.7,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
38 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.0006247556,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
39 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.43559787,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
40 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.04748367,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
41 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
42 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
43 |
+
pos_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
44 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Pass,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
45 |
+
pos_test_max,0.004023424,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
46 |
+
pos_test_mean,0.0039968127,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
47 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
48 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
49 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
50 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
51 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
52 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
53 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
54 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
55 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
56 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
57 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
58 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
59 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
60 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
61 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
62 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Pass,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-06-12/19_05_12.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (81.5 kB). View file
|
|
2018-06-12/19_06_44.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
3 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
4 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
5 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
7 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
8 |
+
hagl_test_max,0.036807913,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_mean,0.0031686819,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
11 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
13 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
14 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.15559219,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.04243126,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
imu_coning_mean,5.140858e-07,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
17 |
+
imu_coning_peak,2.5449478e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
18 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,2.1034635152730014e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
20 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.0008377056,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.0016689737,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.018968074,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.029086651,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
24 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning - Output Predictor,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
25 |
+
in_air_transition_time,784.5,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
26 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
27 |
+
mag_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
28 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
mag_test_max,0.016333159,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
30 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.01633316,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
31 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
32 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
33 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
34 |
+
master_status,Warning,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
35 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,868.8,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
38 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.00149953,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
39 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.06876233,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
40 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.17780297,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
41 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
42 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
43 |
+
pos_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
44 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Pass,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
45 |
+
pos_test_max,0.004023424,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
46 |
+
pos_test_mean,0.0040234243,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
47 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
48 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
49 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
50 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
51 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
52 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
53 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
54 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
55 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
56 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
57 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
58 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
59 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
60 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
61 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
62 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Pass,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-06-12/19_24_37.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
3 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
4 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
5 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
7 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
8 |
+
hagl_test_max,0.13456227,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_mean,0.013045576,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
11 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
13 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
14 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.2603389,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.07971216,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
imu_coning_mean,5.9344615e-07,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
17 |
+
imu_coning_peak,3.771008e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
18 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,2.0502276347482374e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
20 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.00077781174,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.0013303632,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.02010622,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.03722522,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
24 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning - Vibration,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
25 |
+
in_air_transition_time,241.2,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
26 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,1.81347150259,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
27 |
+
mag_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
28 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
mag_test_max,0.67449754,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
30 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.108884595,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
31 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
32 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
33 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
34 |
+
master_status,Warning,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
35 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,323.4,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
38 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.0018676167,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
39 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.023959495,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
40 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.024141507,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
41 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
42 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,4.63414634146,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
43 |
+
pos_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
44 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Pass,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
45 |
+
pos_test_max,0.963041,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
46 |
+
pos_test_mean,0.13436735,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
47 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
48 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
49 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
50 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
51 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
52 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
53 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
54 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
55 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
56 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
57 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
58 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
59 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
60 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
61 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
62 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Pass,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-06-12/19_31_16.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
3 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
4 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
5 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
7 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
8 |
+
hagl_test_max,0.07351747,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_mean,0.00790325,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
11 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
13 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
14 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.15007985,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.06797089,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
imu_coning_mean,4.5584042e-07,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
17 |
+
imu_coning_peak,2.1131946e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
18 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,2.1860446353022046e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
20 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.0007815675,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.0018193177,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.018852782,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.026677633,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
24 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning - Output Predictor,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
25 |
+
in_air_transition_time,650.8,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
26 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
27 |
+
mag_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
28 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
mag_test_max,0.05040179,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
30 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.050401792,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
31 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
32 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
33 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
34 |
+
master_status,Warning,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
35 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,712.2,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
38 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.0009901822,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
39 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.6698303,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
40 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.090833604,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
41 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
42 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
43 |
+
pos_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
44 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Pass,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
45 |
+
pos_test_max,0.12049451,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
46 |
+
pos_test_mean,0.12049449,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
47 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
48 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
49 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
50 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
51 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
52 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
53 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
54 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
55 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
56 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
57 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
58 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
59 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
60 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
61 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
62 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Pass,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-06-12/19_31_16.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (96.1 kB). View file
|
|
2018-06-12/19_37_11.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
3 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
4 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
5 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
7 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
8 |
+
hagl_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
11 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
13 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
14 |
+
hgt_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
imu_coning_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
17 |
+
imu_coning_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
18 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
20 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
24 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Pass,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
25 |
+
in_air_transition_time,994.4,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
26 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
27 |
+
mag_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
28 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
mag_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
30 |
+
mag_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
31 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
32 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
33 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
34 |
+
master_status,Pass,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
35 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,1003.5,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
38 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
39 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
40 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
41 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
42 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
43 |
+
pos_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
44 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Pass,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
45 |
+
pos_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
46 |
+
pos_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
47 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
48 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
49 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
50 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
51 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
52 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
53 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
54 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
55 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
56 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
57 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
58 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
59 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
60 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
61 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
62 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Pass,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-06-12/19_37_11.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (86.4 kB). View file
|
|
2018-06-12/19_37_35.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
3 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
4 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
5 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
7 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
8 |
+
hagl_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
11 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
13 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
14 |
+
hgt_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
imu_coning_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
17 |
+
imu_coning_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
18 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
20 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
24 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Pass,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
25 |
+
in_air_transition_time,1017.8,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
26 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
27 |
+
mag_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
28 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
mag_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
30 |
+
mag_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
31 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
32 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
33 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
34 |
+
master_status,Pass,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
35 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,1039.3,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
38 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
39 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
40 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
41 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
42 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
43 |
+
pos_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
44 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Pass,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
45 |
+
pos_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
46 |
+
pos_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
47 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
48 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
49 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
50 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
51 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
52 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
53 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
54 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
55 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
56 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
57 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
58 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
59 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
60 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
61 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
62 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Pass,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-06-12/19_38_14.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
3 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
4 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
5 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
7 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
8 |
+
hagl_test_max,0.08651192,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_mean,0.007523724,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
11 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
13 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
14 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.24714811,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.06668086,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
imu_coning_mean,3.656168e-07,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
17 |
+
imu_coning_peak,4.6297605e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
18 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,2.111362884326685e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
20 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.00070906885,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.0013645914,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.018670298,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.029415106,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
24 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning - Vibration,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
25 |
+
in_air_transition_time,1057.3,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
26 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,1.32653061224,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
27 |
+
mag_percentage_red,0.204081632653,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
28 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
mag_test_max,1.9541053,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
30 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.09225005,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
31 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
32 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
33 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
34 |
+
master_status,Fail,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
35 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,1260.7,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
38 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.0011385791,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
39 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.014021856,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
40 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.014411514,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
41 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,1.49402390438,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
42 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,2.09163346614,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
43 |
+
pos_percentage_red,1.49402390438,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
44 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Fail,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
45 |
+
pos_test_max,2.49247,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
46 |
+
pos_test_mean,0.11225577,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
47 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
48 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
49 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
50 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
51 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
52 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
53 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
54 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
55 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
56 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
57 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
58 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
59 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
60 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
61 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,0.204081632653,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
62 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Fail,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-06-12/19_44_57.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
3 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
4 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
5 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
7 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
8 |
+
hagl_test_max,0.11591485,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_mean,0.008191313,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
11 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
13 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
14 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.25690904,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.06777267,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
imu_coning_mean,3.749129e-07,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
17 |
+
imu_coning_peak,4.0112445e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
18 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,3.2796184099982115e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
20 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.0007601188,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.0015840365,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.018984258,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.045773696,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
24 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning - Vibration,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
25 |
+
in_air_transition_time,1459.8,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
26 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,2.76381909548,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
27 |
+
mag_percentage_red,5.02512562814,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
28 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
mag_test_max,1.3834869,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
30 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.19367705,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
31 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
32 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
33 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
34 |
+
master_status,Fail,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
35 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,1627.1,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
38 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.0022214078,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
39 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.028176539,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
40 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.027995957,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
41 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,3.90243902439,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
42 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,1.9512195122,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
43 |
+
pos_percentage_red,3.90243902439,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
44 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Fail,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
45 |
+
pos_test_max,4.248762,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
46 |
+
pos_test_mean,0.21849392,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
47 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
48 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
49 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
50 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
51 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
52 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
53 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
54 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
55 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
56 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
57 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
58 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
59 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
60 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
61 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,5.02512562814,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
62 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Fail,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-06-12/19_51_40.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (1.82 kB). View file
|
|
2018-06-12/19_55_27.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
3 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
4 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
5 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
7 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
8 |
+
hagl_test_max,0.13521574,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_mean,0.012103076,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
11 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
13 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
14 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.22602093,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.07710362,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
imu_coning_mean,7.738333e-07,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
17 |
+
imu_coning_peak,3.3483184e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
18 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,2.444631140498866e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
20 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.0009316112,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.0019482474,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.019773176,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.042331178,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
24 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning - Vibration,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
25 |
+
in_air_transition_time,128.7,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
26 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,1.59574468085,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
27 |
+
mag_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
28 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
mag_test_max,0.78217214,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
30 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.09754534,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
31 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
32 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
33 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
34 |
+
master_status,Fail,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
35 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,209.0,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
38 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.0027475867,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
39 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.041472074,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
40 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.04021576,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
41 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,5.5,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
42 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,6.75,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
43 |
+
pos_percentage_red,5.5,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
44 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Fail,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
45 |
+
pos_test_max,2.298366,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
46 |
+
pos_test_mean,0.2722404,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
47 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
48 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
49 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
50 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
51 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
52 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
53 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
54 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
55 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
56 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
57 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
58 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
59 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
60 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
61 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
62 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Pass,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-06-12/19_58_56.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (1.76 kB). View file
|
|
2018-06-12/population_data.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
hagl_fail_pct,0.0,Percentage of logs with height above ground sensor fails
|
3 |
+
hagl_test_max_avg,0.09624023757142856,The mean of the maximum in-flight values of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio
|
4 |
+
hagl_test_mean_avg,0.009570869557142857,The mean of the mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio
|
5 |
+
hagl_warning_pct,0.0,Percentage of logs with height above ground sensor warnings
|
6 |
+
hgt_fail_pct,0.0,Percentage of logs with height sensor fails
|
7 |
+
hgt_test_max_avg,0.20309439499999998,The mean of the maximum in-flight values of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio
|
8 |
+
hgt_test_mean_avg,0.065052156125,The mean of the mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio
|
9 |
+
hgt_warning_pct,0.0,Percentage of logs with height sensor warnings
|
10 |
+
imu_coning_max_avg,0.0031281139375000004,The mean of the maximum in-flight values of the IMU delta angle coning vibration level (mrad)
|
11 |
+
imu_coning_mean_avg,0.00048723946125,The mean of the mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration level (mrad)
|
12 |
+
imu_hfdang_max_avg,1.5257721124999999,The mean of the maximum in-flight values of the IMU high frequency delta angle vibration level (mrad)
|
13 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean_avg,0.7646596175,The mean of the mean in-flight value of the IMU delta high frequency delta angle vibration level (mrad)
|
14 |
+
imu_hfdvel_max_avg,0.032453563875,The mean of the maximum in-flight values of the IMU high frequency delta velocity vibration level (m/s)
|
15 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean_avg,0.018746962375,The mean of the mean in-flight value of the IMU delta high frequency delta velocity vibration level (m/s)
|
16 |
+
mag_fail_pct,0.0,Percentage of logs with magnetometer sensor fails
|
17 |
+
mag_test_max_avg,0.639662156625,The mean of the maximum in-flight values of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio
|
18 |
+
mag_test_mean_avg,0.07562638462499999,The mean of the mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio
|
19 |
+
mag_warning_pct,0.0,Percentage of logs with magnetometer sensor warnings
|
20 |
+
master_fail_pct,30.0,Percentage of logs with fails
|
21 |
+
master_warning_pct,50.0,Percentage of logs with warnings
|
22 |
+
obs_ang_median_avg,1.518755825,The mean of the median in-flight value of the output observer angular tracking error magnitude (mrad)
|
23 |
+
obs_pos_median_avg,0.163803917,The mean of the median in-flight value of the output observer position tracking error magnitude (m)
|
24 |
+
obs_vel_median_avg,0.05550007475,The mean of the median in-flight value of the output observer velocity tracking error magnitude (m/s)
|
25 |
+
ofx_fail_pct_avg,nan,The mean percentage of innovation test fails for the X axis optical flow sensor
|
26 |
+
ofy_fail_pct_avg,nan,The mean percentage of innovation test fails for the Y axis optical flow sensor
|
27 |
+
pos_fail_pct,30.0,Percentage of logs with position sensor fails
|
28 |
+
pos_test_max_avg,1.36716145725,The mean of the maximum in-flight values of the position sensor innovation consistency test ratio
|
29 |
+
pos_test_mean_avg,0.12244836087500001,The mean of the mean in-flight value of the position sensor innovation consistency test ratio
|
30 |
+
pos_warning_pct,0.0,Percentage of logs with position sensor warnings
|
31 |
+
tas_fail_pct,0.0,Percentage of logs with airspeed ground sensor fails
|
32 |
+
tas_test_max_avg,nan,The mean of the maximum in-flight values of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio
|
33 |
+
tas_test_mean_avg,nan,The mean of the mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio
|
34 |
+
tas_warning_pct,0.0,Percentage of logs with airspeed sensor warnings
|
35 |
+
vel_fail_pct,0.0,Percentage of logs with velocity sensor fails
|
36 |
+
vel_test_max_avg,nan,The mean of the maximum in-flight values of the velocity sensor innovation consistency test ratio
|
37 |
+
vel_test_mean_avg,nan,The mean of the mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor innovation consistency test ratio
|
38 |
+
vel_warning_pct,0.0,Percentage of logs with velocity sensor warnings
|
39 |
+
yaw_fail_pct,20.0,Percentage of logs with yaw sensor fails
|
40 |
+
yaw_warning_pct,0.0,Percentage of logs with yaw sensor warnings
|
2018-06-12/population_data.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (37.5 kB). View file
|
|
2018-06-14/log001.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (73.8 kB). View file
|
|
2018-06-14/log002.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
3 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
4 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
5 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
7 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
8 |
+
hagl_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
11 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
13 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
14 |
+
hgt_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
imu_coning_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
17 |
+
imu_coning_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
18 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
20 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
24 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Pass,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
25 |
+
in_air_transition_time,322.8,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
26 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
27 |
+
mag_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
28 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
mag_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
30 |
+
mag_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
31 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
32 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
33 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
34 |
+
master_status,Pass,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
35 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,329.2,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
38 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
39 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
40 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
41 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
42 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
43 |
+
pos_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
44 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Pass,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
45 |
+
pos_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
46 |
+
pos_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
47 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
48 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
49 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
50 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
51 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
52 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
53 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
54 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
55 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
56 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
57 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
58 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
59 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
60 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
61 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
62 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Pass,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-06-14/log002.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (81.3 kB). View file
|
|
2018-06-14/log003.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
3 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
4 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
5 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
7 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
8 |
+
hagl_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
11 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
13 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
14 |
+
hgt_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
imu_coning_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
17 |
+
imu_coning_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
18 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
20 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
24 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Pass,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
25 |
+
in_air_transition_time,340.0,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
26 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
27 |
+
mag_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
28 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
mag_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
30 |
+
mag_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
31 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
32 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
33 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
34 |
+
master_status,Pass,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
35 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,360.9,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
38 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
39 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
40 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
41 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
42 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
43 |
+
pos_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
44 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Pass,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
45 |
+
pos_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
46 |
+
pos_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
47 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
48 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
49 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
50 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
51 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
52 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
53 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
54 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
55 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
56 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
57 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
58 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
59 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
60 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
61 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
62 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Pass,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-06-14/log004.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
3 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
4 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
5 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
7 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
8 |
+
hagl_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
11 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
13 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
14 |
+
hgt_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
imu_coning_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
17 |
+
imu_coning_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
18 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
20 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
24 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Pass,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
25 |
+
in_air_transition_time,373.0,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
26 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
27 |
+
mag_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
28 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
mag_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
30 |
+
mag_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
31 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
32 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
33 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
34 |
+
master_status,Pass,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
35 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,385.9,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
38 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
39 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
40 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
41 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
42 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
43 |
+
pos_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
44 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Pass,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
45 |
+
pos_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
46 |
+
pos_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
47 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
48 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
49 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
50 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
51 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
52 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
53 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
54 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
55 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
56 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
57 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
58 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
59 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
60 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
61 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
62 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Pass,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-06-14/log004.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (98.2 kB). View file
|
|
2018-06-14/not
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Kalkış sonrası yalpaladı daha sonra çakıldı
|
2 |
+
Kumandada manual kill switch yapıldı ancak sonra bir daha havalandı ve sola doğru kayarak duvara çarpıp düştü
|
3 |
+
|
4 |
+
loglarda RC lost gözüküyor
|
2018-06-14/population_data.pdf
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
%PDF-1.4
|
2 |
+
%�� ��
|
3 |
+
1 0 obj
|
4 |
+
<< /Pages 2 0 R /Type /Catalog >>
|
5 |
+
endobj
|
6 |
+
8 0 obj
|
7 |
+
<< /ExtGState 4 0 R /Font 3 0 R /Pattern 5 0 R
|
8 |
+
/ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] /Shading 6 0 R
|
9 |
+
/XObject 7 0 R >>
|
10 |
+
endobj
|
2018-08-21/sess004/log001.ulg
ADDED
Binary file (80.6 kB). View file
|
|
2018-08-21/sess005/log002.ulg
ADDED
Binary file (77 kB). View file
|
|
2018-08-21/sess006/log002.ulg
ADDED
Binary file (73.5 kB). View file
|
|
2018-08-21/sess006/log005.ulg
ADDED
Binary file (66.3 kB). View file
|
|
2018-08-21/sess006/log006.ulg
ADDED
Binary file (97.9 kB). View file
|
|
2018-08-21/sess006/log008.ulg
ADDED
Binary file (82.5 kB). View file
|
|
2018-08-21/sess006/log010.ulg
ADDED
Binary file (88 kB). View file
|
|
2018-08-21/sess006/log011.ulg
ADDED
Binary file (99.1 kB). View file
|
|
2018-09-07/12_48_42.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (96 kB). View file
|
|
2018-09-07/12_51_41.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_fault_status,Pass,Internal Filter check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
3 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
4 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
5 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
7 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
8 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_max,0.348249,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hagl_test_mean,0.023428,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
11 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
13 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
14 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.123372,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.0340872,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
17 |
+
imu_bias_check,Pass,IMU bias check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
18 |
+
imu_coning_mean,1.46791e-06,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_coning_peak,4.73786e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
20 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,1.83750787655e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.00227168,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.00376846,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
24 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.0322441,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
25 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.0390769,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
26 |
+
imu_output_predictor_check,Pass,IMU output predictor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
27 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
28 |
+
imu_vibration_check,Warning,IMU vibration check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
in_air_transition_time,91.5,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
30 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,19.2926045016,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
31 |
+
mag_percentage_red,41.1575562701,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
32 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Warning,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
33 |
+
mag_test_max,2.31542,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
34 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.785281,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
35 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
38 |
+
master_status,Fail,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
39 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
40 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
41 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,164.4,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
42 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.00275299,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
43 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.0586083,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
44 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.0491922,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
45 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,12.5,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
46 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,13.8888888889,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
47 |
+
pos_percentage_red,12.5,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
48 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Fail,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
49 |
+
pos_test_max,3.78502,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
50 |
+
pos_test_mean,0.519041,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
51 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
52 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
53 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
54 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
55 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
56 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
57 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
58 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
59 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
60 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
61 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
62 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
63 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
64 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
65 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,33.1189710611,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
66 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Fail,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-09-07/13_07_23.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (47 kB). View file
|
|
2018-09-07/13_20_12.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_fault_status,Pass,Internal Filter check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
3 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
4 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
5 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
7 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
8 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_max,0.39825,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hagl_test_mean,0.035394,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
11 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
13 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
14 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.0840181,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.0281554,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
17 |
+
imu_bias_check,Pass,IMU bias check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
18 |
+
imu_coning_mean,1.86923e-06,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_coning_peak,5.45644e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
20 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,1.46584719337e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.0025364,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.00474723,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
24 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.0361114,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
25 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.0421033,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
26 |
+
imu_output_predictor_check,Pass,IMU output predictor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
27 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
28 |
+
imu_vibration_check,Warning,IMU vibration check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
in_air_transition_time,35.3,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
30 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,21.7741935484,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
31 |
+
mag_percentage_red,37.9032258065,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
32 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Warning,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
33 |
+
mag_test_max,1.52116,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
34 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.572346,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
35 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
38 |
+
master_status,Fail,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
39 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
40 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
41 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,70.3,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
42 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.00190902,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
43 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.056296,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
44 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.038918,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
45 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,54.3352601156,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
46 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,8.67052023121,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
47 |
+
pos_percentage_red,54.3352601156,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
48 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Fail,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
49 |
+
pos_test_max,72.9176,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
50 |
+
pos_test_mean,1.88571,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
51 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
52 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
53 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
54 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
55 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
56 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
57 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
58 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
59 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
60 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
61 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
62 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
63 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
64 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
65 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,37.0967741935,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
66 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Fail,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-09-07/13_26_48.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_fault_status,Pass,Internal Filter check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
3 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
4 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
5 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
7 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
8 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hagl_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
11 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
13 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
14 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
hgt_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
17 |
+
imu_bias_check,Pass,IMU bias check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
18 |
+
imu_coning_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_coning_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
20 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
24 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,nan,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
25 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,nan,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
26 |
+
imu_output_predictor_check,Pass,IMU output predictor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
27 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Pass,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
28 |
+
imu_vibration_check,Pass,IMU vibration check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
in_air_transition_time,56.2,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
30 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
31 |
+
mag_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
32 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
33 |
+
mag_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
34 |
+
mag_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
35 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
38 |
+
master_status,Pass,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
39 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
40 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
41 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,74.8,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
42 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
43 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
44 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,nan,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
45 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
46 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
47 |
+
pos_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
48 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Pass,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
49 |
+
pos_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
50 |
+
pos_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
51 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
52 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
53 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
54 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
55 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
56 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
57 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
58 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
59 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
60 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
61 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
62 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
63 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
64 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
65 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
66 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Pass,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-09-07/13_39_11.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_fault_status,Pass,Internal Filter check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
3 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
4 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
5 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,0.239808153477,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
7 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
8 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_max,0.666765,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hagl_test_mean,0.0219853,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
11 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
13 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
14 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.105049,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.0289261,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
17 |
+
imu_bias_check,Pass,IMU bias check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
18 |
+
imu_coning_mean,1.68769e-06,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_coning_peak,6.52873e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
20 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,1.98780599455e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.00235215,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.00467675,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
24 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.0304854,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
25 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.0356808,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
26 |
+
imu_output_predictor_check,Pass,IMU output predictor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
27 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
28 |
+
imu_vibration_check,Warning,IMU vibration check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
in_air_transition_time,57.5,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
30 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,21.1956521739,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
31 |
+
mag_percentage_red,30.7065217391,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
32 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Warning,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
33 |
+
mag_test_max,2.91744,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
34 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.721199,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
35 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
38 |
+
master_status,Fail,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
39 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
40 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
41 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,142.0,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
42 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.00306134,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
43 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.0643471,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
44 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.0426881,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
45 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,27.0983213429,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
46 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,10.071942446,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
47 |
+
pos_percentage_red,27.0983213429,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
48 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Fail,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
49 |
+
pos_test_max,11.3459,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
50 |
+
pos_test_mean,0.78884,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
51 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
52 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
53 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
54 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
55 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
56 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
57 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
58 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
59 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
60 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
61 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
62 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
63 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
64 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
65 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,30.7065217391,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
66 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Fail,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-09-07/13_52_43.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_fault_status,Pass,Internal Filter check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
3 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
4 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
5 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
7 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
8 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_max,0.284715,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hagl_test_mean,0.0242014,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
11 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
13 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
14 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.10671,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.0242867,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
17 |
+
imu_bias_check,Pass,IMU bias check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
18 |
+
imu_coning_mean,1.42552e-06,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_coning_peak,3.25596e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
20 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,2.66537879729e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.0023033,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.00394106,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
24 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.030744,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
25 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.0347842,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
26 |
+
imu_output_predictor_check,Pass,IMU output predictor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
27 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
28 |
+
imu_vibration_check,Warning,IMU vibration check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
in_air_transition_time,38.1,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
30 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,20.197044335,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
31 |
+
mag_percentage_red,32.5123152709,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
32 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Warning,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
33 |
+
mag_test_max,1.75584,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
34 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.608891,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
35 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
38 |
+
master_status,Fail,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
39 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
40 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
41 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,89.1,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
42 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.00316832,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
43 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.0532125,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
44 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.035231,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
45 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,22.2222222222,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
46 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,9.92063492063,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
47 |
+
pos_percentage_red,22.2222222222,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
48 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Fail,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
49 |
+
pos_test_max,3.09913,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
50 |
+
pos_test_mean,0.626826,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
51 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
52 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
53 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
54 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
55 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
56 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
57 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
58 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
59 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
60 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
61 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
62 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
63 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
64 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
65 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,20.197044335,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
66 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Fail,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-09-07/13_58_13.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (22.1 kB). View file
|
|
2018-09-07/14_03_01.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (20 kB). View file
|
|
2018-09-07/14_10_59.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (22.1 kB). View file
|
|
2018-09-07/14_16_20.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_fault_status,Pass,Internal Filter check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
3 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
4 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
5 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
7 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
8 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_max,0.225902,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hagl_test_mean,0.016879,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
11 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
13 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
14 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.105123,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.0253857,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
17 |
+
imu_bias_check,Pass,IMU bias check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
18 |
+
imu_coning_mean,1.52098e-06,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_coning_peak,3.45889e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
20 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,1.51189886175e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.00228659,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.00371228,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
24 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.0298286,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
25 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.0347152,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
26 |
+
imu_output_predictor_check,Warning,IMU output predictor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
27 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
28 |
+
imu_vibration_check,Warning,IMU vibration check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
in_air_transition_time,95.4,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
30 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,16.1290322581,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
31 |
+
mag_percentage_red,38.7096774194,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
32 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Warning,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
33 |
+
mag_test_max,2.46007,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
34 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.712215,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
35 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
38 |
+
master_status,Fail,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
39 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
40 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
41 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,161.9,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
42 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.00175935,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
43 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.143698,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
44 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.0642361,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
45 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
46 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,5.18292682927,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
47 |
+
pos_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
48 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Warning,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
49 |
+
pos_test_max,0.807261,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
50 |
+
pos_test_mean,0.213002,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
51 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
52 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
53 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
54 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
55 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
56 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
57 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
58 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
59 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
60 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
61 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
62 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
63 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
64 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
65 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,30.4659498208,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
66 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Fail,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-09-07/14_19_21.ulg.mdat.csv
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
name,value,description
|
2 |
+
filter_fault_status,Pass,Internal Filter check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
3 |
+
filter_faults_max,0,Largest recorded value of the filter internal fault bitmask. Should always be zero.
|
4 |
+
flow_sensor_status,Pass,Optical Flow sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
5 |
+
hagl_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test.
|
6 |
+
hagl_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
7 |
+
hagl_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height above ground sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
8 |
+
hagl_sensor_status,Pass,Height above ground sensor check summary. This sensor data is normally sourced from a rangefinder sensor. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
9 |
+
hagl_test_max,0.219164,The maximum in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
10 |
+
hagl_test_mean,0.0159044,The mean in-flight value of the height above ground sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
11 |
+
hgt_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the height sensor innovation consistency test.
|
12 |
+
hgt_percentage_amber,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
13 |
+
hgt_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight height sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
14 |
+
hgt_sensor_status,Pass,Height sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from either Baro or GPS or range finder or external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no anomalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
15 |
+
hgt_test_max,0.119399,The maximum in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
16 |
+
hgt_test_mean,0.0244689,The mean in-flight value of the height sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
17 |
+
imu_bias_check,Pass,IMU bias check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
18 |
+
imu_coning_mean,1.57537e-06,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
19 |
+
imu_coning_peak,5.51988e-06,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle coning vibration metric (rad)
|
20 |
+
imu_dang_bias_median,2.0542036178e-05,Median in-flight value of the delta angle bias vector length (rad)
|
21 |
+
imu_dvel_bias_median,0.0,Median in-flight value of the delta velocity bias vector length (m/s)
|
22 |
+
imu_hfdang_mean,0.00226739,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
23 |
+
imu_hfdang_peak,0.00409669,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta angle high frequency vibration metric (rad)
|
24 |
+
imu_hfdvel_mean,0.0312963,Mean in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
25 |
+
imu_hfdvel_peak,0.0360221,Peak in-flight value of the IMU delta velocity high frequency vibration metric (m/s)
|
26 |
+
imu_output_predictor_check,Pass,IMU output predictor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
27 |
+
imu_sensor_status,Warning,IMU sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
28 |
+
imu_vibration_check,Warning,IMU vibration check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
29 |
+
in_air_transition_time,41.6,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transtioned into in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
30 |
+
mag_percentage_amber,5.0,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
31 |
+
mag_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight consolidated magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
32 |
+
mag_sensor_status,Pass,Magnetometer sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
33 |
+
mag_test_max,0.610233,The maximum in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
34 |
+
mag_test_mean,0.186937,The mean in-flight value of the magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
35 |
+
magx_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the X-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
36 |
+
magy_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Y-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
37 |
+
magz_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the Z-axis magnetic field sensor innovation consistency test.
|
38 |
+
master_status,Warning,Master check status which can be either Pass Warning or Fail. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
39 |
+
ofx_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor X-axis innovation consistency test.
|
40 |
+
ofy_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the optical flow sensor Y-axis innovation consistency test.
|
41 |
+
on_ground_transition_time,152.7,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF transitioned out of in-air mode. Set to a nan if a transition event is not detected.
|
42 |
+
output_obs_ang_err_median,0.00162649,Median in-flight value of the output observer angular error (rad)
|
43 |
+
output_obs_pos_err_median,0.0999748,Median in-flight value of the output observer position error (m)
|
44 |
+
output_obs_vel_err_median,0.0458046,Median in-flight value of the output observer velocity error (m/s)
|
45 |
+
pos_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
46 |
+
pos_percentage_amber,1.82149362477,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
47 |
+
pos_percentage_red,0.0,The percentage of in-flight position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
48 |
+
pos_sensor_status,Pass,Position sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
49 |
+
pos_test_max,0.586868,The maximum in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
50 |
+
pos_test_mean,0.154257,The mean in-flight value of the position sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
51 |
+
tas_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test.
|
52 |
+
tas_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
53 |
+
tas_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight airspeed sensor innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
54 |
+
tas_sensor_status,Pass,Airspeed sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
55 |
+
tas_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
56 |
+
tas_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the airspeed sensor innovation consistency test ratio.
|
57 |
+
tilt_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the tilt alignment. A nan value indicates that the alignment had completed before logging started or alignment did not complete.
|
58 |
+
vel_fail_percentage,nan,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test.
|
59 |
+
vel_percentage_amber,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 0.5.
|
60 |
+
vel_percentage_red,nan,The percentage of in-flight velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test values > 1.0.
|
61 |
+
vel_sensor_status,Pass,Velocity sensor check summary. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
62 |
+
vel_test_max,nan,The maximum in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
63 |
+
vel_test_mean,nan,The mean in-flight value of the velocity sensor consolidated innovation consistency test ratio.
|
64 |
+
yaw_align_time,nan,The time in seconds measured from startup that the EKF completed the yaw alignment.
|
65 |
+
yaw_fail_percentage,0.0,The percentage of in-flight recorded failure events for the yaw sensor innovation consistency test.
|
66 |
+
yaw_sensor_status,Pass,Yaw sensor check summary. This sensor data can be sourced from the magnetometer or an external vision system. A Fail result indicates a significant error that caused a significant reduction in vehicle navigation performance was detected. A Warning result indicates that error levels higher than normal were detected but these errors did not significantly impact navigation performance. A Pass result indicates that no amonalies were detected and no further investigation is required
|
2018-09-07/14_21_20.ulg.pdf
ADDED
Binary file (33 kB). View file
|
|